WEBVTT - Pounding Chests

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, hi everybody, and welcome to their Nice Stubs Tennis podcast.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We are in the thick of hardcourt season, Caitlin.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>It's been an exciting few weeks, and I mean a

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>few weeks.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I feel like, don't you feel like the US

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>swing has already it's already feels too long in some respects.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's weird.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, I think it's weird because there are so many

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>hard court swings in the tennis season. If you think

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 3>about it, there's one that starts really at the end

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>of December where people go to the Middle East, some

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>of them go all the way down to OZ and

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand. Then we have the Middle East, Australasia part

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>of things. Hong Kong has a tournament. There's a whole

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>bunch of stuff that's happening on hard courts at the

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>end of slash beginning of the year. Then obviously we

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>go to clay, then we go to grass, then we

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>come back and it's just sort of a if you

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>count the Miami Indian Well Sunshine Double, it's a really

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>interesting bookend Asia's hard courts and everything that happens up

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>until basically June or May and June and July are

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>hard courts. So yeah, for me, it is a prevailing

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>theme because I have a feeling we're going to touch

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>on it, which is the season is too long, just

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>full stop. The season is too long, and we are

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>never more aware of it than in recent years as

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 3>the game has become the most physical it possibly can be,

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 3>as climate change has made some of the conditions that

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing right now in Cincinnati, for example, with rainouts

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 3>and just length of time that these tournaments have to

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 3>get extended. We're going to start by talking about Canada,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>which was also affected by a lot of the rain.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's just that the season is too long,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and obviously it's something that we structurally keep coming back

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>to because it isn't changing. It seems to me that

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>if I'm in charge of tennis, which nobody really is,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>but everybody really is, so many people which will never

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>be sadly, which if Tennis knows it's good for it,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>it'll put me in charge. It's an ever present problem,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and I think right now we are seeing all of

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 3>the effects of it, which is it's three quarters the

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>way through this season. Everyone's dead, bloodied, buried, injured or

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>otherwise hobbling, if not mentally vacant. And it's too bad

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 3>because we have amazing tournaments, amazing players, and amazing stuff

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 3>still left on the calendar, not least which is the

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>fourth and final Grand Slam of the year. So yeah,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>it's the season's too long. The hard court season is

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 3>too long. Everything's too long. And what suffers is the product,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>which is on behalf of the players the best it's

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 3>ever been.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say the product suffers, but more importantly,

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the players are suffering. And so one of the things

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to touch on because we hadn't obviously

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because the whole tournament schedule is so out of whack

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with these ten days, nine day events, is that I

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was thinking to myself when egershyon Tech and Ribarkina played

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the final, I was thinking, hold on a second,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you guys had ten days right to finish this event,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet, and yet a player plays a semi final

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and finishes at one o'clock in the morning and then

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>has to come back the next day and play at

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>six pm. I do not understand how a sport can

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>make one person suffer a lot more than the other.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's supposed to be equal. That is not fair.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That is not fair, whether it was Rebarkina or whether

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it was Eagerson Tech that won that second semifinal. Why

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are you starting at seven pm plus when you have

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>all fucking day.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>To play a tennis match?

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to play, you know, in the evening

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because people can come after work or it's an little

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>bit nicer of experience and all that sort of. Yeah, okay,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but is Canada going to sell out in the day?

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Hell ya, Canada will sell out in the day. And

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're supposed to be playing on Saturday or Sunday

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for a semi and a final, which is traditionally what

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we do in tennis, why the fuck are we playing

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>matches now?

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Granted it was pushed back an hour ish because of.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Rain, but you have to also remember, when you're doing

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>a schedule in summer in the United States or in Canada,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you are going to get afternoon rain more than likely,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or you're going to get a whole entire day of rain,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which we did in Washington. We had to finish on Monday,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so it's like you've got ten days to finish an event,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 1>but yet you crammed in two matches in this less

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>than twenty four hours and somebody suffered. Now, Igerschiontek played

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>incredible tennis, and I don't want to take anything away

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>from her.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 2>It's so great to see her back at her best.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>It is so great to see how she played against

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Rebuking in that final. But was Rebukkina at her very

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>best in that final? I would argue, no, now why

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was shouldn't you? Oh, I don't know. She went to

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>bed at like I would guarantee you Caitlin finishing a

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>match at one pm, which is when she finished, she

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>shook hands at approximately one am. She did not go

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to bed, like I'm talking, sleep until three thirty four

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the morning. And you expect that girl to

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>get up when when is she what's the circadian rhythm

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of her sleep?

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, what's the rhythm of her practice? How does she feel?

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And I mean okay, Eger probably finished and went to

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>bed around midnight, maybe, which is still not ideal for

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a tennis player to wake up and play a match

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the next day at six pm. But I'll take that

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>over four in the morning going to sleep. I guarantee

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you that's when she fell asleep. If even then, that

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is just okay.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Brought up the circadian rhythms like a real science nerd.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I love it, and you're absolutely right, it's not okay.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 3>And it's also so clearly problematic and unevenly distributed.

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>It's punishing people when it should be rewarding them. And

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things about these two week

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Masters one thousands that the ATP, who seemed to have

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 3>spear petted the creation or the extension of these tournaments,

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 3>were so clear in articulating when it was announced is

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 3>that it was going to give players more rest and

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 3>they would be they would be less taxed on their

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 3>body because during the tournament they would have more time

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>off between matches and a less brutal schedule. And once

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 3>again that has been proven false.

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and for those listeners out there, yes, that was

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>meet laughing out loud at the fact that that's how

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they think of this. I mean, I start to wonder

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and think that people that put the events on, people

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that run the tournaments, people that run the WTAAP have

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>no idea what it takes.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 2>To be a professional tennis player at their best, which.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Is ironic because I feel like, at least on the

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 3>ATP side. There are a number of former players who

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>make up the leadership of these governing bodies, and so

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>you'd think that they would relate to the player's anguish

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that they are being put through. But maybe I'm wrong.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Maybe that's not true. At the WTA,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Do they sit with the tournaments and think, Okay, guys,

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this is how we're going to do it. We're gonna

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have this long arduous, laid out tournament. We're gonna have

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>players have days off, and then when it gets to

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the semi finals and finals day, we don't give a

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>fuck about resting the players or giving or having them

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be at their best. You know, when I saw this

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>happen and then the rain pushed it back, I was like, Okay,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's bad, But.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have been bad anyway. She would have finished

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>at midnight. Is that any better?

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And then she would have gone to sleep at like

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>two o'clock in the morning, you know, or two thirty

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the morning.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Is that ideal?

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>So what's the solution here?

