WEBVTT - Almost Famous (Archive)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys putting.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>On here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 3>You're not interested in Armed now?

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 4>No, look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey, film spotters. You know this movie is one of

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>my all time favorites, one that if it was up

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, I'd put in the Film Spotting Pantheon, though

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it will ever get there. It is

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>turning twenty five. Cameron Crows Almost Famous. Back in twenty eighteen,

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we gave it the sacred cow treatment. I think it

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>was in honor of Stephen Heyden's book coming out, a

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>book about classic rock. So we decided to talk about

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this film and also do our top five classic rock

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>moments and movies.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was a fun one to put together. And

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Almost Famous a great movie to revisit. I don't remember

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 5>if I blocked any sort of proposal to put it

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 5>in the pantheon, but it was fun to take another

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 5>look at Almost Famous. And you know the archive, the

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Film Spotting archive, we have reviews like this one. We

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 5>have top fives, like the Classic Rock Top five, and

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 5>all sorts of stuff going all the way back to

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and five, and to get access to those shows,

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 5>those lists, those reviews. You should become a Film Spotting

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Family member. That's one of the benefits you get by

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 5>being a member of the Film Spotting Family. You can

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 5>learn about all those details over at film spottingfamily dot com.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 5>For now from June twenty eighteen, here is that Sacred

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Cow review of Almost Famous.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Now for you with what band Oh, I'm here to

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 6>interview Black Sabbath.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm not not a you know, no, A what.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 4>No A what?

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 8>Not a groupie.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>We are not groupies.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Penny Lane Man.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 7>Show some respect.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Groupies sleep with rock stars because they want to be

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>near someone famous. We're here because of the music. We

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>are band aids. She used to art a school for

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>band names. We don't have intercourse with these guys. We

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>support the music, We inspire the music. We're here because

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>of the music.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 8>Mark Bolin broke her heart. Man, it's famous.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 7>It's a long story.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>In a Washington Post interview just prior to the release

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of Almost Famous, the film's writer, director and inspiration Cameron

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Crowe recounts a story about David Bowie guitarist Mick Ronson,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who had died shortly before the movie started production. In

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a deathbed conversation, Ronson was asked how it felt to

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be at ground zero of the decadence in rock. It

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was a very loving time and a very naive time,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or at least it was to me, Ronson explained, And

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that was profound. Crow said. Even the

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>guys who were playing glitter rock, which was so subversive,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>had a lack of irony and cynicism about it that

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>today would be point. But the whole global change in

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rock cool being a mass concept was still around the corner,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so it was still a little more personal. And all

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I can say is passionately naive, and I really wanted

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to catch that. Passionately naive is pretty much the best

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>way to describe most Cameron Crowe characters. I'm thinking here

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of fewer clients, less money, Jerry Maguire and I don't

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a career. Lloyd Dobbler and say anything all this negative

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>energy just makes me stronger. Cliff Ponsier and aspiring supertrained architects,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Dunn and singles and what about pretty much the

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>entire cast of the Crow written Amy Heckerling directed Fast

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>times at Ridgemont High. We, of course, remember all I

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Spacoli, And well, what am I supposed to do?

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to this strange girl in my biology class and

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>say hello, I'd like you to take your clothes off

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and jump on me. Mark Ratner. So that's one way

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>into Almost Famous. If you can relate to Crowe's collection

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of well meaning, idealistic misfits, then you'll surely appreciate his

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>almost famous stand in fifteen year old William Miller, who

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lands an assignment to cover the up and coming band

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Stillwater on tour for Rolling Stone, just as Crow himself

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>did in the early seventies writing about the Allman Brothers,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>led Zeppelin and many others. But there are other ways,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in lots of them, according to film spoting listener Jim

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Pelini and Beth Page, New York, who rates Almost Famous

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as his favorite Crow movie.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 9>And really, I think that's because its script is layered

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 9>with just multiple very well developed storylines that Crow certainly

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 9>must have culled from his own experience, and it really

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 9>shows in a very rich screenplay. I think you know,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 9>at one end of the film. You've got the film

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 9>paying a lot of attention to the role of criticism

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 9>in music and criticism in art in general. It has

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 9>a lot of effective biopic elements, focusing on Lester Bangs

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 9>and the founding staff at Rolling Stone, you know. Right

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 9>in the center, you've got kind of the interpersonal conflict

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 9>with a professional touring rock band that's kind of the

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 9>bedrock of the story, and this ripped and then yet

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 9>it still has time for a very authentic storyline about

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 9>a mother trying to keep her family together despite I

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 9>guess you'd call it the lore of the seventies counterculture.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.559
<v Speaker 9>And on the top of all that, you've got Crow

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 9>very effectively conveying the you know, absolute reverie and bliss

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 9>of live performance, you know, on stage and on hotel

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 9>rooms and as you know, on a bus. Of all

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 9>those lines, you know, which are really fleshed out beautifully

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 9>in the film, but to me, there's one that kind

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 9>of floats above the rest, and that's the one that

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 9>focuses on the young you know, William Miller learning how

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 9>to I guess you know, love a woman for the

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 9>first time and navigating the emotion sparked by that experience

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 9>which is obviously new to him. It's my favorite part

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 9>of the movie, and I really appreciate you guys doing

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 9>a review on it. It's about time. It's a great one.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Take care, guys, Josh. We've never talked about Almost Famous,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not in any detail, but I know you are a fan,

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>or at least you were a fan on initial review.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>After chasing you around Chicagoland screening rooms for four days,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I've pinned you down. The mics are live, the tape

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is rolling. What speaks to you, the attention to criticism,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the highs and lows of life on the road, the

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>family dynamic, the love story, as romantically one sided as

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it may be, the passionate naivete of the movie's young protagonist,

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and his belief in the power of music, or something

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>else entirely. In other words, what do you love about

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Almost Famous?

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 5>Well, I hope we can talk about all those things,

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 5>because it's all good stuff in this really, really good

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 5>movie that does still hold up. I mean, anything with

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 5>this amount of optimism is going to look a little

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>hokier with each passing year. But I still don't think

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 5>I would really apply that word sure to this movie.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 5>A quaintness that grows talking of Yeah, it's quainter more

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 5>quaint each time we revisit it in a few years

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 5>have passed, and maybe we've seen a little bit more

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 5>about the world and become more cynical ourselves. What did

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I love about almost famous on this revisit, Can I

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 5>just say Patrick Fuget's face? Yeah, I mean, and that's

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>something keep part. It's something that was striking initially. Who

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 5>is this kid? Where did he find him? How he

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 5>works so perfectly, the fact that he has that it's

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 5>not really that he's blushing, but it's almost like he's

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 5>been sleeping on a pillow on one side for a

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 5>while and there's just still a little color there that

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 5>wasn't there before. That changes throughout the film. He always

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 5>seems to be a little flushed about something, and when

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 5>he looks at these rock stars, when he waits for

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 5>their answer to his questions, that face. So I have

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 5>a new nephew about a month old, Gideon Eno Coots

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 5>parents are listeners to the show, so first time shout

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 5>out to Nagan. Yeah, well ties in with the music

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 5>theme here, And when I look into Gideon's face, we

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 5>just saw him over the weekend. He looks older and

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 5>more wise and more knowing than Patrick.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 10>Fuget in this movie because the eyes and the awe,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 10>but also just realizing for the first time what life

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 10>could be, which is something that seems to be happening

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 10>to him in this movie.

