WEBVTT - Memento Review (Archive)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Brooklyn Adams and I'm partnering with Abercommedy to

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you about the newest drop from their Active brand,

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Your Personal Best. YPB Luggings are made with buttery soft

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fabrics that hug you in all the right places and

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>common Abercomy's viral curve love fit designed to eliminate waste gap,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Paired with sports bras and super soft sweatshirts. It's active

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>word that supports every part of my busy lifestyle and

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>gives me my best but ever. Heading to the new

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>year feeling your personal best. Shop Active by Abercrombie in

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the app, online and in stores.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>There's a new app where you can invest in your insight.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Introducing Draft Kings Predictions now available in your state. Big

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>on playoff football. Pick a topic, make your prediction with

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 2>a yes or no, then see well your smart's payoff.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>DraftKings Predictions is new, simple to use with playoff trading

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 2>available in your state. Download now. New DraftKings Predictions Customers

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>get up to a twenty five dollars first trade bonus

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>with promo code Spotify. That's promo code Spotify. Don't just

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>know it, predict it with Draft Kings Predictions. The Crown

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>is Yours Draft Kings Predictions is a CFTC registered introducing broker.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 2>The then contract trading involves substantial risk of loss one

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>per new customer, often required non withdrawable predictions dollars expire

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in one year, hence January twenty fifth, twenty twenty six.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Market availability varies. Eligibility restrictions apply. See terms at DKNG

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>dot co. Slash Predictions Promo.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Wednesdays are when we like to drop something from the

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting Archive for all our listeners. Of course, the

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 3>entire archive available to those Film Spotting family members. Now

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 3>on this Friday show, we're going to be doing our

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six movie preview draft, going back and forth

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>with picks. Those movies were anticipating the most coming out

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>this year, and yeah, maybe a movie from Christopher Noland

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>might be chosen fairly.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 4>High on the drive. I can't believe it went seventh.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Josh crazy, so crazy that we thought six other films

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 5>that we were more excited about than The Odyssey.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that was a year. It's going to be.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 5>We do have our draft coming up and that is

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 5>probably the biggest title. With that in mind, we were

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 5>thinking about Christopher Nolan. But Josh, there's there's another tie

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 5>in Sundance is going on. And I don't know if

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 5>you remember this, but Christopher Nolan's Memento screened at Sundance

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty five years ago this month. It didn't premiere there.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 5>It had already played at Venice in two thousand and Toronto,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 5>but it did screen at Sundance. So with that connection

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 5>and the connection to Nolan's Odyssey, which we are looking

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 5>forward to this summer, we thought, why not let's go

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 5>backwards maybe then forwards. I don't know how it all works,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 5>let's try to make sense of it by.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you got us every time. I've got to

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>rewatch it and then figure out what happened. But I

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>do know it's brilliant any which way you look at it,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 3>which we did not too long ago, Adam. Twenty twenty,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>we did a Nolan overview, took all of his films

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in order up to that point, watched them, rewatch them essentially,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>and had a fresh conversation. This was something we were

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>doing during COVID and lockdowns, no new releases, no theaters opened,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 3>thinking about ways to talk about the movie still and

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a Nolan overview was, I think a great way to

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>do that. So many good conversations, including this one about Memento.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Bretman in Los Angeles. I remember nineteen years ago to

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 6>the Dances Film Festival January of two thousand and one

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 6>and seeing a little movie called Amento that completely blew

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 6>me away then and we watched it, completely blows me away. Now,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 6>why is it one of the great Neon wires? Because

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 6>I think it is. I think he uses the mechanics

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 6>of film itself, the unstoppable ordering of shots, to create

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 6>a feeling of noir. You're always looking forward and backwards

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 6>in this movie. You have anxiety for the future. You're

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 6>trap by a doom past. I mean, that's noir, and

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 6>either Leonard nor the audience can ever escape it. My

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 6>sound of looking at me kind of funny. Hey, Riley,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 6>have I ever told you about Memento? Well, go wash

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 6>your hands or remember Sammy Jenkins.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Bret. Good stuff there, And certainly the noir

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>tradition is a useful lens, a crucial lens in a

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of ways through which to look at Memento. Momento

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>debuted at the Venice Film Festival in September two thousand

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 3>went on to play at the Toronto International Film Fest

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>that same month, and then in January of two thousand

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and one it played sun Dance opened in the US

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>a limited release at first in March, and at its

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 3>widest release was on about five hundred screens. So for

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>a very small film made an impressive twenty five million

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars domestic forty million dollars worldwide. Got some Oscar attention

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 3>to nominations Best Editing, which I want to talk about.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Dottie Dorn got that nomination, and then Best Original Screenplay,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a nomination that Nolan shared with his brother Jonathan. Jonathan

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>wrote this short story that Memento is based on, So

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>that story to remind those of you who haven't seen

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>the film in a while or didn't get a chance

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>to revisit it before. This guy Pierce stars plays a

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>man suffering from short term memory loss who's trying to

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>avenge his wife's murder and to do that, he has

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a couple of polaroids that hold some clues, as well

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 3>as the tattoos pretty much covering his upper body. Those

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>are also clues that he's left himself. And you know,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 3>Nolan didn't think that was complicated enough so he and

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>his brother structure this in reverse chronological order. I want

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>to start at talking about Christopher Nolan's brother Jonathan and

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 3>asking you a question related to something we talked about

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 3>when we started our OOV review and talked about Following

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and this idea that the twist there were two twists

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 3>in Following, and how we felt while they were clever

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and entertaining, maybe lacked that existential slash philosophical heft that

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 3>some of Nolan's later films had. I think that heft

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>is all over Memento. I mean, this is this is

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I liked Following quite a bit, but this is a

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 3>huge leap watching them back to back, and I wonder

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>if Jonathan Nolan, his younger brother, if he maybe unlocked

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Nolan here, If that's a way of looking at

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>this film quickly. Jonathan Nolan. He went on to co

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 3>write The Prestige, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises,

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 3>and Interstellar with Christopher, and then on his own. He's

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 3>been executive producer for two TV series, Person of Interest

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 3>in Westworld. He directed a few episodes in each of

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 3>those series. So yeah, going back to Memento, did he

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of find a way in this material to provide

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that philosophical theft. Think about this one element Lenny Guy

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Pierce's character talking about why getting vengeance matters even if

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>he forgets that he got that vengeance, and he says this,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the world doesn't just disappear because you close your eyes,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>and that is, you know, just one thought that kind

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 3>of makes you stop in your tracks and really rethink

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>how you've thought about things like time and vengeance and

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>morality and reality. And then the brilliant thing about Memento

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>is it doesn't just sit there and pontificate on it.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 3>It keeps moving, and it goes moving and it moves

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>backwards and you're you know, and so then you're thrown

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 3>into another sort of existential dilemma. And so yeah, I

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>just thought bringing Jonathan in, whether you know this is

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 3>something that Nolan would have gotten to himself at some

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>point or is it something his brother kind of brought

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>out in him.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, First to quick clarifications, he doesn't like to be

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 5>called Lenny Josh. His wife called him Lenny, so call

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 5>him Lennrue. And also just to be really specific about it,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 5>even though I think all of our listeners understand not

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 5>just short term memory loss, but the inability to create

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 5>any new memories, right, that's really at the heart of

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 5>his condition.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And watching from the point, from the point of the attack.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 5>Point of the attack, exactly the last thing he remembers,

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 5>The only thing he truly remembers is that attack on

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 5>his wife when his life changed forever. And I'll just

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 5>say this isn't even really a disclaimer. It's just a fact.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 5>I had so many pages of notes scribbled around in

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 5>my notebook rewatching this film, and it was the first

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 5>time I watched it since two thousand and one. I'm

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 5>trying to crack the code of this movie and looking

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 5>for all the answers that I really felt way too

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 5>much of a kinship with Leonard, and I finally just

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 5>had to put the notebook down, and I decided that,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 5>you know what, we're going to talk about it. We're

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 5>going to do our best and we'll see what we

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 5>make of it. And I think that your approach with

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Nolan is interesting. I hadn't really thought about it

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 5>at all. It wasn't something that I suppose mattered to

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 5>me as I pondered this film, But I think I

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 5>can fit it into some of my thoughts on the film,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 5>particularly if there's something that maybe Jonathan Nolan unlocked in him,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 5>even though there was already this element at play to

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 5>an extent in following, is that he gave him a

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 5>story that was rooted in some familiar movie conventions that

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Nolan clearly likes to play with. But it did not

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 5>only hint at and more than hint at, force you

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 5>to sort of go down this rabbit hole of larger

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 5>existential and philosophical questions. But he did it with a

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 5>story that I think almost demands to be told and

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 5>explored only cinematically. I think that's what matters most to

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Christopher Nolan, and I'll see if I can ex that

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 5>a little bit better. I don't know if I can,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 5>but we heard in Brett's voicemail he talked about the

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 5>mechanics of film itself, ordering of shots to create a feeling,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 5>and inceptions coming in this Ooh review where you have

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.599
<v Speaker 5>Cob is a thief who casts characters and creates sets

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 5>and scenarios. We've talked about that a little bit on

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 5>the show in the past, and just like Cob in following,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 5>who's a thief who finds characters and inserts himself into

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 5>their sets and their circumstances. There is this meta aspect

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 5>inherently to Nolan that has nothing to do with him

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 5>drawing attention to the fact that we're watching a film

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 5>or that it's being directed by him. That's not what

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 5>he's interested in. But he is taking the tools, and

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 5>he's taking the basic cell structure, the DNA of cinema,

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 5>light and shadow and time twenty four frames per second

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 5>running through a projector, images and actions, all being manipulated

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 5>by someone through the camera, moves and through edits. And

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 5>he's matching that to Mati Cial that similarly relies on

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>the manipulation of time. So I think a more concise

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 5>way of putting it would be that he uses film

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 5>to tell stories about how film itself functions in talking

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 5>about time and chronology, but also in the way so

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>many of his films do deal with dreams and deal

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 5>with memory as well. You can describe dreams and memories

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 5>as they replay in your mind the same way you

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 5>might describe a film, and so all the ways a

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 5>linear film structure usually stabilizes a viewer the cause and

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 5>effect chain of events. You understand where you are, you

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 5>understand how you got here, Memento is about a character

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 5>completely destabilized HM, where he's floating within this dream of

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 5>a past, present and potential future. And so Nolan just

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 5>really brilliantly destabilizes us accordingly in a way maybe no

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 5>other movie prior has done, and it does put us

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 5>in an interesting position where not only are we put

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 5>in that headspace, that difficult, chaotic headspace, and we understand

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 5>his predicament, but I think what I came to realize

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 5>a little bit on this second viewing, Josh, is that

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 5>once you get past that and you do get your

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 5>bearings a little bit, you realize how much it actually

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 5>allows you to empathize as well, with Leonard's situation and

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 5>his circumstances, and the fact that we start every scene

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 5>just like him asking those questions that we hear him

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 5>sometimes verbally ask where am I? What's happening? Yeah, it's

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 5>still a wonder. It's still a wonder almost twenty years later,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 5>and on a second viewing, to me.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that empathetic element is one thing I do want

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 3>to talk about, because that's another thing in following we

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>thought was maybe lost a little bit. These guys were interesting,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>but were they real people? You know, did we feel

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>for them in that sort of way? And I think

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>this is a leap forward there as well, where you

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>definitely have a human in tyst In Leonard, his grief

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 3>is real. He talks about that moment where he wakes

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 3>up in the morning and he thinks his wife might

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 3>still be there. You know, he touches the side of

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the bed expecting her to be there, expecting to be warm,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 3>and she's not, And that touches with a common experience.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my grandfather, who's my grandmother, died about two

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 3>years ago now, and he will still talk about that.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>You know that as an older man in his nineties,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>he wakes up and forgets that she's gone in the

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 3>early moments, And that's a very human experience that is

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>woven into this movie and gives a real feeling to

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 3>it for Leonard. I think Guy Pierce's performance has a

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 3>lot to do with that too, bringing us into it,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and also the Sammy Jenkis subplot, which we can get into.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 3>But I want to go back before we do that

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>to your comment about all the notes you took. What's

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 3>notable about that? And longtime listeners will know this, You

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>usually don't take notes right. You'll often take a piece

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 3>of paper from me in a pen, but there won't

0:13:59.920 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>be much on there at the end of the movie.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 4>It's just not your style.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>And so I find it incredibly interesting that this is

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the movie you have more notes than you know what

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to do with. And it makes total sense to me.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Why why does Memento appeal so much to someone like

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 3>me and so much to someone like you, Adam Well,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna the answer, I think lies in a quote

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Leonard Gibbs when he's describing his process. I'm disciplined and organized.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I use habit and routine to make my life possible.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm probably ninety five percent that guy. I'm gonna

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>guess you're one hundred and fifteen percent that guy. So

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>there's there's something correct me if I'm wrong and making

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>those assumptions. But there's something about this organizational I mean,

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 3>this is we do this show built on top five

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>lists and themes and processes and organization and habits and routines.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>And so when you see a movie when that is

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 3>at once being taken away from you. This goes to

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>what you were just talking about the filmmaking process. What

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Nolan is doing here he's undercutting all that stuff in

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a way that makes this a thriller and makes this destabilizing,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>while at the same time, as movie lovers who know

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 3>how films work, we are simultaneously appreciating the superstructure, the

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 3>stitching that is allowing us to be disoriented in an

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 3>oriented way, if that makes sense, and that is the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>genius of Memento that I think, if your particular personalities

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>in ways that I think we both share, is just

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>going to blow your mind.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:38.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Absolutely.

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>And speaking of blowing your mind, I love the fact

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 5>that you've got not only Carrie Ann Moss in this movie,

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 5>but Joe Penaliano, who I like both of them as performers.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 5>I think they're both very good here, but also just

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 5>that they're in this movie at all, because this is

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 5>a film that came out two years after The Matrix.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 5>And if you think about those movies as a pair,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 5>which I actually do, or at least I do now

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 5>having just re watched this film, these are heady genre movies,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 5>right sci fi and this neo noir, but they actually

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 5>raise really similar questions about human existence that at the

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 5>time were groundbreaking for me. There were films that planted

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 5>something in my brain about the human condition that I

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 5>have never relinquished. And I watch almost every movie I

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 5>see still through this lens, even just in my everyday life,

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 5>I take away aspects of these movies that have filtered

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 5>into my subconscious. And there's a different Leonard line I'm

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 5>gonna give you where he says, we all lie to

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 5>ourselves to be happy. And if you think about it,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Leonard essentially takes the blue pill in this movie. Right,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 5>That's what's revealed. The harsh truth of reality is given

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 5>to him. But unlike Neo and the others in the Matrix,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 5>he does what Cipher does, what Joe Paneliano does in

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 5>the Matrix. He effectively takes the blue pill to remain

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 5>blissfully unaware atow himself to continue living this new version

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 5>of a happy life. And this time, that tattoo that's

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 5>right there where he can see it most plainly, most visibly,

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Remember samby jenkis the one that's right there by his

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 5>thumb on his wrist. Of course, what he literally means

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 5>by that is remember Sammy, remember that story. But of

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 5>course it's more than that, because he remembers Sammy, Sammy

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 5>is actually in his past. He doesn't need the tattoo

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 5>to remind him of what happened with Sammy. That tattoo

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 5>is there because it has broader implications. What he doesn't

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 5>want to do is end up like Sammy. Remember how

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Sammy ends up a man with no agency, no purpose whatsoever.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 5>And that relates to the line he says to the

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy Grant's character who says, what do you want, and

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 5>he says, I want my life back.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Literally.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Of course, on one level he does, he wishes none

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 5>of this had ever happened. But what I think he's

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 5>really saying there is I want a life back. I

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 5>need a life that has purpose. I can't be Sammy.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 5>And that brings us full circle to your line. I

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 5>need a life that relies on discipline and organization and

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 5>habit and routine. I need drive. I'm going to give

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 5>myself that drive. I'm not going to be Sammy. Jenkis

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 5>sitting at home watching TV commercials. There are moral and

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 5>ethical compromises and questions that come with that that he

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 5>has chosen I suppose his answer to. But he is

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 5>definitely decided that there has to be a path and

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 5>a purpose to his life in order to go on.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>And by choosing to deceive himself, by choosing not to

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 3>face the harsh truth. The movie makes us face a

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of harsh truths, I think, and one of them

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 3>is this idea that memories, even for those of us

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 3>who are healthy in terms of memory, aren't what we

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>like to think of the mass. No, right, you think

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of memories as those are the facts. More than that,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>they're my facts. They're my very personal facts I have witnessed,

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 3>I can attest to, and moment makes us face the

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>harsh truth that you know, they're just interpretations. They're interpretations

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 3>of our experiences. And you know, like you hear about

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 3>conflicting police reports of you know, two eyewitnesses to the

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 3>same scene that speak to this, and and other psychological

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 3>studies where we do distort well we've experienced in the

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>way that we want to remember it. And that's just

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 3>something I think we all know. But when you watch

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>something like Memento, where it's put in this context and

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 3>made this stark, it kind of makes us face it

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 3>in a different way. And yeah, Carrie and Moss being

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 3>in the matrix just what like a year or two

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 3>before is really remarkable. Looking forward, it reminds me. She's

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously been working since, but nothing really quite as resonant

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>as either of these two films. So I'm looking forward

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to seeing her in the fourth Matrix film, if we

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 3>eventually get that. I love as Natalie this character, how

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 3>unapologetic she is. That's a word I used to describe

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Betty Davis in of Human Bondage, and I think we

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 3>get a little bit of that here, even before we

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>realize she's using Leonard. There's still this fierceness to her

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>that I appreciated, And there's a you know another speaking

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 3>of the humanity in this movie, so many layers of

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>emotion and that one tentative kiss that she and Leonard

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 3>share because there is betrayal going on there, there's a

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 3>little confusion, but there's also some real longing in it,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you can sense, I think, for because these are two

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>people who have lost people, right. And then Mosque gets

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>that great moment where she gets to act while she's acting,

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, get you get a character playing apart. When

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 3>she comes back in the house after Leonard has hit

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 3>her and she sits in the car. I mean, that's

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the skis. That sequence is where it makes

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>it so palpable the condition he's in, Yes, because for

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 3>some reason the edits to him waking up again. Those

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 3>are movie conventions we're familiar with, right, like, Okay, he forgets,

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 3>I understand we're restarting. But to see it happen in

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 3>real time where the camera looks at her sitting in

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the cop yes, counting down till she knows his memory

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 3>is going to reset, and then calmly coming to the

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 3>door as if she just arrived. I mean, that's just

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 3>a great little bit because the acting is so good there,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 3>but also the terror of realizing this is how it

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>really happens to Leonard. Yeah, I love that moment.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 5>I love that you articulated that moment because I don't

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 5>know that I had a firm handle on why it

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 5>was so effective. I just know that you're one hundred

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 5>percent right that in terms of just pure thrilling moments

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 5>in the movie, that cut to her sneering at him

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 5>from her driver's seat, knowing what she's about to do

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 5>to him, it's electrifying.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, chilling, chilling it is. And then another one like that,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 3>which you know I had forgotten until the chase was on,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think it was pretty common in the trailer too,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>is the I think it starts with why am I

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 3>chasing this guy? And then second later, oh, he's chasing me?

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe it's vice versa.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 4>But that's just.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Another great in the moment way of putting us in

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Leonard's head.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yes, yeah, absolutely a great joke in the film,

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and it probably made me laugh back in two thousand

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 5>and one. It definitely made me laugh this time too.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 5>And of course, this being this overview, we are coming

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 5>at these films considering how each film before it, or

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 5>set of films informs it, and beyond some of the

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 5>things we've already touched on earlier in the discussion, just

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 5>the fact that you've got a man and a woman

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 5>here double crossing Leonard, just like we had in Following right,

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 5>two people that he thinks might be on his side

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 5>but ultimately are working against him. The whole object aspect

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 5>to this film right, in terms of what do these

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 5>objects that people have or hang on to tell us

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 5>about them? And there was that whole sequence I had

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 5>completely forgotten about with the prostitute in this movie and

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 5>the props, right, he effectively buys props that he knows

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 5>he can convince himself. I suppose that belonged to his

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 5>wife and then he disposes of them, but he goes

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 5>through this whole charade with those objects. So that was

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 5>another thing that tied back to following. And you may

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>have a few more items on your list. But also,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 5>like any Sacred Cow we do or with our eight

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 5>for eighty four series, if this is the first time

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 5>you're seeing these movies in a long time, it's always

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 5>interesting to consider what we maybe didn't notice or what

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 5>we didn't put emphasis on in that first viewing, and

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 5>what was different then about this experience. And I had

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 5>completely forgotten, Josh, And I don't know if my eyes

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 5>were perceptive enough back in two thousand and one to

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 5>catch it. It is very subtle, even though it sounds

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 5>like it shouldn't be. I had forgotten completely about the

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 5>moment where the black and white and the color timelines

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 5>actually do intersect with each other near the end of

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 5>this film, right where we actually see the color change.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 5>But beyond that and getting to some of these other

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 5>points we're talking about, I had forgotten or decided to

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 5>overlook how much of a sympathetic figure in some ways

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 5>Natalie really was. You're right, she's completely unapologetic, and I

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 5>like that about her as a movie character. And there's

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 5>no doubt out that she completely uses Leonard, but there

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 5>are some of these other touches that suggest an inner

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 5>life and maybe, as you said, some longing to her,

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 5>and we do accept that she didn't plan any of this.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 5>When you do finally think about this movie and you

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 5>process it in terms of an actual chronology, the first

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 5>thing that happens at the beginning of this film is

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 5>her boyfriend being killed by Leonard, and the next thing

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.719
<v Speaker 5>that happens is the guy who killed her boyfriend driving

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 5>up in his car wearing his suit and pulling up

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 5>to the bar. Imagine being her in that situation. And

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot more we can unpack there. But this

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 5>is a case where even though as you said, there's

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 5>a key moment where she lays out what she's going

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 5>to use him for and she has her own personal

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 5>reasons to do it, it's also driven by her personal

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 5>animosity to the guy who she knows did kill her boyfriend,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 5>even if maybe someone else was pulling some of this rings,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 5>there's a hatred for him as well, and so that

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 5>was surprising to me to see her not just as

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 5>what I thought was a traditional kind of fem fatale

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 5>who's there only to drive his downfall, But actually, in

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 5>a lot of ways, I think she's more sympathetic than

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 5>the hero is.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 7>I've lost somebody too. I'm sorry. His name is Jimmy.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 7>What happened? I had to meet somebody? They never came back.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Who do you go to meet?

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 7>I called Teddy?

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 4>What are the police thinks?

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 7>They don't look too hard for guys like Jimmy? When

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 7>you find this guy, this John Gie, what are you

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 7>gonna do? Kill him? Maybe I can help you find him?

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, it makes me think you talked about the chronological

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 3>cut of following that's out there. We could it'd be

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>great to have a Natalie cut of Memento, right. I mean,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I know you would, you didn't have the memory issues.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 3>But there is definitely a compelling story there that we

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 3>get a good sense of in the performance and in

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 3>the sequences that Carrie on Moss is involved in. I

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 3>was the thing maybe that I noticed, I guess, And

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I think this just comes with you know another what

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 3>two decades of film watching or so is the editing

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>is just you know, I've gotten to learn how to

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 3>look more closely at what the editing is doing, and

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 3>mentioned at the top Dotty Door and Oscar nominated for

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the work. Here, there's just little flickers here and there.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 3>When Leonard references my wife fairly early on, we get

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 3>a quick shot of her eye opening and closing beneath

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 3>that shower curtain of haunting, haunting image, and later on

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Sammy Jenkis storyline, when that's starting to sink

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 3>into us, the conclusive element is that quick flick of

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a shot where we see Lenny sitting in Sammy's car. Right,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it's like half a second, but it's it's and this

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is where Nolan is like, or.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Is it in the wheelchair? I think it's in the wheelchair?

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it the wheelchair? Okay what I thought?

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But it's just it's so quick, and it's almost

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 3>where Nolan is is like, Okay, you've probably caught up

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to me now, so I'm gonna give you a little reward,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, and just like confirm what you're probably thinking.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 3>And then this is more towards the end, but when

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 3>Leonard does kill Jimmy, that sequence is match cut with

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 3>scenes of Leonard's wife played by I think it's Yoria Fox.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>He's looking out the window of the abandoned building where

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 3>he's waiting for Jimmy to come, and we get these

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>match cuts of her looking out the window of their house,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and this again, it brings back that human element. The

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 3>humanity of this ties us. It's it's not just you know,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 3>a noir killing we're going to see, but we understand

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the psychological and emotional building blocks that has brought to

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 3>that moment those it and bringing back that into the

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 3>final scene is just so crucial. So I want to

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>ask you a question about this was a great experience,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 3>a great revisit. Was there any point, however, where clue

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 3>fatigue began to set in? Where As I mentioned, we

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>are trying to keep up with this movie and that's

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 3>part of the thrill. But I did have a moment.

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>It might have been the sequence with around the time

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Prostitute where it was just becoming That's the

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 3>way we can describe it, kind of like I don't

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 3>need any more clues, let me work with what you've

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 3>already given me a little bit.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I can definitely see that.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that I felt it as much as you,

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 5>but I was very aware on this rewatch anyway of

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 5>how many clues. As confounding as the movie ultimately can

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 5>be and as provocative as it is, as much as

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 5>there is unanswered, there are so many clues to unraveling

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 5>it that Nolan gives you along the way. But you

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 5>would only really know that on multiple rewatches because on

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 5>that first watch your head is spinning so much. But

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 5>when you see, like speaking of the editing, you see

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 5>a flash near the end to Leonard, I think in

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 5>bed with his wife, but now he does have that

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 5>tattoo over his heart that says I've done it. You've

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 5>got little things like that that clue you in. Even Bert,

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 5>the guy who is behind the desk at the discount

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 5>in early in the movie, he says, that must suck.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 5>It's all backwards, like maybe you got an idea about

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 5>what you want to do next, but you don't remember

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 5>what you just did. I mean, he's giving you the

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 5>structure of the film in some of the lines that

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the characters say, and Teddy, the Paneliano character really does

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 5>lay out some of the larger themes of the movie

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 5>I was touching on in terms of the subjectivity of

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 5>your experiences and choosing your own destiny and denying things

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 5>and rationalizing in order to be happy. That was way

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 5>more present in the script than I had remembered it

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 5>from two thousand and one, which might be a little

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 5>bit different from some of the clues that you're talking

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 5>about and what you felt fatigued by.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So I have to before we wrap up, note that,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>because now I'm looking for it. Of course, I mentioned

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>how in the basement barn following I saw those doors

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>that had the porthole windows, and something about him screamed, Nolan,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 3>there's It's almost the exact same door in that abandoned

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 3>building where Leonard kills Jimmy at the end, I noticed

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 3>in the background. So I'm gonna be looking for those

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 3>as the overview continues.

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, as you should.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 5>I wonder if we will see them make future appearances.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 5>I guess the last thing I wanted to touch on

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the new experience this time. Even more

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 5>than recognizing Natalie as a tragic figure, I also do

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 5>see Leonard as even more complicated and tragic. Obviously, you

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 5>can't deny the people he's willing to hurt and those

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 5>moral and ethical compromises that he has been willing to make,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 5>not just in the name of revenge, but for him

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 5>to have this life of purpose. But you really do

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 5>tap into I think you mentioned this line earlier. I

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 5>tapped into more this time, Josh, the fact, the real

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 5>weight of the fact that he starts every day with

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the last thing he remembers being his wife, and not

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 5>just starting your day. It's not just when you wake up,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 5>it's whenever you come out of this sort of spell

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 5>you've been in where you are right processing what you're doing.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 5>However many minutes that is five, ten, fifteen, you're back

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 5>to the reality of that brutal act that occurred against

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 5>your wife. So that's a horrible place to be. And

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 5>when he has that sequence where he articulates that pain

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 5>and he says that he doesn't even know how long

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 5>she's been gone, it's like I've woken up in bed

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 5>and she's not here. And the way that ends, how

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 5>can I heal? How am I supposed to heal if

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 5>I can't feel time? That is a true, almost sci

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 5>fi like character dilemma. Right to be in a situation

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 5>where you can't process time, because time truly is not

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 5>to be a hallmark card. It truly is the only

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 5>thing that can get you past grief. It's the only

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 5>way you can get over anything that traumatic or said.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 5>You may never truly get over it, but the only

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 5>way you can go on is to process it through time.

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 5>And he can't ever do that. And as much as

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 5>I understood that, we're supposed to see Leonard as a

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 5>bad person who does some really bad things, and he

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 5>doesn't even fully want to come to terms with that himself.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 5>This is why he sets himself on this path where

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 5>he can live with the bluepill existence. I suppose I

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 5>understand what's driving that, and I do empathize with what's

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 5>driving that well.

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 3>And the tragedy of his choice at the end, the

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 3>reveal at the end is that it has this decision

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 3>to continue to trick himself into pursuing revenge has not

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 3>provided any sort of closure or healing. No, and yet

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.959
<v Speaker 3>that's something he does not learn and he chooses to

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 3>re experience it. I don't know what other route he

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>would have, what sort of healing he could pursue if

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 3>he instead chose to write himself tattoos notes about the

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 3>one you mentioned You've done it, you know, is a

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 3>different route. It's a different path he could have taken,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 3>but that's not his choice at the end, and that

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 3>makes that's what makes him ultimately a tragic figure, is

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 3>he is still choosing this path that is going to

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 3>repeat the pain.

