WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 16th, 2022 (Ep. 597)

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, friends, and welcome in to leading off on Fantasy Pros.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Would you look at my guest today? Look at the

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>guest today. That's not Chris Clegg. That's Julio Rodriguez joining

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the show, or at least a picture of Julio Rodriguez.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Cleig running a little bit late. I don't even

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know if he's gonna join us, and I wouldn't have

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>had a nice overlay so joining me, I am. I

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know how to work under the punch here, guys, I

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>know how to make it work on leading off on

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. Today, it's me and the oh so wonderful

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez. Hi, Julio, how are you doing? He says

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he's doing good for everybody watching on the video, let's

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure his hat's in there. It's a good picture

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of me and Julio. It's really not Chris Clig. I

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>should have gotten the overlay to show Julio Rodriguez. But Hi,

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody high peanuts of cracker Jacks. You can find me

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at is it the Welsh? And let's interact

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and let's have some fun on a Friday, because we're

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have an episode we're not gonna not have

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>an episode if we're missing somebody. Yes, friends, that guy's

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna hang with me for the show. We got a

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff to get to. Your questions are welcome.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>A little bit later in the show, we'll answer some

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of your questions. I will star them in the chat. So,

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have got any for this weekend, streamers,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>next week, pickups, next season, whatever it is, drop it

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the chat and I will make sure to start

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and we will get it at the end of the episode.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But me and Julio we're gonna move on. We're gonna

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 1>get into the show, and the Braves have activated second basement.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Ozzie Albi's from the sixty day il finally getting back

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>into action. You're gonna get him, which is going to

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>mean Von Grissom is going to be moving to the outfield.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe, I mean, I'm believing this is going to

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be starting as of today. If you guys follow me

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and looking at Ozzy Alby's before the injury, eight homers,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>three stolen bases, two forty four batting average in about

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty two games before he was knocked down. So Ozzi

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Alby is going to jump right back into it. Von

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Grisham Grissom. I always struggle with the Grissom versus Grisham.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Von Grissom, who will not most likely get you eligibility

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield due to this due to just the

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of times that are left, but he will have

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>second base. Has hit three h four, five homers, five

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases in that time under twenty percent K percentage.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're not going to knock him off of

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this spot. That's why he's not going to be put

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where, uh, that's why you're not going

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to see him. I don't know if you got double

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at the other that's why you're not going to see

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>him in a situation where he's not getting time. So, uh,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be out there. He's going to be rolling

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be playing some outfield as they

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>were working him recently. So five homers, five stolen bases,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Von Grissom. There you go. Interesting stat from Wonky or

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>just note Wan Sota went over four with a pair

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts on Thursday. The pitcher we'll talk about in

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a shutout loss to the Diamondbacks, the twenty three year

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>older has not homered in sixteen straight games since August

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth, now hitting two two three, seventy five OBP

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with three homers and seven RBI in thirty five games

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>since being acquired last month from the Nationals. Okay, Wan

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Soto have been struggling. Actually, Julio, Julio, what do you

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think about Juan Soto's value coming in next year? Julio, Okay, Julio.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>As you can see, Julio's very positive about the value

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>next season, which I completely understand. I'm gonna be relatively positive,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but I do think there's a potential that you're gonna

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>see Sodo drop out of the first round. He's one

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of those few guys that can hit so poorly and

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>can you know, will have the ability to stay in

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>his relative spot. But I just don't think he's going

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a first rounder. You know what I would

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like in this too. I actually think this would be

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>similar to when Mookie Bets struggled, when you would see

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the poor poor year of Mookie Bets

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>where it was like twenty twenty and his batting averages

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>down in two sixties and he went around fifteen, sixteen, seventeen,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in there. That's where I think SODA's going to

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>end up being. So I think you can liken it

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>similar to Mookie Betts's struggles and how he fared there.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, has the chat does chat not love?

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>My co host today should have went with a pick

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of Joe. I should have went with a pick of Joe.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I am literally have a second camera going here,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and I pulled up a Julio Rodriguez living set card

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that I have because I figured he'd be a good guess.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>But how have I not gotten love for this adjustment

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that I've made for my co host today? It's crazy.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy Dray Jamison, So let's talk about this. A

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of strikeouts came because Dray Jamison, with the Arizona

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>diamond Backs, made his major league debut. He went seven

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>innings on Thursday, he got the win. He ended up

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>striking out five in a really, really impressive performance. By

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, that it wasn't quite what I said like,

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I could see him getting blown out,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but I could also see him being put in a

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>situation where he would end up striking out a whole bunch.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>He didn't actually do that. He ended up striking out.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He ended up striking out five instead of the eight,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was a pretty pretty good performance. So real quick,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we are going to bring in the actual co host

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>today that we lost, Julio. Thank you very much, Julio

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>for hanging out with us. They don't know Rookie of

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the Year, but the real guy is right there, Chris Clegg.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so sorry, guys. I I had a little

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>something come up, but we're here. I know it's not

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the best to be late, but we're here and I'm

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 2>excited to join you.

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Willis.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I was struggling a bit there, but Julio. I didn't

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>get any love on Julio by the way, for co

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>host with me on that beautiful picture. But I was

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>just talking about Dre Jamison in I was I was

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of expecting there to be one of two outcomes.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting big dominant strikeout performance or for him

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to get blown up, and it was just kind of

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. Diamondbacks pitchers absolutely dominate the padres for

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason that that is. These young pitchers, you know

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the PCL. Dre Jamison had like a five VRA just

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter because it's a PCL where these guys get

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lit up. He came in and it's a pretty good performance.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Seventy two percent fastball usage, though one is designated as

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a sinker, and he really can make it die. He

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't get really any whiffs on it. His slider was

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>his big whiff pitch. He had a fifty percent swinging

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with percentage on it. He threw it around seventeen percent

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>of the time. And his change up, which might be

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>his best secondary, he only threw nine of them the

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>whole time. It didn't get it, had a couple of

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>swinging throughs, one miss, but it was a pretty good

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>performance where he had command, which was the shocker of shockers.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you got to catch any of

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the performance. What do you think about dra Jamison and

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what was like pretty poor minor league season but looked

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>really good on Thursday.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, he was impressive, not to the standpoint

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>what you thought, Like you said, maybe big strikeout stuff,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>we didn't see that, but overall a really solid performance.

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have to wonder when we think about

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a season like this where anything about the PCL. I mean,

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Jamison was so good in twenty twenty one and then

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>this year the PCL kind of threw him off, and

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, for what it's worth, that's a very hitter

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>friendly environment. So Jamison's an interesting one. I think that

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>there's still something to like there. You know, does he

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>continue to get starts down the stretch.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, but I've always liked Jamison a bit, and

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, good fastball. I mentioned the change up being

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>a good pitch as well. Walks had been a concern,

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>but we have kind of seen that trend downward a

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>bit this year, which I think was encouraging.

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see moving forward.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I think the the Diamondacks want to

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>see what they haven't Jamison at this point.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I like it. By the way, I just

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest missed opportunities, and it's being pointed

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out to me. Donnie said, I should have had Joe.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This is my biggest missed opportunity of the year. So

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris had an issue he's dealing with. I

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have multiple different copies of the Fantasy Black Book, and

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I should have taken because in the Fantasy Black Book

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is a picture is Joe Pps blue steel picture, And

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I should have put that over here as a It's

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the biggest missed opportunity of twenty twenty two that I

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>could have put blue Steel over here and I could

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have just done impressions of Joe. I'm so sorry I

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>let you guys down in chat. I really could have

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>done that. But getting to the actual stuff, Yeah, Dre

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Jamison I'm impressed with, and I'm impressed overall with what

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks have in a lot of these guys, Ryan Nelson,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>how I think it's gonna shape out those I think

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Nelson is going to be a starter. I think

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Brandon fat who we have not seen, is going to

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be a starter. Led the minor leagues strikeouts this past

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>season with over two hundred, and I think Dray Jamison

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even Tommy Henry or guys that are gonna

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>end up going to the bullpen. Dray Jamison could be

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the closer type, but this type of performance of him

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>being able to go seven, to not be erratic and

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>show an arsenal of pitches is how he can be

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a starter. So I would throw it out. I think

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I might be willing to get down on his next start.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Him and Ryan Neilson, they just both have been really impressive.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Drey Jamison is an incredible athlete. I

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think I've told the story before in a camp about

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. You know, you know Corbyn Carroll, Gorbyn

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Carroll pretty fast, one of the fastest guys was what

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one sprint speed, one of the fastest guys in

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>elite speed. And they've got the back of the Dinebacks field.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>They've got this great like artificial track where these guys

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stretch and stuff, and it's really long, it's probably about

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards or so. And Drey Jamison and Corbyn

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Carroll raced each other and Dre one like he's an athlete.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>He's an athlete. He beat Corbyn Carroll in a foot race.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is a monster athlete with an arsenal of

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>pitches and if it goes right, this is the you know,

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the type of guy who's going to get

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of strikeouts and is going to be

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>able to be an absolute dude. On the prospect front,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Cleig Cincher here and I figured we were going to

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about a few prospects, probably the last of the

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>major prospects that come. I know, I say that's still

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. They're trying to get some players,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, some extra time. We're actually in a space

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>here's when fall leagues releasing their rosters today and they've

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>already released salt Rivers. And another reason I'm mentioning this

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is like, because of the call up, we're not going

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to get Corbyn Carroll on the AFL, We're not gonna

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>get Gunner Henderson. And teams have also made some decisions

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on players, one of being Matt Murvis. If anyone pays attention,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt Murvis with the Cubs was really dominant in the

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues this year, a guy that you could argue

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe would have really benefited from like two weeks in

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the majors and done whatever. But as I'm told, he

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>will be in the AFL. So is not going to

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be a guy they're going to call up. And so

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>teams can still if they want. But I think for

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the most part we've kind of got our Look. Maybe

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll get one random one. This is all the circle around,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and say Jordan Groshans maybe being the last guy that

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to get his major call up. He was

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>traded earlier this year to the Marlins, he had his

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>first career home run. He struggled as far as power goes.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think his slugging and Triple A this year was

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>four sixteen, not a big power guy. Was seen as

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a big prospect at the time. I think he's really

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>falling off. But get your take on Jordan Groschan's the

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>He's honestly looked a bit different since being traded, which

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>is certainly encouraging. You mentioned his slug in Triple A

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and Miami, but it was two ninety six in Toronto,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 2>which is horrific. You know, you're running a three point

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>fifty OVP and a two ninety six slugging and that's

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>nearly over three into plate appearances.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not good.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of Grossian's was some projectability

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 2>and we just didn't really see him develop the hit tools.

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>There. Certainly good to see the power at least.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Early on, and even in Miami in Triple A two

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>home runs and one hundred and thirty three played appearances

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 2>being traded.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Over so Grossian's is interesting.

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Not as high on him as I once was, but

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I do think there's a little bit of fantasy intrigue

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>if he can sustain some of the power gains that

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen, at least over the last month or so,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 2>because there is a good feel to hit there with Grossians,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 2>good contact skills overall, and we'll see. I'm not expecting

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 2>much this year, like I'm not sure for Redraft. He's

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>super valuable, but from a long term perspective, I still

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>think there's a little bit of interesting in Grossian's profile.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's at the end of the day, it's

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about sorry, I was doing something. I was knocking stuff

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>around in the background. It's also about like opportunity and

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>being able to get the opportunity here. He's God. I'm

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to put my finger on how I want to

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>say the type of guy he You know, it might

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be like an Alec Bohm if you really want to

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Alec Boma just a non high power

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>player that can hit for some contact. Once he gets going,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you put him in that spot. But if you got

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty homers you would proba probably be really happy. But

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I could see him hitting in the middle of a

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Marlin's lineup. That is what would be the most intriguing,

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not this year, but going into next year. If people

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>care about it. On the injury front, jitdy Brewbaker left

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>thursday start against the Mets with right Latin discomfort and

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Alihandro Kirk was held out of Thursday's lineup with hip discomfort.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Is Ali Hendro Kirk going to be a top free

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>catcher for you next year? I think top five is

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a no brainer. But do you think

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>he'll be in the top three because you're battling for

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>muto A obviously Adley, I think VARs Show obviously has

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in that spot. Do you think he can

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>top the top three?

