WEBVTT - Urinating Here, There, Everywhere!

0:00:01.870 --> 0:00:05.710
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.750 --> 0:00:07.750
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.790 --> 0:00:12.049
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now,

0:00:12.450 --> 0:00:17.329
<v Speaker 2>here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:17.810 --> 0:00:27.990
<v Speaker 3>The jury is still in deliberation in the Clancy trial

0:00:28.470 --> 0:00:30.790
<v Speaker 3>and could get a verdict today or tomorrow or who

0:00:30.830 --> 0:00:34.229
<v Speaker 3>knows when, but Hasn't had a verdict yet, if you're

0:00:34.250 --> 0:00:38.350
<v Speaker 3>wondering about that. The CIA director visited Moscow the other day.

0:00:38.370 --> 0:00:42.270
<v Speaker 3>That's not a normal thing. Why did he visit? Well,

0:00:42.310 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>we had one report on why. There were two reasons

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:48.860
<v Speaker 3>he went, and I hadn't heard the other one. We'll

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 3>bring that to you in just a little bit. Looking

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>forward to that. But first, it's the beloved Friday traditional.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.100
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a fond look back at the week that was.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:00.210
<v Speaker 3>It's Cow Clips of the Week. It's Cow. They call

0:01:00.270 --> 0:01:01.210
<v Speaker 3>it Cow.

0:01:01.410 --> 0:01:05.830
<v Speaker 2>Clips of the Week. It's Cow. Jurors heard from 84 witnesses.

0:01:06.130 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Prosecutors sought to prove that Lindsay Clancy murdered her three children.

0:01:10.459 --> 0:01:13.060
<v Speaker 3>This young lady did nothing wrong in her life.

0:01:14.100 --> 0:01:17.670
<v Speaker 2>She was a nurse, a daughter, a wife, and a

0:01:17.750 --> 0:01:18.470
<v Speaker 2>darn good mother.

0:01:19.630 --> 0:01:23.970
<v Speaker 1>The majority of people believe that Lindsay Clancy is not

0:01:24.050 --> 0:01:28.809
<v Speaker 1>criminally responsible. President Trump has now imposed a 50% tariff

0:01:28.850 --> 0:01:31.589
<v Speaker 1>on about $ 20 billion in Canadian goods.

0:01:32.590 --> 0:01:34.420
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of real estate on my ass,

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>so he has a lot of room to kiss my ass.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Meta agreeing to pay up to $ 18 billion in a

0:01:40.900 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 3>landmark deal.

0:01:42.750 --> 0:01:43.809
<v Speaker 2>Meta has agreed.

0:01:43.550 --> 0:01:47.270
<v Speaker 3>To set a default daily time limit of two hours.

0:01:48.470 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Rescue teams in Nepal are in a race against time

0:01:51.220 --> 0:01:52.860
<v Speaker 4>as they search for any survivors.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.500
<v Speaker 3>The mystery under the streets of New York after three

0:01:56.540 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>men were captured on video climbing out of the New

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.900
<v Speaker 3>York City sewer system. I'd like to propose that Los

0:02:02.020 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Angeles consider a pilot program for free hygienic sexual relief clinics.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the first known time John Ratcliffe has visited

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Moscow as CIA director. Well, there's a lesson for those

0:02:20.060 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 3>who want to become a billionaire.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.910
<v Speaker 2>Be thrifty with whores. And you know how many of

0:02:26.950 --> 0:02:29.410
<v Speaker 2>them brought up Taiwan or national security?

0:02:29.810 --> 0:02:30.630
<v Speaker 1>Not one.

0:02:31.630 --> 0:02:33.980
<v Speaker 4>So you think it's okay for a parent to slash

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.620
<v Speaker 4>his kid's thing? Do you really want to have this conversation?

0:02:36.660 --> 0:02:42.460
<v Speaker 2>Are you circumcised? Yeah, yeah. I literally didn't even know that. Seriously.

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:43.579
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I put books in there. I don't

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>know if you saw the photos.

0:02:50.370 --> 0:02:53.630
<v Speaker 3>America does not deserve that. That's my new thing.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Robot robots in China are breaking human records for speed.

0:03:02.590 --> 0:03:06.769
<v Speaker 3>Far away, away from having robot soldiers. I think five

0:03:06.790 --> 0:03:07.530
<v Speaker 3>to ten years.

0:03:08.570 --> 0:03:11.370
<v Speaker 2>America is waking up without Dolly Parton.

0:03:12.310 --> 0:03:14.710
<v Speaker 3>People are always asking if they're real.

0:03:14.990 --> 0:03:18.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I would never. But I would give about a

0:03:18.470 --> 0:03:19.669
<v Speaker 2>year's pay to peek under there.

0:03:22.660 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The number one Dolly Parton pet peeve.

0:03:25.460 --> 0:03:30.220
<v Speaker 2>Nobody notices I've got a great ass, too. Well, I

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>dreamed I saw the silver spaceships fly.

0:03:34.980 --> 0:03:38.940
<v Speaker 5>In the yellow haze of the sun.

0:03:40.030 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>There were children.

0:03:41.690 --> 0:03:44.530
<v Speaker 2>Crying and colors.

0:03:43.910 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Flying all around the chosen ones. That trio stuff with

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.460
<v Speaker 3>Dolly and Emmylou Harris and Leonard Onstead is pretty good.

0:04:15.140 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I got to listen to more of that. It's fantastic.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.710
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I was reminded the Chinese robot story that ABC

0:04:21.750 --> 0:04:25.390
<v Speaker 1>was so big on and so cheerful and how wonderful

0:04:25.470 --> 0:04:29.729
<v Speaker 1>it was. ABC News with the bent-nosed jackass David Muir. Well,

0:04:30.770 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I posed the question, and, you know, I could have

0:04:33.900 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>done some digging, but a fellow's only got so much

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.830
<v Speaker 1>time in the day. Is ABC Disney trying to make

0:04:40.930 --> 0:04:43.950
<v Speaker 1>inroads in China? There's got to be an explanation for

0:04:44.010 --> 0:04:48.270
<v Speaker 1>how it was all cheery, happy, no mention of military

0:04:48.410 --> 0:04:51.790
<v Speaker 1>use for these incredibly advanced robots, nothing. Well, a friend

0:04:51.810 --> 0:04:55.650
<v Speaker 1>of the Armstrong and Getty show said the answer is yes.

0:04:55.790 --> 0:04:57.950
<v Speaker 1>Disney came under the sway of the Chinese Communist Party

0:04:57.950 --> 0:05:00.310
<v Speaker 1>10 years ago when it opened the Shanghai Disney Resort.

0:05:00.810 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government holds a 57% stake in the theme park

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai. Disneyland is Disney's most profitable overseas park. There

0:05:07.900 --> 0:05:11.450
<v Speaker 1>are hundreds of billions of dollars at stake. About 300

0:05:11.450 --> 0:05:14.850
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai Disneyland employees are active members of the CCP and

0:05:14.890 --> 0:05:17.930
<v Speaker 1>take part in political study sessions and CCP cell groups

0:05:18.310 --> 0:05:19.690
<v Speaker 1>on theme park property.

0:05:19.730 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>That's from the Wall Street Journal.

