WEBVTT - Conference Championship Weekend: Nick's Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>XSP can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cibo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be two.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode one twenty three, our Conference Championship weekend

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>edition of What's Right with Nick Right, our weekly gambling show.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Last week we went to and two. We should have

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>gone three and one. Our stream of being on the

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>right side, or streak of not having losing weeks continues.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Two and two is nothing to right home about. But

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>there's only four games we and well, let's just go

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 3>through them right now before we get to this Weekends Picks,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 3>which you guys, if you've been listening to this show

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>throughout the year, you probably know this Weekends Picks. So

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 3>our playoff records now six and four, Our season record

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 3>fifty six fifty two in two, which does not sound great.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>But if you know what we were looking like around

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 3>week fifteen, you know what a heater were on Cincinnati

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 3>plus five and a half at Buffalo. We told you

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 3>they'd win outright, We told you they were the better

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>team that was proven out San Francisco minus three and

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>a half against Dallas. That game, as we discussed on Monday,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>went about as hilariously as everyone could predict it would.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Giants plus seven and a half at Philly was flatly

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the wrong side of that bet. But if you remember

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 3>last Friday's show, I said that was the game I

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>felt the least confident. That was the game that I

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>was just like a divisional game. I'll grab the points.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>We weren't sure how healthy Jalen was going to be,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>but there was a chance the game was going to

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>go exactly the way it did, which is it gets

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 3>out of hand early and Philly rolls all over them.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>And then there's Kansas City minus eight and a half

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>against Jacksonville. Now that did not cover, but that is

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>flatley and clearly was the right side of the bet

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>because in order for that to not cover by a

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>point and a half. You needed Mahomes to get hurt,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes to when he came back in be incredibly hampered

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>due to injury, and then the Chiefs to fail to

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>pick up consecutive third and ones that would have allowed

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 3>them to essentially salt the game away. Even though all

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>of that happened, it was still Chiefs winning by ten

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>with less than a minute remaining. Then the Jags, to

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 3>their credit, did do the smart thing, kick the field

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>goals so you can then attempt the on side and

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the hail mary. They got the field goal, they didn't

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>get the on side and the hail mary. So we

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>feel fine about how we did last week, but not

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>nearly as great as how we could feel about this

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>week if we end up nailing these two games. Because well, Demonse,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll welcome you in now and I'll let you discuss

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 3>what has been the underlying story of this entire gambling season,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>our preseason super Bowl bet. Go right ahead.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, before we get into your picks for this week,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about your big super Bowl prediction. Yeah, we

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>talked about it in the first show. Yeah, we're going

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to show.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we have a clip, all right, let's watch the clip.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>My Super Bowl pick is Chiefs Niners. If you bet

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs win the AFC and the Niners to win

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the NFC. It's a rematch, by the way, Super Bowl

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>from a few years ago. That is plus five thousand,

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one. Demonse, there's four teams left. The Eagles

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>are left, the Bengals are left, and who are the

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>other two two teams remaining?

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>The forty nine Ers and the Chiefs.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>So we are as close as we can get to

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>hitting that fifty to one. Now, you go right ahead.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you obviously called that back when the first

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>episode of this particular show aired.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, can you walk timber second?

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep, can you walk us through your thought process and

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>what made you choose this particular bet.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So why did I like the Chiefs and the

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Niners before the year. So we'll start with the Chiefs.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought a number of things were happening. One is,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I thought people were way overvaluing the AFC West. Now listen,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 3>I thought the Chargers were good enough to make the

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 3>conference championship game, and maybe they would have been. They

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously got absolutely annihilated by injuries, and they still found

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>a way into the playoffs. Were up twenty seven to

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing in their playoff game. But I thought the Raiders

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>were not going to be very good, and I the

0:04:54.160 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Broncos were hilariously overvalued. Additionally, what I did get wrong

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>was I thought the Bengals were gonna take a bit

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of a step back. Now it looked like that was correct.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>At the beginning of the season, I had the Bengals

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 3>making the playoffs, making it as a wild card team.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>The Bengals have been obviously one of the hottest teams

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 3>in the league ever since the opening month of the season.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>But the other part of it was there was real

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 3>value on the Chiefs because everyone was anointing the Buffalo Bills,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>and so the Chiefs were not the overwhelming favorites within

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 3>their division. They weren't the favorites at all. They were

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the favorites in their division, were not overwhelming as they

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>had been in years past. You could get plus money

