WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Delta, Constellation Brands Earnings 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 2>The real ap performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Business, breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Window between the peak and cunt changing super fast.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at how drug makers are being impacted

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>by policy in Washington, DC.

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we'll discuss how one bank is abandoning its net

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 4>zero financed emission goals.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 2>At first, we begin with the airlines industry. This week,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Delta Airlines withdrew its full year financial guidance due to

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty surrounding global trade, and this comes despite the airline

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>reporting better than expected first quarter profit.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>For more on this and the state of the airline industry,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>we were drawn by George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence in your Aerospace,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Defense and Airlines analyst.

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>We first asked George to break down what happened during

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Delta's first quarter earnings call.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 5>The call wasn't as bad I think as a lot feared.

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, A lot of what we heard was the

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 5>premium markets are still good. Europe is still good, but

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 5>they're watching it very closely. Asia Pacific was a good

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 5>market as well. Non premium back of the airplane travel

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 5>in the domestic market is poor. And because of all that,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, they're gonna cap You're gonna flatline capacity, no

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 5>growth for the second half of the year. So it

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 5>sounded like things are okay. Maybe they're okay, but we're

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 5>watching things very close.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>But I remember that Delta and the other US carriers

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>probably several weeks ago cut their guidance. This was before

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I think an investor conference, so they've already cut guidance once.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Here agree, So where are we there? I mean, do

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you feel like street estimates need to come down.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Here, agreed. Well, so when I looked at the preliminary

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 5>guidance for two Q, it did seem like street estimates

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 5>for two Q had to come down, right because Delta

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 5>gave some pretty broad ranges. But it looks like capacity

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 5>is going to rise five percent when I look at

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 5>schedules for them in the second quarter, and they said

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 5>revenue could be up to to down two and if

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 5>I did my math right, that means that I think

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 5>either way fares are softening again. It's we're definitely working

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 5>off lower expectations after they cut earnings expectations after the

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan conference. But so Caesar Trappie here, Georgia.

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 2>I know every year you take a boondoggle over to Europe,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>either to London or Parish for these air shows, and

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>this is where these big airlines make place big orders

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>with the airplane suppliers bowing and airbus principally. Are we

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>going to get to a period, George where if they

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>even allow you to go to Paris of the French

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>late let you in, will European carriers buy Boeing planes

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>and vice versa. Will European carriers by or you know, Airbus.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>I think they will. I think they will because the

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 5>queues for airplanes are so long you're not going to

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 5>get out of the queue you're in and go to

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 5>someone else's queue and wait longer. You'd have to wait

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 5>seven eight years for an A three twenty out of Airbus.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 5>I think, as near as we could tell from the

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 5>backlog their show. But what I will tell you about

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 5>discussions with Ed Bastion about taking Airbus airplanes and who

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 5>pays a tariff? And he said he's not going to

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 5>pay a tariff, and he's not going to take any

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 5>deliveries or sorry, very few deliveries this year. So it

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 5>does sound like Delta has a tariff problem and isn't

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 5>ready to take new airplanes. Now I know, you know

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 5>their flatlining capacity for the back half of the year,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>so maybe they don't need them. But if the market

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 5>was growing significantly right now, I think he'd have a problem.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned kind of the weakness Delta was calling

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 2>out in the back of the plane, maybe some of

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the more economy prices and seats. So does that mean

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the discount airlines they're really going to face some trouble.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean the funny thing is again when sort of Delta,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 5>United and American Ad justin earnings a month ago. The

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 5>low cost carriers did a little bit, but the moves

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 5>weren't as great, and the low cost carriers had already

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 5>been cutting capacity, right if you think about it. Spirit

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Airlines went bankrupt. They cut forty percent out of their schedule,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 5>or something like thirty percent of their schedule. Southwest significantly

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 5>slowed growth, they went close to zero. Jet Blue has

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 5>been cutting and now Delta came in today and said, look,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 5>we're going to cut the back half of the year

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 5>to flat. So I feel like the full service have

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.239
<v Speaker 5>to make up ground here because they had been growing

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 5>a little bit too fast. We had seen that at

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of the year, we're going to see an

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 5>earning season. Whether or not maybe low cost got ahead

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 5>of the curve here. I still can't believe that Delta

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 5>can deliver a seat as cheap as a low cost carrier.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 5>So I personally think the low cost carriers still have

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 5>a valid business here and they'll fill airplanes and do okay.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 5>But when you get into times of trouble in this industry,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Trouble is big in this industry. Right, there's a lot

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 5>of operating leverage and so we're going to see, right, we're.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Gonna jetfield prices are coming down. I mean they are,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>That's the thing. Thirty seconds top airline and to manage

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>all of this right now, what do you think.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 5>I'd go with? Balance sheets?

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 5>And that's going to be companies like Southwest and Delta

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 5>that have strong balance sheets and weather storms.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and Airlines Analyst.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the consumer goods industry. This week,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Constellation Brands issued downbeat guidance for the year as new

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 4>US tariffs im muted demand. Way on the beer, wine,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 4>and spirits maker.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 2>For more, We were joined by Ken Sha, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Senior Consumer Products Analyst.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Ken for his take on Constellation's most

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>recent guidance.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 7>There's so many moving parts to the Constellation storyline here.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 7>It's really a challenge of analysts to put it all together.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 7>But you touch on the right points, and that is

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 7>the near term challenge is facing a Constellation and other

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 7>brewers for that matter, is weak demand. A lot of

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 7>it is economic. Constellation would also point to their key

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 7>demographic is the Hispanic demographic, and they're having a little

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 7>tougher time with the employment situation and slow down, but

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 7>they have some longer term threats also. I mean, you

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 7>have more substitute products. You have legal cannabis. You have

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 7>the hemp based CBD THHC products that are now down

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 7>main street. You don't have to go to a dispensary

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 7>to buy THC anymore, you just go to the local

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 7>liquor store. You have the GLP one drugs where people

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 7>are Our studies show that are consuming less alcohol because

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 7>they're on those drugs. All those things are weighing on

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 7>the near term and perhaps longer term sales growth potential

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 7>for beer. And that's what the anamals are trying to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 7>wrap our heads around right now.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>What is the price elasticity on alcohol? Can these companies

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>pass along price increases?

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, it depends on the product pole. The good news

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 7>among that other otherwise onerous outlook is that Constellation's Corona

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 7>and Medello brands lead the market in terms of growth.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 7>Those products continue to command reamium prices. They're growing faster

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 7>than the market, so they're they're generating best in class

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 7>operating margins on those products, but you know, they're not

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 7>immune to the slowdown, and clearly they lowered their guidance.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 7>Well the fourth their fiscal fourth quarter came in a

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 7>little better than expected. Some of the concerns out there

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 7>is they lowered their longer term sales growth projections. Used

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 7>to be, you know, a high single digit kind of

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 7>sales growing segment for many years. They came out and said,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, over the next few years, you're going to

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 7>see yeah, we're like low single digit. And the analysts

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 7>were a little taken aback by that. And to Alex's

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 7>question before, how much is that near term you know,

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.359
<v Speaker 7>cyclical economic issues and how much is longer term demographic

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 7>things weighing on this category? So no one really knows.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 7>So we'll find out.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Nobody knows, right, So then what does Constellation do about that? Like,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 4>do they go build a beer plant in the US,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 4>Do they look for some M and A, do they

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 4>pair back?

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 3>What do they do?

