WEBVTT - How dangerous is nuclear waste?

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>When I was young, kids from neighboring towns would sometimes

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>asked me if I glowed in the dark. It was

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>probably because I grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>home of the Atomic mom and secret plutonium facilities. Those

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>kids were kind of joking, but also kind of not

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really understand what nuclear meant. What they knew

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>came from movies and The Simpsons, where nuclear waste was

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a glowing green goo that gave fish a third eyeball. Well,

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of the Simpsons, but I'm here

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that I don't glow in the dark,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and I only have two eyeballs. Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a particle physicist and a professor at u C Irvine,

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I sincerely hope that my research never kills anyone.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Both of my parents worked at Los Alumos National Labs,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I never knew the details of their projects, but

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew that they were involved in the weapons programs,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>so I never visited their offices or even saw the

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>front door of their building because it was all in

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the part of the lab that required a Q clearance

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to enter around town. That was called working behind the fence.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>They had their reasons for deciding to contribute to our

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 1>nuclear arsenal, which are pointed at cities and threatened civilian

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>populations with horrible death. But I decided to work on

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>problems that were more abstract, less likely to put new

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>tools of mass destruction into the hands of politicians. It

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>means that questions that I answer in my research are

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>further removed from humanity. They're less likely to kill anyone,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but also less likely to improve your quality of life

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in the short term by developing new technology gs or

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>more powerful toasters. Of course, I think there's inherent value

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in basic research, you know, knowledge for knowledge's sake. We

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>do fundamental research for the same reason that we build parks.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We do it because it's nice, not because we think

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to lead to a faster graphics processor in

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>quarter two of three. But we also know that fundamental

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>research is the best way to stumble on transformational technologies,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>just not on the schedule of quarterly product reports. So

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the podcast. Daniel and Jorge explain the Universe,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in which we dive deep into those fundamental questions about

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the universe, what's it made of? On

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the smallest scale. How did it come to be this way?

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>How big is the universe? How small is the smallest thing?

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We seek to understand the basic nature of the universe

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so that we can ask even deeper, more philosophical questions

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like why this way and not some other way. My

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>friend and co host Jorge him is on a break,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to do a deep dive into an

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>area of physics that is close to my heart and

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>my background, not because it answers deep questions about the universe,

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but because it has so much potential to improve or

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>damage the lives of humanity. It's a wonderful example of

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the power and danger of putting scientific knowledge to work

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for people. I'm talking about nuclear power and the dangers

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear waste. While fission reactors have proven that they

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>can produce a steady supply of electricity using a very

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>efficient fuel and requiring a tiny land footprint, the questions

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that hang over them are safety and waste. The eighteen

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>UN Report about Climate change lays out pathways to limiting

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>warming to one and a half degrees, and all of

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>their pathways include nuclear power expansion by a hundred and

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent or more. We have recently done a couple

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of episodes on the safety of nuclear reactors. In this

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>episode three sixty six about molten salt reactors whether alternative

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>designs for fission plants that can produce energy more safely

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>than In March at episode three seventy six about is

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power worth the risks? Where I talked to Kelly

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether we need nuclear power to reduce carbon emissions

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and whether it can be done safely so that covers

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the safety of the nuclear reactor itself. Today we're going

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the question of the waste produced in

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear cycle. Is a lot of misinformation and misunderstanding

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>out there, so I've invited an expert to help us

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>break it down and think it through. So on today's

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>episode we'll be tackling the question how dangerous is nuclear waste?

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We sit at a critical moment in our history when

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>climate change is accelerating, and we need to make important

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>decisions right now about how to reduce our carbon emissions,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but we also need to take care not to spoil

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>our environment. What is the best way forward? Answering that

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>question requires a sober look at the strengths and weaknesses

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of all of the options. On the table. Our remind

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>listeners that in our previous episode we explained what makes

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>new your power and attractive option, because while wind and

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>solar are wonderful, they can be transient. Sometimes it's cloudy

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or the wind doesn't blow in some places in the

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>depths of winter. You need solar power when it's least productive.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's economical to build a grid that uses solar

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and wind for maybe eighty percent of our energy. But

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we need something else, something more robust and steady for

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the other piece, something to help fill in the gap

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when the wind doesn't blow and the sun isn't shining. Now,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels are attractive because they're easy to fire up

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly in response to shortages, but they obviously have huge

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>costs and pollution and carbon emissions. So how well does

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power do. It's very steady because it can provide

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>power all day and all night, regardless of the weather,

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's tricky to ramp it up or down quickly.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>And while it makes no smoke or carbon emissions, it

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>produces a very different kind of potentially dangerous pollution in

0:05:54.680 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>its radioactive byproducts. Our first guest is Madison Hilly, executive

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>director of the Green New Deal. Maddie, Welcome to the program.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us today. Thank you

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 1>so much. It's great to be here. Daniel. So, first

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>help us understand a little bit about your background and

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>your passion for this issue. Obviously, climate change and decarbonization

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of our energy is a vital project, but most of

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>us contributed in minor ways. We reduce our use of

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels or energy consumption, or we vote. But you've

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>made it the core of your life's work and career.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>When did you decide to devote your life to this

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>topic and what made you decide to do that. Yeah,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So I went into nuclear advocacy straight out of college

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen after I was presented with the environmental case

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for nuclear I was really concerned about poverty and developing

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>countries as well as climate change issues that I thought

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>were it odds with one another. So when I found

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>out that we can lift people out of poverty with cheap,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>abundant energy while providing unparalleled environmental protection, I was all in.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>So from I traveled all over Europe and Asia, talking

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to journalists, policy makers, and members of the public about

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the need for nuclear power and Meanwhile, back at home

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US, we were shutting down perfectly good reactors

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're falling behind the rest of the world on

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>new builds. And I didn't really see anyone articulating a

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>practical vision for transitioning the US nuclear industry from the

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>verge of collapse, frankly, to one capable of delivering the economic,

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>environmental and security benefits of nuclear power. So in I

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>decided to turn my focus to the US and launched

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the campaign for a Green Nuclear Deal. So, going into

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, I just want to make it clear I

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>am not a nuclear waste expert. I don't come from engineering.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I came out of college with degrees in environmental sciences

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and political science because I wanted to study and protect

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the environment. So everything that I've learned about nuclear was

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the truth how we can be good

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stewards of the environment without compromising on human development and prosperity.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And I decided to devote my life to being a

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nuclear advocate because what I learned when I studied was

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so powerful. Great, thank you. And there are a lot

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of interesting issues here, scientific ones, political ones. I thought

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we'd start with the science and organize our conversation by

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>following the sort of whole cycle of nuclear power from

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>mining the fuel and dealing with the spent fuel rods

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and talking about the waste and the risks at each step.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's start off with just like, what is the

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>fuel that we need for nuclear power? For those who

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't immersed their lives in fission and engineering, what is

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the fuel that we need? Where do we find the

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fuel for nuclear power? Sure? So the fuel that we