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>on them to win their division, meaning they were the

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 3>favorites for the AFC West. But Chiefs versus the field,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>they were an underdog according to the money on it.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And then there was the Bills that were treated like

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>this unstoppable juggernaut that I just simply did not buy

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>into so for all of those reasons, plus the fact

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I thought the U market was slightly overstating the impact

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of Tyreek Hill being gone. And I knew now, to

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>be fair, I didn't pick the Chiefs to be the

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 3>one seed. I thought they were gonna have to play

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a road playoff game or two for the first time

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>in the Mahomes era. But I knew what they're playing

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>was on defense, in playing all these young players, half

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>dozen rookies getting significant snaps, and the idea then would

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>be by the end of the year, by games fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 3>those rookies are no longer really rookies, and the defense

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>could be peaking at just the right time, and I

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>knew Mahomes would be fine. And to be honest, that

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 3>is exactly what happened. The Bills were frauds. The AFC

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>West was not the greatest division ever, and the Chiefs

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>defense now sits here today in the NFL in sacks

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the most pressures of any team in the league outside

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of Dallas, and the most quarterback hits of any team

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in the league outside of Dallas. With these young players

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>coming into their own and the Chiefs offense led the

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>league in points and led the league in yards. So

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that was the chief side of the bet. Then there's

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the Niners side of the bet. The Niners bet was

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 3>essentially a twofold bet. The first one was I looked

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>around the NFC and I did not believe in the

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Eagles the way everyone else seemed. They were the trendy team.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>We talked about it. People are talking about that they

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>could be the one seed, and I said, listen. I

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>reluctantly picked them to win their division, but I did

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>not think they would be a fourteen and three team. Well,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 3>they were a fourteen and three team and could have

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>been better than that, if we're being totally honest, they

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>were what thirteen and one? And then Jalen got hurt.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>So I missed on the Eagles, but the rest of it.

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>What was our favorite preseason win total? Bucks under eleven

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half. I didn't look at the Bucks as

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>a real contender. The Packers, to me, missed their window.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I didn't look at the Packers as a real contender.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>The Rams we knew that. We didn't know Stafford was

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna get hurt, but he did go into the year

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>with an elbow injury. We knew they'd miss von Miller,

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 3>we knew they'd miss Odell. So the Rams to me,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 3>were not a dynamite contender. So now we're really only

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>down to a handful of teams as far as who

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 3>could win the NFC and the Niners. It wasn't that

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I thought Trey Lance was going to instantly come in

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>and be better than Jimmy Garoppolo. But Jimmy Garoppolo statistically

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>is one of the worst playoff quarterbacks ever. He has

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 3>played six career playoff games. He has four touchdowns, he

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 3>has six interceptions. He has a passer rating of seventy four.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>He is the worst postseason fourth quarter fourth quarter quarterback ever,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>a passer rating of less than twenty in his career

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason in the fourth quarter. And so my

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 3>logic there was the Niners by the end of the

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>season are going to have better quarterback play than they'd

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>had at any point during the Jimmy Garoppolo era. Now

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>that ended up being true, But it wasn't because of

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Trey Lance. It was because of Brock Purty. But Mike

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Shanahan has coached eight playoff games with the Niners.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 3>The two best quarterbacking performances that he's gotten have been

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 3>the two Brock Party games. So I loved the Niners defense.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Loved Damiko Ryans. We said it on the show before

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the year, now he's the new head coaching candidate. Loved

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>their skill position guys, and I thought Trey Lance was

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>going to add a dynamic to the offense as far

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>as quarterback run game that Shanahan's offense would be just

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>utterly devastating with. Now that never came to fruition. The

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 3>guy played five quarter and broke his leg. But and

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>then Jimmy G came in, and once they traded for

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>McCaffrey after the Chiefs game, they were rolling. And then

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the best thing that could happen to him

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 3>was Jimmy G goes out. And I don't think Perty's great.

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know if Perty's good, but Perty is

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 3>not a terrible playoff quarterback. The way Jimmy G has been,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 3>the NFC is wide open. Now what did I say

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 3>when I was explaining this whole thing. My two big

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 3>misses were underrating the Eagles and underrating the Bengals. I

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 3>had them both making the playoffs. I had neither of

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>them as actual Super Bowl contenders. Either one of those

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 3>teams could of course ruin my fifty to one bet,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 3>but and the.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>But got a chance to be responsible in edge it.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't hedge bets. I don't. I'm not hedging you.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I would be This is a do as I say,

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 3>now as I do type of thing. If you had

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>this future writing, I would be hassling you on a

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 3>daily basis, trying to convince you to hedge it.