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 7>They're innovating. I would argue that Constellation is one of

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 7>the more innovative beer companies. So they're taking that that

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 7>base of a real good brand family of Corona and Medelo,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 7>and they have Pacific go but they also are extending

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 7>into chiladas, which are very flavorful malt based products. They're

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 7>getting into the malt based seltzer markets a little bit.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 7>They used to do it, but I'm going to come

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 7>back with a better product. Now they have a no

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 7>alcohol version Corona, So it's innovation. I think that they

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 7>believe can continue to drive sales growth. But there's no

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 7>silver bullet. I mean, there's no big acquisition out there.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 7>I don't believe that they're going to make to enhance

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 7>their growth. I think they have a good brand and

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 7>a good asset to grow. But again, you're not going

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 7>to escape the long term headwinds facing alcoholic products, alcoholic

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 7>beverage products in general as a matter of fact.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So can you follow the beverages, the tobacco and the

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>cannabis companies? Is there a place to hide in your

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>sector here in a world where where you're going to

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>see potentially slower growth from some of these trade policies.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, of the ones you mentioned, Paul, I mean the tobacco,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 7>particularly cigarette company lit cigarettes are some ninety percent of

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 7>that business. Still they are pretty much immune to the

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 7>tariff situation. It's pretty much a domestic business. Yes, there's

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 7>some tobacco leaf imports that come in and so on,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 7>but by and large that's a domestic business. So if

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 7>if you're worried about tariffs, perhaps that's a place where

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 7>can can go in terms of, you know, beyond tariff threats.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 7>Really the soft drink side of beverages is a good

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 7>place to be. I would argue that even the you know,

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 7>tried and true carbonated beverage sodas, you know, the diet sodas,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 7>are still performing pretty well. They're innovating well. Cure Doctor

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 7>Pepper continues to come out with new innovation that's moving

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 7>that category. They're kind of leading that category's growth right now,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 7>but they're doing a pretty good job doing it. So

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 7>that's a good place to go in terms of the

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 7>universe that I cover. Cannabis is tough. Cannabis. You know,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 7>the regulation on cannabis is not easing. The Trump administration

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 7>is not being kind to the acadamist industry, and we're

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 7>not expecting much on the way of legalization liberalization near term,

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 7>with the exception of some states. Some states will probably

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 7>continue to legalize, but from a federal point of view,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 7>I would wait for the next Administration.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Ken Shay, Bloomberg Intelligence senior consumer products analysts.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Coming up a conversation with Workday's chief technology officer on

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>bi go on the terminal.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and a Malex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 4>We look at research from Bloomberg n EF previously known

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 4>as New Energy Finance. They're the team at Bloomberg that

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 4>tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 4>and the agricultural sectors.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 2>We recently looked at the effect of President Donald Trump's

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>policies on clean energy markets. This week, President Trump announced

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>he's raising tariffs on Chinese goods.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Many critical minerals and energy products come from China and

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 4>are subject to these tariffs, and that could have a

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 4>big impact on clean energy moving forward.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Separately, a Trump administration executive order said it's exempting forty

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>seven coal fired power plants from stringent air pollution mandates

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 2>and the goal is to revitalize the coal industry.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 4>For more on all of this, we are joined by

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Derek flackl b any F, lead US policy analysts.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Derek what he makes of the executive

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>order on coal.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, the executive order is interesting because this is sort

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 8>of a replay of what Trump tried to do in

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 8>his first term.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 8>He had previously talked about increasing payments to or using

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 8>emergency powers for preserving existing coal plants, maybe bringing old

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 8>ones back online, and as we can see from the

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 8>power generation data, that didn't really work out. Coal is

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 8>now fifteen percent of generation in the US per year,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 8>down from considerably higher levels before. So there's a lot

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 8>of different moving parts to this. You might see more

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 8>say coal exports, more long term gathering of coal leases,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 8>which have been sort of moving back and forth from

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 8>Obama to Trump one, to Biden and now to Trump two.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 8>But in general it's hard to say that this will

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 8>be a huge boon to coal build out or restoration,

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 8>especially when you have tariffs weighing on any kind of

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 8>big capital project.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, so talk about, you know, the energy ecosystem.

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Where do we get stuff for the energy ecosystem, whether

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>it's fossil fuels, clean energy, where do we get the

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>equipment and is that something that's going to be impacted

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>by these tariffs?

