WEBVTT - Ryding: Fed has messed up communications policy

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveillance way text of view that as

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED rises rights, that removes the US dollar liquidity

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of the world. Sixty percent of global

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>j DP relies on US toll liquidity to bottom have

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>basically seen their income stagnate over a third of a century.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>The Asian economies there are the fastest growing ones in

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, China's Both may be slowing down, but we're

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>still talking about China growing at six and a half

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. Bloomberg Surveillance your link to the world of economics,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>finance and investment on Bloomberg Radio. Good morning, It is

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seven am on Wall Street. It is five am in

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Fort McMurray, Canada, where we wish the firefighters battling that

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>huge blaze up there. The best oil higher this morning,

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>in part on concerns of interruptions to the supply from Canada.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>West Texas sixty two is up two point two percent,

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Brent nine up one point six percent this morning, but

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty much everything is higher this morning. By the way,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael McGee along with Tom Keen Unsurveillance today and

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>we're watching a global rally overnight. Asia up and now

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe the stock six hundred four points higher one point

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent, the docks in Germany up one eighty points.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>That's one point eight percent in London, a thirty point

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>game for the Footsie half a percent of the day

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds little changed to higher, the curve stepens. The two

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>year no yield is at seventy three basis points, five

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>year one point to two, and the ten year one

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>point seven seven. On the day, the dollars stronger. Here's

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the real debate point. The dollar following comments and the

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>jobs report following comments from the Fed moving higher today

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety three point nine for the d X y index,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The yen weekends to one oh oh four, the year

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>O one thirteen eight, and the pound one four fifty one.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's uh the question whether interest rates in the

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>United States and whether the dollar and bond market. We

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 1>have seen Fed officials the latest Bill Dudley this morning

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>time in the New York Times saying we're still on

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>track for June if the numbers continue the way they are,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the way the bond market season. John

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Riding is the chief economist and founder of r t

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Q Economics. John, there's an old saying, don't fight the FED.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And it seems that people on bond trading desks have

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>decided they want to get into a scrap with the

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>U S. Central Bank. Well, the problem is the FED

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is completely messed up its communications policy and UH. It

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>told us it had objectives for unemployment inflation. UH, and

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>then as we go close to those, it lowered the

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate, so that the market simply doesn't believe the FED.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that to believe the Fed, John at

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>YELLTT has to come out and deliver a similar message.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And as I said to Tom on TV a few minutes,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you say to me right now to um, what we

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>have here is typically the central Uh. The chairman of

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the FET goes in May and gives a testimony, so

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>she can be perfectly tied up to say not that

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going in June, but that we are still committed

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to renormalizing monetary policy, and the data points are close

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and if we continue in that direction, we will go.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Because the FED in the past halt about cumulative improvement,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and cumulative improvement as the actual progress won't quote upon exactly,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not just the latest day to point cumulative improvement from

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a temper cent an employment rate to a five percent

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate. John Writing with the rd Q Economics. We

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>say good morning to all of your worldwide Bloomberg Radio

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Plus and of course across Bloomberg dot com Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>This morning brought you by Investco. Factor based strategies can

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>help investors focus on high quality, low volatility and more.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at investco dot com Slash High Conviction Genre

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>writing giving as great perspective this morning, John, As I

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, your note had a certain heat on Friday.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's frame the two avenues out of the jobs report.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>One is it was a molding number. We all agree

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on this with the molding revision. And then there's the yeah,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>but the underlying data was actually pretty good. Explained to

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>us why hours worked in wages can trump? That was

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>upon their thinking. Did you like that? That was a

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very Did you see how we did that? Can trump?

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Get it? Can trump the countables of non farm payrolls?

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we start off with the non fund payroll number?