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I was about to say, I can't afford

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to not have sixteen thousands of my bank account.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, even if it were, I think let's say you

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>made one hundred dollar bet and it was to win

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>five thousand, you know what I mean, instead of one

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars bet to win fifty thousand. If it was

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollars bet to win five thousand, and you

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>right now could get fifteen hundred out of it, I

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 3>would be strongly encouraging you to take it. I don't

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 3>know if you.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Would bring it back down to my scale.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think you would do? Because you made

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollar bet before. So let's say you made

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a hundred dollar future and it was fifty to one

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 3>and you Now the little cash out option says fifteen hundred.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing?

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm sticking with it.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let me ask this. We're watching the game Sunday.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>The Niners win the early game. Now the cash out

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>option is twenty four hundred. All it's either gonna sand

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>so you can either click yes, or it's gonna be zero,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 3>or it's gonna be five thousand. What are you doing?

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing? What do you think?

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Hey man, I'm hoping Joe Burrow gets banged up early.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, well.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm kidding. No, I would pray for injury, but I

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>definitely think i'd still have to, especially if they're forty

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 2>nine Ers were to win early. I couldn't see myself.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 2>This happened to me earlier in the early in the year.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>What happened with the parlay? And it was like, the

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>uh is the Packers playing the Bills? I think, oh, yeah,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the Packers plus yeah, ten and a half or eleven.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Bills were it was Sunday night football. Yeah,

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the Bills were crushing them. And then the Bills ended

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>up having a terrible second half and the Packers ended

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 3>up Yeah, losing twenty seven to seventeen. Yeah, it was

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>a miraculus cover. But you didn't cash out of that one. No,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 3>And if you remember during that one when the bills

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>went up huge early, your cash out on it was nothing.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 3>It was terrible. All right, let's get into these games.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco is getting two and a half points at Philadelphia.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Unlike the Chiefs line, which has moved all over the place,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>this line has been quite static. Demonte go ahead.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts the season and this season and is a

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 2>twenty and three as a favorite in his career.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, yeahs, and he's fifteen to one overall this season.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>As far as just straight up wins, go ahead, right.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Four ricky quarterbacks have ever been in Four ricky quarterbacks

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>have ever been in a championship game? Yeah, Mark Sanchez,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco, Ben Roethlisberger, Sean King, all, oh, and four

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 2>straight up?

0:13:54.720 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that doesn't. None of those factors really bother

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>me here. So let's go through those rookie quarterbacks that

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about. Mark Sanchez, Joe Flacco, Ben Roethlisberger, Sean King.

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking about the Jets of the late two

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>thousand aughts, the Ravens of the mid two thousands, bent,

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers of the same era, and then the Bucks

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>of late nineties. Okay, yeah, Shaun King twenty some years ago.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 3>So all of those teams were trying to win games

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>thirteen to ten, seventeen fourteen. They were trying to win

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>purely on their the strength of their defense. So, yes,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>the rookie quarterbacks, it would have been nice if they

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>could make plays, but those guys really hadn't been making

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 3>plays all year. And those were defensive oriented teams. Nin

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>have the best defense in football, and since they got

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Christian McCaffrey and hell forget that, since Rock Purty took

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>over one of the highest scoring offenses in football. They

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't show that against Dallas, and Dallas has a very

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>good defense similar to Phillies, by the way, but they

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 3>did certainly did show it against Seattle. Now, what is

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>concerning is Rock party on the road in the playoffs

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 3>for the very first time. That is concerning. But I'm

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna tell you what I didn't like from Philadelphia this weekend. Now,

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 3>they played great, and Jalen was excellent, and the defense

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>was excellent. There's not many, you know, holes to poke

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in their performance at the end of the first quarter,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>you're beating up the Giants, who the Giants were not

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 3>a good team this year. Congrats to them from making

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the division round. But that's not a great team. But

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 3>like skycam showed Nick Sirianni and he looked straight into

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 3>the camera and did this whole like an mean no, no, no.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 3>That was different that actually in mind when he ran

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>down to the pylon and yelled at the ref and

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>he said, I'm allowed to be down here. I know

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>what the believe I'm doing. This was him looking into

