WEBVTT - Biden, Trump, and a Presidency in Play

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is Tim. Since this episode was first recorded,

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Florida Governor Ron DeSantis dropped out of the presidential race.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>As you will listen in the following conversation. We did

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>expect him to drop out pretty soon. We just didn't

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>think it would happen this quickly. Anyway, Thanks for listening

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy the episode. Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about business, political, and social disruption and what we can

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>learn from it. I'm Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course Biden

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump and a presidency in play. The first act in

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party's presidential primary season. The Iowa CAUCUSUS has

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>come and gone. Other contests in New Hampshire, South Carolina, Michigan,

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and the collection of fifteen Super Tuesday states all lie ahead.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump registered a resounding win in Iowa. If polls

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are to be believed, he is situated to easily continue

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>his sprint to the GOP nomination, the flag bearer of

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a party shaping itself in his image. Just a year

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or so ago, mired in legal prosecutions and memories of

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the January sixth Insurrection, Trump appeared to be politically spent.

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Voters didn't seem to want to give him another chance

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to torch the Constitution. Iowa at least has proven that

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong. Meanwhile, President Joe Biden, who has presided

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>over a robust and expanding an economy undercut by a

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>savage bout of inflation, a rational and globally minded approach

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to foreign policy in the time of war, and a

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lackluster approach to immigration, comes to the race with strengths

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and weaknesses. A lot does it stake in the race

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for the White House. And joining me to discuss the

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>presidential battle is Nancy Cook, a stellar political reporter for

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She has covered both the Trump and Biden

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>white Houses, and she has a wealth of knowledge to share.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Greetings Nancy, Oh, thanks so much for having me Tim.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit as we get

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>into this about your background, because you have an interesting

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>path into your current and powerful role, and I always

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder what a nice person like you did to wind

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>up in this dirty little business we inhabit. So tell

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit about your first job covering politics,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>when and where was that.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>So, my first job out of journalism school was actually

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>at a tiny paper in Massachusetts called The New Bedford

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>standard times. It's a gritty, old fishing town that has

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>seen much better days. A downtown was cut off by

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a highway. There's a ton of poverty. There's a big

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>drug epidemic there. It's a huge fishing port. There's a

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>huge migrant population there that works in these fish houses

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>on the waterfront. It's basically a place that a lot

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of people drive through on their way to Cape Cod.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 2>But it is an extremely gritty, sort of formerly powerful

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>industrial whaling city that has fallen on very hard times.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>And so I worked there for two years when I

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>was in my twenties, and I do think that that

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>made me very scrappy, because you know, there was twelve

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>reporters on staff. I wrote eight stories a week. I

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>covered local politics. And the thing is when you cover

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 2>local politics in Massachusetts, which is the place that people

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>really care about politics, you also run into like the

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>selectmen that you cover at the coffee shop, and you

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>know when you're getting lunch, and so everybody gives you

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>feedback all the time on your stories. And I definitely

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 2>think it made me realize that journalism is about covering things,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's not just about the horse race. It's really

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 2>about what happens in people's lives, and there's a great

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>responsibility to that.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would argue actually that the horse race coverage

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>off an eclipses coverage of real policy issues that have

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a direct and pivotal impact on voters' lives, and we

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>could do better to tilt more in that direction than

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we do. But we're in an election season and

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you've covered obviously national elections before. Was your first national

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reporting job at MPR in two thousand and eight or

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do I have the timeline wrong?

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>No, that's right, And so I ended up at NPER

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight as a producer during the

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>electtion that Obama won. It was super historic and I

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>learned so much on that campaign. But one thing that

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I did realize was that horse race politics sort of

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>failed us a little bit in that election, because I

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>do remember that fall of two thousand and eight, there

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>was a huge financial crisis, you have to remember, and

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I remember sitting in a big meeting at NPR. You know,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>it was a very low level employee there, and everyone

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>was trying to figure out how to cover the financial

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>crisis in terms of the presidential race, and political reporters

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>really didn't know what they were doing then, because the

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>financial crisis and the economic downturn that came about really

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>was so much bigger and ended up influencing the campaign

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit. John McCain, who was Obama's challenger at

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that point, was really caught flat footed by that. And

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>so after that I took a break from covering politics

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 2>for a few years and covered business and economics in

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 2>New York and then in DC, and sort of having

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that background in economic policy in business really ended up

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>informing me quite a bit when I went back to

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>political reporting in twenty sixteen, And I do think that

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>that has been really a hallmark of my journalism career,

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>is sort of this blending of politics and policy, and

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 2>that's really what interests me the most.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>And in twenty sixteen you were at Politico. Obviously that

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was an epic race for any number of reasons, but

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that was obviously Donald Trump's great debut on national political landscape.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Were you aware during that election that this essentially seismic

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>moment had arrived or did it sort of reveal itself

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>more gradually to you?