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Because our number for private perils was a hundred and

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>seventy five thousand, We got a hundred and seventy one thousand.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Why because we had such a mild winter that the

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>pick up in jobs that normally take place because people

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't work because the weather is so bad in February

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and March, the seasonal sniff, they were already working, and

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so we had a hundred and sixty thousand three month

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>averages around two hundred thousand. I think that the the

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>FED four cash revision calls by economists on Friday at

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>some major banks, we're like looking for an excuse to

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>come to the market, and I think it ridiculously over

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes the latest data point. But the FED in the

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>last statement talked about consumer fundamentals as well. So you've

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>got an increase in hours worked because we had a

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>longer work week of four tenths of a percent. We

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>had a three tenths of p percent increase in wages.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a seven tenths of p percent increases running somewhere

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>between eight or around eight percent at an annualized rate

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if we were to continue that in wage income, which

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>is the bulk of what people have to spend. So

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Kanzian and you're worried about demanding, you're

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>worried about the consumer, you have this big income increase.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>John Wrinning with this with his work at the Bank

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of England, at the Federal Reserve System, of course, with

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Bear Stearns for years, and now at rd Q Economics. John,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna massively rip up the script here. Greg Villier

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>has given us great perspective on our economic politics. Villiers

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and writing stunning political notes about Secretary Clinton and particularly

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump. Here's Valier this morning on debt restructuring and

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Quote he's playing with matches in a very

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>arid forest. The US and much of the world is

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>crushed by individual and government debt. So here comes someone

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with catnip. Let's restructure the debt. Is it even feasible

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>within the economics and the chapters in our economic textbook

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>on debt restructuring that you can restructure quote unquote full

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>faith and credit debt like you'd restructure a hotel in

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic City. No, you can't. But what you can do

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>is lengthen the maturity of the debt at these very

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates, and that has been a policy at

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the Tragedy Department has been doing and could, in my opinion,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>pursue fall more aggressively. The treasure debts not callable. It's

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>full faith in credit. You can't tear up someone's old

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>note and replace it with a new low interest rate.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that that's just simply not feasible. It doesn't matter

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks. It's not legally feasible. But you can

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lengthen the maturity of the debt. Now, one of the

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>interest things is if you look talked to an academic

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on the FED, good friend from Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon, and

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and he will say he will put together, um mon,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>good friends have put together the Central Bank and the

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Marvin good friend here, yes, and then you can

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>then you can look at monetary policy in fiscal policy

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and combine it. And so what was the Fed doing

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It was short in the duration of the debt by

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>operation twist, as the treasure was trying to lengthen the

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>maturity of debt, and those two policies cancel each other out.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I would lengthen the maturity of the debt

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because I certainly as an investor, would not want to

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>invest for ten years at one point. Peter Fisher Blackstone

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is really good at this, and of course I call

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>him the tripod guy. He's served government, he served Wall Street,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's got terrific academic bearing as well. He's a

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bit cautious about Europe. Europe, if you will, the europeanization

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of our death structure France, as I believe a fifty

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>year piece. We don't do that in America because we're better.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the price of going from a blended debt to

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>pick a number seven years out to a blended debt

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of ten years or fifteen years. Well, I think at

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>these low interest rates for the government, there's there's very

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>little price except ten years down the road when you

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>if you had a huge amount of debt to be

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>refunded at that particular point in time, and we're in

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a very different interest rates environment, and and that's the

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the price will come at a future point where we

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>won't know where, we won't know what it is. And

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea about issuing along the curve is not

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so much about minimizing interest rate costs, but is not

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>having any great big refunding coming up. And then let's

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>takes us back to the full faith and credit ten

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>year yield. Do you perceive institutions that could give us

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a glide path to higher yields or by definition, do

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>we have to have a jump condition when the shotgun

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>aw comes that we're actually gonna have normal interest rates. UM.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we could have a glide path, but markets

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>never tend to wear it that way. But what would

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>help is if the FED began to unwind its portfolio,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at least stop reinvesting and start allowing it to shift

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the assets back into the private sector in a gradual manner.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But the FEDS seems intent to hold onto its UH

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio until maturity, and maybe that helps with the glide path,

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but it keeps the market from adjusting. John writing with

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this with our d Q economics, and we will continue this.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>There are headlines out of Lending Club. They have been