0:05:21.820 --> 0:05:24.900
<v Speaker 1>Disney also makes a lot of revenues releasing movies in

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>mainland China.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>There's more.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think of it as just money,

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 3>but number one enemy of the United States, and you're

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 3>not even going to acknowledge as a news organization. The

0:05:35.710 --> 0:05:41.260
<v Speaker 3>military possibilities for the robots or just for the economy,

0:05:41.300 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>if they have them working in their factories or whatever.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 3>We're in a competition with China, as you know, David Muir,

0:05:46.620 --> 0:05:50.940
<v Speaker 3>for the future of the world. And you helped them

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.539
<v Speaker 3>do a puff piece to make it seem like they're

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>just making robots that can beat somebody at badminton. Isn't

0:05:56.820 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that cute? Yeah.

0:05:59.490 --> 0:06:03.030
<v Speaker 1>And our correspondent points out, former ABC News senior correspondent

0:06:03.050 --> 0:06:06.270
<v Speaker 1>Terry Moran complained that ABC slow-walked a news story he

0:06:06.310 --> 0:06:09.020
<v Speaker 1>filed in 2021 about the Wuhan lab leak theory.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.780
<v Speaker 2>The network ran his story past.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Fauci, and it ended up on the air but

0:06:14.300 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>cut to shreds, in Moran's words, by the heavy hand

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:18.820
<v Speaker 1>of censorship.

0:06:18.940 --> 0:06:22.570
<v Speaker 3>You ran a news story by Anthony Fauci before you

0:06:22.610 --> 0:06:24.150
<v Speaker 3>ran it? That's unbelievable.

0:06:24.730 --> 0:06:24.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:26.050 --> 0:06:27.690
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we're not done with Clips of the Week. We

0:06:27.730 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>need to take a look at Millennials. And their inability

0:06:30.940 --> 0:06:37.620
<v Speaker 3>or unwillingness to pronounce T's. Here's a millennial saying Dolly Parton.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:44.630
<v Speaker 2>Dolly Parton. Oh my God, my skin is crawling. Dolly Parton.

0:06:44.910 --> 0:06:45.830
<v Speaker 3>It's a.

0:06:47.330 --> 0:06:48.150
<v Speaker 2>Cultural thing.

0:06:48.350 --> 0:06:54.220
<v Speaker 3>I guess the way gay guys talk a certain way sometimes.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:55.300
<v Speaker 6>Lisp.

0:06:56.620 --> 0:06:59.490
<v Speaker 3>Because my son doesn't pronounce T's, but he hasn't going

0:06:59.529 --> 0:07:03.710
<v Speaker 3>back to when he was little. And the way that

0:07:03.750 --> 0:07:06.970
<v Speaker 3>nobody else in the family does. Let me hear it again.

0:07:07.630 --> 0:07:08.450
<v Speaker 2>Dolly Parton.

0:07:08.730 --> 0:07:11.490
<v Speaker 3>I almost find it difficult to talk like that. Dolly Parton.

0:07:11.650 --> 0:07:14.180
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit painful for me to do that.

0:07:14.330 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>You're going to pull a muscle.

0:07:15.780 --> 0:07:15.980
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:07:16.500 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>To try to leave the T out. Dolly Parton.

0:07:19.660 --> 0:07:22.060
<v Speaker 2>Oh, please stop playing that. It really bothers me.

0:07:22.060 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.540
<v Speaker 1>As I've mentioned before, the first time I ever heard

0:07:26.580 --> 0:07:29.380
<v Speaker 1>that was in a singer in a band who's from

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:36.890
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles area. I'm uncertain about Dolly Parton.

0:07:38.430 --> 0:07:41.730
<v Speaker 3>Was that before or after we had that news person

0:07:41.770 --> 0:07:44.010
<v Speaker 3>in Charlotte who did that and it drove us nuts?

0:07:44.300 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>She didn't pronounce her T's.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.300
<v Speaker 2>She was from Baltimore?

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember.

0:07:50.100 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a weird accent in Baltimore. It's totally unique.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know.

0:07:56.220 --> 0:08:00.830
<v Speaker 3>But it needs to stop. Obviously, a crisis that needs

0:08:00.850 --> 0:08:03.090
<v Speaker 3>to be dealt with. Wanted to mention this to you.

0:08:04.710 --> 0:08:06.790
<v Speaker 3>You've probably heard by now, if you follow the news,

0:08:06.910 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>and clearly you do, that the CIA director, John Radcliffe,

0:08:11.390 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 3>had landed in Moscow very briefly the other day. It

0:08:13.660 --> 0:08:17.140
<v Speaker 3>was the first time a CIA director had been to

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Russia since Biden sent his CIA director right before the

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.090
<v Speaker 3>war with Ukraine started. To warn Putin off. Obviously, that

0:08:24.130 --> 0:08:27.310
<v Speaker 3>did not work. Why did our CIA director go there? Well,

0:08:27.870 --> 0:08:30.810
<v Speaker 3>I was assuming we were assuming that maybe it was

0:08:30.830 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to warn him off. Attack in a NATO country, because

0:08:35.059 --> 0:08:36.579
<v Speaker 3>that had been a big front page story in The

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.100
<v Speaker 3>New York Times that Putin was preparing to move on Moldova,

0:08:40.820 --> 0:08:42.830
<v Speaker 3>maybe some other countries. And that was part of it.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 3>The other part was and I thought this was really interesting.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 3>I remember this is from The New York Times, Wall

0:08:47.380 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal, either one. We don't believe Putin's advisors are

0:08:52.660 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 3>giving him honest assessments of the war's toll. He doesn't

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 3>actually know what we know about how many people are dying,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 3>how little land they've gotten, all the different things that

0:09:06.140 --> 0:09:09.500
<v Speaker 3>has changed the White House assessment from Russia's clearly going

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.660
<v Speaker 3>to win to, hey, Ukraine could win this.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>A brief aside, you may recall, and this was weeks ago,

0:09:16.140 --> 0:09:20.790
<v Speaker 1>we went through an incredibly interesting account of how endemic

0:09:20.850 --> 0:09:25.260
<v Speaker 1>corruption is in the Russian military and that even low-level

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.300
<v Speaker 1>commanders at the squad level, at the larger groups, as

0:09:29.540 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you go up, everybody's making money hand over fist on

0:09:33.940 --> 0:09:36.660
<v Speaker 1>bribes on the front lines.

0:09:36.700 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 2>That's probably part of it.

0:09:38.020 --> 0:09:42.530
<v Speaker 1>The guys who report upward lie constantly as they steal.

0:09:43.090 --> 0:09:45.370
<v Speaker 3>So Radcliffe didn't meet with Putin. He met with his

0:09:45.790 --> 0:09:50.130
<v Speaker 3>counterpart over there, the guy that runs the FSB. which

0:09:50.170 --> 0:09:53.740
<v Speaker 3>is their CIA sort of thing over there, and probably

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>laying out that stuff too. Hey, we're just letting you know,

0:09:57.770 --> 0:09:59.930
<v Speaker 3>our intelligence shows you got a whole bunch of corrupt

0:09:59.970 --> 0:10:02.510
<v Speaker 3>people stealing stuff. You guys are actually losing. Do you

0:10:02.550 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 3>realize that you're losing this many troops? Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

0:10:05.100 --> 0:10:07.340
<v Speaker 3>Does Putin know that? And they're just hoping that the

0:10:07.380 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>information could get past some of the sycophants who don't

0:10:10.140 --> 0:10:12.740
<v Speaker 3>want to tell Putin the truth and actually get to Putin,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.459
<v Speaker 3>which would help him maybe decide that this ain't worth it.

0:10:15.740 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 3>He isn't going to come out ahead on this deal.

