WEBVTT - The Ashen Light

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>My welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And today we're going to be exploring a ghost light

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of astronomy. So in the past we've done episodes about

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>things like the Will of the Whisp, Right, remember that one,

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert that was Strange Lights in the Wood. Yeah, that

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of fun. I really enjoyed it. And

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing about things like the Will of the Wisp

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is you have so many sightings of it over the years.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>People claim they see a light over the marsh or

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a light in the swamp or something like that. Um

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>that you have to assume it's not just people making

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. Somebody at some point really did see something.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>But obviously we don't think it's a ghost or a

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>spirit or a malevolent blacksmith who died in the swamp

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and now wants to lead people off of cliffs and

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to quicksand uh, those stories are pretty great, but you

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have to assume something is there, right, well, something is

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>there that the woods. The woods are filled with various

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>some things. I always come back to the star jelly example, right, Uh,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>the the idea that there's a shooting star and someone says, hey,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a meteorite out there in the woods.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go find it. And then they start

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>going out and they start looking around, poking around in

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a place that they have passing familiarity with but have

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>no real expertise. And then as they're poking around, they

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>find something strange to them, some sort of gooey substance,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's probably, I mean, it certainly is some

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of natural occurring is you know, maybe it's Yeah,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of oozy stuff in the woods if

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you poke around enough, and that's what they find. But

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>then they think this is the thing, this is the

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>goo that fell from the sky, and and so I

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think there there's there's certainly a case to be made.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I imagine. I discussed this in the Will of the

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Whisp episode, and we both discussed this that we noticed something,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we have no immediate explanation for it. But then if

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we have some sort of predominant theory to tie into it,

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or some bit of a myth or folklore, then it

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can take on a life of its own. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>But then with a lot of this stuff, you do

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>actually have to wonder about it in ways that you

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>you feel disinclined to, because, like with the Will of

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Whisp, there are so many reports over the years,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, people had to be seeing some kind

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of light. We don't know what it was. We think

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a materialistic explanation for it, but we don't

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>know what it was, but there must have been something.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Then again, how often are people seeing Will of the

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Whisp today? What where did all the sightings go? Yeah,

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a strange question. If people really were

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing something, how come they don't seem to be seeing

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it with nearly the same frequency anymore? And if you're

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're intrigued by that question, you should check out

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>our Will of the Whisp episode. Will include a link

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to it on the landing page for this episode is

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to your Mind dot Com. Today we want to

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>focus on a totally different type of ghost light, one

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of the most interesting elusive lights in the history of science.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is not something that you would see in

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Mars shore. This fickle, unexplained light in the swamp.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a fickle, unexplained light that astronomers have claimed

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to see through the vast reaches of outer space on

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the surface of another planet. Now, to be clear, we're

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not talking about seeing it, just gazing up into the

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>sky and seeing it. We're talking about using a telescope, right,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because obviously planets other than I don't know if you

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>call the Moon a planet, things out there other than

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the Moon and the Sun resolved to a kind of

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>point like light source for the naked eye, right. And

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and of course we're all familiar with the various strange

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lights one can observe in the sky. Uh, and then

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>attribute to any number of of natural or appearing normal

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or causes. Yeah, we're not talking about UFOs or anything

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. We're gonna be looking at a planet in

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system. So I want to start off this

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mystery hunt by introducing you to a seventeenth century Italian astronomer,

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and his name was Giovanni Batista Riccioli. He lived fIF

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen seventy one. And Riccioli was a Catholic priest

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and an astronomer working in the generation after Galileo. So

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a great time of innovation and progress in astronomy. Right,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So you've had Galileo's strong case made for the Copernican cosmology, right,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and you've had Galileo improving telescope optics and and so

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the people working at this time to appear into the

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>night sky had a lot of new ideas and a

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of new technology available to them, better able to

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>see and model observable universe exactly. Riccioli was also a

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>very important lunar astronomer, and he made detailed maps of

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the Earth facing side of our moon. As we know,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the Moon is tidally locked with planet Earth, so we

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>always see the same side of the Moon, and that

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>side has a bunch of topographical features like seas and craters,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of the names of the features

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of the Moon come from Riccioli's original nomenclature,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Sea of Tranquility and so forth. But on

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>January nine three, richili was examining the planet Venus through

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a telescope when it was in its crescent phase. So

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for Venus to be in a

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>crescent phase. The easiest point of comparison for this would

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be our moon, right, which goes through phases of its own.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got full moon, give us crescent new moon. Uh.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course the moon orbits around the Earth, and

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>as it does, it's always day on the side of

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the moon facing the Sun and night on the side

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of the moon facing away from the Sun. And so

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the type of moon we see depends on how much

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day versus night side of the moon we

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>see facing the Earth. So when the moon is between

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the Earth and the Sun, we're looking at the dark

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>nighttime side of the moon, and we get a new moon.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And when the moon is on the opposite side of

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the Earth from the Sun, we're seeing the bright daytime

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>side of the moon, so we get a full moon.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We're always looking at the same side of the moon,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but it but sometimes it's day, sometimes it's night on

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that side that we can see. Uh. And then of

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>course in between those phases there there are crescents and

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. So a crescent moon happens when the

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>half of the moon facing us contains mostly the moon's

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>night side and then a little sliver of the lid

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up day side. Now, of course, Venus isn't orbiting Earth, right,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so the timing of these phases is somewhat different, but

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the same basic principles apply Venus orbits the Sun on

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a different schedule than we do. So when Venus is visible,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the side facing Us is mostly the bright daytime

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>side which reflects a lot of sunlight and looks very

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>bright in the sky. And other times when Venus comes

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of between the Earth and the Sun. As you

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>can imagine if you picture this, the Venus orbits inside

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's orbit, so it sort of comes between the

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Earth and the Sun. The side facing Us is mostly

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or entirely the darkened night time side of Venus that's

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>facing away from the Sun. And Robert, I bet you've

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>heard about this before. But of course the phases of

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Venus play a role in the history of establishing how

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Solar system works, right like this was a point

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of contention for Galileo and and his critics during during

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the time he was alive. Yeah, I mean, this is this,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this all it makes for a major advancement just celestial mechanics,

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just understanding how the planets in our Solar system are

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>moving exactly because the first time we actually know of

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that the phases of Venus that seeing it as so

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of more darkened or more or more bright and

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>more daytime side. Uh. The first time these phases were

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>observed through a telescope and described was by Galileo, and

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this was in the early sixteen hundreds, and at the

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>time the phases of Venus were more than a curiosity.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>They were a kind of brutal line of evidence against

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ptolemaic geocentric model of the universe. And the reason

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for this is that Galileo showed with the telescope you

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>could look at Venus and that it had phases just

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like our moon. But he observed the unlike our moon,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Venus had a full phase when it was roughly in

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the same direction in the sky as the Sun. So

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think about that. You're looking toward Venus and it's in

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the same direction as the Sun, but the

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>side we can see of it is all lit up

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and bright. The Moon's never like that. When the moon's

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction as the Sun, the side of

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it we can see as dark. So if all of

