WEBVTT - How Smart Is Your Home? Outlook For Smart Home Tech 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's take

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>a look at the smart home. And she met. You know,

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I recently sold my house and I'm only built it

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years ago. But apparently it's not smart enough because

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the new buyer had his tech guy come by to

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>do an assessment. I think they're gonna be a big upgrade.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a tech guy, but apparently a lot

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of people have a tech guy. You need a tech

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>guy for your house. Aaron Amy, tech guy, co founder

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Brilliant Home Technology. Aaron, thanks so much

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. I guess the smart home, I

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>know it's a big thing. Give us a sense of

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>how big it is, how fast it's growing. What are

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>people doing to their homes these days? Yeah, I mean

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the next great platform. Because technology advance is

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in a series of platform wars, and we've seen that

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>happen with personal computers, Internet and then mobile. Uh. Smart

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>home has is the next great platform and it has

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>rapidly grown to more than seventy five billion dollars and

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is taking over every home. But so what is it?

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean? Is this where like the lights turn on

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and off when you walk in and out of rooms,

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>does your stereo, like your playlist follow you around? Um?

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, does it adjust the thermos stat I don't

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>get it. It does all of those things, and it

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>basically personalizes your home, so it does what you wanted

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with a minimum of us and bother and

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it opens up new kinds of possibilities. So when someone's

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at the door, you see who it is and you

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>can talk to them. You can give people permission to

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>come into your home without having to make a key

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for them and the security risks that that entails. And

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>then you can automate functions. So when you're gonna watch

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a movie or you're gonna go to bed, all of

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the different things that need to happen, whether it's temperature,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's light, whether it's locks and so on, can

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>all happen automatically. So what are some of the most

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>popular functionality that I guess people are asking for these days. Yeah,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean smart locks has been a really important category

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of access control because there are a lot of security

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>benefits uh to to being able to control access remotely. UH.

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Security has been a big area where where you have

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you have peace of mind that your home is secure. Uh.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Lighting is a very important area. Smart music is another.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Is another big one. Smart climate control both saves a

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy and makes homes more comfortable. So all

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of these categories have already proven themselves to be very significantly.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>So where do consumers get hold of all this? I mean,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul's HomeBuyer had a tech guy. I don't even know

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>where I would go to get one. Yeah, so there

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly are some, you know, some tech guys that you

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can get in so on. Increasingly, what we're seeing a

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>brilliant is new homes being built with technology in them

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you can buy it yourself and you

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>can install it yourself. You can have it a tech

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>guy do it if you're not that is that chech

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forward yourself, or it simply comes when you get a

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>new house or or you move into a new apartment.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the developers are increasingly building homes as smart homes.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things I'm concerned about. All right,

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>what I've noticed, I guess, is that the technology changes

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. So whatever tech you put into your house,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's out of date, you know, five years later. It

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's got to be super super flexible to

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be adaptable going forward. It is, um, it is, and

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the changes. Uh. And one of the

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>things that companies like Brilliant are doing is making sure

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that what we're doing is extensible. So for example, we're

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>updating our software every two weeks, and the software is

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really the heart of the system. UM. So your home

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>actually gets better as you as you live in it.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And we've already seen this in other rbunus, like if

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a Tesla car, for example, you know they're

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>always software updates, and and you know, one day your

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>car can parallel park itself. One day it can send

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the autonomously drive. Uh. And that happens without having to

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>update the underlying hardware platform. Are you worried about these

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>devices getting hacked? I mean, I wouldn't want, for example,

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody to be watching me through my refrigerator or whatever

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching through the refrigerator. Note this is this

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is a really important topic. And uh and yes, you know,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the the responsible companies in this field are very very

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>careful about about security and actually bring additional security to

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>uh to bear. I myself have a background in cybersecurity. UM.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that we have the ability

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to offer much better security. For example, you don't have

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to leave your key under the welcome matter at a

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>fake rock in the garden that everyone knows what it

