Speaker 1: News round up in information ob load hour. Here's our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number at eight hundred and nine foot
Speaker 1: one Shawn if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. If you are not following the news today,
Speaker 1: it turns out mister Higher Honor James Colly himself turned
Speaker 1: himself into a federal authorities at an Alexandria, Virginia courthouse today.
Speaker 1: The grand jury indictment revealed on Tuesday charges call me
Speaker 1: with threatening to kill President Trump. That's the eighty six
Speaker 1: forty seven shell thing. I have no idea what it meant,
Speaker 1: none at all, whatsoever. Now James call me, maintaining his
Speaker 1: innocence after the second indictment, here's what he had to say.
Speaker 2: Well, they're back, this time about a picture of seashells
Speaker 2: on a North Carolina beach a year ago. And this
Speaker 2: won't be the end of it. But nothing has changed
Speaker 2: with me. I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and
Speaker 2: I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go.
Speaker 2: But it's really important and that all of us remember
Speaker 2: this is not who we are as a country. This
Speaker 2: is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be,
Speaker 2: and the good news is we get closer every day
Speaker 2: to restoring those values. Keep the faith.
Speaker 1: Anyway, so, now indicted presidential death threat suspect James Calemy
Speaker 1: decided not to wait till his squad cards showed up
Speaker 1: at his house this morning and haul him down to
Speaker 1: police headquarters.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: I spent a couple of hours with John Solomon and
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett on my podcast, Hanging Out with Me Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1: You can watch it wherever you get your video podcast,
Speaker 1: and it's on YouTube and Spotify and Apple. You know,
Speaker 1: I would urge you all to watch it because it
Speaker 1: really is the culmination of years of work that we
Speaker 1: all did together. We did it collaboratively, we worked very
Speaker 1: hard at it, and we were able to get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. The left wing legacy media mob
Speaker 1: was wrong. We have been vindicated time and time again.
Speaker 1: I look at this at the as the lower hanging
Speaker 1: fruit when it comes to Comy, mister higher honor, and
Speaker 1: I think, especially with my interview with Dan Bongino and
Speaker 1: what they have found, I think that this Grand conspiracy
Speaker 1: investigation is going to be the mother load that may
Speaker 1: implicate a lot more people. Bongino told me that he
Speaker 1: really felt that there were people in the FBI the
Speaker 1: purposefully preserved evidence, knowing and hoping that one day when
Speaker 1: he and Cash Pttel got in the FBI, that they
Speaker 1: would find it. They did find it, and that's where
Speaker 1: you know. Dan famously said he didn't think a Republican
Speaker 1: survive under these circumstances. But I think that that is
Speaker 1: the case that I'm paying the most attention to. However,
Speaker 1: this is significant anyway. Joining us now, John Solomon. He
Speaker 1: is the founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter justinews
Speaker 1: dot com, Greig Jarrett, Fox News, legal analyst, and of
Speaker 1: course number one New York Times bestselling author. John, let's
Speaker 1: start with you. I think you agree with me. This
Speaker 1: is the lower hanging fruit. I think, yeah, I think
Speaker 1: the big investigation is into the Grand Conspiracy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you're exactly right. This is sort of a side issue,
Speaker 4: but one that takes on more significance when you remember
Speaker 4: what just happens Saturday night. People are getting motivated by
Speaker 4: these social media posts. They are getting motivated by the
Speaker 4: hateful rhetoric. And so if an FBI director or a
Speaker 4: former FBI director wants to suggest it's a good idea
Speaker 4: to eighty six forty seven, get rid of forty seven,
Speaker 4: and that might motivate someone. You're going to charge him
Speaker 4: just like you charge anyone else. If a guy in
Speaker 4: Las Vegas said, Hey, I'm going to kill the lawmaker tomorrow,
Speaker 4: they're going to go arrest him too. So that's what
Speaker 4: went on here. This is a minor case compared to
Speaker 4: what's playing out in Port Pierce, Florida. They are systemically
Speaker 4: looking at an effort to get Donald Trump violate his
Speaker 4: civil liberties over a ten year period, using four or
Speaker 4: five code name investigations, and along the way, not only
Speaker 4: lating President Trump's simil liberties and those around them, but
Speaker 4: very likely members of Congress whose own records were taken,
Speaker 4: lawyers whose law firm records were taken. Us keep in
Speaker 4: mind that they use secret measures to suck up entire
Speaker 4: law firm files as they were looking at certain lawyers
Speaker 4: in these cases. That is going to be such a big,
Speaker 4: inconsequential place, far more consequential than what went on in
Speaker 4: North Carolina yesterday.