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 4>That's it.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to help.

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.479
<v Speaker 5>So I do have a few final little mysteries that

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 5>remain for me, and I'm not necessarily expecting you to

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 5>illuminate me, but I do want to throw him out

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 5>to the audience. And obviously we can have a larger

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 5>discussion about this movie and some of these questions, but

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 5>this one maybe not so much a question as much

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 5>as a little tidbit. I loved the way in the

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 5>flashbacks we see missus Jenkis when she makes that decision

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 5>in his memory and Leonard's version of events to test

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 5>her husband Sammy play by Stephen Tabolowski. She does it

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 5>by telling him that it's time for her insulin shot,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 5>suggesting that it's been some passage of time between the

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 5>last shot. And she actually does rewind her watch every time. Yeah,

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 5>she rewinds the watch almost like Nolan is rewinding the

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 5>watch on this entire film. She doesn't have to, does

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 5>she Is there a reason why she has to do that?

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 5>She's not going to trick him. He doesn't look at

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 5>the watch. Does he take the time?

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's just a flourish to emphasize what's

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>happening for the viewer, But the coverage is that in

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 3>case he looks. I'll just say those are two great

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 3>performances Tablowski you mentioned, and Harriet Sansom Harris as Sammy

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Jenkis's wife, that again bring an element of humanity into

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 3>the movie that really does a lot. It's very important.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 3>It pays off when we understand that they're stand ins

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>for Leonard and his wife, right, because we've come to

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 3>care about them, and all of that care gets transferred

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 3>to Leonard when we get the reveal.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and depending on your reading of the film, there's

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 5>a possibility that they are actually not just stand ins metaphorically,

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 5>they might actually be right. I mean, there's different ways

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 5>to come at it. Maybe this is where my head

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 5>was exploding, but I swear if you go back, Josh

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 5>and look at the scene where Natalie tells Leonard that

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 5>she lost somebody too, he looks at a picture of

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 5>her and Jimmy, and then after they've I think slept together,

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 5>he comes out to the room on his own and

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 5>he's looking through some things, and he looks at that

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 5>picture again, and I swear in the first cut of

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 5>the picture, we see in this new sequence Jimmy does

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 5>not have a go tee like he did in the

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 5>first one. And then when he looks at the picture again,

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 5>there's a go tee there. Okay, so I'm losing my mind,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 5>but I want to know what's up with Jimmy's go tea.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 5>I'm getting crazy, aren't I.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 3>That's a little too deep for me, But go ahead,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 3>what's your other one?

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 5>When Leonard goes downstairs, this is early in the film,

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 5>but in the actual chronology would be late in the film.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 5>It's right before he goes to meet Teddy to take

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 5>him to the warehouse.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 4>He's kind of a rush. He's definitely frazzled.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 5>He comes out of his motel room and he comes downstairs,

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 5>and just as he's about to walk into the lobby

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 5>to talk to Bert, we see Guy Pierce stop, catch

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 5>his breath, kind of get his body in a certain

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 5>physical position, and then he walks through the door slowly.

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 5>It's almost as if he's putting himself into character there

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 5>in the moment, as if Leonard is putting himself into character,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 5>and I haven't been able to figure out yet why

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 5>he would need to do that. My last two and

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 5>these really get it. Bigger questions about this film is

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 5>to ponder why does Teddy even tell Leonard? Why does

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.399
<v Speaker 5>he tell him the truth that prompts him to kill

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 5>him at the end. If he knows what Leonard is

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 5>capable of, and there's a suggestion that he really does,

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 5>because they've done this before, why does he even open

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 5>that possibility right by pushing Leonard to that level?

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Teddy character, at some point, I think, does

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 3>become more about function for this idea to work than

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, practicality if it were actually happening in the

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 3>real world. I agree, there's probably some hiccups there.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 5>So then the real mind bender is what happens now?

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 5>What happens now? Where does Memento go chronologically? After he

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 5>has killed Teddy slash John G. We could presume, because

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 5>there are suggestions that he's done this before, that this

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 5>is what he always does, that a cycle will continue,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 5>Like even if you look at the tattoo and Teddy

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 5>says this, but if you look at the tattoo where

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 5>he has John G and then there's another tattoo below

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 5>it that clearly came at a different time and doesn't

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 5>look as good. That says or James. You know, he's

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 5>just going to keep adding jays until what he's done.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 3>What he's done is he's provided a path, yes, for

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 3>this to continue forever, unless he encounters someone who genuinely

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>will help him. But as long as he you know,

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 3>he has this path's ut for himself, and he encounters

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 3>someone who's going to manipulate him, it'll continue forever.