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>It revealed itself a little bit more gradually in twenty

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>sixteen that fall Politico assigned me and another reporter to

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>basically get to know all of the Trump transition people.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>And the transition people are the people who will like

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 2>go in, you know, if someone wins and sort of

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 2>form the government initially, and it was funny because I

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>got to know all of them well because they didn't

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>think they were going to win, you know, even the

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>people around tru But you know, you have to remember,

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen, the people are on Trump and the

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>people who were closest to Trump did not think he

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>was going to win the twenty sixteen election. They were

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>surprised by that. So I think the media was surprised,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>Trump was surprised, and I think all of Republican politics

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>was surprised. And it's never been the same since.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>What were the biggest changes, And not necessarily exactly in

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, but during the evolution of the Trump presidency

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in the White House, I mean, we're aware of Donald

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump as a in my mind, you know, a cartoon

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>figure willing to burn down certain civic norms to have

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>his way. I think that's been on steroids more recently,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but we can get to that. But beyond Trump as

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>a kind of human phenomenon and someone bursting the seams

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of traditional presidencies and raising the specter of authoritarian rule,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. What other sort of foundational changes

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 1>did you see in that twenty sixteen to twenty twenty

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>period that made that political era in that White House

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>different from other presidential races and administrations you had covered.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was just wild that he won the presidency.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he you know, had sort of no organization,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, in twenty sixteen in Iowa, he had like

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>no field operation, no one there, you know, no one

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>there to speak up for him at caucuses. And he

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>did lose the Iowa caucuses in twenty sixteen to Senator

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Ted Cruz of Texas, but it was only by six

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand votes. And he really changed the Republican Party in

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen. He was able to speak to the working

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>class in a way that Republicans hadn't. He shed a

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of the conventions that Republicans had been talking about

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>for years, Like he didn't want to cut social Security

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>in Medicare, which is what all these other Republicans like

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Paul Ryan had been talking about for years. He wanted

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>to protect that. He talked about trade. He basically changed

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the way Republicans talk about trade. Forever Republicans used to

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>be sort of these country club people who wanted to

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 2>cut taxes and believed in free trade. He doesn't, you know,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>he really believes in this whole different trade policy of

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>putting punishing tariffs on other countries, really punishing China and

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>going after them, and that has informed not just the

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party, but Democrats too, And then within his White

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>House he continued with that. He changed the nature of

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 2>immigration and how it looked. He was much more about

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>closing borders, restricting the number of people that could come here.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Trade was a huge thing. You know. I can't overstate

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>enough the extent to which he has remade the whole

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party in his image and his policy philosophy. And

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 2>that started in twenty sixteen, and when he took the

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>White House it was just, you know, really took off well.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.119
<v Speaker 1>And in many ways, it's not about a fully coherent

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>set of governing principles or policy principles. It is about

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>fostering this idea, almost a cult of personality around Trump himself,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think the Republican Party had ever done before.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>They obviously had people who had great emotional connections with

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>their voters. I think of Ronald Reagan, for example, or

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Dwight Eisenhower, or even George W. Bush in the early

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>part of his first term in office. Having said all

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of that, Trump leaves his mark on this party, but

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>he still loses in twenty twenty. And in your mind,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>why did he lose that race.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he lost that race because of COVID. You

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>know I covered that race and he honestly, before COVID hit,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>it seemed like he was on track to win. The

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>economy was doing very well, He was doing well in polls.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember Biden was nothing in Iowa Genmine. Reporters who

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>saw him there for the Democratic caucuses in twenty twenty

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>thought he seemed tired. He didn't seem like he was

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 2>with it. He was not drawing big crowds. But then

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>COVID hit in twenty twenty. In February, we really started

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to see the first hints that this would be a

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>global problem. And then things started to shut down in March, schools, businesses,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the whole world change. And Trump responded very poorly to that.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>He did not want to do mask mandates. He started

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 2>warring with his health officials. It didn't seem like he

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>took it seriously. He gave these pretty crazy two hour

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>COVID briefings where he urged people to inject themselves with

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>bleach like it just it became off the rails. And

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of the infighting in his White

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>House or the influence of family members like Jared Kushner

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 2>was really laid bare during that time period, and they

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>could not come up with an effective COVID response. Tons

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of people were dying. It's funny because they did actually

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>help develop the COVID vaccine very quickly, and I think

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that if his earlier response had been more measured and

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>more tempered, that he would have potentially won reelection and

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>gotten credit for the COVID vaccine and its development. But

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the public handling of it seemed like a disaster. I

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>think Americans felt tired of the chaos in the middle

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>of a global pandemic, and you have to remember that summer,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>in addition to facing a global pandemic, there was a

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>ton of unrest. George Floyd was murdered by Minneapolis Police

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Office us her people were protesting in the street. People

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>were mad about race relations in the country, and it

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>just felt like Donald Trump was adding fuel to the

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>fire rather than resolving it, you know, leading the country

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>in the extreme times of turmoil. And you know, he's

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>never been a president for the whole country. He's always

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 2>been a president that really speaks to his supporters, and

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>that became very apparent during that time.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>He also was impeached twice. He escaped that, but there

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were also two impeachments. And the other thing I think

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>about COVID is he was sort of trapped by this

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>populis fervor he had helped unleash because I think there

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>was this widespread belief that government couldn't be a force

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for good, You couldn't necessarily put your faith in government

