WEBVTT - Earnings, Mergers, Buy American, and Formula 1

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast To switch skiers and go to the big banks.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Allison Williams Bloomberg Intelligence. She's been founding these big banks

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. She's got an informed opinion. So, Allison,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from some of the big ones here, what's

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of the takeaway? I mean, I know business trends

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are tough there from investment banking and so on and

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so forth, but is trading enough and is wealth management

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to get these big firms through to better capital

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>markets days?

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>So it was a software quarter for the investment bank,

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>but fick with a highlight. It actually came in about

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>stable with a year ago equities trading down about twelve

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>percent across the US banks, and then these coming in

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>down twenty to twenty five percent, which actually was a

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit better than feared and certainly better than you know,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the almost fifty percent decline that we saw last year.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 3>I would say going forward, you know, the pipelines are

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>still healthy. We've been hearing that for several quarters now,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>and more and more of the banks are talking about

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a hope for the second half and twenty twenty four. Certainly,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, clarity is what's needed to execute these deals.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>That the curve is pricing in some FED cuts towards

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year, and I think that has

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>been something that the banks are looking for as a

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>catalyst for that activity. For banks, you know that the

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>outperforming banks in terms of returns and revenue growth were

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 3>really those more focused on lending, so Wells Fargo, Japon, Morgan,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Bank America, and City. I would say that these four

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>banks plus all of the regional banks, you know, the

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>one thing we heard the universally deposits they're down, and

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the net interest income outlook is worsening because the costs

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of those deposits are rising. We did see some some

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of do you.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Think a little too ironic? Yeah, I really do think

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>it's for years I was interviewing bank CEO's Allison, who

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>were like, we can't make any money in this low

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>interest rate environment, there's no way for us to make

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>net interest margin with zero rates. And now that the

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>head and other central banks have been like, okay, you know,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>here's five hundred bases points have increased rates, They're like,

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>we can't make any money in these high interest rate environments.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I reget that they just move too quickly for them,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>But how does it look, you know, going out two

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>or three quarters? Are they gonna are they gonna be

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 2>raking in the net interest margin by Q four?

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so keep in mind that it's all about

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of you know, the expectations and where we are. Right.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So net interest income was up, I mean it's almost

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>up fifty percent of JP Moore. Again, it was up

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>to you know, forty five percent almost at Wells Fargo,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty three to twenty five percent of our city group.

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>So the net interest income growth is really strong, and

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 3>so it is contributing turnings growth. It's just that, you know,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>investors are looking for the peak, and so I we

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>it was four Q perhaps for some banks, it might

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>be one que for others. And so it's not that

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 3>they're not making money, it's just that that the lift, right,

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>So they got the lift on the on the on

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the prices of their loans, but now the prices of

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the deposits, so they're you know, cost of goods sold,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>if you will, is finally starting to catch up. And

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>so that's that's and that's coming in a little bit

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>faster than people had anticipated. So you know, it's all

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>about the expectations. So they are still making snipping an

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>amount of money. Again, commercial real estate, that's the big

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 3>thing we're focusing on. Everyone's focusing on credit. Credit is

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>still really solid. It's weakening at the margin. Commercial real estate,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, is very early innings, but in general, you know,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 3>the returns this quarter were still pretty good.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Head Count, Allison, I mean, when you talk about some

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some weakness in these businesses, that seems to be the

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>first place where these big banks can go to can

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>reduce expenses. What are they saying about headcount going forward?

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>So starting to hear definitely on the investment banking side

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of things, you know, pockets of cuts. As I said

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that the pipelines have been there for a while, and

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>there really weren't reductions last year because the banks keep

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 3>holding out hope that that revenue is coming back. But

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>we are starting to see some some reductions. We're also hearing,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, more broadly so Goldman had had made some

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 3>pretty sizable cuts, as we know at the very beginning

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of the year. They're making cuts in their consumer bank.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>You know, Bank of America is actually talking about hiring

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>people this year, but then things you know, topping out

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>after that, and to some extent it is you know,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of the attrition is also slowing because it's just

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>not the same job market that it was a year ago.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Yep, absolutely, all right, Alison, thanks so much for jumping

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>on with us. We appreciate it. And it's busy time

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of the quarterview with the banks reporting here, they tend

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the first groups out of the gate.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Allison Williams, she's a senior bank's analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>She's based in our Princeton University office. And again, I

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>think what we've heard from a lot of the banks,

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the big banks as well as the regional banks is

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the business is okay at the moment, and they are

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>cautiously optimistic. But you know, I think i'd probably double

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>underscore cautiously at this point when we hear from those

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>bank management teams S and p. Five hundred. I'm gonna

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>say it for Lisa Bromwins. It is unched on the day.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Literally nothing going on out there in the SMP. But

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. It's a Friday yet, Yeah, because we've got

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>options expiring at one pm Wall Street time.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Markets at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 4>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 4>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest has perspective, let me put it that way.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Very very expansive, resume, very impressive, and we need perspective

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in a big way here. Nancy Tangler joins us. She's

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a CIO of Laffer Tangler Investments.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Gets this.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>She splits her time map between Lake Tahoe and Scottsdale. We,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, figured it out completely. Nancy, thanks so much

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. We appreciate it coming to New

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>York City to.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>The Loma Point Loma University. Yeah, I know where Point

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Loma is.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>How good is that?

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 2>That's another great time. Geographically, You've done very.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Fun, very well, and we're stuck here in midtown East

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that works, all right, Nancy, You've

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>seen these markets over cycles, over long periods of time. Here,

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we've just come out of a pandemic. We had some

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy fiscal stimulus. Now to stry to pull that stimulus away.

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>The FED has raised rates at an unprecedented level over

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the past four quarters. How you guys kind of positioned

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>yourself for this environment right here.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I've been pretty critical of Washington and the FED.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, I wrote a piece in July of twenty

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 6>twenty one that was entitled mister Magoo's Washington, and that

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 6>is what they remind me of. They kind of walk

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 6>along and there's destruction all around them, and somehow they

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 6>come out of it clean. But I think if the

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 6>last well, first of all, I wish the FED Reserve

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 6>Board governors would stop talking.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, they talk way too much all the time,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>so many of them. I almost wonder they get paid

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>for each speaking engagement because why.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, but I think a little mystique would

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 6>go a long way. And the last press conference was

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 6>very disappointing because the FED chair was asked, do you

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 6>think monetary fiscal policy is too much? Should we could

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 6>can you say something and he refuses to even correlation

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 6>between the spending.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And you'd missed Alan Greenspan, right.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 6>I know, I miss his briefcase.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I miss his I miss his testimony because he would

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>freely comment on fiscal policy. And why wouldn't you, I mean,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it's such an important component, right, and Vulker.

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 6>Did, Yeah, you weren't born yet, so you wouldn't know.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's so kind of you, so kind.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 6>So what we've been doing is, first of all, we

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 6>moved our clients out of bonds in the summer of

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty when the ten year hit fifty bases point yield,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 6>and then we've been moving them back in recently and

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 6>began adding risk back into our equity portfolios, though it

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 6>sounds counterintuitive last fall. So that was Technology and consumer discretionary,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 6>and those are names that we still like, but we've

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 6>been trimming them because they've they've appreciated so much, and

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 6>we're looking for companies that are Our investing theme is

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 6>old economy companies that are embracing the digital revolution think McDonald's, Chipotle,

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 6>Public Storage, and then the suppliers of the digital solutions.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the names that. You know, again,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a FED that's kind of at or close

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>to peaking on rates, you know, so maybe some of

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that headwind for some of the tech and consumer names

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of abating a little bit.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's go public storage because McDonald's and Chipotle, Paul and

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I are intimately familiar with public storage. We don't know so, well,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>why do you like them? What's that company about?

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 6>So they're engaging over fifty percent of their new clients digitally,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 6>so they never meet with an individual, They access their

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 6>storage locker digitally, and so they've really levered up on

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 6>productivity at the company and they've they paid a special

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 6>dividend last year of thirteen dollars a share, and they

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 6>raised the dividends. So we dislike it for a steady,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 6>stable earner in the portfolio to complement some of the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 6>riskier names that we have in there.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And you have you have Microsoft as well? Or do

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>you like Microsoft? Because lately every company that has a

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>difficult earnings report just has to mention AI to try

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and get back in. But Microsoft's been at this game

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>for longer than you know.

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 6>Tsmc Well, we trimmed it, I mean because we bought

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 6>more last fall, and it was one of our largest

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 6>holdings across all of our strategies. But it went well

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 6>above our guidelines. So we've pulled back on weakness. We'd

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 6>be adding to it.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>That's all those big giant megatech companies, Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you held right, So are those companies that you've taken profits.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 6>We've only taken profits so far in Salesforce and in

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft this round. But historically, you know, we've been at

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 6>this for a long time. We were buyers of Apple

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 6>in twenty thirteen, and so we've been a net seller

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 6>of that stock for a long time, and we have

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 6>it represents about three percent of our portfolio. The others

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 6>are much larger portion of it. But yeah, I think

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 6>now is a really interesting time to look at Amazon.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 6>I thought Andy Jasse's shareholder letter was excellent. I think

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 6>he's being Tim Cooked, which was you know, everyone doubted

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Tim Cook at Apple, and that's when you got it

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 6>once in a lifetime opportunity to buy it at nine

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 6>times earnings.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know you mentioned one of your names buying on

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>weakness is a name that's been in the news a lot,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's Tesla. Yeah, I guess you had the stomach

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>to you know, deal with Elon Musk. What's your tesla

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>call here?

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 6>So we're going to be adding to it. I think,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, the margin decline is meaningful, but he still

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 6>has margins that are twice GM and three or four

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 6>times FORD. What I think is important about Elon Musk

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 6>is that he seems to be always going where the

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 6>puck is going, not where it's been. And so the

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 6>price kept cutting, and then today he announced price increases.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 6>That's going to drive people to the ecosystem, and I think,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 6>much like Apple, that's a really smart strategy. So he

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 6>doesn't mind being underestimated. I think I owned it once

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 6>and sold it because that was when he was on

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 6>the Joe Rogan podcast smoking.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Smoking weed, Yeah yesterday. It was four twenty so a

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of people were smoking yeah.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 6>And I sold it because you know, he had his

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 6>top management team turned over a number of times. He

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 6>had that sec problem. And it went up four or

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 6>five fold from there. So when we got an opportunity

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 6>in January to buy it back on a relative price

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 6>to sales ratio it's still attractive, we stepped in.

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's also interesting that he's doing I mean, essentially

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 2>you see GM and Ford and all the other legacy

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>automakers raising prices on their you know, very expensive products, right,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 2>high margin products, and then doing everything they can to

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>cut prices on their lower end products. And that's certainly

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>what Musk is doing as well. But since it's all electric,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>people don't differentiate this much. Right, He's raising prices on

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the one hundred and thirty thousand dollars SUV while he's

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>cutting prices on the forty five thousand dollars you know Sedan.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So it just makes this.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's kind of the LVMH of the auto industry, and.

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 2>It gets that kind of valuation. And I mean it did, right.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 2>It was at four hundred, now it's at one sixty. Yeah,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 2>so I guess this is the right time.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 6>We've picked it off in at like one oh four,

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 6>but we didn't buy enough. That's that's the perpetual dissatisfaction

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 6>of being a portfolio manager.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Nancy, next time, anytime you're in New York,

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you need to stop buy because but you're gonna be

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in Tahoe in Scottsdale. I'll put You're not in New

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>York very often.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm here every month Okay, well come.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Back, let us know when you're coming back on week

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you here, we'll talk some more stocks and more names.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk you about being a senior woman

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in a financial services industry. I know you're the author

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the book The Woman's Guide to Successful Investing in

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your working on a second edition. Now we want to

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get you to talk to you a little bit about

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that because, as you know, you are somewhat unique in

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the financial services industry, and we appreciate.

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 4>That you're listening to the tape. Cat's are live program

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 4>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Deb Bacon, she covers the detailers for Bloomberg Intelligence, is

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>based in London. So we're going to talk to her

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about Procter and Gamble because she covers Procter and Gamble.

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But then I'm moving on very quickly to luxury because

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Deb is my go to voice, as she is for

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>many institutional investors on the luxury business. But deb let's

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>pay the bills here. Let's start with Procter and Gamble.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The stocks up three point eight percent. It doesn't sound

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like a lot, but that's like the the stock never

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>moves that much. So they had some good numbers. Tell

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>us what happened, right?

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 7>I think you know, I looked at these numbers and

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 7>the market was already expecting decent sales growth, so there

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>was a little beat on sales. But the big thing

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 7>here is the amount of growth margin that they're accumulating.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 7>And when we think that we're going to see costs

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 7>start to fall away and also for X headwinds start

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 7>to transition over the coming quarters, that votes really well

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 7>for the level of productivity that's there. They're volumes are

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 7>down three percent, but that's kind of in line with

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 7>the market. So they're holding market share by value and volume.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 7>They're investing heavily in marketing spend, and it really bodes

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 7>well for where their position going into next fiscal year.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>What are the four X headwind transitions you're expecting? What

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>are we looking for?

