1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to 2 00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:13,159 Speaker 1: The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast where we talk 3 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levine, and I 4 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:19,919 Speaker 1: write the Money Stuff column for Bloomberg Opinion. 5 00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:23,479 Speaker 2: And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and 6 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 2: an anchor for Bloomberg Television. Elon Musk, when was the 7 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 2: last time we talked about this man? 8 00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:33,240 Speaker 1: More than a week ago? Yes, I think I'm probably lying. 9 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 2: It's been a minute. It's been a minute. Let's talk 10 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,640 Speaker 2: about him. We've talked about the Elon Musk premium before 11 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 2: that's been built into the stock of Tesla. I've asked 12 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,600 Speaker 2: the question, I mean, does Tesla still need Elon Musk? 13 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:53,800 Speaker 2: It sounds like the board was, according to the Wall 14 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:56,240 Speaker 2: Street Journal, was also asking that question. 15 00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 1: There's two very distinct questions, which are like, does Tesla 16 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 1: the car company benefit from having Elon Musk a CEO? 17 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,440 Speaker 1: There's the question of like does Tesla the multi hundred 18 00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 1: billion dollar stock benefits from having Elon Musk a CEO? 19 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 1: I think those questions have very different answers, right, Like, 20 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:17,479 Speaker 1: I think that if you were like, hey, here's this company, 21 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: that's selling cars, and it's CEO is in the business 22 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:23,280 Speaker 1: of like making the people who buy its cars hate 23 00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,440 Speaker 1: him and also not paying any attention to the company 24 00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:29,120 Speaker 1: because he's doing ten different other things. You might be like, hey, 25 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 1: let's get a new CEO. But like, then, if you 26 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 1: like the stock and you think about what would happen 27 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 1: to the stock if Elon Musk wasn't the CEO, I 28 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: think it would go down. 29 00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny because if we were talking about a 30 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 2: normal company with a very distracted CEO, of course you 31 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 2: would expect that the board would be, you know, engaging 32 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:50,160 Speaker 2: firms to help look for a new CEO. Tesla obviously 33 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 2: is not a normal company, and this is a special situation. 34 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: Right, And I should say that Tesla has denied reports 35 00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 1: that it's looking for a new CEO. Right. The Also 36 00:01:57,880 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 1: Journal reported that some members of the board had reached 37 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 1: out to executive search forms. So you can sort of 38 00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 1: square that circle by saying, yeah, some board members are 39 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: curious about the possibility of a new CEO, but there's 40 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:10,400 Speaker 1: not a formal process by the board to engage a 41 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:13,320 Speaker 1: search farm. Right, It's like somewhere in between. But right, 42 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:16,360 Speaker 1: even though it's not a normal company, you would think 43 00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 1: that the board, when faced with this extremely distracted CEO, 44 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:24,000 Speaker 1: would look into a new CEO, even if they don't 45 00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: want a new CEO, just to be like, hey, buddy, 46 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:30,280 Speaker 1: could you spend a little more time with Tesla? Like, 47 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: I think that it's very clear that the board would 48 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:36,840 Speaker 1: like him to spend more time with Tesla, and the 49 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: shareholders would like to spend more time with Tesla, and 50 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:43,080 Speaker 1: probably the customers and many voters in the United States 51 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:44,840 Speaker 1: would all like them to spend more time with Tesla. 52 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:46,720 Speaker 1: So as a way to put pressure on him to 53 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:49,799 Speaker 1: spend more time with Tesla, like, does this work? Maybe? 54 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,639 Speaker 2: I mean, we know that investors want him to spend 55 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,080 Speaker 2: more time with Tesla because after the earnings call in 56 00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:57,480 Speaker 2: which he said I'm going to spend more time with Tesla, 57 00:02:57,560 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 2: significantly more time starting in May, the stock popped. Yeah, 58 00:03:01,919 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 2: so the reaction was clear. But I don't know, you 59 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:07,240 Speaker 2: think about the timing of this Wall Street Journal report 60 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:10,360 Speaker 2: when they were asking this question and potentially, you know, 61 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:13,320 Speaker 2: talking with firms about initiating a search. It seems like 62 00:03:13,320 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 2: that happened before that Erness call where Elon Musk said that, So, yeah, I. 63 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:22,160 Speaker 1: Mean there's been conversations with him about spending more time 64 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: with Tesla. Yeah, I think he's like, this is not 65 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 1: an all or nothing decision, right. The model is kind 66 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,239 Speaker 1: of Twitter, where Elon Musk bought Twitter. He installed himself 67 00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:35,520 Speaker 1: as the CEO for a minute, and then eventually, after 68 00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: a flurry of activity, appointed Lindy Akarina as the CEO. 69 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: Now everyone kind of assumed that he was calling the 70 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:47,920 Speaker 1: shots at X even though she was the CEO. But like, 71 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:51,080 Speaker 1: you unload some of the responsibilities onto the CEO who 72 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:52,680 Speaker 1: like runs the thing day to day, and then you're 73 00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: like the visionary kibbitzer and like, you know, I wrote 74 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 1: this week that's not like already has that model where 75 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:03,920 Speaker 1: Elon Musk's title at Tesla embarrassingly or technically techno King 76 00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 1: and CEO he's the techno King. 77 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 2: Didn't realize that. 78 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:09,760 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's happened a while. He's happened in like 79 00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one and he was named the Techno King 80 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 1: and the CFI was named the Master of Coin. 81 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:16,960 Speaker 2: Now it's coming back to me. 82 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 1: Everyone blocks it out because it's really embarrassing, but it's 83 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,160 Speaker 1: still you know, you still look at the filings it's 84 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 1: a techno king. Wow, And so you could split those rules. 85 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,160 Speaker 1: He was once the chairman of the board as well 86 00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:30,599 Speaker 1: as the CEO, as many powerful CEOs are, and then 87 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: he had to stop being the chairman of the board 88 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 1: because he got in trouble with the SEC. But he's 89 00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 1: now the techno king and CEO. So you can split 90 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 1: those roles too and leave him as the techno king, 91 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:41,240 Speaker 1: make someone else the CEO. And like I think in 92 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:44,840 Speaker 1: that split, like the CEO runs the car company and 93 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:47,320 Speaker 1: the techno king is the guy who's like, we're gonna 94 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:48,560 Speaker 1: build human eyed robots. 95 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 2: We're doing the AI stuff, doing the AI stuff. Yeah. 96 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 2: Another suggestion that I've seen in terms of how you know, 97 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 2: the structure could work at Tesla. I forget who exactly 98 00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:00,279 Speaker 2: suggested this, but someone from the cell side, so that 99 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:02,920 Speaker 2: maybe he could become chairman again and just be chairman. 100 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:10,119 Speaker 1: Yeah, But like in the traditional division of public company responsibility, 101 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 1: as the chairman who is in charge of the board 102 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:17,279 Speaker 1: as a fiducia responsibility and overseas management is not quite 103 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:19,479 Speaker 1: what he wants, and the CEO who runs the company 104 00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:21,640 Speaker 1: as a full time job is not quite what I 105 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,839 Speaker 1: think techner king is a good description of what he 106 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:26,039 Speaker 1: wants to be, which is he wants that absolute power, 107 00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 1: be like focused on tech stuff and not have the 108 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:33,279 Speaker 1: sort of full time day to day responsibilities of either 109 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 1: a CEO or a chairman. 110 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:37,279 Speaker 2: That's true. I will say it kind of reminds me 111 00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:41,440 Speaker 2: of micro Strategy to an extent, because Michael Saylor founded 112 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:43,839 Speaker 2: micro Strategy, who is the CEO for a long long time. 113 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,480 Speaker 2: He stepped down from being CEO and now I believe 114 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:47,640 Speaker 2: he's just chairman. 115 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: So that's a common thing. But I do think that 116 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: I do think that micro Strategy and Tesla are sort 117 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: of at opposite ends of like business complexity, like Mega 118 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 1: Strategy in the business of buying bitcoin and putting them 119 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 1: in a pub. 120 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 2: Hear me out they actually have thousands of employees, because. 121 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,719 Speaker 1: That's not all I understand. 122 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 2: That they're somewhat similar in that, Okay, Tesla is a 123 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:16,279 Speaker 2: car company that also has this like AI stuff happening 124 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:20,400 Speaker 2: with it. Micro Strategy is nominally a software company. Couldn't 125 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:22,039 Speaker 2: tell you more than that, but then they have this 126 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:24,200 Speaker 2: whole other thing on top of it, which is just 127 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 2: buying bitcoin and bitcoin. I think that micro Strategy is 128 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,159 Speaker 2: known for the thing on top of it, whereas Tesla 129 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:31,679 Speaker 2: is still known for primarily being a car company. 130 00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:33,440 Speaker 1: Yeah. See, that's where I'm not sure. Like, like I 131 00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 1: think that a lot of people would say that the 132 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,680 Speaker 1: thing that Tesla does day to day is a car company. 