WEBVTT - Chick-Fil-A Gets Plucked

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Impeachment Hearing's day three

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are upon us. Most of it's boring, but there were

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>some worthwhile parts we'll dive into together. Plus the revenge

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of the interagency consensus. Did the DNC try to get

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dirt from Ukraine? Phil chick fil A bends the knee

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and is fart Gate now a thing that in more

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>coming up? This is the buck Sexton Show, where the

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>mission or mission is to decode what really matters with

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:45.959
<v Speaker 1>actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American Great, You're a great

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>American Again The buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, remember no

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>welcome the buck Sexton Show. Everybody another day, another eachman inquiry.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The inquisition continues on, Oh my, it is going to

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be the case. It seems that Adam Schiff will tell

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>us the same story more or less every day. Now

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he'll tell us the same thing day in and day

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>out as we are. Then I suppose going to just

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>cave and say anything, We'll do anything, Just please stop

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this serious tone about the threat to our democracy from

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump's phone call to Zelenski. That didn't change anything, no investigation.

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians got the money for the aid and the weapons

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that Trump would give them that Obama Wooden's But here

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we are going through this nonsense yet again. I would

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>note that there was a lot of what we've seen before. Today.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You had witnesses including Pence Vice and Pence's aid a

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>SIGNFOS State Department, Jennifer Williams, and also Lieutenant Colonel Vinmanton,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hero of the hashtag resistance right now, Oh, isn't that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a surprise too? Exactly nobody, but he is out there

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>giving a lot of his opinions. She's giving her opinions

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. She seems like she is not someone

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to be caught up in this, but is

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>going to answer questions. He definitely, Vinman wants to be there.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>He's part of this thing. He got this running, he

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>got this in motion, so we already know what we're

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>dealing with here, which is also why he's very it's

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>very very touchy about making sure that, for example, he's

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>always referred to as Lieutenant Colonel Vinmanton, and even if inadvertently,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, Devin Nunez just refercs him as mister Vinman,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>must correct him right away. Also showing up in full

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>dress uniform for his testimony, there's a lot of theatrics

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>around mister Vinman right now, and I would just remind

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you that many of the same journos and Democrat members

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of Congress who will try to use Vinman's service in

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the military as a shield for many criticism for what

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he is trying to do now, which has nothing to

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>do with his military service. He was at the National

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Security Council, a body comprised of advisors to the president,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>mostly civilians. That's not his military service. He's there as

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an advisory a member of an advisor committee to the president,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and in that capacity he absolutely can be criticized. But

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>many of the Democrats and the members of Congress who

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>want you to feel that Vinman is beyond criticism, how

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>how dare you critique his motives or motivations? Did they

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>feel that way about the ambush by hashtag resistance Obama

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>voting deep staters like Sally Yates setting up General Flynn

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and then trying to get him not just fined which

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they did, and ruined which they did, but sent to prison,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>which they are still rooting for. So when is military

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>service a shield against all criticism? Oh, when it's a

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrat trying to take down the president. But if it's

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, if it's somebody who's in Trump's good graces,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is trying to help implement the Trump agenda,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>then military services no shield whatsoever. So I'm just glad

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we established the double standards right up front. Let's be

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>very clear about those double standards. And also a well

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into that in a moment. The backstory that

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we keep getting from these different individuals. Vinmn, for example,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>even when often talked about how proud he was of

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>his dad and leaving the Soviet Union, and that's all fine,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I just don't care, it doesn't matter. But you'll notice

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that this is a recurring theme. Look at how honorable

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and decent and wonderful these public servants are. Public servants

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>who have made it quite clear they objected to President

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's decision making on Ukraine. They didn't like that. For example,

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as Vinman said, he didn't use the talking points that

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he was supposed to. Oh, how dare you not use

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the talking points on the phone call that a bunch

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of I used to prepare talking points the CIA for

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would look at talking points for different

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>senior officials. I mean, this is not a This is

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not an unusual activity. And guess what. Plenty of times

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you know the CI director you write up talking points,

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like me, thanks, Who cares? Doesn't really matter. It's

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there for the benefit of the decision maker, for the

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>person who is actually in the exchange, in the for ay,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to accomplish a goal. You're just there in an

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>advisory role. But the backstory of DMan very important. The

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>backstory of these other officials that have come forward, the

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>ones who are clearly trying to advance the narrative of

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate behavior that the president engaged in. Isn't that interesting?

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Inappropriate is a very subjective way to talk about this,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. I mean, I thought it was inappropriate for

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>President Obama, for example, to in a desperate attempt to

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>salvage some foreign policy legacy for himself, for his administration

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and therefore for the handoff to Hillary Clinton to run

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Parties foreign policy going forward. I thought it

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was wildly inappropriate for Obama to send pallets of cash,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>actual pallets of cash, to the terrorist regime in Tehran,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all in an effort to try to curry favor with

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>them to get an Iran nuclear deal done that was

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all about legacy for Obama and as we know, didn't

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>even last into the Trump administration. I thought that was inappropriate.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Obama couldn't do it, although maybe he

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>should have gotten the Senate to ratify it as a

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>treaty so that the next president couldn't just say see

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you later. But I think I don't think it's inappropriate.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a lot of things are inappropriate. I

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>don't care what an NSC detail thinks about the president's conduct.

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't care. I don't have to care. I

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't care, especially given that, why doesn't someone ask Viniman?

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they will later on in his testimony, but why

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't someone point out that there's no credit being given

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>by these deep state elements to Trump for doing what

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Obama would not do and what was so necessary sending

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Javelin missiles, which was a major It is a

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>provocation to the Russian government, but one that if you

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>want to help the Ukrainians you're going to have to

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do if you're serious about it. But the backstory about

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>vin Men that we have to hear have to be

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>told that he also was advising Zelenski at one point

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about how to interact with our government and the Trump

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>administration and perhaps to even ignore some aspects of the

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration's requests. Is that not a bit of a

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>problem for people? Which team are you're playing for? When

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that, you don't advise a foreign government about

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>how to do an end run on your own government

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that you work for? Is request from a spirit of that?

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, you don't tell a foreign government, hey,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>nullify whatever the commander in chief is asking of you.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about that. That came across in testimony today.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much focused the media you'll put on that.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But my favorite moment, I mean, this is the best

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that has happened so far in all this testimony.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>My favorite moment came when Devin Newness is asking for

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a very important information about the chain of transmission of

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>information from VINMIN to anybody else who was involved in this.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Please begin that, producer, Mark, what as you know the

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community has? I haven't teen different agencies? What agency

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was this individual from? If I could interject here, we

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to use these proceedings, it's our time, but

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to protect the whistle blower, if please stop,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure that there's no effort to

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out the whistle blower through the use of these proceedings.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>If the witness as a good faith belief that this

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>may reveal the identity of the whistle blower, that is

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not the purpose that we are here for. And I

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>want to advise the witness accordingly, mister Vinman, you testified

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in your deposition that you did not know the whistle

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>blower rank. Remember at Lieutenant Colonel Viman. Please ooh, clap

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>back at Devin Newness. How dare you? I mean, he's

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously not trying to be disrespectful. I understand he's entitled

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to have his rank said, but you know, just maybe

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe slow your role a little bit. You're speaking too,

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>They're speaking to Congress. They understand what they're dealing with.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Here a few problems with this. Adam Schiff keeps saying

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that the whistleblower has a statutory right to anonymity. That

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lie. That is not true. The whistleblower, and

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we could all read the statute. The whistleblower, at the

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>discretion of the Inspector General of the Intelligence community can

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>remain anonymous unless the Inspector General decides that it's probably

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>going to come out anyway, or the Inspector General decides

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to pass it along to the Department of Justice because

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it could be involved in a criminal prosecution. Someone explained

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this to me. If what the president did is so terrible,

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>then shouldn't it be referred to the Department of Justice

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for possible prosecution? Or they won't do that because of

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>course the Attorney General was appointed by this president. But

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>they don't get to make that determination politically. They should

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>make it based on what the facts of the case

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>may be. Whistleblower is not entitled to ironclad anonymity. That's

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just not accurate. They keep pretending that that's the story.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>People repeating this and saying this just not true. Plus,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we've all already heard this name. We all we've all

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>been told by reputable in so far as they go

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>media outlets who this guy is. So now we are

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to sit around and say we don't know. This is

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Soviet style suppression of information in the public domain because

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>people are running a scam, because Schiff is running a

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>massive scam. But it gets so that's one part of this,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But it gets a bit worse there's a special right

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>now that Adam Schiff has created for someone to just

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>say that they are not going to answer a question.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>They're under oath in front of Congress, not antwer question,

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not that they're not playing the fifth, they're not claiming

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that there is an exemption for classified information. They're not

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>going to answer the question because maybe sort of kind

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of it could lead to some people understanding who the

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower is. That's a new one that gives the witness,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I would note a lot of discretion. Well, can you

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you had for breakfast last week? No,

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because got to protect the whistle blower's identity. How are

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to challenge him on that subjective judgment of

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the witness? Now answer what he wants, don't answer what

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he wants. Is fine. This is why Schiff is disgusting

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is a farce. But we have to go

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>through this farce together. But it gets better. Continue on

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with the questioning from Congressman Newness. Please, Lieutenant Colonel Benman,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you testified in the deposition that you did not know

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>who the whistleblower was. I do not know who the

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower is. That is how is it possible for you

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to name these people and then out the whistleblower. Per

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the advice of my counsel, I've been advised not to

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>answer specific questions about members of the intelligence community. This

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is Are you aware that this is the Intelligence Committee

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that's conducting an impeachment hearing? Of course, I am. Wouldn't

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate place for you to come to to testify

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>would be the Intelligence Committee about someone within the intelligence community. Frank, Remember,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>per the advice of my counsel and the instructions from

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the chairman, I've been advised not to provide any specifics

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on who I've spoken to withinside the intelligence community. What

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>I can offer is that these were properly cleared individuals,

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>or was a properly cleared individual with a need to known. Well,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is I mean, you can really you can plead

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifth, but you're here to answer questions, and you're

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>here under subpoena, so you can either answer the question

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or you can plead the fifth And then Adam Shift

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>jumps in and says, no, no no, there's a special Shift

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>rule where you don't plead the fifth or which, by

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, the reason they don't want that is because

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of the optics of it. Why are you pleading the

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth about who you talk to you with regard to

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>official government business when you're discussing with the House Intelligence Committee.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Why what is what is the justification for that? Exactly,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about self incrimination. You didn't do anything wrong,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so why would you plead the fifth? There is no

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>reason to plead the fifth. There's also no reason for

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>him if he is telling the truth that Vinman does

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not know the whistleblower, then there's no basis for him

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to withhold information about who he spoke to because he's

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, well, theoretically that could be the whistle blower.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's reality. We all know that he is the one

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who talked to the whistleblower. We just have to get

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the proof. We just have to get it one hundred

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>percent because otherwise the shady Democrats will lie about it.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So what is the likeliest scenario here? The likely scenario

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is that Vinman told Charmela about the call, and then

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>these guys, you know, worked together and cooked up a

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>whole scheme. But then he's like, well, I don't know

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm going to be the one that raises the

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>complaint let's give you plausible deniability about whether or not

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm the one who's bringing this complaint as the whistleblower.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's possible. Otherwise, why is he not discussing who he

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>told about the call? I mean, he claims that it

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was a person with a need to know. He's just

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he's just making a subjective determination there. Why would somebody

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not on that phone call in the intelligence community have

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a need to know about a presidential action? The president's

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>conduct is not reviewable under whistleblower's statutes by subordinate employees

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>inside the federal bureaucracy, So how can anyone have a

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>need to know about that? My friends, you see exactly

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what this is. The Democrats are just twisting and contorting

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the law and regulations in bad faith in order to

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this narrative alive as long as possible that there was

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just a honorable public servant who couldn't stand the inappropriateness

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>presidential phone call with another head of state that led

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to no action and no consequence whatsoever. But they've got

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to just keep this going in the media today, You're

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna CNN, Oh my gosh, those whistleblowers were so I mean,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rather witnesses were so believable. The best of this country

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>on display today against evil fascist Donald Trump. Worse than

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a hitler, Donald Trump. We know exactly where this is going.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's appalling, sometimes even a little bit amusing because it's

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so absurd. But we're going to be subjected to this continuously.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you thought that today was boring, just wait

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>till they bring out the next round of witnesses. About

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two weeks after that July tenth meeting, President Trump and

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>President Silinsky had their second call, the now infamous j

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth call. Colonel Ventman, what was your real time

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>reaction to hearing that call? Without hesitation? I knew that

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I had to report this to the White House Council.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I had concerns, and it was my duty to report

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>my concerns to the proper, proper people in the chain

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of command. And what was your concern It was inappropriate.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It was improper for the president to requested to demand

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>an investigation into a political opponent, opponent, especially a foreign power,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>where there's at best dubious belief that this would be

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a completely impartial investigation, and that this would have significant

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>implications if it became public knowledge and it would be

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>perceived as a partisan play, it would undermine all Ukraine policy,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and it would mine our next discurity. Those are all

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 1>opinions that have nothing to do with breaking any law, folks.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we just heard from Lieutenant Colonel Vinman

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a second ago there, and I was just getting into

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>how absurd this whole thing is. He's talking about how

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the president's phone call was improper. Okay, says him, says you, Vinman,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I say here, and I keep saying this, what is

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>improper about the president at when? When? When corruption is

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a major issue, a consensus, interagency consensus issue for foreign

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>policy in Ukraine? What is improper about asking your counterpart

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as the president United States to look into corruption including

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and they keep saying this, this debunked conspiracy theory about

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the about Ukraine interfering in the election, and the debunked

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories of the of the right. I have to

0:18:54.560 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>wonder what was the right wing somehow able to take

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>over Politico because here's the story that they published in

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen. Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire. KIV officials

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are scrambling to make amends with the President elect after

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>quietly working to boost Clinton. Oh wait, but I thought

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a debunked conspiracy. This hasn't been retracted. No one

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>said this is false. But this is Politico, a favorite

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>left wing website and magazine on politics. I'm confused. If

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we had real journalists, there are some, but overwhelmingly we don't.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>If we had a real journalism profession in this country,

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we would have answers to the question already. Did Democrat

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>operatives Alexandra Chalupa's name keeps coming up? There are others

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>as well. Did Democrat operatives try to get information about

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul manif than the Trump campaign chairman, from the Ukrainians

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to use as dirt on him. We need a hard

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and fast answer to that question. The Libs don't want

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>us to have one, because here's the problem. As much

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as they will try to do the usual double standard

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>dance of oh but mana for it's so bad and

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he went to prison. Yeah, but guess what, folks, That

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>would be foreign interference in the election, wouldn't it, And

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it would be the party in power using

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign relations as a tool of partisan politics against a

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>challenging a challenger presidential campaign. A little more from this

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>political piece. Since I'm feeling frisky today, let's do it.

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump wasn't the only presidential candidate whose campaign was

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>boosted by officials of a former Soviet block country had

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>taken a shot there on Russia stuff. Ukrainian government officials

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>try to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>investigating the matter, only to back away after the election,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and they helped Clinton's allies research damaging information on Trump

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and his advisors. A Politico investigation found end quote is

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that who's responsible in conservative circles for that conspiracy? Is

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that really Giuliani's fault? The political report of this in

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen is John Solomon's fault? At Politico actually competitor

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Hill where John was publishing his stories and

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>where I used to work, is it? I'm just wondering,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>did they make that happen or Oh, have you seen

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>any effort whatsoever to follow up on this to get

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>more information? Why don't we have people under oath to

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>defying about this? Because here's the for me, at least

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even more interesting component the story here says that Ukrainian officials,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to curry favor with Hillary Clinton. Keep

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>in mind, everybody thought Hillary was going to win. So

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're a foreign government that's used to a whole

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of corruption like Ukraine is, and you know that

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the incoming administration in twenty sixteen into twenty seventeen would

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>be in a position to really help or really hurt you,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>would it perhaps be a smart play if you thought,

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>because remember what the consensus was, ninety seven percent to

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>three percent, or whatever the New York Times had on

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>election day. If you were ninety seven percent sure in

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>your mind that Hillary Clinton was going to be the

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>next president of the United States, and you needed the

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>good graces of Hillary Clinton in order to fend off

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Russians, wouldn't you perhaps be willing to buy some

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>goodwill give a little information on a admittedly sketchy fellow

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like Paul Manafort. Now I also will point out that

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that the standard the Democrats have set up

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of you can't have information from a foreigner, which they

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't abide by in any sense. Christopher Steal is a foreigner.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The dossier was based on foreign sources, So I mean,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they're total frauds on that to begin with. But I'm

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who believes that if information is relevant to a

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>presidential campaign, information is relevant to a presidential campaign. I

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think that this new way if a British tabloid newspaper

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>were to break a major story about a presidential candidate,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>or are we supposed to say, up, can't see it,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>foreign source, it's idiocy. This is a this is not

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a standard that you could really apply. But the Liberals

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have convinced themselves this is a real standard. But if

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you're the Ukrainian government, wouldn't you or some people within

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian government, wouldn't you think, hey, let's let's help

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>seal the deal here for seal the deal here for Hillary,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe pass along information that looks bad for Trump.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Why do the Democrats so desperately not want confirmation of

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this because it would blow an enormous hole in their

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>whole scam. And the scam is to pretend that only

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Republicans do this sort of thing. The scam is to

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>pretend that they would never leverage foreign sources of information

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in a presidential campaign. Oh my god, foreign interference in

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>our election. Oh no, the political story continues. Quote. A

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian embassy in

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump top

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>campaign aide Paul Manafort, and Russia. According to people with

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>direct knowledge of the situation, the Ukrainian efforts had an

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>impact in the race, helping to force Manafort's resignation and

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>advancing the narrative that Trump's campaign was deeply connected to

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine's vote to the east Russia. My friends, this is

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the This is Politico, which is a major site,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>left wing, a major site telling the American public in

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen that Democrat collusion with Ukrainian sources was part

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the genesis of the whole Russia collusion narrative. Where

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>why do we believe that this is not true or

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>what what reason we have to believe? And keep in mind,

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>all of the senior Ukraine policy people at the time,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>could people like Vin men and the various ambassadors who

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have come forward, not Solomon because they hate him because

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of pro Trump. He's a Trump appointee. But

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the other ambassadors that came forward last week, the guy

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with the big bow tie, I think it was Kent,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>was his ambassador Kent. They could theoretically be implicated in

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this too. They're the ones say, oh, my gosh, Trump

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>asked for an investigation of Ukraine. It's the most horrible

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thing ever. But was it at least feasible? Is it

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>plausible that they would have at least been aware of

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this effort? That makes perfect sense, And no one yet

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>has been able to find a reason why it's not

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>true to dig up dirt on metaphor who was operating

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. All these things line up. None of this

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's crazy, like it doesn't make sense, and

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been reported on and no one's been able to

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>prove otherwise. But doesn't it seem like perhaps some of

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those senior Obama era Ukraine policy officials, the interagency consensus

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as it was at the time, maybe some of them

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>knew that there were Ukrainian officials and some Democrat operatives

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>stomping around trying to find dirt on Trump. What would

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>happen if we found out now that some of the

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very same people who are claiming it was a horrible

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>crime against humanity or whatever they're saying. It's not even

0:26:54.320 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>a crime. It's inappropriate, improper for the President to ask

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for an investigation of exactly what Politico is talking about here,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which is the origins of the Russia collusion lie which

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats ran with for over two years, the origins

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of it as it pertains to Ukraine, and also whether

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>there was corruption going on in Ukraine that involved the

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden family. There was a whole bunch of stuff that

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the President mentioned in that phone call. What would we

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>think of these brave, selfless, nonpartisan public servants if it

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>turned out that when information was coming from the Ukrainians

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it was that was bad for Trump. That's fine, it's

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just when Trump wants information from his Ukrainian counterpart that

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>could be theoretically bad for a Democrat unacceptable. Can't have that.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And now let's also put our thinking caps on for

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a moment here. This report is in Politico is all

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>about whether there or Ukrainian or Ukrainian government officials trying

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to give damaging information on Manifort to Democrats, Hillary people,

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Obama people in order to take down the Trump administration.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Do we believe then that it is it feasible. I

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>can't prove this. Is it feasible that those individuals weren't,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning the Democrats who would have been in receipt of

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this information on Maniford and perhaps other Russia Trump connection conspiracies,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that they wouldn't have been requesting actively seeking that information, because,

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>my friends, there, what we would have is Democrats actively

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seeking foreign interference in the very election that they claim

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>was stolen. Because of foreign interference in the election, all

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of their credibility, all of this stuff would just come

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>crashing down around them. The impeachment proceeding would have to

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>come to a screeching halt, or at least for anybody

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with an IQ over ten, they'd realize it should come

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to a screeching halt. But here we are pretending like

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have this information and hearing from all of

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>these different so called witnesses who have an ax to

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>grind against the president, who are sharing their thoughts and

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>feelings about something, and I simply just don't care what

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts and feelings are with any of this. Nor

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>does the law a nor should a Congress that took

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>its job and its powers with any seriousness. But the

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in this Congress are so desperate because the president

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is doing so well on what matters that they feel

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to throw some wrench into the gears. They

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have to try some desperate ploy to shift the narrative

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to damage this president politically, because otherwise he's going to

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>cruise to reelection and they know it. That's what all

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of this is really about today. Don't lose sight of

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that for one second. You've described this as a demand,

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this favorite that the president asked. What is it about

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between the President Nited States and the President

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine that leads you to conclude that when the

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>President Nited States asked a favor like this, it's really

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a demand, Chairman. The culture I come from the military culture.

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>When a senior asks you to do something, even if

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's play and pleasant, it's it's not. It's not to

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be taken as a request. It's to be taken as

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>an order. In this case, the power disparity between the

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>two leaders. My impression is that in order to get

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the White House meeting, President Zelinski would have to deliver

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>these investigations. Does Vinman think he's in sociology class here?

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's you all of a sudden, you know, a gender

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>studies professor, waxing philosophical on on power disparity. What the

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>heck is this? Well, I come from military culture. Okay,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's great. We understand You've made that very clear of him,

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and we get it. Zelenski doesn't come from the United

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>States or military culture and is certainly not a subordinate

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>officer to President Trump. So if you're going to play

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole, you know, did you order the code read?

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Meaning Trump orders Zelenski to do the code read here?

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>There has to be a chain of command. There is

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>no chain of command. Zelenski could very easily have come

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>back a deret. You later said, you know what, I asked.

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>My guys already looked at that. There's just nothing to

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>see there, I mean. And that's that. You know, there

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are all these extra legal rights that the libs are

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>creating in this there's so much smoke screen, and you

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have people like Schiff who are just the most dishonest

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>human beings you could find anywhere, and they keep creating

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>these acts like the right to anonymity for the whistleblower

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that is not a statutory right, but they're pretending that

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it is, and the media is going along with it.

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>No efforts in the media right now to find out

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>who the whistle blower is. You might ask Buck, why

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>were there some initial efforts, because remember Shift said that

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>then whistle blower had to testify. So they were going

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to do the whole thing that they always do, where

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they construct this narrative of the selfless, heroic public servant

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with no politics whatsoever. What they've done with vin Men

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and Kent, then the other ambassadors that nobody remembers from

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, Ivanovitch, just gonna know how to say her name. Oh,

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the heroic public servants. Okay, they were going to do

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that for the whistleblower, but then they realized, oh, whistleblower's

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>got some political baggage here. Even the Inspector General noted

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that there was the belief or there was reason to

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that he had political bias. Well, if it's clear

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this is all just a political hit job from inside

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the bureaucracy, because there are a lot of feckless federal

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats who hate Trump everything he stands, will do anything

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to stop him. That's nothing new. Doesn't that undermine the

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>whole case. This is about the sectuary of our democracy

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and undermining our national security for personal benefit, and all

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>these other gaseous phrases we hear from Democrats. You don't

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>give a crap about any of this. Well, I leave

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that to your I leave that to your analytic capabilities.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>My friends, I think we all know the answer here

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you had Jennifer Williams. Here's what she had

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to say. It played twenty four. On July twenty fifth,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>along with several of my colleagues, I listened to a

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>call between President Trump and president's Lenski, the content of

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>which has since been publicly reported. Prior to July twenty fifth,

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I had participated in roughly a dozen other presidential phone calls.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>During my closed store deposition, members of the committee asked

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>about my personal views and whether I had any concerns

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about the July twenty fifth call. As I testified then,

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I found the July twenty fifth phone call unusual because,

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in contrast to other presidential calls I had observed, it

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>involved discussion of what it appeared to be a domestic

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>political matter. After the July twenty fifth call, I provided

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>an update in the Vice President's Daily Briefing book indicating

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump had a call that day with President's Lensky.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>A hard copy of the memorandum transcribing the call was

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 1>also included in the book. I do not know whether

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vice President reviewed my update or the transcript. I

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>did not discuss the July twenty fifth call with Vice

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>President or any of my colleagues in the Office of

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the Vice President or the NSC. A little unusual, that's

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>what this woman. I don't think she's hashtag resistance, by

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, which is why she's just like, yeah, this

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is what I heard, like a little unusual. Okay, you're

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going to appeach the president because he had a phone call.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a little unusual enough it happened. Think about this, folks.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So much depends on getting this right, because if there

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>are four more years of this president, we will not

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>recognize our United States of America. We must win. Now.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We already know Donald Trump and as allies will do

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>anything they can to hold on to power. But their

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>playbook is not going to work on me. We all

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>know climate change his existential threat to us all. The

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>first thing I'll do as president is re during the

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Paris climbing to Chord, which I helped put together bring

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all almost two hundred nations to Washington, DC to make

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>them keep the commitment to in fact up the ante

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>on climate change and get to zero met zero emissions

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>by twenty fifteen, by thirty thirty five. Make sure that

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of that is already done. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>beating Donald Trump's not going to be easy. The first

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>thing the next president is going to have to deal

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with is inherited a divided nation, a world in disarray.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, we need a leader who on day one

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>has the proven ability to unite this country, to bring

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>people together. That's what I've done my whole career. Existential

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>threat after existential threat from the Democrats. Isn't it to astonishing?

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Climate change is an existential threat. Trump is an existential threat. Basically,

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>vote for Democrats or we're all gonna die. Is the

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 1>d n c's mantra. Vote for Democrats or the world

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to end. Not an exaggeration, This is not hyperbole.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what they are offering you. Unless you vote

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>against Trump, everybody's gonna die. I don't find that unifying.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Call me strength, I don't find that compelling. I don't

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>find it honest or helpful. I find it insane. But

0:36:58.120 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>here I am I'm the crazy one. I'm a New

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>York City. I think ninety percent of Manhattan, the island

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>i'm currently on, voted for Hillary Clinton in the last election.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess nine out of ten people here think that

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm the crazy one. What does that say? Climate change

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>an existential threat? We will not recognize the United States?

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Pete says he's an existential threat to this country

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>will no longer be America if President Trump wins. Maybe

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they should just come down. Maybe it's time for the

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to just take a step back, take a deep breath,

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and try not to be so utterly crazy. But that

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>brings me to what I start to think is a

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>real threat to this country, at least a threat to

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the unity of this country, to our future as a

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>political entity where we can solve disputes through the process

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about what should be happening in this country, about what

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 1>government is doing and what rights people have, to solve

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it through good faith and understand that ultimately, even if

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't get everything we want, this country is the richest, freest,

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>most prosperous political entity ever to have existed. In the

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>history of the world, and therefore we can handle some disputes,

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>including disputes that don't end up going our way. If

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that changes, then it's not clear to me that we

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>will be able to recognize our country all that much longer.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But this scorched earth politics what exactly the Attorney General

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bar was talking about over the weekend. The ends justify

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the means, stop at nothing. You want to do good,

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the people who oppose what you're trying to

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>do must be bad. That mentality has completely overtaken the

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>left and the Democratic Party and the socialists therein, and

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's getting more and more troubling. They no longer are

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>happy even to have legal victories or cultural victories. They

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>expect legal victory in the culture war. They expect cultural

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>victory in the same and then they want to go

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>around and force people to bend the knee, and if

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>they won't do that, then they plan to just throw

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>them on the ground and baying at the survivors, so

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>to speak. That's where we are now, my friends, that's

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what we face from the opposition. And yet another example

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is Chick fil A. Now I am because

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of my genetic issue with Celiac disease, not somebody who

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>can speak very well about how good Chick fil a

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>is because I can basically eat nothing. I can have

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>their waffle fries, which are just okay, I'm just gonna

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>say it. As French fries go, they are just producer mark.

0:39:56.000 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You like the waffle fries, That's the only thing, of

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>course I do. I like everything about Chick fil A.

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people tell me that the chicken sandwiches are

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like amazing, They're like addictive, and the spicy chicken sandwich

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is a die f. I can't touch any of it

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>basics like I mean, they have grilled chicken nuggets. Now,

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I've had the that's what I do when I'm stuck

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in an airport. And I have supported Chick fil A

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>because I like the way I like their customer service.

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the way that they treat their employees, that

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they close on Sunday, they do all these things that

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they're a Christian values company. The third largest fast food

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>company in the United States. I was unaware of that,

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, after McDonald's, and I believe Starbucks is

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>number two now in terms of if you count Starbucks

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as fast food. Yeah, yeah, but the chicken nuggets, the

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.240
<v Speaker 1>grilled chick Look, no one really wants grilled chicken nuggets.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>It's like diet food, right, So I you know, I

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>understand that that's not a fair way for me to judge.

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>The chicken nuggets are okay. But Chick fil A is

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously a very very successful business model. But it has

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>come under a lot of scrutiny in recent years because

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it is a traditional Christian values company, and as a

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 1>traditional Christian values company, there is some conflict with the

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>LGBTQ community, with the woke left, with the social justice warriors.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>There are our problems that they have with this. And

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>so here is what Chick fil A decided to do.

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>After years of being a staunch supporter not just of

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Catholic I mean sorry, Christian rather values, but also Christian charities,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Chick fil A is cutting off donations to the Salvation Army.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>They're getting rid of donations to the Salvation Army and

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the Fellowship of Christian Athletes because of their stands on

0:41:55.840 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>same sex marriage. So because those organizations, and remember those

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>organizations do not discriminate against anyone, they provide services, relief assistants,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>help food, shelter, advice everything to people irrespective of religious

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>belief of gender, ethnicity, you know, you name anything, right.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>They do not discriminate as a sexual orientation. But the

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>organization does support and it's I believe the Salvation Armies

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>officers so to speak, are or think they're ministers or deacons.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are. I believe that's there. That's a

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>standard for them, and they espouse traditional marriage beliefs. The

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>charity is now getting money cut off to it Salvation Army,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which I think, well, I'll get into their their statement

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that they have put out as a result. But you

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know these people that are always going to ring in

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the bell and they want the money on the street

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and Christmas time they raising all this money. They really

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they do a lot of good for a lot of people.

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:07.280
<v Speaker 1>GLAD which is a it is the gay and lesbian

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I forget what the rest of the but GLAD is

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>an LGBTQ advocacy organization, a very very powerful one, very

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>well funded, a lot of a lot of sway in

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>media world and in corporate America in general. GLAD in

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>response in response to what Chick fil A did here

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>which I and I keep in mind, there was also

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a controversy recently with Ellie Goulding, who I don't even

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>know who. I know she's a singer. I don't even

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know what her songs are, but you know, I'm out

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the loop these days. She wouldn't perform at the

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>halftime ceremony of a I think it was an NFL

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>game on Thanksgiving because there there was raising money I

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>think for the Salvation Army, if if memory serves, and

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so she wanted them to make a statement of support

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or to make a donation to a pro LGBTQ charity.

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just tough to keep up with all

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff anyway. So there's been a bit of controversy

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>right now generated by the left by these different social

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>justice warriors and people trying to outdo one another on

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>their wokeness. A bit of controversy with regard to the

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Salvation Army. Remember an organization that just helps people, A charity,

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>A charity that just helps people. They're going after that

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and glad. The LGBT Advocacy Organization responded officially to Chick

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fil A bending the knee to the LGBT community by

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>cutting off the Salvation Army because the Salvation Army is

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for traditional marriage as a policy matter, Glad responded in

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this way quote In addition to refraining from financially supporting

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:18.720
<v Speaker 1>anti lgbt Q organizations, Chick fil A still lacks policies

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to ensure safe workplaces for lgbt LGBTQ employees and should

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 1>unequivocally speak out against the l anti LGBTQ reputation that

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their brand represents. Ah See, this is the problem with

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>bending the need to wokeness. They do not take it

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>as a gesture of good faith. They do not take

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>it as conciliation. They see it as weakness, and then

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they expect more. Now you've conceded that you're a bigot,

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so you better listen to everything they say going forward,

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or else are going to keep calling you a bigot,

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which you've already admitted to you by changing your behavior

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>based on what they say you should do. Have the

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>executives at Chick fil A who came up with this

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>decision to cut off the Salvation Army of all things,

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have they learned nothing in have they seen nothing in

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>recent years? Let's be very clear about this. The lgbt

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>activist community, there are LGBTQ people I know who are

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>very active Christians, and they have a different view of

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>this matter. Many of them do, I should say, but

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the LGBT community of activist groups and the tremendous influence

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they have in culture and media and in corporate America now,

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they do not accept, they will not accept any organization

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that still advocates for traditional marriage. They expect those organizations

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to be attacked and destroyed, including it. It's just a

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>matter of time before this becomes even more overt religious organizations.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems that they will run into, however,

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with this is that when they try to get the

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Church to abandon its traditional marriage, dance and other

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Christian denominations. Although these days there's so many Christian denominations,

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know some of them. I look at it,

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, seriously, it looks like some kind of

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a like youth rock concert where everyone's just like having

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a great time and no one's actually talking about morality

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or ethics or Jesus or the gospel. But that's a

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>whole another conversation for another day. I mean, if you

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go to a rock concert, just go to

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a rock concert. I don't know. I mean, that's how

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I but then again, I grew up Catholic, so we

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of incense and you know, singing and

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>other things. But what you see happening here is the

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>move toward ostracizing and eventually actively condemning any traditional marriage

0:47:55.560 --> 0:48:02.760
<v Speaker 1>advocacy anywhere as the equivalent of being a racist, for example,

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you know that this is it's no longer going to

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.759
<v Speaker 1>be Oh, those are your religious beliefs. You believe that

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a covenant between a man and woman and God.

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And so as long as that's not official state policy,

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you can still to know. If you even speak that allowed,

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you will be punished. The state will be brought down

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on your head, the culture will be brought down on

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>your head, the media will come after you, even if

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you are a charity that has saved millions of people

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>from deprivation, despair, and perhaps even worse during their darkest times.

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Here is how the Salvation Army responded to this move

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.800
<v Speaker 1>by Chick fil A to drop them as a partner,

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a corporate partner that sponsors some of what they do. Quote,

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 1>We're sad to learn that a corporate partner has felt

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it necessary to divert funding to other hunger education and

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>homelessness organizations areas in which the Salvation Army, as the

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>largest social services provider in the world, is already fully committed.

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The Salvation Army said in a statement, quote, we serve

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty three million individuals a year, including those

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>in the LGBTQ plus community. In fact, we believe we

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 1>are the largest provider of poverty relief to the LGBTQ population.

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>They are helping twenty three million people a year. But

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.240
<v Speaker 1>because the organization and its leadership and its Christian roots

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>still adhere to adhere to a policy preference, really a

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>religious and an ethical preference, or marriage as it was

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 1>traditionally known until the oberg Felt decision the Supreme Court

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in this country. You know, between a man and a

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:11.800
<v Speaker 1>woman that chair. All the good stuff they do doesn't

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>really matter. They have to not just be punished, but

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to. This organization now needs to be humiliated.

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be treated like it's a pariah organization.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We are not going to last very long as a

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>country going forward. If we have to know the politics

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of every restaurant owner when we go into a restaurant,

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>if we have to know you know, I had a

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:38.760
<v Speaker 1>friend recently tell me that she has she knows people.

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>She's obviously conservative, so she's cool, but she knows people

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who won't go to soul Cycle, which is one of

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>these bicycle cycling classes into it, won't go to Soule

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Cycle anymore because the owner has supported Trump. I mean,

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if this is the way that the society is going

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to go, if we're going to accept the hyper politicization,

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>politicization of everything, extend no grace, no forgiveness, and no

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of kindness and decency to each other, irrespective of

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>political differences, we are heading for very dark and dangerous

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>times as a country. Forget about climate change. That's pull,

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a distraction. It's nonsense. It's not going to do

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>anything to you. I promise you. I mean, I know

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you already know this, but I promise you. You know,

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>in ten years they'll still be saying, well, we are

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong about ten years ago, but now it's really gonna

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be bad. I mean, this is just, this is just

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a part of people's brains that like to

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>think about how it's all going to end and the terribleness,

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's it excites the brain to think

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>about the end, and then it excites the socialist to

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think that they can take over all aspects of the

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>economy and day to day life based upon this hyperventilating

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>fairy tale. They tell each other about how the world

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to end unless we stop using certain light

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>bulbs and take shorter shower. This is absurd, But this

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>is a This is a bad day when an organization

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that is as successful as Chick fil A bends the knee,

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and when a group that you would think should at

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>least get some extension of faith, of good faith and

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people treat it with a little bit of just respect

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for the good that it does is being trashed because

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a different view of marriage. This is not

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to end well unless we start to turn the

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>situation around. All right, team, there's a lot going on

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right now in Hong Kong. We haven't updated you on

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the story in a while. It is getting particularly violent.

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>The standoff is getting worse. We want to bring in

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>our friend Gordon Chang, author of The Coming Collapse of China.

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>You see him all the time on Fox News. Also

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>hear him on the John Bachelor's Show. Gordon, thanks so

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Tell us what is going on

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>right now in Hong Kong. Yeah, at this moment, there

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>are two things of importance. One of them is that

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>there was a standoff at Hong Kong Polytechnic University where

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they're about six protesters in the university buildings and they

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>were completely surrounded by police. Was a siege. About eighty

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or so escape, there's maybe a hundred left. The others surrendered.

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Those who were eighteen or above were arrested. Those below eighteen,

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they were merely photographed, their Hong Kong identity card numbers

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>taken and they were let go at least for the moment.

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>The other development is extremely troubling, and I think it's

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>because siege imping. The Chinese ruler believes he has the

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage because the siege at Hong Kong Polytechnic is winding down,

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is there was an attack on Albert Hoe,

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 1>a leading pro democracy figure. There was an attempt to

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>burn down the premises of the Epic Times, a newspaper,

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like we were starting to see thug

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.959
<v Speaker 1>rule in Hong Kong. And this was related, of course

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to China, because China for the most part controls the

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>political activities of thugs. In the territory are now, what

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think the response from the Chinese government is

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the day's ahead. It feels like

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there's been an escalation the violence I feel. I remember

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a few days ago there was video of a policeman

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong shooting a protester at at effectively point

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>blank range in the chest. So there's been there's been

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>real violence. Do you think that what prevents Xi Jinping

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>from just saying do what you gotta do, lock it

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>down and start really essentially go the Tienamen Square route. Well,

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that they police have pretty much orders to

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they want, which is the reason why eight

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 1>days ago, in that incident you mentioned, a Hong Kong

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>traffic cop told the revolver on a protester who was

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously unarmed, shot him in the torso. And this wasn't

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>an open place where the officer could have retreated. There

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was no threat at all to his life, the no

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>threat of all to property damage, nothing. And so we

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have seen a much more aggressive attitude on the part

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of the police, and indeed, in this Hong Kong Polytechnic standoff,

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the tactics of the police have really been horrific.

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>There's this video going around showing a protester lying completely

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>prone on the ground Hong Kong policeman stomping on his head. Also,

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are trying to surrender from Hong Kong Polytechnic

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>were met with robert bullets and with tear gas. So

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the police essentially can do what they want now.

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what prevents China from formally deploying the People's

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Armed Police or the People's Liberation Army is that they

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>know that the protesters will fight them, and that not

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>only the protesters will take casualties, but so will China's forces,

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and the casualties will be high on both sides. I

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the deterrent right now with siege and pain,

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is there any real effort to negotiate between the two sides.

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's in charge of that? You know? Whatever happened to

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>carry lamb and how are the how are those processes

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>playing out if they're playing out at all. Yeah, dialogue

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>between the two sides is completely broken down. First of all,

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it is difficult to negotiate with protesters because there's so

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:17.800
<v Speaker 1>many different types of protesters right now, Nobody speaks for

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the movement. Nobody wants to speak for the movement. On

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Carrie Lamb speaks for nobody, but cijin Ping,

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.399
<v Speaker 1>she is not making decisions. China has completely taken over

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong government as it's taken over the Hong

0:56:31.880 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kong Police Force, so talking to her is not really

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a productive and also cijan Ping doesn't want to talk.

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>He wants to settle this with harsh measures, as we

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.839
<v Speaker 1>have seen over the last several months. Now, what do

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you think that the outcome here is going to be? Gordon?

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how does this It feels like it's gone

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on for so many months at this point, where does

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>his head and how does it end? Yeah? Well, first

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of all, protests have gone on since April, and they've

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>been going on continuously since June, so we're now in

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 1>our sixth month. I don't know where this ends, of course,

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's several outcomes, some of which I think most

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people don't expect. One of them is that the protesters

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just outlast China because China itself is fragile, and I

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 1>think that sig Ping, the Chinese ruler, is certainly going

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to be held to account for these hardline policies that

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have triggered the unrest. So there are any number of

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:35.400
<v Speaker 1>things that could happen, but one of them is and

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the most likely, is just continued standoff in

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. And every time that the protests look like

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to peter rat I'm sure Beijing is going

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to do something to enrage people, just as it did

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple days ago by declaring that the Hong Kong

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:56.640
<v Speaker 1>courts have no jurisdiction to interpret the Basic Law, which

0:57:56.720 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is Hong Kong's mini constitution as they call it. Possible

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 1>off ramp you could see for Hijan Ping to de

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>escalate the situation without without losing a lot of face.

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there something feasible or if he were to say, okay,

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to reevaluate this and essentially call off the

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>dogs that you know, it would just look like he's

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>weak and there could be real ramifications. I mean, is

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>there an off ramp? You know, there probably is an

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>off ramp. I don't think it'll be taken, but we

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do know that some of the senior officials in the

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong government privately do not like what's going on,

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they murmur things in public. So it's possible,

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not likely, but it's possible that you could see senior

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong government officials try to reach out to the

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>various parts of the protest movement. For a number of reasons,

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they will, and I don't think

0:58:56.640 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the protesters will talk to them at this point. So

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>no likely off ramps in the immediate future. To the

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>degree that we can tell, and we're speaking to Gordon

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 1>changing everybody author of the coming collapse of China, Gordon,

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to the degree that that we can tell, or that

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you can tell, what is sentiment in mainland China among

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the general Chinese population about what's going

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on in Hong Kong. Is there are there pockets of

0:59:26.560 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>support for this that could turn into something beyond just

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>what we see in Hong Kong. Essentially, is is this

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>going to maybe get a little bit of a wind

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the sales of some of the pro freedom folks

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>inside of China or is that just a fantasy at

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this point? That's a great question, Buck. I think their

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>pockets of support for the Hong Kong protesters inside mainland China,

0:59:52.040 --> 0:59:56.479
<v Speaker 1>mostly in Goandong Province, which surrounds Hong Kong um. But

0:59:56.560 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>also I think that people in China by and large

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do not sympathize with people from Hong Kong, never have,

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>probably won't in our lifetimes. But that's not to say

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that protests can't spread into the mainland, because people in

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>China got their own grievances, especially related to the economy,

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>which is in serious trouble book. So it's not growing

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at the six point zero percent pace that they claim

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for the third quarter. It's more like one percent, maybe

1:00:26.720 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>even negative, and that is causing and will cause a

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of loss to people who are not accustomed to

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>losing money. So, as Arthur Waldron of the University of

1:00:38.680 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania points out, Chinese regimes unravel from the outside in

1:00:43.600 --> 1:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong is on the periphery of China, and you

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>could see the same dynamic occur as we've seen in

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the past throughout China's imperial period. So Hong Kong could

1:00:54.880 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be a ticking point that has real ramifications for their regime.

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:02.919
<v Speaker 1>How that play out, well, I think it would play

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>out this way, and that is I would like to think,

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and here I'm hoping, probably more than assessing, but I

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>would hope to think that Americans would see that they

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>have common cause with the protesters in Hong Kong because

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the same power that is encroaching on their autonomy China

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is also attacking our democracy. And I don't think the

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>American political establishment is there yet, but you're starting to

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>see many voices, especially in the Senate and even some

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in the House, that are starting to think that we

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>need to be much more supportive of people in Hong Kong.

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>There is the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nineteen. It passed the House. It probably will

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>pass the Senate, both with veto proof majorities, and that

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>could be the start of a more robust response to China.

1:01:56.760 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that we need to stand with the

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kids in Hong Kong argually, because that's our fight. What

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the Trump administration should do? And

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how how would you assess how Trump has handled this

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>so far? Well? I think Trump has handled this in

1:02:13.800 --> 1:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that the American foreign policy establishment has wanted

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>him to, which is to speak up about it, but

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not to do too much, and also to talk to

1:02:23.840 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese behind the scenes, at which I'm sure has occurred.

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump I thought The President made a really really good

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>comments at his You and General Assembly speech in September.

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He's talked about it in August. He's also spoke about

1:02:39.920 --> 1:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it in October. I think we're going to hear more

1:02:43.480 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>from the President on this, largely because this is something

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's becoming unavoidable as we're seeing more and more scenes

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. And I think that, as as I said,

1:02:54.880 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as I hope more people will see this as our

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fight as well. So I do see reaganesque comments coming

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump, especially as time progresses. Have you seen

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a change? I mean, you're somebody that operates in the

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>same echelon as a lot of the folks who are

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>experts on China that go on TV, and I mean

1:03:14.800 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know those folks, you know what they write. Have

1:03:17.200 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you seen a change in sentiment among the Chinese foreign

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>policy and a US Chinese foreign policy intelligencia, specifically about

1:03:25.680 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the trade war, because I mean I remember in the

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>early days of this, it was going to be fire

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and brimstone, and it was crazy, and now we just

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>don't hear a lot about it. Gordon, why aren't we

1:03:33.840 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>hearing so much about the trade war? Well? I think

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump has won many of the arguments on

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the trade bar when what we call a trade war,

1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I should say, because this is really a broader economic war,

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and indeed it's even a more comprehensive struggle than that.

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But put that aside for the moment. People were saying,

1:03:55.120 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in twenty eighteen, Oh, China's got all the

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>copper upper hand, It's got all the cards, it's got

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>more political will, and people has started to look at

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between China and the United States have seen that. No,

1:04:11.480 --> 1:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at objective factors, the US has almost

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>all the high cards. And as a question of political will,

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that's still up in the air because you have President Trump,

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>who has actually, I think played the Chinese very well

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's taken a strong hand and he has

1:04:30.280 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>pushed the Chinese in ways that they probably thought were

1:04:33.960 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not possible. So I think that's good in terms of

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the way China watchers look at this, it's become inescapable

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>how bad China has behaved. And so we're starting to see,

1:04:48.960 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, a new consensus. And if you want to

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>think about any one example in the last week, it's

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that New York Times revelation of four hundred and three

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pages of Communist Party documents on the treatment of the

1:05:01.320 --> 1:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Leakers and Cossacks in the northwestern part of China what

1:05:04.800 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>China call, said John and what the local inhabitants call

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese occupied East Turk of stand Gordon, changing everybody. Gordon,

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for making the time. We appreciate your expertise.

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Buck. We got an update for

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you on the Epstein situation. I don't even know. It's

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not really an investigations. It's a lot of things all

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tied together. You have the guards who the two guards

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who apparently fell asleep in the Manhattan Correctional Facility here

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York City and Epstein. Then Epstein killed himself

1:05:40.240 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>while they were asleep, and they altered the logs somehow

1:05:42.920 --> 1:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to cover up what had happened. And we're supposed to

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>believe it's all a coincidence. I just we're being told

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that they fell asleep, it was an accident. Highest proof.

1:05:52.400 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there was one time in the careers

1:05:55.960 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of these two guards not to fall asleep, it was

1:06:00.640 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this time, and they fell asleep. I bit strikes me

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>as a little coincidental that this happened with this particular

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>prisoner who might have had and now we'll never really

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>know information in his head about pedophilia and some of

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful people, wealthy people, influential people in the world.

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just very coincidental, and I really liked I

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a clip from Tucker Carlson's show recently. It was

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>an old clip where he points out that when you

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>upset the state, the big s state, if you're Roger Stone,

1:06:50.800 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they send squat teams in your house to humiliate you

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and they tip off Sea and remember that one see

1:06:54.760 --> 1:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, we're just got lucky. What a

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of liars. As the place is such a dis grace,

1:07:00.360 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's disgusting. But you know, they humiliated roger Stone, this

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>n armed people. They could have just called and said,

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>turn yourself in tomorrow, you're underrest. One hundred percent chance

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that Roger Stone would have said, all right, I'll be

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in court tomorrow or I'd rather I'll be in the

1:07:14.320 --> 1:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>station house or whatever it is tomorrow. But no, No,

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they send people in at six am with guns and

1:07:19.440 --> 1:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>guns and more guns to terrify him and create a spectacle.

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But Epstein was allowed to turn himself in. Epstein the

1:07:27.520 --> 1:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>first time around was given the most pampered treatment of

1:07:31.880 --> 1:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody you've ever heard of in prison, and he was trafficking.

1:07:35.360 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And I believe over thirty four victims have been identified,

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>young girls. How can anyone look at that part of

1:07:44.320 --> 1:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our system and not say, there's really something wrong here.

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Why are we supposed to always be We're supposed to

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be quiet and believe this system is good and fair,

1:07:56.280 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's no only, by the way, when the system

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is crushing Republicans all the time, and then the system

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is great. But we see what goes on here with Epstein,

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and and we're told, well, no, you have to believe it.

1:08:10.240 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to think that they knew what they were

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>doing here somehow. And if you ask too many questions

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about who in power influenced this whole process, then you

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are a conspiracy theorist. No, I don't think so. I

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the case at all. I'm still wondering

1:08:29.520 --> 1:08:32.799
<v Speaker 1>when there'll be more information, more evidence out there about Epstein.

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the British Royal Prince Andrew, right, that's

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the one, the second son of Queen Elizabeth. He his

1:08:42.000 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>pr director or whatever the guy's title was resigned before

1:08:46.479 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the BBC interview, so clearly he knew that this was

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to go well, and yet he did that

1:08:53.080 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>interview anyway, and then you, I mean, it's it's still

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty stunning to me that there's not more curiosity among

1:09:03.320 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>journalists with so many of these pieces out there. And

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you it's because they're they really they know.

1:09:10.000 --> 1:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a sense that they know that digging

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>too deep with the Epstein thing could lead to places

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of lib journals just don't want to go.

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Forget about all the underage victims for the lib journals,

1:09:20.439 --> 1:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not worth the risk here if it

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>could really damage one political party a whole lot. All right,

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. I know, team, we've talked about the impeachment

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff for quite a bit today. I don't want to

1:09:32.600 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time on it. We've I just there's

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a there's a couple couple of things I wanted to

1:09:38.120 --> 1:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>throw in the mix, and then we'll move on to

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>some other stuff too that I did not get to before.

1:09:42.720 --> 1:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>One is the the clear theatrics of this Vinman fellow.

1:09:47.320 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he really is auditioning for an MSNBC contributor role.

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any doubt about it. Here is

1:09:55.600 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what he said. He's testifying about this in front of Congress,

1:09:59.600 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, break out the world's smallest violin

1:10:03.240 --> 1:10:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for this guy. Play it please, Dad. I'm sitting here

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>today in the US capital talking to our elected professionals.

1:10:10.240 --> 1:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Is proof that you made the right decision forty years

1:10:12.360 --> 1:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>ago to leave the Soviet Union come here to the

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:17.599
<v Speaker 1>United States of America in search of a better life

1:10:17.800 --> 1:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for our family. Do not worry. I will be fine

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for telling the truth. Oh why are we even hearing

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>about this? Why is he's bringing up his father? Who's

1:10:31.280 --> 1:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about? What is? This is ridiculous. We can't know

1:10:35.760 --> 1:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>who the whistleblower is. This guy's gonna tell us about,

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, his life story and his family history, and

1:10:42.240 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>break out the handkerchiefs for all the tears and the

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:47.599
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. And oh, you know, mister president, I don't

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>dance you know his Jack Ryan moment. And how dare

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are you coming here and bark it me like some

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of junkyard dog. I am the President of the

1:10:55.920 --> 1:11:02.759
<v Speaker 1>United States. Sorry, mister President, I don't dance the old

1:11:02.840 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Potomac two step Jack. It's the best scene in that movie. Man,

1:11:07.439 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It's great. There's that clear present danger, so much better

1:11:11.200 --> 1:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>than the Jack Ryan Amazon show. Somebody should really find

1:11:15.280 --> 1:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Ryan Amazon people and be like, you need

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Buck Sexty. I'll help you. See your

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>third season doesn't doesn't stink because right now your your

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>second season's garbage anyway, So yeah, we we. When I

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>talked to you about the theatrics and stuff from Vinman,

1:11:27.240 --> 1:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm I'm just referring to what exactly was

1:11:30.680 --> 1:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>going on here, which is Vinman is like, oh, you know,

1:11:32.800 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>look at me, I'm speaking the truth about this. In

1:11:38.280 --> 1:11:40.639
<v Speaker 1>some ways, Vinman was really the origin of this whole thing,

1:11:40.720 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>right He's he clearly told somebody who concocted the whole

1:11:44.720 --> 1:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower scheme. But you know, Vinman was one who was like,

1:11:47.400 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm so troubled by this because he was upset that

1:11:49.920 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there would be a lack of bipartisan consensus on on

1:11:54.360 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine policy. And also, I do think it's worth pointing

1:11:59.160 --> 1:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out as we go through this, who really cares that

1:12:01.880 --> 1:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>much about Ukraine in this country? I mean, let's be

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>real here for a second. I'm not saying it doesn't

1:12:06.800 --> 1:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>matter at all, but this is not a core national

1:12:10.400 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>security interests of the United States. It's just not. But

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, all Ukraine policy if we get it wrong there,

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean Obama got every foreign policy question wrong for

1:12:20.479 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all years, wrong on everything wrong and maybe wrong on

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Syria wrong, and a rock wrong in Afghanistan wrong. Just

1:12:25.600 --> 1:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>go through a country? Was anyone? Oh my gosh, Obama's

1:12:31.240 --> 1:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy decision making is not within the interagency consensus.

1:12:36.200 --> 1:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Who cares? You know, we're all supposed to care. We're

1:12:41.360 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all supposed to think that this is um, it's great.

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Any let's go, let's switch into oh wait, no, no,

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one more, there's one more. My man, my man, jacketless.

1:12:51.400 --> 1:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan. He he had a moment where he got

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to expose once again that they're someone's lying and I

1:12:59.360 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think we almost lying. But someone's lying about the whistle

1:13:01.920 --> 1:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>blower and knowing the identity of it. Because here's that

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:08.879
<v Speaker 1>would play play Jim Jordan, please, mister Jordan on call readout.

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Certainly after the first call, there were probably a half

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a dozen or more people that I read out. Those

1:13:14.960 --> 1:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are people with the proper clearance and that the need

1:13:18.280 --> 1:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to know in this case because of the sensitivity of

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the call, and mister Eisenberg told me not to speak

1:13:24.000 --> 1:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to anybody else. I only read out outside of the

1:13:26.720 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>NFC two individuals, two individuals das Kent and one other person.

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>And you're not willing to tell us who that other

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>individual is. Mister Chairman. Point of order, Mister chairman. Mister chairman,

1:13:36.479 --> 1:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>point of order, gentle wis suspend counsel. Uh. Mister Chairman,

1:13:40.840 --> 1:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I would ask you to enforce the rule with regard

1:13:45.400 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to the disclosure with regard to the intelligence songs. UM.

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, counsel. You know, as I indicated before this committee,

1:13:52.680 --> 1:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>will not be used to out the whistle blower. Um

1:13:55.600 --> 1:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that same Chairman, don't lose you are recognized again, mister Jordan.

1:14:03.160 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Mister Chairman, I don't see how this is outing the whistleblower.

1:14:06.120 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>That the witness has testified in his deposition that he

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know who the whistle blower is. You have said,

1:14:11.200 --> 1:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>even though no one believes you, you have said you

1:14:13.400 --> 1:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know who the whistle blower is. So how is

1:14:15.680 --> 1:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this outing the whistle blower to find out who this

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>individual is? Jordan, this is your time for questioning. You

1:14:21.760 --> 1:14:23.639
<v Speaker 1>can use it and we like, but your question should

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:25.639
<v Speaker 1>be addressed to the one liked, and your questions should

1:14:25.680 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not be addressed to trying to out the whistle blower. Okay, okay,

1:14:29.120 --> 1:14:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Notice how Chiff can't answer that question. Chief is ruling

1:14:32.800 --> 1:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on this. They're giving this witness some kind of special

1:14:37.360 --> 1:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>immunity from answering a question based on the premise that

1:14:41.040 --> 1:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be outing a whistle blower that they say

1:14:42.840 --> 1:14:46.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't even know who the whistle blower is. Now

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not idiots. Clearly, what they are trying to do

1:14:51.120 --> 1:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is just create a fig leaf, create a facade of

1:14:55.320 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not knowing that what happened here was the what was

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:04.559
<v Speaker 1>was Vinman was all a Homer Cash who brought up Biden.

1:15:04.600 --> 1:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We got to protect Biden. Biden, who's going to bring

1:15:06.920 --> 1:15:09.759
<v Speaker 1>back the establishment and he'll be great for this country.

1:15:09.760 --> 1:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And he talked one of Biden's little buddies in the

1:15:12.800 --> 1:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the deep state, reportedly this fellow Eric Charmela, but

1:15:18.560 --> 1:15:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't know officially. And then the whistleblower must be

1:15:25.479 --> 1:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the person that was told about the call. And then

1:15:28.000 --> 1:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he came up with this idea of well, I'll use

1:15:30.920 --> 1:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the interagency process and go to the

1:15:33.000 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General and maintain anonymity through it and through it,

1:15:37.040 --> 1:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and that way we can talk about this and not

1:15:39.000 --> 1:15:45.599
<v Speaker 1>worry about leaking classified information, etc. Etc. Obviously, that's why

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they won't tell us who he told about the phone

1:15:47.280 --> 1:15:50.559
<v Speaker 1>call and the claim that this person had a need

1:15:50.600 --> 1:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to know. I would I mean, I can't know, because

1:15:53.040 --> 1:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who the person was, but I would

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly tell you that is false, almost certainly tell

1:15:58.920 --> 1:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you that that is a lie. Now, need to know

1:16:00.920 --> 1:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is always there's a bit of discretion and gray area. Well,

1:16:03.400 --> 1:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>who really has a need to know? You've got to

1:16:05.240 --> 1:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have the clearance. That's the legal groundwork for this right.

1:16:08.400 --> 1:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell someone something classified unless they have a

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>clearance for that level of information. But beyond that, need

1:16:16.400 --> 1:16:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to know is always a but I'm telling you, in reality,

1:16:20.920 --> 1:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I gotta haven't need to know. He's like an anti Trumper,

1:16:23.320 --> 1:16:26.599
<v Speaker 1>and Vinman knew that he could all spun up about

1:16:26.600 --> 1:16:28.519
<v Speaker 1>this and that they would come up with some some

1:16:28.600 --> 1:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>scheme to use this as a grounds for impeaching the president.

1:16:32.080 --> 1:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean impeaching the presence they're gonna do it on

1:16:37.200 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this people are out of their minds. All right, I'll

1:16:43.360 --> 1:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I just there was some some left in the cutting

1:16:45.880 --> 1:16:47.559
<v Speaker 1>room floor from before that I wanted to get to

1:16:47.680 --> 1:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>here on the stuff. But let's talk about democrats and

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>they're crazy. Uh oh wait, wait wait, wait, wait, hold on,

1:16:57.160 --> 1:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's one more thing. Speaking of those who talk to

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>us like we're idiots and like we can't figure anything

1:17:04.120 --> 1:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>else out. CNN hired Andy McCabe, the former acting FBI

1:17:10.280 --> 1:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>director who was at the center of all these shenanigans

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with you know, Comey and the special Counsel and getting

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>all the Russia collusion nonsense laundered through the f behind

1:17:21.479 --> 1:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the DJ to make it seem like it was legitimate.

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:28.799
<v Speaker 1>McCabe lied under oath multiple times. He lied about leaking,

1:17:29.000 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>leaking that not only he was guilty of, but also

1:17:30.960 --> 1:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that he was blaming subordinates for that's the kind of

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>guy he is. How dare you leaked information that I

1:17:38.880 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>actually secretly leaked myself. You're lucky I don't fire you

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for doing the thing that I actually did. That's who

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy McCabe is. So before they do the whole Oh,

1:17:46.720 --> 1:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's America's last best boy scout. He's amazing enough about that,

1:17:52.160 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but CNN hired him right away because if your hashtag resistance,

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can go to CNN and they'll pay

1:17:57.439 --> 1:17:59.519
<v Speaker 1>you and they'll take care of you. And you know

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what goes on over there. But here's what McCabe

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:08.559
<v Speaker 1>says about the folks in the federal bureaucracy and the

1:18:08.600 --> 1:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>way that they It's just never about politics, he tells

1:18:11.479 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>us play at twenty police. We don't know in the FBI.

1:18:14.680 --> 1:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't ask each other our political beliefs, we don't

1:18:17.000 --> 1:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about political issues. I think there is, of course

1:18:20.920 --> 1:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>no deep state. There is no resistance within the bureaucracy

1:18:24.320 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>across the government agencies pushing against this president. But what

1:18:27.680 --> 1:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there is in that bureaucracy are thousands and thousands of

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>men and women who are committed to the rule of law.

1:18:34.200 --> 1:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And we now have an administration that frequently finds itself

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>bumping up against those laws that we rely on to

1:18:39.840 --> 1:18:43.559
<v Speaker 1>govern this country. And so when people across government stand

1:18:43.640 --> 1:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>up for those rules and point out those transgressions, we

1:18:46.960 --> 1:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>see how they're treated by this president and by his administration. Nice,

1:18:51.320 --> 1:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>sanctimonious monologue going here, what are the laws that he

1:18:55.439 --> 1:18:57.759
<v Speaker 1>brushed up against? By the way, what are those laws?

1:18:59.000 --> 1:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Laws like the one that Sally Yates said that was

1:19:03.200 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>being violated when she refused a lawful order from the President,

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:08.559
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court had to say actually acting at

1:19:08.640 --> 1:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Trinity General, maybe learn, maybe learn what the statute says

1:19:12.400 --> 1:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>before you decide you're not going to do something because

1:19:14.280 --> 1:19:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't like it. Who's really lawless? The people who

1:19:19.520 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and it must have been a small circle and it

1:19:21.240 --> 1:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>was Obama pointees most likely folks who leaked highly classified

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>information about General Flynt's phone called the Washington Post and

1:19:29.479 --> 1:19:32.559
<v Speaker 1>an effort to take him down. That's a felony. So

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>who are those Those are those people who are just

1:19:36.439 --> 1:19:39.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to do their best to obey the rule of

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:41.559
<v Speaker 1>law and the thousands and thousands of men of women.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>What about Annie McCabe, Why would he lie under oath

1:19:45.720 --> 1:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Inspector General of the FBI. I thought Annie

1:19:50.439 --> 1:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>McCabe apparently brushes up against the law. Isn't that weird?

1:19:53.960 --> 1:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He has problems staying with the law. As the f

1:19:57.439 --> 1:20:06.519
<v Speaker 1>BE Eye director, I am FPI agent. You've never seen

1:20:06.600 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a point break, have you? I have not, dude, you're

1:20:14.160 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>totally missing out. Keanu Reeves better. A Rourke sounded a

1:20:20.040 --> 1:20:23.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit alike. I prefer Jack Bower. It's probably a

1:20:23.560 --> 1:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>better show. So anyway, you got deep state McCabe telling

1:20:27.960 --> 1:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you there is no deep state. What a surprise. By

1:20:31.000 --> 1:20:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's gotta get criminally prosecuted, folks. He lied,

1:20:34.960 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>he lied under oath. They're gonna go after. They're gonna

1:20:39.120 --> 1:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>writ to Roger Stone, they gotta go after McCabe. You know,

1:20:41.960 --> 1:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to criminal law, forget about the whole

1:20:43.800 --> 1:20:47.479
<v Speaker 1>cultural wokeness social justice stuff for a second. I mean,

1:20:47.560 --> 1:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, do we have to live under the rules

1:20:49.040 --> 1:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that they make? Well, that's really hard because they change

1:20:50.760 --> 1:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>your rules all the time. We can't allow that with

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>criminal law. The law is gonna be the law. That's

1:20:55.680 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the way this is gonna have to go. But I

1:20:57.880 --> 1:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>love CNN brings on CNN on McCabe to talk about

1:21:01.280 --> 1:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the absence of the deep state. Is just like CNN

1:21:04.120 --> 1:21:08.599
<v Speaker 1>this past weekend bringing on Dan Rather, the original king

1:21:08.840 --> 1:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of fake news, for using falsified documents to try to

1:21:12.920 --> 1:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>throw a presidential election. They use him to talk about

1:21:17.479 --> 1:21:23.519
<v Speaker 1>truth and accuracy in the media. These people have neither

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a sense of shame nor a sense of irony. His

1:21:26.479 --> 1:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>inability to say words sometimes worries me tremendously. He is

1:21:31.439 --> 1:21:34.599
<v Speaker 1>having trouble word finding. When he said to United Esh

1:21:34.800 --> 1:21:37.599
<v Speaker 1>instead of United States. These aren't words he signed slips

1:21:37.640 --> 1:21:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of the tongue. These are words. He can't find them.

1:21:40.479 --> 1:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is happening over and over again. Comedians joke

1:21:43.320 --> 1:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, but it's not a joking matter. I think

1:21:46.040 --> 1:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a neurological issue that is not being addressed.

1:21:50.200 --> 1:21:52.519
<v Speaker 1>And if he had an MRI of his head over there,

1:21:52.600 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I would be very pleased, because I think he needs

1:21:56.200 --> 1:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>CNN puts on air here, this is a this is amazing.

1:22:00.960 --> 1:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You really cannot make this stuff up. CNN puts on

1:22:08.760 --> 1:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>air a doctor, doctor David Shiner, who was apparently Obama's

1:22:14.240 --> 1:22:18.519
<v Speaker 1>former doctor I see here on our sheet, who is

1:22:18.560 --> 1:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>giving life once again to the theory that Trump is insane.

1:22:24.200 --> 1:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually, like not of sound mind is either

1:22:28.280 --> 1:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>senile or suffering from dementia, has gone crazy. You know,

1:22:30.960 --> 1:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they even tried they tried this against Reagan too, by

1:22:33.880 --> 1:22:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the way, you'll remember that that was what they were

1:22:35.600 --> 1:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>saying about Reagan. But now they're saying it about Trump. Uh,

1:22:41.800 --> 1:22:45.559
<v Speaker 1>at what point do you think they feel silly running

1:22:45.760 --> 1:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the playbook so many times in a way that's so

1:22:49.560 --> 1:22:53.759
<v Speaker 1>obvious what they're doing right there there there once again,

1:22:53.800 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>here we are with all maybe we got to remove

1:22:56.160 --> 1:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump with the twenty fifth amendments. You know, they're they're

1:22:58.439 --> 1:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>starting this whole thing again based on slurred words. If

1:23:03.080 --> 1:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>slurred words are going to be taken as evidence for

1:23:06.439 --> 1:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a doctor to diagnose from a far which is by

1:23:10.720 --> 1:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, not a smart thing to do on national TV,

1:23:14.040 --> 1:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on a cable news network, If slurring words gonna be

1:23:16.160 --> 1:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem, what do they think of Joe Biden? Well,

1:23:21.800 --> 1:23:27.519
<v Speaker 1>that's gurgling, gurgen. But you know, I just want to

1:23:27.520 --> 1:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>know why don't they have somebody on CNN diagnosing Joe

1:23:30.520 --> 1:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden's mental health forgets where he is, says really stupid

1:23:35.360 --> 1:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>things that no one can believe. How dumb it is

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:39.559
<v Speaker 1>what he said. I mean, you know, confuses things that

1:23:39.600 --> 1:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>are not close together. I mean, really, not only Trump,

1:23:44.360 --> 1:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but CNN's unbiased only idiots really believe that. Now there's

1:23:49.880 --> 1:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a mentality among the CNN audience that I'm familiar with,

1:23:53.840 --> 1:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>where they they like to think that the people they're

1:23:57.360 --> 1:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>watching are the smart, good people, and therefore are the

1:24:00.360 --> 1:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>real journalists. So they know that there is really no

1:24:04.800 --> 1:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus that CNN is a partisan organization. It is

1:24:08.360 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a wing of the Democratic Party now and it does

1:24:10.960 --> 1:24:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Democrat left wing bidding all the time, all day long

1:24:13.640 --> 1:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on air. But they still like to cling to that

1:24:19.320 --> 1:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pleasant fiction that maybe they really are just journalists over there.

1:24:23.040 --> 1:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So the CNN audience will never, will never flee from

1:24:25.280 --> 1:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>them because they're doing what they want them to do.

1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>They're they're playing out this this myth in real time.

1:24:31.880 --> 1:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But CNN is the real, honest, good place where the

1:24:35.479 --> 1:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>journalist stuff happens. But you know, this, this whole impeachment

1:24:42.560 --> 1:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>for us, unfortunately, is going to Oh wait, we got

1:24:45.479 --> 1:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Senator Patrick Lahey here talking about how there's witness intimidation

1:24:49.240 --> 1:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with the tweet. Is that what this is? This is

1:24:51.360 --> 1:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be amazing. Play clib ten place

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will. If I could ask you, how do

1:24:54.960 --> 1:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you think the impeachment and choired testimonies aren't going well?

1:24:58.439 --> 1:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Closed Doors had Republicans and Democrats there.

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the Republicans thought they could pull

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the press by claiming we want to be in that room. Well,

1:25:09.760 --> 1:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of course there are Republicans in that room, and I

1:25:12.800 --> 1:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think it stopped the theatrics go down. This is a

1:25:16.120 --> 1:25:19.599
<v Speaker 1>very serious thing. Where the things the ambassador, she said

1:25:19.640 --> 1:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the other day, and then had the president tweet to

1:25:24.120 --> 1:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>try to intimidate her. I was a prosecutor for eight years.

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I know an intimidation. What did you think when she

1:25:31.880 --> 1:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>said that she felt threatened by that call? When I

1:25:34.760 --> 1:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was a prosecutor, I would have thought I would have

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>called that witness tam Park procuter or I don't know

1:25:44.560 --> 1:25:51.559
<v Speaker 1>a witness. These politicians, you know, they really some of

1:25:51.560 --> 1:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>them would just they'd be doing all of us such

1:25:53.720 --> 1:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a favor if they would, uh, you know, give it up,

1:25:57.000 --> 1:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>go spend time with their families, you know, go help

1:25:59.400 --> 1:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>out in their commune. And he's volunteer, do stuff where

1:26:01.320 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have cameras on you all the time, or

1:26:03.960 --> 1:26:08.759
<v Speaker 1>urban mumbling for fifty years, rum mumble for another fifty years,

1:26:08.920 --> 1:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>or no serious legal analyst with any intelligence whatsoever really

1:26:13.479 --> 1:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks that it was witness intimidation for the president to

1:26:16.680 --> 1:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>tweet out that this person is bad at her job.

1:26:19.040 --> 1:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>That's an opinion. If the president no longer has First

1:26:21.680 --> 1:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights because someone is going to testify against him.

1:26:24.120 --> 1:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know how they're going to actually enforce

1:26:26.439 --> 1:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>these rules, but there are there is no universal applicability

1:26:31.880 --> 1:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the rules Democrats are always applying against Trump. It's

1:26:35.840 --> 1:26:38.479
<v Speaker 1>never okay the standard we've created for him is now

1:26:38.520 --> 1:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be the standard, because it's either so in

1:26:42.479 --> 1:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>violation of legal and constitutional norms that it would be

1:26:46.000 --> 1:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it would be preposterous, or even beyond that, they just

1:26:48.520 --> 1:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>have no chance of of realistically speaking, they have they

1:26:53.479 --> 1:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have no chance of using it as a means to

1:26:56.920 --> 1:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>test their own side. They just won't do it anyway.

1:27:00.400 --> 1:27:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I find uh yeah, Patrick said her Patrick leahy Man.

1:27:05.320 --> 1:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic parties not sending us their best, that's for sure.

1:27:08.160 --> 1:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe this is their best. The people who are

1:27:09.800 --> 1:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the most morally pliable, dishonest and just they're relentless, stop

1:27:18.400 --> 1:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at nothing pursuit of power. I suppose the Democrats have

1:27:21.040 --> 1:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>stacked their stacked their roster with people who fall into

1:27:25.000 --> 1:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that category, and maybe that makes them happen. Colin Kaepernick

1:27:28.320 --> 1:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is making headlines again. So this guy from the people

1:27:33.840 --> 1:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that I know, and I have brothers who know a

1:27:35.400 --> 1:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>lot about football. I don't know that much about football.

1:27:37.280 --> 1:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure Mark you know about what is the

1:27:40.000 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick situation here? Just bring everybody up to speed from

1:27:43.439 --> 1:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what is this guy doing now? Like what happened this recently?

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So last week around Tuesday, the NFL said they were

1:27:50.760 --> 1:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a workout, and a lot of

1:27:53.240 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>people think that it was something part of some sort

1:27:55.400 --> 1:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of settlement with between him in the league. So Saturday

1:27:57.920 --> 1:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to the workout at the Falcons facility that's

1:28:00.320 --> 1:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the old team in Atlanta for those people who are

1:28:03.479 --> 1:28:07.479
<v Speaker 1>not two up on football, and they couldn't agree on Basically,

1:28:07.560 --> 1:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick wanted his own film crew there, but the NFL

1:28:11.320 --> 1:28:13.519
<v Speaker 1>was just going to use the Falcons film crew and

1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>then distribute it to everybody, all thirty two NFL teams.

1:28:17.479 --> 1:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick didn't like that. He wanted an independent film crew

1:28:20.720 --> 1:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted it open to the media. So he

1:28:22.960 --> 1:28:26.519
<v Speaker 1>ended up doing his own his own workout an hour

1:28:26.680 --> 1:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>later than the NFL's mandated workout at a high school,

1:28:30.840 --> 1:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>open to the media and all that. What do you

1:28:33.720 --> 1:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think is I mean, was this just for the spectacle? Why? Why?

1:28:36.439 --> 1:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just two parties that can't agree on

1:28:39.120 --> 1:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>anything two that wanted to one up each other. I mean,

1:28:42.240 --> 1:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>does this Does anyone really even think that this guy

1:28:44.520 --> 1:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>would come back in the league, And I mean he

1:28:46.200 --> 1:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was wasn't here. I don't think he wants to come

1:28:47.840 --> 1:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>back in the league at this point. I think this

1:28:49.479 --> 1:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is all a spectacle. I just I don't even understand

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>how this guy is managing to still be in the

1:28:54.880 --> 1:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>news cycle that he is. And I mean, I know

1:28:56.680 --> 1:28:59.439
<v Speaker 1>he's woken and social justice and he's created this whole

1:29:00.160 --> 1:29:03.439
<v Speaker 1>your character of you know that that the TV that

1:29:03.840 --> 1:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the TV viewing audience I suppose is interested in. And

1:29:06.040 --> 1:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>he's now something of a martyr for social justice because

1:29:09.160 --> 1:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he took a knee, did wear pigs in cop uniform.

1:29:13.600 --> 1:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't forgotten about that one. But here we

1:29:16.920 --> 1:29:18.559
<v Speaker 1>could we could hear from it. We have. We've got

1:29:18.600 --> 1:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a Kaepernick clip somewhere along here. Where are you go?

1:29:21.760 --> 1:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear what this gentleman does? He gonn play it.

1:29:24.120 --> 1:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been ready for three years. I've been denied for

1:29:27.120 --> 1:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>three years. We all know why I came out here,

1:29:29.760 --> 1:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>showed it today in front of everybody. We have nothing

1:29:32.200 --> 1:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to hide, So we're waiting for the thirty two owners,

1:29:35.439 --> 1:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty two teams, Roger Goodell, all of them to stop running,

1:29:39.400 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Stop running from the truth, stop running from the people.

1:29:43.040 --> 1:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We're out here, We're ready to play, We're ready to

1:29:45.640 --> 1:29:48.519
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. My agent, Jeff Nally, is ready to talk

1:29:48.560 --> 1:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to any team. I interview with any team at any time.

1:29:52.320 --> 1:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been ready. I'm staying ready, and I'll continue to

1:29:55.439 --> 1:30:00.599
<v Speaker 1>be ready. What if he's just not good enough? Does

1:30:00.600 --> 1:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that ever? Does that ever a factor into the car?

1:30:02.520 --> 1:30:04.599
<v Speaker 1>What if he's gotten a little older, a little slower,

1:30:04.600 --> 1:30:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and he's actually just not good enough and he's a

1:30:07.520 --> 1:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>prima donna and would be a big pain in the

1:30:10.320 --> 1:30:12.839
<v Speaker 1>neck for any team to deal with. Isn't that possible,

1:30:12.880 --> 1:30:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Producer Mark, Yeah, He's not a good enough NFL player

1:30:15.600 --> 1:30:18.599
<v Speaker 1>to be warranting that kind of distraction in the locker room.

1:30:18.840 --> 1:30:21.639
<v Speaker 1>If he was Tom Brady, if he was Aaron Rodgers,

1:30:21.640 --> 1:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a player to that level, a Hall of Fame type player,

1:30:24.200 --> 1:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>any owner would sign him because winning is everything. But

1:30:28.080 --> 1:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick isn't that great of a quarterback to have the

1:30:31.200 --> 1:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>distraction that it would be at this point in the

1:30:33.360 --> 1:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>locker room, and the potential that you have half the

1:30:35.760 --> 1:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>locker room that won't agree with him, and half that

1:30:38.640 --> 1:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>will agree with him, and that'll fracture a locker room,

1:30:41.240 --> 1:30:43.879
<v Speaker 1>which kills the season. And wasn't there a player recently

1:30:44.000 --> 1:30:47.519
<v Speaker 1>who was like a troublemaker and someone signed him and

1:30:47.560 --> 1:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they had to get rid of him right away? I

1:30:48.840 --> 1:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>forget what this will? Oh? Antonio Brown? Yes, yeah, yeah,

1:30:51.320 --> 1:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened with him? Well, the Patriots are a different animal.

1:30:54.360 --> 1:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You didn't. You know, Belichick keeps a very tight ship

1:30:57.120 --> 1:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Brown's a little bit of a mental case,

1:30:59.240 --> 1:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's a great player. But they released him immediately

1:31:02.000 --> 1:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because he wasn't conforming to Patriot standards, right. So he

1:31:04.800 --> 1:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>came in and he was like, I'm gonna do it

1:31:06.160 --> 1:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>my way and they were like you're out. Yes, And

1:31:07.840 --> 1:31:11.479
<v Speaker 1>now there are also rape allegations against him. Well that's

1:31:11.520 --> 1:31:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a that's that's the other reason nobody has signed him since.

1:31:14.960 --> 1:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Ah yeah, okay, well there you go, if you like.

1:31:18.479 --> 1:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I knew there's something going on there. Oh, but we

1:31:20.000 --> 1:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to switch gears here because I promised we

1:31:21.840 --> 1:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about this um at the top of the show.

1:31:25.320 --> 1:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Fart Gate, Dun Dun dune. It's a thing. It was

1:31:30.720 --> 1:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>blowing up on social media last night. It was shaking

1:31:34.960 --> 1:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the room even I know it was explosive. This was

1:31:43.600 --> 1:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC's Chris Matthews talking to Eric Swalwell. Is this childish?

1:31:50.000 --> 1:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it worthy of the Bucks Act and Show to

1:31:51.600 --> 1:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>discuss this? I don't know, but it was a big

1:31:54.000 --> 1:31:56.639
<v Speaker 1>news story last night. I don't make the rules. This

1:31:56.680 --> 1:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is how the exchange went audio on my friends taxpayer

1:32:01.840 --> 1:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars to ask the Ukrainians to help him cheat an election.

1:32:09.840 --> 1:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so childish. I know, it's so dumb. Oh man. Yeah,

1:32:15.040 --> 1:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it came across loud and clear though we all know

1:32:17.479 --> 1:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what that was. We all know what it was. And

1:32:20.960 --> 1:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>then you had the you know, amateur detectives, the various

1:32:24.640 --> 1:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sleuths online who were all taking to taking to social

1:32:30.320 --> 1:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>media to indicate what they whether it was whoever whoever

1:32:36.400 --> 1:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>smelt it, dealt it, or whoever denied it supplied it.

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I swell, well, if you look at the video, he

1:32:44.640 --> 1:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of pauses for a second, and so people initially

1:32:47.360 --> 1:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>were suggesting that that was the that was the moment

1:32:51.160 --> 1:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of recognition that he just let it, He just let

1:32:52.960 --> 1:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one rip, He just let a let a stinky sneeze

1:32:57.439 --> 1:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>go on air and then people were saying, but no,

1:33:02.680 --> 1:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>it might have been Chris Matthews that did this, because

1:33:06.520 --> 1:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Chris Matthews was deadline and I don't know, you get

1:33:09.520 --> 1:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the lav mic the lav mic would it pick up

1:33:13.760 --> 1:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that ambient noise? But that was on a national TV hit,

1:33:17.360 --> 1:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you that some things, you know,

1:33:19.040 --> 1:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>some things do happen when you're doing live TV. I'll

1:33:22.360 --> 1:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>never forget once Judge Ni Piro, who's who's great, a

1:33:25.360 --> 1:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun, but she had me on her show

1:33:27.320 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and she was wearing a dress and I was wearing

1:33:29.240 --> 1:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a suit, and under the lights on that show, I'm

1:33:32.240 --> 1:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>telling you, it was like one hundred and five degrees

1:33:35.000 --> 1:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I started sweating and sweating and sweating, and every

1:33:40.000 --> 1:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>time they would go away from me to her or

1:33:41.960 --> 1:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a clip, I could see in the monitor and I

1:33:43.320 --> 1:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>would just take flop sweat off my forehead and just

1:33:45.800 --> 1:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fling it across the room because it looked like I

1:33:47.680 --> 1:33:49.679
<v Speaker 1>was in the midst of some kind of panic attack.

1:33:49.720 --> 1:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I was actually just really hot, because it's really hot

1:33:51.320 --> 1:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on those lights, so stuff can happen. But Swallowell is

1:33:55.160 --> 1:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna live this one down for a while. I

1:33:56.640 --> 1:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will say that noise was really a perfect SoundBite encapsulation

1:34:02.840 --> 1:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>of his abandoned primary campaign. So there's that producer, Mark,

1:34:07.520 --> 1:34:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a theory on whoever supplied it, denied it,

1:34:11.600 --> 1:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>or whoever smelt it dealt it? Just by his face?

1:34:14.280 --> 1:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It was him, you think, so right? I've made that

1:34:16.439 --> 1:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>face before many times. Yeah. Have you ever done it

1:34:20.960 --> 1:34:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in like a quiet room with a lot of people

1:34:23.479 --> 1:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in it? You know where I've been tappened to me.

1:34:26.360 --> 1:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been told by friends it can happen sometimes in

1:34:30.040 --> 1:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the gym. Oh that's bad because but also you figure,

1:34:33.840 --> 1:34:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'm told that if you're in the gym, people

1:34:36.760 --> 1:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have headphones on. But let's say you're in

1:34:39.280 --> 1:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the gym and everybody has headphones on, and you think

1:34:40.960 --> 1:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you're safe, and then you you were to just relax

1:34:43.479 --> 1:34:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and let it, let you know, let nature have its

1:34:45.560 --> 1:34:48.679
<v Speaker 1>take its course there, and you engaged in your own

1:34:49.200 --> 1:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>aerosol bombing of your athletic facility. And then you see

1:34:53.560 --> 1:34:57.519
<v Speaker 1>perhaps see a beautiful uh you know, woman in her

1:34:57.560 --> 1:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in her late twenties or early thirties working out near

1:35:00.439 --> 1:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you who does not have headphones on because she prefers

1:35:03.040 --> 1:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to just listen to the music coming over the PA system.

1:35:05.200 --> 1:35:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Then you have to think in your head, well, she's

1:35:07.560 --> 1:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a psychopath, did well, but did she did she here

1:35:11.560 --> 1:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or not? And that can that can be troublesome for

1:35:14.160 --> 1:35:16.760
<v Speaker 1>some people. I'm told some people just working out, you

1:35:16.760 --> 1:35:18.479
<v Speaker 1>know you can't help it. I will say, I can't

1:35:18.479 --> 1:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>control your yoga instructors. And it is known that once

1:35:21.040 --> 1:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you kind of get the you get that energy flow going,

1:35:24.840 --> 1:35:27.599
<v Speaker 1>gotta let it all flow, and that can mean stuff

1:35:27.600 --> 1:35:29.559
<v Speaker 1>happens in there. So we see, we're all adults here.

1:35:29.840 --> 1:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>It's nature. It's no big deal. It happens. It happens.

1:35:34.600 --> 1:35:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But neither mean nor producer Mark. We are very gentlemanly

1:35:37.760 --> 1:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the freedom hudding here. So this is this is

1:35:39.880 --> 1:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not This is not some zoo. We don't allow things

1:35:42.040 --> 1:35:47.599
<v Speaker 1>to get crazy and uncouth. We're too close together those

1:35:47.640 --> 1:35:49.599
<v Speaker 1>quarters in here, so we gotta we gotta keep it clean,

1:35:50.720 --> 1:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. Roll calls coming up like soft butter on

1:35:53.120 --> 1:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>warm toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast.

1:36:05.439 --> 1:36:10.439
<v Speaker 1>It's time for roll call Facebook dot com, slash buck

1:36:10.640 --> 1:36:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Sexton or Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot Com. There we go. Now,

1:36:17.600 --> 1:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it, shall we. Chris buck Shield Time

1:36:24.880 --> 1:36:28.479
<v Speaker 1>a man. I hear you and the others say the

1:36:28.680 --> 1:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>rot in the FBI is limited to the top. I

1:36:31.040 --> 1:36:33.839
<v Speaker 1>used to think so too, but I'm having serious doubts.

1:36:34.720 --> 1:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Any organization that relies on handwritten notes and refuses to

1:36:38.080 --> 1:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>record interviews except wire taps and secret recordings, of course,

1:36:41.280 --> 1:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>as the norm is suspicious. An organization that made its

1:36:46.080 --> 1:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>bones going after the mafia with tangential crimes like tax

1:36:49.200 --> 1:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>evasion has embraced the win in any way necessary. That

1:36:53.280 --> 1:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is their mentality. I'm not defending criminals, but this approach,

1:37:00.320 --> 1:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>where did I just lost it? This approach has changed

1:37:03.200 --> 1:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the character of the FBI. It's no longer about criminal intent.

1:37:06.040 --> 1:37:09.519
<v Speaker 1>They'll go after people for a lying or any number

1:37:09.600 --> 1:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of tactics to secure a conviction. I'm not saying this

1:37:12.080 --> 1:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is always unwarranted, but I believe this core attitude is

1:37:15.640 --> 1:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so pervasive it corrupted the entire organization and corrupt and

1:37:19.960 --> 1:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>political top officials. You're looking at the beginning of something terrifying, Chris.

1:37:25.200 --> 1:37:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I do think, unfortunately, especially at that level the FBI,

1:37:28.560 --> 1:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or rather at the FBI level, so federal crimes, there

1:37:31.520 --> 1:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is a common mentality of we want to put wins

1:37:36.280 --> 1:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>up on the board. You gotta get collars, as we

1:37:38.040 --> 1:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>send the MYPD, you gotta get convictions against people, and

1:37:42.160 --> 1:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that that mentality of putting points on the board can

1:37:47.320 --> 1:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>influence decision making about things that can have a really

1:37:51.200 --> 1:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>big effect on people's lives. So yeah, here we go.

1:37:59.320 --> 1:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what we have here, Christian um, Men at

1:38:05.800 --> 1:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Work are definitely Aussies. They were my favorite band of

1:38:09.439 --> 1:38:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. Yes, the Buck is right even when he

1:38:12.800 --> 1:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>doubts himself, because the Bucks should not doubt himself, that

1:38:16.680 --> 1:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is for sure. Um Robert rights Men at Work as

1:38:21.960 --> 1:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>an Australian band and their best song is down Under.

1:38:25.640 --> 1:38:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's right. So there's who could it be

1:38:27.920 --> 1:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>knocking at my door? And then there's also I come

1:38:32.240 --> 1:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from a letting down Under. That's why I thought Men

1:38:34.320 --> 1:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at Work was ausy because they're definitely ausy. And something

1:38:39.240 --> 1:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>something about a vegemite sandwich that's in there too. Can

1:38:45.400 --> 1:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you hear? Can you hear the thunder? Come on? Producer

1:38:47.960 --> 1:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark segment me, babe, let's do it. You gotta h

1:38:52.920 --> 1:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>should call me babe, you know what I mean? I mean,

1:38:57.040 --> 1:39:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I know we're close, but this is rock star. I'm

1:39:00.840 --> 1:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Rockstar mode I'm trying to give, you know,

1:39:03.080 --> 1:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the crowd of one fired up in here.

1:39:07.680 --> 1:39:10.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, didn't you take the harassing course

1:39:10.800 --> 1:39:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of the company gave. That's a fair point, Julia writes

1:39:14.640 --> 1:39:18.679
<v Speaker 1>book Awesome, Awesome Show. Yesterday, a friend of mine, who

1:39:18.720 --> 1:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>also indulges in the Buck Sexton Show said that Netflix's

1:39:22.400 --> 1:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>War Machine with Brad Pitt was based on General McCrystal

1:39:26.200 --> 1:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and his staff's Shenanigan's Shields High. Is that true? I

1:39:33.600 --> 1:39:35.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about that, and thank you so much, Juliet,

1:39:35.640 --> 1:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you for listening. I haven't seen Brad pitt War Machine.

1:39:39.200 --> 1:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really behind my show is because I have to

1:39:41.000 --> 1:39:43.240
<v Speaker 1>go home after the Bucks Exton show every day and

1:39:43.240 --> 1:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>write for hours and hours to put out this book

1:39:45.320 --> 1:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on Crushing Commies that I'm going to be releasing for

1:39:48.040 --> 1:39:50.639
<v Speaker 1>all of you probably in January or February. Yeah, it's

1:39:50.640 --> 1:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>coming soon. So I don't have a ton of time

1:39:53.840 --> 1:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>for the shows because right now I got in the

1:39:55.520 --> 1:40:01.439
<v Speaker 1>queue the Americans, Peaky Blinder's latest season. There's some other

1:40:01.600 --> 1:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I want to see that i've although I

1:40:04.040 --> 1:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>will say at night, I've been watching this Netflix series

1:40:06.600 --> 1:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>on World War two. It's like World War two in color.

1:40:10.800 --> 1:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty good. It's pretty good. It's they do a

1:40:13.400 --> 1:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>good job. They do some of the major events. I mean,

1:40:15.240 --> 1:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I know all the stories already, and I've learned very

1:40:17.920 --> 1:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>little new stuff, but pretty good. Little bit. We'll enjoy

1:40:22.080 --> 1:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. I don't know what it is

1:40:23.120 --> 1:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>watching like World War two movies before you go to sleep,

1:40:25.360 --> 1:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and actually it's as crazy as it is. I don't

1:40:28.080 --> 1:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>know what I like watching the old footage and stuff.

1:40:29.880 --> 1:40:31.639
<v Speaker 1>It just kind of like zones me out, and then

1:40:32.560 --> 1:40:34.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can, like I can go to sleep easily.

1:40:34.560 --> 1:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes I watch, you know, the most cataclysmic battles

1:40:38.200 --> 1:40:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of all history, and I'm like, oh, okay, now it's now.

1:40:41.720 --> 1:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Now I know everything will be okay in the world,

1:40:43.439 --> 1:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I can go to sleep. Here we go.

1:40:47.840 --> 1:40:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Michael writes buck Willow was a great movie, directed by

1:40:52.560 --> 1:40:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Ron Howard and story by George Lucas. It is one

1:40:55.640 --> 1:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of Valcomer's top three roles doc Holiday, being number one,

1:40:58.720 --> 1:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of course in Tombstone. Back in the eighties when kids

1:41:01.960 --> 1:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>movies were a little dark. It deserves a rewatch Shields high. Michael,

1:41:07.320 --> 1:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about willow Man. It has some cool

1:41:11.000 --> 1:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sequences in it. I will give you that, but I'm

1:41:16.320 --> 1:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry to me it is very much right out of

1:41:18.200 --> 1:41:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the Lord of the Rings universe. So you gotta see,

1:41:22.640 --> 1:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you gotta see. Let's see what we get here, Michelle, Right, Buck,

1:41:29.080 --> 1:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I got some great responses and private messages for thanking

1:41:32.320 --> 1:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>me for referring you, and you need have some new

1:41:36.840 --> 1:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>members of Team Buck and then let's see what we

1:41:41.360 --> 1:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have here. I continue making clips with you. Thank you

1:41:45.240 --> 1:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for your work. Continue to fund on. Thank you, Michelle.

1:41:47.160 --> 1:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Please continue posting clips and spreading the word about the show.

1:41:50.680 --> 1:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The single most helpful thing you can do for us

1:41:53.680 --> 1:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>here in the Freedom Hunt is that tell people about

1:41:57.520 --> 1:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what we've got going on here, Tell them about this show,

1:42:00.800 --> 1:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tell them to watch this show. Here we go skip.

1:42:09.400 --> 1:42:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm dismayed to suggest the lack of effective law enforcement

1:42:12.760 --> 1:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the major sanctuary cities is not a new occurrence

1:42:16.920 --> 1:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and will tragically devolve into a similar outcome. California in

1:42:20.880 --> 1:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the mid eighteen hundreds, as a result of the gold Rush,

1:42:22.960 --> 1:42:26.679
<v Speaker 1>collapsed into veritable lawlessness in which the police were either

1:42:26.840 --> 1:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>totally ineffective or unwilling to enforce law and order. This

1:42:31.040 --> 1:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>set the scene for statewide vigilante retaliation on the part

1:42:34.800 --> 1:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of disgruntled citizens. There were many labels creatively describing these

1:42:38.840 --> 1:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>loosely organized groups. One was called the Safety Committee. Law

1:42:43.840 --> 1:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>enforcement in my town is in a downward spiral, and

1:42:46.360 --> 1:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>outraged citizens are demanding chain to the town council voted

1:42:50.120 --> 1:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>recently to create a safety committee with an emphasis on

1:42:52.640 --> 1:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>volunteer neighborhood watch. Perhaps a necessary solution as our police

1:42:56.880 --> 1:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are proven to be ineffective, but as a slippery slope

1:43:00.080 --> 1:43:02.280
<v Speaker 1>vigilante violence shields high, we'll skip. I don't know what

1:43:02.320 --> 1:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>town that is, but I hope everything's okay. Man, Thank

1:43:04.280 --> 1:43:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you for thank you for writing in and sorry about

1:43:08.439 --> 1:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the difficulties that you are facing. Ronnie chick fil A

1:43:15.280 --> 1:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>caving to the LGBT. Uh can you check this out? Yeah, Ronnie,

1:43:20.240 --> 1:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about on the show. So I'm a step ahead.

1:43:22.760 --> 1:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The buck delivers boom m. Somebody also wrote here Gina

1:43:33.400 --> 1:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>higin Buck slapshot stars Paul Newman and a few other

1:43:37.360 --> 1:43:40.639
<v Speaker 1>seventy stars you may or may not recognize. Excellent hockey

1:43:40.640 --> 1:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>flick pre Mighty Ducks enjoy shields High. Clearly we've got

1:43:44.400 --> 1:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>another vote for mighty ducks here. Yeah, and that's bad

1:43:48.000 --> 1:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on me not realizing it was Paul Newman will slap shop. No, No,

1:43:51.080 --> 1:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't see it, so I can't. I can't,

1:43:53.960 --> 1:43:58.720
<v Speaker 1>can't hit you on that one. Um William writes, are

1:43:58.800 --> 1:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you available to chat? Um? I don't know, probably not.

1:44:04.320 --> 1:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for writing that message. I don't know. I don't

1:44:06.120 --> 1:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. Well, that's another Bucks bad. A

1:44:08.760 --> 1:44:11.439
<v Speaker 1>technology that's if somebody's on your page that can click

1:44:11.479 --> 1:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that probably accidentally. Okay, as if you're a business, Oh,

1:44:14.880 --> 1:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a business, that's true. I'm I'm a business

1:44:16.880 --> 1:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of Buck helped spread that business. Tell people about it.

1:44:20.360 --> 1:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>iTunes every day three o'clock Eastern. Download that show. Listen

1:44:24.040 --> 1:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to a best podcast out there. All right, Team Shields

1:44:28.800 --> 1:44:29.320
<v Speaker 1>High