0:10:18.010 --> 0:10:21.150
<v Speaker 1>Spies make their living knowing everything they can about the

0:10:21.370 --> 0:10:24.290
<v Speaker 1>other spies. And I wonder if Ratcliffe and company had

0:10:24.330 --> 0:10:29.230
<v Speaker 1>some perception that this bloke, um, who's, uh, what agency

0:10:29.330 --> 0:10:31.030
<v Speaker 1>is he with? Cause they got a couple of different ones.

0:10:31.070 --> 0:10:33.030
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter, but I wonder if they perceived that

0:10:33.050 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this guy seems to be a straight dealer. Well, an

0:10:35.910 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>actual Patriot who wants the truth, right?

0:10:39.059 --> 0:10:42.140
<v Speaker 3>And as they wrote in the times, because Putin himself

0:10:42.220 --> 0:10:45.819
<v Speaker 3>was an intelligence guy. Some officials said they hope that Mr. Putin, uh,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.900
<v Speaker 3>Former KGB intelligent officer himself would see a message from

0:10:50.940 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the CIA director as more urgent and credible than any

0:10:54.100 --> 0:10:57.370
<v Speaker 3>other communications through normal diplomatic channels. That's pretty interesting stuff.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.690
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's like spy movie stuff right there. Plus,

0:11:02.790 --> 0:11:04.790
<v Speaker 3>and were you going to get into the other purpose

0:11:04.870 --> 0:11:07.830
<v Speaker 3>of his? Now, I think the Journal and others are

0:11:07.870 --> 0:11:11.690
<v Speaker 3>reporting the second priority was to tell them Article 5

0:11:11.690 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>is alive and well. And if you attack an Article

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.130
<v Speaker 3>5 member, even if it's little Moldova or Estonia, is

0:11:20.170 --> 0:11:22.770
<v Speaker 3>Moldova part of NATO? No, they're not.

0:11:22.929 --> 0:11:25.430
<v Speaker 1>But you attack Estonia, you're attacking all of us.

0:11:25.750 --> 0:11:26.670
<v Speaker 2>That has not changed.

0:11:27.790 --> 0:11:30.010
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was probably, I don't believe what you're seeing

0:11:30.150 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>on CNN, that Trump won't. doesn't value NATO and won't

0:11:34.300 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 3>uphold Article 5.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>We will.

0:11:35.990 --> 0:11:38.130
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm sure the spooks in Russia said, oh, we

0:11:38.150 --> 0:11:40.450
<v Speaker 1>know CNN lie constantly.

0:11:40.670 --> 0:11:41.469
<v Speaker 2>Who would watch that?

0:11:41.730 --> 0:11:43.380
<v Speaker 3>Who watches CNN, they said.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Who watches that, Borscht?

0:11:49.730 --> 0:11:53.430
<v Speaker 3>The only thing I remember in terms of their words

0:11:53.510 --> 0:11:55.570
<v Speaker 3>over there, because they use the Cyrillic. Is that the

0:11:55.590 --> 0:11:59.010
<v Speaker 3>word alphabet? It's not the same as ours. If I

0:11:59.130 --> 0:12:01.890
<v Speaker 3>saw the symbol for bathroom, I would still recognize it,

0:12:01.890 --> 0:12:03.610
<v Speaker 3>because it took me a long time when I was

0:12:03.630 --> 0:12:06.630
<v Speaker 3>in Russia to figure out. You know, I'm in Mexico.

0:12:06.670 --> 0:12:07.670
<v Speaker 3>I know what a baños is.

0:12:07.710 --> 0:12:08.230
<v Speaker 2>I can find that.

0:12:08.470 --> 0:12:11.790
<v Speaker 3>But I didn't know what it was. It took me days.

0:12:12.300 --> 0:12:14.860
<v Speaker 3>I'm just wandering the various rooms. Can I be in here?

0:12:15.500 --> 0:12:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Urinating here, there, everywhere. Oh.

0:12:19.940 --> 0:12:23.619
<v Speaker 3>Oh, boy. At some point this hour, I want to

0:12:23.660 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>get to, I asked Claude. Oh, there's a projection out

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.530
<v Speaker 3>about Claude's finances. Blow your mind. We'll get to that next.

0:12:32.870 --> 0:12:35.949
<v Speaker 3>And then yesterday, I asked Claude, after all the conversations

0:12:35.970 --> 0:12:37.990
<v Speaker 3>we've had for the last year or however long it's been,

0:12:39.070 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>what are my character defects? What are my flaws? And

0:12:42.630 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 3>what it told me is dang interesting, and I think

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>you could do the same thing. So, lots on the way.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:54.220
<v Speaker 3>Stay here. Armstrong and Getty. What? I just saw that clip.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>We were just talking about how we're bored with all

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>these airplane stories that they hit us with the news

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>all the time. I just saw the Delta flight from L.A.

0:13:00.820 --> 0:13:05.290
<v Speaker 3>to Boston needs to land. The captain needs to go

0:13:05.309 --> 0:13:07.390
<v Speaker 3>to the hospital. We'll have to play that later. The

0:13:07.429 --> 0:13:10.150
<v Speaker 3>captain's flying the plane. I need to get to a

0:13:10.190 --> 0:13:13.110
<v Speaker 3>doctor right now. That's a bad thing to happen.

0:13:13.150 --> 0:13:15.350
<v Speaker 2>No kidding. Yikes.

0:13:15.370 --> 0:13:18.170
<v Speaker 1>So reference this at the very end of yesterday's show

0:13:18.270 --> 0:13:19.770
<v Speaker 1>and didn't really have time to squeeze it in, but

0:13:19.809 --> 0:13:21.470
<v Speaker 1>I found it just super interesting.

0:13:22.110 --> 0:13:22.910
<v Speaker 2>They're doing all.

0:13:22.809 --> 0:13:25.330
<v Speaker 1>Sorts of amazing research into the human brain these days,

0:13:25.650 --> 0:13:29.930
<v Speaker 1>and they've identified a couple of circuits in your brain

0:13:29.950 --> 0:13:34.890
<v Speaker 1>that work together to judge whether an outcome is actually

0:13:34.950 --> 0:13:42.010
<v Speaker 1>within your control or not. Okay. One circuit linked to,

0:13:42.130 --> 0:13:44.110
<v Speaker 1>it's a long name and you'll forget it immediately, that

0:13:44.150 --> 0:13:46.710
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain, builds a running sense of how

0:13:46.790 --> 0:13:52.270
<v Speaker 1>controllable a situation is. Then a second circuit linking to

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a prefrontal region with reward-related midbrain structures uses that sense

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of control to decide how much to learn from an outcome.

0:14:01.580 --> 0:14:04.210
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they've identified the parts of your brain

0:14:04.250 --> 0:14:07.050
<v Speaker 1>that are firing, doing their thing, And it was kind

0:14:07.070 --> 0:14:11.490
<v Speaker 1>of an ingenious experiment involving orange dots and blue dots.

0:14:12.190 --> 0:14:16.660
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, if people perceived, wait a minute, I got

0:14:16.700 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that wrong. I know that was right. There's something wrong

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.220
<v Speaker 1>with this test. Their brains behaved in a different way

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>than if they actually legitimately were getting it wrong. And

0:14:27.260 --> 0:14:30.390
<v Speaker 1>they identified the whole, all right, I'm just going to

0:14:30.430 --> 0:14:30.930
<v Speaker 1>let this go.

