WEBVTT - The 2024 All-Bust Team (EP. 767)

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. Is Me Joe Pi Zapia, and today we're

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna look on the other side of things. We're gonna

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>take a look at potential bust players. And it's not

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that we hate the players. Sometimes we just hate the

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>adp although sometimes we might hate the players.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how the show goes.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is always my good pal of the Welsh

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course it's all of you out there. If

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already subscribed to the Fantasy Pros MLB page.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>We're the fastest growing YouTube channel in the history of

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe when it comes to baseball.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>That's right. I don't have the data to back it up.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I just feel it in my bones.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But I want to thank everybody out there who's been

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching to all the shows. And of course

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>we've been giving away free things for those people who

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are subscribers of the channel. So speaking of givaway free stuff, Welsh,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you're ready to give away a Jazz Chisham jersey to somebody?

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I am very ready. I love it. Do we have

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a name?

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>We do?

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And the winner of the autograph Jazz Chishom Miami, Marl

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Jersey courtesy of Bettingpros dot Com. Is TJ Pascal. TJ Pascal,

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you're the big winner. Hit us up over a customer

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>support at mailbag at Fantasypros dot com. That's mail bag

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>at Fantasypros dot com. Shoot us your mailing address, proof

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of your subscription to Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel, and

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll get that shipped out to you right away.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Again the winner, TJ. Pascal, Congrats buddy.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 3>And tell your dad I love him. Tell your dad's Pedro,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 3>I love him.

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Pedro, huge fan, hilarious. By the way, he

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was great on SNL last year. Just tremendous performance. If

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you missed it, go back and rewatch it at a

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>national treasure. But you know what else is a treasure.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>This new prize we're given away for those people who

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are saying I want to be like TJ. Just subscribe

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to the channel. Drop your comments below. Ring the belt

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to Lick gos Ding because we're giving away trophy Smack's

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Ultimate Fantasy Baseball Championship Belt.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You know me a big wrestling guy, so I'm all

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about the belt. So again to qualify, subscribe to Fancy

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros MLB, drop your comments below.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That's all you gotta do, and don't forget to ring

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that bell and that trophy smack. Ultimate symbol of fantasy

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>baseball supremacy can be yours.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>So blame your.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Prize then by ringing that bell for notifications, Welsh, Let's

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>start with the All Bus team. And as I said

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>before going into the show, obviously this is the time

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of year where you know, we're trying to evaluate the

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>talent and the talent most importantly in that consensus rankings,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the consensus ADP, both of which you can find

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>over at Fantasypros dot com. That's available for you any

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>time over there. But to me, Welsh, when you're looking

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bus, it's also you know, taking the player most importantly,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the circumstance in which the players in in twenty

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, I think that is the most important thing.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you identify Bus typically as well when you're

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at trying to avoid it. And I'm not saying

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you're avoiding all these players because maybe it's one or

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>two you're willing to take that risk on anyway.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's tough because I'm not as black and

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 3>white as a lot of other people. A lot of

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 3>people will be like this guy sucks, you can never

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah, or this is the best player. I

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 3>do live in gray areas, I think. And this is

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>going to come back to the answer. It's kind of

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>sometimes about cost, like sometimes production is just going to

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>completely fail, you know. Funny enough, a little pat on

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>my own back. I just put together that article we

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it talked about in the last episode, the cheat sheet.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>But I was looking at my cheat sheet from last year.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 3>There's lots of stuff we all like don't get right,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>and you look and you're like, oh, okay, this guy

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of I was looking at like my favorite guys,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Corn Carroll, right, that's sure. Oh yeah, no, he was

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 3>my favorite guy by fourth round. But I was looking

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and I'm leading this in. I looked at the guys

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I was avoiding. I nailed that. I don't think I've

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>ever been more accurate then my avoid twenty twenty three list,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Cees, Alec Minoa. It was great, and it was

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>great in that, but so sometimes are players like Manoa

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>and cs. I just wanted no part of under any circumstance.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 3>But are there players if their cost wasn't quite there

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 3>that I would draft? Yeah, sure, I can get into that.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think a lot of the bust can end

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>up becoming about that player being able to return the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>value of where you're drafting a guy. So that's kind

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 3>of like my core piece to it, because yes, I

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>could sometimes draft some of these players, but that's a

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of my attack here because you know these guys,

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>they can turn it around in a heartbeat. We're seeing

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 3>baseball change on a dime. With all the rules, anything

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>can happen. But a lot of my bust is going

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>to be based on boy, do I hate the costs

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 3>that I'm taking on these players and I don't think

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>they can return what you're investing in.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And for me it is again, I'm willing to

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>take chances on certain players here, but I also understand

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that you have to understand that there's bust potential in

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>some of these names too, even though you might be

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to draft them if they do fall around longer

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>than they should. And some players are going to be

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>some you know, high end players on this list that

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about today, and some lower end

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>players too, because everybody thinks everybody's just a value just

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>because they're lower. Well, not necessarily. Sometimes that's a waste

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of a pick too. So without further ado, let's get

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to it. Let's talk about our all bust team for

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. Let's start a catcher. Welsh who made

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the list for you?

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I could have put them all. I like yours

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>that you're about to say, I don't like hi end catcher,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>so I'm probably going to identify top one hundred catcher,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>and that's what I did. I'm picking on the fourth

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>catcher according to Fantasy Pro's consensus ranks ADP of seventy

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>four picking on William Contreras, who is a very popular

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 3>pick for a lot of people because of some of

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the power potential. Yet last year, William Contrere's only seventeen

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>homers in one hundred and forty games rand a really

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>high batting average, except his expected batting average was almost

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>forty points lower. He also had a career low launch angle.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>His expected slug was lower, well, on all the numbers,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 3>lower lower though he hit the ball harder, So hitting

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the ball harder is always going to give you that

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>baseline They did bring in Gary Sanchez, who I think

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 3>is going to be more of a primary DH, but

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>that is somebody for them to take Contreras out in

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>some instances. I'm just not in love with the idea

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 3>that Contreras is going to be some thirty home run

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 3>catcher like some believe he is. I think the batting

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 3>average could dip. He's not proved in other spots. We

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>saw what the one hundred and forty games are. Bottom line,

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't like catchers in the top one hundred. I

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 3>think there's so much value later. So I am going

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to bust William Contreras.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, high end catchers. I'm also out on so JT.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Real Muto was mine. I've talked about him in some

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of the videos already on Fantasy Pros. But this is

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's batting average fell last year. You know,

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty points, the OBP fell, thirty points, the slugging percentage fell.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all these indicators are there, and the ops completely,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost sixty point difference year over a year,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and go from eight twenty to seven to sixty two. Look,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's still had twenty homers.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 2>I understand he's still had sixteen stolen bases.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So I get from a roto perspective, especially in two

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.119
<v Speaker 1>catcher leagues, if you'r a nut job was still playing

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>those that he has value, I get it, But I'm

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>also trying to factor in the age here. He's going

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to be thirty three years old. We've seen guys like

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian McCann right great catchers and fantasy for a long

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Once they hit those early thirties, you

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>start to see that decline. I feel like you're starting

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to see with Real Mutum. My concern Welsh is if

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you continue to see it that he gets dropped in

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>the order, and if that happens, it could hurt all

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of his counting stats too. So that basically why I

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>think Real Muto has bus potential.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty four, let's take.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>A quick break in the action and tell you about

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Underdog Fantasy. MLB draft season is here, and the easiest

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>place to play fantasy baseball is it Underdog Fantasy. We've

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>already been active in their best ball format fantasy drafts,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where you draft your team over twenty rounds at the

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>best score from your team that you drafted becomes your

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>score for each week. In the MLB season. Drafts are

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly filling each and every day, So go to Underdog

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy right now and draft in the Dinger for your

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>share for seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in prizes,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with first place being a cool one hundred k. It's

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>only ten dollars a draft, and the tournament closes on

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>opening Day March twenty eighth. So jump in now, sign

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>up for Underdog and use that promo code FP MLB

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's FP MLB to get your first deposit match up

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred dollars. That's ten free Dinger drafts. And

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that promo code is fp MLB. And join the Underdog

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>today and get drafting in the upcoming MLB season. And

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>now back to the action. Speaking of phillies or ex phillies,

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'll start with the first baseman here. Reese Hoskins

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, is on this list. And I know he

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>might be saying, but he's so cheap. He's at one

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight overall. Why do you think he's a bust.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he is a bust. I'm saying he

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>has bust potential and I want to harke him. Back

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to Michael Conforto's twenty twenty three season where he hadn't

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>played for a whole year and he came back and

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't go so well. And I understand that

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins is a slightly better player than Confordo, But

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and look at Conforto, he had

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>some peaks there for the Mets once upon a time

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago as a player that looks like

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a thirty home run guy potentially in the league, and

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>then things.

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Really didn't work out.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But Hoskins, although he's a better player, and I like

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark factor more than where Confordo ultimately ended up.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I like Hoskins in Milwaukee. I took him in a

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 2>draft just this week.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I have to recognize there is

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a bust factor you have to be aware of when

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Hoskins because he hasn't played an entire year.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You saw Trey Mancini be off for an entire year.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Obviously different circumstances, But at the same time, I think

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to take that into account and realize, despite

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact you're getting a huge discount race Hoskins, there

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is that potential where either he doesn't hit the ground

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>running again, or it takes you know, a good few

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>months for him to really get back in a groove.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think I'm crazy for calling Hoskins a potential bust?

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm a Hoskins guy so like to but.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 2>To recognize that it's possible, right, Yeah, I.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Think of the possibility. Is there my biggest argument, because

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, the two bus elements are this guy's just

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>going to stink and he's going to be stank, or

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>this guy is not going to return the value. I

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 3>find it very hard because I believe Hoskins is going

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to return to being a thirty home run hitter. I

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 3>find it really impossible that he's not going to be

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>able to return like a top one fifty EIGHTYP value.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So you're a little crazy in my brain, Joey, I

0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>love Race Hoskins.

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess here is the thing.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>If he ends up being a twenty home run guy,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little disappointing just saying even at

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one eighty eight, I think would be a little bit

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of a disappointment for me personally because I'm like you,

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I do see him as a value. I will take him,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but I have to acknowledge that there is the range

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes. Is our good friend Derek Brown likes to say,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>where Hoskins doesn't exactly look great for the first half

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of the season or maybe the entire season, is he's

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to work his way back. I mean, it's just

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things you have to understand. Who made

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the first base team for you in all bust team.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 3>That's actually really interesting that last thing that you said

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 3>that the possibility and this is something I think that

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 3>should be accounted for with talking about bus is a

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>player in the grand scope of a season can end

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>up like kind of returning their value. But when a

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>guy is a dud for half of a year and

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 3>they're killing your team and maybe you're in consideration to

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>cutting them or you possibly do, and then they bounce back,

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't give them. I don't give them the extra

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>credit because they return that value. To your point, with

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Reice Hoskins, mine is kind of the same thing. And

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna do the most anti Homer thing ever, and

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna pick on a diamondback old Christian Walker. Christian

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Walker as my bust here who really suffered in the

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 3>back half of the year. Hitting two zero five in

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the final month of the season, then took that struggle

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 3>bus into the playoffs and killed I mean Barre. The

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Diamonbacks were able to like push past his struggles. He

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 3>did nothing to help outside of a double in the

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 3>World Series. I'm worried he's going to take that in

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to have another struggle in the first

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>half here. His hard hit percentage ended up dropping, launch

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 3>angle was going down, expected batting average was lower. Yet

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 3>we're paying the highest cost of Christian Walker ever. He's

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 3>going off at seventy two in the rank, seventy seven

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>and adp as the eight first, eighth first baseman. He's

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 3>right in the same general vicinity as Paul Goldschmidt and

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Cody Bellinger and guys behind him. We're going to talk

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>about another episode. I love Tristan Cossas. I think Spencer Torkelsen,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>outside of ballpark factors, is a player that is ninety

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to ninety five percent of Christian Walker Walker. The advantage

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>he has is he has hit for some higher batting

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 3>average and put up monster RBI numbers last year. I'm

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>not sure that that is going to continue, and I'm

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>worried the struggles from last year are going to carry

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>over a little bit. There's a little bit of injury

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff already in spring. I'm gonna bust Christian Walker, especially

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>at that cost, because that advantage has gone where you

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 3>draft him at one point fifty and you get the

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>return of a seventy five overall player. He has to

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>perform at the level from last season, I think, to

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 3>return the value. So we will bust the diamond about

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Christian Walker.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel like that's kind of a clump there.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Once you get past Jones and gold Schmith, Walker, Cassas Steer,

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about him coming up to you. But I

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like that that's the big drop off after gold Schmith.

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I always like gold Shmith too, because I

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like this guy they really feel pretty steady about.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Still a guy you don't feel steady about at second base.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>It's the same guy.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>That I don't. It's Nico Horner. You've been riding this

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>train into the ground for or pretty much all of

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>pre draft season here into draft season. So Wels, I'll

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>let you start first year.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to Nico.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>When I saw you had him on here, I was like,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 3>we're going together we're gonna we're holding hands into the sunset.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 3>On bust and Nico Horner. It is not that Nico

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Horner is a bad player. Ninety eight runs is phenomenal.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>He's actually kind of turning into like the Brandon Nimo

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>of that middle infield. And he stole a ton of bases.

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>But his value, I think is heavily heavily weighted based

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 3>on his costs on those stolen bases. I will admit

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>he is a three category player. He's a nothing burger

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 3>on the other two single digit homers RBI's I guess

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>nothing to throw away at sixty eight is still like service.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>That's because of lineup placement.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, lineup placement is why my whole thing was

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and eighty eight played appearances last year. You know,

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like the volume is king right, So if for any

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reason he doesn't recreate that volume, you have to be

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>worried he doesn't recreate that productivity.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's fifty eight overall, fifty eight overall on ADP,

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think that cost is built in simply on

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the stolen bases. Projections don't like or repeat. They're about

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 3>ten to twelve less across the board. I also don't

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>like him to go over forty and because stolen bases

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>are just more plentiful and you can get Bryson Stott,

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>in my mind, is like a Nico Horner light that's

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>a player Andres Jimenez is the true Nico Horner light.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I can get Andres Jmenez outside the top one hundred,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>get more homers. I think I can get within eighty

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>five percent on stolen bases. Average is probably the same.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I sacrifice the little runs blah blah blah, but

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying, like ninety percent ish of Nico Horner fifty

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to sixty spots later, that's what I'm gonna do. I'm busted,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Nico Horner. I know you're there with me.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It is also really for me the ADP in which

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going I just think it's a little too high.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He's going ahead right now consensus ADP on Fantasy Bros.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Of Paul Goldschmith, ahead of Nolan Jones, ahead of Royce Lewis,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a player that I think is a five

0:14:59.280 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>category player.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 2>So I don't I don't get this at all.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand that it's a big number of stolen bases

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but to your point earlier Welsh, it's

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>easier to find steals later in the draft too, So

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>why am I paying almost, you know, a premium basically

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for a guy who is, as you pointed out, and

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very true, a three category player at best.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the power developing for Nico Horner. I

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like the player, I just don't like the ADP. Now

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what I take Nico Horner if he was going closer

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five ninety range, yes, but in the top

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty ish, I just think it's.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>No where he's closer to Andres Jimenez you would take

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 3>it right. I will say, you know, one of the

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>battles here in great episode we did with Ario Cohen

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>if you want to hear about ATC projections on the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>YouTube channel. In the podcast is like Ariol admitted that

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 3>like the guys that pop in the system are batting average,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and Ariol believes that runs are like a bigger fantasy

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>correlation right now, and that is something that Nico does

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 3>a pretty decent job of on both fronts. Like a

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 3>high batting average two eighty plus and he almost scored

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred runs. Those are going to value higher. So

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that is part of why, like you're auction

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>calculators are going to value him a little bit above.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think the depleted homers like I'm chasing power

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 3>even more in drafts this year. Yeah, and he's a

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing on this and stolen bases, I don't feel the

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>same weight of I mean, forty is incredible, but like

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I have to get forty, you don't. I mean, you

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 3>can literally save your stolen base projections with Estory Ruiz

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later while you've sprinkled in ten to

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>fifteen across the board. It's not to be totally dismissive

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>of Nico Horner. There is value runs in average are

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>hard to find on the wire and everything, but the

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>cost is.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Just really high. I can't do it, Walsh.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Not if Nolan Jroones is on the board, a guy

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who get it relatively in the same range of average,

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy who can have thirty thirty potentially. I mean,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>there's just no way. I'm just not doing it. Third

