WEBVTT - Tech News: Apple Introduces the iPhone 15. Tari Calls it the iPhone 14.

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>are you, y'all? I am in the studio recording today,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>which means that super producer Tari is actually listening on

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the cans right now across the room from me in

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the control room. And this is the first time we've

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>done this, possibly since the pandemic. It has been a while, y'all,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and already Tari is making her presence felt on this show,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>largely by suggesting numerous inappropriate titles for the episode, so

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>her assistance, as always, is invaluable. Anyway, what we're going

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about first is, well, you know, around this

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>time of year you can count on a few things

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. For example, folks are already

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>obsessing over Halloween, honestly, with my friend's list that actually

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>started last month. Pumpkin spice flavors have made their way

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>into pretty much everything you are able to eat or

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>drink at this point. And also, you know that if

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's this time of year, Apple's going to hold an

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>event highlighting the next generation iPhone. This is where Tari's

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for titles came in, because technically they showed off

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fifteen, but Tari says, it's more like they

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>reintroduced the iPhone fourteen, or maybe the iPhone fifteen is

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>really iPhone fourteen A or Part two or something like that.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>This already gives you a hint as to how certain

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple devotees are feeling toward the Apple fifteen. So what

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is different, Well, there is one big difference, and that

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is that this is the first iPhone to have the

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>USBC charging port. This was a change that Apple had

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to make because the EU government has mandated that all

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>smartphones as well as several other digital devices are going

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to have to adopt the USBC standard for charging, and

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that means that people will be able to use the

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>same USBC cables to charge their stuff, rather than have

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to hunt between two or three different kinds of cables

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with different connectors. Now that's not to say that all

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>USBC cables are equal. They're not, so there still can

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be some cable confusion, but less so than there would

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be if you've got like five different proprietary connectors or whatever. Also,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple announced that the dynamic Island feature, which previously was

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>only available on the phone fourteen Pro and the iPhone

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>fourteen Pro Max, is actually going to be on all

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fifteen models. So there's one difference, Tari. You

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>get your dynamic island. You know that little black oval

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the screen that gives you your notifications.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I don't know what you're complaining about

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>USBC port Dynamic Island sounds to me like you guys

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>are getting tons of upgrades. Anyway. There are two broad

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>versions of the basic iPhone fifteen. The base model has

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a screen that measures six point one inches on the diagonal.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>That one starts at seven hundred and ninety nine dollars.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the iPhone fifteen Plus, which is a

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit bigger. It's six point seven inches and it

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will start at eight ninety nine. Then you've also got

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pro and the Pro Max models as well. These

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>will have the A seventeen Pro processor. Of the iPhone

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen will have the A sixteen, which was what you

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>saw on the I fourteen Pro, So yeah, A seventeen

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Pro processor. The iPhone fifteen Pro Max has a forty

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>eight megapixel camera and a five times telephoto lens, so

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>well there's that as well. The Pro starts at nine

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred ninety nine dollars, the Promax starts at one one

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred ninety nine dollars. All of these phones will be

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>available for pre orders starting tomorrow. Apple also had updates

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to some other product lines, like air pods and the

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch. I think for the most part, we just

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>saw sort of incremental changes in this update, apart from

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that migration to USBC, which is pretty that's a pretty

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>big thing, but everything else was a kind of smaller

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>innovation or incremental improvement. But you also have to realize

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that the smartphone is a mature technology at this point,

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>right It's been around for more than a decade, so's

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to imagine coming out with something that's significantly

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>different from what we're already used to. Doesn't mean it's impossible,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but as technology form factors mature, it's less realistic to

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 1>expect huge updates and innovations in the They still can happen,

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're fairly rare. Yesterday, US Senate Majority Leader Chuck

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Schumer hosted an insight forum focusing artificial intelligence. Among the attendees,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>were the CEOs of Meta, Microsoft, Google, and Open Ai. Plus.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You had Elon Musk there and the president of Nvidia