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the camera and doing one of these like like, yeah,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 3>where are those guys? And I felt, hmm, maybe maybe

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>believe in the hype a little too much for a

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>team that didn't finish the year great and now in

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>their first playoff game, played a team that was, by

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>any advanced metric, by anything, one of the very worst

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>teams to make the postseason by record, by eye test,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>by advanced metrics. You didn't have a Niners team that

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I feel like has had members of this coaching staff

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 3>working on this exact matchup for probably six weeks. The Niners,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 3>who knew they were winning that division for a long time,

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and who knew this was going to be the team

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>they had to get through. Now you can say the

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 3>same thing about Philadelphia that they have been working on

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the Niners. But I would argue harder to game plan

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 3>for the Niners because of their positional versatility, because there's

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>less film on Party available, and because of the Shanahan offense.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the Niners can win not I think I

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 3>know the Niners can win a low scoring game or

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>a high scoring game. I don't know that. I believe

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 3>that Philadelphia can shut down the Niners off correct. And

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 3>now the road part of it is concerning, and they're listen,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Brock Party is likely turning into a pumpkin at some

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>point in the next few weeks. Is he gonna be

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>on the road in Philadelphia, one of the most hostile

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 3>environments in the league. Maybe, But I also think Shanahan's

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 3>going to try to coach around having to put rock

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Party in those spots. Also, let me be honest here,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 3>not just because of the bet on the San Francisco side,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 3>but I am pretty pot committed to not fully believing

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 3>in Philadelphia, so I might as well keep that going.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd love getting three here, getting two and a half

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 3>is something I'm going to be betting than well, I'm

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 3>gonna be essentially betting the Niners on the money line.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Just to begin with, I'll take the Niners plus two

0:18:58.359 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and a half.

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So those four teams that we talkked about earlier with

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the four rookie quarterbacks, yeah, they all had top three defenses.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Tampa had the number three defense in nineteen ninety nine,

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh had the number one defense in two thousand and four. Yep,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens had the number three defense in two thousand

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and eight, and the Jets had the number one defense

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and nine.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that and the Niners have a top three

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 3>defense this year. The point that I'm making is what

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 3>those teams have in common with this Niners team is

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 3>a great defense. With those teams don't have in common

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>with this Niners team is an explosive offense. And to

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the Niners, because of McCaffrey, because of Deebo, because of Ayuk,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 3>because of Kittle, they have a very explosive offense. And

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>we talked last week about how they can put McCaffrey,

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>used Check Kittle, Ayuk, and Deebo on the field and

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>you don't know what formation they're going to be in.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 3>They can be in five wide, they can be in

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 3>two tight end, they can be into running back, and

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 3>it is very, very difficult to match up with them. Also,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I know Lane Johnson's back, and he came back from

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that injury and he looked good against the Giants. I

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 3>wonder how that groin injury is gonna play with Nicky

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 3>Bosa screaming around the edge on. So for all those reasons,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I like San Francisco next game. Pray for brook next game. Demase.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we got Kansas City plus one for Cincinnati.

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and so let me talk about this line for

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a minute, because by the time people hear this, my

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 3>guess is it'll actually be a pick them. So it

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>opened Chiefs minus two and a half. It instantly, within minutes,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 3>went to Chiefs minus one and a half by the

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 3>next morning, By Monday morning, it was Chiefs plus one

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half. By Tuesday afternoon it was Chiefs plus

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. So it went from Kansas City

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>minus two and a half at the instant open to

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Kancity minus one and a half very quickly thereafter, then

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>through the zero all the way to Cincinnati. Minus two

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half. It has now since my homes practiced,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 3>it has now moved to Kansas City plus one and

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>a half to plus one, And it looks like it's

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 3>going to end up being a pick them if not.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs favored by a point by kickoff. But we'll see you,

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 3>but go ahead.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 2>All right. The Bengals are getting seventy percent of the

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>bets is road favorites. Yeah, you gotta love that. Yep,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 2>my moms will be a home dog for only the

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 2>second time, for the second time ever. Yep, lost to

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo is a home dog this year? At what number?

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Would you take the Bengals plus twenty plus twenty five?