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 9>Oh, very heavily.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 8>Even for fossil fuels, which are often a very domestically

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 8>extracted resource, there's reliance on steel, luminum, specialized equipment that's imported,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 8>which is why you saw the Dallas Fed register such

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 8>negative opinions about the tariffs coming in generally, more broadly

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 8>in terms of say solar equipment that mostly comes from

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 8>Southeast Asia, because we've had batteries, we've had tariffs in

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 8>China for a long time. Batteries themselves tend to come

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 8>from China. Electric vehicles are imported from a variety of places,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 8>but especially you know, it's very domestic, with the fair

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 8>amount of Canada and Mexico in there. And lastly, if

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 8>you're thinking about say offshore wind, that's pretty dependent on Europe.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 8>The only thing that's really effectively on shore and minimally

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 8>dependent on trade is onshore wind in the US.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>What is the future of offshore wind in the US?

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if we're talking about ramping up coal and

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of there's zero love from the administration on offshore wind.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Have we seen sort of I don't know, leases or

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>any contracts be broken or do you feel like companies

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 4>that are still are still committed to the longer term

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 4>world of offshore wind.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean what the offshore win companies will tell you.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 8>This is a multi year, long term process of building

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 8>that's beyond any one administration. We have seen one lease

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 8>be canceled by the federal government for an ongoing project,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 8>but generally speaking, we haven't seen a lot more movement

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 8>for things that have already been permitted and leased. Now

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 8>that's important because the federal government has a lot of

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 8>leverage over that process. We're not seeing a lot more

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 8>being added to the pipeline. But the real issue is

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 8>going to come in the form of costs, inflation, and

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 8>also potentially interest rates. We saw a major slowan an

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 8>offshore win under Biden, which is a very supportive administration,

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 8>simply because the cost of inputs went up and as

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 8>inflation went up. The FED height rates and wind is

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 8>a very large capital intensive project category and especially sensitive

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 8>to those kinds of things. So if the terrorists lead

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 8>to those broader impacts, we might see some fairly negative

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 8>results for even the offshore win projects that are already

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 8>allowed to go forward.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Derek, I think even folks that are you know that

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>question the value of the economic value of tariff in general,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>they kind of recognize that some of this strategically important

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>stuff maybe that we ourn was strategically important from the

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>pandemic when they trade the cycles were all disrupted, the

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>trade routes were disrupted. That makes some sense. Is a

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>clean energy did they have a focus on bringing this

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff on shore as much as possible.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 8>There's been a lot of discussion of that across multiple administrations.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 8>The Bide administration was in favor of that. The Trump

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 8>administration is in favor of on shory manufacturing generally and

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 8>of energy security independence, even dominance, as they like to

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 8>say generally, but that's a hard thing to achieve with

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 8>tariffs alone. Ultimately, a lot of the solar factories, battery factories,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 8>ev factories that are coming up in the US are

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 8>dependent on imports, whether those are imports of upstream components

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 8>or of the manufacturing equipment needed to make the final

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 8>products solar panels and batteries themselves. And right now we're

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 8>seeing costs go up on those across the board. Unless

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 8>you have more reliable revenue streams like tax credits, for example,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 8>it's kind of hard to imagine new decisions to build

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 8>that stuff out. Even things that are already being built

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 8>are facing uncertainty not only from the Trump tariffs, from

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 8>other investigations into tariffs being run at the Department of

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 8>Commerce and US Trade Representative, but also on the fate

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 8>of those tax credits, which is going to help guarantee

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 8>their revenues in the long term.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a great point which leads us to the IRA,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 4>the Inflation Reduction Act, which I mean, clearly President Trump

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 4>hates that thing, but there are is a lot of

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 4>value in it through the tax credits and subsidies for

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 4>companies that supposedly he is a fan of, like the

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 4>oil industry for example. When do you think we're going

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 4>to know the fate of the IRA and those tax credits.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 8>That's a great question, and I've been wondering at myself. Obviously,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing a lot of wrangling between the House and

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Senate about the top lights on their big budget bill

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 8>they're going to try and pass by the end of

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 8>the year. Obviously, the end of the year is when

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 8>individual tax rates go up, and so that's one of

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 8>the big forcing functions. You also are seeing the x

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 8>state the debt ceiling occurring somewhere between July and maybe September,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 8>and that's going to be a point where there's going

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 8>to be a lot of pressure to pass a big

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 8>budget package, raise the debt ceiling, and probably also get

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 8>some of this tax material done. But we've seen a

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 8>lot of debt lines blown already for when we were

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 8>allegedly going to get top line packages, which are a

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 8>preconditioned to figure out what's going to happen what tax

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 8>credit and we don't even know that yet at this point.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 8>We don't even know if they're going to use this

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 8>particular budget commit called current Policy, which would really reduce

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 8>the pressures to cut more. And as they're trying to

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 8>use that, we're seeing a lot of blowback from physical

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 8>conservatives in both the Senate but especially in the House,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 8>and so we'll see.

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much to Derek flackl bn EF lead

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 4>US policy analyst. BLOOMERIG Intelligence recently hosted its fourth Generative

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Artificial Intelligence conference and there were some great lineups in

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>terms of how you apply and make AI for more.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Alex and I were joined by Jim Stratton Workday, chief

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>technology officer the AI platform. Workday trades under the NASDAK

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 2>ticker wday.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Jim where workday sits in the AI space.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 9>Workday builds and deploys and serves enterprise finance and HR

0:18:54.840 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 9>for major corporations, for state higher ed for large institutions,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 9>and AI really is built directly into the products that

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 9>we build. So if you think about the different types

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 9>of workflows around running a business, around running a major business,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 9>all of that is right to be infused with AI

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 9>for automation, for ease of use, and that's really what

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 9>we're building into.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Pointing now, so to what extent, I guess a lot

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of US lay people we're trying to get a sense

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of this is just the next step in the evolution

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of tech or is AI elite a step function? How

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>do you think about the technology of AI, the compute

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 2>that it and the applications coming from that.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 9>It is the next step really the next evolution and technology.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 9>But I think the leverage that we can get out

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 9>of AI, it really is a leap in terms of

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 9>it's in exponential growth, in terms of productivity, in terms

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 9>of enhancing humans and the capabilities of what we have

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 9>in the workplace. It really is an exponential leap for

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 9>us in the technology space.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 4>So give me a use case. So some of your

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 4>client like GE or Visa, right, I come to you

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, Jim, what are you going to do

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>for me? And how does it help me and make

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 4>me more productive or something along those lines. What does

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 4>that use case look like?

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 9>So if you think about across I'll give you a

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 9>couple examples across HR and finance. So think about the

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 9>recruiting space a talent acquisition. You have in many cases

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 9>thousands of jobs, hundreds of thousands of jobs that are

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 9>open across even just the US. Here within a particular

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 9>company you may be sourcing for you know, ten fifty

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 9>one hundred jobs or literally thousands of jobs across a

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 9>large enterprise, and you're getting in some cases hundreds of thousands,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 9>millions of resumes into those jobs. Literally that many resumes,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 9>it's really hard to go through and source that. AI

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 9>is a terrific space, and actually we have a recruiting

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 9>agent out in the market now that helps significantly with

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 9>that sourcing problem in terms of weeding through who are

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 9>the best candidates, what are the best skills, depths of skills,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 9>even some of those skills are hidden. AI is actually

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 9>really good at map that into a job requisition and saying,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 9>you know what, these are probably your top ten candidates,

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 9>and then handing that off to a recruiter to then

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 9>go do the human engagement interacting with those candidates and

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 9>finding the best, the best one, the best fit that's

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 9>already out in the market. And we're seeing incredible improvements

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 9>in terms of talent acquisition efficiency, what the recruiters are

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 9>able to source, how quickly they can fill roles. On

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 9>the on the finance side, I'll give you a quick

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 9>example there as well. Our finance teams and every finance

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 9>team at every every major company out there spend tons

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 9>of time pouring over contracts to understand the details in

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 9>those contracts and how that maps directly into their into

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 9>their books, into their financials. AI is fantastic at not

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 9>only extracting information off of contracts, but summarizing that and

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 9>actually directly mapping that back into the gl of a

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 9>company that's also out in the market for us UH

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 9>and and we're seeing great gains in that in terms

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 9>of efficiency of what the legal and finance teams can do.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So with what love of confidence can you say that

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>all this money that's being spent on AI is generating

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a positive return or will generate a positive return in

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable time.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 9>Actually, it's a great question. There's a huge amount of

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 9>money that's being spent just on the pure advancement of

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 9>frontier models of really research AI, and we are seeing

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 9>incredible gains in terms of those moving to what we

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 9>call reasoning models, so the ability to actually think through

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 9>a problem in multiple steps and then actually go action

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 9>against that. I think that's going to have really broad

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 9>application across lots of things, not just enterprise software, but

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 9>just how we interact with everything in the world. But

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 9>directly within the enterprise world. We're now very much focused

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 9>and I spent a lot of my time talking with

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 9>CIOs out in the community, and they're thinking about this

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 9>exactly the same way. It is, how do we we've

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 9>already spent a bunch of money trying to trying things out,

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 9>playing around. Now we need to show direct ROI back

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 9>in those investments. And that's the part where we are

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 9>now is the products that are being built. The problems

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 9>that people like Workday, Companies like work Day are focused

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 9>on solving are direct ROI. How do we get efficiency

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 9>back into the business. How do we reduce risk in

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 9>the business. Those are the primary areas where we're going now.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Jim Stratton, Workday's chief technology officer.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on the program, We're going to break down

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 4>how drug makers are being impacted by policy in Washington, DC.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>in depth research and data on two thousand companies and

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>via Bigo on the terminal.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and am Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch the program

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg, eleven thirty.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the drug and pharmaceutical space.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 2>The Trump administration recently rejected a plan to pay for

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>OBCD drugs for Medicare.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Patients may now need to rely on Congress to expand

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 4>OBC drug coverage, with a potential scale down expansion possibly

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 4>emerging in a future Republican bill.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>For more on this and the latest news in the

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 2>obesity drug space, we were joined by Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Director of Research for Global Industries and senior pharmaceuticals analysts.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Sam how President Trump projecting obesity coverage

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 4>impacts that market.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 10>Of course, what happened is that this has been something

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 10>that was put together in the Biden era in terms

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 10>of trying to get Medicare coverage for these obesity drugs. Remember,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 10>medicare are folks that are over sixty five years old

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 10>and more likely to be overweight.

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Not necessarily right.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 10>But more likely to be overweight and more likely to

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 10>have issues to do with overweight.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 6>So it's a.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 10>Very important group of individuals to have this products available for.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 10>But I think there is a general sense and I

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 10>think we had expected this, So this is not an

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 10>unexpected outcome that the Secretary of the HHS Human Health

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 10>Services in the US is not necessarily a fan of

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 10>obesity drugs. However, there's a little aspect here that's important.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 10>These drugs are also covered by Medicare for those who

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:20.239
<v Speaker 10>suffer from sleep apnea and cardiovascular morbidities, those indications, and

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 10>that usage has not been withdrawn. It's just the use

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 10>for obesity that's been withdrawn or at least is not

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 10>being proposed anymore.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 4>So what I mean, can that be real? That doesn't

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 4>make any sense to me, And like, the whole point

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 4>of these drugs is to help obesity. How are they

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 4>going to keep that distinction?

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, but Alex, not that I'd like to necessarily agree

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 10>with the kind of decisions that are being made or

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 10>disagree with them. If you think about it, if everybody

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 10>who has a comorbidity, for example, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease,

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 10>sleep apnea, and the only people who are not going

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 10>to be able to get it other people who just

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 10>overweight nothing else, that's a little bit easier to swallow

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 10>than if they were they said, Okay, we're just going

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 10>to ban it. Because those elements of protecting patients that

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 10>is important for health. Now, if these other obius people

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 10>ended up the ones who are now not being included,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 10>just obs and no comobidities having one of these issues,

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 10>they would be included.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 6>So I think the.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 10>Issue here is some folks believe that all of these

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 10>things should be solved by eating better. Of course, we

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 10>all want to do that and not eating too.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 6>Much, et cetera, et cetera.

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 10>However, society shows us that that's clearly not possible for

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people, and they end up in a

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 10>situation where they gain weight and they put in more

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 10>energy and then they spend That's where the problems arise.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 10>But so I don't think it's really as bad as

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 10>it sounds when you first look at it.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Novo Nordisk is down. Is that just the obesity play

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>unwinding for this name.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 10>Well, you would think to yourself, but why would it

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 10>for this name and not for Eeli living right. We've

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 10>always believed that Lily obviously has a lot more going on,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 10>but we all know that Lily is particularly driven with

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 10>the obesity aspect.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 6>We also know that the obesity.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Drug from Lily, zip Bound, has outperformed NOVAL noticsts Bigov.

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 10>We also know that Novo Nordics is based in Denmark,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 10>and there's this fight going on between or at least

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 10>a heated conversations going on between the US administration and

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 10>the and the Denmark Danish authorities. So I think you

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 10>can pilo these things up on top of each other

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 10>and worry about NOVO more than you would about.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 4>All right, fair enough, what about the rest of the sector.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>What are what are some.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Themes that are on your mind?

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so vaccines continue to be a theme on our mind, which,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 10>of course there there's there's always words that get that

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 10>are spoken or statements that are written that seem to suggest.

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 6>That vaccines are a good thing.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 10>MMR is a good way of stopping measles, But they

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 10>don't say you got to go out there.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 6>And get it. That's what's missing.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 10>On the other hand, we also have an issue with

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 10>regards to what I feel like is a I don't

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 10>want to call it an attack, but an undermining of

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 10>research in areas which are infectious diseases, which I just

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 10>do not understand why a tuber closest expert would lose

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 10>their funding. These are not diseases that no virus has

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 10>been annihilated. Maybe smallpox, but I think if you think

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 10>about it, measles, we didn't have any debts.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 6>We have them now.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 10>As soon as you let your guard down a little bit,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 10>it all explodes. So that is I am worried about

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 10>that because I love the United States, I love coming there,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 10>and that is something that clearly is a worrisome aspect

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 10>for me.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Is it shared to any extent in Europe?

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 6>Sam Oh?

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, of course vaccine hesitancy isn't a specific US issue.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 10>The thing is that what you don't want is that

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 10>hesitancy to be fed from top healthcare efficients.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Over Here we have that hesitancy.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 10>Don't forget the person who put together the MMR study

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 10>for and the discredited MMR study and Autism Link is

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 10>a UK individual but that's been discredited. But the UK

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 10>government and health services have continued to push that this

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 10>is the best way to get folks protected.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 6>So it's not. Hesitancy is not just a US issue,

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 6>it's everywhere. What you need is health officials to be pushing.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>It our Thanks to Sam Fazelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Research for Global Industries and senior pharmaceuticals analyst.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the banking sector.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Wells Fargo recently became the first bank to abandon its

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>climate goals as political sentiment in Washington, DC shifts.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 4>The firm's abandonment of net zero finance and mission goals

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 4>puts around five times of one percent of its market

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 4>value held by ESG and climate funds at risk should

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 4>investors choose to divest.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And for more, we were joined by Shaheen Contract of

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. Senior ESG strategist refers to ask Shaheen for

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 2>more context on what Wells Fargo did.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 11>So, wes Fargo abandoned its climate financing goal in particular,

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 11>So that's the emissions from its loan book. Typically it's

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 11>a much bigger emissions chunk than it's sort of operations.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 11>So just to give you a sense of scale, it's

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 11>about let'ld say ninety five percent of its total emissions.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 11>So that's what well Fago did. Other banks like HSBC

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 11>have delayed their operational emissions. Again that's about five percent,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 11>So that's a much smaller piece.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>So how do we distinguish between, you know, headlines where

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 4>it's like forgetting climate goals and just sort of changing

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 4>climate goals for some of these things.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, you have to dig in. I think it's the

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 11>difference is again that operation versus financed. It's not as

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 11>how do I say this as binary? Binary as like

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 11>diversity where they can dilute the language a little bit.

