WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: July 7th, 2025

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Ben later Bradesco joins

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>us now for more, Ben, Welcome to the program sir,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>it's been too long. Let's just get to sort of

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>base case baseline expectations for the next several days. What

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>are you and the team expected to see?

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm hoping we see more of the same, right,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess, continued on certainty, but actually no dramatic changes

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>to this sort of backed off tariff scenario, you know,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>so this does see it feel a little bit like

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>back to reality. Of course, it never went away. We

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 3>just forgot about it for ninety days, and markets, you know,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>ripped off the back of that, and I think we're

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>having a probably a predictable reset here.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Ben, let's talk about how that reset might shape global markets.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>The bias at the stand of the year was to

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>look to international assets and maybe leave the US behind.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 2>The US has snapped back so aggressively, so quickly, I

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>think people are questioning that all over again. Where do

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you stand on the issue?

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I sort of think the genie's out of the

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 3>bottle on US exceptionalism. I'm not a bear on the US.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the US is fine, but I am looking

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>for much more average returns out of the US, these

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of typical ten percent levels, not the twice that

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that we've got used to in the last couple of years.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think the rest of the world looks looks

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty good here. You still and most of the all

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>have this sort of double equity in FX discount the

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>week of dollars clearly helping. And I think some of

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>these countries have real silver linings to a potential restart

0:01:59.520 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>of this tower.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, when it comes to the restar of the tariff

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>for and you're looking at all these countries who you're

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 4>most excited about. Everyone was very amped have been excited

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>about Japan, but they've seemed to take in less of

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>a priority with this administration than they did just thirty

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 4>forty days ago.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Look at Latin if you want to be excited. Cheapest market,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 3>cheapest markets in the world, best and fording markets in

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the world. This year, Mexico one of a tiny handful

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of company of countries that still have tariff free access

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>to the US and places like Brazil, you know, low

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>ten percent tariff, lots of commodity carveouts, and a market

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>which would actually probably like more of a slowdown potentially

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 3>coming in from coming in from the rest of the world.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 5>So there are you know, it's a big world.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 3>There are definitely markets out there that I think would

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>you could have silver linings here.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting you mentioned Brazil because the President was saying

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 4>that any countries that align themselves with policies of the

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 4>bricks could be charged an additional ten percent tariff. Brazil

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>is the host country for this week's Brick Summit. Do

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 4>you think Trump is more embolded now is a question

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan's been asking all morning, given the fact that he

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 4>has had the markets at an all time high and he.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Just passes one big, beautiful bill.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 5>We're going to find out that.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess that's the one thing I know with some certainty.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>But yes, the Trump put is definitely not as strong

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 3>now as it was, you know, when we were down

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 3>in the whole, you know, twenty percent, you know, plus ago.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would like to feel it's still in place.

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I would like to feel, you know, Trump feels he's

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>in a better place. Does he really need to go

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>through that all again, introduce that level of policy uncertainty.

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>There's even greater drags on us growth. You know, I

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>would hope, you know, cooler heads prevailed, but who knows.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, we still have ninety percent of this administration

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>to go.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Ben, Investors feel like they're in a much better place

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>compared to where there were a few months ago. Are companies?

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>What are corporations doing now? Ben? And a question we

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 2>asked on the previous hour. Have we established how these

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>tariffs will be handled? Will it be passed or they

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>have to eait it on margin?

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Listen, I think companies are just like the rest of us, right.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I think this level of uncertainty, even though it may

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>have come down a bit, is absolutely corrosive to decision making,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>to confidence, and I think everything else being equal. That

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 3>means that you are hiring less people, you are doing

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>less capex. And your question on tariffs, I think companies

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>have shown us and the margins are there to prove it.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>They will pass this on. They will pull that pricing

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>lever at every opportunity.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Then which economy, which center consumers do you think is

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>in a better position to absorb that hit.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 3>Well's the US consumer is going to take most of this, right,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So the US consumer is in reasonably good shape. But

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, at the margin, this is all this is

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>all slowing, right, So I'm not sure that the US

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 3>is in the eye of the storm here. I think

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the world, you know, whether it's on

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>the economy side with fiscal stimulus in places like Germany

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and China, whether it's on the market side with these

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 3>double discounts on the on the equity market and the FX.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I think international assets and this global rotation has further

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to go.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Ben, I'd love to get your thoughts on China because

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 4>that is something that the President is still working on,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 4>more of a bigger grand bargain deal he talks about.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, they have a framework when it

