WEBVTT - Trees and Golf

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Golfers have strong feelings about trees. Take the venue of

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>last week's US Open, Oakmont Country Club. Between the nineteen

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>nineties and twenty ten's Oakmont removed almost all of the

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>trees on its golf course, and today in twenty twenty five,

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is still a controversial subject. Some people are still

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>mad about it. So in this episode, we're talking about

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>trees on golf courses, why they get planted, why they

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>might be removed, and what effect they have on the game.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>My guest is Bradley Klein, a veteran golf architecture writer

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and consultant. Brad has been thinking about the tree issue

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>for decades now, and few people are more knowledgeable about it.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Garrett Morrison and this is designing golf. So, Bradley,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in addition to writing prolifically about golf courses, you have

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience consulting with clubs about golfer chitecture.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I assume some of these consultations involved tree studies. Am

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I right about that?

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Sure?

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>What do those usually involve? How does that process look?

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>So? Without? You know, I could get into various details,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>but this started about twenty What is it now? It's

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. So it started twenty five years ago

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>when I started writing about trees and realizing that almost

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>every course I was looking at, including one I was

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a member at, was completely overtreate. And at this time

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>there were already rumors are not the right word, but

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>murmurings of what was going on at Oakmont, which was

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>just beginning to under the guise of their superintendent, Marque

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Markuns surreptitiously with They had the sod squad out there

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>at four in the morning with a couple of boxes

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of Krispy kremes the laborers and they were taking down

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>trees and taking the root ball out and sotting it

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>over and tapping it down, and first group out wouldn't

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 2>even notice anything. Took a while for that to happen,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>but for them to get caught, But that was the start,

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and generally, you know, I was very involved in the

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>restoration movement, if you will, early on as a writer,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 2>championing that and trying to undo in my mind and editorially,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>what I had seen was a lot of reckless modernization

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of golf courses, whether lengthening, stretching, overgrowing, making them straight

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and losing a lot of the character, and so I

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 2>started writing about that and then I got called. One

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of the early ones was Sciota actually nineteen ninety nine

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 2>or two thousand. I still have these reports, and you know,

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you sort of walk them through what was happening, and

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>you try to develop criteria of evaluation. And it helped

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>listening to Gil Hands back then. I have known Gil

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen ninety four when he was probably making five

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 2>hundred bucks a day on a dozer over at Engineers

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Golf Club on Long Island, and we spent a lot

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of time walking and talking, and I went to a

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>presentation and he developed these criteria that I'll never forget

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>about the priorities when you're looking at trees, and it

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>was a matter of the agronomic impact, impact on strategic

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>flexibility of the golf course, the esthetics of the view shed,

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the health of the tree, and also issues of safety

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of personnel on the golf course. And so you start

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>thinking about these trees and what they're doing, and the

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>species and the appropriateness, and you start realizing that most

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.279
<v Speaker 2>golf courses, and this is in the northeast, Midwest, Southeast,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>were wildly overtreated. You know, in my background. I think

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it's helpful to know. I'm an educator by training. I

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>have a PhD in political science. I was a university professor.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm very dogmatic in the classroom. It's probably why I quit.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I got frustrated. But I believe in things and I

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>believe in advocating them, and frankly, I didn't think that

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 2>was happening in the golf industry. I thought the other

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>people writing about golf architecture, in particular Ron Whitten, to

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 2>be fair, he's very knowledgeable, incredibly knowledgeable, but he wasn't advocating.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 2>He was more the kind of a neutral attorney sifting

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>through information, and I was more going to be an agitator.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And I had a platform at Golf Week. I was

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 2>writing articles like crazy, and I've had a following. You know,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>as you know about five or six percent of golfers

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>really care about architecture in an unbelievably passionate way. And

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I had people who started asking me about, Hey, what

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>do you think about our golf course. I said, well,

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>let me go take a look. So I started.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And obviously, you know, as part of the larger

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>restoration movement, tree management programs were a big part of

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that often the most controversial piece of any given restoration projects.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So well, we'll get into some of the details of

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>why trees might be removed or managed. I think that

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that sort of Gilhand's playbook that you briefly refer to

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>would be a good structure for us in talking about

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>trees on golf courses. But I'm curious, first of all

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about the history of trees on golf courses. Maybe we

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>could just give a broad overview of how things have

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>evolved over the past one hundred years or so as

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it relates to trees on golf courses. What were some

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the attitudes of Golden age golf architects toward trees

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>on inland golf courses specifically, and by Golden Age I

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mean the architects who are working primarily in the first

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>four decades of the twentieth century. What were their feelings,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>both expressed and implicit through their work about trees and golf.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a good question. The first thing is that

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 2>trees weren't even an issue until golf moved inland. So

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 2>the basic structure of the game is founded upon coastal

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 2>golf links. Golf and even though it's a small, tiny

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 2>percentage of the golf courses. It's a strong component of

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the early foundation of understanding what was going on, and

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture really was trying to take those design principles

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>of flexibility, of using the wind, of using ground contour,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>of using hollows that had been created, and taking it

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to a land that was not ideally suited, but that's

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>where people were, namely inland, and so around just before

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the turn of the century, lateeteen century, you would say

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the game started moving into onto land that really needed

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to be worked. It had to be drained, it had

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to be cleared as well. Now, initially many of the

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>sites that were picked were treeless. I'll give you an

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>example because I just saw at Huntercombe, which is Lillly Park,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Junior's great inland course an hour west of Heathrow Airport,

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>was a completely treeless site, fairly flat, low lying, and

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the contours that were created were essentially ditches and hollows

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and barrow pits for coal and for mining that had