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 7>So the company expects five percent by year end for

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 7>fiscal twenty twenty three, and this quarter we're already starting

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 7>to see that come off. So it was one half

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 7>way to this is their fiscal Q three pardon.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Me, five percent of five percent of.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 7>What sorry, so on five percent of sales. So at

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 7>the top line for fiscal twenty twenty three, you're going

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 7>to see all in net sales, not one percent, because

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 7>there's going to be about a five percent for X

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 7>headwind fiscal twenty twenty three. But as as we've seen

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 7>through the coming quarters, we see four percent for X

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 7>headwind in the last Q three and that should go

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 7>down some more in Q four, So bit by bit

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 7>into next year, we'll see that headwind turn into tailwind.

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 7>And at the same time we've seen peak. Of course,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 7>we'll start to see some of those coming off, and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 7>that just really puts them in good positions for next year.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, deb, Matt Miller is more of a you know,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>practer and gamble guy. I'm more of a luxury goods guy.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about what's going on in the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>luxury good business. I know you follow all of those names.

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to get it from the angle of China

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>reopening because you know everything I know about the luxury

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>good business I learned by reading your research. But China's reopening,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a really big tailwind. When will

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the luxury good companies start to see that?

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean in terms of share price, we're seeing that

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 7>already right, some of the big So it was announced

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 7>eight to January that that China would do a big reopening,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 7>a very big surprise, and already we start to see

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 7>share price momentum on the back of that. So we've

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 7>seen the likes of Air Mayres or Brunelo, Kushinelli up

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 7>over thirty percent year today. So these companies are already

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 7>swung quite well through second half of twenty twenty two,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 7>and then for the sector overall, it's becoming an outperformer.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 7>And what we saw was January was still very difficult

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 7>because people were hesitant to get back in in the marketplace,

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 7>product not in the right place. By February, these companies

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 7>are saying that we're seeing traveling, we're seeing spending in stores,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 7>a return into the market, but still a drag for

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 7>China overall in the Asia through the Q one into

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 7>Q two, though we would expect if there are no

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 7>big adversaries, that we see double digit growth starting to

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 7>pick up through Q two year on year and through

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 7>the rest of twenty twenty three.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about just the supply chain for some

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of these luxury retailers. I mean, where do they source

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>their product? Has it been a problem, is it getting better?

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So on the on the supply chain side, right.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 7>So if we think about the heritage companies like ms

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 7>like LVMH, the Italian traditional luxury makers, everything's produced locally

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 7>so as in so I need to rephrase that everything

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>is produced out of Europe, so France, Italy and others.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 7>So their supply chain is particularly robust, and in fact

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 7>they're having to probably raise fourty five percent capacity per

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 7>year just to manage that double digit growth because they

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 7>have had such an explosion that some of these companies

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 7>have doubled their sales versus twenty eighteen, So they're fully

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 7>compensated twenty nineteen, twenty twenty and through the lockdown and

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 7>they're out at the other end, and they're bigger and

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 7>stronger than ever. So they're having to build production and

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 7>build supply chain around that. The big move also has

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 7>been that pre COVID we saw only around forty five

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 7>percent of sales online and now that's very much more

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 7>than doubled, and in the teams many makers, and they're

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 7>working with big you know, some of the best in

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 7>class in terms of of partners out there like Farfex,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 7>Alibaba Luxury Portals to really do things also online. So

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 7>they're marketing to more clients baskets of bigger size, and

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 7>also they're getting a younger generation on board more quickly.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So DEBI, I look at you know, the shares of

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hermez or ames up thirty eight percent this year fifty

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>two week high, up sixty percent on a trailing twelve

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>month basis. Have I missed that luxury trade?

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 7>You're going to be buying it for forty eight times

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 7>next year's pe. But I've had so much interest in

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 7>this stock over the week because the idea here is

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 7>that you know, there are only three hundred stores worldwide.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 7>The company will opened two new production sites for leather

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 7>goods this shure. They have another production site coming on

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 7>board every year to twenty twenty seven, and so that's

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 7>how they're fulfilling their growth. They have waiting lists longer

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 7>than some of the watch companies, and yet they're also

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 7>using their one single individual brands to transition into very

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 7>sizable and weighty sectors. They're doing very well and ready

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 7>to wear of course into others, into jewelry, into homeware,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 7>homewhere is that right?

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of stuff, plenty of stuff for me to

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>spend on Debacon. She's a senior anas covering luxury goods

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence out of London, talking about the practer

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and gamble numbers very strong, talking about luxury, which means

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>very strong. These stacks have been on an absolute terror

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in part due to a China reopening.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 4>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 4>iHeartRadio app Berg Business Happen or listen on demand wherever

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>you get your podcasts.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker, thank you so much. We appreciate that. Now

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of forgot about this deal. But it's a

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>big one. Kroger Albertson's the supermarket chained twenty five billion

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar merger. It is winding its way through the regulatory process.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get an update on that, and in

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>order to do that, we have our expert in the

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. That's Jennifer Lee. She's a senior

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>litigation analy She covers antitrust for Bloomberg. Intelligence absolutely indispensable.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>When you get these big M and A trades that

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know are just going to be looked at by

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the various regulatory authorities, it's good to get an expert

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion on that. So Jen, just give us the latest

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>here Again, it's a big deal, supermarket business, twenty five

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Where are we in the review process? Is

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this deal going to get done?

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know they've been in the investigation phase. So

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 9>the FTC started their in depth investigation early December, and

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 9>it usually takes the companies four to five, maybe even

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 9>six months to finish that up, and the news is

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 9>quiet during that time. I mean, I think that's why

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 9>this has been sort of falling off the radar. But

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 9>I'm thinking it's probably about time soon for the companies

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 9>to finish that up, and that's when things sort of

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 9>get into earnest in terms of talking about whether there's

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 9>a remedy that might be sufficient for the Federal Trade

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 9>Commission to agree to clear the deal.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 2>What does the Federal Trade Commission want?

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, they're going to want divestitures of stores and I

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 9>think what this is going to come down to is

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 9>how many stores will have to be sold and who

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 9>the buyer will be, and whether or not that buyer's adequate.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 9>And I believe these companies face a really skeptical Federal

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 9>Trade Commission on both of those, and I have a

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 9>funny feeling they're probably not going to be able to

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 9>come to terms on this, and if they can't, it

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 9>means they're going to get a lawsuit to block the deal.