133 00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:42,480 Speaker 1: It makes cars and sells cars, but the thing that 134 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:45,960 Speaker 1: it is known for is being an MS company, and 135 00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: particularly the thing that like drives its stock market evaluation 136 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:51,919 Speaker 1: is not the current cash list from cars, but like 137 00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 1: the future projections of We're going to build humanoid robots 138 00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 1: and like be like the world's leading robotics and a company, 139 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:00,840 Speaker 1: and like be like pioneers and some driving cars and 140 00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 1: like all this stuff that Elon mus promises, and like 141 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:09,239 Speaker 1: the journal story about the board looking Elsewhere also mentioned 142 00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:12,560 Speaker 1: some texts that Musk sent to someone close to him 143 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:14,800 Speaker 1: saying that he no longer wanted to be CEO of Tesla, 144 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:16,880 Speaker 1: but he was worried that no one could replace him 145 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 1: atop the company and sell the vision that Tesla isn't 146 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:22,600 Speaker 1: just an automaker, but the future of robotics and automation 147 00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 1: as well. I think that's right, right, Like, if you 148 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 1: got like a car person in to run it as 149 00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:29,320 Speaker 1: a car company, it's much harder to sell that vision. 150 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 1: The problem is not just that Elon Musk is a 151 00:07:31,440 --> 00:07:33,200 Speaker 1: good salesman for that vision, and if you put someone 152 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:35,680 Speaker 1: else in charge, you wouldn't have that good salesmanship. There's 153 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:37,440 Speaker 1: also the problem that, like Elon Musk does a lot 154 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:41,240 Speaker 1: of stuff, and if someone else was running Tesla, then 155 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:43,160 Speaker 1: when he wakes up in the morning and has an 156 00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:46,720 Speaker 1: idea for robotics stuff, he is more likely to do 157 00:07:46,840 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 1: it somewhere else. Right, he owns like six companies, He 158 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 1: can always start more companies. If he wants to do 159 00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:54,760 Speaker 1: the future of robotics somewhere else, he kind of just can. 160 00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 1: Leaving him as the CEO of Tesla ties him a 161 00:07:57,920 --> 00:08:00,440 Speaker 1: little bit more closely to Tesla and makes and more 162 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:04,560 Speaker 1: likely to do futuristic stuff within Tesla as opposed to 163 00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:06,720 Speaker 1: at SpaceX of the boring company or in a new 164 00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:10,120 Speaker 1: company or XII or XAI. And if there were just 165 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 1: like a coup, if the board was like, we're sick 166 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:17,160 Speaker 1: of you, you're fired, We're getting a new CEO, that 167 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 1: would be really bad for Tesla. You know, he has 168 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:21,720 Speaker 1: like a million things that he's doing, he'd do all 169 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: of them elsewhere. Is he sort of threatened to do 170 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:25,560 Speaker 1: if he didn't get paid enough from Tesla. Right, Like, 171 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: one aspect of this is like, you know, we've talked 172 00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 1: a lot about Delaware courts clying back. His compensation still 173 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:34,760 Speaker 1: kind of being litigated, and you know he sort of said, 174 00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:37,120 Speaker 1: you know that if I had an extra fifty billion 175 00:08:37,160 --> 00:08:39,240 Speaker 1: dollars a Tesla stuck, I'd be more motivated to do 176 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: stuff within Tesla. But if he gets fired, less motivated, 177 00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:43,960 Speaker 1: you quin. 178 00:08:43,880 --> 00:08:45,280 Speaker 2: To phreeze for this. What was it? Was it like 179 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 2: the Elon attention auction? 180 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 1: Yeah? Right, Like if you are an investor or a 181 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:53,240 Speaker 1: director at one of Elon's companies, the more of his 182 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 1: attention you get, the more valuable the company is, right, 183 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:58,320 Speaker 1: And like you see that particularly with Tesla now or 184 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 1: like they get less of his attention, thought goes down 185 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,400 Speaker 1: a lot, and like partly because they want more of 186 00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:05,959 Speaker 1: his attention and partly because when he directs his attention elsewhere, 187 00:09:05,960 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: it's like bad for pr But how do you get 188 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:13,880 Speaker 1: that attention? The normal way is to give him stuff 189 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:18,360 Speaker 1: like a big pay package, but some amount of threatening 190 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:22,440 Speaker 1: it's also possibility. I know that it's threatening exactly, but 191 00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 1: you had as a board have some amount of independence 192 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:30,000 Speaker 1: and maturity where you can say to the CEO, Hey, 193 00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:31,560 Speaker 1: it would be nice if you shut up to work. 194 00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:52,079 Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe swipe your badge now, and then should we 195 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 2: talk about some debt? 196 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:56,280 Speaker 1: Yeah about x X. 197 00:09:58,040 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 2: Finally sold. 198 00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:03,679 Speaker 1: Yeah. Like a lot of people probably including me, in 199 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:05,640 Speaker 1: like twenty twenty three, like this is like one of 200 00:10:05,640 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 1: the worst leverage biots ever. In like early twenty twenty three, 201 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 1: you look at this and you're like, okay, Like Elon 202 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 1: Musk overpaid for a company. Twitter was not a traditional 203 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:17,640 Speaker 1: leverage biot company because it didn't have great cash flow. 204 00:10:17,679 --> 00:10:20,240 Speaker 1: It wasn't like a you know, money spinner. It was 205 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 1: a you know, social media company that didn't make a 206 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 1: lot of money. And so Elon mus decided to buy 207 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:27,960 Speaker 1: it and the leveraged buyout and he got thirteen billion 208 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 1: dollars over of the DIT, which is a lot of 209 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 1: debt for Twitter. And then after he gret to buy it, 210 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:34,920 Speaker 1: everyone agreed, including him, that he was overpaying for it, 211 00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: and he tried to get out of it by saying 212 00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 1: Twitter is a big fraud. And by the time the 213 00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 1: deal closed, it looked like a very unpleasant deal to 214 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 1: finance and the banks that finance that couldn't sell or 215 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:48,120 Speaker 1: didn't selve the dietage presumaly because there's not much market 216 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,480 Speaker 1: for it. And I don't think they ever marked it 217 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:53,240 Speaker 1: down formally, but like the equity investors marked down their 218 00:10:53,280 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: equity a lot, and there were you know, news stories 219 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:57,079 Speaker 1: saying that, like the banks were getting offers like fifty 220 00:10:57,080 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 1: cents on the dollar, so it looks like they'd lost 221 00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: billions of dollars underwriting the Twitter deal and three years later, 222 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:07,839 Speaker 1: two years later, they've sold held the data like you 223 00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:09,920 Speaker 1: know around bar Like the most reason slug was like 224 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,160 Speaker 1: ninety eighth on's on the dollar. They got paid big 225 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:14,160 Speaker 1: interest payments over that time period because like there was 226 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:17,560 Speaker 1: you know, expensive debts, So they've made an accounting profit 227 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 1: on the deal. I made an economic profit on the deal, 228 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:23,760 Speaker 1: and they also like coz it up with Elon Musk 229 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:26,800 Speaker 1: and now probably get financing work for Xai, which is 230 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:27,640 Speaker 1: a giant company. 231 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 2: I love it because if you just held onto this 232 00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:32,880 Speaker 2: debt and kind of ignored it for three years, you 233 00:11:32,960 --> 00:11:34,760 Speaker 2: made out fine, but it came with a lot of 234 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:35,880 Speaker 2: emotional turmoil. 235 00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:38,480 Speaker 1: It's something I think about a lot, right, like the 236 00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 1: you know, the pitch for private markets is you don't 237 00:11:41,640 --> 00:11:45,760 Speaker 1: have so much emotional turmoil, right, And the individuals who 238 00:11:45,800 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 1: like underwrote the X debt, they did a great decision 239 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:49,560 Speaker 1: for their banks. They made a lot of money, but 240 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,000 Speaker 1: like some of them got fired in the interim because 241 00:11:52,040 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 1: it looked like a terrible decision. And the journal story 242 00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,080 Speaker 1: about that selling the last slug of the ex debt 243 00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:02,559 Speaker 1: says the lega the hung debt might have longer term implications. 244 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:05,480 Speaker 1: X and other hung loans prompted pay cuts and an 245 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:08,680 Speaker 1: exodus of bankers. They also forced some banks to pull 246 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:10,679 Speaker 1: back on lending, which gave room for competitors and the 247 00:12:10,679 --> 00:12:13,040 Speaker 1: booming private credit space to muscle it. So it's like, 248 00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: did Elon Musk invent private credit? 249 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:18,040 Speaker 2: Not really, but like kind of like perhaps you did. 250 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:20,280 Speaker 1: Will the story of private credit be like yeah, and 251 00:12:20,320 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 1: then Elon Musk hung a debt deal and so everyone 252 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:24,439 Speaker 1: had to you know, the banks had to stop lending, 253 00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 1: and so private credit got to get into the game. 254 00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: Because it's true, like there was a big uptick in 255 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: private credit because banks did pull back because there's a 256 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 1: string of hung loans. Yeah, and this was the big one. 257 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:37,560 Speaker 2: I kind of traced a lot of the boom that 258 00:12:37,559 --> 00:12:39,800 Speaker 2: we saw in private credit to the collapse of Silicon 259 00:12:39,920 --> 00:12:43,200 Speaker 2: Valley Bank, but MOBE the whole time it was just xtet, 260 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 2: you know, in like the. 261 00:12:44,640 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: LBO space, like the banks that did LBO lending, you 262 00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:50,319 Speaker 1: have like a small balance sheet for LBO lending, and 263 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:52,000 Speaker 1: you have to turn it over a lot by selling 264 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:55,000 Speaker 1: all your loans. And if you stick thirteen billion dollars 265 00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:57,080 Speaker 1: of loans on your LBO balance sheet, you can't do 266 00:12:57,080 --> 00:12:58,400 Speaker 1: any more loans, and so you know, you have to 267 00:12:58,440 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 1: let private credit do it. 268 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:03,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, So you wrote that perhaps Elon Musk created private credit, 269 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:05,760 Speaker 2: and perhaps he did. But when I read that, my 270 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:08,280 Speaker 2: initial thought was to think about the psyche. You know 271 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 2: what we're talking about the private markets. Investing in private markets, 272 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 2: it's supposed to take out the emotional turmoil. Because I 273 00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 2: was thinking about the past month and the equity markets, 274 00:13:16,080 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 2: and the S and P five hundred in April actually 275 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 2: amazingly was only down about seven eight tenths of a percent, 276 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,160 Speaker 2: which is nothing. That's like the smallest move on a 277 00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:27,079 Speaker 2: monthly basis that we've seen a long time. But that 278 00:13:27,120 --> 00:13:30,760 Speaker 2: came with so much handwringing. It came with so much 279 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 2: volatility that you could watch second to second that you 280 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:35,959 Speaker 2: asked someone how they felt at the end of April, 281 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 2: they would probably say that was crazy. But that mentality 282 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:41,200 Speaker 2: of you know, if you just close your eyes for 283 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:43,720 Speaker 2: three years, you made out great on this XTT. You 284 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,000 Speaker 2: didn't have to think about it. But obviously it wasn't 285 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 2: actually private credit, so those banks probably thought about it 286 00:13:48,520 --> 00:13:48,960 Speaker 2: a lot. 287 00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: One selling point of private assets is that they have 288 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:55,680 Speaker 1: lower volatility, and if you think about that for a second, 289 00:13:55,679 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 1: it can't really be true. But what is true is 290 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:00,680 Speaker 1: that you don't mark them to market its frequently, and 291 00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: so you can't know how volatile they are, unlike a 292 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:06,640 Speaker 1: sort of like theoretical value. And so it is true 293 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: that because you don't mark them to market it is frequently, 294 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 1: you don't have to be as emotionally upset about them. 295 00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:13,320 Speaker 1: And so friend of the Pod Cliff as This has 296 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: written about this that like there is an actual value 297 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:20,480 Speaker 1: from having private assets because if you are if you're 298 00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:23,160 Speaker 1: a human who might be prone to panic and sell 299 00:14:23,160 --> 00:14:25,520 Speaker 1: when things are low, or if you're like an institutional 300 00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:29,440 Speaker 1: allocator who has like some rule where you know, if 301 00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:30,840 Speaker 1: you have a big draw down you have to sell, 302 00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:32,680 Speaker 1: or something like that, you know like some of the 303 00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 1: institutional structures of investing can like replicate irrational panic reader, 304 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:40,560 Speaker 1: email me about this, Like to the extent that the 305 00:14:40,600 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: public markets are dominated by like multi strategy hedge funds, 306 00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:46,400 Speaker 1: who's like one of their salient features is that if 307 00:14:46,400 --> 00:14:48,640 Speaker 1: you have a ten percent drat on, you're fired. Like 308 00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:53,640 Speaker 1: that like creates potential bad incentives where you have months 309 00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 1: like this where you have five percent drite out every 310 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:00,480 Speaker 1: other day but nothing happens, right, Like you could have 311 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 1: like selling it the worst times because you are exposed 312 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:06,600 Speaker 1: to volatility that you can see, whereas if you had 313 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:08,600 Speaker 1: assets that you can't see the volatility of, you can 314 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:11,040 Speaker 1: just like, yeah, that's great. And if like the volatility 315 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 1: is mostly you know, washed out, then yeah, that works 316 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:14,600 Speaker 1: out better for you in the long run. 317 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 2: I wonder how you quantify human emotion, though. 318 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 1: Intuitively, one way you quantify it is that you think, well, 319 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:23,440 Speaker 1: in the long run, private assets and public assets should 320 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:28,680 Speaker 1: have like the same returns arguably, and if like ninety 321 00:15:28,680 --> 00:15:32,880 Speaker 1: percent of the volatility in public markets washes out, then 322 00:15:32,920 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: like that was all emotional volatility rather than real volatility. 323 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 1: That's really not quite right. But like, yeah, this is 324 00:15:39,040 --> 00:15:39,720 Speaker 1: the first. 325 00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:41,960 Speaker 2: Cat like can design a factor around that and then 326 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 2: somehow launching EUTF. 327 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:51,160 Speaker 1: Let's see, there's also a Bloomberg report that XAI isn't 328 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 1: talks to raise twenty billion dollars of equity, which would 329 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:57,400 Speaker 1: be like the second biggest startup fundraise. 330 00:15:56,960 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 2: Ever, second only to Open Eye. 331 00:16:01,040 --> 00:16:02,840 Speaker 1: One of the uses of proceeds might be to pay 332 00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:05,880 Speaker 1: down the debt. It's a little unclear how much money 333 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:08,760 Speaker 1: Twitter is making. I mean x like the ex portion 334 00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 1: of XII the social media company. But it's not like 335 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:16,640 Speaker 1: a great business style, and businesses are still like pretty speculative, 336 00:16:16,800 --> 00:16:19,280 Speaker 1: hugely capital and tons of businesses, So you don't really 337 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:21,200 Speaker 1: want to spend a billion dollars a year on debt 338 00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:24,920 Speaker 1: service if you're a company like that. And so it 339 00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:26,440 Speaker 1: looks like they can get rid of the debt by 340 00:16:26,520 --> 00:16:29,600 Speaker 1: raising twenty billion dollars of equity. Not only did this 341 00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: that all get sold, but also it might get like 342 00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 1: paid back at par early, and like I think that, 343 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,480 Speaker 1: Like the message is that it's fairly expensive to raise 344 00:16:40,520 --> 00:16:44,400 Speaker 1: debt for a social media company and like incredibly cheap 345 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:47,800 Speaker 1: to raise equity for a AI company, right, Like you 346 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:50,440 Speaker 1: can raise billions of dollars of equity at one hundred 347 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:53,520 Speaker 1: billion dollar valuations if you're a cool AI company, and so, like, 348 00:16:53,680 --> 00:17:13,639 Speaker 1: you know, they're correcting the capital structure. Speaking of the 349 00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 1: appeal of private markets, go. 350 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:18,160 Speaker 2: On Group and KKR. 351 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:20,680 Speaker 1: Well everyone, I mean right, so there there's a story 352 00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:23,440 Speaker 1: this speak about Capital Group and KKR teaming up to 353 00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:28,159 Speaker 1: launch mixed public private debt funds, which is like a 354 00:17:28,200 --> 00:17:32,479 Speaker 1: fund that's like sixty percent public bonds and loans and 355 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:35,959 Speaker 1: forty percent drag lending and other private credit stuff. So 356 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 1: it's a public private credit fund. And you know, Capital 357 00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:44,000 Speaker 1: is a big mutual fund manager that I believe sells 358 00:17:44,119 --> 00:17:46,800 Speaker 1: through financial advisors, and so like you know, if you 359 00:17:46,840 --> 00:17:48,520 Speaker 1: have a financial advisor, they might be like, oh, you 360 00:17:48,520 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 1: should put your money in this Capital mutual fund. And 361 00:17:51,600 --> 00:17:53,359 Speaker 1: now the financial advisor can say, oh, you should put 362 00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:56,560 Speaker 1: your money in this Capital slash KKR public private fund, 363 00:17:57,400 --> 00:18:01,399 Speaker 1: and yeah, that's like the way of the near future. 364 00:18:01,440 --> 00:18:04,879 Speaker 1: I think. Bloomberg reported yesterday that State Street and Carlisle 365 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:06,440 Speaker 1: are in similar. 366 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:09,440 Speaker 2: Talks, which is interesting because State Street, you know, has 367 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 2: this partnership with Apollo as well. 368 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:14,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, but like the private managers are kind of they're 369 00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 1: providing paper and then like these big asset managers are yeah, 370 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:19,600 Speaker 1: we'll sell lots of that paper. I think I agree 371 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: that it's a little weird because they are like partnerships 372 00:18:21,600 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 1: rather than like, yeah, pure like issuers. But yeah, Capital 373 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:27,320 Speaker 1: and KKR, State Street and everybody. 374 00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:31,000 Speaker 2: That's just this week you also had Blackstone, Vanguard and 375 00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:35,360 Speaker 2: Wellington team up and some jv to launch these sort 376 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:35,920 Speaker 2: of products. 377 00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:38,240 Speaker 1: And the other thing that there is is Morgan Stanley 378 00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:40,720 Speaker 1: this week in Goldman a couple of weeks ago, launched 379 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 1: private wealth thingies where it's like their own alts businesses, 380 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:49,400 Speaker 1: their own private credit businesses or private aquity businesses. I'm 381 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:51,760 Speaker 1: going to sell some paper to like they're not like 382 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:54,720 Speaker 1: pure retail, but like they're you know, High night Worth 383 00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:58,040 Speaker 1: retail ish private health clients. And so there's a lot 384 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: of emphasis everywhere in private credit and private equity managers. Yeah, 385 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,480 Speaker 1: to sell to individuals, right, because like historically this has 386 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:10,040 Speaker 1: been a business where they raise money from institutional allocators 387 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:14,679 Speaker 1: and now they're like so big that they need to 388 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:18,200 Speaker 1: tap trillions of dollars of individual wealth. And so there's 389 00:19:18,200 --> 00:19:21,000 Speaker 1: just a lot of talk about like putting private credit 390 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:24,840 Speaker 1: and private equity into for one ks, and like target 391 00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:28,840 Speaker 1: date funds and ETFs and retail financial advisors and so 392 00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:30,400 Speaker 1: this is like the big push. 393 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:32,680 Speaker 2: So when you and I were discussing what to talk 394 00:19:32,680 --> 00:19:35,040 Speaker 2: about today, I call this sort of like the evergreen 395 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,199 Speaker 2: story because we're talking about Capitol Group and KKR this 396 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 2: tie up. But it just feels like we're going to 397 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:40,840 Speaker 2: see more of these And you talk about that push 398 00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 2: because they want to open up and raise trillions of 399 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:46,920 Speaker 2: dollars from retail investors. I mean, it just seems that 400 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 2: this is like the inevitable march forward. We could talk 401 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:50,760 Speaker 2: about this story every single week. 402 00:19:50,840 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, oh we will. And it's interesting, you know, you say, 403 00:19:53,160 --> 00:19:56,520 Speaker 1: like March forward. Like my like cynical take on this 404 00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 1: is that people solve the problem of investors, right, Like 405 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:03,680 Speaker 1: it's a dispariting solution, right, But it's like you buy 406 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:07,480 Speaker 1: all the companies and like black Rock or Vanguard will 407 00:20:07,520 --> 00:20:09,720 Speaker 1: do that for you because it's a useful service for 408 00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:12,840 Speaker 1: them to provide and they will charge you three basis points. Right, 409 00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:15,359 Speaker 1: buy all the companies and then you own the market 410 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:17,520 Speaker 1: and no one's going to beat the market for you. 411 00:20:17,720 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 1: And getting the market return with lofis is the right 412 00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:23,080 Speaker 1: way to do it. And like there's lots of reasons subjective, 413 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: but it's like it kind of is a first cut, 414 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: like the solution, and a lot of people believe that 415 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:29,600 Speaker 1: for plausible reasons. And so like a lot of people, 416 00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:32,640 Speaker 1: you know, put their money in intoex ETFs. And if 417 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:37,480 Speaker 1: you are Wellington or Capital and you're in the business 418 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:41,919 Speaker 1: of long only public equity management, you've had a good 419 00:20:42,359 --> 00:20:45,159 Speaker 1: fifty one hundred year run. But like that business is 420 00:20:45,240 --> 00:20:47,399 Speaker 1: really hard right now. It's really hard to sell an 421 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:50,680 Speaker 1: actively managed mutual fund through financial advisors because people are, yeah, 422 00:20:50,680 --> 00:20:53,600 Speaker 1: there's self tright to you know, account buy s and 423 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:56,120 Speaker 1: p five hundred etf right and pay three basis points. 424 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:57,440 Speaker 2: Instead of several dozens. 425 00:20:57,640 --> 00:20:58,960 Speaker 1: You know, you used to pay like two percent for 426 00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:00,720 Speaker 1: a mutual fund for like that those days are long 427 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:05,639 Speaker 1: dat and so how do you address that? The universal 428 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,080 Speaker 1: answer is private markets? Yeah, and like what does that mean? 429 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:11,040 Speaker 1: What it means? It's like you see like kind of 430 00:21:11,040 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 1: medium sized companies, youngish medium sized companies would go public 431 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 1: and now like companies stay private longer and grow bigger 432 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: in private markets, and and like why is that? Like 433 00:21:21,560 --> 00:21:23,160 Speaker 1: there are a lot of good reasons for it, right, 434 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:25,600 Speaker 1: There's a lot of capital in private markets, it's much less. 435 00:21:25,800 --> 00:21:27,800 Speaker 1: It's mcual. We're convenient to be private than to have 436 00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:31,360 Speaker 1: to deal with earnings calls and SEC report and share 437 00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 1: their lawsuits and. 438 00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 2: All the boring staff. 439 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,199 Speaker 1: Like short sell. There's a lot of stuff that companies 440 00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 1: don't like about being public. But I also do think 441 00:21:38,560 --> 00:21:40,800 Speaker 1: that like if you're like, yeah, if you're like a 442 00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:43,960 Speaker 1: big private company, you go talk to like investors or 443 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:48,280 Speaker 1: banks and you're like, hey, should I go public? They're like, no, 444 00:21:48,560 --> 00:21:51,000 Speaker 1: stay private, and like why well, this, like the financially 445 00:21:51,000 --> 00:21:53,480 Speaker 1: intermediates makes so much more money in private markets than 446 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:55,960 Speaker 1: in public markets. In some ways, it feels like a 447 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:58,520 Speaker 1: step backward in progress, right, Like, in some ways it 448 00:21:58,560 --> 00:22:02,440 Speaker 1: feels like what's happening here is that public markets are 449 00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:07,399 Speaker 1: so cheap and efficient for some definition of efficient that 450 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 1: it is kind of no fun to be an investor 451 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,359 Speaker 1: in the public markets. And so all these investment firms 452 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:15,800 Speaker 1: are like, how do we get more stuff that isn't 453 00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:19,680 Speaker 1: just like ruthlessly indexed and charges three asis plants, and 454 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 1: like the answers like more private stuff. 455 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm trying to just said what is the chicken 456 00:22:23,920 --> 00:22:26,160 Speaker 2: and what is the egg? Because like there's two things happening. 457 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 1: I mean, you're all self reinforcing. Just one thing started. 458 00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:30,720 Speaker 2: But yeah, what do you call when the snake is 459 00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 2: eating itself. 460 00:22:31,880 --> 00:22:36,480 Speaker 1: Robbers roborusus roboris. Yeah, that sounds good. 461 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 2: Well, what I'm trying to say, you have you know, 462 00:22:39,560 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 2: the capitol groups and the Wellingtons of the world. They 463 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:44,600 Speaker 2: want to tap into retail investors because we've solved the 464 00:22:44,640 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 2: problem of investing and here's a new thing you can do. 465 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:49,639 Speaker 2: And then here's the other force, is that you have 466 00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:52,919 Speaker 2: all these cool, interesting companies that are small that are 467 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:55,960 Speaker 2: staying private for longer, partly because the funding is there. 468 00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,320 Speaker 2: You mentioned all the annoying things, but there's also like 469 00:22:58,400 --> 00:23:00,560 Speaker 2: there's ways to access funding. You don't need to go 470 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 2: public anymore. And I guess that's the snake. 471 00:23:03,160 --> 00:23:05,440 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, absolutely. And also the other thing is there 472 00:23:05,560 --> 00:23:08,119 Speaker 1: is retail demand for this, like yeah, it's not just 473 00:23:08,200 --> 00:23:10,840 Speaker 1: like the issues like it and the intermediaries like the 474 00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:13,720 Speaker 1: retail coastors. Yeah, I get to own cool private companies, right. Yeah. 475 00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:17,399 Speaker 1: There is this perception based in fact that the highest 476 00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:20,360 Speaker 1: growing companies are in the private. 477 00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:22,440 Speaker 2: Markets Stripe, SpaceX. Yeah. 478 00:23:22,480 --> 00:23:24,560 Speaker 1: And then also on the credit side, because a company 479 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:27,520 Speaker 1: what you're getting in private credit is like a certain 480 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:30,280 Speaker 1: amount of like flexibility and structuring and a certain amount 481 00:23:30,280 --> 00:23:32,680 Speaker 1: of certainty, and you're paying for that with higher interest rates. 482 00:23:32,720 --> 00:23:34,240 Speaker 1: And so if you're a retail client and you're like, 483 00:23:34,520 --> 00:23:35,879 Speaker 1: I can have a bond fund, or I can have 484 00:23:35,960 --> 00:23:38,040 Speaker 1: a private credit fund that pays ANXT one hundred and 485 00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:39,960 Speaker 1: fifty basis plant, it's like, why not do the private credit. 486 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:43,119 Speaker 1: So there's some reality to the idea that private markets 487 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:45,600 Speaker 1: have higher returns, and so you should invest in private markets. 488 00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:48,440 Speaker 2: God, I had something to say and it just flirted away, 489 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:51,040 Speaker 2: it went private. Yeah, I can't access it. 490 00:23:51,280 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 1: Did I tell you that at Disney World I saw 491 00:23:53,359 --> 00:23:53,720 Speaker 1: a snake? 492 00:23:53,840 --> 00:23:56,120 Speaker 2: We haven't talked at all about your trip to Disney World? Yeah, 493 00:23:56,160 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 2: how was it? 494 00:23:57,280 --> 00:23:57,440 Speaker 1: Oh? 495 00:23:57,520 --> 00:23:59,520 Speaker 2: I remember what I wanted to say? Should I say it? 496 00:23:59,680 --> 00:23:59,880 Speaker 1: Yeah? 497 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:03,359 Speaker 2: A mailbag question we got about adverse selection. Yeah, this 498 00:24:03,560 --> 00:24:06,560 Speaker 2: was in relation to private credit euts. But you know, 499 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 2: the cynical suspicion that the private manager was just going 500 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:12,920 Speaker 2: to dump all their not so great stuff into these 501 00:24:13,040 --> 00:24:13,800 Speaker 2: retail funds. 502 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's always like some hierarchy of like if you 503 00:24:17,560 --> 00:24:20,200 Speaker 1: are a private investment manager running a bunch of different 504 00:24:20,240 --> 00:24:24,240 Speaker 1: things like you'll have a natural inclination to allocate the 505 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:27,680 Speaker 1: very best things to your personal account, the next best 506 00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:30,239 Speaker 1: things to the accounts of the important clients to pay 507 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:32,560 Speaker 1: you the highest fees, and like the worst things you know, 508 00:24:32,960 --> 00:24:35,119 Speaker 1: to the retail clients to pay your eighty basis funds. Right, 509 00:24:35,560 --> 00:24:37,800 Speaker 1: But there are a lot of like things to counteract 510 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:41,920 Speaker 1: that tendency, like regulation and like you know, the conflict 511 00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:44,199 Speaker 1: committees of these firms, and like, you know, a lot 512 00:24:44,280 --> 00:24:47,000 Speaker 1: of the stuff is like sort of vertical slices of everything. 513 00:24:47,080 --> 00:24:50,640 Speaker 1: So it's like, I wouldn't you know, like you can't 514 00:24:50,680 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 1: really have this business where like you take the best 515 00:24:52,920 --> 00:24:54,520 Speaker 1: loans and you put them in your private credit fund, 516 00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:56,280 Speaker 1: and you take the worst loans and you stuff them 517 00:24:56,320 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 1: into the public private fund for retail. And also the 518 00:24:59,359 --> 00:25:02,159 Speaker 1: partnerships guard against that a little bit, where like the 519 00:25:02,200 --> 00:25:04,920 Speaker 1: straight streets and capitals of the world have incentives to 520 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 1: negotiate to get the good loans rather than just the 521 00:25:07,080 --> 00:25:07,520 Speaker 1: bad ones. 522 00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, they're doing due diligence and the like, But I 523 00:25:10,600 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 2: don't know. 524 00:25:10,880 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 1: I mean, if you're like a private credit manager, like 525 00:25:12,880 --> 00:25:15,879 Speaker 1: your job is to like make good loans and then 526 00:25:16,040 --> 00:25:19,640 Speaker 1: like you fund them with like a sort of undifferentiated 527 00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:21,800 Speaker 1: pool of like the money that you get from, you know, 528 00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:22,800 Speaker 1: wherever you get it from. 529 00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:25,000 Speaker 2: Cool, So maybe we shouldn't worry. 530 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:26,920 Speaker 1: It's not highest on my list of worries. Are we 531 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,679 Speaker 1: gonna like talk about an sec in force for nationalting 532 00:25:29,720 --> 00:25:32,439 Speaker 1: at someone who, like, you know, adversely selected their retail 533 00:25:32,480 --> 00:25:33,760 Speaker 1: fun maybe one day. 534 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:36,440 Speaker 2: Six or twelve months perhaps the sort of thing. 535 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 1: We're not we're talking about it not in sixty twelve, 536 00:25:40,480 --> 00:25:40,879 Speaker 1: three and a. 537 00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 2: Half years, three and a half years, you know, when 538 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:46,840 Speaker 2: we're on episode whatever, Yeah, we're. 539 00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 1: Sorry, we're not talking. Sorry, And that was The Money 540 00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 1: Stuff Podcast. 541 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:55,800 Speaker 2: I'm Matt Levi and I'm Katie Gal. 542 00:25:56,160 --> 00:25:58,200 Speaker 1: You can find my work by subscribing to The Money 543 00:25:58,200 --> 00:25:59,880 Speaker 1: Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot. 544 00:25:59,840 --> 00:26:02,720 Speaker 2: Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every 545 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:06,159 Speaker 2: day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern. 546 00:26:06,520 --> 00:26:08,239 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. You can send an 547 00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:11,440 Speaker 1: email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot now, ask us a 548 00:26:11,560 --> 00:26:12,879 Speaker 1: question and we might answer it on air. 549 00:26:13,280 --> 00:26:15,399 Speaker 2: You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening 550 00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:17,520 Speaker 2: right now and leave us a review. It helps more 551 00:26:17,560 --> 00:26:18,400 Speaker 2: people find the show. 552 00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:21,679 Speaker 1: The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Ana ma Aserakus 553 00:26:21,720 --> 00:26:23,159 Speaker 1: and Moses onm Our. 554 00:26:23,240 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 2: Theme music was composed by Blake Naples. 555 00:26:25,320 --> 00:26:27,960 Speaker 1: Brandon, Francis Nudim, It's our Executive producer. 556 00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:30,040 Speaker 2: And Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's Head of Podcasts. 557 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:33,359 Speaker 1: Special thanks this week to Dash Bennett. Thanks for listening 558 00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:35,760 Speaker 1: to the Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week 559 00:26:35,840 --> 00:26:36,520 Speaker 1: with more stuff