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Uh. If it's to give people access to

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>your house, all right, I guess that's that's where we're own, Matt.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>So when you, you know, buy your I'm happy to

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>go there. I just want someone to do it for me. Yeah,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you got a guy. We'll find you a guy. All right,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe Aaron, Maybe we'll do that for Aaron. Amy, co

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>founder CEO Brilliant Home Technology, is talking about upgrading the

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>homes to technology. UM and again you know again, what

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed is the technology changes so quickly. So you

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>look at some of those houses where they have like panels,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of in the wall, and they don't

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>use them anymore. The intercom all that kind of stuff.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I I first heard about all this

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff when Bill Gates Um built Zanna Do two point

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>oh like twenty years ago. So now regular people are

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>getting what exactly Let's get to the vaccine mandate for

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>federal employees. It looks like President Biden is set to

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>announce a vaccine mandate, and we have Josh wynd Grove

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>who's broken the story. Josh, what are we looking for?

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna hear from five PM, probably probably

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some more details beforehand. But to rewind to

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Jill Live, they said a rule he had to be

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated or you had an option to sort of do

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>testing and masking and that sort of thing. Now he's

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>expanding it, sort of taking away that option B so

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to be vaccinated, and he's expanding the number

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>or the scope of the federal contract workforce that it

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>applies to. Also previously was aimed at on site, so

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially more people being covered by this without an option

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to instead of get a vaccine, get regular testing and masking.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, obviously many details still TPD. You would

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>expect pushback or legal challenges potentially to this. We don't

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know when this would take effect. We don't know what

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it would mean for let's say, a federal worker who

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>showed up on that day without being able to demonstrate vaccination.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So definitely moving target on this one, but a substantial

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the vaccine requirement and for federal workers. You know,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, Josh, you know roughly how many people were

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about here, Like it's not all federal employees, just

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>executive branch employees plus federal contractors. That still sounds like

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to make. Yeah, I mean, I

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're talking millions of people, but the exact member,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't know. And I think the question

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that I have right now is is, you know, why

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>are we going to see push back from labor groups.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Are they're going to be legal challenges or arbitration, you know, grievances,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things filed, you know, potentially, but the

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>White House broadly abews these sort of you know, Alkhart mandates.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Pretty big one for them is the ctereral government. But

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, for smaller companies are doing the same thing

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as a good way to sort of spur vaccination rates

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>people sort of you know, I don't want to be

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ordered by the government to do it overall. But if

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>your employer requires that, there's there's evidence of that leads

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to enough tick in vaccinations. But you know, of course,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the concern on the flip side is that it might

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>generate blowback or you know, get people's backed up, you know,

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So, you know, broad a lot

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of moving parts in this especially it's almost like they're

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to antagonize, um, the Trumpian anti vaxers. We know

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that percent maybe more are valy opposed, right, Uh yeah.

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's different camps where you've got hardcore anti

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>vax people. You've got people that can be bothered, you

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have people that have barriers, like they don't have paid

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>time off to go get it, that sort of thing.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think it's worth noting that vaccine has

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a nancy has been declining in the US, not maybe

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as fast as other countries, but it's been going down.

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.239
<v Speaker 1>And we now have you know, seventy of US adults

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with at least one shot. That's a fairly big number.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know they had shot for seventy in July,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they hit it in August and now seventy five. The

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>problem of courses with delta you might need to get

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit higher than that when you And of

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>course there's the whole segment of the population those under

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>twelve that aren't eligible for a vaccine and are probably

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks or months away from being eligible. So you know

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the yeah, absolutely, you know, if you're die hard anti

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>vax or, this is probably not going to change your mind.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's folks in the middle essentially that aren't

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated to have questions. Maybe I haven't gotten around to

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it that that I think they're sort of hoping the

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>mandates at the employer level in other with your job

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>making you do it. Well, we'll have it if you

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have a difference. Yeah, Josh, it's you know, the big

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>take story of the day that Matt and I had