0:14:31.010 --> 0:14:33.710
<v Speaker 2>It's out of my control. It's fine. I'm not going

0:14:33.730 --> 0:14:34.510
<v Speaker 2>to worry about it so much.

0:14:35.190 --> 0:14:37.410
<v Speaker 1>And they also got into the fact that when people

0:14:37.450 --> 0:14:39.510
<v Speaker 1>were right, the part of their brain was like, yeah,

0:14:39.550 --> 0:14:40.570
<v Speaker 1>you're damn right, I'm right.

0:14:40.910 --> 0:14:42.230
<v Speaker 2>But then if they got the next.

0:14:42.170 --> 0:14:46.310
<v Speaker 1>One wrong, it was like, this thing doesn't work right. So,

0:14:46.350 --> 0:14:48.950
<v Speaker 1>you know, the success has a thousand fathers, or I

0:14:48.970 --> 0:14:51.390
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's one of those old sayings. But the whole,

0:14:52.410 --> 0:14:54.670
<v Speaker 1>you know, to care about the things I can't affect,

0:14:54.730 --> 0:14:56.980
<v Speaker 1>not care, and the grace to know the difference, all that.

0:14:57.510 --> 0:14:59.570
<v Speaker 1>They've kind of identified the part of the brain that

0:14:59.610 --> 0:15:00.170
<v Speaker 1>does that.

0:15:00.270 --> 0:15:02.710
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm guessing like everything else with human beings,

0:15:02.990 --> 0:15:07.190
<v Speaker 3>it works better one direction or the other for different people.

0:15:07.210 --> 0:15:11.170
<v Speaker 3>Because clearly some people are better at letting things go

0:15:13.130 --> 0:15:15.470
<v Speaker 3>that they have no control over than other people.

0:15:16.150 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:17.270 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting.

0:15:19.500 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>And as we get further down this road, I hate

0:15:21.300 --> 0:15:23.100
<v Speaker 2>to skip to the end in the middle, but....

0:15:24.650 --> 0:15:29.310
<v Speaker 1>If somebody has their don't-do-crimes cortex, it's like you can't

0:15:29.350 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>even find it.

0:15:30.030 --> 0:15:32.370
<v Speaker 2>It's so tiny. They're practically deformed.

0:15:33.250 --> 0:15:35.470
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you still have to keep them away from society,

0:15:35.510 --> 0:15:38.070
<v Speaker 1>but that would certainly change our perception of criminality.

0:15:38.090 --> 0:15:45.150
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead. One of my favorite sayings on accepting the

0:15:45.190 --> 0:15:48.250
<v Speaker 3>things you cannot change is the difference between a problem

0:15:48.290 --> 0:15:51.410
<v Speaker 3>and a fact. A problem has a solution of some

0:15:51.460 --> 0:15:54.380
<v Speaker 3>sort of. If it doesn't have a solution, there's nothing

0:15:54.420 --> 0:15:55.110
<v Speaker 3>you can do about it.

0:15:55.180 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a fact.

0:15:56.340 --> 0:15:58.500
<v Speaker 3>It's not a problem. Looking at it a problem is

0:15:58.540 --> 0:16:00.500
<v Speaker 3>the wrong way to look at it. It's a fact.

0:16:01.260 --> 0:16:03.710
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. It's so funny.

0:16:04.090 --> 0:16:08.050
<v Speaker 1>During the brief and fascinating commercial break right before this segment,

0:16:08.550 --> 0:16:10.650
<v Speaker 1>my wife texted me with some bad news.

0:16:11.210 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>And not like bad, bad, but damn, really? That level

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.380
<v Speaker 2>of bad news. And I thought, wow, I can't do

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>anything about this.

0:16:20.340 --> 0:16:20.900
<v Speaker 6>Hmm.

0:16:21.710 --> 0:16:23.510
<v Speaker 1>And, you know, I came to terms with it pretty quickly.

0:16:23.530 --> 0:16:26.590
<v Speaker 1>I'm still unhappy about it. But somebody else neurologically, their

0:16:26.610 --> 0:16:28.150
<v Speaker 1>brain might work completely differently.

0:16:28.330 --> 0:16:30.590
<v Speaker 3>The salmon you're having flown in fresh from Maine is

0:16:30.630 --> 0:16:31.430
<v Speaker 3>going to be an hour late.

0:16:31.910 --> 0:16:34.900
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yes, yes, yes. And I have a soiree planned.

0:16:36.500 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But like in golf, for instance, you see this a

0:16:39.500 --> 0:16:43.870
<v Speaker 1>lot or sports in general. Some people, including me, especially

0:16:43.930 --> 0:16:47.380
<v Speaker 1>as a younger man, I'm a hothead. I was a hothead.

0:16:47.460 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the few advantages of getting older that's gone

0:16:49.740 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>away to a large extent.

0:16:50.660 --> 0:16:50.850
<v Speaker 4>Low T.

0:16:51.420 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And people I know who are like my son, who

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.810
<v Speaker 1>are born as placid as a trickling stream through the mountains, say,

0:16:58.830 --> 0:17:00.990
<v Speaker 1>it's not that important.

0:17:01.030 --> 0:17:02.490
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you just calm down?

0:17:03.210 --> 0:17:05.889
<v Speaker 1>And, you know, I think more and more life, we're

0:17:05.910 --> 0:17:07.130
<v Speaker 1>going to find out, is like that.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.460
<v Speaker 3>I got my best example of something I could not accept.

0:17:10.540 --> 0:17:12.500
<v Speaker 3>I just could not make that turn. Maybe I'll bring

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.379
<v Speaker 3>that up. Claude, good Claude conversation coming up.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:16.460
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.629
<v Speaker 4>A family is furious after they ordered their daughter a

0:17:20.660 --> 0:17:25.210
<v Speaker 4>Mary Poppins costume and instead received one of Kim Jong-un.

0:17:28.109 --> 0:17:31.390
<v Speaker 4>In the company's defense, I understand the mix-up. Both only

0:17:31.450 --> 0:17:33.590
<v Speaker 4>allow their people a spoonful of sugar.

0:17:33.609 --> 0:17:41.190
<v Speaker 3>Mmm. So before we get into our use of Claude

0:17:41.260 --> 0:17:45.100
<v Speaker 3>to point out our flaws, this about Anthropic, and that

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:50.700
<v Speaker 3>is the company that is behind Claude, the chatbot and AI.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.820
<v Speaker 3>And Elon said Anthropic has got the best AI out

0:17:54.859 --> 0:18:01.020
<v Speaker 3>there a couple of weeks ago. Had you heard this? Anthropic,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.590
<v Speaker 3>which is going public. is about to tell investors that

0:18:05.609 --> 0:18:10.909
<v Speaker 3>it expects to generate $ 30 trillion in revenue. That's what

0:18:10.950 --> 0:18:18.550
<v Speaker 3>it expects. Anthropic expects to generate $ 30 trillion in revenue.

0:18:19.090 --> 0:18:21.210
<v Speaker 3>To give you a context to that number, the Wall

0:18:21.250 --> 0:18:28.230
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal points out, The 191 technology companies in the

0:18:28.450 --> 0:18:32.949
<v Speaker 3>S &amp; P 1500 brought in $ 2. 4 trillion in revenue

0:18:33.030 --> 0:18:34.650
<v Speaker 3>last year added together.

0:18:35.050 --> 0:18:36.010
<v Speaker 2>Good God.