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was there too. The event happened behind closed doors and

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>no media was invited. However, some of the executives gave

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a statement after the meeting was over, and not surprisingly,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>most of these executives were calling for a methodical and

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>careful approach toward legislation and regulation. Now. They argue that

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>AI has enormous potential to benefit business and society and

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>warning that if the government is a little too strict

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with regulations, this can stifle innovation. It's an argument we

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have heard before, but one dissenting voice was Elon Musk.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Musk actually said that a federal oversight committee or agency

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would be appropriate, like to have a part of the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>government specifically to oversee AI development and deployment. He argued

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 1>that companies don't really have an incentive to run AI

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>projects responsibly if you don't have these sorts of constraints,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of agree with him. We have seen

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>time and again that in the absence of regulations, companies

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>will take advantage of the very long leash they are

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be on, and this can lead to consequences

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that then we have to handle and far too late

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>then the government will step in to do something about it.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>According to Schumer, the purpose of the meeting was for

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>members of the US government to gain a better understanding

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>around AI. You know what it is, what it can do,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what the potential risks are, what are the benefits. And

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that is also understandable. While I cover tech for a

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>living and I have a decent but by no means exhaustive,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>understanding of artificial intelligence, it could be easy to develop

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a view of the technology that's far too specific and

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>far too narrow, or to just have a totally mistaken

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>concept of what AI is all about. Schumer was quick

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to point out that this forum was to help educate

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>leaders and that any legislation that follows will take some

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>time to draft and then to amend, and then to

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>vote unto law. So really this was just an early

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>step in the process. We shouldn't expect to see AI

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>legislation roll out anytime soon. I've got some more updates

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on the cybersecurity issue that has severely impacted MGM resorts,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So in case you missed this news on Monday, properties

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>belonging to the company MGM resorts in cities like Las Vegas,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic City, Detroit and others started to encounter massive computer

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>system problems. Those problems shut down many, but not all,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the slot machines in some of these casinos. They

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>took ATM offline. They forced MGM to replace their normal

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>website with a new landing page directing people to contact

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>resorts by phone for stuff like reservations and that kind

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing, and lots more other issues. And we can't

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be sure how extensive these attacks were or what other

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>systems could be affected. In fact, we don't even know

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that it's an attack, or at least

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts has not come out and said that explicitly.

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if the issue has impacted customer data. Personally,

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested in that because literally a couple of

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>hours before all this happened, I made a ding dang

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>reservation at an MGM property for an upcoming work trip.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Come on anyway. At first, a cybersecurity research group called

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>VX Underground posted a message on X you know, formerly

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>known as Twitter, that claimed a Russian based hacker group

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>known as black Cat also known as Alpha so it's

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>spelled alph that this group was behind the attack, and further,

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>according to this research group, the hackers gained access through

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the old fashioned and tried and true method of social engineering.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>They allegedly called someone in it and they got access

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to the system that way. However, more recent reports mentioned

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a different hacker group as being responsible for the attack,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps working in collusion with Alpha. This other group

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is called Scattered Spider, and hackers in that group are

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly located in places like the United States and the

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom. The general consensus is that this is a

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ransomware attack, though again MGM Resorts is not yet commented

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. And interestingly, it appears as though Caesar's Entertainment,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>which also owns multiple casinos and resorts, was attacked by

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this very same group a few weeks ago, and according

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to some unnamed sources, the company agreed to pay millions

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in ransom to regain control of their sets.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>And if that's true, the company has yet to disclose

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that attack. And I feel that if in fact it

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is true that Caesar's Entertainment was attacked a few weeks ago,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts executives are going to be seeing red because

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they might feel that maybe had they known about the

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>attack on Caesar's, they might have been better prepared for

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the one that hit them now. Anyway, apparently the rest

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of the story kind of fits what VX Underground reported