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>solutions to big problems, and COVID really demanded the kind

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of effort that I think ultimately got the country back

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on the right track, which was this public private partnership

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that resulted in the creation of the COVID vaccines. And

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he knew in his books he couldn't really

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>embrace something like that right out of the gates because

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it ran contradictory to the sentiment of his populace base.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And much of his own rhetoric about government getting in

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people's ways. We wind up with that with Joe Biden

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in the White House, and you've now covered Joe Biden

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for the last three and a half years or so.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a report card would you give Biden.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that Biden has done a ton of things, actually,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>but his White House has really struggled with selling it

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and sort of making that apparent to people. You have

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to remember they've passed a sweeping infrastructure law. They responded

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to COVID, Well, they got it under control. They sent

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of money to schools to reopen. They made

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>sure people had vaccines, they made sure people had tests.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 2>You know. He had passed the Chips Act, which helps

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 2>basically bring a lot of manufacturing of pretty key things

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>to the US like semi conductors and chips. He canceled

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>student loan debt that has been blocked by courts, but

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.599
<v Speaker 2>the Department of Education is still managing to do a

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>bunch of that stuff in a regulatory way. He appointed

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the first black Supreme Court justice who's a woman. That's

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>a huge accomplishment that the left has really wanted. The

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>list sort of goes on and on. But for whatever reason,

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's mostly both the people around Biden

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 2>but Biden himself, they have not been able to sell

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the American people on that record. Biden has never been

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a great orator. He's not an Obama figure. You know,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't go out there and give these amazing speeches.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>He's more like a grandpa who has a lot of

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>gaffes and makes the same old jokes. And the people

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>around him too. You know, it's a very insular group.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>They have been together for a long time, and I

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>would say one of my critiques of covering them is

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that they can be very insular and move slowly. And

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>so for instance, when we see things like a low

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>approval rating, you know, he's having problems in swing states

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>with voters. These are like flashing warning signs for this

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>upcoming election. And what they're choosing to do is sort

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of double down and blame the media or defensive rather

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>than realize this is going to be a tough election

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And now the first sort of litmus test of that

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is what happened in the recent Iowa caucuses, in which

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, after not really actively campaigning in the state,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>though he had a much more robust ground operation than

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he had in the past, which I think is something

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about later in the show, because that

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>also should be a warning sign to the Biden crew

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>from a purely competitive standpoint, But he is not physically

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the state very much, but he dominates the polls,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>he dominates the sentiment of voters, and he winds up

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with a thirty point victory over the second place finisher,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Ron de Santis, and slightly more than that over NICKI Haley,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>who finishes in third place. All of the other Republican

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>condenders have dropped out of the race so very quickly.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it is Trump versus DeSantis versus Haley. And I

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think Trump was expected to romp in Iowa. But what

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>else came out of the Iowa caucuses that surprised you

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>despite the sort of foregone conclusion that Trump was going

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the victor.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 2>There well two things. One, I think that it's not

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>just that he won the Iowa caucuses. It's said he

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>did well with almost every demographic group that includes. He

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>did well with all of the age groups. He did

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>well all across Iowa rural areas, suburban areas. Do you

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, he just did well. He's always

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>been a president who has spoken to the working class.

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>He did well with college educated Republicans. I mean, he

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>is really just has a commanding lead among Republicans across

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the board. And I think that's very hard for his

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>rivals to catch up to because it's not like, you know,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>they can pick off, Oh, well, he's just the working

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>class guy, but I'll get the college age Republicans. It's like, nope,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Nikki Haley got some college age Republicans, but Donald Trump

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>got the same amount. Like he's just doing well with

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>every group. So I think that that is a real

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>lesson to take away, that there is a depth of

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>support therefore him that is pretty remarkable. The second thing

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>is just that I think Republican voters and voters in general,

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen in the swing state polls, sort of

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>have amnesia about some of the things that he's done.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Like people don't really talk about January sixth that much.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>There's a bunch of polling that shows that a huge

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>soauthor Republican Party does not think that January sixth was

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a problem anymore. And so he has also been very

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>successful at rewriting the history of what happened sort of

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>after the election in twenty twenty, what he was responsible for,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think that we'll see that moving forward.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Would a candidate in the past be forgiven for inciting

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>an insurrection of the capitol, for several civil and criminal indictments,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for being charged with more than ninety crimes. My feeling

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely not. So something in the water has changed,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'd be curious to know how. Despite all of

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that important baggage that Trump carries, as well as his

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of own proclamations that he might be a dictator

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for a day or more, maybe he'll serve another term

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond this one, etc. Etc. All the warning signs are there,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet it doesn't really affect his standing at all

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>with his base and now with an expanding part of

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the Republican electorate as Iowa is shown.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been fascinating. And I talked with a bunch

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of polsters in Iowa who have asked questions about if

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>he is convicted on any one of these ninety one

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>charges that he faces, will that hurt him? And they

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>all said no, you know, they do not expect him

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to hurt him. So it's hard to see, like where

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 2>The breaking point is. I have been at a bunch

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of Trump events in the past year, and what I

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>have marveled at is his ability to turn his misfortune