0:18:36.250 --> 0:18:42.260
<v Speaker 3>So almost 200 tech companies in the market last year

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>generated $ 2. 4 trillion. Anthropic says it's going to generate $ 30 trillion.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.939
<v Speaker 3>If that happens, obviously... All the rules of investing and

0:18:54.060 --> 0:18:56.419
<v Speaker 3>economics and everything are up in the air and you

0:18:56.460 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>got to refigure them all out, right?

0:18:59.200 --> 0:18:59.700
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:00.100 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you had money in that company and

0:19:04.109 --> 0:19:09.050
<v Speaker 3>that happened, would you need to... I don't even know

0:19:09.090 --> 0:19:11.270
<v Speaker 3>what it would do to your investment.

0:19:11.850 --> 0:19:16.409
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking all of that with a shake or a salt, obviously, but.

0:19:17.010 --> 0:19:21.170
<v Speaker 3>Well, it would seem if they're exaggerating by... 30 times

0:19:21.270 --> 0:19:23.149
<v Speaker 3>it's still an amazing deal.

0:19:24.230 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Invest in my hot dog stand.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.460
<v Speaker 1>We could make $ 40 billion. I mean, I don't even

0:19:28.500 --> 0:19:31.109
<v Speaker 1>know how to... And the person said, oh, no, no, no.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.859
<v Speaker 1>My hot dogs are so amazing. I would think, I

0:19:35.220 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to process this. I don't know what

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to say.

0:19:37.619 --> 0:19:38.660
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to... Well, right.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.210
<v Speaker 3>As the Free Press wrote... You've blown my mind.

0:19:42.590 --> 0:19:42.770
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:42.830 --> 0:19:46.909
<v Speaker 3>As the Free Press wrote, hmm, okay. Well, $ 30 trillion.

0:19:46.930 --> 0:19:49.770
<v Speaker 3>What kind of one-world government is Claude planning? Tune in

0:19:49.810 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>next week for episode one of my 75-part series on

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.860
<v Speaker 3>the Claude-occupied government. But no kidding, what kind of power

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 3>would a company that generates $ 30 trillion have?

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.060
<v Speaker 1>Well, if they had power because they'd made hot dogs

0:20:04.100 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that delicious that they sold that many of them, that

0:20:06.740 --> 0:20:09.859
<v Speaker 1>would be enormous power. But if it was the power

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:18.180
<v Speaker 1>of information and computing and communication, no, it's a dystopian nightmare.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.859
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's got to put the paddles to George Orwell, wake

0:20:21.900 --> 0:20:23.859
<v Speaker 1>him up, and say, hey, we need you again.

0:20:24.700 --> 0:20:28.740
<v Speaker 3>How about old-fashioned lobbying? They could give each congressperson a

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.910
<v Speaker 3>million dollars. And it wouldn't be.

0:20:32.850 --> 0:20:35.290
<v Speaker 2>A drop in the bucket. No, they could give them

0:20:35.290 --> 0:20:36.389
<v Speaker 2>$ 10 billion.

0:20:36.580 --> 0:20:36.780
<v Speaker 1>True.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Good point.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:39.859
<v Speaker 2>Gee, many Christmas.

0:20:40.619 --> 0:20:42.060
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a point to make before I move on?

0:20:42.700 --> 0:20:43.859
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I have zero points.

0:20:44.180 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay. So, I wish I had more confidence in how

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.500
<v Speaker 3>many of you are using chatbots at all. I bring

0:20:51.540 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>it up with some people, and they're like, oh, yeah,

0:20:53.300 --> 0:20:56.570
<v Speaker 3>I've been using them forever. They're fantastic. And then I

0:20:56.609 --> 0:20:59.020
<v Speaker 3>mention it to some other people, and they... Not only

0:20:59.060 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 3>don't use them, but some of you have such a

0:21:00.900 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>negative reaction to anything that is a chatbot. It just

0:21:05.140 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 3>makes you angry that anybody would ask a chatbot a

0:21:08.980 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>question and then listen to it, which I don't quite get.

0:21:12.300 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it doesn't have to be like therapy stuff,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 3>marriage advice stuff. If you ask Claude, like I said

0:21:22.820 --> 0:21:25.570
<v Speaker 3>the other day, I'm hating how much money I'm spending

0:21:25.619 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 3>on rent. Would it be a better idea to buy

0:21:27.460 --> 0:21:29.970
<v Speaker 3>a house at this point It did all kinds of

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 3>research instantly on California, the housing market, all kinds of

0:21:34.340 --> 0:21:36.899
<v Speaker 3>different stuff, and came back to me with actually an

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 3>article from the Wall Street Journal from the other day

0:21:38.700 --> 0:21:42.620
<v Speaker 3>that I'd missed where they said it may not be

0:21:42.660 --> 0:21:44.859
<v Speaker 3>a good idea to buy a house again in California

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.860
<v Speaker 3>for many, many years and explained why. But anyway, there's

0:21:48.900 --> 0:21:50.939
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of stuff like that that these chatbots are

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.660
<v Speaker 3>brilliant at. Trust us. They're incredible.

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:21:56.730 --> 0:21:59.810
<v Speaker 3>If you use Claude or chat GPT or whatever for

0:21:59.910 --> 0:22:04.270
<v Speaker 3>lots of different things, question about your health, question about

0:22:04.290 --> 0:22:07.410
<v Speaker 3>your relationships, question about your job, dealing with your boss,

0:22:08.390 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, financial planning, whatever the hell it is, it

0:22:11.420 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>is compiling a whole bunch of information about you. I

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 3>can't even imagine over a decade or longer what this

0:22:18.980 --> 0:22:21.100
<v Speaker 3>will be like when, you know, one of these chatbots

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 3>has all this information about me. But somebody told me

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.739
<v Speaker 3>the other day, hey, here's something fun, but buckle up.

0:22:27.500 --> 0:22:29.140
<v Speaker 2>Oh, boy, fun. That's one word.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.770
<v Speaker 3>Ask Claude, what are my character flaws? And be honest.

0:22:33.430 --> 0:22:35.330
<v Speaker 3>And then it goes through all your different stuff and

0:22:35.369 --> 0:22:37.630
<v Speaker 3>hits you with that information. And I found it pretty

0:22:37.650 --> 0:22:41.060
<v Speaker 3>darn interesting. Some of it was revealing. Some of it

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.619
<v Speaker 3>was a little painful, but true. Katie, I know you

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.139
<v Speaker 3>did the same thing before I get to mine. You

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 3>want to lay out something?

0:22:47.290 --> 0:22:50.090
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know what I was expecting, but, you know,

0:22:50.430 --> 0:22:52.810
<v Speaker 6>if you were to ask a human that, they'd probably

0:22:52.869 --> 0:22:54.090
<v Speaker 6>take a moment to tell you.

0:22:54.450 --> 0:22:59.830
<v Speaker 2>ChatGPT was like, oh, no, I got it. Sure, there

0:23:00.010 --> 0:23:00.630
<v Speaker 2>you go.

0:23:00.970 --> 0:23:03.230
<v Speaker 3>Even if you told your parent or friend, I really

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.020
<v Speaker 3>want you to be honest with you, they still would, like,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.939
<v Speaker 3>kind of slowly couch it, something. Well, sometimes you have

0:23:10.980 --> 0:23:13.540
<v Speaker 3>a tendency, and don't take this wrong, because you have

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.220
<v Speaker 3>lots of good, you know, that sort of thing. And

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 3>you're right. You ask Claude, and it's like, Okay, here's

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.530
<v Speaker 3>5,000 words on your problems instantly.