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, listen, I wouldn't be taking the I wouldn't

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 3>be taking the Bengals just out of principle. I don't

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>think this is a great game. I don't think this

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 3>is a game that comes down to the final possession.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, you think it's one of these teams he's gonna

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>blow the other team out. I think bad game.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I think the Chiefs are gonna be.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 2>In firm control of this game. That's interesting.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's a lot going into the smoke

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Bengals right now. One is people were legitimately

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>concerned about Mahomes's health. I understand that, but I think

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna be okay. I saw him jogging around the

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 3>practice field. I don't think he's gonna be one hundred

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>day the guy's the fact that he was a full

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>participant in practice, not limited, but a full participant is

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 3>very very positive.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, So can you like, I know you can't

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 2>like like lie on those types of things, but like,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>could you like fudge it a little bit like saying

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 2>he was a full participant but really like he.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Was there the whole time, he was moving around, but like, yeah,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 4>still you could.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 3>You could get in trouble for it, but you could

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>because the media is not there for the whole practice.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 3>But when was there, we have video of him jogging

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and looking fine and he wasn't in a walking boot

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>or any of that stuff. So there's that. Here's another

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 3>stat that I think will blow people's minds, and we

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 3>talked about it a lot on the Thursday pot Joe

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Burrow is five and one in the postseason. The Bengals

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 3>have been this dominant postseason team, clutch, Joe cool, all

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 3>of it. In their six postseason games. Do you know

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>how many offensive touchdowns they have?

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry I left out a very important partover look.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 3>No, well, hold on in there. In the Bengals six

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>postseason games, how many fourth quarter off is Joe Burrow

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 3>is the mister clutch all of it. How many fourth

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 3>quarter playoff touchdowns do you think they have fourth quarter

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 3>offensive playoff touchdowns? Because we all saw Sam Hubbard the

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 3>fumble six in the six games, you think they have two?

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>The enter zero zero.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the Bengals, who again I give massive credit

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>to and I give massive credit to Burrow. I think

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 3>people are slightly misremembering how they've won their games. So

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>let's go through all of them before we talk about

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 3>them coming to Arrowhead, which the players on the Bengals,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 3>not Joe, but the other ones are calling burrowhead because

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>he won their one time okay, their first playoff game

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 3>ever against the Las Vegas Raiders. They had a ten

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>point lead going into the fourth quarter, They added a

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>field goal, and they escaped with a seven point win

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 3>after Derek Carr refused to throw the ball into the

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>end zone. They scored three fourth quarter points in that game.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Against the the Tennessee Titans. It was tied going into

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter. They scored zero points that entire fourth

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 3>quarter until with twenty seconds left, Ryan Tannehill threw one

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of the worst picks you've ever seen right around midfield

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 3>and they ended up kicking a field goal at the gun.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So that is now six fourth quarter points. Against the Chiefs,

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>it was tied going into the fourth quarter. They kicked

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 3>one field goal in the fourth quarter, and then of

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>course obviously kicked a field goal in overtime, but that

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 3>is now nine fourth quarter points against the Rams. They

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 3>had a twenty to sixteen lead going into the fourth

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter in the Super Bowl and scored zero points against

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 3>the Ravens. That game going into the fourth quarter was

0:25:54.200 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 3>tied seventeen to seventeen. Tyler Huntley fumbled Sam Hubbard returned

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 3>it and that was their only points of the fourth quarter.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 3>And against the Buffalo Bills, they were up twenty four

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 3>to ten going into the fourth quarter, added a field

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>goal and that was it. So they have been excellent

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 3>defensively during this playoff run. The turnover stuff is historic.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's now thirteen to three the turnovers, or

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 3>it's thirteen to three or fourteen to three or twelve

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 3>to three, something like that. Fourced turnovers to turnovers given up.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>And the defense. The defense has been unbelievable and Burrow

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 3>has been clutch on third and longs, particularly early in

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the games. However, with all that said, they have never

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>scored twenty eight points in a playoff game. They have

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>never scored a fourth quarter offensive touchdown. They are averaging

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 3>as a team two points aside from the Hubbard player.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 3>As an offense, I should say two points per fourth quarter.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So the Bengals unstoppable offense not exactly true. Now we

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about this. The story going into the Bills game

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 3>was man down three offensive line, Bills couldn't take advantage

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 3>of it. What did I tell you earlier about the

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs second league in sacks and pressures and quarterback hits?

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 3>The single best interior defensive linemen in football since Aaron

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Donald had down yere plays for the Chiefs in Chris Jones.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Now it's a weird Chris Jones a zero playoff sacks

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 3>in his career. Why is that? Well, because he's always

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 3>getting double teamed, which is why Frank Clark has the

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>fourth most playoff sacks in NFL history. Coming around the edge.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 3>I think the Chiefs are gonna be able to take

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 3>advantage of that offensive line. I think the Chiefs we

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 3>forget that. The Bengals did not look like they were

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>in the Chiefs class in the AFC Championship game last

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.719
<v Speaker 3>year before Mahomes made that mistake at halftime and then

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of short circuited the rest of the way. What

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 3>the only truly bad playoff performance of his career. The

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>first time these two teams met, the Chiefs had a

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter lead and were driving to essentially I think

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>salt the gameway. And of all people, Travis Kelsey fumbles

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the football and the Bengals end up winning the game

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 3>holding on. Then after they score their touchdown, Andy Reid

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 3>makes a bad decision I feel like taking the ball

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 3>out of Mahomes's hands kicking a field goal. They missed

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the field goal. Bengals salt the game away. The Chiefs

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 3>are better than them. Mahomes as great as Burrow is.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is better than Burrow. It is at arrowhead. And

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 3>if you believe, as I think most people do at

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>this point, that Mahomes has a real chance to be

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 3>not one of the greatest players ever, but as a

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>real chance to be the greatest player ever. This is

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 3>the type of game and the type of moment that

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the greatest players ever add to their legend, not at

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent a chance for redemption against the team

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that knocked you out last year and prevented you from

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>going to three straight Super Bowls at you know, on

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>an injured ankle goes out there in deals, So I listen,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna do exotics later. The Chiefs minus six and

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a half might be on a card.

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 5>I have.

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs minus nine and a half might be on

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 3>a card I have. I think the Chiefs look great.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I think Pacheco has a big game, and I think

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Kadarius Tony has a big game. And I think the

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Kansaity Chiefs go back to the Super Bowl. So there

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 3>it is Kansadity plus one, San Francisco plus two and

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a half. Take a quick break, play a quick game

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 3>with you guys. That's next, What's right?

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 5>including Jirell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Knavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back in Championship week in gambling show,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>we gave you the Niners plus two and a half

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs to win. That line's gonna be moving. We

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>told you we thought it might be a pick'em line

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 3>move and all about. But those are our bets. And

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 3>now we're gonna play a game, and I have a

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 3>feeling I'm gonna be annoyed by it. We'll see demons

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 3>go right ahead.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we're about to play a new game

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in honor of the second or the conference final.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Conference champions weekend.

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna call it hammer, pass, fade.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I'll.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Give you three bets and you will tell me which

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>one we should absolutely hammer, which we should pass on,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and which we should fade.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 3>And go against. Okay, good, got it.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 4>So this first one we got is called the exotic hedges.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>So obviously you have your fifty to one chiefs forty

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 2>nine ers bet while you're not hedging.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 4>There's a few ways to sort a hedge.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh. We got Joe Burrow for Super Bowl MVP

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>at plus three fifty, Jalen Hurts for Super Bowl MVP

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 2>at plus three hundred, or since he to beat Philly

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl at plus five hundred.

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you can't fade them all, all right, Listen, guys,

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>first I put those back on the screen. I will

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 3>give you I will play along to a degree. If

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I were gonna bet one of these I would be.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>The hammer would be Jail and Hurt super Bowl MVP,

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>the pass would be Joe Burrow's Super Bowl MVP, and

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 3>the fade going against it would be Cincinnati over Philly,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 3>because I don't think Cincinnati, with their offensive line issues,

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 3>could handle either the Niners or the Eagles come the

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl. However, this is one of the many reasons

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 3>you don't head. I don't hedge because I'm a gambler.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 3>But one of the many things people do wrong is

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 3>think they're hedging and they're not. None of those are

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>effective hedges, guys, So let's just paint this sati. Okay,

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>what if the Eagles win and the Chiefs win and

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes wins the Super Bowl. Now I've lost my fifty

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 3>to one bet and I've lost this dumb bet you

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 3>guys made me do that. Those are not effective hedges.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not public defending your guys lunacy on not understanding

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the way if I wanted to hedge out of my bet,

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 3>It's very very simple. I put a few thousand dollars

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>on the Philadelphia Eagles money line and then if they

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 3>if then, if they win, my bet is dead and

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I win that few thousand dollars. If they lose, I

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>then put ten thousand dollars on the Bengals money line.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>If they win, my bet is dead and I've now won,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, the seven eight grand And if they lose,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 3>now instead of winning fifty, I've won like thirty eight

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 3>because I lost a couple thousand on the first hedge

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>and the ten thousand and second edge. That's the way

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 3>you would hedge if you wanted to, not by placing

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 3>exotics where you might live. Who's both next?

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 4>All right? So this let's call it two touchdown scores.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So Christiancaffrey for two touchdowns is a plus five hundred,

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelcey for two touchdowns at plus six hundred, Chase Chase, sorry,

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase for two touchdowns at plus six fifty. All right.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't love any of these. Actually, they're not good

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>enough odds for my purposes. But if I were going

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 3>to bet one, it'd be Christian McCaffrey.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 4>I would.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Pass on Kelsey and I would fade Chase.

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I would one exactly.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if I were going to do it. Now, there

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 3>is someone I do like as a prop bet to

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 3>score a couple of touchdowns, McKinnon. But he wasn't listed there.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But go right ahead, all right, So all goes, we

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 2>call this all goes right. If you have a huge

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 2>day Sunday, it's because at least one of these things happen.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Pick one to Hammer Mahomes over three hundred and fifty

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 2>passing yards at plus five hundred, McKinnon for two plus

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns at plus thirteen hundred, Eagles team total under twenty

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 2>three and a half at plus one hundred.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I would the McKinnon at thirteen to one

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 3>for two touchdowns it would be the one that I

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 3>would be hammering. Not because it's the most likely it's

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>thirteen to one, but I think there's the most value there.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind the Mahomes over three hundred and fifty

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>passing yards, But the thing is this Mahomes throwing for

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 3>three fifty says it's a back and forth highly you know,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 3>tightly contested game. Mahomes gotta throw a lot or the

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs are losing by a lot. I don't think either

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 3>one of those things is gonna happen. So I would

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 3>pass on that, and I would fade if I had

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 3>to the Eagles team total under because I think that

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Eagles Niners game might be high scoring. I don't love

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that one, but that's where I would be on it.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 2>The way you're talking about this Chief Cincinnati game was crazy,

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Like how you don't think it's going to be a

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 2>back and forth game? Do you not know the history

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>between these two teams.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 3>I know the Chiefs were up by fourteen points at

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the end of the season last year and Cincinnati came back,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 3>and one I know the Chiefs were up by eighteen

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 3>points in the AFC Championship Game. Mahome short circuited, and

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals came back in one. I say the Chiefs

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 3>came back and one the first time. The Bengals won

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 3>all of them, obviously. And I know the Chiefs were

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 3>up by seven in the game in Cincinnati and the

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Bengals came back and one. I also know the Bengals

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 3>are calling arrowhead burrowhead. Joe Mixon's talking all that trash.

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Eli Apple's talking all that trash. And the Chiefs have

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.959
<v Speaker 3>the greatest player in the history of the sport at

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 3>home and he's never lost. He has lost three playoff

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 3>games ever won with five backup offensive linemen to the

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Bucks in the Super Bowl and two AFC Championship games

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>in overtime.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I think you're just riding on the fact that they

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>got thought that offensive line all banged up. I think

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that's what you're.

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, the reason Mahomes doesn't have two rings is because

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 3>of offensive line injuries. That stuff matters.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Next, all right, this one's highest scoring team on Sunday.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll leave out Cincinnati because we know you're not taking

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 2>that one. Eagles plus two thirty, Chiefs plus three ten

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the Niners at plus four hundred.

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I would hammer the Chiefs. I would consider betting the Niners,

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 3>but I'll pass on it and I'll fade the Eagles.

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles can't be the most high the highest scoring

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 3>team if I think they're losing. That would be a

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 3>hard one.

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, Next, all right, crazy odds non quarterback to

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 2>throw a pass in either game plus fifteen hundred, McCaffrey

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 2>first touchdown and forty nine Ers to win plus nine hundred.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, hold on that non quarterback to throw. That's

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 3>not to throw a passing touchdown, that's just to throw

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>a pass.

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking that, like, okay, all right, go ahead,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and then Demond's had to hit any partly plus one

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty thousand.

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 3>I like the McCaffrey bet, whether hammer on. I like

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 3>the McCaffrey bet, McCaffrey first touchdown, Niners to win, then nine.

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 3>So there is a great Super Bowl bet that you'll enjoy.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Demanse which is over under two and a half people

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 3>to throw a pass. So that means non quarterback or back.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, so right, But so that can be because

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 3>of a trick play or there's a quarterback injury and

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a guy comes in. But I would hammer McCaffrey. I

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 3>would pass on demands hitting the parlay. I'm not fading it.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm just fasting on it. And I am gonna fade

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the non quarterback throw a pass because this does the

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs that never have non quarterbacks throw passes never uh.

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 3>And the other teams are gonna ride with their quarterbacks,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and the Niners Deebo and Ayuk would be the guys

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and they don't throw passes. These aren't the teams to

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 3>do it in the Super Bowl. That's a fun bet

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 3>to make. All right, I've got a single game parlay

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 3>for you. We'll do that as we wrap up the

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Gambling Show. Next, What's record? Welcome back in episode one

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty three Conference Championship WEEKND Gambling Show. All right, here's

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>the deal. As we are recording this show on Thursday,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 3>as predicted, the line has moved, so we've put in

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs plus one. We did it though, you know,

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 3>in the A bloc all of that. Right now, our

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 3>friends at Fox Bet have the Chiefs at minus one.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>I said that I thought by the time people heard

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 3>this it would be a pick them. I don't think

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 3>they want this game to land on a pick them.

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I think they want it to land on my so

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 3>it might fluctuate a bit, but money coming back in

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 3>on the Chiefs. Here are the bets that I I'll be

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 3>honest with you guys, I don't know what I'm putting

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 3>in because I'm so pot committed on the fifty to one.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 3>But let's say the Eagles lose. I'm sorry, the Eagles

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 3>win and the fifty to one is dead. I will

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 3>be putting in Kansas City minus six and a half

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 3>at plus two hundred and Kansas City minus nine and

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 3>a half at U plus two ninety. I am putting those.

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I will be putting those in. And I am also

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 3>going to strongly recommend the following. Okay, pa Checko over

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty and a half rushing yards, Mahomes over two hundred

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and eighty two and a half UH passing yards. I'm

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to build this UH player to score anytime. Where's anytime? Touchdown?

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Score?

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 3>There we go, TD score. Where is my guy? Jeric

0:40:55.000 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 3>McKinnon to score a touchdown, Kadarius Tony to score a touchdown?

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Those four bets McKinnon to score, Tony to score, Mahomes

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 3>over to eighty two and a half and Pachecko over

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty and a half. That right there is twenty seven

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 3>to one. Will they let me parlay that with minus

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 3>six and a half? They will? It only puts it

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 3>at forty one sixty four? Let me see hold on,

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 3>all right, here's what we're putting in. Pachecko over fifty

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and a half, Mahomes over too eighty two and a half,

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 3>McKinnon to score a touchdown, Cadarius Tony to score a touchdown,

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 3>and the Chiefs minus two and a half. It's thirty

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 3>four to one. That is our single game parlay for

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 3>this Chiefs game. We are not putting one in for

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the Niners Eagles game. And then Demons, I know you've

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 3>got one final offer for me, my friend, Yes, last chance.

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.919
<v Speaker 2>To edge as we got Super Bowl matchup Eagles over

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Bengals or Bengals over Eagles at plus five hundred.

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 3>What do you think I'm gonna say to that?

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're probably gonna stick to what you've been saying. Yeah,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 2>it's an offer.

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I am not and by I am not hedging

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 3>this bet. We've spent an hour today explaining why I'm

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 3>not hedging this bet. Now, what I will tell you

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 3>is this from an emotional just Rex standpoint. It is

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 3>not great for me that the Chiefs game is the

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 3>second game. I would prefer the Chiefs game be the

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 3>first game. But the fact that the Niners could come

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 3>in and then I if the Chiefs lose, I lose

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 3>out on the fifty thousand, I have to deal with

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 3>so much trash talking for the next year. There's nothing

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I could do about it until the Chiefs play the

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Bengals again in the playoffs. Who knows when that would happen.

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 3>All the it'd all take from people with the TV show,

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 3>all of it go. I'm gonna be a mess Sunday. Luckily,

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the Chiefs are gonna handle their business quite well.

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City is gonna win, the Niners are gonna win,

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and that Niners Chiefs Super Bowl EXACTA is going to

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 3>be an all time wager that we're speaking into existence.

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what's gonna happen.

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So I got another offer. Yeah, Black and Miles consumed

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday over under one and a half.

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I never it'll be under, but it'll be exactly one.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 3>And it will either be stressed out and upset or

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 3>celebratory on IG Live should be fun. Talk to you

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 3>guys on Monday. Enjoy Championship weekend.