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>been established on site. And he worked the whole golf

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 2>course around it. And the trees came in later, but

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not till a tree clearing was required for wooded

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>sites on farmland where you had rows of trees that

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>had been used as boundaries. You know, when you're assembling

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a golf course property of one hundred and fifty eight

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>as you're often involving different parcels of land that are

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.239
<v Speaker 2>divided by trees, and that's when the removal process started

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to take place in a heavy handed way. Ross was

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>one of those. Mackenzie was similar McDonald. As I recall

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>not most of them didn't write very much. You know,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the writings we have are from the Occasional Polemical book

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 2>by Hunter or McKenzie and McDonald. Ross himself wrote very

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>very little, but they made it Tillinghast was more prolific

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>about this. They made it clear that trees were acceptable

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 2>and appropriate, but not to be central. They had a character,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, they that first of all, delineating the boundary

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of the property the occasional dog leg around. But I

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>think it was Ross who said that it was a

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>mistake to make a tree a central component of the

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>strategy of a golf hall. So while they accepted, and

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 2>partly that's an economic when you when you when you're

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 2>on a site with trees, you decide how much you're

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>going to cut down. They wanted generous fairways, and it

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>has to be said that even their inland golf courses

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>back then were fifty sixty yard white fareaways. The narrowing

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.479
<v Speaker 2>of fairways was a function of the introduction of fairway irrigation,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>which could only throw water thirty yards, and everything else

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>outside of that starff. So they started to fill that

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>space of dead grass. You know, they put an irrigation

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>system and thinking it's going to irrigate the golf course

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and only irrigated thirty yards. Everything else was dying. So

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>they then filled it up with trees. And that was

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>after World War two for the most part. So you

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 2>look at the history of the planting, which is part

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of this. The aggressive planting program didn't take place till

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>after World War two. So what it tells you is

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the early images, and we do

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 2>this all the time, I'm thinking of a wonderful Donald

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Ross's a nine hole golf course in Massachusetts called Whitonsville,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 2>and there's an aerial from nineteen twenty seven twenty eight,

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and it shows about eight pine trees out there, all

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 2>clustered between the first green and the sixth faaraway, and

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 2>that's it. Everything is also wide open, and the heart

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>was they had, by the way, were many of them

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>graceful oaks and American elm. And the American elm was

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic golf tree because it had deep roots, It

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>had a tall main trunk with a beautiful kind of

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>champagne glass canopy, and you could play under and around

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the whole under and around the tree. And so as

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a majestic, gracious tree, it actually allowed you to incorporate

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>that and still have an element of grace and beauty

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and strategy all combined with that kind of a tree. Unfortunately,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>when the American elm started to get the Dutch elm

0:10:55.120 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 2>disease around and after World War Two, and of them

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>came down on golf courses, they were replaced. People got nervous.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>They started planting spruce and sugar maples and swamp maples

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and all sorts of trees that were not indigenous to

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>clutter up or fill up the golf course. Brookside Country

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Club was a great example of this in Canton, Ohio.

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>It was one of my early projects that I was

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>involved with. And you go out there on the aerials

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>from nineteen twenty it's just sand, open blast areas, no

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 2>trees anywhere. And by nineteen fifty seven, fifty eight, these

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, it looked like German prisoners of

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>war had planted trees every nineteen and a half feet

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>in a dead straight row down both sides of every fairway.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 2>So by the time television came along to show what

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>golf courses looked like, people thought that that look of

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the enclosed, narrow, thirty yard wide, straight tree covered canopy

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>was the norm, and it wasn't.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So you've you've laid out some history for us here.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we start in the first deck of the

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, where the general attitude of most golf architects

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is that trees can be appropriate on a golf course,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but not too many. We're certainly not going to have

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>rows of trees enclosing golf holes because that sort of

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>chokes out the character of the land and of the

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>strategy of the whole and creates other problems as well.

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But then in the post World War II period we

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have these planting programs, sometimes motivated motivated by so called beautification.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Other times you refer to the to the elm disease,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the elm blight that happened in the middle of the

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, and sometimes clubs would react to that by

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>planting a bunch of trees to replace the lost elms.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Except those trees were not nearly as well suited to

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>golf as the elms, nor as beautiful, And so we

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have a variety of factors leading to pretty aggressive planting

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>programs at many classic golf courses in the fifties, sixties,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and seventies. Now we get to the eighties and nineties,

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is when you're starting to enter the industry

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself and writing about golf courses. I've always been curious,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think are the roots of the tree

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>management programs that started in the nineties and really picked

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up pace in the twenty first century. And specifically, I've

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>always sort of wondered when I read about the history

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of Oakmont's tree removal program, it always the story always

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>begins with, well, the club's board and green chairmen were

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>strongly in support of restoration and removing trees, and the

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>members really weren't. And I've always wondered, Okay, well, why

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was the club's board in support of it in the

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>first How did momentum build in the first place to

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>start removing trees at Oakmont and at many other clubs.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you have to say about that.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the what do you think the

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of underlying factors are that that led to tree

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>management becoming a popular process.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think it's I wouldn't say it's popular.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>What I would say it's widely accepted among people who

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 2>know what they're talking about. So the couple There are

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>lots of different strands and converging moments here, So I'll

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>give one. One stream is that restoration generically became a buzzword.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I give the founding moment, and I'm proud to have

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>caddied there at the eighty six US Open at Hinnacock.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>That was a big watershed in the moment in which

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>we discovered at one hundred year old golf course could

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 2>still be relevant.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And that was the first US Open to be held

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnacock since eighteen ninety six. Right, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, I mean you look back at it, it was

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it was heavily trigued a lot more than now, but

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 2>still it was really cool to go out there and

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the wind swept links courses. You know, it was windy,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 2>it was very difficult, lots of fescue a little tall

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 2>off everywhere, and it was rough conditions and it was

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>not what you would call a well manicured, beautiful golf course.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>They were still back then, they were still triplex mowing

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the greens and gang mowing the fairways and fairly rough conditions.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>But the point is that the USJ made a commitment there,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe by accident, whatever, it doesn't matter what their motive was.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>The impact was people started talking. And then two years

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>later eighty eight the country club at Brookline was really

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>important because that's where Rhys Jones made restoration a focal

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>point of his presence, and he spent a lot of

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>time there and established his repation as a restoration is

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 2>now in retrospect, the kind of work he did is

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>now seen as a little bit timid and passe, but

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>for what was going on in the industry at the time,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the use of those fescue mounds, for example, reclaiming some

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of the surface some tree management in areas that were

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>heavily shaded that open also became for marketing purposes alone.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Good reclaimed the reputation and more importantly, that word entered

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>into the vocabulary, and that's really what started the conversation

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>about these things. Now. The other thing that happened is

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that with environmental management and crackdown by the EPA and

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the use of chemical pesticides and basic heavy chemistry mercuries

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>for example, and there was a concern about the overuse

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>of chemicals on golf courses. The environmental movement was manifesting itself.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of resistance in the industry to

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>be fair, but still people realized that from a cost

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 2>management standpoint and from a toxicity level, because a lot

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of environments now were being tested. New York State came

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>out with a report called Toxic Fairways in the I

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 2>think mid nineties that basically was a scathing attack upon

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the overuse of fertilization and chemistry on Long Island golf

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>courses where the water table, you know, golf courses were

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 2>sitting on an aquifer that people were using for drinking water.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 2>So there became more of a conversation about, well, maybe

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>we need to back off this, and then the superintendent's

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 2>developed a more culturally oriented program of relying upon sunshine

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and wind and sand and top dressing for not organic

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>but more or cultural practices as they were called. They

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>were cheaper, they were efficient, they lasted longer, and so

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>you had now a realization that there are things in

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the environment that we can manage without chemical applications that

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>could help promote healthy turf. And a lot of that

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>was simply doing shade studies. You didn't have the apps

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>back then, but you could figure out where sunlight was

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and you could realize that because of the azimuth in

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the shoulder season the sunshine was lower, you had much

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>more shade issues. Shade tolerance was a big issue turf grass,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>particularly on grain. So the superintendent's from a micromanagement standpoint,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>realized they needed to do something and they started paring

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>back trees fairly modestly, but still because if you want

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>bent grass, you need eight hours, You need eight hours

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>of sunlight. If you're just going along with the perennial poe,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you can get by on four, five, six hours. But

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>if you want quality turf, if you want greens roll,

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, people don't realize the conditioning has changed so much.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Back in nineteen seventy seven, Oakmont was the fastest golf

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 2>course in the Country stip meter speed registered by the

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>USJA was nine point eight. It was two feet ahead

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of Augusta National. Augusta National was averaging seven point seven.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>That's in nineteen seventy seven, before they converted. They're greens

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 2>at Augusta. But in any case, conditioning was different. So

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 2>when expectations went up and it's like we would like

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>something faster, the new vents were a little better the old.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>The old perennial poem was not performing as well. Pen

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>cross bent grass was not going to deliver anything faster

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>than eight and a half or nine. Once you want

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to go to ten or eleven, you needed the new

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>high performance bent grasses. They needed much more sunlight, they

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>needed more top dressing. All of these converging factors and

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 2>demands and expectations. Television as well. People started to see

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>really cool golf courses on television and thought, why can't

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 2>we have it at our house? You know, they kind

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of call it the Augusta syndrome, but it's more popular

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>than that. It's realizing that, gee, we could be doing

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>better than what we have and so and the other

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>thing that happened is that superintendents became professionally trained you know,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 2>they used to be greenkeepers, make in genes in they

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>were like farmers. I can remember when I started writing

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>in the industry, superintendents were making thirty thirty five thousand

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>a year maintenance budgets for two hundred thousand, three hundred thousand. Now,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the numbers are astronomical, But the point is

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that the superintendents are now professionally trained turf grass scientists,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>many of them, many more than ever. I would say

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>most have four year degrees or at least they've been

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>through a two year turf program, so they have a

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>better understanding of war, chemistry, sunlight, the factors that are

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 2>really required. And so the whole industry has changed. The

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>professionalism has changed, set of expectations have changed, and then

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the sense of travel. I do think that the golf

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>course ratings process has exposed people with better photography and

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 2>video and media. People are more aware of what's going

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>on with other courses that are really cool that they

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>either visit or that they would dream about visiting. I

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>think that Band in Dunes had a lot to do

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 2>with it as well, because that essentially popularized the idea

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 2>of links golf in a way that had previously only

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>been available to those who had gone to Scotland. Of course,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>as you know, or most of us know, getting to

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Bandon is just as difficult as getting to Scotland, but

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 2>at least it's in the United States and it doesn't

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>involve quite the schlepp. But the availability of that kind

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of a golf really struck a nerve with a certain

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>percentage of elite people who then I think became more

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>prominent in decision making in their home course. And so

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>what happens at every club to get to your I

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>knew i'd get to your point, is that the people

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>making decisions about these things were more and more exposed

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to a variety of golf courses that had not been

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the case at every club that I've been to. The

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 2>people who are happiest with the old Parkland tree laced,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, heavy polar conditions are the ones who don't travel.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>They've spent forty years playing this golf course. They think

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's always been that way. They love it. They had

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 2>their same group, they play five days a week. They

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>remember the tree that they bounced the shot off of,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 2>or you know whatever. They remember all these things. They

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 2>don't want anything to budget they're not making decisions anymore.

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 2>The people making decisions are they're course raiders. They've been debandoned.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 2>They've gone to Cabot, they've gone to stream Song, they've

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>been to Scotland, they're going to Australia now. So there's

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>much more what I call architectural literacy. They're reading the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>books that we write. They understand that superintendents are professionals.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 2>They're not bossing them around. They're starting to listen to them.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And the superintendents have become better about communicating and a

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>little bolder in their articulation of their expertise and what

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 2>they need. That's the other thing. They're more professional. So

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the people who are making decisions have changed. I think

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>increasingly we've found that a more informed decision making apparatus

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>has developed at these clubs, so that they're working with

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 2>superintendents rather than telling them, you know, hey, you should

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 2>mold the left side of the fairways wider because I'm

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 2>hooking the ball and I'm tired of being in the roof.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>That's what you You don't see that as much. So

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a big, big change at many, many levels.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just to put a bow on the historical

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>narrative here. The rise of the superintendent, which you've referred to,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or the increased prominence and education of the superintendent, is

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a big part of this story because now you see

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>superintendent's the head superintendent, being often the most important and

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases the highest paid employee of a given club.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't really the case in the past. They have

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot more power now and a lot more authority,

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and what they're saying often is, well, listen, if you

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>want me to use less chemicals, less inputs, less water,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>then we have got to get our turf in the sunlight.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>And if you want that turf to be of the

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>highest quality, then it needs sunlight and air circulation. And

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if we have trees surrounding every hole and putting all

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of our turf in shade for most of the day,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>then we're not going to have outstanding turf conditions, especially

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if we want to reduce our dependency on chemicals and

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>various other inputs. And so that's kind of the logic

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that has started to win the day a little bit here.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one of the great moments I saw actually witnessed

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 2>this conversation. A fella comes into the superintendent's office and says,

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>you can't cut down the trees down? Can you manage

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 2>this without the tree management? And the superintendent says, you're

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a dentist, right, yeah, I said, do you want to

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>pull teeth without novercame You could do it, but you

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>might kill the patient. And it was a great kind

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of response of a professional, and the guy backed off. Realized,

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, so I think the professionalization and I have

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>to include the golf prost too, because they have you know,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I noticed, starting about twenty five years ago, the PGA

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>of America at the convention would start running seminars on architecture,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 2>on maintenance and instructing golf pros a little bit more

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 2>about that component of it so that they are on

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the same path. And every club where there is ongoing

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 2>tree management, there has to be a collaboration among the

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 2>GM the golf professional, the superintendent, and the green chair.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And the more they collaborate and they're starting to do that, well,

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>they've been doing that for a long time. The architecte

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>leads the conversation, but the professionalization of this relationship means

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that those people are listening to what's best for the

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>facility rather than listening to who's going to make who

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 2>on their board is going to help them keep their job.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>The boards are not effective in that kind of planning.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Just people don't have the time, they don't have the expertise.

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 2>They might have some expertise in financial management, but not

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the agronomics of it or in the

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 2>strategic or historical site. So my job as an outsider

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 2>was easy because I didn't you know, I would go

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 2>in for a day or two for set fee. If

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>they didn't like what I had to say, I don't care.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get paid anyway. So it's I had

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 2>more latitude to say what I needed to say rather

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>than someone who was a full time employee who was

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to get his kids through college and needed his job.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>So that gave me a tremendous freedom and I and

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 2>then you begin to build allies with the resources that

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 2>you have, and all of a sudden, the superintendent feels like, boy,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>nice to be able to talk to someone about this

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing because they know these things and they've

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 2>got their network of some people. But that network is

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>getting has been steadily getting bigger. So and again the

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 2>travel the band and Dunes kind of experienced the television

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 2>exposure of the websites that golf club, Atlas and fried

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Egg and that kind of conversational stream has just been

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>absolutely crucial. I'm not pandering here those names. Your names

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 2>come up all the time when I'm meeting with clubs

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>about things that they've seen. They did not have those

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 2>resources thirty years ago, so I think the social media

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>component of it has also created a reassurance that they're

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>on the right track.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf is brought to you by

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the USGA Green Section. One of the biggest trends in

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>golf course maintenance is data collection, and no management system

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>today makes collecting data easier than Deacon from the USGA

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Green Section. Data collection tools like the GS three ball

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and the new USGA Moisture meter seamlessly connect and instantly

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>upload data. In the Deacon app. You can use the

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>data to make decisions to manage inputs and resources more efficiently,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to provide consistent playing conditions, improved playability, and increased golfer satisfaction.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>With the latest upgrade to Deacon, you get enhanced navigation,

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>robust reporting tools, and decreased testing time. Measure what matters.

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Get your Deacon tools bundled today at gsshop dot USGA

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>dot org. Again, that's gsshop dot USGA dot org. All right,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the episode. In any case, I

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get to some of the specific topics that

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are often covered in discussions of tree management programs. As

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned a couple of times, Gil Hants has kind

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of his taxonomy where he talks about agronomic benefits, strategic

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or playability concerns, he talks about esthetics, he talks about safety,

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the history of the site, and maybe

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>missing a couple here and there, maybe budgetary concerns factor

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>into this as well. So I'd like to touch on

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those. I think at this point most people

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast understand the basic agronomic calculus here.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have light, if you have air circulation, you

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to have healthier turf with less intervention necessary from

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground staff. So why don't we talk about this

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ecology. Trees are obviously great assets to

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the environment, and so there is a sort of, in

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, simplistic, but a very common and common sensical

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>argument that cutting down trees is bad for the environment.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.959
<v Speaker 1>So why are we doing it at golf courses. What

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would be your response to that line of thinking when

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to tree management at golf courses. What are

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the ecological implications? How do you think all that through?

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so here I'm going to differ a little bit

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 2>with common currency. I don't think the Oakmont conversation is

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>actually all that helpful. I think it's paralyzing part because

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the numbers that I've seen are crazy. People talk about

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand trees coming out, nothing like that.

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not the usual. Oakmont is a kind of outlier

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to well tree it's not a representative example. Really.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Well two things. First of all, that number is completely irresponsible,

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So the actual number is far fewer, and at most places,

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 2>what you're talking about is about two to three percent

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of the tree stock that's actually there. I just finished

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm working with a landscape architect. We're teamed up in

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the Campanelli. We're doing the restoration of Shuttle Metal Country Club,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 2>which is Willie Park Junior's first US golf course, which

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>is why I went to Hunter Compe to see it.

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>And we've done a tree management plan and now we're

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 2>getting criticized because we didn't do enough, and I can't

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>exactly count the number, but roughly of about three or

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>four thousand trees on that site, we're looking at one

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty and they're going to make a big

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>difference because they're central, but the periphery the woods. So

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the first thing is that the Oakmont conversation

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>makes it look like your tree you're removing all trees,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>whereas at most clubs. Now it varies, but in most

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>clubs you're talking about a very marginal tweaking of the

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>tree stock to open up views, to open up areas.

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'm I don't think it's helpful to talk about

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 2>wholesale removal, and so the percentages that you're talking about

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>are very small. The other thing is, while trees have

0:32:55.000 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>an important ecology in terms of habitat, the cost agronomically

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>and chemically of having them in areas where you're trying

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to grow turf grass produces reliance upon chemistry that infiltrates

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 2>or has an impact on the environment in terms of

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the watershed. So you're trying to limit and remove and

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>reduce the chemical reliance. The other thing is, of course

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be very mindful of certain special habitats

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>of nesting sites of rare birds or nesting areas for

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 2>eagles and egrets and so and habit water and watershed areas.

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>So you're respecting a lot of the environmental issues. What

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with is essentially the marginal intrusion of trees

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.479
<v Speaker 2>upon central lines of play, So the percentages are very small.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is that in many cases what you're doing,

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I've seen lots of times where you propose an area

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>where you're basically culling some of the trees that are

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 2>impinging upon the growth patterns and the canopies of the

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>large mature trees. And so what you're trying to do

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 2>is essentially allow the more mature specimens to thrive because

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>right now they're constricted either at the root there's root girdling,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>or there's a constrict of habit of the canopies. So

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of helping open up the area for more

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 2>air movement than sunlight so that these trees can thrive.

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 2>And so that's a big component of it as well.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And often the native trees as well. Right if you

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of non native trees surrounding an original

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>indigenous tree, and you're remove the non natives around it,

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the original native tree might be

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in a place to thrive.

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So all of those are components of the responsible

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 2>tree management. Okay, and that's why I don't the olkmont

0:34:56.320 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 2>one is scarce people off. Rightly, that's not what's usually intended. Now,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 2>there are cases where it might be appropriate to do that,

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>but and but that's an extreme exception.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some playability or strategic issues. Again. I

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a broad understanding that tree removal on classic

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>golf courses that were designed to use with an angles

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>restores those with an angles. If you have a dog

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>leg hole to the right and you put in trees

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on the inside of that dog leg, the risk reward

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>equation of trying to cut the dog leg is no

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>longer there. That's a basic example. You remove the trees,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you get back some options and some strategic complexity. That's appealing. Again,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think most people understand that at this point.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Something that's interesting though to me is that there is

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>another brand of this discussion that has to do with

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>how golf courses are played by elite players. Now, if

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you take away trees from a golf course. Then elite

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>players are especially now with the equipment that they use

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and the way that they hit the ball, are going

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to feast on most of those golf courses. If you

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>don't constrict their line of play in some way or another,

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be tough for the golf course

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to defend itself. And I think a lot of people

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>looked at Roy McElroy in the fourth round at the

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Masters and looked at his The most memorable shots that

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he hit that day one on the seventh hole where

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he kind of had to hit this miraculous shot around

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the trees to get to the green, and then of

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>course on the fifteenth hole, where he had to shape

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a I don't even think it was a long iron.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you hit a seven hour, but you know

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing with two and thirty yards or whatever it was.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And but that shot only existed because those trees were there. Now,

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the original design of Augusta National, you would have

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seen a couple of trees in approximately that position in

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth fairway, but most of the fifteenth fairway would

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have been way more open, of course, and then those

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trees on the seventh hole that he played around wouldn't

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have been there initially. So I think people looked at

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>those shots and said, well, trees have to be good

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for strategy, at least for elite players because or at

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>least for the interest of the golf tournament. They have

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to be good because if they weren't there, then we

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have gotten those shots. So I wonder how you

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>balance in your thinking opening up strategic lines of play

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>versus retaining some challenger the opportunity for spectacular recovery from

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>great players.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So the first thing I would tell you is that

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the trees you're talking about that were influential, particularly on fifteenth,

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a couple of trees somewhere the elite player hits

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 2>the ball in the air. So if you're if your

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 2>if your dominant obstacle is trying to create a hazard

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that an elite player has to deal with, the last

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 2>thing you want to do is create a sixty foot

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>high wall that they're going to hit over it anyway.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 2>If you have a big corner dog leg and it's

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 2>two forty to carry, they'll launch it over there anyway.

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 2>Whereas you're actually punishing the high handicapper or the mid

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>handicapper much more because they can't hit it that high.

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 2>They're chipping out all the time. So the first thing

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 2>is if trees are your dominant form, if they're the

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 2>dominant form of a hazard for creating interest, you're actually

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>counterproductive by using trees in that way. The second thing is,

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think it's a helpful guide to use

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a tournament course as your guide for your every day

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 2>golf course because that event takes place once a year.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 2>So I you know, how should it with this? At

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 2>most clubs, one percent of play, no more than that

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 2>takes place from the back teem. So if you're designing

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a golf course for the back te player in some

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 2>big event, you've got your priorities wrong and you're going

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to go bankrop. So I like to think primarily of

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 2>how is this going to play for the fee paying

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 2>everyday golfer, and then where you can you put these

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 2>elements in that for an event or for an elite player.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>But the most effective way to defeat an elite player

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>is not in the air. It's on the ground. Because golf,

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my little mantra took me years to develop. This is

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>that golf course architecture is what happens when the ball

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 2>hits the ground. It's going to kick some way at

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 2>oakmand it's going to get eaten up in the rough.

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 2>It's going to kind of get some weird bounce that

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you might think is unfair. But by opening up contour,

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you create uncertainty. Whereas the elite player can pretty much

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>dominate aerial space. They know where it's going. They have

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a launch monitor that every shot they're registering now, they

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>know the spin rate, they know exactly how far it's

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 2>going within one or two yards on irons. So if

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you focus on the aerial component to defeat a player,

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you're misguided and you're actually punishing the higher handicapper.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 2>The second thing is that the ground contour is what

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is most determinative. And finally, the hardest thing for a

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 2>golf for a good golfer to do is to create

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 2>a target when you get I'll put it this way.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>My favorite example seventeenth augusta National. They lost the part

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>for they lost the Eisenhower Tree, which is about two

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 2>to ten down the left side, which hung out over

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the fairway, and everybody said, oh my god, they're going

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to eat up the golf course. It's going to change it.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So what happened. Average scoring didn't change, but the range

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of scores changed so that you had more birdies and

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 2>more bogies because previously, with that Eisenhower tree, you either

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 2>hit a little light cut or you took a three.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Elite players hit three, which because they're desperately trying to

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 2>hit the fairway. That tree is gone. The target area

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 2>is larger, more of them hitting drivers. Some of them

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 2>land in the adjacent in the adjoining I think seventh hole,

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>others bail out to the right. So the actual impact

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 2>on scoring was more diverse scoring. Although the average didn't change,

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the diversity of the scoring did. So. Gill showed Gil

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Hands showed me this at the TPC Boston. Once he

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 2>showed me the data for the ninth hole, the par

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 2>four doug let. He said, the wider they opened it

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and the more room there was, by definition, the fairway

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 2>was a smaller percentage of the available space you were

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 2>looking at. The more difficult or the more the less

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 2>people a fair way that the ball wandered because they

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 2>weren't able to focus, so they felt that they had

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 2>more freedom. It was more difficult for them, so you're

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 2>actually for the elite player, and they are in a

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 2>completely different world. We're not talking about three four handicappers here.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about plus six's and plus sevens who know

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>exactly within one or two yards where their shots are going,

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and for them, the trees are less of an obstacle

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 2>than the ground contours that they're dealing with.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think, especially if it's firm, what elite players

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>really don't like is that if they don't know what's

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>happening once the ball lands. But I think you know

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying about the effect on elite players versus

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>regular players of trees is really important to point out

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>because that's an argument that many Golden Age architects made

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about trees. To them, trees were not a desirable hazard

0:42:55.520 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to use constantly because they are a relatively inequitable hazard,

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as in, they affect regular players more than they affect

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really good players. And the goal, the goal that a

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of Golden Age architects had was to figure out

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>how to design courses that were fun to play, that

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 1>were playable for regular players but still challenging for elite players.

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So you tried to find elements that were hard for

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>elite players to navigate, but not, you know, necessarily preventative

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to a good time for regular players. And trees are

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty much exactly the opposite of that because.

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 2>They dictate a line of play. As soon as you

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 2>dictate a line of play, you take away the strategic flexibility.

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Just as it's a whole other conversation if you want

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to make a green interesting, take away the bunkers, because

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 2>then the elite player has to think. As soon as

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 2>they start thinking, they're in trouble, whereas myself mid handicapper

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 2>would much prefer chipping or putting on short grass. Now

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 2>that's a separate conversation, but to the extent that trees

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 2>dictate a line of play. Having said that, tilling Has

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 2>has a wonderful drawing that he provides in one of

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 2>his articles from the twenties early twenties, and he says,

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a proper way to do a tree clearing. He

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 2>shows a straight line with trees on each edge, you know,

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and he says that's not going to create any interest.

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 2>He says, show that there's a slice opportunity where you

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 2>open up the tree line on the right, there's a

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 2>deeper one on the left. Have some variety in the

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 2>tree line to conform to the way shots roll, so

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that you can recover. It was the art of recovery.

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's why if the trees are scattered, not dense forest,

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 2>but if they're scattered light. You know, you think about

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Mickelson's famous shot on the thirteenth of Augusta, the six

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 2>iron he hit to the green on the Saturday and

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the Masters that he won. He didn't make the putt,

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 2>but it was a fantastic escape. It's only possible because

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 2>there's room and a possibility. The most boring shot in

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the world is getting down with forearn and hitting it

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 2>out sideways. That's not strategy, that's not a shot, the

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to create an escape, and so a lot of

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 2>that has to do with the density of trees. You know.

