WEBVTT - What Wuhan Can Teach Us About Recovery

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So COVID nineteen is um is a kind of stress

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>test for for how economic systems function, and if you

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>look at how China and the US have performed in

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the last six months, China is actually doing rather better. Hello,

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the COVID

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. We're all about China this week,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was Tom Aulick, Bloomberg's chief economist and old

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>China hand, who has just published a book that helps

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>explain why China's economy has not had the big crisis

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that so many experts have confidently predicted over the years,

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and why it also appears to be winning the fight

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>against COVID nineteen. But first, you'll remember we spoke to

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Sharon Chen, Bloomberg's Beijing bureau chief, back in April. She

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was in quarantine then in her apartment after a reporting

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>trip to Wuhan. That city was just coming out of lockdown.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Then first into the COVID crisis and first out. We

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke to her then about the early signs of recovery

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>there and what it might tell us about the road

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead for the rest of us. Well three months on,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I was interested to find out what life has been

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like in China since then, and whether the authorities still

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>feel good about the way they've handled the pandemic. Sharon,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's great to talk to you again. I know that

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you're planning another trip to Wuhan, but you've been talking

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to businesses there about what's what's happening. When we spoke

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, it seemed to show something that we

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have seen in other places, that it's a twin track economy,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that production side coming back but not so much the

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer side. Is that's still true? Yes, so um you know,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>bought the data and the anecdotes kind of indicate that

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening. Unfortunately, obviously the data is a bit

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of a lagging indicator, but we have factory production and

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, exports, fixed st investment up till me UM

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the economy reopened in April, and even

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in May, we saw that local manufacturers had basically almost recovered.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, industrial production was only zero point four percent UM,

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not lower than the year before in growth, but consumptions

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously still lagging UM and exports as well. I mean

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some more recent data, you know, we look at subway

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>data and a lot of the cities, and in Buhan

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it shows that traffic passenger traffic has recovered to about

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>half the level, which is you know, decent. And also

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be one of the reasons which we talked

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, that people are buying cars and just driving

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves instead of taking public transport, so it's not entirely

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>reflective of how you know, how much people are out again.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And we should mention that Wuhan had a flare up

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in May, so it reopened um in early April, and

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>then in May and new cluster of cases was discovered,

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the city reacted very strongly. Obviously, they

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>put in place a lot of strict restrictions and then

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they tested the entire population of level million people in

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the span of two weeks and since then they haven't

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>reported a single case. So, you know, just based on

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the anecdotes as well, we do see that factories are

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>back up a full capacity UM, a lot of the

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>exporters are benefiting. Trade did search as soon as the

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>city reopened, but of course it depends on what kind

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of product you're making. You know. We spoke to one

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>factory manager who they make plastic cups for airlines and

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for hotels, and you know, business has just evaporated because

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the travel industry just collapsed, like they just don't have

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>any demand. But then we talked to another factory that

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was making helmets and then pivoted to making more face

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>shields and protective gear, and they've seen, you know, demand

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from South America double because the virus cases there keep increasing.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And then it's the same on the consumption front as well.

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, restaurant owners they are struggling because people don't

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really feel safe and also some of the habits like

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>eating at home, they've just persisted. Um. But on the

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you know, we spoke to a factory owner.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>He produces hot dry noodles, but the instant kind like

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>instant raman where you add hot water, and you know,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>business is just going through the roof. He's even expanded,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he's now delivering to the next city because people just

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>want to stay at home, but they want to eat

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite food still, so you know, it's just definitely

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a mixed bag. So if you're if you're involved in

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the COVID business or you're providing, you're able to provide

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>food that people don't need to be sitting in a

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurant to eat. You're doing You're doing all right. That

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>was interesting what you said about the exports, because one

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the concerns looking at China was that we saw

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the sort of early signs of a V shaped recovery,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at least when it came to production, and then the

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fear was that the terrible things that were going on

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of the world would then bring China

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>down again because of it's dependent on exports. But it's

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>so what you're saying is there is that's a twin

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>track as well. If you're on the consumption side, you're

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>doing badly, but actually some of the core products are exporting.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I mean, like the supply chain is so

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>global and so integrated now as well, right, I mean,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they also feel the impact on the raw material side,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think you know, the trade story. What's interesting

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>has is that it's also kind of shown the limits

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of government intervention on government support. You know, the government

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>has rolled out a lot of support for these businesses

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and especially the smaller ones, but until global demand recovers,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a limit to what the government can do.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, some of the companies that we spoke

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to said that they can apply for loans and they

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>can apply for grants, but until their own clients overseas

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>are really able to um bring those orders back, you know,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there's there's really not much they can do. And then

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>another option for them is to try to get new clients.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But then with travel basically understand still, these these trade

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>fairs and everything, I mean, those things aren't happening as well.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that they had tried in Wuhan to have

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>various measures to stimulate consumption, and of course that's something

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we've had this week. The British government has been trying

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to throw a lot of the economy to to get

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>consumers out and about now that the lockdown is easy,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen lots of consideration of that in the US

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Does it work to be putting more money

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>into consumers pockets or is it really all about confidence

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the virus? I mean, I think it does work.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>They've given out about five hundred million grand or shopping vultures,

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>that's about seventy three million U S dollars and you know,

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>people that we spoke to said that they regularly use

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>those vultures, and I think it does get people spending,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>although it's unclear how much of that spending happens in

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>person and how much of it is happening online because

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of transactions in China shop online

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>very easily. Um So I don't know how much that

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is really helping encourage people to go outside and to

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>do things that they used to do. Interestingly, one of

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant owners we spoke to said that it was

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the mass testing campaign that Juhan executed that was the

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.559
<v Speaker 1>big confidence booster. You know, he saw the most number

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>of customers come in the day after they finished their

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign and announced that they had tested every single person

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the city. And you know, if the city is

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>able to pull that off, like, I think that that

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>does kind of really reap dividends in terms of making

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>people feel confident and making them feel safe. Of course,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we're also looking ahead wondering how long we're going to

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're in uh what you described it when

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you came back from Wuhan last time, a sort of

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>dystopian post lockdown world where everyone's getting temperature tests or

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>where you're being socially distanced. How far when you're in

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>your day to laid life and when you go out

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with friends in Beijing. I mean, how far do you

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>still feel you are from normal life? Does it feel

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>when you have these outbreaks that it's still one step

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>forward one step back? Or is it are you starting

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to see the light at the end of the tunnel?

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, personally, I do you like life is pretty

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>much back to normal? So we had an outbreak in

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Beijing a couple of weeks ago, and you know, they

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't employ the same kind of city wide lockdown

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that they've used in China and other places, in part

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the states are just higher in Beijing.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>They can't really bring the city to a stand still

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's just so much commerce going on, and then

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>also the halls of government are here as well. So

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>what they did was that they really took this very

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted approach. They broke up the entire city, you know,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>by district by street, and they determined whether each place

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was low risk, high risk, a medium risk, and they

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>lockdown areas very specifically, and then they also did huge

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>mass mass testing and they restricted people from leaving the

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>city depending on you know, how risk of their areas were.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>But they did manage to maintain a large part of

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>normal activity. You know, shops and restaurants all remained open.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>The main difference was that UM a lot of housing

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>compounds didn't allow visitors in and out, although some did

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to do that. UM And also you know, by

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>now China's developed a lot of the tools that it

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>needs for contact tracing, so everyone has the ability to

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>check on their phone whether they've been in contact with

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's a risk, or they've been to any risky areas,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or they've traveled. So as long as you're able to

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>show that you have that green call, you can basically

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. So I do think it's like much less

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>dramatic now when there are flare ups, like the government

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>has developed the ability to board test and contact trace

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and be more targeted in its restrictions. Do you feel

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we should perhaps say that we were we

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to play some clips from some of the

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>people you spoke to Wan who then said they didn't

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable and actually they've been discouraged from talking to

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign media after the last time that you went there.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of scrutiny on China at the moment

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of not just what's happened in Hong Kong.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>But how how it's handled the pandemic. Do you feel

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>as a reporter that the restrictions are tighter or the

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>more limits on what you can do, or is this

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>more or less business as usual? I mean, you know,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg, we focus a lot on economic and financial news,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, most of the time that's fine, but yeah,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the environment is changing. I mean, you look

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at what's happening in Hong Kong obviously, and you know,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government has also taken steps that seemed to

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>be moves towards silencing more criticism and being more focused

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on making sure that social unrest doesn't take hold. Um.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the President Jumping himself has said that social

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>stability is a concern in the wake of the virus,

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think they are hyper aware of anything that

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>may kind of, you know, foment the same amount of

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>unhappiness that happened when the virus was really bad. And

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know about the whistleblowers who are silenced and all that,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know, simultaneously we're seeing this increasing tension between

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>China and the US word the media. So China kicked

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>out several reporters and the US has also been cracking

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>down on American news organizations. Then now we have this

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>spat between the UK and c GTN statement media about

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>airing force confessions and so, you know, I think as

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>China becomes more assertive, yeah, I mean, it definitely is

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>narrowing the scope from for us to act freely. Not

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was free before, but yeah, well you still

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>do you still produce a lot of stories. Will you

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do the same quarantine if you go to

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan or is that now you just you just have

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to show people your at your foot apple and your phone. Yeah.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, um, you know, Wuhan is considered a

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>low risk area. Now there's no cases and they've tested everybody.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So actually do you have you were saying they do

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>have floods they just can't break. They've now got people

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>dying from floods. Yeah, I mean there's floods. There's flooding

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>now in southern China. I mean it's a problem every year,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>but this year it's one of it's it's really becoming

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>more severe. Um, so it's been tough for people in Well, Sharon,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we might we might check in on you

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>again in in a few months, I mean time, Thank

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Yeah, no problem. M Well, that was

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the view this week from Beijing and Mouhan. Now, as

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned at the start, we have the long view

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>on China from our chief economists, Tom Worlick. He's based

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in Washington now, but he spent eleven years in Beijing,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's just published a book based on his time there,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at least in part, called China The Bubble That Never Pops. Tom.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you back on the podcast. In your

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>recent piece for Business Week about your book, you started

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with this line, don't tell Trump, but China's winning. Is

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>China winning everything or just the fight against COVID nineteen.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>So COVID nineteen is is a kind of stress test

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for for how economic systems function. And if you look

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at how China and the US have performed in the

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>last six months, China is actually doing rather better. China's

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>got the virus under control. The US doesn't have the

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>virus under control. China managed to control unemployment, the U

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>saw unemployment rise to levels not seen since the Great Depression.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>China's poised to get back to growth. Factories are already

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in a better place than they were a year ago.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>The US is still a long way underwater, so there's

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a broader point there as well. I think the way

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we look at the Chinese model is flawed. We only

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>see the downsides and the stresses. We don't see the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>strengths and the sources of resilience well, and the general,

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the general thesis of your book is

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that China is stronger than it looks economically. Certainly. I

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>know when I was working in the investment world and

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>people would say, what are your top three or top

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>five risks for the year, And when you hear the

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of strategist talk about it, if they had sort

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of run out of one, they would just throw in

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>China blowing up, because it was sort of a standard

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that you would expect China's debt issues and financial

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>problems to finally all come home to roost. You're saying

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that we could carry on waiting quite a long time. Yeah,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so I was in I was in China for eleven years,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and for that entire time, there was this sort of

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thread of pessimism, thread of doom, almost running through the

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Western commentary on China. Yes, the story went tem percent

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>growth looks impressive, but if you pope beneath the surface,

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's all financed by debt. All the debt is being misallocated.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a bubble and it's going to blow up, and

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of course it doesn't ever blow up. So my motivation

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in putting pen to paper for this book was, of

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>course mainly fame and wealth beyond my wildest dreams, but

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, I also wanted to explain why the bubble

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>never pops, and I think an important reason is we

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the negatives, we don't consider the positives. And

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on the financial system, what that means is we look

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at the massive build up of debt. We look at

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>how the debt has been allocated to zombie firms and

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>real estate developers building ghost towns in the desert, and

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>those are big problems. But what we forget is for

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>bad loans to turn into a financial crisis, you also

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>need to have a funding problem for the banks. And

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>because China's saving rate is so high, and because it's

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to take money out of the country, the funding

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>base for the banks is actually really solid. And as

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you say, there's all the things that people identify that

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a weaknesses. You know that debt exists um, But you're

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that there is also that there is a corresponding

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>strength there which the government has room to support the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>banks in a way they don't in other countries. I

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think you know some one of a couple of your

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>other strengths that you point out is that state intervention

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that you have there is actually effective and strength, not

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just a question of of meddling in the economy and

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>getting in the way of markets. And you have the

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sheer scale of the economy. That's also an advantage, isn't it. Yeah.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>When we look at the state system in China from

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>our perspective here in the West, where we, you know,

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>firmly believe that free markets of the answer, we just

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>see corruption and we see inefficiency, and those are real problems.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>If you look at return on assets for China's state firms,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they're much lower than return on assets for private firms.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But what we miss is that for countries that are

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>big and that have somewhat effective industrial planners and which

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are still at an early stage in their development, state

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>ownership can be a powerful instrument of development. The state

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>banks can finance acquisitions of new technologies, the state and

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>enterprises can deploy those technologies at a massive scale, and

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that becomes an instrument which can take China's on me

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as a whole closer to the technology frontier and make

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>it more productive, even as the state sector itself is

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>inefficient when looked at from a sort of narrow balance

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sheet accounting perspective. No, and obviously that's something we're being

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>reminded of in many countries of the important In some areas,

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the government really is the only one that can intervene,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and boy if they've done so in response to COVID nineteen. Now,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've achieved one important thing. You've managed to get

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this book out before the bubble pops, which I'm sure

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>was a concern for your publisher, But you probably weren't

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>expecting to have it come out in the middle of

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, which clearly has meant that you weren't able

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to have any lavish book party. So I'm sorry, not

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg would have thrown you any but has the

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>last few months changed your view on any of the

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>arguments you've made in your book or put them in

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a different perspective. Perhaps it's it's an emotional roller coaster

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>being on this podcast. Stephanitiely, I thought you were offering

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>me a lavish book party, and then in the very

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>next sentence it was yanked away from me. Um. Fortunately,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be working from home for the foreseeable future,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>so no one will be able to see the disappointment

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>on my face. So so so covid' is a stress

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>test for the Chinese economy. And let's think about what

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>happened in the first six months of the year. So

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>real estate developers didn't sell any houses, state owned enterprises

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>saw their profits turn into losses. Local governments didn't sell

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>any land, and they saw their tax revenue collapse. And

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>who are the biggest borrowers in China's economy, Well, it's

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the real estate developers, the state owned enterprises, and the

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>local governments. So if there was going to be a

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis in China, presumably it would have just happened.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>All of the biggest borrowers saw their income collapse, they

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't service their loans. This was the moment when we

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>should have seen a financial crisis, and clearly that didn't happen. Um.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a reminder of some of the

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of hiding in plain site sources of strength in

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>China as economy. In China's financial system, the banks have

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a very strong funding base, and so they don't actually

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>need loans to be repaid on time. They can say

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to the borrowers, you know what, we know this is

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult quarter, maybe even a very difficult year.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You pay us back in the second half, or even

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you pay us back in one Private businesses are going

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to be letting go of workers and canceling investment projects.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But China has a massive state sector inefficient, but the

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>government can use the state sector as a kind of

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a counter cyclical instrument and say to the state sector,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, don't let any workers go, and accelerate

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that investment project. And what that means is the economy

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>can climb out of the COVID hole a bit quicker

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>than it otherwise would. So we have obviously had the

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>events in Hong Kong, the passing of the legislation in

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong in the last few weeks, and and one

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that has been very striking is the way that

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>along with the economic success and apparent resilience, the Chinese

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>government is sort of doubling down on some of the

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more uncompromising aspects of its economic models. Shall we say,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at China and you know the major change

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it has to have over the next few years, and

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>then the government is trying to achieve is to move

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from being an export driven economy to a consumer driven economy.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the fond belief of many economists and

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly many outside policymakers has always been that it's quite

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to be a really successful kind of individualistic, consumer

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>driven economy when you're not giving those consumers rights as

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>citizens and moving towards a democracy. Is that being proved

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong in China? So I don't want to come across

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>as um. I don't want to come across as as

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like a Pollyanna on China's social system. Clearly there are

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely enormous costs to China's social system. The question is

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is that going to be Is that going to translate

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>into economic costs? And the answer so far has been no.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's two reasons for that. Um. So

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the first reason we sort of alluded to Stephanie is

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>China's position in the development process. Right, so, when do

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you need freethinking innovators, Well, you really need freethinking innovators

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>when you get to the technology frontier and you need

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to innovate, and that's not where China is. China's GDP

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>per capita is the third of the level in the

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>United States. There are a long way from the technology frontier,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and that means that for the next foreseeable future, growth

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a process of catching up and copying,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a process of pushing act and developing innovative

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>technologies themselves. The second reason I think is that actually

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a somewhat we have a settled view of

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between social systems and economic progress, which actually

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>China is challenging. Right. Um, we think that democracy, markets

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and growth go together, right, And if you have markets,

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>then you will grow, and also also if you have markets,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that will be a driver of democracy. And actually what

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in China is that these relationships which seems

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so settled in the West don't actually necessarily hold well.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>These relationships kind of reassert themselves over the long term.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think as we get closer to the technology front frontier,

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the chances are that they will Is that going to

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>matter for China in the next three for five years

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>when g d P per capita is still a third

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of the level in the United States. I think the

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>answer is probably no. But isn't the mess lesson of

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the Huawei controversy and some of these others involving China

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>technology is that they are closer to that frontier than

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>we like to think. And indeed, in that sector that

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be, they have one company that is

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much dominant. Yeah. I think there's two things there.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing is UM, technological progress is unevenly distributed, right, So, Yeah,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>if you look at five G or AI or sustainable

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>energy for example, China is at or near or pushing

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>back the technology frontier. UM. If you look at other areas,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>China still lags by a considerable margin. China can't make

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>competitive semiconductors, China can't make competitive airplanes for example. UM.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the second point I would make is that

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the success of Huawei UM and sort of

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the advances they've made in five G I think goes

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to UM the sort of confused approach that we have

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to thinking about China in the West. Right, on the

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one hand, we say state and enterprise is a huge

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and inefficient and corrupt, and they are an impediment to

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>China's growth um And we also say Huawei is pretending

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a private company, but secretly it's state and enterprise.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>And then in the same breath we say Huawei is

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>dominating the next generation of the most critical technology for

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the future of the world economy. So which is it

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the state and enterprises? These kind of like corrupt, inefficient

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>dinosaurs who are dragging China down, or are they technology

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>innovators who are going to dominate the future of communication?

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Can't be both right? Either argument stems from fear, and

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the uniting force in in quite

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the commentary around China these days. But

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we have certainly done the long term view, and I'm

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sure we'll talk about this again. I'm interested, just as

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a final question, if the bubble had popped before you've

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>got this book out, had you and your publisher had

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>any conversation about changing the title or what what would

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>plan b So the bubble that took a long time

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to hop with a quick with a new forward. So

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly by publishing a book with this title, Stephanie, I

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have tempted fate and increase the chances that the bubble

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>will pop. So what's absolutely critical is that list listeners

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to the Stephonomics podcast go out immediately and buy a

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>copy of the book so I can enjoy some royalties

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>before my arguments and conclusions are falsified by events. To all,

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, Thanks Stephanie, thanks for listening to Stephanomics.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week with more on how COVID

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is transforming the global economy. In the meantime, you

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, webs app or

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, and for more news and

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>analysis from Bloomberg Economics, you just have to follow at

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Economics on Twitter. This episode was produced by Magnets Hendrickson

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Sharon Chen and Tom Orlick. Lucy Meekin

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is the acting executive producer of Stephonomics and the head

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesca Levy.