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, where is Kroger I mean, Alberts' is

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a West Coast chain.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, Kroger's in Columbus.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Kroger's in Columbus in the South. I mean, they're

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not around here. So I don't even think about them.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like it's an easy fix, Paul.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>If you want the best of everything, including the price

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 2>club program, okay, very good.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I would think you just have a big map, and

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>where they overlap, you say you got to sell one

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of them, end of story. What's the big deal?

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 9>And that's the way it's always gone, Okay, And so

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 9>here's sort of the fundamental problem that the Federal Trade

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 9>Commission is facing and thinking about today. That is the

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 9>way these deals have always gone. You have a map,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 9>you look at local regions one mile to ten miles.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 9>If they overlap and it's concentrated, you divest. You're good

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 9>to go. But what that has resulted in in many

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 9>different industries, according to this Federal Trade Commission, is too

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 9>much consolidation and overly concentrated industries. So they don't like

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 9>that approach very much anymore. They've taken it in agriculture,

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, They've taken it in many different industries that

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 9>are local in nature. So in this one, I think

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 9>they're going to go beyond that. They're not just going

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 9>to look at these local overlaps. I think they'll also

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 9>define fairly narrow markets, which then increases concentration in those

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 9>local regions. But they may also look in regionally or

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 9>nationally to see the impact of this combination on suppliers.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 9>They might go the other direction. Okay, right, so a

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 9>package good.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Store, if I'm in an industry that has Walmart, I'm like,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I got no problem. I mean, you're jumping on me

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>because I'm hooking up with another regional supermarket chain when

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I compete against Walmart.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 9>Right, And you know, part of the argument is that

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 9>these companies need to combine to better compete with the

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 9>Walmarts and the costcos of Coural. But you know what

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 9>happens when they say, well, we need the scale, we

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 9>need to combine because we need the scale to better

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 9>compete against Walmart and Costco. Oh, but we think we

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 9>can divest a handful of stores and they can succeed

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 9>on their own without that scale. You know, it's difficult

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 9>to make that argument. And that's really what they're going

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 9>to do here. You know, they're talking about three hundred

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 9>stores or so, while in their divestiture agreement, Kroger has

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 9>agreed to go all the way up to six hundred

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 9>and fifty before it has the right to walk away

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 9>from the deal. So I think the FTC is going

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 9>to be looking for that six hundred and fifty number

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 9>or more.

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>How long is this going to take? I mean they've

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>just they're likely done responding to the FTC's inquiries now, right,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And then you say, expect maybe a lawsuit at the

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>end of the year next year.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 9>When is it gonna No, I think it'll happen before then.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 9>So as of April fifth, they had not yet finished

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 9>these what they call second requests. That's the investigation. They

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 9>may be done now. Now technically as soon as they finish.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 9>The FTC only has thirty days, but it's pretty commonplace

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 9>to enter into a timing agreement with the agency that

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 9>gives it at least another sixty sometimes ninety more days

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 9>beyond that. So let's say they do that, they could

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 9>get and they get the lawsuit, that would be around

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 9>August timeframe. These kinds of lawsuits are for preliminary injunction,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 9>so they move quickly. The average timing, based on my calculations,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 9>is about five months from the filing of the complaint

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 9>to a decision, So theoretically there could be a decision

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 9>by the end of this year or even early. In

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 9>one queue, all.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, this is what I always do when I'm talking

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>at M and A. I go, M A go, I

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>click on the deal and I click on the advisors.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So the seller here has Credit Swiss and Goldman Sachs

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as their financial advisors. They have seven legal advisors. And

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not talking Mickey Mouse firms here, I'm talking Krevath,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking White in case Walktel Lipton. I mean, the

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lawyers are getting paid here big time. It's just crazy

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>how that plays out. But I guess the question is,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is this just the function This tough view of this

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>deal is at a function of the democratic administration that if

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>this were Republican administration, the FTC might be more inclined

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to let this deal go through, you know.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 9>Possibly. I think there was sort of a change that

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 9>began in anti trust actually during the Trump administration. It's

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 9>not just this this administration. This one is certainly aggressive

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 9>and activist, but there has been this movement generally and

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 9>somewhat bipartisan, to strengthen up our M and A, the

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 9>way we view M and A and the way we

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 9>scrutinize these deals because of anti trust exactly. Yeah, you know,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 9>And we also have this example, you know, from in

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 9>twenty fourteen, Safeway and Albertson's merged, and it was a

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 9>big failure. They cleared it, they divested stores, the company

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 9>that bought the divested stores went bankrupt before a year,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 9>and then I'llson's brought back a bunch of those stores.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean, that is a colossaliz.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Was it a failure in terms of because I think

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>this administration right now has to think not only about antitrust,

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but also about inflation. So the question is with scale,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 2>are you able to keep prices down or with scale

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>are you able to push higher prices onto consumers? Right,

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the crux of the argument that Biden has

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 2>to worry about right now.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 9>It's not Biden viously, but his regulators. But and that's

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 9>exactly the issue. I mean, the companies say, with scale,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 9>this will trickle down to better prices.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>And the companies say, we'll defend it to the regulators

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and to the customers, but to the shareholders they're like, hey,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>if we can get this scale, we're going to push

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 2>through price increasing.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 9>Exact customers exactly. And once upon a time an argument

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 9>about efficiencies was really helpful in the anti trust context

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 9>because the thought was if a company can gain efficiencies,

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 9>that'll pass down to consumers too in better prices. But

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 9>over time the regulators said, no, this isn't really happening.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 9>It's just better margins for the companies. It's really not

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 9>trickling down to the consumers. We're not going to give

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 9>as much credence to these efficiencies claims or these claims

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 9>that this scale will allow us to provide better prices.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we got this big supermarket deal out there.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>What else are you looking at? What else is you

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>know in the lens of kind of this, you know,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>M and a litigation anti trust issues.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm just waiting because I expect the Department of

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 9>Justice is likely to sue to try to block the

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 9>Adobe Figma transaction which has been floating out there.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Really, that's that's another big one right now.

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 9>Now, that's another big one, and I think twenty billion

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 9>dollars I believe, and I suspect that's going to happen,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think that could happen at any time.

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, the Apartment of Justice has already sued to

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 9>try to block Jet Blue in Spirit. So I'm watching

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 9>that that's going to go into trial and we'll see

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 9>what happens there. I think they have a pretty good argument,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 9>to be honest, in that case. I suspect the DOJ

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 9>can be successful. Really, yes, because I think it's.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Jef bluent Spirit, I mean Spirit, who cares about Spirit?

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Really? Do we?

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 9>The people who like an ultra low cost carrier option

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 9>very much care about Spirit, and they're going to lose

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 9>that option if Jet Blue takes over all of those routes.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's the crux of the matter.

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you, having lived in Europe for a

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>long time, it's it was so awesome to be able

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 2>to fly anywhere on the continent for like fifty bucks.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Ye at any time that I've lived there, that I

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>lived there over the last like seven years. Right then

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I come back here and I want to fly to Austin,

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, I gotta fly economy, you know, Oh

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>my god, that's just terrible. But but the flying economy

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>on United to Austin still costs like ten times more

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>than flying business on Ryanair to Valencia, you know, so.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Sort economy is not good for you.

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Now. It's just painful for my knees, you know, especially

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>at my age.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So that I guess they don't factor that into the

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>spirit Jet Blue thing.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear something funny about Paul Until very

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>recently he thought the picture of the guy on Alaska

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Airlines tail was Jerry Garcia. That's not a joke.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 9>I really thought that I did, and I had.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>A pilot Joy Garcia.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 4>It may have been an Eskimo.

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Can we say Eskimo in a way

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>be canceled?

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry?

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. But next time you're at an airport

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and you see Alaska Airlines, tell me what you think.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not so far off.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 9>I'm gonna have to take a look, all right.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Jenry, thanks so much for joining us senior litigation analyst.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>She covers all the antitrust stuff for all the big

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>M and A out there. Nobody else on the street

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has that kind of research we do at Bloomberg Intelligence

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and ssures closely with the industry in stock analys so

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that we get the best analysis out there to our clients. Jenry,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. We appreciate it.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the tape Canser live program Bloomberg Markets

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 4>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 4>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 4>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:30:55.280 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 4>flagship New York station just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think over the last several years there's been a

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>big pusher or moved towards kind of reshoring a lot

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of operations and businesses on US soil, you know, by

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.719
<v Speaker 1>American that kind of thing. It's kind of gain momentum.

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It certainly exacerbated by the pandemic, but there are those

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that say, hey, let's not go so fast here. Maybe

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this global supply chain thing is still a thing. Dave Stalin,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So those people from Taiwan, I don't know. We'll find out.

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Dave Stalin chill out a little bit exactly. He's the

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the Telecommunications Industry Association. He's also a graduate

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the US Naval Academy and a former infantry officer

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>with the US Marine Corps. So we thank him for

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>his service. Dave, thanks so much for joining us here. Again.

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You think about over the last three four years pandemic,

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of talk about on shoring, and it

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes it's taken another level maybe with some

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the technology, maybe a cold war brewing between the

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>US and China on things on the telecommunications and technology space.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your view of how things have kind of evolved.

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, thanks for having me. Yeah, it's an interesting time.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 8>I think through the pandemic, we've recognized how important connectivity is.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 8>It's almost like the air we breathe, but we don't

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 8>want it to be polluted air, right, So it's important

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 8>that we're buying products and building networks from trusted suppliers.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, we are buying a lot of products

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and building networks with products out of China, certainly out

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 2>of Taiwan, but also out of China. Should we be

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>concerned about that?

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I definitely think there's a legitimate concern, and the

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 8>administration has significant concerns about the concentration of ICT or

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 8>technology manufacturing in China. But what's not clear is should

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 8>government review outbound investment in a way that really forces

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 8>companies to determine at a high level with heavy government review,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 8>where they buy their products from. We're strong supporters of

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 8>building product in America and we are definitely as an

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 8>ICT industry trending in that direction more and more so.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 8>But it's probably hard to get everything built in America

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 8>at a reasonable price.

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Well what about a free market? You know, what about

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>businesses being able to do whatever they want with their dollars?

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 2>How much should the government be involved in this?

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah? So I'll go back to the point that everything

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 8>is connected these days, from an IoT device in your

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 8>home to a critical network to a broadband network, and

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 8>we have to be careful with that level of connectivity

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 8>to ensure we're buying products and services from trusted partners,

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 8>and I think that's one of the roots of the issue.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 8>The other, of course, is the overall competitiveness around the globe.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 8>We first need to make sure that we're buying trusted products.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 8>And TIA, as you mentioned, is an industry association that's

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 8>been around for eighty years. We've obviously seen a ton

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 8>of change and we create standards for the industry and

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 8>we advocate with the government for the industry large companies,

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 8>small companies, and we're very focused on ensuring that the

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 8>networks that are getting built are going to become more

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 8>and more trusted over time. But you have to verify trust,

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 8>you can't just assume it. And that's where the standard

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 8>side of TIA comes into play, as we've developed the

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 8>first cyber and supply chain security standard that's measurable for

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 8>the industry.

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>So kind of going down that route, Dave, I mean

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the companies that you are, many of the companies that

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you represent have been, have done, and continue to do

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>business in China. They just have to. That's just kind

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of where the supply chain takes You can't disengage from China.

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the companies that you represent,

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what are they How have they changed their behaviors or

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>their business models over the last several years.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 8>Sure, it's a couple aspects. One is definitely companies are

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 8>moving manufacturing out of China to other places in the world,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 8>some cases of the US, but to other places in

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 8>the world. There are many trusted US trading partners out

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 8>there Mexico, India and others that they're moving. They're manufacturing too.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 8>Number two, one of the big challenges we have is

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 8>on the ICT space is anything that's electronics. We can

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 8>make fiber cable here, and we do with companies such

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 8>as Corning and Comscope. That's not a problem. We can

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 8>make cell towers here, we can make all the attachments. Obviously,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 8>the labor to build and to project manage these networks

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 8>can be done here. But moving chips over is a

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 8>good first step, but it's not the only step. So

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 8>the US government has recently about a year ago, introduce

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 8>US as part of the IIJA, the Infrastructure Investment and

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 8>Jobs Act, a really large, forty five billion dollar program

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 8>to bring broadband to the unserved and underserved around the country.

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 8>One of the requirements is by America so there are

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 8>by America laws in place that say, when you use

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 8>US grant money, for example, the BAD program, the Broadband

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 8>Equity Access Deployment Program, part of IJA, a lot of acronyms,

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 8>you must follow the by America laws. Now, what we've

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 8>asked for is a limited and a targeted waiver for

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 8>certain parts of that and in essence, anything that has

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 8>a chip in it is not effectively made in the

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 8>US current So the labors no problem, the fiber cables

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 8>no problem, the towers, no problem. But anything that has

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 8>a chip, in other words, electronics, anything with intelligence that

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 8>has a chip in it is currently for the most part,

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 8>not made in the US. Therefore, we need that waiver

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 8>for this BEAD program.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 2>By the way, as Paul is saying, you have a

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 2>tremendous resume and obviously have served this country in the

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 2>US military and in many different ways. After the Naval Academy,

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 2>US Army Ranger School Distinguished Honor graduate, there were in

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the first, second, third, and fourth Marine divisions. I don't

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 2>know if this is this question is pertaining to the

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Telecommunications Industry Association at all, but do you worry that

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 2>even some of our military equipment has chips out of.

