WEBVTT - Tesla Will Struggle To Raise Money Without Elon: Kudla (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Tesla

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the forefront of people's minds this morning after

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the SEC sued Elon Musk for misleading the world frankly,

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but particularly the markets when he said that he was

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to take Tesla private for four d and twenty

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars share, saying that funding was secured when in reality

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. Shares now of Tesla down by eleven percent,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so definitely seeing a big fall there. David Cutla is

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief executive officer and chief investment strategist of

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Mainstay Capital. David, you're joining us now, you've embarished on

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla all along. What's your take on this? What are

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the declines really stemming from here? Well, the declines today

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>or something from the lawsuit by the SEC yesterday announced. Uh,

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>just four or five minutes after the close, and we

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>saw what happened after hours trading, and of course what's

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>happening in UH in trading today and UH, you know

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a big problem for Elon Muskin for Tesla obviously,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>David could lad do you ever look at used or

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>pre owned car prices when it comes to Tesla? Yes,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And I was looking, for example, at how they hold

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>their value and they don't seem to do so is

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that concerning? I think it should be concerning, UH And

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting too, UH that that they don't

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>hold their value as someone might expect. But I think

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's concerned primary concern right now, they've got some more

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>media issues with their UH cash position, you know they're there.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Will they be able to remain solvent? UH, their production problems,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>their quality problems, their service center problems, UM, and you know,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just the metrics that they're trying to to hit as

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we go forward here over the coming weeks, months and

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quarters. Yeah. I mean, David to follow

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>up on that when I asked, you know, why are

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the shares falling? Is it because there is a feeling

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk might be kicked out of the position

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of chief executive officer and what that might mean for

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the company, both from a capital raising standpoint as well

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as directional standpoint. Is it because of concerns of fines

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that are going to potentially reduce their capital position further?

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Where's the risk here? Well, it's I think there's a

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of rests. So Uh, first it's that that, uh,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this is an overhang for the company. Um, there was

0:02:55.760 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity where this could have been there as a

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>settlement in front of Elon Musk in the board on this,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and h Elon Musk in his in his way, uh,

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>decided to push back and fight it. So now there

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is you know, obviously a risk to shareholders as as

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen today. Uh, there will be a risk in

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to raise capital and the risk of Elon

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk future with the company because he could be barred

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>from being a director officer of a public company. And

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's problematic because you know, there's been estimates that there's

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars or a hundred and twenty dollars or

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty dollars in the price of Tesla stock

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as Elon Musk premium. And look, he is a genius

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>inventor visionary. You can obviously his his mission is admirable.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And the people the you know, it's almost a cult following.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, the people that are the customers that are

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there at the delivery center, you know, uh respect they're

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>going to a wedding receiving their vehicles. There is a

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>loyal following. And if Ellen is gone or is forced

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to be gone from the company, uh, you know, there

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>are analysts out there saying, well, that could be good

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because of his erratic behavior and there needs to be

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>an adult in the room running the company. The flip

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>side of that is what Tesla has going for it

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is is very loyal following who has given Elon Musk

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla a lot of passes on broken promises, milestones

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been met, cars that are not good quality

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>by a typical standards in the industry. And those people,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>when Elon is gone, they look at Tesla and site

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's Elon and Elon is Tesla and Elon we trust

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and Elon is gone, they lose that that I think

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they lose a lot. And you know, PIM to David's point,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of analysts from JP Morgan and

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>UBS at a number of other big firms, saying that

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.119
<v Speaker 1>they are concerned that without Elon Musk at the top,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is going to really struggle to raise money. And

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a problem because they're running out of cash

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right They're burning they're burning cash. David, could do you

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have any thoughts on the speed with which this action

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>by the Securities and Exchange Commission has been brought after

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>learning that Mr Musk decided to not go along with

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a settlement. Well, it's it's um you know, when we

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it, and you know, we were on Bloomberg

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about it that week, it was it just was

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious when you looked at the circumstances very quickly

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that it there just wasn't a deal there. And then

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>as more facts came out, it became, I think quite

