WEBVTT - Oil Soars on Biden Comments, US Services Activity Expands

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Car playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 3>We've been calling out crude oil Brent crude oil up

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>three point nine percent today, seventy six dollars seventy seven cents,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>big big move hire over the last several days to

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 3>the Mid East tensions. Here Daboca Krishna Kumar Joints, so

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>she's a Bloomberg Oil Markets reporter. Debica, thanks so much

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>for joining us. What's the latest that's moving markets today?

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Hi, thanks for having me today. The big question now

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 4>is whether Israel's retort to Israel to Ron's missile strikes

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 4>will involve oil targets or not. We just had moments

0:00:55.360 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 4>ago comments from President Biden saying that that's currently being discussed.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>The market's obviously on edge because oil infrastructure is critical

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to determining supply and demand going forward.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Iran produces over three million barrels a day, so any

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 4>attack on their main export facilities or energy infrastructure could

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 4>have significant ripple effects across the market, which is why

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing now prices rise for a third straight day,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 4>because markets are very much on edge about how this

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 4>is going to play out.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 6>And just looking at your reporting, you side a City

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 6>Group analyst saying that a major strike could take one

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 6>and a half million barrels of daily supply off the market,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 6>whereas a minor infrastructure strike on downstream assets would be

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 6>closer to three hundred thousand to four hundred and fifty

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 6>thousand barrels a day of output. He just put that

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 6>into context and what that means for the energy space

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 6>and for oil.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, of course, we are actually in an interesting

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>market right now because some people like to call it

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>an artificial prop up because OPEC members and allies are

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 4>basically curtailing production. They were supposed to return supplies to

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 4>the market in October, but they took a look at

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the market and how demand was looking kind of shaky

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>because of questions about economic growth in the US and China,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the two biggest economies in the world, and they thought, well,

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe we should pause and maybe we should kind of

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 4>rethink returning supplies to the market. So now the current

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 4>plan is to return supplies to the market in December.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>So in the market looks at this broadly, the reason

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>we're not actually seeing more talk about one hundred dollars

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 4>oil or an insane spike in prices is because the

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 4>market is where that OPEC members like Saudi Arabia, UAE

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 4>other Middle Eastern producers could quickly bring on supplies should

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we face a major shortage. And obviously there's also the

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>sense that you know, we need we need to understand

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.839
<v Speaker 4>how demand's going to play out. There's still worries about

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 4>the economy, both in the US and China, and bear

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 4>in mind China is actually a big buyer of Iranian

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>CREWD so even if we had, even if this doesn't

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>descend into further missile strikes an all out war, we

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 4>might see more tighter economic sanctions, and that's kind of

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>interesting to see. It'll be interesting to see how that

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>plays out as well, because it's you could only target

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 4>financial components of that trade, and that may not necessarily

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 4>result in loss of supply. So in the broad context

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>of things, there are several moving parts here, and the

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 4>market really needs to understand how each component is going

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 4>to play out. And it's happening in real time, which

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>is why we're seeing the volatility and prices.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Devika, thank you so much for your reporting. Really appreciate

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>getting a few minutes of your time. Devica Krishna Kumar.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>She is part of the team that covers a global

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>crude oil for Bloomberg News and they have a good

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 3>reporting out this morning. To check it out on the

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm Paul Swing.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 3>You're live here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio or

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 3>streaming live on YouTube. To check us out there and

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>go Bloomberg Live Radio. That's what I did yesterday that

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>got me right to where I wanted to go. Networked

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>just just fine.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Here Bailer gets some ism data came out today. It

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>looks like better than expected. Here looks better than expected.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 6>We see the SMP right now down call it two points,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 6>but major averages pairing losses, if not gains.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Looking at the.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Two year right now at three spot seven percent, So

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 6>se markets move, all right.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the breakdown of the ISM data.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Steve Miller joins as he's the chairman for the Institute

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.559
<v Speaker 3>for Supply Management, joining us via that zoom thing. So Steve,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>seems like pretty good numbers. Again, fifty four point nine

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 3>was the headline number they consent. This was fifty one

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 3>point seven and last period was fIF fifty one point five.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Pretty solid, Yeah, very solid.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 8>We saw over a six percent increase in both the

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 8>business activity and the new orders indexes, and that's really

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 8>what drove drove the change in the PMI this month.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 6>And see when I'm looking at our Bloomberg headline expand