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about this morning, focused on, you know,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate mandates. Um, does a White House hope or anticipate

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that by taking this aggressive federal policy that they will

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe coax or urge or prod some big

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>corporations to kind of follow suit with vaccine and dates. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you know they're sort of hoping that people joined the

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>parade behind them in this big wave started. You recall

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with the approval of Fiser's vaccine, remember from montsore reason,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and only on an emergency authorization. When the FDA gave

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>full approval, Biden's administration took that as a real sort

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of turning point to start saying, Okay, you know, corporate America, look,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know it's not an emergency authorized vaccine,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is now an approved vaccine. So you're on stronger footing

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>morally legally what have you to be able to require vaccination?

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're going to expect to hear him

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>call for that this evening, beat that drum. We also

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>expect him to give an update on boosters. Remember they

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>planned to start sister shots in a week from Monday.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe more on testing, a couple other elements on schools.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>There could be some you know, news if you will,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in this speech, But broadly, I think he just wants

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of sweep together what they've been doing over

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the summer to try to curb this thing as those

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cases rose. But so far, as far as we know,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this is only a requirement for the two two vaccine shots,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>or is it? Will they require three? Now that's a

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>good question right now that they consider too to be

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fully vaccinated, so that but that's that's as of now,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>so presumably that may change. But that is a huge

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>open question right now among researchers about what will happen.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>And of course those folks have got that Johnson and

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson shot something fourteen million of people in the US.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't know what they're going to do for booster shots,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know they're considered fully vaccinated after one shot,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this, uh, a lot of questions still

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to be answered. We expect to have some clarity in

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the afternoon, either around the speech, perhaps before

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the speech, on on what exactly they're proposing. And as

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I say, I'm expecting a bit of a wave of

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>statements from labor groups and what have you saying you know,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>responding to this, you know, about their members potentially being

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>forced to do this, and we just simply don't know

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the what you know, what if kind of factor? If

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>someone shows up? Are they fired? Are they furloughed? Are

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they sent home? Are they you know, work from home? Like,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what is the deal? We don't know. It's gonna be fascinatorry.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get more details coming throughout the day. You'll

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have and your team, lots of reporting there, I am sure.

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh wind Grove, White House, correspondent for Bloomberg News, joinings

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Washington, d C. Again green on

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the screen, yet again at or near all time highs.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>As we continue to hear that from Greg jard and

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>his reporting seemingly on a daily basis. It's just for

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks, this feels like a market and

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>looks like a market that is priced to perfection and

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>might have some vulnerability into it, but that's not stopping

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this market. Let's check in with an expert who knows

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Lisa Chalotte, chief investment officer for wealth management

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at Morgan Stanley. They have one point five trillion with

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a t UH and assets under management. Lisa, thanks so

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here today. I guess I'll start

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with kind of the wall of worry, uh kind of

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>question or topic here. How concerned are you about this

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>market given some of the headwinds that you know, folks

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>rightfully point out, whether it's rising interest rates tapering and

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, just the delta variant. How do you view

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this market right here? Uh? So, look, you know we've

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>been on the record, um, you know, to say that

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a market that for the most part, while

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I can claim that it's climbing the wall of worry

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly positioning uh in you know, the megacap

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tex sox, it's suggests an element of defensiveness. UM. You know,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>our sense has been that that this is a market

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>uh you know that is shrugging off most of the concerns,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it is um you know, disruptions coming from delta variant,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, supply chain concerns, whether it's been

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the China regulator or uh crackdown, or you know, shifts

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in policy um from the Fed. UM. Nothing really has

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten in the way of this market. You know. It's

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's notable. I think uh that uh for for much

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the period, uh you know, after the first quarter,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>many folks were saying that the market was rallying because

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates were falling. Uh. You know, really, over the

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>last month or so, we've seen the ten year back

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>up from its ultimate lows on the ten year of

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>one seventeen. We're back up here, uh into the mid

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>one thirties on the ten yere Uh And and even