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 2>The right side of eleven at Augusta National, to me

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 2>is a nightmare because there's a solid wall that they

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 2>planted which obstructs, by the way, the view of spectators,

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 2>and yet they left enough of an alleyway to the

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>right of it. Tiger Woods always seemed to bail out

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:33.919
<v Speaker 2>there and then hit a shot. That is such an

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 2>ill thought out way to go about the tree on

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 2>fifteen on the left, brilliant thinning out the tree so

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that you have the opportunity to play that is appropriate.

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So those are the elements that also go into these

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of things.

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Scattered trees can be a very compelling hazard. And you know,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you I know, there's a quote that everybody

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to take from Alistair McKenzie that talks about how

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>these straight lines of tree down every side of the

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:05.919
<v Speaker 1>fairway or are not desirable. But mackenzie goes on to say,

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in a less quoted passage, well if you have scattered trees,

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>if you have kind of these isolated little copses and

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>things like that, those can be really really interesting. And

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's it's it's very important to introduce

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>nuance to this discussion. It's not about clear cutting versus forest.

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>There's an in between a state for a lot of

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>golf courses that can be the ideal solution. All right. Finally,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>here I'd like to touch on aesthetics. This is such

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting topic to me because the again there's a

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>common sensical argument here that seems persuasive at first, but

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>but might not be after further analysis. Many people might

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>say trees are beautiful, therefore taking them down necessarily makes

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a golf course less beautiful. How do you go about

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>responding to that.

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the trees are not the golf course. So the

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.479
<v Speaker 2>really beautiful part part of being on a golf course

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>is scanning the horizon line. Your eye moves left to right,

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, as the evidence of this to

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I love giving this example. I've done this all the

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 2>time in lectures. When you have newscasters, you got the older,

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 2>scruffy guy on the left and the beautiful young woman

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>on the right. Your eye is always moving this way.

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 2>In horror films, your eye is moving left to right,

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 2>so the knife always comes in from the right. And Psycho,

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 2>when Janet Ye gets killed in the shower, she's coming

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 2>in from the left and the knife's coming in from

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the right. And the impact of your eye moving is

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 2>part of the esthetic experience. That these these are actually

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 2>true physiological components of the human body. The beauty of

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 2>a golf course is when you can scan the horizon line.

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 2>So that Dunlop White talks about raising the canopy, and he's.

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Lop White, the great longtime green chairman at Old Town Club.

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, And He wrote about this a long time ago,

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>about raising the canopy so you don't need to remove trees,

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 2>but you can trim up the canopy so that you

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>can see the horizon line and get a feel for

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 2>how the land moves. A solid wall. You go to

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 2>northern Minnesota and look at a solid wall of pine trees.

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing particularly beautiful about that. What's great is when

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you can when you're in the woods, then you see

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the sunlight and the clouds and the color of the

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 2>sky through that. So that's the beauty of it. But

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 2>an undifferentiated woodland that doesn't have the character so that

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you want to thin it out, open it up, raise

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the canopy being able to move this way, that's the

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 2>beautiful part. And also the occasional view behind where you have,

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 2>say an infinity edge, so you have this dramatic you

0:48:57.800 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 2>know you're in North Carolina in the mountains and you

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 2>have a and behind it is just miles of sky

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 2>or ocean. I think about the at Sebonic, the fifteenth

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 2>hole of the par five, where they gradually lifted the

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>canopy behind so that you now have this beautiful vista

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 2>of a great pliconic bay behind the green that they

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't have until they thinned that out. So what you're

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to do is use the landscape features as a

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 2>canvas and not simply impose this vertical structure upon it,

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 2>because that doesn't have any kind of distinctive, site specific

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 2>esthetic to it. So a lot of it depends on

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 2>what you're looking at and what's there and what you're hiding.

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 2>But exposing that and allowing golfers to see that from

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 2>various vantage points, that to me is where the beauty

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and the variety of a golf course come out. It's

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the most varied canvas of any sports field. The only

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 2>regulation for the esthetic is or the structure is that

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 2>the whole you're playing to is four and a quarter

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 2>inches across. Everything else varies. You might as well utilize

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that opportunity to experience the landform and the sensibility of

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>where you are as part of that. And if you

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 2>rely upon trees to create the curtain, you know, you

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 2>might as well be in a in a darkened room

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for all that matters. You lose the sense of place

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and of what's special about the golf course.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what you're talking about right now, the term

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of art for it is view shed, which is and

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that is the idea that you can you can see

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>across a landscape or have a long view from from

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple different vantage points, and that is that is beautiful.

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing is that there's there are different kinds

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>of beauty. The beauty of an individual tree is undeniable.

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But but but certainly when you're on a golf course,

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability to see, to have that view shed is

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a power esthetic experience. And I think that's that's probably

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the factor that makes a lot of club members who

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>might initially oppose a tree program eventually endorse it once

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>they discover the wonders of the view shed. Then then

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all over. Then they're suggesting more trees that can

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be taken out because they have that kind of emotional

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>experience of being able to see across.

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 2>The views you have, they're either exterior or interior. They're

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>either you know, whistling straight or looking at the lake

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 2>or at aronomank. You're looking across the beauty of that

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 2>slope and the holds behind it, so that you have

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to sort of decide what it is you're revealing. But

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 2>it can be one or two or both that's available

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, No, that's the great point. I was going to

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.879
<v Speaker 1>add that there's a there's an interesting issue also of

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>scale here where, And I just saw an example this

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:58.439
<v Speaker 1>this morning. We're recording this the week of the US Open,

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and this morning Might Clay and the great Australian player

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and architect, just posted a before and after photo of

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the thirteenth hole at the Addington in England. And there's

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the before photo has the tree very closely

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>enclosed by has the hole very closely enclosed by trees.

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the second photos not every tree has been removed,

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>but it has been opened up. And to me, in

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the second photo, the land looks way bigger. It looks

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger in scale, and part of the reason for that

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the trees are no longer overwhelming the scale

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of the land. The land as all of a sudden

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the bigger thing, or is at least competing with the

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>scale of the trees, and so all of a sudden

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the golf hole doesn't look dinky anymore. It looks more

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:57.399
<v Speaker 1>grand by a lot. And that's another effect of tree

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>removal that has that I think is it's something it's

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand unless you have actual on the ground

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>experience of that before and after.

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yeah, yeah. I always I have this secret theory

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 2>that at country clubs people started, they didn't really want

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 2>to see their business partners, they didn't want to see

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 2>who else was sleeping with the you know, their spouses.

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to just have this little isolated thing because

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 2>they really were kind of grumpy about stuff, and they

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 2>got so used to this narrow view that they forgot

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 2>where they were. And it's it's just now we're allowing

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 2>them in this grander view. I think of Inwood Country

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Club on Long Island. There's just a fantastic example. When

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 2>I grew up there caddying, it was tree lined and

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 2>you had no idea of downtown Manhattan, you had no

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 2>idea of the marshland, you had no idea of the

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>transition of the terrain through those landforms. And now it's

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 2>the vital part of the golf course experience. It's just

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 2>completely changes your sense of what you're doing while you're

0:53:57.360 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 2>playing golf.

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So looking towards the few sure here, do you think

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a sense out there that that that

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>tree management has won and that maybe even we've gone

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too far. And that in some courses

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we've removed too many trees. Where where do you come

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>down on that? Do you think there is still a

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>significant amount of work to be done, both both culturally

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and practically at golf courses toward the goal of tree management,

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that that there's a moment here

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when we can start to step back and say, how

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can we restore some trees to some of these landscapes

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that that might be calling out for them. Where do

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you land on that or is it just a club

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>by club thing?

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Well? I am sensitive to the view. I know a

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 2>number of architects have sort of tried to sit this

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>one out and think, well, this is just a fad.

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 2>This is like you know, island greens, or railroad ties

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 2>or or drivable four parts. And I don't think it's

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 2>that way, because I think the agronomic benefits, the management benefits,

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and the esthetic beauty that results is so transformative and

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 2>so unique to the nature of the golf as a

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 2>sports field that I think we're more or less this

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 2>is where we are going to be, and then it's

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a matter of refining that. I do think that a

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:31.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of attention needs to be paid to how the

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 2>site evolved on a case by case basis. I do

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's important. And again I go back to what

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Gill says. I was there when he was making a

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:43.839
<v Speaker 2>pitch to do the restoration of Worcester Country Club, where

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I just was. Last week they had the centenary of

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the twenty five US Open and this is back a

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 2>few years ago, and they said are They asked Gill,

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of all people, are you an expert in what Donald

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Ross did? He says, I'm going to be an expert

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 2>in what Donald Ross did to Worcester Country Club. And

0:56:01.800 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 2>it was the perfect answer. And so that's what architects

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 2>need to do. That's why I resist the notion of

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a certain expertise that you're so used to what so

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and so did that you know what he did. Everywhere

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 2>That formula didn't play very well. I think the architects

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 2>now who have come up either through the ranks or

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 2>who have matured from the big companies and gone off

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 2>on their own, I think a lot of them are

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 2>much more attentive to the specifics of that site, that history,

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that evolution, and on a case by case basis. Having

0:56:41.440 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 2>said that, I do see there's a need for tree

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 2>replacement of existing trees. There's a need for tree planning

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and tree management really is a sustained commitment, not just

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 2>about removal. It's not just a euphemism for removal. It

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 2>requires a really comprehensive plan, you know, attention to the

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:05.879
<v Speaker 2>health and safety of the mature trees, including the elm

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 2>trees that are still there. So I do think it

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 2>requires a little bit more, a lot more than the

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 2>notion of tree removal. It's planning what the landscape is

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.120
<v Speaker 2>going to look like. You know. Frederick Lahlmsted this when

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 2>he built Central Park, and all of his planning was

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 2>about anticipating thirty forty years of how that site would evolve,

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 2>not just what it's going to be today. So that

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:35.400
<v Speaker 2>requires considerable technical training and planning.

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, Brad, thank you for coming on the podcast.

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Always want to talk to you.

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Pleasure.

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf was produced by Will Balsam.

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Will. If you've been enjoying Designing Golf so far,

0:57:56.880 --> 0:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>then leave us a rating and review wherever you might

0:57:59.920 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be listening to us, whether that's Spotify or Apple Podcasts,

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and also make sure to check out Frida Egg Golf Club.

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Frida Egg dot com slash membership to

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 1>see everything that you get with your membership to Frida

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Egg Golf Club. But one of those benefits is exclusive content.

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This includes updates on golf architecture news, so things that

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are happening in the world of golf architecture, you will

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be among the first to know what's happening there. And

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>also weekly course profiles. These are in depth explorations of

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:39.000
<v Speaker 1>particular golf courses with beautiful imagery shot by our team,

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as some very well thought through words about

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the designs of great golf courses. So that's part of

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what you get at Frida Egg Golf Club. We're building

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a really fun community in there. I'm getting a lot

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of value out of it, so I would like you

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to join us. Thank you for listening, and we'll be

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>back again soon with another episode in the back