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 6>in September at the fastest pace since February twenty twenty three,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 6>reading too much into that that it's a bullish indicator.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 8>So I'd say it's a bullish indicator because what we

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 8>saw is an increase in kind of the broadening of

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 8>the expansionary activity, both in business activity as well as

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 8>new orders. But putting that in context, you know, we're

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 8>ending kind of a lackluster Q three. If you look

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 8>at the average PMI for this Q three, it's really

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 8>the lowest average since two thousand and nine. So although

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing it was a great number for this month,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 8>but you know, fingers crossed that with the port activity

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 8>and such, we'll be able to see that continued growth.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Where would you like to see that that headline number,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that fifty four point nine Again, it seems pretty good

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>relative to the last period and relative to consensus. Where

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>would you like to see that?

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely so if we if we saw consistency fifty

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 8>three fifty five range, that would be really that'd be

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 8>really healthy improvement coming off of a couple of fifty

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 8>ones and then actually contraction before that. We're you know,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 8>we're on the right trajectory. Hopefully we can hold it

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 8>all right, Very.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Good, Steve, Thanks so much for joining us for a

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 3>few minutes there, Steve Miller, chairman for the Institute for

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Supply Management.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 2>That's im to us. Cool kids there, Billy.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on fo card Playing and

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Broun Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Right now, let's go to market.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Betell, Senior portfolio Managered Offspring Global Investments. Margo, We're going

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 3>to get a big jobs print tomorrow, which will be

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>presumably pretty informative for.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 2>This Federal Reserve.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>How are you thinking about the markets these days given

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 3>all the economic data that we have had over the

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>past several weeks.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it shows the economy is still growing.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 9>We had a great GDP number, three percent, which is

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 9>better I think a lot of people thought, and I

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 9>think it says a where to continue to move along

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 9>at modest growth rates, probably less than three percent because

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 9>some of the numbers, especially for labors next so still positive,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 9>no recession, no boomy upswing in GDP, so a little

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 9>more of the same and a little pressure probably on

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 9>revenues and profit margins going forward.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 6>And Mary, now that we have the first FED cut

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.679
<v Speaker 6>in the rear view mirror and at least the swaps

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 6>market pricing in a string through the first half of

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 6>next year, how are you positioning in this market, especially

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 6>given the expectation that the Fed can navigate us off landing.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, we think some things are out of control of

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 9>the FED, which is the economy. But I do think

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 9>that we'll see another two quarter point reductions in the

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 9>FED funds rate over the next few months, which would

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 9>be modestly helpful over the long return for the economy.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 9>But basically we think that, as I said, the economy

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 9>is growing, it's a sustainable level, but more modest than

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 9>perhaps you might like to see. So we think that

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 9>says that return some equity will be maybe mid single

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 9>digit going forward, as opposed to the double digit types

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 9>of rates we've had so far. Is here, So no

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 9>changes in the portfolio or outlonger.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>So Margan, I'm looking at then GO function of the

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Index browser, and I see across the US fixed

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 3>income everything's in the green here, solid mid single digit

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>returns for fixed income investors share. The highlight, though, is

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>US corporate high yield. How do you think about that

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>the high yield market? Is there any value left there?

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, yes, there is this modest value. But actually, ever

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 9>since the had began to raise short rates a couple

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 9>of years ago, the best performing part of the high

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 9>old market has been the fixed income market has been

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 9>yield because it just simply pushioned those treasury rate rises

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 9>with the extra yield do you get so right now

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 9>in double B bonds you get a little over two

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 9>hundred basis points two percentage points for single baes, say

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 9>three percentage points, But with a backdrop of the economy

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 9>growing and defaults looking like they're going to be under

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 9>two percent over the next year, that says you're still

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 9>getting a bargain for the risk you're taken by being

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 9>in below investment grade. So we think it's still attractive,

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 9>but modest. Certainly, we're not looking for double digit returns

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 9>going forward, mid single digits, just basically the coupon.

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 6>And so does that impact kind of your allocation to

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 6>risk of your debt or how are you thinking about that?