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 4>comes to export controls and critical minerals.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 6>Do you think China is investible.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 3>I think it's definitely investable. We are seeing very strong

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>inflows into into Chinese assets. I was just looking at

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>the numbers this morning from the from the US ETFs

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>was like five hundred million last week into China five

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred million you know the week before. So absolutely the

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>money's going in. This is a very cheap market. I

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>think people are betting there's a deal to be done

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>and there's a there's enough flexibility on the Chinese side too.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 3>They want to deal and they have a policy stimulus

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 3>to maybe offset some of the costs to the tariffs

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 3>that having to eat right.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, Hi Ben, I appreciate your time, as always been.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Later there a Pridesco. It's the type from Dan Eys

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of Wentbush Rights in the following must diving deeper into

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>politics is exactly the opposite direction. The Tesla investors and

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>shadholders want him to take dan Jo and to surround

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the type with Danka monic great to be. How much

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 2>of a problem is this.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 5>It's a huge problem.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's what we've been talking about and you're

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 7>hearing the show, you know for months that you went

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 7>from Trumdministration Dige BFFs. Obviously there was a huge moment

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 7>you had to step back from politics, and now that's

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 7>exactly what investors want to see. And now you poke

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 7>the bar in terms of Trump and now you're former

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 7>em political party. So the point is, I believe you've

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 7>now hit a point. I think the board's going to

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 7>have to get involved because this is now over. I

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 7>think there's a line in the sand that he's now

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 7>starting across. And that's the frustration that someone that's a

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 7>huge supporter of Tesla Autonomous, the Golden Age ahead, you

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 7>cannot kind of go down this path.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's why the stocks reacting.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's some pack that volt himselfman describe what that might

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>look like.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 7>Look, I wouldn't say it's necessarily an ultimatum, but you know,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 7>you cannot keep going down this path where you know.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 5>To start a political party ahead.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 7>Of the midterms, I mean the amount of work time

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 7>and also you alienate potentially whether it's Republican Party, whether

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 7>it's Trump. So now Trump goes from obviously a huge

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 7>supporter to is that sort of an enemy or blockade,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's why the stocks reacting the way

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 7>it is because the last thing you want to see

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 7>at this point autonomous regulatory that now must goes from

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 7>front seat in the White House to ultimately you become

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 7>more of a foe.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>When you say ultimatum, you mean the board saying to him,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>if you continue this behavior, you can no longer be CEO.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think the board's gonna there.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 7>It's a tricky path right for the board, and this

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 7>is not a board that this has had such a

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, a huge.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Backbone when it comes to Musk. But I do think, look, investors,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 5>there's exhaustion.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 6>Do you want to see a new CEO book.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 7>I want Musk to stay CEO as Tesla because in

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 7>my view, Musk is Tesla, Tesla as Musk the biggest

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 7>asset of Tesla.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 5>But this political.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 7>Journey that he continues to go through, I think he

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 7>just comes down to Investors have hit a point where

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 7>they want him focused on Tesla and AI, and every

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 7>time that happens, he just continues.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 5>To go further and further into the political theater.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 4>He might not be just burning bridges in the Beltway.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 4>I want to read you this quote from the Wall

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Street Journal reporting overnight because of the Musk Trump feud,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Beijing no longer views the Tesla CEO as a geopolitical asset,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 4>will shy away from publicly courting him, so he canna

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 4>have problems outside of the United States as well because

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 4>of his political involvement in the United States.

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 7>Look, it goes back to like, if you just take

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 7>a step back here, it's like, let's try in a

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 7>way to almost alienate every aspect of the ecosystem, right

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 7>in terms of the core buyer to now maybe even

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Republicans to what you're seeing in China.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 5>And that's the hearts and lungs of Taska.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 7>I continued, we must is an asset there and it

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 7>will play that sort of nice in the sandbox, but

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 7>it does show you become an enemy or a food

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 7>to Trump. What does that do in the political and

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 7>obviously the geopolitical.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's part. Look, that's that's.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 7>Part of the you know, the issue here is that

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 7>you start to go into a quicksand situation where I

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 7>think in the view of investors there's really no upside

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 7>and you can say, okay, if you get mid terms

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 7>and you have some success and he has political power,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 7>but that's independence of their ad really success in the US, but.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 5>It's massive risk. That's where the stock's selling off to

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 5>where it is.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>The ANIX community is not exactly build up on the stock.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>It's actually very divided. And if you take the twelve

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>month consensus price target, the average is about two ninety

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.359
<v Speaker 2>eight right now, and that's below where we closed on Satursday.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>How well understood are these risks they manifest and evolve

0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think the risk now they continue to expand,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 7>and I think that's part of the issues that Okay

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 7>for here it did you go back to a few

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 7>weeks ago road attacks, the autonomous you know, must one

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 7>hundred percent committed. Now it's like, hey, over the weekend,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 7>while you know, hot dog and doing a July fourth barbecue.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Hey let's start a political party. Yeah it's a good idea.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah we're going to do that.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 7>So that's as an investor, it's the last thing you

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 7>and I heard over the weekend. The last thing you

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 7>want to see is him going on the spat. But

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 7>I think the bigger worry is as he goes further

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 7>and further down the path from from a Tesla perspective,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 7>does that maybe add risk in terms of Trump becoming

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 7>more of a blockade rather around autonomous.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And around some of the just describe what that means.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by that?

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 6>What could he take?

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 7>A big thing is around the federal roadmap in terms

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 7>of autonomous. I mean, now, this is a key few

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 7>years ahead for Tesla going not just from Austin, but

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 7>twenty five cities over next year. If you start to

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 7>put more blockades in terms of things that they need

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 7>to meet in order to get on the road, if

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 7>instead of more of a green light, it's a little

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 7>more of a yellow red.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Light, that's the word. That's what the stock's selling off.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 7>It's the fear that over the next six, twelve, eighteen

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 7>months Trump starts to put little blockades in that.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 4>But even today the president is looking out for America's interest.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 4>If he just does that, it might hurt Elon Muss

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 4>but also might hurt the United States when it comes

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>to competition with China.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 7>And that's why we've said the biggest asset when it

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 7>comes to autonomous is Tasa because when you think Willima's

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 7>not going to scale at any level relative to Tessa.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 7>So when you're competing with China, Tesla and Musk is

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 7>an accid no different than Jensen.

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 5>That's why. Look, the hope is, at one point, is there.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Some sort of meeting between Musk Trump? Can they sort

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 7>of get to some resolution. The problem is every week

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 7>he gets further and further, and this is not what

0:11:57.880 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 7>you want to see. Just the amount of the content

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 7>to every other tech company, from the Della, from Jents

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 7>and from open Ai, from a Oracle and all down

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 7>the AI path you don't want to see.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Must now going down the Portico path.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>How much time does he have? You've got a pricetocket

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>of five hundred in a pre market right now for

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 2>at two ninety four. How much time does he have

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 2>to back away from that?

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think you basically have what I view

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 7>is kind of like ninety days three months. I mean,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 7>I think there's a ninety days sort of I can

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 7>see like some sort of ultimatum where if he continues

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 7>to go on the path no different than how we

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 7>view with Duge and Trump, or he's on that conference call.

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 5>I had to back off.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 7>This is this is a I would just have to

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 7>say a moment of truth.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 5>But this is a time now for Musk.

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 7>He needs to choose and you can't keep having these

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 7>one step forward, two steps back, one step forward, two

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 7>steps back. And that's why the exhaustion is starting to

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 7>play out in Tesla stock.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Then West, It's going to say, certainly exhisted by a

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of this. The stuck is down by close to

0:12:54.840 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 2>seven percent in the pre market. Let's turned back to

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Trade Treasury Secretary Scale Besson saying that some trade partners

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>tariff rates will boomerang back to Liberation Day levels. Joining

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>us now to discusses Kate Kalukowitz, the former White House

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 2>trade official and former senior USTR trade negotiator. Kate, Welcome

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to the program. Is this the beginning of the end

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 2>or just the end of the beginning?

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think this is President Trump at his best,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 8>when he's bringing the pressure and supporting his negotiators. I

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 8>think this is his favorite time of the negotiations, when

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 8>he can be extremely maximalist. And I think as a

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 8>trade negotiator, it helps to have a leader like that

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 8>pushing for the end, pushing for the negotiations to get

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 8>over the finish line, and providing that sort of threat

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 8>that helps his team actually tell their counterparts he's serious.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 2>Kate, what determines whether you get a UK outcome, a

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Viennam outcome, a China outcome, or something much worse.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, I actually think that's quite an important question,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 8>and the Vietnam deal sort of shows that there are

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 8>two different trajectories here. Let's set China to the side

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 8>for now, because I think that's a separate type of negotiation.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 8>But you have a UK outcome and you have a

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 8>Vietnam outcome. And I think for the list of countries

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 8>with which the United States is actively negotiating, you see

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 8>two different pathways here. One for the more developed economies,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 8>probably looking for something like the UK god and those

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 8>more export heavy economies that receive those very high tariff rates.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 8>Maybe the Vietnam deal reflects what the Trump administration is

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 8>putting on the table.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Is a Vietnam deal actually done though, Well.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 8>Back to our end of the beginning, You're right, Anne, Marie.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 8>These are framework agreements, and I think you described it perfectly.

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 8>The truth announcing the Vietnam deal was I think quite gleeful.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 8>The Vietnamese, of course later in times said we still

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 8>have a lot of things to work out here. But

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 8>let's make no mistake, this is a re really important outcome.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 8>The Vietnamese, of course, were on the hook for very

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 8>high tariffs. They've been the recipient of the ire of

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 8>the Trump administration, going back to the first time around,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 8>the increasing trade deficit, particularly as it relates to China.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 8>The longer term play for the Vietnamese, however, is going

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 8>to be how it manages this very very challenging place

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 8>they find themselves between China and the United States. And

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 8>these will be the details on the transhipment that they're

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>going to have to work out.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 4>When you look at what's coming up this week, the

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 4>President says at noon he's going to be sending tariff

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 4>letters out. You have the European Union, the Commission talking

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 4>about the fact that the President got on the phone

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 4>with Ursula Vonderline. They're looking to get some sort of

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>framework before July ninth. What buckets are different countries.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 8>In Well, I mean, I think you've seen the President

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 8>and his surrogates talk about this smaller set of nations

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 8>or economies which are much further along. I think the

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 8>President had been quite hopeful last week Vietnam would be

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 8>the first of several and now Smith's that day and

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 8>you've seen him signal that talks with India quite forward,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 8>that talks with the EU are quite forward. Obviously he's

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 8>been a little frustrated with where things are with Japan.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 8>But I think these are the countries that we can

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 8>expect some outcomes this week if negotiators can get a

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 8>few of these wrinkles, you know, ironed out.

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 4>These are also the same countries though that given the

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 4>fact that they are in these deep talks, will get extensions.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 4>And is that what you think Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.359
<v Speaker 4>was talking about when we talked about April for August first.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, again, I think the President is trying to signal

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 8>to these countries that they need to stop delaying. You know,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 8>he had hoped to have these deals ready last week.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 8>I think this new notion of letters going out is

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 8>really his way of ratcheting up pressure. Typically when we

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 8>see tariffs go into place, there is somewhat of a

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 8>delay to allow importers some time to adjust.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think we'll still have to see exactly.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 8>When things are implemented. But I really do see this

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 8>more as the President trying to ratchet up leverage.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 4>How surprised are you they're given the fact that you

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 4>were a trade negotiator under Trump, that Japan and the

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 4>European Union have basically swapped fates.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 8>Well Japan is quite interesting because I think the President

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 8>was surprised when he got the Knee Pond steel deal

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 8>across the finish line. He probably suspected that would be

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 8>sufficient to wrap things up. Of course, the Japanese really

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 8>want to see an outcome on cars, and the President

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 8>does not seem inclined to deliver that.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Then.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 8>Of course, you know, when you're negotiating with democracies, this

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 8>is always the challenge. Japan has an election coming up,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 8>which constrains its negotiators, so you know, it is quite

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 8>shocking I think that we've ended up in this place,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 8>but this is part of being a trade negotiator with

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 8>governments which have to be responsive to their own domestic constituencies.

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 8>Europe I think will get across the finish line so

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 8>long as we continue to have these leader level discussions,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 8>as we've discussed before. You know, the European Union is

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 8>a very challenging negotiating partner because it does represent twenty

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 8>seven different countries, and so if you don't get right

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 8>to the leader level, you don't get right to these

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 8>big commercial deals.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very challenging.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 8>So if President vonder Land and President Trump maintain this dialogue,

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 8>I think we can get that one finished.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I Kate, appreciate your view. Kate Kalukowitz there joining us

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>on the latest trade push down in Washington, d C.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>We begin this hour with stocks pulling back from all

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>time highs as President Donald Trump reignites trade concerns. Kadi

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Kaminskive out for simplex writing, Equity trend signals are still

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>modestly strong given the volatility and uncertainty in recent months.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Candy joins us now for more. Can you welcome to

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the program, and good morning. It feels like sentiment is

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>quite one sided now after the massive reversal over the

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 2>last several months or so. Yet will still come on

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the program and say the pin tride is higher equities

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 2>from here? Do you agree?

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 9>I would have to agree that that's what we're seeing,

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 9>especially in the market data. What was interesting, though, is

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 9>we did see a little bit of a pivot last

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 9>week where you saw small caps and perhaps more domestic.

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Focus being in ahead.

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 9>And so I'd say that, you know, the general theme

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 9>has continually been a little bit more pro growth and

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 9>positive for equities, which is something I wouldn't have guessed

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 9>a few weeks ago.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 2>In particular, Okay, you're seeing that inequities, Can you say

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing the corresponding thing in the bond market at

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the same time.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not. I'd say that the bond market has been

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>very tricky this year.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 9>We've seen very mixed signals across different parts of the curve.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 9>We've definitely seen short signals on the long ends suggesting that.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yields need to be higher over long term.

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 9>That may suggest some uncertainty about where rates are going

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 9>to go over long horizons. But in general, it's been

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 9>very tricky to trade the bond market recent because there's

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 9>just been this push and pull between when aer rate's

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 9>going to be cut and also just you know, in general,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 9>what are the impact of all these macro themes on

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 9>fixed income?

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 4>Given this, are you surprised the bond market didn't get

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 4>a vote on the one big beautiful bill?

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Good question. I mean, I think you haven't seen that

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>much movement.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 9>You are seeing some steepening as well recently, like particularly today,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 9>or seeing that as well, So I'd say that you know,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 9>the bond market is not voting yet it definitely voted

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 9>on what was going on in Liberation Day. So I think,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, we just have to wait and see when

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 9>you know, bond investors are really voicing their opinions. But really,

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 9>right now very mixed and fixed income.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you think bond investors are going to pay close

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 4>attention to this deadline this week or they feel like

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 4>it's self imposed and already the administration has signaled that

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these trading partners are going to get

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 4>more time to really work out the agreement with the

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 4>United States.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, if you look at just how much

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 9>movement you have today and how the market has responded

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 9>to recent events, it's almost that the market is sort

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 9>of shrugging off some of this news because it's nothing

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 9>is really a big shock. It's everything that we've been

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 9>discussing along the way, and there's been continual backtracking and.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Back and forth.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 9>So I think people are waiting to know the real

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 9>results before they start positioning themselves for the impact of

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 9>those potential trade decisions.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>It keady in the meantime. What's working in the commodity market,

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Not much, I.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 9>Would say, I mean, i'd say that commodities have been

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 9>up this month, but there hasn't been big swings.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, people have been following oil and energy in general,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but when you look at things.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 9>Like gold, which had also been pretty much on a

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 9>tear this year, it has been sort of stagnating some

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 9>as well. So I think, you know, looking for that demand,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 9>that demand increase that might potentially occur because of having

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 9>better stronger growth is something we're kind of seeing right

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 9>now this month that bodies have been up, but it's

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 9>not particularly strong yet, but it's the potential for a

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 9>trend going the next few months.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Kevy, as I listened to you talk about commodities and

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>fixed income, it just sounds like you're seeing convictionless markets

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>in certain asset classes. Would it be fair to describe

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 2>them as that precisely?

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 9>I think what we have seen is strong conviction and

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 9>equities a week dollar, but everything else has been kind

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 9>of wavering around in sort of anticipation to understand the

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 9>impact of these trade negotiations, but also just sort of

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 9>is the US economy strong enough to actually follow through

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 9>with this narrative? And that's why I think other asset

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 9>classes are really trying to really waiting and sort of

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 9>treading back and forth.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Kenny, do you find that difficult to reconcile while we

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>are seeing that conviction in places like equities and in

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>foreign exchange, why you're not seeing the same thing elsewhere?

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Definitely so, But I mean I think these are just

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>at different time horizons. I think equity move quickly.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 9>I think the bond market needs a little bit more

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 9>clarity on multiple economic factors such as trade as well

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 9>as you know, the overall health of the US economy

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 9>and the job market, and those are a lot of

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 9>themes to reconcile, particularly with the FED that hasn't moved yet.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think bonds doesn't surprise me.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 9>But commodities, I think they're sort of in the wake

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 9>of what you know. I would have expected them to

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 9>move more, just with the tariffs themselves fundamentally, but we

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 9>still haven't seen that yet. So that I think helps

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 9>investors be less worried about this inflation concern or other

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 9>concerns related to trade in the short term.

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Stuck in Limberg, Katy, appreciate the update, Katy Kaminski that

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>of Alpha Simplex. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you the best in markets, economics, antiopolitics. You can watch

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>am to nine am Eastern, Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and, as always, on the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and The Bloomberg Business out

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 7>Mm hmm