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that hackers seemingly got access through social engineering, although the

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>most recent account says that they targeted a third party

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>IT vendor and got access through them. And this is

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>really bonkers because presumably these IT professionals should be on

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for social engineering attacks. Anyway, it really hammers

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>home that people tend to be the weakest link in

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>security systems, and that companies are justified in educating and

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>testing their employees regarding cybersecurity practices and good gull on

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>a selfish level, I sure hope this is sorted out

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>by the time I had to Vegas next week. Also,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>paying ransoms is a bad idea. Companies should not do

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that because paying a ransom sends the message that the

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>attack wasn't just successful, it was profitable, and that means

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you get more attacks in the future. Okay, while I

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>regain my composure, let's take a quick break to thank

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>our sponsors. We're back. As I mentioned in Tuesday's episode,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Google is on trial this week. The US Department of

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Justice has accused Google of engaging in non competitive practices,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>using the company's dominant position in web search to stifle

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>any potential competition, and according to the DOJ, part of

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>those efforts include paying billions of dollars a year to

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>smartphone companies and web browser companies to make Goo Google

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the default search engine on those devices and browsers. The

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>DOJ says that Google spends around ten billion dollars a

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>year in payments to companies like Samsung and Apple and

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Mozilla and others for the privilege of Google Search being

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the default go to search engine, and that this prevents

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>any other company from having a fair shot. Now, we're

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>still in the very early stages of this trial and

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no telling where it will go. For one thing,

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>another news article revealed that the judge in this case,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Meta, may not have a really strong grasp

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of the tech being discussed. According to Ours Technica, Meta

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>has asked if Mozilla is a browser or a search engine,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which I get it. If you're not using this stuff

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and you're not covering the world of tech,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you might not know what Mozilla is. But it could

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that this could be a particularly complicated case for

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the judge to preside over. And as you might imagine,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Google's lawyers say that the company really hasn't done anything

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong and that it just makes a superior product and

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>that's why it has a dominant position in the market.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they have acted unfairly to get and

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hold that position, rather than no one else makes stuff

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's as good as Google does. A paper just published

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders lays out

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a case that TikTok videos covering autism have information that

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is quote not aligned with the current scientific understanding of

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>autism end quote. This is according to Eric Dolan Ofsypost

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>dot org. So the researcher has created a brand new

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok account because they wanted to make sure that they

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any algorithmic bias if they used an already

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>existing account, so brand new account. Then they started searching

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for videos and they use the search query hashtag autism.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>They then weeded out things like duplicate videos, so if

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it showed up more than once, they would eliminate the extras.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>They eliminated any videos from non English speaking hosts. They

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>took those out to They also got rid of any

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>videos that didn't cover autism but were showing up in

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>search results. And what they had left once they did

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that initial culling was three hundred and sixty five videos,

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>one for every day of the year. They then went

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>further and they continued to weed out videos. They took

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out ones that were more about a person's experience with autism,

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of like life story stuff, and they

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to focus solely on videos that were claiming to

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be educational or informational to be providing information about autism.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to just focus on those. This got them

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>down to one hundred thirty three videos. Then they started

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to really look at these videos and compare them against

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the body of accepted scientific knowledge surrounding autism to see

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>how accurate. They were. They would label videos as being inaccurate,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>containing over generalizations, or being accurate right. They would look

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and say, which of these does this fit or how

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>many instances are we finding per video. They would also

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>only label a video inaccurate if something in the video

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly contradicted accepted scientific knowledge. So they wanted to be

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as fair as possible in this approach. Even with all

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>those steps, they found that seventy three percent of those

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thirty three videos contained at least some inaccurate

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>information or over generalized claims regarding autism. They also noted

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that these videos get a lot of views, like the

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thirty three videos collectively accounted for nearly two

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred million views, and while the medical professionals who were

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hosting videos were more likely to get things correct, they

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily the most viewed videos. There were other content creators,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>either those who claimed to have autism or to be

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a caregiver for someone with autism, that were giving information

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that just won scientifically correct or at least not in

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>agreement with the scientific consensus on autism. So the researchers

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are actually suggesting that TikTok works to create a space

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>where people who want to talk about autism and talk

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>about their life experiences and that sort of thing, that

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they have a space where they can do that, but

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that that space is separate from discussions that are about

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the scientific understanding of autism to try and minimize the

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>dissemination of misinformation about autism. They so that it's good

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to have the platform to expand people's understanding of autism

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and to reduce stigma. That's good. What we don't want

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do is to fuel misinformation. So I think it

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>was actually a pretty measured approach outlined in the paper.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The study itself is called The Reach and Accuracy of

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Information on Autism on TikTok. The Verge reports that TikTok

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>has started to include excerpts from and links to Wikipedia

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>articles in your search results. This seems to follow the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>trend of younger people treating TikTok as a search engine,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>which I still have to wrap my mind around because

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm old. The Verge reached out to TikTok, and a

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>spokesperson confirmed that the platform has partnered with Wikipedia and

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, this feature has actually been live for

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>several weeks. It's just been gradually rolling out, and TikTok

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't make a big old fuss about it. They just

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of let it roll out. Now. I do not

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>use TikTok, so I have not seen this in action myself,

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but apparently the Wikipedia stuff appears between videos in your

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>search results. So you search for something, you scroll down

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and in between video like four and five, there might

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be a Wikipedia excerpt or link there, and it's not universal.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>You're not guaranteed to see Wikipedia content connected to any

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in every search. Some topics appear to have Wikipedia in

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tries included, and others. TikTok is also plopping down videos

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>from sponsors in between those search results. So it sounds

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like using TikTok is starting to become more like using

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a regular web search engine. You know, you get some excerpts,

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you get some summaries, you get some links to the

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff you are actually looking for, and you get a

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of sponsored content peppered throughout fun times. A

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>high profile Russian journalist and publisher named Galina Timchenko revealed

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this week that her iPhone was compromised by the NSO

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Group's spyware product Pegasus earlier this year, so in case

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you need a refresher. Pegasus is a piece of software

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that lets someone send an I message to a target

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>iPhone or iOS device, and because of a flaw in

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple's software, this message would compromise that target device and

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>turn it into a surveillance gadget. The attacker could activate

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the device's camera and its microphone remotely, so you can

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>spy using a person's own phone. You can also like

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>search stuff that's in the phone's memory and essentially access

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>all of its contents. Anyway, according to MEDUSA, that's a

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>news outlet that Galina Timchenko co founded, someone used Pegasus

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to infiltrate Timchenko's phone just a few hours before she

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was scheduled to meet with exiled members of Russia's media

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in a meeting in Berlin. MEDUSA says this is the

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>first confirmed case of a Russian journalist being the target

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>of a Pegasus attack, which isn't a surprise. The NSO

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>group says that the tool, the Pegasus tool will not

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>work on phone numbers from the United States or from Russia,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and they won't do business with Russia, and Russia won't

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do business with them, largely because Russia believes in funding

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their own spyware technologies. They don't outsource it, they build

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that stuff themselves. So anyway, NSOL Group has said that

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Pegasus was intended for people to use to identify and

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>surveil like terrorists and other dangerous people. But we've seen

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>time and again that NSO groups customers have been using

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Pegasus to really spy on anybody they don't like and

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that includes journalists and activists and other politicians that sort

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, not active threats against the state, and so

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>NSO groups claims that it's kind of innocent of all

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>these issues fall on deaf ears for me anyway, because

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty clear their customers include some very

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not nice people who are using this tool to spy

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on folks who are not an active like threat existential

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>threat to the state. So yeah, still no word exactly

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on who might have been responsible for this attack. You know.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The thought is that it probably wasn't Russia, but it's

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>hard to say or if it was Russia, the attack

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was carried out through an intermediary of some sort, So yeah,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>no telling who it was that directed the attack on

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Galina Timchenko. But yeah, it's a continuing issue and now

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>has affected a Russian journalist. She joins the ranks. All right,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take another quick break. When we come back,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few more news stories to cover. Okay,

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>let's wrap up with some more news stories. This is

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a big one. So there's this rumbling over in the

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>video game development world, and I don't mean the little

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>motors that cause game controllers to vibrate There's a company

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that's called Unity, right. They make a popular game engine,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the Unity Engine, and this company has announced a big

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>change in its subscription tier that has upset a lot

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of developers. So the way this used to work is

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that as a developer, you would subscribe to a tier

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of service with Unity, and in return, you would get

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>access to the Unity Engine and you would get a

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>suite of editing tools, and that was it. You would

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>pay the subscription that would give you access and you

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>went on your merry way. There were no royalty fees

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you had to worry about. In fact, if you were

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a really small developer, let's say that you made less

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred thousand dollars per month in revenue, well

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>then you would get no fees at all to subscribe

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>to the Personal Tier, the lowest tier of service of

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Unity Engine. However, now Unity has announced that starting next year,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the company will charge developers a certain amount per install

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>once a title reaches a particular threshold. So, for example,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're an independent game developer and you have

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to that Unity Personal Tier or the lowest tier,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you will have to fork over twenty cents per install,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>not per sale, per install of your game once you

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have hit two hundred thousand dollars in annual revenue or

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you have hit an install base of two hundred thousand

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>players for that game. For customers who are paying more

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>money for a higher tier of service, they'll actually see

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a lower per install fee and a higher threshold they

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have to meet before they have to pay it. So,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if you're paying more money for a

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>higher subscription tier, you're paying fewer royalties or less amount

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of royalties, at least on a per install basis. So

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>developers got really really upset. Some of them called out

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to the developer community to stop using Unity Engine full stop.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Just don't use Unity, use something else. And they have

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>accused Unity of pulling sort of a bait and switch

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>routine which got companies invested in using the Unity Engine

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they had the rug pulled out from under

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>them with this change in policy. One developer, Megacrit, which

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>produced the game Slay the Spire, posted a message that

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>said its next game, which has already been in development

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for two years, will actually migrate to a different game

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>engine if Unity does not change its policy. That's a

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>heck of a thing to say, To say you're willing

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to throw away essentially two years of work in order

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to switch over. They also posted the statement quote we

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have never made a public statement before that is how

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>badly you fed up end quote, only they didn't use

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the word ft if you catch my drift. Eurogamer reports

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that Unity executives sold off thousands of their shares in

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the company earlier this year, which some might interpret as

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the executives knowing that this change would likely lead to

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a decline in Unity's share price. It certainly looks suspicious

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>considering the timing. In fact, the CEO of the company

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>has sold more than fifty thousand shares this year, bought

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>no shares in this company this year two thousand of

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>those transactions or those shares, I should say, we're done.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Just last week. Unity has now backtracked a little bit

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on this policy. They are now saying that the charges

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>will only come after a user has first installed the title,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's it just the first time. The reason for

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that some developers were concerned that users who

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>are particularly angry at a developer could potentially install the

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>uninstalled then reinstall a game many, many, many times, and

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's a charge for every install, it means that

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>these trollish gamers can install bomb a developer. If the

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>developer has to pay for every single install above a

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>certain threshold, that could bleed them dry. So now Unity

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is saying, Okay, it only counts the first time you

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>install it on a device. However, we are still going

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to count it for every device they install it on.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So if they have like fifteen devices and they install

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the game on all fifteen, that counts fifteen times, but

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it won't count if they delete it and then reinstall it.

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That that should be done anyway. Developers are not mollified

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>by this, so I expect we're going to see a

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lot more conversation around this moving forward. In the video

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>game space. The Wall Street Journal reports that SpaceX's Starlink

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>division is underperforming, at least from a business perspective, based

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>upon what the company had previously projected. So The Wall

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal says that back in twenty fifteen, SpaceX presented

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>potential investors in Starlink with a pitch, and they said

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that by twenty twenty two, Starlink would have twenty million

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribers and would generate close to twelve billion dollars in

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue and around seven billion dollars in profit. Now, obviously

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this pitch was designed to convince investors to invest money

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>in two SpaceX's coffers, right, Like, that's the whole purpose

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of it. But then, how well did the company deliver

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on these estimations. Well, again, according to The Wall Street Journal,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, revenues for Starlink were one point four billion. Now,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, one point four billion is a

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, and it was a big jump from

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. In twenty twenty one, Starlink made two

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty two million, So one point four billion

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of money. But as impressive as one

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>point four billion is, it falls pretty darn short of

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the twelve billion that SpaceX was projecting back in twenty fifteen. Also,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jeneral reports that the service has more than a

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>million customers. According to SpaceX VP Jonathan Haffeler, it's like

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a million and a half customers worldwide. But again, back

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fifteen, SpaceX was saying they estimated that they

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>would have twenty million customers by now, not one and

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. So it does sound like the division is

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>going to potentially turn out a profit this year, so

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that's good, but it's not performing up to the estimates

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that investors were being told back in twenty fifteen, and

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're gonna feel about that. And finally,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>astronomers have analyzed data gathered by the James Webb Space

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Telescope and discovered that an exoplanet called K two eighteen

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>B has some interesting signs that could potentially mean the

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>planet might support life or maybe support the life in

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the past. Now, before we get too excited, let's try

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and be calm and rational. So this planet is in

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the so called Goldilocks zone around its home star, so

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that means it's not too far out from the star

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to receive too little energy to support life, and it's

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not too close to its star where the radiation from

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the star would burn away any life that could be

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on the planet. It's in the zone that's just right,

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Goldilock zone, so theoretically it should be receiving the

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>right amount of energy to sustain life, at least life

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as we are familiar with it now. On top of that,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>according to the data that the scientists studied, the planet's

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere includes carbon dioxide and methane in it, and also

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of hydrogen. Plus the scientists say they

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>believe there could be signs of another molecule, this one

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>called dimethyl sulfide. So here on Earth, the stuff that

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>produces dimethyl sulfide is life, specifically like microbial life like phytoplankton,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. So again this points to the

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 1>possibility that there is life on this other planet. K

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen B is much bigger than the Earth, is

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>more than eight times as large as the Earth. It's

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>also one hundred and ten light years away, so we're

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna pop by to borrow a cup of sugar

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. But still, pretty aren't exciting. And that's it

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of tech Stuff. I hope you are

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>all well. As I said, pretty soon, I'm going to

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be traveling for work. I'm going to continue to bring episodes.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Next week, we're going to have an interview with someone

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>from Surf air Mobility, a company that is looking to

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be a pioneer in the regional air mobility space. It's

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting conversation that's on Monday, so check that out. Tuesday.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe we've got another Smart Talks with IBM episode.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't have my calendar pulled up, but

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that happens on Tuesday. But you should also

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>get some more new episodes throughout the week, I hope,

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>assuming everything's going well, and yeah, we're gonna have a

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of weird stuff coming out soon because I'm

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>going all the way out to Las Vegas to record

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a show and then cover Mobile World Congress and then

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>come back home. So here's hoping that goes well. Here's

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hoping MGM Resorts has cleared away the problems by the

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>time I get there. From a purely selfish level, I mean,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I want it to be solved because I'm sure the

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>people working for MGM Resorts right now are at their

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wits end. It has to be really stressful, I imagine.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So I hope that's all been cleared up, and I

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>hope again that you are all well out there, and

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again. Really. So tech Stuff is

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.