WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: TechStuff Listens to Negativland

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>job in Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. It is time for

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a tech Stuff classic episode. This episode, originally published on

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>January two thousand fifteen, is called tech Stuff Listens to

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Negative Land. Negative Land being a kind of outsider music group,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>transgressive music group, if you, If you will, also ties

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>into topics that we've talked about recently on tech Stuff,

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like copyright and fair use. And I hope you enjoy

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how many time zones there are in the Soviet Junion.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Power and all that. That's power. We've got so much power.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous. Power, power and power. What you're hearing is

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the work of a performance group called Negative Land. The

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>band creates interesting sounds from accommodation of electronics, musical instruments,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and an enormous library of pre recorded audio from sources

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as diversus political speeches to music numbers to old television

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>commercial guest I spoke with Mark Hustler, one of the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>founding members of Negative Land. Our conversation lasted for more

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>than two hours and we talked about topics like art, music,

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property, and more. Well, this episode has highlights from

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. I really learned a lot. And the first

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to know was how Mark got interested

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in this type of art in the first place. I

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>was really into all kinds of music as a teenager,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and there was just some kind of record that I

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear that didn't seem to exist. And so

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>at some point when I was sixteen or seventeen, you know,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, I want to let's make We're gonna

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>make that record, and that's who we did, and it

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>came out when I was still in high school. The

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we in this case was Mark Hustler and Richard Lyons.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Others would join Nega of Land over the years, including

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Don Joyce, who hosts the band's weekly radio show, and

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Ian Allen, who passed away in early The group's membership

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>changed many times throughout its existence, and each member contributed

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a unique perspective, and the band has always been about experimentation.

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>You've got a good beginning list and trial and era.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just a pend again on breaking the records of

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the radio. We've been around an extremely long time I've

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>actually known the guys in the group for thirty six years.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Our first record came out of Night and for some

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>reason which I don't really quite understand, we all just

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>love strange, weird, funny noises and found things and reusing

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff in ways they weren't intended to be used. And

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so our very first recordings were making tape loops, or

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you could cut real to real recording tape and stick

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>one end to the other and they repeat over and

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>over again, you know, and echo, and you could stick

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>pieces of metal into with guitar and make the guitar

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>string sound all strange. And we were recording things off

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the TV and radio and our parents, you know, baking

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen and the sound of the our dog

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>barking outside, and all this stuff made its way into

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>our into our recorded work, and it was kind of

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>surreal data koufy collage. We also put in beats and

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes sang little songs, and it had a somewhat pop

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of sensibility to it in a way, in a

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>screwy sort of way, too stupid great or dumb five

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>six ideottics. The experiments would evolve into projects, and while

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the tools the band used to create their sounds would change,

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the medium in which they worked would remain sound collage.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Collage is a medium that I think is one of

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the easiest art forms in the world, whether it was

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sound or film or visual art, to do something really crappy.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It's really only easy to do collage and just have

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it be really mediocre. And I but to to to

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>really get it to where it's it's it's at a

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>level that we think meets that you know, our our standard.

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it requires a lot of work and thinking

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. And we've had lots of pieces that get

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to a point, but they're just not there yet, you know,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and we sit on them for six months or even

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>a year later we'll go back. In fact, the band

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>might sit on a piece for decades. One piece Negative

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Land recently revisited is a work called Like a Cattle

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Act the Gun by the late Well. I was thinking

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of a Cadillac Cadillac, got Wreck, Cadillac, Catillac, Cadillac, Cadillac, Catillac, Lack, Cadillac, Lack, Cadillac, Cadillac, Cadillac, Cadillac, Cadillac, Cadillac, Lack, Cadillac,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>La Cadillac, Catillac Alan First worked on the piece back

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties. Before his death, Alan gave his

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>blessing to Negative Land to revisit and finish the recording.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Alan was also instrumental in shaping the band's cultural and

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>social perspectives. Before long, the band was using its quirky

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>techniques not just to make interest sounds, but to provide

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>commentary on various issues. It just kept being really interesting

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that you could use collage, you know, to talk about

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>stuff in this way that invited the listener to work

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on figuring out what you were getting at into some degree.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't spell everything out, but we try

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to do something where it's both about stuff, but there's

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>some thing about it. It's open enough that you're engaged

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're drawn in and you're trying to work with it,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully that's the place where you know, you get

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>something out of it that's interesting and it's and different

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for every person who hears it. And because so many

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sounds Negative Land uses in its collage work

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are taken from other sources, you can't just assume that

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing and what the band itself thinks are

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the same thing. While we do sometimes actually write

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>song lyrics and do songs. Most of the spoken word

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you hear in our work is appropriated in collage, So

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not us saying it. We're not It is not

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the author's voice. You're hearing that. It's what we chose

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to use. Well did we choose to Is it because

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we agree with it? We disagree with it, we like it,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we hate it. We think it's funny, stupid, smart, sad, creepy, annoying,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, surreal, And usually for negative Land, will the

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 1>things we pick to you is will usually be something

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that will be of many of those things all at

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Listen, this is not all that shouting,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>all that noise. Ian Allen's involvement would lead to another

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>pivotal moment in negative lands development, meeting Don Joyce. Joyce

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is a radio DJ who not only joined Negative Land,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>but also helped create a venue for the group to

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>express themselves to a larger audience. It's called over the

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Edge for Negative Land. One of the kind of laboratories

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for us to work on new ideas and try out

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>new stuff is our weekly radio show. It's called Over

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Edge. It's been on, it's still on to this day,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's three hours of audio collage that's always about

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a theme of some sort or another. And Negative Land

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>member Don Joyce is the one who has been kind

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of the steward of keeping that flame alive all these years.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He uses old radio station cart machines. If any of

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you out there are radio makers or listeners are old

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to know, he uses old school dead analog technology

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to play dude live cut ups stuff on the air. Yeah,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we get to try out stuff and occasionally the ideas

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of emerge from that that we think are good enough

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to take out and turn into studio recordings or maybe

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a live show. And for those Negative Land fans who

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>want to explore that material, band member Tom Maloney has

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>been hard at work transferring files to archive dot org

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so that the thousands of hours of programming will become

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>available to anyone with an Internet connection. It's a mind

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>blowingly huge amount of work that will be available for free.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>As any artist will tell you, art doesn't exist in

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum. Art doesn't just reflect the world around us.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It comments on that world. We see elm of the

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>artist's thoughts and feelings within his or her art. And

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>while you might think that creating a collage out of

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>appropriate material limits and artists ability to comment upon the world,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you'd be wrong. As Mark explained to me, collage is

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>just another artistic medium, not significantly different from any other

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>means of artistic expression. Basically, to me, our work is

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>no different than somebody lives in a cave ten thousand

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago who takes a stick out of the fire

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and uses the burnt end to draw on the cave

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wall what's outside of his cave, which could be buffalo

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>or a mammoth, you know. So that's no different than

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>me taking a computer, a tape deck, a cassette deck,

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a real tool, chape recorder, a digital capturing device, and

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm capturing the world around me that I live in

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's in my home, the world it's outside

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>my door. And that world is not just walls and

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>furniture and trees and blue sky and buildings. It's advertisements,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's logos, pop songs, it's media. Absolutely everywhere you go

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 1>person needs. That's great, and so negative lands are often

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>comments on these facets of life. The way messages are

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>communicated to us and how we are expected to react

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to them amusing, And there's Another conversation happening as well,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one about ideas ownership and the peculiar institution has changed

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the way we treat concepts. Corporations who are immortal, who

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>now have these ideas of intellectual property. They own this stuff,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so they want to profit from it. They've privatized it.

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>They've all said, you can consume it, will sell it

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, but don't ever think of messing with it.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't think about doing anything with it, because we own

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's our property. And I'm kind of saying, well, no,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not just your property, because it's inside my head.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's in my brain. So I'm gonna I

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm allowed to do things that have been inserted

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>into my brain. You know, I don't want to see

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>your giant pepsi billboard every time I drive into town,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>but I do, so you know, yes, I'm going to

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>take some of your pepsi ad and I'm going to

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>cut it up and I'm gonna use it in something

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that maybe makes fun of you. And in this case,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a project negative landid called Dyspepsi. Hopefully, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>what you're compiling is going to be a positive reflection

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of what Pepsi is all about and the makers of

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>their advertising. So I think it's fair to say that

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>if that's all the case. Uh yeah, this is part

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of the marketing spin of PEPs of Call. One of

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>my favorite pieces by the band involves a surreal heard

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>radio call in show. This is Pennywise, Joan your next Nie, Sue,

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>How can I help? Jim? I really have a problem

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with ampulse buying. I never have money left for anything.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a piece called truth and advertising, and that was

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>where we were able to take it so that every

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>time the talk show host hung up on the caller

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to the next caller, it was the same

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>caller over again and over again because of how we

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>were able to edit it together and that was all done.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We've always used to call those edits razor takes, because

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>those were done with analog, real to real recuoriers and

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we would cut them with a razor blood, you know,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to rearrange those things. Okay, let's go to line four.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Pennywise. I'm Jim Phillips and your name is Bob. Hi, Bob,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what can I do for you? I get confused by

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all the claims main commercials. This is pennywise line stakes

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on and your name is. I think it definitely

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of grabs your attention. There's a real rhythm, there's

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a real musicality to the way the voice has been

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is the repeats itself and folds back in on itself.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But but also so it gets that something that actually

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is a real thing, which is about how advertising impacts

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>us and how advertisers maybe aren't telling you the truth,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I don't think it's didactic. I don't

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's having handed I don't think it's like we

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are we're wagging wagging our finger at you about the subject.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But it does kind of get get it out there.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back with more of tech stuff. Listens

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to Negative Land after these messages, it really hit me

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that what Mark and negative Land are doing is incredibly challenging.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can grab a dozen or so clips of sound

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and edit them together to make something new, but to

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>create something that has a sense of musical rhythm that

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>can be entertaining and that can also be a comment

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on our culture is extraordinary. It explains how the group

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can work on a project for years before it's ready

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>to be released. Once it is released, that work can

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of attention. Negative Land is no stranger

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to criticism, controversy, or even legal action. In fact, one

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of their most famous works landed the group in legal

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble for several years. But it all started out innocently enough.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>A fan at a show of ours handed as a

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>cassette and uh at a show that we were printing

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>in Portland, Oregon, and it had outtakes of top for

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>D d J. Casey Cason having a really bad day

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. Casey Cason, as you know, just passed

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>away this summer, and I think the engineer's revenge was

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to get these tapes out to some people in the

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>public via cassette. Now, back then, the Internet didn't exist,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and so this stuff had a very very limited audience

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of just people sharing this stuff. And I think if

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it had come out now, we wouldn't have been inspired

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to make that record that we made, because everyone would

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>have had it. But we had something that was kind

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of seemed very precious, you know, and you know, and

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and rare, and it was also you know, Peter Pants

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>funny and just so inspiring, and he was trying to

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do a dedication to a family's dead dog, and he

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was trying to introduce a new song by a band

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he got the name of their country of origin incorrect,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but a band who's been around as long as Negative

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Land has You Too. That's the letter You and the

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>New World Too. The four Man Band features Adam Clayton

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on bank, Larry Moren on drums, Dave Evan's nickname the

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Edge on if this is both nobody cares. These guys

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>are from England and we'll give it. It's a lot

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of wasted name that don't mean diddaly And we ended

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>up using doing a kind of a weird mutated cover

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>version of a YouTube song. We had Negative Land member

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>David Wills the weather Man, do his own dramatic reinterpretation

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of Bono's lyrics. We used the casey caseum stuff. The

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>song was I still found what I'm looking for and

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the end when we were deciding how

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to present it, we ended up deciding to call the

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>whole thing you Too, by Negative Land, And originally it

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually going to be You with a dash between

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the U and the two, because that's actually how the U.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a slight variation on you two's name, which has

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>no dash in the you tube is the airplane, the

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>spy plane that was shot down, and it's where you

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>two stole their name from. In the course of designing

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, our graphic designer we were working with

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Randall hunting Uh. He suggested that we

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>could make the the hell what am I making the

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>airplane of the YouTube airplane itself, which we were using

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as part of the cover design. What about making that

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the dash? And how about we could make the U

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>two really huge and negative Land really small. I think

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he was just kind of joking, you know, like because

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of course you wouldn't really do that, because that would

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be insane, right. But of course when we saw it,

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we said, that's great, genius, you know, yes, that's what

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do. This is even better. We're gonna make

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it look like something it isn't. As it turns out,

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this particularly mischievous release would have a long lasting effect

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on the group. It didn't take long for you two's

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>management to respond, and it came out and two weeks

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>after it came out, or I think maybe it was

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>less maybe ten days after it came out. You Two's

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>record label and their publisher. Uh at the instigation of

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You Two's manager. We only found that out about fifteen

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>years later. But yeah, they suit us for copyright infringement,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>trademark infringement. Uh. It has lots of swearing on it,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of Casey case So they sued us for defamation

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of character for associating this foul language with the clean

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>count image of the band You Two. They sued us

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for failure to get a license to do a cover

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>version of a song because we change the lyrics. You

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>can do a cover version and just pay a licensing fee,

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but if you change the lyrics, you have to get permission.

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And they also suit us for fraud, saying it was

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a get rich quick scheme intended to dupe millions of

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>innocent YouTube fans into you know, buying this record so

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we could make you know, lots of money. So they

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>through everything we could think of at us. We had

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to really look at what we were doing, even more

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>deeply than we ever had, you know, and really examine

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if it was worth the fight. You know, do we

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>really want to destroy our lives and lose at the

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit of money we might be making. And we

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were gonna lose a lot by choosing

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to fight it, but we we really felt like it

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it was it was a fight that

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>needed to happen because at the time there was nobody

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>making any smart, thoughtful cultural arguments about this from a

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>progressive point of view. It was just lawyers, and it

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was just so it was just all very conservative, you know,

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking around money, profit in ownership in ways that just

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>were culturally very very smart. And we've been headed this

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing opportunity because we've been had sued on behalf of

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the largest rock band on the planet Earth. So we thought, well,

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could use as a platform to talk about

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And that turned into an odyssey that took

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>up the next four or five years of all of

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>our lives. I could say literally every day of my

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>life for the next four or five years, literally, I

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with some aspect of it. The FBI got involved,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there were threats made against Casey. We tricked you Tube's

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>guitarist The Edge, into an interview he didn't know we

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>were anyway, all kinds of stuff. It's all documented in

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a book we put out called Fair Use. The Story

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Letter You in the numeral who which actually

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>shows you the behind the scenes facts, lawsuits, press releases,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>phone calls, transcriptions, everything you're never supposed to see when

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>these cases settled out of court is all there in

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the book in short chapters, so it makes good bathroom reading. Ultimately,

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the band settled out of court and their album was withdrawn,

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but that was only the beginning of the battle. Negative

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Land only settled because there was literally no way for

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the group to afford to fight the charges in court.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They wished to argue that their appropriation fell under fair use,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that they were creating art from appropriation the same way

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that other artists had for years. Andy Warhol's famous works

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>were commentaries on consumerism and pop culture. How could that

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>instance be okay? But Negative lands work be considered illegal.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>The experience with you two ended up having the opposite

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>effect on the band than what was intended. It's been

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinating, and then when we got you know, actually

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sumed for doing it, it politicizes more. It actually made

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>us kind of bear down on wanting being more committed

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to doing this work than ever before. And uh, it's

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly kept it really really interesting. While Negative Land has

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>always been interested in culture and consumerism. The legal proceedings

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>brought to light the complicated matter of copyright and fair use,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which became a new focus for mark. Copyright is meant

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to protect the owner of an original work of authorship.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>In the United States, it's defined as such a work

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>quote fixed in a tangible medium of expression end quote.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>It covers all works, whether published or unpublished. Now, it

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't protect facts ideas methods of operation. Some of those

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can be protected under other means, like trademarks or patents.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>As soon as you have your original work in a

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed tangible form, it's protected by copyright. That tangible form

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be a piece of paper, it can

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be code. The law provides for protection of works that

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>require a machine or device in order for someone to

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>see or experience it. Registering a copyright is a way

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of ensuring protection of your work. Technically, your work is

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>protected even without registration, but registering creates an official legal

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>document that establishes your authorship in case you should ever

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have to pursue a claim of infringement against someone else.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>If you were to create an original work but not

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>register the copyright, it's possible someone else could steal your

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>work and register it under his or her own name,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>making a claim of ownership more complicated. The concept of

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>copyright dates all the way back to seventeen ten, and

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's changed significantly over the years. Yeah, it was like

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>twelve thirteen, fourteen years the Statute of Queen Anne. And

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever I do lectures about this, which I've done quite

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>a few, it's very rare that people actually know this,

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds shocking to hear it now, because copyright

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>nowadays lasts for the life of the creator. Plus it's

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy years seventy two seven three. The Statute of an

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>establishes copyright lasting fourteen years for new unpublished works, works

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that had already been published, and we're under ownership of

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>some party or another, we're granted twenty one years of protection.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Ever since copyright was established in British law, people and

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>entities have attempted to expand its protection. According to Mark,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this trend has become truly destructive, largely due to the

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>rise of a particular type of institution, this very strange

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>creature called the corporation. And we've decided to give corporation

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>these rights as if they're human. We give them free

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>speech rights. What I would argue, has led to the

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>total destruction of democracy in this country. But we we

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>give them all these the perks and privileges of being

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a human being, none of the responsibilities, none of you know,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>when a corporation does things that lead to the deaths

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people, we we don't we don't seem

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to give the corporation the death penalty, unfortunately. But because

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>corporations are immortal, in fact, they're not like anything human

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. They from their perspective, understandably they want to

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>profit from their property forever. And since we've decided that

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas are property, intellectual property, you know, it all sort

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of it Also, you can see how this all starts

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to play out in this very bizarre way, um that

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually goes kind of off the rails, you know, at

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this point. And that's kind of what what negative Land

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>got drawn into was. Because our work does appropriate things

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and makes this collage and to to talk about the

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>culture and the country and the world we live in.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>We found that our work was kind of colliding, you know,

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>head first into these these these ideas about copyright, which

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>had just become completely crazy, you know, just ridiculous. I

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>agree with a lot of what Mark saying. He and

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I both acknowledge that copyright has an important role. People

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>who create original works should have some measure of protection

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so that they can receive compensation for their work. A

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>world without copyright could be chaotic and unfair, but so

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can a work old with copyright that extends well beyond

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>what its creators intended. We'll be back with more of

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff listens to negative Land in just a moment.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember when I said that copyright protection originally only lasted

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years for new works. The story has changed significantly

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>today in the United States, a new original work last

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the life of the author plus an additional seventy years.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>This has had enormous implications in the publishing, music, and

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>artistic spheres. It's a balancing act. And that's what kind

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of has been lost in a lot of the conversation

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about all this is that it's it's kind of treated

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>like it's an omnipotent property right of some sort. And

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was saying that when copyright first began,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it was an incredibly short period of time. But but

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the this was not some radical idea that would be

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that short. In fact, it was that that was a

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>conservative idea, you know, that was that seemed on enough,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to give you a chance to profit from

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>your your creativity. And I should also add that just

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the very idea of taking the word intellectual and property

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and jamming them into each other to make one expression

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is very strange when you think about it, that we've

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>decided that ideas are things, you know. It's it's an

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>incredibly abstract idea, and it and it only is true

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>because we've all just sort of agreed that it's true.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Though in the case of negative Land, we decided that

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really like that particular hallucination and we wanted

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to ignore it a lot. This shift towards extending protection

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond the life of the creator has had other consequences

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Corporations that own intellectual property go to great

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>links to protect that property. If there's a prospect of

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>generating revenue off of an original work, it's worth investigating

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>how to protect it. This leads to ideas like digital

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>rights management, which is intended to provide protection to corporations,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but often has the unintended consequence of negatively impacting the

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>honest consumer more than any pirate. As Mark explains this

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is a problem that the industry itself is painfully aware

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of and yet isn't sure how to change. I was

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>actually at a conference on copyright law in Washington, d C.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>And I remember speaking to somebody who was from the

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>r I double A that I said, this is what

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>do you guys talk about behind closed doors? You know,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't it kind of bizarre that you're basically taking legal

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>action against your customers? I mean, you don't you you

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>realize that every twelve fourteen year old kid growing up

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>basically hates you, you you know, just knows the cat is

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the bag about how absolutely ugly your business

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is and how you take advantage of artists, etcetera, etcetera.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>He kind of sheepishly kind of said, well, yeah, we

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of look at it like chemotherapy, and I just

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>hope that that the patient doesn't completely die, you know,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>during given the treatment that we're giving it. You know.

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But yes, we're perfectly aware that this just comes off

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>really horribly, you know, but we don't know what else

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to do. As Mark points out, the concepts of ownership

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>are deeply ingrained in culture and economic models. That's not

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to say ownership is bad. But it does complicate matters,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly when we extend the concept of ownership to institutions

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially live forever. But there are limits to copyright,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and not just in how long protection lasts. You don't

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have to wait until the work goes into public domain

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>before you can talk about it in some other format.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 1>For example. This brings up the concept of fair use. Well,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>here's an example. Anyone listening, I'm sure you've read a

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>review of a book or seen a review of a

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>movie on your television or digital device. And that's where

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fair use comes into play. When you review that, you

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get permission to use a clip of

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the film, You don't have to get permission to excerpt

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from the book. That's considered fair use. You were using

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>someone else's intellectual property within your intellectual property to talk

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about that other intellectual property now, and so fair use

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was trying to acknowledge that, and fairious had four factors

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to it. But the first one, I think was you know,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>are you are you using any bit of someone else's

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>intellctual property? The next one was you know how much

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of it are you using? And in what way are

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you are? Are you not transforming it in some way

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or changing it, And what is the context in which

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it is reappearing. Is it in a different medium, is

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it in a different market? Could there be some confusion

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>between what you've done and the original in some way.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's these different factors that are supposed to be

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>weighed when the courts are looking at these things. And

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years, the courts didn't look at all

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>four factors. They just looked at the first one, did

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you use some of it? Well, if you did, then

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you're a thief and you lose, you know, and you're

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're you're you're the bad guy here. And

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years, that's kind of how the courts

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>look at things, and that's why there's a lot of

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>really bad legal decisions that have been made over the years.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Um So the laws haven't changed, you know. Unfortunately, we

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any any smart, progressive legal changes to intellectual

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>property law. There haven't been any cases that have gone

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>through the court systems to really do that in a

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>long long time, and this is a big problem. Fair

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>use is something that ends up being decided in a

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>court on a case by case basis. Fair use is

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a defense there's no codified set of rules that lets

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you create a checklist to make sure you won't be sued.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You could create a work that sites of pre existing

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>peace owned by someone else and follow all the rules

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and still get sued. You might eventually win that court case,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to cost you just to be involved.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Some entities, like YouTube respond to copyright infringement notices by

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>immediately taking down the infringing material. Sometimes this happens automatically,

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and the content owner has to flip a virtual switch

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to allow the other video to go back up online.

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you create a video series in which you

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 1>critique films or television or some other form of media,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you could run into the issue of having your work

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>taken down. Even if you're following the rules. You could

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>get that video restored if it meets fair use criteria,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but it takes a lot of effort. If all original

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>works were truly original, perhaps I would see this entire

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>system as being tough but fair. But the truth is

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>no work is truly original. Creators have influences. Art doesn't

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bloom spontaneously in a vacuum. The real question is to

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what extent does a work stand up on its own

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>versus relying upon the pre existing work that influenced it.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not an easy or an expensive question to answer.

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>This is deprogramming the universal media netted well as for

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Negative Land, they released a new album them late in

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen called It's All in Your Head. It's

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a college piece that examines religious beliefs, not necessarily specific beliefs,

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but why we believe things in the first place. You're

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to It's All in your Head FM monotheism but

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in stereo. The project was born of discussions within Negative

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Land itself. None of us had ever talked to each

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>other about our religious beliefs. I mean, I've known these guys,

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them since i was a teenager, and we

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>had to work all that out because in fact, we

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't all agree. You know, there's atheists, there's a NaSTA,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's different perspectives on this, and we

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>had to be sure that that was all reflection in

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the work as well. Um, So that that was another

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.479
<v Speaker 1>really interesting kind of behind the scenes part of creating

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. So we would have huge debates over

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>single words that we're being used in it. You know,

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one sentence that what is it going to be there,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna cut it out, you know, typical, just super

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>c D negative planned, you know, obsesso, you know, microscopic

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking that we we do the poetry, we reached to

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>arts to try to begin to articulate what those things are.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we have to acknowledge that we're

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in this realm when we begin to talk about this,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and if we take the symbols and don't acknowledge that

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they're symbols, then we get into this triple. The album

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is organized on a pair of CDs referred to as acts.

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>If you buy the physical album, your packaging is a

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>King James version of the Bible. There was a limited

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>edition version packaged and copies of the Kuran, but it

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has since sold out. While the album takes a critical

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>look at belief systems, it also avoids passing judgment. Sections

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of the album explore ideas such as how the brain

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>processes information to how cultures define and interpret beliefs. Mark

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>explains why the group chose to package the album inside

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a Bible, but having it inside of a Bible framed

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it in this way that I personally just love, you know,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think all of us just love the idea

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're using the Bible as a repurposed found object,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and also anyway that the Bible is the liner notes

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the record. I've listened to the album

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in full and found it provocative. There were times that

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it made me think, in times when I had a

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>very strong emotional reaction to what was going on in

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the album. It's the sort of reaction I imagine many

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>artists hope for when they create their works, and it

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>marked a very different experience to listening to audio entertainment

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>than what I've become used to. It's rare these days

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that I'll sit down to listen to an album in full.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm more likely to listen to my entire music collection

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on shuffle or even a larger collection streaming online following

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some cryptic algorithm that supposedly anticipates what I'll want to

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>hear next. But that's not how Negative Land intends you

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to listen to their work. I actually when I give

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>people copies of our of our music, and I say,

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know it's a lot to ask in

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this day and age, but wait until I don't care

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's a year from now, Wait until you have

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual hour of your toy to do nothing else

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>except just listen to this thing from beginning to end.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And um, and I think you might enjoy it, I said,

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just have it on in the background or

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>just listen to separate tracks, I said, it won't even

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>make sense. It will probably even just be annoying. And

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so It's All in your Head is like that. It's

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>too complete. It's it's one complete work. It's got two

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>acts to it, but it's very much designed to be

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>listened to in its entirety. We had a huge debate

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not to put track points in it

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for for downloading and for CDs, because it kind of

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>suggests or encourages people to put it into random shuffle play.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But we also don't like the idea of trying to

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>control someone's experience that much and just have to be

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one long track. Plus I know people will just break

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it up into tracks anyway. Negative Lands It's All on

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Your Head is available for purchase from their website negative

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>land dot com. That's n e g A T I

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>v l A n d dot com that wraps up

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the episode. Tech Stuff listens to negative Land. It was

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a really cool experience to get to talk to someone

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're a pro coach to making sort of transgressive

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>music that has a real point of view. It was

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't get to do that often. And

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>big thanks to Noel Brown of you know, ridiculous history

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and stuff they don't want you to know fame because

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy who got me in touch with negative

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>land in the first place. So big thanks to him.

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up this episode. If you have suggestions

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for topics I should cover in future episodes, please reach

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>out to me. Do so on Twitter. The handle for

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the show is tech Stuff hs W and I'll talk

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Tex Stuff is an I

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.