WEBVTT - Here Comes the Booming Chinese Biotech Sector

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Odd Loots listeners, We're coming to DC.

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 2>We're finally doing it, Joe. It's going to be our

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>first live show in Washington, DC, our nation's capital. It's

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>also finally going to be the time where we actually

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Jones Act.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Listen talk about doing the Jones Act episode of Odd

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Lots for a long time, and it's become this recurring

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>joke that we've never done on But we're going to

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>do it in grand style because we're going to be

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>doing it live in DC and it's actually going to

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be a debate.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>So we have Sarah Fuentes from the Transportation Institute. She's

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be taking the pro side, and we also

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>have Colin graybou of the Cato Institute. He'll be taking

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the against side. It's going to be really interesting to

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 2>see how all of that shakes out.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>In addition to that, we're going to be speaking with

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Blair Levin, who was around during the telecom bubble, and

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we have Andrew Ferguson, the new head of the FTC,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the one who's replaced Lina Kong. We're going to be

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about mergers and acquisitions and all that stuff. So

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it should be a really fun night.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>If you want to come and join us for that evening,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be on March twelfth at the Miracle Theater.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Go to Bloomberg dot com forward slash odd Lots and

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 2>you can find the link to purchase tickets. We hope

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>to see you there.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jio Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, you know, we talk a lot about China, talk

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>about cars and batteries. It's time for a Chinese biotech.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the Chinese pharma episode.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Joe.

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just what I always wanted. Thank you so much. No,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I am genuinely excited to talk about this. One reason

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>is because this is a sector that I don't really

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>know that much about. Another reason is it has it's

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>actually been in the news quite a bit recently with

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the cuts to NIH funding, which we've discussed and things

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>like that, and then more generally, it sort of sits

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in that nexus of policy aimed at boosting specific sectors

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and also competition between the US and China.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, and it's like you know, we've just

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to the fact that in many areas of

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of physical manufacturing, there are very there are many

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>industries in which China can compete and produce things either

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>cheaper and higher quality. It seems like many areas relate

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to batteries and automobiles and all kinds of stuff like that.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that. And then of course we had like

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the deep seek moment and a bunch of people like, oh,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not just physical things, it's not just gigantic plants.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Also a lot of competition in areas like software, particularly

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. That raised all sorts of questions. And then

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lately the drum is beating that we have to take

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>very very seriously pharma and biotech, And this is one

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of those areas that I think most people, certainly me

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>would say like in the year twenty twenty five. Still

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my conception my head is that the cutting edge is

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the US and Europe still, which I can't say

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that for a lot of industries.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 2>At this point, I want to know how medicines are

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 2>actually made manufactured. I've read a long time ago. I

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>read a book about the Twinkie, and it broke down

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>every ingredient that went into a twinkie and where it

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>came from. And it was really interesting because it turns

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>out a lot of those ingredients came from China. I

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't know that.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that either, but you know what I did,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>were didn't know because we briefly touched on it in

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>our recent episode with the two fellows from Goldman Sax

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about China's role in the pharmaceutical supply chain providing key

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ingredients to India, which then plays a key role. Anyway,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot I want to know. I don't think

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I know anything, and I just want to jump into

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this episode because I want to learn more. In that spirit,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we really do have the perfect guest. He's someone who

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>recently put together a slide deck and I kind of

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think that slide deck catalyzed some articles. The deep sea

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>moment in biotech got a lot of attention on social media.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Drowing straight to the source, we're speaking with Tim Oppler.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 1>He's a managing director in the healthcare investment banking group

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at Stefel. Tim, thank you so much for coming on

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>odd Locks.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank you and Joe and Tracy. I really appreciate you

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 3>having me. I'm very excited to be here today.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>What is a managing director in the healthcare investment banking

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>group at Stevefoild.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't actually manage a lot of people, so managing

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>directors just the title. But basically, I'm a senior banker,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and investment bankers are in the business of putting people together,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 3>people that need money with people that have money, people

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that want to license something out, with people that want

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 3>to license something in. So I'm a middleman basically and

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 3>get paid commissions for doing it.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>With your middleman position, could you maybe describe the ecosystem

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of getting new drugs to market, like where does it

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 2>tend to start, what corporate entities does it go through,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>and then what's the process from there to getting into

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>an actual physical medicine.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>So great question. So you know, back in the old days,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>if you rolled back the clock fifty years ago, large

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>pharmaceutical companies Merck, Pfizer, Eli Lilly had these research and

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>development groups and they would sit around and read up

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>articles and do their own basic science and say, you know,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we should do something to go after such