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>apparent to a lot of people that, um, this had

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the elements of what could be called

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>stock manipulating or fraud. And I think the SEC knows

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they have an open and shut case. They wasn't. Did

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you hear the report for example that the reason that

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it was I can't remember whether it was

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the journal at the times, but I mean even

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in our reporting that uh, he's selected the actual dollar

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>amount of four God, just tell that story. That's it.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was and it was I don't want to

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>say amusing, but unusual that it was actually in the

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>complaint that the SEC stated that he uh added premium

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>to the stock price the time came up with about

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>for nineteen rounded up to because of the reference to

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>marijuana that that has and that his girlfriend would think

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that was funny and that and that's not me, No, No,

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the SEC indeed plane and which is unusual but interesting,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think they wanted to point that out as

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a flip at attitude about everything. And that's that's what

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what's key here that we got David. We gotta

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Thank you very much for joining us.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>David Coudla, chief executive, chief investment strategist, Mainstake Capital Management.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg. John Chambers he is perhaps best

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>known as being the chairman and the chief executive former

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief executive of Cisco. He began his career

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in technology sales at IBM. He also worked for Wang

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Laboratories before joining Cisco, and he joins US now as

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the author of a new book entitled Connecting the Dots

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Lessons for Leadership in a Startup World. John Chambers, thanks

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us, dam and Lisa. It's

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of fun and look forward

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to our conversation. Well, I just want to give full

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>disclosure that I first met John Chambers at a diner

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley with another gentleman named Eric ben Hammou

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and he at that time was running a company called

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>three Calm. And we know what happened to three Calm,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>which is it doesn't exist necessarily in its form anymore. Cisco,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, went on to bigger and better things. John,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could tell us why you wrote the book

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and why you believe that startups really demand a different

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>level of attention, and how you ran Cisco as a

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>startup really until you left. Well, thank you, Pim, and

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I very much remember that conversation because Eric is an

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>excellent CEO and what it talks about, and I decided

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to right to book. Originally, I don't like writing. I'm dyslexic.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It is really hard to do. But I kept getting

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the same questions as I talked to startups around the world.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm now which a C two ventures and where you've

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>invested in sixteen startups globally and focus very much on

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you scale and grow companies? And I decided

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to write the book because I kept hearing these same

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>questions from the startups. It didn't matter if you in Dubai,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>New Delhi, Silicon Valley, West Virginia. The startupe e O

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>s had the same type of issues and challenges, which

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>were how to scale their company, how do you grow,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when do you decide to hire people, how you deal

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with your challenges and your setbacks. And I love teaching

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I love doing, perhaps most of all,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is building teams. So the lessons is very simple. I

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like to share those. You're in a period where you grow,

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you die, you disrupt, you get disrupted, you catch business

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and technology trends at the same time. And Eric was

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a really good competitor, unfortunately, but we had probably five

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or six really tough, big competitors. Five or six companies

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are sized like Free Calm and Wealth Fleet in sent Optics,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and then a whole bunch of startups. What allowed us

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to break away was acting like a startup all the way,

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going from four people when I joined Cisco to seventy

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>five thousand and to be reinvent ourselves again and again,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and to learn that setbacks, while you wish you could

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid them, actually make you stronger as you move forward.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So sharing, that's what I'm after, And I've had the

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be in the front row seat and sometimes

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the playing field as I walk.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>These transitions occur in my home state of West Virginia,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in Boston, which used to be the Silicon Valley of

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, as mainframe computers IBM, many computers think wang

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Deck data, general PC players now the Internet now moving

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>to digitization. So I've seen the movie, I have the scars.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I've done some things right and we have made some mistakes.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And I've quired a hundred day companies, so i know

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>what it's like the scale companies. So, John, given that

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>vast experience, and given the fact that you're currently looking

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for startups that are worthy of your investment, how well

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>positioned is the US in the fight for you know,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>future dominance, not only over technology but in general with

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>its startup culture. Uh. At least I think you've asked

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the major takeaway. I hope people get from the book.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>We think of ourselves as the innovation nation. We are