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>need for nuclear is uranium, and most of that can

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>be an isotope you two thirty eight, and some of

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be more fissionable or readily fissionable isotope

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you two thirty five. So natural uranium that comes out

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of the ground is in general about point seven percent

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you two thirty five and point three you two thirty eight.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So we are able to extract uranium and then enrich

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it to be slightly spicier, that's not a scientific way

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to describe it, but with a higher percentage of you

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>two thirty five to create a reaction to reach criticality

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>within a reactor. And so rather than break up each

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>step of the fuel cycle, I think it's important to

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>start with the context. So whether it's lignite to fuel

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>coal plants, lithium for batteries, or copper for solar panels.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>All energy technologies and systems are going to require some

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of extraction. So the question isn't that we're talking

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>about whether we need to mine or not, but how

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>much mining and extraction is actually required for our system.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And from an environmentalist perspective, the key is to minimize

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the mining that has to be done. The great thing

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about nuclear from this perspective, throughout the whole fuel cycle,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>from mining to milling and enriching and eventually going into

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the reactor, is that nuclear is extremely energy den The

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>technical definition of energy density is just the amount of

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>energy stored in a given system or substance per unit volume,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but that translates to smallness, compactness, minimal impact. And another

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>great thing about nuclear is that it's baseload. They don't

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>require battery backup, so any time you need to dip

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>into batteries or storage, you're suddenly talking about much more mining.

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So minimizing the amount of storage our energy system will

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>need is the fastest way to reduce lithium mining needs,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for example. So wrapping this up nuclear requires the least

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of mining and extraction across energy technologies. In fact,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>most of uranium mining globally is done without digging pits

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or tunnels at all. It's about tiny little wells that

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have things like straws suck up the uranium. So you're

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>making uranium sound quite tasty. I mean, something you can

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>drink through a straw and even maybe has some spice

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. Joking aside. I understand the point that all

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>technologies require extraction of some resources from the earth, and

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly true that uranium is very dense source of fuel,

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but tell us more about how we get it out

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the earth. I know that some uranium is mind

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>via open pit mining. There's also this other technique, leach mining.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this what you're referring to with the straws right exactly?

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're basically drilling little wells and using liquids to

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>extract uranium without having to dig open pits. And that's

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>again the beautiful thing about nuclear is that the ways

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that in which we extract uranium are credibly small and

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>minimizing an environmental impact. One of the silver linings to

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the stigma around nuclear is that the entire process of

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>extracting uranium and milling. It is incredibly regulated, reported with

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>very tight controls and reporting needs compared to fossil fuels

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or other metallurgical mining, despite being very similar, being exactly

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>the same. So the waste from mining uranium is exactly

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the same, mostly the same as any sort of metals

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're mining from the ground. It's just there's a

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>lot less of it, way way less, and it's more regulated,

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's handling because it's part of the nuclear fuel cycle.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard it said that uranium is also very

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>plentiful in the oceans, that most of the uranium on

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Earth is actually dissolved into the oceans. Why can't we

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just filter it out of the water. Why do we

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>need to dig into the ground at all. So it's,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as all things of issue with costs. So

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:34.479
<v Speaker 1>uranium that we can mine is very cost effective, whereas

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're getting into the institute or pulling out of water,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not as cheap. So in a future where I

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of our energy needs will be met

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>by mining, I do suspect we will be doing more

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. So based on the uranium that we consider

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>economically available and the technology that we're using right now,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we are able to meet all of our nuclear needs,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but we wouldn't have many years in the bank if

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we ran completely on nuclear power and everyone had a

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>high standard of living. However, the current reactors that we

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>use barely burn any of the fuel at all, I

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think just about one percent of all energy available in

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the fuel rod. So we have these other reactors, fast

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>reactors that can even breed new fuel, which means they

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can produce about a hundred and forty times as much

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>energy from the same amount of uranium that non breeder

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>reactors can. So that dramatically expands the number of years

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we can use to power society or we have to

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>power society. We also have thorium, which can only be

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>fully consumed in breeder reactors, which is why we don't

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really use it. Now there's a roughly equivalent amount of

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>known thorium reserves as uranium. So again you're doubling that

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>time frame. Now we're talking about, you know, a thousand years,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but what if we want to go longer. This is

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>where your question comes into play. So the earth crust

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>has an average of less than three parts per million

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of uranium and about six parts per million of thorium.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a crazy fact that would mean that

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a random scoop of dirt has more energy in it

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>than an equivalent scoop of coal. The ocean also has

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about two to three parts per million of uranium, So,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we can extract that to get to

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>now hundreds of thousands of years of high energy society.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Because the ocean will continue to pull uranium and thorium

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>from the soil to maintain that equilibrium, will be able

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to continue that extraction process. So we have at our

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>disposal about four billion years worth of fissionable reefs versus

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just what is easily and economically accessible now, given

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have this fully nuclear, fully decarbonized system

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that we imagine we might have in the future. I

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hope that makes sense. Yeah, absolutely, And we'll be talking

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in a few minutes about reprocessing spent nuclear fuel and

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thorium cycle and all that kind of stuff. But the

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>picture I'm getting is that we have economically cheap waste

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>access uranium, but we also have vast stores of uranium

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we can access which would be more expensive, but in

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the mining process you take it out of the ground.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you also need to sort of refine it

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit at this step called milling, where they

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>grind the ore material to these uniform particle sizes and

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>treat them in some process to produce this powder they

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>call yellow cake. So we have this mining and this milling.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>What are the byproducts there? I mean, you don't just

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>get pure uranium out. You must produce also other stuff.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that stuff toxic? Is it like radioactive? Is that

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>something we need to worry about? So, like I said,

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>from the mining perspective, it's no different than the tailings

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>from most mining, So that's not anything special that we

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>need to worry about. For the milling process, you do

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have some against spicy radioactive material left over for a byproduct,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>But the best thing about it is that it's bagged intact.

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>There's almost no radioactivity, because that would be a waste

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the product. You actually want. The radioactive stuff as

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a byproduct of the milling process, or one of the

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>by products of the milling process, can sit around until

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we do have these breeder reactors, and again can be

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>eaten up and used as fuel. So I wouldn't even

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>technically classify that as waste because one day, hopefully it

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>will not be waste, right, got it. And so that's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not just like dumped in piles on the ground, you're saying,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's being carefully tracked somewhere. Right Again, because of the

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>stigma that the nuclear industry has, it is absolutely necessary

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that this whole process be under far greater regulation and control.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessary, it's necessary, and that the industry wants

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to defend itself against anti nuclearism saying that this isn't safe,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this is dirty, this isn't reported. So it's created this

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hyper safety regulation culture that's allowed it to be what

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it is today. Mills are often owned and run by

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>international partners that have all the pressure from their governments

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to stay as clean as possible, so it's got the

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>cleanest standards, and mining the cleanest standards, and milling. So

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that covers mining and milling, and now we have the

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>basic ingredients. Next we'll talk about enrichment. But first before

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we get into the spiciest side of nuclear power, we

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>need to take a short break. Okay, we're back and

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking with Mattie Hilly about the dangers of nuclear waste.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What is produced, how dangerous is it, What are the

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>options for storing it. So far we talked about how

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to get the stuff out of the ground with mining

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and milling, and next we need to talk about enrichment.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You said earlier that most of the uranium that we

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>take out of the ground is two thirty eight, whereas

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this also you two thirty five. So for our listeners,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>those numbers refer to the isotopes of the uranium, essentially

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>how many protons and neutrons are in the nucleus. Sounds

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>very similar, but just three numbers different means very different

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>abilities to fission these materials into something useful. You two

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty five is very facile, while you two thirty eight

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 1>needs faster neutrons, So you two thirty five. The rarer

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>one is the kind of material that we need the

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>actual fuel in these reactors. So there's this step where

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we enrich these things, where we take something which is

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly you two thirty eight, and we boost up the

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>U two thirty five fraction of it. How does that

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>typically happen, Maddie? Is it mostly through centrifuges? So quick

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>note some reactors don't currently use enriched fuel, So for example,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the can does in Canada can use natural uranium, so

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that same ratio of you two thirty five to you

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 1>two thirty eight, But most reactors around them were all

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the light waters that we're talking about do. And yes,

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>those are enriched with center fugues. But we might be

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>getting a new technology soon, laser enrichment. I'm definitely not

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>an expert on enrichment, so I can't describe the laser

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>enrichment process. But that might make enriching I think easier

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and cheaper, is the hope. And so this leads to

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>some samples of uranium with more you thirty five, and

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>some samples with less. I mean, what you're doing, here's

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>your operating right, you're concentrating to so there must be

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>some waste there, right, Some I think they call this

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>depleted uranium. Yes, so with this depleted uranium, if the

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>market price for uranium goes up, we use more of

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that depleted uranium. So again, this is not waste in

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the sense that these are byproducts we can never use. Again,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's that we do not use them now because it's

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>economically cheaper to just not use it. So you can

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>call it extra not waste, all right, that sounds like

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a very nice word for it. And in terms of volume,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there must be sort of a lot of this, right,

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to enrich the uranium from less than one

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>percent to up to a few percent. We must produce

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this depleted uranium. Where is that stuff?

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it sitting in the warehouses somewhere? Is it being

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>used for something else? So first of all, you know,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about a lot that's relative to nuclear,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in general, the amounts that we're talking about

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>with uranium and nuclear are just very small because it's

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>very dense. So a lot is actually a very small

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of depleted uranium sitting near the conversion facilities. You know,

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just in general, from the mind to the reactor of

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the material flow is very very small. Which you know,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so when green Piece talks about all of the nuclear waste,

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's just so little of it that we really have

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to put it into context. It's important to be reminded

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that there are very small material volumes, so more than

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you could put in your pickup chuck, for example, but

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>much less than is produced by coal or mining for

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>battery parts, for example. Is your point? Oh absolutely, yeah,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So all of the waste from commercial nuclear energy, the

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>entire history in the US could fit on a football

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>field stacked about fifty feet high. So each nation only

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>needs a few facilities the size of normal warehouses to

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>store any of this waste or extra that comes from

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the process of creating nuclear fuel. So then let's talk

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>about the spicy part. Let's talk about actual power generation.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So we have our nuclear plant. We've got you two

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty five in there. We have it critically dense so

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that the neutrons that come off of the fission are

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>slowed down by the water and trigger reactions in other

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you too thirty five atoms. And for those listeners who

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>want to know more details about the process, check out

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our previous episodes about nuclear power. We talked about the

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>technology and light water reactors and salt reactors and all

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. But the key thing to understand

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>here is that, as you said earlier, most of the

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>fuel that's in the rod is still you two thirty eight,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's there during the process, and it gets split

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>apart and it's transformed by the process, but you still

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>end up with a fuel rod that has a lot

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of uranium in it. So what exactly is produced when

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you're you're done running the fuel you've gotten your energy out,

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what is it that comes out? What does the fuel

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>rod consist of after the process of extracting the energy, right,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So you pull out the fuel rod assembly from the reactor,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's what is what we called the waste. And

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that waste is made up of three things. One the

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>unused uranium, which is most of it, to the fission products,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which are atomic fragments call them lighter than uranium, and transuranics,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>which are radioactive elements that are heavier than uranium. And

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>all three of these things are stored in the pellets,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>which are stored inside the fuel rods. So that's what's

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the reactor. So heavier than uranium. That's

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a little surprising. I'm thinking fission. I'm thinking uranium is

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking down. I'm expecting to get stuff that's smaller than uranium.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>But I know, for example, that plutonium is produced. Is

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that because it's absorbing neutrons. It's not breaking up. It's

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just like grabbing some of these neutrons and it's going

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>up the periodic table exactly. So those transuranum are the

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>result of uranium absorbing neutrons but not fissioning. So you

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>can think of transuranics as future reactor fuel from neutrons

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>going into uranium and making them chunking it up. To speak.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you have these fission products, which

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are small and the result of as you were describing

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the fissioning there the fragments left over at the end

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of that process. Great. So we have these three elements

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. We have the leftover uranium, we have the

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>trans uranics like plutonium, and then we have the byproducts.

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And so here we have things that are like neptunium

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>two thirty seven with a two million year half life,

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and uranium two thirty four with the hundreds of year lifetime.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the kind of stuff people think

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>about when they hear nuclear waste. They hear about things

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that are radioactive and that will last for millions of years.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about the dangers of these like how

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>dangerous are these things? Why are we worried about them?

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So the general rule of thumb for radiation is that

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a short half life means higher radio activity, so much spicier,

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but for a shorter period of time. Long half life

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>means lower radio activity. It's less spicy, but over a

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>much longer time. So very short half life products are

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of little concern when we talk about the waste because

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>by definition, they've already lost most of their radio activity

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>by the time the fuel rods have cooled off. So

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all of waste management is really dealing with these longer

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lasting products. And so transuranics do have a long effective

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>half life, but that also means they don't produce nearly

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the heat or penetrating radiation of those short half life

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>products or fission products, and so they might last for

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but they're not nearly as hazardous as

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the other materials that were concerned about. And

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>because these transuranics can be consumed in fast reactors, that

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>would mean their remaining waste is very short lived compared

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to the traditional spent fuel that we currently have a right,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>so you're telling us that the stuff that doesn't last

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>very long, like the caesium one thirty seven and the

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>strontium nine s have half lives of like decades, These

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>things are very toxic because they don't last very long.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>They're like giving up the ghost all in one go,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>spring out all of their toxicity in the moment, whereas

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the other stuff, the stuff that people think about lasting

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a very long time isn't as dangerous because it lasts

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a long time because it sort of spreads out the

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.239
<v Speaker 1>poison or millions of years rather than decades exactly. And

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>most of those transuranics actually have radioactivity less than the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of their uranium or equivalent to one ton of fuel,

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so it would be like grabbing dirt essentially. So let's

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about what we can do with this stuff. Obviously,

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the very short lived products that are the very toxic ones,

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>this just needs to be stored and you just need

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to be shielded from it until the radioactivity dies away.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Those have half lives of like decades. But this other stuff,

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>plutonium two thirty eight, plutonium two thirty nine is very

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>long lived. You're saying that we can reuse this. It's

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a little surprising and counterintuitive to think, like the waist

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that comes out is also fueled, because why wasn't it

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just fueled the first time around? What do you need

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to do to it to make it like usable again?

