WEBVTT - Why Millions of Young Chinese Are Refusing to Make Pension Payments

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg, Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Gao Punchin. He's twenty two, just graduated from

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 2>college and lives in China's southern city of Shenzen. Gao

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>wants to become a full time social media influencer. He

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 2>posts video blogs of his life and does freelance work

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>on the side too. He makes about one thousand dollars

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a month, a moderate income in Shenzen, but Gao still

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>appreciates the finer things in life. Here he is on

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Shaohumshu China's Instagram saying that he's treating himself to a

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>luxurious first class flight to South Korea for quick.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Getaway should she set.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>But to afford the occasional splurge, Gao decided to scrap

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>one major expense from his budget, his pension payments. It's

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>about two hundred dollars, and he told Bloomberg that that's

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>a fifth of his monthly income, money that Gao says

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>he'd rather spend enjoying himself.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>What's all the cases union? Yoo? Uh now someone some

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one question one not true? Your Michael Paul Bahoma.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Gao says most of his friends don't pay into the

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>pension fund either if their line of work like freelancing,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>makes the payments voluntary. And across China there are millions

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>like Gao who are boycotting the pension plan.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Based on Bloomberg's calculation of data from Chinese think tank,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of China's young workers have suspended contribution

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese pension plans, and that was additional pressure on

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a system that's already wobbly.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Chenway Jong is a Bloomberg editor based in Hong Kong.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>China's basic pension fund is at the risk of drying

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>up by twenty thirty five, and the government is not

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>able to provide the most basic social security. That risk

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>undermining the publicist faith in the Common Party and its

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>social contract with the people, and it could be a

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>taking time bomb, posing us throughout to China's social stability.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Every week we take you inside some of the world's

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>biggest and most powerful economies and the markets, tycoons and

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 2>businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>why is China's pension fund and danger of drying up?

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>What are the risks to the country's already struggling economy

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and the credibility of the Communist Party. Like most things

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>in China, the size of the Chinese pension system is daggering.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The country has the world's largest social security system, and

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Chenwai Jung says the easiest way to think about

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the different systems set up for retirement in China is

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 2>to break it down to three pillars.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>The first one is the government funded basic pension system.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>This is what we talk about when we refer to

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the pension system. It currently covers one point one billion people,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's around eighty percent of the entire population.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 2>If you work in China with a formal job, you're

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>required by law to contribute to this basic pension plan.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So if I work for a company insite mainland China,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>every month, I'm supposed to pay about eight percent of

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>my income to the pension system, and in the same token,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>my employer is supposed to pay sixteen percent of my

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>income to the pension fund. This is a largely mandatory plan,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but it also covers freelancers and gig workers like Gao,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>who don't have a formal job and can opt out

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if they truce, So their contribution is entirely voluntary, and

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>all that money goes to the basic pension system and

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to pay for the present day retirees.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I got that. What's the second pillar.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The second pillar is called the voluntary cooperate pension and

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it's similar to the four to one K plan in

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the US. It only covers thirty one million business workers

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and with a little over three trillion women in assets.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And what's the difference between the two pension systems.

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>So the main difference is the volunteer croper pension is

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>set up by companies for their employees and by the

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>time the employees retire, they will mostly be able to

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>destroy every single penny that the company put in there

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for them. But the basic pension system, you don't really

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>know how much money you will be withdrawing by the

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>time you retire, and there's no guarantee you will be

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>getting every penny out of everything that you put in.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Workers in China used to enjoy social welfare that covered

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>them from cradle to grave, guaranteed by state owned enterprises,

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>but that policy was upended after China's economy opened up

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in the seven and for decades, most people rely on

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 2>the Basic pension Plan, the first and the largest pillar,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 2>while only a small number of companies offer voluntary corporate

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>pension plans.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think in the past time when times are good,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when China wasn't in such a dire demographic situation, there's

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>hope that government would be able to give you the

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>money back. And on top of that, for a really

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>long time, the basic pension system is people's only option.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>And chen way, what about that last pillar of the

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>pension system. What's that about?

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So the third pillar is still very young. It's called

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the volunteer Individual Pension System. The government only started testing

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it in twenty twenty two, and it's similar to the

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>individual retirement accounts in the US. So you can contribute

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to text sheltered saving fund and then can pick whatever

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>investment that you want to put the money in. So far,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>only a little over sixty million people signed up, but

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>less than a third people have actually putting any deposit.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we've got the mandatory government pension plan, voluntary

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>corporate pension plan and voluntary individual pension plan. How are

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>these three pensions doing right now?

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So all of the three pillars of China's pension fund

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>are underfunded. According to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the savings in the biggest pillar the Chinese basic pension

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>system will peak at seven trillion in twenty twenty seven

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>before shrinking sharply, and by twenty thirty five, the basic

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>pension system is at the risk of drawing up even

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if the government steps in.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 2>One of the main reasons all of these pension plans

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>are underfunded is because of China's falling population. For decades,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>China imposed a strict one child policy that only allowed

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>each couple to have one kid.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, after decades of successful family plan policy, China has

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>created this unique four to one family structure, which means

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that four grandparents will be taking care of one precious child.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you reverse the structure, we're looking at an

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>entire generation of people having to take care of two

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>parents and four grandparents.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of pressure on the younger generation, who

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>now make up the workforce. They're expected to help provide

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 2>for the growing number of retirees. But some people like

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Galpun Chung, are opting out of the pension system altogether.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, many of us are delaying marriage,

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>delaying having children, and a lot of people also say

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to have children at all, and that's

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a problem for the future demographics. We're

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at a rapidly shrinking population, which means not enough

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>labor will be entering the job market and putting money

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>into the pension funding.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>To government data, more than twenty million workers will retire

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>each year over the next decade in China, and by

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty five, the number of Chinese citizens over sixty

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>is forecast a top four hundred million. That's more than

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the population of the US and Canada combined.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This is simple mass. On one hand, more old people

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>will be retiring, and on the other hand, there will

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be less people being born. In China, the population has

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>been shrinking since twenty twenty two, and the United Nations

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>projects that China's population could shrink to half of its

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>current size by the end of the century.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, Chinwai. Problems like aging populations are faced by many

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 2>developed nations in Europe and the Americas. Even the US

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Social Security Trust Fund faces insolvency by twenty thirty five.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So how is China's pension fund situation any different?

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So On one hand, China has way more old people

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>than the US and Canada. The ratio owe to working

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>age people in China is forecast to soar. And on

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, China's pension fund is mostly dependent on

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the basic pension fund, whereas US and Canada, their pension

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>system is more diverse and more people are enrolled in

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the second pillar and third pillar.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>After the break, What the Chinese government is doing to

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>prevent the world's largest social security network from running dry

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and what could happen if those efforts fail. China's rapidly

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>aging population is putting a lot of pressure on the

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>country's policy makers. The government is throwing everything at the

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 2>wall to prevent the pension fund from running out. In

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen, Beijing reversed the one child policy after more

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 2>than thirty five years, and it's been stepping up efforts

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to boost the birth rate every since, but that's done

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>little to slow down the problem. The population remains in

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>decline and most parents can't afford to have multiple children,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and last.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>September, Beijing took a major step last September to shore

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>up the system by delaying retirement age for up to

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>five years, and the shift is the first of its

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind in nearly five decades. The policy whenning to effect

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on January the first, twenty twenty five.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The new policy up to the retirement age for men

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to sixty three from sixty and for women to fifty

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>five years old from fifty. The policy shift has triggered

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>an outpouring of anger on social media, with many complaining

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>about the sluggish job market. Goo the blogger we heard earlier,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>also says the pension plan isn't sustainable.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So looking at postponing retirement age, Gao is very upset

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's asking questions like why do I have to

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>work for so much longer than my parents' generation? And

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>how much money do I put into the system? The

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>big problem for Gao is how much money is he

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>actually going to get by the time he retired. And

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Gao is not the only one who thinks this way.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>According to a Chinese Academy of Social Sciences report, about

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a fifth of urban employees did not contribute to the

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>system in recent years.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Those were mostly migrant workers. Thirty eight million people stopped

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>payment in twenty thirteen alone. That also includes employees of

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>businesses that suspended contributions due to financial difficulties, Chinwai. What's

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 2>at stake here to China's economy and its government. If

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 2>the pension fund does run dry.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>If the government is not able to provide even the

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>most basic social security, it's going to undermine the public's

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>faith in the system, and it can create more opportunities

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for social unrest. And what's worse is that young people

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose hope of the government and they're

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to be motivated to work hard and fight

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for the economic growth of the country.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Mack and shinzen Gow says he doesn't see the point

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of paying into the pension fund with so much uncertainty.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 3>My parents could have retired last year or the year before,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>but now because of the policy change, they have to

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 3>work longer and pay more into the pension fus and

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>we don't even know if they can get that money back.

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>To put it bluntly that if they can live long

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>enough to see that they even come. China has one

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>point three billion people. If everyone retires at a later age,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the contribution altogether is huge. I understand that the country

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>needs this to help the economy, and this might be

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>good policy for the nation, but it's not a good

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>policy for regular people like us.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>This is The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>one ha. This episode was produced by Young Young, Naomi

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Mum and Jessica Beck. It was mixed by Amr Sultan

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and sound designed by Jessica and fact checked by Young.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>It was edited by Aaron Edwards, Luluchen and Tracy Samuelson.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>There was additional reporting by Ding Ming, John and Charlotte Yang.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 2>We also want to give a shout out to the

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Originals team and David Englaise name was Shaven is

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>our senior producer, Elizabeth Ponso is our senior editor, Nicole

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Beemster Bower is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. Please follow and review The Big

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Take Asia wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>new listeners find the show. See you next time.