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 3>and such type of virus. They would work on it

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>for five or six years. They would come up with

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>a drug candidate, they would go test it in people,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>it would work hopefully, and then they would get it

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>approved and then they go out and market it. Things

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 3>started to change, you may remember, you know, as back

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 3>as the late nineteen seventies, companies like genen Tech and

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Biogen came on the scene. And so today we have

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>a huge biotech industry. These are kind of like the

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 3>you might call them the farm league, a big pharma

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 3>are the ones that come up with the new drugs.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the farmers are still doing their own work too,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and so biotech's become a huge part of our ecosystem.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>It's also become a big part of the capital market.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 3>So there's whole groups of people that you know, god

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>mds and PhDs that went to work for funds and

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>they sit there, you know, does this drug candidate look

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>like it's gonna make it? I'm going to bet for

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>it or I'm going to bet against it.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>What does biotech mean?

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes ask Tracy what fintech means, and I still don't

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to that.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But what is biotech touch banking?

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>So I'd like to give three different answers. First of all,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 3>when people say biotech in general, what they mean is

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of the more high tech part of the pharmaceutical industry,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>the cool part.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's always I just figure it's a cool.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>What I mean by biotech is the when you have

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a company whose sole asset is a drug candidate that

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>has not yet been approved by the FD so pre commercial.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 3>When I say biotech, that's what I mean. Other people

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 3>think it refers to biologic, and it's true. The original

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>biotechs like Genetech were focused on biologic so it's understandable

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>that some people would associate biotech.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a distinct type of therapy from the traditional type

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of medicine that would have been developed at America.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>That's correct. So traditionally there are two types of medicines.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>There's small molecules, those little white pills some people take

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>every day, and then there are injectable biologics. Those are

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 3>products that are much more complex, much larger molecules, and

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 3>are made in very different ways.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk about that, going right to my question

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>about how medicine is actually made, how Yeah.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>So for a small molecule, it's actually a chemical. So

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the pharmaceutical industry actually came out of the chemical industry.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 3>So if you go back to the history of pharmaceuticals, say,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>like what was going on in sixteen fifty, Well, people

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 3>were literally chemists. In fact, still in England today you

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>can walk into what we would call it pharmacy, they

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>call it a chemist and they would literally, you know,

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>put together your antimony or whatever it was and serve

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>it up to you. So that still goes on. But

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>of course those small molecule pills are made in giant

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>factories of what's called API, which is really just fine chemical.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>The other side of the industry, though, these biologics are

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 3>made typically in bugs. So you would take, for example, yeasts,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>or you might take E. Coli, or you might take

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 3>what are called Chose cells. Those are Chinese hamster ovary cells.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Why do they use them because they're really good at

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>growing biologics. And you insert a piece of DNA into

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the DNA of that species and then that causes that

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 3>species to manufacture the protein of interest, and that's a

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>whole other industry. And then those say Chose cells or E.

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Coli cells or whatever they are, they're grown in these

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>giant tanks, and so you might have like a forty

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand liter tank full of growth medium and those cells

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>are just swimming around and making their proteins. Then they're

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 3>harvested and you pull out the protein of interest.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, did you say Chinese have overy cells?

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I know, and we're talking about China. See, China is everywhere, Tracey.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I already feel like we're gonna have to have Tim

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>back already, right, because like this is already one of

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>those topics where like we probably could just talk about

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one niche aspect of the supply chain for some ingredient

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because we're not even actually close to getting to it.

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But we need to build up to we need to

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>build up to Chinese.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's let's just jump right into it. I want

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to make sure, I want I want to make a

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>comment here. Okay, So China is all of a sudden

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 3>starting to be very competitive with the US biotech ecosystem.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 3>I personally don't think that's a surprise. I don't think

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>that's the bad thing. And here here's what's going on.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 3>We developed the first biologics in the United States in

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen seventies. Well it's twenty twenty five, right, that

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 3>was fifty years ago. Yeah, I mean you would think

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 3>that the know how of how to make those things

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 3>is spread around, and it has. And so what happened was,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the nineteen nineties, two thousands armies of China,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 3>these people came to the United States for jobs inside

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 3>all those companies, and they learned, not surprisingly, how to

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>make what was being made then, which was biologics. You know,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to call it racism. I think that's

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>probably unfair. But for whatever reason, a lot of these

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Chinese personnel weren't promoted. They didn't become the SVP at

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 3>some big shot US biotech company. You know, they were

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>stuck in a director job, and they got frustrated and