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not and interesting us. The Bloomberg Index on Innovation doesn't

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have us in the top ten countries anymore. We think

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>with the startup nation of the world. That was true

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties and two thousands, and we used to

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>get a venture capital into our country and twenty years ago,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>then ten years ago, eighty. Today it's fifty. And if

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you watch, we're almost to the twenty year low in

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of startups I e H. Versus where we were

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>UH two decades ago. The number of I p o

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>s and you guys know this very well, Lisa is

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>UH at a very low level compared to where it

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>was in the nineties. Were excited about doing two and

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty I p o S in the New York Stock

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Exchange the NASDAQ this year, and it's up slightly from

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the high in one eighties last year. But we did

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>four hundred to five hundred per year in the nineties.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to generate twenty five to thirty million

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>jobs over the next decade, and if you combine with

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that a requirement to generate another twenty million plus because digitization,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>automation artificial intelligence will destroy twenty to thirty million jobs,

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a third percent of our workforce if we don't

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>get the startup engine going again and we're too complacent.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I point out in the book

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is the worst thing you can do. The worst thing

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you can do is keep doing the right thing too long,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what gets companies into trouble. And countries like

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>France that you view and Pam you would have viewed

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>three or four years ago, is the worst place to

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>do a startup. Have moved to the best place in Europe,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going from a hundred and forty high tech startup venture

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>backs per year to seven d and four years John,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if you could offer your thoughts about

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the various numbers of points that you make

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in the book about vision and strategy and so on.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But I thought that one particularly geographic proximity to headquarters

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>or key operational centers, that's like real information you can

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>use it is Originally I thought at at Cisco, we

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>were building the Internet and we were changing the ways

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the world works. Has learned some place, and I thought

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you could have a company that has people everywhere and

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>function just as good as one that had everybody's headquarters.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong. You've got to have economic centers where

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you can move your teams around as one product does

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>better or another product does not, as you promote people

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from one function to another. And in this new startup world, Uh,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>if you watch what is happening, we're not just not

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>doing the number of startups we should. In this country.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's almost all Northeast Coast, almost all Silicon Valley, and

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>almost all Texas. We need to bring that across the

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>heartland of America and down to the southeast. So my

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>view is that we need to locate startups at these

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hubs with universities and pick one or two universities per

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>state and make all fifty state startups because that's where

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the job creation is going to occur. The big companies

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in total will not add head count uh this next decade.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>John Chambers, thank you so much. Unfortunately we have to

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. We can talk with you all afternoon.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to. John Chambers, former executive chairman and chief

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Cisco, now is the founder CEO of

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>j C two Ventures in Palo Alto, California, and the

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>author of a new book connecting the dots lessons for

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>leadership in a startup world. Indeed, Tesla's founder and charismatic

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>chief executive, Elon Musk, was slapped with a lawsuit from

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the SEC saying that he was engaged in securities manipulation

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with his for twenty dollars a share tweet. He said

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that funding was secured to go private, it was not.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now, John Wilson had a research and corporate

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>governance at Quarterstone Capital Group in New York. Joining us

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>here in studios, John, I'd love to get your perspective

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the corporate governance aspect of this, in

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of what the board should have done and what

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the liability is of having one charismatic leader who is

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhat unhinged. Well, that's a great that's a great couple

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of questions, and I think they'll take the second one first. Right,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a company that you when you invest in

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this company, you are investing in one person, really, right,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because this is a company. It's a car company, but

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it has trouble making cars sometimes. Right, it's deep in

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>debt um. It's signature product, the electric car is less

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and less a novelty every day, Right, as other manufacturers

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming up with their own lines, and so what

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are we investing. We're investing in the charism of this

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>one individual and the fact that he's such a fan

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>following all over the world. People want these cars in

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>part because of his persona, and as it starts to flag,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>then you have to ask yourself, Okay, I need to

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>take a step back, ask the question is what am

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I investing in? Is this a company that can grow beyond?

