1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,440
Speaker 1: Day by day, it seems that new revelations about President

2
00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:07,360
Speaker 1: Donald Trump make what were once whispers of impeachment into

3
00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:11,560
Speaker 1: calls for impeachment. This morning, Democratic Congressman Al Green of

4
00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:14,800
Speaker 1: Texas became the first to call for Trump's impeachment on

5
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:18,880
Speaker 1: the floor of the House. We cannot allow this to

6
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:24,119
Speaker 1: go unchecked. The president is not above the law. The

7
00:00:24,200 --> 00:00:28,360
Speaker 1: latest bombshell was yesterday's report that former FBI Director James

8
00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:31,520
Speaker 1: Coomy documented in a memo that Trump asked him at

9
00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:35,040
Speaker 1: an Oval Office meeting to shut down the investigation into

10
00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:39,040
Speaker 1: former National Security Director Michael Flynn. The White House has

11
00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:43,560
Speaker 1: denied Komby's version of events that followed monday shocking disclosure

12
00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,680
Speaker 1: that the President revealed classified information in a meeting with

13
00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:52,279
Speaker 1: Russian Foreign Minister's Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kisleyak, and

14
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 1: Trump's admission last Thursday that he fired Coomy over the

15
00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,720
Speaker 1: quote made up story about him in Russia, followed by

16
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:02,520
Speaker 1: a failed threat in a tweet the next day that

17
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:06,840
Speaker 1: comey better hope that there are no tapes of our conversations.

18
00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:10,760
Speaker 1: Did Trump commit a crime or an impeachable offense or

19
00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:14,840
Speaker 1: neither joining me? Are Richard Painter, professor at the University

20
00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:18,120
Speaker 1: of Minnesota Law School and former ethics lawyer for George W.

21
00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:23,360
Speaker 1: Bush and Bradley Moss, partner at Mark Z. Many people

22
00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:28,399
Speaker 1: are questioning whether Trump's actions constituted obstruction of justice. But

23
00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:32,280
Speaker 1: there's a distinction between the criminal offense of obstruction of

24
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:37,240
Speaker 1: justice and the impeachable offense of obstruction of justice. Mark,

25
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,600
Speaker 1: Let's start with the criminal offense. Do his actions make

26
00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:50,080
Speaker 1: out a case for obstruction under federal criminal statutes? Richard, Yes,

27
00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:56,680
Speaker 1: I think that there is substantial evidence of criminal obstruction

28
00:01:56,720 --> 00:02:01,960
Speaker 1: of joice. I believe that they investigated by an independent

29
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:04,400
Speaker 1: special prosecutor, as well as by the House and the

30
00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:12,360
Speaker 1: Senate Judiciary competty um. But the memo documented conversation that

31
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:16,359
Speaker 1: in and of itself probably would not arise to criminal

32
00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:19,720
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice. But we put that in the context

33
00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:25,160
Speaker 1: as the President asking the FBI director to affirm his

34
00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:30,160
Speaker 1: loyalty to the president. The fact that the FBI director

35
00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:34,280
Speaker 1: was fired, and that the President has acknowledged that his

36
00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:39,600
Speaker 1: firing of the FBI director was connected to the Russia investigation,

37
00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:44,080
Speaker 1: and then the fact that General Flynn was going to

38
00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:48,919
Speaker 1: turn state's evidence in the fact asked for a immunity

39
00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:54,840
Speaker 1: prosecution in return for his testimony, which would of course

40
00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:59,080
Speaker 1: give everyone connected with a Trump Russia scandal a motive

41
00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:02,760
Speaker 1: to want to shut down the plant investigation. We put

42
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:06,680
Speaker 1: all these facts together, and I think there is what

43
00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:10,960
Speaker 1: I would characterize a strong evidence. It's a president and

44
00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:15,800
Speaker 1: in criminal um obstruction of justice, but it's it's certainly

45
00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:18,560
Speaker 1: not moping and shot chic at all. It needs to

46
00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:23,960
Speaker 1: investigate further. And Bradley, do you agree with that? Yeah,