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 3>left and went home to China. Now here we are

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, and they're crawling all over us like

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>they know how to do exactly what we know how

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to do, and guess what, just like in batteries, just

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>like in telephones and these other sectors, they're pretty good

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>at it. And so all of a sudden, US biotech

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I think has really woken up just in the last

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>year or two and said, WHOA, we've got competition. Like

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 3>these guys are as good as US. I'd say they're

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 3>probably better in a lot of ways.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So I definitely want to get to where they are

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and why they might be better and what are the

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>conditions that perhaps allow them to be better. One less

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of like precursor. Oh yes, und question is for

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>these chemicals, I imagine that. Okay, we're going to talk

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about breakthroughs that are happening that are in China, that

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>are you know, in terms of therapies or biologics, et cetera.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But if we wind back a few years to where

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people's brains were stuck at in terms of what is

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of global supply chain of I mean the

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese hamster over is, what is the sort of sort

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of incumbent global supply chain of key materials, ingredients, equipment

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for biotech and what is China's role in that.

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>So if you're making a small molecule which comes down

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>to that basic fine chemical, let's say it's libatare, Okay,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you could probably make it for less than a place

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>like India or Indonesia or China. So that's called API,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>active pharmaceutical ingredient. And in fact, China has become a

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 3>huge source of API because in many ways, you know,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>China's really good in the chemical industry. So why wouldn't

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>they be good in the API industry?

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Can you contextualize some of China's I guess growth in

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>this area with some specific numbers, because we see all

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>these headlines coming out, like thirty percent of major pharma

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>licensing deals now involve Chinese companies. I think that's up

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>from like almost zero five years ago. There are some

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>interesting data to look at.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So just to give you a couple stats the

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 3>API that source into the US, I don't have the

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 3>exact numbers on my fingertips, but I would say at

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>least twenty five to fifty percent of API that's being

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 3>used in the US generic pharmaceutical industry today is sourced

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>from China. India is another big piece of that. So

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Indian China are both really big. What's interesting is India

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 3>has not kind of had this phenomenon of their nationals

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>coming home and opening up local biotech companies. So China

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 3>created this policy, you know, very intentionally five ten years ago,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>saying hey, we want to be really good in biotech.

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 3>It is strategic for US as a country. It's not

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>that they're trying to beat the United States so that

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>they need access to these medicines domestically. You know, why

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>pay the giant global price that some US pharma company

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 3>wants a charge? Like, why don't you just learn how

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 3>to make it at home? So they very deliberately attracted

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>back what are called sea turtles. These are people that

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 3>crossed the sea from the US or Europe back home

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to China. They were then encouraged to start their own

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>biotech companies and apply whatever they had learned, you know,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>in their jobs in Bristol Meyers squib or An Artists

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 3>or what have you, and Boyd learned they had and

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>support they got, and all of a sudden they're churning

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 3>out really interesting molecules. And so Tracy, just like you said,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 3>last year, thirty percent of all molecules that were licensed

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 3>in by big Pharma came from China, not from the

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 3>United States, not from Europe, not from Japan. They came

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>from China. And I do think that statistic, which was

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>generated by our good friends at deal Forma, was really

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of a wake up call for a lot of

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>folks in our industry.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And what five years ago that would have been basically.

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Zero, yeah, five percent, zero to five percent?

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>How much is it?

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Is?

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It genuinely novel therapies. How much is it? There's sort

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of an existing therapy, but they can make it a

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>better version of it, a cheaper version of it. I understand,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like cheaper it must be sort of a weird concept

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in an area where there's I know, a lot of

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property. But talk about what is driving that competitiveness

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and market share game.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>There's two or three different things going on. So the

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 3>first thing is we're seeing what are called fast follower molecules.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's just say for the sake of argument, that Daichi

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Senkio comes up with something called a B seven H

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 3>three anti body drug conjugate B seven H three ADC. Well,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese guys see that pop up, they see the

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 3>patent filing, they look at it, and they're like, Okay,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna make a B seven H three, but instead

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>of using this toxin on the ADC, we're gonna use

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>that toxin are instead of using this link or we're

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna use that one. So those are kind of doing

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>small twists around existing constructs. So we call those fast followers.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 3>China's really good at past followers. The second thing that

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing are first in class molecules and So the

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 3>hottest biotech in the United States right now is a

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 3>company called Summit Therapeutics. They have a seventeen billion dollar

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 3>market cap as we speak. Remember I define a biotech

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>a company that doesn't yet have an approved drug. So

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the highest valuation in the world of any company

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 3>in the world today that doesn't have an approved drug.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>That molecule, which is a combination of a PD one

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>antibody with the VeVe jef modi PD one by Vegef

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 3>it's called is an excellent molecule. It's working really well

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>in mun cancer. And guess what it was invented in China.

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Mert didn't come up with it, Advisor didn't come up

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 3>with it. Habit didn't come up with it. It was

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>come up with in China. And it's the most interesting

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>biotech molecule in the world today.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But this is an American company, Summer, right, They went

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and licensed China got it, just like we're seeing the

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>big pharmaus US biotechs licensing stuff from China all day long.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>How much does the difference in regulatory regimes play into here,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>because one thing we often hear when it comes to

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>outsourcing manufacturing to China whether it's something basic like I

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know, clothing or something more advanced like medicines. Is

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that it's cheaper to make stuff in China because you

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 2>don't have as many rules and regulations to either slow

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you down or add on to costs. Is that a

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 2>factor here as well.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a comp located question and a complicated answer. So yeah.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So for most biologics, the Chinese will allow you to

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>get those into patients more quickly. They have what we

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 3>call phase zero studies where you can just go to

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>a doctor and say, okay, hey, doc, you've got people

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>coming in that are dying of ovarian cancer, use this drug.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>The FDA will not let you do that, right, So,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the FDA won't let that ovarian cancer drug go into

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>a patient until it's gone through typically a Phase one study. Interestingly,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>China's not the only country that does that. Australia does

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>that too, and you know, we have kind of new

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>sheriff in town at the FDA. It might be an

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting thing to explore kind of accelerating that time to

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 3>get to the first patient. So that that's one place

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>where China is a head. But in general, their rules

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>are just as tough as our rules. It's not like

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 3>they have a you know, a low hurdle and we

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>have a high hurdle to jump over to get a

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 3>drug approved. Their vantage is more speed to invent, speed

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to get into the clinic. They're just performing really well

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>on a lot of those key performance indicators.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>What about there's the cost of conducting a phase one trial.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are really expensive endeavors in the United States,

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can spend millions and it goes nowhere past

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>phase one. How does the cost compared to run the

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>equivalent in China?

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean we should pause for moments. So the US

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 3>has capitalistic medicine system, right, So doctors are for profits.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you're a physician, of course you're trying to

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 3>care for your patients. But let's be honest, a lot

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 3>of those dermatologists and endochronologists that you see, they're running

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 3>a business. The other day I was talking to a cardiologist.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I said, like, how many patients do you see the year?

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 3>He's like eight thousand, and I was out like asking

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the lady at the front, like, how much like does

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the average patient visit bill? She's like a four or

0:18:58.320 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>five hundred bucks. So you can do the math that

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>guy pulling down like five to ten million dollars, right,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 3>So running a physician practice in the United States can

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>be very lucrative. I'm not saying every doc's doing it,

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>just to be clear. But now you're a cancer doc

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 3>and you're an MD Anderson or Dane Farber someplace, and

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 3>some company shows up GSK and they want you to

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>test this drug. How much are you going to charge

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>GSK for each patient? It turns out that the average

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>price to enroll a patient and a cancer drial in

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the United States is between two hundred thousand and four

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars per pat per patient.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>How much of that goes to the doctor.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 3>A lot and a lot to the hospital. I mean,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>this is a big issue that's just possed up.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>A big source of hospital and doctor profits that they're

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially selling access to their patients.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 3>You bet, especially at the big places. So developing drugs,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 3>especially in cancer in the United States is very expensive.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I'd note is there's a lot of

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 3>competition for talent in our country. Again, it's a capitalist

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 3>talent market. So you know, let's say you're a doctor

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 3>working in m D Anderson and then GSK comes along

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 3>and says, hey, we'd like you to be our chief

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>medical officer. We'd like you to run this cancer program. Like,

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 3>is that a one hundred and fifty thousand dollars job.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. The average chief medical officer in

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the United States city is pulling down between a half

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>million and one point five million dollars a year, depending

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>on your level of experience and how good you are.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 3>So all of a sudden, you see biotech companies that

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>are going out to raise one hundred million dollars. Well,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that's how much you need to raise to enroll the

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>trial and pay all those people. And you know they

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 3>have lots of posh offices as well, and expensive places,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and so US biotech is not so efficient. In contrast,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in China, there are no seven hundred thousand dollars chief

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 3>medical officers. There are no two hundred thousand dollar patients.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a communist country, right. Doctors, you know, make thirty

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars a year. You don't get to go make

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of thousands dollars a year for being a doctor,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 3>and you definitely don't rent out your patience.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, I have to say this is something I sort

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>of became aware of in this phenomenon of doctors and

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>hospitals renting out their patients, and for this episode, I

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>had no idea that that's how it worked, and I

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>had no idea of the scale of these numbers. Like,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>if there's one fact that's sort of like expanding my mind,

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>this is the one.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know it either. We should probably do an

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>episode just on the market for renting out cancer patients.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>That sounds very It.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Sounds bad when you put it that way, like they're gating, right,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they're profiting from the fact that they You're the sort

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the channel, right, They're they're the channel through which

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the drug company must find patients.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's just talk reality of a medicine in

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>America right now. There are certain specialties that make money.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Cancer treatment is one, cardiology, surgeries is another. In contrast

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>seeing people in the emergency room, seeing people in a

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>primary care sense, you lose money doing those activities. Payments

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 3>from insurance companies are poor, and so hospital systems, by

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>necessity have become for profit. They have no choice.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>So one of the reasons we wanted to speak to

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>you is because, in the course of your work, You've

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>talked to a lot of CEOs and executives on I

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>guess both sides of the ocean here in China and

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>in the US give us a sort of temperature check

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 2>of what people are saying right now when it comes

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to the US VERSUS China pharmaceutical biotech industries.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>So, first of all, the pharma companies, the big pharma companies,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 3>they're thrilled at China's there. It gives them more options, right,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's new molecules, they might be innovative molecules.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 3>The Chinese companies generally don't globalize on their own. One

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 3>of the interesting things is there's you know, Chinese big

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 3>pharma companies. Name the largest pharma company from China you've

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 3>ever heard of. You can't do it. There isn't one, right,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 3>It might be an obscure company like King Ray or CSPC.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>They're relatively small compared to our pharmaceutical companies. So it's

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>great hunting for those guys. For the Chinese companies, access

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to the US pharmaceutical market is a god send capitalist

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 3>tight prices are low for the US biotech company China

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 3>can be worrisome, But honestly, when I speak to my

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 3>friends in the US biotech ecosystem. There are some concern

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 3>but most of them aren't in direct line of fire

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 3>with Chinese competition. It's the US investor, the US biotech

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>investor this kind of worried. So all those stories that

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>you were referring to, a lot of them are sort

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>of freaked out, saying, hey, like thirty percent of molecules

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 3>are coming from China, what about our biotech companies?

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Wait, so why wouldn't your friends in the industry be

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ang I mean, presumably their leverage their own stocks. If

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the investors weren't, they aren't your friends in the industry more.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Anxious because the Chinese, by and large are taking older

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>technologies and biologics and putting twists and turns on those technologies.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Most US biotech companies are not in that business right now,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 3>so by and large they have understood long ago that

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they need to differentiate. But that's not all of them.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there are certainly some companies out there that

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 3>are in direct competition. And by the way, you know,

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the other day I was looking at these antibody drug conjugates,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>So China's gotten really good and antibody drug conjugates are

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>very popular. I think there's four or five major public

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 3>antibody drug conjugate development companies in the US.

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>They all have type of cancer treatment that combines the

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic cancer killing drug. Okay, keep going,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So an ady C is basically chemotherapy that's directed specifically

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>to this cell. So you don't have to worry about

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>losing all your hair or whatever if you take an ADC.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>So the average enterprise value that's your market cap, ple's

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 3>your cash of a US ADC biotech today has gone negative.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Two years ago was quite positive, and I do think

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 3>that those folks have you taken some heat from Chinese college.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 2>I just want to go back to the anxiety or

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>lack of it in the US and just focus on

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the investors for a moment. So the worry is that

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the people who actually fund some of these things, I

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 2>guess venture capital, maybe private equity, things like that, that

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 2>they are going to be intermediated by pharma that's going

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 2>directly to the Chinese companies.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So let's imagine you're a venture capitalists out

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco. You've got this nice life, you know,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 3>on sand Hill Road, you come up with some ideas

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 3>for some new biotech companies, you found them, and then

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you're waiting, you know, for merk to come along or

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>genetech to come along, almost almost like you know, setting

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>a trap for the groundhog in your backyard or something

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 3>like that, and the groundhog never shows up because they

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>don't go to your backyard anymore. They've found some other

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 3>place to go. And so what's happening is that pharma

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>have learned that they can find really interesting molecules in China,

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The themes that comes up in a lot of our

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>conversations about Chinese industry in general. So you see these

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>stories about sort of incredible growth and manufacturing of whatever

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>with pretty slim profits, and famously, like the Chinese stock market,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's actually, i think the last few weeks, it's uh,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this year is kind of doing okay. But like famously,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese stock market, for all the growth that they've had,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>for all the success various industries, it's kind of been

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a dog for a long time. And part of the

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>story is like, well, there's just so much capital intensity

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and you actually only stay at the cutting edge of

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>all these capital intensive businesses. If you're spending all of

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>your money that you take in on more research and

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so there isn't a lot left over for the end

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>equity investor. It kind of sounds like something similar here

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, it's not great if you're a US

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>equity investor in certain areas that are directly in the

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>line of fire. But it doesn't sound like Chinese companies

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>themselves are swimming in profits.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Right. There's no fat cats in China, even though there

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 3>might be nice to think that could be true. So

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 3>I was on a trip recently to China. I was

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>in this one building, like you know, just one of

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 3>many buildings that had biotechs in Beijing, and like every floor,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 3>like it was like an apartment building, every floor had

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>another biotech. And I asked one of the guys, I

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 3>SAIDs like, how many biotechs are in this building? Said

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 3>as sixty seventy? How many biotechs are in Beijing? He said,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 3>nobody knows exactly. So, you know, the US places like

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg have phenomenal databases and stuff that they don't have

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 3>that over there. Maybe that's a business for Bloomberg. I

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for the suggestion.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>So yes, he said, I think there's three thousand biotechs

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>in Beijing. In other words, there's fifty buildings like that one.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 3>And I said, well, what about the country? He said,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 3>nobody knows, but like five to ten thousand biotech companies.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>So they've got a lot of people making molecules that

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 3>are competing for the attention and of a relatively few

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 3>large pharma companies.

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things you've been emphasizing is this

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>idea of China just moving faster than the US on

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>this and it does seem like they've come out of

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>almost nowhere in recent years. How sustainable is that particular pace,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Because if China got a leg up because it had

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a generation of researchers who came to US universities and

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe worked in the US and then took that knowledge

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>back home. Eventually, does that mean that, you know, that

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of wave of talent ebbs away and it becomes

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 2>harder or is it a permanent shift that they're going

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to hold on to for a long time.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I would say that you have to look at where

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 3>their advantage is coming from. So they have a really

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>good ecosystem for going from an idea for a new

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>biologic to an actual drug that can be tested in patience.

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Tracy, if you saw this news last

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>year about the Biosecure Act. The US Congress for some

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 3>reason decided that they wanted to Like ban Wushie I

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>spoke to the CEO of Wooshi, I said, like they're

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 3>saying that you're communists. He said, yeah, we have members

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>of the Communist Party and our company we're actually required to.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>By law, as do many Chinese companies.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>And he said, by the way, have you noticed how

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 3>many Teslas are in China? Has anyone called up Elon

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Musk asked him, does he have anyone the Communist Party

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 3>in this company? How did Tesla get to have one

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 3>third market share of the electric vehicles in China? He said,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>of course, every company China's allied with the Communist Party.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>He said, We're no different than anybody else. So Wouh

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 3>interestingly came up with this concept called idea to I

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>and D in six months, That is, you give me

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 3>an idea for a new biologic, and I will give

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 3>you a drug in six months. That seems insane right

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>in the US, it's like two three years. So if

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 3>you ask the folks of wooh She, how did you

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 3>get your molecule to go through the system so fast,

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 3>He'll say it's all volume. He said, you need to

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 3>have the people that know what they're doing at each step.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 3>He said, when you're slow, it's because you're fumbling around.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>You don't have volumes. So like, oh, yeah, we don't

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 3>have the right cell line, let's go make that to

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the customer. They think, well, just take a year to

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>get the selling going, But in fact, he said, you know,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>if you already have five good choices of a sell line,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 3>well you know you ought to be able to get

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that done in two weeks. So wou Shi is behind

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 3>many of those Chinese molecules, and so they're able to

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 3>access a really good industrial partner. And I'm just still

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>befuddled by, like, why does US Congress want to deprive

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 3>US biotech of access to woo she. It's kind of

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 3>crazy when you think about it.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The talent pool in the US and the incredible salaries

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that you could make in normal traditional tech, and I

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine smart, quantitatively minded people that probably have

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple options. They could go to work in a high

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>speed trading firm. They could go to work at Google,

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they could go to work at open Ai, they could

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>probably apply a lot of their skills in pharma. Have

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happened in the US to the supply of talent

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and has the huge salaries that have emerged over the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years in traditional tech, has that been drain

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on the sort of has that pulled people away who

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>might have otherwise gone into pharma or biotech?

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so so much. I mean, you know,

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 3>there are always the folks in a culture that have

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 3>let's say that immigrant mentality, maybe Indian heritage, something like that,

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 3>where you know, you're really motivated to be a lawyer

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 3>or doctor whatever. I do think a lot of those

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 3>folks have gone into the medical profession, and that's certainly

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 3>more and more they're attracted, I think, to the tech profession.

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 3>But your classic sort of biotech scientists is someone who

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 3>got a PhD. You know, they they got interested in

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>biology and college, they went off and got a PhD

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>from some you know, nice place, and then they got

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 3>a job at industry. Those people would in general not

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>be you know, thinking about a programming jobs.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Got it, Okay?

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I know we're talking mainly about US and China. But

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I have to ask, is Europe in the picture at

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>all here? I mean the only this is partly because

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't follow pharma that intensely, but it feels like

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the only European name I hear nowadays is Novo Nordisk

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's golp Ones.

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Europe historically was the dominant place in the

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.959
<v Speaker 3>world for the pharmaceutical industry, so it's only I would say,

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in the last thirty years that the US has taken over. Unfortunately,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Europe started putting in very draconian price controls and so

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that really hurt their domestic pharma industry. But nonetheless, Europe's

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>got great universities, you know, whether talking about Gottingen, Erlangen, Lighten, Cambridge, Oxford.

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these are really good places, and so you

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 3>can imagine the talent and ideas that are flowing out

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>of those have really created a very vital and successful

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 3>biotech ecosystem in Europe.

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So right now, as you mentioned, the really big US

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>pharma companies are thrilled because they have new options from

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>which they can source or license biologics. And you mentioned

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there's really even know at all big Chinese pharmaceutical companies.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that could change like right now, like

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>still like the J and js and the Pfizers and

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the other big one, Like they're pretty Eli Lillie like

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>these are like pretty big chunks of the US market,

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like they you know, for an investor,

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>an in diverse fyed investor, it's a decent chunk of

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>their holdings. You know, we've seen, for example, China is

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>going taking a shot to break into the aviation duopoly

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of Boeing and Airbus, go up the next level and

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>actually compete at the highest level. Would you anticipate that

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the next few years some company

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or some initiative is like, let's take it to the

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>next level, or we're not just licensing, but we want

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a behemoth. We want to sell into markets

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>around the world that US multinationals are also selling into.

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, kind of comes back to like the core

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 3>ideological conversation that we're having about China. Not only are

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 3>there not Chinese global pharma companies in general, there are

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 3>very few global Chinese competitors. Right There's not a Chinese

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 3>version of Coca Cola, not a Chinese version of Procter gamble.

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the question quickly becomes why, and the

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 3>answer is simple. The country is controlled by the Communist Party.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the Communist Party has one goal survive and thrive. Well,

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 3>you don't survive by going and conquering the US soft

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 3>drink market. You survive by keeping the people in your

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>country happy and supportive. Right they have had their political instability,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and so that is the over writing goal. And it's

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 3>for that reason that you don't see global commercial ambitions

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>from China. Car. Yeah, on cars, but you know that's

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>only because they had to like competing against Tesla, because

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Tesla has taken over their car market. I would say this,

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I do think it could change. I do think that

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 3>China could easily have a large, globally successful pharmaceutical company.

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 3>They have the people, they have the innovation, they have

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 3>the domestic market. All of the pieces are there, but

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 3>for whatever reason, it has not been prioritized.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the deep seek idea

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 2>and ask if you could talk maybe about the connection

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>between AI and biotech here, because we hear people say

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 2>like AI can do these amazing things. It can generate

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 2>formulas for potential new medicines, it can tell you how

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to manufacture them easier, streamline the manufacturing. How is that

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>playing out in China?

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Tracy, that is such a great question. So

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you. So last November, I was in China,

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I'm a banker, like I said, you know,

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>just brokering these deals and stuff. So you go around

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>and you meet all the Chinese vcs. So we're seeing

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 3>this one VC, but unlike all the other ones, Like

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 3>the guy I was talking to you, like twenty eight

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>years old and he's like the head of this VC.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So he's attracted capital at a very young age. And

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 3>I asked him, just point blank, I'm like, so, why

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 3>are all your companies just making sort of like, you know,

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 3>slightly better molecules than the Western molecules. You're essentially doing

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 3>the fast follower model. He said, Tim, you haven't been

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to going down province. He said, down there, guys my age,

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 3>they've never worked in the United States before. It Eli Lilly,

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 3>he said, the folks there they learned AI, like they

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 3>grew up with AI. They know all about AI. And

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 3>he said, you're gonna see a whole generation of biotech

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 3>coming out of China. It's gonna be first in class

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 3>AI driven innovation. You quickly get into the next conversation,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 3>which is AI any good at developing drugs? And you know,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I would say, like a lot of things, maybe the

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 3>first couple generations aren't so good, but AI is getting

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 3>really good at developing drugs.

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Because I can never tell. I was like, if you

0:37:58.239 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>always say, oh, hey, it's gonna be so great a

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>little big drugs, I can't tell if that's just one

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of those things people say, but you think it's real.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, here's my theory of AI. If you go

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>to London twenty years ago, you get in a taxi

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and you'd say, take me to Paddington Station. No matter

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 3>where you were in London, the guy would know exactly

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 3>where to go because he'd memorize the street system knowledge. Well,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 3>then one day came along this thing called a sat NAF,

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden, you didn't need that guy anymore.

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 3>He was obsolete. Overnight Uber moved in, like they're like,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, saying, hey, Uber's going to crash you in

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the Thames River. Of course that was false, and pretty

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 3>soon the market changed fundamentally. That's a medium dimensional problem.

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>In other words, a human being can figure out how

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to navigate London with you know, four years of training,

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 3>but a computer can do it in four microseconds. Well,

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 3>coming up with all the drug possibilities against a potential target,

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 3>that's a high dimensional problem. That's too hard. The computer

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 3>actually can't do it. At least today. You can have

0:38:59.920 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 3>all the unbidio chips in the world. You can't do it.

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 3>But in contrast, these biologics that we're talking about, even

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 3>though they're more complex molecules, it's their complexity that lowers

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the dimensionality of the problem because biologics have to fold

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 3>and fit in a very specific way, so all of

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a sudden it starts to look like the London street map.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And so what we're seeing are these new companies coming

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 3>out of places like Google that are focused on making

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 3>biologics with AI, and they're really good. So we're going

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to see some excellent AI based molecules.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim, when you get out of here, we're going to

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>just like rebook you for the next time we have

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you on, because there's so much stuff here I want

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about. But you're so great to have

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you on. Tim Oppler, fantastic discussion, Truly the perfect guest

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Odlin, Joe, thank you so much, and Faci, thank.

0:39:47.640 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You, Tracy. That was obviously a great episode. There's so

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>many different interesting things there. We're definitely gonna have to

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have Tim back. I like, actually, like I'd love to

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just talk about that last point he made about complexity.

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And but the point about a major profit center for

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire US healthcare system is the cost is borne

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by the pharmaceutical companies to get access to the patients

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is just like to me, that reveals so much, Like

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that says so much right there about the sort of

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>tension between the profit motive and frankly speed of innovation.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. The other thing I was thinking about is this

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of gets to the idea that US protectionism of

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>strategic industries can sometimes backfire. This is like the line

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of China has been taking this idea

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that well, if you cut China off from key technologies,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 2>key developments, it's just going to accelerate its own progress.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna, I guess, kick its research and development into

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 2>high gear. And I mean it kind of kind of

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.720
<v Speaker 2>seems to be the case. I guess. I'm wondering also

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 2>what happens with the Biosecurity Act with the Trump administration,

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 2>because it's still in a legal limbo.

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It would be interesting. There's so many more angles, you know,

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to learn more about the sort

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of generation of Chinese research scientists in the US that

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>felt they had hit a ceiling on how far they

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to progress within the US companies, and then

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they formed the basis of this booming industry. There's interesting

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>parallels in just this idea of like sheer scale, right,

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and sheer scale of the number. You know, China is

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a gigantic country with thousands and thousands of companies and

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the advantage that affords you both in terms of cutting

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>edge research but also doing lagging edge production of various

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>things at size and at low cost. There's a lot

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of interesting angles there.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot, and I expect we're gonna record

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a few more episodes at least on this. We're going

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 2>to fast follow yeah, all of this. Shall we leave

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it there?

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Authoughts podcast. I'm

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Follow Tim Oppler at Tim Oppler. Follow our producers Carman

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez at Carman armand dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot and

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>kel Brooks at Kelbrooks. More odd Lots content, go to

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots. We have all of

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>our episodes in a daily newsletter, and you can chet

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>about all of these topics twenty four to seven in

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>our discord Discord dot gg slash off lots.

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about Chinese hamster ovarian cells, then please

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcast and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.