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is what your your point about the founder's syndrome,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially is can we grow beyond this one individual to

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>create a sustainable going concern that can actually sustain itself

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>over the long term. At this point, especially given their

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>management troubles, seems hard to imagine how they're going to

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. Now, you've written obviously not just about Tesla,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but a variety of companies, and you also speak about

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>how companies are not nimble enough when it comes to

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>these issues. Could you just explain that, well, UM, a

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies have blind spots right about a lot

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of different cultural and social issues that they're facing. Right.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>This is something that we look at when leaders UM

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are not in touch with what there are other stakeholders

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are talking about this can become a huge problem for companies.

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And one issue I think that pr on people's minds

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>right now is the question of sexual and gender based violence.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Right It's not quite the same thing as what TESLA

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is facing at the moment, but it's another cultural issue

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and an issue of leadership. I think, going back a

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>year or so, if you had asked folks, are you

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for or against sexual harassment? I think you would have

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much found everyone to say they were against it.

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And yet, and yet, so many of these companies UM

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>found themselves facing allegations, credible allegations of cultures of sexual

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>harass but not just individual incidents, but whole ultures of

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sexual harassment UM and really being surprised by this. And

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that was what I talked about, by not being nimble,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not being aware of what's going on in your company

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or with its customers, its employees, its suppliers, and it

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>prevents you from acting and it leads to surprises when

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you hear things in the news. All right, So you

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>know you raised sort of a question. Not to conflate

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sexual harassment with securities manipulation, charges that the sec is

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is going after Elon Musk. For there is though a

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>question about the board here with Tesla as well as

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as you said, in terms of what their role ought

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to be in setting a culture that is conducive to

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different points of view. And so I'm

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you could just speak about Tesla, I mean,

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>where is the responsibility for their board? Well, here's the problem.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is an issue that we sometimes

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about, which is that corporate governance doesn't matter until

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it does right. In other words, what I'm saying is

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that people have known for a long time the Tesla's

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>board is a problem that many of the people on

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's board on have real close relationships to to Elon Musk.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There there are members of the board who are part

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of Solar City, which then they purchased, which he also

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>owned um And what we're finding out also right now

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is that there is no one with CEO level leadership

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>skills on the board who could take over if see,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>if he leaves. So these are all issues that we

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>knew about, but Tesla stock continued to rise because of

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Musk. Suddenly he's a problem, and we're looking

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to the board and recognizing its inability to deal with

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. Alright, So you deal with a lot of boards,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and you deal with a lot of companies. Do you

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like there is a critical mass of boards that

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>recognize their role in setting up culture and can you

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what it takes for them

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to play an active role in that. So I think

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that there are I don't want to I think that

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what we were seeing here is a is a problem

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of some boards, and I think there are other boards

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that are really trying to figure out, you know, what

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the right way to go is. But we're dealing with

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>new sets of issues all the time. There is a

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>much greater awareness of the kinds of cultural issues that

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are going on all through you know, different companies, right,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not just Tesla, but you know, relating to sexual and

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gender based violence, relating to racial equality, inequality of you know,

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>um of income and so forth. And and the problem

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what boards need to do is they need to start

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to make themselves more aware of what their employees, their

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>their suppliers, their customers are thinking about them. I think

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's too much in celerity on boards. There's there's not

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>enough turnover on board. This is one governance issue that

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we talk about a lot is that Here's an interesting fact.

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Most of the majority of board members coming onto boards

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>these days are members women are members of minority groups. However,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>board turnover is so low that the number of women total,

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the total women and minorities, is still less than thirty percent.

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And so the problem is entrenched board members, a culture

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>where boards are recycling themselves and you need new blood

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to understand what the issues that are emerging

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for companies are. We're speaking with John Wilson. He is

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the head of research and corporate Governance at Cornerstone Capital Group. John,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is there any connection in your mind between the performance

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>of a corporate culture and the performance of a stock

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, can you make decent investment decisions? Perhaps

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>starting with the corporate governance issue? What I would say is,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and one of the reasons why this is a challenge

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for investors is that cultural issues tend to be longer term.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>As I said before, they tend to not matter until

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they do. And uh, you know, the example of Nike

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is a great one where they lost a lot of

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>talent all of a sudden because of issues of sexual

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 1>harassment in the company. And so if I, if I

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was an investor UM looking at a long term investment

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in a company, UM, I would definitely take corporate governance

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>into account. Now that may, you know, not affect my

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>short term decisions about market sentiment and and so forth,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but if I'm not aware of the cultural and governance issues,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>then I'm opening myself up to risk over the long term,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you know. Just real quick here, I'm struck by what

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>someone once told me that you have one charismatic leader

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>who the whole company hinges on, that company is more

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>likely to experience fraud. Just real quick. Has that been

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your experience as well? UM? Yes, I think that's right,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>because if you have, if you are all about that

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>one person, then other people tend to operate first of

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>all without being um without accountability, right without transparency, and

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>so they sort of get the mindset of impunity, if

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you will. And I think that can happen both for

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>other executives at the company and for the charismatic founder

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who may sort of begin to see themselves as invulnerable,

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that can happen. Thanks very much for being

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. John Wilson, head of Research and corporate Governance

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at Cornerstone Capital Group, talking about the connection between corporate governance, investments,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and corporate performance. We are broadcasting live from the Bloomberg

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Interactive at Broker's studio is getting close to lunchtime in

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>New York, so we want to talk about food, UH

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and PAYM. We're very lucky we're joined by the co

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>founders of AXL Foods, which is a quickly growing venture

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>capital firm. Looking at what we're going to be snacking

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on next, it will actually be good for us. We have,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>luckily Lauren Jupiter and Jordan's gas Bar here in our

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>eleven three oh studios. So Lauren, I want to start

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>with you, what is AXL Foods? Uh? First of all

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>things for for having us, We are a venture capital

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>fund focused on packaged food and beverage companies. So we

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>invest in the newest, you know, the healthiest foods out there,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>um and and most delicious fods out there, but really

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>companies ranging from start up all the way to sixty

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>plus million of revenue and partner with them and really

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>help them of where the pit as along the way.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's maybe you could speak to the issue that there

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are so many very large food companies and I'm thinking

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of dan On and Campbell soup and you know why

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that are looking to expand their business, but either they

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to do it in today's environment or

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they're too big to take chances on things. And I'm

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you could speak to that and how you

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>help them in those roles. Absolutely, so we we are

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>very familiar obviously with both of those organizations. UM. What

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>we're finding right now in the climate is that you know,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>large strategics are looking to either buy or invest in innovation.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>So there's a record amount of capital coming into the

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>industry and it's a lot of the corpors that we're

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about, the COKEX, the pepsis that are driving a

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest UM. They're coming down earlier in the market,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>they're making investments in small brands, they're putting resources to

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>work UM and everything UM from direct partnerships with specific

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>small companies that they get excited about to partnering with funds.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously we have a pretty public partnership with

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>donone UM. You know, in in particular, it's not just

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>happening though with those organizations. We're seeing the retailers also

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>activate and so UM there's more and more shelf space

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's becoming available from the largest retailers in the world,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>including Costco and Walmart and Kroger UM. So it's across

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the board. What we're seeing is is that big food

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is getting very interested in the small guys. So, Lauren,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what does innovation mean in the food space right now?

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Considering the fact that you definitely have a packaging innovation

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to make people feel like you're getting something healthier versus

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to make that ice cream that you eat actually

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have zero calories and lots of protein and save your

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>life and have no problems. So we think about innovation

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and what we actually called challenger brands in a variety

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways. So it can be the product, it can

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>be the ingredient profile. UM. You know, as an example,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a product in our portfolio called for Sigmatic,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which makes mushroom based coffees and powdered beverages, and that

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is an innovative ingredient profile. Innovation can also come in

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>marketing and packaging and how that product is sort of

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>delivered and communicated to the consumer. UM. And then the

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>third step we sort of look at is innovation in

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of distribution and channel strategy. So we're seeing more

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and more brands look at direct to consumer. We're looking

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at more brands look at disrupting the office space and

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>going to direct a consumer in that capacity, and so

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we think about it really in those three buckets, Product, marketing,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and distribution. Jordan's you are described as a reformed corporate lawyer,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>but also you are the kids snack Taste tests are correct,

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's your official title. Okay, um One of the companies

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I believe that you've got something to do with is

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>uh kid Fresh. Tell us about that and maybe use

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it as example how you found it and what your

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>role ends up being. Where we are thrilled to talk

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about kids Fresh. So something that's important to understand is

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that Lauren and I are the proud moms of four

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>kids eating under and so it's a big part of

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our thesis is that we are investing in the companies

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are actually putting on the table for our kids.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's a big part of our philosophy is that

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store is going to look fundamentally different, and

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so we're really putting our money where our kids mouths are.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, for lack of a better phrase, UM kid

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Fresh was a company we came across in two thousand sixteen.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>They were in the market and had great traction. It's

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a New York based brand that is a better for

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you frozen kids platform that's really geared towards UM introducing

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>hidden vegetables and sort of reinventing traditional favorites like mac

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and cheese and you know, chicken fingers and fish sticks

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. UM at the time of our investment,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Matt Cohen, the founder, had really sort of

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten some great traction, and just as we were investing,

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>he happened to pick up a national partnership with Walmart

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to complement his target and Kroger and our hold business.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we really enjoyed kind of working with Matt over

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the past two years. Is he's been scaling really quickly,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and UM certainly has found himself in a great position

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>right now where everyone's thinking out innovation and kids platforms

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and who's going to be sort of the the going

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>forward leader, and frozen is obviously one of the hottest

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>categories now, but it's also in you know, these are

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional foods that people you know all across America are eating.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This is just a better for you version, and I

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>will say as a working mother myself of two young children,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the big challenges is making sure that you

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>actually have something on the table at night. I mean,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but it's much more basic than just having

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>something healthy sometimes. And it's not just in frozen meal solutions.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Right Also, we're investing heavily into kids beverages. We think

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that right now is the time it's right for innovation

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on shelf where we just made a big investment into

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a kid's water play, you know, and for us, it's

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a boxed water that's almost like it's an essence water

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for kids, and so it was launching ten thousand doors

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this summer, and it's an alternative to some of the

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of more traditional players that we've seen,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Capri Sons in the market. But you know,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>for us, the idea that we're now going to have

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an offering for kids where it's a no sugar alternative

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is you know, pretty powerful. I was definitely the bad

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>mom who brought Capri son for a snack, So I'm

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to confess my guilty, Laura. I do want to

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>just get your thoughts on when you have a smaller

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>company scaling up in food businesses is traditionally very difficult.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you help with that? So, you know, we

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>think about ourselves as dot connectors and what we like

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to do is help connect the dots for these brands

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>between the resources they need in the industry. It's the relationships.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the retailers, the distributors, the strategics who may someday

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>beut their exit partners, and we create those relationships early

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and deeply as these brands grow. Um. But that being said,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's more and more um sort of resources

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>out there for brands to scale up. A lot of

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>them are working with outsource manufacturers, co packers, and there's

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of support from the retailers out there who

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking to bring these innovative products to shelf. And

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's a very exciting time I think to be

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a food entrepreneur. And you know, not to mention how

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>receptive I think consumers are today to to new healthy brands,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, Jordan, give you about what is the biggest

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that you've learned working together, about the whole process

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of investing and then seeing it through the production. And

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's a wild ride. Um. I think that you

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>know and for us. Lauren and I are are entrepreneurs ourselves,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we look at Excel we started only

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago and things have changed dramatically

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years. UM, it's really important

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to have have people around you that challenge you and make

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you think critically about your business, but also UM to

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really be able to rely on that you trust them.

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we think of ourselves as a partner for

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>our founders, that it's a real brain trust and you know,

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a different type of partnership. All right, We've

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got to leave it there, but I want to thank

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you both very much. Jordan's gas Bar, managing partner and

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Jupiter, co founder and managing partner of the venture

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>capital fund Excel Foods. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.