WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 23

0:00:01.230 --> 0:00:05.170
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst,

0:00:05.410 --> 0:00:08.690
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.730 --> 0:00:09.910
<v Speaker 1>sports stories.

0:00:09.570 --> 0:00:10.050
<v Speaker 2>Of the day.

0:00:10.070 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst. Not so fast, my friends.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He is

0:00:20.660 --> 0:00:25.180
<v Speaker 2>Paul Paps. Paul, it is unseasonably warm for football weather.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.300
<v Speaker 3>It's not football weather this weekend. I looked at the

0:00:27.340 --> 0:00:31.070
<v Speaker 3>college football slate. USC's home game, 98 degrees. What happened

0:00:31.090 --> 0:00:33.550
<v Speaker 3>last time? Not a lot of people showed up. There's

0:00:33.590 --> 0:00:37.810
<v Speaker 3>only one top 25 football game under 70 degrees this weekend.

0:00:37.830 --> 0:00:39.050
<v Speaker 4>You won't get that coverage anywhere else.

0:00:39.090 --> 0:00:40.670
<v Speaker 2>Wow. All right. What do we got cooking today?

0:00:40.810 --> 0:00:41.830
<v Speaker 4>We got a lot cooking today.

0:00:41.890 --> 0:00:44.949
<v Speaker 3>Busy sports weekend, NFL, college playoffs, but big picture?

0:00:45.460 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Dan Patrick joins us.

0:00:46.340 --> 0:00:50.260
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait. Okay. Last night, of course, we knew

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.550
<v Speaker 2>we'd be coming in early on not so fast. But

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.290
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland Browns is a potential playoff team. Three and

0:00:55.510 --> 0:00:58.590
<v Speaker 2>one beat the Steelers. Paul, what's your first reaction to

0:00:58.610 --> 0:00:59.790
<v Speaker 2>what happened last night in Cleveland?

0:00:59.810 --> 0:01:01.850
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think I said on the Dan Patrick show earlier,

0:01:01.890 --> 0:01:03.910
<v Speaker 3>this is like a couple C students in a fight,

0:01:04.110 --> 0:01:07.310
<v Speaker 3>like a math contest. These are two nice teams. There's

0:01:07.350 --> 0:01:09.010
<v Speaker 3>nothing wrong with them. And there's not a lot right

0:01:09.030 --> 0:01:11.550
<v Speaker 3>with them. At the Cleveland Browns, they won. They could

0:01:11.569 --> 0:01:13.700
<v Speaker 3>have given it up in the second half. But it

0:01:13.740 --> 0:01:16.470
<v Speaker 3>just feels like a good game between two teams that

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:17.889
<v Speaker 3>are in the middle of the road somewhere.

0:01:18.410 --> 0:01:20.770
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what? If you're 9-8, are you a

0:01:20.790 --> 0:01:22.690
<v Speaker 2>good team? If you're 10-7, are you a good team?

0:01:22.730 --> 0:01:25.170
<v Speaker 2>Because both teams have a good chance of making the playoffs.

0:01:25.209 --> 0:01:27.230
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they both have nice rosters. I thought in the

0:01:27.270 --> 0:01:29.390
<v Speaker 3>second half, you look there, Cleveland looks like they're in

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.540
<v Speaker 3>good shape. But Cleveland has been outscored by 14 points

0:01:32.580 --> 0:01:34.149
<v Speaker 3>this season. They could be 0-4 instead of 3-1.

0:01:35.819 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to counter your argument. I think Deshaun Watson

0:01:38.100 --> 0:01:40.190
<v Speaker 2>is getting more comfortable in that offense. I think the

0:01:40.220 --> 0:01:42.830
<v Speaker 2>young players are getting more comfortable. So, no, I'm not

0:01:42.890 --> 0:01:45.790
<v Speaker 2>talking about them as a 12-win team, but I think

0:01:45.810 --> 0:01:47.930
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see a much more competitive Cleveland team

0:01:47.950 --> 0:01:48.910
<v Speaker 2>than at least I expected.

0:01:49.030 --> 0:01:50.290
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree with you.

0:01:50.410 --> 0:01:53.070
<v Speaker 3>Boston, the young wide receiver in Concepcion, they looked really

0:01:53.090 --> 0:01:54.890
<v Speaker 3>good in the first half. But then in the second half,

0:01:54.930 --> 0:01:57.410
<v Speaker 3>if you were up for the second half, Deshaun Watson

0:01:57.430 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>tried to give it back. He read the option wrong,

0:01:59.860 --> 0:02:01.779
<v Speaker 3>and T.J. Watt just decleted him, and he fumbles.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:02:02.460 --> 0:02:04.340
<v Speaker 3>He threw in a triple coverage late in the game

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.670
<v Speaker 3>when that's the only thing they didn't need was an interception.

0:02:07.490 --> 0:02:09.450
<v Speaker 3>He also had a play where he could have closed

0:02:09.490 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>out the game to Harold Fannin, and he missed him.

0:02:12.090 --> 0:02:14.109
<v Speaker 3>He completely missed him on the left side, and that

0:02:14.130 --> 0:02:15.190
<v Speaker 3>would have basically closed out the game.

0:02:15.230 --> 0:02:17.649
<v Speaker 4>If you look at this play here, What is that about?

0:02:17.810 --> 0:02:19.150
<v Speaker 4>I know it was tipped, but my God.

0:02:19.630 --> 0:02:21.769
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, listen, it's the Cleveland Browns. Maybe my

0:02:21.810 --> 0:02:24.310
<v Speaker 2>bar is lower for you. Well, the Cleveland Browns are 3-1,

0:02:24.430 --> 0:02:26.730
<v Speaker 2>and you're throwing cold water on it. Did you see

0:02:26.750 --> 0:02:28.590
<v Speaker 2>the stadium last night? They were going crazy.

0:02:28.690 --> 0:02:31.830
<v Speaker 3>It's a feel-good story. It's a good, especially when you've

0:02:31.850 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 3>been starving for a long time. I think they're a

0:02:33.780 --> 0:02:35.660
<v Speaker 3>nice squad. I don't want to go too much further

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:36.940
<v Speaker 3>than September with them.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>A couple numbers I found interesting. Cleveland's won five straight

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.460
<v Speaker 2>over the Steelers at home, but guess the last time

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:42.940
<v Speaker 2>they beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh?

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 4>On a Thursday night?

0:02:44.730 --> 0:02:47.630
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It was 2003. So there's something about

0:02:47.650 --> 0:02:50.169
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers coming to the Browns. It makes it a

0:02:50.230 --> 0:02:52.510
<v Speaker 2>rock fight every time. So it's not a shock that

0:02:52.530 --> 0:02:54.650
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland won that game. I think what you're saying is

0:02:54.690 --> 0:02:57.470
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean what some people said last night, that

0:02:57.530 --> 0:02:58.609
<v Speaker 2>this means Cleveland is back.

0:02:58.669 --> 0:03:00.610
<v Speaker 3>I think most people would still take the Bengals over

0:03:00.630 --> 0:03:02.430
<v Speaker 3>them and still take the Ravens over them. I think

0:03:02.470 --> 0:03:04.889
<v Speaker 3>you could feel good about the condition of the franchise.

0:03:04.930 --> 0:03:07.830
<v Speaker 3>You put up with the Deshaun Watson off the field stuff,

0:03:07.910 --> 0:03:10.180
<v Speaker 3>and now the on the field stuff, which there was

0:03:10.190 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a point last year, he was like Kaiser Soze.

0:03:11.850 --> 0:03:13.700
<v Speaker 4>I didn't think we'd ever see the guy on the field.

0:03:14.540 --> 0:03:16.860
<v Speaker 3>And I think that, like you said, he's playing decent football,

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.090
<v Speaker 3>B-level football, and that's enough. But more so, if you

0:03:20.100 --> 0:03:22.590
<v Speaker 3>look what their front office did, the Miles Garrett trade

0:03:22.710 --> 0:03:26.630
<v Speaker 3>versus fantastic. They've got good wide receivers. Running back Judkins

0:03:26.690 --> 0:03:29.250
<v Speaker 3>is a good running back. Fannin, the defense with Graham.

0:03:29.690 --> 0:03:32.290
<v Speaker 3>They have a nice roster. So whoever the quarterback is.

0:03:32.230 --> 0:03:34.109
<v Speaker 4>Now or going forward at least has a team around

0:03:34.150 --> 0:03:35.730
<v Speaker 4>him and isn't just running for his life.

0:03:35.750 --> 0:03:38.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, GM Andrew Barry's made some nice picks. Carson Schlesinger

0:03:38.510 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>in the second round was a great pick.

0:03:39.500 --> 0:03:40.380
<v Speaker 4>You nailed Schlesinger, by the way.

0:03:40.540 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I know. Denzel Boston in the second round was obviously

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a great pick. I will counter you a little more

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>on Deshaun Watson. When he runs, it opens up everything.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.860
<v Speaker 2>So the question is, can he run like he did

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.589
<v Speaker 2>last night? He's kind of run all season without getting hurt.

0:03:53.650 --> 0:03:56.070
<v Speaker 2>The only reason he was Kaiser Soze is he was hurt.

0:03:55.870 --> 0:03:56.290
<v Speaker 1>All the time.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:56.900
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>So now, again, I'm just trying to pump the brakes

0:03:59.180 --> 0:04:01.460
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on them. But again, this is a

0:04:01.500 --> 0:04:03.020
<v Speaker 3>fan base that's been dying for it. Let's go to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.020
<v Speaker 3>the other side of this, the Steelers. The Steelers could

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.130
<v Speaker 3>have won that game. They had a really nice fourth quarter.

0:04:07.150 --> 0:04:09.970
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Rodgers got them back in play. They were in

0:04:10.110 --> 0:04:13.210
<v Speaker 3>two-point conversion land. And then it's just, you know, it's

0:04:13.250 --> 0:04:14.610
<v Speaker 3>not enough. You mentioned them.

0:04:14.660 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Earlier before the show.

0:04:15.500 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>You said.

0:04:16.230 --> 0:04:18.250
<v Speaker 4>They're good, but they're good and old, and that's not

0:04:18.290 --> 0:04:18.690
<v Speaker 4>a good good.

0:04:18.930 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're the same team that they've been since 2017,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.860
<v Speaker 2>since Ben Roethlisberger got old. They'll win some games they shouldn't,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.690
<v Speaker 2>and they'll lose some games they should not. You've got

0:04:27.710 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to love that. Don't look. Yeah, I mean, listen, Aaron Rodgers,

0:04:30.980 --> 0:04:33.300
<v Speaker 2>last night he barely completed 50% of his passes, but

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.500
<v Speaker 2>still had 300 yards. He makes a lot of good throws.

0:04:36.900 --> 0:04:39.659
<v Speaker 2>He's dropping back way too much. You've said this all

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.690
<v Speaker 2>season long. Why isn't the offense built around Jalen Warren?

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.990
<v Speaker 2>Why isn't Aaron Rodgers dropping back so many times?

0:04:45.010 --> 0:04:48.830
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, 40 passes, 299, three touchdowns, two picks. The last

0:04:48.890 --> 0:04:51.390
<v Speaker 3>pick doesn't really count because... It's that desperation.

0:04:51.410 --> 0:04:53.790
<v Speaker 2>But he got hit a couple times. Every time he

0:04:53.830 --> 0:04:55.270
<v Speaker 2>gets hit, you think there's going to be a fumble.

0:04:55.410 --> 0:04:57.950
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Warren is in his prime. He's not sharing the backfield.

0:04:58.010 --> 0:05:00.950
<v Speaker 3>I would give him 30 carries. I'm being facetious, but

0:05:01.089 --> 0:05:03.690
<v Speaker 3>they hand the ball very well with him. But Herbstreit

0:05:03.730 --> 0:05:05.750
<v Speaker 3>talked about this. The pass rush, and you see him

0:05:05.770 --> 0:05:06.540
<v Speaker 3>getting sacked there.

0:05:06.650 --> 0:05:06.770
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:07.180 --> 0:05:09.020
<v Speaker 4>He's got to make it through this season, and old

0:05:09.140 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 4>and hurt is not a good mix.

0:05:10.700 --> 0:05:12.420
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you one thing, though. He got hit this

0:05:12.460 --> 0:05:14.610
<v Speaker 2>many times last year and made it through. He's a

0:05:14.620 --> 0:05:16.150
<v Speaker 2>little bit like a rubber band. He seems to be

0:05:16.170 --> 0:05:18.990
<v Speaker 2>able to take these hits now. He's come back fully

0:05:19.010 --> 0:05:21.170
<v Speaker 2>from his Achilles. Yeah, when he gets hit, is there

0:05:21.210 --> 0:05:22.910
<v Speaker 2>anything ugly? It kind of looks like you or me

0:05:23.010 --> 0:05:23.550
<v Speaker 2>out on the field.

0:05:23.570 --> 0:05:23.770
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I know.

0:05:23.830 --> 0:05:25.830
<v Speaker 3>Anyone gray hair getting hit, you kind of feel bad

0:05:25.870 --> 0:05:28.260
<v Speaker 3>for them. He's got the sprinkle gray. But Herbstreet said

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>last night, he was talking about the receivers, there's no separations.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.820
<v Speaker 3>He was looking at the all-22 shot. He said, these

0:05:33.860 --> 0:05:34.700
<v Speaker 3>receivers are not open.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:35.390
<v Speaker 4>There's nowhere for.

0:05:35.370 --> 0:05:35.810
<v Speaker 5>Him to go.

0:05:36.050 --> 0:05:37.930
<v Speaker 2>Well, where does he go in that situation?

0:05:37.970 --> 0:05:38.710
<v Speaker 4>Washington, you're going.

0:05:38.730 --> 0:05:39.190
<v Speaker 5>Darnell Washington.

0:05:39.230 --> 0:05:41.330
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't have to be open. He's a mountain of

0:05:41.370 --> 0:05:43.890
<v Speaker 2>a man. DK Metcalf came back a little bit late.

0:05:43.970 --> 0:05:45.849
<v Speaker 2>That was, I think, a big part of him getting

0:05:45.870 --> 0:05:47.870
<v Speaker 2>back at it in the second half. There's reason for hope.

0:05:48.210 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you right now, you discount the Steelers at

0:05:50.300 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>your own peril. I don't care if Mike Tomlin is gone.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.820
<v Speaker 2>They could be 2-5. They will end up at 9-8

0:05:55.900 --> 0:05:56.500
<v Speaker 2>or 10-7.

0:05:56.540 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 4>You'd bet your life that they win a 7-plus game.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.180
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that's not a good thing. That's a very,

0:06:00.220 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>very bad thing for Steelers fans. They're so sick of limbo.

0:06:03.700 --> 0:06:05.140
<v Speaker 2>I think they would want to get rid of Aaron

0:06:05.190 --> 0:06:07.930
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers and start over a quarterback. Because you look at

0:06:07.950 --> 0:06:10.770
<v Speaker 2>that schedule, you know it's going to land somewhere around 500.

0:06:10.750 --> 0:06:12.350
<v Speaker 4>They could win their next four in a row based

0:06:12.390 --> 0:06:13.070
<v Speaker 4>off that schedule.

0:06:13.130 --> 0:06:15.289
<v Speaker 3>And you'd be like, they did it again. Because I

0:06:15.330 --> 0:06:17.740
<v Speaker 3>keep saying with the Steelers... When are they going to

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>try out another quarterback? And you were talking about it

0:06:20.060 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 3>before the show. They're not going to do that. I mean,

0:06:22.700 --> 0:06:24.460
<v Speaker 3>if you want it to be Drew Aller or Will Howard,

0:06:24.860 --> 0:06:26.460
<v Speaker 3>when do they do that? When they're not longer in

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.290
<v Speaker 3>the playoff picture, but they're always technically in the playoff picture.

0:06:29.310 --> 0:06:31.910
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the problem. They draft around 20, which will

0:06:31.930 --> 0:06:32.989
<v Speaker 2>get you a Kenny Pickett.

0:06:33.070 --> 0:06:33.270
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:06:33.589 --> 0:06:36.970
<v Speaker 2>And it won't get you Sam Darnold. I'm trying to

0:06:36.990 --> 0:06:38.390
<v Speaker 2>think of a good top five pick. They need to

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>really tank. They need to rip off the Band-Aid. They're

0:06:40.580 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>going to have to start over quarterback Aaron Rodgers. They

0:06:43.020 --> 0:06:45.669
<v Speaker 2>were talking last night, there's no coming back. Rodgers was

0:06:45.710 --> 0:06:48.589
<v Speaker 2>talking about his plans for next year. He's done. So

0:06:48.870 --> 0:06:50.910
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're a Steelers fan, you really wonder

0:06:50.970 --> 0:06:51.410
<v Speaker 2>what's next.

0:06:51.430 --> 0:06:53.630
<v Speaker 3>Okay, to put a bow on this game, are either team,

0:06:53.710 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>can you picture them being a threatening team if they

0:06:55.940 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>made the playoffs, either team?

0:06:57.220 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no. I think both teams have a

0:06:59.740 --> 0:07:01.420
<v Speaker 2>good chance to make the playoff, a real chance to

0:07:01.460 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs, but I don't see them as a

0:07:04.100 --> 0:07:05.300
<v Speaker 2>contender for the Super Bowl.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.060
<v Speaker 3>You did sway me a little bit about the young

0:07:07.100 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>guys with Deshaun Watson, and somehow if this keeps up,

0:07:10.170 --> 0:07:14.180
<v Speaker 3>like decent football in the playoff picture, In December, those

0:07:14.220 --> 0:07:15.620
<v Speaker 3>young guys become like sophomores.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.190
<v Speaker 4>They always talk about freshmen becoming sophomores.

0:07:17.820 --> 0:07:20.730
<v Speaker 3>I could see them being better than people expect because

0:07:20.950 --> 0:07:22.430
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have a dip at some point.

0:07:22.710 --> 0:07:26.490
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely. You're being very nice, by the way. I

0:07:26.550 --> 0:07:29.190
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate this because we have not talked about the

0:07:29.250 --> 0:07:31.050
<v Speaker 2>baseball game on NBC last night yet.

0:07:31.190 --> 0:07:32.850
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you're a Phillies fan. You said they weren't going

0:07:32.870 --> 0:07:35.550
<v Speaker 4>to advance. You called your shot. They didn't advance. Phillies

0:07:35.850 --> 0:07:36.150
<v Speaker 4>are out.

0:07:36.370 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Braves are in. Braves continue. The lucky Braves, 6-2 over

0:07:39.580 --> 0:07:42.310
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies. They get to face the Dodgers next out

0:07:42.370 --> 0:07:42.610
<v Speaker 3>in L.A.

0:07:42.890 --> 0:07:44.750
<v Speaker 2>Did the Phillies show up at all last night? Was

0:07:44.770 --> 0:07:47.170
<v Speaker 2>that a game at any point after the Harris home run?

0:07:47.190 --> 0:07:50.230
<v Speaker 2>It felt like it was over early. Yeah, they lost 2-6.

0:07:51.150 --> 0:07:53.370
<v Speaker 3>How do you feel about a team that fires their

0:07:53.410 --> 0:07:56.530
<v Speaker 3>manager but then makes the playoffs but then disappoints in

0:07:56.550 --> 0:07:56.929
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs?

0:07:56.990 --> 0:07:58.070
<v Speaker 4>Isn't that a good season?

0:07:58.210 --> 0:08:00.950
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw a headline that they're going to gently

0:08:01.370 --> 0:08:04.950
<v Speaker 2>let Don Mattingly walk out of the building. That's a mistake. No,

0:08:04.970 --> 0:08:06.570
<v Speaker 2>they're not moving on with him. In fact, they're going

0:08:06.590 --> 0:08:08.450
<v Speaker 2>to rip up this entire lineup possibly. They have a

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of old, overpaid stars. And I said it earlier

0:08:11.740 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>in the week. They have no chance. Their bullpen always

0:08:14.050 --> 0:08:16.610
<v Speaker 2>blows in the postseason. It's time to try a whole

0:08:16.650 --> 0:08:17.790
<v Speaker 2>new approach if you're the Phillies.

0:08:17.810 --> 0:08:19.530
<v Speaker 3>Let's look at the Braves side of this. Two years ago,

0:08:19.570 --> 0:08:21.910
<v Speaker 3>they were one of the favorites. Last year, a little injured.

0:08:22.230 --> 0:08:23.030
<v Speaker 3>This year, they're back.

0:08:23.070 --> 0:08:24.940
<v Speaker 4>They look good. They handled business at home.

0:08:25.540 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Against the Dodgers, we never say no chance.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.700
<v Speaker 4>We don't do that here and not so fast. But

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.100
<v Speaker 4>it feels like daunting.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Braves have really one pitcher, Chris Sale. And

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.330
<v Speaker 2>you need a lot of pitching against the Dodgers. How

0:08:36.350 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>do you sail last night? That's a tough assignment. I

0:08:40.300 --> 0:08:43.260
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone's going to upset the Dodgers, but the

0:08:43.380 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>one team in particular, because of the pitching staff, I

0:08:45.730 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>just don't see the Braves doing it.

0:08:47.179 --> 0:08:49.209
<v Speaker 3>Sale could probably go in Game 2, probably go in

0:08:49.250 --> 0:08:50.930
<v Speaker 3>Game 5, so they're going to see him twice.

0:08:50.970 --> 0:08:51.750
<v Speaker 4>You need a win there.

0:08:52.150 --> 0:08:54.390
<v Speaker 3>But I think the bigger picture is for the Dodgers,

0:08:54.850 --> 0:08:57.010
<v Speaker 3>they don't have to use Shohei Otani as a pitcher.

0:08:57.470 --> 0:09:01.450
<v Speaker 3>The Dodgers are plus 115. That's almost disrespectful to the Brewers,

0:09:01.470 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 3>by the way, plus 300.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:04.620
<v Speaker 2>Oh, why do you say that? The Dodgers still have

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.180
<v Speaker 2>a deeper roster. The Dodgers have everything.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.579
<v Speaker 4>The Brewers outscored the Dodgers this year. They had a

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:10.420
<v Speaker 4>bigger run differential.

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the Dodgers were mailing in half the season.

0:09:12.580 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 4>So you're saying the plan is to pace yourself.

0:09:15.260 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 2>If you want to keep it friendly, I will take

0:09:16.860 --> 0:09:18.140
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers all day long.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.209
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Brewers straight up against the Dodgers this year.

0:09:20.309 --> 0:09:23.850
<v Speaker 3>I look at the Brewers this year as like the

0:09:23.890 --> 0:09:25.590
<v Speaker 3>Pistons when they're trying to get past the team or

0:09:25.610 --> 0:09:27.910
<v Speaker 3>the Bulls. I think this is the year that everything's

0:09:27.929 --> 0:09:29.650
<v Speaker 3>in place. They got a taste of it last year.

0:09:30.070 --> 0:09:31.890
<v Speaker 4>I look at them. Here's my comp for the Brewers.

0:09:32.470 --> 0:09:35.430
<v Speaker 3>The Seahawks last year. They outscored everybody and everyone still

0:09:35.490 --> 0:09:37.570
<v Speaker 3>loved the Rams. The Brewers outscored everybody.

0:09:37.610 --> 0:09:39.850
<v Speaker 4>Look at your face. You're just ready to go.

0:09:40.130 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Why this Brewers team compared to the one two years ago,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.819
<v Speaker 2>three years ago, six years ago? They win that division

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>all the time.

0:09:45.420 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that teams find a way to finally realize

0:09:48.420 --> 0:09:50.700
<v Speaker 3>this is it and they get that. Going back to

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the Bulls when they got past the Pistons, I have

0:09:52.300 --> 0:09:55.790
<v Speaker 3>to use the Bulls. I think that if Otani can't

0:09:55.830 --> 0:09:58.230
<v Speaker 3>pitch or he can and they choose not to, that's

0:09:58.350 --> 0:09:58.990
<v Speaker 3>one less arm.

0:09:59.070 --> 0:10:00.739
<v Speaker 4>I know they have tons and tons of arms.

0:10:02.370 --> 0:10:05.390
<v Speaker 2>The problem with that analogy is that Jordan is in L.A.

0:10:05.470 --> 0:10:08.450
<v Speaker 2>His name is Shohei Otani. His pitching is somewhat irrelevant

0:10:08.470 --> 0:10:10.630
<v Speaker 2>to how good they are. They have four Cy Young-level

0:10:10.670 --> 0:10:13.300
<v Speaker 2>pitchers in their starting rotation. They don't need him pitching

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.940
<v Speaker 2>at all. Maybe I'm overestimating the Dodgers, but they are

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the modern dynasty.

0:10:19.540 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 3>You need a break to beat the Dodgers. You need

0:10:21.179 --> 0:10:23.300
<v Speaker 3>something to go your way and injury so much. But

0:10:23.340 --> 0:10:25.910
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays were so close last year. If you

0:10:25.929 --> 0:10:27.970
<v Speaker 3>look at the Dodgers analytically... They're going.

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.020
<v Speaker 4>To be in the playoffs every year. Other teams aren't.

0:10:30.100 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Brewers are. The Brewers are prepared for this. There's no excuses.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.060
<v Speaker 2>By the way, before we break, I don't think we

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>did helmet stickers.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh, helmet stickers?

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the Browns Steelers. We've got to do our

0:10:38.580 --> 0:10:39.100
<v Speaker 2>helmet stickers.

0:10:39.140 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 5>You first.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.260
<v Speaker 2>Well, I haven't been able to put a kicker as

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.700
<v Speaker 2>a helmet sticker, but last night, Andre Schmidt not only

0:10:44.730 --> 0:10:47.270
<v Speaker 2>hit the game winner, 56 yards for the Browns to win.

0:10:47.730 --> 0:10:51.100
<v Speaker 2>He apparently came up to Deshaun Watson before the drive

0:10:51.140 --> 0:10:53.699
<v Speaker 2>and said, get me to the 42-yard line. I just

0:10:53.740 --> 0:10:55.500
<v Speaker 2>want to try a 60-yarder to win.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.620
<v Speaker 4>That is guts. That's guts. He's calling a shot. And also,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.500
<v Speaker 4>he has no vowels in his last name. We like

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 4>that about him as well.

0:11:01.740 --> 0:11:02.540
<v Speaker 2>Why not a vowel?

0:11:02.710 --> 0:11:04.410
<v Speaker 4>Not in this case. Not in football terms.

0:11:04.429 --> 0:11:04.809
<v Speaker 2>Who do you got?

0:11:04.950 --> 0:11:08.690
<v Speaker 3>Helmet sticker, rookie wide receiver Denzel Boston. He was fantastic

0:11:08.730 --> 0:11:11.790
<v Speaker 3>last night. And he and Concepcion, you see those guys together.

0:11:11.809 --> 0:11:15.339
<v Speaker 3>Just such promise. Big guy, strong guy. Concepcion is more

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.229
<v Speaker 3>the jitterbug guy. Fantastic pair with Harold Fannin. That's a

0:11:19.270 --> 0:11:22.930
<v Speaker 3>good-looking core. Jutkins in the backfield. Real nice job by

0:11:22.950 --> 0:11:23.689
<v Speaker 3>him last night.

0:11:23.710 --> 0:11:26.650
<v Speaker 2>I convinced the BRGs, the backroom guys, that Denzel Boston

0:11:26.670 --> 0:11:29.630
<v Speaker 2>was David Boston's son, and they believe that it's not true.

0:11:29.670 --> 0:11:30.950
<v Speaker 2>The former Cardinals receiver.

0:11:30.990 --> 0:11:32.410
<v Speaker 4>Until 10 seconds ago, I thought the same.

0:11:32.710 --> 0:11:35.340
<v Speaker 2>All right. On that note, Dan Patrick is booked for

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the next segment. After listening to the first one, I'm

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>not sure he's going to want to come back here,

0:11:38.620 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>but he promised. So DP will be coming to Not

0:11:40.900 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>So Fast next.

0:11:43.929 --> 0:11:46.370
<v Speaker 4>All right, Pearl, it's a midday pick-me-up and not so fast.

0:11:46.410 --> 0:11:48.390
<v Speaker 4>Pass to Pearl off here. Watch this. You don't see

0:11:48.410 --> 0:11:51.510
<v Speaker 4>this a lot. The Browns dancing before the game's over.

0:11:52.750 --> 0:11:53.290
<v Speaker 4>Good for them.

0:11:53.530 --> 0:11:54.099
<v Speaker 1>Great win.

0:11:54.179 --> 0:11:55.819
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's jumping around, having a good time.

0:11:56.380 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Take a knee.

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Those uniforms are questionable. When you win, nobody cares.

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:01.940
<v Speaker 2>I was so into Cleveland last night because the crowd

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.980
<v Speaker 2>was so crazy. I was a Browns fan by the

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:04.459
<v Speaker 2>end of the night.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Joining us now, bonus coverage here. Oh, look at this.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:09.850
<v Speaker 4>They're still ready to take the snap.

0:12:10.140 --> 0:12:10.230
<v Speaker 5>Oh.

0:12:10.550 --> 0:12:12.890
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now on Not So Fast, our buddy Dan Patrick,

0:12:12.950 --> 0:12:15.150
<v Speaker 3>fresh off the Dan Patrick show today. Now, when you

0:12:15.170 --> 0:12:20.230
<v Speaker 3>grew up, how split was it, your household, your family, Browns, Bengals?

0:12:20.910 --> 0:12:24.550
<v Speaker 1>When we lived in Zanesville, Ohio, we were Browns fans.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.580
<v Speaker 1>And then my dad got transferred to Cincinnati, and then

0:12:27.620 --> 0:12:31.100
<v Speaker 1>we became Bengals fans. But I kind of went kicking

0:12:31.140 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and screaming because the Bengals weren't any good. But they had, like,

0:12:35.260 --> 0:12:38.790
<v Speaker 1>Paul Robinson. He was, I think, the Cactus Comet fan.

0:12:39.170 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>He rushed for 1,000 yards. They had Greg Cook, who

0:12:42.059 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the next great quarterback out of

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.339
<v Speaker 1>University of Cincinnati, Rookie of the Year. But after that,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.460
<v Speaker 1>I would always go see the teams that came to

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.900
<v Speaker 1>play the Bengals. And then the Bengals got competitive. Kenny

0:12:55.980 --> 0:12:59.900
<v Speaker 1>Anderson was great. Boomer Sias and Joe Burrow. They've been fortunate.

0:12:59.980 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And they played, what, three of the closest Super Bowls

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>in history.

0:13:03.710 --> 0:13:04.620
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:13:05.410 --> 0:13:07.370
<v Speaker 1>But I've always had a soft spot in my heart

0:13:07.410 --> 0:13:09.099
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns because that was the team I grew

0:13:09.150 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>up on. Leroy Kelly, Ernie Green, Jim Brown. I still

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.740
<v Speaker 1>name probably the entire starting lineup offensively and defensively. But

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I have relatives who live in Cleveland. And I know

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.780
<v Speaker 1>when the Browns win, Cleveland wins.

0:13:25.340 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 2>You asked Jason Garrett what team made you cry of

0:13:28.059 --> 0:13:30.020
<v Speaker 2>any sport. Was it a football team that made you

0:13:30.070 --> 0:13:31.030
<v Speaker 2>cry or baseball?

0:13:33.110 --> 0:13:36.429
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I would get sad when the Reds would

0:13:36.570 --> 0:13:41.460
<v Speaker 1>play the Oakland A's playoffs. I don't know if I cried,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember when the Reds were supposed to

0:13:46.620 --> 0:13:49.860
<v Speaker 1>win and when they didn't win. The other Cincinnati teams,

0:13:49.900 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I was, like the Cincinnati Royals

0:13:52.420 --> 0:13:54.980
<v Speaker 1>weren't expected to win. They made me cry, I think,

0:13:55.020 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>when they left, but I didn't have that moment where

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.579
<v Speaker 1>But Jason Garrett's dad was on the staff of the

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.380
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns, and Brian Seip throws the interception in 1980

0:14:05.380 --> 0:14:08.390
<v Speaker 1>in the corner of the end zone. And the Browns

0:14:08.410 --> 0:14:12.070
<v Speaker 1>have had as much. They haven't had the heartbreak Buffalo's

0:14:12.110 --> 0:14:14.070
<v Speaker 1>had because Buffalo's gone to the Super Bowl. But when

0:14:14.110 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about losses, Ernest Biner with the fumble, John

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.420
<v Speaker 1>Elway with the drive, Brian Seip the interception, these are

0:14:23.460 --> 0:14:26.070
<v Speaker 1>just naming a few. Then you throw in the Cleveland

0:14:26.110 --> 0:14:29.590
<v Speaker 1>Indians where they got to the World Series. Man, I'm sorry, Cleveland.

0:14:29.610 --> 0:14:32.330
<v Speaker 3>Well, but it's a fascinating topic because the Detroit Lions,

0:14:32.650 --> 0:14:35.230
<v Speaker 3>they've been struggling. But then the basketball team does well.

0:14:35.890 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>The hockey team does well in Detroit. The entire city

0:14:38.250 --> 0:14:41.660
<v Speaker 3>of Cleveland, it does feel like Cleveland's ownership should get

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>more flack for this because.

0:14:43.780 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 4>They don't put them in position to win. They make

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:46.620
<v Speaker 4>bad contracts.

0:14:46.660 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>But what you saw last night when you see those fans,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:50.860
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're talking about.

0:14:51.530 --> 0:14:53.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's what I've said on the show about

0:14:53.610 --> 0:14:57.130
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson. Stop being a baby. Stop being a victim here.

0:14:57.750 --> 0:15:00.350
<v Speaker 1>And just go out and play. Because that fan base

0:15:00.390 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>will root for you with the uniform you have on.

0:15:03.420 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They may not root for you, but so what? Go

0:15:06.380 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out there and prove you can play. Because the last

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>time we saw him play where we thought he was

0:15:12.140 --> 0:15:15.650
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate starting quarterback was in Houston. And nobody's talking

0:15:15.690 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about Shador Sanders now. Now it's about Deshaun Watson. And

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.770
<v Speaker 1>now you have a chance to at least be entertaining, competitive.

0:15:23.670 --> 0:15:28.210
<v Speaker 1>Not an oh-woe-is-me team going into the meat of your

0:15:28.270 --> 0:15:32.110
<v Speaker 1>schedule here. And they could end up 5-2 after seven games.

0:15:32.970 --> 0:15:36.050
<v Speaker 2>If they make the playoffs, do you re-sign Deshaun Watson?

0:15:36.950 --> 0:15:39.140
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what the numbers are with that.

0:15:40.220 --> 0:15:42.140
<v Speaker 1>But you're going to be... If you get to... Their

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>over-under is now 7.5. They're getting to no-man's land when

0:15:46.180 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes... Now, they do have draft picks, but... Are

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to use those draft picks, bundle, and try

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.130
<v Speaker 1>to get your quarterback? And I think that would probably be.

0:15:56.430 --> 0:15:58.729
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of things. Like the Titans with Cam Ward.

0:15:59.970 --> 0:16:02.510
<v Speaker 1>If you're on the clock and you've got the number

0:16:02.610 --> 0:16:05.220
<v Speaker 1>one pick, I don't know if I'm holding on to

0:16:05.260 --> 0:16:05.500
<v Speaker 1>Cam Ward.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>What about the Giants? If Arch Manning is available for

0:16:08.180 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the Giants, if they. Weirdly. Jameis can't win any games,

0:16:10.860 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>do they pull the trigger on a new quarterback?

0:16:14.100 --> 0:16:15.500
<v Speaker 1>I would stay with Jackson Dark.

0:16:15.540 --> 0:16:15.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:17.580 --> 0:16:20.710
<v Speaker 1>I like Jackson Dart. I don't know about Arch Manning.

0:16:21.070 --> 0:16:25.350
<v Speaker 1>I'm told that he's great. I just need to see him.

0:16:26.250 --> 0:16:28.830
<v Speaker 1>And my friend who's a scout said he's got a process.

0:16:29.590 --> 0:16:31.390
<v Speaker 1>You get to the line of scrimmage, that's where the

0:16:31.430 --> 0:16:33.030
<v Speaker 1>games are won and lost with quarterbacks.

0:16:33.070 --> 0:16:35.300
<v Speaker 3>We have a theory here that we say Arch Manning,

0:16:35.460 --> 0:16:37.300
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter what he does on the field because

0:16:37.340 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 3>they trust the Manning name. If you look at Eli

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Manning at Ole Miss, they didn't win a lot. He

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.020
<v Speaker 3>was a nice player. He was a very nice college player.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.590
<v Speaker 3>But it's almost like I know that guy will not

0:16:46.670 --> 0:16:48.550
<v Speaker 3>cost me my job. He'll be a good player. It's

0:16:48.570 --> 0:16:51.670
<v Speaker 3>like there's no bust in Arch Manning. There is maybe

0:16:51.710 --> 0:16:52.109
<v Speaker 3>a ceiling.

0:16:53.450 --> 0:16:57.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but Eli didn't do anything in the majority of

0:16:57.050 --> 0:17:02.130
<v Speaker 1>the season. And he won Super Bowls in large part

0:17:02.170 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because they had great defenses. And he was asked to

0:17:04.500 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make a couple plays. Did he make those plays? Absolutely.

0:17:07.300 --> 0:17:09.540
<v Speaker 1>But you don't even make the playoffs in the other seasons.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.270
<v Speaker 1>And his stats are average. Like, Interceptions to touchdowns, his

0:17:14.650 --> 0:17:15.169
<v Speaker 1>one loss.

0:17:15.710 --> 0:17:16.150
<v Speaker 2>He was a.

0:17:15.950 --> 0:17:18.190
<v Speaker 4>500 quarterback in the regular season,. 117 and.

0:17:18.050 --> 0:17:18.330
<v Speaker 2>117.

0:17:18.330 --> 0:17:20.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:20.850 --> 0:17:24.369
<v Speaker 1>It worked. It worked. But is he any better than

0:17:24.410 --> 0:17:25.050
<v Speaker 1>Jim Plunkett?

0:17:25.790 --> 0:17:25.990
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Who won a couple of Super Bowls.

0:17:27.650 --> 0:17:29.180
<v Speaker 3>You know, I want to go back to that because

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:30.740
<v Speaker 3>you just brought up Jim Plunkett. One of the things

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I really like that we do and you

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 3>do on the show is you go to bat for eras.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.140
<v Speaker 3>And you talk about, like, Greg Cook or you talk

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.540
<v Speaker 3>about Ken Anderson. And I think that you take it

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.870
<v Speaker 3>kind of seriously as– a national voice who watched these

0:17:43.910 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>guys play. A lot of us didn't see Greg Cook,

0:17:45.940 --> 0:17:48.500
<v Speaker 3>or I saw early Ken Anderson. How important is that

0:17:48.580 --> 0:17:51.180
<v Speaker 3>for you to give credit to an ABA player, a

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:52.780
<v Speaker 3>former NFL player from the 70s?

0:17:53.060 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to just, you know, get the

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.090
<v Speaker 1>fruit off the top of the tree. But you've got

0:18:00.109 --> 0:18:02.990
<v Speaker 1>to dig down a little bit. And I love to

0:18:03.330 --> 0:18:06.270
<v Speaker 1>put things into perspective of, boy, this guy's the greatest

0:18:06.290 --> 0:18:09.820
<v Speaker 1>player whatever position, and I go, well, hold on here.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.850
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's these guys. When somebody says, oh, my God,

0:18:12.869 --> 0:18:18.609
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody like Manu Ginobili. Yes, there was Nate Archibald, left-handed, and,

0:18:18.630 --> 0:18:21.330
<v Speaker 1>you know, led the league in scoring and assist in

0:18:21.350 --> 0:18:24.380
<v Speaker 1>the same year. And I think sometimes we forget, you know,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like all those old guys, but I don't because I

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think bringing them into the modern era... is great to

0:18:31.140 --> 0:18:34.260
<v Speaker 1>have that name resurface. So somebody goes, oh, I had

0:18:34.300 --> 0:18:35.210
<v Speaker 1>no idea about that guy.

0:18:35.220 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>One of my favorites that you go to bat for

0:18:36.859 --> 0:18:40.850
<v Speaker 3>is Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. And it's like, you saw him in Milwaukee.

0:18:40.990 --> 0:18:43.230
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine seeing him in Milwaukee. I look at

0:18:43.270 --> 0:18:46.429
<v Speaker 3>his stats, they're galactic. And whenever people say he's the

0:18:46.470 --> 0:18:49.050
<v Speaker 3>best player of all time about certain people and Jabbar's

0:18:49.090 --> 0:18:49.689
<v Speaker 3>name doesn't come up.

0:18:49.730 --> 0:18:50.350
<v Speaker 4>It bothers you.

0:18:50.790 --> 0:18:53.899
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because I think Kareem's the greatest basketball player of

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>all time. Because if I look at high school, college,

0:18:57.220 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and the pros... But it feels like he didn't, like

0:19:01.220 --> 0:19:03.140
<v Speaker 1>he let us down in the pros. The big man

0:19:03.300 --> 0:19:07.700
<v Speaker 1>Shaq let us down. Akeem didn't, but Akeem wasn't a giant.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>David Robinson didn't let us down or Tim Duncan. But

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the bigger you are, the more of a,

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.980
<v Speaker 1>you didn't, you weren't as great as you should have been.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Or he missed the TV era. His prime was in

0:19:18.740 --> 0:19:19.419
<v Speaker 4>the late 70s.

0:19:19.830 --> 0:19:22.690
<v Speaker 1>I think that, I think Kareem, well, he had the

0:19:22.730 --> 0:19:27.649
<v Speaker 1>most unstoppable move in basketball history. Um, I think if

0:19:27.750 --> 0:19:32.970
<v Speaker 1>he had had Magic Johnson's personality, or Larry Bird's personality,

0:19:33.030 --> 0:19:36.150
<v Speaker 1>or Jordan's personality, or Isaiah's personality, I'd love to know

0:19:36.190 --> 0:19:39.550
<v Speaker 1>what he would have been like. Because he was so

0:19:39.630 --> 0:19:43.149
<v Speaker 1>cerebral and so many other things he was interested in.

0:19:43.710 --> 0:19:45.990
<v Speaker 1>The other guys wanted to kill you. I don't think

0:19:46.070 --> 0:19:49.469
<v Speaker 1>Kareem wanted to kill you. I think he's an underrated player,

0:19:49.750 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>which is... kind of crazy to say, but I just

0:19:53.260 --> 0:19:57.459
<v Speaker 1>remember where he's getting 28 and 16 every night, and

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.310
<v Speaker 1>he led the Bucs to a title that didn't. They

0:20:00.350 --> 0:20:03.370
<v Speaker 1>had an aging Oscar Robertson, and they didn't have much

0:20:03.430 --> 0:20:05.810
<v Speaker 1>more than that. Bobby Dandridge was a good player, but

0:20:06.570 --> 0:20:10.830
<v Speaker 1>Greg Smith and John McLaughlin, those are nice players. Kareem

0:20:10.850 --> 0:20:11.530
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievable.

0:20:11.650 --> 0:20:13.250
<v Speaker 2>All I can tell you is I've never been in

0:20:13.290 --> 0:20:15.210
<v Speaker 2>a room with a taller man than when Kareem came

0:20:15.250 --> 0:20:17.430
<v Speaker 2>to the old man cave. Do you remember that day?

0:20:17.770 --> 0:20:20.410
<v Speaker 2>And we were, I was terrified. He came in, he

0:20:20.450 --> 0:20:23.109
<v Speaker 2>looked like he was not messing around at all. And

0:20:23.130 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 2>then I remember you, you got him to loosen up somehow. Baseball. Oh,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.179
<v Speaker 2>you got him off basketball.

0:20:28.540 --> 0:20:31.659
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Robinson. And he played first base when he was

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>growing up. And then, then we were off to the races. But,

0:20:35.859 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but Kareem, like you got to work.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:20:38.820 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm I'm working when he walks in the

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>room and he doesn't walk in and he's like, you know,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>glad hand. He's just kind of looking around, surveying the scene.

0:20:48.470 --> 0:20:52.010
<v Speaker 1>And once I got him into a comfort zone, then,

0:20:52.270 --> 0:20:53.550
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was able to get him. He was

0:20:53.609 --> 0:20:55.889
<v Speaker 1>unlike Bill Walton, who I don't have to say anything.

0:20:55.950 --> 0:20:57.890
<v Speaker 1>And Bill would just go for 15 minutes.

0:20:58.190 --> 0:21:00.970
<v Speaker 2>Can I relitigate an old sports topic that no one's litigated?

0:21:01.859 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 2>You were a paralegal. I was a paralegal. Okay. So

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I had a question. I want to tell you the

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.500
<v Speaker 2>first time I cried at sports was when the Eagles

0:21:09.540 --> 0:21:12.540
<v Speaker 2>lost to the Raiders in the 1981 Super Bowl.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>With Jaws?

0:21:13.700 --> 0:21:16.340
<v Speaker 2>With Jaws. The Raiders cheated. They had stick them everywhere.

0:21:16.380 --> 0:21:18.940
<v Speaker 2>Fred Belitnikoff, the ball just get anywhere near him. That

0:21:18.980 --> 0:21:20.340
<v Speaker 2>was a flawed Super Bowl.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.070
<v Speaker 3>I think it was technically legal at the time.

0:21:22.570 --> 0:21:23.270
<v Speaker 2>Lester Hayes?

0:21:23.420 --> 0:21:25.429
<v Speaker 1>But weren't the Eagles able to have stick them?

0:21:26.230 --> 0:21:28.389
<v Speaker 2>They just, nobody said white uniforms. They didn't want to

0:21:28.430 --> 0:21:28.990
<v Speaker 2>get them all dirty.

0:21:29.010 --> 0:21:29.810
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it was?

0:21:30.710 --> 0:21:31.210
<v Speaker 5>Cleanliness.

0:21:31.230 --> 0:21:34.149
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're worried about the laundry not winning the Super Bowl.

0:21:34.190 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 2>But I remember my mom told me that I wept

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>at that. By the way, I didn't want to mention

0:21:38.340 --> 0:21:41.660
<v Speaker 2>my mom. She kind of broke her heart today. Why?

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>You have Ray's parents into the man cave.

0:21:44.820 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.129
<v Speaker 2>You know, my parents love coming to Dan Patrick's show.

0:21:48.470 --> 0:21:52.129
<v Speaker 2>My mom texted me and said, what are they doing?

0:21:52.170 --> 0:21:54.090
<v Speaker 1>Well, Big Day Ray's mom was cooking.

0:21:54.630 --> 0:21:54.930
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:21:54.950 --> 0:21:55.020
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:21:55.450 --> 0:21:57.109
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if your mom can cook.

0:21:57.609 --> 0:21:58.530
<v Speaker 2>Carol Perloff?

0:21:58.710 --> 0:21:58.990
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:21:59.010 --> 0:22:00.850
<v Speaker 1>But if she wanted to do a meat Friday and

0:22:00.890 --> 0:22:01.970
<v Speaker 1>had a special dish.

0:22:02.130 --> 0:22:03.689
<v Speaker 2>Don't make that invitation if you don't meet her.

0:22:03.750 --> 0:22:05.220
<v Speaker 4>Now you're pressured. Now she has to show up.

0:22:05.550 --> 0:22:05.750
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:05.990 --> 0:22:06.570
<v Speaker 4>She's been invited.

0:22:06.670 --> 0:22:09.710
<v Speaker 1>Be careful. Did the Bears make you cry?

0:22:10.430 --> 0:22:11.869
<v Speaker 4>No, I've never cried over a loss.

0:22:11.890 --> 0:22:13.750
<v Speaker 1>Did Leon Durham ball go through your legs.

0:22:13.570 --> 0:22:13.859
<v Speaker 5>Make you cry?

0:22:13.869 --> 0:22:14.369
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough one.

0:22:14.490 --> 0:22:17.010
<v Speaker 3>That was, by the way, the same day as Walter

0:22:17.050 --> 0:22:19.150
<v Speaker 3>Payton broke the rushing record, so his tears and joy.

0:22:19.350 --> 0:22:21.369
<v Speaker 3>I've never cried during a sporting event. Not in a

0:22:21.450 --> 0:22:24.910
<v Speaker 3>negative way. I've gotten emotional watching a good performance or something.

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:26.500
<v Speaker 4>I'm unemotional, you know.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say that, you know, I can't

0:22:30.660 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 2>bring my dad here. Yeah.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.379
<v Speaker 4>Oh, you know what he's doing? Yeah.

0:22:34.540 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>DDC. Yeah, just say, like, I'm one of the Danettes,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 2>former Danettes, who can't bring a dad.

0:22:39.820 --> 0:22:40.580
<v Speaker 1>Old dad's dead.

0:22:40.780 --> 0:22:41.060
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:41.100 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Long time.

0:22:41.740 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not longing for another dad.

0:22:44.140 --> 0:22:44.380
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:45.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't need another dad.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:48.260 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm daddy.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.310
<v Speaker 3>That's Dan Patrick joining us here on Not So Fast.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:53.790
<v Speaker 4>Let the awkwardness commence.

0:22:54.150 --> 0:22:54.550
<v Speaker 2>Stick around.

0:22:54.570 --> 0:22:56.130
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get to warm takes right after the break.

0:22:57.410 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Paps and Perloff here.

0:22:58.460 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Not so fast. College football time is here. We love

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.580
<v Speaker 3>college football towns. We're going to Starkville, Mississippi. And I

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:04.899
<v Speaker 3>know you've been there. I'm going to get to you

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.180
<v Speaker 3>in a second on this. We had a lot of response.

0:23:07.260 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 3>We asked where to go eat, where to go drink.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Kind of dive bar-ish, not maybe sports bar-ish. We got

0:23:11.859 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of recos. Dave's Dark Horse Tavern.

0:23:14.980 --> 0:23:15.110
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:23:15.450 --> 0:23:16.689
<v Speaker 4>Hobie's Tiki Dogs.

0:23:16.830 --> 0:23:19.330
<v Speaker 3>And then, of course, Lil Dewey's Barbecue, which is very

0:23:19.369 --> 0:23:20.630
<v Speaker 3>popular and a staple down there.

0:23:20.970 --> 0:23:22.609
<v Speaker 4>You actually had a meal in Starkville?

0:23:22.630 --> 0:23:22.710
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:29.139
<v Speaker 2>I had Thanksgiving dinner with Lee Corso in 2004 in Starkville, Mississippi. Obviously,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.020
<v Speaker 2>Mississippi State, Mississippi played Thanksgiving weekend. We had to go

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.540
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday night. Lee Corso and I sat right near

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.139
<v Speaker 2>each other. We had the best time. And then afterwards,

0:23:38.180 --> 0:23:39.580
<v Speaker 2>we saw each other at the grocery store because he

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.220
<v Speaker 2>bought four giant bottles of Diet Coke.

0:23:41.550 --> 0:23:42.570
<v Speaker 4>And the restaurant was?

0:23:43.410 --> 0:23:44.090
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember.

0:23:44.350 --> 0:23:47.170
<v Speaker 3>We need help remembering the restaurant Lee Corso and Andrew

0:23:47.190 --> 0:23:48.050
<v Speaker 3>Perloff went to.

0:23:47.950 --> 0:23:49.129
<v Speaker 4>In Starkville 20 years ago.

0:23:49.230 --> 0:23:49.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and a whole crew.

0:23:49.950 --> 0:23:50.590
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:23:51.090 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Dave's Dark Horse, Hobie's. Little Dewey's, go eat, watch some football.

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:55.340
<v Speaker 4>We're done.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:24:00.540
<v Speaker 2>I want to try Hobie's. Welcome back. Not so fast.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Perloff, Paul Pabst. Yeah, I can't remember the name

0:24:03.460 --> 0:24:03.900
<v Speaker 2>of that restaurant.

0:24:03.940 --> 0:24:04.459
<v Speaker 4>We'll figure it out.

0:24:04.780 --> 0:24:05.020
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:24:05.430 --> 0:24:09.010
<v Speaker 2>Coming up this weekend, tomorrow night, the Huskies. Washington heads

0:24:09.030 --> 0:24:12.469
<v Speaker 2>his USC primetime for a Big Ten Saturday night. It's

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.580
<v Speaker 2>Washington at number 18 USC tomorrow night at 7 p.m.

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.699
<v Speaker 2>Eastern on NBC and Peacock.

0:24:18.780 --> 0:24:20.100
<v Speaker 4>It is going to be warm there.

0:24:20.100 --> 0:24:24.940
<v Speaker 3>430 local kickoff, 98 degrees at noon, maybe 95 for kickoff.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.699
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of that, warm takes right on cue. Time for

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 3>some warm takes to get you warm for the weekend.

0:24:29.530 --> 0:24:32.990
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go back to Steelers versus Browns, Rogers

0:24:33.030 --> 0:24:33.709
<v Speaker 3>versus Watson.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 4>I call this game the unlikable.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 3>These are two quarterbacks that social media cannot stand for

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 3>different reasons.

0:24:39.340 --> 0:24:41.580
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to get into the reasons. But these guys,

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 4>you throw a touchdown, and I hate this guy because

0:24:44.380 --> 0:24:44.620
<v Speaker 4>of this.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 3>It was wild to see Deshaun Watson and Aaron Rodgers

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.370
<v Speaker 3>play well at different points in the game, and social

0:24:51.390 --> 0:24:54.230
<v Speaker 3>media just cannot stand them. So the bigger picture is

0:24:54.290 --> 0:24:56.710
<v Speaker 3>the Browns are 3-1. They're in really good shape, and

0:24:56.730 --> 0:24:58.190
<v Speaker 3>they haven't been in really good shape in a really

0:24:58.250 --> 0:24:58.810
<v Speaker 3>long time.

0:24:59.410 --> 0:25:00.109
<v Speaker 4>But here's my problem.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.290
<v Speaker 3>I don't want Deshaun Watson on my team after this season,

0:25:03.410 --> 0:25:05.109
<v Speaker 3>and I think they should make a mandate or a

0:25:05.150 --> 0:25:07.990
<v Speaker 3>decision now, no matter what happens, almost like be disciplined.

0:25:08.650 --> 0:25:10.149
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you look at the Vikings got rid

0:25:10.170 --> 0:25:13.550
<v Speaker 3>of Sam Darnold after winning 13 games and having 35 touchdowns.

0:25:13.950 --> 0:25:16.890
<v Speaker 3>If Deshaun Watson throws for 25 touchdowns and 12 picks

0:25:17.450 --> 0:25:19.210
<v Speaker 3>and they win nine games, are you going to give

0:25:19.250 --> 0:25:22.270
<v Speaker 3>him a three-year $ 150 million deal? Are you giving him

0:25:22.290 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>another $ 150 million? I don't want to get into his baggage,

0:25:25.650 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 3>but this is a guy that you've kind of outlasted

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 3>or he outlasted you or whatever.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:30.060
<v Speaker 4>You want to say.

0:25:30.650 --> 0:25:32.530
<v Speaker 3>I know he's playing well now, but I don't think

0:25:32.550 --> 0:25:34.070
<v Speaker 3>he's that great of a quarterback. I think he's a

0:25:34.109 --> 0:25:36.490
<v Speaker 3>solid quarterback. I don't think you could win a Super

0:25:36.510 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Bowl with him no matter what team you have around him.

0:25:38.210 --> 0:25:40.690
<v Speaker 4>And that's not personal. That's just his playing ability. He's okay.

0:25:41.020 --> 0:25:41.450
<v Speaker 4>He's solid.

0:25:41.690 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 3>He's not like he was with the Texans five years ago.

0:25:44.380 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 3>And then the off-field stuff, he's never going to be

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.220
<v Speaker 3>embraced by some people, whether it be fans or media

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.940
<v Speaker 3>or whoever it may be. So I think as a franchise,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:53.619
<v Speaker 3>you have a good team. You have a lot of

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>good young players on rookie deals.

0:25:55.340 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 4>That's great.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.030
<v Speaker 3>When this contract ends, no matter what he does, you say,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.070
<v Speaker 3>good luck to you in the future. We are going

0:26:01.090 --> 0:26:03.189
<v Speaker 3>a different direction with the position. You want to get

0:26:03.230 --> 0:26:04.030
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones in there?

0:26:04.109 --> 0:26:04.389
<v Speaker 5>Fine.

0:26:04.410 --> 0:26:06.470
<v Speaker 4>You want to make a play for a rookie? That's fine.

0:26:06.770 --> 0:26:08.990
<v Speaker 3>You have a very good team. But the days are

0:26:09.100 --> 0:26:11.100
<v Speaker 3>over for Deshaun Watson at the end of the season.

0:26:11.140 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Be disciplined about it and just say, we got some

0:26:13.580 --> 0:26:15.660
<v Speaker 3>good days out of it. It didn't work out big picture.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 3>And don't let that cloud your thinking and give him

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 3>another $ 150 million.

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 2>What if they offer him one year for $ 35 million,

0:26:22.990 --> 0:26:25.730
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield style, and say, hey, if you want to

0:26:25.770 --> 0:26:26.270
<v Speaker 2>come back for the.

0:26:26.250 --> 0:26:26.770
<v Speaker 1>Cheap, we'll do it.

0:26:26.790 --> 0:26:27.550
<v Speaker 2>Would you still say no?

0:26:27.770 --> 0:26:29.649
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Deshaun Watson would do that. I don't

0:26:29.670 --> 0:26:31.330
<v Speaker 3>think his agent would let him do that. I think

0:26:31.350 --> 0:26:33.700
<v Speaker 3>they would go to the best three-year offer. He's not

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.929
<v Speaker 3>going to get five years, 275. The best-case scenario for

0:26:36.970 --> 0:26:40.450
<v Speaker 3>him would be like a Sam Darnold, a Baker Mayfield.

0:26:40.530 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 3>A three-year, $ 50 million a year would be the max

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:44.220
<v Speaker 3>he could get.

0:26:44.460 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>His agent is David Mulageta, so we'll see. Or at

0:26:47.060 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>least it used to be.

0:26:47.660 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 4>Mulageta should be his name.

0:26:49.380 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he's stuck with him. Yeah, I think

0:26:52.140 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that sounds good in theory, but if they're a good team,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:56.129
<v Speaker 2>if they win 10 games, they're not going to be

0:26:56.140 --> 0:26:57.709
<v Speaker 2>able to draft a quarterback. So where do you get

0:26:57.730 --> 0:26:59.890
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback? You're not signing a free agent. What free

0:26:59.910 --> 0:27:01.710
<v Speaker 2>agent quarterback is signing with Cleveland?

0:27:01.750 --> 0:27:02.390
<v Speaker 4>Like Mac Jones.

0:27:02.430 --> 0:27:03.790
<v Speaker 3>If you told Mac Jones, we'll give you— Mac Jones

0:27:03.810 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 3>is not going to Cleveland. I would— If I'm Mac Jones,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.219
<v Speaker 3>this is your one chance to run a franchise. You

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.790
<v Speaker 3>have a nice team, defense, offense. I think they have

0:27:10.970 --> 0:27:14.530
<v Speaker 3>nine draft picks, three fourths, two firsts. They're in good shape.

0:27:14.830 --> 0:27:17.350
<v Speaker 3>But Deshaun Watson is not the answer. And don't let

0:27:17.369 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 3>this three, four games cloud it.

0:27:19.450 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 2>They had to pay Deshaun $ 220 million to go to Cleveland.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.620
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones is from Florida. is playing out in San Francisco.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.300
<v Speaker 2>And he hated being in New England. Mac Jones is

0:27:28.340 --> 0:27:30.139
<v Speaker 2>not going to Cleveland. He's not a Cleveland quarterback.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:30.660
<v Speaker 4>Mark this one down.

0:27:30.740 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know it. There's no way Mac Jones is

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.659
<v Speaker 2>signing with the Browns. Okay, I'm going to stick with

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.770
<v Speaker 2>the NFL for my warm take. We have San Francisco

0:27:38.950 --> 0:27:42.149
<v Speaker 2>and Denver facing off this weekend. This could be a

0:27:42.170 --> 0:27:45.350
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl preview. With Dan, we're talking about old-school Super Bowls.

0:27:45.410 --> 0:27:48.670
<v Speaker 2>I believe the Broncos and 49ers played, but the Broncos

0:27:48.730 --> 0:27:51.330
<v Speaker 2>never competed in the 80s in these Super Bowls. But

0:27:51.369 --> 0:27:55.450
<v Speaker 2>we could be seeing a Super Bowl preview. Obviously, the

0:27:55.470 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Broncos were a lot of people's pick, including myself. Now,

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>they haven't really put it all together, but they are 2-1.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 2>And the Niners was nobody's Super Bowl pick. But guess what?

0:28:03.859 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 2>They absolutely should have been. A couple numbers here. San

0:28:07.500 --> 0:28:11.830
<v Speaker 2>Francisco is second in the league with 32 points a game. Unbelievable.

0:28:11.869 --> 0:28:14.629
<v Speaker 2>Brock Purdy, MVP candidate. And they don't even really have

0:28:14.670 --> 0:28:18.669
<v Speaker 2>Nick Bosa. He's coming back by week seven. And then Denver, meanwhile,

0:28:18.690 --> 0:28:20.889
<v Speaker 2>the last two years, Denver has led the entire NFL

0:28:20.910 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in sacks. They're a little behind this year, but the

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.140
<v Speaker 2>reason is they played the Chiefs, the Jaguars, and Rams.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 2>That means Andy Reid, Liam Cohen, and Sean McVay. And

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.970
<v Speaker 2>now they have another... Offensive genius to face. But once

0:28:34.050 --> 0:28:35.690
<v Speaker 2>Denver gets an easier schedule, I think they're going to

0:28:35.830 --> 0:28:38.810
<v Speaker 2>tear people up on defense. Now, we can talk about

0:28:38.850 --> 0:28:41.990
<v Speaker 2>Bo Nix. Is he good for hours on end? I

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>don't care. Denver wins. Bo Nix wins in the fourth quarter.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>These two teams look like legit Super Bowl contenders to me.

0:28:49.060 --> 0:28:51.300
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like the Denver aspect of this. I don't

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:52.980
<v Speaker 3>really care what Bo Nix does in the first three

0:28:53.020 --> 0:28:55.660
<v Speaker 3>quarters because he's clutch. I wish he would play better,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure Denver fans wish he would play better.

0:28:57.540 --> 0:29:00.060
<v Speaker 3>But that team was really good. They were really close

0:29:00.140 --> 0:29:02.850
<v Speaker 3>last year. And what's going on with Brock Purdy, he's

0:29:02.890 --> 0:29:05.590
<v Speaker 3>finally getting there. I think getting rid of Ayuk was big.

0:29:05.630 --> 0:29:08.209
<v Speaker 3>Just getting that mess off the roster. Look, I know

0:29:08.230 --> 0:29:10.370
<v Speaker 3>they've got injuries, but they're used to being injured, the Niners.

0:29:10.410 --> 0:29:11.210
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't phase them.

0:29:11.250 --> 0:29:13.350
<v Speaker 4>Next man up. They're playing fantastic. It's fun.

0:29:13.490 --> 0:29:14.750
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll see. I mean, they're going to face a

0:29:14.770 --> 0:29:16.770
<v Speaker 2>real defense for the first time in a while. Brock

0:29:16.810 --> 0:29:20.030
<v Speaker 2>Purdy's been unstoppable. But if Nick Medino and company can

0:29:20.070 --> 0:29:21.050
<v Speaker 2>get to him, it might be different.

0:29:21.270 --> 0:29:21.510
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:29:21.670 --> 0:29:23.750
<v Speaker 3>Next warm take for me. I'm going back to college football.

0:29:24.090 --> 0:29:25.030
<v Speaker 3>Going back to Starkville.

0:29:25.090 --> 0:29:27.110
<v Speaker 4>Here we go. We mentioned him before. You love this guy.

0:29:27.310 --> 0:29:30.750
<v Speaker 3>Camario Taylor, the star quarterback of Mississippi State Bulldogs. You're

0:29:30.790 --> 0:29:33.090
<v Speaker 3>getting to know his name. He's getting known. People have

0:29:33.110 --> 0:29:36.060
<v Speaker 3>compared him, like pro scouts and different things, to Cam Newton.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.690
<v Speaker 3>It's an easy comp, big kid, runs and passes.

0:29:38.850 --> 0:29:39.270
<v Speaker 4>Okay, great.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 3>If you look back at Camaro Taylor, he was not

0:29:42.980 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 3>really well known to the casual fan just six weeks ago.

0:29:45.330 --> 0:29:48.180
<v Speaker 3>It reminds me of young Cam Newton. Cam Newton in 2010,

0:29:48.170 --> 0:29:50.730
<v Speaker 3>he was at Florida. It didn't work out well there.

0:29:50.850 --> 0:29:53.430
<v Speaker 3>He went to junior college, then took over Auburn football.

0:29:53.810 --> 0:29:55.710
<v Speaker 3>He was 4-0 in the month of September, and I

0:29:55.710 --> 0:29:57.670
<v Speaker 3>remember watching a game and texting Dan Patrick.

0:29:57.690 --> 0:29:59.870
<v Speaker 4>I go, are you seeing this guy? He goes, which guy?

0:30:00.170 --> 0:30:02.890
<v Speaker 4>I go, Cameron Newton. The announcers were calling him Cameron.

0:30:03.140 --> 0:30:05.260
<v Speaker 3>The screen said Cameron Newton, and in our notes the

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.260
<v Speaker 3>next day, Dan goes, we're going to talk about this

0:30:07.300 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 3>guy Cameron Newton. Six weeks later, he's a household name,

0:30:10.740 --> 0:30:13.300
<v Speaker 3>and he's one of the biggest stars in football. There's controversy,

0:30:13.540 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 3>but he's playing well, and he led Auburn to a

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.860
<v Speaker 3>national title. Camario Taylor, you can do something like this.

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 3>You can pull something like this off, and it's sure

0:30:20.740 --> 0:30:24.540
<v Speaker 3>not easy, especially at Mississippi State. Kamara Taylor in October,

0:30:25.020 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 3>he's got Bama, LSU, Oklahoma, and number one, Texas. You

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.620
<v Speaker 3>can go from being a guy that people know and

0:30:31.660 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 3>people like for next year's draft, when I mean 2028,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.340
<v Speaker 3>or you could be going to take a look at

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the Heisman in eight to ten weeks. You could be

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 3>talking about the face of college football in five weeks. Now,

0:30:43.460 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>you're saying Kamara Taylor, Mississippi State? Who said Cam Newton

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.860
<v Speaker 3>or Cameron Newton was going to do that in 2010?

0:30:48.860 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you a couple of reasons that I'm worried.

0:30:51.420 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>It's September Heisman, and I think he's two now.

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:30:54.260 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 2>A little early. You just mentioned that schedule. That's a

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>come-down-to-earth schedule.

0:30:58.420 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Or an opportunity schedule.

0:31:00.220 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think college football works that way. Most of

0:31:03.100 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 2>your success depends on your schedule.

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.260
<v Speaker 3>If he outduels Arch Manning on national TV, it's.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>It's one thing to outduel South Carolina or Missouri, but...

0:31:12.070 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not Arch Manning he has to worry about. It's

0:31:14.300 --> 0:31:17.180
<v Speaker 2>those future NFL players on Texas' defensive line.

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:17.740
<v Speaker 4>They've got a few.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:19.979
<v Speaker 2>So that's the problem. I looked it up, by the way,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>why we never heard of Kamario Terrell. He was the

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>number 80 player in the recruiting class. Number one in

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.070
<v Speaker 2>that class was Bryce Underwood. Not good. And then Keelan Russell,

0:31:30.090 --> 0:31:31.870
<v Speaker 2>who will play this weekend, was number two. But then

0:31:31.890 --> 0:31:35.460
<v Speaker 2>there were eight other quarterbacks before Kamario Terrell. Some of

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 2>them are playing, but some of them are not playing

0:31:37.060 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>at all. I always love looking back at recruiting rankings.

0:31:39.100 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's the best.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:40.020
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:40.940
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.770
<v Speaker 2>For my warm take, I'll have a little bit of

0:31:43.810 --> 0:31:46.810
<v Speaker 2>high school in there, actually, because this weekend we see

0:31:46.830 --> 0:31:50.570
<v Speaker 2>the Texans play the Cowboys. Now, listen, the state of

0:31:50.590 --> 0:31:54.140
<v Speaker 2>Texas obviously loves our NFL. Dallas Cowboys, God's favorite team

0:31:54.180 --> 0:31:56.830
<v Speaker 2>and all that. And Houston, Texas are popular. But both

0:31:56.870 --> 0:32:00.650
<v Speaker 2>those teams better win this weekend because whoever loses is

0:32:00.690 --> 0:32:03.610
<v Speaker 2>in big trouble. The Cowboys just traded for Joey Porter Jr.

0:32:03.690 --> 0:32:06.690
<v Speaker 2>They can't fall to 1-3. And the Texans obviously can't

0:32:06.730 --> 0:32:09.140
<v Speaker 2>go 0-4. I don't know if they're ever going to

0:32:09.180 --> 0:32:12.140
<v Speaker 2>lose fan interest, especially in Dallas, but there's a lot

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.980
<v Speaker 2>of football competition in Texas. Obviously, we have the Longhorns

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 2>number one. And, you know, Friday night's fall. It doesn't

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>matter what happens on Sunday. Let me tell you about

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy who is ripping up the fields in Texas.

0:32:24.250 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Landon William Callis out of Randall High School could set

0:32:28.660 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the Texas high school running record and the national high

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>school record.

0:32:31.660 --> 0:32:34.010
<v Speaker 4>I've seen this guy. This running back, he's all over

0:32:34.070 --> 0:32:34.510
<v Speaker 4>social media.

0:32:34.530 --> 0:32:37.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Sark was at his game last night. He's ripping

0:32:37.810 --> 0:32:40.540
<v Speaker 2>up the record book. But here's the fun part about him.

0:32:40.550 --> 0:32:42.170
<v Speaker 2>He goes to Randall High School. Guess what his coach's

0:32:42.210 --> 0:32:43.690
<v Speaker 2>name is? Brian Randall.

0:32:44.490 --> 0:32:46.180
<v Speaker 4>Randall High School. No.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.260
<v Speaker 2>So his coach's name is Randall and his high school's

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.630
<v Speaker 2>name is Randall. And he's setting every record. My point is, Texas,

0:32:53.010 --> 0:32:55.410
<v Speaker 2>you can lose interest in pro football pretty fast. There's

0:32:55.450 --> 0:32:57.500
<v Speaker 2>a lot that's put into the Cowboys and a lot

0:32:57.540 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that's put into the Texans. These two teams are in

0:32:59.740 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>real danger of becoming irrelevant.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'd love to know. We may put this

0:33:02.460 --> 0:33:04.300
<v Speaker 4>out there on social media, not so fast. Follow us

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:04.700
<v Speaker 4>on Twitter.

0:33:05.220 --> 0:33:07.780
<v Speaker 3>If the casual sports fan or the serious sports fan

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.330
<v Speaker 3>in that state could pick the Cowboys to win the title,

0:33:10.630 --> 0:33:13.390
<v Speaker 3>the Texans to win the title, or the Longhorns to

0:33:13.430 --> 0:33:15.230
<v Speaker 3>win the title, who would win that poll?

0:33:15.830 --> 0:33:16.230
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:33:16.290 --> 0:33:17.150
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the Longhorns.

0:33:17.490 --> 0:33:17.970
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no.

0:33:18.030 --> 0:33:18.770
<v Speaker 4>I know there's A &amp; M fans.

0:33:18.810 --> 0:33:20.990
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean, it's Dallas and Houston. If you're

0:33:21.030 --> 0:33:22.290
<v Speaker 2>in Houston, you want the Jets.

0:33:22.310 --> 0:33:23.830
<v Speaker 4>But I'm saying a statewide poll.

0:33:24.390 --> 0:33:26.230
<v Speaker 2>My only thing is A &amp; M is pretty big, too.

0:33:26.310 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>If you're in Houston, you're more likely an A &amp;

0:33:27.930 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 2>M fan. And by the way, so this kid, Landon

0:33:31.130 --> 0:33:34.100
<v Speaker 2>William Callis, chose between UT and A &amp; M, and

0:33:34.140 --> 0:33:35.980
<v Speaker 2>he went with UT and broke so many hearts.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:36.780
<v Speaker 4>Shocking.

0:33:36.820 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I bet you he did pretty well there. All right,

0:33:38.660 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 3>coming up next, it's the clip joint here on Not

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.270
<v Speaker 3>So Fast. We're going to chop it all up.

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:43.060
<v Speaker 2>Stick around.

0:33:43.450 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Dan Patrick was here earlier today. A lot coming up.

0:33:45.350 --> 0:33:46.310
<v Speaker 4>Stick around. Not so fast.

0:33:51.450 --> 0:33:54.330
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's panic time yet, but what

0:33:54.350 --> 0:33:56.870
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from the Chargers with Justin Herbert, it's got

0:33:56.890 --> 0:34:00.670
<v Speaker 1>to be alarming. And now you go to Seattle. If

0:34:00.690 --> 0:34:04.230
<v Speaker 1>they start out 0-4, what are we doing?

0:34:04.940 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, alarming is obviously the word. Picture the offense that

0:34:10.300 --> 0:34:13.580
<v Speaker 7>Mike McDaniel ran in Miami with Tua. It was almost

0:34:13.620 --> 0:34:16.379
<v Speaker 7>like ball in, ball out, boom, right behind the ear

0:34:16.420 --> 0:34:20.250
<v Speaker 7>of the linebacker. These 8, 10, 12-yard completions, like he's

0:34:20.310 --> 0:34:22.850
<v Speaker 7>turning two. Like he's a shortstop, bang, get it out

0:34:22.890 --> 0:34:26.790
<v Speaker 7>of my hand. Justin Herbert is not that guy. Justin

0:34:26.830 --> 0:34:29.650
<v Speaker 7>Herbert's a longer strider. He's back in the pocket, driving

0:34:29.670 --> 0:34:32.069
<v Speaker 7>the ball down the field. And I just don't feel

0:34:32.090 --> 0:34:35.070
<v Speaker 7>like the marriage has been real smooth so far.

0:34:35.530 --> 0:34:37.460
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is, is they're losing games.

0:34:38.739 --> 0:34:41.790
<v Speaker 3>Back on Not So Fast with Paxton Perloff, NBC Sports.

0:34:42.570 --> 0:34:45.529
<v Speaker 3>We're still arguing Camaro Taylor's Heisman candidate during the break.

0:34:45.550 --> 0:34:47.430
<v Speaker 3>They were just chopping that up. This would be a

0:34:47.450 --> 0:34:49.890
<v Speaker 3>concerning cut. When I listen to that back, if I'm

0:34:49.910 --> 0:34:52.710
<v Speaker 3>a Chargers fan, I am actually more concerned. What he

0:34:52.750 --> 0:34:56.089
<v Speaker 3>was saying, Coach Garrett, that this offense is not right

0:34:56.210 --> 0:34:59.790
<v Speaker 3>for Justin Herbert. And we said before the season, Jim

0:34:59.850 --> 0:35:02.190
<v Speaker 3>Harbaugh and Mike McDaniels can be so fun together. We

0:35:02.210 --> 0:35:04.989
<v Speaker 3>were into them as a couple, almost like, as a

0:35:05.150 --> 0:35:07.660
<v Speaker 3>odd couple of tones. One guy is from the 50s.

0:35:07.670 --> 0:35:09.649
<v Speaker 3>The other guy looks like an IT guy. But he's

0:35:09.690 --> 0:35:11.609
<v Speaker 3>saying this offense doesn't match Justin Herbert.

0:35:11.630 --> 0:35:12.430
<v Speaker 4>That's shocking.

0:35:12.690 --> 0:35:14.830
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those takes that I greatly regret how

0:35:14.870 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>excited I got about Mike McDaniel going to the Chargers.

0:35:18.860 --> 0:35:21.180
<v Speaker 2>The other thing, too, O'Marion Hampton, their starting running back,

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.660
<v Speaker 2>doesn't fit this offense at all either. The backup Keaton

0:35:24.700 --> 0:35:26.980
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell from Baltimore is a much better fit for a

0:35:27.020 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Mike McDaniel offense. Why didn't we know this in August?

0:35:30.020 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Because every fantasy draft had the Chargers guys at the top,

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:34.489
<v Speaker 2>and now they don't look like they don't know what

0:35:34.510 --> 0:35:34.950
<v Speaker 2>they're doing.

0:35:35.010 --> 0:35:36.810
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the casual fan or the casual media

0:35:36.830 --> 0:35:38.029
<v Speaker 3>person says, it's not working out.

0:35:38.310 --> 0:35:38.770
<v Speaker 4>Get better.

0:35:39.090 --> 0:35:41.730
<v Speaker 3>But when you hear this, it's saying it won't get

0:35:41.770 --> 0:35:45.250
<v Speaker 3>better because it's the wrong offense. And that's a scare quote.

0:35:45.510 --> 0:35:47.950
<v Speaker 2>Well, could you argue that these guys need more time?

0:35:48.010 --> 0:35:50.770
<v Speaker 2>For example, my Eagles, Sean Mannion is the offensive coordinator,

0:35:50.850 --> 0:35:52.230
<v Speaker 2>and Jalen Hurts, they don't look like they're on the

0:35:52.270 --> 0:35:55.530
<v Speaker 2>same page. It's only three games. Same with Davis Webb

0:35:55.590 --> 0:35:58.180
<v Speaker 2>and Bo Nix in Denver. And maybe Mike McDaniels just

0:35:58.219 --> 0:36:00.380
<v Speaker 2>needs time. Is that a legitimate argument?

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, but how much time if you have a losing record?

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Like the Eagles in that division, I think they're going

0:36:05.060 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to be okay.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:06.700
<v Speaker 4>They're going to keep the float.

0:36:06.900 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 2>That helps.

0:36:07.420 --> 0:36:08.780
<v Speaker 4>It does help. And the Chargers.

0:36:09.260 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 3>One more loss, and you will start thinking, this isn't

0:36:11.900 --> 0:36:15.620
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. Could you imagine Mike McDaniel after one

0:36:15.660 --> 0:36:16.410
<v Speaker 3>season being out?

0:36:16.489 --> 0:36:20.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. Justin Herbert's the franchise. Mike McDaniel, they don't

0:36:20.530 --> 0:36:22.609
<v Speaker 2>need him. Sorry, buddy.

0:36:22.890 --> 0:36:24.890
<v Speaker 3>There's a schedule coming up, and it doesn't really matter

0:36:24.930 --> 0:36:26.890
<v Speaker 3>what game because it seems like the Chargers play to

0:36:26.930 --> 0:36:29.270
<v Speaker 3>their opponent. All right, let's get back to last night.

0:36:29.670 --> 0:36:32.010
<v Speaker 3>Nice win for the Browns. Nice win for Todd Munkin.

0:36:32.290 --> 0:36:34.890
<v Speaker 3>Todd Munkin, who we felt bad for in August, now

0:36:34.969 --> 0:36:37.250
<v Speaker 3>is 3-1. Here's what he had to say after the game.

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:38.989
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm human.

0:36:41.180 --> 0:36:45.819
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I don't go beyond thoughts. If you said

0:36:45.860 --> 0:36:49.190
<v Speaker 8>that was the way we would start the season after

0:36:49.210 --> 0:36:52.149
<v Speaker 8>the way we worked, I would have said you're nuts.

0:36:52.210 --> 0:36:53.989
<v Speaker 8>And if you'd have said we'd be 3-1 after that

0:36:54.030 --> 0:36:56.590
<v Speaker 8>first game, I'd have said you're nuts. But that's a

0:36:56.610 --> 0:36:58.770
<v Speaker 8>credit to our players because all they do is just work.

0:37:00.070 --> 0:37:00.510
<v Speaker 5>It's them.

0:37:00.810 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, they didn't blink. Like I said, that week

0:37:04.260 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 8>after was a little chippy, and that was a good thing.

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 8>They were not happy. with the way we played, and

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 8>sometimes that's good.

0:37:14.580 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 3>He even sounds like the coach in Major League, the

0:37:17.620 --> 0:37:18.940
<v Speaker 3>old coach who's crusty like this.

0:37:18.980 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Lou Boudreau. Yeah, Lou Boudreau.

0:37:21.219 --> 0:37:23.460
<v Speaker 3>If you were doing a movie about the up-and-coming Browns,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 3>you'd get this craggly old coach with a scraaky voice.

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.819
<v Speaker 2>He has never said true words. After that Jacksonville game

0:37:29.860 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 2>in Week 1, I would have thought that Browns might

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.739
<v Speaker 2>have another 0-17 season. The turnaround between that game and

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 2>this game is a miracle.

0:37:37.070 --> 0:37:38.910
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing is a lot of people said

0:37:38.930 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 3>when Watson got the start two weeks ago, enjoy Deshaun

0:37:42.180 --> 0:37:43.779
<v Speaker 3>Watson's last start in the NFL and he's going to

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 3>be gone. They're going to go to Shador Sanders, whatever

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.340
<v Speaker 3>it may be. And now the quarterback situation is the

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:49.819
<v Speaker 3>least of their problems, if they have any problems.

0:37:49.860 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Browns insider Mary Kay Cabot, a good friend of

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.370
<v Speaker 2>the Dan Patrick show, said that they're looking at Shador

0:37:54.430 --> 0:37:57.770
<v Speaker 2>for week three. Now Shador isn't even, as DP said earlier,

0:37:57.969 --> 0:37:58.970
<v Speaker 2>no one talks about Shador.

0:37:59.010 --> 0:38:01.410
<v Speaker 4>And you could play your way out of almost anything.

0:38:01.630 --> 0:38:03.780
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. All right, on the other side of the ball,

0:38:03.860 --> 0:38:07.580
<v Speaker 2>Mike McCarthy and Aaron Rodgers had a heated exchange. A

0:38:07.620 --> 0:38:11.500
<v Speaker 2>lot of lip reading going on last night. Let's listen

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to McCarthy talking about what happened.

0:38:15.219 --> 0:38:18.339
<v Speaker 5>Communication sometimes is not the best choice of words, but

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.180
<v Speaker 5>everybody's competing on the field. And I think, you know,

0:38:22.700 --> 0:38:25.549
<v Speaker 5>what's said on the field, the way I grew up

0:38:25.570 --> 0:38:27.509
<v Speaker 5>in this game, you know, usually stays on the field.

0:38:27.530 --> 0:38:31.150
<v Speaker 5>That's not the case today. I understand that. But, yeah, any...

0:38:31.950 --> 0:38:35.509
<v Speaker 5>Negative communication on my part. I wish I wouldn't use

0:38:35.530 --> 0:38:35.970
<v Speaker 5>those words.

0:38:36.910 --> 0:38:38.610
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you're a Steelers fan, you might be

0:38:38.650 --> 0:38:41.270
<v Speaker 2>nervous because Mike McCarthy and Aaron Rodgers are cussing each

0:38:41.310 --> 0:38:43.810
<v Speaker 2>other out and TJ Watts getting on the phone screaming

0:38:43.850 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 2>at somebody. This looks bad, right? Steelers always do this.

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.620
<v Speaker 2>They always lose in Cleveland. They always turn it around.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.779
<v Speaker 2>I'm not worried about this Aaron Rodgers-McCarthy dust-up at all.

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's anything to this. Aaron Rodgers has

0:38:55.900 --> 0:38:57.740
<v Speaker 3>been doing this for years. There's usually not an overhead

0:38:57.780 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 3>camera watching him saying it. And McCarthy, he F-bombed him

0:39:01.180 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 3>right back. You need one of those things. You put

0:39:03.460 --> 0:39:06.100
<v Speaker 3>the flip chart up. The microphone, they should have a

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:07.980
<v Speaker 3>little cover so you can't read their lips as they're

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:08.660
<v Speaker 3>swearing to each other.

0:39:08.739 --> 0:39:12.140
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. And Rodgers, I think, I can't exactly read his lips,

0:39:12.180 --> 0:39:14.060
<v Speaker 2>will curse out his receivers when they drop the ball,

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:14.900
<v Speaker 2>which is way too often.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 3>There should be a blue channel where you can hear

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.450
<v Speaker 3>exactly what they're saying because Rodgers curses out everybody.

0:39:19.550 --> 0:39:22.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's like too old. I don't care anymore. Aaron

0:39:22.190 --> 0:39:24.549
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers has nothing to lose. He's playing like that.

0:39:24.670 --> 0:39:26.049
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't have a turn signal on his car. He

0:39:26.090 --> 0:39:27.810
<v Speaker 4>backs up without looking. He does whatever he wants.

0:39:27.830 --> 0:39:29.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, why not? I mean, what are they going to do?

0:39:29.730 --> 0:39:31.779
<v Speaker 2>Make him retire? He's already retiring at the end of

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the year.

0:39:32.060 --> 0:39:33.620
<v Speaker 4>He's got three months left. He doesn't care.

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:35.419
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to a team that's doing pretty well.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.779
<v Speaker 3>Liam Cohen, he doesn't swear. He's the head coach of

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.940
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars. Jaguars are playing well, not getting a lot

0:39:40.980 --> 0:39:43.029
<v Speaker 3>of coverage. You've heard this story before. And they've got

0:39:43.050 --> 0:39:45.130
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals coming up. Here's what Liam Cohen thinks of

0:39:45.170 --> 0:39:46.330
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback, Joe Burrow.

0:39:48.070 --> 0:39:51.109
<v Speaker 6>The down in down out accuracy that you just take

0:39:51.170 --> 0:39:54.210
<v Speaker 6>for granted. I think in a lot of ways that, um,

0:39:55.170 --> 0:40:00.430
<v Speaker 6>you know, challenging throws under duress, under pressure with somebody

0:40:00.489 --> 0:40:03.030
<v Speaker 6>bearing down on them and the ball just like lands

0:40:03.530 --> 0:40:05.940
<v Speaker 6>in a, in the, in the spots that, you know,

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.100
<v Speaker 6>he could put the ball wherever he wants.

0:40:07.540 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.210
<v Speaker 6>A ton of respect for Joe, a ton of respect for, uh,

0:40:11.380 --> 0:40:14.060
<v Speaker 6>the way that he's played throughout the course of his career,

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:18.190
<v Speaker 6>the plays that he's made, uh, the games that he's won. Um, Yeah,

0:40:18.250 --> 0:40:21.029
<v Speaker 6>anytime he's across from you, you know that they have

0:40:21.050 --> 0:40:21.390
<v Speaker 6>a chance.

0:40:22.090 --> 0:40:24.350
<v Speaker 2>You know, actually, Liam Cohen is a bit of a maniac,

0:40:24.390 --> 0:40:26.790
<v Speaker 2>which is weird. We met him before. I met him

0:40:26.810 --> 0:40:28.370
<v Speaker 2>at the Kansas City Draft, and I'm like, that's a

0:40:28.430 --> 0:40:31.910
<v Speaker 2>mild-mannered guy. Then he goes nuts. But he's right about

0:40:31.950 --> 0:40:34.029
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow. He's a great offensive coach, man. If he

0:40:34.050 --> 0:40:35.890
<v Speaker 2>got together with Joe Burrow, it would be great. But

0:40:35.930 --> 0:40:38.810
<v Speaker 2>look what Liam's done with Trevor Lawrence. It's really awesome.

0:40:39.070 --> 0:40:41.190
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Trevor Lawrence was getting the kind of criticism two

0:40:41.230 --> 0:40:43.189
<v Speaker 3>years ago that we're giving some of these quarterbacks today.

0:40:43.250 --> 0:40:44.850
<v Speaker 4>What happened to this guy? And now.

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.220
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's like, oh, Trevor Lawrence, he's just playing good football

0:40:47.260 --> 0:40:49.380
<v Speaker 3>week in, week out, and with very little coverage, and

0:40:49.420 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a good thing.

0:40:50.260 --> 0:40:52.340
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it funny this Jacksonville Cincinnati game, two of the

0:40:52.380 --> 0:40:55.299
<v Speaker 2>best teams in the AFC? There's so many premier games

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.420
<v Speaker 2>this week. It's hard to pay attention to that one.

0:40:57.460 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's getting the buzz at Marist.

0:40:59.460 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 4>It's going to get completely lost in the shuffle.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.509
<v Speaker 3>All right, before we get to break, college football weekend,

0:41:03.550 --> 0:41:06.390
<v Speaker 3>very saucy. Let's get to getting the Heisman. Who's in

0:41:06.430 --> 0:41:08.270
<v Speaker 3>play this weekend? Who's going to make a statement? Pearl,

0:41:08.290 --> 0:41:11.109
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go first. That's a good-looking haircut. All right,

0:41:11.140 --> 0:41:12.860
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go our guy Jaden Ball. He was

0:41:12.940 --> 0:41:14.860
<v Speaker 3>on Not So Fast just a couple days ago. He

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 3>is the star running back for the University of Florida.

0:41:17.260 --> 0:41:19.380
<v Speaker 3>He is now up to fifth in the rankings. Here's

0:41:19.420 --> 0:41:21.779
<v Speaker 3>the formula for a running back. Your team has to win,

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 3>and you have to run for at least 150 yards

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:24.580
<v Speaker 3>a game.

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 4>You've got to get to.

0:41:25.700 --> 0:41:29.730
<v Speaker 3>That 1,600, 1,700, 1,800-yard level to get the invite to

0:41:29.770 --> 0:41:32.029
<v Speaker 3>New York City. So Jaden Ball, if you want to

0:41:32.090 --> 0:41:33.589
<v Speaker 3>feed him, you're going to have to feed him even

0:41:33.630 --> 0:41:36.450
<v Speaker 3>if you're up like 15, 18 points in the fourth quarter.

0:41:36.650 --> 0:41:39.540
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he's a fantastic running back. The days

0:41:39.580 --> 0:41:42.370
<v Speaker 2>of Rashawn Salaam and Curtis. Actually, Curtis Edis did not

0:41:42.410 --> 0:41:44.219
<v Speaker 2>win it, but it used to be a running back award.

0:41:44.590 --> 0:41:47.049
<v Speaker 2>Now it's obviously quarterback and wide receiver, which is where

0:41:47.070 --> 0:41:50.190
<v Speaker 2>I'm going. Okay, Jeremiah Smith is everyone's darling for the

0:41:50.230 --> 0:41:53.270
<v Speaker 2>Heisman right now, but he plays Iowa. Iowa just takes

0:41:53.330 --> 0:41:55.169
<v Speaker 2>his air out of all games, so I'm not going

0:41:55.190 --> 0:41:57.029
<v Speaker 2>to give him too much credit. Malachi Toney, on the

0:41:57.050 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 2>other hand, I believe they play Clemson, right?

0:41:58.890 --> 0:41:59.569
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, TV game.

0:41:59.910 --> 0:42:02.660
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Clemson let up 600 yards to LSU, who's not

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 2>even great on offense. If Malachi Toney wants to, he

0:42:05.820 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>could get 300 yards of total offense in this one

0:42:08.460 --> 0:42:10.620
<v Speaker 2>game and get back right up to the top of

0:42:10.660 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 2>the office.

0:42:10.900 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he could use a showcase game. He started off

0:42:12.900 --> 0:42:14.810
<v Speaker 3>week one with a showcase game. Then they played a

0:42:14.830 --> 0:42:17.710
<v Speaker 3>couple teams that weren't so good TV-wise. Now you can

0:42:17.750 --> 0:42:19.370
<v Speaker 3>take care of Clemson. Clemson has no defense.

0:42:19.390 --> 0:42:21.350
<v Speaker 2>That's the right team to have a showcase game against.

0:42:21.390 --> 0:42:23.129
<v Speaker 3>I think you're calling your spot there. All right, coming

0:42:23.170 --> 0:42:26.219
<v Speaker 3>up next, we have the not-so-fast coming up. We have

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.180
<v Speaker 3>a special report on the Case Keenum College Football Hall

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.060
<v Speaker 3>of Fame situation and the Monday's headline for Week 4.

0:42:32.060 --> 0:42:33.500
<v Speaker 4>Stick around. It's not so fast.

0:42:35.260 --> 0:42:37.820
<v Speaker 3>Sunday Night Football returns to Carolina as Bryce Young and

0:42:37.860 --> 0:42:40.430
<v Speaker 3>his Panthers host Jared Goff and his Lions in primetime.

0:42:40.989 --> 0:42:41.710
<v Speaker 4>Sunday Night Football.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.819
<v Speaker 3>Football Night on NBC and Peacock. Sunday Night is Football Night.

0:42:46.140 --> 0:42:47.060
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Pearl.

0:42:47.300 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Can't wait. Welcome back. Not so fast. I'm Andrew Perloff.

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.140
<v Speaker 2>He's Paul Papps. Of course, NBC Sports Now and Peacock.

0:42:53.180 --> 0:42:56.860
<v Speaker 2>And every week we do something called Monday's Headlines Today.

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's really interesting that we talked about Sunday Night

0:42:59.580 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Football because I think that's the direction I'm going. But

0:43:01.420 --> 0:43:02.380
<v Speaker 2>why don't you start us off?

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go that the Rams continue losing and

0:43:05.580 --> 0:43:06.620
<v Speaker 4>they lose to the Eagles.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.170
<v Speaker 3>Eagles got kind of embarrassed on Monday Night Football. They're

0:43:10.190 --> 0:43:11.890
<v Speaker 3>going to right the ship. It's going to be a battle.

0:43:11.910 --> 0:43:13.049
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to go down to the last

0:43:13.090 --> 0:43:15.469
<v Speaker 3>possession and the Eagles win, and it'll be a referendum

0:43:15.510 --> 0:43:16.330
<v Speaker 3>Monday on the Rams.

0:43:16.750 --> 0:43:17.589
<v Speaker 4>What happened to the super team?

0:43:18.150 --> 0:43:21.870
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man, it's interesting. The dream team scenario seems like

0:43:21.890 --> 0:43:23.969
<v Speaker 2>a distant memory. Okay, I'm going to stay on Sunday

0:43:23.989 --> 0:43:26.029
<v Speaker 2>Night Football. I know there are major games, but I

0:43:26.070 --> 0:43:28.989
<v Speaker 2>think we are going to see an offensive explosion, much

0:43:29.030 --> 0:43:32.550
<v Speaker 2>like that Patrick Mahomes-Jared Goff game several years ago. because

0:43:32.989 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Carolina lost its two starting cornerbacks who are awesome, J.C.

0:43:35.940 --> 0:43:38.740
<v Speaker 2>Horn and Michael Jackson. So they're in trouble on defense.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I think we're seeing teams running up and down. And

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the guy we're talking about Monday morning is Jameer Gibbs.

0:43:44.260 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>He's a highlight machine. He's a great dancer after he

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.130
<v Speaker 2>gets in the end zone. And I'm not saying he's

0:43:49.150 --> 0:43:51.110
<v Speaker 2>an MVP, but he's definitely an Offensive Player of the

0:43:51.150 --> 0:43:54.250
<v Speaker 2>Year candidate. So far, with no David Montgomery, they've been

0:43:54.310 --> 0:43:56.090
<v Speaker 2>feeding him the ball, and he's been taking advantage.

0:43:56.110 --> 0:43:56.910
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a good point.

0:43:56.930 --> 0:43:59.029
<v Speaker 3>They don't have the shared backfield anymore. He's got the

0:43:59.070 --> 0:44:01.430
<v Speaker 3>new contract. He gets almost every touch at the running

0:44:01.469 --> 0:44:01.910
<v Speaker 3>back position.

0:44:02.310 --> 0:44:02.970
<v Speaker 4>Very slippery.

0:44:03.270 --> 0:44:05.069
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't had that game this year where it's like

0:44:05.110 --> 0:44:07.589
<v Speaker 3>that statement Kenneth Walker game, the B.

0:44:07.610 --> 0:44:09.030
<v Speaker 4>John Robinson game. This is his week.

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, the funny thing is he's run for as many

0:44:10.739 --> 0:44:12.259
<v Speaker 2>yards as both of those guys, but he hasn't gotten

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the attention. I think he's going to go to town here.

0:44:14.300 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 4>I think he clicked his heels together on that one.

0:44:16.180 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.819
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to the weekend. Keep it friendly. We have

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.069
<v Speaker 4>a little side bets, actual money. Where do you want

0:44:21.090 --> 0:44:21.410
<v Speaker 4>to start?

0:44:21.450 --> 0:44:24.069
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to start Chiefs giving four and a half

0:44:24.090 --> 0:44:26.310
<v Speaker 3>to the Raiders, which you're mixed feelings on the Raiders.

0:44:27.170 --> 0:44:31.450
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is when the Raiders' dream dies. Kansas City,

0:44:31.469 --> 0:44:32.790
<v Speaker 2>you never know where you're going to get with this

0:44:32.890 --> 0:44:35.859
<v Speaker 2>era of Patrick Mahomes. But I think Vegas has been

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 2>playing way over their head. And I'm sorry, with all

0:44:38.620 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the attention here on this particular game, I don't know,

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.540
<v Speaker 2>I assume we'll have a Taylor Swift sighting. I think

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:45.020
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs are going to be fired up and the

0:44:45.060 --> 0:44:46.060
<v Speaker 2>Raiders cannot compete.

0:44:46.219 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking the Raiders straight up, money line, because I

0:44:48.580 --> 0:44:50.140
<v Speaker 3>think that this goes a little bit longer.

0:44:50.180 --> 0:44:52.830
<v Speaker 4>It's a feel-good story. I think they're, and J.J.

0:44:52.850 --> 0:44:54.730
<v Speaker 3>Watt was on Dan Patrick's show earlier and talked about

0:44:54.750 --> 0:44:55.670
<v Speaker 3>how good their defense was.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see how good they were.

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 3>If they can get the running game going to help

0:44:59.020 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Kirk Cousins out, I think they have something. Next game,

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:04.730
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys at Texans. Texans giving three to the Cowboys.

0:45:04.790 --> 0:45:07.230
<v Speaker 2>For me, this is a desperation game. Both teams are desperate,

0:45:07.250 --> 0:45:12.210
<v Speaker 2>but Houston is particularly desperate. Now, the Cowboys' offenses look fantastic,

0:45:12.410 --> 0:45:14.989
<v Speaker 2>and the Texans' defense gave up 36 to Josh Allen.

0:45:15.630 --> 0:45:17.770
<v Speaker 2>I think the Texans play with their hair on fire

0:45:17.810 --> 0:45:21.379
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Not literally. Well, we'll see. It's going

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.330
<v Speaker 2>to be hot there in Houston. I think they play

0:45:24.489 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 2>with their hair on fire, and I think D'Amico Ryans

0:45:26.860 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 2>is a good coach. They're way too good a team

0:45:28.380 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to be 0-4. That's my only logic here. I know

0:45:30.940 --> 0:45:33.500
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't make sense from an X's and O's standpoint,

0:45:33.739 --> 0:45:35.660
<v Speaker 2>but you know that incentive is important.

0:45:35.780 --> 0:45:38.170
<v Speaker 4>College football, Ohio State at Iowa.

0:45:38.230 --> 0:45:41.549
<v Speaker 3>Game day is going to be there. Iowa's getting 14.5.

0:45:41.550 --> 0:45:43.930
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't touch this game. I would either take Iowa

0:45:43.950 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to win. or lose by 28. That's one of those

0:45:46.500 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 3>two things they have. Iowa wins at the buzzer, or

0:45:48.780 --> 0:45:49.610
<v Speaker 3>loses by 28.

0:45:49.610 --> 0:45:51.930
<v Speaker 2>See, that 14-point spread says to me this game is

0:45:51.950 --> 0:45:55.550
<v Speaker 2>going to be 28-14 with three minutes left. It feels

0:45:55.590 --> 0:45:58.330
<v Speaker 2>like they really nailed it with this spread. Iowa will

0:45:58.370 --> 0:45:59.750
<v Speaker 2>slow down the game, so you're not going to see

0:45:59.790 --> 0:46:02.230
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State run up and down the field, but that's

0:46:02.290 --> 0:46:05.530
<v Speaker 2>a tough task for Iowa, especially coming off that big win.

0:46:05.930 --> 0:46:06.660
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it happening.

0:46:06.739 --> 0:46:09.739
<v Speaker 4>Big game for Florida, minus 5.5 at Mizzou. They keep

0:46:09.780 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 4>it going, Florida? No problem.

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.940
<v Speaker 2>Well, emotional letdown. I'm really worried about that. Trap game? Oh,

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Big time picking Missouri. Like Florida, you know, Florida,

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.489
<v Speaker 2>their star player, Jaden Ball, gets on not so fast,

0:46:20.530 --> 0:46:22.009
<v Speaker 2>gets a big head. You know how that works.

0:46:22.070 --> 0:46:23.830
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the media coverage he got from being on our

0:46:23.850 --> 0:46:26.009
<v Speaker 3>show surely will go to his head. It's time for

0:46:26.150 --> 0:46:29.290
<v Speaker 3>constructive criticism. What you had to say, special edition of

0:46:29.330 --> 0:46:33.770
<v Speaker 3>constructive criticism. Yesterday on the show, we reported that Case Keenum,

0:46:33.890 --> 0:46:37.190
<v Speaker 3>backup quarterback for the Bears, when he was at Houston,

0:46:37.210 --> 0:46:39.770
<v Speaker 3>threw for 20,000 yards. He is not in the College

0:46:39.790 --> 0:46:42.540
<v Speaker 3>Football Hall of Fame. We got a response from Case Keenum.

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:44.430
<v Speaker 3>Case Keenum loves we went to bat for him.

0:46:44.810 --> 0:46:45.550
<v Speaker 4>Now, here's the story.

0:46:45.989 --> 0:46:49.450
<v Speaker 3>Case Keenum, because he was not All-American, is not eligible

0:46:49.910 --> 0:46:52.049
<v Speaker 3>for the College Football Hall of Fame. The College Football

0:46:52.090 --> 0:46:55.650
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Fame is run by NFF, the National Football Foundation.

0:46:55.690 --> 0:46:58.570
<v Speaker 3>I reached out to their people, and they said, while

0:46:58.610 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 3>we deeply respect Case Keenum's accomplishments, he is not a

0:47:01.980 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 3>first team or was not a first team All-American by

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 3>an NCAA-recognized publication. Therefore, he is not and will not

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.259
<v Speaker 3>be eligible for the College Football Hall of Fame going forward.

0:47:10.610 --> 0:47:11.890
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to wink at this. They're not going

0:47:11.910 --> 0:47:14.410
<v Speaker 3>to have a special vote. Case Keenum, as we know now,

0:47:14.469 --> 0:47:16.049
<v Speaker 3>will not be getting in the College Football Hall of Fame.

0:47:16.110 --> 0:47:18.379
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know how deeply they do respect Case

0:47:18.410 --> 0:47:20.380
<v Speaker 2>Keenum if they're not willing to make an exception for

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the all-time leading passer in college football history.

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:24.580
<v Speaker 4>So here's my comp on this one.

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Let's say the NFL had a similar rule where if

0:47:27.260 --> 0:47:29.620
<v Speaker 3>you weren't first-team All-Pro, you couldn't be in the Hall

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of Fame. Here are some quarterbacks that would not be

0:47:31.460 --> 0:47:34.989
<v Speaker 3>in the Hall of Fame. John Elway, Warren Moon, Troy Aikman,

0:47:35.010 --> 0:47:38.529
<v Speaker 3>and Roger Straubach, never first-team All-Pro. Some never All-Pro at

0:47:38.650 --> 0:47:39.750
<v Speaker 3>all and would not be eligible.

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.860
<v Speaker 2>Wow. I mean, Troy Aikman probably shouldn't be in anyway

0:47:43.620 --> 0:47:45.939
<v Speaker 2>as an Eagles fan. No, I'm kidding. Of course, Troy's

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer.

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Good luck to that with the Cowboys fans all weekend, Pearl.

0:47:48.580 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>By the way, if Case does get in, we are

0:47:51.219 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 2>in the front row.

0:47:52.100 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we're presenting him. It's time for the feel-good before

0:47:54.540 --> 0:47:56.620
<v Speaker 3>we wrap up this great week. Thanks to everybody at

0:47:56.660 --> 0:47:59.310
<v Speaker 3>Not So Fast in the building for doing a bang-up job.

0:47:59.350 --> 0:48:00.170
<v Speaker 4>Really good job all week.

0:48:00.850 --> 0:48:03.890
<v Speaker 3>Dickinson College. I don't know where they are, but they

0:48:03.930 --> 0:48:06.529
<v Speaker 3>go around the campus. They're kickers and long snappers, and

0:48:06.550 --> 0:48:08.469
<v Speaker 3>they let the kids kick. to get them pumped up

0:48:08.489 --> 0:48:12.500
<v Speaker 3>for tonight's games against Johns Hopkins, the fighting anesthesiologist of

0:48:12.540 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Johns Hopkins against Dickinson.

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:16.500
<v Speaker 4>Where is Dickinson College, Perloff?

0:48:17.060 --> 0:48:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I said Pennsylvania. What do you think?

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go Delaware because I really, really don't know,

0:48:23.620 --> 0:48:24.270
<v Speaker 3>and I know even.

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:25.629
<v Speaker 4>Less about the state of Delaware. This is good TV,

0:48:25.650 --> 0:48:28.290
<v Speaker 4>by the way.

0:48:28.350 --> 0:48:29.250
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to get an answer?

0:48:30.110 --> 0:48:31.109
<v Speaker 4>It is in Pennsylvania.

0:48:31.130 --> 0:48:31.330
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay.

0:48:31.350 --> 0:48:31.890
<v Speaker 4>Good for you.

0:48:32.390 --> 0:48:34.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, listen. Throw out the record books when

0:48:34.850 --> 0:48:36.510
<v Speaker 2>Dickinson and Johns Hopkins get together.

0:48:36.750 --> 0:48:38.690
<v Speaker 4>Is this going to catch on running around campus getting

0:48:38.710 --> 0:48:39.210
<v Speaker 4>kids to kick?

0:48:39.250 --> 0:48:41.810
<v Speaker 2>We should run around the man cave and have people kick.

0:48:41.930 --> 0:48:44.300
<v Speaker 3>I'd pull a hammy like Caleb Williams. Tune in to

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the Dan Patrick Show on Monday and the Not So

0:48:46.060 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Fast right after.

0:48:46.780 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Have a good weekend. Enjoy the football.