WEBVTT - CoreWeave Drops 2.5% After Heavily Downsized $1.5 Billion IPO

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Cory've actually in positive territory now just around forty dollars

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>fifty five cents a share, so up about one percent.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>We're going to keep an eye on this one and

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 3>we're going to get into it a little bit more

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>deeply in just a moment. First up, though, as Charlie mentioned,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>you heard, stocks are down overall bonds up following today's

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 3>batch of US economic data that showed to pick up

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>an inflation, weaker than estimated spending and the latest update

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>to the Atlanta Fed GDP now pointing to a negative

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>growth in the first quarter, even after adjusting for gold imports.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 3>It was revised lower to down point five percent from

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>up point two percent previously. After day's weaker than expected

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>spending data, we needed to do an economic round up.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 4>So we got the guy with us to help us

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>with that. That's Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy Corus.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Mia'm a cowboy to do the economic ground up. Well Dallas, No,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, Dallas people would be They wouldn't like that.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking of your Boston Red Sox.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yes, they're in Dallas or they won last night.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>So okay, good, that's what we care about.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, do we have a problem, Uh, well, now you

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 5>can use the NASA thing, Houston.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 6>We're trying to get there, Mike, do we have a problem.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 5>We have black clouds on the horizon. Put it that way.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 5>We don't know if the storm is going to actually hit,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 5>or if it does, how bad it's going to be.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 5>But definitely we saw we saw weakness in spending. The

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 5>spending that we did get up four tenths for the

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 5>month after three tenths decline in January basically was in

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 5>durable goods. So you get the impression that people were

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 5>pulling forward purchases trying to get ahead of tariffs, which

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 5>is probably also the story that we saw in the

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Michigan sentiment numbers today. With this was the final update.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 5>We normally just talk about the preliminary and that doesn't

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>usually move much, but this time we saw a drop

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 5>in the headline number and drop in expectations of fairly

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 5>strong to fifty two six from fifty four to two.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>So people think there's going to be a problem six

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 5>months from now, and you can see that reflected in

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 5>the inflation expectations numbers.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 4>Which was the most important data point that we got

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 4>this morning. Which one's the one moving the markets right now.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 5>It's probably the inflation ones.

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 4>But that's interesting because when those came out, we didn't

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 4>see I mean, when the market opened, didn't seem like

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the market moved a lot. The equity market at least

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>didn't move a lot un till ten.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, everybody, well, that's that's what I mean. The inflation

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 5>expectations number, not the inflation numbers. We got basically what

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 5>was expected with the PCEE, because that's that's an indicator,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 5>that's the way it's put together. Economists can forecast it

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 5>pretty accurately. And it was only off by a tenth

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 5>in the core on a year over year basis, So

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 5>it was the inflation expectations numbers on a one year basis.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 5>People think inflation this year is going to be five percent,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 5>and five to ten year inflation is will be four

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 5>point one percent. These are significant moves, and you know,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't think the Fed is terrified, but they're keeping

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 5>an eye on this. They don't want inflation expectation.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 6>Mister Mike, can there be five percent inflation?

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Sure, this is only the highest level since twenty

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty two. Remember we had nine percent inflation. And that's

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 5>part of the thing here is that people think this

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 5>is possible because they saw it happened, and so now

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 5>the idea is, you know, we're going to get tariffs.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be a tax on everything we buy

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 5>that's imported, and so people are thinking, well, I'm going

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>to be paying more. And the more I hear about it,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 5>the worse it sounds. Especially you know, you've got Donald

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 5>Trump saying twenty five tariff on important cars, right, and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the American cars we buy come from

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 5>Canada and Mexico. The American marks put it that way.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that what is attributing to higher inflation expectations? Is

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 4>it just tariffs?

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 5>It's basically tariffs. We haven't seen any real inflation news

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 5>in the actual inflation figures that would move people's expectations.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>In general, inflation has been coming down. It's gotten stuck

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 5>a little bit, but it's not moved up significantly. So

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 5>you've got to be looking at the headlines for what's

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 5>going on.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, One thing I do wonder is how quickly

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>do we start to see the actual tariff impact in

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>economic data points. I thought I heard something this morning

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 3>on surveillance. It's it takes a few months for it

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to work its way in. So when will we start

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>to because right now a lot of it is sentiment right,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>concerns about things. But when the reality hits and we

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>see those prices, like, when will we see that?

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would look forward sometime in the summer. You

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 5>get the tariffs on automobiles. Dealers generally have about two

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 5>months worth of inventory in their lots on a rough basis,

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 5>so they'll sell through those, and then when you start

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 5>to get replacement for those, the costs will have to

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 5>go up. The same thing with the other tariffs is

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 5>going to put on next week. We don't exactly know

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 5>what they're going to be, but supposing puts on tariffs

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 5>on fruits and vegetables from Mexico, depending on when those

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 5>tariffs become effective deals start to see those sooner than

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 5>you would other things. And then there's the intermediate goods,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 5>the stuff that goes into other stuff that comes into

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 5>the country, and that'll just depend on how soon it

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 5>gets put in and how soon those things get go

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 5>on sale.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 6>All Right, we got to leave it there.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 3>That is certainly though, something that investors are keeping an

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>eye on all of that. Economic Mike, thanks so much,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>have a great week. And Bloomberg News International Economics and

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Policy correspondent Michael McKee. So that is the key economic

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 3>news you need to know, and that is certainly impacting

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>today's trade. We've got another big indicator of market health

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 4>And that takes us to the highly anticipated IPO of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the Nvidia backed core Weave Corey've shares opened up at

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine dollars. It was two and a half percent

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 4>below the IPO price, up two percent though right now,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>just in the last nine minutes or so, Carol, Yeah,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 4>they went from the red to the green. The offering

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 4>did raise one and a half billion dollars thirty seven

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 4>and a half million shares priced at forty dollars a piece.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 4>The deal was downsize though from an initial plan of

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 4>forty nine million shares. Who is said to have bought

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 4>the shares also super interesting. So let's get into all

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>of that and more with the dynamic deal of Bloomberg

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 4>News US IPO and Deals reporter Ryan Gould and Bloomberg

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 4>News Equities reporter Bailly Lipschultz here in the studio. Bailey

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 4>on the price action. Why did we see the reversal here?

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Probably bankers utilized in the green shoes, so especially with

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 7>the deal like this, so you kind of use the

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 7>shares with the thing with it. When you do an IPO,

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 7>you sell a bunch of shares and then banks can

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 7>buy other shares at the IPO price. So typically the

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 7>whole mechanism operates to basically give some form of balance

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 7>with the deal. So I was talking a few bankers

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 7>away from.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Its orchestrated to make it's orchestrated.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, don't ask Bill Ackman about it, he has

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 7>some pretty strong thoughts on it. But I was talking

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 7>to a banker away from the deal and he was

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 7>basically saying, when you see a deal like this, where

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 7>so much of the book, as we've reported, has been

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 7>allocated to a handful of investors.

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 8>People will get jittery.

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 7>So if you see the stock dropping in your hedge

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 7>fund who bought this to make a quick buck, you

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 7>want to get out as quick as you can. And

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 7>then the banks will wait for that kind of rush

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 7>of volume help stabilize the price, and then that can

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 7>set up for you know, down two and a half

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 7>to up two and a half, but still marginal.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 6>Is that not normal?

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 3>To have what half of the book allocated to the

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>three largest investors.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 7>That is tighter than I can think of in recent memory.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 7>We normally will have some deals that are they call

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 7>him klubby. But as we reported half the book to

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 7>three investors, so seven hundred and fifty million dollars of

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 7>stock chopped up. And then if you look even further

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 7>at our reporting, top fifteen to ninety percent of the deal,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 7>so very tightly allocated to almost friends of Morgan Stanley,

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 7>if you will, all.

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, klubby friends, all that good stuff. Having said that Ryan,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 3>going into this it was downsize, so we had reduced

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>expectations going into it based on that, and we are

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>now showing a little bit of a gain. Is this

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>a good debut, a bad debut?

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Or neutral?

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 9>I think it's probably slightly I don't know, have to

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 9>be that person, but I think it is still slightly

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 9>too early. Let's see where we are at for because

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, to the Green Shoe Point shore.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 9>But I was also talking to Mark Linchrato this morning

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 9>the sea of Cooley, and you know, he was quite

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 9>quick to point out aside, you know, away from the

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 9>noise that we've seen this week in markets, and you know,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 9>just given where the nasdeck is in the smp IS today,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 9>cooleyve is not like most other tech companies that some

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 9>of these investors you know, would be putting orders in for.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean, his his view is that quite capital intensive.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 9>It is just based on the business model of Corey.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Even so, his view in telling me this morning on

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 9>the phone, was that investors are going to take some

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 9>time to actually get their heads around how we do things,

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 9>and you know, it's going to be a little bit

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 9>of a process. So I think you could probably see

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 9>some volatility for a period. And you know, I mean

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 9>we're at you know, forty ninety one now it is

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 9>conspicuously in that forty dollars area.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, the price there isn't it just CEO speak.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't, like, know, how how should we we're smart

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>here at you like, how don't we read that?

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 9>And I put that to him, and you know, I

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 9>think there's there's a lot going on. I mean, you've

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 9>obviously got the Microsoft headline this week, which we spoke

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 9>about yesterday. But then at the same time, the biggest

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 9>customer it is, Yeah, and you would have to imagine

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 9>in there among that sort of you know, taking fifty

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 9>percent of the book too, I'm sure, in and around

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 9>that area. And you know, I actually put it to

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 9>Michael in for this morning, around sort of the Nvidio

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 9>angle and you know, again away from some of the noise.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 9>He said that without in video and without the other

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven investors, this IPO would have got over the line.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, how did they do it then?

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Or is it because they knew they had those backstops?

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, for a company like Cole, we've

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 9>that the thesiss is quite clear. It's just it becomes

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 9>it's a valuation mechanism right now if you're an investor,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 9>because I think, you know, the free cash flow is

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 9>very good. I mean, people are generally quite comfortable with

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 9>the leverage, but it's always coming back to sort of

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 9>some of the concerns around the customer concentration. And you know,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 9>they're quite quick to point out that the open a

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 9>Eye contract that they agreed, you know, quite recently almost

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 9>twelve million dollars is a boon, and you know it is.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 9>But at the same time, you're still faced with seventy

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 9>seven percent of me your revenue one paper, coming from

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 9>essentially two customers. So regardless of what sector you're in,

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 9>whether you're AI or otherwise, people are going to look

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 9>at that and think is that okay for us?

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 4>And you take a view, right, yeah, Billie. Even though

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 4>this is a little bit different of an IPO, it's

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 4>certainly a canary in the coal mine or some sort

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 4>of bell weather for other companies that are on the

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>sidelines right now thinking about going public. What's at stake here?

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 5>A lot, but also not a lot, okay?

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 10>So it put it this way.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 7>The biggest side, the biggest IPO of the year was

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 7>Venture Global, similar downsize, cut the book by about forty percent,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 7>priced poorly, traded, poorly down north of fifty seven percent.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 7>When I talk to bankers and investors, they're vocal, they

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 7>were vocal.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 8>This is a one off. We're not worried about it.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 7>This deal comes out talking to bankers yesterday, We're not

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 7>too worried about it. But it begs the question when will.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 8>People be worried about it?

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Because when you have six of the ten largest US

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 7>IPOs year to date trading below offer, you can point

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 7>to the market being down as much as you want,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 7>but at the end of the day, people.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 8>Buy IPOs to outperform the market.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 7>If you're not getting a day one pop or even

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 7>a month later outperformance, that starts to make people second guess,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 7>why am I going to allocate resources to a private

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 7>company that I've maybe met once or twice when I

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 7>can buy your direct peers at a discount, and that's

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 7>kind of what's been playing out.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 3>It also makes me wonder, you know, at Bloomberg Investors Share,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I talk with the president of the New York Stock

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Exchange Land Martinet, and the expectations were that this was

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be a better year for m and a

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>for IPOs highly anticipated with Corewave and some others that

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 3>were substantial in terms of their size. So I'm just

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of wondering, is there something systemic going on in

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the IPO market or is it just once again, you know,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 3>because right, give us some context in terms of the

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 3>last few years.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 7>So we're in entering now the fourth year of very

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 7>lackluster IPO offerings. So Ever since the market really got

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 7>shut late twenty one early twenty twenty two, you've had

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 7>dribs and drabs.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 8>Arm has been terrific.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 7>Reddit has performed outside of the pullback, all things considered,

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 7>quite well. But when we've had three years of bankers

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 7>and CEOs pointing towards the market not being there even

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 7>though we're at all time highs, now you're dealing with

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 7>a market pulling back. A number of companies, early investors

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 7>maybe saying, hey, we penciled in twenty twenty five, we

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 7>need to get this on the ice. And when you interview,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 7>when you when Bloomberg investors playing out the vix was

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 7>back above twenty, we're back above twenty again. That's where

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 7>people on the banking side look at as a Okay,

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 7>maybe we should rethink this, or we need to be

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 7>more diligent with how we price these deals and how

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 7>we communicate to investors. But there's as you mentioned, since

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 7>March fourteenth, market's been choppy Klarna, stub Hub, e, Toro,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 7>and Integrity Insurance have all flipped public.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 8>So they've opened the door to going up.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 9>But go ahead, Ryan, Yeah, now just jump in and say,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 9>I think it points to a wider question that's going

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 9>on between investors large, you know, tier one investors in

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 9>the banks around you know, what is the true quality

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 9>of most companies trying to go public these days and

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 9>how much of a discount is necessary to get them

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 9>over the line. I mean, we've talked a lot about

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, on the desks only abount, the

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 9>nature of the ip of discount. It has narrowed, you know,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 9>in recent years, but is there an idea that it

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 9>could start to widen again given some of the price

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 9>pressure that we're seeing in some of these debuts.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I also think about, you know, this is something I

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 3>know you guys cover and we talk about Tim and

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I the private markets and just again there's so much

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 3>cash out there.

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, how how old is Core Weave.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 9>It's been around for I think twenty seventeen.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a younger company, all right, because we have seen

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 3>a lot of companies that are able to stay private

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>for a lot longer.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look at Clona.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>Right, we talked about the other day.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Iah, this is like a company that's almost as old

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>as Facebook. Yeah, it's wild.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's it's kind of interesting. All right, So

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 3>then what's the Outlok. We got just about a minute

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 3>or so left. I mean, Ryan, how are you thinking

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>about this today and maybe what's to come.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Or what are you hearing from?

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean you know a street.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 9>I think the point on private private captain in general

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 9>is a prescient one because you know, there is someone

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 9>I was speaking to this morning who was away from

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 9>the from this deal that we're talking about today, and

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 9>they're kind of saying, you know, our IPO is again

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 9>being seen as sort of the last resort, you know,

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 9>as opposed to a sign of strength. And you know,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 9>what does it mean for those who look to go

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 9>And you know Clana could in theory go as soon

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 9>as next week.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 4>But are they well Bailey mentioned all these companies that

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 4>in the last few weeks have flipped to go in public.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 4>How much can they actually delay? Just in the last

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>half thirty seconds that we have There's.

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 8>No rule, so technically you can be on file for

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 8>as long as you want.

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 7>You just pay lawyers to Ryan's point, Clarna, the earliest

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 7>they could launch a roadshow would be Monday, so that's

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 7>what we'll be watching. But again, tariff days next week,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 7>and who knows what's going to go well.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully for your sake for the weekend, I hope that

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 4>doesn't happen.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 6>Get a break, Get a break, everybody.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Core weave just up a hair so it's

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>above forty, but it was just below forty a moment ago.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Guys, Thank you so much.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Usipo and Deals Report, Ryan Gould and Bloomberg

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>News Equities reporter Bailey Lipschultz.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Literally stock Actually the last segment we were talking about

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the Core reeve ipo and that is Reddit.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 6>It's also on our radar today.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>The gloomy sentiment around the company has failed to dissipate

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>after it shares fell fifty percent from a February high.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 3>With volatile technology stocks under pressure, a little perspective, as

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>we like to do here at Bloomberg. Stock is up

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>about two hundred and nine percent from its IPO tim

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>just about one year ago.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, with the trade concerns and the outlook for the

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 4>social media platform. Here with us as Bloomberg News acuaby's

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 4>reporter Karmen Ryanikese, she joins us here in the Bloomberg

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Business Week studio. What happened? I mean, it had a

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 4>great IPO, great debut, and at the end of the

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 4>year things were looking really good.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 6>Tim spends a lot of time on it.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I actually spent so much time on it that

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, they do the like the Spotify rap thing.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Everybody does the Spotify rap thing. Reddit had one and

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 4>they showed me like the data, like how much time

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I spent on it. And my reaction to that was

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 4>deleting the app from my phone because I was like,

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm wasting my life with this.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 6>They're sending you a hat a T shirt.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Especially Enough about me though, Karmen, Yes, what's going on?

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 11>Reddit had a huge run up. It was a great IPO,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 11>great performance. Last year, got really swept up in the

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 11>AI wave that we saw across you know, the entire

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 11>technology space. For the most part, and then in the

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 11>beginning of this year, it's it's fourth quarter report felt

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 11>like just fell just a little bit short of user figures.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 11>There was a change in the Google Out algorithm that

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 11>sort of hit its US users. That actually seems to

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 11>have abated. But what's happened on the other side is

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 11>that it's gotten really weighed down in this overall tech

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 11>momentum trade that where we've seen so much volatility. I mean,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 11>even today you can see the nasdas down more than

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 11>two and a half percent, and some of these heavy

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 11>highest flyers are really just getting dragged down. And so

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 11>Reddit is a really good example of a stock where

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 11>there is so much bullish sentiment. There's you know, a

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 11>ton of excitement I think for use with AI, like

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 11>we're saying, large language models usage with Reddit, a lot

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 11>of the train.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 4>Using the data. So people have answered a lot of

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>questions on Reddit, a lot of experts. That's what's great

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 4>about Reddit. Reddit has then sold the data to the

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 4>LLLM companies exactly and they train their lms using that data.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 11>Exactly, and there's a you know, bulls also point out

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 11>that there's a lot of growth potential markets here for Reddit,

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 11>especially outside of us. So it really is a good

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 11>example of a stock that's just gotten really hit, And

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 11>there are other examples as well.

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 3>So fifteen buys seven holds three Cells. If I look

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 3>at the Bloomberg in terms of analysts coverage, still a

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of buys on the stock.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Are animalsts though getting.

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 3>More negative on it, or do they still like the

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 3>fundamental story but just think it's the tech malaise?

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 8>What is it?

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so there was one downgrade late recently or an

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 11>analysts that initiated at Cell after the Google algorithm okay switch,

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 11>But other than that, honestly, analysts have maybe tweaked their

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 11>price targets a little bit, but they've maintained their by ratings.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 11>They think that there's a long term monetization story here,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 11>that there is a lot of growth I had for Reddit.

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 8>The one thing that I.

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 11>Also think is interesting here is and again like the

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 11>entire sort of tech momentum, I think people are a

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 11>little bit hesitant of where to buy the dip or

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 11>trying to call a dip, just seeing that there could

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 11>be so much more room on the downside for a

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 11>lot of these stocks that have really just cut the

0:18:58.520 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 11>wind taken out of their sales.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I would say, like fourteen percent of the float is

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 3>still short, so there is still some negative sentiment out

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>there that it could go for sure.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't understand why Google would change its algorithm

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 4>to show less of this because people and the cover

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 4>of Business Week, of the upcoming issue of Business Week

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 4>is about what Google's doing in the face of the

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>rise of AI and how people's search habits are changing

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 4>and how Google's dealing with that. And one thing that

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 4>the article mentions is that people started to change the

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>way they search by adding Reddit to the end of

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 4>their Google search, so it would then show Reddit results

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 4>because Reddit results were so useful. It seems nuts to

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 4>me that Google would change its algorithm and not show

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Reddit results with the same you know, at the same place.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you make such a good point. I think

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 11>there is sort of a sentiment out there that, I mean,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 11>Google is going to lose some search right because of AI.

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 11>And the thing I will say is like they do

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 11>change their algorithm on occasion. This is not like a

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 11>new thing. So it's something that for Reddit at least

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 11>hopefully has abated. It's something that they're used.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 6>To dealing with.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 11>But Ruby's one to watch it is really interesting.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, and as we said, still way above its

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>IPO price, but it's certainly been under pressure. Good stuff,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Carmen Rhinikeshy's Bloomberg News Equities reporter.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarflay and Android

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 6>I still love because we're kind of cool about a

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 6>lot of things.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 4>We're so chilling cool.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Give us a quiz, Tim and I and man it

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>gets so competitive, all right, Politics, economics, geopolitics, markets, business culture,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>luxury sports.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 6>We love all of it, don't we.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we also love a Bloomberg quiz, A new one

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 4>launching today here to tell us about the Bloomberg Appointed

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 4>News Quiz is a big friend of the show, Really, Sam,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 4>we can say family. Yeah. Former editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Joel Webber, He's head of Bloomberg, explains he's here in

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 4>our Bloomberg BusinessWeek studio. We love quizzes. We love games.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 4>I like beating Carol, I like winning. Pointed is different, though, Joel,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 4>this is not just like you know, what do you know?

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 4>You've got to know and be confident in what you know.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 10>So thanks for having me. Great to be back in

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 10>the studio with you both.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 12>I love that you all are this competitive, and this

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 12>is what we know about our people.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 10>Our people are highly competitive.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 12>We see that every day, and we wanted to give

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 12>our you know, super fans and even you know, people

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 12>who've never interacted with us a way of playing right.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 10>We have so many verbs that we do.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 12>We do, watch, read, listen, why not play that's pointed

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 12>So Bloomberg dot com slash pointed will drop you into

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 12>the game news quiz ten witty questions every single week,

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 12>written by a trivia master, so this is not your

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 12>normal news quiz. And then on top of that, we've

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 12>made the gameplay really distinct.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 10>Do you like to.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 4>Gamble if this is gambling? I like to gamble.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 10>There's gambling, but you know the stakes.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 12>Are relatively Yeah, money process, So you're gonna wage your

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 12>points when you play, and then you can use leverages

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 12>to either amplify your score or hedge.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 3>If you're not so short, how come there's only three

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 3>though opportunity to do that because you got.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 10>To use them strategically.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 6>I wanted the more.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so see, I'm curious. What was your score? That's good,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 10>it's above average, thank you.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I got one fifteen or no, I got one ten.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Sebastian got one fifteen. Yeah, Carol one and Sebastia.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 6>Get one fifteen. Our producers, Elizabeth, what did you get?

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Double digits? Not the triple digits, That's what I'll say.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 4>So we'll see it is it's only the higher the score.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 12>So the high score is one ninety. If you play

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 12>this game perfectly, you get one ninety. The thing about

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 12>this game that's unique is you can also end up

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 12>with one ninety negative. Right, we will lose will Docu

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 12>points if you get your answers wrong. So yeah, I

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 12>knew all the answers, and I knew exactly how to

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 12>play the game, and it was to test that we

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 12>could do it. Wait, so did you get there's a

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 12>number of people who have played and.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 10>Aced it so far, so it's happening.

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>So is it basically like if you pick a category

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and go all in and then leverage.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 8>That one is that how.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 10>You still learn how to play the game.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 12>There's the times that's how you play okay, and so

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 12>we're we're eager to see everyone scores. You get an

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 12>awesome little readout at the end that shows how you played,

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 12>and then the game is free to play. Uh if

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 12>you register on Bloomberg dot com, you'll get a little

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 12>readout that shows how you compare to everybody else. We're

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 12>going to kick this off on Thursday nights from the US,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 12>and it's going to be opened through the weekend. This

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 12>is part of you know, the company's the Bloomberg Weekend,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 12>so it's.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 10>More of a lean back experience. We want you to

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 10>take your time, be thoughtful, make sure that you actually process.

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 12>The little hidden clues we've you know, scattered across the

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 12>questions for you.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I think people understand the leverage portion of it within

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 4>the game, but before you actually play the game, you

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 4>have to know what you know that week. So you're

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 4>essentially given what ten categories you're gonna wager. It could

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 4>be politics, it could be technology, it could be IPOs,

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 4>you could be bankruptcies, and you got to think about

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 4>what you know for that week.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 12>And you're gonna have a little slighter Then you wait

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 12>the category, so you have how many what's the antie that.

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 10>You have to you have ten categories. You can go

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 10>down to five and up to thirty.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 12>Right, so you got a wager whatever you want to

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 12>put on the line there.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Yeah, so that's why it's going to add up

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 4>to one hundred.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 12>And then when you get to a point that you

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 12>get the teas of the question, that's when you can

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 12>use your leverages.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 6>It's really fun.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 3>It was really fun, and I agree with Tim, like

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of quizzes where you've got to be fast.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 3>That's part of like getting a higher score, and it

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was nice to have some time to kind of play

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 3>with it.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 12>What we've cracked here is it's not testing whether or

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 12>not you read your push alert, as most of us

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 12>probably did that or scan the headline. It's how confident

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 12>you are in your answer, and that we think is

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 12>a really uniquely Bloomberg thing.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 10>We're excited to explore more in this category.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 12>This is a new category for us, and we're really

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 12>you know, wanting to prioritize you know, little habit forming experiences.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Like is there a lot of discussion that goes on

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>beyond like what the questions are going to be, like

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>is there something that happens during the week.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 10>And you're like, of these questions.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 12>We've been doing rough draft after rough draft to make

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 12>sure we get it right.

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 10>And you know, this week, maybe.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 12>There was a certain messaging app that was in the news,

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 12>like maybe maybe one question about that. It's a pretty

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 12>good way to get people to start buying and challenge

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 12>each other.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 4>I got that one right.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 3>By the way, there is another Dare I say another

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>quiz that comes out on Thursday, right, and it's.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Always in terminal users, right, big fans.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>But we do but we will be like during the

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 3>week like, oh, that's going to be on the Bloomberg quiz.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 3>And I have a feeling we're going to do the

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 3>same thing with this one.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeap dirt And look, they satisfied different niches like when

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 12>is very terminal centric and you play it for speed

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 12>and see how you can compare. And we're bring a

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 12>little bit more strategic.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 10>With what we're doing on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 13>I love it.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Joel Webber, good to have you here the head of

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 4>Joints and Games. Can you come about more of course

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 4>we can do this every Friday, all right, and don't

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 4>look at the answers for next week. Oh so then

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 4>you can actually take the.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 6>In a real way job.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 10>Come on this job. If I didn't do it before,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 10>say a little advantage.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>You are listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 2>US live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Apple CarPlay and the Android Auto with the

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app, or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Well an update from or on the war in Ukraine,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 4>and I should say an exclusive yesterday from our team

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 4>at Bloomberg News. The US and pushing for a deal

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 4>that would give it control over major future infrastructure and

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 4>mineral investments in Ukraine, potentially gaining a veto over any

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 4>role for Kiev's other allies. This agreement would grant the

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 4>US first claim on profits transferred into a special reconstruction

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 4>investment fund that would be controlled by Washington, and would

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 4>require Ukraine Carol to pay for all US military and

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 4>economic support provided. Since the start of the war.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Andy Kurtzik has kept a close eye on everything happening

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in Ukraine.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 8>It makes sense.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 3>He's the founder and chief executive officer of just answer,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>which matches you with experts such as doctors, lawyers, and

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 3>mechanics and more who can answer your question. He has

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 3>more than three hundred employees in Ukraine. He joins us

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 3>from San Francisco, the Bay Area on this Friday. Andy,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 3>nice to have you back with us. How are you

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and how is your team in Ukraine?

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 13>I'm doing fine, thanks, Carol and Tam happy to be here.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 13>And yeah, it's tough in Ukraine and its situation has

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 13>changed dramatically over the last few years.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, Carol asks how your team is doing,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 4>and it's a complicated question because you have more than

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 4>three hundred people there. But since we last spoke to you,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 4>has the team had to take breaks to go and

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 4>actually fight in the war. How has that worked?

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean our people are getting drafted and they

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 13>are going to fight in a war. It's a it's

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 13>a You know that this war is a meat grinder

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 13>and it is killing lots of people on both sides,

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 13>and they need to keep keep bringing in more people

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 13>to fight the war, and that includes our employees.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Including Andy, those who work for you. Have have you

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 4>lost any members of your team?

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 13>We have, we have It's it's tragic. We have lost

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 13>members of our team. A wonderful guy that I worked

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 13>with closely was killed. It's a tragedy.

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm so sorry to hear that. It's that's absolutely awful.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 4>As I mentioned, it had has been a few years

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 4>since we spoke to you. We spoke to you right

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 4>at the beginning of the war. Certainly a lot has changed,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 4>including a presidential administration. How have you been watching the

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>way that the US has shifted its view in this

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 4>administration on how to support Ukraine and end the war.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 13>I mean, it is, it's a it's a complete one

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 13>shift recently with the Trump administration's approach compared to the

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 13>Biden administration's approach to Ukraine. It is. It is quite

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 13>a lot of uncertainty right now and a lot of

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 13>fear and concern in Ukraine for what might happen.

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 4>One thing that we spoke about when we last spoke

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 4>was the talent in Ukraine, especially on the computer science,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 4>programming engineering side. For years, American companies have tapped into

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 4>the talent there, uh for jobs that have been hard

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to fill here in the US. A lot of companies

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 4>decided not necessarily to continue with their operations in Ukraine

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 4>as a result of the war. You did, though you

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 4>kept your team intact. Explain the reasoning there.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so supporting Ukraine is incredibly strategic for us. I mean,

0:29:54.000 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 13>these are bright, talented, hard working folks and you know,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 13>they they help they be. Without them, we would be

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.719
<v Speaker 13>able to to be where we are today as a company.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 13>And so we really doubled down on supporting them. And

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 13>it's it's both well smart from a business perspective, but

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 13>also I think beyond that, it's it's strategic from a

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 13>global perspective. We're investing in the future of democracy and

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 13>the future, i think a future innovative partner in Europe.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 3>What did you make of when Tim you know, kicked

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>off the introduction to you, you know, talked about, you know,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the negotiations that are going on US involvement looking for

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 3>control over major future infrastructure mineral investments in Ukraine.

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 6>How do you read that?

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 13>I mean, it's it's it's it feels like it's gone

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 13>from UH an incredibly strategic perspective on you know, the

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 13>world democracy and really thinking about the future of all

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 13>of our allies and encouraging democracy to more of a

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 13>negotiation and a business transaction, and you know that's difficult

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 13>to watch.

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 6>Is it also difficult to watch?

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>And I think about some of the optics that some

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 3>have mentioned, certainly during the inauguration of President Trump second

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>time around, of very prominent members of the US tech community,

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>And I am curious what you are hearing from some

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of your peers or others in the tech community about.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 6>The lack of support.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.479
<v Speaker 3>That might be coming from some very prominent individuals who

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 3>could maybe help you help Ukraine in terms of the future.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that has.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 13>Been difficult to watch as well. You know, a couple

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 13>of years ago, the whole world was on ukraine side,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 13>and everybody was rooting for them, supporting them and encouraging

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 13>their fight for democracy, which is really a fight for us,

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 13>and it is. It has been disheartening to watch that

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 13>evaporate over time, and many of those same leaders that

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 13>were staunchly in favor of Ukraine and out there promoting,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 13>you know, Ukraine's democracy, are now quite silent on the topic.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 13>And so you know, that's exactly why I feel it's

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 13>crucial for me to speak up. You know, this fight

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 13>isn't over. Ukraine's struggle for freedom is a marathon, not

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 13>a Sprint, and I believe the tech community, known for

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 13>its innovation, should be standing up and persevering with Ukraine

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 13>to help them them win. So my message to my

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 13>peers is stay engaged. This is good for not just

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 13>your business, but it's good for the world.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>What hope do you have that you can get the

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 3>support that you need from Europe itself? Because I think

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 3>there are some who would say, Okay, this is in

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, the European Union, it's their backyard. You know

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 3>they should be stepping up more.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Are they?

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing in terms of support from other

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 3>European nations in terms of this this ongoing war now

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's third year.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 13>So this is an incredibly strategic battle for the whole world,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 13>for democracies everywhere. So it is about not just the US,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 13>It's about Europe as well. And I am seeing positive

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 13>signs that Europe is stepping up more and doing more

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 13>to fill the void that the US has been expanding

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 13>in terms of the support. So I am hopeful that

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 13>Europe will step up more and do more.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Andy, I want to shift just in the last couple

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 4>of minutes that we have to talking about the business,

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 4>just answer and get a business update from you while

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 4>we have you, I'm curious how you're incorporating AI, something

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 4>that we're spending a good portion of our lives using

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 4>and talking about at this point. How are you incorporating

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 4>it into just Answer? Thank you.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 13>That's a great question.

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 10>We love AI.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 13>We've been using AI for about twelve years a very

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 13>important way. So the way that AI works a just

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 13>answer is that we think about the professional services experience

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 13>going to see a doctor or a lawyer, or a

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 13>mechanic or an accountant or a veterinarian, and we essentially

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 13>took that entire process apart and reassembled it in an

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 13>AI first way twelve years ago, so that everything in

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 13>that customer journey except for the human answer, is automated

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 13>using AI. The intake, the triage, the follow up. So

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 13>everything you can imagine is automated using AI, except for

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 13>the human expert answer. And so that's really driven a

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 13>lot of growth for our business.

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Is there a way though, to I mean, is there

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 4>a way to automate that human answer? I think that

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 4>that's sort of the natural next step for your company

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 4>is that the experts, the answers to the questions exist

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 4>online in some form already no.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 13>Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. So I mean

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 13>as we know. So, first of all, we have a product,

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 13>a division called peerl dot com that is giving AI

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 13>forward answers, so we have a front row seat on

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 13>that experience as well and actually giving expert answers via AI.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 13>Our system is twenty two percent better than Chat, GPT

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 13>and Google Gemini in the professional services sector and forty

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 13>one percent less wrong, and yet people still prefer to

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 13>talk to a human expert for many reasons. First of all,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 13>these systems all hallucinate. Ours is better than Chat, GPT

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 13>and Gemini, but it still hallucinates. And that's just a

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 13>fundamental problem with these foundational models. They make mistakes. And

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 13>when you're talking about a poem or help me write

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 13>an email, you know.

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 5>What you're doing. You can deal with that.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 13>But when you're talking about medical issue, a legal issue, right,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 13>these things are have high consequence and the quality is critical,

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 13>and you're even seeing companies getting sued now Google included

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 13>for you know, giving bad advice.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a good point. Hey, Andy, always good to

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 4>check in with you. Andy Kurtzig is the founder and

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 4>CEO at Just Answer. He joins us from the San

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 4>Francisco Bay Area.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 11>Robmucle I'll bet you let me drive.

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, no, no, no, this is not a toy.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 10>Who's going to drive any please? I'll do the gravels. Wait,

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 10>I want to drive.

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 13>It's a good question.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 5>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 10>That punk's commuting.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, l the don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, we've got about eighteen minutes to go

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>until we wrap up the trading day on this Friday

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 3>and wrapping up the week overall. As we've been reminding

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>everybody you just heard from Bill Maloney and Charlie Pellett, we're.

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 6>Pretty much near our loads of this session. We've stayed

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 6>there really for the last hour.

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 3>It feels like that we haven't been able to see

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 3>any kind of rally potentially into the close here, still

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>down about two percent on the S and P five

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred Dow Jones Industrial average, a decline of seven hundred,

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 3>almost seven hundred and fifty points, down almost one point

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 3>eight percent. The tech heavy Nasdaq one hundred down almost

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 3>two point eight percent. That's a decline of almost five

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty points. But we are seeing really some

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>broad based selling. I keep bringing up the equal weighted

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 3>index for the S and P five hundred just to

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 3>see where that is. As I mentioned, the S and

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 3>P down two point one percent, the equal weighted S

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred ten still down about one point

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 3>six percent.

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm taking a look at deeper dive into the

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 4>different industry groups. Can Communication services down a three point

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 4>nine percent? Consumer discretion down three point six The Bloomberg

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 4>gauge of mag seven is underperforming everything right now. It's

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 4>having its worst day going back to March tenth. This

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>is the Bloomberg Magnificent seven Total Return Index. It's down

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 4>three point seven percent.

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's see what our next guest has to

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 3>say a little bit about this market environment. Rob Fummell

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a senior portfolio manager at Tortoise Capital. It's got nine

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 3>point six billion in assets under management. He helps manage

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Total Return Tick or is TRIX.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 3>It is returned more than thirty eight percent over the

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 3>last year, putting it in the ninety fifth percentile among

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 3>its peers. Go back about three years, averaging about twenty

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 3>percent per year, putting that in the sixty ninth percentile.

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 3>He joins us now from Kansas City, Hey, Rob, before

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 3>we talk energy and other sectors, broad view on today's environment, market,

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 3>environment and the selling that we continue to see on

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>this Friday.

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, good efening Carroll.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Tim.

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Well, obviously it's been a rough week obviously the

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 14>tariffs and uncertainty regarding the impact of tariffs on the

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 14>economy or or driving everything, and so that's what we're

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 14>seeing across the board. I guess the good news is

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 14>as an energy investor, and that's what we focus on

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 14>at Tortoise, the one thing is certain. We always need

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 14>more energy in the un and always need more energy

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 14>in the world, So that's been a good place to be.

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Is it concerning at all to you, given that energy

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 4>prices are volatile in terms of supply and demand, mainly demand,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 4>not just here in the US, but also globally, if

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 4>we could be entering a period of perhaps a recession.

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Tim, And that's a good question. So energy demand

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 14>and the economy go hand in hand. So if we

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 14>do have a recession, yeah, energy demand does go down,

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 14>but it also comes back, and it comes back fairly quickly.

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 14>So if you go back and look over the last

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 14>forty years, global energy demand has risen thirty eight out

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 14>of those forty years. So do we watch it pretty closely, yes,

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 14>But when we look at where do investors look to

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 14>put cash, one of the great things about the energy

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 14>sector is there's a lot of companies out there, like

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 14>infrastructure energy infrastructure companies that has that have fee based

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 14>cash flows and they pay high dividend yields right to investors.

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 14>And that's a good place to be in these uncertain

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 14>times because these dividen and yields are certain. Of the

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 14>cash flows of these companies are certain, and so we

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 14>like those type of plays in this type of a

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 14>market environment in the energy sector.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 3>And there are some specific companies because I do think

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 3>in an environment like this there's always buyers and sellers.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Is just a matter of price, right, And you do

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 3>like you know, and we do see it sometimes an

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 3>investor at this point saying, well, wait a minute, there's

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 3>a name I like, I like the fundamentals.

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 13>I get it.

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's a longer term hold because of the uncertainty

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 3>in the current environment, but nonetheless I can maybe get

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 3>it at a cheaper price in this environment. But let's

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 3>get to some of your individual picks that you like.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Williams Companies is among them. Ticker is WMB. Why this

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>name in particular, Yeah, no Chrols.

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 14>So if you think about this from US a big

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 14>picture perspective, we think that natural gas really well, the

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 14>energy sector is being redefined. We think in the next

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 14>decade or so in natural gas will play a really

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 14>important role.

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 10>And so all that that all ties back.

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 14>To Williams because Williams is one of the operators of

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 14>the largest natural gas pipeline networks in the world. So

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 14>once again they're one of these companies, pretty high dividend yield,

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 14>five percent dividend yield. They're going to grow that dividend

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 14>four to six percent, might even be a little bit

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 14>higher than that out into the future. They're really benefiting

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 14>from a lot of different things that are going on

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 14>in the US, whether that's exporting of liquified natural gas

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 14>out of the US, whether that's bringing back manufacturing to

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 14>the US.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 10>That's really important.

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 14>But the big change is AI and the development of

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 14>electricity demand. That's really needed to support the development of

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 14>AI and all these data centers and Williams will benefit

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 14>from that.

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 4>How do you look at and you have a couple

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 4>more picks, We're going to get to them, But I'm

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 4>just wondering how you look at renewables and whether or

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 4>not there is a future in renewables given what we've

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 4>seen from the Trump administration.

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 14>Sure, Jim, Well, well, we think there's an all of

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 14>the above approach that's going to be necessary for energy demand.

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 14>I think if you just look both domestically and globally,

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 14>energy demands going up, and we're going to build a

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 14>lot of data centers. I know that this data center

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 14>trade is I guess calin being called in the question,

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 14>and maybe some capex is going to be a little

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 14>bit low, or maybe it's going to be a little

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 14>bit higher down the road, but the big picture is

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 14>we're going to need a lot a lot more data

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 14>centers in the US. We're probably going to build this

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 14>equivalent to the Strategic Data Reserve, kind of like we

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 14>have the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and oil, we'll have the

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 14>Strategic Data Reserve for technology. That just means you're gonna

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 14>need a lot of electricity, and you know what, You're

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 14>gonna need a lot of energy, and so we're gonna

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 14>need all of the bit of approach. Renewables to play

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 14>a role in that, but natural gas will play a

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 14>really important role and probably one of the most consequential

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 14>roles going forward.

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, since you are so embedded into the energy space,

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.240
<v Speaker 3>what is your longer term view on renewables?

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 6>Is it a rollback?

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Will we not see the investment? Is it a one

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 3>to eighty turn for the United States? Or you know,

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>the train has already left the station, and renewables has

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 3>to be a part of our energy story going forward

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 3>and will continue to be maybe even more so.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think, I think well part of the technology,

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 14>So I do. I do think that the technologies have

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 14>to have to or will continue to get better. Obviously

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 14>we're looking the wind energy has struggled offshore for sure

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 14>as far as the technology becoming commercial commercial operation. But

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 14>when energy domestically will continue to grow, we think solar

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 14>energy will continue to grow. Hydrogen will be a little

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 14>bit tougher. The economics right now are really tough for

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 14>hydrogen going forward, but carbon capture has the potential as

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 14>well to really change the game and improve the environment

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 14>and the environmental circumstances pretty substantially, probably over the next decade.

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we only have about thirty seconds left, but I

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 4>want you to give us just thirty seconds on energy

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 4>transfer ticker ET. Yeah. ET.

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 14>So it's a great company, diversify energy companies. Almost an

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 14>eight percent dividend yield, going to grow the divid in

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 14>three to five percent a year. It's a classic American

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 14>entrepreneur store run by an entrepreneur, Kelsey Warren.

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 8>Are founded by Kelsey Warren.

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 14>It's got It gives you really exposure to energy infrastructure,

0:43:56.120 --> 0:44:00.320
<v Speaker 14>so fee based cash flows, and exposure to exports, sporting

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 14>of crude oil, exporting of natural gas liquids like athleene

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 14>and propane as well. So it's a great opportunity to

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 14>get some heal.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Twenty seconds left here. Are you nervous about this market environment?

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Are your investors getting nervous running for the exits?

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 14>No, not ours because of the dividend field that we

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 14>can provide.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 14>The energy is underperformed in so many markets, Carolyn, As

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 14>you know, energy is coming back, and actually we're seeing

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 14>a rotation. There's a rotation out of tech into energy.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 14>Energy is one of the best performing sectors in the

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 14>S and P. Five hundred when we wrap up, but

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 14>on Monday, I think it might be the leader. And

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 14>so as a result of that, we're excited about where

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 14>the world.

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 10>Can go with energy.

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, have a good weekend, Rob, Thanks for your

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 3>time today. Rap Down All, Senior portfolio manager, Tortoise Capital.

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.879
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every week day on

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal m