WEBVTT - A Ryder Cup Draft with Shane Bacon

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a brid egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida egg,

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, Frida egg bride egg Lie, I'm about ready

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to run off of.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>The Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Egg

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Golf Podcast. I am Andy Johnson today. With the Ryder

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Cup just a couple of weeks away. I decided to

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>do something kind of fun and different with Shane Bacon,

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>who's obviously a regular guest here, host of the Getta

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Grip podcast, host of the Ping Podcast, some sometime contributor

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>to The Friday Egg, sometime contributor to part time contributor

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 3>to Friday Golf's newsletter, A man of many talents, many

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>hats to come on and draft out the twenty four

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cup players as if they had no team. We

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>were just doing a draft like a pickup basketball. You know,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I take this guy, you take this guy type draft.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>So I thought it was really illuminating. It kind of

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 3>reframes the argument for against different players. I guess it

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>removes a lot of that. But I found one of

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the things interesting was where JT fell on both of

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 3>ours and for me, he fell a lot higher than

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the last pick, which would kind of say maybe he

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 3>should be on the team. So anyways, that was really fun.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>It was a different podcast and excited for you guys

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>to hear it. Before we get to Shane, let's take

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>a quick second to talk about one of our partners,

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>our new partner, Red Rooster. These guys make awesome gloves.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>It is direct to consumer glove brand. It is a

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>new upstart. Their founders, Brad and Carrie have worked tirelessly

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 3>on improving the glove experience. So Redrooster golf dot com

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>is the the url. They won numerous awards with my

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Golf Spy and really it is a is a high

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 3>quality product. They have players gloves, they have more durable gloves.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 3>They have the rain Rooster, which is a really great

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>rain glove, so they have all of your glove needs.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>And as well as that, they have a membership, so

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>like if you go through a lot of gloves, you

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 3>can just get shipped gloves and you never are scrambling

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 3>before around, you know, going to pro shop looking for gloves,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>so you can find out all that stuff on redrooster

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>golf dot com. You can just you can shop the gloves,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the different gloves they have, and you get fifteen percent

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>off with the promo code fried Egg fifteen. That's Frida

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Egg fifteen to get fifteen percent off at redroostergolf dot com.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Red Rooster, and I've started using their gloves.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I really really like it. And let's now get to

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Shane Bacon. Bacon, I have to say I think that

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 3>this is happening because I was in you know, last

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>week when I came up with this idea for the pod.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I was doing a fantasy football draft. So are you

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>a fantasy football person?

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yep.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Needed about eleven points from a certain Jets quarterback yesterday

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to win my first games.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>That was fun. That was an exciting first day.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, can I throw something at you off the top

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>here since we're talking about football. Yeah, I was texting

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 2>with your with your Shotgun Start co host. I don't

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>know if people listen to that podcast or not. It's

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a great podcast. You should listen to it. Congrats on

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>five years by the way, Oh thank you. But I

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I was texted today. I was thinking about the Aaron thing,

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like the easy comp is Gordon Hayward.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Gordon Hayward, right, I mean first like game of the

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>season gets injured. But that's I mean, he's not Aaron Rodger.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the best comp I could come up with

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>is the one that hits your heart the hardest is

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the Derek Rose in the playoffs.

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Thing, Like, I mean, the Bulls are not the Jets.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>For goodness sakes, you guys have had plenty of success

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>over the years, but going into the playoffs, you and

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I have talked about this, I think online and offline

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>plenty of times.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But you, you and the Bulls.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Fan base were convinced you guys were going to make

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the finals of potentially win. The Rose injury happens and

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 2>obviously things go could.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Put Yeah, yeah, I mean it was crazy. I don't

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that applies. I think this is

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the thing about the Rose thing that was so disheartening

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>as a Bulls fan was it was like our guy,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it was the Chicago guy. Okay, you know it was

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 3>the Aaron Rodgers is the Jet sky right, and the

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 3>US Open.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>A couple of times. We're a tennis channel hat. You know,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's into it.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 3>How good was the US Open?

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I went, I went Cindy and I

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>went and watched Alcarez.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable to watch those guys in person.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I it is like quickly, you know, it's funny, as

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>like a kid, you have these sports streams of things

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>you want to see. And as I've gotten into like

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>very much of middle aged adult, the two events that

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 3>are just ascending the list, getting to the top of

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the list are the or Wimbledon and the US Open

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 3>of tennis that I really want to go see. And yeah,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I have to say being on the West Coast for

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>the for the US Open, it's like the greatest thing

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 3>in the world. Those late matches. I like Bemoan. Everybody

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>says West Coast is great for sports. It's not if

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you have a kid, like because like you have bedtime

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 3>and dinner time, like right when all the sports are on.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 3>But like with with that US Open, you get the

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in in those quarter final rounds, you get those late

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>matches that just hit right at the right time. I

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 3>was I brought this up on the shotgun start, but

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 3>I feel like one of the things that tennis does

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>so well is that it has the you know and

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of ills about tennis right now.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>It is not a sport in a great place. People

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 3>tune in for one of them, tune in for four

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>events of the year. But one of the things I

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 3>love is the anticipation for matches, and like, you know

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 3>when they like that you were at the Alcarez Zverev

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 3>match right right like they were they were showing the

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>next round the Alcarez Medvedev, like what Alcaaz was doing

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to Medvedev the previous couple matches, and you're like, get

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>to see how they adjust and stuff. And golf, we

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>just it's so rare we see showdowns in golf, and

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>it's even more rare that we ever see a repeat

0:06:59.320 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 3>of a showdown.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I mean I listened to the pod

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 2>you guys were talking about this on and I was

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>not in my head as you were discussing this, And

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've been preaching the match play thing for years.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not just with the Tour Championship, but just

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if you.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Want to get all the best players together and make

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>these things what I don't know what's the new term.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not elevated anymore, are they calling it now?

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Signature signature. There you go just elev.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you have these signature events, but unless it's

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>match play, you're you're never gonna guarantee yourself. You know,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>these great matchups and the fact that there's not like

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>a four part match play series throughout the year where

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you get like twenty guys that qualify for it, and

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's two floating spots that you could play your

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>way into, but maybe eighteen spots are guaranteed considering how

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you played last year, like that would be such an

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>easy way to guarantee a little bit of rivalry. Think

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>about Phil Tiger.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Like, we never got it, never ever ever.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Got a true Phil Tiger showdown in a major chapship,

0:07:58.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>which is why you.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Got Ernie Ernie Tiger.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Shut I know you're well, did we though, did we

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>really get Ernie Tiger showdowns?

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Felt like we got Tiger and Ernie was there.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, he was there, he was he wasn't uninvolved.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, you know, it'd been nice if we'd

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>had Phil Tiger a little bit.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We get Phil Henrick and we got Tiger.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Bob May Like, if you had match play and you

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>had a really really small number of players, you would

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 2>guarantee at least some of these finals would involve five

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>floating names that you'd care to see play each other, right,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and even in the matchups early into it, you'd get

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to see Rory play Jordan Speith.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Think about too like these great match play moments. We've

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 3>had great match play moments. Think about Sergio Kucher. They

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 3>never played again, They never played each other again. Think

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>about Sir Keegan Bradley and Miguel and hell Havenez. We

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>never saw him play again.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 2>There's too many. The problem with the match play is

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>there's too many people in. And I get why they

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>have sixty four. I mean, I get it's early in

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the week interest that you have that many people, but

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 2>just cut it to about a tenth of that, you know,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and then let's have to top eight, top sixteen and

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 2>go about your business. But having a match play series

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>throughout the year where every you know, there's a there's

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a winter tournament, and there's a fall tournament, there's a

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 2>spring tournament, and there's a summer tournament, and you win

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>ten million dollars if you were the highest rated person

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.359
<v Speaker 2>throughout that because obviously money runs everything.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>But well, there seems to be plenty of money floating around,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and there might be a giant influx of money in

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>the sport if a certain public investment fund gets involved.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, just yeah, there you go, there you go.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>But match play is is it needs to be more

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of a king of golf, and it's just not even

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>in the conversation right now, which is a bummer.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I talked about too like controversial matches, but

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>then you have these great matches you had. You had

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Sergio and Phil at the right the same day as

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 3>as Rory and Reid, and Rory and Reid obviously got

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>huge headlines, right and it was an amazing start to

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the match. But that Sergio Phil match was out of

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>this world and we just don't have a chance to

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 3>ever see like how great would have been after the

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Sergio philm match if it was like in the spring.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh, yeah, these guys are playing a match

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 3>in this match play circuit, like there should just be Yeah,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>as you said, some semblance of Inn's to the roots

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of the game. It's the history of the game. The

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>game started as the match play sport, and it's just

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 3>now at this point with the match play going away

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>completely abandoned, at the professional level. It's so silly. I

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>get that there's some limitations. I get their struggles, but

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 3>if you made these as you suggested, like events, like

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 3>you could have four to eight matches going on all

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 3>the every day, it doesn't you know, just because you're

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>playing out a champion doesn't mean you can't play out

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>third place. You can't play out fifth place. You can't

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>play out and pay out the spots. Like these guys

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>play money matches for twenty grand. You know, they play

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 3>these matches regularly. There's it's no different if you're playing

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>an eighth place match for the difference of fifty grand.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>There's there's stuff on the line, and they're competitive. They

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 3>don't want to lose. And I think that's something that

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 3>I have in here about guys, this skuld parlay at Wow.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, hold on hold one second.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Just I remember the early days of you podcasting and

