Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. A million new COVID
Speaker 1: cases in five days, California on lockdown. Rue Giuliani test positive.
Speaker 1: The Arizona legislature closes in response, and vote in Georgia
Speaker 1: or the socialists will win. This. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: sex and Show, where the mission or mission is to
Speaker 1: decode what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, Great,
Speaker 1: Great American. Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. CIA analysts.
Speaker 1: Remember he's a great guy. No welcome, friends to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. These are troubling times. We have multiple
Speaker 1: crises happening. You'd think that right after an election there'd
Speaker 1: be something of a calm before the storm. You'd either
Speaker 1: have their preparation for a new administration or the continuation
Speaker 1: of the old administration, and we'd be thinking about the holidays,
Speaker 1: Christmas presents, Hanakah gifts, new Year's plans. Instead, we are
Speaker 1: subjected to more and more lies about what is actually
Speaker 1: happening in this election recount and auditing process, and we're
Speaker 1: subjected to increasing totalitarianism that doesn't even try to justify
Speaker 1: itself anymore, in order to stop COVID. As if that's possible.
Speaker 1: And let me tell you, and I don't usually complain
Speaker 1: about these things to you, because I think that oftentimes
Speaker 1: people use this as an opportunity to just direct attention
Speaker 1: to themselves or oh look at me. I have found
Speaker 1: out beyond any doubt. I mean, it's official that, because
Speaker 1: of my stances, is on COVID nineteen asking questions, mostly
Speaker 1: because I say, hold on a second, that data does
Speaker 1: not support this thing that they say, hold on, amitted,
Speaker 1: How does it make sense to do this and not
Speaker 1: that for those thought crimes for that wrong thing. I'm
Speaker 1: currently throttled, limited, demonetized, you name it on all of
Speaker 1: the major social media platforms. That's currently happening right now.
Speaker 1: Some people have been saying back, you haven't been tweeting
Speaker 1: as much, you have been posting as much what's going on.
Speaker 1: It's because I'm trying to figure out what's happening, and
Speaker 1: I've gone into the back end of various accounts and
Speaker 1: looked at the stats and seeing the official warnings you
Speaker 1: have to look for them sometimes, or the official suspensions,
Speaker 1: all these things that happen. And yes, what they do
Speaker 1: now is they bring in quote independent fact checkers, end quote,
Speaker 1: and they shut you down, and they don't even tell
Speaker 1: you about it. Necessarily, you'll just find out, Oh, you're
Speaker 1: reaches down nine. You think that your followers and your
Speaker 1: followers believe they have access to what you're saying and thinking,
Speaker 1: but no, you're just putting the penalty box. This is
Speaker 1: coming at a time when people asking important questions, people
Speaker 1: being willing to say, hold on a second, why are
Speaker 1: we at in all time high in cases in this country?
Speaker 1: Why are we being told that California is going into
Speaker 1: full on stay at home mode in Los Angeles, in
Speaker 1: some of the Bay Area counties, the most extreme lockdown
Speaker 1: orders that you would find anywhere in this country. And
Speaker 1: this is all happening after months of masking and social
Speaker 1: distancing and limitations on gatherings. And they tell us that
Speaker 1: the reason for all of this is because we haven't
Speaker 1: done a good enough job. We've had months of restrictions
Speaker 1: in place. Remember when California over the summer was think
Speaker 1: itself up as a great example. We mask up so
Speaker 1: we're safe. That's what they were saying. That was what
Speaker 1: the governor of gavinusom that just slimy fraud. That's what
Speaker 1: he was telling everybody. Great job, you listen to what
Speaker 1: we tell you, Therefore you're safe. Did they stop listening suddenly? No?
Speaker 1: But can they admit that No. People in power don't
Speaker 1: like to have their power taken away. And they also
Speaker 1: really don't like to look stupid or like they've been
Speaker 1: swindled or they're frauds, right. They prefer to avoid that
Speaker 1: when they can. They certainly don't like looking dumb, though,
Speaker 1: because mockery of public officials is one thing that they
Speaker 1: know is destructive to their brand. You can disagree with them,
Speaker 1: you can think they're they're left wing hacks. But if
Speaker 1: you can really make fun of them and it sticks,
Speaker 1: that bothers them. That's why this hypocrisy that we see
Speaker 1: stays in so many people's minds long after it happens.
Speaker 1: When Gavin Newsom and others London breed the mayor of
Speaker 1: San Francisco. These public officials California and elsewhere across the
Speaker 1: country who don't take their own warnings to heart. They
Speaker 1: want you to shut down, They want you to lockdown.
Speaker 1: But the rest of us, you see, in the elites,
Speaker 1: we get to get out of lockdown free cards. That's
Speaker 1: their position. But I just get very angry because I
Speaker 1: see what's happening here. I see that this is really
Speaker 1: about shaping the public mind, shutting down debate and discussion,
Speaker 1: and big tech is now full on part of this authoritarianism.
Speaker 1: What purpose does social media serve in a time of
Speaker 1: national policy crisis if not to allow people to exchange
Speaker 1: information and ideas that are contrary, contrary to the dominant paradigm.
Speaker 1: Why even have it? What's the point? These are communications platforms,
Speaker 1: and yes they've been given special exceptions and carve outs.
Speaker 1: Two thirty should go. It should go because they're acting
Speaker 1: like the New York Times editorial board has created this
Speaker 1: place where you can have a conversation, but they shut
Speaker 1: it down the moment they don't like what you're saying.
Speaker 1: You know why I bother them so much? Because I'm
Speaker 1: right about things that they the consensus enforcers, have been
Speaker 1: wrong about. It's embarrassing for them, But it's only embarrassing
Speaker 1: if people know about it. So they cover it up
Speaker 1: and they shut people down, and they say, you're violating
Speaker 1: our terms of service. How am I violenting? Oh that's right.
Speaker 1: Third party fact checkers say that this is not correct.
Speaker 1: Third party fact The third party fact checkers are morons.
Speaker 1: I am smarter than all of these third party fact checkers.
Speaker 1: I know more than them. I have a longer track
Speaker 1: record of not just calling things about COVID, but about
Speaker 1: everything in public life. Why do they get the ability
Speaker 1: to stifle me? Oh, that's right, and I'm not the
Speaker 1: only one at all. I know this is happening to
Speaker 1: a lot of my fellow conservatives in this fight. But
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you right now, I have been directly
Speaker 1: targeted by this. They're going after me with everything they've got,
Speaker 1: and they're doing it in the slyest bossible way. They
Speaker 1: can't they're not suspending me. I haven't broken any rules.
Speaker 1: So what do they do. They just throttle me. They
Speaker 1: shadow ban me. Oh you think you're communicating with your followers,
Speaker 1: but you're not. And you know that I wouldn't say
Speaker 1: this unless I have the proof. I know I can see,
Speaker 1: and then I track it down and there's this little
Speaker 1: oh you violated this here or and remember it's not
Speaker 1: in terms of service. Really, it's that they bring in
Speaker 1: these fact checkers. You know what the fact checkers do,
Speaker 1: launders their authoritarianism to a third party. So these billionaires
Speaker 1: that you know own and run Facebook and Twitter and
Speaker 1: everything Google affiliated. They're not the one saying that there's
Speaker 1: no free speech. Well, they brought in these independent fact checkers.
Speaker 1: People are losing their livelihoods. California is turning into like
Speaker 1: a prison state right now for what? Because this is
Speaker 1: gonna make everything so much better. Ask somebody who believes, Oh,
Speaker 1: we only have to do this for two weeks and
Speaker 1: then we'll find it. Really yeah, because the environment, the
Speaker 1: climate for COVID is going to be so much better
Speaker 1: in the middle of December or the end of December
Speaker 1: than it is now. What happens when you start to
Speaker 1: open back up. G think this one through. If the
Speaker 1: lockdown slows down cases what happens when the lockdown ends,
Speaker 1: when you look at hospital capacity. The media keeps lying
Speaker 1: to you about this and or I'm gonna get to
Speaker 1: the lies about the election and how they say that
Speaker 1: what happened that the Georgia video is debunked. It's not debunked.
Speaker 1: There's all these things that they could do. There's all
Speaker 1: these ways they could show us that the election results
Speaker 1: were not fraudulent in a widespread and systematic fashion, and
Speaker 1: they choose not to do them. Why they're so busy.
Speaker 1: It's so hard to do a signature match in Georgia.
Speaker 1: But there's something bigger going on here. I mean, remember this.
Speaker 1: If they can censor us during a pandemic, when they've
Speaker 1: gotten countless things wrong already, they can always find an
Speaker 1: excuse to censor you for anything else that really matters
Speaker 1: as well. Most of most of the most worst worthwhile
Speaker 1: ideas and arguments and news stories you can share on
Speaker 1: social media and now are getting banned. They may not
Speaker 1: tell you their band, but their shadow band. And it's
Speaker 1: happening faster and faster now every day. And the tidal
Speaker 1: wave of fact checking and false news censorship is occurring
Speaker 1: during an election and in the immediate aftermath. You think
Speaker 1: it in any way unconnected that Hunter Biden the shutdown
Speaker 1: of that story right before the election, and now they
Speaker 1: continued shutdown and all this. Oh, this is disputed. This
Speaker 1: is disputed. Everything worth talking about in politics is disputed.
Speaker 1: They put these little idiotic disclaimers on everything. This is
Speaker 1: putting their thumb on the scale, putting their elbow on
Speaker 1: the scale for the authoritarian left. And they've lied to you,
Speaker 1: they've lied to society about this. They've said that they
Speaker 1: are devoted to free speech. These are platforms for the
Speaker 1: exchange of ideas. They're not publishers their platforms. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: They are acting as publishers, straight up. It's just there's
Speaker 1: so many people publishing on their sites they can't go
Speaker 1: after at all. So what do they do. They use
Speaker 1: algorithms and they go after people that are too problematic
Speaker 1: for them. They go after people that are getting too
Speaker 1: much attention for an idea that opposes this consensus. None
Speaker 1: of this is a coincidence or an accident. None of
Speaker 1: this also was applied to the mass hysteria about Trump
Speaker 1: Russia collusion, all lies. For years, Where was all this
Speaker 1: third party fact checking? Then where was all the shadow
Speaker 1: banning and the suspending of people? Then? No, it's only
Speaker 1: now when we have lockdowns happening. We're separated from each other.
Speaker 1: This is actual tyranny in practice. Now, when someone says
Speaker 1: your restaurant can't open, but across the streets, someone else's
Speaker 1: can because I say so, and you go bankrupt and
Speaker 1: someone else doesn't because I say so, That is tyranny.
Speaker 1: That's what it feels like. The Founding Fathers were drawing
Speaker 1: muskets on people for taxing their tea too much, you remember,
Speaker 1: But here we are being told you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: ask tough questions, You're not allowed to point out what
Speaker 1: that the public health policies in place? Is this success?
Speaker 1: Is this what success looks like? They've got to be kidding, right,
Speaker 1: I mean compared to compared to what? What is the baseline?
Speaker 1: Californias are reported more than thirty thousand new coronavirus virus cases,
Speaker 1: the biggest one day increase on record for any state.
Speaker 1: Is it because California's Trump Country and people are masked
Speaker 1: deniers there? Gee, I guess that whole narrative about it's
Speaker 1: all the Trump people not wearing masks they're spreading the
Speaker 1: virus was idiotic, reckless, vicious and stupid. But if you
Speaker 1: try to point these things out, be careful because the
Speaker 1: third party fact checker, who are these people? Who are
Speaker 1: these individuals that I'm supposed to believe E're in a
Speaker 1: position to fact check me? And it's not even facts,
Speaker 1: it's opinion that they disagree with. But the fact checkers
Speaker 1: have better opinions. Now, this is of course happening in
Speaker 1: part because journalism has so thoroughly disgraced itself because of
Speaker 1: it's obvious bias and it's blatant part as an activism.
Speaker 1: They're rebranding this wing of objective journalism as fact checking.
Speaker 1: Now they cannot win the argument, so they must control
Speaker 1: the flow of information. That's what's happening right now. It
Speaker 1: is real, it is all around you, and big tech
Speaker 1: is their way back to information dominance. That's what they want,
Speaker 1: just like the old days. No Fox News, no conservative media.
Speaker 1: Just get your talking points read to you by some
Speaker 1: imbecile with too much hairspray on the nightly news or,
Speaker 1: in this case, from the New York Times website. That's
Speaker 1: the only thing that's allowed. Don't question the election, don't
Speaker 1: question the COVID lockdown policies. If you do either of
Speaker 1: those things, they will silence you. Where are the big
Speaker 1: fenders of our democracy right now? Oh no. The great
Speaker 1: irony of our present moment is that many of the
Speaker 1: loudest voices that claim to be preserving our democracy are
Speaker 1: in fact the leftist mouthpieces for censorship and totalitarianism, which
Speaker 1: are in fact mortal threats to our democracy. That is
Speaker 1: what is happening right now. Don't ask questions about the election.
Speaker 1: It's over. They say, don't ask questions about COVID policy.
Speaker 1: It's the science, they say, and they are wrong on
Speaker 1: both and they know it, which is why they won't
Speaker 1: even let you talk about it. You're in the Freedom Money.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I'm not
Speaker 1: the only one who's furious about this in the media.