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Why wasn't it just useful in the first go around? Right,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So this in part gets into the difference of reactors

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have and reactors that we will use in

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the future. So in thermal nuclear power plants, we're talking

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>about slow neutrons. These are neutrons that basically move at

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the same speed of the materials and the reactor, so

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>slow relatively speaking, as opposed to fast reactors, where fast

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>neutrons smash up everything in there but are less efficient

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>doing so. So you need a lot of neutrons and

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to move fast because some leak. Right, So

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is that the slow reactors here, you have

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you two thirty five, and they produce neutrons that are

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit faster than they actually need to take

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to do more fission. Right, So YouTube thirty

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>five produces neutrons and if those hit other atoms they

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>would cause fission, but actually works better if they're a

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit slower. It's like a whole nuclear model where

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you have protons and neutrons layered together in these shells.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>The speed at which the neutron hits it really affects

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's going to split in half or get absorbed.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So in the original process the thermal water reactors, you've

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>got to slow down those neutrons to be like the

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>optimal speed for you two thirty five. You're saying these

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>other fuels they actually like faster neutrons. Now you need

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like a different kind of reactor, one where you have

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the fast neutrons buzzing about to create fission in these

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>other products. So the two steps were why are different

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>speeds of neutrons, which is why it doesn't just happen

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>all at once. Right, So, if you're working with slow neutrons,

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>which we do in our current thermal reactors, you form

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but do not fission the transuranics. So what you would

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>need to do is take them out and switch them

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to a fast reactor. But you can also just start

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>with a fast reactor. In fact, the first ever lightbulb

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to get powered by a generator from a nuclear reactor

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was a fast reactor. And so historically did we start

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out with just the sort of slow neutron reactors and

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not worry about this stuff because it was cheaper to

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be inefficient about it, just sort of use up some

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of the U thirty five and leave the rest of

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the stuff as waste. And now we're developing these faster

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>reactors or what's the history of it there, if you know. So,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we did try a lot of what are now being

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>touted as advanced nuclear designs back in the fifties and

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sixties with the commercial nuclear energy program. Part of the

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>reason we chose light water is that for these fast

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>react afters, you need spicy your fuel. You need that

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>higher enrichment, the higher ratio of you toot to youtubet

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to start up that fast reactor, and so the thought

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was that's you know, more difficult, has higher proliferation risks,

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was the main motivation to avoid that and stick with

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the lower enrichment. And light water really helps to slow

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>down neutrons a lot while carrying away lots of heat,

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>which is how you get energy from a reactor. So

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's this narrative that, oh, we just chose

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this very inefficient technology because we adopted it from the

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Navy and we got locked in, whereas there are these

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>other better alternative designs, where there were actually a lot

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of physical and engineering and like sound reasons why the

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>light water reactor was a really great reactor tommercialize and

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>export to the rest of the world. All right, So

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>now we have this technology, we produce waste, and part

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of that we can reprocess into fuel for other reactors

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>extract even more energy out of it. As you were saying,

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this gives us a huge extension on our ability to

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like power our society using uranium. But still we're gonna

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have some waste right in the end. We can't burn

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>everything up into harmless byproducts. Even if you do these

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fast reactors, you get something. So tell us about what

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it is that actually comes out. I mean, I think

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in people's minds you have these Homer Simpson barrels of

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>glowing green goo. What does the nuclear waste actually look like? Right?

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So for most of the world, it looks like this.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>They are long, skinny metallic rods that are all put

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>together in a bundle called a fuel assembly, and once

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they're done cooking in the reactor, you take them out there,

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>put into what's called spent fuel pool to cool off,

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards, you know, maybe like five years or so,

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there's taken out and put into these virtually indestructible, large

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>steel and concrete containers called casks. Can I stop you

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there and ask you about that? You said that they

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>cool off for five years in a pool. Are we're

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about heat in terms of like radioactive spiciness or

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>heat in terms of temperature? What takes five years to

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>cool down both. So, like I said, there are the

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 1>short lived spicier products that we want to lose their radioactivity,

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's also the thermal energy from radiation. So the

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>answer is both. So these things are literally hot and

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they take five years to get colder. Is that because

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the radioactor processes are still happening, Like the caesum

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and the strawntium that's decaying, it's still heating up the

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>rod as it's cooling. Yeah, the spiciest stuff is decaying

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>rapidly and that's putting off thermal energy. And can we

0:33:58.160 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>capture any of that energy? It seems like you have

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the glowing rods that are dumping heat. Can we just

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>use water and capture that heat and turn it into

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>energy or is that just wasted somehow? I mean, some

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>people have proposed this. I don't actually know what the

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>feasibility is. I don't know that it's that important in

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the grand scheme of things, but perhaps all right, And

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so now we have these rods which contain things we

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think are useful in the fuel cycle anymore. And

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I spent five years cooling down and bleeding off some

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of the radio activity. And then the question is what

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>do we do with it? Right, we need someplace to

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>put it that's like geologically stable and that we don't

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>think future humans are going to stick a straw into

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it and drink it. So what are the options in

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of like where to put this stuff? Right? So

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>first let's talk about what we do in the United States.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, you get these assemblies out of the

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.919
<v Speaker 1>spent fuel and you put them into these big containers

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and right now they just sit right at the site

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of production in at the power plant. They have a

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect safety record, they're regulated, monitored, and you can hug them,

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you can sit on them. I mean the utilities typically

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>don't allow people to come in and do that, but

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the times that nuclear advocates have been allowed, you can

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>touch them. I mean they're completely and perfectly safe. There

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are videos of these cast getting hit by a train

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and the train does not survive the impact, but the

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>cast does. There's also they shot a missile at these

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>casts and it was unharmed. I mean, it was damaged,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but nothing that would open the cast that compromises the

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>integrity of the cask. So the way we do it

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>currently is just fine. So can I stop you there

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and ask you a question, because the perception among those

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>who are not experts and haven't done the research in

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>this is that nuclear waste is dangerous and that it's

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>been spilled, and that we don't have a way to

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>contain it. And you're telling us something quite different. You're saying,

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>basically that we have the tech knowlogy to seal it

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>up in a way that we never have to worry

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>about it. Again. I read a report from Greenpeace. Is

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a quotation from their executive summary. They said, without exception,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all countries reviewed were found lacking a sustainable and safe

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>solution for managing the vast volumes of nuclear waste. This

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>includes high level spent fuel produced at all nuclear reactors,

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>for which to date all efforts to find secure and

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>safe permanent disposal options have failed. How do you reconcile

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>their statements with what you're telling us about the safety

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear waste. Are they talking about different things or

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is it just a different policy approach? Right, So, there

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are two things that you address there. I want to

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>start with the first, which is the public perception, and

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very real issue. In fact, I

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think that is the most important issue facing nuclear waste.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not that there's any danger. There isn't because the

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hazards of the waste are physically very small and very

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weak to the countermeasures and systems we already have in place.

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>The public doesn't know because they haven't been able to visit.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So their perception of nuclear waste comes from Mr Burns

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>shoving green barrels of goo into trees in the Simpsons,

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and not just these big, ugly, boring concrete casks that

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>take up the space of, you know, a fraction of

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>a parking lot. So I think that there needs to

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be more transparency when it comes to nuclear waste to

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>solve that perception issue. Green Peace is a different thing.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So green Peace is an anti nuclear organization, which means

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they aren't looking for a solution, they're looking for nuclear

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>not to exist. Their trick is to be for everything

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't exist yet, like geological repositories being proposed or

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>very advanced nuclear reactors, but then turning against them as

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>soon as they even begin to exist. So, for example,

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Finland actually does have a geological repository and green Peace

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>has fought it every step along the way, and now

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that it exists, says it's not good enough. So they

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>start by defining everything in nuclear as not sustainable. Then

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they point out everything existing and proposed and called it

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable if it includes anything with nuclear that's the game

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I see. And something else that might give people the

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 1>sense that nuclear power produces waste which leaks out into

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>their water table, for example, is that there have been

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>nuclear incidents at reactors Fukushima, Ensure Noble, and these things

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have caused radioactive clouds, for example, or into the water,

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that people need to think about

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to nuclear power. But today we're just

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about the danger of the waste itself, right, the

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actual product that comes out of a nuclear power plant

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>which is operating in a stable and safe manner, right right.

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can't really understand the fear around nuclear waste

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at the science and the physical

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>evidence and what's coming out of the reactor. So I

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think a better way to understand is when you start

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at it in terms of a way to express

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fear by projecting it onto the waste. And a

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of minds there's no difference between nuclear power and

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear bombs, and these tasks of nuclear waste are seen

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as small nuclear bombs, which is a huge public perception problem.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think if people were allowed to visit

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the waste like they are in other countries and see

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it for what it is, suddenly you can have a

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation about what do we do with a waste that

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 1>deals with the physical nature of the waste and not

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the emotional concerns around it. Agree, thank you. I want

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to talk more are about the storage issues and Yuck

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a Mountain and how we move forward with First, let's

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Okay, we're back and we're talking

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>with Maddie Hilly about what to do with nuclear waste,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about the stuff that comes out of

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the reaction. Once you've processed it, you've gotten your fuel,

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe you've done some reprocessing to use more of the

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>radioactive elements inside the rods, and now you need a

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>place to safely keep this. And you're telling us that

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's basically not a big deal. You can just wrap

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>it up in these casks and you can even store

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it above ground. Right. So, in the United States, for

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>many years there was this project that Yuck a Mountain

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to basically bury this stuff, to find a place to

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>put it where we thought it was not going to

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be geologically a problem for many, many thousands of years,

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and where maybe future humans weren't likely to stumble across it.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>What is the history of yuck A Mountain? Why did

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that fail? And do you think we need a similar

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of project or a totally different approach? So I

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think Yucka Mountain is another example of the nuclear industry

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to respond to social concerns with costly technological solutions.

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So yuck a Mountain. The idea is that you would

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 1>put your waste in the center of the desert, deep underground,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 1>so it could harm no one and no one would

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be near it. But we already have a system that

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>has a perfect safety record. So Yucca Mountain, if it

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>were to get completed, would save zero lives, protect against

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>zero injuries, avoid zero cancer. But what it would do

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is give the false impression that nuclear waste is somehow

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 1>uniquely dangerous industrial waste such that it needs to be

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of nowhere, deep underground. Ironically, because of

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the sheer cost and effort involved in a repository like

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yucca Mountain, the public fears that about nuclear waste are reaffirmed,

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not diffused, so they see that the industry and government

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are willing to spend all this money and build a

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>huge megaproject to bury the waste, and they think, Wow,

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>my god, that must be so dangerous. Let's just not

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.839
<v Speaker 1>have it at all. So you're saying it's sort of performative.

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not actually making things safer. It's just sort of

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to make people feel like something is being done. Exactly.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's trying to solve a social concern with the technological fix,

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of the main theme of the nuclear

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>industry over its existence, at least in the US. And

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you another question about your claim. Earlier

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you said that this has a perfect safety record, and

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that sort of jives with people's perception

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of the nuclear industry, because, you know, we hear about

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>toxic spills. I was reading report from the Department of

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Energy that says that there are millions of galleons of

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>radioactive waste and they're huge quantities of contaminated soil and water,

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and they identify like fifty seven sites that need to

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>clean up. Is that because this radioactive waste comes from

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>other sources, other processes, other industries, and that the spent

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fuel itself has never had a safety issue. Is

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that the distinction? Yes, exactly. So almost all of those

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>things that you mentioned, including Hanford, including you know, the

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Southwest US, are almost exclusively heritage weapon facilities. So I

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, if anything, the creation of a commercial nuclear

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>energy industry has made nuclear at large safer because now

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we know how to properly regulate and monitor waste. So

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>those are all from the weapons project, which is a

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>separate topic and one that I think is really important

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to cover, But none of that is from commercial energy production. Great,

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>and so you're telling us that yuck a Mountain wasn't

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a great idea because it's mostly performative, it was

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>very expensive, and plus then you have to transport this

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>waste from where it's produced and where it could be

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>safely stored into some other location, carrying these things like

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>across the country. So what do you think is the

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>best path forward for storing nuclear waste? Should we just

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of keep it where it's produced? To start off?

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I would just want to say that I have absolute

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>confidence that underground storage will work physically. That's not the

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>problem here. The problem is that the impulse misunderstands the

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>needs and fears. So for example, I mentioned earlier that

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Finish have built an underground repository, but the Finish

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:44.720
<v Speaker 1>are already extremely pro nuclear. Their Green Party has rebelled

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Green piece party line and openly supports nuclear power,

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so they had the comfortability with nuclear first and the

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>repository came next. In the US, we don't have that comfortability,

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and part to that is I think the lack of

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>transparency and honesty and the discussion about waste. So in

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, nuclear waste is like co parenting. You want

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 1>absolute transparency and visitation rights. What does that mean. We

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>need to talk about the waste and put the risk

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>into context, which is that there's virtually no risk and

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that our system works great. And then we need the

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 1>public to be able to visit and see that for themselves.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll come and see that this isn't green barrels of

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>leaky goop. You know. For example, in the Netherlands, they

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>store their process waste in a centralized facility that's basically

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>an education and art museum open to the public. They

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can walk on top of the waist with just some

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>concrete in between them and the spicier stuff. And that's

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a really spicy stuff compared to what we have because

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 1>it's processed. So I think that in the US, our

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>first priority is to allow the public to see that

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nuclear waste is no big deal. Then we can have

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>discussions about waste that deal with the physical properties of

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the waste and not how do we ease social and

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 1>emotional concerns. All right, Well, it's a very complex issue scientifically,

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and the politics are even more complicated. So thanks very

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>much Mattie for coming on today and walking us through

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the details of what exactly is nuclear waste

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to how to store and what the real dangers are.