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have that skill, and I mean watching you

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 2>grow and just become this pro is just it's just

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it's made me so happy inside.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not pro. I'm still very very rougher our badges.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>But anyways, much like my writing, I still don't know

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.479
<v Speaker 3>where to put commas. I just guess commas.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Are so lame. Get out of here, Commas.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 3>So we're doing a pod. We're doing a draft, and

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>and I thought this, you know, I found this to

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 3>be like a particularly like in the JT discourse, an

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 3>illuminating thing. So I asked you and I were gonna

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>draft teams. You've got the first pick, I've got the

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>second pick. This is a tie back to the fantasy football.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.239
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna draft out the teams. There's no country allegiances.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>There's no continent allegiance, you know, US or Europe, there's

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>no allegiances there. It says you're gonna pick your team

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>from the twenty four players that are playing in this

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>year's Ryder Cup. I'm gonna pick my team. And the

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 3>way I went about this process is I just kind

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>of ranked players one through twenty four. I didn't do

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 3>really like a deep analytics drive. I have reasons that

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I have players in certain spots. But one of the

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>things is like you start to get to players and

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh, they might hate to lose more than

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 3>they want to win, and hating to lose is an incredible,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 3>incredible match play trade.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it's what's made some of these guys

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>who are in terms of match play, I mean, you

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>think about like the column Montgomery's of the world and

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the Endpulter.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Obviously in Sergio.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you if you went through this,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and obviously we'll hear in a bit really heavy European

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>side of mine on the top end. I just feel

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>like I've got a lot of the European players. I

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>just when I think of match play, for whatever reason,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 2>my brain tends to go that way before it goes

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to the American side of things. And I think that's

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>because when you and I were in our formidable years,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>was when the American Ryder Cup teams were just dreadful,

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and the teams were dreadful, and the European guys were

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 2>such studs.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>But I leaned euro heavy to start, I have to say.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Then it was alarming in the middle and at the

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>bottom for the European Yes.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a tough spot. I will say.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you did this, but I went

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I when I did my list, I did like the

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 2>top ten and then I did the bottom ten before

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I did the middle.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>My bottom is uh, hero heavy as well.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>He heavy, it's like extraordinary, it's it's kind of crazy,

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>it's it's it's very and I think that's gonna be

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of how this like, I don't think the bottom

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>matters as much, especially and I think the European team

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll get into more of a preview in the coming weeks,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 3>like a full preview. But one of the things I

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>think with the European team is I think they're way

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 3>more committed to the analytics, and the analytics would probably

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 3>say if you have weak players, just don't play them

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 3>until singles, you know. And I'm I'm I've heard that

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 3>this is a tough place to walk, so it'll be

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see, like can guys do thirty six? Thirty six?

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>But like I'm just gonna tell show my hand. McIntyre's

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>my last guy.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Okay, I got a euro last. He's not mine,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>but he's he's let me tell you, he's floating around

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that all right.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not worried about you taking back and tire,

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 3>but he's last. If I'm the if I'm the captain,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably just gonna say I'm I'm not playing it

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>until like until Sunday. And I think there's like a

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>moral thing of like if you pick a guy, do

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>you have to play before Sunday? But like, I'm not

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>letting my weak links just just cost me points. And

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I think this was the fill discourse in France when

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 3>he was completely not a course fit. He wasn't ready

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to play, and they've rolled them out there and it

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>was just so clear that he was not going to

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 3>win points. It's like, why are you just giving away points?

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So it's an interesting I don't know which roster I'd

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>rather have right now, and I think that's great for

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 3>this Ryder Cup.

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally agree with you.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 2>It feels I think if you're an amateur golfer, I

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>think you should be guaranteed two matches if you're playing

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>in a Curtis Cup or you're playing in a Walker Cup.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>But when you get to professional golf, I think it's

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>who's gonna give us the best chance to win this Cup?

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>It only happens every two years and it's one of

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the most talked about events.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>In our sport.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>The issue being here, Andy is it's almost like the

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>shoebomber syndrome. Right, one guy does the shoe bomb thing

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and now everybody's had to take the shoes off for

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. You go back to ninety nine and one captain,

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Mark James sits all of his bottom tiered guys till

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the end. They lose on Sunday, and every captain scared

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of doing what Mark James did. I don't think we

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>should look at the outlier situation as the thing to

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>lean into. I would like to see a modern captain go, hey, Bobby,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 2>no knock to you. You're a great player, You're one

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of the twelve best on the European side. You're playing

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday, and that's it.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Like, if you want to play more matches, play better golf,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll get you out there more.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think, I mean, this is this is what

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I would love an event on the speaking of like

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 3>loving of would love event. Remember when the NBA All

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Star Game did the public drafting of players, Jokisch was

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the last pick. Now he's the best player in the world.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's I mean, it's perfectly played better Like,

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 3>it would be so fun if they did one of

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 3>these events and then they had two captains pick the teams.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>That would be better than the President's Cup in its

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 3>current form.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean everything would be better in the President's Cup.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh so that's a shot. That's you know, that's a

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>shot against the internationals.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not an international thing.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just the event is is a Lesser Ryder Cup,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and it always has been.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>It always win it will be.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 2>What are your thoughts on one of my great Ryder

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Cup ideas that the captains should have to play in

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the last singles match against each other.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It would be so great.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 3>See who would you favorite? I mean the film Phil Luke,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the Luke Donald Zach would be would be? I think they.

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be a good matchup.

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying is I feel like if you

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>go through the captains over the years, it would it

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 2>would be a pretty good matchup. Like I would be

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>interested to see how it went. So I just think

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the last match should be the captains.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>That'd be so great.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>But then the captains are like grinding on their games.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Zach was playing the other day. He's playing in Rome. Like,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't think he's been grinding on this game. He's

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>probably played twenty five PJ torvents this year, right, You.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Think it's a big deal that Speith can't lay and

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Xander missed the little outing to real mean, I will.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Say it would it would be nice to have seen

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 2>the course before before getting there. I was texting with

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>somebody on the team about the course and he's like,

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the rough is it's not us open, Thick, it's like

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>your backyard, like letting your backyard get out of hand, Thick.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I just think it'd be nice to see the golf

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>course before you get there on Monday. The only caveat

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to that is they don't play till Friday, so plenty

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of time to obviously get practice in. But I mean,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it hurts seeing the golf course once

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 2>if you've never seen it before.

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think if you have other extern circumstances, it's

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 3>okay to miss it. Like rumors of you know, of

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 3>a bachelor party. I'm fine with that. But yeah, you know,

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>it's just all right, let's go. You got the first pick.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Who are you taking the first pick in the in

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the fake Ryder Cup draft? What's your team? What's your team?

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess you can be bake and I'll be egg.

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It makes a lot of sense. I'm going to make

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>this really simple. I was battling between your two year

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>tour players. I think you're going to take the other

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 2>one here with the second pick, which is fine, I'm

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 2>going Rory off the top. I think Rory is the

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 2>alpha in golf. I also think the last Ryder Cup

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>has probably been eating at him for two years. And

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>I think Rory is a guy that is going to

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 2>show up here with the mentality that I'm going to

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 2>go five and oh, four and one, three to one

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and one because he played poorly last time, and obviously

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>he's a guy that I think, when across the board,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>has probably played the most consistent golf in the world

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the last year year and a half or so. Also

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 2>gets to go hatless, which I think Rory really likes.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>We're talking probably like a two thousand dollars haircut from

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Rory headed into Ryder Cup week. So I'm taking Rory

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>off the top.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 3>That's I figured that was where you're going. And I'm

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm so pleased because I got my number one

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>pick number two and the reason I have Rom.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you're taking Rom here? Yes, unbelievable. Are we doing

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 1>snake by the way, or are you going now?

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>You get you get the next one? I'm not gonna

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna do that to you. Yeah, I'm gonna

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>give you then on this piece of paper Fantasy draft.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 3>So I've got I'm taking Ram because I think this

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is like the he hasn't been playing his best golf

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>is it's gonna be It's a month from when we

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 3>last saw him, right. I think he's gonna turn things around.

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 3>But the reason I'm picking him is that I think

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that this man hates losing more so than than he

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 3>likes winning. Like I think there's like, you know, that

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 3>deep down kind of fire. I've you saw it at

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Whistling Straights. He was just he was so into matches,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>he was so engaged. He was a great teammate. And

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I think I I take Ram just because he I

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>think the guy hates losing and he's obviously an elite player.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 3>I like players with no holes in the game. He

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 3>has no holes in his game like Rory. But I

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 3>think just the edge of like I think you get

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>on the golf course with that guy, that's a guy

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to play a match against. Like Rory.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 3>I think it was just he's too nice to be

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>completely honest to be my first pick. I mean, he's

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 3>but he's but he's he is he too nice in

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>this event, I think Rom would piss you off. You

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 3>do think that would bother you?

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that I think that Rory is too nice whatever.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and what is it, one hundred and one

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 2>week out of the year, out of the two years.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 2>It's just a one hundred and three weeks out of

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the two years, but the one week at the Ryder Cup.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 2>I do think Rory has a little bit of that

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to step on your throat mentality. Depending on

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>who he's playing. I think obviously certain guys will get

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 2>under his skin more than others. But uh yeah, I

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>mean I think Rom's a good pick. It's an interesting pick.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't played great the last what seven months?

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>About that?