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>base here for my All Bus team. This is a

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>player that I was really in on last year. He's

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>probably All Sleeper Team last year. I have to go

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>back and watch. But as Josh Young of the Texas Rangers.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I like Josh Young. Again, this is not like me

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>turning on Josh Young. You look at the counting stats

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, you go, hey, this

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is a really good season. He was in the early

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>discussion for Rookie of the Year last year. Is a

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>very strong season. Twenty three homers, seventy RBI, seventy five runs.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>He did miss some time there last year. But some

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>other deeper issues there with Josh Young. The first one

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that I want to bring up is against right handed pitching,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>just two forty seven. That's a problem for me. You're

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna face more right handed pitching in the American League.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Two ninety nine OBP, a four to nineteen slugging, seven

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ops against righty's. That's not good enough. That is

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a red flag to me. Also a red flag second

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>half of the year.

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, I am.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Counting into the fact that health was part of it,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, Welsh over his final thirty

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>four games in the second half, he hit just two

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine with a two to seventy one OBP and

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a three to sixty six slugging. That reeks to me

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of a guy where maybe the league was starting to

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>catch up to him figure out his weaknesses. Can Josh

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Young bounce back from that and adjust, Of course he can,

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time you have to count into

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>all of those other things that I just brought up

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there where there's a potential also for him to bust.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So once again, i'd rather have Royce Lewis, who I

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think is going to be a bust. I think

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be great players of this year. I'm

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at nuelve Marte, who's cheaper. I think there's other

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ways if you're gonna look for a corner guy or

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a low end third baseman that there's other places I'd

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like to go that I think are a little bit steadier.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Potentially than Josh Young.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Welsh who made your third base list here for the

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>All Bust Potential team in twenty twenty four, and.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like this guy's kind of a darling and

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 3>he qualifies at so many positions. This was the player

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 3>that I decided on because but I would do want

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 3>to point out Josh Young and like November, this was

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 3>my pick for this. The problem is he's just falling

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 3>so far. The injuries are falling like he's so cheap

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 3>now that now you're getting get and he's doing with the.

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Cash war too, So it's not like it's not like

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't linger potentially either, And so that doesn't make

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>me feel warm and fuzzy either. So this is more

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about all those deep numbers than it is about the injury.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>But we can't take that out of the equation too,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's had a lot of injury issues in the

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>last three years of his career.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and taking guys like that are already in going

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 3>into the season, yeah, is a really dicey thing, Like

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>you gotta be really careful about those players like Corey

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Seger is one that I'm comfortable with, but there's not

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of others. Oh so okay, So the guy

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 3>that I picked qualifies at multiple positions, kind of a darling,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>but the cost is just a little too high for me.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And I picked Spencer Steer, who is technically twelfth that

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 3>third base. He's a top one hundred player you know

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>in deeper leagues. That position eligibility is a big positive.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>But I just I'm worried about the position flexibility of

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 3>this roster because they've got so many great players that

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to find spots for Ellie Noelvie, Christian and

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Carnelcio and Strand and Candelario has been slammed in the

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 3>middle of that as a lockdown starter every single day.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Not to mention, you've got Frehley, You've got Freedol, you've

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>got Will Benson. There's so many players in there that

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 3>they didn't make a commitment to Spencer Steer not being

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the guy. But I do feel like we're only a

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 3>couple of hot starts from players to push him off.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 3>So not a huge, huge home run threat. Twenty homers

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>last year, stole a bunch of bases, but eight of

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 3>his stolen bases came in one month. That's eight of

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 3>fifteen stolen bases came in June of last year. If

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>opportunities are waning a little bit, this is not a

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 3>massively big stolen based guy. So if you're paying a

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred cost and he can't meet that home

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>run threshold, and he can't meet that stolen based threshold,

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a lot has to work in his

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 3>favor for him to be able to return the value

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 3>where it's inside the top one hundred. And I'm just

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 3>not quite there with with Spencer Steer. I'd also say

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 3>his expected batting average twenty spots lower than his actual

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>batting average expected slug almost sixty points slower four sixty

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 3>four to four h nine. Just I can't pay the

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred price. And this is the guy that

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be picking on.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I understand. And the squeeze is my big concern too.

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that, Look, they've got so much young talent

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>there strand Dela Cruz Marte, like, you know, not to

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>mention Matt McLain, like.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's only so many India is still sitting

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 3>out there, to.

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 2>India is still there.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's gonna get deltough do you I

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>feel like that?

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've been thinking that was going to happen

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>for three months and it still hasn't happened. But that's

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the craziest thing is India can be traded and it

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 3>still doesn't actually really fix this crazy big glut of players.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So like, what did Spincer Stereer? Just real quick and

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 3>we'll move on from it. Spencer Steer six hundred and

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>sixty five played appearances last year and one hundred and

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 3>fifty six games. I think it's going to be tough

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 3>for him to be able to reach that marker again.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>By the way, every projection one hundred played appearance less,

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 3>so I think it's going to be a tough task

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>for him to repeat what he did last year, and

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 3>we're kind of paying this year for what he did

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 3>last year.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>It would take an injury, I think, for him to

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>get back to that number. But it's also tough because

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a player who was really useful off the waiver

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wire for a lot of people. They have a lot

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of good feelings about him, so they want to reinvest.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I totally get that. But the calculus is changed for

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Reds in twenty twenty four, and I think that's

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>something you have to take into account of that equation.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>See all that math, metaphor just throughout there's a lot

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of math. All right, Let's get to the next position

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>here on our list. It is shortstop and this is

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a player Welsh that you selected that I gotta tell you,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been drafting a lot of and I'm curious

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear your take on why you put them on

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the bus team, because the more I continue to research,

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the more.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I continue to look.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need to be kinder to this player,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you see things differently when it comes to

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Hasi on Kim.

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's a couple of players I've kind of identified

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>that they don't have great hitting metrics but made every

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 3>ounce of their bat work and put C. J. Abrams

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>is one of those players. Like really poor barreling, not

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>great hard hit numbers, but launch angle, you know, pulled launch,

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 3>pulled fly balls was what he was able to, you know,

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>make work. Hassan Kim was kind of the same way.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Hassan Kim had one of the lowest barrel I actually

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 3>think he had, like the heart the bottom three worst

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>hard hit rate in all of bagall last year of

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 3>qualified hitters. It was a twenty six point two percent

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 3>that was seven percent lower than the previous year. But

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 3>he had a thirteen almost fourteen degree launch angle. But

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>those are paired with bad barreling that you got the

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 3>bad hard hit, you've actually got a negative expected batting average.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 3>He hit two sixty, but it was two forty three

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and his average EV was eighty six miles per hour.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Those are atrocious with an above average launch angle in

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>a bad hitting park. So what did he do absolutely

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>maximized to the umnth degree to get seventeen homers to me,

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>and it could blow up in my face. I don't

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 3>think that's sustainable, and I don't think that's going to continue,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and projections kind of agree. The stolen bases, I also don't.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 3>I will say this, I think he stole like at

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 3>least three bases in every single month of the year.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 3>So he could be a fifteen thirty guy and that

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 3>could end up working out. But his ADP is right

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>around eighty five and it's going a little bit higher

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of other places. I have not drafted

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 3>him in, I think a single league, and I really

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 3>worried that the bat is going to take a regression

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 3>point where it's gonna be tough to get to thirty

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases, it's gonna be tough to get to fifteen homers.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 3>And if that's happening, he's also not going to hit

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 3>high in the lineup. I got like Jackson Merril could

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>take over high points in the lineup. So I'm fading

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 3>and busting Hassan Kim.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, my shortstop might surprise you again. This is

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>guy a little lower on the trough right now, he's

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>currently in a consensus ADP of two twelve, but I

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna change in the next couple weeks significantly.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's Trevor's story of the Boston Red Sox. And

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this is more of a cautionary tale for everybody out

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>here too, because I don't think he's going to be

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a post two hundred and EIGHTYP guy when we get

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to two weeks from now, when people are drafting right

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>before the season, I think already you're seeing all the

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>positive things in the spring. He's in great shape, he

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>looks healthy, he looks like his old self, and I

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're already seeing these injuries to other players that

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are ahead of him in ADP where he is going

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue to chug up, up, up up up. I

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>would not shock me if he broke the one seventy

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>five mark Welsh by the time he got closer he

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes one of these people we look at, go well,

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>he's an infielder with you know, power and speed. We

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>could suffer the two thirty batting average. Okay, fine, but

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I just want to remind everybody who Trevor Story is,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and Trevor Story is a player that you are going

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to suffer batting average. You are going to suffer the

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that he is not in Colorado. Boston's not the

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>same place for him. You look at the home road splits.

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just we know who Trevor Story is.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I continue to be perplexed of what the Red Sox

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.479
<v Speaker 1>have done the last few years, getting rid of Mooky Bets,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>letting Xander Bogarts walk, and then paying guys like Trevor Story.

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it, and.

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't get and I want to warn against the

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rising adp of Trevor Story, because I do think it's

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>going to rise the familiarity factor, the member berries of

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Trevor's story being once upon a time in Colorado. Hey, member,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when Chevis's story with thirty thirty, I membt that's what's

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen here, you know, and I know it. Do

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you think I'm wrong? Do you think that's good? I mean,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like that's where we're starting to head

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of is oh. I remember this guy used to, you know,

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>steal twenty five bags and hit thirty homers, And I

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're chasing something that just isn't going to exist

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at the age thirty one season for Trevor story again.

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 3>My only problem that this is Reeze Hoskins all over again.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I kind of like Trevor's story, like, here's something I

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 3>learned from last year. Here's one thing I really screwed up.

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So remember that article where I'm like, oh, I was amazing.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>I was the best in all of my fades and whatnot.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I loled it myself when I looked at my first

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 3>base targets and my number two was jose A bray You.

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And last year something I was very about was like, hey, listen,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I think I can skip and fade these high end

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>first base and blah blah blah because I can get

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 3>this guy a little bit later. I want to move

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>off that approach. If I was being like, hey, I

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>can fade some of these shortstops because I can get

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Trevor's story later, he could be my starter, and I

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 3>think he can be a top seven shortstop. I think

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>that's a recipe.

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>He could also be your version of twenty twenty four,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>jose A bra You of twenty twenty three.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 2>Same logic.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>That thing I'm trying to warn everybody of is like, hey,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>jose A Bray was great once upon a time. But

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>when a player starts to decline, no matter what, sometimes

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, new circumstances don't always fit. The other thing, too,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is well you talked about you know that range. Here's

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the names in that range. Logan o'happy, I

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>want to draft him, Shotto Imanaga, I want to draft him.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Jaron Durant, I like Brian Wu, I like

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Tovar, I like Lars Neubar, Junior Kaminarol. I am

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>running love letters too on a daily basis. Brandon Fott,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Jung Holy, all of which are going in this ranger

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of Trevor story. That's my big problem is I think

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>those are all players that I personally want to be

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in the business of. Or is Trevor story The downside,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think is bigger and people realize, let's move

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>on to the outfield. Give me a couple outfielders that

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned with. One of them is one of my

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite guys. So I'm gonna fight you on the first one.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've kind of talked about it a decent amount.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I hate the adp of Nolan Jones and it's gonna

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 3>be a pitchforks and people coming after me and trying

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 3>to send me to the town square. I get it

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>because everybody loves Nolan Jones. But the cost is I mean,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>it is peak, peak peak. It is fifty nine off

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of what he did last year, which was great in

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>so many instances. He second half, the second half he

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 3>hit three to zho one. Two things that kind of

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>stand out to me based on the cost. He had

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 3>a skyrocketing babbit of over four hundred, and that is

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 3>not sustainable. And that also is a regression batting average.

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a candidate. That's the candidate for batting average regression,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 3>like without question. Another thing I talked about Spencer Steer

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 3>stealing half of his stolen bases in one month. Well,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 3>the September October, Nolan Jones twelve of his what was

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 3>it twenty stolen bases came in one month. So that

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 3>has me worried over fifty points of batting average regression

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 3>implied to his expected batting average. He hit two ninety

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>seven two forty seven expected batting average. So I take

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 3>sky rocketing babbit numbers expected numbers that look lower from

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 3>a batting average standpoint, and stolen bases that might not

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 3>be sustainable, and I go top fifty. He barrels, he

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>hits the ball hard, he gets the ball in the air,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 3>and he's in Colorado. All are awesome, but I'm a

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit worried about a top fifty overall costs. We

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 3>had this conversation about Bellinger versus Nolan Jones. Nolan Jones

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>has better hitting metrics, but I think from a track

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>record standpoint, even though I know it's been walky last

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>couple of years, I think I feel better about the

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>changes that Bellinger has made as a hitter. I'll take him.

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 3>That's why I'm busting Nolan Jones. Did you want my

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 3>other or we just.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just want to the only thing I want

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to throw out in Nolan Jones' defense too, because a

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, well, he plays in Colorado. Was

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>he do on you know, on the road last year

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on the road to eighty eight three eighty obp five

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to fifty four, slugging on the road nine to thirty

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>five ops. That's why I'm so in on Nolan Jones

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's not just a Colorado product. You're one hundred

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>percent right that babbit cannot hold. We know it's gonna

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>come down, but evens something in two sixty and still

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>goes thirty twenty, I'll take that to the bank.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's still good at eightyp.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 3>And that may be what happens, like and I kind of.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's still if I told you that's the top fifty player,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you would agree, right.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's right there. But see, like I think

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 3>like a high outcome has to be in play for

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 3>him to return that value. He might be a twenty

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty guy again with more at bats this year, with

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that batting average regression. So I'm just throwing it out there.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't love the If it's an OBP league,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 3>I take him. I just don't love the cost. My

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 3>other one just wrote, QUEBP league, that's a good point too.

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 2>You got is es there.

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 3>My other one is Masataka Yoshita. I actually think he

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 3>might be the third most valuable fantasy outfielder from the

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox, after Tyler O'Neil and after Jaron Duran And

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I throw this out. I even think there's a chance

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that Rafaela could be a guy that could overpower him.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I love the batting average, but I don't like any

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 3>of the hitting metrics. He doesn't steal enough, he doesn't

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 3>hit enough homers. He hits at the top of the

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 3>lineup that is going to score some good runs. So

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>this might this is like two categories. But I'm not

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>in to Yoshu Masataki Yoshida, especially one fifty three ADP

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty eighth of outfielders overall, and like I said, I

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>think he might be the bottom tier of those Red

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Sox outfielders.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>For me in the outfield, I got two names. The

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>first one is Evan Carter, going at one oh three ADP.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, that's a consensus ADP. It's just too high

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for me. You see some of the other guys, you

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>know we're gonna talk about, probably on the breakout teams.

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine the Cheerios, the Caminaros, the White Langfords.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Evan Carter, I understand it was fun, you know, you

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>got to play the postseason, big exposure level.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But he has only played eight games.

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>He only is thirty nine at bats over actually thirty

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>four at bats I should say at Triple A level.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And when players make that jump from Double A to

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues sometimes it just it doesn't always work out.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, for every Evan Longoria, there's a player that

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it does not work out for, probably threefold, if not five.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So my other.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Concern when I look at Evan Carter two is, and

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I keep bringing this up and all these shows, is

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the frame. He's a little slight. I feel like it's

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a long season of major league baseball. It's a lot

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of travel, it's a lot to deal with at the

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>big league level. I could see it wearing on him

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I look at the body type of

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>some players who are young and coming into the league,

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like camon Arow, like White Langford, and I just think

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they're built differently, and I think that's to their advantage.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of reason why I think he

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a bust at one oh three. I know

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>people love Evan Carter. Again, I don't hate Evan Carter.

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't like the price of Evan Carter this year.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you want to talk about a guy

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>who's priced that everything has to go right as a

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred player, basically, I think that's where his

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>price is. And the other one is Jorge Solaire coming

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>off a really good season last year, but I don't

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like the signing in San fran for him. It's not

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the best ballpark factor for him, it's not the best lineup.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>You know. As much as you know, we could all

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>joke about.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Marlins from time to time, you know, the Marlins were

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>chippy last year, you know, And I think that now

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll look back and you see him going over here.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like so Lair people are gonna try

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to chase, you know, last season.

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>A little bit. I think they're gonna be disappointed again.

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The ADP at one fifty two is still fine if

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for power late in your draft, but I

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think you have to understand too, there's been a lot

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of up and down the career of Hore Solaire, and

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a tough player to gauge. So for

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>those reasons, I think Carter and Solarra players that I

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>think have bust potential in twenty twenty four.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Welsh any comments about one or both of those guys.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I kind of like es Solaire, I'm a

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>little indifferent about Evan Carter. We had someone was like

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 3>tweeting us about Evan Carter like I was actually defending

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I've kind of been shady on Evan Carter even after

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 3>he hit his two bombs the other day, because I'm

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I question, like, what the impact.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Springs are not going to impress me for That's not

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going to change my opinion of what I'm saying.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 3>People like that Ava Logan Gilbert, but he's still not

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>like hitting, you know, extra base hits off a lefties.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I think White Langford is the better of the Texas

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Rangers outfielders. I'm kind of okay about him, So Lair.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 3>The reason I like Solaire it's hard to find thirty

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 3>five plus homers outside the top one twenty five or

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 3>one fifty and you can get that there. You could

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 3>argue ballpark factor as something that's going to worry you

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, but he's in a hit in the

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 3>middle of that lineup, and I think thirty homers are

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 3>a gimme and one fifty eighty piece. So of those players,

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I actually like Jorgees Solaire more than Carter, just kind

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of based off of like my draft acumen. But yeah,

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>like Solaer, I kind of dig I no way I

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>could bust him.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you took him in the last draft

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we did right, yeah, when I think and Bubba and look,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I had him in my cue because I needed some power.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>So I get it.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But I also have to understand too, for you know,

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the every two to fifty season he had last year.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got to look at the two PHO

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>seven that he had in twenty twenty two and the

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one or two to twenty three, so he

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>could be a drain on batting average.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 2>He really hurts you in a lot of spots too.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not chasing the forty home runs from twenty

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen when it comes to Hora Slaram, just not going

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 2>And last year was.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>A good season, but it was also a good season,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a contract year and now, and you

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>know sometimes you can't chase that either. Let's get to

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the pitchers here. Well, I'll start first with these and

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>sure these are very simple for me. Blake Snell is

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>number one for me. He's still going at an ADP

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of sixty three as of us recording this right now.

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 2>He is still yet to sign. Right. I didn't miss

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>anything in the last twenty minutes.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't think probably releases it will probably and

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it doesn't matter because I think it's

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>already into march here and you're starting behind a little bit.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of rushing. It makes me a little uneasy,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>that's all I'm going to say. And we don't know

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>where he's going to land yet, and I just don't

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're getting enough of a discount currently on that,

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because if you're looking at the other pictures going in

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that same range, Welsh, that's my big concern. It's I

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>feel very comfortable with knowing, you know what I'm going

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to get out of Grayson Rodriguez, let's say, or Hazel's Lozardo.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Those are pictures going in that same range. I'd rather

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>take both of those guys than Blake Snell. Despite the

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that Snell's coming off of cy Young in a

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>great season. Now it's like, not only does he have

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to follow it up, which we've already seen sometimes it

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen with Blake Snell, but also the walk rate's

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>still very high last year despite all the success.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't have a home. He's gonna be working from behind.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like this is a big ask here

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at sixty three overall, and Kodai Singa is still being

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>drafted at one O two.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the other one for me.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's because I'm just a loser Mets fan

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at heart that can't get the negativity out of his brain.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's no guarantee that this guy's back in May.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>There's no guarantee that he doesn't have another setback. There's

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee that the Mets rush him back because the

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Mets are gonna be competitive or have designs on being competitive.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at that roster, it is

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 1>not a competitive team right now, especially in the rotation.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>So for me, Senga and Snell, their ADP has not

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fallen enough for me, and the bust potential is too

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>large for the ADP on both of those guys. So

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna be out on both Snell and Senga

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>unless the ADP changes, or unless Blake Snell signs with

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees tomorrow or something like that, or some juggernaut

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>team that I go, Okay, well you know what I'm

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:28.399
<v Speaker 1>back in now.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll admit I've been kind of a Snell apologist, oh man,

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 3>but I'm worried a little worried right now.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why not it's the sixth of March as

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it's recording this.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it. I think it happens this week,

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 3>but you know say it every since.

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Well we said two weeks ago, and last week and

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the week before that.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 3>The Sego one's ridiculous. Like I love Sanging before the injury.

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you I've been doing a couple drafts. He

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.919
<v Speaker 3>just keeps falling one fifty two hundred, So I don't

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 3>know who's still taking him if things haven't updated. But yeah,

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>that's based off of ADP. That's silly.

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>He's on a one from one two to one oh

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seven in the last twenty four hours.

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 2>That's it in consensus.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now, look, you're right, that's probably going to

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>change in the next couple of weeks. That numbers gonna

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>drop more. But as of right now, as of today,

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>if that's where he is on the board, I'm out.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like him and Bradish are on my no draft

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 3>list right now, we don't have enough information to invest,

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 3>so absolutely no. Thanks the two guys I got on

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 3>my list, We'll see. You might get poked at and

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 3>prodd it a little bit if people get mad at

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 3>me about it, but I'm not investing. I've not drafted

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 3>these guys, I think, like really anywhere. So there's kind

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of a part of like they just don't fit my,

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, my mix of the pictures that I want.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 3>They're also around pictures that I like quite a bit

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>more so they're pushed out on my ranks. Number one

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Logan Gilbert, who is eighteenth on SP's sixty five overall.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I he's the least of the exciting Mariner pictures in

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 3>the entire group. Lost a little bit of elo on

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 3>the fastball of all the pitches as well. The expected

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 3>slugging numbers I believe on I think every single pitch, Yeah,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 3>every single pitch I'm seeing here was higher than the

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 3>year before. The expected slug so and the slug number.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's just telling you he's getting hit harder and

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the potential still there is he's trying to revamp this

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 3>pitch mix. He did lower his walk rate, which is

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Kirby esque, but his expected era numbers were right in

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 3>line with this above three and a half number, and

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 3>he's getting smacked hit hard, Like his fastball is getting

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 3>hit hard. He gave up a one seventeen and a

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 3>one eighteen the year before he's a good pitcher, I

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's exceptionally exciting. I do like low walk pitchers,

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think the strikeout upside is going to

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 3>be there. I don't think the pitch mix is telling

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 3>us anything super exciting. Maybe if he starts throwing something else,

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>we'll get there, but I think what it is is

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 3>he's masking his fastball, and I just don't think we're

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 3>going to get anywhere. We're paying like a top twenty

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 3>s but I don't think he That's another thing. I

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think he has the upside to be a top

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>ten SP. And there's just a hand full of guys

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 3>from fifteen to thirty that I think do. So that

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 3>gets me out on him and the other one, this

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 3>might be another one that people don't like, but is

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Hazius Lozardo, who is SP twenty three. He's seventy six

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 3>on the overall ADP. And this kind of comes back

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to similar things with Gilbert in that I think Lozardo

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 3>has been kind of this like heavy. He moved his

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 3>pitch mix heavily into the fastball last year, and I

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 3>don't think that's doing him any favors or any big

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 3>wonder he got hit two sixty eight expected batting average

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 3>against where the year before it was two twenty five.

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 3>He also not doing well as far as splits go

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 3>versus lefties. He had a sub one whip, but it

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 3>was a one to three to one whip against righty,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 3>so he has not figured out how to get Righty's out.

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And I just like he's always a good strikeout option,

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 3>but I think he's expected I got to go back

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 3>and look because I went away from it. His expected

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 3>era was almost four. It was three nine six this

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 3>past year. And his expected era has sat relatively with

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 3>his era most of his career, but this is almost

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 3>a full run above. He's getting hit harder. He got

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>barreled almost ten percent of the time. I just like,

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a better strikeout option than Gilbert, and

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 3>he's cheaper. I actually like Lizardo over Gilbert. Both of

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 3>these guys are pictures. I'm fading and I will put

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>on my bus list.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, Lozardo did fade in the second half. I

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>want to equate that to workload more than anything for him.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one hundred and seventy nineythings. That's just high

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Major leagues. The other thing, too, is the

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>splits at home last year for Lozardo three ZHO seven

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>e RA away four point four to eight. That's a

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>big difference, So a little bit more consistency on the

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>road I'd like to see out of Lozardo.

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I still like him more than you, but I understand

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 2>all the points you made.

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to closer, the guy that made of

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>my list is at one sixty seven. It's Kenley Jansen.

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a combination of age but also injury. He was

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a lat injury in February. They shut him down.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Now he's back to throwing this week apparently, so we'll

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>see how that goes. But lot injuries can be tricky.

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that before. And also a guy that's been

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>around for quite some time. The ERA was up a

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit last year three six three, a little higher.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Strikeout rate is down a little bit. You know, there's

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a player that's been around the block more than one.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that Kelly Jansen can't be good. But

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm looking for a potential bust at closer, I

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>think Kenley Jansen could be one of those guys that

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you circle and say I'm a little concerned about him

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, Welsh, is there a closer that

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for you have concerns with coming into the season?

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 3>Mine, just like Ryan Helsley, don't. I don't like this.

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't do this. He's had a lot of injury

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 3>issues and the Cardinals continuously seem comfortable like grabing other guys.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 3>We would see Gegos get it. I mean, Hicks isn't

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 3>there anymore. But I don't feel that the ground is

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 3>solid under Hellsley. Plus you've got some injury stuff, plus

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 3>you know how bad that first half of last year is.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the leash would be very short on Helsey

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 3>if he were to be to be screwing around early

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 3>in the year, because they do have guys like you know,

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 3>they like to go to Diego's. So I don't feel comfortable.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 3>I do not draft Hellsley. I push him down, gimme Fairbanks,

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>give me quite a few other closers over him. So

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 3>he's my bus closer. Who I believe he is fifteenth

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I wrote it down at fifteenth with a one eighteen ADP.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely no, thank you.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Welsh's all bus team. William contreras a catcher,

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker first, Nico Horner at tewod, Spencer Steer at third,

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>has Young Kim at short, Nolan Jones and Masatake Yoshita

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield that he got Logan Gilbert Hajesus Lozardo

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Helsley for me, jt Realmuto over at catcher,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Rhese Hoskins, Nico Horner as well so same Zy's Welsh,

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Young, Trevor Story, Evan Carter, Jorge Hilaire, Blake Snell,

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Coodei Singa and ken Lee Jansen. But of course we

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from you. Drop your comments below in

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube channel. Tell us who your big busts are

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty four, and you just might win yourself

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy Baseball Championship Belt, the Ultimate belt from Trophy

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Smack for your league this year. You can keep it

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for yourself or you can give it away to somebody

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>wins your league gets up to you, depending on how

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you feel how philanthropic you might be. Again, you can't

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the contest if you don't subscribe to the

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Fancy Pros MLB channel. Drop your comments below and don't

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>forget to ring that bend notifications so you know every

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>time a piece of content drops here on the channel

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>before you know it. Leading Off Live will be here

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>every single day. And don't forget run your mock drafts

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>over at draft Wizard Fanacybros dot Com slash mock. Also,

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the draftkit is live, it's free, it's there for you.

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as Welsh as talking about, you can

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>use some of these cheat sheets and all these insights

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and all the strategies. Welsh and I are putting out

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 1>content as is our entire fantasy baseball team over at

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot com, so'll be sure to check all that

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>out as well.

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 2>game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. We'll

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>see you next time kids.

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Bye,