WEBVTT - Do Animals Have Consciousness?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Please take a second and leave us a review

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, the production

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio. I'm More Hey, chim and today we're answering

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the question do animals have consciousness? Have you ever looked

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>into your dog's puppy eyes and wondered what's going on

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in there? Can animals have thoughts, sense of self and

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>even dream What about chickens, or fishes or even bugs?

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Can they have an inner world and feelings? To find out,

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk to a couple of experts on

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>animals sentience, and we're going to learn how to tell

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if an animal has consciousness, which ones have it, and

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to ask the big question about what it

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>would mean for them to be conscious. So dream along

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with us as we answer the question do animals have consciousness?

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy Hey everyone? Today on the episode, we're going to

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>find out if different animals have consciousness. We're going to

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>learn whether the monkeys have it, where their dogs have it.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll even talk about whether their chickens and crabs have consciousness. Now,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is a super tricky topic, so the first thing

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do is define what consciousness is. And

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to do that, I reached out to an animal philosopher.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's doctor Heather Browning.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>So I'm doctor Heather Browning. I'm a philosopher who works

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 2>at the University of Southampton, and I'm most interested in

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 2>using the methods of philosophy to answer questions about the

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>minds of animals. So animal sentience and animal welfare incredible.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>First of all, can you tell us what is consciousness?

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>All right? So we start with the really big questions.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>So consciousness is something that's proved notoriously difficult to define.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>A lot of philosophers try to think really hard about this,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and essentially, when we want to talk about consciousness, I

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>think the best way is to think about it through

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>examples of the kinds of experiences that are familiar to us.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>So you might think that, for instance, a rock doesn't

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>feel anything when water falls on it, but we do.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 2>When a grain falls on our skin, it feels like something.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>For that, when we're asleep, it doesn't feel like anything

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to be us. When we're awake, we're seeing, we're smelling,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>we're tasting. All these experiences have this quality of feeling

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 2>that are associated with it, and that's what makes up consciousness.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so it's very tied to the idea of a feeling.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So one way to think about consciousness is that it's

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of being a rock. Rock exists in the

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>world and things happen to it, but it doesn't feel anything.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have thoughts about the things happening to it. Basically,

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing going on inside of a rock. Another way

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to think about consciousness is that it's also kind of

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of being a robot. You can imagine making

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a robot that looks like a person in this program

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to act and respond like a person, but that robot

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>we don't have an inner life the same way you do.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>But when I look at another person, the only information

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I have about them really is the words that come

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 2>out of their mouth and the behaviors that they do,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and they all resemble mine in a lot of ways.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>But technically that person, you know, they could be sort

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of an android with nothing going on inside, or they

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>could be what philosopher's like to call philosophical zombies, which

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>is a person who essentially is like a robot. You know,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>if there's no kind of light on, no spark.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, there are other things that are part of being conscious.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, some people say having consciousness is having a

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of self, you know, like a feeling that you're

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a person in this world. Another part of consciousness is

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>having the power to make decisions that you don't do

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>things automatically, but that you think about them. There are

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of definitions, but for now, just hang on to

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the phrase. It means that you have an inner life.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And so the question now is do animals have this

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>inner life? Well, the problem is that we can't ask them.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, I mean this is something philosophers like to

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>debate a lot, and they call it the problem of

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 2>other minds. And we don't know when we look at

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>another person, we don't know for sure that they're not

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>a philosophicals on video, they're not an android. And I mean,

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>right now you're just seeing me on a screen. I

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>could just be an AI. You know, shot out. That's

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 2>from program.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I Am an AI. By the way, you're being interviewed

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>by an artificial interviewer.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>We're very sophisticated on us.

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. We worked on it a lot. What doctor

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Browning is saying is that it's hard enough to know

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if another person has consciousness, much less an animal we

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can't even communicate with, So how can we know if

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>an animal has consciousness? Well, it turns out scientists have

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>come up with sort of an animal consciousness test to

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us about it. Reached out to doctor Alex Schnell.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>You might remember her from a few episodes ago. He's

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a comparative psychologist who is all so in National Geographic Explorer,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and she talked to us about how smart octopuses are.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It turns out she's also a researcher on animal consciousness. Well,

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you, doc, there's not for joining.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Us again, thank you for having me.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you conscious right now?

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Slightly? It's about thirty two degrees celsius. I don't know

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>what that is fahrenheit, it's very very high.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Scientists like her study consciousness and animals have come up

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>with a set of indicators or tests that can tell

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you whether an animal potentially has consciousness. What does that mean?

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>What are the indicators? I guess?

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So the indicators are We've got four that are neural

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that really look at the presence of nose receptors, so

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>receptors that can respond to stimuli like a prick or

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 3>heat or an electric shop whether they have integrative brain

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 3>regions where that information can be combined and integrated.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So the first indicator scientists used to tell if an

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>animal has consciousness is whether the animal can feel pain.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And really the scientists are interested in whether the animal

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>can feel anything, but they pick pain because there's a

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more data out there on it. Then see whether

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>an animal feels happy or sad. Okay, that's step number one. Now,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>if an animal does feel pain, the sign of consciousness

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is what the animal does about it.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And then behavior indicators include protective behaviors. So you've

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 3>brought octopus, so I'll tell you for an example, if

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 3>it octopus is inflicted in with something that might cause

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 3>pain or harm, they generally show protective behaviors that you

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 3>might see in your pet dog or cat at home.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, they'll stroke their arm or rub their arm,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 3>or wrap their injured arm really close to their body

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and protect it with their other arms, and they won't

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>use that as often.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So a sign of consciousness is if an animal

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>feels pain and then acts to protect where they feel

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the pain, because that means they have a feeling and

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they're conscious of it. It affects how they behave The

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>next step is whether they learn from their experiences.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Another indicator is learning from experience, just learning that doing

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 3>a particular activity, if you're getting a negative emotion from that,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>to stop doing that.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So if an animal feels something like pain and they

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>stop doing it, that's a sign that they're in a

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>way thinking about that feeling and that they have learned

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what caused that feeling. That's another sign of consciousness. And

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the last test of whether an animal has consciousness is

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>whether they can make choices that trade off different feelings.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>And then also the last one is showing a preference

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>or an aversion to an experience that is going to

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>have a particular vailance. So if you keep getting stung

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>or prodded in one particular room, then you might avoid

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 3>that room in the future.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, these are going to make more sense a little

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>later when we apply these tests to different animals, and

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to be surprised how some animals,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>even bees, respond to these tests. So this is a

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>list of indicators that let's say an animal checks all

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the boxes, then it's a very clear candidate that

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it may be has sentients and maybe consciousness is how

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you would phrase it.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So definitely like Marx that there's strong evidence that they

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>are sentient.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, when we come back, we're going to apply this

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>set of tests to a wide range of animals, including dogs, chickens, hermit, crabs,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and even bees to find out which of them have consciousness.

0:08:50.480 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So stay with us. We'll be right back, and we're back.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about whether animals have consciousness, and so far

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>we talked about what that means and how you might

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tell even animal has it. Scientists who study this have

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a test for consciousness or sentience as some

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>people call it, which involves looking at how animals react

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to pain. How they react to, for example, getting tricked

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>by a sharp object or getting a slight electric shock

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can tell you a lot about whether they have feelings

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and whether they have complex thoughts about those feelings. And again,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they use pain because a lot of the research out

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there focuses on whether animals feel pain. Now, the question

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>is which animals pass this test to Monkeys, dogs, birds, crabs,

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>or even insects show signs of consciousness well. According to

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>doctor Heather Browning, it's kind of hard to tell.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's still a lot of uncertainty and

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 2>controversy about which animals are conscious or which animals are sentient,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>because this is something that we're talking about that's happening

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>inside their heads, inside their minds, and we don't have,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, a consciousness scope that we can just go

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 2>and look into the minds of animals and tell us

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>what they're thinking or feeling. We don't even have that

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 2>for other humans.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Now. The thing about consciousness is that most scientists don't

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>really see it as a kind of on or off thing,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you either have it or don't. The more

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>common view is that it's something that's on a scale.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>So that is something that there's still debate about, and

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I think people aren't sure because I think intuitively it

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>makes sense to us to think about it as being

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>on or off, but that doesn't trap very well with

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>how we think about a lot of the rest of biology.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>When we think about the kinds of evolved traits that

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>other animals might have, often they do come in degrees.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, Yes, some animals can fly and some animals

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 2>can't fly, but there's all kinds of gradients in between

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 2>there where some animals can glide, some animals can fly

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, and some animals can't do that at all,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 2>And so it makes sense that almost all traits and

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>biology are actually on these kinds of gradual scales, and

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>consciousness is probably something.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Like that, Yeah, well, I feel like right now we're

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in a very different time zone, and so I am

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>only partially conscious right now myself. Yes, okay. According to

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this definition of consciousness, doctor Browning says most experts agree

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that most mammals, down to about a dog or a mouse,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate signs that they have consciousness. It's clear that they

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>have feelings and that there is some kind of inner

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>life going on inside their brains.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's very very difficult, I think, for anyone who's

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>had a pet dog and spend any time with it

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to really, you know, and not think that there's someone

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>there on the inside in the mind of that dog,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>but they're really interacting with another being or another subject there.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So there isn't much debate about whether animals like dogs

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or horses, or elephants, or pretty much any mammal has

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>some form of consciousness. Where it gets triggier is in

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>animals like birds, or even chickens.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think what chickens get over looked quite

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot. But yeah, they are actually quite cognitively complex animals.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, chickens can learn very well, they have good memories,

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>they make complex decisions, they have complex social lives. You know,

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>they're able to remember and interact with a lot of

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>different chickens as well, and thinking about what they feel.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Certainly we see chickens that have the kinds of injuries

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that we would think would be painful when a human.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>They will preferentially go and eat food that has a

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>painkiller in it. Even that food tastes worse and a

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>normal chicken that wasn't in pain wouldn't want to eat it,

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>which you know, is very strong evidence in my mind

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that they are feeling pain, that there is something there

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>that they're trying to stop, just like we would.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I see, there are things they like and they things

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that they don't like.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right, And a lot of work in animal

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>welfare science is trying to look at, you know, what

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>animals like and don't like through doings that they call

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>preference testing, you know, giving them different situations and seeing

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>what they choose.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is part of that test that I mentioned

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to you before. Here's what the experiment looked like. You

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>offer a chicken two balls of food. One are the

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>bulls is food that tastes great to a chicken, and

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the other ball has food that doesn't taste that great

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to chickens. Now, normally chickens will choose the food that

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tastes better, But if the chicken is in pain for

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>some reason, and you put pain medicine in the food

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that tastes worse, the chicken will choose the one with

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the pain medicine. And this, scientists argue, is a sign

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that chickens can feel and have a preference and make

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a choice based on that preference, all of which are

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>signs of consciousness.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 2>And chickens have been the subjects of a huge amount

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>of these tests. And you know, do they prefer to

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>stand on the floor, do they like to be on

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>a perch? Do they like to be in a nest box?

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Or do they like to nest in a corner on

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the ground. And yeah, they're very good at telling us that,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 2>And it really does seem like they have those kind

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>of rich sets of preferences about what they want and

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 2>what they don't want what they like and what they

0:13:58.280 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 2>don't like.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the next animal we're going to talk about are fish.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Do fish have consciousness?

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So fish a roment of travelers. They ran into a

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of skepticism because their brains are very different from ours,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and so the kinds of inferences that we make from

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>our types of brains and saying well, look, other animals

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>have brains that are similar, so they probably produce the

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>same kinds of experiences. You should have different kinds of brains,

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And so people wanted to use that as a reason

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to say, well, they can't have consciousness, And people who

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>worked with fishes and look at their behavior wanted to

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 2>push back on that and say, well, no, a fish

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 2>might have a different brain than ours, but we might

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>still be able to have consciousness. Fish do a lot

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of these sort of complex things. They respond when they

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>receive I mean we would think would cause pain, or

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>if they get an injection in their lips of a

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>mild acid that should cause them pain, they will wrap

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>their face on the tanks, they will lose interest in

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>their food, They'll be less likely to respond to predators

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>because they're distracted. They will preferentially go to tanks. They

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.359
<v Speaker 2>have painkillers in them. All those same kinds of responses

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that if we saw them in a mammal or a

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>bird tho sort of experiences we see in fish.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So according to our definition of consciousness, fishes are conscious

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>beings too. They have feelings, they can feel things, and

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they have complicated thought processes that guide how they behave. Okay,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>now we get to even trick your animals. Invertebrates. These

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are animals like crabs and shrimps and octopuses and insects.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Can we say that they have consciousness too. We'll start

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with an easy one, which are octopuses. Here's doctor Alex Schnell.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So, for example, we looked at three hundred studies by

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 3>way a team of scientists led by Jonathan Birch to

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>find evidence of sentience in cephalopods and decapod crustaceans, and

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 3>octopus satisfied seven of the eight criteria, and the one

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>that it didn't satisfy studies in that criteria had not

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 3>been conducted.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So octopuses passed seven of the eight indicators that tell

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you they might have consciousness, and some sodis even show