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Start the fucking match in the day.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Start the match in the day, let them finish at

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>six pm and have an entire nice evening of dinner.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>This is what I'm talking about, the circadian rhythm of

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like somebody, right, I bet Ribackina when she woke up

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>or whenever she woke up, felt sick. And for those

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of you listening out there, I'm sure plenty of you

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have gone and traveled and and had jet lag. I

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bet you she felt like she had jet lag when

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>she walked on that court, yes, you know, And she

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>walked on the court in the daytime, so the sun

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is out just probably like her brain is.

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Probably like, oh my god.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind, guys, she's not just walking on

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the court to play a final at six pm or

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever it was. She's practicing at probably three point thirty

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or four. So think about going to bed at four

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, like falling asleep at four in the morning,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>getting up at whatever ten or eleven am, which is

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>not normal, and then going and trying like drag yourself

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to go on practice and then get yourself up for

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the match. And if you watch the match, there were

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so many like quite easy balls that she missed, and

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>she struggled through the week, but she found a way

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>every single match. She found away. Rebeckin Ha found a

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>way through every single match against Coco. She lost a

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of first sets. She won in three sets. There

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is no way playing Eager Schirantech at her best, which

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>she was, she had a chance and the score line

0:08:58.640 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>proves it.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>If she had lost six the third I would have

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>been like, man, kudos and what a great match. But

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the score line and you look

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at the amount of times Rabakina has beaten Egistian Tech,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly on hardcore, you just go, huh, what was off?

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And again, I do not want to take away from

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Ega because she played fabulous tennis, but you have to think,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how can that or not affect her.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's back up. The last time we spoke, Coco Goff

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 3>was still in the draw, Benchech was still in the dra,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Osaka was still in the draw, Spindelina was still in

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the dra. And what we had between the time we

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>last spoke and this finals that you were returning to

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>were a lot of very good matches and in fact

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 3>very good. The player field in my view in Toronto

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>got the two best players of the tournament. Rbakna came

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 3>into that having beaten, as you noted, Coco Goff over

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>a masterful three set performance. The round before, she had

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 3>beaten a very inform, dangerous Naomi Osaka, another master performance,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>and Egostiantec played to me what was probably the match

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of the tournament in the semifinals to beat Alnas Fidelina

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 3>with a absolute conviction in a third set after kind

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of getting blanked in the second. Obviously she got a game,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 3>but she was the recipient of a breadstick in the

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 3>second set. Elenas Fidelina played phenomenal tennis and Niga did

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 3>incredible depth digging to find a way to win that match.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>So to me, I was really looking forward to this

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>final because I felt looking at the matches that had

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>led up to it, how resilient both Rebacchina and schfian

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Tech had been in getting to the final, how great

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the matchups were, and how really women's tennis really proved

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>itself again as just being an embarrassment of riches. There

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 3>were so many good players left in this draw. There

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>were so many good matches leading into the final, and frankly,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we really deserved a good final. Egos Fiantec

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 3>deserved to win the turn. As you're saying, no doubt

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 3>she played phenomenal. She is back. I'm very excited about it.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>She's playing the kind of tennis that we saw from her. Honestly,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>it's been a couple of years that we've seen her

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>play this confidently in this decisively that said, we deserved

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 3>a better final and rebarkiing it deserved a better schedule,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 3>so she could have put up a better fight even

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>if you go would have won anyway. To me, that

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 3>was the story of Toronto, which is the tournament itself

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 3>was great, the last match was not.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, have the semifinals in the daytime and

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>allow the both players to have enough rest time to

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>play at night.

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>In the of you play at night, then you have

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>the Marqui match.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You know certain hours of the evening that it's best

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, TV, whatever it is, spectators players, But play

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the semi finals in the daytime and allow them to

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>get the rest they need to play their best and

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>most important match of the week and they deserve that.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And to finish a match at one am in the morning,

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and don't tell me about the rain. They would have

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>finished at midnight and she would not have gone again

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to bed until at sleep at least two thirty in

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the morning.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>So I just it just.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Bothers me to the nth degree that we are still

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>continually fucking the players over with schedule. It's not okay,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and I will ten I'm ten ties down on this.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't blame you. Let's briefly talk about the men's

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 3>because even though we got a better quality final, and

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I was there for the Semis and I saw some

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>great tennis. Shout out Brandon Nakashima for really really making

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 3>a statement with his win in the Semis over Raphael Hodar,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>who I think a lot of people myself included thought

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>would certainly get to the finals, if not win the tournament.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, honestly, it was great to be in Montreal.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I talked about how excited I was about that project.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>The tournament is great. I really love going to these

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Masters one thousands tournaments because I think they're awesome, especially

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>now in a world where the Slams have just become

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>insanely expensive, insanely overcrowded, and all the best players are

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>at all of the other tournaments. So maybe spread the

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>love a little bit. But it was strange because during

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the there was nothing going on, and then they saved

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the matches for the evening session and I just think

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 3>in a city like Toronto or a city like Montreal,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 3>where you have tons and tons of people, even if

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>it's on a weekday, because the ATP and WTA Masters

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>one thousands extended schedule means that it's not a weekend final,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 3>which is stupid. On a weekday you get a ton

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 3>of people on the grounds just watching tennis. Why wait

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>to the evening. It was very strange to me to

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>not show up to site until four or five pm

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 3>to watch doubles and then have the two night sessions

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 3>be the men's semis. I didn't see the need for it.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>It should have been during the day. You sell more merch,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>you get more people excited about it. And I don't

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>think attendant suffers, not in a semi, not in a

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 3>later stage of a tournament. I happy to talk about

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the tennis, but I think to continue your point about

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the scheduling, it's baffling to me and I don't understand why.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, that's why sammis and finals and tournaments

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>have always finished on the weekend, because you play them

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in the day because people aren't at work. Right, So

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case and it's a weekend, you play

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>them in the day and then you can play the

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>final maybe at night. But also keep in mind that

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>people have to get to another tournament right away after

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that as well, so you're not considering them in certain

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>circumstances with that as well. But you know, you're making

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>my point again for me, Now, the guys started on

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>time at six pm, I think that's when they started

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>their match, and then the next day the final was

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at five thirty pm, right, So now they got lucky

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the Nakashima Joda match was fantastic, you know,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>thankfully Ben Shelton won in straight sets and won quite

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>comfortably against Learna TM and so he had enough time

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to recover for the match the next day at five

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>point thirty because he finished it.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't I.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't remember, maybe ten pm, but still that's still not

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>okay for me. But ten pm difference to one am,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And it was only because if those two matches had

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>gone very very long, like both the women's semi finals

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>did in Canada, then you're going up against the same problem.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>They would have finished at one o'clock in the morning

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to you have a little bit of rain, which is

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>very very possible in Canada. At that time of the year,

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the guys would have faced the same problem. So it's like,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who's running the sport at this time,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but somebody has to have some kind of semblance of

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sensibility that the players are suffering. And also Kitlyn, you know,

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this is when injuries do happen, right, So you think

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about Rebukina going out there not feeling great, and or

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Shelton, who you know, I mean ran into the

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>back wall. I mean, first of all, why is there

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a mat on the back of the court. That's a

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>whole different story that I tweeted about when I was

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>watching the match. I mean, he was so unbelievably close

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to having a catastrophic injury there. He could have twisted

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>his ankle horribly. He could have banged his head on

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that LED screen, which people that don't know, those LED

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>screens are really really rough, So when you put your

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hand on them, they're like little baby lights essentially, and

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so when you actually touch it, which is why his

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>arm was all scratched up and his hand was all

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>beat up, it's like, Okay, you're not going to necessarily

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>change that because LED screens are beautiful on a tennis court,

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and I get it, but why do you have a

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mat at the back of the court. And I did

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>put that question out on Twitter and one of my

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>producers that I worked with for many, many years, Bobby

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby text and he said, well, maybe it's to hide

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the cables and and I said, well, is there any

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>way to do that without a piece of mat And

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>he goes, yeah, you just tape it down underneath the

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>led screens. So even little things like that, Caitlyn, Like,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if I saw that as a tournament director, I'd be like,

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>why do we have carpet here? This is dangerous for

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the place if they happen to come back. And these

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guys are all and the women they're so good defensively,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they will run a ball down. Why are you putting

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>anything on there that they can trip over?

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we saw it at the French Open.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw people get very, very hurt with those boxes

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they used to have.

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Around the lines.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>People and it's just like, whoever's running this sport, I

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just wonder, have you ever fucking played tennis that?

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he could have really hurt himself.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And guess what he couldn't have played the next day

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the finals is that what you want, you want

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to hurt player. So ah, there's so many I was

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>so annoyed with certain things last week, with what happened.

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know it is our job, Caitlin, you and

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>me to make sure that they get it right, because

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we are the commissioners that no one's paying.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, I was gonna say, is it a job to

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 3>make sure they get it right? Is there a job

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 3>to complain about it? But I'd love for it to

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 3>be a job to get it rape because clearly the

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>people who are in Churche aren't doing a good job anyway.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But Ben played amazing. I mean, I don't know what

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>it is in the North.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Is this a Canada thing? Like he's just ready to

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>roll in Canada?

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It definitely is. And I've said this many times on

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the pod.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Players feel really comfortable at certain places, which why everyone's panicking,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and rightly so panicking with Saberlenca. She is not playing

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>well right now, she has lost her confidence. But you

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>know she might slide into the US Open and go

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>or Cincinnati, where she's had great success and be like, oh,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. And it is this game is so mental.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It is so mental, and yes, it is how you're

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hitting the ball and all that sort of stuff. But

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if you can have a calmness about you, and we

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>saw that with Eager last week. Her calmness on the

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>court was so much more obvious. And is it because

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>she's winning, of course, but you know, when she's under

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the pressure like she was against Fitzelina in the semis,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and even there was periods in the final where it

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten a little tricky, she just stayed really calm.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm loving the fact that she's finally hitting her

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>heavy forehand again, like with the height and particularly the

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>forehand up the line with like you know, she like

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>went away from that and I don't know, and it

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>must feel really good for her to have had the

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>guts to like get you know, to leave winfa set

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and get be done with that experiment and move on

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to somebody else in a new voice. And she has

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly excelled quickly since since sort of breaking that partnership up.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 2>And so it's a lesson for a lot of players

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 2>out there. Just because someone has.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>A big name in quote unquote coaching, it's not necessarily

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the person for you, And you have to always be

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>willing to pull the ripcord when it doesn't feel right,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what she did.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I share your I share your enthusiasm for that.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like she's dictating points with that really

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>aggressive stance and looking to move forward and not playing.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>She looked, you know, I think for stretches at a time,

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 3>kind of lost out there. She looked strategically confused. And

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of that isn't fitness or skill, certainly,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's coaching probably, And I think a lot

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>of it is belief. She has belief again, And what

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>a difference does it make because it is really fun

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to watch her. Now, I do have a question for you,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's a little bit controversial, but I feel like

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 3>we can handle it because we're both grown people now.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>In her victory speech, she called out the.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Hater I was getting there. I was getting there.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>In a victory speech, she called out the haters. And

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I want to be specific in what she said, because

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>there was some speculation on the internet that she was

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 3>talking about us. I would not kind of characterize us

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 3>as now or wasn't what. I would characterize us as

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 3>people who are willing to call it as we see it,

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>which is you know, sometimes these players, as much as

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>we like them, need new solutions, they need new teams.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 3>They need to look at themselves. If they behave badly,

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>we're going to say it. I think my understanding of

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 3>how media should call it out is that we're doing

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 3>everybody as service. We're not paid to do this. We

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 3>are calling it like you'd want it to be called,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 3>in service of a better sport, and in some cases

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>that means the players need to get it together. But

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 3>I do think I want to read you the quotes

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 3>because there's a lot of conversation about who she was

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 3>talking about. Igoshiantek wins the match, she wins the tournament,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and this is an excerpt of what she says. I

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 3>mean so much to me. These past few months were

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 3>not easy. Despite all the opinions meant many people have

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>about me every day on the internet. It's not easy

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>to deal with that. I'm happy. The reality is different.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>The reality is I have people who support me. I

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>want to dedicate this title to anyone who's dealing with

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>unfair judgment and hate. Always remember, just keep pushing and

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 3>keep growing, keep focusing on yourself. I always remember what's

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.239
<v Speaker 3>ahead and what might be possible. So those were her

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>words upon lifting the trophy. Are we the haters?

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it you?

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>No, she's not talking about us. I think that I

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think there was some a lot of chatter in Poland.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you know, can imagine when you know

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>us or you know Andy Roddick or anybody is talking

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>about you know, the players. We're going to give an

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>honest evaluation of what we see. And I would suspect

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that you and I over the months, you know, I

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have I have said many times that I think that

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>she looks lost out there, and that to me felt

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of stuff that was not being done

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the practice court. And I will go to my

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>grave saying that you don't play a match, you don't

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>practice a certain way and then rip onto the tennis

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>court and play differently.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>You play how you're practicing, if you're doing.