Speaker 1: And John, if you can explain how arctic frost is
Speaker 1: only the tip of the iceberg, that there are multiple
Speaker 1: investigations with multiple names that they also now have discovered,
Speaker 1: and we will learn a lot more in the days,
Speaker 1: weeks and months ahead about these examples.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Basically, there's a Washprin's repeat cycle of weaponizing law enforcement,
Speaker 4: and each time a Democrat has a problem, they then
Speaker 4: hang a fake scandal on a Republican and the youth
Speaker 4: of powers of the intelligence in law enforcement commute to
Speaker 4: try to give the elude usion that this is a
Speaker 4: serious matter. Hillary Clinton has that Russia collusion problem after
Speaker 4: the Peter Schweizer book, they make the crossfiy a hurricane
Speaker 4: investigation against Trump. We know that had no merit. Then
Speaker 4: Joe Biden has a Ukraine corruption problem with this son
Speaker 4: a hunter, and they hang Ukraine impeachment around him. A
Speaker 4: little bit while after that, they find Joe Biden's classified
Speaker 4: documents right after he got named president. They want to
Speaker 4: neutralize that. They create the investigation against President Trump that
Speaker 4: leads to the raid on mar A Lago, for which,
Speaker 4: now that we know, the FBI believe there was no
Speaker 4: probable cause to do that. And then as it's becoming
Speaker 4: clear in twenty three that Joe Biden has a mental
Speaker 4: acuity problem that he's fading away, they need to put
Speaker 4: Donald Trump back on the defensive because he's doing well
Speaker 4: on the polls. They use Arctic Cross, which basically goes
Speaker 4: all the way back to twenty twenty and says we're
Speaker 4: going to look at that period after the election and
Speaker 4: charge Donald Trump with something that John Kennedy and Sam
Speaker 4: Tilden did and never got charged, which is submit alternate
Speaker 4: electors to a Senate as a former protest. Twice in
Speaker 4: American history that wasn't a crime, but when it came
Speaker 4: to Donald Trump, they tried to turn it into a crime.
Speaker 4: Four consecutive Washerton's repeat cycles all along, capturing hundreds of
Speaker 4: people into a dragnet who were clearly innocent.
Speaker 1: Let's get your take, Greg Jarrett. Let's start with eighty
Speaker 1: six forty seven. According to Komi, he had no idea
Speaker 1: what that meant. He had no idea. It just happened
Speaker 1: to stumble upon it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he said, gosh, it never occurred to me that
Speaker 5: some folks associate those numbers with violence. I mean, that
Speaker 5: kind of fakery is a pattern with James Cummy. He
Speaker 5: feigns ignorance, he plays the dummy to try to weasel
Speaker 5: out of wrongdoing, and he's proven to be a master
Speaker 5: of deceit lying about leaks to the media, line of
Speaker 5: the Pies accords, secretly weaponizing the FBI and the Russia hoax,
Speaker 5: while denying it all with a straight faith. Were under
Speaker 5: testimony before Congress, he claims, acute, am Nigia, I don't
Speaker 5: remember anything. It's all a phony act.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: Komy loves to portray himself as Saint James, that there's
Speaker 5: nothing virtuous about Komy. I will say this. I've been
Speaker 5: mildly amused at all the legal commentators who've been quick
Speaker 5: to condemn the Komy indictment as frivolous or absurd. They're
Speaker 5: overlooking several important points, and if I may, I'll just
Speaker 5: run through them quickly. This case, first of all, is
Speaker 5: in the Eastern District of North Carolina, predominantly conservative, and
Speaker 5: in a politically charge case like this, that helps the prosecution,
Speaker 5: it doesn't help Komy. Second of all, the federal grand
Speaker 5: jury was persuaded that Komy wilfully intended to threaten the
Speaker 5: life of the president. Will the trial jury from the
Speaker 5: exact same district may agree, even though there's a higher
Speaker 5: burden of proof. Third, it's important to realize that the
Speaker 5: second count against Komy does not require a willful threat. Instead,
Speaker 5: recklessly disregarding the risk of violence is sufficient. It's a
Speaker 5: lower standard. It's easier to prove.
Speaker 4: For the all.
Speaker 5: You know, other people in that same eastern district in
Speaker 5: North Carolina have been successfully prosecuted on the exact same charge,
Speaker 5: which will undermine Comy's claim that g I'm a victim
Speaker 5: of selective, vindictive prosecution. And finally, I point out, you know,
Speaker 5: Comy is surely going to argue I have a free
Speaker 5: speech right, that's my defense. Well, the Supreme Court has
Speaker 5: made it abundantly clear that the First Amendment is not
Speaker 5: a shield for threats against the president the seminole case
Speaker 5: Watts versus the United States in nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 4: So you know, I.
Speaker 5: Also suspect that prosecutors have marshalled together a lot more
Speaker 5: incriminating evidence than we now know. The attorney acting Attorney
Speaker 5: General said yesterday, we have witnesses, we have documents that
Speaker 5: will help prove the government's case. Well, it's quite quite
Speaker 5: possible they've uncovered evidence that Comy's doobious story is a
Speaker 5: brazen lie. Will wait and see.
Speaker 1: You know, this is the low hanging fruit. John Solomon
Speaker 1: that I often talk about, but there is being built
Speaker 1: as confirmed by the Attorney General still Pam Bondi, confirmed
Speaker 1: by Todd Blenz, confirmed by the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
Speaker 1: new evidence put forward by Tulca Gabbert at D and
Speaker 1: I that in fact, a grand conspiracy investigation is not
Speaker 1: only going ongoing, but it is being built out. How
Speaker 1: do you imagine that that will play out?
Speaker 4: I think the first likely charges if a grand jury
Speaker 4: decides to do something, we'll be to charge John Brennan
Speaker 4: in the next few weeks, once the Sendate transmits its evidence,
Speaker 4: so that you begin to and grand jury begins to
Speaker 4: understand there was a cover up as far late as
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three. People were lying in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 4: trying to cover up what began in twenty sixteen. That
Speaker 4: is I think the starter gun firing for a larger
Speaker 4: conspiracy case. All right, there's a lie. That lie is
Speaker 4: trying to cover up the fact that the intelligence community
Speaker 4: committed created a fake intelligence document to justify the fact
Speaker 4: that the FBI previously tried to investigate Donald Trump wrongly
Speaker 4: for Russian collusions. So that sort of becomes a what
Speaker 4: we call the pattern case. And then from that pattern case,
Speaker 4: you're going to start to look for people like fbidence
Speaker 4: or CIA analysts who did think that exceeded the role
Speaker 4: of their job, that exceeded the evidence, exceeded their training,
Speaker 4: and say, these guys were part of it too, different
Speaker 4: part of the conspiracy. And at some point you're going
Speaker 4: to flip someone because when you look at all the
Speaker 4: great conspiracies that have been brought against the mob or
Speaker 4: against drug CARTELSI you usually flip an insider Sammy the
Speaker 4: Bold in the case of the famous Gambino trials. Whoever
Speaker 4: flips first, whoever becomes that key critical witness he can
Speaker 4: help or she He or she can help tie it
Speaker 4: up in a very big way. And I think that, well,
Speaker 4: who might.
Speaker 1: That person be? Is it going to be like an
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman? Who's it going to be?
Speaker 4: It's a great question, right, we don't know yet. You know,
Speaker 4: who's going to take a deal, who's funding their law fers.
Speaker 4: You know, maybe the Left will pay a lot of
Speaker 4: people's legal bills and try to keep people from cooperating.
Speaker 4: So we'll see. But you know, someone like an Andrew
Speaker 4: McKay would be a really interesting thing. Now I'm not
Speaker 4: saying that Andrew k committed to crime yet I don't
Speaker 4: know the evidence against him. But he's a guy that
Speaker 4: can testify upward on a James Comey and Chris Ray
Speaker 4: and Barack Obama because he had contacts with him, and
Speaker 4: he can testify downward to the agents who didn't think
Speaker 4: so to Pete Struck's in the lease of pages and
Speaker 4: other So you're looking for someone that is like a
Speaker 4: man in the middle or a woman in the middle,
Speaker 4: that has visibility up and down. That sort of conspiracy
Speaker 4: witness becomes really key to a good prosecution.
Speaker 1: Right, quick break more with John Solomon, Greg Jarrett on
Speaker 1: the other side than your calls coming up eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four to one, Sean. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, I we continue now.
Speaker 1: John Solomon, Greg Jarrett are with us. Greg Jarrett, I'll
Speaker 1: give you an opportunity explain how you think this will
Speaker 1: play out in terms of the broader case, the larger case,
Speaker 1: the more significant case of an eleven year grand conspiracy
Speaker 1: to destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 5: Well, I think John has summarized it as he always
Speaker 5: does with his reporting quite well. You post an important question,
Speaker 5: who might flip and implicate others, for example, like John Brennan,
Speaker 5: who is right is clearly the next person of you indicted.
Speaker 5: There were people high up in the CIA and in
Speaker 5: fact in other intelligence agencies that warn Brennant, you can't
Speaker 5: use this dossier by Christopher Steele, paid for by Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 5: There was a total smear and a complete lie. It's phony.
Speaker 5: You can't use it to try to implicate Trump and
Speaker 5: altering the intelligence community assessment upon the orders of President
Speaker 5: of Barack Obomb he can't do it. Brennan did it anyway.
Speaker 5: He essentially had one person compose it. And I would
Speaker 5: think that that person who was the writer who penned
Speaker 5: this thing would be somebody. If I were a prosecutor,
Speaker 5: I'd be looking at the flip along with some others
Speaker 5: who were in on it against John Brennan. And once
Speaker 5: you get people to begin again to flip to save
Speaker 5: their own butts, you know, then a snowball effect invariably happens.
Speaker 5: And so you know, look, you've got a grand jury
Speaker 5: investigation going on, it's very intensive. Dan and Fort Pierce, Florida.
Speaker 5: You've got some new blood there that took over recently
Speaker 5: that are motivated to make sure that justice is done,
Speaker 5: so we're going to see some action over the course
Speaker 5: of the next few weeks.
Speaker 1: By the way, if you want a longer discussion on
Speaker 1: this very topic, both John Solomon and Greg Jarrett came
Speaker 1: on my podcast, and you know we go over this
Speaker 1: in great specificity, in detail for nearly two hours NonStop
Speaker 1: conversation about it, and you will learn a lot, I
Speaker 1: promise you. John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, thank you both. Appreciate
Speaker 1: both of you. Anyway, we'll get to our busy phones.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn our number Hannah
Speaker 1: in Utah. Next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7: Hi, hey, Hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 1: I can hear you? Can you hear me? The worst
Speaker 1: words in the English language?
Speaker 3: Go ahead, yes, I can.
Speaker 7: Hey. So it's in honor to speak with you. But
Speaker 7: what I wanted to comment on is a gentleman saying
Speaker 7: wondering why this last shooter wasn't dead, and and you
Speaker 7: wanted to have him alive so that you could get
Speaker 7: information from him. And I'm just kind of the opinion
Speaker 7: that there's hint this flashooter and there's so many more
Speaker 7: people that have drink drank the kool aid and they
Speaker 7: aren't thinking for themselves anymore. And I feel like there
Speaker 7: just needs to be a consequence, and tell there's consequences
Speaker 7: for people doing this, like call me not knowing what
Speaker 7: the show represented. That's that's just ridiculous. And I want
Speaker 7: to know when the consequences are going to happen.
Speaker 1: Well, they may never happen to the extent that they should,
Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna I'm not going to give you
Speaker 1: false hope. Too many of these people. Oh, they're going
Speaker 1: to be in jail for the rest of their life.
Speaker 1: They will never see another day free. And you know,
Speaker 1: look at John Hinckley who shot Reagan. He's free as
Speaker 1: a bird. So it frustrates me. In terms of dead
Speaker 1: or alive, I'm perfectly fine if the guy ends up dead. However,
Speaker 1: if you have the person alive, you do have an
Speaker 1: opportunity to discover if there might be other people that
Speaker 1: were aiding a betting, supporting and that were part of
Speaker 1: a grander conspiracy. And in that sense, I would like
Speaker 1: to know the answer to that so you can get
Speaker 1: information you otherwise would not be able to get from
Speaker 1: a dead person. But with that said, if the guy
Speaker 1: ended up dead, I would not be sitting on this
Speaker 1: program today, you know, shedding a tear, I promise you, right.
Speaker 7: But I think we can pretty much guarantee that there's
Speaker 7: unfortunately many more like him every and they're where well.
Speaker 1: I think there's plenty of them. And I think we're
Speaker 1: doing a very poor job in terms of creating a
Speaker 1: safe perimeter for the president, his cabinet and high ranking
Speaker 1: government officials. And we're doing a poor job. We're not sweeping,
Speaker 1: we're not securing, we're not holding areas. In this case,
Speaker 1: the entire hotel should have been swept. It was not,
Speaker 1: just like it was not swept. The area around Trump International,
Speaker 1: just like Butler was not swept the way it should
Speaker 1: have been swept. And at this point, how many how
Speaker 1: many more examples do we need before we make the
Speaker 1: changes that are necessary?
Speaker 7: By zero zero?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I appreciate the call, Janet, Thank you. Uh let
Speaker 1: us say hi to doctor George in my free state
Speaker 1: of Florida. Doctor George, how are you? What kind of
Speaker 1: doctor are you?
Speaker 3: For longevity medicine? But in any case, mister Sean Hannity,
Speaker 3: my wife and I hold you in such high esteem
Speaker 3: because you're very few bona fide.
Speaker 6: Professional journalists who is not going to lose their professional
Speaker 6: journalism card because you've never attended one of those White
Speaker 6: House dinners through the years, and any journalists who did
Speaker 6: participate in those events ought to lose their professional journalism card.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you a question, doctor, If you know
Speaker 1: you have to go to an event, and there are
Speaker 1: events all of us have to go to that we
Speaker 1: really don't want to go to. It's not at the
Speaker 1: top of our list of things we would choose to
Speaker 1: do on a day off. Why would I want to
Speaker 1: go in a room full of people most of whom
Speaker 1: I don't particularly like, that don't like me. What is
Speaker 1: the point? I don't see any point to that.
Speaker 3: Well, the point is that professional journalists ought to not
Speaker 3: casually cavort with the people whom they have to ask
Speaker 3: probing questions off. And this is the problem we saw
Speaker 3: when the Democrats were in power, When they get together
Speaker 3: at that White House dinner and they joke around about
Speaker 3: serious issues that affect our country. Journalists should not be
Speaker 3: doing that if they want to maintain their ethics and
Speaker 3: still be highly respected bona fide professional journalists. And the
Speaker 3: very fact that you had the spine and the determination
Speaker 3: knowing that that would challenge the ethics of any professional journalists.
Speaker 3: We just admire you for your fortitude, for your patriotism,
Speaker 3: and we just think the world of you. Thank you
Speaker 3: for fighting the good fight. By the way, you have
Speaker 3: the best screen or calling shows.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that, George, Thank you, doctor George. Thanks uh.
Speaker 1: But look, if people want to go, if that's fun
Speaker 1: for them, then I guess we just have very different
Speaker 1: definitions of what's fun. I think I would rather hang
Speaker 1: out at a barbecue joint or a restaurant with friends
Speaker 1: and family, and I think there's better use of my
Speaker 1: time than hanging out with these DC you know, arrogant
Speaker 1: elitists that hate the president. And you know they call
Speaker 1: it nerd prom for a reason. Marty in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: next on the Sean Hannity Show, Marty, how are you, Sean?
Speaker 8: Thank you for taking my call. I saw you recently
Speaker 8: by the way in Florida, and you were looking dapper,
Speaker 8: and you were looking healthy. And I've been following you
Speaker 8: all the way since you used to sit in for
Speaker 8: Rush last century.
Speaker 1: Wow, thank you. Where did you see me in Florida?
Speaker 1: If I may be so bold to ask, it was
Speaker 1: a it was a real.
Speaker 8: State gathering, and you found the only liberal in the room.
Speaker 8: Remember he was on the camera crew.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm actually I've got liberal you know, I
Speaker 1: have liberal detectors that are working twenty four to seven.
Speaker 1: They don't stop. I can usually spot them a mile away.
Speaker 3: It was fun.
Speaker 8: It was so fun, and you were funny. So that
Speaker 8: was that was great to be with you.
Speaker 1: Well, it was nice to meet you. And you should
Speaker 1: move to my free state of Florida. Although I do
Speaker 1: like North Carolina. I love the mountains of North Carolina.
Speaker 1: I think it's great there.
Speaker 8: Actually, I'm from the mountains, and I might move to
Speaker 8: the free State of Florida if we can't get a
Speaker 8: democratic if we can't get rid of this democratic governor
Speaker 8: that we've got. But listen, the reason I called you
Speaker 8: is because I got a question for you. You know,
Speaker 8: selling real estate last century and the average prot the
Speaker 8: average age of the first time home buyer. When I
Speaker 8: first started selling real estate, it was twenty seven, twenty
Speaker 8: eight years old. The average age for somebody to buy
Speaker 8: their first time home now is forty forty one. What happened?
Speaker 1: Look, a lot of things happen. Government has you know, adopted, waste, fraud, abuse, corruption,
Speaker 1: et cetera. You have governments on the state level, federal level.
Speaker 1: They have been taking more and more people's harder and money.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump now seeking to reverse that. I think, you know,
Speaker 1: as soon as we get the Sarran situation over, I
Speaker 1: think you'll see a dramatic move with the economy. I
Speaker 1: think interest rates will come down. I think manufacturing will
Speaker 1: go up dramatically because we have committed investments trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars worth. I think high paying career jobs will come
Speaker 1: online once interest rates go down. People that have been
Speaker 1: reluctant to sell a home that they want to sell
Speaker 1: because they don't want to give up their two three
Speaker 1: four percent thirty year fixed rate mortgage, I think that'll
Speaker 1: get fixed. And I think you'll see, you know, sale
Speaker 1: of pre existing homes, a new home construction starts to go.
Speaker 1: That's my hope. Yeah, I absolutely hope that that will
Speaker 1: happen sooner than later. I think I'll never forget when
Speaker 1: I bought my first home and it was in Roswelt, Georgia,
Speaker 1: and I was in my early thirties and I paid it.
Speaker 1: I think I don't know what did I pay for that?
Speaker 1: Home one hundred and twelve thousand dollars. I was the
Speaker 1: happiest guy on earth. I felt like I'd.
Speaker 8: Made it, I know, but you know when this first
Speaker 8: started happening is when Pelosi started selling young people on
Speaker 8: you can have some kind of universal income and you
Speaker 8: can go out there and be an artist. And it's
Speaker 8: the lack of commitment. We've got to sell home ownership.
Speaker 8: That's been the backbone of the American family's economy for years,
Speaker 8: and I don't want to see that change so anything.
Speaker 1: I know and I know more people that are waiting
Speaker 1: for interest rates to go down so that they can
Speaker 1: move up to the next level of home that they
Speaker 1: want to get into. But they're not willing to sacrifice
Speaker 1: a low thirty year fixed rate mortgage to get there.
Speaker 1: So that's an important part of the equation. And I
Speaker 1: think it will happen sooner than later. Let's get this
Speaker 1: Iranian conflict behind us, and I think things will change quickly.
Speaker 8: I do tell Slump to do anything that promotes tax
Speaker 8: deductions on American home ownership and for the American family we've.
Speaker 1: Got the average American is getting over thirty five hundred
Speaker 1: dollars in terms of their tax refund more than they
Speaker 1: were getting under Joe Biden. That is a significant increase.
Speaker 1: People's take home pay has gone up significantly again because
Speaker 1: of the one Big, Beautiful Bill and the largest tax
Speaker 1: cut in history. So people are beginning to feel the
Speaker 1: benefit of Trump's economic policies. However, I mean, stopping Iran
Speaker 1: from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon did kind of get
Speaker 1: in the way of all of this, and for a
Speaker 1: short period of time until this is resolved, unfortunately, it'll
Speaker 1: slow down progress, but then it'll pick up right now
Speaker 1: after great but.
Speaker 8: I feel the ground shaking. The Golden Age is coming,
Speaker 8: and it always begins with America real estate.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent, and I urge every American if you can,
Speaker 1: once you get to the point you can afford your
Speaker 1: own home, I urge you to get it. But most
Speaker 1: people it is the biggest investment they have in their life.
Speaker 1: And look, the value of property is not going to
Speaker 1: go down on the end. Property values keep going up.
Speaker 1: Look for property that is unique, look for property that
Speaker 1: is special, Look for property that you can improve. Don't
Speaker 1: buy the nicest house on the street, buy the one
Speaker 1: that needs a little elbow grease, and you can invest
Speaker 1: in yourself in your spare time. Improve the property and
Speaker 1: you'll make more money. Appreciate it, Marty, God bless you
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four one, Sean if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Jeff and Oregon. Jeff,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you call?
Speaker 3: Hi?
Speaker 9: Sean? Yeah, thanks for taking my call. I'm a long
Speaker 9: time a listener since Comb's day. Also, I'm a retired MD.
Speaker 9: Point only is a quick one. I find it extraordinary
Speaker 9: that Cole Thomas was able to travel across the country
Speaker 9: on a train. Trains have rules, regulations. You can't carry guns,
Speaker 9: you have to check them in and I think I
Speaker 9: ride trains all the time and I actually have a
Speaker 9: license to carry, but I won't carry because I'm afraid
Speaker 9: of getting caught and getting a felony. He could have
Speaker 9: been caught if they had security at trains like they
Speaker 9: have at planes. And the days now are not safe
Speaker 9: for trains. God awful things can happen without security.
Speaker 1: Listen. I think, probably, deep down in my heart, I
Speaker 1: think you're one hundred percent right. I think the same
Speaker 1: protocols we have in place for anybody to get on
Speaker 1: an airplane should be institutionalized for trains. And buses. I
Speaker 1: think it would make travel more safe and secure. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's a bad idea, but I hate the
Speaker 1: idea of being further inconvenienced.
Speaker 9: I hate it they being blown up on a train
Speaker 9: also or having some If.
Speaker 1: I had a dollar for every time I was wanted
Speaker 1: in my life, i'd be a very very wealthy man.
Speaker 1: And whatever you do, don't ever travel with sweet Baby James,
Speaker 1: and don't ever travel with Linda because they're wearing signs
Speaker 1: on their forehead. It's tattooed in saying wand me, you know,
Speaker 1: give me extra security, you know, sweeps. And Linda gets
Speaker 1: impatient when they pull her out of the line because
Speaker 1: it's very impatient. Sweet Baby James is a lot nicer
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 9: I've had drunks that the police have pulled out who
Speaker 9: are threatening, but that's the that's the worst I've ever had.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just not fun. But you know, unfortunately, I
Speaker 1: guess you know, it's the twenty fifth anniversary year of
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. I guess you know we can't go
Speaker 1: back to where we were, and you can thank radical
Speaker 1: Islamis for changing all way of life and now you know,
Speaker 1: we don't even think about it anymore, and it's just
Speaker 1: it's just unfortunate. It really is. I wish it wasn't
Speaker 1: that way, but in this day and age, we have
Speaker 1: to put safety first. I'm gonna wrap things up for today,
Speaker 1: Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Senator
Speaker 1: John Kennedy, our favorite Senator Louisiana, Senator Ted Cruz, Keith Kellogg, Tonight,
Speaker 1: Greg Jared, Tommy larn David Asman, much more. Set your DVR,
Speaker 1: nine Eastern, Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back
Speaker 1: here tomorrow, and thank you for making this show possible