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the planets in the Sun went around the Earth, how

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>would it be possible for Venus to appear full to us,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lit up in daytime side when it's in the same

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>direction as the Sun. It couldn't were forced to to

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>reevaluate the entire structure of our our solar system. Exactly. Yeah,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So what this showed was that Venus, because it showed

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a full phase at the same time that it was

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction as the Sun, it couldn't be

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>between the Earth and the Sun. It had to be

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of the Sun from Us, which

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>meant that Venus was not orbiting Earth, it was opening

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. And so Galileo first published this argument in

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>his sixteen thirteen Letters on Sun Spots, which was a

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of a series of letters that he turned into

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a pamphlet, and which turned out to be the first

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>place Galileo actually officially endorsed the Copernican model of the

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>solar system, in which the planets go around the Sun

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of everything going around the Earth. And of course

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we all know that this was kind of a this

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was rather a controversial theory at the time. It it

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was not well received by by some powerful individuals. Yeah, exactly.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean this put Galileo on course to have extreme

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>conflicts with both the scientific and religious hierarchies of the day. Uh. People,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>people forget that it wasn't just the church that was

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>persecuting Galileo. I mean a lot of his scientific colleagues,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I just thought he was wrong for reasoning, you know,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>for reasons of their own. Yeah, and there were a

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that were very invested in the previous model.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>He's really changed everything, whether you were looking up at

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the stars with a with a more of a scientific

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>mindset or or a purely religious one exactly. But anyway,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so when an astronomer looks at Venus in its crescent phase,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing mostly the night side of Venus, right, and

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so you've got this sliver of daytime that's separated by

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what's known as the terminator line. The terminator line is

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the boundary between the night side and the day side

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of a planet. And if you've never

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>seen this, it can be very haunting, Like if you

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>view the terminator line on Earth from the International Space Station.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>There are videos of this you can look up online

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>where the station is rapidly orbiting the Earth. You see

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the ground beneath passing along and it's the daytime side

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the planet and suddenly this curtain of dark just

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>sweeps over the face of the planet. Uh. It's it's

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of terrifying to see actually but also very beautiful.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's worth looking up alright. So so we're looking

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>up at the night side of Venus here gazing into

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the dark, just into the dark on another planet, right,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>What is the curious incident of the Venus in the

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>night So on that j Your evening sixteen forty three,

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Richie Ali's looking at Venus through his telescope in this

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>crescent phase where there's a small crescent limb of light

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's the terminator line, and most of Venus should

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>be dark. The crescent portion was at roughly thirty percent

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of the planet when when Richieli was looking at it. Now,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Venus in a crescent phase like this,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the nighttime side of the planet is supposed to be

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>completely invisible. It's so dark compared to the brightly lit

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>up crescent of the daytime side that you shouldn't be

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>able to see it at all. The daytime sliver of

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the planet should be like a bright melanrind floating in

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>space by itself with nothing else there. But when Richili

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at it that January evening in sixty three, something

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was not right. Instead of a bright crescent and an

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>invisible nighttime side, Richie Eli believed he saw something startling,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a very faint glow coming from the dark side of Venus.

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The side of Venus where it was currently night time

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be ever so faintly shining gray light into space.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And Richie Eli gave this glow a name. He called

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it the ashen Light of Venus. Spooky. Huh, yeah, it

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>has it has it certainly has an anonymous ring to it. Yeah,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's It's funny. How if you just give something a

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>really good name, it'll end up getting a lot more

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>attention than something that doesn't have a good name. Uh

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And and I think that's probably the case here. The

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>ashen light, I think maybe gets more attention from amateur

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>astronomers trying to find it and stuff like that than

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a similar observation would be if it was just called

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>something very mundane. It sounds like a like like a

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>new metal album from from the early two thousands, so

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>people were like, yeah, let's look for that ashen light.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure there is a is a metal band

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>called Ash and Light. You just know it happens, right,

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like there's nothing left. The metal bands have scoured

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the earth. It's like going through a post apocalyptic wasteland

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has been picked clean of every bit of canned food

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and ammunition and everything you think you might want. If

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an idea or an ordering of words that sounds cool,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it has been scavenged by a metal band in Ohio somewhere.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I have a feeling that before we

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>make it through this this episode will have found something

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>that some fledgling metal band can latch onto and embraces

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>their name. But anyway, the Action Light itself. So Ever,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>since Riccioli's original sighting, other astronomers, both professional and amateur,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>have been looking for the Action Light, and a lot

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have claimed to see it, but many others have looked

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>when it should be visible and found nothing. So this

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>controversy exists. Does the Action Light really exist? And if

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it does exist, what is it? What is making the

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>night time side of Venus glow? On that note, we're

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break, and when we come

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>back we will discuss subsequent sightings or claims of sightings

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Action Light and some ideas about just what

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be. Alright, we're back. So we've been discussing

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Giovanni Batista Riccioli's original sighting of what he thought was

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the action light on the night side of Venus in

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty three, and here's how he described it. So he said,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be a dull, faint glow, some sort

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of gray, somewhat like earth shine on the dark side

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the moon. Now what is earth shine. That's when

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the moon is in a crescent phase, meaning most of

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the moon's sunlit day side is facing away from Earth

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and most of the moon's darkened night side is facing

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>towards Earth, and light from the Earth shines on the

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>night time side of the Moon to produce a soft, gray,

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>glowing reflection. But the action light is allegedly even fainter

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>than the earth shine on the moon. Because we know

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the earth shine on the moon exists, we've got evidence

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of that that the action light is still controversial. So

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got all these claims of sighting this of this

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dull brownish or copper or gray light on the other

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>side of Venus. Now where do some of these sightings

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>come from? One of them was by William Durham in

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fourteen, so that was apparently the next sighting after

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>richie Oli. Uh seventeen fourteen, the English natural philosopher William

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Durham was observing Venus through a telescope and he called

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the light a dull, rusty color. Then you had actually

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a big name in the history of astronomy, the German

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>born British astronomer Sir William Herschel. Oh yeah, yeah, nature

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>name there. So he lives seventeen thirty eight to eighteen

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. And Herschel was the discoverer of Uranus in

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighty one, which was extremely significant because I think

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't really It's got a mythological name,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>right like the other planet. So a lot of times

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think people assume that Uranus was known about by

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who believed in the god Uranus or Uranus

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like I guess, however you say it, both both are correct,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just once more funny solistic with Uranus. But yeah, the

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Uranus was actually discovered in sev one. It was. This

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was extremely significant because it was the first discovery of

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a new Solar System planet since ancient times. The ancients

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>had been able even before telescopes, to see planets like

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Jupiter with the naked eye, so to be clear at

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this point, we've we've already established there's not just one

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>individual who saw it, and it's not just uh, and

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and Also we're talking about like noted astronomers

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of of their day here, not near amateurs who just

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>happened to pick up a telescope and and gaze hopefully

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>up at Venus to see what they could see. No,

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>these were respected astronomers and observers of the sky. These

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>are people who we can talk about this more in

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But there are people who you wouldn't expect