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>The top's pretty crowded, and you know with Real Muto

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 2>he struggled first half, but he's been just pretty dominant,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, the second half of the year. Varshow obviously

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>quietly putting up the good power speed. You have Will

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Smith too to think about.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's tough.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Kirk probably is four or five, and you also,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I think about ADLEI like Adley's second half has been incredible,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of talent at catch, so it's tough.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Kirks just as talented and can produce, but you certainly

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>have Real Mutwo and far Show at the top. Thanks

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to their still in the base potential on speed exactly.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>And I just want to point out, boy, dang in here,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>drop the comment. Any comment you guys have. Will try

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to answer a couple questions at the end here could

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>be prospect related, might make a lot of sense with

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>me and Claig on here on a little Chris and

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris action.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But just throwing it out to you guys. In nineteen

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven, this day in baseball, Phillies Kurt Shilling struck

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out nine and the Phillies went over the New York

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Mets to become the thirteenth pitcher since nineteen hundred with

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred strikeouts in a season. When was the last

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>three hundred strikeout season? Do we know? Was it recent?

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it wasn't.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>When no idea To be honest.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm strike out because I feel like to me, that

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most impressive markers that we can

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get here. Let's see three hundred strikeout seasons in baseball.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 3>It sure's here to it.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's see rand look in here, it's not see it's

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not breaking This is just breaking down the people that

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have done it. Yeah, I'm gonna say if this is Okay,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Verlander did it in ninety. This is why Verlander did

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it in twenty nineteen where he hit the three hundred

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>strikeout marker and Garrett Cole also did it in nineteen.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Sureser did it in eighteen, Sail in seventeen. So it's

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like you might get one or two a year, but

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had it obviously with the COVID season and

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>then in twenty fifteen Kershaw. But I think those are

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the only ones in the last Yeah, those are the

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>only ones in the last like twenty ish years or

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so that have pulled up a three hundred strikeout season

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>until Spencer Strider does it next.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Year, you know what I mean, love bat.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through some stat heroes, y'all. Mancata now four

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to five with the homer and RBI two runs, Brandon

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Marsh a perfect four for four with two rbi, Essak

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Parades had a bomb, Kutel Marte had a rare performance

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of offensive output two for three with a homer. Brianday

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Lacruz had a home run. Aristevie's a keen Eale the

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>punisher has been doing so lately. We're talking about him

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on itl and how he's just getting playing time right now,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's going Homer, Carlos, Koreahanamer Saladar prez uh led Me,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.119
<v Speaker 1>His Diaz and Yasmani Grandal. Do you have hope for Aristides?

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's no no doubt right now. Aristia is

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a ken is a guy you go pick up write

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a hot hand if you're looking for Homer's. Do you

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be anything for him next season?

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I have no clue with what direction the

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Reds are going to go. There.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Certainly there could be a spot.

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's had his streaks where he certainly looks valuable,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But I just fear that's what it's going to be

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>with him. It's just going to be these hot streaks

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that we ride out for a couple of weeks to

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a month, and that's kind of it. I think the

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>playing time's probably going to be inconsistent with him.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm kind of a bye. Also, you know, Brandon

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>marsh is one of those players that this new destination

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>has just been such a good spot for him. I

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Also, you know the learning aspect of

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>working with Harper, you know, like Harper and Casianos have

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>both been players that you know, have had a lot

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of tutelage with guy. Bryce Harper has worked with Bryson

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Stott and Alec Bohm and is trying to be in

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the leader and they just seems to be a new

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>home for Brandon marsh and it seems to be it

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to be like a relevant fantasy destination, which I

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>think is apparent. And Es SoC Parates, it's just you know,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I love you SoC Prates. He does it on the

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>pitching side. Dre Jamison five strikeouts, as we mentioned, only

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one walk, two hits over seven. Carlos Carrasco six innings,

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>struck out eleven. He had two walks and four hits.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Lance McCullers, who I think was on our prop marker

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>last week or last show. Lance McCullers went six, struck

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>out eleven in two hits, but he did walk four.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Shane McClanahan in that return five innings, five strikeouts, a

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>walk in a couple hits, and Chase Anderson went five,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>struck out three on the stat zeros on you know

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Cruise he had three strikeouts with four can you believe

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it he can? I'll bet you those strikeouts though I'll

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bet you the velocity of the bat that swung through

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>those balls were the fastest in all of baseball. I'll

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>bet no one has swung harder and faster through probably