47
00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:26,480
Speaker 1: by and large, I mean I think that the evidence

48
00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:29,359
Speaker 1: we've gotten right now is very strong, circumstantial evidence for

49
00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:32,800
Speaker 1: at least the impeachment charge of a structal justice UH

50
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:35,480
Speaker 1: to to supplement what Richard was saying in terms of

51
00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:38,880
Speaker 1: the criminal side. The one thing that might save the president,

52
00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:41,160
Speaker 1: which is a legal nuance a highly doubt he actually

53
00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:43,520
Speaker 1: is aware of, is that, as far as the criminal

54
00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:47,920
Speaker 1: courts have typically been concerned in a pending FBI investigation

55
00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:51,200
Speaker 1: in and of itself would not qualify as the type

56
00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:55,480
Speaker 1: of proceeding that would implicate any of the obstruction of

57
00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:59,400
Speaker 1: justice criminal provisions under the US Code. So it's a

58
00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:03,480
Speaker 1: slightly a loophole which just by happenstance would possibly save

59
00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:05,960
Speaker 1: the president from a criminal charge if that was ever feasible,

60
00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:09,560
Speaker 1: But in an impeachment context, he wouldn't be quite as limited.

61
00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:12,680
Speaker 1: I think we do have some good circumstantial evidence. I

62
00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:15,520
Speaker 1: don't believe all the pieces have quite moved into place yet, though.

63
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:21,600
Speaker 1: Impeachment is a different kind of standard, and the Constitution

64
00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:27,080
Speaker 1: uses the phrase high crimes and misdemeanors. So, Richard, just

65
00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:30,200
Speaker 1: in thirty seconds we will continue with this. But in

66
00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:34,880
Speaker 1: thirty seconds is the case easier to make out an

67
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:42,000
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice claim under an impeachment standard? Well, of course,

68
00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:46,200
Speaker 1: impeachment is a very political process. That in Congress has

69
00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,920
Speaker 1: impeached the president for lying under oath about his text life.

70
00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,039
Speaker 1: I couldn't give a rap behind about present sex life,

71
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:55,640
Speaker 1: but I don't care about the Russians in Russian esta

72
00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,640
Speaker 1: by the United States, Russian agents so working in the

73
00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:04,640
Speaker 1: NAST Security Council and so forth. Uh so, Um, that's

74
00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:07,800
Speaker 1: going to be up to Congress to determine whether there's

75
00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:11,360
Speaker 1: been obstruction of justice or whether there's been other invatuable

76
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:16,479
Speaker 1: offenses that whether to remove the president. Uh, you know,

77
00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:20,480
Speaker 1: the thought process obstruction of justice was the main charge

78
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:24,880
Speaker 1: in both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment cases. The Constitution

79
00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:29,599
Speaker 1: uses the phrase high crimes and misdemeanors, and they include corruption,

80
00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:33,560
Speaker 1: abuse of power, and undermining the rule of law and democracy.

81
00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:38,920
Speaker 1: Many people are questioning whether President Donald Trump's actions constituted

82
00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:42,000
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice, and we've been talking about that with

83
00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:45,360
Speaker 1: Richard Painter, professor at the University of Minnesota Law School

84
00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:49,480
Speaker 1: and former ethics lawyer for George W. Bush and Bradley Moss,

85
00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:54,839
Speaker 1: partner at Mark Z Bradley. Let's talk about obstruction of

86
00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:59,839
Speaker 1: justice in the context of the information we learned about

87
00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:04,200
Speaker 1: the meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey love Rob and

88
00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:09,679
Speaker 1: Ambassador kisleyak Um. Although it was it has been said

89
00:06:09,839 --> 00:06:14,960
Speaker 1: many times that President Trump has the ability to declassify

90
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:20,360
Speaker 1: information on the spot, how do you view that, Well, No,

91
00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:24,920
Speaker 1: it's very true that under Article to Authority, the president

92
00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:28,840
Speaker 1: can do pretty much whatever he wants with classified information.

93
00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:32,320
Speaker 1: All classified information and all the procedures for deeming something

94
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:37,520
Speaker 1: classified emanate from the presidency, and every president has that authority.