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 5>See now that Josh almost strikes me as a generous

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 5>reading of the film that I don't know that I

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 5>subscribe to, which is I don't think it matters who's

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 5>there to help him or double cross him or not.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 5>He is always going to pick the path that leads

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 5>to a life where he's not Sammy Jenkis. So he

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 5>is the one that's always going to manipulate a situation

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 5>until he gets what he wants, which is to continue this.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 5>And so if you look at it that way, then

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 5>the reason I'm asking the question is the license plate

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 5>that belongs to Teddy and those facts that he gave

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 5>him to lead him right to John g Now that

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 5>he's killed this John g. Even if there are others

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 5>out there that he will be able to conjure up

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 5>and seek out and get his revenge, it's gonna be

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 5>a lot harder for him, isn't it. I Mean, he

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 5>kind of put himself on this path to find Teddy

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 5>and the movie ends with him killing him. So where

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 5>does it go?

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's why I mean, the discrepancy in his

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 3>clues allow for him to invent and you wonder at

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 3>some point in his consciousness, somewhere down below, he just

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 3>wants it to keep going, right, So there's always it's

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a it's the conspiracy mindset. You You know, if you

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 3>have that sort of mindset, you can always invent a

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 3>new path to keep you going the direction you want

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to go. Yes, And the reason I say, if he

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 3>encounters someone who who would not manipulate him but care

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 3>for his mental well being, that's I only say it's

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 3>a possibility because we haven't seen that fail yet. We've

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 3>only seen him encounter people who are going to use

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 3>him for their own purposes. So I have one logistical

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 3>question to ask you. It's the only open question, and

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to trick the film out because I

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 3>don't like to play those games with movies. This thing

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 3>works as beautifully as it needs to. But I did

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 3>wonder how does he remember he even has those polarites,

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Because if he's supposed to wake up not know anything

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 3>except for the incident, he will all he'll often go

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 3>for the polaroids to orient himself. And so I'm just

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 3>wondering if I missed something where he or maybe it's

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 3>just a short cut, you know, it's a storytelling shortcut,

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise he would watch, he'd be dazed, he'd notice

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a tattoo, he'd look at other tattoos, he'd go to

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the mirror, and rather than have us go through that

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 3>whole process every time, you know, the Nolans, have him

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 3>grab the polaroids, look at them, and start the path.

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, Yeah, I think the only potential answer is

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 5>that he knows what condition he suffers from, and so

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 5>knowing that by habit, and this opens up another whole

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 5>line of questioning with this film, because that dovetails with

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 5>Sammy and what he could or couldn't learn from from

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 5>habit and ritual. The way Leonard does, right, that's what

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 5>distinguishes him. One of the habits he's picked up. Is

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 5>he knows to look around him and look at his

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 5>pockets immediately, right, Yeah, to find anything, right, to find

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 5>anything that might orient him whatsoever. But there's no doubt

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 5>there are a ton of those little questions that this

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 5>movie makes you ask and will continue to make us,

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I love the fact that we got a chance to

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 5>revisit Memento as part of this OUV review. Next up

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 5>is two thousand and two's Insomnia, a remake of the

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 5>nineteen ninety seven Norwegian thriller starring Al Pacino and Robin Williams.

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 5>As I've said before, the only Nolan film I suppose

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I feel like I don't like based on one viewing,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 5>it was a disappointment for me, So I can't wait

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:25.919
<v Speaker 5>to watch now in this order.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm fascinating after Memento too, because my memory of

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 3>it is being fairly conventional in terms of narrative and filmmaking,

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 3>so it'll be interesting to revisit that after we've seen

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Memento now.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 5>Last week we went through our whole Nolan filmography ranking

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 5>as it currently stands, Memento after this watch still my

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 5>number one.

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:45.959
<v Speaker 4>Christopher Nolan.

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 5>Again, we're only two films into the OUV review, so

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 5>we'll see if that does change as we move ahead here,

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Any changes for you with your list?

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the way I'm gonna do this is because I

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 3>have thought about it. I'm going to like start from scratch.

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So basically, right now, it's a boring way because we've

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 3>only had two films. I have a Mento number one

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and I have Following two, and so when I get

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to Insomnia, I'm I'm gonna see where it fits compared

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>to those two.

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 5>If only it was that easy, we'll just keep it

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 5>two films. And yes, I know where Memento ranks, and

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 5>we're following ranks.

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I like a plan. I like an organized path. I

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 3>like a procedure.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Out of course, mind of course you do, Lenny, I mean, Josh,

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 5>we'll get to following here in a few weeks. And Josh,

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 5>that is our show from April twenty twenty. That was

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 5>our conversation about Memento. A reminder that access to the

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 5>Film Spotting Archive, including monthly bonus shows, is available to

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 5>every member of the Film Spotting family, including monthly bonus shows.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 5>And we do have a discussion of Paul Thomas Anderson's

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Boogie Nights dropping soon in that feed. Again, that's exclusive

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 5>to film Spotting Family members. You can join at Filmspotting

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 5>Family dot com and you can get twenty percent off

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 5>through the month of January if you use promo code Supreme.

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 5>That's twenty percent off using promo code Supreme. Film Spotting

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 5>is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family at Filmspottingfamily

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 5>dot com and get access to ad free episodes, monthly

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 5>bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and, for the first time,

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 5>all in one place, the entire film Spotting archive going

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 5>back to two thousand and five. That's a film Spotting

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 5>Family dot com panically