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, with your spread so narrow and dollar prices pretty

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 9>high in the high yeld market, most bonds are trading

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 9>pretty close to their face value, maybe ninety eight ninety

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 9>cents on the dollar, we think that you pretty much

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 9>have gotten rid of the extra risk premium that was

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 9>in the high yeld market when the Fed had rates

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 9>or high. So we don't think there's a lot of

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 9>capital appreciation room. So really, if you're looking realistically in

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 9>return and say over the next year five six, maybe

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 9>seven percent. That says to me that the market really

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 9>is going to favor stocks where I think we should

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 9>at least get that much and maybe even a little

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 9>bit more if we have growth to stay around that

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 9>one two percent level. So basically, low volatility, modest coupon,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 9>and modest return is how we see fixed income in

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 9>the high old market right now.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 3>And Margie, I guess this month of September it was

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>a record month for new issuance.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>What is that?

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Is that good for the market.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 9>Yes, it's excellent because the problem with the high old

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 9>market is there simply has not been enough supply for

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 9>all the demand by investors for that extra yield. In fact,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 9>we actually had about a year ago or so the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 9>market actually shrink because we had new issuance drop off,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 9>we had maturities and bond calls, so the whole high

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 9>old market actually shrunk. So it would be very good

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 9>to have a big supply. There's a lot of demands

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 9>that will match that, and to have the high old

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 9>market grow a bit would add to the liquidity, give

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 9>investors more choices of names Dubai, So I think more

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 9>supply would be very positive. There's a saying supply creates

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 9>and some demand in the bottom market.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very good at across all of fixed income. A

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>really really busy September four new issue. And so Margia Btel,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us market. Bettel is a

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>senior portfolio manager all Spring Global Investment. She's based up

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 3>there in Boston. Joining us via Zooming.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>androyd Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, that port strike. It is still ever day

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 3>three here, and it's starting to get serious here, and

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't get a sense that there is, you know,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of discussion going on here. So the questions

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>one is going to really start the impact this economy?

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 3>And to what degree? Dristic a critical joins is. She's

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>a chief scientist at Workplace Culture. The company is called

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Culture Partners. Joining us via Sacramento via that Zoom thing. Jessica,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about this strike. How do you kind of envision

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>this strike from both sides perspective, what's what's going on.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Here and where could there be movement? Maybe?

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, this strike comes down to ultimately two issues. It's

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 5>about wages and it's about automation. So Harold Daggett, who's

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 5>the president of the ISLA, has said, not only are

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 5>they wanting seventy seven percent increase, which is significant, they've

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 5>already been offered fifty percent. They're going to seventy seven,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 5>but they also want to create air tight language quote unquote,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 5>air tight language that removes the ability for the ports

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 5>to use automation or semi automation. And it's downright archaic

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 5>what they're asking for. If you want to understand what

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of automation they're saying they refuse to allow. It's

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 5>not some complicated, new fancy AI technology. We're just talking

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 5>parking gates going up and down. They're not okay with

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 5>that kind of automation. They're not okay with time card

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 5>stamping automation. In fact, right now they have people who

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 5>are employed as schedulers to write down who is there,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 5>when they arrived and when they left, which allows for

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 5>inaccuracy and time reporting. So they're really holding the port

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 5>hostage with these demands, and that is why we're at

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 5>a standstill. I think we could easily get there at

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 5>the wages. The ports are doing very well. They have

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 5>the financial capacity to meet the needs of seventy seven percent.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 5>But it's really the automation that is the sticking point.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 6>Is that just a fear of automation becoming a slippery

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 6>slope from your understanding.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it's a fear. I think it's a strategy.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 5>They have said, quote, I will cripple you are words

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 5>that have come from the president of the union's mouth.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 5>He is intentionally trying to cripple the American economy in

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 5>an effort to get what they want and to maintain

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 5>the job security. And it is downright an American. I mean,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 5>I believe that we all, every industry has the ability

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 5>to implement basic technology, basic automations in order to advance

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 5>and progress as a society. And what's interesting here is

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 5>if you look at what they're doing, they're actually making

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>the argument for why we need these ports to implement automation,

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 5>because if they were automated, we wouldn't be being held

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 5>hostage by this union and the effects of the economy

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 5>and the American consumer are going to be felt soon

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 5>and it is going to be widespread. There will be panic.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 5>There already is panic. There's already been a run on

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 5>toilet paper and paper towels, which is completely unrelated to

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 5>the imports from these ports. So it's interesting that's really

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 5>just psychological in nature. We're remembering when toilet paper wasn't

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 5>available at COVID and so people are going to stockpile

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 5>toilet paper now. But what else will they stockpile? And

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 5>who else is going to be affected by this and

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 5>lose their jobs because supplies that they need to do

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 5>their jobs haven't arrived. It's really going to be devastating

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 5>if this doesn't get resolved soon.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>So Jessco, what has anyone on either side quantified the

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>job potential job loss from automation? How big of an

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>issue is this in reality?