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to a political advantage. He is out there at rallies

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 2>telling people, I am being prosecuted because of you. I

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>am a victim, I am fighting for you, and these

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>people believe it. You know. I was at an event

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>in Florida that he did this fall. There was someone

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>who had been to sixty rallies. You know, people really

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>view it almost like a grateful dead show. They come.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's like a sense of community. It's a movement. People

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>come to the rallies to see people that they've seen

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>at other rallies. They wear T shirts. It's not really

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>just like a political rally. It is almost like a concert.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And he has been so successful at flipping the script

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>around on his criminal charges and making it sort of

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>all about him and to his political advantage. And I

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>will tell you his campaign officials are delighted by this.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think the idea of I'm a victim too.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I know what it's like to be persecuted. Even though

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has walked through life with enormous embedded advantages,

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a white male. He's a wealthy white male. He's

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>had these various rings of protection around him his whole life,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>his father's wealth, celebrity, now the White House. But he

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>has always sort of, I think, pitched himself historically as

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the working person's idea of what you would do if

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you became rich. You'd have glitzy women around you, you'd

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have a triplex condo that looked like Louis the fourteenth

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that built it on acid. You would have a jet

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>with your name on it, et cetera, et cetera, what

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you do with your lot of money. And he's shrewd

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>about that, you know, he's built a business around that.

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting, though, I guess in the electoral context to me,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is while he has this bond of shared victimhood and

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 1>presents himself as an EmPATH to his voters, he hasn't

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>really come up with a full set of policy solutions

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that really address the very real struggles working class and

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>middle class Americans are contending with.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're right, he hasn't, and I don't think that

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see a ton of policy specifics from

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.239
<v Speaker 2>him ahead of the election, Do you know what I mean?

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're going to hear from him what

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>would you do on affordable housing, for instance, what would

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>you do to tackle inflation. I think that his campaign

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't see a lot of value and offering these specifics.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 2>I think that they're going to try to win based

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>on this personality cult that he has and based on

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the connection that he has forged with his base of

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>working class voters. But this expanding base, which we've already

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>talked about, and that's really going to be coupled with

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 2>an intense organization this time. They're very organized on the ground.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be how they're going to win the election.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>On that note, I wanted just tilt to a break

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>here from one of our sponsors, and then we'll come

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>right back and pick up this very interesting conversation. I'm

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>back with Nancy Cook, who's educating me and you, I

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hope about the presidential primary season that just kicked off. Nancy,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about Trump's win in Iowa and

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he demographically scored very well with groups

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>who had conventionally been seen as not having an affinity

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 1>for him. Of interest to me is college educated Republican

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 1>voters which were seen as sort of the province of

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Haley, and Nikki Haley has closed within several percentage

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>points of Trump in New Hampshire, though that might be

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>her high water mark in this whole campaign. But New

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire's a very different Republican electorate than Iowa. New Hampshire

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>has more educated Republican voters, more affluent Republican voters than Iowa.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very different kind of case. But I

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you where does Iowa leave Nicki Haley?

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And if she doesn't really have a standout show in

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire, you know, her next step is in South Carolina,

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>her home state where she was governor, And if Trump

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>beats her in South Carolina, I don't see how she

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>extends her campaign beyond South Carolina. But I want to

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>know what you think about that. And you know what

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>we could possibly expect to see in New Hampshire and

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina with her.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 2>So Nicki Hailey has spent a ton of time in

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 2>New Hampshire over the last year, and New Hampshire people

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>like her, you know, her more moderate style really speaks

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 2>to them. Also, you have to remember that independence and

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Democrats can you know, switch over and vote in the

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>New Hampshire primary, the New Hampshire Republican primary. And so

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>if a bunch of Independents and Democrats come out to

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>vote for her in New Hampshire and she can pick

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>up some of the supporters from Chris Christy, you know,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 2>who just dropped out of the race recently, that could

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 2>really help her. You know, she is closing in on

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump in the polling, but I'm just not sure it

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>will be enough for her to beat him. I'm not

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>on the ground in New Hampshire. I'm sort of in

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 2>between Iowa and New Hampshire now, so I'll have to

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>see what it looks like when I'm on the ground there,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>But I would be surprised if she overtakes him. And

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 2>then the tricky thing is is that he is still

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 2>pulling at a huge advantage in South Carolina, her home state,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 2>and is definitely expected to win there. And so really

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I think her best chance to do well and beat

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>him would be in New Hampshire. And if she does that,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, it could change the tone of the race.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it could show some Republicans that maybe Trump

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't as invincible. But the Trump campaign is banking on

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Nikki Haley does not have enough of

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a base in the Republican Party to actually get a

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 2>path to the nomination. That New Hampshire will proper up

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>potentially because of Democrats and independence, but that won't be

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the strategy in South Carolina.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And did you pick up that vibe in Iowa? Obviously

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you were sort of on an Arctic tundra there. You know,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>there was sub zero temperatures, there was a blizzard. It

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>affected turnout. I think only slightly more than fourteen percent

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of registered Republican voters actually turned out to vote in

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the caucuses there. What was it like on the ground

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just the sentiment you were able to

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>pick up on in Iowa about Trump and Haley and DeSantis.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would say when I was in Iowa, Trump

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>just still seemed really dominant. And you know, I talked

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>with some business leaders in Iowa who I think didn't

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 2>necessarily want to support Trump again, but were already sort

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 2>of getting back in line because they viewed him as

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the inevitable nine. Nikki Haley really surged in the polls

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in Iowa within the last few weeks, and there was

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 2>some pulling a few days before the caucus that showed

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>that she could have potentially come in second, but that

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 2>support was pretty soft, you know, it wasn't people who

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>showed the same enthusiasm level that they did for Trump,

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and so I think the bad weather really hurt her.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 2>She also did not have as much of a ground

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 2>game as DeSantis or Trump did. You have to remember that,

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>like she was surging in the Iowa polls kind of late.

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>She got some money from the Koch Brothers a little

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>bit late. So her ground game in Iowa and Iowa

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 2>is so much about a ground game, like making sure

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>people would basically just go to the caucuses. I think

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>she was just a little late with the organization to

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>do well. You know, DeSantis has a lot of problems.

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>His campaign has had a ton of turmoil. The candidate

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>himself can be pretty awkward. He has a hard time

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>connecting with people. I heard this from Iowan's both you know,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of leaders in the Iowa Republican Party but also

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 2>just rank and file people who I spoke with it

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>rallies and events the days leading up to it. But

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>he did have a really strong ground game and I

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 2>think that helped him in Iowa. I mean, his campaign

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>was like offering to shovel people's driveways and they needed it.

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>See. That's why I want them to take a campaign

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>more near my house. You know. The one other thing

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to sort of think about with Haley is

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sununu, the governor of New Hampshire, has thrown his

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>support very strongly and visibly behind her, but he has

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>also said that if she ends up not being the candidate,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going to support Trump. And I think that that's

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of drum roll you're going to hear across

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>much of the Republican Party that even people who have

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>been openly critical of Donald Trump and call him a

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>threat to democracy and a buffoon and a racist, et cetera,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, when push comes to shove and the political

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stakes are at play. And I still find this mysterious,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're willing to throw in with him, and I

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>think that that might become visible in New Hampshire. With DeSantis,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting to me in Iowa. He gets beaten

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>by thirty points, but he said, you know, I still

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>got my ticket punch. Here we go. But he obviously

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>got that ticket punch for South Carolina because he's not

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>going to New Hampshire at all, and so South Carolina

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>could be in the end of the road for him

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't it. Yeah, he is going to New Hampshire. He

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>just went to South Carolina first after Iowa. But he's

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>not expected to do well in New Hampshire. Some recent

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>polling had him pulling like fourth or even fifth behind

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Chris Christy before Christy dropped out, and so we're not

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>expecting him to do well in New Hampshire. He's going

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to kind of make his last stand in South Carolina.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>You have to remember the Desanta's people, though, there's always

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of chest slumping, then a lot of bravado,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 2>but never back down, which is the super pack that

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>did all the ground game in Iowa started laying people off,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 2>so you know, there's always a lot of bravado there,

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>but then they end up doing layoffs because they're running

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 2>out of money. So I know they say they want

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>to go through South Carolina, which is at the end

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>of February. I do not know if they will actually

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>have the money to do that, which is.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Pretty amazing given the windfall Ronda Santa's had coming into

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>this campaign. A big portion of which they appear to

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>have spent on the jets, so maybe they'll learn some

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>discipline the next time around. After South Carolina, I think

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Michigan is one of the next big votes, and then

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we hit this collection of more than a dozen Super

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday states in early March. But prior to even Super Tuesday,

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump could have this wrapped up. Is this a primary

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>season in which the primaries don't really matter?

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just think that Trump basically broke the primary,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, similar to the way he broke Republican politics

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and reshaped it in his own image and broke Republican

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 2>policy long standing policy and trade and immigration and all

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>these things, he has broken the primary. You know. He's

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 2>done it totally differently, and I will be curious to

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>see if anyone ever does it the same again. He

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>did not campaign extensively in Iowa until sort of the

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>very final stretch. He is campaigning in New Hampshire a

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>lot this week, but hasn't spent a ton of time

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 2>up there. And you have to remember that he's basically

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>merging his campaign at this point with all these courthouse appearances,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and he's trying to sort of turn the courthouse appearances

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and speaking after into their own little mini campaign rally.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But he has totally changed the nature of the primary.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 2>You know. Also, big donors aren't really backing him, and

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter. He has a bunch of people who

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>give ten dollars and twenty dollars, you know, all these

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>people around the country, and that's what's fooling his candidacy.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 2>One of the most interesting things this cycle is I

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.239
<v Speaker 2>have never seen such a gap between what sort of

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>upper middle class and wealthy Republicans want from the Republican

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 2>primary and what everyone else wants. You know, there's all

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 2>these super rich donors who are berefed that it's going

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>to be Trump again, or have been, and they've been

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to back to Santis or Nikki Heely but it

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been working. They don't want Trump, but he's still