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that has not uh you know, interrupted this this grind

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>higher UM in markets. So you but you expect a

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>pullback right least, so you expect to ten to correction

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year. Yeah, we do, and

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and and um. The reason for that is essentially two fold.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So with that move in rates, we ultimately think that

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>price earnings ratios, especially on those most expensive stocks, should compress.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We've seen PE multiple compression uh in many many other

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market, whether you're talking about international stocks,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about value stocks, more cyclical stocks, you're talking

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about the small caps. Uh. This is the one area

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the market that has remained immune so far. Uh.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's just no precedent for that. Uh. You know,

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>historically when rates go up, ultimately PE ratios um do

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>come down. So we we see that as a risk.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>In secondarily, Uh, you know, we're seeing folks talk about

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the growth scare. We're seeing people downgrade their estimates for

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>third quarter GDP growth. Even at Morgan Stanley ellen Ventner

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>has cut her third quarter number from six point five

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>percent annualized growth rates to a two point nine percent.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty big cut. Uh. And yet folks, uh,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't think that's going to harm earnings in

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter. And we think that that could be

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>another negative catalysts. So, you know, lower PE ratios and

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially earnings disappointments or or fewer positive earnings or visions

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are the two catalysts that that might unleash that ten

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>fiercent correction. So with that type of correction between now

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and the end of the end of the year possible,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are you suggesting people raise cash? Are you suggesting they

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rotate into uh, just maybe more cyclical names. How do

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you think people should position themselves for that? Yeah, so

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in the camp that says this is about

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>UH rotating and actively managing UM. So we are buyers

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of consumer services, of financials, of some of the uh

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>industrial cyclicals, from some you know, safer healthcare names and

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some staples. UM. It's just really some of these long

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>duration oriented UM secular growth stocks that that we just

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>think are long in the tooth and need to kind

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of take their hit. So we're rotating here. Uh no

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>need to panic and go to cash and get paid nothing,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and even negative returns after inflation. But we do

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think that we're in a bull market. It's just a

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>bull market in things other than the SMP depth. How

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>important is the infrastructure bill or how important is um

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fiscal Uh you know, trillions of dollars in continued fiscal support. UM.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. Our perspective is that it's not so much

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the dollars, because what people forget is that a lot

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of this is going to be spent over you know,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple years, if not, if not a decade, uh, and

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so on any annual basis, it's it's it's fractions of

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>percentage points of growth. UM. But it's really the the

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>shift in mind that uh, that we are in a

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>m in a more fiscally active environment and and um,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you know that is growth oriented. Uh. And so you

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>know we are constructive broadly. I don't know, um you

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what the form of final legislation is going

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to take, given all the puts and takes of this,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but we do think we're going to get something, uh.

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's something on the margin. Is helpful. Lisa, great

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to get your take. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Hope we can get you back on soon. Lisa Shallatt

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is the chief investment Officer for wealth Management at Morgan Stanley.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Obviously very important for you to get so always good

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to to hear from Lisa. You know, we are seeing

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>continued gains in the markets right now, and as we

0:17:53.920 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>heard earlier from UM from Dave Wilson, we see the

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>SMP five lead by energy, financials and materials. This is Bloomberg.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Now let's get over to Nathan Chetty. I told you

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be joined by the head of multi

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>asset at now ven they've got one point two trillion

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets under management. We're gonna talk about the

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and risks in private markets. Where do you start when? Um, uh, Nathan,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>when analyzing such a huge universe, Thanks uh, Matt Paul

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. It is indeed a massive universe,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think, um, it's only growing. We've seen a

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ton of interest in in private markets, and I think

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this has been driven really by two phenomenon. The first

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is this lower expected return environment at least on a

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>go for a basis, and I I'd argue the second

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>one is partly driven by the volatility we're seeing in

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>economic variables and brought broad indicator. So investors are moving

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to private markets in order to incorporate them in their

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>portfolios for more diversification. They're trying to eat out every

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>basis point of return that they can, and that liquidity

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>premium UM is certainly one place to source it. So

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, Nathan, we hear a little bit more I

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>guess really over the last several weeks and months about

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>private credit, and I guess that's simply, you know, investors

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>looking anywhere they can for yield. Give us kind of

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the risk return profile as you know, you guys got

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to go out from you know, maybe you know, looking

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>at treasuries, are looking at public corporates to to going

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>out into the private credit market. Give us a sense

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of the risk return that you guys think about. Yeah,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>private credit has just absolutely exploded, and and part of

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that is due to UM, you know, some of the

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>bank rag et cetera, and ultimately UM syndicated loans haven't

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>had the same levels of plot that we was seen

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So the credits stepped in there UM

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and really have a risk return profile that's not dissimilar

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to their public cousins, meaning syndicated loans, but at least

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on the middle market lending or senior secured side, we're

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>looking at high single digits and uh, you know, a

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>lower risk profile than you'd see in public markets, and

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>again part of that is due to that illiquidity risk

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>premium that you're getting UM. I think another reason why

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>private credit is of such interest is you're sitting higher

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the cap structure. Private equity or VC has always

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been part of UH portfolios, but with private credit, you're

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting higher up in that cap structure, have to deploy

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>less risk, but again a very attractive risk return profile,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly UM for income oriented investors. So how much does

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>how much do things like FED policy matter to private markets?

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>How quickly you see follow through? I mean, look, FED

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>policy matters for all markets, public or private, and it

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>depends on the private market we're talking about. Some are

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>going to UM transmit or or reverberate in in those

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>private markets quicker than others, particularly those that are sensitive

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to fixed income. We're just talking about private credit. Most

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of private credit is in UM live or plus type

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>landing or floating rate structures. So UM you have some

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>UH some ability to manage that rates duration risk, which

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is really going to reflect FED policy much more so

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>than you would with public market rate sensitive assets, and

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>those are obviously going to be reflected UM immediately in

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the private real assets space. UM, not dis similar funding rates,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>credit spreads. They all are going to have an impact

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>on UH demand and and ultimately debility to to purchase

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and supply in the real asset space. But but but

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the the implications and that transmission from shifts in FED

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>policy are going to take some time. They're going to

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>take UM multiple quarters, and ultimately I guess that goes

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>back to why we've seen such a huge uptake in

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>demand and interest is to mitigate some of that volatility

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around UM, you know, economic variables, and that volatility around

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>policy uncertainty gives it time to digest UM and ultimately

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>reflect more fundamentals going forward. Nathan, we're presumably heading into UH.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is inflation in this economy, Nathan, the discussion,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess the debate is whether it's transitory and there's

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>something more longer term. How does your portfolio, a portfolio

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of you know, alternative assets, private

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>market investments, private credit investments, how does that typically fair

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in you know, a inflationary perhaps rising rate environment. UM.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the question, And obviously inflation is is top

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of mind for all investors right now, it's re entered

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. It does exist. There's supply chain issues, and

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we can argue UM round and round about its transitory nature.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>We do believe that it's going to settle UM at

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a at a level that's higher than we've seen in

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the past decade, this disinflationary decades. So UM in a

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>portfolio the size of ours and a portfolio that is

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>highly diversified traversing public and private markets. The big area

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>where UM, say an uptakeing inflation is going to influence

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the portfolios in the bond equity correlation. I mean people

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hold bonds in their portfolio as a diversified against equities.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>When we enter higher inflation regimes, we see that correlation

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tends to flip. I mean this this dynamic of correlation

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's thirty years ago it was positively correlated. So UM

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for us very much about finding diversification. You need to

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>find divertification real assets, UM and private assets to provide

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that diversification that we're seeking in those environments. All right, Nathan,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. For really appreciation

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Nathan Chetty, head of Multi Asset at Nuvine,

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to us about the private market alternatives in a portfolio.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller. Yet on boul Sweeney. I'm

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.