Speaker 1: That's the good news. Although I've been going after the
Speaker 1: COVID lies harder than almost anybody. There are a few
Speaker 1: others who have been really strong on this one. But
Speaker 1: Rick Santelli, speaking of the tea party, this is the
Speaker 1: guy who's got the tea party started. Remember that it's
Speaker 1: from his rant that's however, got the idea for the
Speaker 1: tea party. This guy Rick Santelli ce NBC. Here he
Speaker 1: is having the classic exchange of this moment where it's
Speaker 1: smug elitist, wealthy lib who can stay at home, have
Speaker 1: door Dash and Hulu take the edge off the day.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have to worry about anything, and he doesn't
Speaker 1: want the peasants getting all upity about how their small
Speaker 1: businesses are being ruined or they can't see any of
Speaker 1: their elderly relatives this holiday season. You know, if people
Speaker 1: understood what the death data was year in and year
Speaker 1: out in this country. How many people are dying, especially
Speaker 1: in a certain age group, all the time. They might
Speaker 1: feel a little differently about saying sorry nine months, ten months,
Speaker 1: eighteen months of your life not allowed to see people?
Speaker 1: Too dangerous? You know, if you're ninety seven and you
Speaker 1: want to see your loved ones, I think you should
Speaker 1: be able to. I don't think you should be told
Speaker 1: just six more months. Here's here's Santelli play. It can't
Speaker 1: tell me that shutting down, which is the easiest answer,
Speaker 1: is necessarily the only answer. Rick, I just just as
Speaker 1: a as a as a public health and public service
Speaker 1: announcement for the audience. The difference between a big box retailer,
Speaker 1: who is this? Hold on, the difference between the different
Speaker 1: difference between a big box retailer, hold on, the difference
Speaker 1: between a big box retailer and a restaurant, or frankly,
Speaker 1: even a church are so different it's unbelievable. You're where
Speaker 1: I disagree, You're where you're gonna have your thoughts and
Speaker 1: I disagree. Science. I'm sorry, it's science. If you're wearing
Speaker 1: it's a different story. I've rendered. People in the lows,
Speaker 1: aren't any safer then one hundred and fifty people in
Speaker 1: a restaurant that old six hundred. I don't believe it. Sorry,
Speaker 1: don't believe it. And I where there a lot of
Speaker 1: restaurants that are footback and they don't have any problems
Speaker 1: and they're ope. Okay, you don't have to believe it.
Speaker 1: But let me just say this. You're doing a disservice
Speaker 1: to the viewer, because the viewers need to understand. You're
Speaker 1: ahead of viewer. You are. You are listen to that
Speaker 1: smug lib. It's science. It's as if he knows anything
Speaker 1: about science. And this is actually public policy. This isn't science.
Speaker 1: If it were science, as in there's a right answer
Speaker 1: and a wrong answer, they would have gotten the answer right,
Speaker 1: don't you think somehow they haven't, As anyone can observe
Speaker 1: for themselves, all this stuff we've been doing, all these preparations,
Speaker 1: all the old were your mask, mask up between bites,
Speaker 1: mask indoors for dining, outdoors for dining. All this stuff
Speaker 1: we've been doing has not worked. That is obvious. And
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna telling this right now. I am getting
Speaker 1: attacked on mine by the social media companies now for
Speaker 1: saying things like that that the policy has not worked. One,
Speaker 1: I'm right and that's obvious. And two, that is an
Speaker 1: opinion about a public and political concern. That's not a
Speaker 1: fact checkable thing, but they treat it as a fact
Speaker 1: check so they can censor so that idiots like It's
Speaker 1: science guy can keep on going around thinking that they're
Speaker 1: not imbeciles. Who are the enemies of free speech and
Speaker 1: the free exercise of ideas and your freedom as an individual.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus ess and show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. They can ban me, they
Speaker 1: can throttle me, they can shadow ban all the things
Speaker 1: that they're doing, demonetize, you know, they can scold me
Speaker 1: with these emails. There's no human being that could win
Speaker 1: any of these arguments with me. So now it's all
Speaker 1: it's all from anonymous online accounts, from these mega social
Speaker 1: media companies. I mean, this is like a cough gass nightmare.
Speaker 1: You're banned because you said something not true. I shared
Speaker 1: an opinion and it's actually rooted in fact. But who
Speaker 1: wants to debate me? No? No, sorry, the fact checkers
Speaker 1: said you're wrong. Oh Oh, the fact checkers. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: sure people that spend their time doing fact checks on
Speaker 1: social media are really smart and understand the complexities of
Speaker 1: American politics as well as microbiology and COVID policy. I'm
Speaker 1: sure there are a bunch of geniuses. You know what
Speaker 1: this is, friends, The left was losing ground when social
Speaker 1: media was never a truly open playing field, but when
Speaker 1: there was an active censorship. And so what they've done
Speaker 1: is they've bullied their buddies, their peers, Jack Dorsey and
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg and the rest, and they've bullied them into adopting
Speaker 1: these official stances that privilege advanced and support the left
Speaker 1: wing narrative of events. This we talk about how if
Speaker 1: we lose, and we'll talk about the Georgia Senate Sea
Speaker 1: it's coming up here a little bit too. But if
Speaker 1: we lose the Senate, they're going to add DC, Puerto Rico, pack,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court get obviously the filibuster are getting rid of.
Speaker 1: It goes first. If we don't get control of the
Speaker 1: ability to communicate freely online, we're done. In the long term.
Speaker 1: Conservatism is over. If they can tell you what you
Speaker 1: can think and what you could say, and how you
Speaker 1: can share information because we can't compete. You can just say, oh, buck, well,
Speaker 1: we can all start writing to each other with quill
Speaker 1: pens and use snail mail or something. We won't be
Speaker 1: able to compete. Their propaganda machine will become overwhelming. Again,
Speaker 1: why do you think they're so desperate to do this.
Speaker 1: It's pathetic, but it's very effective. It's very effective. This
Speaker 1: is concerning. It's upsetting. We gotta fight, friends, We gotta fight.
Speaker 1: We gotta fight for these election results to be clear,
Speaker 1: to be re we have to see where there was fraud.
Speaker 1: We have to find it. We have to put it
Speaker 1: out there. And they're gonna tell you that fact checkers
Speaker 1: say this isn't true, of course, and they're going to
Speaker 1: tell you do what you're told, wear a mask. Shut up, peasant.
Speaker 1: Sorry if you lose your business, Sorry if you have
Speaker 1: a mental breakdown. Mental health metrics in this country are
Speaker 1: in the toilet. I mean, it's going terribly for people.
Speaker 1: Kids taken out of school. I just want to know
Speaker 1: when I was advocating for schools to be open in August,
Speaker 1: as I was, and as the President Trump was, when
Speaker 1: I was advocating for schools to open, I wonder I
Speaker 1: have them to be able to go back and look. Yet,
Speaker 1: how much fact checking and throttling of my usage of
Speaker 1: these supposedly free and fair platforms online occurred? Do you
Speaker 1: think that? Do I get an email from Twitter saying, hey,
Speaker 1: Fauci's actually a week will Democrat jackass and you will
Speaker 1: write about schools? Sorry about that? No? No, I do not.
Speaker 1: I do I get anybody saying, oh wow, great call.
Speaker 1: When I said that New York City was gonna lock
Speaker 1: down again, that all these cities were gonna lock down again,
Speaker 1: and that the stuff we were doing over the summer
Speaker 1: when cases were low was just theater. No, I do
Speaker 1: not get an apology for that. No one tells me sorry,
Speaker 1: you were right. Wow? What has Fouchi been right about?
Speaker 1: I just what has Fouchi said that? He go? Oh wow,
Speaker 1: that was good. He saw that one coming. Of course,
Speaker 1: Biden's keeping them on the classic bureaucrat status move. Have
Speaker 1: somebody who's a total clown, but they have the right politics,
Speaker 1: and you keep them around. You keep them around and
Speaker 1: have them hide behind their credentials. You know, Fouchi's not
Speaker 1: some world class brain surgeon. Okay, he's a guy who's
Speaker 1: a game we got, you know, to metrics and the numbers,
Speaker 1: and you know, I've been a doctor in public health
Speaker 1: for a long time. Yeah, what what? What great public
Speaker 1: health scourge did he help us defeat? Ask yourself that question.
Speaker 1: Where where's his record? Where's his track record of success?
Speaker 1: Or was he just hiding in the flabby folds of
Speaker 1: bureaucracy for the last forty years? The flu season might
Speaker 1: be bad this year, Be careful, wash your hands. Thanks,
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci. Amazing, It's amazing, right. You would hope that
Speaker 1: we could at least be honest about this, but we can't. Okay,
Speaker 1: I've got more questions. I can say them here, Thankfully.
Speaker 1: I don't get shut down on radio, so I can
Speaker 1: tell you the truth on the radio. I try to
Speaker 1: tell you the truth online those of you follow me,
Speaker 1: but getting getting shut down yet? What else am I
Speaker 1: gonna do? But yeah, by the third year, you're gonna
Speaker 1: tell me. I'm already I'm posting every I'm on parlor
Speaker 1: all the time. I'm posting there, of course. But that's
Speaker 1: why I've been saying. We need these things, and we
Speaker 1: need people to back them, and we need big money
Speaker 1: to go into them. You know, Republican billionaires. I put
Speaker 1: out Mike Clarion call to you again. You want to
Speaker 1: help save the country, stop funding another think tank that
Speaker 1: does nothing, and fund a social media platform so that
Speaker 1: it can actually get the user base necessary. And if
Speaker 1: it's Parlor, that's great. I love Parlor. I'm using it
Speaker 1: every day, and I appreciate what the people who are
Speaker 1: spearheading that are doing. I'm all about it. But we
Speaker 1: need more. I want conservative movie studios. I want conservative
Speaker 1: news organizations that don't have to worry and shut down
Speaker 1: the moment that there's a boycott from some of these
Speaker 1: left wing activists who the game they play it doesn't
Speaker 1: even have to be a boycott. They just have to
Speaker 1: make people afraid they'll be a boycott. And those of
Speaker 1: you were saying, oh but buck, let's you know what.
Speaker 1: We gotta dig more into the Sydney Powell thing or whatever.
Speaker 1: I'm sitting here saying, look, I want to do all
Speaker 1: of that. If they control the information flow, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: This is the fight that is hanging above all these
Speaker 1: other political fights we're having. If they can shut this down,
Speaker 1: if they can censor you, they can stop people like
Speaker 1: me from telling you the truth about things. What arguments
Speaker 1: do you think we're going to win. We're in a
Speaker 1: very divided country. There are a lot of Democrats. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter how bad, it doesn't matter what happens. We
Speaker 1: could set it all new COVID record next week and
Speaker 1: the week after and the week after, and they'll say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know you're not locking down enough. And if the
Speaker 1: cases go down or the next two weeks, guess what
Speaker 1: they'll say. See, lockdowns are great, they work really well.
Speaker 1: And then what happens you stop and then what happened? Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is not allowed, not allowed to even
Speaker 1: think about it, not allowed to have a real discussion
Speaker 1: about it. People are suffering because of this. People are
Speaker 1: suffering because of bad policy, because of capricious and arbitrary
Speaker 1: decision making by government officials who are going outside the
Speaker 1: normal legislative process that checks and balances the accountability for
Speaker 1: what's happening. That's been wiped away. And you have people
Speaker 1: like this, like this woman who is a restaurant owner,
Speaker 1: strawn owner in California who put out a video when viral,
Speaker 1: and I want to just narrate a little bit, then
Speaker 1: you'll hear her voice. But she goes outside of her restaurant.
Speaker 1: She's spent eighty thousand dollars a lot of money for
Speaker 1: a small business, for a restaurant. I mean, I'm spent
Speaker 1: eighty thousand dollars creating a really functional, cozy, substantial outdoor
Speaker 1: dining area in California. And after doing that, and she
Speaker 1: obeyed them a she bent the knee. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I don't say that disparagingly, but you know, she said, okay, government,
Speaker 1: I'll do what you say here. I'm trying to be
Speaker 1: a good citizen, you know, and she's expecting a little
Speaker 1: pad on the head from the governance is all right,
Speaker 1: we're gonna we're taking eighty thousand dollars out of your pocket.
Speaker 1: But once you've done that, we'll let you operate and
Speaker 1: sell your food to customers, but it has to be outside.
Speaker 1: And then they turn around, they say, oh, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: too many cases, too many cases, so you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to open your restaurant anymore. You're not allowed to do this.
Speaker 1: And she walks outside and her outdoor dining and this
Speaker 1: is why it's it's so I mean, you can't you know,
Speaker 1: you can't see this if you're listening to this on
Speaker 1: a podcast or radio. But her outdoor dining area is
Speaker 1: right next to another outdoor dining area which is set
Speaker 1: up exclusively for the use of a movie production, which
Speaker 1: is considerably larger, more chairs, more tables, everything, movie production.
Speaker 1: It's sort of catering tables because Hollywood needs to be
Speaker 1: able to do its business. And if you're the mayor,
Speaker 1: if you're Garcetti in Los Angeles, you gotta keep Hollywood happy.
Speaker 1: So her business goes up in smoke. She's out eighty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. She may go bankrupt. She has to fire
Speaker 1: all of her employees. Remember there's no PPP anymore. There's
Speaker 1: no money coming, there's nothing. Because Nancy Pelosi wanted to
Speaker 1: make a political point. These democrats are vicious, vicious. It's
Speaker 1: going to get worse too if they actually managed to
Speaker 1: seize power with Biden. Here but here she is, in
Speaker 1: her own words, describing what she sees outside of her restaurant.
