WEBVTT - What is a particle?

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>What is everything made out of? That seems like a

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>simple question, and it also seems like a reasonable question.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know what I'm made out of, what

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>my food is made out of, what kittens are made

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>out of, what lava is made out of. It's also

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>an ancient question, I think, one that people have been

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>asking since people have been asking any questions. The Greeks,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>famous for asking questions in their sexy robes, thought that

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>everything was made of earth, air, water, and fire. And

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>modern science, of course, has made a lot of progress

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>here and uncovered some pretty weird and kind of shocking

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>news about what everything is made out of. What seems

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like smooth and continuous matter is actually made up of

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny little bits that are woven together into some extremely

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>fine mesh. And we are all made of the same

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>basic bits, some together to make me or you, or

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>kittens or lava. The world is of particles. But our

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>curiosity doesn't just end because we have that answer. We

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know what are these basic bits? How do

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>we think about them? What mental pictures should we have

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in our mind? Are they tiny dots of stuff or

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>rippling waves or some other concept that's too alien to

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>even imagine. And what does it tell us about the

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>universe that these are its basic building blocks?

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Or are they? So?

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Today, on Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe, we'll be tackling

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the basic yet confusing, the simple yet deep, the important

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but impossible question what is a particle?

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe. I'm Kelly Wiener Smith.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm a parasitologist and I'm particularly excited to be here today.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 3>But it might have been really cute if I had

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>been able to pull it off, but I didn't.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm Daniel.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist, which means I probably should know

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what a particle is.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, we've got the right expert on the show today.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>So Daniel, here's what I'm wondering. So you've told me

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>that you go to CERN in Switzerland to do your research.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Why doesn't the United States have the biggest particle collider?

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh. Why you are putting your foot in

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a sensitive spot right there. You know, for many years

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a race between the Europeans and the Americans.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So before CERN had the most powerful collider.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>We had one.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>It was outside of Chicago at Fermi Lab. It's called

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Tevatron. I did my PhD there. I had one

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>child born near that collider, and then my next child

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>born near Cerns. You know, not a kid at each collider.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Basically, wait, one of your kids was born abroad?

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my daughter Hazel was born in Switzerland, very close

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to cern That's cool.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Did you have to not pay because you were in

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Europe and they just do healthcare there or what was

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that like?

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Actually they told us that when we showed up for

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the delivery, we had to bring fifty thousand Swiss fronc

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in cash if we didn't have local insurance.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>WHOA.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that was going to be an issue.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But then we discovered this a law in Switzerland that

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're working there, which my wife was, they have

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to insure you. So even though she had all sorts

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of crazy pre existing conditions, we could buy insurance for

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>like one hundred franc and then we didn't have to

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for anything. So it was amazing.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Actually nice, Okay, that's good.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And the insurance company even offered to retroactively cover a

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>bunch of appointments to where we hadn't yet had insurance.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It was very different experience than American insurance.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's incredible. I'm going to get depressed if we

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>stay on this topic too long. Let's go back to

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>particle colliders. Okay, so you have had each of your

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 3>children near very large particle colliders. Why isn't the biggest

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>one in the US.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, they planned to build the biggest one in the US,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the Superconducting super Collider in Waxahachie, Texas, and they started

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>building it, and they spend billions of dollars digging a hole.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>But then the director of CERN.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>At the time came and testified before Congress saying it

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was a big waste of money because CERN was building

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>one that was going to be bigger and better and

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they should just cancel it. And Congress, for all sorts

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of complicated political reasons, listen to him and canceled the

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>American Superconnecting super Collider. And since then the lead has

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been in Europe and probably will for a while. And

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the US particle physics communities mostly focused on things like

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>neutrinos and stuff like that. So these days, if you

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want to do cutting edge, high energy particle physics at colliders,

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you got to go to Switzerland, which, hey, it's not

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>too bad.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>The chocolate's amazing, no doubt.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 3>You know what. Actually, I'm gonna go out on a

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>limb here and say I'm not a huge fantas with chocolate.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know you prefer Belgian I do.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there I said it. So every once in a

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 3>while I'll hear about like astronomy students who want to

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>get time on a telescope, but the telescope's all booked

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>up and it takes forever. Does cern have enough time

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 3>for everyone? So like, when that guy came to the

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>US and tanked our program, did he know he was

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 3>going to have enough time time for all of our

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>scientists to come over and do their work.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great question, And people often ask me

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>about that, like what's it like to set up your

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>experiment at the collider? But the reality is very different.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Telescopes and colliders don't work the same way. A telescope

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to point at the thing you want to

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>look at. So you write a proposal to say, let's

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>point our amazing telescope at this one star I want

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to study, and then it's not pointing at any other stars.

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>But a particle collider is very general.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It always just does the same thing smashes the particles

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>together and you take pictures of it, and then afterwards

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>you analyze it. So everybody who uses the collider uses

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the same data. They're just looking for different kinds of particles.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to point the collider at certain things.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't swap out what we're using to take pictures.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Every few years we turn the thing off, revamp it,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>build a new detector that's better, faster, higher resolution or whatever,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we make it as general as possible so

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody can use it so you don't have to swap

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>it out every day or every experiment. Everybody uses the

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>same data set, which makes it kind of crazy because

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's looking for discoveries in the set SA data set

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, So you could get scooped by

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>any of your thousands of colleagues Yanks.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>So do you actually need to be there in person

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 3>or if it's just data, they can make that available

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 3>anywhere right.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>CERN has long been at the forefront of the Internet.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We invented the web at CERN, for example, and we

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have excellent cloud computing and so we transfer that data

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. We've collaborated from Japan to Singapore

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to South Africa, to the northern tip of Canada, all

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>over the world. People analyze this data. Absolutely, you don't

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have to go. I go frequently because I have students

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>there and postdocs are like on site building stuff and

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>helping keep it run. But technically you don't have to

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at the data.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Cool. I mean, that's good and bad. I feel like

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>ecologists like we want to study exotic animals, but partly

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 3>because we want to go there, And I imagine it's

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of the same with cern, like it'd be nice

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>to go to Switzerland. But I guess the more important

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 3>thing is answering the question.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>It is nice to go to Switzerland, but then again,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's also nice to be able to do science without

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>having thousands of dollars to go to Switzerland, which means

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>smaller groups and not such institutions, for example, could also participate.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>So it makes it a little bit more democratic, you know.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Nice. That's awesome. Okay, So the whole point of having

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a large particle collider is so that you can figure

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>out what those particles are made of, Is that right?

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>The whole point of having a particle collider is that

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you can say you're smashing particles together and nearly the

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, which sounds pretty awesome at parties.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 3>It does, yeah, kind of like jousting for particles.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, particle colliders, I think, sort of have two different purposes.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>One is like, hey, let's take stuff and see what's

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>inside it. Let's start with something familiar, you know, like

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the proton, and smash it open and see what it's

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>made out of. And that's a continuation of like a

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>long glorious tradition of taking the stuff around us a

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>part to understand what it's made out of. You know,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm made of molecules, which are made of atoms which

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have a nucleus and electron, and the nucleus is made

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of protons. Let's go inside the proton. So that's definitely worthwhile.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>And we do that.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But colliders can actually do something else, even more powerful,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>which kind of sounds like magic, which is that they

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>can convert the mass of those protons into energy and

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then back into mass, and so what can come out

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the collision is not just a rearrangement of what

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>went in. It's not like chemistry where you're like this

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen moved from this atom to over there, and now

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a different kind of compound. You can annihilate

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>these things, and then you basically have like a budget

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to make anything. And the stuff that comes out of

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the collision doesn't just have to be like a refashioned,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>rearranged version of what went in. You can have entirely

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>new matter. It really is alchemy. So like protons go in,

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have this intermediate state of frothing energy, and then

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you can make whatever the universe can make, dark matter, muons,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other stuff. You're not just rearranging the protons.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>There's got to be some rules right for what you

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>can make.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, that's the whole premise of particle physics. There

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are rules, there are patterns. Quantum mechanics tells us what's

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>likely to happen in certain collisions. We look at those patterns,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we notice, oh, this typically happens, typically shoots out at

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>those angles.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>What are the rules that control this?

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely there are rules, but fundamentally it's random. Right, Like

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you do the same collision twice, you get two different answers.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it's quantum mechanical, it's not determined by the initial conditions.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's really a very powerful way to explore the

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>universe because you don't have to know what's out there

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to discover it. You smash protons together often enough,

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>eventually everything the universe can do, it will do, and

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you get to take pictures of it.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, imagine if you could build a box and

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>every kind of creature that could exist on Earth would

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>randomly cycle through that box. You could just sit there

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and watch and be like, oh, wow, I didn't know

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that existed. Oh look at those things.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>What are those? You know?

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>That would be pretty powerful. That's basically what we can

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do with particle physics.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Now you have my attention. Although that box, I guess,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>could mostly be showing me like different species of bacteria,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 3>which would be a bomber. You could show me different

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>speceis of bugs, that would be great.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it'd be mostly beetles. You're like, wow, it's basically

0:09:58.160 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>a beetle box.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 3>So there is that famous saying that like God is

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 3>inordinately fond of beetles, because there's this thought that beetles

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 3>are the most common species group on the planet, but

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>actually quite often those beetles are infected by more than

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 3>one species of hymenopter and wasp, and so we think

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 3>there might actually be more wasp species on the planet

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>than there are beetles based on that observation.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And probably those wasps are infected by viruses, so they're

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more viruses than wasps. Yes, and those viruses are made

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of particles, and boom a boom, we're back to the

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>topic of the episode.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, what makes up a particle, Daniel exactly?

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So we smash particles together, we look at what's inside them,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we annihilate them to make new kinds of particles. We

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have this idea that particles are what everything is made

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>out of. But I struggle, still after decades in this field,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>to understand this basic question what is a particle?

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>So I really want to explain to.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>People what we do know and what we still don't

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>know about this very basic concept that everybody talks about

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>all the time.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, first, let's hear what our listeners think. And if

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 3>you would like to be a listener who tells us

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 3>what you think, send us an email at questions at

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Daniel and Kelly dot org and we will get you

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>in the loop and send you a question from time

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to time and you can send us your answers. So

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 3>let's see hear how folks answer the question what is

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>a particle?

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>A particle is a thing that interacts with other things.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>A particle is really just an excitation in a field.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>A particle is a defined portion of something, something that

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is infinitesanly small to us.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the smallest unit of energy or mass.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that particles are the excitement of different friends,

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>spatial spots, and interaction.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>A particle could be very small vibrating field. A mass

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>or non mess object.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Exists within what we would perceive as matter.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>A particle is a sub microscopic kernel of energy and

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 4>or matter. A particle is an excitation of a field.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 4>I do know that particles aren't just tiny bits of matter.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 4>I've heard that there fields, or strings, or some other

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 4>impossible to understand little bits of the universe.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Particle is a ripple and a quantum field. Particle is

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the name we give to the smallest discrete, quantum little

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>bits that we know of and haven't been able to

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>break up.

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Further yet, an expression of a field where the chances

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 3>of that occurrence happening is the greatest. There. The more

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 3>think about, the bigger this rabbit warren is going.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think these answers perfectly encapsulate this episode. I mean, really,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an excellent snapshot because a lot of what people

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have said in here is correct. But also there's a

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>huge list of conflicting answers, right, you know, is it

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the smallest bit of stuff? Is it just something in

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>space time? Is it actually an excitation of a field?

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's so many conflicting concepts for what a particle.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Is, and is this one of those topics where at

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the end the answer is going to be we really

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>have no idea, could be all of these things? Or

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 3>is this a topic we're at the end. We're going

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 3>to have a pretty clear answer.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>At the end.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have a pretty clear answer, but not

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this episode, at the end of

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this journey, which might be in ten or one hundred

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>years unfortunately. Okay, I mean we're going to get somewhere.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Today we have a pretty crisp clear view of what

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a particle is mathematically, but we also know why that's

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not really satisfactory, and there's lots of big open questions

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about what that really means. So it's not like all

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is a scam because we don't know what

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a particle is. We have a working definition, but we

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>also know that it's incomplete, just like most of science.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, Oh yeah, amen, All right, well, so let's start

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>with the historical perspective. Bring me back to the beginning.

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 3>When did we start thinking about this question?

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's important to trace the origin of

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this historically because it still shapes how we think about

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And you know, whenever you ask a big

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>question about science, you got to think about like what

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of answer you're looking for.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And in science, even though.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We try to be like mathematical and open minded and

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>let the data tell us what the universe is saying,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we still need to understand that data. We still need

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to interpret it. We still need to cogitate on it

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in a way that makes sense to us. And we're

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of limited in our mental intuitive language. We can't

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really grapple with things that we've never experienced, that are

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>completely alien to us. We tend to translate the unfamiliar

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>into the familiar.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>My favorite example of this is like what happens when

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you drink a wine or you taste a new fruit

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, this fruit tastes kind of like

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a cherry and kind of like an apricot and whatever,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit like a kiwi. You're explaining something

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>new in terms of something you already know, and that

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense also what we do in science,

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it's important like dig into like what are

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of basic mental building blocks we're using to

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>understand this stuff.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I think one of my favorite examples of that is

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>the brain being compared to whatever technology is hot and

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 3>new at the time. You know, like your brain is

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>like a clock, your brain is like a computer. And

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 3>some of those analogies work in some ways, but you know,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 3>having an analogy like that sometimes limits the way you

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>actually attack a problem.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it also is what allows you to understand it, right,

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So in the end, it's sort of how we understand everything. Yeah,

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's useful to go back to like

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth century BC and talk about Democratus and his buddy Lucepis,

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because these folks were thinking about, hey, what is the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>universe made out of? And they came up with this concept,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or they're credited with this concept of what seems like

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>smooth and continuous matter, you know, water, seems smooth and continuous.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Air seems smooth is actually made of tiny little bits

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. This is a big idea, right, This is

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge concept. It is like pulling back the veil

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on the world and saying the world isn't the way

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that it seems. It's actually quite different. You know, it

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>has like a resolution. These days, we're kind of familiar

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>with this because you're used to things like, Hey, I

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>look at my TV screen. It looks like I'm just

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at a picture, but I know that if I

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>put my eyeball closed to the screen, I'll see pixels.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>This is basically saying the whole world, all matter is

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>actually pixelated. It's built out of little bits instead of

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>smooth and continuous.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Did they have any thoughts about what the little bits

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>were like, like do you get different bits in the

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>sand and different bits in your skin? Or how fine

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 3>grained was this idea?

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god?

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They had hilarious ideas about what the little bits were.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>They thought that everything was made up a little bit

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, but that stuff had different shapes, and you know,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they were right on the spirit of it that they thought,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like the properties of the shape determined how we experienced

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it and its property. But for example, they thought that

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>something's tasted sour because it was made of little sharp

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>needle shaped atoms that like stabbed your tongue when you

0:16:59.560 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ate it.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>This is going to be so condescending, but that's such

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>a cute idea.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It is so cute, I know.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And they thought that things that were white were white

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because they were made of very smooth atoms. And they

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that your soul was made of atoms, and that

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>those atoms were particularly fine grained. They were right in

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the spirit in that the behavior and the structure of

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the atom really does determine, like hey, what is shiny

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and what conducts electricity and what's liquid at room temperature.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all true. They were just wrong on the details.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they couldn't see atoms. They were just imagining.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really impressed by this. I'm impressed by the

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>courage to imagine that the universe is so fundamentally different

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>from the way it seems, because that's really the scientific spirit, right, Yeah, totally.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So we've got Democritus and his buddy what was

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the buddy's.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Name mispronounced as Lacoupiskopis, But I don't know the correct pronunciation.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't heard of that person before. So you got

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 3>the two of them, and they're proposing that everything is

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>made of small bits of stuff. How long before we

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 3>get some clarity on the fact that sour isn't just

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>sharp little bits of stuff.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they're credited with this idea, probably came up

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier because remember, we give people credit because we have

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a written.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Record of it.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>We have like a tiny fraction of everything the Greeks wrote,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>though very excitingly, they're now scanning burnt scrolls from an

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ancient Greek library. We're going to like double the amount

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of Greek writing.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>We have very soon.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, we just don't have writing from

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>other civilizations. What do the Etruscans think ancient Chinese writing? So,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, people give the Greeks a lot of credit,

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but we should remember like other people thought about this

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff too.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Ain't that always the way?

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>It's always the way, I know.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And they use the word adam because atomos in Greek

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>means indivisible, So that's where that comes from. And this

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is the origin of this idea that you know, smooth

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff is actually made of little bits and that still

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>guides our mental picture. When I think particle, I still

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>think tiny little dot of stuff, like a little spinning

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ball or a grain of sand.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what it means to me.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's particular, Like if you say something is particulate, right,

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you mean it's made of these little bits. And so

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the words are powerful because they guide our mental images.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't for a couple of thousand years that

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we had really more information. I mean it was chemists

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like Dalton who were doing experiments on chemical reactions and discovering,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, laws of ratios and proportions and the things

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 1>were divisible by integers. That really give us a clue that, oh,

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>there were like units of stuff going into these equations

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that you really needed two to one hydrogen to oxygen

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a certain amount of water. It gives you

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a clue that it really has just clicked together out

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of these tiny little bits. So that was a really

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>important clue. But it wasn't until the late eighteen hundreds

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that we really had the discovery of anything that we

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>would today call a particle.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>And is that because it's so tiny, it probably depends

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>on having the right technology to be able to address

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>that and so did we just have to wait until

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 3>the late eighteen hundreds because that's when we finally got

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the technology where we could start making a dent.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And in the great tradition of particle physics, we didn't

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>invent the technology that we used to make these discoveries.

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>We borrowed it. In this case, we borrowed it from

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the circus.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 3>From the circus, yes, exactly. All Right, we're going to

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>take a break, and when we come back, you're going

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>to tell me about how the circus allowed us to

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>understand the electron. All right, and we're back, and today

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about the freak show that is particles, and

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Daniel's gonna tell us about how we were able to

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>understand the electron from technology developed for the circus mm HM.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Back in the mid eighteen hundreds, there were circuses, and

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there were these side shows, and you know, you had

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>bearded ladies or conjoined twins or whatever freak show you

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see, but also you had people with weird gizmos,

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and in particular, somebody invented basically the cathode ray tube,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>but a cathoid ratube back then was actually called a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Crooks tube. And basically you have a glass and you

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>put electricity on one side, electricity on the other side,

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and we now know what happens is that electrons boil

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>off of one and fly through it.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>And hit the other.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you left a little bit of gas in

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that tube, then the electrons would hit that gas and

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>gas would glow. People were making these tubes because they

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>glowed in this eerie way and that was pretty cool.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, back in the eighteen hundreds, this was

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a magical thing to see that somebody could build this

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>thing and it would glow green, it would glow red

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And so these Crooks tubes were very popular

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on side shows. And then later scientists were like, what's

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>going on here, Let's see if we can understand what's

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>going on. And JJ Thompson in the late eighteen hundreds

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>used it to discover the electron.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 3>How do you go from ohnit that tube lights up

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>to and that's because of electrons.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So JJ Thompson was trying to understand what is

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>lighting up here. And they already called these things cathode

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>rays because they could see paths, like definitely, there's a

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>line of stuff moving through them. And they were like,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what are these rays? Is it made of something? A

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people tried to understand this and failed, But

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he had like the best vacuum, so the best control

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of this experiment, and he did it the most systematically.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.959
<v Speaker 1>What he did was he put these tubes under electric

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fields and he was like, hmm, can I bend these rays?

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And then he tried with magnetic fields, like, oh, can

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I bend the rays this way and that way? And

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>he tried with combinations of them. And so we had

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of electromagnetism back then. We understood that electric

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fields whole things that have charge, and magnetic fields can

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>bend them. So from this he determined, oh, these cathode

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>rays are little bits of charge. There's charge flowing here

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>because I can bend it with fields, and so that

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was really fascinating. And then he very carefully bounced the

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two fields and he was able to measure the mass

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the thing, and that right there is the origin

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of this sort of concept of a particle. He was like, oh,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these rays are made of tiny little bits of stuff

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that have a charge and a mass. And what he's

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>doing conceptually there is very important. He's saying there's a

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>point in space, and I'm going to put two labels

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>on it. I'm gonna say it has a charge and

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>has a mass, and those two things cannot be separated.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He tried to separate the mass and the charge and

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't. So he's like, now in his mind, he

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>has these little dots that are moving through space and

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's putting these mental labels on them. And that's really

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the origin of the modern concept of a particle.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I'm imagining being in his lab He's got

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 3>this ray, he's got a magnet on one side, and

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 3>he does the magic, and he's got that line. Is

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 3>it like a bolt of lightning? Like does it go

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>from one side to another and you can see all

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>of it? And if so, how does he make the

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>jump from there's a line that lights up and bends

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 3>towards the magnet two, And that line is made up

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>of lots of little tiny things that come to be

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 3>called electrons, You know what I mean.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So what you should be imagining is sort of

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like what a fluorescent life. Well it looks like now,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like long and thin and filled with glowing gas, right,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>except there were like thinner lines. So these were very

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly rays. And you're right that he measured that there's

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a flow of charge. Right, So there was

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a screen on one end and you could see these

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>glowing dots landing. But he also measured the mass. That's

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>what told him that this was made of little bits

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because he could measure actually their charge to mass ratio.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>He couldn't measure the mass itself, but he measured the

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>charge to mass ratio by seeing how much they were

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>deflected by the magnetic fields.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing that.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Gave him the clue that it was made of little bits,

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>not just some continuous stream, because he could identify a

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>charge to mass ratio for these bits. And he almost

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>sent the world down a crazy path where my job

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>title would be different because he didn't call this thing

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a particle, he didn't call it an electron. He used

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the word corpuscule. He thought that was a really cool

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>name for this thing that he help. To me, it

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds like especially explosive kind of Yeah.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you were almost a corpuscoologist.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Or a corpuscular physicist. Fortunately, the person who discovers the

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>thing doesn't always get to name it, and later on

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people adopted the name electron suggested by Fitzgerald and Lorentz

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and other folks, and so fortunately the word corpuscular didn't

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hang on. But that was really the seminal experiment where

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>people discovered, okay, the world has made the little bits,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and we can put labels on them. And these days

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>we have so many labels for particles. We put spin

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on them, we put charge. Of course, we put other

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of charge. Every particle has a charge for electromagnetism,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>as a charge for the weak force, a charge for

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the strong force. It has a mass. This is really

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the concept of a particle is a little

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>dot in space with labels that we put on it.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 3>And it sounds like it gets complicated pretty quick. So

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 3>let's back up a little bit. So we've got mass

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>in charge. What is our next historical advancement?

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, next came Rutherford because people were wondering, all right,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so these things exist, these corpus s gules, or these

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>electrons as we they to call them. But how do

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you use that to make up the world. It's sort

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of like the twofold question we were talking about before.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>One thing you can do is try to answer, like,

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>what is everything around us made out of by taking

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it apart. The other is just to ask what can

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the universe do? Like, not necessarily, how am I built

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 1>out of the universe, but what is the universe capable of?

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Sort of holistically, And so Thompson discovered, oh, the universe

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can make electrons. People were wondering, Okay, are those electrons part.

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Of who we are?

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they were speculating, we think electrons are

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>probably inside the atom. But nobody knew yet what the

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>atom structure was. We knew that we had chemicals and

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we had these different atoms and periodic table the elements

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>was a thing, but nobody understood how the atom itself

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>was built. And we suspected electrons were in there, but

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>we didn't understand, like, well, what's balancing that charge? And

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so Thompson proposed that, like, well, we have electrons because

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I discovered them, and so they must be the building

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>block of everything, and they're embedded in like a jelly,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>like a positive jelly that balances the charge.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 2>That was sort of his idea.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But then Rutherford came along and said, well, let's see,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and he took a sheet of gold foil and he

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>shot radiation at it, and he wanted to understand, like,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>what is that positive stuff made out of And if

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that positive stuff was like spread out like jelly, then

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he would expect that his particle would mostly just slop

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>through it. But what he saw was that most of

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the time they just shoot right through the foil, but

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>occasionally they bounced right back. What he concluded from that

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>was that the positive charges weren't spread out evenly. They

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>were clustered into these little hard dots. So most of

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the time the radiation missed it, sometimes they bounced right back.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>That gives us the more modern picture of the atom

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as a positive nucleus surrounded by electrons.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so if we are still trying to think of

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 3>this as a jelly, then we should be picturing like

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that strawberry jelly that has seeds in it, and those

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>seeds are like the nucleus that the electron was bouncing

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 3>off of. Is that right?

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>M hmm exactly.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And so now we have like electrons, and we also

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have the nucleus, which later on we discover is made

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>out of protons and neutrons. And so you were starting

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to build up our catalog of particles to try to

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>understand like what is the world made out of? What

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are these particles? And at this point the concept of

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a particle is still it's a dot in space that

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we could put labels on, and one of those labels

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is mass. But then that was all up ended when

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we discovered the next particle, which is the photon.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Why does it always get more complicated?

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I know?

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Photons mess everything up, right, my goodness. So around the

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>turn of the century, Einstein was thinking about what happens

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when you shine light on metal, very bright beam of

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>light on metal. What happens is electrons boil off. This

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is something people had seen but not really understood because

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they were confusing results about what happened when you made

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the beam brighter. People expected that if you make the

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>beam brighter, which if light is a wave, mean that

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the em fields are oscillating with larger amplitude, so more energy.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Then they thought that electrons should get kicked off with

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more energy. But instead what they saw was electrons kicked

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>off with the.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Same energy, but more of them.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So instead of having faster moving electrons, you have more

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>electrons at all the same speed. And it was Einstein

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>who figured out what that meant. What it means is

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that the light you're shining at the metal is not

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a continuous beam, perfectly smooth the way Maxwell imagined, but

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>made of chunks made of bits called photons. And what

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was happening is that each electron can only absorb one

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like the electron absorbs a photon or it doesn't.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 2>If it absorbs a photon.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It gets kicked off, and it always has that photon's energy.

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't eat two photons or ten photons, and so

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when you make the being brighter, you're shooting more photons.

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>More electrons get to eat a photon. But because it's

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>based out of these chunks, it's not smooth and continuous.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's basically a one on one interaction.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>You said that was Einstein who helps figure outright, So

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't that long ago one hundred years. Yeah, we

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 3>went from like nothing to amazing detail in the last

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred years.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It's really incredible what we've understood. And this is a

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>huge advance because now we're like, oh wow, light is

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>also made of little mini servings. Right, there's a minimum

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of light. Like you take a flashlight and you

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>start to turn it down and down and down and down.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't have it be arbitrarily dim like this one

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>setting where it's dark, completely dark, but then there's a

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>minimum brightness. You can't shoot half a photon out of

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a flashlight or one and a half photons. It's quantized,

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not continuous and smooth. But this is

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>confusing because they were going to call a photon a

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>particle a minute ago. We set a particle something that

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>has like mass in charge. Photons don't have mass, So

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>already your mental conception of like, oh, a particle is

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of stuff, Well, this boton doesn't have

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>any stuff to it. You know, you can't catch up

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to a photon and look at it, you can't hold

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it in your hand, and yet we think of it.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>As a particle. So already one hundred years.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Ago, we have to like back up and broaden our understanding,

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like what is a particle if it's not a little

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of stuff the way Democratis was imagining.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 3>And doesn't it get even more confusing yet, because then

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 3>we decide that photons aren't necessarily particles. Sometimes maybe they're waves.

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 3>And at this point you're like, I'm majoring in biology.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It gets more confusing before it gets more interesting and

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>more clear. But yes, there's definitely a period of confusion there,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that's kind of a filter. Some

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>people hear that and they're like, I need to understand

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this and learn more. I'm going to become a physicist.

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And some people are like, I'm going to go study eels,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's cool because eels can make waves too, you know,

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Wiggly and electric fields and yeah.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And something you said I want to get back to,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which is like, sometimes they're particles. I mean, a photon

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is always a photon. What is a photon? Is it

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a particle? Is it a wave?

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Like really, it's neither.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>The way that that new fruit is not a cherry

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or an apricot, it's not sometimes because it has hints

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of it in your mouth. It's something new and weird.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And a photon has behaviors that we sometimes describe in

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a particle way, and behaviors we sometimes describe in.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 2>A wave like way.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's not choosing now I'm a wave, now I'm

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a particle. It's always a photon. It's just that none

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of these descriptions perfectly capture what it is the way

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that like I can't perfectly describe you. I mean, you're

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a mother, you're a partner, you're a podcaster. None of

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>those things define who you are. You're Kelly, right, and

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you're sometimes well described by one of those labels.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, yes, right, So this is another one of those problems,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 3>like brains are like a computer, yes, but not entirely.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 3>And by putting these labels on it, sometimes it helps

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>you think about it, but also sometimes it makes things

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 3>more confusing.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's dig into what it means though, because the

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thing people were trying to confront, the thing people were

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>struggling with is like, yeah, Einstein tells us light is

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>made out of these little packets, so we should think

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of them as like individuals. But also we had all

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>these experiments showing that lighthead wave like behavior, you know,

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it like interferes with itself, diffraction. There's all sorts of

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we only usually attribute to waves, and so

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>people have this idea in their mind, and they hear

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the particle wave duality that sometimes you

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>use wave to describe light and sometimes you use particles

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to describe light. And later on it got more confusing

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>because we saw that electrons do this too, like electrons

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have wave like behavior. You could take beams of electrons

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and they will interfere with themselves as if they are waves.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, electron is like the original og particle.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on here? And there is definitely a

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>way to.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Think about this that's not Sometimes it's a.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Wave and then it switches suddenly to a particle. It's

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the more quantum mechanical way to think about it, which

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is rarely like a way to think more clearly about stuff,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it is the way that we think

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. And the quantum mechanical way to think about

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this without getting heavy into the math, is to say

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that what controls where a particle goes is a mathematical

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>equation that looks like a wave equation.

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 2>We call it the Schrodinger.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Equation, and it tells us what's likely to happen to

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a particle. So an electron enters an experiment, the shorting

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>equation tells us, oh, is it likely to go left?

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is it likely to go right? A photon goes

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>through a slit, the shortening equation tells us is it

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to go here?

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Is it likely to go there? It's going to land

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 2>on a screen.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The shortening equation tells us what's the probability of something happening,

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's wave like in that an equation that looks

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot like other wave equations, the equations we use

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to describe oceans and sound and all sorts of wave

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>like behavior, which is amazingly everywhere in the universe. And

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we can have a whole conversation about, like, why does

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe all seem like waves? There's a wavy equation

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>that describes where this stuff is likely to go. But

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>then there's something weird that happens, which is the universe

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has to go from here. All the things the photon

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>could do, and here's the various probabilities of it going

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>here or there. Then we do the experiment. We want

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to know the answer. The universe does this thing where

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it picks one. It's like, all, right, of all the possibilities,

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to decide this photon goes over there, and

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this other photon is going to go over here, and

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>this third photon is going to go there. And it's

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of amazing and it's a process. We fundamentally do

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>not understand how the universe goes from Here's the list

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities to I'm going to pick one. But this

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>is what people imagine when they think wave like to

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>particle like. Wavelike is like when the universe is still

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>maintaining all the possibilities. Particle like is like I've looked

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at it, I've measured it, I see a dot on

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the screen. So I'm thinking of it as acting like

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a particle because it's here, has the location, and we

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>think of particles as like it is somewhere. It's a

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>tiny dot in space with labels. So when we force

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe to tell us where did that photon go,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we call it being particle like because we put a

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>location on it.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And is this the right way to think about

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>all particles or do some particles follow this wave function

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 3>thing and other particles don't.

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the nineteen thirties way to think about all particles.

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You can use this to describe photons, you can use

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it to describe electrons. You can do use to describe

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>any particle. This is the Shortener equation, and it works

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>really really well for individual particles, and these deep fundamental

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>problems with it still like we don't understand when the

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>universe goes from here are all your possibilities to actually,

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do this one. People call this the

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>wave function collapse or quantum collapse, and philosophically it makes

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>no sense because it doesn't happen when a photon is

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>measured by a quantum particle. Like a photon can interact

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>with an electron and maintain all of its possibilities. But

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if a photon hits an eyeball you see it here

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or you don't see it there, it collapses. And so

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really this wave versus particle thing is about maintaining quantum

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>possibilities or collapsing to one. That's really the core of it,

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is not something we understand why that happens,

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>When that happens, If that happens, huge open question in

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>physics and in philosophy, and what is a particle sort

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of sits right at the nexus of that. So we've

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>mapped this question of like what is a particle to hey,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>when do quantum wave functions collapse?

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 2>And do they?

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a question we have an answer to.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure how helpful it is. But the

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>modern view of what is a particle is actually a

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit different from this sort of nineteen thirties concept

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of a wave function and the Schrodinger equation.

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's take a break and then we'll get modern.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 3>So we are up to the nineteen thirties, and now

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 3>you are going to tell us about our more modern

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 3>understanding of particles.

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so this idea that particles are these weird quantum

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>objects and where they go is controlled by a wavy equation.

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes we can make their measurements and force the

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>universe to tell us where they are in an instant

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and they have these properties masked sometimes charge, sometimes spin. Sometimes.

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of an old fashioned view. When we started

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing with lots and lots of particles discovered, Oh, this

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.439
<v Speaker 1>math is kind of clunky. Like if you have ten

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>particles or one hundred particles, it becomes really awkward to

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have a Shorteninger equation for each individual one and try

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to bring it together. The math just becomes impossible. And

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so people instead of thinking about like one wave function

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for each particle, they're like, let's just think about all

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the particles as if they're wiggling the same field. So

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of imagining like an individual person waving their hand,

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>now imagine like a crowd at a football stadium and

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they're doing the wave. So add this thing to your brain,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a field. Right, A field in space is

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>just like a set of numbers. I say, over here

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to my left, the field has a value of seven,

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and over here to my right field is a value

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of three or two or whatever. And there are wavy

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>equations that determine what is the value of the field.

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you can have waves in that field. You

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>can like ripples in that field where like a large

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>value of the field moves through space from here to there.

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we think about particles as those ripples in

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the field. So we take like individual wave functions, we

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of stitch them together into a single

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>field and think about all the particles as wiggles in

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the same field.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So what assumptions do you have to make to make

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 3>that transition? Do you have to assume that they don't

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 3>interact with each other in a way that changes the

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>behavior of the group?

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Ah, great question.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to assume that, because you can have

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of different kinds of fields. You can have some

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>fields where the particles don't interact with each other. For example, photons,

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>photons don't interact with each other. Photons only interact with

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>particles that have electric charge, like they will be eaten

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>by an electron or proton can give off a photon.

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But photons ignore each other, like they wiggle right past

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>each other. Two beams of light cross without touching or

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>bouncing off each other. Other particles do interact with each other,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like gluons. For example, gluons bounce off of other gluons

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>amid other gluons eat other gluons. It gets very complicated

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and messy because gluons talk to each other all the time.

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have to assume that we build that

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>into each field. So we have a new mathematical framework

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that allows us to make different kinds of fields. Some

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>fields are very simple, they're just numbers, like the Higgs field.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just a number in space. Other fields, like the

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field. At every point in space, you have an arrow,

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a direction, you have three numbers.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Basically.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So now imagine like a bunch of arrows filling space,

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and when a photon is moving through that field, what's

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>happening is those arrows are growing and shrinking, They're changing direction.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It's oscillations. In these fields that we think about as particles.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>But we do have to make one important assumption which

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of consequences, which is that every electron

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is basically the same and every photon is basically the

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>same because they're all part of the same field. It

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was a question for a long time, like why does

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>every electron have exactly the same mass and exactly the

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>same charge? Why is every photon zero mass? Why are

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they all identical?

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is kind of beautiful as well. They're

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>all wiggles in the same field.

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not like the.

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Universe made a bunch of electrons and it was really

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>good at it, so it was super precise, and the

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>electron factories like high precision engineering, so they're really you know,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>balls on perfect it's because they literally are the same

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that are just ripples in the same field.

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's convenient because it's easier to think of it

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 3>as a field, right than as a particle.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Mathematically, it's much easier because if you want to think

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>about like particles being created, oh, that's just energy going

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>into the field, whereas in the shirting equation it's like

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to create a particle and add its wave

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>function to your calculations, and the same thing with destroying particles.

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really awkward if you're thinking about it one particle

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>at a time, and very natural if you're thinking about

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it as a group of particles.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 3>The universe threw us a softball. Thanks universe. Okay, So

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 3>when I was in high school, I learned about electrons

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and protons and neutrons. I don't remember hearing about quarks.

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 3>But you know, since high school, I've learned that protons

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 3>are made up of quarks. But I think particles as

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 3>being the smallest things that make up everything. And so

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 3>if quirks make up protons, does that mean protons aren't

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 3>particles or are they both particles but maybe different categories

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 3>of particles? What's going on here?

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's a great question. So we mostly use these

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>fields to describe fundamental particles, things that we think are

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not made of anything else. So the photon and the electron,

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.439
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Those particles are wiggles and fields that are

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>just a basic element of space itself.

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But you can totally use.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>The same math to describe wiggles in other stuff, like

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>water in the ocean or sound waves in the air.

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>These are just wave equations, and the universe is kind

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of wavy, and you can also identify particles of those

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>fields quanta of those fields. A phonon, for example, is

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a packet of sound, the way a photon is a

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>packet of light. The math is the same, it's just

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>what's wiggling is not fundamentally universe stuff whatever that is,

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but something else water or air or plasma or whatever.

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 2>So we distinguish these.

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Things from particles by calling them quasi particles. But the

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>point is that the math still works, all right. So

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to your question about the proton, we know the proton

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a fundamental particle. It's made of quarks, so

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no proton field, right. Well, actually, if you zoom

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>out far enough so you can't see the inside of

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the proton, it kind of acts like a particle that

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>moves around the universe the way a particle does. And

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you can pretend that there is a proton field. You

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>can write it down mathematically and use it to describe

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the motion of the proton as a particle. And the

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>proton field is like an approximate description of the quark

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>fields dancing together. The way they interact together makes it

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>seem like there is a proton field, and until you

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>get enough energy that breaks that proton apart, it all

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>works just fine. And the same, of course, might be

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>true of the electron. We think that there is an

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>electron field, a fundamental part of space. But if the

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 1>electron is just made of other little particles, which are

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the true fundamental particles, then the electron field is just

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>an approximate description of those fields dancing together.

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, So where do you go from there?

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So in this picture, particles are not little bits of stuff, right,

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to give up that whole idea, that whole

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>mental picture we've had since Democritus that said the universe

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is made of particles and particles are little bits of stuff.

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we say, well, particles are not little bits of stuff.

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They're wiggles in these fields. And that means something really deep.

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It means that the universe is not made of particles.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's made of fields. Particles are just something that happens

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to fields. There's just something fields can do.

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>You know. It's like discovering.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, ice cream exists in the world, but actually it's

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not fundamental. Universe is not made of ice cream. There's

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>times when you don't have ice cream. There's whole periods

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 1>in the universe when there was no ice cream. It's

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine there was a moment when somebody invented

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ice cream for the first time, right, and the universe

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was filled with light. Yes, what it means is that

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we've gone one level deeper though, right.

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the whole goal. It's like, what really is.

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>At the foundation? What is everything made out of? And

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this takes quite a left turn. It says, yeah, the

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>universe is not built of little bits. Those bits are

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>actually just ripples in these fields that fill the universe.

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And I want people to really have an accurate visual

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>image of what these fields are because people think about, Okay,

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a particle is a ripple in the field, or it's

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>an excitation in the field, And you should understand that

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a field really is a wavy kind of thing. It

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>can do the same wavy kind of things that other

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>fields can do. You know, like imagine a guitar string.

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>What does a guitar string do when you pluck it,

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you pull it back and so now it's like you're

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>stretching the string, right, we say in physics, now it

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of potential energy because a lot of

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>tangent in there really wants to go back to its

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>relaxed position.

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 2>What happens when you relax it?

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>What happens when you let it go, Well, it flies

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>back to that relaxed position. But now it's moving really fast,

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so now has a lot of speed, rights a lot

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of kinetic energy. So it doesn't actually stop there when

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it gets back to the relaxed position. It keeps going

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and it bends the other way, and it oscillates back

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and forth and back and forth and back and forth.

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It slashes back and forth between potential energy and kinetic energy.

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what a wave equation, and that's a wave like phenomenal.

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that slashes back and forth. That's what fields

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Fields you can think of them as these

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers in space, but those numbers are slashing back and forth.

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The field itself has potential energy and kinetic energy. The

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>changing of those numbers has a speed to it. And

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>when we solve the wave equations for fields, what is

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally quantum field theory the bedrock of modern particle physics.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what the solutions look like like. The Higgs field

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is oscillating when we say a photon is an oscillation

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the electromagnetic field, We mean the values of the field.

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Those numbers in space, Those arrows, they're moving, they're wiggling,

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they're slashing around.

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So when I was in high school, we got the

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.839
<v Speaker 3>like plum pudding model. So yes, I do think now

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 3>about particles as like a raisin embedded in something, and

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 3>not as like a wave function. If I were in

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 3>high school right now, would I be taught something more

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 3>like what you just said? How long have we known

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 3>about this stuff? Why does this feel new? Is what

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking? Is it new? Or did I forget?

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a great time to ask me this question because

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my daughter, who's taking high school chemistry right now, is

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>learning about this stuff and asking me questions about it.

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm getting like a front row seat too. How

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>are people taught about the nature of matter in high school? Yeah,

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, they're taught about the plum putting model. Though,

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>just for the record, the plum putting model is not

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a modern conception. It was like disproved by Rutherford, right.

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>People thought, well, maybe the universe is filled with this

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>jelly of positive stuff. Sounds tasty, but it's not the

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>way that we understand it. It's in contrast to having

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like a hard dense nucleus at the core. So the

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>plum putting model, they teach it to them and then

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they throw it out, but they don't really go very

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>deep into like the quantum mechanics of it. Even in

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>AP chemistry, I discovered they don't really talk about this stuff,

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and they certainly don't talk about particle physics in AP physics.

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So in high school you don't really get a whole

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of this modern stuff. I teach modern physics at

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the college level, and that's the first time we really

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>give people an understanding of the nineteen thirties concept of

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>what is a particle and how does quantum mechanics work.

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we don't show them quantum fields until like

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>graduate school. So I didn't learn about quanum field until

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I was in like eighteenth grade.

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So you know, this is not the kind of.

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Stuff that percolates mostly into high school. Maybe fortunately, maybe unfortunately,

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I would love to have some of these ideas introduced earlier.

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>So you think if you talked to just about any

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 3>recent graduate of high school, they're probably still thinking of

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 3>electrons as particles that stay in one spot.

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Tiny little dots orbiting the nucleus. Do you know Electrons

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't orbit, They don't have specific locations. They can't be

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in one spot and have a specific velocity. You can

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>measure them here, you can measure them there, but they're

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>weird quantum objects. They don't go from here to there.

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>They don't obey all the intuitive rules that you expect

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>things that have specific locations to do.

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.720
<v Speaker 3>So we can all feel good about our advanced physics knowledge.

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Now, yes, exactly, you have pushed well beyond high school

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and even college physics. And you know, I have to

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>underscore how powerful this quantum field theory approach is. To

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>say that all particles are just ripples and fields, and

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe fundamentally is made of these fields. All space

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is filled with many kinds of fields. You have one

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for the electron, one for the muon, one for the upcork,

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>one for the down cork.

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 2>We have more than a.

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Dozen fields that fill space. This is a really powerful

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>way to think about the universe. We see patterns in

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:46.279
<v Speaker 1>these fields, how energy flows from one to the other,

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>their symmetries that they observe. It's allowed us to make

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really powerful, very accurate calculations of all sorts of stuff

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that we see happening in particle experiments, and so it's

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really beautiful and really crisp and really clear. And I

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think that most particle physicists this is what they think about,

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or most theoretical physicists, imagine the universe as filled with

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>fields and particles as just ripples in them. But of

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>course it's a field filled with controversy, and so not

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody agrees with that view. There are lots of people

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>who have a very different concept of what a particle

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is and fundamentally how it all works at the bottom level.

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 3>So to back up real quick, the field's theory has

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 3>produced loads of testable hypotheses that have been tested and

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 3>panned out. But there are still some people who think

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe something else is going on that explains these resultss

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:37.720
<v Speaker 3>and what are they proposing is happening.

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Then they suggest the fields are a fiction, that the

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>fields don't really exist, that the fields are basically just

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a calculational tool we use in our minds to explain

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what we see, because in the end, you can't observe

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a field. You can't directly see a field. It's always

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an intermedia thing like what you can see are particles.

0:50:57.600 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You see those little dots on your screen, or you

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:04.240
<v Speaker 1>see the electron deflected in your cathode ray. It's always particle,

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like I'm doing air quotes when we see it, And

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>particles are what we observe, They're what.

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 2>We interact with.

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we can use fields to explain them, and yes

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we can think about fields as being out there, but

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to argue philosophically that we know fields are

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>real in some way other than we can use them

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to calculate these experiments. You can't like really directly see them.

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And lots of famous physicists like Nima or Kanye Ahmed,

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the maybe most brilliant modern particle physicists, calls

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>them a convenient fiction.

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 3>Huh, So would someone like Nima then argue it's all

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 3>just particles, Like the field thing is throwing us off track.

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 3>We were on track with the particles, and we just

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 3>got to stick with thinking about particles and figure out

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 3>a way to measure yes at that level instead.

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and here I want to take the opportunity to

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>disentangle something you hear about a lot in popular science.

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>People probably hear oh, particles or ripples in a field.

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But they also hear this other story, like what happens

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when two electrons repel each other, Oh, they exchange a photon.

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They're passing a photon back and forth.

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 1>What you're doing there is rejecting the field picture. The

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 1>field picture of what happens when electrons push on each

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other is an electron makes a field around it, the

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field, right, and that field pushes on the other electron.

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the field picture. People who don't believe in fields,

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like, just explain it all in terms of particles.

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't need the field. What happens when an electron

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>pushes on another electron is it throws a photon at

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the other one. And so you can either explain everything

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in terms of particles that are pushed by fields, or

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you can explain it just in terms of particles and

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 1>say you don't need fields. Just go particles all the

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.959
<v Speaker 1>way down. There are particles we observe, and they push

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on each other by passing other particles between themselves. So

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you can basically replace the fields with an infinite number

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>of particles doing all the pushing and pulling and all

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that other stuff that some people say fields are doing

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and the frustrating, slash confusing, slash amazing thing is that

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you do the calculation since you get the same answer.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.399
<v Speaker 1>So is it particles is it fields? We can't tell

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the difference because the two theories mathematically are equivalent. It's like,

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>either you can imagine these fields which fill space, which

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are beautiful and elegant but kind of weird, like what

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are they? Or you can say, I'm going to replace

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>those fields by a bunch of particles flying around doing

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that same work.

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 3>And are you a field guy?

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a fields guy until I read this book

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>about whether science can be done without math. You know,

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>people wonder like is math invented? Or is it something

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in our minds? And there's a guy who developed an

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>alternative theory of gravity that doesn't use any math, no

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers at all. It's called science without numbers, and it's

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 1>really weird. It's very alien. You read it and you're like,

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what was this guy smoking? And where can I get some?

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But he philosophically pulls it off. He shows that you

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to have fields essentially, and the crucial insight

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in that book is to get rid of fields, because

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 1>fields are like numbers in space. So he divorces physics

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 1>from mathematics by ditching fields. My favorite part of the

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:10.240
<v Speaker 1>story the guy's last name Fields. So Professor Fields gets

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:13.799
<v Speaker 1>rid of fields, the field fieldless theory of physics. There's

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of jokes you could make there, but it made

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>me wonder, you know, like our field's just something we

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think about or they actually out there. When aliens come

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us about their theory of physics, will

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they have fields in it? Or will they have Schmields

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or something totally different?

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 3>So have you dodged my question or are you saying

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that you're a particle person.

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying I don't know.

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I used to be a fields person, but now I

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>teach the controversy, got it?

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So when you first said that there were people

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 3>who reject fields, I thought that was going to get

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 3>us into string theory. Are we going to get to

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 3>string theory too? There's three options. So there's particles, fields,

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and strings. Is that right?

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 2>There's more than three options? Unfortunately?

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So there's lots of directions to go here. People

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.440
<v Speaker 1>also wonder, like, well, what are these fields? Are fields

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that bend ra the truth of the universe at the

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 1>firmament is that the thing that has to exist. And

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of unsatisfactory because, well, why are there all

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>these different fields? Why do we have the electron and

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the muon, which is like a weird heavy version of

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the electron. Why are there these obvious patterns among the

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.799
<v Speaker 1>fields that we can't explain. And one explanation for that

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:22.839
<v Speaker 1>are strings, to say, well, none of these things are

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what's at the bedrock underneath it all is something else,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and strings are this idea that the universe is not

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:33.720
<v Speaker 1>made out of field to instead these one dimensional bits

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of matter that can do wavy like stuff. They can wiggle,

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and they can dance, and they can wiggle in various ways.

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you're zoom down far enough so you can't

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>see the actual string bits themselves, when they wiggle one way,

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it looks like an electron field, and when they wiggle

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>another way, it looks like a muon field, and when

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 1>wiggle a third way, it looks like a photon. And

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so all these fields are actually just different wiggles in

0:55:56.080 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 1>these strings. This is another beautiful bit of mathematics. Nobody's

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 1>proven to be true or not, but might represent what's

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 1>going on underneath all of this, right, So maybe particles

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are ripples and fields which are just wiggles in strings.

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:15.919
<v Speaker 3>So string theory is still a popular contender. I thought

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 3>maybe string theory was waning, but I'm you know, not

0:56:19.800 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 3>in this field. What's the current state of the string theory.

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>String theory was very popular in the nineties. It seemed

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>very exciting. People discovered this math and could do all

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sorts of fun stuff with it. And they've done a

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun stuff, but they haven't been able to

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>prove that it's true because they talk about the mathematics

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the strings, but nobody can see these strings.

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 2>The strings are too small.

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>In order to see the strings themselves, you'd need like

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a collideer to the size of the solar system, and

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the funds for that. And so until

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they make a prediction that we can actually test it,

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:49.959
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, string theory, if it's true, we should

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to see this thing, then we don't know

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's just mathematics or if it's actually a description

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. And so there's been a lot of

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are negative about string theory for that reason.

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's exciting, but there are other ideas

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>out there about you know, what the universe could be

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>made out of?

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 3>What else?

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>As you were saying earlier, we tend to think about

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the brain as made out of whatever is the latest

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:13.439
<v Speaker 1>technology in the same way we try to think about

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe that way. Like the advent of quantum computing

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>makes us think about cubits and information And there's a

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:22.919
<v Speaker 1>whole line of argument that I think we should talk about,

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:26.960
<v Speaker 1>probably on another episode, about whether the whole universe is

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>just a quantum computer and particles are like patterns and

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the flow of information in this quantum computer. There are

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 1>folks who do these experiments that discover that if you

0:57:37.000 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>build a space time from entangled cubits, that these patterns

0:57:41.280 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>naturally arise, which have properties that align well with.

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 2>The particles that we see.

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>This is all really very speculative stuff, but it's sort

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:51.919
<v Speaker 1>of the forefront of current research. People wondering, like, what's

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>underneath all this stuff? Maybe it really is even different

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>than democratists imagined, or Schrotinger or even Fineman.

0:57:59.080 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 3>What is a cubit.

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:03.000
<v Speaker 1>A cubit is a quantum analogy to a classical bit,

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like in your computer. A bit is something that can

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be zero or one. It's like the minimum piece of

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>information you can have. It's boiled down to just two options,

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like a switch you can flip. And a normal bit

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is in one state, but a quantum bit has a

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>probability to be in one state or in the other.

0:58:19.960 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily in one or the other. So it's

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a cubit is a quantum bit. And people wonder if

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally the universe is made out of cubits that are

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 1>somehow woven together to make space and time and our reality.

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But we'll dig into that in a whole other episode.

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Awesome, all right, So if we tomorrow were to find

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:43.919
<v Speaker 3>out which one of these explanations was correct, what would

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:47.439
<v Speaker 3>that change? So that would be satisfying, But where could

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 3>we go from there? That would be even cooler, Like

0:58:49.440 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 3>what doors would that open up? For us?

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, awesome question. You're basically asking, like, why do we

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>care about any of this? So what does it mean

0:58:56.800 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for us? For me, it's like really deeply important and

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to understand what is the nature of the universe we're in,

0:59:03.880 --> 0:59:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is it made out of? If you

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>told me the universe starts from these conditions, and everything

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>else follows from that, Like to have a universe, you

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have to have space and time and this little bit

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, and then everything else, all the complexity, the blueberries,

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the kittens, the lava, the podcast, all that comes from

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how that stuff is arranged and interacts.

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's cool.

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what is the most fundamental thing,

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because that tells me something deep about the nature of

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe. If it's this, then the universe is that

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>way in some deep wave. It's that the universe is

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:37.440
<v Speaker 1>another way, in some deep way, and I just fundamentally

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:40.280
<v Speaker 1>want to know. It doesn't change how you drink your coffee,

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't change how you treat people. It doesn't change

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what investments you should make. But it changes what it

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:47.680
<v Speaker 1>means to be alive in this universe in a really

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:48.439
<v Speaker 1>important way.

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 2>To me. It's very uncomfortable that we don't know the.

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Answer to the basic question of like, what is the

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamental building block of the universe we live in. It's

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like being born into a jail and not knowing who

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>built it or what's in the outside. It's like, I

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want to break out of this ignorance.

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I found myself personally wanting the answer to be that

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 3>everything is a field and it's sort of connected in

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 3>a way that feels like, I don't know, maybe sort

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of like kum bay us sit around a fire sort

1:00:16.920 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of feeling. But I like that stuff, so anyway, I

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 3>guess my gut wants that to be the answer. But yes,

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be good for us to know

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 3>the answer to this very fundamental question.

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And I suspect the answer is none of these and

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>something even weirder. That's going to be so difficult for

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>us to understand. It's going to be a stretch to

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>even explain in terms of our intuitive language of concepts.

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're going to have to use kiwis and

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fields and particles and strings and all sorts of other

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff to try to wrap our minds around the way

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that we universe actually works, which has no guarantee that

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's even understandable to us.

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>So people are going to be like Democratus thought it

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>was sour because it was like little knives, and then

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Daniel and Kelly thought it was like strings and fields.

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>What idiots? So you know, who knows what they'll think

1:00:58.400 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>in a hundred or so years.

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I hope they're laughing at us. In one hundred years,

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>that would be awesome.

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, progress is good.

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thanks everybody for taking this journey with

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>us from the ancient misunderstanding of what matter was to

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>our modern misunderstanding of what matter is. And we hope

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to continue this journey and to slowly chisel away towards

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>some actual, solid understanding.

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Have a good week everyone. Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe

1:01:30.080 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>is produced by iHeartRadio. We would love to hear from you,

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 3>We really would.

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>We want to know what questions you have about this

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary Universe.

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

1:01:45.280 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>back to you.

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at Danielandkelly dot.

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Org, or you can find us on social media. We

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on all

1:01:57.960 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of those platforms. You can find us at D and

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>K Universe.

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Don't be shy write to us