0:23:20.910 --> 0:23:22.570
<v Speaker 6>I'll put the main issue in bold and then I'll

0:23:22.590 --> 0:23:24.490
<v Speaker 6>tell you all the details about it right underneath.

0:23:24.630 --> 0:23:25.930
<v Speaker 3>It's like, okay.

0:23:26.290 --> 0:23:27.650
<v Speaker 2>Right, how do you want this organized?

0:23:27.730 --> 0:23:32.290
<v Speaker 1>In order of what a douche you are or alphabetically?

0:23:35.100 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I did that and just a couple, like

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the first one it hit me with, which was pretty

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>damn good. I probably do do this. You mistake insight

0:23:45.340 --> 0:23:49.780
<v Speaker 3>for change. It said to me, it said, you're unusually

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.100
<v Speaker 3>good at naming your own patterns. And to you, the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 3>naming feels like progress. It isn't. Unless you do something.

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 3>You haven't done anything.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:00.580
<v Speaker 2>That's some straight talk.

0:24:00.700 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. You can describe the ambivalence with real precision and

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 3>from all different views. But you don't ever do anything.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.859
<v Speaker 2>That's basically what it said. Wow.

0:24:13.300 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Which I thought was really, really interesting. You mistake insight

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>for change. A couple more. I'm not going to hit

0:24:21.580 --> 0:24:23.300
<v Speaker 3>you with this. Some of these would be confusing to you.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:29.300
<v Speaker 3>Some of them are really actually just too personal. I

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 3>thought this was kind of interesting. One of the problems

0:24:31.380 --> 0:24:35.620
<v Speaker 3>with the whole chatbot thing is... It said you ask

0:24:35.700 --> 0:24:38.300
<v Speaker 3>questions you already know they're answered. It gave me some example.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.100
<v Speaker 3>And it was stuff that I do for the show.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.140
<v Speaker 3>Where I will go in and say... Why do some

0:24:45.220 --> 0:24:48.780
<v Speaker 3>people think that Clancy woman didn't kill her kid? You know,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.530
<v Speaker 3>whatever I'm getting, I'm gathering information for a segment on

0:24:51.550 --> 0:24:53.409
<v Speaker 3>the radio show. So I had to tell Claude, Hey,

0:24:53.470 --> 0:24:55.610
<v Speaker 3>I do a radio talk show. And all of those

0:24:55.710 --> 0:24:58.090
<v Speaker 3>questions are about, I said, Oh, okay. I get it completely.

0:24:58.369 --> 0:25:00.270
<v Speaker 3>So I will leave all those out when you're doing that.

0:25:00.290 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>You're just gathering. It actually said show prep. It used

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the term, which was, wow. Yeah. Um, uh, you're, this

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.109
<v Speaker 3>one was really good. This one was good. Your attention

0:25:13.170 --> 0:25:15.410
<v Speaker 3>goes where it goes, and I won't use the particular,

0:25:15.850 --> 0:25:19.070
<v Speaker 3>but it hit me with a couple of crisis points

0:25:19.109 --> 0:25:20.910
<v Speaker 3>in my life, and it said, you've asked me many

0:25:21.010 --> 0:25:24.020
<v Speaker 3>questions about this one and not one about this one.

0:25:24.340 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Just pointing out that clearly this one is a prior

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>to you, and I was like, how have I asked

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.740
<v Speaker 3>so many questions about this one and not this, which

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 3>is clearly more important? Why have I done that? That's

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:36.100
<v Speaker 3>really weird.

0:25:36.859 --> 0:25:41.940
<v Speaker 2>Wow, this is almost a little disturbing. Useful, certainly, but...

0:25:42.780 --> 0:25:43.899
<v Speaker 2>How does it know that?

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 3>It was right about that. It was right about a

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of them. And it did say at the end,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.900
<v Speaker 3>two honest caveats. I only see what you bring here,

0:25:53.940 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 3>which skews toward the hard stuff. You know, you're not

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.770
<v Speaker 3>bringing your whole life to me on a daily basis,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.109
<v Speaker 3>which I would say as you use it more and

0:26:04.170 --> 0:26:07.250
<v Speaker 3>more over many, many, many years, it is going to

0:26:07.310 --> 0:26:11.510
<v Speaker 3>have more of your life and more ability to It's

0:26:11.530 --> 0:26:12.570
<v Speaker 3>a layout. What's wrong with you?

0:26:12.619 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Katie.

0:26:15.060 --> 0:26:16.420
<v Speaker 6>You only bring me part of your life, so I

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.340
<v Speaker 6>only know how screwed up you are for part of it.

0:26:19.940 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:20.830 --> 0:26:23.810
<v Speaker 6>I mean, mine said the same thing, but if you

0:26:23.830 --> 0:26:26.210
<v Speaker 6>choose to do this, it is humbling.

0:26:27.290 --> 0:26:28.430
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not a nothing.

0:26:29.810 --> 0:26:34.100
<v Speaker 1>So I'll tell you, I hesitated to do this, partly

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.340
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't think I would get a very satisfying answer.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>And you're perfect in every way, and it's really quite exemplary.

0:26:39.340 --> 0:26:41.369
<v Speaker 3>Is that what it's about? And please teach me how

0:26:41.390 --> 0:26:42.169
<v Speaker 3>to be more like you.

0:26:43.770 --> 0:26:46.350
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I was expecting kind of a complete answer,

0:26:46.390 --> 0:26:47.470
<v Speaker 1>and it was just three words.

0:26:47.510 --> 0:26:51.890
<v Speaker 2>You're a dick. No, I kid.

0:26:52.090 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And I did it in the classic, you know, modern

0:26:55.859 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 3>snarky style. Three words, you, period, next line, are, period.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:01.820
<v Speaker 3>You know, all capital letters.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:09.060
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I'm a little disappointed and slightly confused. I said,

0:27:09.420 --> 0:27:12.270
<v Speaker 1>in our conversations, have you perceived any character flaws in me?

0:27:13.250 --> 0:27:15.350
<v Speaker 1>And it, of course, said, I appreciate the honesty in

0:27:15.369 --> 0:27:16.969
<v Speaker 1>this question, but I want to be straight with you.

0:27:17.070 --> 0:27:18.790
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm well-positioned to answer it in the

0:27:18.830 --> 0:27:20.169
<v Speaker 1>ways it sounds like you're asking.

0:27:20.230 --> 0:27:22.290
<v Speaker 2>Few reasons why. I only see what comes up in

0:27:22.330 --> 0:27:22.770
<v Speaker 2>our chats.

0:27:23.210 --> 0:27:25.730
<v Speaker 1>Character judgments about real people aren't something I do well

0:27:25.770 --> 0:27:28.570
<v Speaker 1>or should be doing casually. I don't have the standing

0:27:28.609 --> 0:27:32.690
<v Speaker 1>to diagnose flaws in someone from scattered conversation topics. And

0:27:33.070 --> 0:27:35.370
<v Speaker 1>if I reach for something anyway, I'd likely be pattern

0:27:35.390 --> 0:27:38.150
<v Speaker 1>matching on thin evidence and dressing it up as insight,

0:27:38.490 --> 0:27:40.179
<v Speaker 1>which isn't actually useful to you.

0:27:41.500 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 2>But then I thought, well, wait a minute.

0:27:42.940 --> 0:27:45.990
<v Speaker 1>I did have one, like, actually using it as counseling

0:27:46.130 --> 0:27:49.830
<v Speaker 1>for an issue at one point, but now I can't

0:27:49.890 --> 0:27:50.770
<v Speaker 1>find that chat.