Speaker 1: This woman Mars did play it. So this is my place,
Speaker 1: the Pineapple Hill Grill in Saloon. If you go to
Speaker 1: my page, you can see all the work I did
Speaker 1: for outdoor dining, for tables being seven feet apart, and
Speaker 1: I come in today because I'm organizing a protest and
Speaker 1: I came in to get stuff for that, and I
Speaker 1: walk into my parking lot and obviously Mayor Garcetti has approved,
Speaker 1: has approved this being set up for, this being set
Speaker 1: up for for a movie company. I'm losing everything, everything
Speaker 1: I own is being taken away from me, and they
Speaker 1: set up a movie company right next to my outdoor patio,
Speaker 1: which is right over here. And people wonder why I'm
Speaker 1: protesting and why I have had enough. They have not
Speaker 1: given us money and they have shut us down. We
Speaker 1: cannot survive. My staff cannot survive. Look at this, tell
Speaker 1: me that this is dangerous, but right next to me
Speaker 1: as a slap in my face, it is is a
Speaker 1: slap in her face. And these morons in our media,
Speaker 1: and they're disgusting. Who don't give more voice to women
Speaker 1: and men like this who have done everything they're supposed
Speaker 1: to do and then just based on the arbitrary whim
Speaker 1: of government power, they're ruined. Why should she accept that
Speaker 1: based on what, let me tell you this. Do you
Speaker 1: think anyone from the government is going to come to
Speaker 1: help her? Does anyone feel sorry for her when her
Speaker 1: business goes under? When she can't make the rent payments
Speaker 1: for this business. When her life savings are drained, what
Speaker 1: do they think happens? No, the movie industry producers, the
Speaker 1: people that are connected that that Garcetti and others like him,
Speaker 1: other Democrats who are particularly odious when it comes to this,
Speaker 1: all across the country. The ones who are connected, they're fine,
Speaker 1: They'll be fun. Does anyone feel sorry for this woman?
Speaker 1: In three months or six months, with the pandemic recedes
Speaker 1: as it will and she's bankrupt. No, it's sorry, start
Speaker 1: all over again. Your livelihood, your future was the cost
Speaker 1: of doing business. Sorry, that's the way that it had
Speaker 1: to be. Because doctor Fauci says, so. Oh no, not
Speaker 1: the movie producers, they're important. Sorry, too bad for you.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Does anyone even want to try to answer
Speaker 1: this question? Why is outdoor dining banned in California? I
Speaker 1: want to know. Show me the study, show me where
Speaker 1: outdoor dining is a major transmission risk. And keep in
Speaker 1: mind there are activities that are allowed still. There are
Speaker 1: plenty of things you can still do in California. I
Speaker 1: mean I shouldn't say plenty. There are a bunch of
Speaker 1: things you can still do in California that are far
Speaker 1: riskier than outdoor dining, like go into a home depot
Speaker 1: or a lows, go into a costco. That's totally fine.
Speaker 1: Retail is open at limited capacity, but retail is open. Huh.
Speaker 1: Where do you think you're safer being in a place
Speaker 1: where they limit the number of people indoors but there
Speaker 1: are still people indoors? Or being out in open air?
Speaker 1: Do they think? Do you think the virus is going
Speaker 1: to fly at you with open air flow? It's like
Speaker 1: a heat seeking missile. It's going to come at you
Speaker 1: from twenty feet away outdoors. I'm just I'm wondering. Does
Speaker 1: anyone want to try to answer this. No, they have
Speaker 1: no It's just be quiet, do what you're told. And
Speaker 1: I've had enough of be quiet, do what you're told.
Speaker 1: I think this is wrong. I think this needs to stop.
Speaker 1: And I'm not the only one obviously. That's why there's
Speaker 1: these protests happen thing. It's why people are speaking out
Speaker 1: against this. Kevin O'Leary, mister wonderful. I gotta say I've
Speaker 1: always I like Kevin O'Leary. I've interviewed him. Amentum good dude,
Speaker 1: here he is asking the obvious questions. Play nine. How
Speaker 1: is it possible when I've spent sixty eighty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: on the back of the restaurant and the front of
Speaker 1: the restaurant to provide the seats and the heaters, and
Speaker 1: complied with the city ordinance and was just about to reopen.
Speaker 1: No tents. This is not tented. This is outside with
Speaker 1: air flowing. I'm shut down, And right across the street
Speaker 1: is a big box retailer with food services, vending machines
Speaker 1: and open service courts inside the store, providing food inside
Speaker 1: of a big box walls around it. And you could
Speaker 1: argue to me that they have HEPA filters. I know
Speaker 1: with certainty they don't. So you're telling me the viral
Speaker 1: load in the outside of my restaurant is higher than
Speaker 1: the viral load inside of the big box, which is enclosed.
Speaker 1: That's ridiculous. And there's no science claim on this. You
Speaker 1: people are making a comment of science statements. How can
Speaker 1: outside be less safe than inside? You heard God leave
Speaker 1: himself on your own error just moments ago talking about
Speaker 1: eating in restaurants outside with a mask on. So now I,
Speaker 1: as a cheryl, have to go bankrupt and all the
Speaker 1: employees I have have to be laid off for the
Speaker 1: third time. This is totally unfair. This is just Los Angeles. Kevin,
Speaker 1: by the way, it's not just Dela. How come I
Speaker 1: can be open to Miami in the same chain. I
Speaker 1: would love to see Fauci trying to explain that one.
Speaker 1: I know he's not making the decision. It's Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: Why can't he tell them not to do this? He'll
Speaker 1: weigh in on things whenever he feels like it. Dude,
Speaker 1: is do that open schools? Don't open schools, wear a masks,
Speaker 1: wash your hands, don't breathe too much. This guy's got
Speaker 1: lots of opinions about what the public should be doing
Speaker 1: all the time. Why isn't he telling me? But but
Speaker 1: didn't have an opinion about how schools should be open,
Speaker 1: even though all the data always always not only support
Speaker 1: that proved that schools were effectively zero risk to children
Speaker 1: and not only zeros to children, but that children don't
Speaker 1: transmit this very easily at all to adults. If at
Speaker 1: all that's what we actually have seen in schools, Fouci
Speaker 1: wouldn't speak up on that. Why doesn't want doesn't want
Speaker 1: the Democrats and the teachers' unions not to like him. Oh,
Speaker 1: but he's non part If you think Fouchi's nonpartisan. Honestly,
Speaker 1: you know, somebody should go watch MSNBC because they're just
Speaker 1: not smart enough to handle reality. Does anyone have an
Speaker 1: answer to what mister wonderful Kevin O'Leary's talking about there, No,
Speaker 1: they do not. They don't even pretend to have an
Speaker 1: answer they have. They have no idea, right, They just say, well,
Speaker 1: that's what the people in charge are saying. Really really, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is where we are not even offered up any answers.
Speaker 1: I wonder if Kevin O'Leary will get if you put
Speaker 1: some of the stuff out there, if he'll get shadow
Speaker 1: banned on social media. By the way, the social media
Speaker 1: companies are doing great, aren't they during this? Amazon's doing great,
Speaker 1: Washington Post doing great, all these A lot of these companies.
Speaker 1: They're not laying off people. They're not worried. Who's voice
Speaker 1: listen all of this, the small business owner, the independent American,
Speaker 1: the worker, the person who's still driving his truck, or
Speaker 1: the you know, the woman who's still at the grocery store,
Speaker 1: at the pharmacy, they're still doing their jobs. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. I've got a terrible take from Obama
Speaker 1: and a good take from Obama. Believe it or not,
Speaker 1: Just just spare with me. I should say an accurate take.
Speaker 1: So I've got an inaccurate and inaccurate take from Obama.
Speaker 1: Here's the inaccurate one. Play five. This comes up every December.
Speaker 1: Is Diehard a Christmas movie? No? Yeah, I agree. It's
Speaker 1: a wonderful life as a Christmas movie. That's right, Charlie Brown.
Speaker 1: Christmas is a Christmas. Diehard is an action flick that
Speaker 1: happens to involve tangentially Christmas. This is unbelievable. This is
Speaker 1: the best interview I've ever done. Diehard is clearly a
Speaker 1: Christmas movie. I don't know why we keep coming back
Speaker 1: to this every year. The whole thing takes place Christmas Eve. Okay,
Speaker 1: it doesn't get more Christmas Eve than that. They're Christmas trees.
Speaker 1: Ho ho ho, I've got a machine gun too. It's
Speaker 1: a Christmas movie. But so Obama is wrong about that.
Speaker 1: He's right However, about this, and this is really important
Speaker 1: for everyone to understand. As we're looking at the election
Speaker 1: results and trying to get answers, trying to get a
Speaker 1: signature audit in Georgia, why aren't we seeing more action
Speaker 1: from Republican officeholders in some of these states? What is
Speaker 1: wrong with them? I really asked that, I'm wondering what
Speaker 1: what do they think they're doing? Most of the Republican
Speaker 1: Party thinks this election was stolen, they think that there
Speaker 1: was cheating. If they don't if Republican officials believe that
Speaker 1: it was not stolen, if they think there was not,
Speaker 1: in fact, cheating, they should be helping to prove that.
Speaker 1: They should be assisting those who are trying to get
Speaker 1: answers here, that they shouldn't be doing all of this
Speaker 1: nonsense the way that they're doing it right, slowing things down,
Speaker 1: making things harder for everybody. It's absurd. It is absurd.
Speaker 1: So I want answers here. But anyway, Obama said this
Speaker 1: about the Georgia special election for these Senate seats. I
Speaker 1: watched the debate with Leffler and Warnock tell you about
Speaker 1: it in a bit, But I mean, you know, not
Speaker 1: a particularly Warnock is a radical left wing guy, no surprise,
Speaker 1: basically a well spoken socialist. And yeah, that's what you've got.
Speaker 1: And Kelly Leffler, you know, is I think somebody that
Speaker 1: I align with ideologically on a lot of stuff. She's
Speaker 1: not bursting with charisma. I'm just gonna speak honestly about this.
Speaker 1: But you know, she's good, She's solid, be solid in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Better than Warnock. I don't want else to say.
Speaker 1: And here you go with Obama pointing out just what
Speaker 1: the stakes are here at play twenty two. The special
Speaker 1: election in Georgia is going to determine ultimately the course
Speaker 1: of the Biden presidency and whether Joe Biden and Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris can deliver legislatively all the commitments they've made. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's telling the truth. This Senate election is essential. It's essential.
Speaker 1: Think of this Senate election as the as the firewall.
Speaker 1: Think of this as the last line of defense against
Speaker 1: the leftist socialist lunacy. If we lose the Senate, if
Speaker 1: they have unrestricted, unrestricted control of government, or rather uncontested
Speaker 1: control of government, we are in for a very difficult period.
Speaker 1: I don't even know. I don't even know what to say.
Speaker 1: About it other than you know, getting the trench, put
Speaker 1: your helmet on, and you know, hope that you make
Speaker 1: it through the shelling. I mean, it's gonna be bad
Speaker 1: if Biden somehow still manages. And I don't you know what,
Speaker 1: I don't even care. People have been telling me buck
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what the percentages are. You say, we're in
Speaker 1: the fight. So we're in the fight. You know what.
Speaker 1: I think that's fair. I agree who long shot or not.
Speaker 1: I was just saying that so that people could psychologically prepare.
Speaker 1: But I understand that that critique. I always want the
Speaker 1: team to tell me what they think. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: here to serve you, the audience. I always want to
Speaker 1: know and if you if you want me to say, look,
Speaker 1: you're saying we're in this fight. You know, a coach
Speaker 1: before the big game doesn't say, you know, we're eight
Speaker 1: to one underdogs, but go out there and have a
Speaker 1: great game. I agree, that's fair. That's fair. So we're
Speaker 1: going to fight this thing to the end. That said,
Speaker 1: you still make preparation. That's a different thing. That's not
Speaker 1: setting yourself up for fit or that's just being smart,
Speaker 1: and that's really fighting two contests, two battles at the
Speaker 1: same time. You know, even if you're even if you're
Speaker 1: outmatched in one contest, you don't go into another one saying, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we can't focus on this. This Georgia's Senate
Speaker 1: situation is essential. It's essential, and Obama knows it because
Speaker 1: there's only so much that Joe Biden will be able
Speaker 1: to do by executive order, and the Republican Party has
Speaker 1: no stomach for this great reset idea of the Democrats
Speaker 1: are increasingly going to be running with. Build Back Better
Speaker 1: is really now just a code word for the Great Reset,
Speaker 1: Build back Better. What they mean by that is use
Speaker 1: this crisis as an opportunity to push things that they
Speaker 1: couldn't normally get the American people to go along with,
Speaker 1: and to use executive order kind of like what they
Speaker 1: do with COVID instead of normal legislative process to get it.
Speaker 1: But if they have the legislative branches too, disastrous stuff disastrous,
Speaker 1: as evidence by the fact that they think that having
Speaker 1: John Kerry as the climates are, he's perfect for that job.
Speaker 1: John Kerry is an empty suit with a big bank
Speaker 1: account courtesy of his wife that just kind of wanders
Speaker 1: around with this very pompous tone, and it's such a
Speaker 1: joke that doesn't know anything about anything, but he speaks
Speaker 1: good French. So when he sits down to talk to people, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're impressed. The journals are impressed with this. He's an internationalist,
Speaker 1: he goes to Martha's vineyard, he's got a yacht. You
Speaker 1: know you can trust him. He's not a socialist. Really,
Speaker 1: how many super rich socialists do we have to see
Speaker 1: throughout history before we realize that it's actually a religious
Speaker 1: belief masquerading as an economic system, and that the people
Speaker 1: that want it are invariably the people that wanted the
Speaker 1: most and push it the hardest are invariably those who
Speaker 1: believe or no, they will not be ruined by it.
Speaker 1: Classic John Kerry or limousine liberalism. You can either way,
Speaker 1: same idea, same thing. But I need to know. I
Speaker 1: need to know why we can't have a signature audit
Speaker 1: in Georgia, why Raffinsburger isn't going along with this, And
Speaker 1: I also need to know why everyone thinks that the
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania I shouldn't say everyone, but why anyone should say
Speaker 1: that Pennsylvania is not a completely legitimate legal challenge. They
Speaker 1: held an election in violation of law. They violated the
Speaker 1: election process to have an election. That's a problem. How
Speaker 1: do you certify a state like Pennsylvania when they didn't
Speaker 1: go through the rules change necessary to actually do what
Speaker 1: they did. They just decided that they're going to do it.
Speaker 1: The Pennsylvania Secretary of State just said, Oh, we're going
Speaker 1: to do it my way. That's not how it's supposed
Speaker 1: to go on. Unacceptable. But now we're going to see. Also,
Speaker 1: the real stress test on all this will be whether
Speaker 1: the economy, whether the economy is able to continue on
Speaker 1: in a Biden administration, even with these socialists and these leftists,
Speaker 1: because I think what you may eventually see here is
Speaker 1: a recognition that Joe Biden, Yeah, it's gonna be business
Speaker 1: as usual for big business, but the engine of the
Speaker 1: American economy is small business, and they're going to be
Speaker 1: decimated here, buddy. That's that's just more of a more
Speaker 1: of a prediction down the line. And it's so sad
Speaker 1: because I think there are a lot of people that
Speaker 1: have been brainwashed by the media into thinking that Trump
Speaker 1: didn't do a great job with the economy, and that's
Speaker 1: why this election is even in the position it's in
Speaker 1: right now because the media has been so able to so.
Speaker 1: So you have a stress us the economy. You also
Speaker 1: have a stress test of the system where you're going
Speaker 1: to You're gonna get to the Supreme Court and they
Speaker 1: may just refuse or maybe they'll refuse to take it,
Speaker 1: which is the same thing as refusing to do the
Speaker 1: right thing. And it's just because people are so worried
Speaker 1: that the Libs, the crazy Libs, are going to burn
Speaker 1: the country down if they don't get their way. That's
Speaker 1: what we're dealing with now. The mass hysteria and near
Speaker 1: universal Democrat temper tantrum that the country will go through
Speaker 1: just isn't worth it. I worry there are people that
Speaker 1: think that that's all the rationalization, all the justification, they
Speaker 1: need to ignore these legal challenges and to just pretend
Speaker 1: that everything we've seen here is fine. It's not. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Let us be clear. What we have right now are
Speaker 1: people suffering in a way economically that we have not
Speaker 1: seen since the Great Depression. Hunger is at an all
Speaker 1: time high in recent years. You have tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of people facing eviction. You got over ninety million people
Speaker 1: who are uninsured or underinsured, and what the American people want.
Speaker 1: They understand that in the midst of this crisis, through
Speaker 1: no fault of their own, because of their pandemic, the
Speaker 1: economy is in shambles. They are asking the United States
Speaker 1: Congress to help them. At the very least, what we
Speaker 1: should be doing is continuing that twelve hundred dollars payment
Speaker 1: to every working class adult in this country, plus five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars for their children. Now, why aren't we seeing help?
Speaker 1: I mean, we'll just go beyond right now pointing fingers
Speaker 1: about why the economy is in such difficult shape for people. Remember,
Speaker 1: one of the issues you have right now is the
Speaker 1: overall economy is still continuing. A lot of people are
Speaker 1: work from home, and a lot of businesses have been
Speaker 1: able to adapt. But there is a large segment of
Speaker 1: America people that work in the service industry, people that
Speaker 1: you have to show up, people that are in any
Speaker 1: way tied to theme parks or movie theaters or anything.
Speaker 1: There's a large segment of America that is getting a
Speaker 1: totally raw deal in this situation, and they haven't been
Speaker 1: receiving the government has effectively shut down their businesses on
Speaker 1: the claim that it's necessary for public health. And I
Speaker 1: won't even get into how true or not true, or
Speaker 1: how accurate or not accurate those predictions are. The government's
Speaker 1: done that and now has failed to give them the
Speaker 1: assistance that they deserve from the government. Why is that, Well,
Speaker 1: we know the answers Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. The
Speaker 1: answer is the left wing lust for power is more
Speaker 1: powerful than their desire to help people who are in
Speaker 1: a very bad spot right now. You know, you see
Speaker 1: once every couple of weeks now you'll see a story
Speaker 1: about a massive food lines. These people are newly in
Speaker 1: difficult circumstances for the most part, right we haven't. We
Speaker 1: didn't see these food lines a year ago, not stretching
Speaker 1: on for miles and miles. It's because of the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: It's because of the decisions made by government to shut
Speaker 1: down businesses that this is as bad as it is.
Speaker 1: The people that would say, oh, but buck, nobody would
Speaker 1: do It's not the government. Yeah, really, because in Florida
Speaker 1: they have the businesses open and people are still going
Speaker 1: to them, and they're not warsaw than these other states
Speaker 1: where everything is closed. Oh I'm gonna get fact checked
Speaker 1: on that one. Oh, get the fact checkers on me.
Speaker 1: Maybe I canna shut it down? Can't say that buck
Speaker 1: not allowed where we've hired some team of idiots somewhere
Speaker 1: that you don't get to confront that you don't get
Speaker 1: to debate, who get to shut you down? M just
Speaker 1: look at the numbers yourself, it's all published. Look at
Speaker 1: the CDC numbers for New York, California, and Florida. Florida
Speaker 1: is open for business. Which state would you rather be
Speaker 1: in right now? Exactly? So? They talk about Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: rightly talks about the suffering that people have, but doesn't
Speaker 1: understand the role that Democrats have played, the role that
Speaker 1: Democrats have had in all of this, or rather won't
Speaker 1: talk about that role. And Nancy Pelosi, worst of all,
Speaker 1: Pelosi still goes around acting like she has the interests
Speaker 1: of the people at heart here that she really cares
Speaker 1: play eleven. We had the time to do it, it
Speaker 1: doesn't it And again we want to have it on
Speaker 1: the omnibus. We have to have an omnibus, and we're
Speaker 1: hoping that that will accelerate the discussions on the omnibus.
Speaker 1: We are going to keep government open. You know, we're
Speaker 1: not going to have a continuing resolution, but we need
Speaker 1: to take the time to do that. And then, as
Speaker 1: I said, we saw a framework they're putting. Now they
Speaker 1: have to turn it into text and then so we'll
Speaker 1: take the time we need and we must get it done,
Speaker 1: and we must get it done by this before release.
Speaker 1: Pelosi has allowed millions, perhaps tens of millions of Americans
Speaker 1: to suffer, to be unable to pay their bills, to
Speaker 1: be despondent at home without jobs, or watching as their
Speaker 1: business just day by day gets closer and closer to
Speaker 1: complete collapse enclosure if they're not already there. She's put
Speaker 1: millions of people through that because she wants more stuff
Speaker 1: from Republicans that Republicans don't want to give her. I
Speaker 1: repeat it because it bears repeating. She is holding COVID
Speaker 1: relief hostage. That is the game she has been playing,
Speaker 1: and she should be held to account for this, but
Speaker 1: she's never really held to account because she's an ultra
Speaker 1: limousine liberal who runs in a left wing, you know,
Speaker 1: Chardonnay socialist district in San Francisco, and she can get
Speaker 1: away with this because she's sticking it to Republicans. The
Speaker 1: suffering of the people is a small price to pay
Speaker 1: in Pelosi's mind, as long as it means that she
Speaker 1: has leverage against Republicans. That's what she thinks. That's her approach.
Speaker 1: And you can tell she gets a little a little
Speaker 1: snippy when it's pointed out that she's waited up till
Speaker 1: now on COVID relief? Why did she wait? What really
Speaker 1: has been gained in this now a lot of suffering?
Speaker 1: She thinks that she gained leverage over the Republicans. But
Speaker 1: people are now understanding, Oh, so you just wanted some
Speaker 1: thing and people had to suffer as a result. Here
Speaker 1: she is not liking it when people come to the
Speaker 1: obvious conclusion here play ten months ago and he said,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to stuff half a little taste something.
Speaker 1: Don't characterize what we did before as a mistake as
Speaker 1: a preface to your question. If you want an answer,
Speaker 1: that was not a mistake. It was a decision, and
Speaker 1: it has taken us to a place. Or we can
Speaker 1: do the right thing without other shall we say considerations
Speaker 1: in the legislation that we don't want? No, that is it.
Speaker 1: Don't you dare ask a question that comes to the
Speaker 1: or at least raises the obvious conclusion here that Pelosi
Speaker 1: was Pelosi was playing games with people's futures knowingly, didn't matter,
Speaker 1: didn't care, you know what. It was one of the
Speaker 1: big things that she's wanted all along here, all this
Speaker 1: mail in ballot stuff, it's about Democrat power. Friends, you suffer.
Speaker 1: You're not getting checks now if you lost your job
Speaker 1: or your business is shut down, whether it's your business
Speaker 1: or your work for a business that's shut down, you're
Speaker 1: not getting checks now from the federal government that you deserve.
Speaker 1: It would be as if the government was siphoning money
Speaker 1: out of your checking account, promising to put it back
Speaker 1: and didn't do it. Okay, It's like they've put a
Speaker 1: lean on your house that they're not supposed to and
Speaker 1: now they're supposed to pay it off and they won't
Speaker 1: do it right. They've taken this action against you, they
Speaker 1: have hurt you, and they're not fulfilling their end of
Speaker 1: the bargain. And it's Nancy Pelosi that's insisting that they
Speaker 1: not fulfill the bargain. And this is what's brought us
Speaker 1: to this current moment. It's the Democrats who have blocked
Speaker 1: this aid why it was going to be good for Trump,
Speaker 1: and they knew this going to the election. If people
Speaker 1: were getting checks, it showed government action, It showed that
Speaker 1: there was a reasonableness in all of Trump's approach on
Speaker 1: COVID at the federal level, and it also would have
Speaker 1: made people feel more promising about the few. They would
Speaker 1: have felt more optimistic about where the country was going.
Speaker 1: So Pelosi knew that she could either make them bend
Speaker 1: the knee and give her all this list of goodies,
Speaker 1: or the American people get to be more miserable and
Speaker 1: therefore more likely to just vote against whoever's in charge,
Speaker 1: even though the reason they're being made more miserable is
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi. That's what we have seen happening. That is
Speaker 1: the reality of what is going on right now in
Speaker 1: American politics, and that journos can just barely even begin
Speaker 1: to get the question out before Nancy starts shrieking at them.
Speaker 1: Tells you everything you need to know. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: What is going on out West? We've got Congressman Andy
Speaker 1: Biggs to answer that question, California on lockdown. Arizona's got
Speaker 1: COVID problems plus election problems. Let's ask the Congretion about
Speaker 1: his home state as well as what he sees happening nationally.
Speaker 1: Congress and Biggs, thanks so much for joining us book.
Speaker 1: It's always good to be with you. So let's start
Speaker 1: with what you see happening here, the hypocrisy around the
Speaker 1: lockdowns affecting some businesses not others. It finally seems people
Speaker 1: are catching on to this being arbitrary. First, what do
Speaker 1: you see happening with some of these responses to the
Speaker 1: economy and to small and what it's doing to small
Speaker 1: business nationally and in your home state of Arizona. Well,
Speaker 1: with regard to the small business, what you see is
Speaker 1: you're going to see some businesses can make it and
Speaker 1: they're going to thrive for whatever reason. Maybe maybe their
Speaker 1: businesses has not been one of the ones crushed. And
Speaker 1: some of these lockdowns have been very targeted. See whether
Speaker 1: it's a bar, whether it's a restaurant, whether it's a gym.
Speaker 1: And we have a gym owner in Arizona, for instance,
Speaker 1: and the Department of Health Services coming to shut his
Speaker 1: down his business. He's been hit with forty criminal complaints
Speaker 1: because he refuses to close down. He says, because I'm
Speaker 1: being targeted. And he said, there's and there's no evidence
Speaker 1: that his gym has ever even caused a single case
Speaker 1: of COVID spread. So you have that type of thing going.
Speaker 1: You can go down Main Street, you can go into
Speaker 1: your malls and you're going to see, you know, half
Speaker 1: the businesses are closed. And that's what's going on. You've
Speaker 1: seen restaurants closed and fold and many restaurants just the
Speaker 1: nature of the business. They're not gonna make it anyway.