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I he's not looking at you like Fuget looks at

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Billy kruddup. Is he Josh? I hope not. No, No,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that kind of wisdom to disciss.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Not making that comparison. But it is really something what

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Fuget brings that's got to work, right. I talked about

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 5>that with Solo and aldn Aaron Reich that he had

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 5>to work if the movie was going to soar. Fuget

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 5>had to work here if Almost Famous was going to soar,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 5>and it absolutely does, and a lot of it has

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 5>to do with him. I want, I do want to

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 5>get into some of that other stuff. I think, probably

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 5>secondarily stuff that you can more chew on and think

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 5>about and maybe we can discuss, is its attention to criticism,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 5>and in particular the critics relationship to the creators as

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 5>opposed to their art. That's obviously at the heart of

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 5>this film. But here I've been doing something somewhat in

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 5>the same arena for a number more years since I

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 5>first saw Almost Famous, and that's something that's becoming only

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 5>more complicated. So I'm curious to hear how that struck

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 5>you as well. Yeah, you know just where things are,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 5>especially as you do this more than me. But interview

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 5>filmmakers from the show, and we know filmmakers who follow

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 5>the show closely and listen on occasion to what we

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 5>have to say about their movies, and that is all

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of like it's always kind of given me the

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 5>willies a little bit, sure, and seeing Almost Famous dig

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 5>into those complications did that more so in a way

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 5>that was good and challenging and thought provoking.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, at the end of the day, I'm a fan,

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a movie fan, and I'm a fan of pretty

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>much everybody who I've ever done an interview with for

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this show, and that line potentially crossing that line into

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>exposing your fandom too much, not being seen as a professional,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or just appearing uncool in front of them whatever that means,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which is so germane to this movie. That is something

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that obviously I struggle with. I feel a lot like

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>William Miller in those situations and to your point about

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fugutz performance. I appreciated it the first time I saw

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this movie, but that was something on rewatch, and I

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know believe it or not as much as I

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>love this movie as much as I've said this before.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it came up recently that I have the

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>shot from the end of this movie with the microphone

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as my avatar. It has been my avatar since I

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>saw this film pretty much and avatar has existed. I

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have the shot of Philis Seymour, Hoffman and Fuget walking

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>up that hill talking about criticism after the radio station

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>scene where they meet, and almost famous as our header

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on our Facebook page and on Twitter. So I've always

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>been enamored with this film and what this film is about,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and yet I don't think I've ever watched it in

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>its entirety since I saw it in the theater in

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one. I've maybe caught scenes here and there.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So I really was kind of watching it again for

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and yet I felt like I knew

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it so well. Just so many scenes in so many

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>lines were ingrained in my memory. And his performance is

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a standout element of this movie, and he was a newcomer.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is his first real feature film, his

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>first major project anyway, And that over enthusiasm when he

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is walking out of that first concert scene and he

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>knows everybody's names, and he can't stop himself from trying

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to show that he fits it right, right, that he's

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the group. Now, he's part of this larger group,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not just that he's attached to Stillwater in anyway, which

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point he isn't, but he thinks he's now

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>part of this collective, this backstage musical life. And he

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>insists on saying hi and saying everyone's name, just as

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's even proving to himself, well, this is really happening.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm part of this and I know these people. And

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then the way Sapphire comes up Rusa Balk and kisses

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>him and calms him down. His facial reaction there is magic.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>His reaction when Philip Seymour Hoffman says to him, go

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be a lawyer, which we know his mom has been

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>instructing him to do earlier in the film. That look

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on his face not just of disillusionment, but as if

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Daggers Yeah thrush rushed through his heart in that moment

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's great. So that look of despair, he just captures

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it perfectly.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm glad you mentioned those specific moments, because I didn't

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 5>want to imply that it was just how he looks

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 5>that makes this role so great. It is in the performance.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 5>And one other thing he adds in additional all those

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 5>things you said, is that when he's caught not being cool,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't even have the coolness to try to cover

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 5>it up. He always cops to his uncoolness immediately, and that,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 5>of course just makes him seem more vulnerable and more rendearing.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 9>So.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought a lot about as soon as I finished

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this rewatch, why do I love this film? And before

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I get into some of those reasons, I do have

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to say that Almost Famous might be in a very

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>small category of movies for me that I unabashedly think

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are great, even though I'm not convinced it's a great movie. Okay,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there are problems I have with the film, and we'll

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>discuss those problems. There are ways in which I think

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Crow sabotages his own material, unfortunately, but there's so

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>much I do adore, and I think there are some

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>obvious things we can point to you touched on some

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of this. It combines my primary interests movies. It's a

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>movie after all music, which I've noted many times. But

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been playing in bands since I was twelve years

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>old and played instruments, so music's always been near and

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dear to me. And of course criticism what we do

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>or try to do here on the show. And it's

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a movie that is about the consideration of art and

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the power it has and the place that it has.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I've already alluded to this. I'm a card carrying member

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of the uncool. I do feel like even when I'm

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in these circles, and sometimes you can convince yourself that

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>when you hang around certain people, certain filmmakers a little

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bit or whatever, you feel like you're in that circle.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>You feel just like William Miller backstage, like you're part

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the gang. You're not part of the gang. So

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>even when you are an insider, I often feel like

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the outsider. And it's a movie fundamentally, like all coming

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of age movies are about figuring it out, about gaining

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>experience about wisdom, and we get to gain that experience

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>in wisdom through William Miller in the film. And I

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>think just overall the fact that it's the type of

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>film that gives you a scene like the one when

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Zoey Deschanel as Anita says, this song is why I'm

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving home. She can't articulate to her mother why she's leaving.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Which is exactly what drives her mother nuts about it. Right,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Why do we.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Have Simon, Simon and Garfunkle. They can express it. They

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can express something that we in our everyday lives simply cannot.

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that this movie and these characters have

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that type of reverence for music is something that I

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of us just can't help but too

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>attached to. And I do love that scene in particular

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the way that it starts out as diegetic music. It's

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>there in the scene she puts it on the record

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>player and we're hearing it, But then that cut to

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>them actually packing up the car. Now it's non diegetic.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Now it's Crow playing it over the scene as they

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do head off, just like the protagonists in that great

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Simon and Garfunkle too.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that was one of the things that

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 5>impressed me more about the craft on this rewatch is

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 5>the interweaving of the music not only diegetic and non diegetic,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 5>but just what songs he's going to use, when, what

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 5>portions of songs, so that you don't get a lot

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 5>of just here's the beginning of the song for the

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 5>beginning of this scene, and when this scene ends, will

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 5>come to a nice ending point.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>In this song.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's much more very well constructed, complicated and

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 5>layered than that. I did find it, even as I'm

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 5>praising that sort of construction, shaggier and scruffier than I remembered.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 5>And maybe that's going to point to some of the

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 5>issues you had where the scenes altogether didn't quite flow

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 5>as seamlessly as I remembered in my mind, which, of

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 5>course you remember beloved movies like this as Greatest Hits elements,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 5>and it's sort of like maybe when you stumble across

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 5>that track on the Greatest Hits album and you're so,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why that's in there. There were maybe

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 5>a few moments where you're like, oh, I've forgot this

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 5>was in almost famous in general. I forgot there was

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 5>this much. Francis McDorman, Yes, I think realization, Yeah, I

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 5>mean it's a I remember it being a through line

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 5>how his mother felt and the connection to her. But

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 5>I didn't remember it being this good, including their scenes

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 5>that are always talked about, like when she's on the

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 5>phone with Russell and spins him around in an instant,

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 5>But how about the one where she's exasperated at the

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 5>end of her rope with William and I forget exactly

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 5>what they're discussing at that point, but her response finally

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 5>when she realizes he's gone, that there's nothing she can

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 5>do about.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>This story, she breaks down. Actually at the end of

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the scene.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 5>What she says, this is what I remember. Her response

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 5>is not to condemn him, not to give him anger,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 5>not to give him a final warning. It's to say

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 5>I love you, yes, And she says it in a

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 5>way that's not necessarily saying I'm now on board with

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 5>this or you've convinced me otherwise. She hasn't shifted in anything,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 5>including her love for him, and that's what she decides

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 5>to leave with. So she's amazing. And the other element

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 5>I thought there was way more Philip Seymour Hoffman. Yeah,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.959
<v Speaker 5>and that shows you how iconic has scenes. Yeah, right,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 5>And the way that you give Philip Seymour Hoffman four

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 5>minutes and he'll make it feel like you just watched

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 5>a feature.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I really was struck by that as well, But

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I had a complete reappreciation for Francis

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 1>mcdorman's performance and just how Cameron Crowe uses that character.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I actually did watch this with Holden and Sophie, my

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>two oldest kids, and I was very gratified at the

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the film that they enjoyed it. They both

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it quite a bit. Holden felt like he could

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>relate to William Miller, even though he certainly doesn't have

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>any sense of his appreciation for music, especially rock music.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest change in me from that time I

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>saw it in two thousand and one is I had

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so much more sympathy for the mom. I mainly saw

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>her as comedy. It was there for comedic relief, and

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>those scenes still are or maybe the funniest scenes in

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the movie anything with her and da Chanel and with

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Fugue. But my kids they didn't see her as

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>a villain exactly watching the movie, but on that Miller spectrum,

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>from William who sees his mom as overwhelming but admirable

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>and well intentioned, to Anita who sees her as soul

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>crushingly overbearing. My kids saw her as closer to Anita,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think the younger you are, you probably see

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>her that way. Now as a parent, which I was

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not in two thousand and one, I'm way more in

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tune with that character and her fears. And I don't

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>know if it's the exact same scene you're thinking of

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or not, but I'd completely forgotten about the one where

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>she is talking to William. It's one of the hallway scenes.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not the one where Russell gets on. It's the

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one where they introduced the new girl who says she's

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>correct orient or whatever, and William can't hear what his

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>mom's saying, and she's saying, I love you. And the

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>way she breaks down at the end of that scene,

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>camera Crow gives her a moment to herself, This mom

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>who is emotional but who's otherwise had such kind of

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>steely resolve. Actually with Anita in that moment she's just

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>finally done. That really resonated with me.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I do remember thinking of her as comic relief

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 5>because of those highlight scenes, also as being well you

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 5>had to have her to show where William was from. Yeah,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 5>but this drops us. This speaks to the richness of

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 5>the writing in terms of all of these characters, so

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 5>many characters, how Crow is able to juggle them, give

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>them each their own narratives within William's experience, which is

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 5>obviously the driving force, and have us feel like we're invested.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 5>We're just as invested in how his mom is experiencing, Yes,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 5>this journey he's on, almost as much as we're invested

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 5>in William herself.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of those lines too. On the phone, when she's

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>telling Russell, now, go do your best, be bold, she's

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>quoting good to and you've been kissing she knows Anita's

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>been kissing Anita telling her feck you, and the way

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>she says hey in response to that is so great.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And the other really good McDorman moment, though there are

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so many we could point to, when the woman on

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone Freus a balk I think answers the phone

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in the room and she says, is this Maryanne with

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the pot and they cut back to McDorman and she

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just closes her eyes. It's just a very subtle close

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the eyes. It's everything she feared could be happening

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>has now been realized. In that moment with just that

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one line, all those moments between the family, I really

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do think our gold and extremely funny. I even love

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the touch. And of course it's all about the details

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's Crow's real life, and whether he embellished this

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or not, it seems like one of those elements that

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>had to be authentic. The family whistle, right the way

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that she sends him off to that Black Sabbath concert

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and says look for me later and you know, if

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>we can't find each other the whistle, and later in

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the film when he's walking away from Penny Lane, we

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>actually do hear that whistle she is calling for him

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the car. There are some really

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>nice moments too that we get visually from Crow in

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this movie that I wasn't aware of the first time

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw. There's some symmetry in some of his shot choices.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>He likes to use that track forward when Anita is

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at him by the car before she goes and

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we get that close up one day You'll be cool,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's echoed then in that shot of William's eyes

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>close up when we get some of that later between

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>him and Penny Lane, of course played by Kate Hudson,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>who we haven't really talked about here yet, And the

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>love triangle shot is something he uses at least two times,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe three times. One of them is when still Water

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>is playing the song Fever Dog. Russell's on stage, so

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>William's standing next to Penny and Russell keeps looking over

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at them, and the way Crow uses point of view

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and the close ups, it's about Russell looking at them.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's he looking at? Does William think he's looking at

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>him and he's trying to impress him, or is he,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of course trying to impress Penny Lane and that's who

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he's looking at, And the way William turns and sees her.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>We get that again in some different scenes, like the

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one at the pool after Russell tells him just make

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>us look cool. In that scene, Penny's the one now

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the distance looking at the two of them standing

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>next to each other, and we get that exact same

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>type of love triangle cross cutting. That does underscore one

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of the key parts of the film, which is what

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Russell says at the end of the movie, which is

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>we both wanted to be with her, She wanted us

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to be together.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for sure, there's also some nice concert footage. I

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 5>should say, it feels like real concert footage when Stillwater

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 5>is on stage and the camera gets looser, more lively,

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 5>and you're right there with the players, which again is

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 5>a way of accentuating the interaction between Russell and which

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 5>is another relational dynamic that's central to this, but also

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 5>between him and Jason Lee's Jeff, the lead singer and

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 5>the lead guitarist, and the tension there. We feel a

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 5>lot of that in the camera work on stage, not

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 5>only when they're in moments of tension, maybe even more

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 5>so when the camaraderie is high and they're both in

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 5>the same groove and you understand, as he says at

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 5>one point, why he's still with these guys even though

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>he reckoned Nices. He has more talent than them. Yeah,

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.239
<v Speaker 5>but he may be able to find other bandmates who

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 5>will put on a better show, but he won't have

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 5>that vibe when he's on stage with these new guys

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 5>that he has with these guys he's been playing with

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 5>for years.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, that's a great point, and that might be

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a perfect transition into some of the issues I have

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with the movie. And I'll build up to mister Crudup

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and Russell Hammond. I think there are some scenes that

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.239
<v Speaker 1>just play out way too quickly for how important they

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are to the film, or Crow just makes some unforgivable choices,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And one of them is when we watch the band

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>meet Jimmy Fallon's agent character, the manager the road manager

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>character for the first time, and he's talking to them

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>about how we're gonna go by a plane. We're gonna

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>leave the bus behind. We can fit in more shows,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we can make more money. It's all about business, business, business,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and Crow, for some reason cuts in the voiceover from

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>William's conversation with Philip Seymour Hoffmann about how he's here

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for the death Rattle. They're going to strangle all the

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>life out of music. He underlines it for us in

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a way where just showing William Miller's face in that moment,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we know what he's thinking. We're all thinking it. We

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all remember that diner conversation with Hoffman's Lester Banks and

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking the same thing. He doesn't quite trust us there.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I also really hate the scene, frankly that takes place

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>at Rolling Stone late in the film. He's turned the

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>article in, Oh, we've now seen two scenes where they're

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fawning all over him and the piece he's in the

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>room with Ben Fong Torres, and I should know who

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the other guy is because it's clearly Rain Wilson playing

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a real character from Rolling Stone lore, and they're fawning

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all over him, and then the fact checker comes in.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a terribly acted scene. It all happens way too Abroughly,

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they reject his story in like thirty seconds, right even

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>though they've been just talking it up for the last

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, and they completely reverse their position and they

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even give him a chance to explain himself. And

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes from the cover to the garbage can just

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. And for me, the details, the very similitude

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of this movie are what's so key to making it great.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And Cameron Crow obviously knows this world, he knows the

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>world of Rolling Stone, he knows what this process would

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 1>actually be like. And in that moment, it's not even

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>him going for an easy laugh. It's just a short cut.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just a shortcut to then get out of that

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>scene and get to something else. But I actually think

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a really important scene since the whole movie has

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been building up to William actually turning that piece in.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand them wanting to reject it, but how it's

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>depicted I don't buy for a second.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't think. I mean, we have backgrounds in journalism.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 5>I think even if you didn't, you would sniff out

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 5>that something's false there, because it goes back and forth

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 5>so many times. It's false drama. The other issue is

0:25:55.000 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 5>that it's a choice of efficiency over atmosphere. All of

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 5>those details you're talking about that are in the home scenes,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 5>well they're not going to be built out here, because

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 5>all this is there to do is to set up

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 5>the conflict between William and Russell and to fracture them

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 5>in a way, or at least maybe not even fracture them,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 5>but set up that potential for their reunion and for

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 5>the reunion to be in a really satisfying way. So

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 5>that's where you see the chess pieces being set up

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 5>in the screenplay, and because everything else is so authentic

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 5>and fully realized, it does absolutely stand out.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It's phenomenal William, to be quite honest with you, sophisticated, intelligent.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Now we only have to cut out a couple of graphs.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Phebe's mother already sent up our whole shoe box

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 5>for my childhood Aboto, but it's really going to look fantastic.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 10>The band just nine percent of the story.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 8>It's a fabrication.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 4>You weren't honest, and worse, you wasted our time.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Did you talk to Russell Hammond?

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Russell Hammond is the one who denied it.

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Now wait a second, denied it.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 4>We're going with the Hill manuscripts in my office.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 6>He's just some fan.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect anyway?

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Wait?

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that, as we have both said, there are

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really funny moments in this movie, and

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, Crow gets the comedy just right.

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there are other scenes where he just pushes

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>too hard and it becomes too broad one of them.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think these are minor quibbles. But this is a

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>movie I adore, so I'm gonna quibble with it the

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>way we do with the things we love, especially music.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The scene straight out of Airplane when Sapphire is running

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>along the bus and runs into the beam as the

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bus is pulling out of the stadium unnecessary at best.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, but I remember that coming. I remember thinking, Oh,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 5>this mays me gonna do it. This makes you laugh

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 5>once because it surprises you. The second time you're like, no,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 5>don't do that. But going back to Fugut's face, his

0:27:59.080 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 5>reactions turn.

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a good point that worth watching.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>We could probably spend twenty minutes on this scene and

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to. And actually Jim Plini, who helped

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>us so much with that voicemail in our setup, he

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>singles this scene out and likes this moment. But if

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about music being used poorly in

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie, everything about the scene. The only scene, actually,

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh in this entire film that really played terribly for

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>me on this rewatch was the one right after Penny

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Lane takes all the quayludes and William Miller, as he

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>says it boldly goes where many men have gone before.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's uncomfortable. It's really uncomfortable, and it's it's made even

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>more uncomfortable in a movie that has so many amazing

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>musical cues to then have my Sharia more pop up

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on the soundtrack as we cut between William's kind of

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>horrified face and these images of Kate Hudson's struggling legs

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and body kind of writhing as they're pumping or stomach.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand, or at least I think I understand that

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's meant to be ironic. Sure, the music in that

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>moment is meant to be ironic, because there's nothing romantic

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening, and I don't think the crow is

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>suggesting there is. But that doesn't make it any more

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>satisfying to watch. And it's another moment where I almost

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's intended to be a joke. It's so

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 1>ironic that I don't understand how it can be anything

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but us reacting and laughing, almost like when you can't

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>believe what you're watching and you recoil from it a

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit and you let out a laugh. That's what

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's going for in that moment, which

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 5>I think the difficulty with that scene, and first of all,

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 5>the kiss, the choice to kiss her while she's just

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 5>about passed out and maybe dying. Yeah, wrong choice. You

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 5>could maybe argue and I'd have to watch it again.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 5>But it was a possibility that crossed my mind as

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 5>it was happening and I was feeling uncomfortable, is does

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 5>William think this might snaper out of it? I don't

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 5>know if that's what the thinking was. Yeah, it's not clear.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just it's the only moment where he

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>can finally fully express himself in his feelings.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, which of course is a huge issue. But what

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 5>I do think is the ultimate problem with that entire

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 5>sequence is, in one scene that's also doing many other

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 5>things with their relationship, Crow is trying to squeeze in

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 5>all of the concerns that Francis mcdormand's mother has about

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 5>this lifestyle that the movie otherwise completely ignores. I mean,

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 5>this is like, and I remember when this came out,

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 5>there were people much more familiar with the rock scene

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 5>of that era said, this is like the squeakiest, cleanest

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 5>version of what was going on. And unless I'm missing

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 5>something that's top of mind, you never get a hint of,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, the cost of any of this hard living

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 5>that is part of the rock and roll lifestyle into

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 5>this kind they at it. Francis McDormand talks about it,

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 5>and there it's kind of laughed off, like she's the

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 5>over concerning mother. Then all of a sudden it all

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 5>is supposed to be like here's where she's been discarded

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 5>as the sexual plaything. Here's where the overuse of drugs

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 5>has severe, serious health costs. And it's like all this

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 5>is bearing down on one sequel. It's just too much.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 5>It's it's not going to be able to do the

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 5>work that I think Crow wants it to.

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And another scene that is too rushed and is about

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>efficiency is the one leading to that, the card scene

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where he bets her and she goes to Humble Pie.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't believe any of that either, and I know

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's also what Crow knows that Life on the Red.

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Why didn't you believe it was?

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like you're saying about the Russell play performance.

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 5>It's the performance, but Whistle's demeanor exactly. It doesn't like him.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Also the character who is their manager, Derek, And I'm

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>forgetting that wonderful actor.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 9>Noah Taylor.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Noah Taylor, thank you everything about it, Josh. It

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just it plays out too rushed. It just seems like

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Crow needs to get to that moment where they lose.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 5>Her, so shelfy Field betrays exactly.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So one other quick comedic moment that just does not

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>work for me at all.

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't think you like this movie.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's another punchline, Josh, it's another punchline Crow goes for.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's the scene on the plane, the scene on

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the plane where the drummer finally speaks and confesses to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole group this truth about him, and the moment

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he says it, the plane straightens out, they get out

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of the weather, and everything's fine. It's just a moment

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in a movie filled with these wonderful, funny moments, like

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed, these moments that feel organic and truthful to

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the characters. It's a moment like the airplane one where

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Crow's just going to laugh too, absolutely just going for

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the joke. He goes for the gag and I wish

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't there.

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think we hear from that character no,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 5>but that is that his only line of dialogue.

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That's actually part of the joke too. And of course

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't hit me. It didn't hit me, And we

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>could talk about this for a little bit. I put

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in I made the mistake of putting in the extended edition.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 5>First.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I was watching with Holden and Sophie untitled the version

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that came out like after the DVD release, and I

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>started noticing scenes that I was sure, I had never

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>seen before. And I look at the running time and

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it's two hours and forty one minutes long. I'm like,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>there's thirty five extra minutes here. Yeah, I got to

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>start over. But after I watched this movie again, I

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>went through the extended edition and looked for the differences,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to see what they were. And there

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is a scene, it's the one later in the film

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>where they make the decision to spike the story. The

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>band's talking outside a hotel and they're saying he wrote everything,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he wrote the truth and Jason Lee's Jeff Beebe's all upset,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we only get this sense that Russell Hammond

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>may want to spike the story. He doesn't come out

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and say it. Well, actually, in the extended version of

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the movie, Jimmy Fallon does a bunch of talking there.

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>He convinces the band that this is a bad idea.

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty good scene. You don't need it. The

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>movie doesn't need it. But I actually kind of really

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like the scene. And there's a moment with the drummer

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>where Billy Crudup says, again, this isn't in the cut

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that we all saw. Billy Crudup looks at him and says,

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you had the right idea the whole time to the drummer,

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and the drummer just kind of rolls his eyes. The

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>joke being, of course, that his approach the whole time

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to the journalist was to never say anything. So that's

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. Is that one moment where he finally

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>lets out this confession, the plane straightens out. I don't care,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 5>Joke, John Feedovich. I'm looking up here since we're talking

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 5>about him in Drummers, which no one would have predicted

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 5>in an almost famous review, But he plays the drummer.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Out of it. I do love that at least the

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>drummer and the bass player are real musicians, and you

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>can tell their real musicians, not necessarily actors, and they

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>do a serviceable job, but they are the real musicians

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on stage that we need, which now brings me to

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the big thing, Josh, the guitarists with mystique doesn't have

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>enough of it for this film.

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Or I'm really hoping you weren't going to yeah direction,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 5>I can't help it, Billy crowd Up, you don't like

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 5>I overall.

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Like his performance, but hear me out here. It's actually

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>probably more accurate to say that mystique is all he has.

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He has that kind of a loof charisma, especially in

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>contrast to Jeff Bbe in his NonStop, superficial chatter, that

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>makes him kind of compelling. You're drawn to him because

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to know what's going on in that head.

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But we do need to buy him as a musician

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and as an artist. You mentioned this that he is

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>someone who sees himself as separate from the band. He

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is gone past them now, as he himself verbalizes, and

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just not there on the screen. It's not

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>at all. His sound may be incendiary. William Miller may

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have that right, but his playing isn't. And there's a

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>reason why Cameron Crow always shoots him from behind.

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, I was going to always.

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 4>That.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't, and we need it. It's not just the

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Billy c can't pull it off. I think the movie

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>needs it because it's constantly underscoring how great of an

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>artist he is and why William is so drawn to him.

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just not sure where they went wrong. I mean,

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just did deliberately cast for what they thought

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Billy Krudup brought to the role as an actor, and

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't broach it like the Coen Brothers with Oscar

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Isaac in Lewin Davis or some other movies where the

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>musicianship really does matter and you have to believe it.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure how with Crow's background and Nancy Wilson,

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>his wife's background, being one of the members of Heart,

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the founding members of Heart, I don't know

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>how they didn't put more of an emphasis on that.

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's essential, Like I said, from every

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the band dynamic to that dynamic between William

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and him and his reverence for him. I like the

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>performance overall. He's out of place on stage, and I

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>think that matters.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 5>I can't go with you there. I think you make

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 5>a choice when you're and you've cited some movies that

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 5>made the other choice and it works. The choice to

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 5>show the art on the screen. I will give you

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 5>another one, Patterson, where we see his poems. Yes, Adam

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 5>Driver's poems that he's writing and they hold up. Okay,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 5>So that's one choice, show the art, but man, then

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 5>it better be good, it better work. The other choice

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 5>is to not show the painting. Don't show us the poem, yeah,

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 5>and let the performance and the other cinematic elements make

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 5>you believe that it is that good.

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We get a fair performance though in this movie, Josh,

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they're on stage a fair amount.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 5>They are, but as you pointed out, it's often he's

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 5>often from behind. We get that one like strong Chord,

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 5>when we first see him covering it and you realize

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 5>that he's Yeah, they are covering up, but you also

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 5>realize that he's in that chord even he's the driving

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 5>force of the band, Like the song doesn't start until

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 5>he gives that chord, turns around and joins the others.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think there's filmmaking there that makes it work.

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 5>And crut Up is a performer who's exactly built to

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 5>play a character like this, who doesn't need to show us.

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't need to put on the screen, because in

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 5>almost every one of his roles, he's this sort of

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 5>guy who he slouches onto the screen because he doesn't

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent want to be there. He doesn't need

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 5>to be there. He's not an actor who has that

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 5>that desire for attention that I feel right away, And

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.439
<v Speaker 5>I think that's part of Russell's issue too, is he's

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 5>there just essentially the end of the day. He's there

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 5>to play, right. I mean, he takes advantage of all

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 5>these other benefits that it has being a rock star.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 5>But he is exactly who he says to William and

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 5>who William believes him to be, and who William worships

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 5>because of it. Yeah, so I don't know.

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a strong That's fine, we disagree. I

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>like the performance. I just needed to see some of

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the actual artistry. I really did. It makes sense. I

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>can already hear people saying the counter to this is

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the band's supposed to be a mid level rock band

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and their songs are average at best, even if they

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily but reason to be that way.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but he is.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's the unfortunate part I really really is.

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that you're saying you needed to see

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 5>more of it. Yeah, but I don't know that we.

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to be convinced beyond just the very similitude if.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 5>You want him to kick ass guitar solo, to just

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 5>maybe blow your hair back.

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to believe as that performer, as that artist

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on stage. So one other quick thing, I did want

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to mention totally random about this film is something did

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>click when I was watching the extended edition. I'm sure

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there's another line or there's some intimation of it, but

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in the extended cut there is a moment that's definitely

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not in the theatrical where he has to finish his story.

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>He is asked by the other band aids to take

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the clothes and do the laundry. He goes to Russell's room,

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he's told to go away, and he just kind of

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>breaks down there in the hallway. They finally do come out,

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Penny Lane and Russell, and they're talking to him and

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>they're urging him to go on the road, to stay

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road and we'll do the interview at the

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 1>next stop, and he says, I want to go home.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And I was instantly taken back to The Wizard of Oz,

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking about Judy Garland being lost and

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 1>wanting to go home and she has to go see

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the Wizard, who ultimately disappoints her before she can go home.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>And of course Russell Hammond here is the Wizard who

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>completely disappoints him. When they finally do get to or

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>finally get to connect here in the scene, and it's

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all about this whole movie is all about life on

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the road versus the real world back at home and

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid that type of life. And when Russell

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>decides he needs to escape the fantasy of the road

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>life and connect with real people in a real place.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 5>Where is he He's in Topeka.

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>He's in Kansas. That's right, he goes to Kansas.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He could have played Elton John's Goodbye Yellow Brick Road

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and really put a point out there, but Camera Crow doesn't. Overall,

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>though the extended edition, if you love this film, it's

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>worth watching. But there's a reason why those scenes were

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>left on the cutting room floor, which is usually the

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>case with the deleted scenes, and some of them are

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more examples of going for the comedy where it doesn't

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>really work at all and it's not needed. There are

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple moments here there that actually kind of like,

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>including one exchange with Lester and William on the street,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>an extension of what we already see where remember he's

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>asked by Lester, do you like lou Reid? And he

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>says the early stuff, yeah, but now he's trying to

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be Bowie. He should just be himself. And I think

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the next line is do you take drugs? In the

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.959
<v Speaker 1>longer cut, he says, now he just wants to be Bowie,

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 1>should be himself. And Lester says, but if Lou's doing

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Bowie and Bowie's doing Lou, then isn't Lou still doing Lou?

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's that little that extension I could have watched, of course,

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>an entire film that was just those tho, well that's

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just it.

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, and you know I can sense there's a

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 5>repetition too. Have you not watched it? That sense of

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 5>homesickness still absolutely comes through in few gets performance and

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the scenes we do get so, yeah, you don't need

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 5>him actually saying that I want to go home in

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 5>that scene. That's probably a decent cut to make.

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get mail if we don't talk a little

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more about Kate Hudson.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, I like to ask you.

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a great take on her performance here.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>It's one that I do like, but there is a

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>part of me that still feels, on watching it again,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that it's a little forced. It's just a little bit

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>forced that that moment where she maybe for me it's

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like Billy Kredit's performance where I need

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to believe the artistry a little bit more. Her artistry

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is the way she walks into a room and owns it.

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>She is the center of everything. And we get that

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of scene where they go into that room early

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the film at the Hyatt House and she starts

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>speaking in French. And for me, Josh, every time I

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.280
<v Speaker 1>watch that scene, I completely lose her in that moment,

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm never I'm never swept up in the glory

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and the magic of Penny Lane.

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, the filmmaking there doesn't really help her because if

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.919
<v Speaker 5>I recall, the camera kind of shifts away from her

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 5>to it wasn't her about the room when the scene

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 5>is supposed to be just directing all the attemption.

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>John Tole's camera loves her though. Some of those close

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ups and any of the scenes outside with the sun

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and the way it radiates on her, they make her

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>look incredible, just her face and the way they shoot her.

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>There's magic in that.

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're probably closer to Debbie than who actually was

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 5>getting frustrated watching this with me, and she just said

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 5>she's always acting. She's always acting, And I guess I

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 5>can see that but for one thing, it's incredibly the

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 5>role that she's given, I think is a pretty interesting

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 5>choice to make when you're telling a story like this.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 5>I realize it does revolve in the love triangle with

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 5>the two male characters, but she also benefits, like Francis

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 5>McDormand does, as having her own narrative within even that

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 5>larger one that maybe related and tied to them, but

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 5>also you come to really worry about where she's going

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 5>to end up through all of this, and I think

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 5>that's the element that Hudson sells when she finally does

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 5>let that facade fall a little bit and she's no

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 5>longer this bright, shining flower, but more of a trampled

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 5>one that's refusing to admit she's been stepped on until

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 5>everybody sees it. And then you know, towards those scenes,

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 5>and unfortunately they kind of tie in with the one

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 5>in the hotel room where she does overdose that's trying

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 5>to do other things too, But overall, I still think

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 5>she's really strong here and is able to bring that

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 5>sort of that lament and loss, that other flip side

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 5>that the movie really needs.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 7>So I guess what I'm trying to say is I've

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 7>done twice the things I said I've done.

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 5>What about your mom?

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 7>She always said, marry up, marry someone ground, and that's

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 7>why she named me lady.

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 3>She named you lady, Lady Goodman.

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Lady Goodman.

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 7>That's great, and.

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I know all my secrets.

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.439
<v Speaker 1>You got me, believe it or not. There's a lot

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>more we could talk about with this film, including the

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.240
<v Speaker 1>tiny dancer scene on the bus, which maybe fortunately doesn't

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>actually need any words. Josh, don't really explain.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 5>It works because it doesn't use any words, So why

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 5>we waste some on it?

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go. When we come back. Enough of us

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>amateurs rock critics. Stephen Heyden joins us with his take

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>on almost Famous. Stay with us.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 8>This episode is brought to you by dead Man's Wire,

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 8>the new film from Roquet Entertainment. Dead Man's Wire is

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 8>the incredible true story of the nineteen seventy seven kidnapping

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 8>that turned an aspiring entrepreneur into an outlaw folk era.

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 8>Directed by legendary filmmaker Gus Van Santro, dead Man's Wire

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 8>stars Bill Scarsguard Daker, Montgomery, Carry Always and Mahala, with

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 8>Coleman Domingo and al Pacino now playing in select theaters everywhere,

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 8>January sixteenth.

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 6>God, it's gonna get ugly.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:37.359
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 6>They're gonna buy you drinks.

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 7>You're gonna mean girls.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 6>They're gonna try to fly you places for free off

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 6>of you drugs. And I know it sounds great. These

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 6>people are not your friends, you know.

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 9>These are people want you to.

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 6>Write sanctimonious stories about the genius of rock stars, and

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 6>they will ruin rock and roll and strangle everything we

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 6>love about it, you know, because they're trying to buy

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 6>respectability for a form that is glory and righteously dumb.

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 6>And you're smart enough to know that.

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 5>And the dates seases to be dumb as the day.

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Seems to be real, right, And the late great Philip

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Seymour Hoffman as Lester bangs and almost famous. We're using

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that clip to introduce one of the great contemporary rock writers,

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Heyden, is back on film spotting. Thank you so

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>much for doing the show, Stephen.

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. You know, I can't really compare myself to

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 4>the fictional Lester Banks. You know, It's funny because like

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 4>when people talk about Lester Banks now, I feel like

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 4>everyone pictures Philip Seymour Hoffin as Filter Banks like that

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 4>has become the greatest rock critic of all time. Yeah,

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 4>like his portrayal pretty enough Luster Banks. Yeah, because I

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 4>think the actual Lester Banks, you know, he had some

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 4>great attributes to him, but the Philip Seymour Hoffman version

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 4>is a little bit warmer and fuzzier, you know, So

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 4>I know that's the one I always think of when

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 4>I think of Lester Banks.

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm curious first just what your kind of relationship

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to the movie Almost Famous is when it came out.

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>You're just a couple of years younger than Josh and me.

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You would have been just out of school at a

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>college for a few years. I imagine embarking on a

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>writing career, embarking on a writing career about music, when

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something like Almost Famous comes along and it is in

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>your wheelhouse as much as it is. How much were

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you anticipating it? And then did it live up to

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>any expectations you had?

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Well? I was definitely anticipating it because I was a

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Cameron Crowe fan already. I mean, going back to say Anything,

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I loved Say Anything as a kid, and

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:37.439
<v Speaker 4>I you know, and really every step along the way

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 4>I was I mean, I knew Cameron Crowe as the

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 4>screenwriter of Fast Times the Ridgemont High, you know, and

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 4>I was aware of his you know background as a

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Rolling Stone journalist, you know, as I write about in

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 4>my book, I was a big led Zeppelin fan, so

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I knew that he had, you know, interviewed led Zeppelin

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 4>file LEDs up when when he was a teenager. And like,

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 4>what kind of fantasy is that, like if you are

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 4>a teenage fan of led Zeppelin and to see this

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 4>guy that had been able to hang out with the

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 4>with Jimmy Page and Robbert Plant when he was in

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 4>high school. So, you know, like when he when I

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 4>heard that he was going to make a movie about

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 4>basically his own life and talking about the Rolling Stone stuff,

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it was amazing. I was very excited about

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.919
<v Speaker 4>the movie. And then the movie came out and I

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 4>loved I loved the movie so much. I mean, you know,

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people love this movie. But

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 4>if you are a music writer, if you're a rock critic,

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 4>it really is like just a whole other level, I

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 4>think where it's like being an investigative reporter and watching

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 4>all the presidents met or being a fighter pilot and

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 4>watching top gun, you know, or a lawyer and watching

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 4>a few good Men. You know, it's like it is

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 4>the ultimate sort of fantasy of what you would want

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 4>to do. And like you said, I was just starting

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 4>out in my career when this movie came out. Almost

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 4>Famous came out in two thousand and one, so I

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 4>graduated from college in two thousand, so I was already working,

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 4>and I was working for my hometown paper at the time,

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 4>and I think I knew at that point that the

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 4>days where you would go on the road with a

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 4>rock band for like three weeks were like long gone,

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, like I was pretty naive about how,

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, journalism worked. I think still at that point,

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 4>but I knew that that was totally a remnant of

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:46.439
<v Speaker 4>the past. But you know, loving seventies rock and being

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 4>a music writer, I mean, this was just the ultimate

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 4>movie for me, and the ultimate sort of fantasy. And

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of stayed that way ever since. I mean,

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 4>I feel like this movie among music critics sort of

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 4>fashionable to discredit this movie, you know, to say that like, well,

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's just a fantasy.

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 3>Or.

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't hold up as well. But every time I

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 4>watch this movie, it totally connects with me. And I

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.359
<v Speaker 4>think Cameron Crowe, whatever you want to say about some

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 4>of his movies after this, you know, maybe being Hit

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 4>or Miss. I feel like the combination of his music

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 4>knowledge and also you know, that sort of romantic spirit

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.359
<v Speaker 4>that he brings to all of his movies, and also

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:40.439
<v Speaker 4>the humor that he brings it really just it all

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:44.399
<v Speaker 4>connects and comes together really beautifully in that movie. I mean,

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel like if there was any movie that he

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 4>was going to hit out of the park, it was

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.479
<v Speaker 4>that one. Yeah, you know, and for me, it totally

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 4>holds up even now when I revisit it.

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, That's what I was wondering as you look at it,

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, years after you've gotten into your career and

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:03.879
<v Speaker 5>it's significantly grown and you've learned the ropes and seen

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 5>how things work, when you revisit it again and it

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 5>still has that authenticity to you, it still still rings

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 5>true in those same ways.

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think it is pretty authentic. But

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 4>it also I mean it's a totally different era, you know,

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 4>so there's things that I can't really speak to sure.

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 4>The authenticity of it. I mean, to me, I look

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 4>at it more as a fantasy. You know, and not

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 4>saying that it wouldn't be authentic as someone who was

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 4>a journalist in the seventies, but it's more of like

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 4>what I wish I could have been through, you know,

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 4>I wish I could have had the opportunity to be

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:44.320
<v Speaker 4>on the road with one band for like weeks and

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 4>to just immerse myself in the world of a band

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 4>and like all the things that they go through, because

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 4>there's no way you get that kind of opportunity now.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 4>If you can spend a day with a band, that's

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty incredible, And I've had the chance to do that,

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, here and there right, and that's pretty great.

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 4>But like you know where you're going to, like you're

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 4>going like across the country. It's a different venues, and

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 4>you're like you're in dressing rooms and you're watching the

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 4>lead singer and the guitarists argue about the tour shirt.

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:21.959
<v Speaker 4>You know, like you're there's no way a publicist would

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 4>ever let you do that now. But that doesn't detract

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.879
<v Speaker 4>from the movie from me. In a way, it makes

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 4>me value the movie more because I get to I

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 4>can at least live vicariously through William Miller. You know,

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 4>I can I'm not going to be able to hang

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 4>out with still Water, but I can hang out with

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 4>William Miller while he's hanging out with Stillwater and have

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 4>a proxy experience, you know, through this movie.

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to ask you, Stephen about some of

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the things maybe Almost Famous doesn't get right. I did

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have a few issues with the movie, as much as

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Josh and I discussed them. We agreed

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for the most part on some of the scenes that

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.959
<v Speaker 1>just don't quite work or feel an authentic We talked

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>about some of the comedy at times being a little

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>bit too broad crow going for punchlines. But the one

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we disagreed with, and I really do want to hear

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>your take, is the performance of Billy crutt Up and

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really more the depiction of Russell Hammond and the fact

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that they clearly cast someone who doesn't really have any

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>musical ability or who isn't playing the guitar, and he's

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe not quite the artist that everyone else makes him

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>out to be and that William seems to think he is.

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with that take or disagree?

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I disagree with you, so I guess I agree.

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>With you, Joshua.

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 5>That would be me Stevin because.

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the fact that Stillwater is not a

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 4>great band, yes, is one of the great things about

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Almost Famous. Yeah, And I think that was a deliberate

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 4>choice by Cameron Crowe. I feel like I watched a

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 4>DVD extra where he talked about writing the Stillwater songs

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 4>his wife Nancy Wilson from Heart and how one of

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 4>the things that they were trying to do when they

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 4>were writing the songs is to make sure the songs

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 4>weren't too good they succeed aus. The idea was that

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 4>this was an up and coming early seventies band, but

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 4>like not a great seventies band, like one of those again,

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 4>one of those Middle American sort of boogie rock bands

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 4>that would have been big at the time but ultimately forgettable.

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, like when they talk about

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 4>him being a great artist, I think the authenticity in

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 4>that is that when whenever you're in a band situation

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 4>and you're talking to artists, you know, there's always that

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 4>one person in the band that everyone talks about being great,

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, where they talk about this person with a

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 4>certain amount of awe, and it's the reality that gets

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 4>treated in the sphere of a band. You know where

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 4>there has to be one genius, but you step outside

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 4>of that, and that person rarely is a genius. You know.

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 4>They're just a pretty good musician that somehow form this

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 4>band and convinced everyone around him that he was great.

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 4>And I really think that that is what Crow is

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 4>going for. I don't think the point is that Russell

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Hammond actually is this genius. It's that the people around

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 4>him think that he's a genius. I think of that

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 4>movie like had a sequel that was set like in

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:29.959
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty or nineteen eighty one, like Russell Hammond would

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 4>probably be on the downswing of his career, you know,

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 4>And I think, I mean, to me, that's how I feel, like,

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 4>that's how I read the movie anyway. So yeah, I

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 4>don't know. I love the sort of like mediocrity of Stillwater. Yeah,

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 4>in the Bank, I think it's in the movie. I mean,

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that's totally works and that does feel truer

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:55.400
<v Speaker 4>to life in a lot of ways that Crow did

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:55.839
<v Speaker 4>it that way.

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one thing, I need to now watch

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the film kind of with these eyes. It's not just

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>about how the others perceive him, it's potentially how he

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>perceives himself. He says very directly, he thinks that he

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>has more talent than anyone else in the group, but

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's just part of his own fantasy, you know,

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.399
<v Speaker 1>as a character, that's one of the ways that he

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is deluding himself about his abilities.

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I mean, yeah, and I think that's just

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 4>a common thing if you're in a band, I think,

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 4>if you have you know, the if you're a person

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 4>who actually says that I belong on a stage or

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I deserve to be on the quiver of Rolling Stone,

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you have to have a certain level of megalomania,

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:37.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, in order to do that, you know, to

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:41.840
<v Speaker 4>have that kind of level of self belief. But the

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 4>fact of the matter is is that there are very

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.279
<v Speaker 4>few geniuses. You know, Like most people are not geniuses.

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Most people are just pretty good and they put out

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:55.399
<v Speaker 4>pretty good music for a while and then they sort

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 4>of drift away, you know, and that's fine, you know,

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 4>but like when you're in the moment, you know, everyone

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:06.319
<v Speaker 4>is a genius, we're the best, we're gonna be We're

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna be the next led Zeppelin, and you go for

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 4>it and you try your best, and then you inevitably

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 4>fail and and you go away. You know, that's the

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 4>trajectory of almost every single rock band ever.

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm always going to tell you the truth. From the

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.919
<v Speaker 2>very beginning, we said I'm the front man and you're

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the guitarist. With mystique. That's the dynamic we agreed on

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 2>page plant Mick Keith. But somehow it's all turning around.

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 2>We have got to control what's happening. There's a responsibility here.

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me.

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We always love having Stephen on the show. Hope to

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have him back on soon. He's the music critic at

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>up Rocks and we'll link to his work in our

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 1>show notes and you can find that in the podcast

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>description as well. If you'd like to become a film

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Spotting Family member and get access to our complete archive,

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>please do so. You can learn more at filmspotting Family

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:08.000
<v Speaker 7>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Bine film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Family at film Spotting Family dot com and get access

0:58:54.160 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and,

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, all in one place, the entire

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hire film Spotting archive, going back to two thousand and five.

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a film. Spotting Family dot com pro pannibly