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 8>China, absolutely, and the US military, the DoD is very

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 8>concerned about that as well, and they're putting tighter restrictions.

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 8>We all know that the Biden administration also just set

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 8>aside something like sixty five billion dollars to bring chip

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 8>manufacturing back to the US standard that I alluded to,

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 8>what we call SES nine thousand and one is the

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 8>only measurable and certifiable cyber and supply chain security standard

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 8>out there. We look at the processes that somebody uses

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 8>when they're developing a product to ensure that it's trusted.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 8>The software and the hardware. You have to go back

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 8>to the route to ensure that you're developing a product

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 8>that is secure. So you have to have third party

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 8>verification that the software and hardware. There's so much open

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 8>source software being used these days. You have to verify

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 8>that those things are secure.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 8>That's why I'm in this job. Many of my peers

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 8>are sailing on a boat or digging in their garden

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 8>in the backyard and long retired. But I am really

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 8>passionate about this industry and passionate about the security of

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 8>our country.

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, we appreciate it. Dave I appreciate all your services

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in support of this country. Dave Stalen, CEO of the

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Telecommunications Industry Association, looking at the kind of the global

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>technology trade, the global telecommunications trade, a lot of work

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to be done there to ensure these systems out there.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the tape Can's our live program Bloomberg

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 4>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 4>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 4>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 4>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Formula one. This is a big business globally. It's starting

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to get bigger here in the US, I think, and

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I know a little bit about this because the liberty

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>media folks own it and they have big, big plans

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for growing Formula one. And we got a big, big

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>race coming to Miami, Formula one Miami Grand Prix coming.

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a big news for I guess any city that

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>hosts it. But let's get the latest with Hannah Elliott.

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>She's got a great story out on the Bloomberg Hannah

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>covers the auto industry for US how to talk to

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>us about Miami. It sounds like a fun event. It

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a must to event, must must see event

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and be seen event.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 10>About mind, must see it? Yeah, totally must see and

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 10>be seen is exactly right. There's there's a reason they

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 10>call it the Magic City. That certainly applies to how

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 10>Miami does Formula one. It is a spectacle unlike any other.

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 10>Last year we saw that it f one brought three

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 10>hundred and fifty million dollars into Miami, with people, you know,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 10>spending money on hotels, decadent nights out, uh, drinking, partying,

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 10>eating culture, all of that, plus of course race tickets.

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 2>And not a little bit of money. Hannah, I mean

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 2>I saw on You're sure lots of money. I mean

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>some people are spending. Did you say there was like

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty or fifty thousand dollars bottle service?

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. So you know, for instance, at the Club eleven,

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 10>which maybe you've heard of before, it's a big Miami club,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 10>we've had this table. Tables start at five thousand dollars

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 10>and they go up to two hundred thousand dollars. If

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 10>you want a table with bottle service on the dance floor,

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 10>that'll accommodate.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 2>One hundred people.

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 10>But yeah, I mean, of course we've got h you've

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 10>heard of Carbone, of course, the great Italian restaurant chain,

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 10>Carbone is doing a pop up called Carbone Beach. They

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 10>did it last year, they're going to do it again

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 10>this year. Tickets cost three thousand dollars. Tables start at

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 10>twenty four thousand dollars. That's for a dinner or a meal.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 2>So this is yeah, this is just for going going

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 2>out right now. I just came back from the Moto

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 2>GP in Austin, which is motorcycles, of course, and it

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 2>was far less crowded than Formula One was in Austin.

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But what everybody you want at the race is access,

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 2>right You want to be in the paddock, you want

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 2>to be able to walk up and down pit lane,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you want to be able to peer into the garages.

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 2>How much is that kind of access going to cost?

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 2>If I can even get it at F one Miami.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 10>So Padda Club tickets right now are costing over fourteen

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars. I have seen prices as low as ten thousand,

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 10>but according to my last check, I was emailing a

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 10>couple people this week to confirm the final price. They're

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 10>at fourteen thousand dollars right now. That gets you, of

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 10>course access to these luxury suites with food and alcohol,

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 10>and we'll get you pit access to in some cases.

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 10>Then you have a lot of pride.

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that was a tenth the price at

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the Moto GP in Austin, they were fourteen hundred.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 10>You know Austin is I love Austin. Of course, Austin

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 10>had the first formula and raised in a long time

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 10>in the US. We love Austin. But Miami, you know,

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 10>has quite a reputation for partying and they really have

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 10>to live up to it, and the prices are reflecting.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>That kind of talked to us about just Formula one

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US. I know, you know, the likes of

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Matt Miller all into it. I'm sure you

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are as well. Where where is it just in terms

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of popularity and the growth of it?

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>How has it grown since the first race in Austin.

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 10>So it's been really interesting, you know, my Formula one

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 10>has had some history in the US, starting in the

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 10>late nineteen fifties. There have been random races everywhere from

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 10>Michigan to California to New York, but it's never really

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 10>got a foothold. Of course, the Austin Race started about

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 10>twelve years ago. That was really the first one and

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 10>since then. This is the second year for Miami. Also

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 10>this year we've got a race in Las Vegas coming,

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 10>which is going to be potentially even bigger and more

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 10>expensive than Miami, So we're getting a bit of a foothold.

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 10>A big part of that is the fact that Liberty

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 10>Media is now the owner and really prioritizes television. Of course,

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 10>TV audiences are very important in America if you want

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 10>a big fan base exactly. I was just gonna say,

0:43:55.520 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 10>you cannot underestimate the influence of Netflix's documentary series Drive

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 10>to Survive. They've had I think they're in their fifth

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 10>season now, and that is really humanized and drama dramaticized

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 10>the drivers and the race and actually it's kind of

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 10>been called the Kardashians on four wheels. It is kind

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 10>of It's really interesting and it really has broad and

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 10>so it's very fair to say that television. Of course,

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 10>television audiences are up every year by double digit percentages.

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 10>We do have a lot of momentum, and Miami is

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 10>a big part.

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 7>Of that all right.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Hannah, while we have you here, I want to

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 2>get your take on some of the other issues in

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 2>the car industry. More broadly, we've been talking so much

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 2>about Tesla cutting prices six times in a row now

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 2>for the cheaper models. Last night we heard their raising

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>prices for the more expensive Model X and Model S.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 2>What's your take on Tesla right now? They've seen incredible

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 2>top line growth, not as much as Elan as projected,

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 2>but they have a lot of competition coming into the market.

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I think the biggest problem that Tesla has right

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 10>now is the connection to its owner, Elon Musk. I

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 10>live in La. I can't tell you how many people say,

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 10>I'm a little cringey when I drive my Tesla. I'm

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 10>a little embarrassed about it. Because of some of the

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 10>antics of the company owner. We can't disassociate Elon from

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 10>Tesla right now, and I do think that's hurting the

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 10>brand perception. Secondly, to your point, there are so many

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 10>worthy competitors now to Tesla. Tesla one hundred percent beat

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.919
<v Speaker 10>everyone to the punch, but that was ten years ago

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 10>and now we have amazing electric vehicles from outing BMW, Mercedes,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 10>Pull Star, you know, Volvo. The list goes on Porsche,

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 10>every every automaker, now Kie.

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Ev Kia makes some kick can I say, I don't

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>think kick butt EV's Hey? Listen one more on. Paul

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 2>has like a two thousand and six fourteen twenty fourteen

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 2>V it's a stick and he doesn't want to give

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.439
<v Speaker 2>it up, but he needs to buy a new car,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and he said he can't find anything with a stick

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 2>out there. What would you recommend to a sporty, successful

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 2>former Wall Street gentleman like Paul Sweeney? What should he

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 2>get with a stick? What's out there?

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 10>You can get a nine to eleven with the stick,

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 10>you go, let's just call it how it is. You

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 10>can still buy a nine to eleven with a manual

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 10>transmission and you will love it.

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that sounds good.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I've been telling you for a while, but you know what,

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Why put it off when eventually.

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 10>A matter of time?

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's only a matter of time. You guys have got

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>me red. Well, so, Hannah, what's the next thing on

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the what's the next car you really want to test

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>drive out there?

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 10>I'll tell you what I'm gonna drive in a week

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.280
<v Speaker 10>and a half. And I'm actually very excited about it. It's

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 10>the Lamborghini Hurricane Strato, which is their off quote unquote

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 10>off road Lamborghini. I'm going to go out to Joshua Tree.

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 10>We're gonna drive it in the desert.

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna video it.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they say off road. Instead of it being like

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 1>an inch off the ground, it's like three inches off

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the ground.

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, exactly, So you're not going down a dirt trail

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 10>very slowly.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not sure you want to take that on

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan Street with all the potholes.

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I know, is Hannah's job. By the way, She's gonna

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 2>go to Joshua Tree, probably with some rock star in

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.959
<v Speaker 2>a Lamborghini. They're gonna do shrooms, camp out. It's gonna

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 2>be awesome, and she gets paid.

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 10>I will report that. You're welcome to join. You know,

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 10>let's make a party of it.

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 2>That is that is very cool, And a lot of

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 2>these car makers are coming out with, you know, off

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 2>right road versions. You mentioned the nine to eleven. They

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 2>have their what's it called the Decar and it's like

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty grand. Is it really like an

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>off road worthy vehicle?

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 10>I think so. I think so. Let's not forget. Lamborghini

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 10>really does have sorry sorry, Porsche really does have a

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 10>history of off road racing, of Raleigh racing. Of course,

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 10>they're Rothman's cars, you know, decades ago were really successful

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 10>and popular. So yeah, I believe it when Porscha says

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 10>we've got an off road We've got a Safari style

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 10>nine to eleven. I believe that.

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You can even get that Rothman's livery painted on your

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 2>nine to eleven to car. I think it's like a

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty three thousand dollars option.

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 10>The only thing about that is they changed the word

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 10>to say rough roads instead of Rothman, even though delivery

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.760
<v Speaker 10>looks the same. Oh, which is yeah.

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 2>A little week.

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Are there car makers, like luxury car makers that just

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>say we're not gonna go ev Has anybody ever said

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:25.919
<v Speaker 1>that now?

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, yeah, Ferrari has said that. Lamborghini said that. There

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 10>have been a lot who say that, Okay, who swear

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 10>up and down we will never go electric. I think

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 10>at one time Rules Royce said that, you know, they

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.720
<v Speaker 10>a lot say it. A lot also said we will

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 10>never make an suv. So whenever someone says never, I

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 10>do take it with a grain of salt.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll let you go. But the story I thought

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this week was hilarious or just really telling was Ford

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>f one point fifty. They're bringing their electric truck to Norway,

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Which is double funny if you remember those Will Ferrell

0:48:58.040 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 2>commercials in Super.

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Bowl exactly, So I'm like, I don't know where you're

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going to park that thing in EUROPEA Yeah, Henda Elliott,

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Really great stuff. We

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>look forward to your reporting from Joshua Tree in a

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Honda La she covers automotive stuff, and she

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.760
<v Speaker 1>actually gets to ride and test drive all these.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Cars, and she's gotten on the highest of high high

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 2>end yes vehicles expecting She writes for Bloomberg Pursuits. Check

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it out on the web.

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 4>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 4>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 4>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that Matt and I like to

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do on this show is try to bring some perspective

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to these markets. Try to tap into some veterans who've

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been through a cycle or two in our Exicus certainly

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>qualifies Chris Allman, He's the CIO of Colsters. What is Colsters?

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Is California State Teachers Retirement System? Is it big? Well?

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they got a portfolio valued three hundred and

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 1>six billion as of every twenty eight, twenty three, So

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the answers yes, and of course based in Sacramento, California. Chris,

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and it's also.

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to mention it's important, right, This

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 2>is the retirement of teachers, the most underpaid people in

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 2>our society, the most undervalued, and people like Chris helped

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that they can live well after they're

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 2>done doing the service that they do for our for

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 2>our society.

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, it's a big responsibility. So Chris, given that kind

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of build up, I mean, twenty twenty two year to

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>forget for most investors a little bit better starting off

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 1>this year, we where do we go from here?

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, first off, thank you, gentlemen, thank you for that introduction,

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 5>and you said term gentlemen loosely. Yes, Matt and Paul,

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 5>it's been a long time. It is great to see you.

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.959
<v Speaker 5>I had to travel all the way to Berlin once

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 5>just to see Matt on TV.