Speaker 1: This has made it tougher for them. And then you're
Speaker 1: throwing the hypocrisy on top of that, and then and
Speaker 1: then we're only focusing on business. Don't forget all the
Speaker 1: mental health issues, all the educational development issues that are
Speaker 1: happening for kids that are being delayed. So lots of
Speaker 1: problems as a result of the approach that these hirants
Speaker 1: have taken. Why isn't Arizona taking a more Florida approach. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, you're familiar with what's going on at this
Speaker 1: I know you're not in the state legislature, you're in Congress,
Speaker 1: but well, what's the what's the hold up on that?
Speaker 1: Why can't they I mean, especially given some of the
Speaker 1: similarities in weather, are they are they considering, have they
Speaker 1: considered following in the footsteps of Governor Rhonda Santists a
Speaker 1: little bit here, or they just refuse. Well, it's all
Speaker 1: up to the governor and the governors. I mean, Governor
Speaker 1: de Santis has a very different approach than the governor
Speaker 1: of Arizona. And right now, legislature, the legislature in Arizona
Speaker 1: has been out of session for many months now, and
Speaker 1: they can't call them back in themselves back in because
Speaker 1: the constitution doesn't allow it to requires two thirds supermajority
Speaker 1: to go back in, or the governor's got to call them.
Speaker 1: And the governor is, in my opinion, exceeding the bounds
Speaker 1: of the emergency powers that were already in statute for him.
Speaker 1: And that's a dangerous precedent number one. Number two. It's
Speaker 1: also dangerous and difficult for people now. And uh, you
Speaker 1: know what we've had. There's a lot of court cases
Speaker 1: that have gone on and they continue to go on
Speaker 1: in the fight. But I don't know really what's driving
Speaker 1: this governor, um. But I'm I'm I'm not pleased, of course,
Speaker 1: I'm very disappointed by it. Talking to Congressman Andy Biggs
Speaker 1: of Arizona, Congressmen, you've been You've been willing to at
Speaker 1: least ask questions and sometimes push back a little bit
Speaker 1: on the I keep telling everybody, all you have to
Speaker 1: know about the COVID consensus is that it changes every
Speaker 1: two weeks about what we're how well we're doing, what
Speaker 1: we should be doing, what the science says. The science
Speaker 1: is absolute for two weeks at a time, and then
Speaker 1: and then it tends to adjust depending on where we are. Uh,
Speaker 1: what do you think the the Trump administration right now
Speaker 1: should be doing. I mean, what could be done to
Speaker 1: try to get people there their freedoms back, their individual liberack.
Speaker 1: I mean when we're seeing out in California, Hollywood and
Speaker 1: connected businesses, big box stores are getting very different tree
Speaker 1: but never mind, of course churches the stead of California
Speaker 1: than small businesses. This just seems like a place where
Speaker 1: the federal government could and should step in. Yeah. So
Speaker 1: I've got two points. Number one, I've been very bullish
Speaker 1: on how President Trump has tried to keep the federal
Speaker 1: government from intervening in the states as they've governed themselves.
Speaker 1: I think that's important. I'm still there, but I do
Speaker 1: think we've reached a point well, and I thought this
Speaker 1: quite some time ago. Actually, where the civil rights are
Speaker 1: being violated of individuals, and where civil rights are being violated,
Speaker 1: that's when the Department of Justice would step in and
Speaker 1: should step in and bring the lawsuits necessary to assure
Speaker 1: that everybody can maintain their civil rights. And we just
Speaker 1: haven't seen that. Our DJ has been asleep at the
Speaker 1: wheel here, and that's where I think we should be.
Speaker 1: I would I would encourage the President to continue to
Speaker 1: use the bully pulpit, which he's done pretty effectively. But
Speaker 1: I think I think if we're going to watch the
Speaker 1: rights of citizens to be taken away, then why would
Speaker 1: we ever provide bailout money. I mean, we should never
Speaker 1: have provided bailout money because you've seen the corruption that's
Speaker 1: resulted from that. But why should we provide more bailout
Speaker 1: money when states are going to continue to abuse the
Speaker 1: rights of individuals and they're going to suck it out.
Speaker 1: It's like given money, it's like given four and eight.
Speaker 1: None of us want to give four and eight. Why
Speaker 1: because we know that the eleigarchs of whatever country we're
Speaker 1: giving it to are gonna siphon money off the top.
Speaker 1: Were speaking to Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona. Congressman, your
Speaker 1: state is very much still on the minds of Americans
Speaker 1: all across the country, at least those of us who
Speaker 1: have questions about this election. And as you know, there
Speaker 1: are many who believe outright that there was widespread fraud
Speaker 1: still and they want answers. What do you think about
Speaker 1: the Arizona role in all of this? Right now, we've
Speaker 1: had certified results, We had those hearings with Giuliani, Jenna Allis,
Speaker 1: the rest of the Trump legal team, and they seem
Speaker 1: to be raising some some troubling questions. Can you tell
Speaker 1: us what do you think is going on here? Well,
Speaker 1: I think the questions and when they came to Arizone
Speaker 1: and had their hearing, I thought it was pretty good.
Speaker 1: A lot of a lot of direct evidence and particularized
Speaker 1: evidence came out and there's literally hundreds of affidavits. And
Speaker 1: what we're seeing is our governor won't call anybody back
Speaker 1: into a special session. I think it's kind of symbolic
Speaker 1: that that he chose to at the same time that
Speaker 1: hearing was going on with the Trump attorneys. He went
Speaker 1: in had a session to certify the election at that
Speaker 1: very same hour. So it's kind of a symbolic I
Speaker 1: think that he's not going to help. But the reality
Speaker 1: is many and the state legislature are rallying around and
Speaker 1: their trying to get forensic oddit done so you can
Speaker 1: find out what went on with the machines on the
Speaker 1: back end, on the front end with the software, and
Speaker 1: also on the front end with the affidavits and the
Speaker 1: and the ballots. There's there's evidence of literally thousands of
Speaker 1: people or ballots being cast by people who don't exist
Speaker 1: or and from residences that don't exist. So I mean,
Speaker 1: and that's in Arizona. So I think the legislature is
Speaker 1: trying to push this through the rank and file members
Speaker 1: of the legislature. They're having trouble because the because the
Speaker 1: governor won't help them. And I can you explain this
Speaker 1: to me, Congress, I mean, or if you were just
Speaker 1: I mean the Washington Post headline from earlier today, Arizona
Speaker 1: legislature closes after Juliani spent two days with maskless gop
Speaker 1: is it was it was open and now is what's
Speaker 1: going on. So when they say the legislatures closed, they're
Speaker 1: just talking about the building, the physical building itself. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's just a silly, misleading headline. Yes, they closed the
Speaker 1: building down, but that doesn't mean that they can't do work.
Speaker 1: They're not in session now. But what they what they
Speaker 1: can do is they can move into interim committees. They
Speaker 1: can try to trip to push forward and get some
Speaker 1: subpoenas to to bring people in and get more evidence
Speaker 1: and really get after it. But I mean this notion
Speaker 1: that the legislature is closed because the COVID they've been
Speaker 1: they've been out of session for months. M What that means,
Speaker 1: I suppose, is that the building is closed. Conreman, do
Speaker 1: you do you believe that there was there was substantial
Speaker 1: fraud in the Arizona component of the of the federal election.
Speaker 1: I do, I do, and and Buck what we get
Speaker 1: back to is what I'm talking about. So, first of all,
Speaker 1: we know that in Merricoba County, for instance, two thirds
Speaker 1: of the of a certain batch of ballots, which totals
Speaker 1: well over three hundred thousand, were opened with a Republican
Speaker 1: observer being there to make sure that everything was according
Speaker 1: to the rules. That's a violation of law, should never
Speaker 1: have happened. We know that there were somewhere in the
Speaker 1: neighborhood eight to ten thousand ballots cast by people who
Speaker 1: don't exist or from residents that don't exist. We know
Speaker 1: that you have the affidavit, which is the envelope that
Speaker 1: have returned ballot, and you have nearly two million of those.
Speaker 1: Not all of those is the testimony has been so far,
Speaker 1: is that not all of those had the signatures verified.
Speaker 1: So not only want to verify the signature, you want
Speaker 1: to verify who's voting. So there are there are places
Speaker 1: to go. And I just I just literally a few
Speaker 1: hours ago, spoke to a fellow from another state who
Speaker 1: is a leadership position in that stage, who said they
Speaker 1: have their cyber people believe that they have found the
Speaker 1: feature which caused vote switching in dominion software and machine.
Speaker 1: So there is not just indition anymore. There are affidavits,
Speaker 1: there are there's testimony of witnesses. We're ready to move
Speaker 1: into a full blown investigation, and we're being denied that Congressman,
Speaker 1: before we let you go, and we're speaking to Congressman
Speaker 1: Annie Biggs from Arizona's fifth district Congressman, You've obviously shut
Speaker 1: a lot of light on what's happening in Arizona, and
Speaker 1: it's fascinating that the media is so It's just it
Speaker 1: seems like intentionally just a misleading about what's going on there.
Speaker 1: But in states Arizona, Georgia, people bring up why are
Speaker 1: there some Republican state officials who seem so hesitant to
Speaker 1: just even do the basic investigation or do the give
Speaker 1: the basic due process to all the voters who cast
Speaker 1: their votes for Trump. I know, at some level this
Speaker 1: might just be me ask you to look at the
Speaker 1: motivations of others, But can you come up with why
Speaker 1: are they doing that? Well, you know, if people keep saying, well,
Speaker 1: in Georgia, for example, you've got a Republican government, got
Speaker 1: a Republican controlled state legislature. Arizona is thought of as
Speaker 1: a as a red state as well, what's going on
Speaker 1: with these GEOP officials who don't seem to want answers?
Speaker 1: You know, I don't understand their motivations. They've never said
Speaker 1: why they don't want to do this. I think two things.
Speaker 1: Number One, they immediately went into a defensive mode as
Speaker 1: soon as people start saying well, this just can't be right.
Speaker 1: Before there was even any evidence, they immediately stepped down
Speaker 1: and said, no, no, this was perfect, this is great,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. And I think they took a defensive
Speaker 1: point of view and instead of being willing to walk
Speaker 1: it back and say, but you know what, we think
Speaker 1: it was great. And I told them, I've I've told
Speaker 1: many of them this. It's even if you think it
Speaker 1: was great and perfect, there are many people not just
Speaker 1: in Arizona but around the country that I think it
Speaker 1: wasn't great and perfect. And there is in Disha, and
Speaker 1: there's evidence. So if you do a forensic at it
Speaker 1: and it turns out that you were right, everything was perfect,
Speaker 1: you're going to come off like a champ. If it
Speaker 1: comes off and we find out that there was fraud,
Speaker 1: whether it's systemic fraud or anything else, guess what, you
Speaker 1: still come off looking like a champ because you've discovered
Speaker 1: a fraud in our election. You can't lose doing this.
Speaker 1: And so it's been so difficult for me to understand
Speaker 1: what their motivations may be. Buck it just doesn't make
Speaker 1: sense to me. Congressman Andy Biggs, Congressman right to have
Speaker 1: you as always sir, thanks again, Thank you, Buck, You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast,
Speaker 1: including Governor Newsom, San Francisco may Or London Breed disregarding
Speaker 1: their own coronavirus restrictions even as they told your fellow
Speaker 1: Californians to do the opposite. Does that kind of behavior
Speaker 1: undermine their credibility as they try to prevent the virus
Speaker 1: from spiraling out of control in California? Well, I certainly
Speaker 1: think those were unfortunate miss stakes, and each of those
Speaker 1: elected officials have held themselves accountable and apologized. But I
Speaker 1: don't think that that is sufficient in terms of a
Speaker 1: mixed message. I think that we have to be much
Speaker 1: stronger in California and the rest of the country in
Speaker 1: really putting out accurate public health information. You know, if
Speaker 1: this had been done in the first place, I don't
Speaker 1: believe that we would be approaching a holiday season with
Speaker 1: over two hundred and seventy thousand lives that have been lost.
Speaker 1: And my heart goes out to all of those families
Speaker 1: that have to go through the holidays with empty chairs.
Speaker 1: So much said here, that's just makes no Sense's Congresswoman
Speaker 1: Karen Bass from California here with fake Tapper doing what
Speaker 1: he once once a month. He asked, not a heart,
Speaker 1: just a question of a democrat. And then Ross was
Speaker 1: to say, oh my gosh, fake Tapper, he's so honest,
Speaker 1: he's such an honest journo. Look at him. He asked
Speaker 1: a real one and real question that he can go
Speaker 1: back to you to writing checks to the D and
Speaker 1: SEE and giving them at least in kind contributions. If
Speaker 1: he's not writing checks, that's what his journalism, his so
Speaker 1: called journalism is. But Karen Bass noticed. She says that
Speaker 1: they've these elected officials have held themselves account held themselves accountable.
Speaker 1: She says that with a straight face. Oh yeah, I
Speaker 1: get caught doing something embarrassing, so I go sorry about that.
Speaker 1: That's accountability. Oh yeah, businesses are getting huge fines, getting
Speaker 1: shut down. But accountability is whoop. See you guys called
Speaker 1: me so yeah, my bad. That's that's democrat version of accountability,
Speaker 1: of course. But even more interesting to me is her
Speaker 1: idea here that if only we had gotten out public
Speaker 1: health information sooner and better, If only we had had
Speaker 1: done that, everything would be better. Now, what what public
Speaker 1: health information do we have? Now that's out there? You
Speaker 1: know what has change for due now and where we
Speaker 1: were nine months ago. If any, we've learned that the
Speaker 1: virus is now, I'm comparing it to nine months ago.
Speaker 1: So I know the third party fact checking totalitarians, they're
Speaker 1: going to get this wrong. But nine months ago, we
Speaker 1: thought this virus was actually more lethal, and we thought
Speaker 1: we were in worse shape treating it, and we had
Speaker 1: didn't know what the mortality rate was going to be
Speaker 1: for children, for the young, so we were in a
Speaker 1: worse place, and we were being given all this advice
Speaker 1: and all this stuff, and then here we are now
Speaker 1: finding out that it's actually not as bad as we
Speaker 1: had anticipated in that regard. Yes, the death count is high,
Speaker 1: it is very This is a disease that is a
Speaker 1: serious risk to the elderly, that is the truth. It
Speaker 1: is not a major risk to people who are under fifty,
Speaker 1: for sure, and that's a large segment of the population
Speaker 1: that has that effectively entirely acceptable risk level from the virus.
Speaker 1: But Congresswoman bass Here says, if we'd gotten public health
Speaker 1: information out sooner, we'd be better. Often, No, there's no
Speaker 1: reason to believe that's true. California was over this summer
Speaker 1: when for whatever reason they seem to have a pretty
Speaker 1: low caseload, holding itself up as a model. Its citizens
Speaker 1: were doing a great job. They were all so good
Speaker 1: about masking and distancing and all this. What are they
Speaker 1: saying now, all of a sudden, when the flu season
Speaker 1: and when indoor is more common, Now they've gotten bad
Speaker 1: at that because they don't believe it anymore. They can't
Speaker 1: answer the questions, my friends, because they don't have answers.
Speaker 1: That's what we all need to know, That's what we
Speaker 1: all need to understand, and they're just telling you nonsense.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. What are your concerns about Christmas,
Speaker 1: Doctor Fasci, My concerns John the same thing of the
Speaker 1: concerns that I had about Thanksgiving, only this may be
Speaker 1: even more compounded because it's a longer holiday. With Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: you know, it was just the end of the week
Speaker 1: and then you go back to work the next week.
Speaker 1: With Christmas, it starts several days before it goes through Christmas,
Speaker 1: the week after Christmas into New Year's and the New
Speaker 1: Year's holiday I think it could be even more of
Speaker 1: a challenge than what we saw with Thanksgiving. So I
Speaker 1: hope that people realize that and understand that as difficult
Speaker 1: as this is, nobody wants to modify, if not essentially
Speaker 1: shut down their holiday season. But we are in a
Speaker 1: very critical time in this country right now. We've got
Speaker 1: to not walk away from the facts and the data.
Speaker 1: This is tough going for all of us. Can't walk
Speaker 1: away from the data. Fout, she says, what is his advice?
Speaker 1: Wash your hand, social distance. I mean, really, that's it, folks,
Speaker 1: mask up social distance, wash your hands, that's it. That's
Speaker 1: all he's got for you. And hope that the vaccine
Speaker 1: comes as soon as possible. That's all. That's all we
Speaker 1: got from this guy. Even Doctor Burkes, now, who in
Speaker 1: the beginning sounded a little less apocalyptic, even Doctor Burkes
Speaker 1: was seems to have gone over to the masks are
Speaker 1: the only thing we've got for you, guys. So that's
Speaker 1: what we're just going to keep saying. Play twelve. But
Speaker 1: I want to be very frank to the American people.
Speaker 1: The vaccine is critical, but it's not going to save
Speaker 1: us from this current surge. Only we can save us
Speaker 1: from this current surge, and we know precisely what to do.
Speaker 1: So if you have loved ones that you want to protect,
Speaker 1: you have to follow these guidelines. Now, So explain this
Speaker 1: to me. Explain this to me. If we follow the guidelines,
Speaker 1: this goes away, Well, what is it if we follow
Speaker 1: the guidelines? How much of a reduction will we see?
Speaker 1: Do they have any idea how what does this works
Speaker 1: look like? And then let's line that up against how
Speaker 1: long do we expect before just the cases reach their
Speaker 1: maximum and start to recede, because that's what the virus
Speaker 1: is doing. And anybody, anybody want to try this thing
Speaker 1: that these public health officials are telling you. It's a
Speaker 1: lot of it driven by panic, and it's because people
Speaker 1: are realizing that they can actually do very much. The
Speaker 1: public health officials can't do very much to help us.
Speaker 1: In fact, you could really argue that a lot of
Speaker 1: what they've said and done has made things worse. You
Speaker 1: could certainly argue that, oh, get the fact checkers on me,
Speaker 1: they could make things worse. The only thing that we
Speaker 1: know will stop this virus, and this is true. I
Speaker 1: mean short of a vaccine, of course, but the only
Speaker 1: thing that we know in the interim that will stop
Speaker 1: this virus is if we stop human contact, stop going out,
Speaker 1: if you avoid human beings, and I mean entirely, the
Speaker 1: virus will not spread. That is true, that is that
Speaker 1: is science. But we can't do that. We won't do that,
Speaker 1: So we keep going, We keep going in circles with this.
Speaker 1: You're still going to go to the store. You're still
Speaker 1: gonna have some essential workers and some people doing things.
Speaker 1: You're still gonna have people who are going to see
Speaker 1: each other. Who are you know, going to socialize with
Speaker 1: other human beings. It's going to happen, and the virus
Speaker 1: will continue to spread. So this this idea that if
Speaker 1: only we listened, we would all be safe and this
Speaker 1: would go away. I think this is just it's just nonsense.
Speaker 1: At least if they're being total extremists and just telling
Speaker 1: you to stay home, stay indoors, don't see anybody, that's
Speaker 1: an accurate thing. I mean, that would certainly bring the
Speaker 1: virus down. But what they don't tell you is that
Speaker 1: if we did that, guess what, When we stop doing that,
Speaker 1: what happens. The virus spreads. The virus spreads again. So
Speaker 1: this whole oh two weeks, just two weeks. Just do
Speaker 1: this thing, just just just and you know this hospital
Speaker 1: capacity the same, You could run the same stories you've
Speaker 1: seen before. ICUs are regularly at ninety percent of capacity,
Speaker 1: and a lot of major hospital systems and a lot
Speaker 1: of cities across the country they can't staff and maintain
Speaker 1: ICUs at thirty or twenty percent capacity because they're going
Speaker 1: to lose a ton of money. It's like a plane
Speaker 1: and an airline, right. Do airlines like to fly a
Speaker 1: lot of flights with nobody on them. No, they try
Speaker 1: to set up the flight so that the planes are
Speaker 1: basically full all the time. Efficient usage of resources. The
Speaker 1: same principle applies to ICUs. To intensive care units in hospitals,
Speaker 1: they have to have a special special nurses and they
Speaker 1: have the doctors assigned to them. They have to have beds,
Speaker 1: they have to have equipment. They don't keep hot, they
Speaker 1: don't keep ICU at a major hospital operating at ten
Speaker 1: percent capacity. To think about that, that would mean they
Speaker 1: have ninety percent staffed ICU beds. So if you if
Speaker 1: you actually look at the data, we're not all overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: They might have to ramp up and go to expansion capacity,
Speaker 1: but that's why they have expansion capacity. So this is
Speaker 1: just this is more fear mongering you see in the media.
Speaker 1: This is more you know, don't pay attention to what's
Speaker 1: actually happening, don't pay attention to what you can learn
Speaker 1: and know about this, allow them to terrify everybody. Then
Speaker 1: you got doctor when who was kicked out of I
Speaker 1: think she was the head of plant Parenthood and she's
Speaker 1: on CNNA. She's the head of plant Parenthood and they
Speaker 1: got rid of her because she wasn't enough of an
Speaker 1: abortion extremist, I mean to be the head of plant
Speaker 1: parent Now you have to think that abortion is this
Speaker 1: wonderful thing that should be which is the most I
Speaker 1: mean morally barbaric and horrific position imaginable. But that's what
Speaker 1: they do. And the Democrat Party is completely tied in
Speaker 1: with this. I mean, it is a stain on the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party's conscience and on its morality. That will I
Speaker 1: hope in future generations they'll look back on this and think,
Speaker 1: how could the Democrats have been so barbaric and evil
Speaker 1: about abortion? But I don't know, I don't know how
Speaker 1: long it will be before we get there. Will the
Speaker 1: day will come? Here? You go with doctor Wynne formerly
Speaker 1: a Planned Parent or telling everybody cancel everything, play sixteen.
Speaker 1: I'm also deeply concerned about deaths going up. At some point,
Speaker 1: we're going to be surpassing three thousand deaths per day,
Speaker 1: maybe even four thousand deaths per day. Our surge right
Speaker 1: now is intensifying, it is amplifying, and I hope that
Speaker 1: people realize that hospitals are the lost line of defense.
Speaker 1: The first line of defense is the community, and we
Speaker 1: really need everyone to do their part to flatten the curve.
Speaker 1: And that means, of course wearing a mask, keepy physical distancing,
Speaker 1: but also so critically at this point, avoiding indoor gatherings.
Speaker 1: Anyone who has not canceled their plans yet for Christmas
Speaker 1: and the New Year should cancel their trouble plans and
Speaker 1: absolutely not gather indoors with anyone who's not in their
Speaker 1: immediate family. Actually, that might be a different doctor when
Speaker 1: than the one who ran Planned Parenthood producer markta I
Speaker 1: gotta check on that one. Same spelling of the name,
Speaker 1: and I thought that she was a CNN Analystic contributor,
Speaker 1: but it actually might just be a different doctor doctor
Speaker 1: when so anyway, same idea that doesn't matter right, Sorry,
Speaker 1: I gotta I'm just saying I got a whole planned
Speaker 1: parenthood ran just because I think planned parenthood is barbaric.
Speaker 1: But that might not apply to this doctor. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I only have the audio. I don't have the video.
Speaker 1: Is that it was a doctor? Was? I mean, I hear,
Speaker 1: I can check, you know, we can. We can find out,
Speaker 1: so I know, because I think that's important. Yes it is. No,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry it was doctor. Wait? No, is it different?
Speaker 1: It's just tough to know. I give up. I give
Speaker 1: up anyway. I don't know. I can't figure out. It's
Speaker 1: the same name, could be wrong. We'll figure it out.
Speaker 1: I'll find out. I'll tell you guys tomorrow. I don't
Speaker 1: have time to go too deep into the so, so
Speaker 1: put a hold on it. Any The point is they're saying,
Speaker 1: can't all your plans, all that, all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff doesn't It's not really relevant. It's kids saying, kids,
Speaker 1: all your plans. You know, I went out to a
Speaker 1: restaurant on Saturday. Oh my gosh, so risky. I'm a daredevil.
Speaker 1: I wan't to a restaurant on Saturday. And it's just
Speaker 1: the whole thing is bizarre. You know they have this.
Speaker 1: They've got these servers who are all masked up and
Speaker 1: gloved up your indoors. But we're all sitting their masks down,
Speaker 1: eating And if you get up to go to the bathroom,
Speaker 1: you have to put a mask back on. They won't
Speaker 1: hand you a menu because if you touch a menu,
Speaker 1: you're gonna get infected. Right, So you gotta do this,
Speaker 1: read the menu with your phone. You got to stare
Speaker 1: at your phone. But you're sitting there. They've got these
Speaker 1: plastic barriers between the tables, as if that someone someone here.
Speaker 1: Here's some more questions. Oh, I got more questions. There
Speaker 1: as some belief now and some studies to support that
Speaker 1: very high grade air filters may be helpful in reducing
Speaker 1: transmission inside certain spaces. Right, there's some belief that's the case,
Speaker 1: if an air filter in one part of a large
Speaker 1: indoor space might help protect you from the virus. Does
Speaker 1: anybody really believe that wearing a bandana around your face
Speaker 1: alone would be enough to do anything? Think about what
Speaker 1: that's saying. It's that it's freely circulating the air. It's
Speaker 1: not about because an air filters, just like in the
Speaker 1: corner of a room, Let's say that means that it's
Speaker 1: just the air that's in the room, and the virus
Speaker 1: is freely circulating. If the filter in the corner is
Speaker 1: protecting you. Do you think that the mask that you
Speaker 1: wear when you're five feet away from away from somebody
Speaker 1: really makes any difference. I mean that that's telling you
Speaker 1: that it's it's just freely circulating the air around you.
Speaker 1: It's not about direct it's not about drop blit transmission
Speaker 1: directed at you. It's just about what's in the air
Speaker 1: around you, right, I mean, I'm just thinking this thing through.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm asking questions. But yes, so I'm at this restaurant.
Speaker 1: They have these plastic barriers because that's the virus can't
Speaker 1: go up six inches over the over the plastic barrier.
Speaker 1: It sees the plastic barrier and goes, WHOA, that's way
Speaker 1: too much work. That's way too much effort. And then
Speaker 1: at the end of the night, it's it's ten o'clock.
Speaker 1: I got the restaurant, you know, around close to eight.
Speaker 1: It's ten o'clock, ten oh one. They come around everyone's table.
Speaker 1: You have to leave right now. They're not mean about it.
Speaker 1: I'm not blaming the restaurant at all. By the way,
Speaker 1: I have no it's I understand restaurants are being forced
Speaker 1: to do all this, their businesses are being destroyed. I
Speaker 1: got no problem with these restaurants. I had a problem
Speaker 1: with the idiotic government mandates like shut down at ten o'clock. Really,
Speaker 1: we could sit there for two hours, but it's that
Speaker 1: last fifteen minutes when I'm you know, finishing my soux
Speaker 1: flat or whatever that I can't That's the real risk
Speaker 1: period idiocy. This is idiocy, and everybody knows it. Who
Speaker 1: thinks about it, But people are scared, and they're so
Speaker 1: much cowardice in our intellectual class, so called intellectual class,
Speaker 1: and our information workers. So much cowardice. It's outraged, out rageous.
Speaker 1: So I'm just telling you, don't you if you go
Speaker 1: to them and you listen to them and you do
Speaker 1: what they tell you, uh, you know, you're gonna have
Speaker 1: a very unmarried Christmas, that's for sure. Here's doctor Salowie,
Speaker 1: who's the guy very involved in the in the operation
Speaker 1: warp Speed and the getting the vaccine out. Even he
Speaker 1: you know, even be able to that. Are that are
Speaker 1: you know, working for the Trump administration? Obviously, Doctor fauci.
Speaker 1: I mean, look at all these doctors are telling you
Speaker 1: to wear the one hundred day mask mandate. They like
Speaker 1: this played seven presidents like Biden told me in an
Speaker 1: exclusive interview Thursday, he's going to ask Americans to wear
Speaker 1: masks for his first one is in office. Do you
Speaker 1: think that's a good idea or is it too little,
Speaker 1: too late? Oh? I think it's a good idea. It's
Speaker 1: never too late. It's this pandemic is ravaging the country.
Speaker 1: We all need to take our precaution, have our masks,
Speaker 1: wash our hand, keep our distance, remain aware that this
Speaker 1: virus is a killer. We have a vaccine. There is
Speaker 1: light at the end of the tunnel, but we will
Speaker 1: not all have the vaccine in our arms before May
Speaker 1: or June. So we need to be very cautious and vigilant.
Speaker 1: President like Biden praise the fact that. So here's another
Speaker 1: thing that you have to think about. Notice how that
Speaker 1: the health experts that we say we all have to
Speaker 1: do our part. Wear a mask, comma wash your hands,
Speaker 1: comma social distance. The reason we're doing all of those
Speaker 1: things is because very clearly, any one of those things
Speaker 1: is entirely insufficient to protect you, Right, someone doesn't tell me,
Speaker 1: get the get a measles vaccination, but then also wear
Speaker 1: a mask all the time and also wash your hands
Speaker 1: all the time to avoid beasles. No, you get the vaccination,
Speaker 1: You're good. So I'm just saying there is an admission
Speaker 1: here that, for example, masking on its own is not
Speaker 1: even close to sufficient. Obviously, right. I noticed as well
Speaker 1: that you know, Rudy Giuliani gets COVID h and you know,
Speaker 1: God bless Rudy, and I hope he gets through this
Speaker 1: very quickly and he's fine. But Rudy gets this and
Speaker 1: it's all oh, because he was at these things without
Speaker 1: a mask on. So when somebody who isn't always masked
Speaker 1: and isn't and is a Republican gets COVID, it's their fault,
Speaker 1: you see, That's what the But there are a million
Speaker 1: people in five how many of the million people do
Speaker 1: you think we're wearing masks? Based on polling and based
Speaker 1: on the data that we have on compliance, ninety percent
Speaker 1: of them, ninety percent of people were wearing masks. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: people get who got infected? We're mask wearers? Well, what
Speaker 1: does that tell you? How effective are these policies really?
Speaker 1: They don't want to hear it now, don't stop asking questions.
Speaker 1: Then they need to do what you're told. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom line. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Let me begin by wishing you all a very merry Christmas.
Speaker 1: Remember the word. Remember we started five years ago and
Speaker 1: I said, you're gonna be saying Christmas again, and we
Speaker 1: say it proudly again. Although they'll they'll be trying to
Speaker 1: take that word again out of the vocabulary. We're not
Speaker 1: gonna let him do that. I will, you know, if
Speaker 1: we don't win this fight, and I and I've again
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not doing the percentages anymore because we're
Speaker 1: in this to win it and we're fight until the end.
Speaker 1: But if we don't win this fight, I will certainly
Speaker 1: miss just having a president who will say things like that,
Speaker 1: you know, and say Marry Christmas. I hate this whole
Speaker 1: don't say these things to people, you know. I say
Speaker 1: Mary Christmas to Mark, knowing that producer Mark is not
Speaker 1: somebody who's celebrating Christmas per se, and he can say
Speaker 1: happy Hanaka to me, and I know that these are
Speaker 1: exchanges of goodwill and actually there are exchanges of inclusiveness,
Speaker 1: right Producer Mark, you don't get offended when I say
Speaker 1: marry Christmas. No, yeah, you're like, okay, thanks, Marry Christmas
Speaker 1: is like I'm celebrating Christmas and I wish you all
Speaker 1: the best during this period of celebration. For me. When
Speaker 1: Producer Mark says happy hanakah, Buck, I don't say, well,
Speaker 1: I don't have a manua of my house. I say great,
Speaker 1: thank you. I hope you have a great hanaka too,
Speaker 1: Like this is what normal, happy, well adjusted adults. This
Speaker 1: is how they interact with each other in society. So
Speaker 1: all this is the get rid of it. You know,
Speaker 1: you can't say marry Christmas to people. It's offendshove. It's
Speaker 1: not inclusive. No, it actually is inclusive because it's somebody
Speaker 1: expressing their good wishes and goodwill to someone else during
Speaker 1: a period that is you know, religious for them. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying somebody else has to say, you know, it's
Speaker 1: not Mary Christmas and they say yes, and I am
Speaker 1: celebrating Christmas in return, Like that's not how it goes.
Speaker 1: And with this bid administration, if it happens, If it happens,
Speaker 1: you're going to have so much of the return of
Speaker 1: the culture war stuff and so much of this corporate
Speaker 1: diversity propagandist stuff all the time play eighteen. We could
Speaker 1: teach one of these creeps jobs to push their leaders
Speaker 1: to make sure there's a greater diversity. Well, I can
Speaker 1: promise you is when this is all said and done,
Speaker 1: you see everyone that I've announced, and it's going to
Speaker 1: be in the next several weeks, we'll have it all
Speaker 1: out there. You're going to see significant diversity. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to tell you now exactly when I'm going any department,
Speaker 1: but I promise you it'll be the single most diverse
Speaker 1: cabinet based on race, color, based on gender that's ever
Speaker 1: existent in the United States of America. So no commitment
Speaker 1: on those spots, commitment of what I just said will
Speaker 1: be the most diverse cabinet in the main spots of
Speaker 1: White House as well as the cabinet positions. Here's a
Speaker 1: question I always wanted, what is diverse enough? When have
Speaker 1: you achieved sufficient diversity in any organization or place? I
Speaker 1: just want to just you know, Notice the note ever
Speaker 1: says that what's enough diversity? They don't know, they'd like
Speaker 1: it to be. This amorphous concept. Is it? Is it
Speaker 1: the specific representation of ethnic and and you know identity groups,
Speaker 1: gender groups. Is it specific identification as it is in
Speaker 1: the general population. The problem is is that's actually called
Speaker 1: the quota, and quotas are actually unconstitutional. Quotas are not allowed,
Speaker 1: but so so they always keep it. Ah, they keep
Speaker 1: it amorphous for a reason. They can't tell you because
Speaker 1: they want to always continue this agitation. For we were
Speaker 1: never diverse enough. And even if we got to the
Speaker 1: to a place where you have have direct representations as
Speaker 1: a percentage within the population, that's a quota. That's a problem.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Rock and roll, fellow Patriots, we
Speaker 1: made our school up to eleven. It's time for roll call,
Speaker 1: Roll call everybody, producer Mark before we get to all
Speaker 1: the folks out there across across the country. How are
Speaker 1: you doing, man, how's the weekend? Good? How about yourself?
Speaker 1: You know we're at the dinner was nice, It's awesome. Friends.
Speaker 1: Snow Princess had a lot of business school stuff, so
Speaker 1: I didn't really get to see much of her, but
Speaker 1: I got to hang out some friends and in the Frenchy.
Speaker 1: I had the Frenchy all weekend, little Toolula and she's great.
Speaker 1: So that was pretty much I was. It was a
Speaker 1: pretty lazy weekend for me, which was nice. I enjoyed it.
Speaker 1: And I'm getting like much better at Call of Duty.
Speaker 1: I will tell you, like, I'm not turning. I'm not
Speaker 1: turning into somebody who's getting good enough a Call of
Speaker 1: Duty that it's like maybe I need to play less
Speaker 1: Call of Duty. That's where I that that's really the
Speaker 1: pandemic has pushed me to that point where I'm getting
Speaker 1: too good at some video games. Now, I mean it's
Speaker 1: not necessarily a bad thing. Yeah, I mean I'm not
Speaker 1: playing I'm like one of these guys you could win
Speaker 1: tournaments or anything. But I'm now doing things on the
Speaker 1: Call of Duty screen where I'm like, I'm I'm a
Speaker 1: nerd now, like I'm actually I've reached that point where
Speaker 1: it's not just like I'm running around big bang and
Speaker 1: like having some silly fun. I'm like entering at a
Speaker 1: level of tactical excellence in this computer or this this
Speaker 1: video game, not a computer game that makes me think
Speaker 1: that maybe I need to like get out more so
Speaker 1: just say it. I mean, you could be doing all
Speaker 1: lot worse things with your time. Yeah, I will say this,
Speaker 1: video games are a great like brain mush reliever. I mean,
Speaker 1: I have to do so much content every day, that's funny.
Speaker 1: People are always and I do do a lot of reading,
Speaker 1: not just for for day to day work, but also
Speaker 1: reading books to bring an now, to bring additional background
Speaker 1: into what I'm doing here on the show. And so
Speaker 1: it is nice to just like, what is your what
Speaker 1: is your version of when it's brain mush time? That
Speaker 1: would it would be the same thing playing some sort
Speaker 1: of video game. Yeah, I think so too. Yeah, yep,
Speaker 1: alrighty let's uh, let's see what we have here. Now,
Speaker 1: we've got some role called Oh did you any any
Speaker 1: interesting food or any any stories from the producer Mark
Speaker 1: culinary adventures? No culinary adventures. But I have I set
Speaker 1: up some new tech. I realized I really like dad
Speaker 1: tech you have? That means no, what is that? You know?
Speaker 1: How like most dads just love interesting new technology. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well I got some great deals. I got a robot
Speaker 1: vacuum and a and a Seltzer maker. Oh, I've got
Speaker 1: a Seltzer maker. They're great, aren't they awesome. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: finally crossed the bridge into I have enough money to
Speaker 1: do stuff like this. Now there we go. Well done.
Speaker 1: Yeah man, No, seltzer Maker is great game changer. The
Speaker 1: robot vacuum is very nice too. I mean to not
Speaker 1: have to vacuum. You're I'm sure you don't, oh vacu No,
Speaker 1: I don't have dude, I'm a I'm a I'm a
Speaker 1: like a bachelor pad guy here, Like, I don't have
Speaker 1: a vacuum. I just I've got a dog and uh
Speaker 1: what is that has nothing to do with a vacuum. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's like I've got a I've got a broom somewhere. Um, yeah,
Speaker 1: so my floor could use little work actually that I'm
Speaker 1: looking at, I'm looking at the floor as they talk
Speaker 1: to you, I'm like, definitely some what do they do?
Speaker 1: You call them a dust? What is it when you
Speaker 1: know when the things pile up as the little uh bunnies, Yeah,
Speaker 1: dust bunnies. You have had like dust they're running all
Speaker 1: over the place. You seem like a type of person
Speaker 1: to use a cleaning service to guess on occasion what
Speaker 1: ends up happening? Is it always I'll have my mom
Speaker 1: or my sister over and they will just be like, um,
Speaker 1: your bathroom needs work meeting, like you know, and that's
Speaker 1: what I'm like, Okay, and yeah, I mean there are
Speaker 1: there are these greats, there are these great services in this.
Speaker 1: You can just use task rabbit too. Honestly, sometimes it's
Speaker 1: like the best seventy bucks you'll ever spend. You know,
Speaker 1: You'll just be like, oh, the whole the whole home
Speaker 1: is so clean. All of a sudden, if snow Princess
Speaker 1: moves in, she's gonna be very upset with your cleaning habits. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she's way cleaner, So that's how I would imagine. So
Speaker 1: I'm hoping she can. I'm hoping she could take care
Speaker 1: of that for it. It's the opposite of my relationship.
Speaker 1: I do all the cleaning. You're missus Mark is a
Speaker 1: little bit less lax on, a little bit more lax
Speaker 1: on the cleaning. I clean the whole apartment. It's all me.
Speaker 1: Do you do you throw in like a little apron
Speaker 1: Do you really get into in the clubs? And no,
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm very anal retentive about cleaning, like it
Speaker 1: has to be perfect. She will help me sometimes and
Speaker 1: I'm like, can you do it right. If you're gonna
Speaker 1: do it, you might as well do it right. It's important,
Speaker 1: it's important. All right, Here we go, so the thoughts
Speaker 1: of the folks. Randy, hey, buck, I've got an idea.
Speaker 1: Let's agree to defund the police, beginning with the special
Speaker 1: bodyguards for all the politicians and bureaucrats who cost the
Speaker 1: most money and serve the least purpose, followed by the
Speaker 1: so called news media that only serves, pardon me, their
Speaker 1: own self interest. Only let the police in place for
Speaker 1: the streets and the common people. That should save a
Speaker 1: small fortune. Randy, let me see here. Yeah, I see
Speaker 1: what you're saying, and I know the point you're making,
Speaker 1: but it's not going to happen. But your point is
Speaker 1: well taken, which is that a lot of the people
Speaker 1: who are big advocates of both defund the police and
Speaker 1: gun control because those things tend to go together. So
Speaker 1: it's no police or totally different police, whatever that means.
Speaker 1: They don't even know. They just want to say that
Speaker 1: no police, slack Ah, you're not allowed to have a
Speaker 1: firearm in a country with over three hundred million guns
Speaker 1: currently in circulation, over three hundred million. I mean, there
Speaker 1: so many guns. They're more guns than people in America,
Speaker 1: but you're not allowed to have a gun. That's what
Speaker 1: they want. Yeah, I think that's a problem, and especially
Speaker 1: when the people who do that have private security and
Speaker 1: all these other things in place. So yeah, Jason Rights, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: just want to let you know that I first listened
Speaker 1: to your podcast back in March. I first heard you
Speaker 1: on a station out of Panama City Beach. Since then,
Speaker 1: I've listened to your podcast on Spotify A listen to
Speaker 1: what I'd like to call The Killer Bees, Buck, Ben,
Speaker 1: and Bongino. Spotify notified me that you were my number
Speaker 1: one podcast of the year with one hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: eight episodes. Listen to Here's hoping to catch every show
Speaker 1: at twenty twenty one Shields High. Jason, thank you so much,
Speaker 1: and yes, the Killer Bees. I'm in great company there
Speaker 1: with two other guys who have got really, really great podcasts.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening to my I do
Speaker 1: appreciate that I'm number one of your choices. It's very
Speaker 1: kind of you, and yeah, I thank you. Please spread
Speaker 1: the word and it's a great way to listen. As
Speaker 1: Prucer Mark has to point out, the iHeart app is
Speaker 1: also our employer's app is also a great way to
Speaker 1: listen for those of you out there. Number one for podcasting,
Speaker 1: number one four podcasts. Yes, but if Spotify is super easy,
Speaker 1: if you're a Spotify person, we I mean, first and foremost,
Speaker 1: I just want you to listen to Bucks ext the
Speaker 1: show so h and Panama City beach Man. I want
Speaker 1: to get down to the Panhandle really badly. I am
Speaker 1: going to be down in Florida or around the holiday.
Speaker 1: Although I don't want to say that too. I don't
Speaker 1: want to, you know, Cuomo or de Blasio to head
Speaker 1: me off at the pass and prevent me from getting
Speaker 1: down there. But Prucer Mark, I'm taking some I'm going
Speaker 1: down to Florida for a few days. Well, that sounds lovely.
Speaker 1: I would do the same if I could. Are you, Well,
Speaker 1: couldn't you go in New Jersey? Couldn't you go to
Speaker 1: like the Jersey Shore at least get some fresh air.
Speaker 1: Here's some seagulls whenever you want. Yeah, I guess I could.
Speaker 1: It's just my wife works in a healthcare setting, so
Speaker 1: I can't really leave the area because she can't quarantine. Oh, yes, yes,
Speaker 1: that's right, all right. Next up, here, Eric Buck, why
Speaker 1: shouldn't we make poll workers where body cams. That way
Speaker 1: we can see exactly what they're doing. Eric, I think
Speaker 1: the answer to that question. The first of all, I
Speaker 1: think there should be there certainly should be surveillance cameras
Speaker 1: up in every poll working a pole place, right, And
Speaker 1: I think a lot of them do. But this is
Speaker 1: so complicated because every state has its own you know,
Speaker 1: there's a federal outcome of these elections, with the presidency obviously,
Speaker 1: but also members of Congress go to a federal body,
Speaker 1: the Congress, But states have their own way of doing things,
Speaker 1: and they have a lot of their own rules and regulations.
Speaker 1: So I would say the problem that they would raise
Speaker 1: with this, though, is just cost, you know, And and
Speaker 1: it would they'd say that I don't have the money
Speaker 1: for this. Now you can say, well that's crap, but
Speaker 1: I'm just telling if that's what they would say. But yeah,
Speaker 1: and I don't know. I mean, you know, body camps
Speaker 1: think about this. All you need is people to be like, oh,
Speaker 1: I turned off my body cam, and there'd be a
Speaker 1: huge controversy. It's just a cost thing. They they won't
Speaker 1: they won't spend the money. Leo Buck you worked in
Speaker 1: law enforcement, right, Why aren't detectives talking to these democratic
Speaker 1: poll cheaters and post office workers. Also, Wally is a
Speaker 1: great movie for adults. I'm sixty and saw it three
Speaker 1: times with my kids. You will enjoy it very much. Well, Leo,
Speaker 1: first off, Yeah, so I didn't. I wasn't. I was
Speaker 1: never a copp or a detective or sergeant anything like that.
Speaker 1: I was a CIA officer who spent a year at
Speaker 1: the NYPD, about eighteen months really at the NYPD, working
Speaker 1: in the Intelligence division is what they call a a
Speaker 1: intelligent specialist. So I was effectively a case manager and
Speaker 1: you know, analyst for counter terrorism cases within the NYPD.
Speaker 1: So all the information would come in, I'd speak to
Speaker 1: the undercovers, I'd speak to the confidential informants sometimes depending
Speaker 1: or the detectives would do that and they would bring
Speaker 1: me back their their DD fives, their intel reports. I
Speaker 1: would look at all the reports. I'd take to the bosses,
Speaker 1: this is what we know, this is what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: So it was it was an analytic role, but I
Speaker 1: was in the NYPD. I was an employee of the
Speaker 1: NYPD for that period, so I spent a lot of
Speaker 1: time in and around law and force, and these were
Speaker 1: legal We're bringing criminal cases. This was actual law enforcement work.
Speaker 1: It's different than the CIA, where you're not actually trying
Speaker 1: to bring criminal cases. So that's the specifics of what
Speaker 1: I did there. And yet, but as to your point
Speaker 1: about why aren't they interviewing these people, I don't know,
Speaker 1: you know, you'd tell me they should be. There's certainly
Speaker 1: reasonable suspicion to have a sit down and talk to
Speaker 1: some of these people. Bruce and Mark, have you watched
Speaker 1: The Undoing yet? By the way, I saw that's the
Speaker 1: one on HBO, right Yeah, everyone's talking about it. It's good,
Speaker 1: but you it's it's a U and missus Mark should
Speaker 1: watch like she'd like it too. It's it's murder mystery
Speaker 1: kind of thing. Six episodes, pretty pretty low, you know,
Speaker 1: low investment of time and definitely on the list. Yeah,
Speaker 1: worth seeing, worth seeing. I'm I'm up to speed on
Speaker 1: Mandalorian right now, and I'm just gonna say it, Mandalorian
Speaker 1: season two the action sequences got kind of bad and
Speaker 1: the writing is not as good. Just the storyline. The
Speaker 1: storyline is not as good. And the Mandalorian season one
Speaker 1: one of the things that was so so good about
Speaker 1: it was that they took this Star Wars character and
Speaker 1: almost made they made him like a almost like the
Speaker 1: Delta Force operator of Star Wars. You know, he was
Speaker 1: he says, you know, weapons are my religion, and he's
Speaker 1: so good with all these different weapons, and he kind
Speaker 1: of moved and and maneuvered in a way that gave
Speaker 1: a he almost was like a Spec Ops Star Wars character.
Speaker 1: And in season two he's just running around pul pew
Speaker 1: peew with this little laser gun. It's way less if
Speaker 1: you if those of you who watched closely, No, I'm
Speaker 1: telling the truth. It's just much less gritty and it's
Speaker 1: not not as good Mentalori in season two and then
Speaker 1: the story it's like everything is just you know, he's
Speaker 1: got to go to this place. Oh, they try to
Speaker 1: steal baby Yoda. He's got to go that place. Oh,
Speaker 1: they try to steal baby Yoda. It's like, what are
Speaker 1: we doing here? Folks? You know, come on, you gotta
Speaker 1: ask yourself. Oh and as for Whale, I might I
Speaker 1: might be able to check that one out. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'll be looking. I'm definitely. Oh man, I'm gonna watch
Speaker 1: movies over the break. I'm gonna just oh gosh, it's
Speaker 1: gonna be fantastic. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast more roll Call. We got
Speaker 1: Kristen up here. She writes, Hello, Hello, Kristen. I love
Speaker 1: listening to your show. You keep me company while I
Speaker 1: do chores at night, either on the podcast or on
Speaker 1: WTAQ in Wisconsin. I'm not one to usually write into shows,
Speaker 1: but your show to night Georgia on our Mind struck
Speaker 1: a chord with me. Wisconsin's governors had a mask mandate
Speaker 1: in place since August first. I went shopping earlier today
Speaker 1: and for the first time since the mask meant it
Speaker 1: went into effect, did not wear a mask. Then I
Speaker 1: listened to your podcast tonight. You spoke of seriously considering
Speaker 1: civil disobedience and not wearing your mask. I will tell
Speaker 1: you that not wearing a mask is probably the most
Speaker 1: liberating thing I've done so far in my life, which
Speaker 1: sounds crazy when I realized I'm talking about not wearing
Speaker 1: a mask. I highly recommend not wearing a mask. Civil
Speaker 1: disobedience is my new normal. Shields high. Well, christ And
Speaker 1: you're a brave lady, and I appreciate so much you
Speaker 1: write again I'm glad I got to keep you company
Speaker 1: up there in Wisconsin. It's an honor. And I'll just
Speaker 1: tell you this. In New York, if you tried that,
Speaker 1: people would and this is nothing new with you, so
Speaker 1: you do you up in Wisconsin. And I'm just saying
Speaker 1: if someone tried to do that in New York, they
Speaker 1: would not only would you be told leave the store immediately,
Speaker 1: but people would act like you had just infected about it.
Speaker 1: If you walked into a store for fifteen seconds without
Speaker 1: a mask on, and people would would approach you stranger.
Speaker 1: Not only would store management, but I think strangers in
Speaker 1: the place would approach you and say you're being reckless,
Speaker 1: lives are at stake, get out, and they would like
Speaker 1: scream at you. So they it's not just enough to
Speaker 1: say could you put a mask on please? Or would
Speaker 1: you mind doing it? They will shame you over it.
Speaker 1: That's the mentality in New York. That's how how crazy
Speaker 1: they've gone. I mean, I saw this guy, Pete Davidson
Speaker 1: from SNL. I mean SNL's garbage. It's it's really it's
Speaker 1: just trash. It's just pure trash, and it has been
Speaker 1: for a long time. It's a shame because I used
Speaker 1: to like SNL. I used to watch US and all
Speaker 1: my family sometimes would be in my grandparents place in
Speaker 1: the Hudson Valley and we would watch SNL, you know,
Speaker 1: and it was something that you know, my my immediate
Speaker 1: family we could do together. And it was back in
Speaker 1: the Dana Carvey, Mike Myers. Uh, what's who's the guy who?
Speaker 1: Phil Hartman um? And then of course who's the robust
Speaker 1: the robust bellied fellow Riley? Thank you Chris Farley. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, they were great. They were great back in
Speaker 1: the day. But now SNL so it's just lib trash.
Speaker 1: It's like they're trying to amuse their buddies in Williamsburg
Speaker 1: all the time and uh, you know, just just going
Speaker 1: the left wing hipster nonsense. But they had this guy,
Speaker 1: Pete Davidson and he was talking about how anybody protesting
Speaker 1: like the guy in Staaten Island, although I think he
Speaker 1: ran into cops with his car. That's very dumb. It's
Speaker 1: not a good idea. Don't do that, don't you know?
Speaker 1: You can't assault, you can be said, you can say
Speaker 1: with those obedients, you can't assaul police officers. That's alleged
Speaker 1: it's alleged right now. I'm not saying that's what happened,
Speaker 1: but that is what is reported. But you know, this
Speaker 1: guy Pete Davidson calling up people in Staten Island for this,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, you know, why is it that the
Speaker 1: people that still have jobs and have suffered not at
Speaker 1: all are supposed to have to lecture those of those
Speaker 1: people who are having problems and losing their businesses. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Roan rights, I live in southern California, and everywhere I
Speaker 1: go everyone has been wearing masks for months, and everyone,
Speaker 1: including me, has been social distancing. I have not been
Speaker 1: wearing masks, he says, and yet here we are with
Speaker 1: more lockdowns ostensibly because we didn't do it well enough
Speaker 1: for the last nine months. It's amazing to see how
Speaker 1: many people assume the government can save them from anything
Speaker 1: that comes their way, and if the government can't, then
Speaker 1: it's our fault somehow. Shields high. Yeah, Roan, I find
Speaker 1: it very troubling. I don't know where this idea comes
Speaker 1: from that people seem to think that government is really
Speaker 1: efficient and good at what it does and is like
Speaker 1: your friend, and it's not. It is not those things, Okay,
Speaker 1: government is not going to save you from this, and
Speaker 1: the government also does not, especially when it has power
Speaker 1: like this. There's no accountability. Gonna be a great week
Speaker 1: of show? Is that going to show you? Please pass
Speaker 1: the buck tell someone to check it out and they
Speaker 1: can go to bucksexon dot com to read our latest stories.
Speaker 1: Until next time, Shields High