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that octopuses might even dream.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 3>There was some other research that's not my own, but

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>some researchers in Brazil had conducted on octopus looking at

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>different phases of sleep, and this was so cool. They

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 3>showed that octopuses have two phases, a quiet phase and

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 3>an active phase, and their active phase looked very similar

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 3>to the way that humans sleep during RAM, so the

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>rapid eye movement phase, and in humans that is a

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 3>phase when we dream. And so they had a lot

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of behavior footage of an octopus clearly asleep because their

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>eyes are closed and they'd be prodden just to make

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>sure that they're asleep, but changing coloration and texture is

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 3>if they were having a dream. You know, sometimes they

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>look like they were outfeeding and hiding for a predator.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 3>So wouldn't that octopus be dreaming? You know, there's still

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>a huge question mark, but it was pretty phenomenal.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>To think that is fascinating. Well, I guess, first of all,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know octopuses slap, but that the dream is

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing and that you can see it in their coloration.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>They might dreap, sorry, that they might dream, yeah, and

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that you might be able to see it in their

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>coloration and their movement.

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 3>That's incredible because there's not many other animals. I mean,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>you can see a dog when they you know, they

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 3>might be dreaming and they're running in their sleep and

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>they're whimpering like they're trying to catch something.

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>You can see that in dogs. I don't know inn

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a dog.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 3>So oh, okay. I think there's a whole community of

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 3>YouTubers that share results and videos their dogs and cats dreaming.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 3>It's very entertaining. But yeah, you can. But there aren't

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 3>many animals like an octopus where you can actually see

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the color of their skin changing. And so I like

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 3>to think that they wear their emotions on their skin

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 3>and maybe that's a window into their mind.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It kind of makes you wonder what does an octopus

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>dreap about? Okay, So that covers octopuses and like extension,

0:17:55.200 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>also curdlefish and probably squids as potentially having consciousness. Now

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we get to even trickier animals like crabs and these

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>do insects have consciousness? We'll review the scientific evidence for

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it after the break. Stay with us. You're listening to

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>sign stuff and we're back. Okay, we're talking about whether

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>animals have consciousness, and so far we talked about what

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that means how to tell if an animal has it.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>And we've gone down the evolutionary tree of life to

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>see which animals can be said to possibly have consciousness,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And now we're at animals that are very different from us,

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the invertebrates, invertebrate animals, that is, animals without bones or

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a spinal cord, separated from us, or we separated from

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>them over five hundred and ninety million years ago. And

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>yet invertebrates like octopuses clearly have intelligence and can be

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>said to have a consciousness too, even perhaps to have dreams.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But what about other invertebrates like crabs or shrimp or

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>even insects. We'll start with crabs. So crabs, what was

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of crabs?

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so crabs action there was a surprisingly large amount.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>We went into the project assuming that there'd be quite

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot about octopuses, because we know people find octopuses

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 2>very interesting, but crabs. Actually there was almost as much

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>evidence in crabs as there was in octopuses. So hermit

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>crabs are crabs that don't have their own hard shells,

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but they move into the shells that are left behind

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>by other sea creatures and they change those shells over

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>time as they grow, or if they find a better shell.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's the experiment that's been done with hermit crabs,

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty interesting. This was done by a biologists

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>named Bob Elwood. Elwood and his team gave hermit crabs

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the choice of different shells to pick for their new home.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But all the shells were rigged. Each had a little

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ho all drilled into them with the wire that went

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 1>inside the whole. Now, the hermit crab would try on

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all the shells and eventually pick the one the crab liked.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>But here's the twist. After they picked a shell, the

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>scientist would send a mild electric shock to the crab

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>through the wire place inside the shell. So now the

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hermit crab had a problem. The shell they liked had

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this annoying quality that it would shock them every once

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>in a while, and so they had to make a

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>choice should they stay or should they go and find

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a different shell. The hermit crabs would get a variety

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of different shells qualities, and some of them would give

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>them a shock, So they really had to think about, well,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which shell do I want?

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And can I sustain that shock? And just to

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 3>keep this great house that I'm in or I'm just

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>going to get rid of this house and go for

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 3>one that's of less equality to me.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, what they showed is that if they were in

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the good shell, they'd be much less likely to leave it.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd be much slower to get out of it than

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 2>if they're in the badge. And so, you know, they

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 2>were showing that they valued these shells, that they really

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 2>did make this kind of decision based on the badness

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>of the shock versus the goodness of the shell.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And then the scientist made it even more complicated for

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the crabs. They would sometimes put in the water the

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>smell of a predator that tries to eat the hermit crab,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And so now the hermit crab had to make an

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>even harder choice. Should I stay in my preferred home

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm getting shocked, or should I take the

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>risk and go find another shell, even though it seems

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there's something out there trying to eat me.

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 3>And so they would have to integrate the risk of

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>getting the shock and maintaining that home and trade off

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 3>between those risks and opportunities. And so it really told

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>a nice story of how hermit crabs why they might

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 3>not have an inner monologue. They to have the capacity

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to integrate this information and make decisions based on that integration.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>You would have thought that of all animals, the hermit

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>crab would have a monologue. They don't really talk to

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>any other crabs. Yes, so even crabs seem to pass

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the test or potentially having some form of basic consciousness. Now,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point you might be wondering, how far does

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this go? Do all animals have consciousness, even insects? Well,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it turns out the answer is maybe, Okay. So then

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>if we keep going down the complexity of animals from

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>shump you and crabs, you would get insects. And so

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what do we know about insect consciousness?

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So I think insects report will you wear a

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of the players right now? I think that's where

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>people are paying a lot of attention the question of

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>insect consciousness. This is because our use of insects is increasing,

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Insect farming is set to rapidly increase over the coming years,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and so the question of whether or not they're sentient

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>is becoming very very relevant to the ethics of insect farming.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean insect farming for what? For food?

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>For humans? So insect farms, So say, crickets for instants

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>are being seen as potential sources of protein for humans. Know,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 2>when we're struggling to feed the world in a way

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>that has kind of you know, effishient, environmentally friendly protein

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>sources and also more than that, as food for the

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>animals that we feed. So black soldier fly larvae in

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 2>particular are being used quite a lot to feed feed chickens,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to feed fish in aquaculture.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, so then what do we know about

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>insects sentience?

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So there was a relatively recent review done of the

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>evidence for sentience and insects, very similar to the one

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about that we did in cephalopods and decapods,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and again found quite positive and promising results. They ran

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 2>into many of the same problems in that there's not

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of research done, and insects are very diverse,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>like there are so many different groups of insects, and

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 2>insects also have very different life stages. You know, they

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>have larval stages, they have pupair stages, they have adult stages,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and so really what you need is evidence for each

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 2>of these different groups of animals at each of these

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>different life stages and that is not there. But again,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>there is pretty good evidence for at least some groups

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 2>of insects that they do seem to meet these same criteria. Bees,

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>for instance, are pretty well studied, and there's evidence that

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>bees can make your flexible decisions, that they respond to

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>painful stimuli.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you can beleave it. Scientists have done experiments

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>to test whether bees have consciousness. The experiment when something

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like this. They offered bees the option to drink sugary

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>water from different feeding stations. Some stations had sweeter water

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>than others, but all the feeding stations were rigged so

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that the pads the bees had to stand on to

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>drink could get hot, hot enough to make it uncomfortable

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for the bees to drink from that station. Now, when

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>nothing was heated, bees would choose the sweetest stations, but

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when those stations were made to be hot, the bees

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>would switch and drink from the less sweet feeding stations.

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Meaning the bees had to weigh the pros and cons

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of their options. Should I drink from the sweetest station

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but then it's kind of too hot, or should I

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>go for a less sweet station even though I'm getting

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>less sugar? And this shows the scientists argue. In this

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>case a biologist named Matilda Gibbons and her team that

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bees are doing something that resembles being conscious.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 3>And so what she was looking at is again whether

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 3>they could integrate that information on the risk of going

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>to get the more sugard concentration based on the heat

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>on their fate. At what point was it just not

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 3>worth it?

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>In that case, they were weighing whether the buzz was

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>worth it.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like what you do there, And it's sort

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 4>of pointing to a sophistication in how they respond and

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 4>make choices.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not a simple mechanism in their little brains. It's

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.479
<v Speaker 1>like they have to kind of think about it.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's kind of the basis of the idea

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of sentience, is that they're thinking about things.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>They're not reflexively responding. Like there's integration going on, there's

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 3>weighing up, there's decision making.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Brownie, bees have even been shown to

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially play, so.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, a very cool work on bees recently showed that

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>they seem to play for no other reason but can

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>be explained except that they seem to like it. So

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 2>if they get these little plastic balls that they can

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 2>roll around. Even if those balls have got nothing to

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 2>do with their food. You've never had anything to do

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 2>with their food. You know, the food's in another room.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>The bees will still go and roll these balls around

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 2>for you know, decent periods of time. Really only explanation

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that the researchers can give is that they seem to

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 2>be enjoying it, that this is something they like and

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>it's fun for them, and so they do seem to

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 2>be these little beings who can have these experiences of

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, at this point you may be wondering, well, well,

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't have consciousness? Well, it turns out people who

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>study consciousness and animals do draw a line at some point.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, the general consensus is that worms probably don't

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have consciousness. When you apply the same set of tests

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about to worms, they score pretty low.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't seem to have preferences or be able to

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>weigh these complex decisions. And also plants, philosophers are fairly

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sure they're not conscious, although not everyone agrees. You just

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 1>put up an interesting point, which there plants, and I

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>assume most people greep plants are not conscious.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that is definitely the mailstream view. At

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the moment, there are people who think the plants are conscious,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and I've seen some work of people arguing if plants

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 2>are much more complex than I think we used to

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>think they were, well communicate with one another. You know,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>trees have these massive underground root systems that no one

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 2>really knew about before, where they can send chemical signals

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 2>to one another, They can respond to different kinds of

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>environmental stimuli. But I think none of that passes the

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>thresholds for what we would take in animals to be

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 2>required for a conscious experience, okay, and particularly the speed

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of processing. So a lot of people think that in

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 2>part what consciousness might be for is to help us

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>respond relatively quickly to changes in the environment, to update

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>what's happening to us, to be able to make decisions

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>between competing motivations that we might have and plants they

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 2>don't move that kind of spilled. So one of the

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>big things that differentiates an animal from a plant is

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 2>that one part of the animal, right we're wanting to feed,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 2>an other part might be wanting to reproduce, and they

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 2>can't do both those things at once. It has to

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>pick one or the other. Whereas a plant is able

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to actually do multiple things at once. They don't have

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>to physically move themselves around, and.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I see they don't have a sense of its whole

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>being all at the same time.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's your right.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay. The last question we're going to ask about animal

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is what does it all mean? What does it

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that a dog has conscious thoughts, or that than

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>octopus dreams, or that bees like to play. I asked

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>both our experts this question. Okay, the last question, what

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are the implications of animals or certain animals having or

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not having consciousness or sentience?

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>So one sentience is recognized. I think humans are faced

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>with ethical legal obligations.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>When we think about how we act towards other animals.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>In my mind, whether or not they're sentient is the

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>key feature that tells us whether or not we should

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>be concerned about the harms that we're doing to them.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>And I think that is profound because even if an animal,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 3>let's say a crab or an octopus, doesn't have an

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>inner monologue, or they can't communimicate feelings or reason, it

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that they can't suffer, and so the ethical

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>considerations of that remain critical. It means that their suffering counts.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess to get a little bit deeper, you said,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes this these certain questions and responsibilities. What does

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that mean or why is that?

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>What it is? Is it? So being able to recognize

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 3>that an animal has the capacity to feel negative and

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 3>positive emotions, it removes this barrier of arpness, and so

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 3>we could recognize that like us, like humans, they have

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 3>this capacity, and so it bridges I guess, our world

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>with theirs.

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So studying consciousness and animals should make us think about

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how we treat them, and it can also tell us

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>something about our own consciousness. What does that mean about

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness that animals are conscious?

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that a lot of research in the

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 3>past has been like, well, this is unique to humans,

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and human intelligence and consciousness is highly complex, and we

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 3>are able to obtain knowledge and understand concepts and thing

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 3>can reflect in ways that we haven't been able to

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>see in other animals. But these things that pop up

0:30:55.240 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>in our mind are not evolutionarily isolated, and so by

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>recognizing and researching other animal minds, then forming a more

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 3>comprehensive view of how the mind evolved in our evolutionary trade.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Because each mind is one piece of the puzzle.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I see, we can trace where our consciousness came from,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge part of understanding what it is

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and how it works.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, all right.

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We hope that made you a little more conscious of

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>animal consciousness, so the next time you look at an

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>animal eyes, you wonder what's going on in there. Thanks

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, See you next time you've been listening

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to Science Stuff. Production of iHeartRadio written and produced by

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>me or Hm, predited by Rose Seguda, Executive producer Jerry Rowland,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>an audio engineer and mixer Ksey Pecrom and you can

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>follow me on social media. Just search for PhD Comics

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and the name of your favorite platform. Be sure just

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.239
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts, and please tell your

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>friends we'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.