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Do we know?

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 5>There are a lot of analysts making estimates on the

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 5>cost that this strike will have and the ranges are

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 5>significantly wide, so it's unclear and the job costs we

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 5>can only speak right now philosophically, as construction materials don't arrive,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 5>when construction workers are not going to be able to

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 5>do their jobs, and so they will be laid off

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 5>or temporarily furloughed, and that impact will be devastating on

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 5>those workers. So if you think about the union, workers

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 5>are being very selfish right now, and they do want

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 5>the American worker and consumer to feel the pain. They're

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 5>counting on it, they're looking forward to that, and I

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 5>think one of the devastating things here is that they're

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 5>saying and don't blame us, blame them, So they're not

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 5>taking accountability for the strategy. And I also don't think

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 5>it's very logical because the American worker and consumer is

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 5>going to become outraged and say, you know what, that

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 5>we want them to automate because this is a danger

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 5>to the American culture, society, workplace, labor market, all.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 6>Of it Protisica. In terms of the actual dock workers

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 6>about twenty five thousand at the East Coast and Gulf

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 6>Coast ports. What percentage or number of those workers would

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 6>be at risk of losing their jobs if automation were

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 6>to be implemented at a grand scale.

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 5>It all depends on what we're talking about with regards

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>to automation. So the schedulers will lose their job if

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>we implement time cards. Right now, there is already some

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 5>automation if you think about it. I was listening to

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 5>an interview with one of the union strikers yesterday and

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 5>he said, you know, decades ago, we were literally offloading

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty five pounds of sugar with our hands.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 5>So that's not happening anymore. That's because of automation, and

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure that they celebrate it. So the where automation

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 5>is allowed and where automation isn't allowed is exactly what's

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 5>under negotiation. There is already in their current contract language

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 5>that prevents new automation. They're not saying that they're okay

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 5>with that language though, they're wanting to go backwards. They're

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 5>wanting to remove automation that's already been implemented, and so

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 5>that's really regressive and not progressive at all.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, have to see how this plays out

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>where day three and again the tensions are mounting, the

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 3>risks are mounting for the economy. Jessica Kregel, thank you

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 3>so much for joining us. We really appreciate getting your

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 3>thoughts of perspective. Jessica Kriegel. She's a chief scientist of

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 3>workplace culture on the firm is called Culture Partners. They're

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 3>based in Sacramento, California, and she's joining us via zoom.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Billy Lipscholtz sitting in for Alex Steele on Paulswuni. We

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>live here on a Bloomberg and Arctive Brookers studio, which

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 3>on Tucker We're assell streaming live on YouTube dot com.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 3>You can find us over there just search Bloomberg Live Radio.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're a little bit.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Of a sell off here today, A lot of just

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of mixed trading here, all within one or two

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 3>percent of the all time highs.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean why not? I mean, I guess you got a.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 3>Fed cutting rates, you got decent earnings. I guess that's

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 3>a pretty constructive look for this market. I want to

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 3>how the technicals look. Our next guest, I think can

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 3>help us a little bit there. Francis Stacy chairwoman of

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 3>the Global Digital Finance Committee, joining us from Tampa, Florida

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>via zoom. Francis Again, you look at this charge kind

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of up into the right here. What are the technicals

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>tell you about this market? Anything concerning you?

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So it's very interesting because the technicals actually look

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 10>quite toppy. And I do think that if the S

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 10>ANDP gains any kind of momentum and a bit of

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 10>a sellof which is you know, could be news driven.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 10>We've got a big jobs number coming out tomorrow, you know.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 10>I think fifty six twenty five is the initial stop

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 10>for support to indicate that the upward trend is as

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 10>well in play, and there's nothing that's coming on the horizon.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 10>As far as calculating an additional risk, I agree with you.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 10>The FED is obviously changed its modality into an easing mode,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>and that's happening globally. I mean, the global money supply

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 10>is up seven point three trillion as of September, and

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 10>just globally we're getting a lot of simultaneous rate cutting

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 10>and that supports the reacceleration and global growth type mindset.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 10>I do think we'll see a little bit more softening

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 10>in the growth and labor markets here in the US,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 10>and we just have to see if there's a catalyst

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 10>that would indicate a recession, Well, how.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Much is that recession risk being priced in. I'm just

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 6>looking at the swaps market, and at least as it

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 6>relates to the FED, we're at an implied rate at

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 6>a round three and a half percent by May of

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 6>next year. In VideA is kind of the S and

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 6>P one, if you will, and is seemingly talking up demand.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Apple and Microsoftware are relatively bullish as well.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Kind of what do you make of those dynamics.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so absolutely there's no indication and the markets are

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 10>not pricing in an indication of a recession, which makes

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 10>this rate cutting and a regressive rate cutting, I would

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 10>argue globally very interesting. I mean, I think they're cutting

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 10>rates globally on the orders of magnitude that they did

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 10>during the you know, the global financial crisis. Without that

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 10>catalyst in place. It's just basically looking at the yield

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 10>curve and potential. You know what happens when you have

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 10>a prolonged and yield curve inversion that is, you know,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 10>pretty severe and you have the resteepening quinte essentially that

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 10>has been an indicator mechanically of an imminent recession. However,

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 10>there was always a catalyst. You know, in the nineties

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 10>you had the invasion, you know, the Kuwait situation, and

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 10>the two thousands you had the tech bubble bursting, and

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 10>then of course with the GFC you had the housing

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 10>bubble burst that sort of tipped that domino effect. Right now,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 10>there's nothing in the system, and certainly, as you say,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 10>not being priced in that that domino effect is ready

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 10>to be tipped. But you know, sometimes these things happen

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 10>slowly and then all at once.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 3>So overall, I mean here it's it seems like again

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 3>the backdrop for a lot of the the bull seems

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty simple. I've got decer earnings growth, I got of

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 3>interest rates coming down. Is the recession risk something that

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>could really be upset that kind of foundation.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 10>Yes, certainly if there's a catalyst, and we do have

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 10>some potential catalysts in our geopolitical environment. I don't know

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 10>sort of what volatility the election outcome could enter into

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 10>the system. So we just you know, we just have

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 10>to watch the catalyst. We have to, as you say,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 10>you know, watch the spreads, watch the swaps and see

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 10>if there's any sort of a reaction there. It's interesting

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 10>because from the role of my new committee, and I've

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 10>brought in John Degastino, who's very storied as my co chair,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 10>we are looking at the fiscal and debt dynamics around

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 10>the world, and we are engaging countries and looking at

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 10>the new prominence of global digital finance and what that

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 10>algorithm looks like. Because here's the thing. You put a

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 10>record amount of monetary and fiscal stimulus and you know,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 10>pretty much globally, but the most in the US during COVID,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 10>and then you know, something like the mechanical implications of

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 10>the yield curven version. We've seen an elongation of the

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 10>seasons of these economic cycles, and so the question becomes,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 10>have the mechanics fundamentally changed post COVID or do we

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 10>have the same mechanics in place on a delay. And

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 10>then also just looking at the liquidity dynamics around the

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 10>world juxtaposed to the debt and looking at the potential

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 10>a potential new algorithm for the managing of this, the

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 10>managing of recession risk, you know, with the integration of

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 10>the digital finance component, and certainly you know a potential

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 10>for digital currencies as well.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 6>So are you talking we're talking bitcoin?

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you're kind of alluding to?

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 10>Bitcoin will never replace fiat because it has a finite

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 10>supply and it cannot disrupt the function of the central banks.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 10>If it cannot do the function of the central banks.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 10>Central banks adjust mone you know, money supply, and you know,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 10>in the United States they have their dual mandate of

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 10>price stability and full employment. They could never accomplish that

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 10>because they can't manage the supply of bitcoin. But you know,

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 10>for instance, El Salvador has this hybrid approach between bitcoin

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 10>and the US dollar, and I do think that it's

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 10>kind of like trying to make an electric car talk

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 10>to an internal combustion engine. They have different underlying mechanics,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 10>but there is potentially an algorithm possible that bridges that

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 10>gap and brings in a digital currency. I do think

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 10>if we see digital currencies, you know, obviously Bitcoin is

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 10>legal tender and El Salvador, but if we do see

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 10>digital currencies widely adopted as legal tender, it's going to

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 10>be the central banking digital currencies because those are the

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 10>only things that can disrupt what the central bank is doing.

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 10>The Central Bank has been given all of the legal authority,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 10>has all of the legal precedent from Congress, and you

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 10>know that's you're not likely to unmock that anytime soon.

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 10>So I do think that there's going to be an

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 10>opportunity coming up. But that's that's what we're really looking

0:23:58.359 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 10>at systemically.

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Very interesting.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Francis Stacey, thank you so much for joining us. Francis Stacey,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 3>she's a chairwoman of the Global Digital Finance Committee. Joining

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>US FRO Tampa, Florida.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Via zoom you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>York station just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Another big news in the tech spasis, some of the

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 3>valuations they are coming back, it seems to think in

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 3>a big ways, particularly if you have anything to do

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>with AI. So if you have a company that's called

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 3>open ai, that's a pretty good name to happen, a

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 3>pretty good time to raise capital. OpenAI I just raised

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 3>six point six billion dollars in the private markets and

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 3>new funding, giving the artificial intelligence company a one hundred

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>and fifty seven billion dollar valuation as a look to

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 3>build the world's leading generative AI technology. Check in with

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 3>it somebody who knows this stuff really well. On a

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 3>rock run of technology channels for Bloomberg Intelligence from the

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 3>tech hub of Chicago, Illinois, anurag talks about open Ai.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 3>These are some real numbers here on a rock, and

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>there's some real investors investing in this company.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>At this stage, what do we know?

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, open air has really taken a lead over the

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 11>last three years because of the launch of chat GPT

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 11>and after that it has become to go to things

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 11>even for enterprises. We recently did a CIO survey and

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 11>open Ai Microsoft combination was far ahead than all the

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 11>other large language models that was out there.

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 7>So that's on the enterprise side and consumer side.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 11>We already know how well they are doing both on

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 11>the app that they're selling along with the distribution that

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 11>they what they won with Apple being part of CD

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 11>when the software upgrade is going to come. So open

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 11>ai in the world of large language models really at

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 11>the top of the you know, the top of the

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 11>mountain at this point, and this is one of the

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 11>reasons you're getting these high valuations.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I just want to put into perspective, at one

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty seven billion dollars, open AI would be

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 6>larger than uber and at that six point six billion

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 6>dollars in funding relative to IPOs, it would be the

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 6>twelfth largest global IPO since twenty eighteen. So anorak, are

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 6>we in a AI bubble as it relates to private markets?

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 11>I think, to be very frank with you, I can

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 11>only answer that five years from now. But we just

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, updated our numbers looking at capital expenditures for

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 11>the top five six companies. These companies, which includes Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 11>et cetera. In twenty twenty three, they spend about one

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 11>hundred and ten billion dollars in all the things what

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 11>we call capital expenditures. In twenty twenty five, they're going

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 11>to spend about two hundred billion dollars. So that's a

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 11>massive increase of ninety billion over a two year period.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, where is that money going to?

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 11>Expansion of data center, buying more GPUs, buying more hardware,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 11>expanding their own large language models. So it really feels real, frankly,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 11>as to the amount of money that the big guys

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 11>are spending it over here, they won't be doing it

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 11>if they didn't see the demand on the other side

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 11>of the equation.

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 3>It's been a turbulent year for the company here. I know,

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 3>last November the company's board fired and then quickly re

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 3>hired the CEO, Sam Altman. Following months at a lot

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of key leaders leave, including the co founder, the chief

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>technology officer. It seems like the market's kind of forgotten

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 3>all about that, or maybe it's not a problem anymore.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>How's the market dealing with some of that turmoil we've

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 3>seen over the last year.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 11>I think people tend to forget that who's really behind

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 11>a lot of backing of this particular company, and that's Microsoft,

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 11>and you know they have the biggest distribution and among enterprises.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 11>So if they are basically telling people, if you want

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 11>to create an enterprise application using some AI large language model,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 11>here is open a model and you can host it

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 11>on our cloud platform, I think that is resonating very

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 11>well with customers. So as long as that continues for

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 11>the next several years, open AI's revenue will continue to

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 11>go up. And you know, then you can and you know,

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 11>argue whether the valuations is high or not.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 6>And just from the bloom we're reporting Tiger Global put

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 6>in three hundred and fifty million dollars, Ultimeter putting in

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 6>at least two hundred and fifty million dollars. But to

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 6>your point, if Microsoft is able to write such large checks,

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 6>how does that impact the funding environment for AI companies.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm just thinking about the biggest competitors for open ai

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 6>in Anthropic and Xai.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, Anthropic is backed by you know, Amazon

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 11>Web Services at this point primarily, and almost all the others.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 11>The one thing we heard, you know, from reporting from

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 11>Bloomberg News is that open ai is asking them not

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 11>to back up you know, Elon's Xai or others. And

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 11>I think that's partially the reason you see all the

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 11>other plays coming in because and by the way, there's

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 11>not going to be one winner, They're going to be

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 11>multiple models. They're going to be multiple companies doing well here.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 11>And there is no reason Anthropic don't thrive in this way,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 11>or Mistral or all the other large language model companies.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 3>What do we know about open AI's financials, If anything.

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 7>It's I mean, I don't have a clear pick on it.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 11>I've read as much as you have, and you know,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 11>we have seen projections out there for the next several

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 11>years they can get to I don't know, five billion,

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 11>ten billion or so forth. So I mean it's it's

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 11>unless we see the s one when they go public,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 11>you know, up till at that point, you know, it's

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 11>it's it's purely a guess work.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Do we have any sense of do they have an

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 3>appetite to go public? Is it a sense of timing?

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 3>What are their plans for going public if any?

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 7>See?

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 11>My personal view is they don't need to go public

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 11>at all. They don't need the funding they will you know,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 11>the whoever is part of this particular ecosystem is getting

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 11>rich every day. I think they should figure out how

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 11>to grab as much enterprise workloads as possible before they

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 11>think about it, because one thing is for sure, even

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 11>as they are doing this land grabbing right now, they're

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 11>at a loss, and they will be at a loss

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.479
<v Speaker 11>for several years out because the cost of running these

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 11>workloads is very high and it's going to you know,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 11>you're not going to see any free cash flow. You're

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 11>not going to see any But once you've got public,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 11>you know, you really go under the lens when it's

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 11>about profitability and your margins.

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 6>Well about thirty seconds. But going back to a story

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 6>that has been reported out recently in terms of giving

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 6>Altman a stake in the company that could be worth

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 6>more than ten billion dollars, what do you make of

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 6>those conversations and what that could mean for the company

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 6>and its ambitions.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean he's always talked about how he is

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 11>doing it for the greater good of the world. But

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 11>but I guess when you get this much options, you

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 11>change your mind on that.

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 7>But it's it is what it is.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 2>It is what it is. We always fall back on

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that one.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I love it on a Ragranet technolog channels Bloomberg Intelligence

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>joinings today talking about open Ai again. Just a huge,

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>huge funding round six point six billion dollars raised and

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 3>giving the company an evaluation of one hundred and fifty

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 3>seven billion. That's just massive and impressive in and of itself.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 3>What's also impressive to me is who's going in there.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 3>We're getting some big, big technology companies, including Nvidia, some

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 3>seriously smart private equity money, private capital money including the

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Tiger and some others, and Fidelity as well. So a

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of what a lot of folks would call smart

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>money getting in even at this value oation level. That

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>gets your attention here, so we'll keep an eye on that.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Thirty Barely Lipsholtz sitting in for Alex Steele today, I'm

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Paul Suonier live.

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Streaming live on YouTube's at headverd YouTube dot com search

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Live Radio on this where you will find us

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>which s are from the CEO of Levi Strauss, Michelle

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Gost talking about the business. Let's do a little bit

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 3>more retail here, Mary Ross Gilbert. She's a senior equity

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 3>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence covering the retail space. She's based

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 3>out there in Los Angeles. Mary, what did you make

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>of We'll just start with the Levi's story. What did

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>you make of their their quarter, their outlook and kind

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 3>of maybe some of the reasoning for some of the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>weakness they're seeing.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so, Paul, the Levi's earnings out yesterday, I think

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 12>there was too much focus on some of the negativity,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 12>so for example, weakness in China. China is only two

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 12>percent of the business and still the growth prospects there

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 12>are tremendous, but we have been hearing that there has

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 12>been some weakness generally with the consumer. But also I

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 12>think there's some execution opportunities there. So they did bring

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 12>in a new leader, so I think we could see

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 12>things shift, but frankly, it's really really small if you

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 12>look at what's happening in the bigger parts of the business.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 12>The overall Levi's business on a currency neutral basis was up,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 12>and if you look at direct to consumer and that's

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 12>about forty four percent of the business, that was up

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 12>twelve percent. The USDTC was up twelve percent, Europe was

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 12>up nine percent, and also the European wholesale business turned

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 12>positive and comped up four percent, and then they have

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 12>a strong order book for the fourth quarter. US wholesale

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 12>though is still you know, trending negative. It's improving, but

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 12>still noative. So you do have a little bit of

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 12>headwinds there, but like I said, the big focus is

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 12>really on DTC, it's on women's. The women's business is

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 12>about thirty five percent of sales, but that could be

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 12>half the business that was also of double digits with

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 12>strong performance you know, across bottoms and tops there. So

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 12>I think there's some real strong points here. And then

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 12>the news about the sale of Dockers. That's great news.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 12>They've tried to sell this company in the year is passed,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 12>and it will be great to get rid of it

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 12>and really focus on the strength of the Levi's brand

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 12>and also expanding beyond yoga.

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 6>Mary, you sound really bullish and the stocks down eight percent,

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 6>So why is it getting beat so badly? I mean,

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 6>it's it's returned over the last twelve months fifty one percent.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 6>Does it sell the news or is it just that

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 6>uncertainty From a macro perspective.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 12>I don't think so. I think sometimes there's volatility around

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 12>earnings that don't necessarily reflect the true fundamentals. So I

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 12>think there there was a miss on the top line,

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 12>you know, on the revenue miss versus consensus, but of

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 12>course they beat on the bottom line. But I think

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 12>the real focus was okay, they said net revenues. Previously

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 12>the guidance was net revenues to rise one to three percent.

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 12>Now it's going to be just up one percent. I

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 12>don't really if anything, I view that as an opportunity

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 12>to beat. We do have the port strike, of course

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 12>that's making headlines, but Levi's and a lot of other

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 12>apparel companies have shifted more of their shipments over to

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 12>the West Coast and so and when you think about holiday,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 12>most of that is already in. They start shipping in

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 12>July or the ports start the West coast ports start

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 12>receiving in July, and it goes all the way through September,

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 12>and September was quite busy for the West coast ports.

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 12>I checked in with the Port of Los Angeles yesterday

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 12>on that. So I think there's going to be some impact. Obviously,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 12>it really has to do with how long the strike lasts.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 12>But I think that Levi's, Macy's and other companies have

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 12>mitigation measures in place.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 3>What does it mean as it relates to the port

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 3>out and cheer on margins, I mean, presumably their cost

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 3>will be hired to get some product that was East

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Coast bound to get it now to the West coast.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 2>What does that do to their margins? Of companies given

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 2>in guidance.

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there's a couple of companies that have indicated, not

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 12>all of them, so for example, Oxford Industry, so that's

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 12>the Tommy Bahama, Lily Pulitzer brands. So what they did

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 12>say is that they expect a freight negative freight impact

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 12>in the second half of about fifteen to twenty basis points,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 12>and in that they did incorporate what they think might

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 12>be the impact from a possible because again their earnings

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 12>call was before the strike which just hit this week

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 12>on Tuesday. They said that that does incorporate that impact,

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 12>but once again it depends on the duration and just

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 12>looking back and in previous disruptions with regard to the port,

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 12>we sort of estimate it could be in that sort

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 12>of ten to twenty basis points impact on margin, But

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 12>again it depends on the duration and then also any

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 12>other mitigation factors that will help offset some of those

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 12>costs if they're able to.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 6>And Mary, you mentioned the duration. How long does this

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 6>strike have to last for it to start to show

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 6>up and impact some of these businesses.

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 12>That is a really good question. When I think about

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 12>some of the other disruptions and the duration, and of

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 12>course the last one that happened back in the seventies,

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 12>I was sixty days, I can imagine the damage must

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 12>have been pretty extensive, and even just thinking of you know,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 12>let's say eight days. Going back to twenty fifteen when

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 12>the West Coast ports had some you know, shutdowns, so

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 12>it wasn't actually a strike, but they were called shutdowns

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 12>at that time, and that that did last for days,

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 12>but there was an impact that lasted months after that.

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 12>So there was an impact on margin because if you

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 12>have a delay in getting your apparel, then once it

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 12>does arrive, you have to promptly mark it down. And

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 12>that's exactly what happened with Macy's on off price. They

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 12>tend to be less impacted to a certain extent because

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 12>they can just pack it away and bring it out,

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, when the season is right.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 3>All right, Mary, thank you so much for joining us.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Mary Ross Gilbert, she's a senior equity analysts covering the

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 3>retail space for Bloomberg Intelligence. To space that Bloomberg's Los

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 3>Angeles office, joining us of via that zoom thing.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast available on Apples, Spotify,

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal