WEBVTT - Beta Testing Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to a radio show at two

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to watch

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News. You

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>know it's interesting here, uh, Sarah. I think the market

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>is just really focusing on those the fiscal stimulus discussions,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and again there is a deadline tomorrow. But I don't

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>know what it's just the field doesn't look that great

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>right here, even though the President is in fact pushing

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>forward right you described as that it as on again,

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>off again. We could probably add four more on agains

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and off against to that, but it looks like and

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I've gone on some emails from investors to set today

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that the packages that have presented still look to

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be a non starter between the Democat, demo Crats and

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and it's just looking a bit unlikely ahead of

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the election. All right, let's set the business week agenda here,

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>let's kick it off. We can do that with Gina

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams, chief equity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joined

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from New Jersey, and Dave Wilson,

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, Bloomberg Stocks Editor UH, also on remote access

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>from the great state of New Jersey. Gina, let's start

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with you here. You have a fascinating UH piece of

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>research out talking about some of the underperformers and how

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this third quarter earning season maybe a catalyst. Yeah, I

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>think it can be. U. First, good afternoon, everybody. Welcome

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to Monday, and a little bit of a slow Monday

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so far, but not happy Monday, Happy Monday. You know

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about today in our note is a

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>basket of oversold stocks that we follow on a weekly basis.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>We rebalanced the most oversold stocks in the spire and

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>any given week tend to dramatically outperform over a week's

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>time as they bounce off at very very low levels.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And what we've done in that note is highlighted that

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a few of those key oversold stocks that

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are due to report earnings this week, and they may

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to really change what has been a

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>very sour tone um at least from the market response

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>to earnings. So far, We've had tremendous reports out of

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector, really really strong beats, more than companies

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that have reported of beat expectations, and yet the price

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>action in response to those expectations as the negative. So

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for these reporters to potentially change that tone.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>On our shortlist of Verizon A ten team Las Vegas

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fans to watch this week, Dave, let's bring you in

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>here because in addition to the names that Gina just

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>named for us, will also hear from Tesla this week. Netflix. Sure,

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been a sour tone, but we are entering the

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>second largest week of earning season of the season. What

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are you keeping an eye on this week? Well, I mean,

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>it's just a matter of how forthcoming our company is

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be when it comes to talking about their

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>prospects for this quarter or next year. I mean, certainly

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories of is that the coronavirus let

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies to which rather forecast. We've seen

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them come back. Others have been more reluctant

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to forecast even if, say their third quarter results are

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively positive. So you know that that's definitely going to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>be worth watching as we proceed through all these earnings

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>reports do in the next couple of weeks. So, Gina,

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the banks here. What was your takeaway from

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks here? It seems like the numbers were pretty good,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but the outlook was perhaps a little bit more conservative.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you do you expect to hear some of that

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>going forward with some of these non bank companies. Yeah,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful not, because I do think that that's what

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten the way of the banks is. You know, they

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>did come out and dramatically beat expectations. At a matter

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of fact, at the start of earning season, financial sector

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was expected to produce earning and earnings drop of nearly

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and just because of the banks that reported

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>last week, that earnings decline is now expected to be

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>less than three percent, So they didn't make a very

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>big ustment to expectations. All of the SMP five is

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>virtually adjusting expectations higher for a third quarter. But that's

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>where the buck stops, and that's the problem I think

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that the market is running into is analysts are not

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>taking the cues from an incredible beating the second quarter

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and now it's looking like a very very strong beating

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter to raise expectations into the future. As

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, this is what we're writing about

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for tomorrow is expectations into future quarters have basically just

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>been stagnant and have been for some time because analysts

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>are not taking any sort of confidence boost out of

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these earnings results. Dave mentioned the guidance has been relatively limited.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>The guidance that we have gotten has been very strong,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's just a handful of companies it's willing to

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us that it's very strong, and those are the

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>companies that have been strong throughout for the most parts.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So we need something to change. Um, we need a

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more visibility to evolve. I think, Uh, if not,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be sort of churning for a while

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that visibility to proven to one. I fear,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know what are the underlying signals of the

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>market really telling us? Though? At the moment, I look

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at the NASAC one hundred right now, down about one

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>percent down for a fifth day that's the longest losing

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>streaks since August. But at the same time we have

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to remember small caps the Russell two thousands up more

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>than eight percent this month. We've also seen some other

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>cyclical areas of the market performing well. Can you take

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that and run with it as a bullish signal. Yeah.

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We actually wrote about this in our chart book last

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Thursday that even though the market is churning, there are

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>some really strong signals of rotation emerging in that churn.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>One of them is as you correctly identify the small

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>cap index. We've also seen really key constituents of industrials

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology breakout are automated technical pattern recognition software recognized

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a breakout in Caterpillar as well as Micron last week,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So those are pretty strong indications of a rotation. And

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>then this has been our scene since late August is

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we think the market is going through a rotation, rotating

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to potentially stronger earnings growers in the year ahead as

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the defensive stories which has really dominated the

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>markets games from the March lows. And that rotation can

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the market concern sideways for a while. But if

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're rotating into supercyclicals, we're rotating into leading indicators or

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>leading stocks, then it probably is a pretty good sign

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of things to come once we've reached the end of

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that charning process. Dave, real quick, what are you looking

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for earnings wise? What's the big one next up? IBM

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>after the Clothes. That's gonna be the one to watch

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>IBM after the closes. We're gonna ana Rona from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna join us right after the Clothes to kind

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of give us his quick take of those numbers. Gina

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams, thank you so much for joining us, Chief

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>equity strategist Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us on the phone from

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, and the Dave Wilson, Bloomberg Stocks Editor, also

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on remote from New Jersey. We've got New Jersey covered. Sarah.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Jersey as well, but you are in the studio.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I am in the studio. I must say that it's

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more lively in the office today, but

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>still nothing like it used to be. Obviously, we miss

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you in here. That's right, we'll be Hopefully we'll get

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>back there soon. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Messer from Bloomberg Radio. We're really in the in that

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>prime testing stage right now where there's a lot of

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>tests going on around the world. Bloomberg News Adventure Capital

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter Ceremony Bride is actually taking part in one of

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>those tests. Let's get a real sense of what we're

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at their Sarah, thanks so much for joining us. UM.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about what you're doing and why you're doing

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it well. Um, at the beginning of the pandemic, I

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>just felt awful about everything that was happening, and the

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>worst thing for me was how scared everybody was because

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody really knew what COVID was, how they could catch it,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>where when. So I just wanted to do something to

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>try to help the situation. So I thought I would

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>look into vaccine childs and I did a lot of

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>research online, figured out which child would be taking place

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in the San Francisco area where I live, and UM

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to sign up for one of those.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And it was tough because even if you know the

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>jug companies that are going to be testing vaccines, I

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. I learned they outsourced those tests two

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>different clinics, so then you have to figure out which

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the clinics are doing it and then you have to

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>call them and get in their databases. That eventually I

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>managed to sign up for the Fiser trial. So Sarah,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>give us some color on what it actually looks like

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>or feels like to be in one of these trials.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how long have you been in it? How

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>often do you have to be checking in? Do you

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have to go in for in person visits? What does

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this all look like? Sure? So um. I went to

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this clinic in Walnut Creek, California, called the Diabolo Clinic.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It was very well run um lots of distancing, uh,

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>very kind of efficient feeling. I didn't you like I

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was wasting any time, but it was a substantial commitment

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of time. The first time that I went was probably

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>about two hours, tons of paperwork. I met with a doctor,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I met with a bottomist. They did a COVID test um,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but they don't really tell you any of the results

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want you to know if you're getting

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the placebo or the real thing. And also they don't

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>know I have a patient number. All my records are

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow separated from my name, so you know. I asked

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>them do you know what I got? And they said no,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we have it all rigged up so we can't tell.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And um the actual shot for what was either the

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine or the placebo came at the end of that

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>first visit. It was very funny because there was this,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, all I was being led from room to

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>room for different tests and talks with different people, and

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>then there was a big empty room, empty except for

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge blue chair. It almost looked regal like, look

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so medical at the same time, and I sat down

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and they gave me my shots. I felt fine that

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>first time. UM I went back for a booster shot again,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>either the real thing or the placebo three weeks later.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>That hit me pretty hard. You know. I can't say

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure if I got the vaccine or if it

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was just a coincidence that maybe I got a weird

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about a twenty four hour flu or something around the

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>same time, but I did not feel good after that. UM.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been back once more, about a month after that shot,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>so they could take blood work and so on. I

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine they're testing me for um COVID and antibodies again,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I will go back three more times over

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the course of two years total. So at the end

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the two year study, I'll have been to this

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>clinic six times, and I also have an app on

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>my phone, so it's called child Max. I had to

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>download it on my first visit. So after each of

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>those shots, every single day, it would pay me and

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>ask me are you experiencing nausea? As your temperature elevated.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>There were a bunch of questions, but I would have

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to go through an answer on that app. Since then,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it now buzzes me once a week and just asks

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are you experiencing symptoms? And I'm not, so I said no,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and then there are no more questions on the app.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank goodness. I haven't experienced symptoms. If I ever do,

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine the questions again would be more comprehensive on

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>the app. So, Sarah, do I take from this that

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>fiser won't know whether this is this test is effective

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for two years, as opposed to people talking about weeks

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or months trying to get some knowledge from these tests. No.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>My take, and this is just based on reading a

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of what my colleagues at Bloomberg has been reporting,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>is they'll have a pretty good idea. And let's say

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that I went UM and had the test or had

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the shot and UM I had the second one on

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>September one, so I've already been back once they've measured

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>my blood for antibodies. So let's say I did get

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the real shot and not the booster. They already know

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>whether my blood has antibodies in it, so I think

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they have a good idea. And there are thousand people

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like me across the country that have been a part

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of this trial. So they are getting those early results

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of whether the people who got the early tests have

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>antibodies or not. They are starting to see that right now,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and so then over two years they'll be checking for

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the people who got the real shot. Oh do they

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>still have antibodies six months later? Do they still have

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>them a yearly? Earth do they still have them two

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>years later? So it's I think that part is testing

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>how long it might be effective, So really quick, just

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up, Sarah, is your sense then that the test,

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>the study might not end for two years, but if

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>there are signs that it works, they'll release it to

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the public before it's over. That's what they've said that

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they're planning to do. And again, they'll know whether it's

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>working right now, and then the rest of it is

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>just to see how long it works for. And one

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>more thing, I'd like to say that I felt really

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>sick after that second test, So clear your schedules that

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>once you do get the vaccines, if that was the

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>real thing. Seravic right, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Servic right. Jeez a Vent, your Capital reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from San Francisco. This is

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. Let's

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get to that M and A activity, Chronical Phillips buying

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Concho Resources for about nine point seven billion dollars in stock.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the largest shale industry deal since a collapse in

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>energy demand earlier this year. Let's get some details. We

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can do that with a good friend, Fernando Valley, oil

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and gas analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us on

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. So, Fernando, thumbs up,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thumbs down? Do you like this deal? And why? All right?

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul glad to be here. Definitely like this deal for

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for both really, if there are two to the premier

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>players in the shale patch, and for Chronico you're getting

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an entity that already generates free cash flow has a

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of locations in an area at the Permian basin

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>where you really didn't have any locations beforehand, and if

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you're Conto, you're getting all stuck to you. Also, you

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>still capture an eventual upside from an oil prester recovery

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in the next several years, and you're getting probably one

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the few companies that's been all about generating pre

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>cash flow from shale for the past ten years. Conico

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is really right sized for a lower for longer from

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the oil price crash. So they came into this downturn

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>all lady prepared for an eventual prolonged weakness, and so

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they're in really good shape. And Chronical really also helps

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lower the corporate declines. Remember, shale declines really quickly at first,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and so Conical because they have exposure to l en

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>G oil sands conventional, their corporate decline rates are closer

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to ten percent as opposed to you you've seen shale.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So thumbs up all around from you, Fernando. How does

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.239
<v Speaker 1>this Conjo acquisition though, change Conco's production profile and strategy,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if at all? It doesn't really change their strategy, mostly

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>because Concho is also being focused on more moderate growth

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and returns as opposed to some of the players that

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>were growing at fifty to six percent for random and

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>taking on significant leverage. The post post merger profile, they're

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>still gonna be under one and a half times du

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>more so as they captured a five million dollars and

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>synergies they mentioned UM, so they're erg is really complementary.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>What it does change is that increases Chronicle is consolidated

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the climate that I mentioned UM, but it does so

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in the core of the Permian basin, which is the

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>premier shale basin. When you have the profile in the

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>other asset the Chronicle has, it can be a complementary play.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It can be something where they don't they don't need

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to grow it at thirties, and they can grow more

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>slowly and and really get that cash return on capital

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've been targeting for a really long time and

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they needed because their boxing position is dwindling. Their eagle

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth position is also slowing down considerably, so they needed

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to grow and the place to grow in the US

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>at the current oil priced outlook is really the Permium basis.

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Fernando, as a former investment banker, this is

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>my next question, are we gonna do more deals in

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the shale patch? Are we gonna this just just the beginning.

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean the beginning really was Chevanovo and and this

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is why, uh, certainly not the last one. We don't think. Uh.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>There is a need for the industry to right size

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>for a lower for longer or a lower forever oil

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>price scenario, and a lot of the companies were really

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>preparing for sixty five seventy dollars and we just don't

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>see that happening anytime soon. UM. You're either looking to

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>improve your overall drilling locations, you may have produced too

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>much and run out of the really good stuff UM

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in in your portfolio, or you could have an issue

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with your balance sheet. So for Carnico, they were looking

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>for more locations. For Concio, they were looking for a

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>really strong balance sheet. UM. And that that makes sense

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where we see an issue or the players that have

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>both run through most of its portfolio and also have

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>significant leverage. So we think we'll see mergers in the

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>high quality names, but the lower quality, highly leveraged names

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll struggle to catch a bid. In this scenario. There's

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resources out there, not necessarily a lot

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of cap So it's really the high quality names that

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be looked at. So quick one to

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up. Yeah, good, it's a quick one to

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up. So if we have forty dollars a

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>barrel lot, we're really lodged here for some time. Are

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>there any other companies out there you see his potential targets? Uh,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>there are certainly companies that will look to merge. Whether

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>they are the targets or they are the consolidators, it

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. Because you could see high quality

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>names like an E O G and Pioneer or Diamond

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Back Parsley Energy look to merge together with small or

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>no premiums to reduce costs and improved locations. So interesting.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, now we're gonna have to leave it there,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna have some more deal activity from you.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I am sure. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Messer from Bloomberg Radio. Fascinating story in the magazine here,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh coming up. It's um. You know, just as we thought,

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you're getting back to a little bit of normal in

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the restaurants and going out to eat cases,

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Europe, surging putting the restaurant industry on its

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>back foot again. Joel Webert joins us. He's editor Bloomberg

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>business Week. He joins us from the remote line from Brooklyn.

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And Robert Vines, chief food critic for Bloomberg News, he

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from London. So, Joel, just

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>when the you know that our friends over in Europe,

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing stories in Paris and London and other cities

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in Italy as well, just trying to get on their

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>feet again. Then the infections go back up. It's not

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>good for their business, is it. It's a story UM everywhere,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's like just when you think you're

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like rounding a corner, Uh, you know, cases sneak back

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>up and or surge. And you know, restaurants in particular

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that have been you know, they were

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>really been just like on the front lines of this UM.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Richard Vines is the one who who

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>came to us from UM London to say, let's let's

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>talk about restaurants here. So so Richard give us a

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sneak peak of kind of what's been happening in the

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>UK and and London as uh, infections go up and

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and restaurants are are caught in the in in the vice. Yes,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>good evenings for none and well death has doubled in

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the UK in the past twelve days, so obviously the

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>government's filely concerned. The last month he introduced the ten

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>pm closing time for restaurants. It's quite serious. It's imagining

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sense want to eat and drink and ten o'quarck have

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to be out on the streets and that's been bad enough,

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but now they just need to use further instrictions. You

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can't eat at restaurants with people who not in your

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>household or in your group. So I'm single, for example, beings,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>basically I can't go to restaurants, so quite a serious situation.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Just I'm myself at home because where am I going

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to go? I'm not going down to the pub on

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my own. So Richard, I get the sense that last

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>time around the subsidies really helped these restaurants, but obviously

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>subsidies can't be too helpful if there are curfews in play,

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you just can't go out and eat at

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant, or there are higher restrictions when you speak

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>with restaurateurs with restaurant owners, especially those that are more

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so local and mom and pop owned. What's their tone

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like right now? What's the feel? The tone is of

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>total desolation and depression. I'm afraid Corbyn and King which

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the big restaurant groups in London. They own

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a place called the wolves Ley which is known internationally.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>When the latest restrictions came in, they had two thousand

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>cancelations in twenty four hours. And the British government has

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>actually even very help and supportives to restaurants or to

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses in general, paying for wage for SAPO further and

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so on. But those that subsidies easing down now and

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it looks like restrictions are coming back on more seriously.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Whales just that it's on Friday's introducing total lockdown. Scotland

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>introduced match strict measures and London, as I say, has

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>come in the strict to measures. So I'd say the

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>movie is quite depressed. And a group of restaurants, chefs

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and restaurants were demonstrating outside Parliament's day banging their pots

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and pans. But I don't think anyone really thinks that's

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>going to help. And Richard, what about the pub scene

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>which has been. You know, it's obviously like a staple

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of English life in a way that that Americans envy

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and probably normal times. Um, what's what's that seem like?

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Now that um, you know the restaurants are are closed,

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the pub situation? Well, the pep situation is very

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>bad because perhaps usually can stay open late. And now

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that again the ten first first ten o'clock closing is depressing.

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The thing is in U K's you can stand out

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and drink on the street, which you can't to New York. Right,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so that's something super go outside, whether drinks still have

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a good time, but generally businesses down seriously and pups

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of closing all the time. Alright, So Richard, give us

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a sense as to the um the density issue, like

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in art can can a restaurant be open and seed acent?

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Or is it because it's we have some limitations here

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in the States, Yeah, people, they are a limitation. It

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>depends on the place and so. But the main thing

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is the distancing between in the UK's distancing between different tables.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So in in Copenhagen, for example, it's another since you've

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>been looking at they've got maximum people fifty in the

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurant here, it's more requestioning distancing between tables, which means

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>places can't generally can't operate much beyond sixty seven cent

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of capacity, which you know, when people are spending this

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and then just a fewer customers and then going home. Eva,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of course the numbers don't really add up. And Richard,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what about delivery since that's become such you know, like

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at least here in the US, restaurants have just gone

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>all in on it. It is, or take out for

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that matter, it's just sort of the new the new normal.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Um howur is how our restaurants managing to pivot? And

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is it a permanent shift or or have they found

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>their footing in a in a short term kind of way.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a permanent shift. It's really surprising some

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the restaurants that are doing it. Daniel Hamm, the

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>chef Madson Park, is doing home delivery from Marriages Hotel

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in month, which is something that would have been completely

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>unthinkable before the virus, right down to Maple Japanese restaurants.

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So I've been hearing of one. He said they were

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit precious about their food, wasn't super put home delivery.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But now everyone's got to do it because people are

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>eating at home, and this is restaurants have to get

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all the business they can. I think this is going

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a partnershift, but certainly in the short term

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a very extreme shift. It really is amazing to

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>see how some of these restaurants have reacted. I know

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, just seeing the dining on the sidewalks,

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>which is more so relevant in Europe in normal times.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's just amazing to watch. But I want to

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>get your sense if these restrictions last or if they

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>get worse over in Europe, do you have any sense

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of how long the average restaurant can last they can

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wait this out. I think a lot of restaurants will

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>announced closure in the next month or two. Actually, I

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's going to be a fairly short term thing.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Restaurants in the UK had a holiday on their their

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>rents during a lot down this on. Those bills are

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>coming to you now, so rests are trying to operate

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with bow reduced income, new reserves and then facing huge bills.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm personally very pessimistic restroom past to say, even

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>though I want everyone to do well, I think only

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the very best sort of people. The biggest pockets are

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>going to survive deepest pockets Richard Vines, thank you so

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Just a fascinating piece there and uh,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you know our Hearts Guide. We really feel for the

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>folks uh in Europe that are experiencing this surge and

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>how it's impact in their lives, including on the restaurant business.

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Richard Vines, chief food critic for Bloomberg News, joining us

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from London, and of course Joel Webber,

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week on the remote access line

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>from Brooklyn, thank you so much for joining us. And Sarah,

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a big issues we head into these colder months.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not sure, I mean people canna be

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>standing outside the pub. Um, So it's really important for

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>these businesses to try to get you know, some to

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of continue their business but in a safe way.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Right It's a very big question, Mark one, what your

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>restrictions look like. Also just the weather itself. As you said,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think about dining in the city right now, these

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>restaurants are doing absolutely everything they can and people seem

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to be grasping onto it and enjoying it. But if

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it is sub forty degrees outside and you have a heater.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure Still, how willing are people going to be to

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>actually go venture outside in a coat and eat outside? Yeah?

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. And for starting to get to that point

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in the year where the heaters are good? Um, but

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>are they enough here? And you know, when we're standing

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out there and there's a ten inches so I don't

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna be sitting outside on the street, but

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe some intrepid diners will see. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer on Bloomberg Radio Hi and

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney alongside Sarah Panza. Carol will be back later

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>this hour. I mean, Sarah, it's really interesting here. First

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Jack Ma brought us Ali Baba, the huge Amazon like

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>type of company. Uh. Now he brings us another company

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>called Aunt Financial. It is winding its way through the

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>regulatory process on its way to an initial public offering.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people don't know that much about Ant Financial,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but one person does is Andy Brown. He's editorial director

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg's New Economy. He joins us on the phone

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from New York City and he thinks, so much for

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. It looks like this I PO might

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>happen relatively soon. What if you could just tell us

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what is and financial and how big is this thing?

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So and financial is huge? Um, you can think about

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and financial as The Economist put it in its latest vision,

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as a combination of Apple Pay, PayPal, Venmo, Mastica, JP

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Morgan I shares with an insurance brokerage thrown in. So

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's really it's a blog and it's all,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in one single app. So and is

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>going public at the end of this month, and it's

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be the biggest I p O in history,

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>way big of in Saudi Aramsa last year billion dollars

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>or more, which would value the company about two eight

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, bigger than any single US bank except JP Morgan.

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So Andy, as you wrote recently, data wars are the

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>new trade wars clearly as you just described, and has

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>so much consumer information. Do we expect or already have

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we seen the US administration want to go after the

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>likes of Aunt, just as we saw earlier this year,

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think we can call it the TikTok saga. Yeah,

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this is really a battle for the digital future of

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the world. Chinese companies are scooping up massive amounts of

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>data personal data everywhere. So you think about this and

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>financial in China. Has it grew out of the payments

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>system Ali pay this you bihooitous payments app that has

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred million or more Chinese uses, so basically and

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>knows everything about the spending habits of pretty much everybody

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in China. And they're now doing these joint ventures with

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>companies around Asia, India, Thailand, Philippines, um sort of retrofitting

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that buying into companies, retrofitting them with and technologies, and

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so they have a lot of insight into into the

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>data of about a billion or more people now around

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, and could easily double that number inside five years.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And what's the relationship between the US government and and

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>financial I mean, that's got to be a lot of

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>concern there. Yeah. So SO essentially has put into the

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>category of national security risk. So Royters has reported that

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the US State Department under Mike Pompeo is trying its

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>best to derail this this listing UH and um SO.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It has proposed, according to Royter's that um and should

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>go onto a blacklist. This entities list have only some

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it would have only symbolic importance. Is not like Huawei,

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>which is rarely dependent completely dependent actually on US technology

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case on and it would be largely symbolic.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But it would make the listing. Would it would definitely

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>complicate this listing. It would put a cloud of uncertainty

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>around its global expansion. Don't forget, the US is not

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the holy country in the world that's worried about China

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>getting control over data. Europe has concerned. India, by the way,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 1>also banned TikTok uh not just the US, and as

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier, this really is a race for digital

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>dominance around the world. I wonder though not even just

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the US, as you said, but other countries, how much sway,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>how much teeth do they actually have? I know Bloomberg

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Opinion described the TikTok deal as a quote empty threat.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Once we saw it finally finished and through and President

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump had approved it. How much can other companies or

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>other countries, I should say, actually do? I think? I

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>think it really does depend on on the company one

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 1>and number two, it depends on uh their level of

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>dependency on US technology UM. But also I think it's

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it really depends on an overall assessment

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese risk. The problem that the private sector in

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>China face is that they are seen as essentially um

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 1>handmaidens of, or in throll to the Chinese state. I mean,

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>private companies have an explicit mandate to serve the state.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's fine domestically insofar as it gives access to privileged capital,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to protected markets. When they go overseas, they're they're they're

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>trusted about as much as the they're as good as

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese state. And as we've seen from PW serve

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>As just in the last week, levels of trust around

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the world towards China plunging. So andy, what I mean

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this this could be a big issue because I know

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>aunts big and obviously China looking at India. What are

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the US plans strategy given TikTok, given everything that's going on. Yeah,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>well see, so this is this is a big difference

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>where you have TikTok, which really took the US by storm.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's tens of millions of active users, and

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>financial actually has almost no business in the US unless

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you count Chinese travelers that are coming over to the

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>US and and using and UH to access financial services

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>back home. So you know, they made a big play

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eighteen to get to the Chinese market.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to buy money Gram and Syphius. The agency

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, UH that's foreign acquisitions in the US

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>turned that down. So that was a big US play

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which was completely derailed by the by by by the

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>US government. Andy Brown, thank you so much for joining us.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Andy Brown, he's the editorial director for

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Economy, joining us on the phone from New

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>York City. And Sarah, this is gonna be interesting. This

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be as Andy was just reporting, is going

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to be potentially the big is IPO on record? Um

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and this company is just extraordinary. You know it was

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>once a part of Ali Baba. Just to give you

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a sense of just how big Ali Baba was before

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they spun this and financial off right, and Ali Baba

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>does still own a third of and after spinning it out.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But like you said, we think about the hype that

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was really surrounding Saudio Rampco when we saw that IPO.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Imagine once this does go public, how much attention this

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to get across financial markets. Not just in

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. Yeah, and it's gonna be interesting the again,

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as we're talking to Andy Brown about this, the relationship,

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the trade relationship, the tensions between China and the US.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>UH it played out we saw play out in TikTok

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on that racial where we ended up there. But this

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is a company that is even more strategic from both

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese perspective and perhaps from the US perspective that might

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>warrant UH some you know, closer um oversight by regulators

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 1>around the world. We have to see my coel journal now.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But you let me drive. No, no, no, he's going

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to drug home. Please, I'll do the riding drivel lets me.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive, Just drive, baby, question trying. This

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the globe, Timmu. Thanks, we'll drying

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>us down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, So I just

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>got about eleven minutes Paul Sweeney left in today's trading session,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like almost from the get go, it's

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>just been like a rock slowly falling right going down

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the hill. We're just off our lows, but nonetheless we're

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty much near it down about one and a half

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>percent about the SMP and Nastack down about one in

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a third percent on the Dow Jones Industrial average. Let's

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 1>bring in Michael Cougino. He is president and part the

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>manager at the Permanent Portfolio family of funds approximately two

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 1>point two billion in assets under management, and he joins

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from San Francisco. Michael, it's good

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to have you back with us. How are you not bad? Carl?

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>How are you How are you doing? It's been a

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>while in person, so it's great to be on. I

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>had a thought listening to the montage on driving songs

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>before this segment started. You guys gotta add Gary Newman

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>here in my car. I will let early eighties my

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>age demographic. I will definitely let our producer Paul Brennan

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>know that. Um, you guys are doing well. You're a

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Permanent Portfolio fund in the nine percentile for funds in

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>this category of the past five years, and you're up

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess around seven percent on average annually in each

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the past five years. What's working right now in

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this environment? I mean, we know big tech has worked

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>really well, those fang stocks. What are you finding is

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>working well for you guys? Well? Broadly speaking, we tend

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to do better when markets are mixed an environment US

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are mixed, and you know, the last couple of years

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's begun to be a more mixed picture than maybe

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the better part of the last ten years, which was

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, by S and P five hundred and by

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>long bond funds and buying index and you did great, UM,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I think the next ten years

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are probably gonna look different. And as a result, I

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think the markets have started to reflect that. What's worked

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for US so far this year has been i would

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>say the growth stocks UM, you know, have come back

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>very strongly in a variety of industries. For US. We

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>were buyers UM in February and March. We were also

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>buyers recently in September, although not as great. We were

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>nibbling in a lot of areas that we felt cut

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>over sold and in the in the sell off as

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>well as some you know, structurally sell off the areas

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like energy and materials and and some of the cyclical

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>growth that that really is has lagged. UM. We'll also

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to hold some of our tech UM, and so

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that's worked well. I mean natural resources of you know,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the begun to show some improvement, but they have a

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>long way to go reats. You know, similar all the

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>issues on the economy coming out of COVID and what's

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with UH entities that own assets that

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>need to rent space, whether it's residential or industrial, or

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>office or retail. UM and bonds have been a slight

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>contributor for us UM. We've been you know, low duration,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>high quality. We've found some opportunities in the short term

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>investment grade credit markets, so we've also gotten some contribution

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from bonds there. Hey, Michael, how about on the precious

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>metal side, gold silver, I'm looking at gold here back

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>up above nine announced. How are you doing that right now?

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You guys like gold? Michael? Right, yeah, you know what

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and I and I got I get into the stocks

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and bonds and didn't you know, neglected to mention the

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>precious metals. The number one holding is that the number

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one holding in your fund gold gold is yes. So

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I mentioned industrial medals and and and

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and materials. But you know, the alternative currency side of things,

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the gold and silver of obviously worked for us UM.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a variety of reasons for that.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have negative really just rates across the

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>curve starting with the third year and end and um

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and even worse globally. So that's us, and they look

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 1>even worse when you look at you know, rates around

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. You have the uncertain environment with respect to COVID,

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the uncertain recovery, the duration, the length of

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the strength, the employment pictures mixed. You've got a really

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of headline risk with respect to the election

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, um, and then what comes after that and

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>so and and COVID really overrides it all given that

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we've never been through this, we've never shut down the

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 1>country before and then tried to bring it back up. Um.

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's uh, you know, it's gonna be two steps

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>forward one step back, which we're not surprised by. But

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That is in fact what's transpired, and we

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>expect that to continue. Well, it should gain momentum given

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pent up demands, slacking labor, slacking capital, I mean, all

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those things argue for a continued momentum growing situation. When

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we get a vaccine, when we get a viral, or

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just if we get hurt immunity or something like that.

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there is an end to all this,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be uncertain until we get there. Um.

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And since we've never been through it before, I really

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>can't trust anybody's predictions about what's going to happen. And

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a big risk factor. But it's a vaccine, right ultimately,

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think we expect her immunity to

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to fix this, so it's stay safe until we get

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine essentially, right, Well, that would be the one

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with the most certainty, but again we're we're dealing with

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unknowns here. And I know people are

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>like to say trust the science, but from my perspective,

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.959
<v Speaker 1>science has been all over the place, um, and it's

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>probably been just as useful to use common sense, social distance, UM,

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.919
<v Speaker 1>be smart about how you're interacting and where um, as

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>as pure reliance and any sort of science. I mean,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I've seen so many contradicting studies over the last seven months,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's hard to know what works today versus

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a month ago. But I think when you use common

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sense and social distance and use your head, um, you

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 1>can accomplish a lot. You're not gonna you're not gonna

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>eliminate the risk, but you can minimize it. And uh,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the best way, you know it would

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be a vaccine. The most certain way to sort of

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>snap your fingers and go would be a vaccine. It's

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>an amazing pot. We didn't talk election. How did we

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not do that? Fifteen days? Right? Yeah? So Michael continue,

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>could you know, does it does it matter to you

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who ends up in the White House. I'm not talking

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>about your political preferences, but in terms of the financial

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>markets understood, Um, the I think of the short term no, Um,

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there's there's pent up demand and the economy. So regardless

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of who wins in the short term, they're gonna look

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like a hero. In terms of economic recovery, um and

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>both sides, uh, you know, appear to want stimulus at

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>some level, whether it's before the election or after. And

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so from that standpoint, you have, you know, some alignment.

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>What happens is after that, once that's sugar high of

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the initial recovery to pent up demand, all of that

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff begins to subside, then you have very different policy

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>prescriptions that that really kind of coalesced around more government

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>spending um and and that's going to drive economic growth

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Biden side, or more private sector spending, less regulation.

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You know on the Trump side of things, and then

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it gets into philosophical issues whether you you know which

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>one you believe is better long term, which one do

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you believe is going to give you the better rate

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to return? Um? And you know there's there's a lot

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of evidence, you know, I smart people can construct cases

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the map on that one. I think the

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>other factor, UM would be that how is Congress made up?

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We tend to focus a lot on the presidency, um,

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but the makeup of Congress, who owns which houses by

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>what majority is also going to be issue. Uh So

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that matters. And I think investors generally have been so

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in in the personalities, the headline, risk, etcetera,

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that I sense a lot of people haven't focused on

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>policy yet and that may come to that may need

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>need to be done or need to be better priceding

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward. All right, Michael Gugino, thank you so much,

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>President portfolio manager at Permanent Portfolio family of funds. Say

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that five times fast on the phone from San Francisco.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or at Bloomberg dot com,

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to check out our daily radio show

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. And be sure

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>News