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:01.359
<v Speaker 5>Hey, listen, guys, you know surprise saying my fiscal year

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 5>is June thirty, so it is a positive year. We're

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 5>up single digits, you know, high threes. That isn't a

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 5>great year for us. We need to earn seven. But

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 5>like you've been saying all day, everybody feels worried. Everybody

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 5>is slightly negative. But the numbers aren't telling you that

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:26.240
<v Speaker 5>the stock market is up. Look at non US developed

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 5>markets are up thirteen percent so far. They're up nine

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 5>percent just in twenty twenty three. So maybe, just maybe

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 5>they're going to pull off a smooth landing.

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.240
<v Speaker 2>We just talked with Phil Orlando over at Federated Hermes.

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 2>He expects S and P earnings to total like one

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred ninety dollars, down from two nineteen last year. So

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 2>there are some bears out there. What do you make

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of the sentiment in these markets, Chris.

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, Matt, I am looking out and I gotta

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 5>tell you, I'm worried. I had talked to a lot

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 5>of global CIOs and we are all on I feel

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 5>like we're on thin ice. Liquidity is very tight. You

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 5>don't go from zero to five hundred well in case

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 5>of the Miami Grand Prix, you don't go from zero

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 5>to five hundred basis points in nine months without seeing

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 5>some pain. Not just Silicon Valley Bank or Signature Bank.

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, the next shoe to drop is obviously

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 5>probably going to be in commercial real estate office debt.

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 5>People are seeing some of that debt roll and rates

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 5>are higher and the buildings have to come down in value.

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 5>We haven't seen any transactions, but just the cap rates

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 5>have changed, so it's a tough market.

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And people got to refinance. There's a wall of maturity

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 2>coming do that we're all scared of. I find it

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 2>fitting that the that the phrase the next shoot to

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 2>drop comes from real estate. Yes, and it's from New

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 2>York tenements basically back in the day the walls and

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the I guess ceilings and Florida threat then that you

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 2>could hear someone taking off his shoes when he got

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:04.319
<v Speaker 2>into bed, and you just waited after the first one

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 2>for the next shoe to drop.

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 4>That's good.

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 5>You guys are amazing. What history buffs shoes news.

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You can use hue drops so so in terms of

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 2>the Fed, how does Jerome How did Jerome Powell and co?

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Deal with this? We I guess I'll expect them to

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 2>raise rates at least one more time. The debate is

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 2>as to whether they cut rates when things start getting

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 2>really painful, if we have big problems in commercial real

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 2>estate for the financial stability picture, if we have a

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 2>jumping unemployment, if another one or two million people lose

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 2>or if one or two million people lose their jobs

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 2>when we get to like four and a half percent,

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 2>which relatively is relatively low, but still that would that

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 2>would hurt for especially those losing the jobs. Does the

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 2>FED have the resolve to keep fighting inflation or will

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 2>they you know, blink and cut rates early?

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 5>Well, I can't read his mind. And you know, you

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 5>got to believe Jay Powell. He's he's been consistent all

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 5>the way back since last last year. I was going

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 5>to say last summer he is willing to hurt the

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 5>economy to reduce inflation. But so far inflation has come down.

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:11.879
<v Speaker 5>Oil prices and commodity prices have softened. You guys are

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 5>just talking about doctor Copper about thirty minutes ago. And

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 5>so I got to think that amazingly they are orchestrating,

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 5>even though it's hard to believe a soft landing. They

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 5>are though going to raise rates obviously again at least

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 5>once more. And as your last guest said, we're all

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 5>going to be looking for the P word, the pauseword,

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 5>and maybe they will. I don't think they're going to

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 5>pivot this year. I think the market, the bomb market's

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 5>overly optimistic about that. But I am amazed at how

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 5>uncomfortable investors feel. Yet the planes are full, people are shopping,

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 5>they're going to the Grand Prix, they're buying bottle service.

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:56.720
<v Speaker 5>This economy is strong, not just here. But Matt explained

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 5>to me Europe. That is amazing to me.

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 2>It is actually I mean, for months, Paul and I

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 2>were terrified for Europeans on their behalf. We thought, oh

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 2>my goodness, what are they looking forward to. It's going

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to be an awful winter. And it turned out, you know,

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the weather is what blessed them, I guess, and they

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 2>seem to have avoided a recession. Also, you got the

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Chinese reopening, which was a surprise. With those things happening,

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I kind of expected a lift to commodities prices, right,

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and we still see oil now at seventy seven dollars

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 2>of aarrol, even after the surprise cut. Why don't we

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 2>see you know, iron Ore was tanking this morning when

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I came in. Why don't we see a lift of

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 2>these commodity prices. Why isn't the global economy expected to

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:46.760
<v Speaker 2>grow with all of with all these blessings from beyond?

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'll tell you guys a secret. That's why

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 5>I listened to your show every day when I drive in.

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:55.319
<v Speaker 5>You go, you know in California. You know, we're the

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:57.840
<v Speaker 5>graveyard shift of the financial markets. So we're coming in

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 5>when the market's already open. But I listen to you

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 5>guys because I'm baffled by this. You're right, I have

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 5>been in Paul mentioned, I've been in this business a

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 5>heck of a long time. And this market is really

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 5>a conundrum because so many people feel like there's some

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 5>kind of a pothole, not an O eight, but a

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:22.240
<v Speaker 5>pothole coming a recession. It's the most anticipated recession in history,

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 5>and I can't believe I'm saying this. But therefore it

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.439
<v Speaker 5>may not happen. We may just muddle our way back

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 5>out of this. I find that hard to believe I've

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 5>been nervous. We have been defensive all year, and that's

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 5>hurt us, not tremendously, but you know, every time there's

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 5>a rally, we sell into it, and I see that

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 5>in a lot of investors. The one thing I'm very

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 5>concerned about is ill liquidity amongst major institutional investors, endowments.

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 5>Certainly in there's no liquidation in private equity or in

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 5>real estate, and those are two huge illiquid asset classes.

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 5>We all count on some activity and cash flow and

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 5>nobody's seeing anything. So if you're a mature plan like

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 5>we are, where people have negative cash flows, you know

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:11.320
<v Speaker 5>your cash is dear in this market and you're holding

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:11.799
<v Speaker 5>on to it.

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chris, really appreciate getting a couple of minutes

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of your time. As always, next time you're in New York,

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>please let us know. We'll get you in the studio here,

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have a proper discussion studio.

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll take you out to launch Man exactly right. Yeah,

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 2>this is the big town. We stayed into hotail hours,

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 2>sure le service. Absolutely. Chris Alman. He's the CIO of Colsters.

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:32.360
<v Speaker 1>They manage the money for the California State Teachers Retirement

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>System been a longtime investor, really stage, we love getting

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>his in the thoughts.

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:49.439
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio