WEBVTT - Hoops Tonight - Celtics pull away from Miami

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The volume Lakers Tonight is presented by FanDuel Sports Book.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no better place to make every moment more than

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with FanDuel. You get great odds in markets for the

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA and HL college and so much more. It's America's

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>number one sports book. It's super easy to use. Plus

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you can combine multiple bets from the same game into

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a same game parlay. If you are new, just download

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the FanDuel Sports Book app to get started. Now sign

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>up with promo cod json T so they know I

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sent you. Twenty one plus in president Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Permitted parishes only, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Virginia

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>or West Virginia. First online real money wager only. Refund

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>issued as non withdrawalable site credit that expires in fourteen days.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Restrictions apply see terms at sports book dot FanDuel dot com.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Gambling problem called one eight hundred, next step or text

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>next step to five three three four two in Arizona

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or visit CCPG dot org slash chat in Connecticut

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler or visit FanDuel dot com slash

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>RG in Colorado, Indiana, New Jersey, in Virginia one eight

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seven seven seven seven zero stop in Louisiana one eight

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred to seven zero seven one one seven for confidential

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>help in Michigan one eight seven seven eight hope and

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>why or text hope and Why to four six seven

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>three six nine in New York. In Tennessee redline dial

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred eight eight nine nine seven eight nine

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee. Visit www one eight dot one eight hundred

0:01:46.040 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>gambler dot net in West Virginia. So let's get started

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with this game. I said to you guys throughout this series,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and much to the chagrine of Miami fans, I said

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that Boston is by far the better team on both

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>ends of the floor. And obviously, and I'm strictly talking

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>about talent there, because most frequently I'll get people that

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>will say things like, hey, if they're a Jekyl and

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>High team, that means they're not a good basketball team.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point. Hey, if they're too two with

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Heat, maybe they're not that much better than Miami.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>That's also a fair point. I don't disagree with those details,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but in a vacuum strictly looking at talent, Boston is

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly more talented then Miami both ends of the floor.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>To give you an idea, coming into tonight, Boston was

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve points better then Miami in half court settings per

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one possessions. Miami was giving you about ninety points per

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>every one half court possessions was actually pretty good, about

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>eight points better than Milwaukee faired against this Boston defense.

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But Boston, for all their limitations, against a very good

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami defense, they were averaging about a hundred and two

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>points per half court possession. But that static half court

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>environment is just one part of the game of basketball. Now,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where your overall talent will be most on display,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because when teams are squared up and there's no advantage

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>either way, that's where talent has to take over. You'll

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>see freakishly athletic teams succeed in transition. You'll see really

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>skilled players like Lucas thrive in slow pace environments. You'll

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>see really big teams thrive in offensive rebounding and depending

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>defending the paint and things like that. But those are

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>all ancillary factors. Those are all, like I said, swing

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>factors that occur outside of that static half court environment,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and the story of this entire playoff run for Boston

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>has been losing games outside of the static half court environment.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>They were a much better half court offensive team than

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>both of Milwaukee and Miami, and for all the limitations

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that Brooklyn had, and they were a very good offensive team.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>That was where Boston had to win in some of

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the swing factors of the game. But as you saw

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>again in the first half tonight, Miami goes into the halftime,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe they were up by four. I can't remember exactly,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>but that a little bit of a lead, and it

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was textbook. They were getting destroyed on the offensive glass.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe Miami had a twelve to two second chance

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>points advantage in the first half. Boston only had ten

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at ten to seven turnover disadvantage, but Miami was running

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>out and getting layups on every single one of them.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Boston's transition defense has been awful in this entire playoff run.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up a hundred and forty points per one

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred transition opportunities, which is last among all four teams

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the conference finals. So Miami knows because

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They're well coached, and they're great in those details, and

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they're great in those swing factors. If they try to

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>avoid the half court environment at all costs, they can

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>win games, and they did. I told you guys coming

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>into this series that I thought Boston was good enough

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to sweep Miami, but that I expected Miami to push

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it to six because I figured they'd take a couple

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of games off of Boston because of all of that

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sloppiness that I talked about, and you've seen that resoundingly

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>displayed in that series. I've been wrong about a lot

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of things in this playoff run, just like everybody is predicting.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Predicting sports is a huge pain in the ass. But