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate your time. Thank you very much. Thank you

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. Daniel, great to chat. So that was my

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Maddie Hilly, who was a very strong advocate

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for commercial nuclear power and feels that the waste is

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>something that we can manage. I thought that it was important, however,

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear from folks on the other side of the issue,

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so I reached out to representatives from Greenpeace and the

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Natural Resources Defense Counsel. Here are some excerpts from my

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>interviews with them. Okay, and so I'm very pleased to

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome Jan Horcomp He's a senior expert in nuclear energy

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and energy policy at green Peace, and he's a master's

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 1>degree in environmental science. John, thanks very much for taking

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>some time to talk to us. Oh, I'm very happy

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to be there. It's an afternoon here, beautiful weather and

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for you, a very early morning. So my first question

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for you is what is your assessment of the safety

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>record of various producers of sort of the most dangerous

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>highest level waste. We heard from an advocate for nuclear

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>power who told us that the commercial nuclear power industry

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>has a quote perfect safety record when it comes to

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>spent fuel. Is that how you would characterize it? Well, exactly.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've had a lot of incidents in the Princess,

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in the reprocessing industry, which is dealing with spent fuel.

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the most horrible ones is probably incident where

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 1>too much of high level material was thrown together and

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>where we had an explosion. I mean, those incidents you

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see often. But we also have the

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>track record of Lahagan in France, and track record of

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>seller Field, and the track record of Mayak in Russia.

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot to tell about that. There is

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so much to tell about that that I want to

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>go now into all of them. But the management of

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>spending nuclear fuel is not an easy job to do.

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>It's technically very complex, and in technical very complex things,

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 1>things go sometimes wrong. Luckily enough, most of the time

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:37.919
<v Speaker 1>those are minor incidents where we deal with a minor

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 1>contamination of people that are involved. But we have seen

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some very very large incidents like the Mayak nineteen fifty

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 1>seven incidents, or Team incident as it's also known, which

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is probably the third largest emission radioactive substances from the industry.

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you can argue whether the Russian lucre industry

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is a civil care industry because it's a hybrid industry

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>military civil, But that's a discussion you can have. It's

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>high level radioactivist is a very complex issue, and I

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>think slogans are not really benefit to to discussion about him.

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>To help us understand the challenge here, why not just

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>store the fairly small volume of nuclear fuel at the

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>reactors where it's produced so you don't have to transport it,

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't worry about loss and damage during transport. Why

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't you store them at the reactors or at facilities

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like cobra in the Netherlands. What's the danger there. The

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>small amount is at the moment almost half millions of

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>four heard eight ninety tons world wide, so it's it's

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not that small of a map. Here in Netherlands we

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred and ten cubic meters, which is not

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that very much at COD and I think storage of

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>spendinger fuel temporarily is basically the default option that the

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>majority of the operators is now choosing, and that's done

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>in different quality. Is one of my headaches last night

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was shelling sub Region compower station and a shell that

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>was falling next to the dry casket towards there. You

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hear my side. I mean that has been a few

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>hours off twitting to find out what the what the

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>impact was. It was just far enough away. So I'm

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 1>happy about that. There is no incident there in the Netherlands.

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Ferenstans that COVID. How we've chosen for a very large

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and very well protected engineered storage space to habog and

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is probably at the moment the

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:35.359
<v Speaker 1>state of the art of how to temporarily store high

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>level radioactive waste. Now that's not spent fuel. The Netherlands

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are reprocessing, so that's petrified waste, which we are sure

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that it will have to be kept out of the

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>environment for the next a few hundred thousand years. Temporary

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>storage for that reason, is only a temporary solution in

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this case until the year two thousand and thirty when

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it is supposed to close. And decision about what to

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>do with the waist then is in the Netherlands not

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be taken before the year two thousand one hundred.

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>That is probably also your great great grandchildren that will

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>have to take the decision for something where they have

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.399
<v Speaker 1>had no benefit of at all. You aready noticed there's

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a few things that play here. In principle, if we

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>have waste like this, it is better to store it

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with as little transport as possible dry storage on site,

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but you need to take care that also, and will

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 1>we protect against extreme circumstances as we now see in

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a putty difference. Is that why you describe it as

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>temporary storage because you don't think this is sustainable for

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>five thousand or a million years. This is designed for

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>both hundred years and you need to do something with it.

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Then the choice of options is at this moment not

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>very large. Most of the people work in the sector

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about the geological disposal as the preferred option. My

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>remarks then are always if it works. The other options

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that we see now are the fully engineered solution for

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the long term, but that is not what is COVID

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>cover is is an engineered solution for a hundred years.

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Just to clarify, I can ask you why does storage

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>at the reactor or in coverra only work for a

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred years? What happens after a hundred years that it's

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:18.439
<v Speaker 1>no longer possible to leave these things where they are now. Well,

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the concrete that we have there of the building, it

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is not for eternity. It's been designed to withstand, for instance,

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>severe whether impacts tornados for a period of about a

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred years and all beyond. At the moment we talk

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>about long term storage of this way, so we talk

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about hundreds of thousands of years. There's alstend something you

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:40.439
<v Speaker 1>can just uphold. You would have to have people take

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>over the responsibility time by time to upgrade the installation,

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to repair the installation so that it is still able

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to withstand natural impacts or malevolent impacts. And that is

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a very long responsibility. You could there archly, of course,

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think about engineering something that will all need that, but

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that is something in which there is not very much

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>researched on at this very moment. So engineered free engineered

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>solutions are not really taken a serious option right now

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 1>within the industry. And the last option that I'm now

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>only seeing is extremely deep woreholes that we talk about

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>three or four or five thou meter deep. There is

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>research ongoing at this moment into that option, but it's

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>still in its infancy. And for that reason, Yeah, what

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>what is happening comb is really is temporary storage. And

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in most other cases like Philipsburg in Germany,

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or we see also in Zapper region, I mean in Ukraine,

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 1>or what we see in the Ciano Bill spent fuel

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>site that was set up there by Whole Tech, that

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is all temporary storage places and they're designed tetemporary storage places.

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So something that pro nuclear advocates of and comment is

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that the waste that's produced by nuclear power is toxic,

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:58.839
<v Speaker 1>but temporarily that these things will decay, that in five

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>years or million years, it will no longer be toxic.

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the mercury and lead and cadmium produced in other

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 1>industries is toxic forever. With your response to that kind

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of argument, I worked on mercury who waste in the

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Czech Republic when I was living there with my toxic

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:17.359
<v Speaker 1>campaigner dreams tech Republic. That's also a headache. I mean,

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:19.799
<v Speaker 1>if one headache is a headache, it doesn't mean that

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>something else is not a headache. I find it a

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very shabby argument in the discussion. That is, yes, that

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is not eternal. It's a risk that endures for well,

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the peaches in a few thousand years. In about twenty

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>four thousand years, it's not such an issue anymore. But

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I hesitate taking people seriously who think that that is

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not such a problem in human terms. Geology is an

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting science, but it has very little relevance for a

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>human lifetime. Well, it has all over the levels for

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 1>human lifetime, but not when we talk about times, and

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>even if we talk about low and mid level waste.

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've got a canty yas that need to

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:03.879
<v Speaker 1>be kept out of the environment for about a hundred years,

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>three hundred years, seven hundred years, depends a little bit

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on the isotope. Even there to three generations is a

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>very long time, and to guarantee political stability for those times,

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that you can keep that safe is a piece

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of homework that we, of course do not only face

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>for radioactive waste, also for other toxic waste. But it's

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a piece of homework of our generation that is

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>going farther than we currently are able to manage properly,

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 1>say the least. So for that reason, I mean, I've

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 1>my grandchildren are the loveliest of kids, but their generation

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is is going to try to clean up a lot

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of rubbish that we've been met. So here in the

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>United States, we've seen some nuclear power plants close with

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 1>our replacements by new facilities, for example Indian Point in

0:55:56.360 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>New York, and a lot of the power that was

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 1>produced by that plan is now being produced by natural gas,

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>which admits, of course, lots of carbon. What's your advice

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for policymakers who want to decarbonize the grid and reduce

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:12.840
<v Speaker 1>our dependent on fossil fuels and needs something to bridge

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the gap between what solar and wind can provide and

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what the grid needs. What's your advice for how to

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:20.520
<v Speaker 1>close that gap? But the first advice would have been

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:23.720
<v Speaker 1>start earlier with renewables. I mean, we've been calculating four

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>green peace since two thousands and three US. The first

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>version the social energy revolution scenarios were the r is

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>between records, and that's because we have been only calculating

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:39.720
<v Speaker 1>technical evolutions conservatively. But we are well aware that thinking

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that way needs a political revolution. Now, if we look

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at the scenarios that have been developed over the time

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>until when we stopped producing them, and we look at

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>more recent scenarios, the goals that we need to starch

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep within the Paris Agreement one and half degree

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that we need to speed up development of truly

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>clean renewable sources very fast. Anyway, There's just no getting

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>around that. And that's point one what needs to be done.

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And if I look at policies of different countries, and

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at the policies of countries that have a

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>higher amount of nuclear in their mixes, I see that

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the developments towards renewable grid is slowing down there. I

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>mean an example is Finland where the development of solar,

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>especially wind, where the heavy, huge potential has been slowed

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>down enormously by the fact that they were focusing on

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the finalization of Holkylo into three. Now that took twelve

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years, longer than they expected. That means also that

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the development of renewables they are sold for about thirteen years.

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But are you suggesting that we can use pure renewables,

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just solar and wind as a way to provide energy

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.080
<v Speaker 1>for the grid. Renewables is why the ninjues solar EdWay it.

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I think we can come to a

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 1>zero fully renewable energy provision in twenty fifteen. That is

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>still possible. It needs a lot of a lot of

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>work with that's possible. Now you said, well, before we're

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:15.320
<v Speaker 1>getting there, there might be a gap. That depends on

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the great structure you have. It depends on where you are.

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We've seen similar discussions in Germany where the closed capacity

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear has been surpassed with reduced capacity by largely

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>wind and solar, but also a good traction of biogas,

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and that appears to be possible. It appeared to be

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>possible to phase out sensibly and phase in renewables in

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a sensible way. What went wrong there is that there

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>has been a large hesitance to close down Cole and

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we see now that Germany has to speed up even

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's already relatively well. No, it has slowed down, to

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be very honest, that it's ready to be high development

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of view energy sources. Because it has slowed down, they

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can do it. And that is also the steps that

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we see now in the in the Ukraine War and

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the gas problems that the Germany is facing. We've seen

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>especially an increase in development of of their renewable resources,

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's possible for the United States. The choice for

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for fracking gas it was I think a politically very

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>conscious one. I don't think at the moment it was

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the most wise choice when it happened. And the fact

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that we now see gas increasing as he was increasing

0:59:32.240 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States when Lucar power stations switches off

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>here and there, as you mentioned, has more to do

0:59:37.240 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 1>with past policies than that it has to do with

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the decision to replace nucre by gas. And I think

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that it makes sense to look at the issue from

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a total grid perspective and prepare also for the coming

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 1>years of an increasing and renewable production, the grids that

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can deal with it, storage that comes with it, with

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>more dispatchable verses like biogas, there will be a tiny

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>niche for hydrogen in it. There will be a good

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>niche for nange I suppose for for bettery storage that

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>needs attention at this very bold Thanks very much, that's

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. I really appreciate your time and your thoughts

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the issues, so you can hear that Yon has

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a very different view about the long term dangers of

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>spent nuclear fuel than Maddie did, and specifically whether storage

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at the plant where the waste is created is a

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>temporary solution on the time scale of hundreds of years

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or a long term solution on the time scale of

1:00:35.160 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years. Dealing with storage over thousands or millions

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of years is very tricky, not just scientifically but politically.

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Where does it go? Who would accept it and why?

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>What promises could we make to them. I spoke to

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Fettis at the Natural Resources Defense Council, a senior

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>attorney for nuclear, climate and clean energy and the former

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Attorney General of New Mexico, and I asked him

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about the prospects for finding a place to keep this stuff.

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he had to say. That is a terrific question,

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and I love the way you asked it, because I

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're asking the right way as you're starting at

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what are the prospects for it? And how do we

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>get there? And I want to give a little piece

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of history to your listeners that I hope will be

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really helpful in centering them on where the agreements are

1:01:23.360 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and where the disagreements are. And I'll start with Yucca,

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>because everybody turns to Yucca Mountain and says, oh, it

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was a disaster, or it was all politics, or the

1:01:34.760 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>science was bad, or all of the fights over it,

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and in RBC has a different view than reductive or

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>easily breaking it down into it was one thing that

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>killed Yucca. And for too long, too many industry advocates

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>conflated support for the Yucca Mountain repository is support for

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>any deep geological repository. That's just wrong. I'll do a

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>fast history and then I hope to get you to

1:01:57.680 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a narrative that really centers you on and your listeners

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to these are where the agreements are and here the challenges.

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So in ninety seven, the National Academy of Sciences came

1:02:10.080 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to a conclusion that spent nuclear fuel at high level

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>waste and we had both of it by seven not

1:02:16.640 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>much of the spent nuclear fuel yet, but we certainly

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>had high level waste at Hanford and Savannah River. They

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>came to a conclusion, we have to get this stuff

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>into a deep geological repository or repositories, and that's kind

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of been the consensus ever since, and it remains the

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>consensus to this day that we can't shoot it into

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the sun, we can't send it under the See. The

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of holy grail for nuclear true believers was eventually

1:02:42.840 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have hundreds and hundreds of fast reactors

1:02:45.960 --> 1:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that we can reprocess the waste. And that hasn't worked out,

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and in r NC sees no suggestion that it ever

1:02:52.880 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>will work out. But in nine seven, Congress short circuited

1:02:57.080 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the process of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and said, well,

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this looks really expensive and problematic. So Nevada against the

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>short straw, and it's all going to go to Yucca Mow.

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we spent about twenty years in a ferocious

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fight with Nevada and many others objecting to how YUCKA

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was decided upon and what its technical qualities were. There

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was a one of those classically boring d C. August

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Commissions created called the Blue Ribbon Commission for America's Nuclear

1:03:31.840 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Future that ran from two thousand ten to two thousand twelve,

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and it came out with three really important again consensus

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan observations that remained true then and remained true now

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully can guide the way forward. But they've still

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>left one thing off the table. Ready. This is what

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they found. They said, we've got to have a repository

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>way or repositories. We've just got to have a repository

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this no other way to do this, to store this

1:04:01.960 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>waste and then eventually dispose of it permanently in a

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>way that's morally and technically suitable. Number Two, we're processing

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to solve things in any time in our lifetime,

1:04:13.760 --> 1:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not for years. And number three, we've got to get

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>consent based citing, we've got to get the consent of

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the folks of where the waste is eventually going to

1:04:24.480 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>go places plural, we think, but we've got to find

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a way to get consent. And in Ergacy agrees with that.

1:04:31.480 --> 1:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And what the Blue Ribbon Commission didn't do was talk

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about how to get consent. They didn't describe how do

1:04:39.680 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we arrive at consent and what does it look like?

1:04:42.680 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And so if you look at where we are now,

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this is why your question was so thoughtful because you

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>asked it in the right way, which was what's the prognosis, like,

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the chance? Where are we? Well? Right now, we

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>still can't get consent. That is never going to give consent.

1:04:57.080 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>There's been no indication over forty years the statement consent,

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and nor should they as far as nardc Is concerned.

1:05:03.680 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>They were chosen based on political weakness, not on the

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>technical merits of the site. Those bed rock environmental laws

1:05:10.520 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>don't apply to No state will ever be okay with that,

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and this has been bipartisan. Right now, the two efforts

1:05:18.040 --> 1:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to site consolidated interim storage sites are in New Mexico

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in Texas. Both governors, as different as they could be,

1:05:25.320 --> 1:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Governor Abbott in Texas and Governor Lehan Grisham in New

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Mexico have expressed ferocious non consent. We're going to keep

1:05:34.040 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ending up in this cul de sac until we deal

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with consent and really figure out how it works. We

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>think Congress should pass a law removing the exemption from

1:05:42.640 --> 1:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>nuclear waste from bed rock environmental laws. Right now, the

1:05:45.440 --> 1:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>actual organic law that governs the nuclear industry exempts them

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from environmental laws. And we think once that exemption is gone,

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>e p A consent, nationwide safety radioactive Protection standards and

1:05:58.000 --> 1:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>EPA in the States could set up on their own

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>limits on how much and on what terms the waste

1:06:03.920 --> 1:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>would come, and then we can move much faster than

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what we've ever done on nuclear waste on siting because

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the power dynamics will be so deaf. So there's my

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>explanation of nuclear waste on how we can go forward. Wonderful.

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. So your focus then is on establishing consent

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and setting up the situation so that things can be

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>monitored and regulated. So is it your opinion then that

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the technical solution exists, that we can put this stuff

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>underground fairly safely where he can sit for thousands or

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>millions of years and mostly not harm the people living

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>above the surface. That it's essentially mostly a political and

1:06:37.600 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>policy issue right now. That's a terrific question. I think

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it should remain absolutely foremost in everybody's mind that this

1:06:45.240 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is a profound technical challenge like few others. I mean,

1:06:48.280 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a scientist and you're asking an extraordinarily difficult thing.

1:06:54.160 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Of everybody, from engineers to archaeologists and anthropologists to suggest

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that something can be safe for something beyond the scale

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of human history. It's a profound technical challenge by any measure.

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And do I think it's simple. Do I think that

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the scientific defensibility of any particular site is going to

1:07:15.560 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>be a straightforward process. No, I don't. One of the

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>things that's been most interesting as a lawyer to work

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>on these issues is I get so much history from

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>so many brilliant people, from geologists to physicists, to engineers,

1:07:28.960 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to archaeologists and anthropologists who looked at so many of

1:07:32.480 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>these sites, from Lions to Tennessee, the Salmon site in

1:07:35.680 --> 1:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi to Yucca, and what I understand, Yucca looked as

1:07:40.400 --> 1:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a site much more promising in the eighties than it

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:45.959
<v Speaker 1>did by the middle of the nineties. The Nuclear Waste

1:07:46.000 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Technical Review Board. By the early two thousands, they suggested

1:07:49.240 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that the technical case for Yucca was weak to moderate

1:07:52.040 --> 1:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at best, and that was a site that had been

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>studied for twenty years. So I think the technical issues

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for any of this going for word, are going to

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>outstrip most other decisions we make as a society. They're

1:08:04.760 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just that difficult because it is. It's a million year challenge.

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a challenge beyond the scale of human history. But

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing that is so apparent to us

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>after sixty years of failure to get to even interm

1:08:18.000 --> 1:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>storage sites that are not just at the point of generation,

1:08:21.080 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we have interm storage sites, by the way, that are

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>technically working, which is at reactor sites. They are still there.

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had a dreadful accident yet in this country,

1:08:30.200 --> 1:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's good. And let's hope we can keep the

1:08:32.720 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>NRC on its job to ensure we think, by the way,

1:08:35.479 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the NRC should do better and require the fuel get

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:43.599
<v Speaker 1>moved from densely packed pools into dry storage faster. That's

1:08:43.640 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a safety issue, all right. Thank you very much to

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>all of our guests and interviewees for sharing their thoughts

1:08:48.479 --> 1:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and the listeners were hanging on for this extra long episode.

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope that gave you a taste for the technical

1:08:54.080 --> 1:08:56.599
<v Speaker 1>side of nuclear waste, what it is, how it's made,

1:08:56.640 --> 1:08:59.479
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous it is, as well as the flavor of

1:08:59.520 --> 1:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the police nickel complexities of solving the problem a long

1:09:02.880 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>term storage. All of this goes to inform policymakers who

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have to make the really tough decisions in a changing

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>landscape and a very hard to predict future. Thanks very

1:09:11.360 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>much for listening and tune in next time. Thanks for listening,

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge explained. The Universe is

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. Or more podcast from

1:09:28.240 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.