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>You don't.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm bringing him on no holes in the game, and honestly,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>he's got a physical intimidation. Brendan talked about this with

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Brooks in the Masters.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't I don't buy this from you guys. I just

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>don't buy this.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 2>It's golf because don't have to tackle anybody.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I think there's something to it. There's just a physicality.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 3>There's going against a mountain, a mountain of a man,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and he's my number one pick. I'm all in. I'm

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>just pitching to him, like, I'm so happy that you

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>passed on him, because I got him. I got my guy.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Well I am surprised you passed on this guy.

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Just like the Bear. This is the Bears trading up

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to get Mitch. We got our guy.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, did you just did you just compare it

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 2>to Mitch? Just ch It's just a horrible situation for you.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the Bears just looked terrible in Week one.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, it was horrible the.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Other year another year looking forward to the draft.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That's awful.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like, what is that like eight months? That's what

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you're looking forward to. By the way, I have the

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Packers in a winds pool.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I was in and I.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Knew if they got through Week one, they've got a

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty good chance to win nine games. My second pick

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>is somebody I thought you were going to take off

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the top, somebody who has been playing the best golf

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of anybody in the world over the last two months.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And another European. I'm gonna take Victor Hovlin. I mean no,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not just simply form.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, my one in three players, I know who.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna take care because you're gonna take another hates

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>losing ever winning guy, which is fine, But I'm just

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 2>saying I have Rory and Victor and I think you

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>guys have discussed this on Shotgun a little bit. But

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>when you think about the twenty four players on the

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup right now and you look at the picks

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>we just took, there is an argument to be made

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>that the top three players of the twenty four are

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 2>in fact all Europeans.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 3>When was the last time they could say that? And

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it was unfathomable to say that after the after whistling stretch.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Was like fifteenth in the world.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was like, who, what's going to happen to

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 3>this European team? Is it even going to be competitive?

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Are they you know? Do they need to change the

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Like these were discussions and like now we go, you know,

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>two years and it's just it's always a great reminder

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of like how and we I talked about this on

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 3>the Shotguns start at the beginning of the year, is

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that like every year three to four guys fall out

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of the top ten in the world rankings, and you

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 3>never expect like it's like, oh, this guy's never going

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to be out of the top ten. You know, there's

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 3>no way Matt Fitzpatrick's going to fall out of the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 3>top ten after the last year. Now he's out of

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the top ten, right the with the with the Brider Cup,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 3>it was like, this is over for the Europeans and

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 3>now we're well there.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Was one spot Andy, like I thought after whistling it

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 2>was the Harris English spot was the floating one. I

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 2>thought there was literally going to be one spot that

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 2>might float in two years in what is it? Is

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 2>there four or five guys that aren't on the team

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>from that team DJ Bryson, Tony Harris. I mean, I

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>mean that's four off the top of my head. There

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>might be a fifth. It's like it's not the same team,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 3>And if you did it strictly off of like points,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>if because that was a really chalk points selection right,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 3>like there was no drama, like it would be even

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 3>more churned because you wouldn't have JT. You wouldn't, you know,

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 3>like it, So yeah, he'd be on right, he was

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 3>like eleventh in points.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mean that's like going back to like all

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>twelve getting pick but yeah, I mean, but like that,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>he's a question mark.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you something right now.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to spoil anything low on my list,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>just in case you're wondering, not high on my list

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 2>right now, but.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I got.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 3>All right. My next pick is Scotty. I'm taking Scotty Shuffler.

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 3>I had him third, I had him above Holand I

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>just think, I think, when it comes to match play,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>tee to green game is so so so important, Like

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 3>it is just it when you play a guy that

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 3>hits it really good, it is just relentless and you

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 3>just feel like you have no hope when when they're

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 3>just constantly ten feet away, and I think, like you

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 3>look at like Sergio is never the greatest putter, but

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 3>he's he's awful to play against because of how good

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of a ball striker he was, you know, or is

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 3>and was. And I think with Scotty Scheffler, we're gonna

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 3>see a similar thing where he's just he's so hard

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 3>to play you can roll him out in any format.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I know the putter is an issue, but the tee

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>to green game is such a weapon in both alternate

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 3>shot and and best ball. In a match play situation,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you know the guy's going to shoot a good score

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 3>because he's going to hit the ball better than probably

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 3>everybody on the golf course, with the exception of the

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>three guys that we just picked, are the really the

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>only ones in this in this group that can hit

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 3>it better than him. And like from that standpoint, like

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>especially an alternate shot, you can play this guy in

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 3>any format. He's going to excel in any format. So

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 3>I love I love Scheffler, and I that's my second pick.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So I totally agree with what you're saying about the

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 2>ball striking thing. And I think in match play, we

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, we think about Scotty's game this season, right,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, hit it great, obviously didn't put very well,

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and I mean it's been talked about a million times,

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 2>but there is a mental side of match play when

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>you're playing someone when Scotty's going first, no matter the format,

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 2>if it's foursomes or four ball, when they hit it close,

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>it makes you feel like you have got to hit

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it close and stroke play, that doesn't matter if he

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>it's at twenty five, if he hats at five feet

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's not a great hole location for your ball

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>striking or your the way you move the golf ball,

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't feel like you got a sling one in there.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>In match play you do, and so in that regard,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree with you on Scotty. I think Scotty

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 2>will put the most pressure on his opponents of anybody

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of the twenty four because he's going to flag so

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>many iron shots on par threes and approach shots into

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>par fours that it puts the pressure on you to

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>hit a great shot, not a good shot. And englf

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>with these professionals. A lot of the time they're looking

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 2>away from flag sticks, or they're playing a fat part

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to the green knowing that pars fine, I could make

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a twenty footer. You don't have that luxury when you're

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 2>playing Scotti Scheffler.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, I think it gets interesting here fifth pick.

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 3>This is where I think it goes into.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Like it to anybody who listen, you're gonna be You're

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna be surprised.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm going I'm going to newbie here. I'm going.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Going A fella that hadn't played on a Ryder Cup team,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 2>hadn't played on a President's Cup team before, really hasn't

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>been on many radars over the last few years.

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, no, it's a little down on

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>my list.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a guy that I think when whatever sports

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>book you bet on comes out with odds on you know,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>leading American point getter or leading point getter for the

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>whole event, this is the person I would suggest, do

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>you throw a little.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Bit of money on? I'm going Brian Harmon here.

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 2>With my third no no, oh, yes. I think this

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>golf course sets up great for his game. I think

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>match play sets up great for who he is as

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a person. I think he's gonna play with Kopka a

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of the week, and I just think that team

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>is gonna.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Be really, really hard to knock off the stoop.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I think Harmon is gonna have an unbelievable week, and

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I would not be pay surprise.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Hates to lose, factor, hates to lose.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I think three to oho to one, three

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to one to oh, something like that is in the

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 2>cards for Harmon here.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, all right, I you know, I don't know

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 3>you didn't see that. He was pretty pretty far down

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>my list. I think it was a little bit of

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a reach. I think you could have gotten in the

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>round eight eight.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I want you know what, I take the quarterback early

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>in fantasy. I'm not scared to take forty nine ers

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>defense a couple of rounds early. I wanted to have

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Harmon on my team. I think he's gonna have a

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>really really solid Ryder Cup. Are you you're not you're

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>out on him? You don't you don't love him?

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>All right? So real quick? Can I hear? Can I

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hear why you didn't? Why you don't love Harmon? Here?

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I just I think I'm looking at skill set. I

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 3>just think I got a lot of guys ahead of them.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I you know, and listen, I would have loved I

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 3>would have loved to snag Harmon, you know, is one

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 3>of my later picks, you know, and everything. I'm just

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 3>not going I'm not going number five with him. He's

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna be, He's gonna be, and that's fine. He's just

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 3>not a fit for my team. We're still looking at

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 3>at the players with superlative talent and uh and and

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>abilities here. So by watched the open?

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you watch the open?

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Right? All those guys that were in the field this week,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>they were at the Open, right?

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>They were there? Yeah?

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was they were I guess wasn't but yeah,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 3>that's right, lud Big wasn't at any of the majors.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>But I mean there is something to be said. I

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have I wouldn't have believed this if you told

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>me this at the beginning of the year that the

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Brian Harmon was gonna run away with a major. There's

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna be one player that ran away with a major

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three, and it was Brian Harmon that

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 3>nobody else had a shot on Sunday.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Really unbelievable.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 3>All right. Now, for a quick word for our sponsor, Gooder.

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Gooder makes some just awesome twenty five dollars active sunglasses.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>These things don't slip, they don't bounce, they're one hundred

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 3>percent polarized, and they have a wide range of styles.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 3>These look good and uh, they don't cost you a fortune,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 3>so you can you know, they can be active sunglasses.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to worry about it. You can take

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 3>them on runs, don't have to worry about them falling

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>off and you you know, losing your hundreds of dollars

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>pair of sunglasses. Like I said, they're lightweight and comfortable,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>they're one hundred percent polarized. They have a one year warranty.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 3>They have thirty day free returns and one hundred percent

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>satisfaction guaranteed. Uh. They are really They've changed the way

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I think about sunglasses and they've been a partner of

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>ours for some time. So that's Gooder g oo d

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 3>R dot com. And if you use Gooder dot com

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>slash TFE you will get free shipping. So not not

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 3>nothing Gooder dot com slash tfy you get free shipping.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a really good customer experience on that website.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>You can kind of like see how these how the

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>different styles would fit on your head. And they're twenty

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 3>five dollars sunglasses. They are They're great for you know,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 3>running around. I've got a toddler now that you know,

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 3>pulls sunglasses off my face and it's it's a nice

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 3>when it's a twenty five dollars pair and not a

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 3>super fancy uh set of sunglasses. So that's Gooder dot

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 3>com slash TFE for free shipping. Thank you, And now

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>back to Shane Bacon. All right, my next uh, my

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 3>next pick is uh, I'm going with Xander Shaffle.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I mean it's listen in the at this event.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a good pick. I had them high,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I had them really high.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I uh, I just I again, no holes in his game.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that. But when you just are are extremely

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>skilled in every facet of the game, it really shows

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 3>off in match play where you know there are a

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of high leverage moments and you don't want to

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 3>have weaknesses. And that's Xander Schafflee so.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 2>On that in that same vein my next pick is

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of a similar player, I think to Xander. I

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>think when you look at the PGA tool right now,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>these guys are relatively comparable. Obviously, Morikawa has done more

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of winning the big events, but I'm gonna

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>take Mori Kawa here for two reasons. One, I just

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 2>think Marikawa a lot. It's Morikawa to me is very

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 2>similar to what you said about Scotti Schefler.

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit it close a lot.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Like bottom line is, he's gonna be a great player

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in match play.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit the ball close.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna have a lot of birdie putts if you're

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 2>playing obviously four ball, and your partner is gonna have

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of birdie putts if you're playing foursomes.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And I also just like the pairing.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Marikawa is gonna play with it sounds like

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be more Kwa Homa, And I just feel

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 2>like those guys are gonna be the new age kind

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of Xander can't lay and I feel like they're gonna

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 2>have a great week. And obviously we saw what Max

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 2>was able to do at the President's Cup. And this

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is no knock to Billy Horschel, but if you think

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 2>about Max in the way he played at the President's Cup,

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 2>he's basically trading, you know, Billy Horschel for Colin more Kala.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 2>So I just feel like those two are gonna have

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 2>a really, really, really successful week together.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the thing with Mark Kala, the one thing

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 3>you didn't hit on that I love about him, especially

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>in this golf court. He's uber accurate off the tee too,

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 3>So you get a guy that's in play a lot.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 3>And then also if you're if those guys are hitting

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 3>behind players, like if markw is hitting the pro shot first,

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that's that's hard to play against. That's the guy that puts.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 3>As you said, like Skotti Scheffler, it's not only par threes,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's also like par four's if he's hitting a

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 3>pro shots first. That's a really hard thing mentally to

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 3>play matches against. Because this is a different, completely different

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 3>mental test. People could say, oh, you should play the

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 3>same way as stroke play. It's impossible to play the

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 3>same play as stroke play in max play. And you can,

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 3>but you can't aim away when a guy hits it

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to three feet like you just can't. You know, there's

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 3>it's not like play to the fat side of the green.

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>You have to take on shots in different moments because

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you can't just lose holes when you have chances to

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 3>win hole, you know, to match them.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And and and Andy, that to one point you made there,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>especially in foursomes, is Max is going to be hitting

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 2>those approach shots. And you know Max is one of

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 2>the best iron players in the world, so you're going

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to be hitting first, and you're leaning on Max Homa

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 2>to hit an iron close. So there's a real good opportunity. Now, Andy,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you just right here it for should if you took Xander.

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I can't believe. I can't believe I got

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 3>both of them. I can't believe I got my guys.

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 3>All right, here we go write it down again. It's

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 3>just the all around talent. Right, Malleable can play any

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 3>format and I got Xander and can't they're there. I'm

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 3>rolling them out there as much as they can play.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Think it's it's gonna be just like a physical aspect, Right,

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 3>can can they handle? Can can people handle walking this

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 3>golf course?

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that a good idea?

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they sit once, but I love I love both

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.879
<v Speaker 3>of their games for alternate shot and and best ball

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>And if it were doing this make believe draft format,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Like these are two guys that, like they're games, you

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 3>don't need to pair them with anybody, like they're they

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 3>could play with anybody. And I think this is like

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the thing that we get hung up too much on

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 3>these like pairings. It's like certain guys are going to

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>work with whoever you play and pair them with, Like

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 3>we saw this with Sergio. How many different partners did

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 3>Sergia have over the years. It wasn't like that one

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 3>pairing was just gold. It's just certain players, certain skill

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 3>sets are so greatly rewarded. And I think these two

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 3>guys just being great all round players make them great

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>match play players because there's just a level of consistency,

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 3>consistency is Key and King and I love that I

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>got Xander and can't you know you you you.

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Touch on something I've been really thinking about with these

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup teams because the twenty four players you said

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>you can you said players can play with anybody?

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this the most players can play with anybody Ryder

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Cup ever? And you think about the twenty four players,

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 2>like who's an a hole?

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Who's a jerk? Like?

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Who were guys not wanting to play with? Like I

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>feel like the list is slim, if at all. It

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 2>feels like all of these guys could play with whomever

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>they get thrown out there with with their captains and

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll be fine with it.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, of the big names, I think the toughest

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 3>person to play with would be Brooks.

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, but I mean it's see but I feel like

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Brooks in this format is so good at match play

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's also such a big I want to I

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 2>don't want to lose. I want, you know, more than

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to win that I feel like with this team,

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 2>like no Bryson, you know, you don't have to worry

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 2>about whatever the hell was ever going on with Brooks

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and DJ like Ricky, He'll play with Wyndham will play

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 2>with JT will play with, Jordan will play with. Like

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 2>going down the list of the Americans, there's not really

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>that combat of other partner that you wouldn't feel comfortable

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>throwing Brooks out with.

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, who would you least want to play with

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 3>as your partner.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean that would probably be talent question more than

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>personality I talk to anybody, I mean it'd probably be

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 2>who we're gonna take twenty third and twenty fourth when

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 2>we get there?

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, all right, who who's your next pick?

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>All right? So fifth pick? I'm gonna kind of follow

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>your lead here.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 2>You went Xander Cantley, kind of leaning on a Perry,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>and you think you're gonna see a lot in Rome.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do the same with more Kala. I'm gonna

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>take Max Homa here.

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I just think I knew you were taking Max early.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I knew I didn't have to worry about taking Max.

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna listen, listen.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 2>It's just I think they're gonna be on the first

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 2>tea a lot together, and I think they're gonna be successful,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think they're gonna be probably the most successful

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 2>American team. If it's not Xander Cantley or Brooks and

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Brian and so, I mean Max played so good at

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>the President's Cup. I just think he's gets so up

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>for this thing, and for whatever reason, when he gets

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>up for these events, he seems to play his best.

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 2>You think about how he's played a rib last couple

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 2>of years. I just feel like, I feel like it's

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna be another Homer show, you know.

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So we talked about how the top three picks were

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 3>all Europeans and how amazing that was. But now you

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 3>see how the how these things are different, right like

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>where the middle like it's just us US US US.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Straight amer Us.

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's it's a that's a fascinating aspect of

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 3>this whole competition. We talked about Max a lot with

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 3>more kala. The next pick I'm taking is Tommy Fleetwood CA.

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>No almost reached there, been.

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Playing been playing great golf. Is uh has had some

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 3>really good Ryder Cup moments and just is a tee

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to green nightmare to deal with again, a guy that

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 3>just hits the ball close a lot. The Butter Butterson issue.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 3>But it's you know, I guess statistically he profiled his

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 3>like the second or third best putter on the European team,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 3>which I don't know if that's a good sign for

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the Europeans, but the uh, you know, not everyday Sunday.

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And I like Tobby Fleetwood. I love I love him

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 3>for just match play purposes because of that t degreen excellence.

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm quite thrilled. I'm so I love my team

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:22.399
<v Speaker 3>so far.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was that one hurts. That's that's my dad.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Drafted somebody that I really wanted the other day in

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy draft to pick before me. And nothing gets

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 2>you more in fantasy than when you get that pick

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 2>taken right ahead of you. That's the one for me.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I had Fleetwood on my list. I thought I could

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>take him around five and six. I should have just

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 2>take him at five. I'm such an idiot.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't gonna take Homa. You know, I knew, I

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 3>knew you were taking him. He's off by board. I

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 3>just put him down at the bottom because I'm not

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna reach for Homa because.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 2>I think I got I think I got duped there.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I think you chessed me and I was playing checkers there.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Damn it all right, I'll settle for you know the

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 2>guy that's one of the most majors of anybody this era.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Kopka here at six.

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, all right, I'm a little worried about Brooks.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I well, I agree with you, but I'm I'm taking

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 2>them in terms. I'm taking them in the sense that

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 2>he'll show up and play good golf. But obviously, I mean,

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 2>he's a question.

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't played. He hasn't played golf.

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's the thing is he's a he's a very

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>big question mark.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't played golf, and he's got a kid, a

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 3>new kid. I just don't think, man, I know, I

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think head of an exhibition that he has, like,

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine he has a lot to gain from

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 3>this play. He's the only guy playing here from Blip, right,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't know. Any time you second guest Kopka,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 3>he always comes out big. But for me, I'm just

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 3>worried about Brooks in terms of like, I think he's

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 3>gonna be really rusty. I don't think he really I

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 3>think he doesn't care that much about this. It's not

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>a major. Probably just doesn't care that much. And I

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 3>worry about about his his just motivation levels.

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 2>The hair is is is out of control, like between

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 2>him and burns. I mean, this is like almost show

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 2>shoulder linked levels hair.

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen it?

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, he looks like it. He looks like a

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 3>new dad.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that's a great way to put it. He looks dad.

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 3>He looks like a little burly.

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 2>He's They've ordered a lot of uber eats. Yeah, it's

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 2>probably not been the healthiest us I'm saying. I just

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I've done it. You've done it, like we've all done it.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just those first few months are really hard. And

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he has had any but I think

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 3>he's just probably been around. He's just been hanging around,

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 3>like I saw it with like it's you know, you

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 3>just want to be around when you have a kid,

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 3>if you're starting. I think, like in just reading the

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 3>tea leaves and reading like hearing his comments to certain

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember where I heard him just about like

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 3>having the kid. It seems like he wants to be

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a very involved parent.

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean still, I will say this, I'm leaning more

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 2>on the talent and less on the lack of golf

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 2>as of late, and I just feel like going back

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to the team mean and pairing. I think Harmon and

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Kep are gonna play together, and I think that is

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 2>a sick, sick group to throw out there. If you're

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 2>ZJ Well, I'm.

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Happy I get my my partner for Fleetwood. I got

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Jordan's Speith, just a guy. I'm taking him. Uh with

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 3>your partner with Fleetwood. Yeah, I'm gonna pair him up.

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 3>That's what I see him. I like. I like the

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 3>match of of of Speith with Fleetwood, and uh that

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I that's my next pick. I'm taking Jordan's Speith and

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna pair up with Tommy Fleetwood for my team.

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see what you're saying, because this is not

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 2>European specific, so you're you're throwing Fleetwood in Speet out there.

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah all right.

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 2>So it's like it's like Jesus and then like the

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Golden Child or playing together exactly.

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like, you know, you get got a guy that's

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, a little bit of a wild card with

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 3>a with a real steady guy and uh or maybe

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I maybe I pare him up with Scotty or Scotty

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 3>or Ram, you know who knows. But I'm taking speak

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 3>with my next pick, and I'm pretty happy to get

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 3>him here. I think like just in terms of like

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy that can annoy people in match play.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just like, wait, how am I losing this guy

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 3>type type situation?

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Hey?

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you a real team question for you?

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking about this lately and I haven't really

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 2>chatted with anybody about it. Let's say Jordan and Justin

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 2>go out, and let's say Justin doesn't play well on Friday, Okay,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Like they go out both sessions and JT just doesn't

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 2>have it like you hadn't had it for a year

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and a half. If Zach was gonna split the team up,

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's say Jordan was playing well. Who is the most

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 2>likely new partner to Jordan on the American side?

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Scotti, It's kind of what I was thinking too.

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I was going to I wouldn't want I like, I'll

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 3>tell you this much like if I was the Europeans,

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd be a lot more scared of Scotty Scotti, Speith.

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the whole. I kind of touched

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 3>on this earlier. I think this whole like we have

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to pair, we have to play these guys with Xander

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and Cantley. I think Xander with anybody and can't lay

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 3>with anybody. You could maybe make an argument there better

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 3>if you split them up, because you get two really

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>really strong players. Right with With regards to Spith, I

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.839
<v Speaker 3>think he's such a unique player in the sense of

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 3>like he can swing momentum, you know, like he and

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 3>he hits. You know, he's he's been a really good

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 3>t degree in this year. But like he's just got

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a little bit of an it factor

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 3>where he can do some like some stuff, right, And

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 3>if you pair like it doesn't mean he fits well

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 3>with like anybody. Right, It's like saying like, hey, you

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 3>know we can't have Steph Curry, We've got we've got

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 3>this other guard. Yeah, Like it's certain players work with anybody,

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and we shouldn't get so locked into this is the

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 3>pairing we have to to do, right, Like Speith was

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.479
<v Speaker 3>great with Patrick Red. Everybody's like, oh, you can't break

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 3>up Speith and Reid. Oh you can't break up j

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 3>T and Speth. Like I think Speed is going to

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.479
<v Speaker 3>be really well or do what really well with any

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 3>type of player you put them with.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>So just for people at home counting, there are four

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Americans left, there are eight by my count Europeans.

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Left this wild's that's the the fascinating thing about way

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 3>these teams stack out. And and to thank God that

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the Europeans had such a surge this year, because if

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 3>this was a couple of years ago, after that that

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the Whistling Straits, I think we would have gotten too,

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Like I mean, Rory probably would have gone with like

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.760
<v Speaker 3>pick five and Hi, yeah that's it, and that, yeah,

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 3>top five, both those guys' top five picks, and then

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing nothing for you know, Hovland wasn't hovelin now.

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Andy.

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>So in both of my fantasy drafts this year, I

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 2>took Jonathan Taylor. Okay, I took Jonathan Taylor on potential.

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 2>We know who he is, we know how he can play.

0:46:57.960 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 2>We know that if he gets traded to a team

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>that needs to have somebody in the backfield that makes plays,

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna make plays and he's gonna be a very

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 2>very high rated running back in fantasy football. My seventh pick,

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 2>my seventh pick, is similar to that.

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It is not justin Thomas. I'm not going that way,

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:17.399
<v Speaker 1>uh huh. I'm going with.

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 2>A young player that is a generational driver the golf ball.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>It's it as far as anybody and hits it very

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 2>very straight. If the game is dialed in Rome, I

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 2>think he could have a great week. Now, I think

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you could also go with three and zero, like there's

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a there's a possibility of that being the case as well.

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Ludgig here with my seventh pick. I like Ludwig.

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 2>You know again, I don't know what we're going to

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 2>see out of him, but if he's Ludgig to a

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 2>certain degree, if he's B plus Ludwig, I think it's

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be.

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>A good week for Ludgig.

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean he's gonna be able to apply a lot

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 3>of pressure with the driver total. I think like you

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 3>have like your all round players in people in skill sets, right,

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 3>like he has a dominant skill and I like to

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 3>actually think about match play with golf similar to the

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>way tennis is. Right, you have your all round players,

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 3>you have your your your power players with the big

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 3>serves like I think Shelton Ben Shelton would fit into

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 3>that power player mold, like what we say.

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Almost a throwback from Sampress used to serve and volley, right.

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 3>And then you have like Medmdev who's just like a control,

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 3>like it just gets everything back right again. That's like

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.919
<v Speaker 3>you're kind of like your Tommy Fleetwood right where he's

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 3>just gonna be in play and he's gonna hit some

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 3>really good shots and he's just gonna be annoying, right.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think with Ludwig he's just this dominant skill.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 3>He can overwhelm somebody, especially at this golf course with

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 3>the with the setup, there's gonna be a few driveable

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 3>part fours, and and that that's just the driver such

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 3>a weapon. Anytime you can get somebody who might be

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the best in the field at a certain trait, it's

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a good thing.

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Andy.

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Could we see Ludwig and Rory play four ball together?

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's a possibility of that?

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know, though you might want to split

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 3>them up in four ball.

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah.

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I just I just think more in terms of, like you,

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 2>you and I've both talked about in match play, that

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the sensations you can feel as an opponent. And if

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't, I don't know a ton about Marcos Simoni,

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 2>but I mean I've watched the no Laying up video.

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean seems like there's gonna be drivable par four's

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 2>on this golf course set up to maybe play into

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 2>the hands of the Europeans. I just feel like if

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 2>you if you throw those guys out there, it could

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 2>be a Phil Tiger situation.

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>If it goes bad, it could go very bad, but

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 2>you could have a lot of looks for eagle and

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 2>chipping and hitting you know, mid to short irons into

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 2>par five's.

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 3>What was the match at Hazel team was it DJ

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 3>and Brooks and and then Thomas Peters and Rory It

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 3>was just all.

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's when Peters had Peters was a rookie and

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>won like four points.

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, yeah, I think that, and it was like

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.920
<v Speaker 3>everybody in the everybody in it was just just just

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 3>beat it. Yeah yeah.

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Well this this is my question too. A lot of

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the time with these things, right, because the teams and

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the captains are so involved, I wonder if the entertainment

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>aspect of this gets thought about in team rooms, right,

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.879
<v Speaker 2>because it is an entertaining product, right, You're trying to

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 2>have people watch it and care about it and get

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 2>involved and turn the TVs on and on the entertaining side,

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 2>that would get golf people geeked out, that would get

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 2>sports people interested. But like you said, is it the

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 2>best use of two of your power players.

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because you can split them up and then you

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 3>get looks on both of them, and you can split

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 3>split up one of them and put them with the

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 3>guy I'm about to take.

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I know who this is. I know who it is.

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 3>FITZI wow. Guy that's never won.

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Never never want a point. I never want a half point.

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>A Ryder Cup.

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 3>That's not hurted any semblance of a point two.

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cups has never won a half point.

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 3>He's never he's gotten a chip on his shoulder, and

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 3>he's a new player. He's got some powerful I think

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 3>he just got engaged. I think I saw on Instagram.

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 3>You know he's a new man. It's a completely new

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 3>fits and I'm taking fits again. I'm just harping on this.

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I want all around skill. You can do everything. He's

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 3>long now. I like fits here.

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty third on my list. Case you're wondering second to

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>last on my list.

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 3>That's fine, that's fine. I love it. This is all

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the batters. I don't need to justify this to anybody else.

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 3>All the fans of the Egg team just know we

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 3>got our guy.

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I just want to lay this out.

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 2>There are five picks left on both teams, and this

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.839
<v Speaker 2>is where it gets hard. This to me, yeah, for me,

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>really tough. This is like when you turn the fantasy

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 2>on auto draft because you're like, it doesn't really matter.

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably not gonna play these guys outside of Bie

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Weeks anyway, but I'm just gonna lean into a dude that,

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you know history has been a great putter and seems

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 2>like he's good in match play and seems like a

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 2>guy that gets along with everybody and everybody likes playing with.

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take.

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Ricky here with my eighth I'm gonna take Ricky Fowler.

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 2>I will never forget the match. I'll never forget it.

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 2>I'll never forget Eduardo just four down with four to go,

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 2>had to win all four and he did it. That

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 2>was those That was the worst outfit Ryder Cup ever,

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 2>which is saying something on the American side. I was

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 2>watching that one the other day. Oh a shout out

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to the Ryder Cup YouTube page. By the way, Andy,

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 2>if you watch those, I don't know if they've cut

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:35.240
<v Speaker 2>audio on the matches, but they have these like fifty

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>minute YouTube videos of old Ryder Cup matches that are great,

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 2>and the audio, like if you go watch the old

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 2>film matches, he is chirping so much and fit in

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Phil's you know manner. It is unbelievable missing putts and

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you hear Phil go, well, that's too bad, you know,

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's too bad. It's like, I don't know if

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 2>they've if they've pumped up, like the natural audio and

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 2>those matches on YouTube, but they are a great watch

0:52:58.480 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 2>at night if the kids go to bed.

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, I've got something that I'm gonna be diving

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 3>into the next couple of weeks. Thank you for that record.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 2>By the way, a lot of Americans on my team,

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 2>A lot of Americans on my squad.

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, I got I got Ricky.

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 3>With my I've got I got another American. I thought

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought you were going to take this guy. I

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 3>was really I was really no, I I thought you

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 3>were going to take him. When you were describing the

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 3>last player, I think he's going to have a chip

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 3>on his shoulder. People are talking about, Hey, this guy

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be on the team. He got snubbed in his

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 3>amateur days. I'm taking Sam Burns and I think he's

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 3>just got a little bit of red ass to him.

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 3>And I just don't you know, I think it's a

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 3>hate to lose guy with some with a lot of talent,

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think he's just got something to prove. And

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.279
<v Speaker 3>I and I I think people are sleeping on how

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.720
<v Speaker 3>talented he is. Like I, you know, of all the people,

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's fair should have been left off, Like I

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think he should have been one of the people

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:58.919
<v Speaker 3>left off. So I've got I've got the Sam Burns.

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I, I mean I I agree with

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 2>everything you said about Sam Burns. He was probably gonna

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 2>be my next pick, so a little bummed you took him,

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 2>But I'm with you in it. And it seems like

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna play with Scotty, which now you have that

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 2>on your team as well, which is nice. Uh So

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 2>that'll be a good pairing for ant for the team.

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Team agg grouping to go out. Uh I listen, two

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Americans left, It's Wyndham Clark and JT. And I'm not

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 2>taking either of them. So I gotta go European here.

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 2>It's it's not great. It's not great.

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought I thought you were gonna take JT in here.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I'm not gonna do zone.

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 2>This is JT zone for you. I'm gonna go Shane

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Lowry here. I'm just gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna take

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 2>a vat that. You know he probably plays a session

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 2>with Rory here there. I've got both of those guys

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 2>on my team. Throw them out there, let's see what

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 2>they can do. We know when Shane Lowry gets going

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and gets playing well, he can rock and roll. But

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean I again, I think we're to

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the point now where I mean, you know, I'm taking

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 2>him over oyguard right, all right.

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I got Wyndam Clark, I'm taking Wait.

0:55:04.239 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 2>A minute, Wait a minute, where you you said you're

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 2>taking JT.

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 3>No, I was getting to the JT zone. I'm in

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the I'm in the range. But I got Wyndham Clark

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 3>ahead of him. Obviously elite, elite driver of the golf ball.

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he he can keep up with anybody. You

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 3>know what you said about Ludwig. I think Wyndham Clark's

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 3>in that, in that group that could be the best

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.360
<v Speaker 3>driver of the golf ball in a given week. Also,

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 3>as we saw at at the US Open, extraordinarily good putter.

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So I like Wyndham Clark, I think he's, like, you know,

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously kind of forced the American's hand. Who knows if

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 3>he's on here, if he finishes second in the US Open,

0:55:44.640 --> 0:55:48.879
<v Speaker 3>probably isn't on this team, but probably, Like I think

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 3>he's probably this year proven to be one of the

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:55.880
<v Speaker 3>twelve best American golfers this year. So without a doubt,

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 3>I I just think he's he's I think he's another guy.

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:01.319
<v Speaker 3>He's a rookie, he's got stuff to prove. He wants

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 3>to probably play a lot of these and I think

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 3>he could well.

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's again to your point on the on

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the season of Clark and being a top twelve American,

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna hear Wyndham Clark US Open champion a million

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 2>times when you watch golf over the next two or

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 2>three years. You know, broadcasters always like to lean on

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 2>like their highest accomplishment. I mean, he won the Wells

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Fargo this year too. I mean it's a it was

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 2>an elevated event. Now I think it's a signature event,

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 2>but it was an elevated event at the time. Like

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 2>that's a big win, you know, I mean, you win

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 2>that event and you win the US Open, like, that's very,

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 2>very impressive to do in a full season when you

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 2>have never been in that position before. So probably a

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 2>little low on the list to be fair, Here we go,

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:42.800
<v Speaker 2>here it is, I'm doing it. I mean, if he's

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 2>if he's justin Thomas Ryder Cup, justin Thomas, this is

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:48.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna make us look stupid that he was third to

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 2>last pick. He's been third to last pick. Right for me,

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 2>it is okay, yeah, this is this is my tenth pick.

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he he's been incredible in Ryder Cups and

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:03.479
<v Speaker 2>team events in general, incredible. And if he can find

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 2>the form like we've seen with Sergio and like we've

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 2>seen with Poulter over the years, not counting whistling straights

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 2>with Poulter, if he can find whatever works for him

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 2>in match play, we're going to talk about JT, you know,

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 2>obviously deserving the pick, and all that stuff comes Sunday

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 2>night and uh you know, I mean, now, now, now

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 2>you got to throw speed with Fleetwood, and I get

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 2>JT to maybe throw out there with Max one session

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 2>or blood big one session.

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You never know.

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it's it's funny, like I think I've presented

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of cases against picking JT just from like

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 3>just purely like what should the Ryder Cup be? Should

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:43.160
<v Speaker 3>it be like an All NBA since there's big financial benefits, right,

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, the All NBA team in the NBA, like

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:48.760
<v Speaker 3>you get these contract bonuses, and it's similar in golf,

0:57:48.800 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 3>like these guys get so like that's kind of been

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 3>my premise of like don't pick JT. Right is because

0:57:55.760 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 3>this is a historical moment and an honor for players, right,

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 3>and he did not do what he needed to do

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 3>to deserve a pick. Now, when I did this exercise,

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I found it's like, this is why you pick JT

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:16.640
<v Speaker 3>because of American players. I had him ahead of Max Homer,

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Ricky Fowler, and Brian Harmon. He was the sixteenth. He

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 3>was sixteenth on my list and probably could have easily

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:29.439
<v Speaker 3>been gotten up to like fourteen from like probably Sam

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Burns down, which was Sam Burns was twelfth down I

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 3>had It was kind of just a I don't know,

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess this guy here type thing. So like when

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you think about it from that prism, JT was a

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 3>no brainer. Now, I think the thing that you have

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 3>to grapple with with with the Ryder Cup is like

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like Hall of Fame criteria type stuff. Totally, totally,

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 3>And and Keegan who earned points like got got pulled

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 3>on that, like he didn't get like if he's a

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cupper ten years apart, ten plus years apart, that's

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 3>like a crazy career statistic that shows longevity and excellence

0:59:06.960 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 3>in the game. So this is the case for JT

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 3>is that he, without a doubt, wasn't going to be

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 3>the last pick.

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>In this Yep.

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a great point. And I mean he was last

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 2>American taken for US. But you had Americans below him

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 2>on your list, huh and we have.

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Would you have picked him ahead of Wyndham Clark?

0:59:26.120 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I had. I had Clark low on my list.

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, just just simply because of the To me, there's

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 2>unknown and then there's unknown unknown, and I just feel

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 2>like with Windham, it's a lot of unknown and it'll

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 2>be what you know, four months since the US opened.

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it'll just be interested to see what he

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 2>can do. We have five picks left. We have five

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Europeans on the board, by.

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 3>The way, that's the thing this is I you know,

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about reaching to get one of my guys,

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 3>but I'm gonna take Hatton here. Wow, he had a

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:55.600
<v Speaker 3>great year. He was like, really really good this year.

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Somebody that might get under people's skin, and he might

1:00:00.880 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 3>get his under The problem is he might get looking

1:00:07.560 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 3>at my team. I have no clue. I might put

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:11.840
<v Speaker 3>him out with there with speed. Just see what happens.

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You might go ninety nine James and just not play

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>until singles. The problem with Hatton is to me, is

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the self deprecation works in stroke play events

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>because you're only shit talking yourself.

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, how need to bring your teammate down.

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying.

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the problem is when you're acting the way

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Hatton acts on the golf.

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I love Tyrol Hatton.

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I got asked the other day in an interview, who's

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>my favorite golfer in the world to watch. I said,

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Tyrol Hadden because you never know what you're gonna get,

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and he's a lovely guy.

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I've interviewed him. I love Tyrol Hadden.

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>But as a partner on the golf course, and you

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>played a lot of competitive golf in your years, who's

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the worst partner to have. It's the negative partner. It's

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the guy that gets down and gets down on the

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>dumps and gets down on his own game. That partner

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>is hard to play with because in it inevitably creeps

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>into what you're doing right totally. So I just think

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 2>he's a hard guy. I think to throw out there

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>with someone that's real positive, you know.

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe maybe we'll find a partner later in this.

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Man, this is uh, this is it. Here we are

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Hoy Guard Rose, your voice, Step and Bobby Mack. Final

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>four on the board. So do you go veteran or

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>do you go young player? Do you go unknown or

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>do you go somebody that's done it in their life.

1:01:35.360 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna lean and I don't love lean and veteran

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and Ryder cups. I think it's overrated. I'm gonna go

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Justin Rose here.

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank God. I'm just so happy that I got Step,

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I got the guy.

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You got Step. Here we go. I'm so worried you're.

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Gonna say, Hm, I gonna pass on Hattan and got

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>my guy. I don't think we really need to talk

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>about just us.

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. We'll see what he does. He might play

1:01:57.080 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Rory. Who knows.

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've done well in Ryder cups. He's done

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>bad and Ryder cuffs who that knows.

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>The septic tank sepstraca. He really showed me something at

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the UH at the Open. I thought that was just

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>an illuminating performance. I'm ready for him to be that

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 3>is the player that nobody saw coming.

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>He's the He's he's your I mean, what is the

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:21.919
<v Speaker 2>last one would have been?

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Who was last time?

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Can't Ley and Xander Destin Johnson going five and oh

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Scheffler Cheffler Scheffler physically physically imposing presents.

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>God, you're going back to this again. Step is physically Listen. Listen.

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:41.439
<v Speaker 3>We've got a physically imposing team. We've got rom We've

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>got uh Tony, Tommy Fleetwood's caddy. We got Seth Scott

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>real quick.

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You have Xander Can't lay Spieth, Fitzpatrick Manhattan on your team.

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>He got something. We got some big guys up front.

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>We can roll out some imposing player.

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if you want to throw your team at my

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>team in like a five on five pickup game, I'd

1:03:05.320 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>play it. If you want to do like flag football,

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd feel comfortable with my squad as well, even wrestling.

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think my team would be Okay.

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>You got Ricky and Harman.

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I.

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Mean you gotta Rugby has the guys that run the ball.

1:03:17.880 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, you gotta have blockers in the front.

1:03:19.440 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, here you going next two picks left. I

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>know you're gonna saddle it.

1:03:26.280 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I know I gotta do it. I mean, this is

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so unknown. I'll take away guard.

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>All right. That leaves with the last guy on my board. Hey,

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>can I ask you a question real quick going back

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to my last pick? Yeah, if I ask you, you

1:03:39.400 --> 1:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you literally cover golf on a week tweek basis. You

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>do three podcasts a week about topical golf and literally

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 3>tournament golf. Nobody on the world I would trust more

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>than maybe you, poor Raff like wrap a port or

1:03:55.400 --> 1:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, to share somebody like that or Doug Ferguson

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that like literally covers the sport on a week to

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>week basis. Can you tell me one great tournament Justin

1:04:03.760 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>ros has had this year? He've won Pebble?

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, well, there you go.

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I just was wondering if you could, if you could

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>ring one big event that was in February.

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you know what he's been doing too. He's

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:18.840
<v Speaker 3>been having these like fluky major rounds, I feel like

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>for a few years and it like it all the

1:04:22.640 --> 1:04:26.600
<v Speaker 3>tip of the iceberg of this was pebble, where like

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>it was like he was third place and he was

1:04:28.760 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 3>negative strokes game Teita Green right, he was just like putting.

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 3>It was like everybody's like, this is either gonna fall

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>apart or maybe you'll like hit it well for once,

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>and it fell apart. And since then it's like we've

1:04:40.000 --> 1:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>been going down underground where it's like one round he played,

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, Justin Roch shot sixty five, Like how

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>did he do that? It's oh, he made like three

1:04:49.560 --> 1:04:53.959
<v Speaker 3>hundred feet of putts, you know, and like that's where

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>we've gotten with Justin Rose. I don't know. I thought

1:04:57.400 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>you were gonna ask me a ho Guard question, which

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>was I was gonna be way less prepared.

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>For for people that aren't watching this or if this

1:05:04.120 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>is even on YouTube. Andy was frantically googling when I

1:05:06.960 --> 1:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>started that question, and I was thinking he was going

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to go to the Rose page. He was obviously going

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to the Holy Guard page.

1:05:12.760 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I was. I was like, I was like, I know

1:05:16.760 --> 1:05:20.680
<v Speaker 3>he's won a couple of things, but Nikolai Hoguard is

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a complete unknown.

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>How many how many matches does he play? Does he play? Two?

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think two. I'm I'm way more worried about

1:05:29.760 --> 1:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Justin Rose and Bobby Mack than Hoguard same.

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you on that.

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just the Rose thing is a bit of like,

1:05:37.240 --> 1:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously he knows what he's he knows how to do this.

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>If he can somehow conjure up that again, maybe he

1:05:43.160 --> 1:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>has a good week. I don't expect him to have

1:05:44.800 --> 1:05:46.439
<v Speaker 2>a good week. There's a reason he was my second

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to last pick. There's a reason you take kickers in

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>the second to last round, right, I mean you gotta

1:05:51.400 --> 1:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have somebody on your team to play that position.

1:05:53.600 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>But you had. We had to pick without those two guys,

1:05:56.680 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>so they would you most.

1:05:57.760 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Want to see on the American side play Rose and Sae, Like,

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>who do you think would be.

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The most entertaining?

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question.

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think mine what what? I don't think? I think?

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I think you to worry about about Kepka being complacent

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:16.840
<v Speaker 3>like he's not, he's not getting up for the match,

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and then Rose sneaks someone out like I think you

1:06:20.080 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>got to put Ka against like rom like it just

1:06:23.000 --> 1:06:25.920
<v Speaker 3>have a it was uh. I was listening to Rory

1:06:25.960 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Subpar Pod. Yeah, they the Subpar Guy's Colt

1:06:29.960 --> 1:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and Drew Stultz were talking about how they want the

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cup to be, like the captains get a pick

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 3>like based off of the other ones versus the blind

1:06:38.600 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>the blind card. Where do you fall on that? So

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>like President's Cup style where they go one after another?

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean absolutely, I mean way more fun that way.

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate that.

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the blind cards the way to go.

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Wait, wait, so you're saying the other way way.

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I like their strategy that you're trying to think about,

1:06:56.680 --> 1:07:00.120
<v Speaker 3>like where where people are going to slot players and

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you don't know. I like that. I like everybody doing

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>it that way.

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do.

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>We do a golf event in January every year, me

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>and my fifteen idiot buddies, and we do the President's

1:07:10.080 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Cup way where you know, a team is presented and

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>then you get to counter that team.

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of fun. It is better for TV that way.

1:07:17.440 --> 1:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's better for like internal strategy, trying to

1:07:21.040 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>figure out what the other person's thinking and trying to

1:07:24.360 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>roll out your strategy the other person trying to counter.

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't know.

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Andy, let me just say the only defense I'll give

1:07:30.600 --> 1:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you on this point is this all I think about

1:07:34.120 --> 1:07:35.840
<v Speaker 2>on a day to day and week to week basis

1:07:36.280 --> 1:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>is how to change things in golf. I write about

1:07:38.400 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>it for the newsletter a lot, I text you about it,

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 2>We talk about it everybody in golf. All we're ever

1:07:45.200 --> 1:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to do is change things in the game. This

1:07:47.800 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>is like the loane thing in golf that doesn't need

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>changing is the Ryder Cup. It's perfect the way it is.

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>We don't got to change anything. We don't need to

1:07:56.280 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>mess with the way teams are picked, formatting, all that

1:07:58.760 --> 1:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Stuff's like like, this event is perfect.

1:08:01.960 --> 1:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It's perfect.

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm gonna push back one big change I'd

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>like to see in the Ryder Cup. Can we go

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>back to the venues of yesteryear? Could we get the

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>old course, Could we get like Hinch, Can we like

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>can we go to like great golf courses instead of

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:21.439
<v Speaker 3>these like made for Ryder Cup places?

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Well?

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>But but but match play is the is the s

1:08:25.520 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>portion of golf. It doesn't necessarily matter with the golf.

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>I agree, But it's not like it's not gonna be

1:08:30.360 --> 1:08:32.439
<v Speaker 3>better if it's had a great golf course.

1:08:32.760 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean I I obviously it's not gonna make

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it worse. Yeah, it's well.

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean one of the silliest things that they do

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>is when they change the nines. Yeah, and it's like,

1:08:41.000 --> 1:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't like this golf course to begin with, and

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:44.479
<v Speaker 2>now I don't know what hole they're playing, Like the

1:08:44.479 --> 1:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>President's Cup last year, It's like.

1:08:46.200 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Can we just play it the way it's played?

1:08:48.080 --> 1:08:51.679
<v Speaker 3>Well? In the course, the best word is always like, well,

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:55.000
<v Speaker 3>we don't want the eighteenth hole to be insignificant. And

1:08:55.080 --> 1:08:58.639
<v Speaker 3>whenever they re route. Whenever they do the reroute, every

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>match always goes to eighteen and you're like, well, I'm

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>glad they're playing the worst sole on the golf course.

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 3>It's the eighteenth. Like I'm glad this boring gas hole

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:09.800
<v Speaker 3>is the last hole instead of you know, Austin is

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:11.360
<v Speaker 3>just that eighteenth hole in Austin.

1:09:11.439 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>God, love it.

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I love that golf course. But my god, I mean

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like three eighty. You're like, what is this hole

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>for these guys?

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what about the rory T shot this year

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>that was made the shot of the year.

1:09:22.880 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm not going to go shot at the year,

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it might be in the top ten.

1:09:26.160 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not gonna go.

1:09:27.600 --> 1:09:31.800
<v Speaker 3>That was like d Windham's shot at the US Open

1:09:31.840 --> 1:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday. I'm fourteen on eighteen in the dark.

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god when he hit the flag. Dude, Andy,

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>this is this is I think.

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:43.639
<v Speaker 3>Rory wins that if Wyndham Clark's not in the final group.

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's unbelievable. You brought that up. It was.

1:09:46.080 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>It was floating on Instagram yesterday, the shot into eighteen,

1:09:49.280 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the one that he hit off the flag stick, and

1:09:51.240 --> 1:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>it's this will be forgot in history forever that it

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>changed the final pairing. And I was thinking the exact

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>same thing you just said, the exact same thing. Ricky

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>was leading, Rory was in the final pairing, and Wendy

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Wyndham because of that shot, got in the final pairing.

1:10:05.680 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And I'm with you, I think all of that changes

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>if that shot doesn't happen.

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I was hanging around the media center. I think

1:10:15.120 --> 1:10:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Rory was talking and I saw I was watching it.

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of like floating it. There's two tents

1:10:21.520 --> 1:10:24.000
<v Speaker 3>that were together, one had a TV, not the one

1:10:24.080 --> 1:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Rory was in, and I was kind of watching what

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>was happening, and I saw I was watching the shot,

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and then I saw Rory's manager was watching the shot, Sean,

1:10:35.000 --> 1:10:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and I saw him like when he hit the shot,

1:10:37.439 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>like there was like a visible like disappointment reaction of

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>what happened, because like I know, he knew that if

1:10:46.840 --> 1:10:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Rory was in like there was that was just a

1:10:50.600 --> 1:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>monumental moment. I think, like to me, like maybe the

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>shot of the year. No shot made a bigger impact

1:10:57.320 --> 1:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>on a major championship.

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, so I'm gonna go through our teams.

1:11:02.120 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm glad you were taking I've mine boulded, but.

1:11:05.560 --> 1:11:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, so my team is Rory, I'm going

1:11:08.520 --> 1:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>in order of our picks, by the way, Rory Hoveland,

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Harmon Morikawa, Homa, Keopka, Ludwig, Ricky Lowry, Justin Thomas, Justin Rose,

1:11:18.600 --> 1:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Justin Zone, and Hoyguard. And Andy's team is Rom Scottie, Xander,

1:11:23.439 --> 1:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Can't Lay, Fleetwood Speed, Fitzpatrick's never won a point in

1:11:27.439 --> 1:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a Ryder Cup, Burns, Clark, Hatton, Sepp and twenty fourth

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>pick of the experiment was Bobby.

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Mack So I got I got ten of my top

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>fourteen on on board.

1:11:40.280 --> 1:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good.

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:43.639
<v Speaker 3>You probably were in the same same zone.

1:11:43.680 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean, like you said, I mean I

1:11:45.320 --> 1:11:47.679
<v Speaker 2>had Harmon high on my list. I had Maximore Kwa

1:11:47.760 --> 1:11:49.720
<v Speaker 2>high on my list. You didn't have as high. And

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:52.439
<v Speaker 2>I had Ludwig relatively high on my list. I was

1:11:53.200 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 2>I was hoping to get you know again, I want

1:11:55.479 --> 1:11:57.679
<v Speaker 2>to get Ludwig. I mean, it's like it's like Wimby, Right,

1:11:58.040 --> 1:12:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Wimby's gonna be great in the NBA, but.

1:12:00.400 --> 1:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is great. He's gonna be really great,

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>you know.

1:12:03.080 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, Hey, this is fun. I hope this

1:12:06.520 --> 1:12:10.320
<v Speaker 3>gets everybody in the in the Ryder Cup mood. And uh, Shane,

1:12:10.439 --> 1:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Well you got anything going on? What you got? What

1:12:12.760 --> 1:12:14.799
<v Speaker 3>you got coming up? You got scratch series?

1:12:14.880 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Right? Yeah?

1:12:15.800 --> 1:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So when is this strop? It is dropping this week? Yeah, Thursday,

1:12:18.720 --> 1:12:21.599
<v Speaker 2>all right, So h Thursday through Sunday Golf Channel. I'll

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>be hosting Corn Ferry broadcast with James Nitties and Gary

1:12:24.920 --> 1:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Christian and playoffs. We don't normally have a fourth member

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of the team, Ned Michael's home game for him in Tennessee,

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>so he'll be on the grounds as well, and then

1:12:33.320 --> 1:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I have a series drop in I think on Thursday

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>with Scratch about caddying, and then you can listen to

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>my podcast. I got two of them, Get a Grip

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and the Ping Proving Grounds podcast.

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Next week I heard I heard rave reviews for the

1:12:48.320 --> 1:12:49.479
<v Speaker 3>Joel Joel Damon.

1:12:52.320 --> 1:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah we did.

1:12:53.120 --> 1:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>If you, if you, if you don't know what we're

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about. I had Joel and Gino on last week

1:12:58.000 --> 1:12:59.639
<v Speaker 2>on the Get a Grip podcast. We did the five

1:12:59.680 --> 1:13:04.599
<v Speaker 2>worst shots and five worst caddy decisions of their entire career.

1:13:05.840 --> 1:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable. It was so fun to do.

1:13:08.160 --> 1:13:11.679
<v Speaker 3>That's I got. I got multiple texts from like friends

1:13:11.720 --> 1:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>who don't know you, like friends like my friends prior

1:13:16.400 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>to this thing about that pod. So that's that's good.

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>You reached out into the they were they were comments

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>coming in from out of the golf echo chamber.

1:13:29.560 --> 1:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fun.

1:13:30.240 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I might see you next week to which or in

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>two weeks which I'm excited about as well. But yeah,

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>we we have KFT like two straight weeks on TV

1:13:37.400 --> 1:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>week off and then the finals are on TV as well,

1:13:40.200 --> 1:13:41.559
<v Speaker 2>so I'll be hosting all those.

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:46.839
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, to get get into the corn Faerry with

1:13:46.840 --> 1:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>with everything online.

1:13:47.880 --> 1:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Totally great, great, guys, great, great players, a lot of

1:13:50.160 --> 1:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>young players in there as well, so tune into that

1:13:52.240 --> 1:13:54.840
<v Speaker 2>if you got a minute. Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday

1:13:54.840 --> 1:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>on Golf.

1:14:05.760 --> 1:14:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to another edition of the Friday

1:14:09.200 --> 1:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Golf Podcast, and thank you to Shane Bacon for coming on.

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode was edited and produced by Matt Rushes. Thank you, Matt.

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>As a quick reminder, we're humming on Club TFE. I

1:14:20.920 --> 1:14:23.439
<v Speaker 3>think the biggest thing that I'm excited for is I've

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:27.479
<v Speaker 3>been working on our twenty twenty four events. It's definitely

1:14:27.560 --> 1:14:30.479
<v Speaker 3>the most time that I've put into the event schedule,

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and we have as a team, put into the event

1:14:33.280 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 3>schedule for next year. As a reminder, as a Club

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>TFE member, you get early access to all of our

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>events as well as access to some member only events.

1:14:42.080 --> 1:14:46.439
<v Speaker 3>We will have one in October in my neck of

1:14:46.439 --> 1:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the woods in California that is almost full, so if

1:14:49.960 --> 1:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>you are a member you get access to that as

1:14:53.120 --> 1:14:56.719
<v Speaker 3>well as special member events that we will have next year.

1:14:57.360 --> 1:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll have a couple next year as well. And then

1:15:00.360 --> 1:15:03.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, with our public anybody can get in events.

1:15:03.200 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>You get early access, so we had a few of

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:07.519
<v Speaker 3>those this year. That sold out before it ever got

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to the public. So if you're really interested in coming

1:15:11.240 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and being part of some of our events, I recommend

1:15:14.400 --> 1:15:18.439
<v Speaker 3>them highly. They we're really excited about the calendar next year.

1:15:19.400 --> 1:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>CLUBDFE is a no brainer. It gets you into the

1:15:21.720 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 3>events and then we're doing heaps of content. We're doing

1:15:25.680 --> 1:15:28.680
<v Speaker 3>course profile every week, we have our hangouts, and we

1:15:28.720 --> 1:15:32.519
<v Speaker 3>have our member videos. It is I'm really excited about

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:36.320
<v Speaker 3>about the membership, the community we're building, and I am

1:15:36.320 --> 1:15:38.280
<v Speaker 3>confident it's only going to get better in the coming

1:15:38.320 --> 1:15:41.400
<v Speaker 3>years as we continue to build it and grow and

1:15:41.439 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>add features to it. So if you're interested in that,

1:15:44.920 --> 1:15:48.679
<v Speaker 3>it's Thefrida egg dot com slash membership. It's one hundred

1:15:48.680 --> 1:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>and twenty dollars for the year and it's a rolling year,

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:54.880
<v Speaker 3>so if you join now, you're you're in through next year.

1:15:55.200 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 3>So thank you guys, and we'll be back next week

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>with a couple of podcasts.