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The right practice drills, if you're reiterating the right things

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to a player, if you're getting them to understand the

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>nuances of how to play a point, that's what you

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>do on the practice court. And then when they go

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on the match court, it's all the stuff that they've

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>been doing in practice. Nothing comes onto a match court.

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>We're like, oh, I'm going to try this now. No,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you do what you've been practicing over and over for

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>hours and hours on the practice court.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>So I felt like there was a lot.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Of things that she was doing on the on the

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on the match court that was clearly being shown up

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>because of what she wasn't doing on the on the

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>practice court. So you know, I'm going to and tennis

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>experts quote unquote again I'm doing that are evaluating what

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing and so. And also the you know, the

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>stress on her face and on her in her body

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is knowing Eager pretty well.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Is she needs.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>She's kind of like a person that needs everything in place, right.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And Sam stowso was very similar to that. Who I

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>worked with her knew really well like if you practice

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a certain way on the practice court and you do

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>drills certain way, she's going to be able to implement

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that on a match court and she's going to be

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>real calm about it. And I just felt like she

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was so lost on the match courts that I was like,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>what is she doing on the practice court because it's

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously affecting her in matches and then she spirals. She's

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a spiraler, right, she's like everything's going a million miles

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>an hour, which sometimes Sam would get that way as well.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And then there's some players like, for example, I think

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Serena is a really good person for me to talk

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about in this regard is that Serena does very specific

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>practice drills as well, very specific target oriented going for

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the cans. You know, she does every single practice session,

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>she'll do minimum of five minutes to start the practice

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>where she doesn't hit one ball in the net.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>That is her goal.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, Lindsay Davenport used to hit every single practice she

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hit one foot from the baseline. Every single

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 1>time she had a ball, she wanted to hit one

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>foot from the baseline. That was her goal in practice. Now,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>when Serena goes and plays a match, or when Lindsay

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Davenport went and played a match, or you know, whatever,

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>whoever you wanted to talk about. Everything they've done in

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the practice court, they can implement on the match court

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and be calm about it because they know they've almost

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>they've not mastered it, but they've kind of mastered it

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>on the practice court, so their anxiety level is lowered

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're doing it so well in the practice court.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Now you will hear players say I was practicing so

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>well and I just didn't implement it on the court,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's nerves and that's circumstances, and maybe you played

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody that just simply played better than you. But I

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>would say that Eager is implementing the right stuff on

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the practice court, where she's able to go on the

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>match court and feel a lot calmer about her abilities

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>because her abilities are what I saw last week, haven't

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>changed from three years ago. They're just calmer and better

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's clear in her head what she needs to do,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I s and that makes me really happy,

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because nobody likes to see anyone out they stressed, and

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what she looked.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Like, No, for sure, and I do feel like, you know,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I've made enemies out of everyone in Poland for saying

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that she's not my favorite player. That has nothing to

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>do with the fact that I'm not happy to see

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>her winning, happy to see her playing confidently, happy to

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>see her executing a game plan. You know, there are

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 3>inexplicably some players whose games speak to you more than others,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't ever mean that I'm rooting against somebody

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>getting it together playing confident, calm, composed tennis. And I'm

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 3>really impressed with the way that she's been resilient. I

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 3>think in the last stretch of the year, I would

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>say the same thing about you know, Nami Osaka, somebody

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 3>else whose game I don't doesn't speak to me personally,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 3>but it's exciting to see when players crack codes, figure

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>something out, work their way out of a rut. And

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I think women's tennis and tennis in general is better

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 3>when you have more viable, confident, happy, stylistically different players

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 3>bringing their best. And I think when I get angry

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>or when I get disappointed, it's because I feel like

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>somebody has maybe lost the plot or not given their

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 3>full effort. That was never the case with Ego. You

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>see how much she cares about it, and now I'm

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 3>really happy that it's filing into place for her.

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I certainly know that she certainly cares about it,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's for sure. But you know, back to Rebakina,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>who has been a little bit of a question mark

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. Hasn't had the year that she and we,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>frankly all expected, particularly after she won the U Strain opener,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and she ended the year last year really well,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and she's you know back winning a major title and

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic win at the Train Open, a great match,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's been a little bit since then. Really it

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great for her standards. You know, she's made

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>finals and all that sort of stuff. But I sort

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of said this when she turned that match around down

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a set and three love earlier in the tournament, I

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>was like, maybe this is a massive turnaround time for her,

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>This is this could be career changing this year, and

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it all was. And that's what really triggers me and

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>pisses me off about the fact that she wasn't given

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to be at her best after the effort

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that she put in all tournament long, and the matches

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 1>that she came back in, and then you made her

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>go out and play a final where she's on limited sleep.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And if anyone knows, if you're lacking five three percent

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>against someone playing so well against eger, if you're lacking

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that three or five percent physically mentally, that's enough, that's enough.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>To lose the match.

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I said the scoreline as an indicator

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of how I feel like she was physically and mentally

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit impaired in the final because of her

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lack of rest and sleep. And again, I don't want

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>to take it away from me because she was the

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>best player I feel that week. But it'll be nice

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to finally see them maybe have an opportunity to be

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they're mentally and physically best if they were to reach

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the final here. And you'll play each other in the

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati because there are two form players right now and

0:27:58.600 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really great to see.

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>We take a quick break and then tuck Cincinnati.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we will, all right, we'll be back after this. Okay,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So Caitlin, you know we are in Cincinnati now. Well,

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, can I just like as a little

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>bit of fun before we get to the depth of

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this tournament.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I got into a little bit of a little.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Back and forth on the old socials about Schapovolov and

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you got a little He got a.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Little annoyed getting into it with the.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>He got a little annoyed at I can't think of

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the French players right now. I've lost my train of thought.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But he Lefty Bold, come on, give.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 3>It to me, Give it to me, Adrian Manrena, Goh.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You're good, Caitlin. We we should do charades together. Good job,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So man Aarino. Okay, So Shapavolo hits the ball, it

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hits the net. It kind of sitting up a little bit.

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But Sharpo's mid court at the net ish and like,

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you've done this a million times where you're running up

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>players at the net. Now you're having to decide in

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>your head in the space of zero point eight of

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a second, where you're going to hit the passing shot.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to go line, You're gonna go across,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to go right at him? Where are they

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going to move? Which side are they going to move to?

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And Shapavolo is a great volleyer, so and he's he's lanky,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and he can.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Get He's done it.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>He's a shot guy. He's a pleamaker guy.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He's awesome let the net like he can make I've

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>seen him die for volleys in matches. So this isn't

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>an athletic very good volier and tall and so I'm like,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>where's he going to hit this? Look like he might

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>shade to the line. And also people at home have

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand when the players is sitter. I know this

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>because this was one of my specialties is that I

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>would move to a spot and give someone the open spot,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and then I would move to the open spot and

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>pick the volley off right. And so you know that

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as a player, which way is he going to go?

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So Mannorino decided to go straight at him, which to

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>me was actually the right shot, right, because if you

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>try and go cross court and he tips the racket

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on it, he's gonna hit a winner down the line.

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>If you go down the line, he's gonna hit his

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>back end bolly pasted you, and you're done. So we

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>went right at him and he hit him and oh no,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't even.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Know if he hit him.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Shapavolove was so pissed he starts yabbering away at Mannorino

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like you had the whole court, like blah blah blah,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, brohre you serious? And Max Purcell wrote

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in the same little thing on I think it was

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. He's like, bro is a tennis ball, like

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>get over yourself kind of thing, right, And people like

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he had the whole court and they're going at me like,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, it was the right shot.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>It was the correct shot. I just don't understand.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I just get so annoyed by people that have never

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>really played, and even some guy in Australia like wrote me,

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I've coached tennis for thirty years and it

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>was not appropriate. I was like, oh my god, maybe

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why you weren't on the pro tour because that

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was the right shot that he hit. Shapovalov next game

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>has a fourhand running passing shot. Menorin is kind of

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a dead duck at the net. Absolutely

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>rips it at him.

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>That's fair in tennis. That's the play.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>If you don't think you can get around them or

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>over their head, you go right at him.

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these people have obviously never played college tennis

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 3>because college tennis pegging somebody's extra points.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't talk to Von Landel about this. That was like

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a sport for him.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I am reminded of Ben Shelton playing doubles. Where was

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 3>it in Montic drib Y He he hit a player

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 3>with a tennis ball and the guy falls over like

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 3>he's been shot point blank and he's like, bro, bro,

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>you guys are so soft. It's a tennis ball. And

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I was like, yeah, this is really actually endearing me

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to Ben Shelton I'm not saying you try to go

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 3>for their heads, but if it hits their body part,

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 3>or if you can't, as you say, strategically make a

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 3>cross court down the line or lob going right at

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 3>them is a great play. You know, tell me you've

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>never played competitive tennis. Without telling me you never played

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>competitive tennis. Although Renee, I thought we did have a

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 3>new resolution for you to not get into it with

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>people on social.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, I mean, listen, I go back at people.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe five percent now it used to be fifty. I

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>guess are improved.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I've grown up. I've grown up.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 3>This is what growth looks like. Ladies and gentlemen, Let's

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>talk more about Cincinnati. It's all popping off you. You

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 3>mistakenly said that we were here in Cincinnati. I think

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 3>you meant here in this portion of the year, in

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 3>this portion of the calendar, because neither of us in

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>fact or in Cincinnati, where it appears to be one

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty percent due point and raining all the time,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>which is a real bummer. But obviously all the best

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 3>tennis players in the world are there and they are

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 3>duking it out. Our favorite sisters are going to be

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 3>playing doubles this evening.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Today, today and Serena.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>We've got Alex Yala versus Amanda Anissimova. We got Arthur Ferry.

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 3>He won his first match since his amazing magical semifinal

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>run at Wimbledon, takes on Alex de Minar. It's you know,

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Ben Shelton's already out till their Fritz loss is cool,

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 3>but won his match. Felix O jel Asiem took a

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>teasy passe. It's all happening. I don't know where you

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>want to start, but there's just a bevy of great matches,

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a bevy of great players, and I I don't know.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 3>For me, I'd like to see Amanda Nisimova turn the corner.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Here looks she looks happy. Kind of pursue it to

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 3>our conversation about players, even if you don't love the

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 3>way they play, you just want them to do well.

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I love him in a Nissimova's backhand. I love her pep.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I love the fact that she's, you know, got the

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 3>goods when it matters in deep ends of tournaments. And

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to see her kind of get through whatever

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 3>mental funk with her new well returned coaching team. Alexei

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Ala fantastic story. That's gonna be popcorn. But for me,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to see a Nissimova go deep in this

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 3>tournament to give her a little bit of a boost

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 3>going into the OS Open.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and she needs it because you know, clearly so

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody has a lot of points to defend. Not that

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that matters because she's such a good player. She's going

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to be in the top twenty at least for her

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>entire career. She's too good a player not to be

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. But yeah, look, certainly it will

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be a test for her against Iyala, and it's because

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>guess what as I talked about and I have talked

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>about for the last week or so, is that you

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be mentally prepared to deal with the crowd

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be not only alexi Alla's ability

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and talent to take the ball on and redirect the

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ball really well as much like Angie Kobe used to do.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Amanda has to be patient, but she has to be

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in control of the aggressiveness of this match, because if

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>she allows Alexiala to move around the court, she will lose.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 2>The second thing is I have talked about the.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Serf, and you know, got into a little bit of

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>trouble a couple of weeks ago when I said that

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think she could ever win a major title

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Alexialo because of the serf, and I still stand by

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that to a certain degree. But these players have to

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out the leftiness of her. And

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about you got to go with the spin.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You have to get the correct shot. You have to

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get depth on the return. That's what's important because if

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't, alexiy Ala will make you move on the

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>second as we say, serve plus one, and that's what

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>she's going to do to Amanda if Amanda doesn't get

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball deep and sort of getting Eyala on the

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>run straight away off the very slow second serve.

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is really.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Leftie is the lefty. She tends to go body or

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>tea a lot. I've noticed on that second serve it's

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 3>only like seventy miles an hour at most, Like it's

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty most, it's pretty slow. It looks like some of

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the stuff I'm looking at in the good old recreational

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 3>courts here in New York City. But it's effective because

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 3>a it's off pace, it's kind of a knuckleball comes

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 3>into the body where if you're tall and lanky like

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 3>in Anissimova or a lot of these girls, it's not

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in their strang zone. They got to really move around

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 3>it and get away from it so that they can

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 3>have a clean look at it. And I actually think

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of a key to understanding Yella's game, which

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 3>is she's smart, she works with spins, and she's got

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 3>a you know, a lefty look that's not typical. She's

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 3>not coming out and blasting you off the court. She's

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>coming and slicing and dicing you in a way that's

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, movement heavy, and once the crowd gets into it,

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 3>as you say, it can be a really effective combination.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 3>So for me, it'll be a really interesting contrast in styles.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Can Anisio Moba keep it together? Can Yalla find success

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of slicing into the body of anisim mobile, she

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 3>will get jammed. I'm sure she's going to try to

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 3>do that a ton Can a Nusumbo adjust like it's

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a picture catch, you know, pitcher

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 3>batter dual To me where it's so different in style,

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 3>like who's going to be able to impose their will

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 3>onto this match. And there's you know, obviously a lot

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 3>of really interesting matchups. This one stood out to me

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 3>because I like both these kids and I want them

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to do well, and you know, I'm curious how how

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 3>the matchup will go.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you sort of have a little bit

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of like anxiety going and playing a player that has

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>such a slow second serve, especially when it's a lefty,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and you sort of have to work out how you

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>want to approach it and you and you have to

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have fantastic footwork and that's going to be key today

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>for Amanda against Yala, but it will be certainly a

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>popcorn match also, Pagoula Navarro. I mean, nice to see

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Lindon Naskova when you know her match, when she's obviously

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to play Clara Towson, who's had a bit

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of a struggle over the last twelve months, but two

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>very big hitters of the ball, Ken Ribarkina continue to

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>play well, IGAs Ciontek looking great, and you know, there's

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of question marks on sable Anka still, but I.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Still should we start and talk about that for a second,

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 3>just because I think a lot of folks are kind

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of questioning what the sable Anka situation is right now.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 3>We can we talked about it. We hit a bun

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 3>it a little bit last week, so I don't you know,

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to die on this hill if you

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 3>don't want to get into it more. But it does.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 3>It has the questions have remained. Let's put it that way.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the thing.

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Look, she had a tough second set yesterday against Talia Gibson.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Tali is a very good hitter of the ball, can

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>play very good tennis. She's had some you know, big

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wins in her young career, already in place very well

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on hard court, so it would have been interesting to

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>see if she had been able to win that second

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>set in the tiebreak. But Sabolanka kind of got the

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>best in that situation, which maybe gives her a lot

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of confidence.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Because one of the things that we talked about through the.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Last feels like two years is that every time Sabolanka

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>got into a tie breaker was like good night.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 2>She was winning every tie break. That is not the

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 2>case this year.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>She's losing those types of moments, tiebreaks, third sets, all

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the matches that she was winning last year or certainly

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year in Indian Walls in Miami.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 2>She's not winning this year, So I.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't know, it might be a little it might be

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>something small, but I do look at those little things, like, Okay,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so she won that second set tiebreak, didn't get into

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the third set. But you know, she's got a handsful

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to win this tournament because there are

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>some players that are playing really good, like a she

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on Tech, like a Rebeccina, and players that can beat Saberlenka,

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, she's thankful that there are a couple

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of people that are not in the draw that can

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>beat her. But look, if Sabolenka would have come through

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and win Cincinnati, then she's still my favorite at the

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>US Open, just because again, she loves playing in New

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>York and the crowds love her in New York.

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>So her temperament is a perfect fit for New York.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 3>She likes the night session, she likes the sizzle, she

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 3>likes the fashion components. She's very, you know, obviously comfortable

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 3>with media and crowds and attention, and I think that

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 3>speaks very well. To do well in New York, you

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 3>have to lean into those sort of things. And I'm

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>mainly just excited because I feel like we have so

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 3>many good players, and I do want to say just

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 3>because time is getting a little short and I want

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to make sure we get this in. You know, we've

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 3>been really big upping the women's tour, I mean really

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 3>truly for the better part of a decade, and we've

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 3>been doing this this show. I do want to talk

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about how the men have really impressed

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 3>me in the last two weeks. I've been really impressed

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 3>with your not only your Ben Shelton's, but your brandon

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Na Kashima. His sort of belief not to not to

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 3>lean too heavily on you know, a cliche and we

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 3>talked about it with the ego, but he's got given

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of credit size, but he's got belief. And

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 3>do you think it's Wayne Ferira?

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, I think I give so

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>much credit to Wayne Ferrera. We saw what Wayne Ferrera

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>did for Francis Tiafo. He gave Francis Tiafo the belief

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I would argue and say that Francis was,

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, semi finals of the US Open, was really

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on the cusp there, and I think Wayne really did

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a great job with him. And if anybody knows Wayne,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I know Wayne very well. I grew up playing with him.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>He's I think the same age as me, like hard work,

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>are very basic, sort of lovely guy who just does

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the work, and he knows tennis inside it and was

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.240
<v Speaker 1>an awesome player in his own right, and he understands

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the forward movement and how to play a point really well.

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's given that structure to Brandon, who's

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>always I've loved Brandon Nakashima for years. I've talked about

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>him years and years ago on the pot about he's

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the best backhands in the game without question.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 2>He's win against Hodah was amazing.

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>The last game to get into the final, which was

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest when really technically of his career to get

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to a final of a Master's one thousand.

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 2>The game went for ten minutes serving.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Out the mount and he kept his composure and he's

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>calm against a young, very good player who's absolutely going

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to win a major title in the next.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I would say three years undoubtedly in Hoda.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>But it's just really great to see Nakashima sort of

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>get the wins there, but again I think he just

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>fell short in the final with the Ben played awesome, but.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Ben played awesome. I I want to shout out Yakub Menchik,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 3>who we just released a very fun digital cover package

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 3>on He photographs very well. That's all I'll say. Go

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 3>to our Instagram or our website. You got a nice

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 3>future story. It's in the next print issue of the

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 3>magazine that we're launching next week. You know, made a

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 3>semi made a very very strong showing in Montreal and

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 3>won a very impressive match in his first round in Cincinnati.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, we have called out the second sort of tier,

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 3>the second band of players, for not stepping up. And

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Ben Shelton defending a Master's one thousand title back to

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 3>back years is impressive. Getting confident Nakashima, getting some of

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 3>these guys who made it deep in the tournament. Arthur

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 3>feasts back and looking healthy. Like I said, Menshik is

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 3>exciting and backing up his Miami win last year with

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 3>a pretty strong season this year. They're not feeding away,

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 3>they're not going away, They're getting better. Hodar is the

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 3>best example of all of them. This time last year

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 3>he was ranked what five hundred in the world. Now

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 3>he's solidly in the top echelon. So I think for me,

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 3>we discussed the elephants in the rooms last episode, it

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 3>does not seem more likely that Carlos A. Karez is

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be playing the US Open. We have no information.

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm just speculating. It doesn't seem terribly confidence inspiring. And

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't have any inside information about whether Yannick Center

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 3>is playing. But what I now have confidence about and

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 3>what I now have information about, and it's not insider

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 3>information because anybody watching tennis could have surmised us, is

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that maybe this band of players, this tier is ready

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 3>to step up and make some noise and pound their

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 3>chests a little bit. And that makes me very exciting,

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 3>excited because I love a tennis environment where lots of

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 3>different people are contending, lots of different outcomes. I like chaos,

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I like carnage, I like variety. I don't like certainty,

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and so to me, the certainty of one of those

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>two guys winning every tournament was starting to get pretty old.