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this particular Boston team I've had a really good feel for.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, Miami's offense is not bad. I had.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I was pessimistic about them compared to some of the contenders.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Like when people would ask me, is my Miami a contender,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd routinely say no, because I didn't think they had

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the top end offensive talent to be able to hang

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>with some of the best teams in the league. But overall,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they're a good offensive team. They were twelve in offense

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this season, which is not bad. That's above average, right.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>They have two All Stars on the team, all Star

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.679
<v Speaker 1>caliber players in the form of bamb At a Bio

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy Butler. Tyler Harrow obviously he missed part of

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>this series with injury, but even when he was on

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the floor, Miami struggled to score. Overall, this is a

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 1>decent Miami offense, and Boston has utterly and completely shut

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>them down over the course of this series. I thought

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>early on they struggle with some coverage stuff. I thought

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they were dropping way too much. They still dropped way

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>more than I thought they would in this series, but

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>early on Miami made them pay for that. But over

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last twelve quarters, so three games,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve quarters, Boston has held Miami to twenty five points

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>or less in ten of the twelve quarters. The two

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>outliers were that first quarter in Game three when Boston

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>mailed it in and it cost him the game and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the series be over by now if it wasn't for that,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the fourth quarter of Game four when Boston

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was up by a million points and all the bench

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>players were in the game. So basically, at any point

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in time where Boston was engaged defensively, Miami could not

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>score the basketball. Jimmy Butler was a complete ship show

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>again tonight after being a ship show in the last game.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I understand so many people are gonna be like,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he's hurt, and I get that, and I'm I'm not

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>undercutting the injuries to Jimmy Butler, Tyler Harrow, and Kyle Lowry.

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>They are real. They are a thing that was absolutely

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>had a factor in this series. It's very possible that

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these games are closer if those guys are healthy.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But also, the better you are, the more Boston respects

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you as an opponent, and they don't do what they

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>did in Game three. Everything is depending on each other

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. But Janis and kd their efficiency tanked

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>against this Boston defense. Both of them utterly fell apart

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their ability to put the ball in

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the basket efficiently compared to their regular season performance against

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this Boston defense. So, guess what did you think Jimmy

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Butler was above that? Did you think Jimmy Butler was

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna succeed where Kadie and Janice failed? It wasn't gonna happen.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, did. I thought the drop coverage early

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>in the series, Jimmy was able to get downhill way

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>too easily, way too often, and he got a bunch

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>of easy shots. And then in Game two was all

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>transition stuff. I mean it was like pick six, pick six,

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pick six, right, But overall I expected Jimmy Butler to

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>have a nightmare series against Boston's defense, and he has,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And even if his knee was perfectly healthy, I still

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>believe to some extent he would have had that type

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of nightmare series. Baman a bio same thing. Like, again,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this is an all star level talent, and he's a

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of issues with aggression that need to be

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>addressed by this Miami team in the off season. Like

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>if Miami loses the series, which I expect him to.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand the culture. I understand the power of that culture.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand the power of coaching. I think Erik Spoelstra

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>might be the best coach in all of basketball, and

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>his performance in this series was excellent, capitalizing on those

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>swing factors versus Boston. But there's a limitation to that.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>There's a ceiling, and the ceiling is lower than what

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>talent can bring because this is a Boston team that's

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>not sharp in all of those areas I thought he made.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Judoka got soundly out coached in this series. I thoroughly

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with his defensive strategy, and it's still worked because

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the overall talent gap and just how ridiculously talented

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this Boston defense is. But this is if you're Miami

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, as as powerful as your culture is,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to identify somebody out there that you can

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bring into this system that can be a supreme offensive

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>engine for you, because I think as a as Jimmy

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Butler can lead you to the two near the mountaintop

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in down years like the bubble guys, like what happened

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that year. If you guys remember Kde was out, Kyrie

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was out, Steph Curry was out. There were a lot

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of swing factors that allowed a weaker Miami team to

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>rise to the top of that pile. And at a

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>certain point Miami is gonna have to confront that. I

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk a little bit about the third quarter

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>run from Boston because I thought it was inevitable and

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they outscored Miami thirty two to sixteen in that In

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that quarter, and that was where they cleaned up those details.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>When you have that big of an advantage in the

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>half court, all you have to do is clean up

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>those details, and you're just about guaranteed to go on

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the run. You Know what's funny is Tatum had a

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad game in terms of his ability to make shots.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But this is the advantage of the way Boston's offense

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is put together because if you look at if you

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>look at Boston's offensive construct, it's a driving kick offense, right,

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's you've got Jason Tatum, who's this supremely talented

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive wing. You've got Jalen Brown who's this supremely talented

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive wing. You've got Marcus Smart who's a great driving

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>kick guard. You've got Derek White who is every bit

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is capable of being that type of dribble drive guard

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that Marcus Smart is. You've got Al Horford and Great

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams are a great spot up players. You've got Peyton

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Pritchard bringing scoring punch off the bench. When you've got

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that type of talent depth on offense, it's kind of

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like a it's kind of like a game of whack

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a mole, and like, okay, congrats. You've got Marcus Smarten

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to have Jayson Tatum to have a rough night. But

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>tonight Jalen Brown had it going and Derek White got

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it going, and that was enough to carry you offensively.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You could go into Game six and Derek White could

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have a rough night and Jalen Brown could have a

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rough night, But chances are Tatum will play a lot better,

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and chances are Marcus Smart will play a lot better.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You might have a crazy four or five three night

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>from Peyton Pritchard. Right when you have this type of

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>depth of offensive talent, just by virtue of odds, there's

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a good chance for a couple of those guys to

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get hot. I remember I was talking with Colin Coward

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday about how to compete with luck, because to

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>win in the NBA playoffs, you need luck. You need

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>some things to go your way, whether that's injury luck

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or whether that's shooting luck, guys getting hot. But I

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>said to Colin, the way you combat that is by

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>getting multiple cracks at the table. The more opportunity ease

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you have. If I told you you've got seven polls

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at the slot machine or the roulette table instead of

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>two chances are you're gonna win three or four of them, right,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of the way I look at it.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And when you've got six guys that are capable of

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going for twenty plus points, chances are two or three

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of them are gonna get hot on any given night.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's the advantage of Boston's overall offensive depth and

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the way that that can carry them for stretches in

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA playoffs. Let's look forward for Boston here, and

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, it's not over. This is a team

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that is routinely every single opportunity they've had to close

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>a deal to take a lead in a series, they

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have shown their ugly side the basically Game five of

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this series in Game seven of last series against Milwaukee

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are the only two times I can think of in

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>his last two Hounds where Boston put multiple good performances together.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They fell down one out of Milwaukee with a sloppy effort,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and then they kicked their ass in Game two. Then

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>they came out in Game three and they were sloppy

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>again and dug themselves in a big hole. Then they

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>came out in Game four and smacked them again. Then

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they came out in Game five on their home floor

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and laid an egg. Then they went on the road

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in game six, they controlled them again, and then they

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>come back in game seven, and finally they have a

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>second good performance in a row, and it's enough to

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>win the series. You look at this series, my They

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>come out and play really well in the first half

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and take the lead, and then they get smacked in

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the second half and a third quarter run where they

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>look unrecognizable. Then they go in game two on the

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>road and beat the ship out of them, and then

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>go home in game three and lay the mother of

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>all eggs at home in front of your own crowd,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>before you blow them out again in game four, and

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>then finally tonight they put a second good performance together.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That is routine evidence that tells us we should not

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>trust these guys, which again, regardless of what happens in

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this series. And my guess is they're gonna be able

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to close out Miami in game six because Miami is

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not as good as Milwaukee was. And I don't think

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they said, I simply don't think they have the talent

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to get this job done. Even that horrific performance from

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Boston in Game three, they still were a couple of

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>shots away from stealing that game. I think Miami's gonna

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>close it out and get or Boston's gonna close it

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>out in game six. So looking forward, I think Golden

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>State's gonna close out Dallas. This inconsistent effort, this inconsistent

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to detail that might get you beat against Golden State.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we talked about earlier, Boston's given up a hundred

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and forty points per hundred possessions in transition, which is

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>last among the four teams in the conference finals. That's

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a swing factor. Boston is giving up more offensive rebounds

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>than Miami and Golden State. They're turning the ball over

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more than Dallas in Miami. That's Golden State's one weakness.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>They are weak in the details compared to the competition

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's remaining in this field, Golden State is going. I'm

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>super interested to see this matchup because Golden State only

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>managed about a hundred eight points per one hundred possessions