0:27:50.910 --> 0:27:54.250
<v Speaker 3>How often do you use it? Like, how much do

0:27:54.290 --> 0:27:54.890
<v Speaker 3>you use it for?

0:27:55.590 --> 0:27:56.030
<v Speaker 2>Personal stuff.

0:27:56.050 --> 0:27:56.330
<v Speaker 1>At all?

0:27:56.770 --> 0:27:57.430
<v Speaker 3>Personal stuff.

0:27:57.930 --> 0:27:58.370
<v Speaker 2>At all?

0:27:59.290 --> 0:28:02.449
<v Speaker 1>Oh, personal stuff as opposed to comparing two guitars for me?

0:28:02.490 --> 0:28:04.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:04.500
<v Speaker 2>Once a.

0:28:05.740 --> 0:28:08.780
<v Speaker 3>quarter okay see once a month i'm doing it like

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 3>daily so there's just a lot more information to work

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.740
<v Speaker 3>from and it's funny i did the same thing on

0:28:13.820 --> 0:28:17.189
<v Speaker 3>chat gpt because i i do multiple chat bots uh

0:28:17.230 --> 0:28:19.190
<v Speaker 3>to see if the answers are different and sometimes they're

0:28:19.210 --> 0:28:21.310
<v Speaker 3>quite different sometimes they're very much the same but chat

0:28:21.330 --> 0:28:25.870
<v Speaker 3>gpt had basically the same summary of my character flaws

0:28:26.930 --> 0:28:32.100
<v Speaker 3>um I have a lot of insight into my flaws

0:28:32.180 --> 0:28:35.020
<v Speaker 3>and problems. The problem may sometimes be that you examine

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.820
<v Speaker 3>yourself relentlessly and gather all this data and then don't

0:28:38.860 --> 0:28:42.060
<v Speaker 3>do anything. So both of them basically said the same thing.

0:28:42.420 --> 0:28:46.180
<v Speaker 3>Really good at observing problems from all different angles and

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.130
<v Speaker 3>bringing all the information and saying, okay, now we know that.

0:28:49.570 --> 0:28:50.770
<v Speaker 3>And moving on to something else.

0:28:50.650 --> 0:28:53.350
<v Speaker 2>Without ever doing anything. Which kind of fits.

0:28:54.430 --> 0:28:58.620
<v Speaker 1>I wish these were were dated, because I know precisely

0:28:58.660 --> 0:29:02.020
<v Speaker 1>when I had the conversation. And now I can't find it,

0:29:02.020 --> 0:29:03.060
<v Speaker 1>and I could retype it.

0:29:03.310 --> 0:29:05.290
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I couldn't, because I'm not... Have you done

0:29:05.310 --> 0:29:06.470
<v Speaker 2>the search? There's a search.

0:29:06.490 --> 0:29:07.430
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a search option.

0:29:07.710 --> 0:29:08.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I just.

0:29:08.530 --> 0:29:10.770
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember exactly how I phrased it, and I

0:29:10.810 --> 0:29:13.070
<v Speaker 1>haven't found it yet. But I'm going back as far

0:29:13.110 --> 0:29:17.150
<v Speaker 1>as I can on Claude, because it was like Christmas

0:29:17.190 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>time last year that I was asking the question, and, well,

0:29:20.260 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it ought to be in here somewhere, because the farthest

0:29:22.500 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>back it goes is... What's a good turkey size for

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>11 people?

0:29:27.660 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe ask Claude.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 6>Hey, we had a conversation at Christmas last year.

0:29:30.620 --> 0:29:34.510
<v Speaker 3>And I asked you. And so when you asked for

0:29:34.530 --> 0:29:39.890
<v Speaker 3>your character flaws, it said your love of fried birds.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.470
<v Speaker 3>is dominates your life perhaps find something else to focus

0:29:44.530 --> 0:29:47.140
<v Speaker 3>on Why don't you Google that?

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.010
<v Speaker 1>I'm really sophisticated, and you're asking me a question that's stupid? Man,

0:29:51.050 --> 0:29:53.310
<v Speaker 1>for stuff like that, it is so good. No wonder Google,

0:29:53.670 --> 0:29:55.990
<v Speaker 1>how is Google handling this in terms of the drop

0:29:56.030 --> 0:29:59.250
<v Speaker 1>in revenue? I've read the numbers. They're catastrophic.

0:29:59.630 --> 0:30:02.790
<v Speaker 3>Why would I ever Google anything again in my life

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 3>when I can get such good information from Claude or ChatGPT?

0:30:07.630 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and just keep asking follow-up questions, and not a bunch

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 3>of ads yet, but not a bunch of ads that are,

0:30:13.500 --> 0:30:16.180
<v Speaker 3>you know, not even what I wanted. It's really interesting.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.180
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I finally found a chat.

0:30:18.820 --> 0:30:21.060
<v Speaker 1>It's funny, but it still said, I don't have enough

0:30:21.140 --> 0:30:25.100
<v Speaker 1>info to go on, which is interesting. And I have

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.940
<v Speaker 1>a child's understanding of how these large language models work,

0:30:27.980 --> 0:30:31.950
<v Speaker 1>but it is somewhat astonishing to the point of being

0:30:31.990 --> 0:30:34.910
<v Speaker 1>disturbing that it said to you, sure, we can get

0:30:34.930 --> 0:30:37.910
<v Speaker 1>into this. And it said to me, you know, you

0:30:38.670 --> 0:30:42.170
<v Speaker 1>asked me about guitars and what radius of table is

0:30:42.230 --> 0:30:45.950
<v Speaker 1>best for a four-person card game. I don't freaking know

0:30:45.970 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you like turkey and cards. But it perceived that, quote-unquote.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.340
<v Speaker 1>And I know, Paolo, don't lecture me. It doesn't perceive anything.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a series of circuits.

0:30:55.860 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, I know.

0:30:58.430 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems as though it does. It's like if, you know,

0:31:02.660 --> 0:31:04.580
<v Speaker 1>I met a guy on the golf course the other day.

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We hit it off like crazy, really like the guy,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.660
<v Speaker 1>respect him, can't wait to, I hope we can be

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>friends going forward.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.770
<v Speaker 2>But if you were to ask me, Joe, what do

0:31:13.790 --> 0:31:16.750
<v Speaker 2>you think my flaws are? I'd be like, dude, I

0:31:17.250 --> 0:31:17.610
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:31:18.630 --> 0:31:19.370
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, exactly.

0:31:19.390 --> 0:31:22.750
<v Speaker 1>And it perceived that, that we have a similar, not

0:31:23.050 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>super deep relationship.

0:31:24.380 --> 0:31:27.220
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's so good sometimes and y'all should try it

0:31:27.260 --> 0:31:29.180
<v Speaker 3>if you're not. I mean, I know some people are

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 3>hostile to the chatbots for whatever reason, but like I've

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.610
<v Speaker 3>gotten acquaintances really struggling right now in life and I'm

0:31:34.660 --> 0:31:36.750
<v Speaker 3>concerned about them, but I laid out a lot of

0:31:36.810 --> 0:31:40.770
<v Speaker 3>the specifics of that person and it pointed out what

0:31:40.830 --> 0:31:44.590
<v Speaker 3>was the most significant part of their crisis that I

0:31:44.630 --> 0:31:50.300
<v Speaker 3>would have never guessed. And it was completely right. It's just,

0:31:51.100 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I find it quite amazing. Um, I got a great

0:31:53.740 --> 0:31:57.540
<v Speaker 3>story about asking for honest opinion of yourself that my

0:31:57.580 --> 0:31:59.370
<v Speaker 3>dad used to tell at the dinner table. I'll have

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.290
<v Speaker 3>to get to that next. When we finished strong, stay here.

0:32:02.750 --> 0:32:08.650
<v Speaker 3>So it's not the joke that I love so much

0:32:08.850 --> 0:32:11.470
<v Speaker 3>about interviewing for a job. And you say your biggest flaws,

0:32:11.490 --> 0:32:13.570
<v Speaker 3>you're too honest. And the guy says, well, I don't

0:32:13.610 --> 0:32:14.850
<v Speaker 3>see that as a flaw. And you say, I don't

0:32:14.870 --> 0:32:19.660
<v Speaker 3>give a crap what you say. It's just pretty funny. Um, uh,

0:32:20.310 --> 0:32:21.950
<v Speaker 3>My dad used to tell this story a lot when

0:32:21.990 --> 0:32:25.270
<v Speaker 3>he was in grade school. It's a harp for my dad.

0:32:26.130 --> 0:32:30.790
<v Speaker 3>One room schoolhouse, middle of Iowa. The teacher one time said,

0:32:30.810 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I want you to tell me what you think of me.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.860
<v Speaker 3>And I want you to be completely honest to a

0:32:36.900 --> 0:32:39.420
<v Speaker 3>bunch of kids, like grade school kids. I want you

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 3>to be completely honest about what you think of me.

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And he said, they all wrote it down and sent

0:32:44.300 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>it to the front. And she sat there crying at

0:32:46.180 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 3>her desk for the rest of the class.

0:32:49.250 --> 0:32:50.450
<v Speaker 2>What a bad idea.

0:32:50.930 --> 0:32:51.510
<v Speaker 3>No kidding.

0:32:51.530 --> 0:32:55.900
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy. That's rough.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, man. Depending on the age. I don't remember the age,

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 3>but like if you're past, you know, six year olds

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.830
<v Speaker 3>and into like 14 year olds, you're going to get

0:33:07.850 --> 0:33:09.210
<v Speaker 3>a heap and help on the stuff that's going to

0:33:09.230 --> 0:33:09.850
<v Speaker 3>hurt your feelings.

0:33:10.830 --> 0:33:11.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:33:11.930 --> 0:33:12.230
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:33:12.510 --> 0:33:15.090
<v Speaker 1>I actually dug into that one chat. I found it and,

0:33:16.230 --> 0:33:18.970
<v Speaker 1>in the interest of being fair because everybody else, although

0:33:19.030 --> 0:33:23.230
<v Speaker 1>Katie just hinted at her results, but she's raising a

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.580
<v Speaker 1>small baby. She doesn't have time for these mental exercises.

0:33:26.900 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It said essentially to me that you don't say what

0:33:33.700 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you need. You just grind your teeth. And then when

0:33:38.460 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets too much, it's worse than if you said

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>what you need in the first place.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:46.580
<v Speaker 3>I had one very similar.

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:47.210
<v Speaker 2>So did I.

0:33:47.420 --> 0:33:49.660
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. I had one very similar to that, too.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Don't grin and bear it till you explode. Dumb, dumb.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.510
<v Speaker 3>That's the and I heard this phrase the other day.

0:33:59.450 --> 0:34:01.750
<v Speaker 3>People pleasing, like in the moment, you don't want to

0:34:01.810 --> 0:34:04.510
<v Speaker 3>cause a problem or hurt somebody's feelings. And somebody said,

0:34:04.770 --> 0:34:10.899
<v Speaker 3>how often does people pleasing please people? Oh, wisdom rarely does.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, kids, it's that time again. Final Thoughts! With Armstrong

0:34:17.380 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>and Getty.

0:34:18.140 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's your host for Final Thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.420
<v Speaker 1>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the

0:34:23.460 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>crew to wrap up the show for the day and

0:34:24.820 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the week.

0:34:25.100 --> 0:34:27.580
<v Speaker 2>Michelangelo pressing the buttons. Michael, would you lead us off, please?

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, if you're a psychology major and you're working to

0:34:29.700 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 6>be a therapist, change your degree right now.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:32.739
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no kidding.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:34.939
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, wow.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.060
<v Speaker 1>Katie Green, our esteemed newswoman, has a final thought and

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:39.460
<v Speaker 1>a baby. Katie, what's your final thought?

0:34:40.090 --> 0:34:42.660
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, just the way they did this list. The first

0:34:42.780 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 6>one was self-criticism, and then it went into a couple

0:34:45.300 --> 0:34:47.180
<v Speaker 6>other ones and said, it's a cycle I'd keep an

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:48.700
<v Speaker 6>eye out for. Thanks.

0:34:48.980 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Jack.

0:34:49.739 --> 0:34:53.980
<v Speaker 2>You have no eyes. Jack, a final thought for us.

0:34:54.620 --> 0:34:57.859
<v Speaker 3>I've not really been a thank God it's Friday guy

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.140
<v Speaker 3>mostly in my life. But man, oh man, this week

0:35:02.180 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 3>with school back in session and everything like that, me

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.779
<v Speaker 3>trying to keep up, I am very, very happy today

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:07.180
<v Speaker 3>is Friday.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Wow. Wow.

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.509
<v Speaker 1>My final thought, thinking back to that study about the

0:35:11.550 --> 0:35:14.290
<v Speaker 1>part of our brain that controls the, yeah, I can't.

0:35:14.390 --> 0:35:16.290
<v Speaker 2>Do anything about this. I'll just accept it.

0:35:16.550 --> 0:35:20.250
<v Speaker 1>There's so much of what we think are our character.

0:35:21.790 --> 0:35:23.770
<v Speaker 1>that we're just born with. So try to be a

0:35:23.770 --> 0:35:27.569
<v Speaker 1>little more patient with other people's flaws. You got your own, and.

0:35:27.489 --> 0:35:28.650
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking to me, folks.

0:35:29.210 --> 0:35:32.430
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty wrapping up another grueling four-hour workday.

0:35:32.930 --> 0:35:34.410
<v Speaker 1>Oh, so many people, thanks for a little time. Go

0:35:34.430 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to armstrongandgetty.com. We've got some fine swag for you. The

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Socialism Sucks and It Never Works t-shirt. It needs to

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.180
<v Speaker 1>be flying off the shelves. Send a message to those

0:35:44.219 --> 0:35:45.180
<v Speaker 1>young communists.

0:35:46.140 --> 0:35:47.580
<v Speaker 3>We'll see you on Monday. I'm sure there will be

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.700
<v Speaker 3>plenty of news. God bless America.

0:35:53.130 --> 0:35:58.069
<v Speaker 2>I'm strong and jackie we started the show with death.

0:35:57.810 --> 0:36:03.530
<v Speaker 5>And dismay a cow abortion this can't be the way

0:36:04.830 --> 0:36:09.990
<v Speaker 5>it's friday or friday as jack likes to say we

0:36:10.030 --> 0:36:13.989
<v Speaker 5>promise to do better Coming up on Monday.

0:36:15.130 --> 0:36:16.490
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:36:16.610 --> 0:36:19.610
<v Speaker 5>The Armstrong and Getty Show. Get the podcast free and

0:36:19.650 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 5>mostly doesn't blow. Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:36:24.180 --> 0:36:29.460
<v Speaker 3>The Armstrong and Getty.