WEBVTT - The View from Beijing

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:22.196
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.236 --> 0:00:25.436
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:25.956 --> 0:00:30.396
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Here in the US, coronavirus seems to

0:00:30.436 --> 0:00:34.356
<v Speaker 1>be spreading steadily. Now. I know we cover this in

0:00:34.396 --> 0:00:37.916
<v Speaker 1>a special episode last week with Mark Lipsitch, But for me,

0:00:38.476 --> 0:00:42.876
<v Speaker 1>this whole pandemic issue is still very much front of mind,

0:00:43.636 --> 0:00:46.116
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like most people I've talked to over

0:00:46.116 --> 0:00:49.796
<v Speaker 1>the last few days are thinking pretty much the same thing.

0:00:51.036 --> 0:00:54.316
<v Speaker 1>As of my taping this on Monday night, ten states

0:00:54.396 --> 0:01:00.276
<v Speaker 1>have now reported cases Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon,

0:01:00.476 --> 0:01:05.076
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin, and New York. With its geographical spread,

0:01:05.156 --> 0:01:07.796
<v Speaker 1>that list tells you that pretty shortly it'll be all

0:01:07.876 --> 0:01:11.516
<v Speaker 1>fifty states that have cases. But in China, where the

0:01:11.556 --> 0:01:15.396
<v Speaker 1>epidemic first erupted, the outbreak, at least for the moment,

0:01:15.756 --> 0:01:20.876
<v Speaker 1>appears appears to finally be slowing down. About a week ago,

0:01:21.036 --> 0:01:24.316
<v Speaker 1>as that process was beginning, I spoke to Ian Johnson,

0:01:24.636 --> 0:01:28.196
<v Speaker 1>a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who's based in Beijing. I

0:01:28.236 --> 0:01:31.676
<v Speaker 1>asked him what life is like in a city where

0:01:31.756 --> 0:01:35.396
<v Speaker 1>everybody is sheltering in place, all twenty million of them

0:01:36.396 --> 0:01:40.236
<v Speaker 1>in Tell me what the mood is among the people

0:01:40.316 --> 0:01:45.516
<v Speaker 1>you speak to with regard to coronavirus. Well, there are

0:01:45.556 --> 0:01:49.156
<v Speaker 1>some cities in China where for a couple of weeks,

0:01:49.156 --> 0:01:52.676
<v Speaker 1>although things are loosening up a bit now, they had

0:01:52.796 --> 0:01:57.956
<v Speaker 1>people under complete lockdown where you couldn't leave your housing

0:01:58.036 --> 0:02:02.916
<v Speaker 1>compound without permission, or sometimes families could only leave their

0:02:02.916 --> 0:02:06.636
<v Speaker 1>housing compound once every couple of days to go shopping

0:02:06.716 --> 0:02:10.156
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, where all the park sort of closed.

0:02:11.036 --> 0:02:13.516
<v Speaker 1>In Beijing, which is of course a big city, so

0:02:13.556 --> 0:02:15.876
<v Speaker 1>it's even hard to generalize in Beijing, but it's a

0:02:15.916 --> 0:02:20.396
<v Speaker 1>little easier the parks are open, and of course in

0:02:20.436 --> 0:02:24.076
<v Speaker 1>the capital, buying groceries and so on is no problem.

0:02:24.516 --> 0:02:28.076
<v Speaker 1>And I guess also the thing in Beijing, the government's

0:02:28.116 --> 0:02:31.276
<v Speaker 1>influence is probably at its strongest, just like probably in

0:02:31.316 --> 0:02:35.916
<v Speaker 1>any capital city. So I think overall in Beijing, the

0:02:35.996 --> 0:02:39.876
<v Speaker 1>sense I get is that people are they're getting a

0:02:39.916 --> 0:02:42.956
<v Speaker 1>little frustrated. They're feeling that boy has been going on

0:02:43.036 --> 0:02:46.956
<v Speaker 1>for a while. The government's asking us not to meet anyone,

0:02:47.156 --> 0:02:49.316
<v Speaker 1>not to go out. But how long are we supposed

0:02:49.316 --> 0:02:52.916
<v Speaker 1>to do this? I think when it started. It started

0:02:52.996 --> 0:02:55.356
<v Speaker 1>right around Chinese New Year, which is a time when

0:02:55.396 --> 0:02:59.196
<v Speaker 1>people tend to be more inwardly focused anyway, visiting family members,

0:02:59.796 --> 0:03:01.996
<v Speaker 1>and so it became sort of like a really long

0:03:02.196 --> 0:03:04.596
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving weekend or something like that, which is good or

0:03:04.636 --> 0:03:06.436
<v Speaker 1>bad depending on how you're feeling about your family at

0:03:06.436 --> 0:03:09.076
<v Speaker 1>the end of Thanksgiving weekend exactly, you know, sort of

0:03:09.156 --> 0:03:11.956
<v Speaker 1>again the weekend from hell. And I think that's what

0:03:11.996 --> 0:03:13.596
<v Speaker 1>it's going to become for some people, because this long

0:03:13.596 --> 0:03:16.636
<v Speaker 1>weekend's gone into two weeks and now it's a month,

0:03:17.916 --> 0:03:19.636
<v Speaker 1>and people are start of wondering, well, when's this going

0:03:19.676 --> 0:03:21.436
<v Speaker 1>to end? In one sense is in the government that

0:03:21.476 --> 0:03:23.796
<v Speaker 1>there are people asking that question. Also, even if for

0:03:23.796 --> 0:03:26.436
<v Speaker 1>another reason than GDP reasons like when can the economy

0:03:26.516 --> 0:03:29.276
<v Speaker 1>get going again? So I think there's a little bit

0:03:29.316 --> 0:03:33.556
<v Speaker 1>of frustration and percolating up. The frustration makes perfect sense

0:03:33.556 --> 0:03:36.516
<v Speaker 1>to me. This is sort of fascinating that almost precisely

0:03:36.556 --> 0:03:40.036
<v Speaker 1>at the moment that you're describing people in Beijing thinking

0:03:40.196 --> 0:03:43.036
<v Speaker 1>can this be over? Already? In much of the rest

0:03:43.036 --> 0:03:45.956
<v Speaker 1>of the world, people are waking up to think, oh

0:03:45.996 --> 0:03:49.036
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, this might just be getting started. Do you

0:03:49.036 --> 0:03:51.076
<v Speaker 1>think that in Beijing there just haven't been a large

0:03:51.156 --> 0:03:53.596
<v Speaker 1>number of reported cases, so people don't have a sense

0:03:53.636 --> 0:03:56.236
<v Speaker 1>of the immediacy of the danger. Yeah, I think it's

0:03:56.236 --> 0:03:58.316
<v Speaker 1>partly about but I think the government also set this

0:03:58.476 --> 0:04:01.116
<v Speaker 1>up wrong. The government set this up as a quick

0:04:01.476 --> 0:04:05.676
<v Speaker 1>crisis that it could manage and come out successful, where

0:04:05.676 --> 0:04:08.596
<v Speaker 1>they were going to put the country into lockdown, implement

0:04:08.596 --> 0:04:12.236
<v Speaker 1>these your onian measures for two weeks or four weeks,

0:04:12.436 --> 0:04:15.036
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways, statistically we are You see the

0:04:15.156 --> 0:04:19.476
<v Speaker 1>rate of increase in China has gone way down. But

0:04:19.556 --> 0:04:23.156
<v Speaker 1>also as the country gets back to work, people are

0:04:23.196 --> 0:04:25.636
<v Speaker 1>going to come into contact with each other. You can't

0:04:25.716 --> 0:04:30.076
<v Speaker 1>have even Hubei Province can't stay indefinitely locked down. This

0:04:30.116 --> 0:04:33.116
<v Speaker 1>would be almost like the entire Midwest. This would be

0:04:33.116 --> 0:04:37.756
<v Speaker 1>like Chicago plus Illinois plus maybe Michigan to So to

0:04:37.796 --> 0:04:40.356
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of the overall economic impact of Hubei

0:04:40.436 --> 0:04:43.476
<v Speaker 1>Province right at the crossroads of the country being locked down.

0:04:43.836 --> 0:04:46.716
<v Speaker 1>That can't go on forever, and so it's going to spread.

0:04:47.036 --> 0:04:50.116
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be other centers of the epidemic, and

0:04:50.236 --> 0:04:53.316
<v Speaker 1>the government hasn't set people up for this. The messaging

0:04:53.356 --> 0:04:54.916
<v Speaker 1>is sort of off. It's that it's going to be

0:04:54.956 --> 0:04:58.036
<v Speaker 1>over by now, and these draconian measures are going to stop,

0:04:58.636 --> 0:05:00.356
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know what they're going to do when

0:05:00.396 --> 0:05:02.996
<v Speaker 1>this continues on. I think everybody now has come to

0:05:03.036 --> 0:05:05.796
<v Speaker 1>the realization in the sort of expert community that this

0:05:05.916 --> 0:05:09.356
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue on for months to come. The

0:05:09.436 --> 0:05:14.476
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government is pretty sophisticated in managing the way that

0:05:14.996 --> 0:05:18.116
<v Speaker 1>its own citizens make sense of what's going on in

0:05:18.156 --> 0:05:20.556
<v Speaker 1>the world, and I'm wondering if there isn't a pivot

0:05:20.596 --> 0:05:24.316
<v Speaker 1>point available to them as it becomes more of a

0:05:24.316 --> 0:05:27.796
<v Speaker 1>global phenomenon. Is there a way for the Chinese government

0:05:27.796 --> 0:05:30.836
<v Speaker 1>to say to their own citizens, Look, this is bigger

0:05:30.836 --> 0:05:33.636
<v Speaker 1>than just us, and we're just doing what everyone else

0:05:33.636 --> 0:05:34.876
<v Speaker 1>in the world is going to have to do, and

0:05:34.916 --> 0:05:37.556
<v Speaker 1>this is an unfortunate normal, But don't look at us

0:05:37.556 --> 0:05:40.156
<v Speaker 1>and say, why didn't you solve this? After all, no

0:05:40.316 --> 0:05:43.436
<v Speaker 1>government in the world has a simple or straightforward solution

0:05:43.516 --> 0:05:45.996
<v Speaker 1>to this problem. It's nature. And in a way, might

0:05:46.036 --> 0:05:48.556
<v Speaker 1>that in a sense almost let them off the hook. Yeah,

0:05:48.596 --> 0:05:51.596
<v Speaker 1>I think that would work better if the government weren't

0:05:51.756 --> 0:05:55.476
<v Speaker 1>partly culpable for the outbreak, and they also just haven't

0:05:55.476 --> 0:05:58.876
<v Speaker 1>been able to downplay that that is still kind of

0:05:59.396 --> 0:06:04.636
<v Speaker 1>popularly understood on some level that there were these whistleblowers,

0:06:04.796 --> 0:06:08.276
<v Speaker 1>they did try to say something, and at least local

0:06:08.316 --> 0:06:11.876
<v Speaker 1>officials were responsible for the outbreak. Now I think the

0:06:11.876 --> 0:06:13.516
<v Speaker 1>government's going to try to just push all onto the

0:06:13.516 --> 0:06:16.436
<v Speaker 1>local officials. But I think there is on some level

0:06:16.436 --> 0:06:19.596
<v Speaker 1>and Moong more sophisticated people or not maybe more sophisticated

0:06:19.596 --> 0:06:22.356
<v Speaker 1>the wrong world, but maybe in a narrower group of people,

0:06:22.716 --> 0:06:25.236
<v Speaker 1>there's an understanding that the government was also responsible. So

0:06:25.276 --> 0:06:27.636
<v Speaker 1>that makes it harder to make that case. I think,

0:06:28.436 --> 0:06:30.636
<v Speaker 1>is it clear that had the early whistle blower has

0:06:30.676 --> 0:06:34.916
<v Speaker 1>been taken more seriously, that could have actually contained the virus,

0:06:34.916 --> 0:06:38.916
<v Speaker 1>because the sense that I have from speaking to epidemiologists

0:06:39.036 --> 0:06:41.716
<v Speaker 1>is that as we learn more about how the virus

0:06:41.756 --> 0:06:43.756
<v Speaker 1>spreads and whether you can spread the virus when you

0:06:43.796 --> 0:06:46.876
<v Speaker 1>don't have any symptoms at all, it's at least possible

0:06:47.236 --> 0:06:50.476
<v Speaker 1>that nothing that the government could have done would really

0:06:50.516 --> 0:06:52.996
<v Speaker 1>have been able to contain this well. I think that's right.

0:06:53.596 --> 0:06:56.716
<v Speaker 1>I think the government sort of hasn't made that argument yet,

0:06:56.756 --> 0:06:59.636
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably true. And I mean, even this heroic

0:06:59.676 --> 0:07:03.596
<v Speaker 1>guy who died the face of the whistleblower Leeu and Leang,

0:07:03.756 --> 0:07:07.436
<v Speaker 1>the doctor whose image is now ubiquitous even in Chinese

0:07:07.476 --> 0:07:12.316
<v Speaker 1>social media. He wasn't a real whistleblower. He was telling

0:07:12.756 --> 0:07:16.596
<v Speaker 1>a social media group of friends of classmates about this.

0:07:17.116 --> 0:07:19.596
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't as if he had filed a formal complaint

0:07:19.596 --> 0:07:23.396
<v Speaker 1>to the government or gone on widespread social media about this.

0:07:23.476 --> 0:07:26.556
<v Speaker 1>So it just shows, of course how ubiquitous the government

0:07:26.596 --> 0:07:28.716
<v Speaker 1>censorship is that they can even see what you're saying

0:07:28.716 --> 0:07:34.356
<v Speaker 1>to your classmates. But he hadn't actually started a process

0:07:34.396 --> 0:07:37.236
<v Speaker 1>that could have resulted in anything, even if the government

0:07:37.236 --> 0:07:39.916
<v Speaker 1>had been open to it. So yeah, I think that's

0:07:39.956 --> 0:07:42.196
<v Speaker 1>that's probably true. It's not clear at all that that

0:07:42.276 --> 0:07:44.796
<v Speaker 1>would have changed things, but at least there's a sense

0:07:44.836 --> 0:07:47.116
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to make win the pr battle

0:07:47.516 --> 0:07:50.596
<v Speaker 1>that the government's partly responsible for it. What is your

0:07:50.716 --> 0:07:55.316
<v Speaker 1>daily life like in light of the current situation. Well,

0:07:55.396 --> 0:07:59.316
<v Speaker 1>my daily life, like other people's, is sharply constrained. So

0:08:00.316 --> 0:08:03.716
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to go and meet people because for

0:08:03.796 --> 0:08:06.996
<v Speaker 1>the people who are buying the government line, they're still like, oh,

0:08:07.076 --> 0:08:09.676
<v Speaker 1>we better not meet because the government's told we shouldn't

0:08:09.676 --> 0:08:12.716
<v Speaker 1>read people. And then even for the people who aren't

0:08:12.756 --> 0:08:16.356
<v Speaker 1>binding the government line, is getting harder and harder to

0:08:16.396 --> 0:08:19.196
<v Speaker 1>get into people's housing compounds, because if you just go

0:08:19.276 --> 0:08:22.436
<v Speaker 1>to somebody's apartment block and to try to get in,

0:08:22.556 --> 0:08:25.116
<v Speaker 1>you can't even necessarily get into the building. And then

0:08:25.156 --> 0:08:28.516
<v Speaker 1>with most restaurants and cafes closed, the most you can

0:08:28.516 --> 0:08:30.716
<v Speaker 1>do is go for a walk in the park or

0:08:30.716 --> 0:08:33.756
<v Speaker 1>something like that with somebody. So it's hard to get

0:08:33.836 --> 0:08:37.156
<v Speaker 1>as much information as before. It's sort of fascinating because

0:08:37.156 --> 0:08:41.796
<v Speaker 1>it draws out the ways in which a quarantine works

0:08:41.876 --> 0:08:47.956
<v Speaker 1>alongside technological control to really shift the way information spreads.

0:08:48.396 --> 0:08:50.476
<v Speaker 1>That sounds as if for someone like you who talks

0:08:50.516 --> 0:08:52.836
<v Speaker 1>to people about things that they may not want the

0:08:52.836 --> 0:08:55.596
<v Speaker 1>government to hear, there's actually a real limitation on your

0:08:55.596 --> 0:08:58.916
<v Speaker 1>ability to gather information. Yes, it is hard to talk

0:08:58.956 --> 0:09:01.556
<v Speaker 1>to people. I mean I think when you read things

0:09:01.596 --> 0:09:03.636
<v Speaker 1>on social media, you really have to parse things. And

0:09:03.676 --> 0:09:06.356
<v Speaker 1>I find a look at an article on social media,

0:09:06.356 --> 0:09:07.756
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things I try to do because

0:09:07.756 --> 0:09:12.596
<v Speaker 1>things get erased so quickly, is I'll quickly send myself

0:09:12.716 --> 0:09:14.916
<v Speaker 1>on wa chat. There'd be things through these articles that

0:09:14.996 --> 0:09:18.156
<v Speaker 1>people write, they sort of self published someone wa chat,

0:09:18.276 --> 0:09:19.876
<v Speaker 1>and so I'll see something like this, some sort of

0:09:19.956 --> 0:09:22.236
<v Speaker 1>edgypiece about how the governments in trouble and so on

0:09:22.316 --> 0:09:26.516
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and I'll quickly save the URL and

0:09:26.676 --> 0:09:29.036
<v Speaker 1>printed to PDF for something like that, so that if

0:09:29.036 --> 0:09:30.996
<v Speaker 1>it's gone, I still have a record of it. But

0:09:31.036 --> 0:09:32.836
<v Speaker 1>I sometimes have to do that really quickly, because if

0:09:32.876 --> 0:09:34.036
<v Speaker 1>I sort of say, oh, I'll do that in a

0:09:34.036 --> 0:09:36.116
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours, I go back and reopen the URL

0:09:36.236 --> 0:09:39.636
<v Speaker 1>and it's been closed. So the government's pretty quick on that,

0:09:39.636 --> 0:09:43.876
<v Speaker 1>although sometimes what I'm surprised is that not everything is erased.

0:09:44.516 --> 0:09:47.396
<v Speaker 1>And I just had an article that somebody sent me

0:09:47.916 --> 0:09:50.916
<v Speaker 1>the other day on how nothing will nothing can be

0:09:50.956 --> 0:09:54.596
<v Speaker 1>the same after the coronavirus, and partly they were talking

0:09:54.676 --> 0:09:57.716
<v Speaker 1>about how the government had to allow a free or

0:09:57.716 --> 0:10:01.636
<v Speaker 1>flow of information. They avoided key words that would cause

0:10:01.916 --> 0:10:05.036
<v Speaker 1>the bots to censor the article, like freedom of speech

0:10:05.676 --> 0:10:08.476
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, but I was surprised that that

0:10:08.556 --> 0:10:11.636
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been eras yet. Do you have a theory about why.

0:10:12.876 --> 0:10:17.036
<v Speaker 1>I think partly the censorship works on two levels. One

0:10:17.116 --> 0:10:18.516
<v Speaker 1>is they have bots to just go through and so

0:10:18.556 --> 0:10:20.996
<v Speaker 1>if you say something like you know, the Nobel Prize

0:10:21.356 --> 0:10:24.956
<v Speaker 1>winning dissident to Leosha boy, you put those three characters

0:10:24.956 --> 0:10:27.316
<v Speaker 1>out there boom, your piece is probably going to be

0:10:27.356 --> 0:10:31.476
<v Speaker 1>automatically erased. But I think also things that are a

0:10:31.516 --> 0:10:36.276
<v Speaker 1>little harder to tell from just if if you're just

0:10:36.396 --> 0:10:38.996
<v Speaker 1>using AI, maybe you need a human eye on it.

0:10:39.396 --> 0:10:41.636
<v Speaker 1>I think the flood of articles right now is such

0:10:41.716 --> 0:10:44.596
<v Speaker 1>that probably the censors are just a little bit behind

0:10:44.636 --> 0:10:47.236
<v Speaker 1>on their work. You know, that's probably the only explaination.

0:10:47.316 --> 0:10:49.116
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it means that there's a split in

0:10:49.156 --> 0:10:51.876
<v Speaker 1>the government and that therefore the information is getting out

0:10:51.876 --> 0:10:55.396
<v Speaker 1>because someone in the propaganda ministry, etcetera, etcetera. I don't think.

0:10:55.396 --> 0:10:57.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's happening. In light of what you

0:10:58.036 --> 0:11:02.276
<v Speaker 1>have described as genuine mismanagement of the crisis from the

0:11:02.276 --> 0:11:04.756
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the government, and in light of the fact

0:11:04.756 --> 0:11:07.756
<v Speaker 1>that this is, you know, almost certainly the most significant

0:11:07.836 --> 0:11:11.556
<v Speaker 1>threat to the country that Chi Jinping has faced during

0:11:11.596 --> 0:11:14.356
<v Speaker 1>his entire time in office. What do you think are

0:11:14.436 --> 0:11:19.716
<v Speaker 1>likely to be the longer term consequences for his relatively

0:11:20.436 --> 0:11:27.036
<v Speaker 1>still young transformation of the political codes of the country. Well,

0:11:27.196 --> 0:11:29.716
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say it depends, but it sort of

0:11:30.236 --> 0:11:32.676
<v Speaker 1>depends on how quickly we can pull out of this.

0:11:33.036 --> 0:11:36.236
<v Speaker 1>It's like the government has sort of put the patient

0:11:36.356 --> 0:11:39.116
<v Speaker 1>in a coma to try to solve the illness, and

0:11:39.156 --> 0:11:40.396
<v Speaker 1>now I was going to try to pull it out

0:11:40.396 --> 0:11:43.036
<v Speaker 1>of the coma. And if that works and the illness

0:11:42.836 --> 0:11:47.396
<v Speaker 1>is cured literally and metaphorically, then I think the government

0:11:47.396 --> 0:11:50.196
<v Speaker 1>can still say it was a big success. You know,

0:11:50.276 --> 0:11:53.196
<v Speaker 1>we took firm, resolute measures, and it was difficult. And

0:11:53.316 --> 0:11:55.516
<v Speaker 1>GDP's taken a hit and probably will be you know,

0:11:55.596 --> 0:11:57.676
<v Speaker 1>zero in the first quarter or something like that, but

0:11:58.356 --> 0:12:01.196
<v Speaker 1>this was a difficult situation. It was a national crisis,

0:12:01.196 --> 0:12:02.436
<v Speaker 1>and we did the right thing and so on and

0:12:02.516 --> 0:12:05.836
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But if this goes on, and if we

0:12:05.956 --> 0:12:08.996
<v Speaker 1>do indeed have another wave of cases, which a lot

0:12:08.996 --> 0:12:11.636
<v Speaker 1>of people are expecting as the country gets back to work,

0:12:11.956 --> 0:12:14.436
<v Speaker 1>and if there's maybe another wave again in the autumn,

0:12:14.476 --> 0:12:17.996
<v Speaker 1>which is sometimes a possibility in these patterns, and the

0:12:18.076 --> 0:12:20.916
<v Speaker 1>numbers keep going up and up and up, I think

0:12:20.956 --> 0:12:24.116
<v Speaker 1>it will be hard for this to not be seen

0:12:24.436 --> 0:12:28.636
<v Speaker 1>as another really major crisis. The memory of the SARS

0:12:28.716 --> 0:12:30.956
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand and two and two thousand and

0:12:30.996 --> 0:12:34.996
<v Speaker 1>three is still surprisingly fresh for people who were saying

0:12:35.676 --> 0:12:39.916
<v Speaker 1>over thirty or thirty five years of age, people still

0:12:39.916 --> 0:12:42.636
<v Speaker 1>refer to it all the time, and that it wasn't

0:12:42.636 --> 0:12:45.956
<v Speaker 1>really handled maybe all that well. So I wonder whether

0:12:45.996 --> 0:12:47.436
<v Speaker 1>this isn't going to be another one. In fact, I

0:12:47.476 --> 0:12:49.076
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be hard for it not to

0:12:49.116 --> 0:12:52.396
<v Speaker 1>be a case like that, unless this turns into some

0:12:52.556 --> 0:12:56.876
<v Speaker 1>full blown real disaster or with tens of thousands of

0:12:56.956 --> 0:12:59.716
<v Speaker 1>people dead or something. I don't think this is going

0:12:59.796 --> 0:13:02.916
<v Speaker 1>to be a Chernobyl type event, which is the other

0:13:02.996 --> 0:13:07.316
<v Speaker 1>scenario that people look at. It's amazing how the government

0:13:07.356 --> 0:13:10.556
<v Speaker 1>can control these narratives. Thirty one years ago there was

0:13:10.596 --> 0:13:14.596
<v Speaker 1>a Channeman Square crackdown when hundreds and hundreds of people

0:13:14.596 --> 0:13:16.556
<v Speaker 1>were gunned down to death in the center of Beijing.

0:13:16.916 --> 0:13:20.156
<v Speaker 1>The government came out of that wounded and damaged, but

0:13:20.276 --> 0:13:22.636
<v Speaker 1>still okay, and was able to keep control. I think

0:13:23.276 --> 0:13:26.396
<v Speaker 1>one always has to be careful in China about saying

0:13:26.476 --> 0:13:29.196
<v Speaker 1>this is a turning point that will shake people's faith

0:13:29.196 --> 0:13:33.956
<v Speaker 1>in the system. People's stability to believe in the system again,

0:13:34.076 --> 0:13:38.916
<v Speaker 1>just like in any country, is amazingly resilient. So I'm

0:13:38.916 --> 0:13:41.156
<v Speaker 1>hesitant to say that this will be a turning point

0:13:41.236 --> 0:13:44.636
<v Speaker 1>or shake thing. So what you say it makes enormous sense,

0:13:44.796 --> 0:13:48.036
<v Speaker 1>especially with respect to the overall system of Communist Party rule.

0:13:48.116 --> 0:13:50.236
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm wondering about is whether, at just

0:13:50.316 --> 0:13:52.796
<v Speaker 1>a more micro level it might have an effect on

0:13:53.276 --> 0:13:57.396
<v Speaker 1>Shijun Ping's own bid to say, remain in power you

0:13:57.596 --> 0:14:00.516
<v Speaker 1>much longer than his predecessors have done. Do you see

0:14:00.516 --> 0:14:04.476
<v Speaker 1>it having a micro effect on those internal party developments

0:14:04.476 --> 0:14:08.356
<v Speaker 1>and debates. I think it can. I think the problem

0:14:08.876 --> 0:14:12.956
<v Speaker 1>with is that he hasn't also really handled this very well.

0:14:12.996 --> 0:14:16.556
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is I'm not trying to project

0:14:16.556 --> 0:14:19.276
<v Speaker 1>what I think a Western politician would have or should

0:14:19.276 --> 0:14:20.996
<v Speaker 1>have done in this case, in other words, that they

0:14:21.036 --> 0:14:24.516
<v Speaker 1>should be out glad handing people or visiting all the

0:14:24.556 --> 0:14:29.636
<v Speaker 1>emergency wars and so on. But the only visibility that

0:14:29.676 --> 0:14:33.436
<v Speaker 1>he's shown at all was to go to one neighborhood

0:14:33.596 --> 0:14:36.116
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing, which is not badly affected at all. The

0:14:36.156 --> 0:14:39.516
<v Speaker 1>city and the neighborhood is not particularly affected, so that

0:14:39.836 --> 0:14:45.716
<v Speaker 1>is not much visibility. He's made speeches and said sort

0:14:45.716 --> 0:14:47.396
<v Speaker 1>of the right thing. He recently said that this was

0:14:47.436 --> 0:14:52.236
<v Speaker 1>a grave and serious crisis to the country. But he's

0:14:52.316 --> 0:14:54.636
<v Speaker 1>normally at the forefront of these kind of big things,

0:14:54.636 --> 0:14:58.596
<v Speaker 1>and it looks, I think even for casual viewers, it

0:14:58.636 --> 0:15:03.036
<v Speaker 1>looks as if he's not willing to take responsibility because

0:15:03.036 --> 0:15:05.756
<v Speaker 1>it is such a problem, and he's let the premier,

0:15:06.196 --> 0:15:08.996
<v Speaker 1>who is supposed to be in charge of the leavers

0:15:09.116 --> 0:15:12.396
<v Speaker 1>of the actual bureaucracy and government, he's let him take

0:15:12.396 --> 0:15:14.916
<v Speaker 1>a greater role. Although even he hasn't been really out

0:15:14.916 --> 0:15:17.796
<v Speaker 1>there every day. So I guess there are different models

0:15:17.796 --> 0:15:20.836
<v Speaker 1>of authoritarian rule. There's a sort of Putin model, which

0:15:20.956 --> 0:15:24.476
<v Speaker 1>is he's you be out there probably on talk shows

0:15:24.516 --> 0:15:28.596
<v Speaker 1>and fielding questions and stuff like that. Teaching thing would

0:15:28.596 --> 0:15:31.076
<v Speaker 1>never be like that anyway, but he's been, I think,

0:15:31.156 --> 0:15:35.716
<v Speaker 1>quite noticeably absent from the day to day managing of

0:15:35.756 --> 0:15:39.716
<v Speaker 1>a crisis. One story that's gotten a fair amount of

0:15:39.756 --> 0:15:44.316
<v Speaker 1>coverage outside of China is the Chinese government's decision to

0:15:44.596 --> 0:15:49.516
<v Speaker 1>expel three journalists associated with the Wall Street Journal in

0:15:49.636 --> 0:15:55.556
<v Speaker 1>retaliation for the headline of an op ed editorial piece.

0:15:55.956 --> 0:16:00.276
<v Speaker 1>The headline referred to China as the sick man of Asia,

0:16:00.516 --> 0:16:03.996
<v Speaker 1>a reference to a nineteenth century formulation that was actually

0:16:04.196 --> 0:16:07.076
<v Speaker 1>mostly used about Turkey in the nineteenth century, although I

0:16:07.156 --> 0:16:10.196
<v Speaker 1>learned in this context it was also sometimes said about China.

0:16:10.356 --> 0:16:12.916
<v Speaker 1>My first question is, are you surprised by the government's

0:16:12.916 --> 0:16:15.716
<v Speaker 1>decision to do that? Well, I am surprised. You know,

0:16:15.756 --> 0:16:17.876
<v Speaker 1>I could see where they would expel perhaps one person,

0:16:17.916 --> 0:16:20.876
<v Speaker 1>but three seems a lot. It must also be tied

0:16:20.916 --> 0:16:25.476
<v Speaker 1>to the State Department's decision to declare Chinese media companies

0:16:25.476 --> 0:16:28.596
<v Speaker 1>to be the agents of foreign influence or something like that,

0:16:28.596 --> 0:16:31.996
<v Speaker 1>that they're essentially working for the state, which is accurate,

0:16:32.276 --> 0:16:34.876
<v Speaker 1>but that that was sort of maybe in Chinese do

0:16:34.996 --> 0:16:37.836
<v Speaker 1>a provocation or throwing the gauntlet down, and so they

0:16:37.876 --> 0:16:39.516
<v Speaker 1>had to say something. So I think the number of

0:16:39.516 --> 0:16:42.436
<v Speaker 1>people probably went up from one to three. The government

0:16:42.476 --> 0:16:45.356
<v Speaker 1>had been asking for several days for some sort of

0:16:45.396 --> 0:16:49.356
<v Speaker 1>an apology, the people in the journal even before the expulsion,

0:16:49.916 --> 0:16:53.036
<v Speaker 1>the people on the news side of it, the reporters

0:16:53.036 --> 0:16:55.076
<v Speaker 1>in the bureau, many people were sort of appalled at it.

0:16:55.716 --> 0:16:59.236
<v Speaker 1>So I think that it was something that the government

0:16:59.276 --> 0:17:01.236
<v Speaker 1>probably felt it had to do something not to be

0:17:01.276 --> 0:17:03.156
<v Speaker 1>sort of a conspiracy theorist, because this is sort of

0:17:03.196 --> 0:17:05.756
<v Speaker 1>hard to prove this, but I think this also plays

0:17:05.956 --> 0:17:08.676
<v Speaker 1>wonderfully into the government's narrative. I mean, this was something

0:17:08.716 --> 0:17:12.076
<v Speaker 1>that they could blast out on social media. I don't

0:17:12.076 --> 0:17:14.836
<v Speaker 1>think this term sick man of Asia. It was to

0:17:14.916 --> 0:17:17.916
<v Speaker 1>me sort of a face plant, a grown sort of like, Oh,

0:17:17.996 --> 0:17:22.356
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe they did that headline. I mean, I

0:17:22.756 --> 0:17:25.236
<v Speaker 1>worked the Walsta Journal for many years. I know the

0:17:25.876 --> 0:17:28.996
<v Speaker 1>opinion page very well, and they like to provoke. They

0:17:29.076 --> 0:17:32.596
<v Speaker 1>like to make people to get up and notice something,

0:17:32.676 --> 0:17:34.876
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not atypical for them. But when I

0:17:34.916 --> 0:17:37.116
<v Speaker 1>saw that, I was okay. So I was a little shocked,

0:17:37.116 --> 0:17:40.556
<v Speaker 1>but I was even more shocked by the government's reaction.

0:17:40.596 --> 0:17:42.636
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a nice way for them to

0:17:43.756 --> 0:17:46.476
<v Speaker 1>shift attention away from the crisis and be able to

0:17:46.756 --> 0:17:50.196
<v Speaker 1>blame a foreign country for kicking China while it's down

0:17:50.316 --> 0:17:53.916
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. I think it's this outrage has

0:17:53.956 --> 0:17:58.596
<v Speaker 1>been really fomented by the government and probably they're quite

0:17:58.636 --> 0:18:00.316
<v Speaker 1>happy for this sort of thing. And this might also

0:18:00.356 --> 0:18:04.396
<v Speaker 1>be a precursor of a strategy in the future if

0:18:04.396 --> 0:18:06.476
<v Speaker 1>the crisis spins out of control and we feel a

0:18:06.516 --> 0:18:10.636
<v Speaker 1>need to somehow sort of divert attention and blame foreigners, etc.

0:18:11.876 --> 0:18:15.076
<v Speaker 1>Going back to your face palm reaction. Was your reaction

0:18:15.116 --> 0:18:17.236
<v Speaker 1>because you thought to yourself, Oh, my goodness, this is

0:18:17.236 --> 0:18:21.516
<v Speaker 1>going to make the Chinese government crazy? Or was your reaction? Boy,

0:18:21.636 --> 0:18:24.996
<v Speaker 1>that's actually kind of offensive, because, as I discovered after

0:18:25.036 --> 0:18:27.956
<v Speaker 1>a little poll of my friends and family. Most people

0:18:27.996 --> 0:18:30.836
<v Speaker 1>are not going to get their reference to, you know,

0:18:30.996 --> 0:18:34.876
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century European treatment of the Ottoman Empire, and so

0:18:34.996 --> 0:18:37.156
<v Speaker 1>most people are just going to see it as a

0:18:37.276 --> 0:18:40.676
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, almost quasi racist statement that China

0:18:40.796 --> 0:18:44.556
<v Speaker 1>is sick in some way because of the coronavirus. Well,

0:18:44.636 --> 0:18:47.396
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first of all, my face plant failing was like,

0:18:47.436 --> 0:18:50.236
<v Speaker 1>this is a stupid cliche. I can't believe they're using that.

0:18:51.476 --> 0:18:55.316
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think when countries are down. Historically,

0:18:55.316 --> 0:19:00.076
<v Speaker 1>when they've been down, they often look to analogies to

0:19:00.156 --> 0:19:02.436
<v Speaker 1>the human body. You know, if you go back to

0:19:02.436 --> 0:19:04.796
<v Speaker 1>say Germany in the mid nineteenth century, there was this

0:19:05.596 --> 0:19:10.356
<v Speaker 1>movement among nationalists who wanted to unite Germany to literally

0:19:10.556 --> 0:19:15.276
<v Speaker 1>improve the physical strength of people to get out there

0:19:15.316 --> 0:19:19.716
<v Speaker 1>and climb mountains and do outdoors activities and things like that,

0:19:20.156 --> 0:19:23.316
<v Speaker 1>to strengthen the physical body of the people, and that

0:19:23.316 --> 0:19:28.676
<v Speaker 1>would strengthen the body politic and the national character and

0:19:28.756 --> 0:19:30.756
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. And so I think it

0:19:30.836 --> 0:19:33.396
<v Speaker 1>is sort of on a deeper level, it is sort

0:19:33.396 --> 0:19:35.996
<v Speaker 1>of insulting to people to imply that their country is

0:19:36.036 --> 0:19:39.956
<v Speaker 1>sick and that it has some sort of fundamental illness.

0:19:40.716 --> 0:19:43.276
<v Speaker 1>I know, the article itself didn't make that the case

0:19:43.316 --> 0:19:44.876
<v Speaker 1>exactly like that. It was saying there was something wrong

0:19:44.916 --> 0:19:48.196
<v Speaker 1>with the political system. But you can see where people

0:19:48.276 --> 0:19:51.116
<v Speaker 1>might take it if they're not really reading the article anyway,

0:19:51.116 --> 0:19:53.356
<v Speaker 1>and they're just reading this stuff on social media third

0:19:53.356 --> 0:19:55.276
<v Speaker 1>hand and fourth hand and so on and so forth,

0:19:56.316 --> 0:19:58.516
<v Speaker 1>that they would say, hey, you know, China is not sick.

0:19:59.076 --> 0:20:01.396
<v Speaker 1>And the whole story the columnist party is pushed over

0:20:01.436 --> 0:20:03.636
<v Speaker 1>the past seven years is that the Chinese people have

0:20:03.796 --> 0:20:07.116
<v Speaker 1>stood up. That's what Mao said in nineteen forty nine

0:20:07.596 --> 0:20:10.596
<v Speaker 1>at think Dat of Heavenly Peace in downtown Beijing. This

0:20:10.636 --> 0:20:13.436
<v Speaker 1>is his famous of saying at the founding the People's Republic,

0:20:13.476 --> 0:20:15.796
<v Speaker 1>we've stood up. We're on our own two feet. And

0:20:15.796 --> 0:20:17.996
<v Speaker 1>then a few years later they fight the US to

0:20:18.076 --> 0:20:21.036
<v Speaker 1>a down still in the Korean War. So now to

0:20:21.076 --> 0:20:24.516
<v Speaker 1>sort of imply that China is weak and sick, it

0:20:24.756 --> 0:20:28.836
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a provocation to many people. So

0:20:28.876 --> 0:20:33.436
<v Speaker 1>before the coronavirus story came to dominate your coverage and

0:20:33.796 --> 0:20:38.076
<v Speaker 1>the West's consumption of news about China, you were doing

0:20:38.196 --> 0:20:42.716
<v Speaker 1>amazing work in explaining the complexities of the Hong Kong

0:20:43.196 --> 0:20:46.676
<v Speaker 1>protests to the rest of us, and I was following

0:20:46.716 --> 0:20:49.676
<v Speaker 1>your coverage of that extremely closely, and in fact, when

0:20:50.436 --> 0:20:52.996
<v Speaker 1>my producer Lydia Jina first reached out to you, we thought, well,

0:20:53.036 --> 0:20:56.476
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to Ian about Hong Kong. Presumably Hong Kong

0:20:56.556 --> 0:20:58.516
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to undergo the same kind of

0:20:58.556 --> 0:21:01.596
<v Speaker 1>nobody in the streets, nobody talking to each other, shelter

0:21:01.676 --> 0:21:06.236
<v Speaker 1>in place arrangement as other major cities in China have

0:21:06.276 --> 0:21:09.596
<v Speaker 1>been undergoing. What is that going to do to the

0:21:09.676 --> 0:21:13.916
<v Speaker 1>protest movement that otherwise was sort of continuing. Well, I

0:21:13.916 --> 0:21:16.276
<v Speaker 1>think in the short term, this, of course will make

0:21:16.316 --> 0:21:18.396
<v Speaker 1>it hard to have protests if you're not allowed to

0:21:18.396 --> 0:21:20.956
<v Speaker 1>be out on the streets. But I think it feeds

0:21:21.076 --> 0:21:23.356
<v Speaker 1>much more strongly, much more importantly. I think it feeds

0:21:23.356 --> 0:21:26.276
<v Speaker 1>into this overall feeling that we don't want to be

0:21:26.396 --> 0:21:31.356
<v Speaker 1>part of this governing system which is sort of not

0:21:31.476 --> 0:21:33.276
<v Speaker 1>on our level. I mean, I think there's this feeling

0:21:33.276 --> 0:21:36.076
<v Speaker 1>among Hong Kong people at some basic level that we're

0:21:36.196 --> 0:21:40.796
<v Speaker 1>much more advanced. We've got a modern, functioning, cosmopolitan city

0:21:40.836 --> 0:21:43.396
<v Speaker 1>that we built. Yes, it was a British colony, but

0:21:43.436 --> 0:21:46.396
<v Speaker 1>we Hong Kong people, we built the city. These are

0:21:46.556 --> 0:21:51.236
<v Speaker 1>our freedoms and so on, and we don't want to

0:21:51.236 --> 0:21:53.156
<v Speaker 1>lose this, and we don't want to be part of

0:21:53.196 --> 0:21:55.516
<v Speaker 1>this sort of messed up system north of the border

0:21:55.996 --> 0:22:00.396
<v Speaker 1>that isn't able to handle a public health emergency without

0:22:00.436 --> 0:22:04.516
<v Speaker 1>having a giant conniption fit that you know, has all

0:22:04.516 --> 0:22:06.116
<v Speaker 1>these other problems. So I think they're going to look

0:22:06.156 --> 0:22:09.556
<v Speaker 1>at this as further proof of the incompatibility of Hong

0:22:09.596 --> 0:22:13.716
<v Speaker 1>Kong with the mainland, and when people in the mainland

0:22:13.716 --> 0:22:16.116
<v Speaker 1>get frustrated about those people south of the board are

0:22:16.156 --> 0:22:21.436
<v Speaker 1>protesting all the time, those uppity, no good Hong Kong people, great,

0:22:22.076 --> 0:22:24.676
<v Speaker 1>thankless Hong kongress. One of the first things people in

0:22:24.716 --> 0:22:26.716
<v Speaker 1>the mainland say is let's just cut off the water

0:22:26.716 --> 0:22:29.796
<v Speaker 1>supply and see how long that works, or the food

0:22:29.836 --> 0:22:32.716
<v Speaker 1>supply and so on and so forth. So you know,

0:22:32.716 --> 0:22:35.516
<v Speaker 1>the two places are really closely linked, of course, and

0:22:36.116 --> 0:22:38.436
<v Speaker 1>of course we all are, and Hong Kong's just going

0:22:38.516 --> 0:22:40.956
<v Speaker 1>to catch this earlier. But we're seeing this spread to

0:22:41.036 --> 0:22:47.516
<v Speaker 1>other neighboring countries South Korea, obviously, Japan. This shows probably

0:22:47.556 --> 0:22:49.476
<v Speaker 1>the well, it'll make it hard for people in Hong

0:22:49.516 --> 0:22:52.076
<v Speaker 1>Kong to avoid what's going on. No matter how much

0:22:52.116 --> 0:22:55.716
<v Speaker 1>they want to independent of the virus, was it your

0:22:55.756 --> 0:23:00.796
<v Speaker 1>sense that the protests were losing steam or that they

0:23:00.796 --> 0:23:04.316
<v Speaker 1>had just sort of entered a phase of institutionalization where

0:23:04.756 --> 0:23:07.076
<v Speaker 1>people were accustomed to them and working around them to

0:23:07.116 --> 0:23:08.356
<v Speaker 1>the extent that they could, and they were going to

0:23:08.436 --> 0:23:12.916
<v Speaker 1>remain a challenging facet of life. We've had a series

0:23:12.916 --> 0:23:15.196
<v Speaker 1>of protests over the past say ten years. They come,

0:23:15.276 --> 0:23:17.596
<v Speaker 1>they go, they come, they go, but they seem to

0:23:17.716 --> 0:23:20.116
<v Speaker 1>just it SEMs like a roller coaster ride, but maybe

0:23:20.116 --> 0:23:24.556
<v Speaker 1>where the altitude keeps increasing, so you're just you are

0:23:24.876 --> 0:23:27.356
<v Speaker 1>dipping down a little bit, but you go up to

0:23:27.396 --> 0:23:28.996
<v Speaker 1>newer highs. You go down a little bit, but you

0:23:29.036 --> 0:23:32.036
<v Speaker 1>go up again. And I think we might see that again,

0:23:32.516 --> 0:23:35.796
<v Speaker 1>maybe after the coronavirus ends, if there's no end to

0:23:35.836 --> 0:23:40.036
<v Speaker 1>the political crisis, if there's no accommodation from the side

0:23:40.076 --> 0:23:43.836
<v Speaker 1>of Beijing, that will probably see a new wave of protests,

0:23:44.636 --> 0:23:48.356
<v Speaker 1>perhaps later this year or next year. Last question for

0:23:48.396 --> 0:23:51.516
<v Speaker 1>you in I know you go back and forth frequently

0:23:52.116 --> 0:23:55.636
<v Speaker 1>between Beijing and London. Can you still do that? What

0:23:55.876 --> 0:23:57.596
<v Speaker 1>will happen to you when you go to London? Are

0:23:57.636 --> 0:23:59.316
<v Speaker 1>you allowed to fight to London? You have to stay

0:23:59.316 --> 0:24:01.596
<v Speaker 1>in quarantine. You know what's going to happen. Well, I

0:24:01.596 --> 0:24:04.276
<v Speaker 1>am planning to go to London. There's no, for example,

0:24:04.276 --> 0:24:07.276
<v Speaker 1>British Airway flights, but there is Air China, which is

0:24:07.316 --> 0:24:10.316
<v Speaker 1>the national carrier and probably a great financial loss, is

0:24:10.316 --> 0:24:14.316
<v Speaker 1>still flying to countries around the world. So I still

0:24:14.356 --> 0:24:19.076
<v Speaker 1>have an Air China flight booked, and unless things change dramatically,

0:24:19.636 --> 0:24:22.036
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll be out of here. But yeah, I'm

0:24:22.036 --> 0:24:25.316
<v Speaker 1>going to self quarantine myself. I have a family member

0:24:25.316 --> 0:24:27.316
<v Speaker 1>on the outskirts of London who has a big country

0:24:27.316 --> 0:24:29.236
<v Speaker 1>house and has given me a wing of the place

0:24:29.796 --> 0:24:31.876
<v Speaker 1>and just said you can just hang out there for

0:24:31.916 --> 0:24:34.196
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. And so I'm going to do that and

0:24:34.276 --> 0:24:38.036
<v Speaker 1>go for walks in the English countryside and do writing

0:24:38.036 --> 0:24:39.996
<v Speaker 1>on my computer and so on, and then I'll be

0:24:40.716 --> 0:24:42.596
<v Speaker 1>clean and then I'll come back to China again in

0:24:42.636 --> 0:24:44.436
<v Speaker 1>a few months when I can get more work done,

0:24:44.476 --> 0:24:46.636
<v Speaker 1>because basically the problem here is it's really hard to

0:24:46.676 --> 0:24:49.156
<v Speaker 1>do any research, to go out and talk to people

0:24:49.716 --> 0:24:52.916
<v Speaker 1>because the country is in such lockdown. Well, I hope

0:24:52.916 --> 0:24:56.436
<v Speaker 1>you're extended English country weekend with your own wing of

0:24:56.516 --> 0:24:59.516
<v Speaker 1>the house is an enjoyable one, but more importantly, and

0:24:59.796 --> 0:25:03.156
<v Speaker 1>I hope you stay healthy and well yourself. And thank

0:25:03.156 --> 0:25:04.996
<v Speaker 1>you for speaking to me, and thank you for your

0:25:04.996 --> 0:25:09.476
<v Speaker 1>steady stream of insightful analysis of events in China. Bye,

0:25:09.476 --> 0:25:11.276
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you very much. It's been a pleasure.

0:25:17.596 --> 0:25:20.036
<v Speaker 1>We caught up with Ian when he had just returned

0:25:20.076 --> 0:25:23.516
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. Here's what he says. Yes, I've arrived

0:25:23.556 --> 0:25:26.876
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. It was shockingly easy. I thought a

0:25:26.916 --> 0:25:30.076
<v Speaker 1>guard's regiment might forcibly take our temperature, or at least

0:25:30.076 --> 0:25:32.436
<v Speaker 1>ask of our contact information in case someone had to

0:25:32.476 --> 0:25:35.236
<v Speaker 1>track down those who had contact with an infected person.

0:25:35.516 --> 0:25:38.716
<v Speaker 1>But nothing of the sort happened. I arrived when through

0:25:38.716 --> 0:25:41.596
<v Speaker 1>an automated passport control and was in a car in

0:25:41.636 --> 0:25:45.076
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. Now that's a little bit upsetting. If

0:25:45.076 --> 0:25:47.436
<v Speaker 1>that's how you traveled from China to the UK right now,

0:25:48.316 --> 0:25:51.516
<v Speaker 1>that may have consequences for the rest of the world. Ian, however,

0:25:51.756 --> 0:25:54.396
<v Speaker 1>is a good citizen and a good sport. He's now

0:25:54.436 --> 0:25:57.356
<v Speaker 1>in the empty wing of his relatives country home south

0:25:57.356 --> 0:26:00.276
<v Speaker 1>of London. He's going for long walks through the English

0:26:00.276 --> 0:26:04.876
<v Speaker 1>countryside while avoiding pubs, swimming pools and any other place

0:26:05.116 --> 0:26:08.756
<v Speaker 1>where people congregate. It's nice work. If you can get it.

0:26:09.596 --> 0:26:12.156
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with this week's playback in just a moment,

0:26:13.236 --> 0:26:21.276
<v Speaker 1>and now our playback. That's the sound of clapping in Doha,

0:26:21.436 --> 0:26:24.436
<v Speaker 1>the capital of Qatar, where a representative of the US

0:26:24.516 --> 0:26:28.636
<v Speaker 1>government and a representative of the Afghan Taliban signed a

0:26:28.716 --> 0:26:33.636
<v Speaker 1>peace agreement this weekend. The clapping notwithstanding, this is an

0:26:33.636 --> 0:26:38.556
<v Speaker 1>agreement that's already facing very significant challenges, and those challenges

0:26:38.596 --> 0:26:42.676
<v Speaker 1>are only going to get greater. To understand why, you

0:26:42.716 --> 0:26:45.916
<v Speaker 1>have to begin with a painful fact about the nearly

0:26:45.956 --> 0:26:51.516
<v Speaker 1>twenty year US engagement in Afghanistan. By any ordinary military standard,

0:26:51.836 --> 0:26:56.436
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately looks like a defeat. It didn't start that way.

0:26:56.636 --> 0:26:59.596
<v Speaker 1>When the United States first came into Afghanistan, it very

0:26:59.676 --> 0:27:03.636
<v Speaker 1>effectively and very rapidly made the Taliban leave the country,

0:27:03.916 --> 0:27:07.756
<v Speaker 1>and that, after all, was the initial reason for the invasion.

0:27:08.116 --> 0:27:10.916
<v Speaker 1>The idea was number one, get rid of the Taliban.

0:27:11.276 --> 0:27:14.116
<v Speaker 1>Number two, catch as many members of Al Qaida as

0:27:14.156 --> 0:27:17.076
<v Speaker 1>it's possible to get our hands on. The trouble was

0:27:17.396 --> 0:27:23.036
<v Speaker 1>that happened almost too quickly, and then gradually imperceptibly over time,

0:27:23.276 --> 0:27:27.796
<v Speaker 1>the US mission in Afghanistan changed. Ultimately, the argument was

0:27:27.916 --> 0:27:30.396
<v Speaker 1>that the United States should make an effort of some

0:27:30.516 --> 0:27:35.596
<v Speaker 1>kind to produce some kind of stable, functioning, quasi democratic

0:27:35.676 --> 0:27:40.076
<v Speaker 1>government in Afghanistan, and yet the government that presently exists

0:27:40.236 --> 0:27:45.236
<v Speaker 1>in the country is very very loosely democratic and only

0:27:45.276 --> 0:27:48.636
<v Speaker 1>stable in the loosest sense of the word. In fact,

0:27:48.796 --> 0:27:53.396
<v Speaker 1>most observers believe that should the United States actually withdraw

0:27:53.476 --> 0:27:56.676
<v Speaker 1>its troops from Afghanistan, as it has promised eventually to

0:27:56.716 --> 0:27:59.356
<v Speaker 1>do in this agreement, that that government would have a

0:27:59.396 --> 0:28:03.796
<v Speaker 1>great deal of trouble, withstanding a serious attack from the

0:28:03.836 --> 0:28:07.196
<v Speaker 1>Taliban now in order to get there, the so called

0:28:07.196 --> 0:28:10.156
<v Speaker 1>agreement between the United States and the talis An Agreement,

0:28:10.156 --> 0:28:13.316
<v Speaker 1>which notably does not yet include Afghanistan as a party,

0:28:14.476 --> 0:28:17.836
<v Speaker 1>says that the Taliban are supposed to negotiate a peace

0:28:17.876 --> 0:28:22.236
<v Speaker 1>with the Afghan government and put down their arms. From there,

0:28:22.396 --> 0:28:25.516
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to move on to an eventual US withdrawal

0:28:25.756 --> 0:28:28.756
<v Speaker 1>of all of its troops. But from the standpoint of

0:28:28.756 --> 0:28:32.596
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban, they don't have any really strong reason to

0:28:32.636 --> 0:28:35.516
<v Speaker 1>put down their arms if it would require them to

0:28:35.556 --> 0:28:38.236
<v Speaker 1>form a compromise with the current government that would not

0:28:38.316 --> 0:28:41.636
<v Speaker 1>be to the Taliban's liking. The reason for that is

0:28:41.636 --> 0:28:43.956
<v Speaker 1>that once the United States has said publicly that it

0:28:43.996 --> 0:28:48.396
<v Speaker 1>intends to leave Afghanistan, its leverage to force the Taliban

0:28:48.476 --> 0:28:51.916
<v Speaker 1>to do anything other than whatever it wants is reduced

0:28:52.196 --> 0:28:55.876
<v Speaker 1>very drastically. After all, all along in this war, the

0:28:55.956 --> 0:28:58.236
<v Speaker 1>only thing the United States has ever been able to

0:28:58.276 --> 0:29:00.356
<v Speaker 1>do when it wanted the Taliban to listen to it

0:29:00.436 --> 0:29:04.316
<v Speaker 1>was to continue to fight the Taliban. That's why, within

0:29:04.396 --> 0:29:08.156
<v Speaker 1>a few days of the initial agreement, the Taliban demanded

0:29:08.236 --> 0:29:10.556
<v Speaker 1>that if the Afghan government wanted to negotiate with it,

0:29:10.756 --> 0:29:14.436
<v Speaker 1>the Afghan government would have to free five thousand Taliban prisoners.

0:29:15.036 --> 0:29:18.036
<v Speaker 1>For their part, the Afghan government is terrified about the

0:29:18.036 --> 0:29:20.916
<v Speaker 1>possibility of an actual US withdrawal, so it's in the

0:29:20.996 --> 0:29:25.836
<v Speaker 1>Afghan government's interest to delay that as long as possible. Consequently,

0:29:26.036 --> 0:29:28.756
<v Speaker 1>the Afghan simply said, we're not handing over the five

0:29:28.796 --> 0:29:31.876
<v Speaker 1>thousand Taliban prisoners, which means that at least as of

0:29:31.996 --> 0:29:34.636
<v Speaker 1>right now, the Taliban on the one hand and the

0:29:34.676 --> 0:29:37.796
<v Speaker 1>government of Afghanistan on the other hand, are not even

0:29:37.876 --> 0:29:42.396
<v Speaker 1>on speaking terms. Technically, without an agreement between them, the

0:29:42.476 --> 0:29:45.676
<v Speaker 1>United States cannot withdraw and therefore the agreement between the

0:29:45.796 --> 0:29:48.516
<v Speaker 1>United States and the Taliban might turn out to be

0:29:48.636 --> 0:29:53.956
<v Speaker 1>more symbolic than actual. Nevertheless, this agreement probably will have

0:29:54.236 --> 0:29:58.316
<v Speaker 1>a major long term consequence, and that long term consequence

0:29:58.516 --> 0:30:03.476
<v Speaker 1>is primarily in the US domestic context. Donald Trump, in

0:30:03.516 --> 0:30:06.916
<v Speaker 1>the run up to a reelection, seems fully prepared to

0:30:06.956 --> 0:30:09.516
<v Speaker 1>do what none of his predecessors were willing to do

0:30:09.996 --> 0:30:14.036
<v Speaker 1>and essentially admit defeat in Afghanistan by agreeing to do

0:30:14.116 --> 0:30:18.156
<v Speaker 1>a deal with the Taliban. Barack Obama was not prepared

0:30:18.196 --> 0:30:20.596
<v Speaker 1>to do that, even in a second term when he

0:30:20.676 --> 0:30:24.196
<v Speaker 1>himself was not running for reelection. George W. Bush wasn't

0:30:24.196 --> 0:30:26.556
<v Speaker 1>prepared to do it in either of his terms as president.

0:30:27.276 --> 0:30:31.676
<v Speaker 1>Both of them ended up owning the American involvement in Afghanistan,

0:30:31.956 --> 0:30:35.356
<v Speaker 1>and the history books will so record. Donald Trump, on

0:30:35.356 --> 0:30:38.956
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, despite to a great extent continuing the

0:30:38.996 --> 0:30:41.796
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration's policies in the first part of his term,

0:30:42.356 --> 0:30:45.876
<v Speaker 1>has actually now signaled a willingness to bite the bullet

0:30:46.156 --> 0:30:48.796
<v Speaker 1>to say that the United States actually must get out,

0:30:49.516 --> 0:30:52.516
<v Speaker 1>and Trump will now carry the historical legacy of the

0:30:52.556 --> 0:30:56.636
<v Speaker 1>willingness to withdraw even if the United States doesn't withdraw

0:30:57.036 --> 0:31:00.796
<v Speaker 1>in either of his potentially two terms in office. I

0:31:00.916 --> 0:31:03.556
<v Speaker 1>hate to say it, but that's actually a major gift

0:31:03.636 --> 0:31:06.396
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump is making to the United States and

0:31:06.636 --> 0:31:10.596
<v Speaker 1>also to a future president, any future president, and it's

0:31:10.636 --> 0:31:12.596
<v Speaker 1>no secret that my view is that it would be

0:31:12.596 --> 0:31:14.836
<v Speaker 1>better for it to be anyone other than Donald Trump.

0:31:14.996 --> 0:31:18.356
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty, we'll be able to continue the Trump

0:31:18.476 --> 0:31:21.156
<v Speaker 1>policy of saying that the United States has signed a

0:31:21.236 --> 0:31:24.756
<v Speaker 1>deal and is prepared to leave the country. That will

0:31:24.796 --> 0:31:27.636
<v Speaker 1>be a tremendous advantage because it will mean that that

0:31:27.756 --> 0:31:30.956
<v Speaker 1>president will not have to say we agreed to lose

0:31:30.956 --> 0:31:34.876
<v Speaker 1>the war on my watch. There is, however, a final coda,

0:31:35.076 --> 0:31:39.156
<v Speaker 1>as there almost always is. No US president is going

0:31:39.196 --> 0:31:42.276
<v Speaker 1>to want to preside over scenes in Kabble that are

0:31:42.316 --> 0:31:46.116
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent of the famous scenes of the US withdrawal from

0:31:46.116 --> 0:31:49.636
<v Speaker 1>Saigon in nineteen seventy five. No one will want to

0:31:49.676 --> 0:31:52.676
<v Speaker 1>be present in the United States with helicopters flying out

0:31:52.716 --> 0:31:56.236
<v Speaker 1>with the last US personnel and tens or hundreds or

0:31:56.396 --> 0:31:59.756
<v Speaker 1>thousands or tens of thousands of Afghans begging to be

0:31:59.836 --> 0:32:04.476
<v Speaker 1>on those helicopters. And yet that scenario is entirely possible

0:32:04.836 --> 0:32:07.836
<v Speaker 1>if the US government ultimately withdraws troops and if the

0:32:07.876 --> 0:32:10.876
<v Speaker 1>Taliban move on the city in a serious military way.

0:32:11.676 --> 0:32:14.636
<v Speaker 1>The agreement does give Donald Trump the flexibility to say that,

0:32:14.716 --> 0:32:18.156
<v Speaker 1>under those circumstances with a Taliban army heading to Cobble,

0:32:18.396 --> 0:32:21.236
<v Speaker 1>that the United States would not withdraw, but it seems

0:32:21.356 --> 0:32:24.516
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that Donald Trump would be willing to do so,

0:32:24.716 --> 0:32:28.396
<v Speaker 1>and to bear even that price. A remarkable consequence of

0:32:28.436 --> 0:32:31.716
<v Speaker 1>Trump's confidence that his base will support him almost no

0:32:31.756 --> 0:32:35.236
<v Speaker 1>matter what his apparent belief that he cannot be made

0:32:35.236 --> 0:32:37.796
<v Speaker 1>to look weak on foreign policy, no matter what his

0:32:37.876 --> 0:32:43.036
<v Speaker 1>actual policies are, and Trump's conviction probably accurate that most Americans,

0:32:43.196 --> 0:32:45.356
<v Speaker 1>even if they would feel bad in the short term

0:32:45.556 --> 0:32:48.436
<v Speaker 1>at such a painful public betrayal of the Afghan people,

0:32:48.716 --> 0:32:52.916
<v Speaker 1>are ultimately tired of this war. The upshot of all

0:32:52.956 --> 0:32:55.436
<v Speaker 1>of this as if the United States will at some

0:32:55.636 --> 0:32:59.236
<v Speaker 1>point find itself with its troops out of Afghanistan, and

0:32:59.316 --> 0:33:03.156
<v Speaker 1>the consequences for the Afghans are likely to be disastrous.

0:33:03.996 --> 0:33:06.236
<v Speaker 1>The Taliban in this piece deal did not say that

0:33:06.276 --> 0:33:09.596
<v Speaker 1>they had embraced democracy, because they haven't. They did not

0:33:09.676 --> 0:33:11.916
<v Speaker 1>say that they now support the education of girls and

0:33:12.036 --> 0:33:16.076
<v Speaker 1>young women, because they don't. They do not commit themselves

0:33:16.116 --> 0:33:19.276
<v Speaker 1>in this agreement to any future course of action other

0:33:19.356 --> 0:33:22.676
<v Speaker 1>than agreeing to talk to the Afghan government, something which

0:33:22.716 --> 0:33:26.276
<v Speaker 1>is already not happening. Ultimately, historians will look back at

0:33:26.316 --> 0:33:29.276
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of the American presence in Afghanistan and wonder

0:33:29.476 --> 0:33:32.716
<v Speaker 1>just how the United States could have gotten itself wrapped

0:33:32.836 --> 0:33:36.796
<v Speaker 1>up in a nearly twenty year war. Why They will

0:33:36.836 --> 0:33:41.156
<v Speaker 1>ask didn't the United States defeat the Taliban, catch Osama

0:33:41.156 --> 0:33:44.076
<v Speaker 1>bin Laden and then turn back to the Taliban and say,

0:33:44.276 --> 0:33:46.516
<v Speaker 1>you know what, if you want to go back to Afghanistan,

0:33:46.756 --> 0:33:48.756
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing we can do about it, and we're not

0:33:48.916 --> 0:33:52.996
<v Speaker 1>going to try and stop you. Real politique will not

0:33:53.196 --> 0:33:56.436
<v Speaker 1>answer the historians question. To make sense of how the

0:33:56.556 --> 0:34:00.676
<v Speaker 1>United States experienced the ultimate mission creep in Afghanistan, will

0:34:00.756 --> 0:34:04.116
<v Speaker 1>have to look back to the context of post September eleventh,

0:34:04.676 --> 0:34:07.436
<v Speaker 1>to the feeling in the Bush administration that the goal

0:34:07.476 --> 0:34:10.756
<v Speaker 1>of the United States should not simply be to try

0:34:10.796 --> 0:34:13.156
<v Speaker 1>to take steps against those who perpetrated the nine to

0:34:13.156 --> 0:34:18.036
<v Speaker 1>eleven attacks, but to bring about generational transformations in the

0:34:18.076 --> 0:34:20.956
<v Speaker 1>countries of the Muslim world so that such attacks would

0:34:20.956 --> 0:34:24.916
<v Speaker 1>never happen again. Those transformations turned out to be well

0:34:25.116 --> 0:34:28.916
<v Speaker 1>beyond the power of United States and probably beyond the

0:34:28.956 --> 0:34:33.476
<v Speaker 1>power of any one country. In retrospect, it all seems

0:34:33.516 --> 0:34:38.396
<v Speaker 1>so painfully obvious. At the time, a derangement syndrome far

0:34:38.596 --> 0:34:42.516
<v Speaker 1>greater than that of trumped arrangement gripped us all, myself included.

0:34:43.196 --> 0:34:46.436
<v Speaker 1>We wanted more because we the United States, thought that

0:34:46.436 --> 0:34:50.796
<v Speaker 1>the trauma we had suffered was unmatched. Unmatched trauma was

0:34:50.836 --> 0:34:55.156
<v Speaker 1>supposed to lead to unmatched realization of new plans for

0:34:55.196 --> 0:34:59.196
<v Speaker 1>a democratic Muslim world. In the end, the only people

0:34:59.196 --> 0:35:02.636
<v Speaker 1>who can make democracies in majority Muslim countries are the

0:35:02.716 --> 0:35:05.956
<v Speaker 1>people who live in those countries, and the American effort

0:35:06.076 --> 0:35:11.276
<v Speaker 1>to create democracies by the sword is definitively a historical failure.

0:35:13.036 --> 0:35:16.036
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:35:16.076 --> 0:35:19.396
<v Speaker 1>producer is Lydia gene Coott, with studio recording by Joseph

0:35:19.436 --> 0:35:23.516
<v Speaker 1>Fridman and mastering by Jason Gambrel and Jason Roskowski. Our

0:35:23.556 --> 0:35:26.956
<v Speaker 1>showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme music is composed by

0:35:27.036 --> 0:35:30.956
<v Speaker 1>Luis Gara. Special thanks to the Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell,

0:35:31.116 --> 0:35:34.756
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm Noah Feldman. You can

0:35:34.796 --> 0:35:38.556
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Noah r Feldman. This is

0:35:38.596 --> 0:35:39.436
<v Speaker 1>deep background