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>horrible pitches than Onell Cruise, So let's give him. Give

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>him some credit. Guys, nobody swings through them better than O'Nell.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gammel and Jake Swinsky also o for three with

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>three strikeouts. On the pitcher side, Hunter Gaddis four innings,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>seven earned runs, gave up five homers. I don't I

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know when the last time we've had a five

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>homer game here and JT. Brewbaker three innings, five earned

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>runs with a home run. I think I think we

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>liked this. Wonky set this up by the way she

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>does the show she which, by the way, we should

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>always give a hand a hand to Wonky for the

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>great show stuff puts together. And and I just dull

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>up a few things later, But he did. Do you

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like how I led with cruz Wels? That is my

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>gift to you. Wonkey did that, And yes I do,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, And again if you know again, I hope

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm around even more after this season ends. But like

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a turn next season where I will

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be I will be more pro onell cruise. I just

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was never pro this season on a rookie year. Where

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>where have you stood on the only all cruise front?

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure we've talked about that clig. I've never

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gone as high as some prospect people.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like somebody just pushed him up like crazy

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of last season, and then you know,

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 2>he had that stretch when he came up where he

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 2>just dominated and everybody just went as ieric like this

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>was going to be, you know, the next coming of

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>whichever player you want to name, was going to be elite,

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>and I just wasn't quite buying end. You know, the

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 2>long levers, the swing and miss, there were some some concerns.

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>The power speed undeniable, but you have to make good

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>contact to be able to get to that, and that's

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>been my concern. I think he'll be fine, but I

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's going to be elite. Honestly, probably not,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>probably not, but well I don't know.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I say you know, and I say probably not.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to take that back. That's it's again, that's

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>my brain into this year because if the right changes

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>are made, He's got the skill set of a player

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that could be the number one overall Fantasy guy. You

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>could easily drop a thirty thirty season. I wouldn't be shocked.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just you have to make good contact. He didn't

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>show any of that this year. Probably come up into

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Franzosco. Look at some home run calls yesterday.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, Kat Fox, the leader is the only person

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on the board who would have been on the board

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>if I had a piece of art to show you.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Guys that had a home run with Salvi Perez now

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a three home run lead, trying to move away. Fifty

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>four for Cat Fox, Elsco with fifty one, De Blum

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and High Cobby with fifty only four people with fifty

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>called home runs. We've got go cards and help us

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. Both down there at forty nine. The race

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is getting very tight. As we are coming to the end,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be crowning a winner. I have to find

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>out too. I remember what the prize is, so we

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>can have a prize for I imagine Fantasy Pros will

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>have a nice prize for the home run contest, just

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like we have for the subscribe Rate and Review where

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys can get that Austin Riley twenty twenty one

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>signed World Series Baseball. All you gotta do is subscribe

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast, Rate it, review it in the month

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of September and someone's gonna win. Pretty awesome. Let's go

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and check out. I guess I gotta do this right.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been one of those shows today. That's right, bet MGM.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>They've actually got a whole bunch of props today. They're

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on the plus side. Yes, we're wearing the crowns. I

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how the hair is right now? How can

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we do this? Can we make it look good? Yeah,

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll flow the hair a little bit. Here we go,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>flow it up a little bit, look like I have

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a perm or anything. I'll put on the tr I'll

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>put on the crown for bet MGM any day. And

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll also use a promo code leading off and if

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys do you guys can get hooked up with

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it potentially a one thousand dollars risk free first bet.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>They got a whole bunch of bets. I've also said

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they do a fantastic job at giving you a whole

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of free bets. As you go. So it's definitely

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the sportsbook to check out. Go and check them out,

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>King's and Queen's. Put on your crown or tiara and

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>celebrate with bet MGM and the promo code leading off.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're all fixed here. I've got some bets

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>here and Chris, I want to see what you have

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to think about them. The number one bet of all

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of them on betting pros prop cheat sheet is Mike

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Trout today is sporting a one total base. It's a half,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>so you need to get one. He's projected at two

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. On bet MGM. It is juice though

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at minus one eighty five, but you just need one

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>hit today. Now. MGM also has the number one plus

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>money play according to betting Pro's algorithm, and that's Derimus

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Garcia with the a's. We've seen him multiple times. Just

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>got to get one. He's projected at one and a half.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>But you got to get one total base if you

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>want to play some total bas props. If you want

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to go to the strikeouts, these are really good. Justin

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Verlander's return has him having the number one strikeout prop

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day on Fan Duel minus one thirty four.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You just need six strikeouts. That's it. They're projecting him

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at seven to three and it's five and a half

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is the number. Love that bet, And Robbie Ray is

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>your plus money play of the day versus LA. Six

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number you need seven And

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings they're giving you plus one fifteen. So Clig,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you think here? Anything that you're gonna dance with?

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Multiple We've got Robbie Ray and Verlander on the strikeouts,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Dermis and Mike Trout on the total bases.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>A Trout one on a total basis a pretty easy one,

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>even though, as you mentioned, mine twenty eighty five. But still,

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it's been insane what Trout's done since coming back. You know,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 2>he's got ninety eight played appearance since coming back, with

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>eleven home runs, three eleven average, three sixty seven OVP

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>seven eleven slug by the way, So he's just been

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>insanely good. So feel pretty confident with him hitting you know,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 2>one total base today as he's been you know, consistently

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>doing that.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 3>The Dermis one is tough. I'm not sure that I

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>love it.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I do like both of the strikeout props, though, I

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 2>feel pretty good about Verlander coming back. Usually I'm not

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>one to go crazy for pitchers coming back from injury,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>but with Verlander, you know, he hasn't missed that much time,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and you've seen what he's done this year. I feel

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 2>pretty good projecting the over on five and a half half,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and though Robbie Ray's had some inconsistencies, He's going over

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>six and a half in most of his starts recently,

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I know, is the last two he hasn't. Atlanta had

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 2>six and then against Cleveland he had three. But I

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>do feel pretty good about that going against the Angels

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 2>lineup kind of men. So I like both the Verlander

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and Ray and then the Mike Trout option as well.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's it's a little bummer like the three

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>bet I'm not really interested in the Dermis one. I

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>really like the other three. They're all from different books, though,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>so just check it out. You know, if you're going

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to bet MGM, who's got the Trout one, they probably

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have something similar on Verlander and Robbie Ray. The Verlander

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>one is when I would probably target, you know, guy

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>returning from injury. I totally get it. But as far

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as a matchup goes, it's a great matchup. This is

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a player that one's healthy, he gets back, he can

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>go seven. Reminds me of like the Clayton Kershaw one.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So I would love to pair Trout and Verlander together today.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I bet you MGM has got

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>something similar to what FanDuel is putting out for Verlander.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Those would be two I would put. So I kind

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of dig those over On the DFS side, we did

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have some good We have both some prices on DraftKings

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and FanDuel today. DraftKings Verlander was eleven, Max Freed ten

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to one, Robbie Ray nine to eight, and Flaherty is

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>around seven. If you want to go over to FanDuel

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for your locked in solo player, Verlander's around eleven, same

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>price actually as Draft Kings Max Free ten to four,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>just a notch above Robbi Raised a little bit more

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>expensive at ten to six. And you also have Lucas

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>gi Alito at nine if you're wanting to put together.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do the five implied runs because it's you know,

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the teams that you expect, it's the astros, it's

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the cards, all that. But I did look at some

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the higher implied run totals that are close to

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that that might be a little bit more juicy, and

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox, the Mariners and the Marlins might be

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a couple teams. You might want to look for some

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>stacks on that you can put some players that are

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>high in the lineup. I think that would be pretty good.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We had one question to answer, and dang it said,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what the heck happened to a story? U? He was

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna steal me thirty bases, then got trade to Washington

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Soto deal. He has one steal since he's

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a story Rees was traded to the Brewers. He's yeah,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he's with the Brewers. He actually still five bases in

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a minor league game the other day. Leads the entire

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues in stolen bases. So I think you might

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>have the players confused. Maybe you were thinking of cj. Abrams.

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking you're thinking of CJ. Abrams there and not

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>his story. But speaking of his story, any thoughts on

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>his story moving forward into next season with his seventy

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>plus stolen bases, I.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Mean, the steals are certainly enticing the powers, I guess

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of my question with what kind of power does

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>he get to does it hinder him from being Fantasy relevant?

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really the biggest question that I have.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 2>And we saw a little power breakout from him this year,

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just not sure how much of it is

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 2>legit based on the hitting environment that he was in in.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Both Double and Triple A with the Padres.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So the field of hits good though, and they stolen bases,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of undeniable. So Ruiz has been a tough

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>one for me to rank. It seems like he should

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 2>get regular run in the Brewers Org. But again, that

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>outfield's kind of stacked with just like mediocre guys that

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>they liked running out. So I mean, you have Yelich

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and then they're playing of wide variety of guys. Plus

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 2>they're loaded in Triple A at this point, South Relic

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 2>and Joey Weimer and I mean, Jackson Surio's coming, So

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 2>it's tough to know what they're gonna do with Ruiz.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's see. JP had a question Bubba Thompson or

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Frayley head to head cat.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it depends on you know what you think

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you need more, I mean, you know what you're gonna

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>get from Thompson is going to be still on basis

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Frayley's a little more well rounded at least from the

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 2>power speed standpoint, could give you a couple steals, but

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 2>more likely to get some homers. So I think it

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>comes down to just need personally.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think thing was saying Ruiz had fifty

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>before the break dropped him. For James Wood, that is

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that is the correct move. Still James Wood in a

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>long term as good. But yeah, with the Bubba Thompson thing,

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and they go the last two weeks, Bubba Thompson's had

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>seven stolen bases and he had a couple of multi ones,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>so steals, it's hands down Bubba. But Fraley hits at

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of the lineup great against I want to

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>say it was against lefties, So Frehley is a good pickup.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think for overall, Bubba is your stolen bass play.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a no brainer. There, there's some good questions

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and let's go over to the home run call. Now

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>check this out. Wonky is going with Julio Rodriguez and

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>listen because of our early co host of the show. Oops,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez. Yes he was here, just a tiny bit Ago.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go with Julio today. Julio's gotta be my call.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It was it's destiny that I ride with Wonky here

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for Julio Rodriguez because he joined the show. Mayor has

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>got Vladdie Cleig. Who do you want for your home

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>run call for the day?

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with uh, Man, this is uh.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you should go with Ozzy. Albi's in

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the front of your community. You should you should be

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 1>having your player.

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean possibly, but I don't know, man, I

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to expect him coming back, So you

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>know what, I'm going to go with ord On Alvarez,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>who has two home runs over the last four games

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and pretty good matchup tonight against Adrian Martinez where he's

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of home run prone and it's in Houston, so

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I also think Von Grissom should have a homer today

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>being moved to the outfield. Here's one last good question.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Go cards Web versus the Dodgers or Montas versus Milwaukee.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Montas versus Milwaukee.

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to lean Mantas as well, even though

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of been less than stellar.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 3>But I would go that.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Way, Clig, what do you got going on? What's going down?

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Not too much, man, just a season wraps up, kind

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of wrapping up regular season content. We've got two more

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>quick grades, man, we got this week's and then we'll

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>have one more full week. So sad that you know

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the season's winding down, but hey, the Dynasty stuff never ends,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's what I love about Dynasty. Balls, prospect evals

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and Dynasty work is all year and that's what I'll

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 2>working on.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 3>This wraps up, so this is very very true.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>I've also got James Anderson from RotoWire coming on with

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>me to break down the end of the season. The

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>AFL rosters are getting released today, one full, one half,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so I will probably do a second prospect one episode

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>if people are into the prospects that are for Dynasty.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>To make sure you subscribe to that. Follow me on Twitter.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Is at the Welsh rot o Clegg for all his

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff and we hold on a second. We got Cleig.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry you're getting kicked off here for a second,

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and I know you guys can't see me here. It's

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a weird thing, but we have a got a special

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>guest here is always a Joe piece of Pia. Oh

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Joe Piezapia. He's here. Uh heyo, everybody, Aaron Judge,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I like swords. It's Joe Piezapia here into the road,

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>O Cleig. Look at that picture, Ladies and gentlemen. That

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.239
<v Speaker 1>man will be back next week. As far as I know,

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he hit put himself on the schedule. He will be

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>joining me for the last episode, which actually is not

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>next week, it's the week after. Joe Pizza Pia will

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be back. But look at that face. The story of

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the game goes on four Welsh. I'm Joe Pizzapia. Hey yo,