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to be hoaxing. You know. It's not like somebody is

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I saw a willow,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the whisp and the swamp. Yeah it was great. But

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>then to be clear too, whereas the willow will of

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the whisp already has like supernatural connotations to it, this

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was more of a purely scientific observation without getting into

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the possible reasons that could be attached to it. Uh,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>just gazing at another planetary body and and and seeing

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.239
<v Speaker 1>some sort of illumination or seeing just anything, any kind

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of phenomena that they could not be easily explained. I mean,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of part for the course of gazing up

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at other planets. I mean, I would be shocked if

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>over the years, somebody at some point didn't claim that

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the ashen light was caused by I don't know, the

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>fires of hell burning on the surface of Venus where

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all the damned and heretics went. I mean, just think

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of Herschel for example, here like which is the crazier thing,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Which is the bigger moment in his life? Yeah, I

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>saw some of this light that this other guy was

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I saw it on on the dark side

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of Venus, versus I've discovered a new planet. Yeah, he

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>don't planet exactly. That's a good point. He didn't need

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be like a tension seeking or anything. There's no

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>reason really for Herschel to claim to see this without

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>actually seeing it, though of course he could be mistaken

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>about seeing right, And when we're discussing it in hindsight,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the action light is more of a mystery, yeah, versus

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the the the awe that would have been associated with

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>discovering a new planet. Because, like you say, we've known

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of of Uranus our entire lives. It's just it's one

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of the planets to memorize, and we often fall into

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the traffic, just thinking that humans have known about it

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for ages. Yeah, exactly. Uh so. Another observer in the

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century Thomas William Webb in eighteen seventy eight. He

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was a British astronomer. He was a reverend, and he

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>claimed he saw the light in eighteen seventy eight on

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>January thirty one, with a two hundred and thirty eight

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>millimeter reflector, so you know, mirror based telescope. And he

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>writes quote on January thirty feet after having many times

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>looked for it in Vain in former years, I saw

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it without specially thinking about it, with powers of about

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>ninety and two twelve on my nine point three at

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>inch or two hundred two hundred and thirty eight millimeter mirror,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out at intervals rather paler and browner than the

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>twilight sky, and equally visible when the bright crescent was

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>hidden by a field bar. Now, this field bar, or

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes called an occulting bar, would be a device that

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially blocks something bright so that you can see dimmer

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>things better. In this case, it would block out the

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>crescent on Venus, because that's the daytime side is very bright,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and that would allow you to see whether there's something

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>visible on the nighttime side by eliminating the glare. And

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I also want to point out for anyone who lacked

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>unto the fact that this guy was a reverend um

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a number of these sort of gentlemen scientists of the

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Uh, we're also religious individuals as well,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's not really that uncommon. Oh yeah, Especially in

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the history of astronomy, you see tons of astronomers who

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>were affiliated with, for example, the Catholic Church, or with

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the Church of England or something like that. Another astronomer

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>named C. V. Zinger of Prague said he observed the

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>ghost slide of Venus in January eight eighty three and

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that the disc of the planet was quote splendidly visible.

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The most important feature of the observation was the ring

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that I could detect all around the disk dark part

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and crescent of brownish red color more pronounced on the

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>illuminated side than on the dark part of the limb,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but of a peculiar coppery hue. And then of course

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>there were many reported sightings in the twentieth century. A

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of sightings in nineteen fifty three with independent observers

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>claiming to see the light at the same time in

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>different locations. Uh. There were also a number of alleged

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sightings in nineteen fifty six and fifty seven. Also, I

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>think I read about sightings in nineteen forty and I

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think on all in all these years I mentioned there

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>were sightings on consecutive nights reported to the British Astronomical Association.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But already we can see that if something is occurring,

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if there actually is a light there, it's not it's

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>not there all the time, right, Yeah, So this is

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to contribute to the mystery and maybe

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>help us reason about if it really exists what it is. Um,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Now you may be noticing so far that we're all

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about visual sightings, not about capturing images of it.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Now that that'll that will play into our discussion. In

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute, just to mention a couple more sightings real quick.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Um and Dale Crookshank, a planetary scientist at NASA Ames

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Research Center, and William K. Hartman, another planetary scientists, they

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>observed Venus at inferior conjunction. Now that conjunction is when

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>planets line up in a line, So inferior conjunction would

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>be when the Earth Venus and the Sun line up together,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with Venus on the same side of the Sun as

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. I guess obviously it would have to be

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>on the same side of the Sun as the Earth

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're observing it now. The thing here that I'm

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sure it's jumping out at everyone though, as we mentioned

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>these dates, is that none of these dates are particularly recent,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's easy to just assume that. Okay, as

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>as as our technology increases, is our ability to view

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and capture images of venous increases. If sightings go down,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>then that's that's a huge red flag. It absolutely is.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good point in something that other astronomers

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>uh we we will talk about later in the episode,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have pointed out. But yeah, it seems that while there

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have been all these numbers of sightings, sightings apparently get

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>more rare as our ability to capture faint images with

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>astronomical equipment becomes better. Uh So, uh Dale, Dale Crookshank,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and William Hartman that I mentioned a minute ago, they

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>did not capture an image of it. They drew an

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>image of it based on their visual observations. Um. They

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>said that the circle of the disk within the ring

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of light glowed to kind of dull brown color, and

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they said that this was a different color from the

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>blue sky behind the planet, and that the color difference

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be the strongest near the crescent. And so

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I added an illustration of what they think they saw. Robert, Now,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks kind of like if there's a bright ring

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and then inside it there's just a slight, slight hue

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of brown, right right, And now trying to include this

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>image on the landing page for this episode of Stuff

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to Plow your Mind dot Com so that people can

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>can see what we're talking about as well. Just one

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>more alleged siding, the English astronomer Sir Patrick Moore, who

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>passed away unfortunately in two thousand twelve. He claimed to

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have seen the ash and light many times throughout his career,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>including a siding in nineteen eighty that he regarded as

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of unmistakable, in which he described as looking like

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>earth shine on the moon. Now, despite all of these

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>claims of observations, as we've been discussing, there is emerging

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a pattern of like questions that somebody skeptical of this

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon should should be asking, right, the British astronomers Dr

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Paul Abel and Pete Lawrence, writing for BBC Sky at

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Night magazine right about how part of the problem with

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the ash and light is that all the claimed sidings

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>over the years have just been people claiming to see

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it directly with their eyes through the eyepiece of the telescope,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and no one has ever captured a good, really unmistakable

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>photo or digital image of the glow. And they discuss

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>how lots of astronomers have searched for the low over

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the years and never been able to see it, despite

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>earnest attempts many many years in a row. For example,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the famous American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard tried to see it,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but he never could And the authors themselves at the

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>time of writing claimed they've never been able to see

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the ash and light. Yeah, all you have here is

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>observation data. You have no like like hard measurements of

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>it based I mean, besides what can be made with

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the human eye and then recorded, which opens it up

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to a number of different errors in cognition and memory

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>encoding that can occur. And really you have to realize

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to here, that's like most people that are looking at

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>venus do not see it. Only some people are seeing it.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Some people are arguably good at seeing it, whereas others

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>are are less skilled at seeing the ash and light. Now,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to be fair to proponents of the ash and light,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it seems to be part of the phenomenon. If

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it is real, that it is infrequent, like it only

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>appears at certain times, and we could discuss later what

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>could cause that. If it really is a is an

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>actual glow coming from the planet and not just a

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>trick of the eye. Uh So, I guess before we

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get into explaining what it could be if it is real,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>we should explain what could cause all these sightings if

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>it is not real. One of the things you always

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have to consider, of course, is the possibility of a hoax.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>But that really doesn't seem very likely to me in

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this case, because you've got so many reports from very

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently serious people over the years. Um, like, this wasn't

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a ghost reported by some drunk high schoolers in a

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in a swamp or something. No, But but I think

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it is important to realize that seeing a UFO whilst

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>drunk in the swamp is exactly the kind of thing

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that a that a that a that a non scientist

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>might see, but seeing an astronomical detail that other experts

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have reported over the years. I mean, that's the kind

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing that an astronomical observer might uh want to see, right,

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, I I certainly think that they could

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the people seeing it could be mistaken. Well, I was

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>going to mention that in a second, but I'm trying

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to rule I don't think it's deliberate hoax. That that

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like it doesn't fit. Uh, you know, why would

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>William Herschel be participating in a deliberate hoax and all

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>these different people over the years. It just doesn't does

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>not seem like a good explanation to call this wilful misrepresentation. Now,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, observer error is a very strong candidate.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>As as you're talking about Able and Lawrence right in

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>their article quote, it's reasonable to suppose that under certain conditions,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the brilliant crescent of Venus, combined with poor seeing tricks

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the human eye into thinking it can see the night

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>side of Venus when in reality it is not visible. Now,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we've talked before about different kinds of optical illusions on

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the show, and a very common kind of optical illusion

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of completion effect of the eye. Right,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you see part of a figure, and the brain knows

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>what the rest of the figure should look like and

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of seese it. Because our brain, our vision is

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>not a camera or a video recording device. No, our

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>vision is cognitive. It is a cognitive process. And and

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>therefore it's not just our brains are not just seeing

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing. Our brains are forming the picture of

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the world that our eyes are helping us to to

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>take in. Yeah, so you see with your eyes, but

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you also see with your emotions, and you see with

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>your memory, and you see with your biases. These these

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>actually affect what you see. Like you say, Robert, it's

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not just a totally neutral device taking pictures of things

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and recording different light levels at each pixel spot. Yeah.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm instantly reminded of times that I've looked at, say,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a three D image one of these of

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what were they called? They they had whole books off them,

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and you had to sort of stare magic I have

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the magic Eye books, and uh, some of those I

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>could see fairly easily, but others that would just stare

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>at and stare at, and then you reach a point

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, do I see it? I think maybe

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I see it. I kind of want to stop staring

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>at it, but maybe I see it. Um maybe this

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>means there's something wrong with my brain. But I was

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>never able to see those things. Well, this could be

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>something we explore in a future episode, like why why

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do some people see the Magic Eye things more more

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>readily than others? Um Or is it? Maybe it's all

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. Maybe there's there's nothing there. But if you

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>stare at it long enough and people were expecting you

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and priming you to see these images, then you eventually say, yes,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a tiger. Clearly, the Emperor has no clothes. The

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>magic Eye is fake. There is no tiger. It's all

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>just gibberish. Everybody's like, oh, yes, yes, I see the fleas.

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've also had that situation with I mean

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and being a little glimp here about the magic Eye.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But I've had that situation with the attempt to observe

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>something supernatural, the like the the desire to say, see

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a spaceship, you know, as a kid, like look up

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at the stars and and maybe you know you're afraid

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to see something, but you also you just want to

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>see something staring into the woods and hoping to see

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a ghost, that kind of thing. And I never did

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>see anything of that nature, um in either case. But

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's this you can feel the straining at time, like

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like do I see something? Do I see something? Like

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it almost like you're pushing yourself up to that line

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of telling yourself you see something. Uh you know whether

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to actually cross that line, uh you know

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or not. But it's not. But I don't think that

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>line is necessarily a situation of today. I shall make

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>something up today, I will will create the story of

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>how I saw a UFO. I feel like that's a

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>line that we that we sometimes creep up to. Oh

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly you're standing on the other side of it.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like, uh, it's like listening for the

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds of ghosts whispering in an echoeek cathedral, Like you

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>know your you might not be likely to hear that

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if you just stand there listening, But if you're trying

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear a ghost speaking in a cathedral, you might

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not think that you're making it up, but you will

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be sensitive to kind of anomalous and m pops and

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds that you can apply your cognitive filters too and

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>make something out of. Yeah, and we've discussed before in

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the show how you know, we've already talked how the

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>brain is sort of filling in the blanks of vision,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and when we are presented with limited stimuli, be it

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>auditory or visual, the brain can kind of create, uh,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>patterns where there are no patterns. It can create a

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>voice where there is no voice, a sound where there

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is no voice. And and ultimately you're talking about astronomical

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>data that is limited visual stimuli. That's right, But then again,

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I I also don't want to go over the edge

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and be too dismissive because you've got a lot of

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>reports over the year. There's a lot of undeniable And

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>again getting back to that that very important point that

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, we're just if we were just to assume, yes,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there is was an action light on venus, like you said,

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it is clearly not observable all the time, so it's

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not something that can be is regorously tested, as say,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the the idea of canals on Mars, which we'll get

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to in a bit, right, So if it does cist,

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we should transition to talk about, if it

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>does exist, what could explain it? What would match the

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>descriptions people see, what kind of light could be shining

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>off of the night time side of venus uh And

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think clearly, clearly the best explanation for the ashen

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>light comes to us from the Bavarian astronomer and physician

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Franz Vonpaala Growthhausand uh from who he lived from seventeen

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty two. And he was you know, it seems

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to me he wasn't a dummy, but he was obsessed

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with space aliens. Oh yeah, he was. He was the

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>real deal. He was a major contributor of the day

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to fields of urology and lithotrity, which is the treatment

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and removal of gall stones, bezors, and kidney stones. We

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we discussed all three of these on our Stone of

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Madness episode did a few years back. Uh So he

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>developed key technologies that helped make bladderstone removal safer and

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>less likely to result in the horror rible death of

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the patient. As we discussed in that Stone of Madness episode,

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 1>not only were kidney stones painful ordeals, but the methods

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of treating and removing them, but they had the other

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>days were just barbaric. Uh. So there was a very

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>high mortality rate for surgical intervention and growth thousand helped

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>change that. He helped establish the technologies that allowed the

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>uh these fields to evolve and for people to uh

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to to engage in the treatment of of of various

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>stones without without facing down death quite as often. So

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so real physician, not a dummy, Yeah, not a dummy.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>He was highly influential in his field. During his life.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>He went on to write hundreds of scientific articles and

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of books that covered various topics in the

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>field of natural sciences. So he was, you know, he

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was something of a renaissance man in that regard, and

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he was he was a legit astronomer. Yeah. He became

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>professor of astronomy at the University of Munich in eighteen

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. So again, very bright guy. Uh, No mere amateur.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>He didn't just pick up a telescope and say, hey,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I see the ash and light. I'm going to write

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a book about it. Uh. He knew what he was

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about. But at the same time, I think it

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>could definitely be argued that he he engaged with uh,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with astronomy, with a certain imagination. Uh, nothing wrong with imagination,

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but you should remember the difference between imagination and good theory. Yeah.

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So for starters, he believed Earth's moon was habitable, which

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is not a crazy thing to to think. There are

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>people today who think that that, yes, given appropriate technology,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we could live on the moon. And and it certainly

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't all that unusual back then a lot of people

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thought stuff like this. But what's more, he also identified

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>what he took to be structures on the moon. He

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thought he observed a vast city. And even when it

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:53.479
<v Speaker 1>had called it Volver, wasn't that a craft ferk album?

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It could be. It could also be a great name

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.479
<v Speaker 1>for a metal bands. There you go, We've already had

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>another possible suggestion there. So again he's he's he's not

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a nobody. He's making this this uh, this this claim.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>So if he says there are cities on the moon,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>even one called Velver, people people take the sea, they took,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>they took notice that there's a certain amount of sensation ensued. Uh,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean cities on the moon. Right, So the notion

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>resonated through the media of the day, through the culture

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of the day, influencing the literary world, and and not

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>just early sci fi. It laid the seeds for the

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth and twentieth century telescope sightings of canals on Mars,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>which will discuss more in a bit, which you know

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>greatly influenced our perception of the red planet and continues

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to sort of color our our perception and expectations of

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the planet Mars. Yeah. It also, uh again, influenced literature.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote of of these lunar cities in

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>his poem tim Buck two. He wrote, I saw the

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>smallest grain that dappled the dark Earth, the indistinctist atom

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in deep air, the Moon's white cities, and the opal

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>width of her small glowing lakes, her silver heights unvisited

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with dew of vagrant cloud, and the unsounded, undescended depth

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of her black hollows. That's good stuff, man. Yeah. Tennyson

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is not usually one of my favorite poets, but I

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well, yeah, you you inject a little sci

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>fi and uh it's a it's a whole different kettle

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of fish, right. I should also point out the growth

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand Uh you know, it wasn't all just cities on

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the Moon. Uh In terms of his astronomical contributions, he

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>also suggested that lunar craters were caused by meteorite strikes,

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which is reasonable, right, uh So, but we should get

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to his explanation for the ashen light, which is fantastic.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is quoted and discussed in the book Atlas

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of Venus by Peter Cattermole and Patrick Moore from Cambridge

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>University Press. And so they're writing about growth thousand. I'm

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sure I'm saying his name wrong, but that that's the

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>closest I can do growth thausand his opinions on the

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>action light of Venus. And so apparently Growthausand noticed that

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>astronomers had claimed to see the light in seventeen fifty

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>nine and then again in eighteen o six, which means

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that the main previous sightings in his lifetime were separated

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by forty seven Earth years, which is seventy six Venus years.

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And Growthausand wrote, quote, we can assume that some Venusian

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Alexander or Napoleon then attained universal power if we estimate

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that the ordinary life of an inhabitant of Venus lasts

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty Venusian years, which amounts to eighty

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Earth years. The reign of an emperor of Venus might

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>well last for seventy six Venusian years. The observed appearance

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is evidently the result of a general festival illumination in

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>honor of the ascension of a new emperor to the

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>throne of the planet. What do you think, Thumbs up?

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Thumbs down. I'm gonna have to give a thumbs down

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. Why, I mean, assuming he wasn't just joking around,

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if if he's presenting this is uh, is anything close

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to a possible explanation that it is a bit ridiculous.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>It's there's so many, so many leaps of faith one

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>has to take there. I think that's that's a terrible explanation,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you think there's life on the surface of Venus,

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because how would you be timing out the coronation process later. Yeah,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you're making so many assumptions about about life on Venus. Uh.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>He also later suggested that the ashen light might be

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>due to Venutian slash and burn agriculture, in which farmers

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of Venus would burn down these huge stretches of jungle

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to clear the land for tilling and planting. Quote,

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>large migrations of people would be prevented so that possible

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>wars would be avoided by abolishing the reason for them.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Thus the race would be kept united. Well, I don't

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>know that feels a little more reasonable. I mean, really,

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess in both cases what he's essentially doing is reasonable.

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, how would I explain this light on venus?

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And on both cases he's assuming that there is some

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of intelligent life form. What do we do on

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>our planet? And then how might I model behavior on

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Yeah, if if the dark side of

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Earth is shining, what causes that? Well, it's probably some

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>huge illumination for some festival or its agricultural burning. Right,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it can't be just the light of cities, because then

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be more stationary, wouldn't be this, wouldn't have

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 1>this this frequency to it, right, Uh, And so all

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff it's it sounds cookie to us, but it's

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>not in principle as cookie as it sounds. Because Robert,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned a minute ago, lots of people used

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to believe that there were visible civilizations on the surfaces

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.919
<v Speaker 1>of other rocky planets in the Solar System. We've talked

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>before about the American author and astronomer Percival Lowell. You know,

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he comes to mind who Around the turn of the

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century he was writing about the supposed canals of Mars,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which we talked about. I thought that the canals of

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Mars were evidence of the handiwork of Martian civilization. Now,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, later it was discovered that the observations that

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>people thought were canals on the surface of Mars were illusions,

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and Mars does not have canals. Yeah, they were actually

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>first observed in eighteen seventy seven and then confirmed, uh

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, by various dedicated astronomers around the world.

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that Carl Sagan actually wrote a

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit about in The Demon Haunted World, his his

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>book that essentially about science communication and the struggle between uh,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, scientific literacy and uh uh and our susceptibility

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to everything from conspiracy theory to pseudoscience. He wrote A

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>network of single and double straight lines was reported criss

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>crossing the Martian surface, and with such uncanny geometrical regularity

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that they could only be of intelligent origin. Evocative conclusions

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>were drawn about a parched and dying planet populated by

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an older and wiser technical civilization dedicated to conservation of

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>water resources. So hundreds of canals were actually mapped and

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>named um. But but just as with the action light,

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there were no photos. This was all based on observation

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>through telescopes. Most astronomers did not see them, but some did,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and says Sagan suggests that, you know, it might have

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>even been more of a you know, perceptual delusion. But

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but one of the key differences here is that canals

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on Mars, that's something that you can keep looking for.

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're rolling out some elaborate explanation about canals disappearing

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or being hidden by secretive Martians, They're going to remain

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>there and you can look for them. Yeah, it should

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>be a fixed feature of the surface. Right, So as

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>our observation abilities improved, we found that they did not exist.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>When Marin or nine orbited the planet in nine UM

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and Sagan was an experiment er for that mission, he said,

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there were, of course no canals at all, and nobody

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was surprised by this by that point. But but again,

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>this was a perfectly testable situation in the science corrected

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>our expectations and understanding of the surface of Mars. And

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>now we understand, as we've discussed in the past, we

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>understand more about the surface of Mars than we do

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 1>about the the bottom of earth oceans. Yeah, uh yeah,

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's a fortunate situation where this misconception could

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be cleared up. Like you say, but as you implied,

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the light on Venus is that it

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is observed to be infrequent and difficult to detect, very faint,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always there. So this makes it harder

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to verify or disconfirm through experimentation. Right now, as far

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as as the idea of life on Venus, we actually

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just did a recent episode on the possible existence of

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>life on Venus. But of course, as we know, if

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it were to exist, it would not take the form

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of a surface dwelling agricultural civilization. The surface of Venus

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>has an average temperature of over four hundred and fifty

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>degrees celsius or over eight hundred and fifty degrees fahrenheit.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Then that makes complex life totty much impossible. If if

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>life were to exist on Venus, astrobiologists generally think that

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it would consist of micro organisms living dispersed in vapor

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>droplets in the clouds of the upper Venusian atmosphere, higher

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>up where it's cooler. So I guess we should get

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the question of the action light. It is

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the action light like the canals of Mars. Is it

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>just an observer illusion? And if not, what is the

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>real cause? What could really make the nighttime side of

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Venus glow? All right, We're gonna take a quick break

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then when we come back we will continue. Thank you,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you. All right, we're back. So I think it's

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>time to turn to a paper by William Sheehan, Klaus brosch,

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Dale Crookshank, and Richard Baum from the Journal of the

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>British Astronomical Association, and the papers called the Ashen Light

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of Venus the oldest unsolved solar system Mystery, and this

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>paper tried to take a look at the action light

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to determine if it's real, and if it is real,

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what could explain it. So they point out that many

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of the observations of the action light are very likely illusory,

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 1>based on optical illusions or inadequate equipment, poor telescopes, all

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. But really the question is not are some

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the observations of the action light illusory obviously some

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 1>of them are, but are all of them illusory? Or

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is there there's something real to it? And there's a problem.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>The identify in the term action light apparently appears to

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>refer to at least three different kinds of observation scenarios.

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of them is you've got the dark side

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of Venus and it appears paler or the same brightness

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but a different color or darker against a bright twilight

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>or daylight background. And then another type of observation is

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet is observed near inferior conjunction. Remember that's when Venus,

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Earth and the Sun line up, with Venus and Earth

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>on the same side of the sun, so we're near that,

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and they see the planet against a bright sky or

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in daylight, and the extent shin of the horns of

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the crescent planet seemed to go all the way around

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the planet and form a bright ring, and they say

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this is probably due to scattering of sunlight from the

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>planet's atmosphere. And then third, finally there's the true ashen light,

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in which the dark side of the planet appears as

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a brighter glow against a darker background sky, and it's

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that third category we're going to be most interested in here, right,

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>because that is that is the true action light. Yes,

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>though all three categories are met by various observations around

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the years, so so they take a look at all

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of them, but that the third one is considered the

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>true ash and light. And given the different uses for

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the term, obviously it can be hard to nail down

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>an explanation that fits them all perfectly. I mean this

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>goes back to our Will of the Wisp episode. Like

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to say, Okay, if people really did

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>see something, what's the best material explanation for it? You've

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>got a problem in that the sightings are so different

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>in the way they're described. Yeah, they range from the

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>original ashtion lie to these descriptions of something that's more

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>rusty and uh and sort of like the color of

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>dried blood. But there have been plenty of explanations proposed

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>over the years. So for example, how about the idea

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of earth shine, Like is light reflecting off of Earth

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and then bouncing to Venus so that we can occasionally

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>occasionally see the light bouncing off of Earth reflected from

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the surface of Venus at night. Uh, The authors say no.

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Many calculations have been done and found earth shine to

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be much much too weak to explain the observations, but

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>people have tried to reason this way. One explanation along

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>these lines was offered by a guy named god Free Sykes,

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>who apparently worked for Personal Lowell, uh you know Personal

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Lowell of the Canals of Mars fame and god Free

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Sykes thought that Venus was tidally locked with the Sun,

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>which would mean that one the same side of it

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was always facing inward towards the Sun, and that it's

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>dark side, which always faced away from the Sun, would

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 1>be completely covered in a hemisphere year of ice. And

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this ice, being highly reflective, would reflect light from the

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Earth and other planets and stars and all all that

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>all that light coming into the dark side of Venus

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>would reflect off of the ice, the ice sheet on

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that side of the planet back out into space, and

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thus we would see that kind of shine. Obviously this

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>is wrong for you know, clear reasons, because we now

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know that Venus is too hot for liquid water, let

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>alone ice. Alright, what else do we have? People have

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>proposed lightning? How about lightning? Well, that makes sense, So

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>we have lightning in our world, and it certainly can

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>light up the sky. Yeah, there's actually long been a

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>question of whether there's lightning in the clouds of Venus

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and if so, how much. And there does appear to

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be some evidence for lightning on Venus, including these what

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are called low frequency quote whistler waves that are detected

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Venusian atmosphere, like for example, they were detected

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>by the Venus Express vehicle. But astronomers have also largely

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>ruled out the lightning explanation because the lightning would just

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be too faint to be seen on Earth. So the

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>authors of this paper right quote, the auroral and lightning

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>theories have both been eliminated because though visible spectrum night

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>side air glow on Venus was discovered by the veneera

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>nine intent spacecraft, and lightning has also been confirmed from

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft observations, the illumination they produce is orders of magnitude

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>too faint to be detectable with the eye from Earth.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just a little bit too faint, it

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would be way too faint. And it likewise that means

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that whatever is occurring, if it's occurring, is uh is

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>substantial enough that it is it is orders of magnitude

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond what near lightning activity or rural activity would consist

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of right for us to be seeing it with the

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>eye and telescopes from Earth. Now, you've got a couple

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of remaining hypotheses. One of them is infrared thermal emission

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>from the night side. We know that the surface and

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lower atmosphere of Venus are red hot, and she had

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>at all right quote. Since the absorption and light scattering

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by sulfuric acid aerosols in venous atmosphere are weak at

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>visible and near infrared wavelengths, a number of authors have

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>proposed that at least in principle, the lower atmosphere from

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty kilometers down to the surface might produce a glow

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that for a suitably dark adapted observer under the right

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric conditions both on Venus and the Earth, may be

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>dimly perceived at visual wavelengths. So maybe the planet is

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>so hot it's glowing in a way that the atmosphere

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>does not appropriately scatter the light, and the light comes

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>through to us. And in their article Able and Lawrence

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>right about this idea, uh they write that apparently the

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thick atmosphere occasionally thins in places, allowing the hot surface

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. Quote. The problem is that this would

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>only be visible in the infrared part of the spectrum,

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>well beyond the threshold of the human eye, So infrared

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:58.359
<v Speaker 1>heat is below the frequency of the visual band of

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the the electromagnetic spectra. And she Han and co authors

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>right quote. Thermal emission of a body at venus temperature

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>reaches its peak value at about three point nine five

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>micrometers wavelength, which is invisible to the eye, and decreases

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>very rapidly towards shorter wavelengths that the eye can detect.

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The longest wavelength visible to the human eyes about zero

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>point seven micrometers. Using Planks law, we calculate that wind

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>venus is very near inferior conjunction when it just a

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 1>few degrees of separation from the sun. The intensity of

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the heat emission at zero point seven micrometers is some

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand times weaker than the brightness of the sunlit sky,

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So the lowest possible frequency of light that could feasibly

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be seen by the human eye, that the lowest frequency

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that's visible to us is produced at far too weak

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.320
<v Speaker 1>an intensity. On an object of the temperature of venus,

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>compared to the sky around it. So, yes, Venus is

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>very hot, but not hot enough to glow in a

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>way that we could see from Earth with the naked

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>eye through a telescope lens. Alright, so it has to

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>be something else, right, Yeah, So it can't be the

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>planet glowing from heat. So what's left pretty much just

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>one hypothesis, and that's the hypothesis of oxygen emission. So

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.839
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty seven, the Mirrorner five spacecraft did an

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>early fly by Venus and detected what was believed to

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be an ultra violet quote night air glow on the

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>dark lamb of the planet. So there was a nighttime

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on the night side of the planet. The atmosphere was

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>glowing slightly and scientists at the time thought that this

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>night glow on the dark side of the Venus might

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be due to chemical reactions in the atmosphere or possibly

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>due to the atmosphere being bombarded by charged particles from

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. And then later the Mirrorner ten vehicle did

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 1>another Venus fly by in nineteen seventy four and it

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>also found both a daytime and nighttime air glow around Venus,

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and it was found to be ten times brighter than

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>had been predicted. So this sounds really promising, right, Yeah,

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is a perfectly reasonable scientific explanation

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for what could be occurring. Yeah, exactly. So at the

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>time people thought that the problem of the ashen light

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe was solved. So one version of the chemistry explanation

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:14.320
<v Speaker 1>from oxygen emission goes like this, You've got UV radiation

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from the Sun also ions charge particles flying out from

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the Sun, and this UV radiation and other stuff hits

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>particles in the upper atmosphere of Venus. And the atmosphere

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of Venus is made made up mostly of carbon dioxide,

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>which contains one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms. And

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 1>when the solar bombardment hits these carbon dioxide molecules, it

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.359
<v Speaker 1>splits them into and what it leaves in their wake

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:40.319
<v Speaker 1>when when they get split up is you get a

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:44.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon monoxide molecule which has one oxygen atom one carbon atom,

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you get a single isolated oxygen atom. And

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>single isolated oxygen atoms are not happy. They're lonely, they

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be out on their own, and they

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to recombine into other molecules. In this case, combining

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with other free oxygen atoms to orm O two, two

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>oxygen atoms together in a molecule, and when this combination happens,

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the atoms emit photons of light in the visible spectrum,

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's often described as a green light. And apparently

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>this has been observed with instruments like apparently the Keeck

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one telescope in Hawaii has previously spotted green light in

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere of Venus, which is consistent with the light

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be emitted by free oxygen atoms combining to

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>form O two in the in the Venusian atmosphere. And

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that light was apparently also observed by the Soviet spacecraft

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Vanera nine and Vanera tin. And what's more, this theory

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>could help explain why there are some years when so

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>many observers claim to see the light and other years

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in which nobody can find it, because this would depend

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on the atmosphere of Venus being bombarded by the Sun.

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So variations in solar activity could explain variations in the

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>emissions due to atmospheric chemistry on Venus, like when the

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Sun is hitting the planet hardest, the oxygen mission becomes

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the strongest, well it sounds like a pretty strong theory. Yeah,

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it does. It's so far at least so, but is

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it is it accepted? Is this is anywhere you're accepted?

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately not. The authors conclude that while this this theory

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:17.480
<v Speaker 1>probably has the best chance of being correct, ultimately they

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>decided probably is not the correct explanation. So they decided

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to investigate the validity of the oxygen emission hypothesis in

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the spring of two thousand twelve, and they used visual

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>observation and cc D or charge couple device recorded imagery

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of with different telescopes and different filters and observing visually.

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>There were occasions where they thought maybe they saw the

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ashen light when they looked at Venus in two thousand twelve.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 1>The authors actually quote Johann Shredder saying it had the

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>texture of thought, Oh well, that's that's a that sounds

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot like I'm making it up. Yeah, well no,

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that's what they're saying. It's like

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting there looking at it and they think maybe

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they can see it, but they get the sensation that

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're seeing with with their minds as much as

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing with their eye. This is this is staring at

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the magic eye image. This is staring into the woods

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and trying to convince yourself you see something. Yeah. But

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of course the authors here aren't aren't just trying to

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>go by their own perceptions. They want to use neutral

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>imagery to see if they can capture this somehow. So

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they used a special filter for green light, and with

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that special filter they were able to detect a glow

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that could be imaged. I've actually got an image here

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 1>with a very creepy looking crescent and and some green light.

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you can see that, Robert, it's

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>yeah on here. Yeah, that that that is. That is

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>creepy looking. But the authors also used some planet simulation

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>comparisons to establish that the red and green ashen light

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>perceptions that they thought they saw and that were imaged,

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we're probably due two scattered light from the illuminated to

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the unilluminated side, and there was no actual ashen light detected.

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Another big problem I'm thinking about here. Most of the

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>astronomers who have reported seeing the ash and light over

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the past three centuries have not had this kind of equipment,

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with the equipment available in the past,

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems highly possible that observers would not likely have

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 1>been able to see this emission for moto formation. So

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not that there is no light coming off of

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>venus from from the chemistry of the atmosphere, that it

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>does appear to be coming off of venus. The question

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is would it have ever been bright enough for people

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with telescopes hundreds of years ago to see And the

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:35.720
<v Speaker 1>answer looks like probably not. It's kind of like staring

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>across a great lake, right, and maybe you can distantly

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>see the distantly see the other side. And then if

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you if you're trying to figure out if you can

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>see people or not, you know, and then if you

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you investigate, you can later find out, oh, yeah,

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there are people on the other side, but it's it's

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a far different thing than being able to actually see

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 1>them from your shore. Yeah. So ultimately the authors conclude

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that they don't know for sure. The most sensible explanation

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:06.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point is, unfortunately, the illusion hypothesis that despite

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the many reports over the years by by very respected astronomers,

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon is most likely due to observer error and

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:19.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of optical artifacts from imperfect telescopes. And there's an

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>example they give and in their paper. In the early es,

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a there was a German astronomy writer named Daniel

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Fisher who produced an example of what he thought at

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the time was a directly captured digital image of the

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.920
<v Speaker 1>action light with a charge coupled device, you know, like

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a digital camera. Unfortunately, it now seems clear that the

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>image is actually just a case of what's known as

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 1>filter leakage, and Fisher himself has accepted the fact that

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the image is is not a real image of the

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>action light and has actually come to strongly doubt the

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 1>existence of the action light. So the reasons he gives

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are there are no good direct images of it captured

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:58.760
<v Speaker 1>by a neutral device. And then he he says, quote

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>just as amateur planetary imagers have started getting really good

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>reports have dwindled. This is what we talked about earlier.

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:07.839
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like, you notice how as soon as

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>cell phone cameras are everywhere, suddenly bigfoot sightings and UFO

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>sightings drastically drop off. It seems like, just as people

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 1>should be really having the ability to capture this image

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but on a neutral recording device, suddenly people aren't seeing

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it nearly as much as they used to uh, and

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>so Fisher actually now thinks that the phenomenon is fringe

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>science and calls it quote the locknest monster of astronomy. Now,

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's that bad because it's it's not

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a monster. There's no reason that you you shouldn't expect

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to find some kind of strange, chemically produced light on

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the dark side of a planet, right, that's perfectly plausible.

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:48.280
<v Speaker 1>The question is just we're people really seeing it or

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was it all tricks of the eye and tricks of

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the mind. And certainly the more it became a mystery

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to write it has this appeal, Like you the near

0:57:55.560 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're talking about it is is evidence of this,

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the action light of Venus. Who who

0:58:02.400 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want that to be real? Who doesn't want to

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to glimpse that and partake of the mystery as well? Yeah?

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Exactly so. Ultimately, the authors of the paper conclude quote

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>none of the putative images of the actual action light

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:16.640
<v Speaker 1>can be regarded as convincing. They appear to be due

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to filter leakage, crescent glare, and excessive image processing used

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to bring out dark side detail. And yet despite their doubts,

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they say it's still possible that the action light does

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>exist despite their inability to detect it. One possible explanation

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 1>could be that maybe it's only during extraordinary solar events,

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>such as like coronal mass ejections, because that would provide

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 1>extra bombardment of the planet Venus enough that its atmosphere

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>really has a lot of oxygen emission going on, and

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that oxygen emission spectrum can be seen from Earth only

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>during those times when the planet is hit with really

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>strong solar radiation. Well, that that makes sense, and it's

0:58:57.520 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in as in a sense, it would be the echo

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.959
<v Speaker 1>of a may your solar anomaly. Yeah, exactly. They don't

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mention whether what because we know about we know about

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:09.800
<v Speaker 1>solar activity in the past, so they don't mention trying

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to line up observations of it in the past with

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:14.560
<v Speaker 1>what the Sun was doing at the time. I wonder

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if somebody tried to do a correlation analysis there if

0:59:17.800 --> 0:59:20.439
<v Speaker 1>they would find anything that seems like the logical next step,

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it, But they right at the end quote for

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the time being, we can say no more. The action

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>light cannot yet be laid to rest, though inevitably it

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>becomes a little harder to believe in. With each passing elongation,

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it might finally transpire that the longest standing mystery and

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Solar System astronomy is nothing more than a stubborn illusion.

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, the observer who enjoys a challenge

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is encouraged to remain on the key viv or on

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the alert. So here's my By the way, I had

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a crazy idea float here's my crazy question linking our

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>two venous episodes. So, first of all, I do want

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to say I accept their their conclusion that by far

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the most reasonable explanation of the point seems to be

1:00:00.840 --> 1:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>observer error. But if it is real, what if there

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is microbial life in the clouds of Venus, And if

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>there is, what if it's bioluminescent. How do you like that? Yeah?

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So like if the ashen light is real and it's

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the glowing equivalent of periodic algal blooms and the clouds

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>on the hot house planet, So uh yeah, I wonder

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>about that. Astrobiologists, astronomers, planetary scientists tell me why this

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is wrong? Well, I mean, the the one idea that

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind here is that it would have to

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>be pretty intense during these flare apps. They would have

1:00:33.360 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to be again an order of orders of magnitude above

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>what mere lightning or a rural activity would consist of. Correct,

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's I mean it's difficult to I mean, we've

1:00:42.760 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>all seen terrific lightning storms. We've seen uh, you know,

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the Aurora borealis at least in you know, images of it,

1:00:51.440 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's uh, it's it's on inspiring and also challenging

1:00:56.080 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to imagine some sort of biological phenomena occurring of the

1:01:01.000 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>same caliber, you know. But but then again, I mean

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a long shot, but maybe yeah, somebody at least

1:01:08.600 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you know what kind of spectra that

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a big luminescent organism in a cloud could produce, Uh,

1:01:15.000 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>do the math? What does that? Is it possible? I

1:01:17.600 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it kind of matches up really with the ideas

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of like coronations and wars and slash and burn agriculture,

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because what are these but um, but the infrequent bursts

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of activity that line up with biological activity on our planet.

1:01:34.760 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So this could be, yeah, the case of an intense

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>season of mating or even some sort of essentially a war.

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm thinking about the way that that different

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>varieties of coral wage wars against each other for dominance,

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's just um the and the you know, the

1:01:52.200 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>death that takes place at the borders between the two. Uh.

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the action light is that sort of phenomenon, the

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, two different rival species of bioluminescent organisms clashing,

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, micro microbial war in the venus and clouds.

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a good that's a good story. I like that one. Well,

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>here's another thing I want to know. Do we have

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>any astronomers out there among you all in the audience

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>who have seen the action Light? Do you think you've

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seen it? If you've seen it, Uh, do you think

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's likely you could have been mistaken or there are

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>reasons you have for thinking you were not mistaken? We

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>would like to hear about this. Yeah, anybody else who

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>has any stories about attempting to see something and that

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that curious mindset that we're talking about, where you're you're

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of screening to see something you don't see or

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>hear something you can't hear, and what it's like to

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of creep your way up towards that line. Yeah,

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's always shocking what our brands are capable of can't

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>trust them. You can't, you can't. But it's all we have.

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not all we have. We have science.

1:02:56.920 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the one of the the key r D mints

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>here is that we do have scientific inquiry. We have uh,

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the ability to observe and record data. That should be it.

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a great pro science slogan. Science better than your brain,

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, I mean created by our brain. But uh,

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but but so much better at tackling problems like this. Agreed. Well, uh,

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that does it for today. But this has

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>been fun, Robert, Yeah. Yeah. Perhaps we'll return to Venus

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future. For the time being, head on over

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where

1:03:27.000 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll find all the episodes of the podcast, including those

1:03:29.880 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>past episodes on Venus, including that Will of the Whisp episode,

1:03:34.040 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and social media links. If you want to find out

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblo, you want to

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see if we have some sort of revide live tour

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in the works, there will be a tab up there

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for that. Huge thank you as always to our excellent

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>audio producers Alex Williams and Tarry Harrison. If you would

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us directly, to let

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>us know feedback on this episode during the other to

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>let us know if you've seen the ashen light or

1:03:56.080 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>looked forward and not seen it. To let us know

1:03:59.080 --> 1:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>uh topic you think maybe we should cover in the future,

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hi, let us know where you

1:04:03.920 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>listen from, tell us who you are. You can email

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:08.439
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com. B