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in the news and it's been challenging news, to say

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the least. The Lending Club chairman and chief executive Officer,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Renold Laplanche resigns. Hans Morris is named chairman, but very

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>importantly Scott Sandborn will serve as acting CEO. They will

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>not provide guidance at this time. That's probably the key headline.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Things are so messed up. They got to sort out

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in their lending club. The violation of

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>practices and a lack of disclosure is unacceptable. Lending Club

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of previous seven dollars ten cents is giving me an

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>indication self will try to firm up that bid. An

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ask on lending Club as well. Again, the present chairman

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Lending Club resigns. Shootures of five down,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>futures of forty one the yield one point seven seven percent.

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Check in with Michael Byer and get the latest World

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>and Nashelle headlines. Michael Mike time, thank you very much.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>British Prime Minister David Cameron called on Britain's not to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>vote to leave the European Union next month. Cameron, in

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a speech at the British Museum in Central London today,

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>says leaving the EU is genuinely a leap in the dark.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Mexican government officials say the new Mexican prison holding convicted

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>drug lord La Kina l Chapo Guzman is rated as

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst in the country's federal penitentiary system for inmate conditions. However,

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the former head of the International operations for the US

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Drug Enforcement Agency questions sending Guzman to a less secure

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>prison that is in the territory firmly controlled by his empire.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Officials in Alberta, Canada say a forecast for cooler temperatures

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and light rain will help them corral and enormous wildfire.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Global News twenty four hours a day, powered by our journalists.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael barn Time and Mecha, thanks so much. In

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a currency front, yend weaker and dramatically weaker over two

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>three days one oh eight point zero nine point of

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>note as a dollar shows modest strength x Y with

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>John riding Bloomberg Surveillance Bloomberg surveillance by by sector spider

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>et s y by a single stock when you can

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>invest in the entire sector, Visit sector spdrs dot com

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or call one eight six six Sector e t F.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg surveillance way tech. The view that as

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED raises rights, that removes the US dollar liquidity

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of the world. Sixty percent of global

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>j DP relies on U s TOL liquidity. At the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bottom have basically seen their income stagnate over a third

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of a century. The Asian economies there are the fastest

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>growing ones in the world. China's Both may be slowing down,

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but we're still talking about China growing at six and

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a half seven percent Bloomberg Surveillance your link to the

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>world of economics, finance, and investment on Bloomberg Radio. Good morning,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>It is seven am on Wall Street. It is five

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>am in Fort McMurray, Canada, where we wish the firefighters

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>battling that huge blaze up there. The best oil higher

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning, in part on concerns of interruptions to the

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>supply from Canada. West Texas two is up two point two.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Brent nine up one point six percent this morning. But

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty much everything is higher this morning. By the way,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael McGee along with Tom Keene Unsurveillance today and

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we're watching a global rally overnight. Asia up and now

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you're up. The stock six d four points higher one

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>point two percent, the docks in Germany up one eight points.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That's one point eight percent in London, a thirty point

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>game for the footsie half a percent of the day.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Bonds little changed to hire. The curve steepens. The two

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>year note yield is at seventy three basis points, five

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>year one point to two, and the ten year one

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>point seven seven. On the day, the dollars stronger. Here's

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the real debate point the dollar following comments, and the

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>job report falling comments from the Fed moving higher today

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>nine for the d X y index, the yen weekends

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to one oh oh four, the year one eight, and

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the pound one four fifty one. So that's the question

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>whether interest rates in the United States and whether the

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar and bond market. We have seen FED officials the latest,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Dudley this morning time in the New York Times

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>saying we're still on track for June if the numbers

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>continue the way they are. But that's not the way

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the bond market sees it. John Riding is the chief

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>economist and founder of r t Q Economics. John, there's

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>an old saying, don't fight the Fed, and it seems

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that people on bond trading desks have decided they want

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to get into a scrap with the U s. Central Bank. Well,

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem is the fattest completely messed up its communications

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>policy and uh. It told us it had objectives for

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our unemployment inflation uh, and then as we got close

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to those, it lowered the unemployment rate. So that the

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>market simply doesn't believe the Fed. And I think that

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to believe the Fed, Janet Yellen has to come out

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and deliver a similar message, And as I said to

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom on TV a few minutes, you say to me

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>right now to um what we have here is typically

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that the central uh, the Chairman of the FED, goes

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in May and gives a testimony. So she can be

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly tied up to say not that we're going in June,

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but that we are still committed to renormalizing monetary policy,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and the data points are close, and if we continue

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, we will go. Because the Fed in

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the past talked about cumulative improvement, and cumulative improvement has

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>actual progress. One quote, if I'm exactly not just the

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>latest data point, CU want of improvement from a ten

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment rate to a five percent unemployment rate. John

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>writing with the rd Q Economics, we say good morning

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to all of your worldwide Bloomberg Radio Plus and of

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>course across Bloomberg dot com Bloomberg Surveillance. This morning brought

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you by Investco. Factor based strategies can help investors focus

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on high quality, low volatility and more. Learn more at

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>investco dot com slash High Conviction Generating. Giving his great

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>perspective this morning, John, as I mentioned earlier, your note

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>had a certain heat on Friday. Let's frame the two

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>avenues out of the jobs report. One is it was

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a molding number. We all agree on this with a

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>molding revision. And then there's the yeah, but the underlying

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>data was actually pretty good. Explained to us why hours

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>worked in wages can trump? That was a pun there, thanking?

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you like that? That was a very Did you

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>see how we did that? Can trump get it? Can

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trump the accountables of non farm payrolls. Can we start

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for the non fund payroll number? Because our number for

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>private paerallels was a hundred and seventy five thousand, we

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred and seventy one thousand. Why because we

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had such a mild winter that the pickup in jobs

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that normally take place because people couldn't work because the

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>weather is so bad in February and March the season,

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>they were already working, and so we had a hundred

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and sixty thousand three month averages around two hundred thousand.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the FED forecast revision calls by

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>economists on Friday at some major banks were like looking

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for an excuse to come to the market, and I

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think it ridiculously over emphasizes the latest data point. But

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the threat in the last statement talks about consumer fundamentals

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you've got an increase in hours worked

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>because we had a longer work weed of four tenths

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of per percent, we had a three tenths of per

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>percent increase in wages. That's the seven tenths of per

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>percent increases running somewhere between eight or around eight percent

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>at an annualized rate if we were to continue that

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in wage income, which is the bulk of what people

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have to spend. So if you're a Kanzian and you're

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>worried about demand and you're worried about the consumer, you

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have this big income incre John writing with this with

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>his work at the Bank of England, at the Federal

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Reserve System, of course with Bear Stearns for years, and

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>now at our DQ economics, John, I'm gonna massively rip

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up the script here. Greg Valier has given us great

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>perspective on our economic politics. Valier has been writing stunning

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>political notes about Secretary Clinton and particularly Mr Trump. Here's

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Valier this morning on debt restructuring and Donald Trump quote.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He's playing with matches in a very arid forest. The

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>US and much of the world is crushed by individual

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and government debt. So here comes someone with catnip. Let's

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>restructure the debt? Is it even feasible? Within the economics

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and the chapters in our economic textbook on debt restructuring

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can restructure quote unquote full faith and credit

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>debt like you'd restructure a hotel in Atlantic City. No,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you are. But what you can do is lengthen the

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>maturity of the debt at these very low interest rates.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And that has been a policy that the Treasury Department

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>has been doing and could, in my opinion, pursue far

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively. The treasure debts not callable. It's full faith

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in credit. You can't tear up someone's old note and

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>replace it with a new low interest rate. Now that

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just simply not feasible. It doesn't matter what he thinks.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not legally feasible. But you can lengthen the maturity

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of the debt. Now, one of the interesting things is

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look talk to an academic on the FED

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>good Friend from Pittsburgh Carnegie Mellon and and he will

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>say he'll put together um more good friends have put

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>together the Central Bank and the Treasury about Marvin good Friend, Yes,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you can then you can look at monetary

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>policy in fiscal policy and combine it. And so what

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>was the Fed doing It was shortening the duration the

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>debt by operation twist, as the treasure was trying to

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>lengthen the maturity debt, and those two policies cancel each

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>other out. So yes, I would lengthen the maturity of

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the debt because I certainly as an investor, would not

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>want to invest for ten years at one point. Peter

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Fisher Blackstone is is really good at this, and of

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>course I call him the tripod guy. He's served government,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he served Wall Street, and he's got terrific academic bearing

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's a bit cautious about Europe. Europe, if

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you will, the europeanization of our debt structure France, as

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe a fifty year piece. We don't do that

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in America because we're better. What's the price of going

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>from a blended debt to pick a number seven years

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out to a blended debt of ten years or fifteen years. Well,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I think at these low interest rates for the government,

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>there's there's very little price except ten years down the

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>road when you if you had a huge amount of

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>debt to be refunded at that particular point in time.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>We're in a very different interest rate environment and and

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. But the price will come at a

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>future point where we won't know where, we won't know

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>what it is. And the whole idea about issuing along

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the curve is not so much about minimizing interest rate costs,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.239
<v Speaker 1>but is not having any great, big refunding coming up.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And then let's take this back to the full faith

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and credit tenure yield. Do you perceive institutions that could

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>give us a glide path to higher yields or by definition,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>do we have to have a jump condition when the

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>shot gun aw comes that we're actually gonna have normal

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Um, I think we could have a glide path,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but markets never tend to work that way. But what

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would help is if the FED began to unwind its portfolio,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>but at least stop reinvesting and start allowing it to

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>shift the assets back into the private sector in a

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>gradual manner. But the FEDS seems intent to hold onto

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>its at portfolio until maturity. And maybe that helps with

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the bly path, but it keeps they market from adjusting.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>John Riding with us with our d Q economics and

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we will continue this. There are headlines out of Lending Club.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>They have been in the news and it's been challenging

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>news to say the least. The Lending Club chairman and

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive Officer Renold Laplanche resigns. Hans Morris is named chairman,

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>but very importantly Scott Sandborn will serve as acting CEO.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>They will not provide guidance at this time. That's probably

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the key headline. Things are so messed up. They got

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to sort out what's going on in their lending club.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>The violation of practices and a lack of disclosure is unacceptable.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Lending Club a previous seven dollars ten cents is giving

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>me an indication self. We'll try to firm up that

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>bid an ask on Lending Club as well. Again, the

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>present chairman and CEO of Lending Club resigns. Futures of

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>five down, futures of forty one, the yield one point

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>seven seven. To check in with Michael Barr and get

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest world and national headlines. Michael, Mike time, thank

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you very much. British Prime Minister David Cameron called on

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Britain's not to vote to leave the European Union next month. Cameron,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in a speech at the British Museum in Central London today,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>says leaving the EU is genuinely a leap in the dark.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexican government officials say the new Mexican prison holding convicted

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>drug lord Lakina L Chapo Guzman is rated as the

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>worst in the country's federal penitentiary system for inmate conditions. However,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the former head of the international operations for the US

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Drug Enforcement Agency questions sending Guzman to a less secure

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>prison that is in the territory firmly controlled by his empire.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Officials in Alberta, Canada say a forecast for cooler temperatures

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and light will help them corral and enormous wildfire. Global

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>News twenty four hours a day, powered by our journalists.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Barr and Meca thinks so much. On the

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>currency front, yend weaker and dramatically weaker over two three days,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one oh eight point zero nine point of note as

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a dollar shows modest strength on d x Y with

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>John riding Bloomberg Surveillance. Bloomberg Surveillance brought you by Sector

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Spider et s y by a single stock when you

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can invest in the entire sector of visit sector spdrs

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>dot com or call one eight six six sector e

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>t S