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 11>Carbon goales are either there or not there.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>It is actually binary.

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 2>Are they walking away? Are they saying, we're not going

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to restrict our lending to companies that have to fossil

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>fuel companies. We're not going to do that anyway.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 11>Correct, So that's in a way what they're saying, because

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 11>what a finance goal would mean is we're going to

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 11>reduce the emissions small loone book from X to Z,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 11>and that would probably come with reducing to these sectors.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now, what's JP Morgan, whatis City? What's Bank of America?

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 6>Said?

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 11>Nothing yet so far, so they have exited the nets

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 11>zero Alliance. That being said, they've still been on track

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 11>with their goals. They've still reduced to missions that is

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 11>in line with their targets. What's also interesting is West

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 11>Fago has also done that, but it's still abandoned its goals.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 11>So what's to come We'll see.

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting talking about abandoning goals like Airbus was just

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 4>saying that they still want to get to that net

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 4>zero by twenty fifty, but they're constrained by like infrastructure

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 4>and technology, et cetera. How much of that is wrapped

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>into the conversation, how much of that is aploaded not them?

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 11>So west Fago and his statement actually said that they

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 11>attribute this to changing custom behavior, to politics, to a

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 11>number of things. However, given that they're quite on track

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 11>to achieving this goal, which is also an analysis we've done,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 11>we've attributed it to politics.

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 2>So the politics in the US are different from the

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 2>politics obviously in Europe for example. So are we seeing

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>any of the big European companies or sectors of companies

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>walk back some of the ESG goals so in a.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 11>Much smaller way, yes, So again HSBC and UBS have

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 11>delayed their operational missions goal. Again, that's I would call

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 11>that almost insignificant for a bank. So they have the

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 11>bigger pieces of financed mission goals, which we'll see.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm a shareholder, if I'm an ESG fund

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and I own Wells fargar, do I just sell my

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 2>position here?

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 11>So it could be at risk. Yes, I mean climate

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 11>is quite high up in ESG funds agenda, and we've

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 11>done the analysis. So for Wells Fargo, about zero point

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 11>five percent of its market value is held in these

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 11>ESG and climate funds. Honestly quite small, right, So the

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 11>risk lies in other more expost peers.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So just give me a sense once again. I know

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>we've gone over this number million times how much money

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>is in ESG funds roughly.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 11>So if we look at ETFs, which is the analysis

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 11>I've done, it's about I would say, close to six

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 11>hundred billion.

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 6>Ok.

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 11>Now, let me go back. So I did this analysis

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 11>two years back. At that point, all ESG label funds

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 11>was about two point three trillion. So that's to give

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 11>you a sense of scale.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Now that's really fine in funds funds flowing out of ESG.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 11>No, sorry, So I go back to the two point

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 11>three trillion number, which is all ESG funds. The atfs

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 11>are much smaller share, So I would say that we've

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 11>not done that analysis more recently, but it is two

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 11>point three trillion is quite large substantial share.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 4>When you talk about the amount of assets that are

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 4>in broader funds, not just ETFs, which is broader funds.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 3>What the numbers that we're talking about here, So that.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 11>Will be the two point three trillion that I mentioned.

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 11>So this is all funds with words, yes, she climate,

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 11>et cetera.

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 11>I would say a lot of those funds are changing names, so.

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so we don't know if they're going to be

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 4>labeled that later on down the road.

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, okay, what's your biggest call for this industry for

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 3>this year?

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Like, what do you think the biggest change is going

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 4>to be?

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 11>I think, given the recent headlines, I think a lot

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 11>of it is divestment tists, which I don't think people realize.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 11>I don't think people realize ESG investor base that is

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 11>in a company. So if a company is like State Street,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 11>for example.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 6>They've.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 11>Acts the diversity policyes the example, and three percent, well

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 11>up to three percent of their investor base is actually

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 11>in ESG funds. So I would say that's quite an exposure.

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Our Thanks to Shieting contractor, Bloomberg Intelligence senior ESG strategist.

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You can a so watch us live every weekday on

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal