1 00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: This is the Action Network podcast, but this one is good. 2 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:07,760 Speaker 2: We'reout further ado. 3 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 3: That's what the game's all about. 4 00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 2: All of a sudden, you feel like you can't miss. 5 00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 4: I'm up there could make sense if you try that again. Absolutely. 6 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Action Network Podcast NBA Edition. Thanks for 7 00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:34,519 Speaker 2: joining us. I am Matt Moore, NBA Senior writer for 8 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:37,320 Speaker 2: the Action Network, joined as always by Raheem Palmer and 9 00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:41,200 Speaker 2: Brandon Anderson as we bring you this week's final NBA 10 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 2: regular season edition of the NBA Podcast here on the 11 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 2: Action Network Podcast. As a reminder, all of our picks analysis, 12 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 2: everything that you need to know to track your bets 13 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 2: to be up on what's happening in the world sports betting, 14 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,240 Speaker 2: you can find on our award winning app, the Action 15 00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 2: Network App. Download that immediately right now a podcast. Go 16 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 2: download that app if you have not already right now. 17 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 2: Also shout out to bet MGM, the official odds provider 18 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 2: for the Action Network Podcast. On today's show, in our marquee, 19 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 2: Brandon Anderson has been waiting for this for a long time. 20 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,679 Speaker 2: He's put together an exercise based off of March Madness. 21 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 2: The NBA playoffs are here and we are going to 22 00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 2: be the selection committee. If there were not going to 23 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:28,560 Speaker 2: be seatings based off of record, we are going to 24 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:30,959 Speaker 2: be the committee that decides who goes where and who 25 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 2: plays whom. We'll get to that in our marquee. We 26 00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 2: have an extended victory lap segment because it's the end 27 00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 2: of the regular season and I have to give the 28 00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:41,160 Speaker 2: guys time to promote all the things that they got right. 29 00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 2: I have like two so throws that and I believe 30 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 2: the Brandon also has a thanks for nothing. We'll do 31 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 2: all that and more. Let's get kicked off with our marquee. 32 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 4: The marquee. 33 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 2: If you can hear the shutter from the crowd, Brandon 34 00:01:57,240 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 2: take it away, all right? 35 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 4: So, oh, gentlemen, we are the NBA Selection Committee, just 36 00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 4: the three of us, and only the three of us. 37 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:09,839 Speaker 4: We will be determining the entire NBA playoff bracket. We're 38 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:14,360 Speaker 4: choosing sixteen teams and we're tweeting it like the NCAA bracket. 39 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 4: So we're going to pick four number one seeds, for 40 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 4: two seeds for threes, and four fours, so just sixteen, 41 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:23,799 Speaker 4: no planes on this one. And we are not projecting 42 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,400 Speaker 4: how good the team could be. We're not trying to 43 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 4: predict in order who the best team is that will 44 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:31,680 Speaker 4: play itself out. That's what the tournament is for. We 45 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,960 Speaker 4: are rewarding teams for what they've accomplished for this season. 46 00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:37,760 Speaker 4: So however each one of us wants to do that. 47 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:42,639 Speaker 4: You strength, the schedule, RPI and net rating efficiency differentials, 48 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:46,480 Speaker 4: had to have tipe breaks, as Zachlo says, shwarps and 49 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,960 Speaker 4: warps and whatever other aclums you want to go with. 50 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:51,399 Speaker 4: That's up to each of us. We got to argue 51 00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:54,800 Speaker 4: about it, come to consensus. We'll pick the sixteen teams. 52 00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:57,680 Speaker 4: Once we have the four seed lines, we'll throw them 53 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:02,120 Speaker 4: into a bracket. And of course, we are the NCAA. 54 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:06,399 Speaker 4: We would never ever care about setting up fun matchups 55 00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:09,919 Speaker 4: or the money or anything like that. And that's pretty much. 56 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 4: So we're gonna start with the number one overall seed 57 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 4: and then we're just gonna try to fill in our 58 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,959 Speaker 4: lines four seeds at a time and go from there. 59 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,359 Speaker 4: You guys are ready to do it, let's do it. 60 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:22,400 Speaker 2: If you're wondering about how this is actionable. The big 61 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 2: key here is to get a sense for who has 62 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:27,079 Speaker 2: actually had the best season, like who has been strongest 63 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,280 Speaker 2: like that should influence your playoff betting, right, Like if 64 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:32,040 Speaker 2: you're trying to figure out, like what's the difference in 65 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:34,600 Speaker 2: these records, like one team can have a really you 66 00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 2: can game the NBA regular season. I promise you that, 67 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:39,760 Speaker 2: having covered the league as long as I have, you 68 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 2: can absolutely game the NBA regular season and not be 69 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:44,720 Speaker 2: that good of a team. This is gonna tell you 70 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 2: who the actual best teams are, all right, Brandon, I 71 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 2: think we're probably gonna be in agreement on the number 72 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:52,480 Speaker 2: one seed, right. 73 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,440 Speaker 4: I think so? I mean, I think it has to 74 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 4: be the Utah Jazz. The Sons have made a push. 75 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 4: I feel like those are the two possibilities if you 76 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 4: have anyone except the Utah Jazz as your number one 77 00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:04,119 Speaker 4: overall seed. 78 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:08,120 Speaker 5: A the Utah Jazz. So I agree with that. 79 00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 2: Okay, We're we're all set the Utah. Look they've been, 80 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 2: they have wins versus good teams. They have the best 81 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 2: overall record right now. They're likely to hold onto it 82 00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 2: after Phoenix has lost to Golden State on Tuesday. I 83 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 2: don't think that you can make a convincing argument anyone 84 00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 2: deserves it more. I will say, like, I think this 85 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,200 Speaker 2: is super close. I don't think the Jazz are definitively 86 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,720 Speaker 2: the one seed, but if we look at it from 87 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:37,039 Speaker 2: a resume standpoint, the Jazz have the most solid resume 88 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:39,200 Speaker 2: of any team, So I think they got to be 89 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:39,520 Speaker 2: the one. 90 00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 4: Were the Suns of the team you would have considered 91 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 4: when you say it's close, what they have been your 92 00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 4: runner up? 93 00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:47,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, I would have put them that. I would I 94 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 2: think between them and the Suns, it's it's very close, 95 00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:51,920 Speaker 2: because like the big thing with the Suns is, if 96 00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:54,279 Speaker 2: we look at this from a college basketball standpoint, the 97 00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 2: Suns are able to say, look at our record versus 98 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:58,120 Speaker 2: the best teams in the league, look at all the 99 00:04:58,160 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 2: wins that we have the problem with the Suns as 100 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 2: they've tailed off over this last month, Like, we're gonna 101 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 2: have to talk about this next week in our Western 102 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 2: Conference playoff picture. We're doing East on Wednesday and West 103 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 2: on Friday next week for those of you listening, two 104 00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:15,159 Speaker 2: episodes next week reviewing the entire NBA Playoff first round, 105 00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:17,160 Speaker 2: and I'm gonna have to We're gonna have to talk 106 00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:20,600 Speaker 2: about the Suns next week because I have concerns. I 107 00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 2: have concerns I would like to raise about the Suns, 108 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 2: and so I think they have to be number two here. 109 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:28,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, So I think I think if you're going to 110 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 4: argue against the Jazz, it has to be the Suns. 111 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 4: I think the crux of your argument is that the 112 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 4: Suns went three to zero against the Jazz, and if 113 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:38,160 Speaker 4: this were NCAA and you had that had to head, 114 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:41,720 Speaker 4: you certainly would consider it. But I think my takeaway 115 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:44,039 Speaker 4: from the Jazz before we move on, Matt, one of 116 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:45,920 Speaker 4: the stats that you asked, we kind of prepared a 117 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 4: little like cribsheet of some numbers to look at. One 118 00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:50,880 Speaker 4: of the ones you said was the Pythagorean win expectation, 119 00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:54,320 Speaker 4: and it's not surprising to me that the Jazz lead 120 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:58,000 Speaker 4: the league in win expectation. What's surprising is they are 121 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 4: leaps and bounds ahead of every other team. So the 122 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:04,720 Speaker 4: Suns are not second in win expectation. The Suns are 123 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:07,840 Speaker 4: expected to win forty six and a lot of these 124 00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:10,159 Speaker 4: numbers are going to be outdated from last night's games 125 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:12,880 Speaker 4: because it was prepared before that without forty six wins 126 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 4: compared to forty eight in real life. Ther Clippers were 127 00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:19,040 Speaker 4: second at forty seven point four expected wins, the Utah 128 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:23,840 Speaker 4: Jazz fifty five point zero expected wins. That is seven 129 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 4: and a half more expected wins than anyone else. They're 130 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:30,280 Speaker 4: actually five wins under expectations this year, despite still being 131 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 4: the best record in the league, and despite all these 132 00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 4: missing games with Conley and with Mitchell. It just made 133 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:40,040 Speaker 4: me think, geez, the Jazz are really good, and how 134 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:42,880 Speaker 4: much credit do we need to give them? What does 135 00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:45,839 Speaker 4: this regular season strength mean we'll get rest of the 136 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 4: next week. I guess just. 137 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:51,360 Speaker 2: An incredible regular season performance. You can't say enough how 138 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 2: they've played in the regular season. Really, if we're going 139 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:57,760 Speaker 2: to give awards for best regular season performance, we have 140 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:01,520 Speaker 2: to reward the regular season Utah Jazz, all right. 141 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 6: So I think even more impressive is the fact that 142 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:08,000 Speaker 6: they lost Donovan Mitchell for thirteen games, and they lost 143 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 6: they lost Mike Connley for the last eight, and they 144 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:12,120 Speaker 6: haven't tailed off at all. 145 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 5: So I think they get it by far, all right. 146 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:16,560 Speaker 2: So we we're arguing a lot of us and then 147 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 2: we agree on I think we should talk about the 148 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:21,520 Speaker 2: other other one seeds. 149 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 4: So yeah, I think it sounds like we all agree 150 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 4: that the Songs are one of the one seeds. So 151 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 4: we've got the Jazz and the Suns as two of 152 00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:32,560 Speaker 4: the one seeds. So let's talk about let's just each 153 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 4: name who our other two one seeds are and see 154 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 4: where we need to disagree. So, Matt, who are yours? 155 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 4: Besides the Jazz and the Suns. 156 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:43,640 Speaker 2: It's the Bucks and the Clippers. Everyone's going to be 157 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:46,320 Speaker 2: mad about the Nets. Everyone's be mad about the Sixers. 158 00:07:46,760 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 2: But look the Bucks have for me, they check too 159 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:55,280 Speaker 2: many boxes here. If we look at let's start and 160 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:59,119 Speaker 2: take a look at their Pythagorean expectation, they're at fifty 161 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 2: four point two. Only at fifty four point five, he 162 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:03,880 Speaker 2: had all the adjustments. I think for me, the biggest 163 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 2: reason why I kind of lean towards Milwaukee is based 164 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 2: off of if we look at their performance versus the 165 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 2: best teams. You know, the Bucks are eighteen and seventeen 166 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,240 Speaker 2: versus teams five hundred and above. They've been really good 167 00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:19,440 Speaker 2: versus the top teams. They have wins over the Clippers, 168 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,640 Speaker 2: they have wins over the Nets, wins over the Sixers. 169 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 2: They've got all these like marquee wins, right Like, they 170 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,720 Speaker 2: have been absolutely dominant. They also have a top three rating, 171 00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:32,439 Speaker 2: like they just it's the Clipper, it's the Jazz, the 172 00:08:32,440 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 2: Clippers and the Bucks for the top three net rating 173 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,559 Speaker 2: this season. The Bucks have beaten more teams, buy more. 174 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:40,640 Speaker 2: I understand that the Sixers are going to finish with 175 00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 2: a better record. I understand the Nets are the Nets. 176 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:45,600 Speaker 2: The Nets have been too inconsistent. They don't take care 177 00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:51,439 Speaker 2: of business often enough. The Bucks have are our most 178 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 2: solid in most areas. The Clippers, I don't think we 179 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:57,000 Speaker 2: can even argue about their second Empathagorean expectation. They're second 180 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:01,200 Speaker 2: in net rating like the Sixers, the Clippers have to 181 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:05,960 Speaker 2: be in the top four. But I do think that Milwaukee, genuinely, 182 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 2: based off of regular season performance and resume, has put 183 00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:13,800 Speaker 2: together the best the better resume of these teams, even 184 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 2: with the win differential. 185 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 4: So rahiem, do you also have the Clippers and the 186 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:20,160 Speaker 4: Bucks as your other one seeds? 187 00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 6: I actually have the Clippers. I mean, I mean, you 188 00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:25,439 Speaker 6: guys know, I've been high on the Clippers all year. Actually, 189 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:28,280 Speaker 6: I have the Clippers above the Suns because they actually 190 00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:32,400 Speaker 6: have a higher point differential, and in my model, I 191 00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:34,560 Speaker 6: actually have them ranked higher than the Suns, and the 192 00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 6: Suns have really been slipping. I mean when I've used 193 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:40,880 Speaker 6: my post All Star break numbers, they're knife, so that's 194 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 6: how far they've slipped. Now the Bucks I don't agree with, 195 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 6: but I mean I can't really argue too hard because 196 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,559 Speaker 6: I think they are close enough with the Sixers to where. 197 00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:51,160 Speaker 5: I understand it. 198 00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 6: But I mean, this is the team that just gave 199 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:55,439 Speaker 6: up one hundred and forty six points to the Spurs. 200 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 6: This is a team that gave up one hundred and 201 00:09:57,080 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 6: forty one points to the Rockets. 202 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 5: To me, the Sixers are just the better team. I mean, 203 00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 5: the Sixers have dealt with, you know, injuries to both 204 00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:09,640 Speaker 5: Joelle and Be and Ben Simmons, they've had COVID absences, 205 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 5: and they still have a better record. I mean, like 206 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:15,080 Speaker 5: you said, the Sixers are nineteen and sixteen against teams. 207 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 6: Above five hundred. The point differentials is very similar. But 208 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 6: I got to give the nod to the Sixers just 209 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 6: because they have the better record, and also the Books 210 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:26,960 Speaker 6: have taken a slight step back this year. So I'm 211 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:29,280 Speaker 6: you know, maybe it sounds fair for me to you know, 212 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 6: dock them for that, but you know, when this team 213 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 6: is giving up one hundred and forty points to the 214 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:40,200 Speaker 6: Houston Rockets and fifty point games to Kevin Porter, I 215 00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:42,319 Speaker 6: just can't trust this team as a number one seed. 216 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:46,720 Speaker 4: Like, so, yeah, I'm with Raheem on this one. And 217 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 4: I'm surprised myself because we initially talked about doing this 218 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:52,560 Speaker 4: about a month ago, and at the time, I was 219 00:10:52,640 --> 00:10:55,840 Speaker 4: in the hard on the Sixers, being like like seventh 220 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:58,079 Speaker 4: down the list or something like, I have them much lower. 221 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,240 Speaker 4: And as a dug into it, a few things that 222 00:11:01,280 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 4: stood out to me. Their record with Joel Embiid and 223 00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:06,960 Speaker 4: Ben Simmons on the court the season is thirty four 224 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:11,319 Speaker 4: and six. That is really good. That's a lot of wins. 225 00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 4: And I agreed too with what Rahim said that like 226 00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 4: we forget now, but early in the season, like this 227 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 4: team got rocked. They they were playing with like G 228 00:11:20,120 --> 00:11:23,200 Speaker 4: league dudes for multiple games, and I think that we 229 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 4: maybe are underestimating exactly how much that that crushed, like 230 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:29,680 Speaker 4: the overall like the efficiency and the net ratings and 231 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:31,959 Speaker 4: some of those things. Just with a few of those 232 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:34,200 Speaker 4: numbers in there and some of the you know, like 233 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,560 Speaker 4: Tyrese MAXI like, I love him, but in like his 234 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:39,400 Speaker 4: tenth game of the season, he was like leading the 235 00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:44,640 Speaker 4: team in shots and scoring. I just think I don't 236 00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 4: know that I'm still ready yet to say that the 237 00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 4: Bucks are not the better team than the Sixers. The 238 00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 4: Bucks went three and zero against the Sixers. I did 239 00:11:52,320 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 4: my argument against Philadelphia when I was hesitant about them. 240 00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:58,160 Speaker 4: They're all and three against the Bucks. They're all and 241 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 4: two against the Suns, they're alling two against the Nuggets. 242 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,880 Speaker 4: It's you can't read too much off of just those things. 243 00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 4: And who knows who's missing in all those games or whatever. 244 00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 6: I mean, everybody was missing in those games, like literally, 245 00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:13,640 Speaker 6: they didn't they didn't like for any. 246 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,959 Speaker 2: Yeah, funny how that works? Funny how that works? The 247 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 2: Joel Embiid's never on the court when they're facing the 248 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 2: big teams. Always on the floor when they're facing the 249 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 2: Thunder and the Rockets, though, always on the floor when 250 00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:29,880 Speaker 2: they're facing the garbage teams. Oh man, it gott arrest 251 00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:33,440 Speaker 2: him versus Eddie sort of Marquis, what can you do? 252 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 2: Come on for me? 253 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:39,480 Speaker 4: The Bucks would not even be my next choice. I 254 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:42,440 Speaker 4: actually would have the I was choosing between the Sixeries 255 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:46,000 Speaker 4: and the Nets for my last spot here. I think 256 00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:48,640 Speaker 4: that I don't know. I gave a lot of argument 257 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 4: to Okay, what is this team looking like going into 258 00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 4: the tournament? 259 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:52,679 Speaker 2: Now? 260 00:12:52,720 --> 00:12:54,880 Speaker 4: That we know who the players are actually healthy and 261 00:12:54,920 --> 00:12:57,320 Speaker 4: going to be, So I do care about what the 262 00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,440 Speaker 4: record is when they have em Bead and Simmons. I 263 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:01,800 Speaker 4: do care what the record is when hard and plays. 264 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:04,599 Speaker 4: The Bucks have mostly had their guys, And I know 265 00:13:04,679 --> 00:13:08,080 Speaker 4: we're talking about what have you accomplished, but it matters 266 00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 4: like what version of you is going in and I 267 00:13:11,040 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 4: just don't know. At the end of the day, the 268 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:16,640 Speaker 4: Sixers have beat out the Bucks and the Nets at 269 00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:18,960 Speaker 4: the top of the standings, even though they've been missing 270 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:22,040 Speaker 4: this time. Even though they've been missing the guys, I 271 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:24,600 Speaker 4: just have a hard time arguing against them. 272 00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:29,640 Speaker 2: Well, I'm well endo to cave on this. The Bucks 273 00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 2: are eighteen and seventeen versus five hundred and above. The 274 00:13:31,920 --> 00:13:35,840 Speaker 2: Sixers are nineteen and sixteen. More importantly, I just found 275 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:40,000 Speaker 2: this one for cleaning the glass. Versus teams that are 276 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:45,240 Speaker 2: top ten in point differential, the Sixers are eleven and 277 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:48,400 Speaker 2: ten with a minus zero point one point differential. The 278 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 2: Bucks are minus one point zero point differential and ten 279 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:53,880 Speaker 2: and eleven, So they're pretty close. I think that has 280 00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 2: to like Brooklyn is not applicable here. I'm sorry, Like 281 00:13:56,800 --> 00:14:00,800 Speaker 2: you don't get the you don't get to lose as 282 00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 2: many bad games as they have, like at some point, 283 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:05,440 Speaker 2: like taking care of business matters. But I will go 284 00:14:05,440 --> 00:14:08,280 Speaker 2: ahead and cave and we'll give the Sixers, uh, the 285 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 2: one seed. But I am definitely going to be shopping 286 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:13,280 Speaker 2: for an upset later on with the Sixers. So let's 287 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:16,840 Speaker 2: go ahe and move the Sixers up. So we've got Jazz, Suns, Sixers, 288 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 2: and Clippers are one seeds. 289 00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:21,280 Speaker 4: All right, So we've got our one seeds. And then 290 00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 4: the nice thing about this exercise too, I think we 291 00:14:23,440 --> 00:14:25,360 Speaker 4: can just go ahead and lock in the Bucks as 292 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:27,560 Speaker 4: a two seed. Pretty obviously they're going to be on 293 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,560 Speaker 4: that line for us. We've made that argument for them. 294 00:14:31,320 --> 00:14:35,520 Speaker 4: To me. Looking at where we're at, I suspect we're 295 00:14:35,520 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 4: all going to have the Brooklyn nets as a two seed. 296 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:41,200 Speaker 4: Does ever, does anyone not have the nets as a 297 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,280 Speaker 4: clear two seed? Yeah? 298 00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:47,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, I've got there. There are two Sure do we. 299 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:48,640 Speaker 4: Have anything that we all have? 300 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 5: The nuggets? 301 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 3: Right? 302 00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:51,760 Speaker 4: Yeah? The nets and the nuggets I feel like are 303 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:55,680 Speaker 4: the clear choices here unless we're penalizing Jamal Murray being out, 304 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,280 Speaker 4: which I don't think is fair. I have the nets 305 00:14:58,280 --> 00:14:59,640 Speaker 4: and the nuggets Matt, do you have the Nets and 306 00:14:59,680 --> 00:15:01,000 Speaker 4: Nuggets here as well? 307 00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:02,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, so. 308 00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:05,600 Speaker 4: That's the kind of the clear grouping of twos. That 309 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 4: last two seed was an inflection point for me. So 310 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:12,760 Speaker 4: we've got right now, we've got the Bucks, the Nuggets, 311 00:15:12,800 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 4: and the Nuts. Rahiem, who's your final two seed? 312 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 6: I took the Lakers, And for me, it was just 313 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:22,520 Speaker 6: pretty simple. I mean, when I look at my model 314 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:25,840 Speaker 6: and I look at the ratings of teams, I had 315 00:15:25,720 --> 00:15:29,960 Speaker 6: the Lakers around ten to eleventh. But there's no way 316 00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 6: I could, you know, realistically put some of these other 317 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:35,080 Speaker 6: teams above them. I mean, the Lakers, even without Lebron 318 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 6: James and Anthony Davis, they still had a top three defense, 319 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 6: I mean. 320 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:40,240 Speaker 5: And that says it all. 321 00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:43,120 Speaker 6: And then you know, Anthony Davis is back in the lineup, 322 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:46,840 Speaker 6: Lebron is coming back tonight. I know we're not supposed to, 323 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 6: you know, judge teams on you know what they could be. 324 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 6: But Lebron actually played half the season, Anthony Davis played 325 00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 6: half the season, and we got to see them with Lebron, 326 00:15:58,320 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 6: without a d without Lebron, and their defense is still, 327 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:05,520 Speaker 6: you know, one of the best in the league. So 328 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:09,240 Speaker 6: I think they can. I can't realistically put them in 329 00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:12,720 Speaker 6: the third tier of teams when I know their defense 330 00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:15,800 Speaker 6: is capable of making them competitive against those same teams. 331 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:19,360 Speaker 6: So I think they're a step above them. So I 332 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 6: have them as the number two seed. 333 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:25,640 Speaker 2: I do you agree, Yeah, I've gone there too. I 334 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:29,560 Speaker 2: just think a lot of it is based off of 335 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:33,720 Speaker 2: consider this like last stretch of games kind of to 336 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 2: be the conference tournament. That's kind of comparison, right, and 337 00:16:36,760 --> 00:16:40,400 Speaker 2: like they are gaining ground and looking much better. The 338 00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:42,480 Speaker 2: fact that there's still the number one, that there's such 339 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 2: a good defense overall, I think really matters. Like I 340 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:47,200 Speaker 2: think if you're going to look at this and say 341 00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 2: the Lakers despite losing Anthony Davis for a significant chunk 342 00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:53,760 Speaker 2: of the season and Lebron James for a significant significant 343 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 2: chunk of the season, and still have the number one 344 00:16:56,600 --> 00:17:01,840 Speaker 2: defense in the NBA, that's really impressive. And a lot 345 00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:03,600 Speaker 2: of it, for me, honestly, has more to do with 346 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:08,239 Speaker 2: like the resume of the three and four seeds I 347 00:17:08,320 --> 00:17:10,159 Speaker 2: just don't think are as good like that's a lot 348 00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:11,639 Speaker 2: of it is. I think if you look at the 349 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:14,760 Speaker 2: resume of what the Lakers have done their wins when 350 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:16,639 Speaker 2: they are fully healthy. Like this is part of the 351 00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,240 Speaker 2: problem is that you can't. You cannot in this season 352 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:25,120 Speaker 2: in particular, just take the like, well what have they done? 353 00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:29,640 Speaker 2: You can't because it's too long of a season and 354 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:32,840 Speaker 2: it's too that you have to end, especially with the 355 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:35,879 Speaker 2: COVID and everything else. I mean, we also look at 356 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,680 Speaker 2: the Nuggets and Lakers, right, look at the Celtics, look 357 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:40,520 Speaker 2: at what the Heat have been through. Even when look 358 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:42,480 Speaker 2: at what the Nuggets have been through. You know, the Lakers, 359 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:44,560 Speaker 2: we know it's been difficult for those top those final 360 00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:47,120 Speaker 2: four teams. So I'm willing to go ahead and give 361 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:51,320 Speaker 2: the championship pedigree. And also like, look, we're a selection committee. 362 00:17:51,640 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 2: We're a selection committee. 363 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:55,480 Speaker 4: We would never do this. I don't know what sort 364 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 4: of implication you're making. 365 00:17:57,119 --> 00:18:00,399 Speaker 2: And so yeah, like the the big name pro rams 366 00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 2: get the bump. So the Lakers are a two seed. 367 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:06,080 Speaker 4: So let me make the case I have the Lakers 368 00:18:06,119 --> 00:18:07,959 Speaker 4: as my top three seed. I'm not going to win 369 00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:10,040 Speaker 4: this argument, but let me just take one minute and 370 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:12,879 Speaker 4: make the case. My case is for the Dallas Mavericks 371 00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 4: and I think that the Lakers, and I think the 372 00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:18,639 Speaker 4: Lakers and MAVs have pretty similar resumes both of them. 373 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:21,439 Speaker 4: When you look at all of our little Pythagorean and 374 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:25,000 Speaker 4: differentials and net ratings, they both are like ninth and tenth, 375 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 4: neck and neck. Dallas is like slightly ahead and most 376 00:18:27,480 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 4: of them, but they're basically even on all of them. 377 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:32,240 Speaker 4: Dallas has a great offense, but not a good defense. 378 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:34,760 Speaker 4: The Lakers have a great defense, but not a good offense. 379 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:37,439 Speaker 4: Here's a couple of key things that stood out to 380 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:41,439 Speaker 4: me as like they mostly look tied, and so ty 381 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:43,680 Speaker 4: should go to the champs and the Lakers and Lebron. 382 00:18:44,119 --> 00:18:46,760 Speaker 4: Here's the thing that swung the slight tiebreaker for me 383 00:18:46,840 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 4: to pick the MAVs number one, Lakers record with Lebron 384 00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:52,600 Speaker 4: twenty nine and fourteen, and that's the Lakers team we 385 00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:55,640 Speaker 4: should be judging that's good. Twenty nine and fourteen very good. 386 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,920 Speaker 4: The Mavericks record since February third is thirty two and five. 387 00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:03,679 Speaker 4: So basically, if we're willing to throw off the Lakers 388 00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 4: games without Lebron, that shouldn't matter. Shouldn't we also be 389 00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,240 Speaker 4: willing to throw out the early MAVs games when they're struggling, 390 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:11,880 Speaker 4: that shouldn't matter because they're not that anymore. And they're 391 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 4: just as good. Second argument is us, here are the 392 00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:18,880 Speaker 4: Lakers records against all the teams we've chosen so far. 393 00:19:19,240 --> 00:19:21,879 Speaker 4: And I know they haven't had their full guys for 394 00:19:22,240 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 4: all these games, but against the seven teams above them, 395 00:19:25,960 --> 00:19:28,679 Speaker 4: they're own three against the Clippers, on and two against 396 00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:31,320 Speaker 4: the Sixers, one and two against the Jazz, one and 397 00:19:31,359 --> 00:19:33,520 Speaker 4: two against the Suns, one and one against the Nets, 398 00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,359 Speaker 4: and the Bucks. The Lakers don't have a winning record 399 00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:39,440 Speaker 4: against any team that we agree is one of these 400 00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:42,680 Speaker 4: top seven teams. The Mavericks are two and zo against 401 00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:44,840 Speaker 4: the Nets, the Mavericks are two and one against the Nuggets, 402 00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:47,160 Speaker 4: and the MAVs are two and one against the Lakers, 403 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 4: So head to head, I gave it a slight nudge 404 00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:53,639 Speaker 4: in their direction. I'm not going to win the argument, 405 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:55,200 Speaker 4: but am I getting close? 406 00:19:57,440 --> 00:19:58,840 Speaker 2: Yeah? I mean I think you're close. Like I've looked 407 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:00,560 Speaker 2: at some one of these Number two. I was talking 408 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 2: him with a friend last night. The Mavericks, by the way, 409 00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:08,800 Speaker 2: are twenty to one to win the Western Conference. That's 410 00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:11,880 Speaker 2: the like we we'll talk about next week. I could 411 00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 2: make the argument for a path there, depending on which 412 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:16,119 Speaker 2: seed they get. 413 00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:18,720 Speaker 4: Well, and then the bracket Yeah, that's the key. The 414 00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:22,679 Speaker 4: five seed is a huge key there because obviously Denver 415 00:20:22,840 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 4: is not what Denver was. And we've talked about Utah 416 00:20:26,600 --> 00:20:29,520 Speaker 4: all season and so suddenly if you can get past 417 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 4: those two, I think we agree at least winnable matchups. 418 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:34,680 Speaker 4: Now you're in the Western Conference finals and who knows. 419 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:40,640 Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm kind of he's he's kind of I'm 420 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:45,400 Speaker 2: a little swayed here, Rahim, am I what do you think? 421 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 5: See? 422 00:20:49,080 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 6: I think the thing I struggle with is how they 423 00:20:54,760 --> 00:21:00,320 Speaker 6: started the year. But that still counts for me. Yeah, 424 00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:02,239 Speaker 6: And it's just like, I gotta look at the I 425 00:21:02,280 --> 00:21:04,840 Speaker 6: can't just look at this run at their on currently. 426 00:21:06,200 --> 00:21:09,200 Speaker 5: I didn't. Yeah, I still gotta go with the Lakers. 427 00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:09,800 Speaker 5: I'm sorry. 428 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:13,040 Speaker 4: All right, Well, we said, Matt that you are the 429 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:15,399 Speaker 4: selection committee chair, so you got to make the final 430 00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:18,680 Speaker 4: call on this one. I'm willing to concede that the 431 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 4: dollars and eyeballs will will want one of these two 432 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 4: teams in the two seeds. Side I made it really got. 433 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:26,119 Speaker 2: I mean, like, look, here's here's another going back to 434 00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:29,880 Speaker 2: claying the glass. Okay, versus top ten teams in their 435 00:21:29,880 --> 00:21:36,080 Speaker 2: top ten point differential, the Mavericks are third in point 436 00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:38,840 Speaker 2: differential versus those teams with a plus one point four. 437 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:43,159 Speaker 2: They're under five hundred, they're eleven and twelve, but the 438 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:47,680 Speaker 2: Lakers are eight and fifteen straight up versus teams with 439 00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:50,439 Speaker 2: the top ten point differential. I know that Lebron and 440 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:52,280 Speaker 2: ad were out, but at some point it's like you 441 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 2: are what your record says, like you just that's what 442 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:59,000 Speaker 2: you were. And with a with a minus six point 443 00:21:59,280 --> 00:22:01,720 Speaker 2: like the Lakers have a worse point differential versus top 444 00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:03,840 Speaker 2: ten teams in the league than the San Antonio Spurs. 445 00:22:05,040 --> 00:22:06,920 Speaker 5: That is pretty damning. 446 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:10,359 Speaker 4: But are we talking about this season, Spurs? You be 447 00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:12,680 Speaker 4: sure you didn't go back like thirteen years or something, 448 00:22:12,680 --> 00:22:13,240 Speaker 4: oh like that. 449 00:22:13,760 --> 00:22:15,640 Speaker 2: I don't, Man, this is. 450 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 4: Great, this is tough. It feels like we've gotten to 451 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,000 Speaker 4: a similar spot to where we got on the last 452 00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:26,359 Speaker 4: seed lest where I think what we're discovering is I 453 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 4: think that we may have to give the Lakers the 454 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 4: NOD on regular season, like we gave the Sixers of 455 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:33,880 Speaker 4: the NOD. But I think we're discovering that even though 456 00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:36,360 Speaker 4: the Bucks maybe don't belong in that one seed, we're 457 00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:38,680 Speaker 4: seeing some value there. And I feel like we're seeing 458 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:40,240 Speaker 4: some value on the Mavericks here too. 459 00:22:40,359 --> 00:22:42,119 Speaker 2: The Mavericks may be better I think than the Will 460 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:44,840 Speaker 2: we indicate the other reason, I mean, let's go you what, 461 00:22:45,680 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 2: no Thursday night game against the Nets said a lot 462 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:53,280 Speaker 2: about that Mavericks team. Yeah, here's the other thing. I'll say, 463 00:22:54,320 --> 00:22:57,280 Speaker 2: let's go ahead and put Lakers in the two. And 464 00:22:57,320 --> 00:23:01,000 Speaker 2: their reason is the Mavericks are two incomessistant, like they 465 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:03,399 Speaker 2: lost to the Grizzlies last night. Like, I care a 466 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:07,920 Speaker 2: lot about consistency, and the the Mavericks have been really inconsistent. 467 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:10,240 Speaker 2: This is why he keeps telling everybody, don't pen them, 468 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:12,960 Speaker 2: don't put them in pen for that five seed like 469 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:15,320 Speaker 2: they are. They are too, They're already they fall in 470 00:23:15,320 --> 00:23:19,080 Speaker 2: the six as of this recording. Like they do not 471 00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:20,960 Speaker 2: take care of business versus the teams they need to 472 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:24,680 Speaker 2: take care of business against so good and have them 473 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 2: as a top three seed. 474 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:29,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean that's the opposite side of of all 475 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:32,199 Speaker 4: those good ratings against those top teams is they're not 476 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 4: a top team. So why aren't they well? Because they 477 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:36,440 Speaker 4: aren't good against the bad teams and. 478 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:39,440 Speaker 2: Are all right three seeds is probably we're gonna argue 479 00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 2: I think this is where it gets where it. 480 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:42,840 Speaker 4: Gets to Dallas. Dallas I think is in as a 481 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:45,840 Speaker 4: three seed. I think there's one other three seed lock. 482 00:23:46,480 --> 00:23:48,280 Speaker 4: I think that that team is the New York Next. 483 00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:52,080 Speaker 4: When I look at they appear to be definitively the 484 00:23:52,160 --> 00:23:55,199 Speaker 4: tenth best team in the NBA, not more, not less. 485 00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:59,560 Speaker 4: They are perfectly a three seed to me. Raheem and 486 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:02,040 Speaker 4: Matthew guys have the Knicks as a three seed as well. 487 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:05,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean they check all the boxes, right, 488 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:08,760 Speaker 2: Like I think, especially with the offense that they've played 489 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,080 Speaker 2: over the last two months, Like their offense has been good, 490 00:24:11,080 --> 00:24:12,840 Speaker 2: and that's what you wanted to see was Okay, they 491 00:24:12,880 --> 00:24:15,040 Speaker 2: could play defense, but can they actually produce the offense? 492 00:24:15,440 --> 00:24:19,280 Speaker 2: And they have. They're they play in a really brutal 493 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 2: division too. That's a lot of this is they play. 494 00:24:22,560 --> 00:24:25,159 Speaker 2: Think about how many games they play versus the Sixers 495 00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:27,920 Speaker 2: and the Nets, plus the I mean Boston was better 496 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:31,080 Speaker 2: earlier in the season. They're one in one versus them, 497 00:24:31,119 --> 00:24:34,960 Speaker 2: So like there's you and the Raptors are not. We're 498 00:24:34,960 --> 00:24:37,440 Speaker 2: not pushovers for I think two thirds of the year. 499 00:24:37,960 --> 00:24:41,679 Speaker 2: So uh, they they had a really tough schedule. I 500 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:45,200 Speaker 2: think that's that's got to be factored in. I need 501 00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:46,680 Speaker 2: to look at what their what was their SRS. 502 00:24:47,359 --> 00:24:50,359 Speaker 4: Yeah, their tenth and SRS ten differential tenth in that 503 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:53,520 Speaker 4: rating and tenth and Pythagorian. They're literally number ten on 504 00:24:53,600 --> 00:24:54,080 Speaker 4: all of them. 505 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:57,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, so they've got to They've got to be I 506 00:24:57,080 --> 00:25:02,919 Speaker 2: think in a three seeds. So we've got Mavericks and Knicks. Rahim, 507 00:25:02,960 --> 00:25:04,320 Speaker 2: I want to know who your other two third seeds are, 508 00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:05,960 Speaker 2: because I think this is where we're going to disagree. 509 00:25:07,080 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 6: I have the Miami Heat and I have the Atlanta Hawks, Okay, 510 00:25:11,480 --> 00:25:16,880 Speaker 6: And I think the thing is because we're grading. 511 00:25:16,520 --> 00:25:17,879 Speaker 5: These teams against other teams. 512 00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:20,320 Speaker 6: So as much as I said I don't like the Heat, 513 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:22,479 Speaker 6: I like them a lot better than some of the 514 00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:25,080 Speaker 6: other teams in the conference, I mean, in the league. 515 00:25:25,240 --> 00:25:27,000 Speaker 6: And then I'm also giving them a little bit of 516 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,479 Speaker 6: a benefit of the doubt because they've also had, you know, 517 00:25:29,880 --> 00:25:33,440 Speaker 6: issues with COVID and injuries and they've been decimated and 518 00:25:33,680 --> 00:25:36,040 Speaker 6: you know, still after the All Star break, they've been rolling. 519 00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,399 Speaker 6: You know, these these two wins over the Celtics. You know, 520 00:25:39,440 --> 00:25:42,440 Speaker 6: despite how how bad the Celtics started, they've been pretty impressive. 521 00:25:43,359 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 6: You know, I mean, so it's just like I'm giving 522 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:47,480 Speaker 6: them the not there. I think, what are the heat 523 00:25:47,560 --> 00:25:50,280 Speaker 6: They're like twenty and what are they since the All 524 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,560 Speaker 6: Star break? They're twenty and thirteen since All Star break? 525 00:25:52,600 --> 00:25:57,280 Speaker 6: And I think, I wait, performance after the All Star 526 00:25:57,359 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 6: Break is you know, I wait that heavily because just 527 00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:04,440 Speaker 6: because I think this is the time where everybody's making 528 00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:09,040 Speaker 6: a playoff push and if you're playing other playoff teams 529 00:26:09,080 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 6: or teams that are trying to get into the playoffs, 530 00:26:10,560 --> 00:26:14,560 Speaker 6: especially a time when you know, we actually have a 531 00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:18,600 Speaker 6: playing game, so there's more teams who are going for it. 532 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:20,080 Speaker 5: So I wait at really heavily. 533 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 4: We're gonna go ahead? 534 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:27,240 Speaker 5: Oh yeah. And then the Hawks. 535 00:26:27,400 --> 00:26:29,879 Speaker 6: I think the Hawks, they've they finally got healthy, they 536 00:26:29,960 --> 00:26:34,359 Speaker 6: got some guys back since bringing in Nate McMillan. I 537 00:26:34,359 --> 00:26:36,520 Speaker 6: think this team is really you know, they're playing some 538 00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:38,679 Speaker 6: great basketball, and I like, I had to have them 539 00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:40,560 Speaker 6: as as a three seed. 540 00:26:41,320 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 4: All right, So I agree with the Hawks. I don't 541 00:26:45,480 --> 00:26:48,000 Speaker 4: to me, the Hawks, the Hawks and the Necks are 542 00:26:48,080 --> 00:26:50,280 Speaker 4: kind of like the default three seeds. I don't find 543 00:26:50,280 --> 00:26:52,600 Speaker 4: the Hawks super interesting to talk about, Like I think 544 00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:54,640 Speaker 4: that they kind of just fall into this range. We'll 545 00:26:54,640 --> 00:26:56,600 Speaker 4: talk about them more and Matt if you disagree, but 546 00:26:57,200 --> 00:26:59,320 Speaker 4: my I don't agree at all that the Heat are 547 00:26:59,359 --> 00:27:02,359 Speaker 4: a three seed. I actually have the Heat closer to 548 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:06,640 Speaker 4: missing our bracket than being a three seed. The Heat 549 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:11,200 Speaker 4: I was really really underwhelmed with, like the advanced profile 550 00:27:11,240 --> 00:27:13,320 Speaker 4: of the Heat, and I know they lost some of 551 00:27:13,359 --> 00:27:15,800 Speaker 4: the COVID games and all that kind of stuff, but 552 00:27:16,200 --> 00:27:18,800 Speaker 4: here are some of the Heat ratings. This was before 553 00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:21,720 Speaker 4: the Celtics win last night, so you know, yay, you 554 00:27:21,800 --> 00:27:26,159 Speaker 4: beat like another not good team, Pythagorean eighteenth in the league, 555 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:31,880 Speaker 4: SRS nineteenth, differential nineteenth, net rating, nineteenth. We're choosing sixteen 556 00:27:31,880 --> 00:27:35,080 Speaker 4: team guys we want to be above sixteen. Eighteenth and 557 00:27:35,160 --> 00:27:38,520 Speaker 4: nineteenth are not good. Their record with Jimmy and Bam 558 00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:43,399 Speaker 4: is now twenty eight and nineteen. That's good. That's not great. 559 00:27:43,480 --> 00:27:45,960 Speaker 4: That's certainly not overwhelming to me as a three seed. 560 00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:50,159 Speaker 4: Looking at like head to head records, they're three to 561 00:27:50,240 --> 00:27:53,639 Speaker 4: zero against the Knicks and then not winning record or 562 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:57,000 Speaker 4: good against like all the other teams above them. I 563 00:27:57,240 --> 00:28:00,359 Speaker 4: don't think that the Heat should be in consideration here. However, 564 00:28:00,440 --> 00:28:03,199 Speaker 4: I'm very surprised who I did come up with. For me, 565 00:28:03,280 --> 00:28:06,080 Speaker 4: it came down to Portland and Golden State for my 566 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:10,520 Speaker 4: last spot here, and I ended up choosing the Blazers. 567 00:28:10,600 --> 00:28:12,119 Speaker 4: And I did not think that I was going to 568 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:17,200 Speaker 4: be choosing the Blazers here. The Blazers, I think I 569 00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:20,760 Speaker 4: kind of forgot. I don't know why, but how much 570 00:28:20,800 --> 00:28:23,879 Speaker 4: the Blazers also have missed. They've missed CJ McCollum for 571 00:28:23,920 --> 00:28:26,800 Speaker 4: a big chunk, they missed Nurkic for most of the 572 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:30,600 Speaker 4: season until recently. They're twenty six and eighteen once CJ 573 00:28:30,760 --> 00:28:34,320 Speaker 4: McCollum is on the court. They are two and oh 574 00:28:34,359 --> 00:28:36,359 Speaker 4: against the Sixers, two and one against the Lakers, two 575 00:28:36,359 --> 00:28:39,440 Speaker 4: and one against the MAVs. Especially the Lakers and MAVs, 576 00:28:39,480 --> 00:28:42,840 Speaker 4: those are kind of teams somewhat in their range. Unlike 577 00:28:42,880 --> 00:28:45,640 Speaker 4: the Heat, their advanced profile is pretty good. They are 578 00:28:45,720 --> 00:28:50,720 Speaker 4: top ten in Pythagorean and differential. They're number thirteen in 579 00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:54,000 Speaker 4: SRS and net rating. They have a top five offense. 580 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:58,240 Speaker 4: I think I tend I came into this thinking, oh, 581 00:28:58,280 --> 00:29:02,440 Speaker 4: the Blazers aren't really that good. They've been outperforming expectations 582 00:29:02,480 --> 00:29:05,040 Speaker 4: because dame time, and they just keep winning these crunch 583 00:29:05,080 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 4: time games. And the profile I feel like it's changed. 584 00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:12,000 Speaker 4: I guess in the last month they've they're closing really well. 585 00:29:12,080 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 4: Right now, they're playing well, and I just I had 586 00:29:15,560 --> 00:29:19,120 Speaker 4: them ahead of the Warriors, and I don't really feel 587 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:21,760 Speaker 4: like the heat are in the conversation. I don't think 588 00:29:21,800 --> 00:29:23,160 Speaker 4: I'm gonna come in to you guys at all on that. 589 00:29:23,480 --> 00:29:26,280 Speaker 4: I feel like Matt's can have another team entirely. So, Matt, 590 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:27,040 Speaker 4: who do you have here? 591 00:29:27,120 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 2: Yeah? We got three different teams? Ryan, who was number 592 00:29:29,840 --> 00:29:31,840 Speaker 2: ten on your power ratings last week on our NBA 593 00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 2: Best Stream presented by MGM on League. 594 00:29:33,920 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 5: Past it was the Boston Celtics. 595 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:39,960 Speaker 2: Was the Boston Celtics. Okay, this is not the this 596 00:29:40,040 --> 00:29:43,160 Speaker 2: is not the recency bias bracket. This is not the 597 00:29:44,040 --> 00:29:46,000 Speaker 2: this is not the ooh, what's been going on in 598 00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:48,400 Speaker 2: the last two weeks bracket. This is this is about 599 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:51,360 Speaker 2: the NBA season, Okay. And we've we've given edges to 600 00:29:51,400 --> 00:29:53,240 Speaker 2: the Lakers. We've given all these edges based off of 601 00:29:53,280 --> 00:29:57,000 Speaker 2: whatever factors. Let's not get carried away here, like, yes, 602 00:29:57,080 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 2: it sucks that this like the Celtics have fallen off 603 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:03,320 Speaker 2: a cliff oh dispute, but like they've put in the 604 00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:06,760 Speaker 2: work they were one of the last four teams remaining, 605 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 2: and they've dealt with co like Tatum got covid. They've 606 00:30:12,280 --> 00:30:14,760 Speaker 2: had massive injuries. Kemball Walker has been in and out 607 00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:17,760 Speaker 2: of the lineup constantly. They lose Jalen Brown, Marcus Smart 608 00:30:17,760 --> 00:30:21,160 Speaker 2: missed like a month, and yet there's still twelfth in SRS, 609 00:30:21,440 --> 00:30:25,160 Speaker 2: twelfth in efficiency differential twelfth, and net rating tenth, in 610 00:30:25,240 --> 00:30:29,880 Speaker 2: offense nineteenth, and defense with an RPI of sixteen. Like 611 00:30:31,680 --> 00:30:34,280 Speaker 2: to me, the Boston Celtics have earned a spot here. 612 00:30:34,760 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 2: I understand that they've had bad games versus the top 613 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:42,640 Speaker 2: teams in the Eastern Conference. For sure, that's been rough, 614 00:30:43,640 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 2: but they've had some signature wins along the way. This 615 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:50,360 Speaker 2: was still a very good team throughout the season. I 616 00:30:50,400 --> 00:30:52,760 Speaker 2: think if you look at this they've been even though 617 00:30:52,800 --> 00:30:54,480 Speaker 2: the Heat have passed them in record in these last 618 00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:57,479 Speaker 2: couple of games, I think the Celtics have been more 619 00:30:57,520 --> 00:31:00,400 Speaker 2: consistent than Miami. I think they've been better and more 620 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:02,640 Speaker 2: balanced than the Blazers. Like the Blazers, a lot of 621 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:05,160 Speaker 2: their differential has been boost up over the last four games, 622 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:08,160 Speaker 2: where they've just absolutely annihilated teams like they've killed the 623 00:31:08,160 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 2: Pacers like one thing, Rahimo, I will disagree with you 624 00:31:10,440 --> 00:31:13,640 Speaker 2: openly about like you're rating, You're you're putting emphasis on 625 00:31:13,680 --> 00:31:15,760 Speaker 2: after the All Star break. I would not do that, 626 00:31:15,880 --> 00:31:19,840 Speaker 2: especially this season. The cumulative effective of injuries, the cumulative 627 00:31:19,840 --> 00:31:23,320 Speaker 2: effective like the month of March was the worst basketball 628 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:26,760 Speaker 2: in the NBA I have seen, Yeah, right, two thousand 629 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:32,040 Speaker 2: and four, Like it was bad and so like I 630 00:31:32,320 --> 00:31:34,959 Speaker 2: can't look at the at those games and take as 631 00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:37,160 Speaker 2: much meaning as I can through the course of the 632 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 2: entire season. I think the Boston Celtics still deserve to 633 00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:41,680 Speaker 2: be a three seed. Here. 634 00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:44,600 Speaker 6: You know what an interesting thing is because when I 635 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:48,000 Speaker 6: look at my model, my model still has this I 636 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:50,040 Speaker 6: think they have the Celtics sixteen because they just got 637 00:31:50,080 --> 00:31:52,600 Speaker 6: blown out and back to back games, but they still 638 00:31:52,640 --> 00:31:53,200 Speaker 6: have them. 639 00:31:53,040 --> 00:31:54,240 Speaker 2: Over to Miami Heat. 640 00:31:54,400 --> 00:31:57,920 Speaker 6: Yeah, which is just And I think the thing that 641 00:31:57,960 --> 00:32:03,760 Speaker 6: I'm struggling with now is sometimes there's teams that break 642 00:32:03,800 --> 00:32:07,560 Speaker 6: the model in opposite directions. Yeah, and I'm wondering if 643 00:32:07,560 --> 00:32:10,959 Speaker 6: the Celtics are that team because now I'm watching all 644 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:13,920 Speaker 6: these games and my model is showing value on the 645 00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:15,360 Speaker 6: Celtics and I just can't do it. 646 00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:18,160 Speaker 2: So I think, look, here's the big here's one of 647 00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:20,200 Speaker 2: the big things here. We're not trying to predict who's 648 00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:22,280 Speaker 2: gonna We're not We're not seating this based off of 649 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:23,320 Speaker 2: who that we think is gonna win. 650 00:32:23,880 --> 00:32:24,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, of course. 651 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:27,400 Speaker 2: And so if we're not seeding it based off of 652 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:29,520 Speaker 2: who we think is gonna win, then I think we 653 00:32:29,560 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 2: got to give the Celtics the edge, even though we 654 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:33,440 Speaker 2: know that they're gonna get annihilated like they are. They 655 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:36,000 Speaker 2: are that five seed that you know should not be 656 00:32:36,080 --> 00:32:39,120 Speaker 2: a five seed that you're absolutely hammering the twelve seed 657 00:32:39,520 --> 00:32:42,160 Speaker 2: in the tournament like they are that team. They are 658 00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:46,240 Speaker 2: that eight to seven the seventh seed where you're like, oh, 659 00:32:46,240 --> 00:32:48,360 Speaker 2: they should not be favored, like this line is completely 660 00:32:48,560 --> 00:32:51,320 Speaker 2: and everyone's on it, and that team still loses, like 661 00:32:51,600 --> 00:32:54,760 Speaker 2: everyone bets the same way and still cashes. That's why 662 00:32:54,800 --> 00:32:56,280 Speaker 2: I think we're out here, is like the Celtics and 663 00:32:56,320 --> 00:32:58,160 Speaker 2: the I think the Celtics need to be a three 664 00:32:58,200 --> 00:32:59,240 Speaker 2: seed here, Brandon. 665 00:32:59,440 --> 00:33:02,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm swayed by the argument. I know the Blazers 666 00:33:02,800 --> 00:33:05,280 Speaker 4: were never going to win the argument, but I also 667 00:33:05,360 --> 00:33:07,360 Speaker 4: I had the Celtics ahead of the Heat in my 668 00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:10,600 Speaker 4: kind of ratings, And yeah, I mean, the Celtics are 669 00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:14,840 Speaker 4: the Eastern version of the Blazers argument I made. They're 670 00:33:14,880 --> 00:33:18,600 Speaker 4: high in all those ratings, they are below win expectations 671 00:33:18,600 --> 00:33:21,200 Speaker 4: by like three wins, so they're getting unlucky. They've had 672 00:33:21,240 --> 00:33:23,520 Speaker 4: all these injuries. I don't know how much we need 673 00:33:23,560 --> 00:33:25,680 Speaker 4: to weigh in that Jalen Brown is just out. Now, 674 00:33:26,400 --> 00:33:28,960 Speaker 4: that's too many factors for us. We're three man committee. 675 00:33:29,280 --> 00:33:32,840 Speaker 4: I feel like for the third straight line, we're getting 676 00:33:32,920 --> 00:33:35,320 Speaker 4: our final seed on the line to be a team 677 00:33:35,400 --> 00:33:38,440 Speaker 4: that we think, well, I don't want to bet on 678 00:33:38,480 --> 00:33:40,840 Speaker 4: this team, but I guess they deserve it here. But 679 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:42,520 Speaker 4: I think it should be the Celtics. 680 00:33:43,040 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 2: So for the four seeds, I will go ahead and say, mine, 681 00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:50,440 Speaker 2: the Heat have got to be in Brank like we 682 00:33:50,480 --> 00:33:53,520 Speaker 2: can't not have it. Like I agree they're right now 683 00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:56,880 Speaker 2: the five seed in the East, Like they've got to 684 00:33:56,920 --> 00:34:01,720 Speaker 2: be in. The Blazers have to be in. The Blazers 685 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:03,400 Speaker 2: like they just based off everything that you've made the 686 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:06,840 Speaker 2: argument for like the Blazers have to be in. The 687 00:34:06,880 --> 00:34:10,000 Speaker 2: Warriors have to be in based off of you know, 688 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:12,800 Speaker 2: even though I don't want to treat this recent stretch 689 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:14,919 Speaker 2: of games like we talked about, like I think there's 690 00:34:14,920 --> 00:34:16,960 Speaker 2: a lot of holes. People are really pumping up the 691 00:34:17,000 --> 00:34:19,480 Speaker 2: twelve and five records since Wiseman and Ubray went down. 692 00:34:19,640 --> 00:34:21,319 Speaker 2: There's some holes that you can poke in that, but 693 00:34:21,320 --> 00:34:24,440 Speaker 2: they've been overall like their defense is to like great defense. 694 00:34:24,480 --> 00:34:27,520 Speaker 2: Steph Curry, that's like that's a tournament team right there. 695 00:34:29,239 --> 00:34:32,160 Speaker 2: So that's three raheem. Do you have any arguments with 696 00:34:32,239 --> 00:34:33,280 Speaker 2: heat Blazers Warriors? 697 00:34:34,800 --> 00:34:37,680 Speaker 6: No, I don't have any arguments on those. I think 698 00:34:37,719 --> 00:34:40,480 Speaker 6: my biggest argument we actually was with the Celtics. For me, 699 00:34:40,560 --> 00:34:42,080 Speaker 6: I actually I had them out together. 700 00:34:44,320 --> 00:34:45,720 Speaker 4: You have them out your bracket? 701 00:34:46,239 --> 00:34:47,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, I didn't have them in a bracket. 702 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 2: Are you okay with them being a three seed jumping out? 703 00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 2: Can we agree on that? Have I swayed you? 704 00:34:53,640 --> 00:34:53,799 Speaker 5: Not? 705 00:34:53,880 --> 00:34:54,759 Speaker 4: Really? I mean. 706 00:34:56,160 --> 00:35:00,160 Speaker 2: Right, hang on again, they see I agree with you. 707 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:03,359 Speaker 6: You want everything if they still have if they still 708 00:35:03,400 --> 00:35:06,239 Speaker 6: had Jalen Brown, I would be cool with it. But 709 00:35:06,360 --> 00:35:08,799 Speaker 6: I just think this is a fundamentally different team if 710 00:35:08,840 --> 00:35:09,839 Speaker 6: you take Brown out of it. 711 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:11,839 Speaker 2: Here, think of it this way. I know you can't 712 00:35:11,880 --> 00:35:14,800 Speaker 2: you have to look this up, but think of it this way. Anecdotally, 713 00:35:15,120 --> 00:35:17,680 Speaker 2: how many weeks in a row were the Celtics top 714 00:35:17,680 --> 00:35:18,800 Speaker 2: ten and your power rating. 715 00:35:20,320 --> 00:35:21,120 Speaker 5: For most of the year. 716 00:35:21,520 --> 00:35:24,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, like it's I've been doing these bedstreams with you 717 00:35:24,440 --> 00:35:27,160 Speaker 2: every week, like just this is gonna be the first 718 00:35:27,160 --> 00:35:29,920 Speaker 2: week the Celtics aren't going to be top ten and 719 00:35:29,960 --> 00:35:31,880 Speaker 2: we're saying okay, and we're dropping and we're dropping them 720 00:35:31,920 --> 00:35:32,600 Speaker 2: to twelve. 721 00:35:32,280 --> 00:35:36,920 Speaker 6: Here, Okay, that's fair. You know what, That's fair. I 722 00:35:37,640 --> 00:35:39,960 Speaker 6: can live with that, all right, all. 723 00:35:40,000 --> 00:35:43,520 Speaker 2: Right, Brandon, Are we in agreement on Heat Blazers Warriors. 724 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:44,080 Speaker 3: Yes. 725 00:35:44,560 --> 00:35:46,399 Speaker 4: I don't know how you make an argument against them. 726 00:35:46,480 --> 00:35:48,839 Speaker 4: You could make an argument against the Warriors, but we're 727 00:35:49,040 --> 00:35:51,480 Speaker 4: building a tournament that needs eyeballs and money, and we're 728 00:35:51,520 --> 00:35:54,000 Speaker 4: not leaving out of the tournament. So even if you 729 00:35:54,040 --> 00:35:56,200 Speaker 4: want to make that argument, it's not a good one. 730 00:35:57,320 --> 00:36:00,480 Speaker 4: I was disappointed as we were building this that to me, 731 00:36:01,160 --> 00:36:03,680 Speaker 4: I just felt like there were the sixteen was a 732 00:36:03,719 --> 00:36:05,560 Speaker 4: clear cutoff, and I don't know that we're going to 733 00:36:05,600 --> 00:36:08,120 Speaker 4: agree on that. But I ended up being like, Okay, 734 00:36:08,160 --> 00:36:11,800 Speaker 4: here's my number sixteen. And I tried desperately to dig through. 735 00:36:12,080 --> 00:36:14,680 Speaker 4: I kept adding profiles to our Google doc, trying to 736 00:36:14,680 --> 00:36:17,120 Speaker 4: find any other team that I thought could give us 737 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:19,680 Speaker 4: an argument, and I couldn't really come up with one 738 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:22,680 Speaker 4: to me, my last team in is the Grizzlies. I'm 739 00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:25,400 Speaker 4: not that excited about it. They're kind of just fine. 740 00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:28,799 Speaker 4: They're fine. They're fourteenth or fifteenth or sixteenth on all 741 00:36:28,840 --> 00:36:32,560 Speaker 4: the different ratings we've talked about, and I don't have 742 00:36:32,600 --> 00:36:35,520 Speaker 4: a lot of great things to say about them there. 743 00:36:35,560 --> 00:36:37,880 Speaker 4: I guess yay, John Morant is going to get us 744 00:36:37,920 --> 00:36:41,200 Speaker 4: some eyeballs and money. I just don't I'm not gonna 745 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:42,680 Speaker 4: I don't know what you're going to do to talk 746 00:36:42,760 --> 00:36:45,200 Speaker 4: me into any of the other options here. My next 747 00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:47,520 Speaker 4: option was the Pelicans, and I tried hard to talk 748 00:36:47,560 --> 00:36:49,800 Speaker 4: myself into the Pelicans, even though they should be below 749 00:36:49,880 --> 00:36:52,120 Speaker 4: like another like they should be like a sixth seed. 750 00:36:52,640 --> 00:36:55,480 Speaker 4: But I don't know. I have the Grizzlies. I'm curious 751 00:36:55,560 --> 00:36:57,880 Speaker 4: who either of you ended up going with. So, raheem, 752 00:36:58,040 --> 00:36:59,359 Speaker 4: who's your last team in here? 753 00:37:00,400 --> 00:37:00,880 Speaker 5: I had? 754 00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:04,680 Speaker 6: I mean, the final four that I had was the Blazers, 755 00:37:04,680 --> 00:37:06,880 Speaker 6: the Grizzlies, the Warriors, and the Wizards. 756 00:37:07,800 --> 00:37:08,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, and. 757 00:37:10,120 --> 00:37:13,080 Speaker 6: You know, I probably should have put the Celtics there, 758 00:37:13,440 --> 00:37:15,279 Speaker 6: and I do regret that. I think you're one hundred 759 00:37:15,280 --> 00:37:17,359 Speaker 6: percent right. I think the Celtics should have been you know, 760 00:37:17,800 --> 00:37:19,880 Speaker 6: there over the Wizards. I think I was just a 761 00:37:19,960 --> 00:37:23,240 Speaker 6: victim of recency bias. But I do like the Grizzlies. 762 00:37:23,239 --> 00:37:27,120 Speaker 6: I mean, the Grizzlies are eighth in defensive efficiency. I 763 00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:30,239 Speaker 6: think that I weighed defense heavily, especially if you're in 764 00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:33,320 Speaker 6: a playoff setting, and then you know they got Jaron 765 00:37:33,400 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 6: Jackson back. 766 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 5: I think they blew. 767 00:37:35,680 --> 00:37:37,480 Speaker 6: I think they think about the Grizzlies is they've been 768 00:37:37,520 --> 00:37:40,239 Speaker 6: super competitive, and they've blown a lot of games in 769 00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:42,600 Speaker 6: which they probably shouldn't have lost. Like they had the 770 00:37:42,640 --> 00:37:45,839 Speaker 6: games against the Clippers, which they had no Kawhi Leonard 771 00:37:45,880 --> 00:37:49,239 Speaker 6: or Paul George or surge of Baka. They had the 772 00:37:49,280 --> 00:37:52,480 Speaker 6: game against the Nuggets, I'm sure Matt Saller they were 773 00:37:52,560 --> 00:37:55,640 Speaker 6: up fourteen to fifteen with four minutes ago, went to overtime, 774 00:37:55,920 --> 00:37:58,440 Speaker 6: they had the lead in overtime, they blew that, had 775 00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:00,440 Speaker 6: the lead in double overtime, bleue that. So I just 776 00:38:00,480 --> 00:38:04,120 Speaker 6: think this this Grizzlies team is really solid. They can't close, 777 00:38:04,160 --> 00:38:06,919 Speaker 6: so I think they deserve that fourth seed. 778 00:38:07,520 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 4: So I'm curious coming into this exercise. Before I made 779 00:38:11,200 --> 00:38:13,520 Speaker 4: up our little cribsheet with all of our net ratings 780 00:38:13,560 --> 00:38:16,959 Speaker 4: and everything else, Matt had one team as his last 781 00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:18,719 Speaker 4: four seed here, and I would like to know if 782 00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:22,680 Speaker 4: that is still your pick after you saw all these horrible, horrifying, 783 00:38:22,840 --> 00:38:26,560 Speaker 4: shockingly bad ratings for them, Matt, Are the Charlotte Hornets 784 00:38:26,560 --> 00:38:27,719 Speaker 4: your final four seed? 785 00:38:27,960 --> 00:38:30,680 Speaker 2: So I'm debating it now because you're right, the numbers 786 00:38:30,680 --> 00:38:35,160 Speaker 2: are compelling, for sure. Here's a good comparison. Okay, the 787 00:38:35,239 --> 00:38:37,840 Speaker 2: Hornets are thirteen and twenty three versus teams five hundred 788 00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:41,799 Speaker 2: and above. All right, thirteen and twenty three. Grizzlies are 789 00:38:41,800 --> 00:38:47,560 Speaker 2: fourteen and twenty two, one game better. Okay, Memphis is 790 00:38:47,600 --> 00:38:50,880 Speaker 2: twenty one and eleven versus teams under five hundred. Charlotte's 791 00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:56,799 Speaker 2: twenty and twelve, one game worse. So when record was now, 792 00:38:57,080 --> 00:39:00,279 Speaker 2: the argument here is going to be, Okay, look at srs, right, 793 00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:04,560 Speaker 2: SRS which factors strength the schedule versus point differential? You 794 00:39:04,560 --> 00:39:05,680 Speaker 2: know what does that look like? 795 00:39:06,040 --> 00:39:06,239 Speaker 6: Right? 796 00:39:06,400 --> 00:39:08,520 Speaker 2: Like the Grizzlies. And that's the like. Recency bias is 797 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:11,759 Speaker 2: tough here. The Grizzlies just waxed the Dallas Mavericks last night, 798 00:39:12,440 --> 00:39:15,480 Speaker 2: and the Hornets lost by five to the net to 799 00:39:15,520 --> 00:39:18,040 Speaker 2: the Nuggets. It's not a bad loss, but it's not 800 00:39:18,080 --> 00:39:20,719 Speaker 2: really impressive. I think here's the big thing with my aunt. 801 00:39:20,719 --> 00:39:24,120 Speaker 2: Where I'm at with Charlotte. Hayward is out of a boot. 802 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:27,319 Speaker 2: He's just started load bearing work. There is like a 803 00:39:27,480 --> 00:39:31,280 Speaker 2: chance he makes they if they win the play in tournament, 804 00:39:31,320 --> 00:39:35,120 Speaker 2: There's a chance he makes it. With Hayward, they're twenty 805 00:39:35,160 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 2: four and twenty. This is like if we're gonna give 806 00:39:39,160 --> 00:39:43,080 Speaker 2: Lebron that edge, Right, I'm not saying we have to 807 00:39:43,120 --> 00:39:45,520 Speaker 2: give Gordon Hayward the same edge, but we're gonna trade 808 00:39:45,520 --> 00:39:47,400 Speaker 2: the Lakers and be like, Okay, we have to consider 809 00:39:47,440 --> 00:39:49,960 Speaker 2: who they were missing. The Hornets were without LaMelo Ball 810 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:54,640 Speaker 2: and Gordon Hayward. Remember the Hornets were the fifth seed 811 00:39:54,680 --> 00:39:59,080 Speaker 2: in the Eastern Conference before Hayward and Mellow went down. 812 00:40:00,239 --> 00:40:03,879 Speaker 2: Like they were a good team and they fell off 813 00:40:03,920 --> 00:40:08,160 Speaker 2: the map because they lost their two best players. Like, 814 00:40:08,480 --> 00:40:10,440 Speaker 2: this is a team that relies on two guys and 815 00:40:10,440 --> 00:40:12,520 Speaker 2: then like a supporting cast. I've made the argument for 816 00:40:12,560 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 2: the Hornets because of their switching defense. I like the 817 00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:16,759 Speaker 2: way that they match up and playoff environments, et cetera, 818 00:40:16,760 --> 00:40:19,920 Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. I am okay. If we want 819 00:40:19,960 --> 00:40:21,840 Speaker 2: to agree on the Grizzlies, if we just want to 820 00:40:21,880 --> 00:40:23,680 Speaker 2: like look at it because like the big key here 821 00:40:23,719 --> 00:40:28,760 Speaker 2: I think is honestly, of all the numbers, I think 822 00:40:29,080 --> 00:40:33,879 Speaker 2: the biggest key is that SRS differential. I will say this, 823 00:40:34,239 --> 00:40:37,200 Speaker 2: the Pacers are fifteenth in offense and fifteenth in defense. 824 00:40:37,360 --> 00:40:41,080 Speaker 2: They've got their eighteenth in SRS, which is only four 825 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:45,440 Speaker 2: spots behind the Grizzlies. And the Pacers have had just 826 00:40:45,480 --> 00:40:47,440 Speaker 2: as many injury issues as well. I think you can 827 00:40:47,520 --> 00:40:49,800 Speaker 2: make a case for the Pacers too, Like the Pacers 828 00:40:49,800 --> 00:40:53,480 Speaker 2: have had a year from hell. Like I don't want 829 00:40:53,520 --> 00:40:56,960 Speaker 2: to punish the Pacers because Nate Yorken lost York and 830 00:40:57,400 --> 00:40:59,360 Speaker 2: lost the locker room, Like I don't want to punish 831 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:00,040 Speaker 2: the team for that. 832 00:41:00,640 --> 00:41:02,920 Speaker 4: But here here's the problem with the Pacers, though, is 833 00:41:02,960 --> 00:41:06,120 Speaker 4: the injuries aren't over, Like we're still only left with 834 00:41:06,200 --> 00:41:08,879 Speaker 4: the corpse of the team that has struggled to make 835 00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:12,040 Speaker 4: it to the finish line. Like I would buy that 836 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:14,920 Speaker 4: argument if it looked like you know, like Turner and 837 00:41:15,160 --> 00:41:17,920 Speaker 4: and I don't know whoever else, even Brogden, I don't know, 838 00:41:17,960 --> 00:41:20,040 Speaker 4: like that they might just be done. I just don't know. 839 00:41:20,360 --> 00:41:21,200 Speaker 4: I don't know what they have. 840 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,439 Speaker 2: Let's I think I am not going to hold onto 841 00:41:25,440 --> 00:41:27,200 Speaker 2: the Hornets as much I think they I like them 842 00:41:27,239 --> 00:41:28,920 Speaker 2: as a play in team if we had that, but 843 00:41:28,960 --> 00:41:32,200 Speaker 2: we don't, I will relent and let's go ahead and 844 00:41:32,200 --> 00:41:34,680 Speaker 2: get put the Grizzlies as the final team in our tournament. 845 00:41:35,000 --> 00:41:37,440 Speaker 4: I mean, look, we're the selection committee. Should we just 846 00:41:37,840 --> 00:41:39,799 Speaker 4: make a play in game? Should we have Memphis and 847 00:41:39,880 --> 00:41:41,120 Speaker 4: Charlotte playing game? 848 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:45,600 Speaker 2: Because we are at about forty minutes into this podcast, 849 00:41:45,600 --> 00:41:48,440 Speaker 2: and Matt Mitchell has things to do with his life, 850 00:41:48,760 --> 00:41:52,880 Speaker 2: like degenerately bet on Day baseball, so you know it happens, 851 00:41:53,440 --> 00:41:55,719 Speaker 2: all right, So I have a bracket. I built a 852 00:41:55,719 --> 00:41:58,879 Speaker 2: brack of all we were doing this, and here are 853 00:41:58,920 --> 00:42:00,719 Speaker 2: going to be our matchups. Okay, you guys ready for this. 854 00:42:00,719 --> 00:42:03,040 Speaker 2: I did this space off of entertainment value, not necessarily 855 00:42:03,520 --> 00:42:05,640 Speaker 2: like ranked Who went where. 856 00:42:07,040 --> 00:42:07,600 Speaker 5: The top? 857 00:42:07,840 --> 00:42:11,160 Speaker 2: The top bracket is the Jazz face the Grizzlies. In 858 00:42:11,200 --> 00:42:16,920 Speaker 2: the first round, they face the winner of Lakers Celtics 859 00:42:17,400 --> 00:42:22,560 Speaker 2: the Classic rivalry, the Classic Rivalry, and then the second 860 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:26,319 Speaker 2: round the Jazz likely face the Los Angeles Lakers. 861 00:42:28,360 --> 00:42:31,480 Speaker 3: This is Action Network podcast producer Matt Mitchell here to 862 00:42:31,520 --> 00:42:33,920 Speaker 3: tell you our friends at bet MGM have a great 863 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:36,600 Speaker 3: news sign up offer for our listeners a six one 864 00:42:36,680 --> 00:42:40,160 Speaker 3: hundred dollars risk free first bet. Here's how it works. 865 00:42:40,480 --> 00:42:42,800 Speaker 3: If you don't already have an account at bet mgm, 866 00:42:43,200 --> 00:42:45,640 Speaker 3: just sign up, make your first deposit, and place that 867 00:42:45,719 --> 00:42:48,920 Speaker 3: initial wager. If the bet wins, you get all the money. 868 00:42:49,239 --> 00:42:52,239 Speaker 3: If it doesn't win, bet mgm will refund you in 869 00:42:52,320 --> 00:42:55,400 Speaker 3: free bets up to six hundred dollars. It's that simple. 870 00:42:55,880 --> 00:42:58,279 Speaker 3: Just click on the link in this episode description to 871 00:42:58,280 --> 00:43:01,480 Speaker 3: get started. Bet mgm has been a great podcast partner, 872 00:43:01,640 --> 00:43:04,279 Speaker 3: and they've got all the features gamblers like us love, 873 00:43:04,680 --> 00:43:08,040 Speaker 3: like live betting and daily odds boosts posts. They're compatible 874 00:43:08,120 --> 00:43:11,000 Speaker 3: with Betsinc. So when you place a wager at betmgm, 875 00:43:11,400 --> 00:43:14,239 Speaker 3: that bet can automatically be tracked in your action app. 876 00:43:14,680 --> 00:43:17,000 Speaker 3: So open an account today and make your first bet 877 00:43:17,080 --> 00:43:19,920 Speaker 3: risk free up to six hundred dollars. Just click on 878 00:43:19,960 --> 00:43:22,919 Speaker 3: the link in this episode description to get started. Must 879 00:43:22,960 --> 00:43:25,320 Speaker 3: be twenty one or older and physically located in Michigan, 880 00:43:25,360 --> 00:43:29,240 Speaker 3: New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, West Virginia, and Iowa, Virginia, Tennessee, Nevada, 881 00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:32,279 Speaker 3: or Pennsylvania. Please gamble responsibly. Gambling problem called one eight 882 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:34,360 Speaker 3: hundred and five to two two forty seven hundred in 883 00:43:34,360 --> 00:43:37,280 Speaker 3: Colorado and Nevada. One eight hundred Gambler in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, 884 00:43:37,320 --> 00:43:39,360 Speaker 3: in West Virginia, one eight hundred and nine with it 885 00:43:39,440 --> 00:43:41,680 Speaker 3: in Indiana. One eight hundred and twenty seven zero seven 886 00:43:41,719 --> 00:43:43,640 Speaker 3: to one one seven in Michigan, one eight hundred eight 887 00:43:43,800 --> 00:43:45,879 Speaker 3: nine nine seven eight nine in Tennessee. One eight hundred 888 00:43:45,880 --> 00:43:47,839 Speaker 3: bets off in Iowa, or one eight eight five three 889 00:43:47,920 --> 00:43:51,200 Speaker 3: two thirty five hundred in Virginia betsinc. Not available in Nevada. 890 00:43:51,719 --> 00:43:53,800 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening. Now back to the show. 891 00:43:55,880 --> 00:43:58,560 Speaker 2: In the bottom bracket, on the left side, we've got 892 00:43:58,800 --> 00:44:03,480 Speaker 2: the Los Angeles Clipper versus the Miami Heat Kawhi Leonard 893 00:44:03,560 --> 00:44:06,920 Speaker 2: versus Jimmy Butler, Bam out of Bayo versus Avitza Zubach, 894 00:44:06,920 --> 00:44:10,040 Speaker 2: who everyone thinks is an amazing player. You've got Paul 895 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:14,160 Speaker 2: George versus Gorn Dragis Tyler Hero that's a really fun one, 896 00:44:14,600 --> 00:44:18,640 Speaker 2: Spoulsra versus Tylu And then the bottom of that one 897 00:44:18,760 --> 00:44:24,360 Speaker 2: is the Brooklyn Nets versus the New York Knicks battle 898 00:44:24,440 --> 00:44:27,560 Speaker 2: for New York in the bottom of that side of 899 00:44:27,600 --> 00:44:31,600 Speaker 2: the bracket. On the other side, we've got the one 900 00:44:31,719 --> 00:44:37,359 Speaker 2: seed Phoenix Suns facing the Portland Trailblazers. Damian Lillard versus 901 00:44:37,480 --> 00:44:42,000 Speaker 2: Chris Paul CJ. McCollum versus Devin Booker. Let's go DeAndre 902 00:44:42,120 --> 00:44:44,560 Speaker 2: Aiden versus use of Nurkis. That's a great game. In 903 00:44:44,760 --> 00:44:48,760 Speaker 2: the one eight there and then one four rather bottom, 904 00:44:48,880 --> 00:44:52,600 Speaker 2: they faced the winner of the Bucks and Mavericks Luca 905 00:44:52,960 --> 00:44:58,200 Speaker 2: versus Jannis in that matchup. That one's gonna be Everyone's 906 00:44:58,200 --> 00:45:01,319 Speaker 2: circling that game and gonna be really driven to watch that. 907 00:45:01,320 --> 00:45:03,640 Speaker 2: That's gonna be awesome watching the Bucks try and handle 908 00:45:03,960 --> 00:45:07,680 Speaker 2: Luca and the Shooters, and the bottom the Philadelphia seventy 909 00:45:07,719 --> 00:45:11,880 Speaker 2: six Ers gets Steph Curry and the Golden State Warriors. 910 00:45:13,120 --> 00:45:15,600 Speaker 2: I will be taking the Warriors in that matchup when 911 00:45:15,680 --> 00:45:18,040 Speaker 2: that goes down, I will be definitely be betting them 912 00:45:18,120 --> 00:45:22,400 Speaker 2: for the upset versus Raheem Sixers. And then the bottom 913 00:45:22,400 --> 00:45:25,520 Speaker 2: of that, the final matchup is the Denver Nuggets versus 914 00:45:25,560 --> 00:45:29,080 Speaker 2: the Atlanta Hawks. Yoki has a lot of trouble with Kapella. 915 00:45:29,160 --> 00:45:31,879 Speaker 2: That's a bad matchup for them. I could realistically see 916 00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:42,000 Speaker 2: the final four being Bucks, Warriors nets Lakers, which would 917 00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:45,319 Speaker 2: be quite the four. I think as we go through here. 918 00:45:45,480 --> 00:45:47,160 Speaker 2: This is a fun exercise. This is really good. 919 00:45:47,280 --> 00:45:50,799 Speaker 4: Yeah, this was Yeah, this was really helpful. My only 920 00:45:50,840 --> 00:45:53,880 Speaker 4: columns with the bracket is that, Matt Moore, you are 921 00:45:53,960 --> 00:45:57,600 Speaker 4: clearly a Lakers fan. You gave them the easiest draw 922 00:45:57,719 --> 00:45:59,879 Speaker 4: for the two seeds. You gave them the Celtics who 923 00:46:00,280 --> 00:46:02,799 Speaker 4: didn't even have in his bracket. You're a Lakers fan. 924 00:46:03,200 --> 00:46:05,360 Speaker 4: You're a hater. You put the Bucks and the MAVs 925 00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:07,399 Speaker 4: against each other, even though they are our favorite two 926 00:46:07,400 --> 00:46:10,719 Speaker 4: and three seeds. You're penalizing the small markets. You're a 927 00:46:10,800 --> 00:46:11,439 Speaker 4: Lakers fan. 928 00:46:13,920 --> 00:46:16,200 Speaker 2: What can I say? Everyone knows. Everyone that's ever met 929 00:46:16,239 --> 00:46:19,360 Speaker 2: me knows I'm a huge Lakers guys. That's pretty obvious. 930 00:46:19,560 --> 00:46:21,520 Speaker 2: All right, let's gotta wrap up, bar Marquee. Thanks to 931 00:46:21,560 --> 00:46:23,439 Speaker 2: Brandon for putting the exercise together. I think we learned 932 00:46:23,440 --> 00:46:26,279 Speaker 2: a lot there. The real bracket was the friends that 933 00:46:26,320 --> 00:46:29,520 Speaker 2: we made along the way. All right, let's go too. 934 00:46:29,920 --> 00:46:34,160 Speaker 2: It's time to take a victory lap. I'm stupid, you're smart. 935 00:46:34,440 --> 00:46:35,759 Speaker 4: I was wrong, you were right. 936 00:46:36,600 --> 00:46:38,240 Speaker 2: You're the best. I'm the worst. 937 00:46:39,640 --> 00:46:41,280 Speaker 4: You're very good looking. 938 00:46:41,560 --> 00:46:45,279 Speaker 6: I'm not attractive, all right, as long as you're willing 939 00:46:45,320 --> 00:46:45,920 Speaker 6: to admit that. 940 00:46:46,280 --> 00:46:48,680 Speaker 2: So every week, I give the boys an opportunity to 941 00:46:48,680 --> 00:46:51,040 Speaker 2: take victory laps because I've never met two individuals that 942 00:46:51,120 --> 00:46:53,040 Speaker 2: enjoy talking about the best that they got right more 943 00:46:53,200 --> 00:46:57,160 Speaker 2: than these two. This is our season finale version. We 944 00:46:57,160 --> 00:46:59,080 Speaker 2: don't have time next week because we're doing playoff stuff. 945 00:46:59,160 --> 00:47:02,359 Speaker 2: So raheem, are there any that you in particular want 946 00:47:02,400 --> 00:47:04,359 Speaker 2: to give yourself a pat on the back and take 947 00:47:04,400 --> 00:47:04,960 Speaker 2: a lap over. 948 00:47:05,960 --> 00:47:07,080 Speaker 5: I'm gonna go with the Celtics. 949 00:47:07,080 --> 00:47:09,920 Speaker 6: I mean, obviously it ended with you know, Jalen Brown, 950 00:47:10,000 --> 00:47:13,160 Speaker 6: and I never want to see anybody have a season 951 00:47:13,200 --> 00:47:13,880 Speaker 6: in the injury. 952 00:47:13,960 --> 00:47:16,040 Speaker 5: But I feel like I was right about. 953 00:47:15,760 --> 00:47:19,440 Speaker 6: This team and in the mistakes they age made, you know, 954 00:47:19,600 --> 00:47:24,680 Speaker 6: really not putting this roster together properly, letting Gordon Hayward walk. 955 00:47:24,920 --> 00:47:27,000 Speaker 6: I wasn't really high on them. I just felt like 956 00:47:27,400 --> 00:47:31,600 Speaker 6: there just wasn't enough pieces around Jason Tatum and Jalen Brown, 957 00:47:32,280 --> 00:47:36,000 Speaker 6: and obviously they had some COVID issues, but I wasn't 958 00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:38,239 Speaker 6: excited about them, you know, to start the season. So 959 00:47:38,800 --> 00:47:40,719 Speaker 6: I'm gonna give myself a pat on the back for that. 960 00:47:40,760 --> 00:47:43,080 Speaker 6: And then obviously I think the big one I had 961 00:47:43,200 --> 00:47:45,439 Speaker 6: was Jordan Clarkson, went six man of the year. 962 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:49,640 Speaker 5: I had that in our piece to start the season. 963 00:47:49,719 --> 00:47:52,719 Speaker 5: So I'm real proud about that one. 964 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:56,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm still kind of mad about Luca. Not like 965 00:47:57,000 --> 00:47:59,640 Speaker 2: Luca not finishing. He's not even gonna finish top five. 966 00:47:59,680 --> 00:48:01,799 Speaker 2: That's easy. Luca's not gonna finish top five for m VP. 967 00:48:01,960 --> 00:48:05,160 Speaker 2: That was my preseason pick there the Jordan Clarkson pick, 968 00:48:05,200 --> 00:48:07,000 Speaker 2: but early was phenomenal. That was a that was a 969 00:48:07,040 --> 00:48:09,319 Speaker 2: really good pick. To look at the at the entire 970 00:48:09,360 --> 00:48:12,799 Speaker 2: board and recognize that I am calling the Anthony Melton 971 00:48:12,840 --> 00:48:14,879 Speaker 2: next year, the Anthony Meltin sixth Man of the Year 972 00:48:15,080 --> 00:48:15,520 Speaker 2: next season. 973 00:48:15,600 --> 00:48:18,040 Speaker 6: I'm right with you on that because I really like him. 974 00:48:18,200 --> 00:48:21,080 Speaker 6: I really like him, you know what he is. I'm 975 00:48:21,080 --> 00:48:22,520 Speaker 6: a little biased towards the Grizzlies. 976 00:48:23,000 --> 00:48:24,839 Speaker 2: We're gonna We're gonna get a great number on him too. 977 00:48:24,960 --> 00:48:26,680 Speaker 2: It's gonna be great. It's gonna be absolutely awesome. 978 00:48:27,880 --> 00:48:28,280 Speaker 5: Brandon. 979 00:48:28,680 --> 00:48:32,440 Speaker 2: Keeping in mind that were many minutes into this podcast 980 00:48:32,680 --> 00:48:36,080 Speaker 2: and we can't do this for another hour. What are 981 00:48:36,080 --> 00:48:37,240 Speaker 2: your victory laps of the season? 982 00:48:37,680 --> 00:48:40,680 Speaker 4: All right, So first victory lap is for brain cells 983 00:48:40,840 --> 00:48:43,200 Speaker 4: that Nikola Jokic is going to win the m v P. 984 00:48:43,560 --> 00:48:45,600 Speaker 4: It's a victory for all of us. He's been the 985 00:48:45,680 --> 00:48:48,000 Speaker 4: m VP for a months. We finally got everyone to 986 00:48:48,040 --> 00:48:51,200 Speaker 4: figure it out. Uh, My victory laps are more like 987 00:48:51,320 --> 00:48:54,640 Speaker 4: victory laps where I made a great run and I 988 00:48:54,800 --> 00:48:57,800 Speaker 4: was leading coming around the final turn and then stumbled 989 00:48:57,880 --> 00:49:00,959 Speaker 4: and fell and watched everyone else to the finish line. 990 00:49:01,239 --> 00:49:03,040 Speaker 4: So I was gonna hunger games. Some of these off 991 00:49:03,120 --> 00:49:06,040 Speaker 4: fire off the cannon for all of these victory lapp 992 00:49:06,200 --> 00:49:08,839 Speaker 4: futures bets that looked really good, much better than when 993 00:49:08,840 --> 00:49:11,640 Speaker 4: I placed them, and ended up shredded into the little pieces, 994 00:49:11,800 --> 00:49:14,080 Speaker 4: all of them worth zero dollars. So here we go. 995 00:49:14,760 --> 00:49:17,879 Speaker 4: Jalen Brown preseason Most Improved Player thirty three to one. 996 00:49:18,400 --> 00:49:21,759 Speaker 4: Keath to missed the playoffs rip last night fourteen to one. 997 00:49:21,880 --> 00:49:25,000 Speaker 4: We had to get run though. Preseason MVP Kevin Durant 998 00:49:25,040 --> 00:49:27,239 Speaker 4: at twenty to one. That one seemed great for a while. 999 00:49:27,840 --> 00:49:30,400 Speaker 4: Mid season James Harden thirty three to one. That one 1000 00:49:30,480 --> 00:49:32,439 Speaker 4: got up to like a second or third favorite until 1001 00:49:32,480 --> 00:49:35,839 Speaker 4: he got hurt. Late season MVP Stephan Currey forty to one. 1002 00:49:36,360 --> 00:49:39,160 Speaker 4: You might finish second on the ballot. Now not gonna happen. 1003 00:49:39,480 --> 00:49:42,719 Speaker 4: But those were great runs last but not least Joe 1004 00:49:42,880 --> 00:49:45,120 Speaker 4: Ingles sixth Man of the Year one hundred to one. 1005 00:49:45,800 --> 00:49:47,719 Speaker 4: Still hold on a little hope on that one. I'm 1006 00:49:47,760 --> 00:49:50,200 Speaker 4: seeing some of the nerds online talk about it. I 1007 00:49:50,280 --> 00:49:51,880 Speaker 4: think he's gonna at least get out of the ballot. 1008 00:49:52,239 --> 00:49:55,560 Speaker 4: We had a great run last one. Last victory lap 1009 00:49:56,440 --> 00:49:59,600 Speaker 4: NBA Props this season. My victory lap is for justin 1010 00:49:59,640 --> 00:50:02,520 Speaker 4: the fan and our incredible projections and our props tool 1011 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:05,520 Speaker 4: for the season, and we've been a positive return and 1012 00:50:05,560 --> 00:50:09,120 Speaker 4: investment every single month on our props column through April 1013 00:50:09,600 --> 00:50:12,160 Speaker 4: two hundred and forty wins one hundred and eighty four losses. 1014 00:50:12,200 --> 00:50:16,040 Speaker 4: It's a fifty seven percent hit rate plus eighty four units. 1015 00:50:16,320 --> 00:50:18,840 Speaker 4: That is a twenty percent return and investment one hundred 1016 00:50:18,880 --> 00:50:22,359 Speaker 4: dollars better on every props back to this season would 1017 00:50:22,400 --> 00:50:25,000 Speaker 4: be up eight thousand to three hundred and eighty nine dollars. 1018 00:50:25,440 --> 00:50:28,480 Speaker 4: So victory lap to the props tool and the projections. 1019 00:50:28,680 --> 00:50:30,239 Speaker 4: You really should be following those. 1020 00:50:32,000 --> 00:50:35,840 Speaker 2: That's absurd. That's that's that's just really good way to go, guys, 1021 00:50:36,080 --> 00:50:40,640 Speaker 2: just way to go. That's phenomenal, all right. For mine. 1022 00:50:41,680 --> 00:50:45,200 Speaker 2: Back before the season, I did my top five favorites 1023 00:50:45,880 --> 00:50:52,080 Speaker 2: win totals the Wolves under chit ching, the Chicago Bulls over. 1024 00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:56,000 Speaker 2: I'm let's see, I got a twenty eight and a half. 1025 00:50:56,080 --> 00:50:57,440 Speaker 2: I actually need to check the number on this and 1026 00:50:57,440 --> 00:50:59,040 Speaker 2: make sure. I think there are twenty nine. I think 1027 00:50:59,080 --> 00:51:03,759 Speaker 2: there are twenty nine. They're twenty nine. That cash that's 1028 00:51:03,800 --> 00:51:06,799 Speaker 2: two Oh Warriors over thirty six and a half. King 1029 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:10,880 Speaker 2: King's under twenty nine. I think that one is actually 1030 00:51:11,040 --> 00:51:16,200 Speaker 2: in some danger. Nope, yeah, that one is thirty one. 1031 00:51:16,320 --> 00:51:19,239 Speaker 2: So that one died. And then finally, the really bad 1032 00:51:19,280 --> 00:51:21,360 Speaker 2: one was Mavericks over forty one and a half. That 1033 00:51:21,440 --> 00:51:23,920 Speaker 2: was my worst one of the batch. I can't believe 1034 00:51:23,960 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 2: that the Mavericks did not hit that number. I'm really 1035 00:51:27,040 --> 00:51:28,239 Speaker 2: really mad that the maver I. 1036 00:51:28,239 --> 00:51:28,960 Speaker 5: Mean, they still can. 1037 00:51:29,440 --> 00:51:31,040 Speaker 2: It's forty one and a half. They got three left, 1038 00:51:31,520 --> 00:51:33,880 Speaker 2: so probably gonna hit it. I'm probably going to go 1039 00:51:33,920 --> 00:51:39,040 Speaker 2: four and one on those. The other thing is back 1040 00:51:39,080 --> 00:51:42,600 Speaker 2: in January on I'm looking at the article as of 1041 00:51:42,840 --> 00:51:47,280 Speaker 2: this exact moment. Back in January. On January twenty second, 1042 00:51:48,719 --> 00:51:52,640 Speaker 2: a month into the season, I wrote this column Nicola 1043 00:51:52,719 --> 00:51:56,320 Speaker 2: Jokic emerging was sleeper MVP value despite the nugget struggles 1044 00:51:57,280 --> 00:52:02,640 Speaker 2: Denver where they were under five hundredth time and Jogic 1045 00:52:02,800 --> 00:52:05,040 Speaker 2: was plus eight hundred and you could get them at 1046 00:52:05,080 --> 00:52:07,759 Speaker 2: ten to one at DraftKings. I said, I gave that 1047 00:52:07,840 --> 00:52:11,560 Speaker 2: to you back in January at tend Wow. 1048 00:52:12,360 --> 00:52:15,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, you just lapped all of our victory lapse. You're 1049 00:52:15,160 --> 00:52:16,000 Speaker 4: just you're just running. 1050 00:52:16,960 --> 00:52:20,000 Speaker 5: That's the one right there, you can see. 1051 00:52:20,520 --> 00:52:22,480 Speaker 2: The biggest thing was you could see it coming where 1052 00:52:23,200 --> 00:52:25,160 Speaker 2: everyone was like, oh, but they're not any good, and 1053 00:52:25,200 --> 00:52:26,760 Speaker 2: I was like, they lost three times with the Kings. 1054 00:52:26,800 --> 00:52:28,239 Speaker 2: Do you really think the Nuggets are going to be 1055 00:52:28,280 --> 00:52:29,880 Speaker 2: worse than the Kings this season? Is that the thing 1056 00:52:29,920 --> 00:52:32,239 Speaker 2: that we think? So that that's probably my best one 1057 00:52:32,360 --> 00:52:33,920 Speaker 2: of the season. I had a couple of others. My 1058 00:52:34,000 --> 00:52:37,240 Speaker 2: win totals are predictably a mess. I'm not gonna hold myself. 1059 00:52:37,760 --> 00:52:39,960 Speaker 2: I'm not gonna be I'm not under five hundred. I'm 1060 00:52:40,000 --> 00:52:42,799 Speaker 2: gonna finish about five hundred. I think units wise, I'm 1061 00:52:42,800 --> 00:52:45,759 Speaker 2: probably gonna wind up being a little under. It's just 1062 00:52:45,920 --> 00:52:48,239 Speaker 2: it was just too hard with everything, Like there's just 1063 00:52:48,920 --> 00:52:50,240 Speaker 2: like I think. 1064 00:52:50,120 --> 00:52:52,840 Speaker 6: You need to be commanded for even attempting win totals 1065 00:52:52,880 --> 00:52:55,239 Speaker 6: this season because it's just like that's something I just 1066 00:52:55,520 --> 00:52:57,520 Speaker 6: had no interest in doing with the COVID stuff. 1067 00:52:57,880 --> 00:52:59,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I wanted to do it because there's 1068 00:52:59,719 --> 00:53:00,040 Speaker 2: so much. 1069 00:53:00,080 --> 00:53:02,400 Speaker 4: On Whatever is the opposite of a victory lap? I 1070 00:53:02,520 --> 00:53:04,239 Speaker 4: have to go back and see. I don't remember if 1071 00:53:04,239 --> 00:53:05,799 Speaker 4: I actually picked this, but I know I at least 1072 00:53:05,840 --> 00:53:08,839 Speaker 4: strongly considered it. I'm pretty sure I had the Utah 1073 00:53:09,000 --> 00:53:11,840 Speaker 4: Jazz out of the playoffs, or at least as like 1074 00:53:11,960 --> 00:53:14,840 Speaker 4: my seven or eight seed. So if I get like 1075 00:53:14,960 --> 00:53:18,080 Speaker 4: run a backwards victory lap the wrong direction around the track, 1076 00:53:18,239 --> 00:53:19,719 Speaker 4: that's my reverse victory lap. 1077 00:53:20,480 --> 00:53:23,400 Speaker 2: All right, So Brandon to wrap up here, do you 1078 00:53:23,440 --> 00:53:26,960 Speaker 2: have a thanks for nothing? I do. Good teams win 1079 00:53:27,520 --> 00:53:31,960 Speaker 2: and great teams cover, but some teams do neither. This 1080 00:53:32,239 --> 00:53:34,000 Speaker 2: is thanks for nothing. 1081 00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:39,040 Speaker 5: It's it's too night. 1082 00:53:40,000 --> 00:53:44,799 Speaker 4: We really did, John, Gentlemen, we know how I feel 1083 00:53:44,840 --> 00:53:47,680 Speaker 4: about my Minnesota Timberwolves. We know how I like to 1084 00:53:47,760 --> 00:53:51,960 Speaker 4: dump on my Timberwolves. Today. It's not a thanks for nothing, 1085 00:53:52,120 --> 00:53:55,680 Speaker 4: it's a thanks for everything. It is Hall of Fame weekend. 1086 00:53:56,440 --> 00:53:58,759 Speaker 4: My guy, Kevin Garnett is going to the Hall of Fame. 1087 00:53:59,520 --> 00:54:02,560 Speaker 4: Kevin gar And that is literally the reason that Minnesota 1088 00:54:02,600 --> 00:54:05,600 Speaker 4: Timbrelds still exists. If it were not for Garnett, there 1089 00:54:05,600 --> 00:54:08,400 Speaker 4: wouldn't be a team in Minnesota anymore. There wouldn't be 1090 00:54:08,640 --> 00:54:11,560 Speaker 4: basketball fans in Minnesota. We'd be all stuck watching hockey 1091 00:54:11,680 --> 00:54:15,440 Speaker 4: up there again. Garnett gave everything to the team everything. 1092 00:54:15,560 --> 00:54:18,480 Speaker 4: There's not a single fan was upset when he left. 1093 00:54:18,560 --> 00:54:22,360 Speaker 4: Every fan rooted when he won the championship because we 1094 00:54:22,440 --> 00:54:25,560 Speaker 4: all knew that the team wasn't it. We all just 1095 00:54:25,960 --> 00:54:29,440 Speaker 4: wanted him to win. He loved Minnesota, loved Minnesota fans. 1096 00:54:29,719 --> 00:54:32,759 Speaker 4: I think he's the greatest modern defender in history. His 1097 00:54:32,920 --> 00:54:35,960 Speaker 4: numbers should be in the Minnesota Rafters Police Minnesota, get 1098 00:54:35,960 --> 00:54:39,279 Speaker 4: it right. Ken Barnett is why I'm a basketball fan 1099 00:54:39,440 --> 00:54:43,160 Speaker 4: and why I'm a basketball writer. So in a kind moment, 1100 00:54:43,960 --> 00:54:46,440 Speaker 4: thanks for everything. Kevin Garnett Hall of Famer. 1101 00:54:47,560 --> 00:54:50,480 Speaker 5: Well that's sweet, that's just yeah, that's just that was 1102 00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:51,200 Speaker 5: real positive. 1103 00:54:51,800 --> 00:54:56,200 Speaker 2: Brandon Anderson is a hater and for me, like I 1104 00:54:56,280 --> 00:54:58,279 Speaker 2: have something similar to that I want to share with 1105 00:54:58,640 --> 00:55:00,480 Speaker 2: with where everything has been this season, and like you 1106 00:55:00,560 --> 00:55:03,560 Speaker 2: talk about like the things that make you love sports, right, 1107 00:55:03,680 --> 00:55:05,640 Speaker 2: like what what are the stories that really make you 1108 00:55:05,719 --> 00:55:09,040 Speaker 2: love sports? And for me for doing thanks for everything, 1109 00:55:09,160 --> 00:55:11,399 Speaker 2: I gotta say thank you. New York next for being 1110 00:55:11,440 --> 00:55:13,759 Speaker 2: the best first half team in all of history. Thank 1111 00:55:13,840 --> 00:55:16,719 Speaker 2: you so much. You've made me so much money. Thank you, 1112 00:55:17,120 --> 00:55:20,440 Speaker 2: bless of New York Knicks first half. Thank you so much. 1113 00:55:20,600 --> 00:55:21,520 Speaker 2: Rahema's with me on this. 1114 00:55:22,800 --> 00:55:24,919 Speaker 4: Start spreading the news. 1115 00:55:25,840 --> 00:55:27,960 Speaker 6: You have no idea, yo, I had them the last 1116 00:55:28,000 --> 00:55:31,840 Speaker 6: two nights, right, they were dale seven with three minutes 1117 00:55:31,920 --> 00:55:34,120 Speaker 6: and thirty seconds to go against. 1118 00:55:33,840 --> 00:55:38,000 Speaker 2: Both the LA teams and one both outright. It's amazing. 1119 00:55:38,120 --> 00:55:40,080 Speaker 2: I've never seen anything like. 1120 00:55:40,200 --> 00:55:42,520 Speaker 5: It's just like I can't even say what I'm thinking 1121 00:55:42,640 --> 00:55:42,920 Speaker 5: right now. 1122 00:55:43,000 --> 00:55:44,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, I got the number. I got the numbers. You 1123 00:55:44,360 --> 00:55:46,680 Speaker 2: want the numbers. Here the numbers the Knicks this season 1124 00:55:46,760 --> 00:55:51,719 Speaker 2: in the first half forty eight twenty and one. That's 1125 00:55:51,760 --> 00:55:56,399 Speaker 2: a plus twenty six units just on the spread. That's 1126 00:55:56,520 --> 00:56:00,040 Speaker 2: not even moneyline, baby, which they were getting like it 1127 00:56:00,160 --> 00:56:03,040 Speaker 2: was really crazy. This is what I keep saying, these lines. 1128 00:56:03,320 --> 00:56:05,880 Speaker 2: They just take the full game line and they chop it. 1129 00:56:06,440 --> 00:56:08,359 Speaker 2: So it doesn't matter that the Knicks are the best 1130 00:56:08,520 --> 00:56:11,200 Speaker 2: first half team in existence. If they're a dog for 1131 00:56:11,320 --> 00:56:15,600 Speaker 2: the game, they're a dog at half. Like your edge 1132 00:56:15,640 --> 00:56:18,600 Speaker 2: there has been incredible because like, yes, the Knicks have 1133 00:56:18,680 --> 00:56:21,720 Speaker 2: been one of the best like ats teams this season overall, 1134 00:56:21,800 --> 00:56:25,640 Speaker 2: for sure, But the bigger thing is that you're getting 1135 00:56:25,760 --> 00:56:28,960 Speaker 2: a plus money line just for them to lead at half, 1136 00:56:29,120 --> 00:56:31,239 Speaker 2: and then when teams either figure them out or push 1137 00:56:31,360 --> 00:56:33,840 Speaker 2: past them or whatever, you've already cashed. 1138 00:56:35,040 --> 00:56:37,200 Speaker 1: Thank you New York Nicks for being the I'm gonna 1139 00:56:37,200 --> 00:56:41,520 Speaker 1: tell you it's gotten even crazier for me because I've 1140 00:56:41,600 --> 00:56:44,920 Speaker 1: actually been waiting until they get down five or six 1141 00:56:45,040 --> 00:56:46,440 Speaker 1: points and then. 1142 00:56:46,480 --> 00:56:49,239 Speaker 6: Taking the money line and then getting a bigger money line. 1143 00:56:49,280 --> 00:56:52,520 Speaker 6: So it's just like it's literally been like printing money. 1144 00:56:53,520 --> 00:56:56,400 Speaker 2: It's been absolutely incredible. All Right. That's gonna wrap it 1145 00:56:56,480 --> 00:56:59,120 Speaker 2: up with the Action Network Final NBA Regular Season Edition. 1146 00:56:59,560 --> 00:57:01,520 Speaker 2: Thanks for joining us. We've had a lot of fun 1147 00:57:01,600 --> 00:57:06,680 Speaker 2: this season. Next week, Monday, we are doing a Twitter Spaces. 1148 00:57:07,440 --> 00:57:09,879 Speaker 2: I'm just telling you guys this now. We are doing 1149 00:57:09,880 --> 00:57:14,560 Speaker 2: a Twitter spaces on Monday breaking down the play in 1150 00:57:14,680 --> 00:57:18,680 Speaker 2: tournament angles to bet all those props, all those odds. 1151 00:57:18,840 --> 00:57:21,320 Speaker 2: Check that out on the Action Network Candle at Action 1152 00:57:21,440 --> 00:57:24,680 Speaker 2: Network HQ on Monday. It's gonna be sometime towards the evening. 1153 00:57:24,840 --> 00:57:26,720 Speaker 2: We all have the exact details that will be up 1154 00:57:26,760 --> 00:57:28,400 Speaker 2: on Twitter. Check us out on Twitter and you can 1155 00:57:28,440 --> 00:57:33,480 Speaker 2: follow that. Wednesday, we are previewing the Eastern Conference playoffs. 1156 00:57:33,960 --> 00:57:36,400 Speaker 2: We will break down the entire slate. We will look 1157 00:57:36,400 --> 00:57:41,080 Speaker 2: at series prices, win differentials, props, everything that you need 1158 00:57:41,160 --> 00:57:43,680 Speaker 2: to know to bet the NBA playoffs first round the 1159 00:57:43,680 --> 00:57:48,080 Speaker 2: Eastern Conferences on Wednesday. On Friday is the Western Conference. 1160 00:57:48,480 --> 00:57:51,200 Speaker 2: We're not going to know who the one eights are 1161 00:57:51,760 --> 00:57:54,360 Speaker 2: when we do the East on Wednesday, and we won't know. 1162 00:57:55,760 --> 00:57:59,040 Speaker 2: We may not know who the even the West are 1163 00:57:59,280 --> 00:58:02,080 Speaker 2: the one eight depending on what the schedule is. So well, 1164 00:58:02,120 --> 00:58:05,600 Speaker 2: have everything else but the one eights. Those are going 1165 00:58:05,640 --> 00:58:07,520 Speaker 2: to be compelling, but we'll have all that content up 1166 00:58:08,000 --> 00:58:10,400 Speaker 2: on Action Network. Make sure to follow us in the 1167 00:58:10,400 --> 00:58:12,600 Speaker 2: Action Network app. You heard about Brandon's and the prop success. 1168 00:58:12,760 --> 00:58:16,280 Speaker 2: Follow him on that app. Raheem's been killing out on 1169 00:58:16,360 --> 00:58:18,960 Speaker 2: totals this season. Follow him. I've been good on halves. 1170 00:58:19,240 --> 00:58:20,920 Speaker 2: Follow me and just pay attention to my half my 1171 00:58:21,160 --> 00:58:24,800 Speaker 2: halftime plays. Make sure to rate, review and subscribe. Give 1172 00:58:24,880 --> 00:58:26,760 Speaker 2: us those five star reviews. Check out all the shows 1173 00:58:26,800 --> 00:58:29,560 Speaker 2: on the network this week, including We've Got Golf, We've 1174 00:58:29,600 --> 00:58:31,760 Speaker 2: got MLB. I'm sure that we're going to have NFL 1175 00:58:31,800 --> 00:58:33,880 Speaker 2: futures very soon. Check out the favorites. Raheem and I 1176 00:58:33,960 --> 00:58:36,680 Speaker 2: were on yesterday with Chad Milman and Simon Hunter talking 1177 00:58:36,680 --> 00:58:39,280 Speaker 2: about the Knicks and other angles. Make sure to check 1178 00:58:39,360 --> 00:58:41,160 Speaker 2: that out and we'll see you guys again next time 1179 00:58:41,520 --> 00:58:43,760 Speaker 2: on the Action Network podcast, NBA Edition. 1180 00:58:52,400 --> 00:58:53,440 Speaker 3: We're finished talking