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 3>Wish they were playing, hope that they're going to play.

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 3>No inside information whether they will or not. But I'm

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 3>excited because now it seems like there's a whole bunch

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of other guys who want it and feel like they

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 3>can go and get it, And I think that will

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 3>make for a much much more exciting US Open.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more. And I do think that I

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>said who's going to step up? And Ben stepping up?

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And remember what happened to him last year at the

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>US Open when he was in control of the match

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and he dove for a ball because he almost killed

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>himself in Montreal running back for a ball that he

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>probably had no business running trying to run down.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But that's just Ben and who he is.

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 1>And he's enthusiasm for trying to play tennis and have

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>fun with it is so obvious. And I love that

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about him. And he's yes and he's come ons and

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff. That's just like his little

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ticks that he's had from playing college tennis, where he

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>would have been you know, Caitlin, are you yelling and

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>screaming all the time in college? So it's kind of

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like comparative to what it was like five years ago

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>when he first came on tour. It's like he's like

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a normal tennis player now out there, like just expressing

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>himself in those moments.

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>But there is no doubt.

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've said this, We've been waiting for who's going

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the next American to win a major title,

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and I do believe that it's Ben. And the reason

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I do say that I think he has the best

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>chance of everybody is because he has the weapons and

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he's dangerous when he's on. But it's a matter of

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>mentally and emotionally, and not so much physically, because I

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's physically a specimen. I think that it's more

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of emotionally and mentally. Can he get

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>through the best of five seven matches against the Yannis

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and against Alchasz and winning masters, won thousands like that,

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and having those results and knowing how well he played

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open last year, look out, no one's

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going to want to play Ben Shelton, And particularly whatever

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he does here in Cincinnati will certainly be if you

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>win Cincinnati, for example, wow, will that give him tremendous

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>like confidence going in to play the big fellas at

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the US Open? And who knows if the big fellows

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>are even going to be there at this point, because

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they're certainly not looking good at the moment. All right,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>let's take a really quick break. We've got one or

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>two questions that we want to get to before we

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>end the pod today, so let's.

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Do that now, Okay, Caitlin, my lives usual. I woke

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 2>up this morning, decided to throw out a tweet.

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I know so many of our this morning and

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>choose violence. I chose to just throw a quick question

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. But you know it's I apologize everyone. I'm

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit unorganized.

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I was out in the Hamptons this weekend at a wedding.

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I was at a wedding, you know, and.

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really have I forgot to send the question out,

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>so everyone, I apologize. But we did get one or

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>two people right in garam Hawa Is like you know

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is our staple wrote in and said, I am not

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling the hype around Hoddah clearly and up and coming player,

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but seems a bit rude and disrespectful to players and

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>people who work around him.

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Misreading or something else.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Hmm, thoughts, Well, I can tell you from my perspective

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>before you get to yours, because I did interview him

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington.

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Dey, can you tell me you've too interacted?

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>With him.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 2>He was lovely, He was a delight to talk to.

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 1>He answered the questions really really in depth, and he

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was great with the fans, very delightful. I do think

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's a little bit of a snippety or snickety

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever the word is, a bit punchy sometimes on the court.

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's nineteen. He's learning to deal with these pressures now.

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>One thing I don't like players doing is pointing at

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the towel, like, get me the towel.

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I know, it's a.

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Kind of like a little bit of a it's become

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a thing, like please go get my towel.

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Little things like that I think annoy people when they

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>watch him. They feel like he's a little bit entire

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>all at times. But people making comments like he's taking

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a time out to fix his shoe and his shoe lace.

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 2>It's like, guys, his shoelace is broken. What do you

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 2>want him to do?

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Play without a fucking shoe tied up. So there are

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>certain things that I think people are grabbing too, or

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like even when Novak would do stuff, people

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>would like grab at it and like think it was

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>nefarious and all this sort of stuff. Having been around

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>him and even off the court, and his dad is

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>such a delight. I think that he is a lovely

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>kid that has a little bit of a snippety, snickitty

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 1>personality on the court.

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes. Now I was a little bit the same.

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes people had thought processes of like how maybe I was,

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but I was different off the court. So he's young,

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>give him time, but as far as his talent, he's

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>going to win a major in the next three years.

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have very little dad to that. I spoke

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to his dad when I was watching in practice in Rome.

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm never going to stop myself from trying

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 3>to speak Spanish to people or French really depending you know,

0:47:58.160 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 3>high role.

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It depends on how drunk.

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I went on the Tish Tennis Montreal's podcast s llin

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 3>this week. Actually, if you want to catch her latest episode,

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and I spoke French at the top of it, not drunk,

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I should add wasn't very impressive, as you've heard.

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 2>But well, because you're better when you're drunk.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 3>As is everyone at languages. But hod Our's game, I

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 3>get that it's not tremendously appealing on the surface level.

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 3>It is not Carlos Altgraz it is Yenick Center. It

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 3>is a stoic, it is internal, It is highly highly efficient,

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 3>and I understand how that makes people a little bit

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 3>less emotional. It makes me less emotional. I'm less excited

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 3>about him as a player than I am about an

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Arthur Feace, for example, just because I like the energy

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and I like the flash that said he's his talent

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 3>is undeniable. I will make a statement that's not going

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to countervail anything that you just said about his snippy

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 3>perception or how sometimes he can be a little short.

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 3>But I think tennis has been missing in the form

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 3>of Holgaruna, who I love of a very low stakes villain,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 3>a very low stakes villain, somebody who maybe takes a

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 3>little extra time out, maybe goes to the bathroom a bunch.

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Chapavolas, who you mentioned earlier this podcast, got really

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 3>pissed at Hodar for taking some inopportune breaks bathroom and

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 3>otherwise when he was up five to one against Hodar.

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Shoelaces were also a factor. This has happened a couple

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 3>of times. Do I think it's a conspiracy? Do I

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 3>think he's a bad sport? No? If his shoelaces are broken.

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what do you want him to do,

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 3>but I think this is exactly the kind of like

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.919
<v Speaker 3>low steaks villainy that makes for fun tennis spectating. He's

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 3>not out of pocket, he's not hurting anybody. He's just

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 3>sometimes maybe lining himself up to be a little bit annoying.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's okay. And I think he's a

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 3>good addition to the pack of these guys who I

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 3>think are gonna take it to the top and really

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 3>make it. You know, I don't have to love every

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Shoty hits, but I definitely think the tennis tour is

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 3>better better with him in a shirting dip, and I

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to happen one way or the other.

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I did say the same exact thing about Yanick Center.

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember having a conversation with Darren k.

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Hill.

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He was at the US Open, and I remember Yanick

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>was just getting there. He was just getting whether he

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was a quarters or semis of slams or maybe it

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>was prior to that. And I went and Darren told

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>me he was working with like, oh, you got a

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>good one there, mate, He's gonna be good. And because

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yannick had the stoicet. He was so stoic, he was

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so hard working, He had the weapons, and it was

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a matter of just sort of molding that young, early,

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of deary body and trying to figure out how

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to play tennis at a high level day in, day out,

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>point in, point out, game in, game in, you know,

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things. So I feel like in that thing,

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the one thing that he has to consider is.

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 2>A coach with his dad. Keep the dad.

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>He's young, He's done a fantastic job already. Just maybe

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>someone to add one colors for, like, somebody that can

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of add that extra layer of how to emotionally

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>handle the semi final, how to emotionally handle the final,

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with the press, how did you know

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with you know.

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 3>How Dad will not necessarily have any experience irrelevant.

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>He has no idea to do it. Dad has no idea.

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He's done a great job. And as I said, he's

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a lovely human being, and you spoke to him, you

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>know what kind of a man he is, the good

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>family and nice kid, you know. So anyway, all right,

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>James Tan said, can you compare the slice back ins

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of Ashbarty and Steffie. How did they stack up against

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>each other where they use this different tools by them?

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I figure you would know both well. Most wtare slice

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>back ends. Discussions feature these lazies, thanks Dubsy. Well different

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. Steffie was a little bit

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:45.799
<v Speaker 1>more sort of a longer stroke if you think about it,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Like she really turned her shoulders like really well and

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really used her body to hit her slice backhand. It

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was really flowy and just could pop it anywhere on

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the court. It was just a beauty to watch. Ashes

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit more sort of hand, but also

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a beautifully constructed slice back end. But she she utilized

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>her hands a little bit more than Stephie. But both

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:11.879
<v Speaker 1>could hit any slice anywhere short, deep down the line,

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cross court so well and keep the ball low. And

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.280
<v Speaker 1>any player that can do with that on the tour

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to be successful. Because I can tell you,

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>even my pathetic self, if when I would hit with

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>players much better players than me, even when I was

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>coaching them, and they would be killing me, and then

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden I'd throw in a just a

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>knife slice, I cannot tell you how many times they

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would miss that ball. It was like it was the

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:38.280
<v Speaker 1>only way that I could survive and win a rally.

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I would just finally go.

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd just throw in a big chop slice deep into

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the court and they'd like hit it in the bottom

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>of the net. Now they get used to it over time,

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is an underutilized shot. So if I was

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>teaching a kid to play that had the talent, I

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>would teach them a two handed back can and a

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>very good slice back end. And Kim Cloisters was pretty

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>good at that. I think Kim was probably the best

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at two hand, best two hander I'd seen with a

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:00.400
<v Speaker 1>slice back end.

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Kim was great at that.

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how they both use them differently,

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but they were very attacking.

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I'm gonna maybe this is charge of it

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 3>in an area of which you are more of an

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.319
<v Speaker 3>expert than anybody else on the planet. But for me

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 3>as a spectator, Steffi was one of my favorite players

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 3>ever growing up, and she almost exclusively used the slice.

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.840
<v Speaker 3>So she used it way, way, way more to attack.

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I think right, she hit over a backhand maybe three

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 3>times in her entire career. I mean exactly, she had it,

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 3>and it was she was good at it. But really

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the slice was more of an attack shot whereas Ash party.

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 3>For me, it was more of a way to mix

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 3>it up, not only reach, a way to approach, whereas

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Steffie was the default. So for me, that that is

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 3>also something that we really haven't seen. We've seen it

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on the Men's Tour, like Dan Evans

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 3>was using a slice more as the default backhand. Obviously

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 3>we've seen Tatiana Maria use it, but she goes over

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:55.240
<v Speaker 3>it quite a bit as opposed to just hitting slice.

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 3>But I think that era of heavy top spin forehand power,

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 3>frauline for hid forehand and then a knife slice attack

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 3>is something that it would be cool to see that

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 3>come back. I wish more people would teach their kids slaces,

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 3>because it's all right, I'm trying to teach my son now.

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to teach. Actually, it's very hard to teach.

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's a bit of a natural thing. Yeah you

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.399
<v Speaker 3>either kind of you either kind of get it, you.

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Have it, or you done, and yeah, you know, I

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>have it, and I I'm thankful because it's the one

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>thing I can still hit pretty well. All Right, well

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of I'll answer the other questions with my

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>own little responses on Twitter and for those of you

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not on Twitter or X yes, I know, but I

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>woke up this morning and that was just the last

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>minute thing. So I'll be do better, Renee, do better.

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It's pathetic.

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm just positive. Let's keep a positive. Sorry, next, next point,

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 3>give a moving all.

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, we've got a ton of tennis super excited

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about who wins Cincinnati. The women's is the Hunger Games.

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:55.359
<v Speaker 1>The guys is Hunger Games. Because it's true.

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 3>I love it. Now the guys are stepping up, so

0:54:57.360 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 3>keep it going, guys, Let's have some exciting later rounds.

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>We much prefer Hunger Games in all departments. Although I

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.760
<v Speaker 1>miss you Carlos and I miss Youyanick, So get back here,

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>all right, guys, thanks for joining us today. It was

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a really spirited discussion. Thanks Caitlin. And then I don't

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>even honestly, this is what's embarrassing about this, because I

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit having fun this weekend.

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, what part of the tournament are we in

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in Cincinnati? You know what I mean? It just doesn't

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 2>feel right.

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:26.360
<v Speaker 3>It's because of the weird tournament ending on Thursday in Canada,

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:29.319
<v Speaker 3>that's why you're weird. I'm weird too. Play where even

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 3>are we you're used to? Okay, the week is over.

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 3>This tournament should end on a Sunday or maybe Saturday,

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's why we Monday. It's so strange. I know,

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 3>it's really weird. Well, thankfully, with US Open starting in

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a very short two week window, we will be back

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 3>on schedule exactly.

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And I did get asked if I'll be in Cincinnati

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>with Serena. I will not. She's just playing doubles there.

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>She has enough team there to deal with her on

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that occasion, and so you'll see me back in New

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>York with Serena. But anyway, everybody, thanks for joining us today.

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate Caitline. Let's go of a drink. I

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>never see you.

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 3>In your apartment.

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm in my apartments.

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Unaccepted, all right, Matete Bye,