WEBVTT - Chargers take down Chiefs, no OBJ, Week 15 rankings, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, m Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do yea

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Here on the Fantasy Sports Brain,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you're net work alongside Franky snanvill I am Greg. What's

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going on Monday? T G I F getting ready for

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Week fifteen semifinals football playoffs? A what a kickoff last night?

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Your Kansas City Chiefs? My Los Angeles Chargers? Are you

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>know how in basque? In basketball and baseball, Corpy has

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like a team for every division. The Chargers. They're my

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>West Coast team. They're my West Coast team. There, they're

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>my a f C West team. I'm officially embracing the

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers as my a f C West team as long

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as Tilli revers. Honestly, I just I mean last night,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if we could get that in the playoffs, signed me

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up every single day. I mean, look, I'm sorry for

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen owners last night. I mean that was just

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that was absolutely real. I mean I use them in DFS.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have them in any season longs. That's sucked,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but I mean just awesome game all around. Fantasy performances

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up the wazoo. Uh Justin Jackson, Damian Williams, Kelsey, Tyreek

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Hill left a little bit to be desired. But what

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a game. Great, What a game. It was a great game.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>It was a great game of Anthony a lot of

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>credit for going for two at the end of the game.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course I keep him cretic as it worked. But

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it was great. It was great. It was you know what,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>go in it now, let's freaking do it. And that

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was fancy popular though, Like Roads team down on the

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>goal line, let's score a touchdown, down by one, They're like,

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're not going into overtime. We're just gonna

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>try and steal this victory. You get the hell out

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of Kansas City, and you know they were actually able

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to pull it off. But of course you mentioned it.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>If they don't convert that we're probably sitting here killing them.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you just going to overtime? Blah blah blah

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. We praise them, We praise coaches when it

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>works out, and obviously we crushed him. What it doesn't. Yeah,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mike Williams was just tremendous last night, and

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>when we didn't see coming. Of course, Keenan Allen got

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>hurt very very early on in this game. Him really

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a ball at a touch of town, um, but he

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt there, and Mike Williams just steps up in

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a major way. And I was listening to Philip Rivers

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>after the game, who was saying, Hey, the play that

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we were in the two point conversion was actually the

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>same exact play we scored the first touchdown on. We

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just disguised a little bit, but the same play. And

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anybody more wide open than I sell

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like Williams on that two point conversion last night. And

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the downfall of the Kansas City Chiefs

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is giving up. It's just having these defensive lapses right

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and giving up these big plays. Obviously, we know that

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the defense has been a main issue for the Kansas

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs all season long. We hear it. It's very cliche.

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Defense wins championships, and that's why I like the Chargers

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year. I don't think that they're one

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the top three best defenses in the league. But

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Charges are very well rounded football team. If you

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>see what they're able to do. Philip Rivers having one

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the best seasons of his career in his late thirties.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>He's surrounded by a ton of weapons on the offense.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They revamped the offensive line in the off season. They

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>added uh, they added Pouncey. There he's you know, he's

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>helped them tremendously as long as he stays healthy. That's

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>helped the running back situation. You saw it last night,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>even without Melvin Gordon, even without Austin Ekeler. Justin Jackson

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>did not run efficiently, but he did well enough. And

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>then you had Newsom come in and he actually looked

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty explosive. So just a pretty revamped team all around.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the defense is very solid. The offensive line,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they've built that up. I remember a couple of years

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ago we were talking about the Chargers offensive line is

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst in the league. And then I

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>really really like and it's also cliche, but like that

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>next man up mentality, right, like keenan Allen goes down

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're down by four keen points in the fourth quarter, Greg,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and to come back and win that game, Mike Williams

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>having the game that he did. You know, I'll throw

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this out there, and I asked you this downstairs today, Greg.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why the Chargers have been reluctant to

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>unleash Mike Williams this year. And I tweeted this out

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>last night. I had a pull, you know, where does

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams go next year? Because we saw him creeping

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>up in draft this season. Our own Corey Partson, the

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy executive, said that he drafted Mike Williams in the

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>sixth round of a high stakes league this year. So

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I posed the question on Twitter, where do you see

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams going next year? Fourth round, fifth round, earlier

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>than fourth or later than the fifth, and as of

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>right now say later than fifth. I think come next year.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean just all the hype third year breakout. Whatever

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>he does the rest of this season as well, people

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are just gonna remember that and carry it over into

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>next You're gonna remember exactly what he did in Week

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen here of the Fantasy Playoffs. You're going to remember

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever he does in the NFL playoffs as well. That's

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>going to stand out for Mike Williams. You expect the

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>breakout now, Hunter Henry he's going to be back. Keenan Allen,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be back. Although Tyrol Williams will probably

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be gone. You know what will Mike Williams value increased to.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm not sure about. I was not bullish

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on him this year. You know, he was everybody's hype

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>guy going into this season. I saw you tweaking out

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of hyper pross thing yesterday. You didn't like it, Come on,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Little Mojo rally action. You don't get hyped or went

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to school? Oh, don't tell me, No, Pride of Malepin.

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it is? College Park, Maryland? He went

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to the University of Maryland. Oh he didn't go to

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your high school? Now, No, that wouldn't surprise me because

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of like a party Jersey strikes me as

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he went. He went to Maryland. Um. But anyway, the

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>point being, I get what it was, gonna be excited

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about Mike Williams. That agree right, first round pick. Uh.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>For most of that draft season, it was the best

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in college Clemson, the whole deal. I get it.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of reasons why it might not work.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>For the same reasons this year might not work. So

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be correct, and I don't want

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to be the the Antimke Williams guy. This year I

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was because I just didn't see it and he was

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going way too early. Like where he was going by

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the time draft season was all sudden done. He had

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to provide a certain amount of value for you, and

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the same thing. Is that gonna happen

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>next year? Um? So I don't want to necessarily get

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>him where he's going, But who knows where we would

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be going? That's questionable. Ask next answer? Next year? Did

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you vote in the poll? I have? What would you not? Um?

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I would like this later the fifth it's the most popular,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you give me the six round, I'm happy to

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>take Willis in the sex. I think that's fair. Yeah,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>they just wouldn't surprise me if I because exactly what

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people were expecting this year is the reason why he

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>started creeping up like this wasn't the season obviously, and

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think going into next year, people will buy that.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>They'll say, Okay, well we were off by one year.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Next year is going to be the year. This is

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the season where you know, Mike Williams could

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>give us double digit touchdowns. He could give us, you know,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean if he doesn't even have to a thousand yards,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if you if you draft him in the fifth round

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>next year, if he gives you eight hundred yards and

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>double digit touchdowns, I mean, you'll be happy with that.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a really good compliment to like

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what the offense is right now with Melvin Gordon and

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>running back situation that they have Keenan Allen as like

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that do it all receiver, receiver, possession receiver. He can

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the best route runners in the league. And

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>then Mike Williams, that bully, that guy on the outside

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone who can make plays. He's huge.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Saw him yesterday a ninete yard rushing touchdown. You get

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy out in space. We know that the head

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>agree is there. I just didn't come next year. People

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are just going to hammer hammer in on Mike Williams.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And I also tweeted out drink if you have this

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>guy and keeper or Dynasty, you are excited. You're feeling

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really really good right now if you own Mike Williams

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty leagues. For the running back point of view,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers, we saw a lot of Justin Jackson.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>We saw a lot of their fourth string running back

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, who actually be the ball pretty well, Frankie

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>uh Dietriz Newsome. Yeah, Dietrich knew them. Uh six rushing

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>attempts for thirt or four yards? Five point seven yards?

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Pare I mentioned he ran much more efficiently than Justin

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Jackson in this game. I thought Backson was okay. Now

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he just he kept turning, kept moving. He wasn't bad.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>He was fine. He also he also had a few receptions.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I might have I might have over ranked him a

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I thought him stepping at you know, that

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>lead Chargers running back role. That um, you know, he

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>would be even better than he was last night. I

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was being a little bit greedy, but you know, in fairness,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got eighty total yards and a touchdown out of

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you likely picked up. You might have

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>used him in your sex or an RB two. I

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>had him right. This is my eleven thing back last

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>night going into that game, and you know a lot

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of people were killing me. This is what I love

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to greg, those those people on Twitter who randomly jump

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>into your conversation. Someone will ask you a question, Damian

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Willys or Justin Jackson. I'll answer Justin Jackson. Someone randomly

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>will jump in and say, Damian Williams, everything said done hindsight, Well,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams, I'll perform Justin Dackson, I can do your job.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah blah blah. Well, if you knew that

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen, why why didn't you Why didn't you

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the house? Why didn't you have every dollar nine account

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on Damian Williams scoring two touchdowns yesterday? Await for an answer.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, dude, like it's hindsight, like everyone

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>could say it. It started Damian Williams. I started him

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in one league in a semifinal. I feel great about it.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Damian Williams. We mentioned yesterday mid range RTY

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>two perfectly in on him. Did I have Justin Jackson

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>backt higher than him? I did. I thought it was

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a matchup. I thought the workload was better, and on

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>paper it was. I mean Justin Jackson still had six

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>more carries, he had a few less receptions, but overall, um,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you started mean Williams or Justin Jackson. You feel really

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>good right now for those people Greg who were riding

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like that city stack all season long. Though Patrick Mahomes

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill, we saw Tyreek Hill dropped that long touchdown

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Kelsey really a pedestrian performing for his standards.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Seven receptions for sixty one yards. You don't feel great,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but don't go out there and do crazy stuff like, oh,

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I need to play the upside now. I

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't get enough points at a Tyreek Hill and Travis

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey stay the course. Don't overthink things. Now is not

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the time to overthink things. Yeah, doing more specific again,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson sixteen or fifty eight on the ground at

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown? Uh? Didtres News I had six for thirty four,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but again it was efficially he was good, I mean

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he was exploded a lot of what we saw from

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson. A couple of years ago where he looked

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>better than Austin Ekeler. I thought you could make the

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>same case for Jason Newsom a lot last night. But

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Triston Justin Jackson, he did wind up in the

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>end zone in the Fatasyathers. Listen, if we would tell

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you that you would get how many points they wind

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up with Fantasy points Jackson, it depends. Like you played

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in PPR eighty two total yards, two receptions that would

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have been ten plus a touchdown like over sixteen and Peple,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you've given me over fifteen over sixteen points for DRIs Jackson,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you're taking that. You're obviously taking that in this round. Um,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>over to the other side of things for Kansas City,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the good. Damian Williams over to your hearts,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like basically in the first half he finishes. Um, surprise

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't get more carries though I wasn't. Man. I told

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you that I really thought that they would just go

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to all Patrick mahomes, which is which is what they did. Um,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, this is crazy. This is crazy. Do

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you remember before the game, we're with DAMEZ and you

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>were talking about over under completions for that game, and

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you said you said you would make it over under fifty.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what you see. Said over under Frank Sett was

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty and they over under Dane Took was forty six.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We're under fifty Frank Set exactly. Look at that. Yeah,

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you know I mentioned to see you when

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I walked in today as well. The over under for

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that game fifty three and a half I believe it was.

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They were at fifty three total points with the chart

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just going for two. The odds makers are just they're

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>troubling people weekend and week out. It's insane. I don't know,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like to have a club ball or something. They were

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at fifty three total points over under his fifty three

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So many people were on the over

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and you're just sitting there holding your breath for

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a two point conversion. All right, you can't make this

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff up, No, you can't. But Damian Williams was just

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>tremendous yesterday. He looks pry, he looked good. The announcers

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Joe Bault, Troy Acn were gushing over him. Uh and

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for good reason, rightfully. So he was great. He was great.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He had two touchdowns on the day yesterday and Darryl

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Williams what I told you I liked yesterday. I didn't

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>get in the end zone as well. So all the

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>d Williams last night, all the d Williams, and I mentioned,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's gonna be that one play where D

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Williams breaks out along on and it happened. We're playing

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the game, all right, is it number twenty six? Is

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a number thirty one? Trying to figure out, you know,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>which which D Williams is it? You know, great, great

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>performance from both of those guys. Damian Williams specifically. UM,

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say I'd be surprised if Spencer where doesn't

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>play in week sixteen. He obviously has ten game, ten

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>days to get ready. So we'll see what happens. But um,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll they'll continue to run that committee approach.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>It might be closer to like a fifty split both

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of snaps and usage. Now maybe we see

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Spencer were twelve carries a couple of receptions

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and Damian Williams eight ten carries couple of receptions. Uh,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be frustrating, but we've we were we were

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>reminded last night that I might want to just start

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a Chiefs running macks, even as a flex option, because

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the offense is just so potent there in the red

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>zone all the time. Now, speaking over the Chiefs offense,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I give you the good like I said with Damie

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Williams to start, Travis Kelsey was okay, seven or sixty

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>one prs thirteen points and half points over ten. So

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not what you're used to with Travis Kelsey. But

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it was like destructive either. Tyreek Tyreek Hill was a

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>disasters for fantasy owners last night four forty six, and

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he dropped the shirt fire touchdown now the touchdown of

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the count because they're offsetting penalties, but wide open hits

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>him in the damn helmet like Marcus Robinson was like,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>ah and no crazy Tyreek Hill brutal. So I final

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>game for you last night. Also a guy that did

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not give you what you needed, and that's Patrick Mahomes.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I got it to three and two. You see that,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>all right? Give me twenty points, give you take right.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not bad. But if you're there in the semifinal,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, a few team is really really good, which

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is certainly possible, or you were relying on that close

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to thirty Patrick Mahomes week in a week, And I

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's crazy to say it's twenty point adding quarterbacks

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not good enough, but I have a feeling you have

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes and you know that's not my finals right now.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>What you got last night wasn't good enough. Yeah, I

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>would agree with that, And for most of the night

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it looked like he was completely gonna smash the output

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>from Philip Rivers and Rivers turns around and yeah, while

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>he did throw two intersons historically has been bad in

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, Philip Rivers has and the Chargers overall, but

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>really he turned his performance around, obviously with that last

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and then throwing for another two point conversion. But

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers over three hundred yards for Patrick Mahomes. You know,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the turning point for his fantasy production, Greg was when

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he had that QB sneak. And I don't really understand

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>how you how you give him the first down there

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and you don't give them a touchdown because they're basically

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>right on right on top of each other. So I

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, you give him the first town and then

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you signal like all right, and you're an inch away

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>from the goal line. If he gets that rushing touchdown

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>right there, Greg, we're looking at this all right too.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Forty three two passing touchdowns. If you're playing a four

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>point touchdown league, and then you get the rushing touchdown

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, then with that you're probably like,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, I feel pretty damn good. From Patrick Mahomes,

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that was kind of a turning fantasy output yesterday. Listen,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you had two rushing touchdowns and it wasn't Kareem Hunt,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't bencer Aware and it was just wild

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that that happened. Tyreek Hill, Travis Kelsey was the last night. Well,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys kept out of the end zone. You got

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>your shot outs or a guy Paton Hill. I texted

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this to you guys last night. I was crazy. I

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was all my way at home. Um it was all

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>my way home from this cooking glass. Like it wasn't

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>real cooking classes, easily just cooked before OSSes. All right? Cool? Um,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>did you learn anything now to tell you things? Um?

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Son right? All right? I mean I might do it,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>probably not when the Charges and Chiefs are playing, but

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I didn't realize it was gonna be this

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>good when we what am I gonna do. But anyway,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so I only missed like the first driver whatnot. So

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it was fun and I saw it. Sweet Mayo was

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>betting like thirty three two one to Marcus Robinson first touchdown,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like all right, Like I would have been if I

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was looking at it, I would looked at my Guydee Williams,

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not Damian Williams, Daryl Williams. I would have looked at

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>him the first touchdown. And I'm walking by. I see Patrick,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>my home store was touchdown? All right? You kidding? Means

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>your mortgage robins in thirty three to one, Patty Mayo

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>get that cash. That was awesome. Yeah, that was crazy.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I see a lot of people just looking

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at the odds for the first touchdown score and just really,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know what to throw anything crazy bucks,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you get that at thirty three the one. Absolutely. When

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll give you the latest on all

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the injured players. We have more news in Odell Beckham

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>more news. Don't see why Hilton stick around? Give you

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the It doesn't answer your calls. Rest of the way.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Cut out. Next Daily Rodo dot Com learned from the

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily rodo dot Com Optimizer. In minutes,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Learn from the game's best DBS player joined Daily rodo

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a year from drug overdose, twenty people a day, five

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>people every hour, one person every twelve minutes. Thousand people

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>die every year from alcohol abuse, over to two hundred

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and forty people a day, ten an hour, one person

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>every six minutes. Somebody you know, maybe next learn how

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to help someone you love get away from the drugs,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>alcohol and bad influences. With the f m l A,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>people can take a leave of absence from their job

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and still keep it. Call now and learn how we

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can help you. Eight six six eight four nine six

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to one eight six six four eight four nine six

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to one. That's eight six six four eight four ninety

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>six Fantasy sports Today, we've talked about argers a lot.

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Danis talked about them from the beginning of the season.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about how they're on the common they

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably the best team in the a

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>f C. They go on the road against a formidable

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a f C opponent down two touchdowns, they put their

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cons on the line last night. You go for two

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that I can appreciate. You like the call to I

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is the most impressive win in the NFL.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>All season weekends eight m Eastern on F A T

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>S Y Radio and not your popular podcast providers. Well, well,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>well back with you on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and Radio that work. That is frank Stamfell.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sussman, Frankie Stampfel. Let's get everybody the

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>latest news and notes off the injury report, and that

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>includes Odell Beckham Jr. Who was one again out with

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a quad injury. You return to practice on Wednesday, basically

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>practice the entire day, full practice. It's called limited, but

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he practiced in full and then he said blank game

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>right in practice Thursday. So a specialist. Did not practice Friday,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even on the bike on Friday. Not sure what's

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>going on with Odell. I'm not sure if it's a

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>quad injury or it's a quad injury, but board for

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners, he is out in the semifinals this week, Like,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with your boy? Normally the time of

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the month does not last this long. Greg, I don't

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>understand what's going on with Odell Beckham. I mean, this

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>quad injury really popped up out of nowhere last week

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on a Saturday. I mean, normally, if we were going

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to get like injury news, that pops up, like what

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>was he doing Friday? Was he out somewhere dancing twerkin

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doing something like that that he ended up hurting his quarter?

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I like, no, I'm not here to speculate, but I don't.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand what's going on with Odell Beckham

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that randomly this injury pops up last week, we hear

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing about it. He's ruled out on a Saturday called

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody by surprise, has a whole another week to kind

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of like elaborate or figure things out or at least

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>let us know what's going on, and we get nothing. Greg.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what's going on with Odell Beckham.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>With that being said, Uh, the Giants wide receiver snap

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>counts last week, We're just all over the place. Um,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it was like Sterling Shepherd of the team a sixty

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. I realized it was a blowout. But then

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>like Corey Coleman sixty five percent, you get Russell Shepherd,

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Benny Fowlert. So realistically you ask me, all right, well,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>what is this? Due to their their offense, you probably

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>just see a lot more um se Kwon Barkley. Obviously,

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it. I think it improves the floor of

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>one Evan Ingram. He's been all over the map this season,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>but we did see last year when Odell Beckham was out.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>When he gets more volume, when he sees more targets,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram's in a better spot. But the Titans have

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>been stout against tight ends all season long, so I

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>think it raises this floor. I still don't love Evan

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Ingram Sterling Shepherd low and wide receiver three. I can't.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't really push him much higher than that. He

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>plays the slot for the Titans a season long. They've

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>struggled to outside wide receivers greg because Malcolm Butler has

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been just torched all season long. So it might be

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these. You know, Corey Coleman or Russell Shepherd's

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch random touchdown in this game, Sterling Shepherd for

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>me low and wide receiver three. I can't trust him

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>much more than that. Yeah, listen, I think you're now

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty right. I like certainly Shepard. I think

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they utilized him. Of course without Odell Evaningram obviously gets

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the bump Um especially rend Ellison can't go as well.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It's more snapps and opportunities for Evan ingram Um. Corey James,

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got a bunch of questions about him. This region

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>or Jackets has been really good as of late, so

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I would fee a little cautious about Corey Davis. The

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>big question we're getting, Frank, and I know it depends

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on who else you have, but do you go back

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>to Derrick Henry a week after the best fantasy and

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen? Do you put him in your lae

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>up this week? Is that he'll must start well? Depends

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>what this is always like semantics. What do you consider

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a must start top? And Derrick Henry's must start from

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's a great He's in a great position.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a similar game flow to last

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>week against the New York Giants here, and it's been

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup for running backs. I continue to reference

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this direct correlation. Once they traded away Snacks Harrison, their

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>run defense has completely left the team with him, so, uh,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've given up. I liked I liked Adrian

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Peterson last week because I thought it was a good matchup. Obviously,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Mark Sanchez, Josh Johnson, what do you know?

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't help a guy like Adrian Peterson. But in

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>every other game outside of that, they've given up like

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fantasy production too running back. So I

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could do think Derrick Henry is in another spot here

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>where he gets around, you know, fifteen carries. I could

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>see him scoring a touchdown. He's been a touchdown monster

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the past what five six weeks or so, So I

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do think he's in a good spot. I think he

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>is low n RB two this week. Great. I think

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>him and Doug Martin are really interesting ones. If you

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>just talk about like against each other or like you

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to trust Derrick Henry, you don't really

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>want to trust Doug Martin, But they're both in really

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>good spots this week Doug Martin going up against the

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals. You know how bad they've been to uh

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to running backs all season long. Um, and he scored

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in three straight games. I was quizzing you

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>guys downstairs the other day. Doug Martin over the past

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two weeks has the most red zone opportunities in the NFL.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, say, Kwon Barkley, you can name any other

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 1>running back Christian McCaffrey. No, it's Doug Martin who has

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the most red zone targets plus carries over the past

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, and I think that continues in Week fifteen,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Cincinnati Bengals. I like him, and

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I do like Derrick Henry as lowand RB twos. Already

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>continuing on t Y Hilton did not practice again today.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not practice Wednesday, Thursday or Friday. Obviously, given his

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>stature with the Colts, he probably doesn't need to practice

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to play. I would say, um, But certainly concerning do

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you want he had a great game last week without

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>practicing Wednesday or Thursday. He did practice Friday. What are

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you think gonna Ty Hilton? Hilton? I still I'm gonna

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>trust him as a high end wide receiver to Obviously,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if he plays, it is a tougher matchup. You know,

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to dispute that the Hot Boys. The

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys defense with Byron Jones and shadoube Ewusia, those

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>corners have played out of their mind this season. But

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton. You know, I mentioned um what he

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>does against the Houston Texas in his career, and really

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's whenever he plays indoors, so their home this week,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>whether they were playing home or at Dallas. I mean,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an indoor game. He typically does well in these spots.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he has the same upside as

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>he did against the Houston Texans secondary because the Texas

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>secondary is just not nearly as good. But I do

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>trust t Why Hilton as a mid range wide receiver

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to um, assuming he plays great, Okay, there you go.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>He's water ship too. If he plays, are going against Dallas.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, Marlon Mack, where is he ranked for you? Bug?

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you kill a bug? Is that what you're telling me?

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I just MR that there was a fly? I killed it? Yeah?

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Give it the old Mr yagi O good. Who are

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you asking me? About Sorry flies, Is Marlon Mack in

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>your top twenty four this week? Well, Mac, no, he's

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near my top twenty four. Actually, I was talking

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>with the King Scott Angle yesterday about Marlon Mack and

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where he should be ranked this week, and he got

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on my case. Greg because I had both Edo Smith

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and Tevin Coleman. I'm trusting the match up here with

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons running backs at home as big favorites

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Arizona Cardinals. The Arizona Cardinals not

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>only have they given up the most close to the

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy production to running backs all season long, they

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>consistently give up the most rushing attempts per game to

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs. Why is that because they're constantly playing

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>from behind. Opposing teams play with leads against the Arizona

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals because news slash they're not very good. So, once again,

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in a spot where the Falcons are favored by you know,

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half points at home this week, I

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do think that they're going to be playing with a lead.

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Falcons have not been great as

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of late, but I just don't really trust the Cardinals

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>offense all that much. And and they're just giving up

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fantasy production. So I like guys like

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Edo Smith, Tevin Coleman in that mid range flex option

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of range. Um, and I'll trust those guys over

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack. The Cowboys have been great against running backs

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>all season. I don't know if it's the injuries that

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are catching up to Marlon Mac, but he hasn't looked

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like himself the past couple of weeks. You know, he

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't topped sixty total yards in the past two weeks combined. Greg,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>he really is just touchdown or bust, especially in this

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Cowboys. Give me the Falcons running backs

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>over Marlon Mack in weeks seen. Alright, do you agree

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>with that? By the way, Yeah, I do, Actually I do.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Um One Scott was killing me, you know, an nothing

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to do with more on the Mack this week. I

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>really don't. I realized the Falcons running backs have let

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you down all season long. But the Cardinals, I mean,

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just like whoever they face, they're giving up

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>production to running backs because um, you know their their

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>defense is just on the field a lot. No. I

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>mean the point, what like I was while you were

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about that, I was thinking about Marlon Mack. I

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was also thinking about another guy we've heard a lot

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>about this week. Within's Aaron Jones with Green Bay and

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what to do um against Chicago. Another team that wants

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to hold the ball, a lot that wants to keep

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of Aaron Rodgers hand. And when I

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose to Scott on the air off there yesterday, I

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>said that I liked Aaron Jones compared to tell the

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>more people that he threw at me, I think it

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually Damian Williams. Is just just a disaster um. But

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hey man, Aaron Jones didn't play yet, you never know

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. But how confident are you when it comes

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to Aaron Jones and Green Bay? Aaron Rodgers will be

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>spoken about where you have him this week? What do

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you do with Aaron Jones here against Chicago? Yeah, this

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>is a really tough spot, Greg, and I've kind of

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>struggled with this one because it's a classic example of

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>alent for the running back versus the really really tough

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup here in the Chicago Bears. A Bears team that

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>has allowed seventy one rushing yards per game to opposing

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs just three point six yards per carry versus

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, where As if you look at what he's

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>done pretty much over the past you know, six seven weeks,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the past the past six weeks, Greg, he's had at

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>least three receptions in every single game. He scored at

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>least one touchdown in six of his last seven games.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>He has you know, he has two games in there

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>where he scored two rushing touchdowns against the Miami Dolphins

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and the Seattle Seahoaks. Just the way that he's been trending,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's been used, and I know it's

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>been frustrating. That's kind of why Mark Mike McCarthy is

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>out right now. Because we saw the game two weeks

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ago against the Arizona Cardinals where oh yeah, it's supposed

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a great matchup and Mike McCarthy the only

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>plays Aaron Jones. Of the Snaps, it was frustrating that

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he didn't start last week, but he ended up taking over.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Still got seventeen carries last week against the Falcons, seventy

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing yards and a touchdown. I'm trusting the talent here, Greg.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in play as a n RB one

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>high end RB two. Trust me. That's actually that's actually

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty high, higher than I've seen kind of elsewhere. Huge

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>start Aaron Jones in this matchup against the Bears than

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you would say, like mark Ingram against Caroline On So

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I have yes, I would definitely just because there's so

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>much volatility with the with the Saints running backs. Like, okay,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingra you have a game like you did last week,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but right we were there sweating out together. We we

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>own mark Ingram against Matt Modica. Thanks Matt Moodica with

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Derrick Henry fiftie burger against us. But mark Ingram,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get that touchdown, what are you getting

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>out of him? Right? So it's like you can't really

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't really trust the red zone usage on a

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>week to week basis because there's no really, there's no

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>rhyme or reason when it comes to Alvin Kamara versus

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram. Mark Ingram, you know there's been games where

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he actually gets more touches inside the red zone. It's

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>very much. So we're going to ride the hot hands.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take Aaron Jones, I'll take the talent. I'll

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>take the fact that when the Packers aren't being idiots.

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The workload is there for Aaron Jones. I mentioned especially

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in the receiving game, at least three receptions in sixth

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>straight game, Tames. I have Aaron Jones ranks is my

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>RB thirteen Greg, So he's right behind Chris Carson for me,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>right behind Dalvin Cook. And I have him just ahead

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of guys like Lamar Miller, Sony Michelle, David Johnson because

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys have their warts too. Lamar Miller, he's actually

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>surprised me this year. I don't know if he sucks

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>as much as you say he does, Greg, And it's

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a solid spot against the Jets. But Sony Michelle, he's

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>been getting voted by James Devlin And you know, I

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think we should talk about the Patriots weapons as well,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because seemingly there's five big weapons on this team. Every

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>single week, three of those guys are gonna come through.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Good luck figuring out which three those are going to be.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's warts when it comes to Sony Michelle and

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots running backs. David Johnson, he's had great matchups

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>every single week. Is a great match up again this week?

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna be able to come through? Who knows?

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So the guys that I have ranked just behind Aaron Jones.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they also have their deficiencies as well. I'm

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>trusting the talent even in a bad matchup against Chicago

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Bears four four eight four three six seven nineths. Answer

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>some questions before we continue on with some our game breakdowns.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Let me start in Milwaukee with Jordan by Green Bay.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's when it was cousin. Jordan, You're up first. Here

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are the fantasy best friends forever. Awesome, Thanks guys for UM.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I got two quick ones here. I'm gonna get the

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dirty one out of the way. UM pretty much as

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.239
<v Speaker 1>it have Derrick Henry or Jeff Wilson Jr. Who did

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty well against Seattle in Seattle. UM, I have Henry

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>in right now. Think yeah, So for me, I think

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to start Derrick Henry. It looks like Matt

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Breeda might try to suit this one off his practice

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days that you have to make

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the decision. Unfortunately, before we get word on a Breeda

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>will be active most likely unless he's not on the

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>injury report today. Yeah, because that's a four o'clock game

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and reason so I have to start Derrick Henry there. Yeah,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I do agree with you here, Greg. Originally I was

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that it will be answered for you. Basically,

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Breeda doesn't play, I would use Jeff Wilson

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>over Derrick Henry. But Greg's right, by the time you

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know the one o'clock game Star, we might not know

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on Matt Breeda, but we've seen this all season long

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>where if he's limited in practice all week, he is

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>most likely going to play unless he's ruled out today

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or tomorrow or early Sunday. I'm gonna use Derrick Henry.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But if we do get that news on Brita and

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wilson has this backfield to himself, I would start

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>him over Derrick Henry. Okay, Um, And then this is

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough one. Um. Right now, I have

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>RB one Comaro RB two, Lindsay, I'm flexing Cohen, and

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I still have Jalen Samuel's on the bench. I didn't

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>know if there was UM an RV you would switch

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in there. So it's if you keep Samuels on the bench. Wait,

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just too Cohen versus Jalen Samuel's. Um, you're not

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>betting Camar, I mean're not menturing the two of them.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's be realistic, so it's three color North Jiln Samuels,

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>let's take that out of it. Yeah, and I do

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's close to because, um, if you told me

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a Steelers running back was gonna be percent of the

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week and saw you know, seventeen total touches

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Greg based on what he did in the past game

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as well, I think you know you you you'd be

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty excited about said Steelers running back. Um. I want

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to look at when when these games are played here too,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>because the Steelers all are you know, when I'm looking

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at Greig, I'm looking at Week six team matchups. What

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hell am I doing here? Well, the Steelers are the

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and the revenge game for Stephen Stephen Ridley and

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Bara the Packers. So that game is the

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers are at four thirty and then the Packers

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are at once. So it's a similar situation. And I'm

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna know what James Conner. I think just in

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum, it's very close anyway between Tarreco and versus

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels. But as of right now, I do have

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Tariko and ranked higher. Um, just what he's been able

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, because like he's been scoring touchdowns with teams

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like every single week, is used to in the past

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>game as well. I think it's a pretty good match

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>up here against the Green Bay Packers. I'm gonna trust

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>recon unless we get news about, Unless we get news

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about I'm probably so that's the question. Right when we

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get news about James Conner Connor's out, I'm going with

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuel's. I think, as you said, eighty percent of

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the snap, Steven really probably trying to find his way

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. He does have that huge game

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>narrative against doing. The Patriots kind of lean Jalen Samuels though,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Um, I just think he'll be out there. I

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's very hard. It's very hard bet. These

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two guys are very close to me. It's just if

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>if James Conner isn't ruled out before that game, I

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can't risk it because then what is Janalen Samuel's going

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to do? Right, That's what it comes down to. Your

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>I hopef you'll get a comification today. Maybe, Yeah, A

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>lot comes down to today. I know, you know, James

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Conner they said that he doesn't need to practice in

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>order to play. So it's a very tough situation if

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't rule him out before Sunday. I'm taking the

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>shirt production out of Terkowen, and I'm not going to

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>risk it with Janen Samuels. All right, eight four four

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>four three six seven nine to continue on. So to

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Devon in San Antonio, it's up Devon. Hey you guys,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>how are you all today? All right? What's up? All right? Um?

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So I just have a line up question. Um, I

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>need a I need a receiver, a running back and

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>flex from this bunch. Uh. My options are Dante Petties,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson, Mark Ingram, Jeff Wilson Jr. Tyler Boyd, and

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake. Okay, that s all right, So there's a

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>full point PVR. He needs a running back, a wide

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver in reflex. Let me wide receiver first. That's the

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>easiest part. It's Tyler Boyd versus Dante Pettis's only it's

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one me one here. Which one would you choose?

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Frank they were looking at this is a tough one

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for me because what Dante Pettis just did against the

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. I have these guys ranked in a similar range.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Tyler Void is that wide receiver

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>too that he was before. He's more of a wide

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver three. And Dante Pettiz has been performing as such

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>recently as well. I like the matchup in the slot

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Oakland Raiders. I'll take Tyler Boyd here. That

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that we can't get Dante Pettis in as

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the flex For me, I think it's um. I definitely

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>want Carson in at running back. I know that he

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he doesn't catch a lot of passes, but he's

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>been extremely consistent one thousand percent long. I think it

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>comes down to drink. I'm not starting Kenyan Drake against

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings given his usage and the inconsistency there

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>With the Miami Dolphins. It comes down to mark Ingram

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>versus Dante Pettis versus Jeff Wilson and they and they

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all play later, so he will fight. So I'll say this,

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Brida doesn't play, I'll start Jeff Wilson. I

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. If he doesn't. If he does play,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 1>we can't start Jeff Wilson. That selves that question. Let's

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>say Brita does play, just for argument's sake, Pettis over Ingram. Yeah,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I just don't expect Ingram to catch many passes. And

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>then again with the running back. I know, you know,

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>normally we go all right, well, if it's close between

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and running with the running back with the

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>running back. But here in the PPR the way Dante

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Pettis is playing right now, it's very very close. If

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt bree doesn't play, I agree with you, Jeff Wilson.

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>If Matt Breida does play, I'm plugging Dante Pettison at

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the place. I'm gonna plug in Ingram and just hope

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for the touchdown, to be honest with you. Agree with

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bough and Carson locked in, locked in. Hopefully Brida doesn't

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>play so we can agree on Jeff Wilson. All right,

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break. More of your phone calls the

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way coming up next. If you're someone

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>that needs fantasy sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network has you covered. When you download the n

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>T S Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>top fantasy advice every single day right through the weekend,

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to listen to our weekend warriors like

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>They call me the fantasy Jesus in this league is

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>never short of exciting at I t L and it's

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Gap

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in the iTunes and Google Play Store now and keep

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the best fantasy experts right in your pocket all day

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>long and all week long. Indeed knows finding the right

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>higher takes time away from your businesses Hireing a qualified

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>data engineer felt like a second job. More job seekers

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>use Indeed than any other site, so there's no better

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>place to find someone with the skills you're looking for.

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I needed someone with a mesters in computer science and

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>database experience. Plus Indeed, screener questions help you find your

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>shortlist fast. Now I'm back to having just one job.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 1>See why more than three million companies worldwide use Indeed

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to Higher post your job at Indeed dot Com Slash

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Higher Indeed, the world's number one job site source score

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>total visits. Lumber Liquidators is celebrating the opening of our

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four hundred store, so we're putting over four hundred floors

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>on sale. That means huge savings for you. Get pre

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>finished hardwood and bamboo up to thirty six percent off,

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>including news styles like Mediterranean Maple and best sellers like

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>silver Stone Bamboo. Take twenty five percent off all dream

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>home laminate and ten to fifteen percent off our best

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>waterproof floors. More from just forty nine cents plus special

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>financing and professional installation. Hurry get to your local lumber

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>liquidators today. Fantasy Freestyle Lamar Jackson is in fact starting.

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd started that rushing floor similar to what I talked

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about with Josh Allen. That rushing floor is the jit

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I would have Lamar Jackson and Josh Allen this week.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm saying this, but over Aaron Rodgers,

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>do you hear me? Josh Allen greater than sign Aaron Rodgers.

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Lamark Jackson greater than sign Aaron Rodgers. And I think

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco had started his last game for the Baltimore Ravens.

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be a Jacksonville Jaguar next year.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday and Thursday, t Emister on Tepentine Why Radio and

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast Providers. Back with you, Fantasy best

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. That is Frank Staville.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sousman, rapping it up and getting you

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>ready for week fifteen. We're here to answer all of

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>your questions and we could do the absolute best we can. Uh.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>In that regard Saturday games, Frankie Isaiah Crewell already ruled

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>out through you. Your Jesse said that earlier, which means

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you're walking with Elijah and I'm opening the door so

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Elijah can get in. Elijah McGuire should start a see

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>significant action against Houston Texans the later game these Cleveland

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>against Denver. Um any changes to the Denver wide receivers.

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I know I asked you this earlier in the week. Um,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we now know Denzel Ward is out, so you're starting

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton over day. Sean Hamilton's that and Tim Patrick

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that correct, Cortland Sutton would still be number one, Okay,

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think Dashawn Hamilton's is number two. And I know, uh,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people are talking up Tim Patrick.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He did have the double digit targets a week ago.

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton left that game briefly with an injury, but

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been practicing. He's been a full goal this week,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and I did mention if Denzel Ward is out, which

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>has already come out, he is going to be out

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in that game dealing with a concussion that on the outside,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be harder for them to stop a guy

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>like Courtland Sutton. So I know he's letting people down.

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's in that wide receiver three discussion. I will say this,

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I think Courtland Sutton is more of the standard play.

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Dashawn Hamilton's is more the PPR play, just

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>playing the slot receiver role, and case Keenum, even dating

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>back to last year with the Minnesota Vikings, typically leans

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>on his slot wide receiver. We saw that in Week

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen when Dyshawn Hamilton's had nine targets seven receptions. He

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a lot Yardagewise had around like forty seven yards,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but scored the touchdown as well. So I'm Lulu, I'm

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>bullets on Dashawn Hamilton's this week. I think targeting the

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>slot receiver against the Cleveland Browns makes a lot of sense,

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But in standard I would still look quote on Sutton

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and PPR. I like Dashawn Hamilton a little bit more.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And then our guy, not really our guy, my guy

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>j E. T. S who wants to walk with Elijah McGuire.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in a good spot here in terms

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of usage and opportunity. Greg, the matchup is not a

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>great one. The Texans have been stout against the run

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this year and limiting opposing running backs fantasy production. But

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire looks like he's in another spot here to

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 1>get at least fifteen touches. I would say that that's

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the floor. Last week he had twenty total touches, fifteen

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>carries and five receptions in that game against the Buffalo Bills,

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>up over eighty total yards, and he scored a touchdown,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's If he doesn't get that touchdown, you're probably

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at anywhere from six to eighty total yards. I

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>think that the Texans will be able to limit him,

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but because he's, you know, basically the main running back

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on the roster, if they do manage to get there

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>into the red zone and they have a goal line opportunity,

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think McGuire is gonna be that guy. So

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think he's in play as a flex option.

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd use him over Marlon Max this week. Greg I

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>went to I completely agree with that the matchup is

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>just better. You know he's the guy. He got it

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>done last week. I think he does it again this

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>week for the New York Jets. Um, anything else you want,

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I would need touch on before I hit the phones.

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Just sticking in that game. UM, if you go on

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to rodal Experts dot com right now, you can do

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the best Fantasy five, the five players that I have

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ranked higher than the consensus this week. Robby Anderson is

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those players, Greg Um, and I know Quincy

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Numo has already been ruled out for Week fifteen, and

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's back to back games with at least seven targets

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for Robbie Anderson. His production has been up and down

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>all year long, but last week he converted four of

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>those targets for seventy six yards and a touchdown. Sam Donald,

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you can tell was leaning on him a little bit

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Targeted down the field against a strong cornerback,

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the best shutdown corners in the league, Intra

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Davious White. They connected on a thirty seven yard reception

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>over the top, and then on a scramble play, Sam

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Donald got out of the po get and he threw

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it to Robbie Anderson inside of the red zone scored

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown Andre dabous White. Again. The Houston Texans defense,

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>really the way that you want to attack them is

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 1>through the air, through the secondary. Over the past two weeks,

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Texans have allowed the most fantasy points to opposing

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. We just saw t Hy Hilton put up

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred ninety nine yards against these Houston Texans. I

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.919
<v Speaker 1>think with with the new being out, the target's been there,

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they're starting to grow some chemistry

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>here between Sam Donald and Robbie Anderson, I think he's

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in play as the mid range wide receiver. Three. I'm

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>very bullis and Robbie Anderson this week. Freddy loves Robbie

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Anderson this week, which means you should as well. Eight

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>four or four eight four three six stight seven nine.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Nathan in New Jersey. It's up Nathan,

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>hear me? What's up? Man? So my unfortunately, my team

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is out of the playoffs. I finished the season thirteen

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and I lost in the first round because I made

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a mistake by starting uh McCoy start before. I mean,

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes did good for me, but McCoy had only one

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>yard last week. So that's that messed me up, But

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, for uh, I know you guys already

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess ranking for next or that, but where do

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you put my homes for next year? Number one nice quarterback?

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott Angle paid this person. This is this is the

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>ghost caller for Scott Angle, which, if you're head on

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:17.479
<v Speaker 1>over to the Road of Experts dot com, Scott talks

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>about this exact thing. He just wrote an extensive article, Greg,

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>an extensive article on where Pat Mahomes should be drafted

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>next year and whether or not you should even consider

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>him in the first round. So it's a free article.

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Head on over road Experts dot com. Check that out. Um,

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't use the first round pick on a quarterback.

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I do think that Pat Mahomes will be the first

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback taken forty five passing touchdowns this year. Um, you know,

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a second year player threatening Peyton Manning's passing touchdown record,

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>which is fifty five. I do think that he's in

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>play to to throw for fifty touchdowns this year. But

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I see him. I could see someone reaching

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on him on like the second round, maybe late second

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>early third round. Me personally, I won't be able to

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>do it, but I can see him realistically going in

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the second round next your bag. Yeah, I can see

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it too. I mean that's where Rodgers used to go,

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of second round. So I can

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>see that for sure. And I think he will. I

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think the youth, which is crazy to say, he absolutely

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>absolutely on belt of the team, Greg. The sky is

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the limit eight four four eight four three six eight

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Let me go out b J in San Antonio.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>What's up? B J? Hey, how you guys doing doing great? Man?

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>What's happening? Um? Okay? Unfortunately I was one of the

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>guys who had Melvin and I have a James Conner

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>on my team, and I had Spencer wear also, and

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I had a first round by in the playoffs, I

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was the number two seeds, so I went in comfortably

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm panicking. Yep, time, Um, I have to

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>choose to out of see one two five guys here

0:45:50.360 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire's PPR, Elijah McGuire, Chris Ivory, um Sprows, Chris

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Thompson and Corey Davis, and there is I know it's

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys, but I'm not sure which one

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to go with. There's also Edo Smith on the way

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>was also all right, So that's uh, that makes things

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a little interesting here. How many do you need to

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>start to? You said two are two of those, grading

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>between Elijah McGuire, Chris Ivory, Darren Sprowls, Chris Thompson, Corey Davis,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and Edo Smith. I'll just stay right off the top

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of eliminating Chris Thompson from this group. I don't want

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to really start anyone on Washington's offense, but Josh Johnson

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>as the quarterback. I know we performed well rushing last week. Whatever,

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA. I just don't really want exposure to the

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Washington offense going up against the Jacksonville defense, which has

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>played better at home this season. So they we're looking

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>at Eto Smith, Corey Davis, Sprawls, Ivory McGuire. I would

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>say the one lock for this lineup has of right now,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the player we just spoke about, Greag I think Elijah McGuire.

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a high inflexible, good with that. I'm

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>good with that. Just had five receptions a week ago

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>in the PPR against the Houston Texans. I I like

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the workload year Chris Ivory going up against the Detroit Lions,

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they've been much better since they've got snacks Harrison Darren Sprowls.

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>With Nick Foles as the quarterback, he could check down

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to him a lot. I expect him to be playing

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>from behind against the Los Angeles Rams. And then you

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have Corey Davis and Edo Smith as well. I think

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's between Ivory, Corey Davis, and Edo Smith. The Giants

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have done a great job against number one wide receivers

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all season long. I don't really I have I have

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis in the league. I don't really want to

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>use him either. Greg. This is tough. This is really

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hard for me. UM. It's a PBRs. I guess a

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>shy away from Ivory because of that. UM, I like

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>McGuire for one game where McCoy didn't play earlier on

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in the season, we had over twenty touches Chris Ivory

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in that game and he's healthy. I don't think I

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>did eat either. We haven't trusted McCoy all season long,

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, why would we trust the Bills running

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>again Detroit Long, which are season on the line. I

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch Darren Sprawls against the maybe touch

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>d pros. It's the Rams, maybe Maybee. That's the answer. Yeah,

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a really tough one. You know what,

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis is the best player out of these guys

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 1>match up his bed. But it's PPR and I and

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I've said this in PPR, you lean with the wide

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver when it when it's tough here. I know I

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>talked to Edo Smith but doesn't really catch a lot

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of pass I don't want to. I'm gonna go Corey Davis.

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Elijah McGuire and Corey Davis, Greg and

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the PPR here. I just want to see one thing

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>before I answer that question. So for me, I'm'm definitely

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Elijah McGuire. Yeah, even last week Ainst Dallas

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>darren Sproles to get the touchdown, we only had four touches.

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>He had four touches, uh in back to back weeks

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and gonna have a single reception of the week before

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>against Washington. With that being said, I'm gonna go to

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis. He's just the best player out of these guys.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So for me, it's Elijah McGuire and Corey Davis as well.

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Eight four four eight four three six seven nine aaron

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Ian Lancing, You're up what's up man? Hey, guys, make

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it quick. I lost O J for a second week

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in a row. UM wondering out of the waiver wire

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve team PPR. There is Um, Josh Reynolds, Randall Cobb, Um,

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and one more one second here her is going to

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>be and then Robbie Anderson. I know you guys talked

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about Robbie Anderson might be a good play this week. UM,

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering, out of those three, which way Wouldjlean?

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes to me, it's between Josh Reynolds and Robbie Anderson.

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to trust Randall Cole. I don't like

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers a lot this week in that spot in Chicago.

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.279
<v Speaker 1>So with that being said, Randall Cobb is eliminated from this.

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very close between Robbie Anderson and Josh Reynolds.

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those your guy, my guy things.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sumhow Lean towards, especially against the Eagle secondary

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds again, and I have a feeling you'll probably

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 1>go with Robbie Anderson, your guy. Yeah, it's super close. Now,

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, Greg, I'm gonna go with Josh Reynolds.

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Here because you just look at what the Eagles secondary

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>has done all season long. They've allowed the second most

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing wide receivers, and last week we

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 1>saw what a Marii Cooper just did. I mean, overall,

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they allowed Cowboys wide receievers agast two hundred and sixty

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>eight receiving yards and three touch that equated to sixty

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one point eight PPPR fantasy points a week ago. I

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>do think the old the Eagles secondary is vulnerable. I'll

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>lean Josh Reynolds, but ah, I'm gonna end up kicking myself. Man.

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's close. I think it's very close between

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds and Robbie Anderson. I'll take the I'll take the

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>better offense here, better offensive, better matchups here, matchup too yeah.

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Eight four four eight four three sixt eight seven nine.

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 1>We continue on Jay Rod and Matton Rouge. What's up,

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>jard d that the guys that's gone. It's going well, now,

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:37.439
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? I've lost unfortunately Gordon and Spencer ware down

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a flax flex and a half point PPR too, uh

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to mediocre. The bad choices. Uh. Marlon Mack against the

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Cord is very stout Cowboys defense. And I'm afraid of

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the hot or double tapping the or double tapping the

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore running backs. I'm not sure if it's a smarter

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>dumb Gus the Bus and Kenn Dixon as as starting

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>both those guys along with the Baltimore defense. So what

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think? On Mac? You know his his

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup or rolling with both Baltimore running backs. So

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>why would it two spots? Or do you already have

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gust Bus in your line up? Because you're saying both

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you have the option of both Ravens running backs, is

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. I got to use well, i gotta

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>use guts Busts. As Rbach and Gordon were out last night,

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck. There's nobody on the world away wire. Yeah,

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 1>so it comes and I agree with your decision. Gust

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Bus is the one that I would leave in the lineup.

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I haven't ranked the highest of all these running backs

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, So it comes down to Marlon Mack and

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of Dickson. Greg do you wanna do you want

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to ride both Ravens running backs going up against the

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Bucks. And I will say this, while I've

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>given the Bucks credit um their defense. Their defense has

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>come around the past couple of weeks, especially in the secondary.

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>What they've been able to do against against the posing quarterbacks,

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it has suffered against their their rush defense. They they're

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>continuing to give up a lot of yards high yards

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>per carry to opposing running backs and a lot of

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy production to running backs as well. So and the

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Dixon versus Marlon Mack. I have these guys really really

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>close in my ranks. I think I have Marlon Mack

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of spots higher. But if you're just looking

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at pure matchup here, Greg Hannah Dixon has the way

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the better match against Tampa Bay. I know it's had

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack two spots higher in my rankings. Got to

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, I would use Marlon Mack and just

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hope that he scored a touchdown. Exactly what I'm gonna do.

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I know I've been the cold guy all week on

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Kenvins Dickson. I've gone a lot of people ask me

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>about Kevin Dixon. I agree you Gus otherwords, he's the

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one that goes Could this be the week where Kennedy

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Dixon because he's ascending and gust Bus is descending. But

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I know the wheels are falling off the bus here, Greg.

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I know that, But I also know that Marlon Max

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is the guy. I know that Marlon Max is the guy.

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that. Was so hard to trust the Ravens

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs right now? Correct, It's like, if you do

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>trust one of them, who do you try? I think

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>you got. I have Gus Edwards just because while the

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>snaps he saw four week low in terms of snaps

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the snaps this past week, he still has seen at

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:02.840
<v Speaker 1>least six team carries in four straight games. So and

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the red zone opportunities. I

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>thought this was really interesting. I don't have to pulled

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>up right now or do I see? No, I don't,

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but Gus Edwards last week he h Kennet Dickson scored

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the three yard touchdown or whatever. That was his only

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>red zone carry over the past two weeks. Gus Edwards

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 1>has had I believe it was. I think it's like

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>three red zone opportunities over the past two weeks. So

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he still once they're inside the red zone, he still

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>has seen more work over the past two weeks than

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Dixon. I think they were just like all right,

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>let's try something. Let's see if Kennet Dixon could punch

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it in here. And he did convert on that, but

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>over the past two games, gust Bus actually does have

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>more red zone work than Kennet Dixons stuff. Gus Edwards

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and Marlon Mack, I'm with you right there, Greg, It's

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just it's hard to trust Kennetics with that. Al we

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye to our YouTube audience. Good luck even week

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>number fifteen. We're certainly rooting for you. The friends you

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will help you up next. Chris Ventra, Jim Day, and

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Corey Parson maybly just Jim will help you. The other

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>two will just you know, but nevertheless, uh, they'll help

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you out a feeling. They'll be talking about Chris s

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Fenter's hair today A lot on the show sounds about right, uh.

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Frenzies up next. If you are listening on the podcast

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like subscribe Ratus five Stars, please the comment if you're

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.240
<v Speaker 1>listening live on the radio, we go another two minutes

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or so. I do have another call you get to

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and then we will wrap up with a question from

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Oorrown Chris real quick, here's uh, here's what I was

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for for Gus Edwards last week it was red

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>zone carries, Gus had three, Anticson only had one, and

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>then three weeks ago Gus Edwards had five. So I mean,

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it still seems like he's the guy. Like I know,

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the snaps tell you a different story. They're going down

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for Gus Edwards and they're going up for Kenneth Dixon.

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But he still did out carry him at least sixteen

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 1>carries in four street games. He's my highest ranked Ravens

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>running back. Alright, eight for four four three six, Staight

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.479
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. We go out to Sarah Sota to talk

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to Anthony. What's up, Anthony? Yes, I have a question.

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Have three quarterbacks? I wonder who I should start? And

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have three? I have already a receiver seven as Judio Jones.

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I either have Mark, I have Jarmond Golf, I have

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, and I have Tom Brady. Who should I

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>start this week? And my receiving that I um uh,

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm having trouble with is my second receiver either Marie

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Cooper or Mike Kevins. Who should I start? All right,

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there you go. So the question is let's start with

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and Evans, Frank and Mary Cooper versus Mike Evans

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this week. I can't ben to Mary Cooper right now.

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that I know that the Colts Greg, Greg's

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna kill me man. And you know I've already heard

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>people talking about this on Twitter party Cooper is going

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to be a second round pick next here. Greg, you

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>can't bend Mariy Cooper what he's done in terms of

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>what his floor has been with the Cowboys and what

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>his upside has been. We saw what his upside was,

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we could go with the three touchdowns, and we also

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 1>saw that a similar upside on Thanksgiving against Washington. I

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot bench to Marie Cooper right now. And and Mike

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Evans is going up against the Baltimore Ravens with the

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>quarter acts, I think it's close between Golf and Brady.

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually from a DFS perspective, I just wanna I want

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 1>to stack that Steelers and Patriots game, and I know

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Jim Sannas has spoken about that as well as the quarterback.

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm using that of those three, totally agree with both

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of you, as you can't matchup is what dictates it

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for me was me, Mariy Cooper, Um and Mike Evans.

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna start a marketing with me. No, how

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about them hot boys, I'll not say any of that,

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and then quarterback wise, I'm gonna go with Jerry Goff.

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Our own Christmavona has the final question of the week

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for US. Frank, you ready, Tyler Boyd or Josh Reynolds.

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Who you got? You're gonna go with Tyler Boyd. I

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 1>know the matchup is good for Josh Bynds, but still

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has to compete with two other wide receivers and Todd

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Gurley Tyler board is still the main receiver target. Honestly,

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with Tyler Boyd as well. Good luck in

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 1>week fifteen. We can't wait to hear from you on Monday.

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>For Frank staff Al Greg Susman, we want you to win.

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Good luck, we hope