95
00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:41,120
Speaker 1: So the president couldn't theory post the nuclear launch codes

96
00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:42,719
Speaker 1: if you wanted on Twitter, and there would be no

97
00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:46,240
Speaker 1: criminal provision to take action against him, but there would

98
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:49,560
Speaker 1: be a basis to impeach him for abuse of a

99
00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:53,240
Speaker 1: far sorry, for abusive power and failure to faithfully execute

100
00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:55,479
Speaker 1: his office. And that's kind of what we have here,

101
00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:58,600
Speaker 1: is that, yes, as a criminal matter, the president could

102
00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:00,840
Speaker 1: share whatever he wanted with the Russian officials in the

103
00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:04,479
Speaker 1: Oval Office, but from the context of his position and

104
00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:09,920
Speaker 1: improperly executing his duties to share such sensitive details which

105
00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:13,320
Speaker 1: have been provided only on condition of confidentiality from an

106
00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:17,040
Speaker 1: intelligence partner, which put the asset at risk, which had

107
00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:19,680
Speaker 1: not been coordinated with other agencies to make sure all

108
00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:23,000
Speaker 1: proper procedures were followed first, to just off the cuff

109
00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:26,240
Speaker 1: describe that information to the Russian officials could in and

110
00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,040
Speaker 1: of itself be viewed as a basis for impeachment. But

111
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:31,480
Speaker 1: if we ever get to that point, I don't necessarily

112
00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:34,080
Speaker 1: think we're emnestly and convinced we're there yet. But if

113
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:36,000
Speaker 1: we ever do get to that point, I think that'll

114
00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:38,760
Speaker 1: be icing on the cake. If this president gets impeached,

115
00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:40,880
Speaker 1: it's not going to be what happened with the Russians

116
00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:44,120
Speaker 1: in the Oval Office. Richard. It does seem like impeachment

117
00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:48,400
Speaker 1: is if at all, a long way away, considering that

118
00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:53,160
Speaker 1: both Houses of Congress are controlled by Republicans. So what

119
00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:57,080
Speaker 1: would be the next step the Special Council, Independent Commissions,

120
00:07:57,280 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 1: Lect Congressional Committee. What would you see as the best

121
00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:04,080
Speaker 1: next step? Well, I think that there is going to

122
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:08,000
Speaker 1: need to see an investigation continue investigation of the Russia

123
00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:12,520
Speaker 1: uh A connection by the House and Senate intelligence committees,

124
00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:15,760
Speaker 1: and the Republicans are going to have to very forcefully

125
00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:20,560
Speaker 1: supportment investigation. The Republican Party has never in its history

126
00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:25,360
Speaker 1: foot for shielding Russian agents and Russian espionage inside the

127
00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:29,640
Speaker 1: United States and other subbursive activities they've been really going on.

128
00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:32,040
Speaker 1: The Russian has been doing this since the nineteen seventeen

129
00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:36,440
Speaker 1: Russian Revolution, trying to destabilize Western democracies. We just thought

130
00:08:36,600 --> 00:08:40,160
Speaker 1: Gramps this last week. I don't think the Republicans are

131
00:08:40,160 --> 00:08:42,920
Speaker 1: going to tolerate that, and those investigations are gonna pursued,

132
00:08:43,280 --> 00:08:45,280
Speaker 1: and then we're gonna have investigations in the House, the

133
00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:48,680
Speaker 1: Senate History Committee on the question of abuse of power.

134
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:52,400
Speaker 1: And I went to Gown. I think Republicans will uh

135
00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:55,800
Speaker 1: come around on this, you know, remembering that even with

136
00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:59,280
Speaker 1: the next debacle of the Republican Party came back very

137
00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:03,680
Speaker 1: strong and Kenadie with election of Ronald Reagan. But participating

138
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,640
Speaker 1: and cover up it's certainly not the interest of of

139
00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:11,640
Speaker 1: anybody in the Republican Party or anyone in Congress. So

140
00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:13,640
Speaker 1: hopefully we're gonna be able to move forward on this.

141
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:17,120
Speaker 1: But it's a very serious situation because unlike water Gate,

142
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:21,000
Speaker 1: which was really a third rate burglary um, you know,

143
00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:26,360
Speaker 1: but it's purely domestic, this involved the Russian UH aspying

144
00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:29,559
Speaker 1: inside the United States and attempt to be stablized our government.

145
00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:36,240
Speaker 1: That's a very dangerous situation. Now, do we expect Bradley

146
00:09:36,360 --> 00:09:42,920
Speaker 1: to see James Comey anytime soon testifying in in Congress

147
00:09:42,920 --> 00:09:45,920
Speaker 1: in the open? I believe, I know, I know that

148
00:09:45,960 --> 00:09:47,600
Speaker 1: there's already been a request I think it was just

149
00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:51,320
Speaker 1: made earlier this uh this morning or this afternoon for

150
00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:54,080
Speaker 1: him to come back, and also Senate Intelligence or Senate

151
00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:57,560
Speaker 1: Judiciary that want him to testify an open and closed

152
00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:01,240
Speaker 1: classified session. I think that is very much warranted at

153
00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:03,880
Speaker 1: this point. I think, given all that's already leaked out,

154
00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:08,120
Speaker 1: and given these various stories now about the memoranda that

155
00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:12,599
Speaker 1: he was drafting documenting the conversations with the President that

156
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,720
Speaker 1: were raising concerns for him that we need to have

157
00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:19,840
Speaker 1: some clarity on the situation. And it's it's it's more

158
00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:21,840
Speaker 1: or less about time that he comes back we get

159
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,720
Speaker 1: some certainty as to what exactly happened, why he didn't

160
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:29,360
Speaker 1: raise this earlier, why he had what he one of

161
00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:32,000
Speaker 1: the conversations he had with the president, and what else

162
00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:36,720
Speaker 1: he was concerned about, if anything. And Richard, let's talk

163
00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:41,319
Speaker 1: about an FBI memo and the weight that an FBI

164
00:10:41,440 --> 00:10:48,959
Speaker 1: memo carries that what about the FBI memo that an

165
00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:53,040
Speaker 1: FBI memo in criminal proceedings even carries a great deal

166
00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:57,800
Speaker 1: of weight, and a memo made almost contemporaneously with a

167
00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:02,319
Speaker 1: discussion by an FBI up person or questioning, Well, the

168
00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:06,240
Speaker 1: question is what happened in the conversation And at the

169
00:11:06,360 --> 00:11:09,280
Speaker 1: end of the day, the question is gonna say, was

170
00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:14,280
Speaker 1: the President UH seeking to intimidate the FBI and trying

171
00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:20,120
Speaker 1: to threaten UH, were actually threatening Director Comey with being

172
00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:23,360
Speaker 1: fired if he did not UH put ustop to the

173
00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:27,800
Speaker 1: point investigation and tamper down the Russia investigation. UH. The

174
00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:30,840
Speaker 1: evidence points in the direction of that, indeed being the case,

175
00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:35,640
Speaker 1: the question isn't the mamo the mamos the evidence. The

176
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:41,160
Speaker 1: question is did the President seek to impede the FBI

177
00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:44,880
Speaker 1: investigation by threatening to fire the FBI director if he

178
00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:47,800
Speaker 1: did not put us out to the point investigation. I

179
00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:50,560
Speaker 1: want to thank both of you for being on Bloomberg Law.

180
00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:54,160
Speaker 1: That's Richard Painter, professor at the University of Minnesota Law School,

181
00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:58,560
Speaker 1: and Bradley Moss, partner at Mark's Aid. Coming up on

182
00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:00,800
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law. We're going to go back in history to

183
00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:04,280
Speaker 1: look at the parallels between Komi's memo and the smoking

184
00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:08,720
Speaker 1: gun that took present Richard Nixon down. I am June Grosso.

185
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:11,679
Speaker 1: You're listening to Bloomberg Law on Bloomberg Radio. This is

186
00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:12,320
Speaker 1: Bloomberg