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>against Memphis, and I couldn't figure out how to filter

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that for John moranch just because of some limitations of

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the the uh second spectrum stats on NBA dot Com.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see it specifically without John morand because

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I bet you it's significantly lower because Golden State lit

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies on fire when John Randt was on the floor,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't score efficiently against Memphis relative to the

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>other two teams. So I'm super curious to see what

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this matchup looks like. I'm gonna dive way further into

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it in the film once we get out of these series.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And again, you're gonna want to follow me on Twitter

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at Underscore Jason and lt to see that breakdown when

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the time comes. But against Golden State, you're gonna be

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>put in some predicaments that Miami didn't put you in.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>If you bring a weak defensive effort at any stretch

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>during Golden State, you're gonna get beat. Dallas is a

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>good defensive team, and they gave up what sixty eight

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>points in the second half of that game through a

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Game two that they blew. When a Golden State is

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna space you out and put you in real five

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>out predicaments, there's gonna be some predicaments that Boston is

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna put them in, right, I mean, like they might

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have to play Kevon Looney the whole series just to

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>match up physically with the Al Horford Robert Williams front court.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be predicaments going both ways. And again,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dive too much further into the

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>details because I'd rather do a whole video about this

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>once we get out of these series. But all I'm

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>saying is these series are defined and decided by the

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tiniest of margins, and you can't afford to be sloppy.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you are, this Golden State team is gonna

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>beat you. And as of right now, even though I

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>think Boston is just a hair better overall in talent,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Golden States a better offensive team, but I

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think Boston is a significantly better defensive team. And so

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint, you know, I'm Boston has the tools

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to get the job done in the next round. But

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a Golden State team that's been there before.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot about scar tissue in the last show,

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and I had Boston fans in my mentions and in

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>commons saying things like, oh, we've been in the conference

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>finals all these times. These guys have been there, they've

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>lost they have scar tissue. Two. No, they don't. If

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they did, you'd see it on the floor, you'd see

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it in their effort, you'd see it in the attention

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to detail, and it's not there. So maybe they do

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>have scar tissue, but it's not enough. I know for

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a fact that Golden State is gonna come out tomorrow

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>with an incredible effort to try to close that series.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Can Dallas still win? Yeah, they're really good and they're

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>con persistently generating quality three. So if they go in

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there and they you really well, Dallas might still upset them.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's no concern from anybody watching that game whether

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>or not Golden State's gonna come out focused. I have

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>no idea whether or not Boston's gonna come out focused.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I haven't looked at it yet, but there

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>might be an interesting little first quarter spread bet for

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Miami and that in that game six, because it's a

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>coin flip whether or not they're gonna come out and

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>care enough to do the job. And that's a huge

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>monumental difference between this Boston team and this Golden State team,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's why I pick Golden State as of right now. Alright,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna switch gears here a little bit. We're gonna

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talk some Lakers. Okay, So, like I said earlier, I

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>covered the Lakers over the course the last two years.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>That's uh, was the original inception of this show, although

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>things have been shifted, and um, it's a team that

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, I'm not a Laker fan. This is

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>something I have to encounter with Laker fans all the time.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Laker fan. I just covered them over

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last two years. That said, that

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>team in particular, I fell in love with that team.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I fell in love with their approach. I thought they

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>were one of the toughest teams that I can remember watching.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>They very rarely lost multiple games in a row. They

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>were incredible with their focus and their commitment to the details.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's so interesting about the decline, you know.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I I We're gonna talk about the coaching search here

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in a second, but like, it's pretty bizarre to see

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and a d the same two guys that were

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so bought into Frank Vogel and what he did in

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that season, come out flat and just simply not caring.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's just part of that downfall. And ironically, the Lakers,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>as much as I fell in love with them as

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a basketball team in twenty I despise them now they

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>offend me as a basketball fan watching their approach day

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to day from the front office down, the way the

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>owner behaves, the way the general manager behaves, the stubbornness

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of Frank Vogel all season, the commitment from the players.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It was awful. It was offensive to watch, and it

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a pain that I had to cover

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>them the way that I did. But that's such as

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>life covering the NBA, and things can change quickly. But

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to take some time tonight to talk a

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the Russell Westbrook trade rumors that have

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>been flying around, my thoughts on the head coaching search,

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and then just overall what I think needs to happen

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>this offseason for the Lakers to recover. So with this

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>rush trade, and you're seeing a lot of intel coming

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>out from a bunch of different sources about whether or

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not they're going to trade Russell Westbrook. And there's two

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>specific rumors that are that are kind of leading this charge.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The first is the Lakers brass is asking coaches when

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they're interviewing them, what would you do with Russell Westbrook.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that report, right, and then I even saw

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one today that Terry Stotts is particularly excited about all

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that he could do with Russ, which don't

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>even get me started on that. The second thing is

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there's extensive reporting that says that the Lakers feel like

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they can't attach a first round pick to Russ, which

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is stupid on like seven different levels. First of all,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just pride talking. Okay, you're concerned, you're concerned about

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the optics of attaching a first round pick to get

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>rid of Russ. Are you aware that you're a dumpster fire?

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Are you aware that everyone in the league already thinks

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you're the most poorly run franchise in the league. Are

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you aware that most coaches wouldn't even consider the idea

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of going to you like we heard about with Quinn

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Snyder because of your micro management and your lack of

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>organization in general unprofessionalism. You're already a dumpster fire. Your

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>reputation is already in the trash. So you expecting to

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to heal that or repair that to some extent because

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you managed to flip Russ without a first round pick.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous. And then, secondly, the only thing that should

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>factor into whether or not you a hatch a first

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>round pick should be what is coming in return, because

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if good players are coming, if you're gonna get good

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>basketball players back, then you have to give out assets.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're under the impression that you can

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>get good basketball players in return, for us, who cares

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>about the optics of attaching a first round draft pick.

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just such a twisted approach to the whole thing,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's just the latest indicator of how much of

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a disaster this ownership in front offices. But let's let's

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about this Rush trade from the standpoint of how

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>important it is to get him off the roster. The

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>thing with Russ this year was toxic. It was toxic

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>with the fans, It was toxic with the coach, It

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>was toxic with the weird you know, the weird posturing

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of clutch sports and the Lakers front office. It was

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>toxic with Russ himself. It the way that he would

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the press and refuse to accept blame for

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>anything that he did during the entire season. The whole

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thing was toxic. So I don't care what Russ says

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to apologize. I don't care what Terry Stotts thinks he

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can do with Russ. If you bring him back into

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>training camp, you are willingly signing up for a toxic

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>environment and thus punting the season, namely the twentie season

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of Lebron James. And I said last night on the show,

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be the last truly great season

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of Lebron james career potentially. So it's a big time

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>punt that you're signing up for there. And I've had

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Leaker fans be like, Oh, it's posturing. They're doing it

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for for you know, to try to help with the

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>trade value in these negotiations. Calling himself said that on

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>his show, and again I hope that's the case. But

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>for me personally, I can't give the like is the

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt? They have burned that down For me,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>when I see the Lakers do something and I have

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether or not it's them operating on some

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>higher plane mentally or them not knowing what they're doing,

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna error on the side of not knowing what

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>they're doing because routinely they have demonstrated that to us.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And so as far as the rush trate goes, you

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>simply have to get rid of him because of the

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>fact that he will propagate a toxic environment if you

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>allow him to come into training camp. And then secondly,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's what you get in return. Now there's a fear, Oh,

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna bring back these bad contracts. Oh man, I'm

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure if I want to pay Gordon Hayward two

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>years at sixty million or two years at thirty million

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a year, or oh, I'm not sure I want to

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>take on that that uh you know that that Buddy

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Hell contract or whatever whatever it is that you're concerned about.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Here's the deal, guys, Russ is a bad contracts. You're

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna get Russ. You're gonna get back contracts in return.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the deal. That's what you're signing up for. But

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the difference. I thought Russ was a net negative

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>player this year. I thought he had an overall negative

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>basketball effect, even if we ditch all the toxicity. The

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>only people who feel otherwise about that are Russ stands

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and people who routinely overlooked most of the things that

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he did this year out of their own fanhood, which

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>again I grew up a lebron stance. I'm not I'm

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>not hating on people who behave that way. I'm just

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>calling it what it is. It clouded their judgment. Russ

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was a negative basketball player with this team because of

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>his inability to be effective off the ball, because of

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>his inconsistent defensive effort and focus, because of his shot selection,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because of his attitude, because of especially in key moments

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of games, his inability to finish around

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the rim and the way that hurt the Lakers and

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>transition defense, his propensity to make catastrophic mistakes at the

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>end of basketball games. It was mad. It was all that.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the way I look at it, you have

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at the Andrew Wiggins example. Now, Andrew Wiggins

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is the supreme example. You have almost no chance of

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>hitting that much of a home run. But if you

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>can get a smaller version of the Andrew Wiggins example,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're looking for here. Andrew Wiggins was considered

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a disaster in Minnesota on a max contract. I think

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>he had to promise he was gonna work hard when

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he signed when he signed the deal, if I remember correctly.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't quote me on that because I could be wrong,

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But what happened with Andrew Wiggins, he got traded to

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors, which was the latest example of brilliant asset management.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And it's the thing that the Nets have to be

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking with Kyrie and it's the thing that Philly has

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking with James Harden. Never allow yourself to

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lose a player for nothing. Because the them flipping k

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>D for D'Angelo Russell and then flipping d' angelo Russell

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew Wiggins and retaining and taking back picks in

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the process. Not only was that genius asset management. Now

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wiggins is this pivotal piece of the team that

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is gonna win the NBA Championship. Like he's

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>been just flat out better than Klay Thompson on this team.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how good he's been. And so Andrew Wiggins lacked

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the audacity in the upstairs aggression to be a lead

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>swing man, a superstar wing but and a tertiary role

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>or even further down than that. When he's able to

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>fall into the background and focus on the little things,

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he's great at it. Because that's what happens when you

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>take supremely talented individuals, talent individuals that are so talented

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that they dictated large contracts and you put them in

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a position where they can focus on specific things that

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're good at. And so that needs to be the

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>thought process with this Russell Westbrook thing. They're overpaid role

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>players all around the league. The classic example of this

0:28:58.160 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 1>was Otto Porter Jr. Remember when he was so good?

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It when he was with Washington and everyone's like, oh,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>do we pay him? Do we not? And Washington didn't

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>want to pay him, and so he ended up signing

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that big deal and go into Chicago. Right. I actually

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>think they they might have signed him and then traded

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>him to Chicago. I can't remember exactly, but my point

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is Auto Porter Jr. Dictating that massive contract as a

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>role player. Since then, he's been an overpaid role player

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>right until he signed in but in it when he's

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>been healthy with Golden State, he's been a monster. He's

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>been huge for their spacing. He's given them one trivil

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>pull up game like, the ability to attack close outs

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and get pull up jump shots. He's been huge for

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>their rebounding and in allowing them to play some of

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>their smaller lineups. That's an overpaid role player who slotted

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in on a great team and was great. That's the

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>type of guy you gotta be targeting with the rush trade.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You need to bring back two or three guys that

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are massively overpaid for their position, but at the same time,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>next to Lebron James and Anthony Davis in smaller roles,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they can excel. And that's the way I look at it.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>With this rust steal, You're flipping one terrible contract that

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>actively hurts you on the court for two or three

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>massive overpaid contracts that can functionally help your basketball team.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the approach that they need to take. So let's

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>move on to this coaching starts really quick. So the

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>three names that have been thrown out or Terry Stotts

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>fired from Portland, Kenny Atkinson fired from Brooklyn famously for

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not playing DeAndre Jordan's like Katie and Kyrie wanted him to.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And then Darvin Ham, an assistant from the Milwaukee Bucks.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm huge on Darvin Ham for two reasons. First

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, this the defensive scheme that Milwaukee ran is

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely similar to what I think the Lakers will need

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to run next year. So the way that Milwaukee ran

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>their defense, if you guys remember, is they played like

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a twin shot blocker scheme, they play Jannie at the four,

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>brook Lopez at the five, and with Jannat's mobility, they

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>usually have him guard the pick and roll screener from

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the other team so that he navigates the pick and

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>roll coverages because he's more mobile, and then they'll talk

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>brook Lopez usually on the four man whoever it is

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that's their worst shooter, and have him weighed around at

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the basket right, and functionally with that, because Janice is

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>up at the screen and they're funneling guys to brook Lopez,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they gave up a crazy amount of three's, but they

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely shut down the pain right and as a result,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they have a functional defense over the course of the

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>last two years, one that was good enough to win

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>an NBA championship and one that really through Boston for

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a loop. Right. That concept is a seamless transition to

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Lebron in a d front court. As a matter

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of fact, like now again, is Lebron the same level

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of shot blocker as a brook lopezer A honest no.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But he's an amazing back line defender and he's great

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>at navigating pick and roll coverages if you need him to,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so you can run a very similar setup that what

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to to what Milwaukee ran with Lebron and a D.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Plus they're interchangeable. You can have Lebron work the screen,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or Lebron run the back line, or Anthony Davis can

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>do either as well, and you can They even give

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you the added flexibility of switching they have. You know,

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and a D is a better defensive front court

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>than Janis and brook Lopez when they're engaged. It's just

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't get him to try hard, which we're gonna get,

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>which we're gonna get to here in a minute. But

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>my point is, especially with the Lakers lack of perimeter defense,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the Lakers team that was horrific in containing

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>ball handlers this year. Chances are, unless they hit a

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch of home runs in the off season, that's going

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in a weakness for them again next year.

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're not going to be able to be a

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>team that plays, you know, really switchy, spread the floor

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>defensive scheme. Everybody, just hold onto your man type of deal.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to play into your shop blocking.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to funnel teams into the paint.

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So that is the ideal example of where the Milwaukee

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive schemes slide right in. So I love the idea

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of Darvin Ham coming in and sliding right in to

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>two and executing basically Milwaukee's defensive scheme with the Lakers now,

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive organization is a huge deal, and I don't know

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a ton about Darvin Ham on the offensive end of

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the floor, having at the time in this playoff runer

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>really dive into it. But I'm less concerned about that

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically for this this Laker team because Lebron and a

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>d are a brute force offense. They accomplish everything on

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the sheer power of their talent. So I'm more concerned

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about spacing concepts on the offensive end of the floor

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that I am about running, you know, coherent sets all

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. I like the Dallas Mavericks model getting guys

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that are routinely in the same spots on the floor,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>especially for a guy like Anthony Davis who's not a

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>great passer, if you can simplify his reads to the

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>point where it's like, hey, a d if you ever

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>find yourself in trouble, you know for a fact there's

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a guy in this spot, there's guy in that spot,

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's a guy in these other two spots. Because

0:33:57.800 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the way we routinely set up our spacing. That

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that I think they need to set up

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>their offensive vent. I'd love to see what Kenny Atkinson

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can do on on the offensive vent. I'd love to

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>see what Terry Stotts can do on the offensive vent.

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully you can get him as an assistant, right

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the spacing concepts are are what I'm

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>most interested in. And then last, it's the egos. You know,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and a d tuned Frank Vogel out. They were

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so bought in to everything that the team was doing,

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and they just they just bought out, They tuned them out.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a crazy thing, and I think it has

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with egos. This is not the

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 1>first time Lebron is tuned to coach out. He pretty

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>much tuned out David Blatt right now. David Blatt. If

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you've ever read Brian hit Windhorse and David Benneman's book

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about that year, David Blatt was also a huge pain

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>in the butt to deal with, and he had a

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>massive ego and there's other stuff going on. There. My

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>point is is that the establishment guys, these big coach personalities,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>seemed to clash with the egotistical titles, the guys like

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Lebron the guy. Right, if you have a Steph Curry,

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have like a supremely coachable player Tim Duncan,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>then you can have those guys play for all time

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>great coaches because those coaches are gonna resonate with that

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>player on a certain level. Right, I think there's I

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's I don't think it's a coincidence that Tyler

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has succeeded, that Jason Kidd has succeeded, the Email Udoka

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>has succeeded. These former players that recently played in the league.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Darvin Ham played in the league in this century. These

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>recent NBA players specifically tough guys, guys that represented toughness

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>when they were playing, which Tyler and Jason Kidd and

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Email Udoka and Darvin Ham absolutely did. I feel like

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>that specific archetype of coach has a better chance of

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>resonating and getting buy in from the egotistical stars around

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the league. Look at what he look at what Emai

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Udoka did to turn around the psychology of that Boston

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Celtics team. Look at how Jason Kidd in one season

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>got the Dallas Mavericks to buy into defense. Look at

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the job that tylu has done with l a Clippers.

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a coincidence that those guys have

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten buying. And like, if I actually thought that Lebron

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and a D would sit there and listen to Kenny

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Atkinson's you know, approach to offense and go like, hey, Kenny,

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a great idea. Let's try that. If

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought they'd do that, then maybe you want

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to target an offensive minded coach, right, I just don't

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>know that they necessarily would. And so having a real

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>trenches type of guy, a guy like Darvin Hand that

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>can look at Lebron and A D and be like,

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I need you guys to try every night, I need

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys to buy into training camp, I think that

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>brings the most value In this specific case, I would

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>argue that the most important detail for the Lakers to

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to contention next year, outside of anything else,

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is Lebron James and Anthony Davis being on the floor

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and playing hard, which neither of those two things happened

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>consistently this year, and I think Darvin Ham has the

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>best opportunity to accomplish that with those guys, especially with

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>him bringing over the defensive scheme from Milwaukee. Last but

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not least, I just wanted to quickly kind of go

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>over and I'll be really quick with us just the

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>just the what I think are the overall offense off

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>season needs for the Lakers. So when I do this

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, I always want to pay close attention

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to what is working in this playoff front, pay attention

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to what what types of constructs are working and what's not.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, I think I just talked about this,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so I won't get into it again. But spacing concepts,

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>which the Lakers were awful at this here copy what

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Dallas did in the form of just making sure that

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>guys are always in the consistent spots on the floor

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that allow your stars the best amount of space to operate. Then,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of personnel, we are once again seeing size

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in strength, specifically on the perimeter working not interior size.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Again the Brook Lopez I told you guys, Milwaukee got

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 1>destroyed with Brook Lopez on the floor in the Boston series.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It was the biggest mistake that Mike Budenholz Aer made

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in Game seven was playing brook Lopez thirty seven minutes.

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They got destroyed with brook Lopez on the floor. When

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they went small, they were great in the outscored Boston.

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Robert Williams. He's a big, but he's a mobile big

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that can run up and down the floor, hanging in transition,

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>cover ground when he needs to in five out situations,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>switch out onto perimeter players and succeed Kevin Looney all

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of the same things. Great defensive player can switch out

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>onto guards, dominant on the glass, those kinds of things.

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>If you are not. The Lakers need to avoid the

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional center archetype at all costs this summer and target

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>guys like Maxi Kleiba, like Kivan Looney, like Rob Williams.

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You can You're not gonna be able to get guys

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that caliber, but if you can find guys that are

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of that for the veteran minimum, guy like Damian Jones

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>who played for the Lakers a little bit this year,

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a younger player who's more mobile, that plays hard every night,

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those are the kind of guys you should target about overall.

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The what this postseason has proved once again is the

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>number one place where size matters is a perimeter. Your

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>guards need to be big, strong guards. Your wings need

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to be big, strong wings, not thin wings that are

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna struggle in the physicality the environment. That's what destroyed

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn in the first round. They had no size and

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>strength on the perimeter, and Boston bullied them as a result.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So flip flip Russ for overpaid role players that will

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>fit alongside Lebron and a d and with your veteran

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 1>minimum contracts or mid level exception or whatever it is,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you opt to use this summer target big strong perimeter players.

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And and if all those things happen, if they get

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Darvin ham and if Lebron James and Anthony Davis are

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>healthy and on the floor and caring, I genuinely believe

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers can rejoin contention now. Last but not least,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>do not have faith in that the Lakers have not

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated an ability to coherently follow a smart basketball plan.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>So chances are those things will not happen. And that's

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunate reality of the circumstance with Genie Buss at

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Helm. But it's a possible outcome. And that's the

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>way that I think it needs to go down for

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers to get back. All Right, guys, that is

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>all I have for tonight. As always, I sincerely appreciate

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys supporting the show and rocking with me. If

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys could take the time to like this video,

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I it sincerely appreciate that it helps us a lot. Also,

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the YouTube channel so you don't miss any

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>more of our shows. If you miss part of this

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>show and you don't have time to go back and

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>check it out on YouTube, check out our podcast feed

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>under Lakers Tonight and subscribe to that as well, and

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>then follow me on Twitter. I underscore Jason LT. I'll

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>be having a lot of videos coming out, especially once

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we get into the NBA Finals. All right, guys, we

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>will be live tomorrow night four, Game five of the

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Warriors in Neverick Series. I'll see you guys right after

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the final buzzer. Volume