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>likely going to be the nominee.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Why don't they want Trump. He's going to cut their taxes,

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He'll loosen regulations on their businesses. On the other hand,

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he is retrogressive in many ways about global trade, and

0:28:55.480 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not, in the most charitable analysis, do anything

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to really improve national security. I know he positions himself

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>as better on this issue. Than Biden. But the reality

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is he is ignorant of foreign affairs and hasn't really

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>developed any kind of a consistent policy about some of

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the global security threats we face. So what is it

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that wealthy educated Republicans who can't bring themselves to vote

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for a Democrat but can't detest Trump? What aren't they

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>getting from Trump that they want? Is it simply civility

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or does it go beyond that.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I actually don't think it's civility. I mean, I think

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>we're just giving everyone way too much credit. I think

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 2>it's actually just that his white House was chaotic. Every

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>day was sort of this remarkable fight between different factions

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>in the White House. There was sort of like a

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>business faction or a more maga faction, and it was like,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 2>if you were a business leader, you kind of never

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>knew what policy was going to come out. It kind

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 2>of depended like who won the fight in the Oval

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Office that day. I mean, it was really fun to

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 2>report on. But I think if you're a business leader,

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 2>you want some certainty that policies or executive orders aren't

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>going to come out that you like literally weren't expecting,

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 2>or that policy wouldn't change one day to the next,

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's just this feeling of certainty and

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a desired not to have chaos that has kept these

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>people from not supporting him. I do think in the

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>end they will get behind Trump because they would rather

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>have lower taxes, less regulation, and like the few parts

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>of sort of Republican orthodoxy that still remain. They would

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>rather have that than Biden. But for now they've really

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>been sitting it out. I also think that we may

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>not see some big Republican donors step into the race,

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 2>simply because if these people are involved in running public companies,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>there would be big backlash from their employees if they

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 2>supported Trump. So I think these people may stay quiet,

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and although they may vote for Trump, they'll sit on

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the sidelines and instead get involved in things like Senate races.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And issues like Trump weaponizing Justice Department against his opponents,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>or sending the US military into Mexico to resolve the

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>drug wars, or attacking other institutions across our civic and

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>academic and media and legal landscapes in the US. Those

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't reasons for any Republicans with resources to simply say no,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I still can't do this. No.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I think people don't like those things, and I think

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that people think that those are bad things. I just

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>think the number one thing is total chaos. They don't

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 2>want the chaos that was around him in the last

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>White House. And then I think a bunch of them

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>are really bothered by those things. You have to remember, too,

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump is totally transactional, and he's into retribution. That's part

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of his personality, and so I think that there is

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a fear when you're dealing with someone like that. If

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't play ball and you don't flatter him and

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>his White House, he could come after you, you know,

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 2>or your industry, and so I think that is another fear.

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ben Carson was on CNN the other night saying

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that Trump doesn't really believe in vengeance and retribution. I thought, huh,

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not that Donald Trump. I've come to know. But

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. There's also been pressure on Biden over the

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>last year not to run and to step aside for

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a younger, more vibrant, more verbally adept candidate in order

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to create some energy among younger voters, energy among Latino,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic and Black voters who are slipping away at least

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at the margins around the Democratic Party. Why has Biden

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>hung in there thus far? And do you think anything

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Iowa is giving him pause?

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Biden has hung in there so far because

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you have to remember, he's always wanted to be president.

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>He's run for president several times, and he hasn't gotten far.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 2>He was finally made vice president under Obama. He has

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a real inferiority complex that has just been a hallmark

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 2>through his political career. There's sort of a real chip

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 2>on his shoulder about always feeling like, oh, you know,

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the Obama people looked down at him when he was

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 2>in the White House as vice president there was some

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 2>tension there, and then as president. I think there's a

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 2>real chip on his shoulder. He and his team they

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 2>feel like they've done all these great things, you know,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>for the country. They've changed industrial policy, the unemployment rates low,

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>they tackle COVID well, and they feel like they're not

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>getting credit for it, and they're mad about it. And

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 2>I think once he got into the White House, if

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it's something you've always wanted and you feel like you've

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>done a good job and you're not getting credit for

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to walk away from it. He is

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty one years old, and I think that he and

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the people around him sort of underestimate how much the

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>age question weighs on voters and even donors. They're trying

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to overcompensate by this by bringing donors to the White House,

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, by having Biden meet with them and make

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sure they feel good. But when I talk to people,

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, vote for Biden at this point, I think

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>what's animating Democratic voters is not Biden's candidacy. It's a

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>threat of another Trump term. And I think people will

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>vote for Biden for that reason, not because people think,

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 2>oh wow, he's a perfect presidential candidate for twenty twenty four.

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to keep supporting him.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's take another quick break here from a sponsor, and

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll roll right back into this conversation. I'm back with

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Cook, a Bloomberg News political reporter, and we're talking

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>about the Iowa caucuses, the other looming presidential primaries, and

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the candidates. If, as it seems likely Nancy, that Trump

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and Biden will be the nominees at the end of

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>all of this, how do you see them positioning themselves

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>against one another? How will Biden position himself against Trump,

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>How will Trump position himself against Biden.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So we got some glimpse of this in Iowa. I

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think the Trump campaign is really going to hammer Biden

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>on the economy and immigration over and over again, and

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 2>those are going to be their two main themes. Trump's

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.280
<v Speaker 2>aids are trying to steer him away from talking about

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>his view that he lost the election. They don't want

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 2>him to talk about January sixth, But they're really going

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to hammer home economy the fact that they're say the

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>borders are too open, and those are going to be

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the two main themes Biden. Those people are really banking

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>on the idea that democracy is at stake. They are

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>going to make January sixth and everything that Trump has

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>ever said about being a dictator for twenty four hours

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 2>like that's going to be in an ad this year.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>They're also really trying to make women's reproductive rights and

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 2>the restrictions on abortion and Roe v. Wade falling as

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a very key thing. You have to remember that Democrats

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 2>did much better than people anticipated in the midterms. Female

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and suburban women have really turned away from Trump. That's

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 2>a weak spot for him because of abortion. And so

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I would just say abortion democracy for Biden over and

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 2>over again.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's unpack a little bit of that. I think you know,

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa, both the entrance and the exit polls show

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that the top two issues were caucus goers, as you noted,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>immigration and the economy, and the Trump team is obviously

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>latched onto that. You know, the economy. I think the

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden team has a good story to tell if they

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>can figure out their messaging. Because GDP has grown, wages

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have gone up, job creation has gone up. The US

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is the most resilient developed post COVID economy in the world.

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a very good story. The stock market has

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>performed well, et cetera, et cetera. But there's been this

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>bugaboo of inflation where people, really average people feel the

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>economy more than pointy heads like I do at the

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>gas station, in the grocery store, et cetera, et cetera.

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And they haven't really been able to get around that narrative.

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And by the time inflation appears to have peaked and

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually waning, but that might not be in time

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for this election. Immigration, on the other hand, I don't

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>think the Biden administration has a good story to tell there.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It has been chaotic at the southern border. The administration

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>came in and didn't really try to move beyond where

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration was on this, and states that have

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>but the southern border feel this pain, and they've been exporting,

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>i think, in heinous ways for political points. They're migrants

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to states like Illinois and New York and Massachusetts, Blue states.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Why hasn't the Biden administration been able to get its

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>act together on immigration?

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that to really deal with immigration, you'd

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 2>have to have, you know, probably some sweeping legislation come

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>out of Congress, and there's no sort of bipartisan appetite

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to do that which you would have to, and that

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 2>has been the problem for many, many years. Like I

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think that anyone in either party thinks, oh, immigration

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>is going great. There's just not really a political will

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 2>or consensus in Congress to solve it, and so that

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>leaves the Biden team with things that they have to

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 2>do vis a v executive order. But I do think

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that they have sort of tried not to deal with

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>it as best they can. And what has happened is

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 2>that a bunch of these Republican governors have sent bus

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 2>loads of migrants to these blue states. As you talked

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>about creating crisis in New York. You know where Bloomberg

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>has its headquarters in Iowa. The Illinois Governor J. D.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Pritzker was there on behalf of the Biden administration sort

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of trying to give a counterpro argument in the middle

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of this Republican caucus as to why Democrats would be better.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 2>But at this press conference, I was said, all these

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 2>questions that he got was what he was going to

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 2>do with migrants in Chicago. And so it is a

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 2>real problem for the Biden administration. They don't have a

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>good answer on it, and they've been trying to hide

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 2>from it, and the Trump people are going, I can

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 2>tell you, going to shove it down their throat again

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and again.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think no matter how much the Biden administration says,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's only so much we can do because there's gridlock

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in Congress and Congress has to act. Republicans in Congress

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are very happy to hang this particular albatross around the

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>White House's neck because they know the electoral points they'll

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>score off of it. And they're really going to be stuck.

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how they explain their way out

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of that one. Getting over to the Trump side, you know,

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned January sixth, democracy and reproductive rights for women,

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the other things that really interested me

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in the entrance and exit polls in Iowa again, was

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the top two reasons at least an entrance

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>polls that caucas Gooers gave for supporting Trump. The first

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one was he fights for us, and the second one

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is he shares our values. You know, he knows he

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>animates his supporters that way. He's been I think, engaging

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in pretty craven spirituality, baiting, saying he's the chosen one

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>God sent Donald Trump to heal the voters. He has

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>tried to engage emotionally on almost any path, regardless of

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's true or not, with his voters, and it

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>has worked so for that voting block, things like January

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>six and the threat to democracy. It's falling on deaf ears.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>But I do think for swing voters, independence, moderate Republicans,

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>conservative Democrats, January sixth and democracy are still salient issues,

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>aren't they.

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what the Biden team is hoping. I

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 2>just think we're going to have the longest general election,

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 2>potentially ever, because if Trump wins the nomination by early

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to mid March, will be have a general election fight

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>from March to November. That is a very long time

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 2>for Trump and Biden to sort of go after each other.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think that what we haven't seen is while

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump's support among Republicans is much deeper than we thought,

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm still not totally sure once we do

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>hit a general election and all the media focus is

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>on him day after day and not like him Nikki Haley, DeSantis,

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 2>avec Ramaswami like once it's just really trained on him,

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that like his statements or the things

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 2>that he says off the cuff at rallies or at events,

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not sure how those will play with as

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>you said, moderates, swing state voters, suburban women like these

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are people that have turned away from him in the past,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and I'll be very curious to see that, you know,

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 2>once we hit the summer.

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Although he won the presidency in twenty sixteen, he has

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lost every national referendum he's been engaged with since then,

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenty eighteen midterms, the twenty twenty election, the twenty

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>two midterms, with more recently abortion being a real key

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>reason for that. That was the last sort of policy

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to ask you about. Is that made

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a big difference in the midterms. We've seen voters in

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>unexpected states like Kansas and Ohio really moves strongly to

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>protect women's access to abortion and reproductive rights. How big

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a factor is that going to be in the Biden

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump face off.

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be huge. And the way

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 2>that immigration is probably the weakest spot for the Biden administration,

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 2>abortion is the weakest spot for Trump, but also for

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>all Republicans. It's interesting because Trump really tries to distance

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 2>himself from the abortion question, when in fact he appointed

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the three Supreme Court justices who overturned the Dabbs decision,

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 2>which is overturned Roe v. Wade. But he really tries

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 2>to act like this is a bad issue for Republicans.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I wasn't involved, like sort of a hands

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 2>off thing, and I think that that won't fly. Like

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.359
<v Speaker 2>abortion is the question that he doesn't have a good

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 2>answer to on his side, and that's why I think

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Democrats keep hammering him on it.

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, On the one hand, when he says that

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing to do with this, even though I

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>appointed the Supreme Court justices that made this happen. He also,

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on other occasions talks about the Court owing him favors

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for their appointment, so he wants to have it both ways.

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>All of this is probably going to come down to

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a handful of swing states Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we know them, maybe North Carolina, and then swing voters

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>within those states. But the sort of characteristics of the

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>swing voters are a little different than we've had in

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>past elections. Right, won't swing voters in this election actually

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>be younger voters and voters of color.

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>It will be they'll be younger voters, they'll be voters

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of color. I mean, I just think, well, the Democrats

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 2>at least expect this election to be very, very close.

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of wild that our presidents at this

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 2>point are being elected by a tiny sliver of people

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in basically seven states who don't have strong feelings about

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Biden or Trump or it's people who hate both of them,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 2>but they just have to decide who they hate less.

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of the electorate that we're dealing with.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 2>There's some political scientists or longtime political operatives who call

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 2>these voters who hate both of them the double haters,

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, which one do you hate? Which one

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 2>are you going to hate less in November? And that's

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 2>ultimately who's going to decide who's in the White House next.

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's sort of emblematic of the United States right

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>now is we are judging things based on who you

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hate less, not who do you love more. Unfortunately, we've

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also run out of time, but I want to ask

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you one last question. I always like to ask guests

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what they've learned from a certain event or experience. What

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>have you learned thus far that you didn't know, say

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>two years ago or a year ago, about how the

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Biden Trump face off is shaping up?

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 2>So I would say on the Trump side, Trump is

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 2>still Trump built the way that he has always been built.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.800
<v Speaker 2>He has not changed, the people around him have changed.

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And there is a very competent, smart, small group of

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 2>people around him that understand politics very well and that

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 2>executed their strategy and ground game in Iowa pretty flawlessly,

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 2>and we can expect to see them take that to

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>state by state. And I think the Democrats have not

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 2>really caught onto the fact that Trump is not staffed

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 2>by a bunch of clowns this time. There's no infighting.

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 2>They get along with each other, and I think that

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Democrats should take the people around him and his operation

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 2>this time very very seriously. That's been my takeaway for

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 2>months dealing with them, But that's really my takeaway from Iowa.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Nancy. I hope you'll come back again and chat with me,

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because I always learned something from you.

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. I would love to.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Cook is a Bloomberg News political reporter covering the

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>White House in the twenty twenty four presidential race. You

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can find her work online at the Bloomberg dot com

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>website and on the Bloomberg terminal. You can also find

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>her on Twitter at nan Cook. Here. At crash Course,

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we believe the college can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising,

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and always instructive. In today's Crash Course, I learned that

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has learned a lot himself about how to

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>professionalize his political game. That doesn't mean he's going to

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>roll into the White House, but it does mean he's

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a more formidable opponent for Joe Biden

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this time around. What did you learn? We'd love to

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can tweet the Bloomberg Opinion handle

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>at Opinion or me at Tim O'Brien using the hashtag

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also subscribe to our show

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening right now and leave us a review

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that helps more people find the show. This episode was

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:49.800
<v Speaker 1>produced by the indispensable Anamasarakis and me. Our supervising producer

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is Magnus Hendrickson, and we had editing help from Sage Bauman,

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Grocott, Mike Niitza and Christine Vanden Bilard. Blake Maples

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>does our sound engineering. Then our original theme song was

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>composed by Luis Guerra. I'm Tim O'Brien. We will be

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>back next week with another Crash Course