WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Rep. Sean Casten - What’s Broken In Congress & How To Fix It

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.960
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Toodcast is brought to you

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>by Quints. A thoughtfully built wardrobe comes down to pieces

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that mix well and last. That's where Quince shines. Premium fabrics,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>considered design, and every day essentials that feel effortless to

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>wear and dependable even as the seasons change. Quince has

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the everyday essentials I love with quality that lasts, lightweight

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>cashmere sweaters, not too expensive either by the way, short

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>sleeve Mongolian Kashmir polos, linen bottoms, and shorts. Quinch works

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>directly with top factories and cuts out the middlemen. That's

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>why it's more affordable. You're not paying for the brand

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>markup or any fancy retail stores, but you're still getting quality.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Everything is built to hold up to regular wear and

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>still look good. Quite often I'm wearing something that I've

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten from Quints. It is incredibly comfortable. I've become a

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>middle aged man who loves his quarter zips. They have

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>plenty of those. I have been very pleased, and it's just,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I like a piece of clothing, I

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>probably wear it too much, and usually you in tell

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>after about two or three months that's not the case.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So far with Quinn's that's been impressive. So right now,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>go to quins dot com slash chuck for free shipping

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred and sixty five day returns. It's a

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>full year to build your wardrobe and you'll love it.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Now available in Canada too. Don't keep settling for clothes

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that don't last. Go to qu I n ce dot

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>com slash chuck for free shipping, three hundred sixty five

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>day returns quins dot com slash chuck. Well joining me now,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is someone anybody elected after twenty sixteen I still call

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a new member of Congress, but he's been there a

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>few terms now, so it's hard to call him a

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>new member. And we're going to get to that in

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But it's Sean Caston. He is a republic

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Democratic sees me from suburban Chicago, and we're going to

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>make him describe his district a little bit. He did

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the original district he won. He flipped a Republican seat.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It has gotten after the normal redistricting. I have to

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>say normal redistricting now considering all the different ways iterations

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that take place these days. But he got I think

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a slightly less competitive district these days. But I booked

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the Congressman because he did something that I've been dying

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for somebody to do at one of these open committee hearings.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>He asked detailed questions looking for a response, without being theatrical,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>without trying to dunk on a person. He was just

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to get information, and it went viral because the

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>person that didn't answer the question. In this case, it

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was the Treasury Secretary didn't have an answer to what

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>was a fairly simple question. Though it was fraught with

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>how he answered. It was fraught with some political peril there.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But it was a reminder that you don't have to yell,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to perform for something to go viral

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if you just have a really good question and you

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>stump the cabinet members. So Congressman, is good to see you.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, and it's nice to it's nice to be

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>recognized for not doing this job just so that I

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>can become an influencer.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, look, that's it is.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I used to joke and part of it is the

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>way leadership has sort of hijacked Congress. And I say

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that I use that term intentionally because when I first

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>started doing this in the early nineties, committee chairs meant something,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>subcommittee chairs meant something, and leadership would be deferential to

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>committees and to subcommittees and things like that. Now you know,

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're four hundred and thirty one excuse me, five hundred

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and thirty one elected pundits and four people that make decisions.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's and when you do that, eventually you'll stop

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>having legislators and you'll start having more political pundits as

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>elected officials. You know. I I remember I interviewed Jake Laturner.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you remember him. Yeah, he's left

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>no reason.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>To leave about Bob's big Boy's body double by the.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Way, Yeah, he is a but he he essentially left

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't want to be an influencer that seemed

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be what it is he was. Look, he's more

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of a Paul Ryan conservative and that's out of vogue

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>these days in the Republican Party. But he saw that,

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he did something that meant that was

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>good for his district on the Egg Committee, nobody was

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>going to cover it. And he figured that that Congress

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>was you know more Marjorie Taylor Green and Alexandria Cassio

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Cortes than it is. You know, the grinders. Do you

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>feel that well?

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So I have a more I have maybe a more

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 2>boy scouted you of Congress. I think hearings. Hearings have

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>always been really important. There are places to get information.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>It's also not lost that in the age we're in,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>for better or for worse, they're all on TV, and

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>so there's always going to be some theater too.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I blame TV for a lot of problems. I mean,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the minute the cameras got come came on.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is why I'm not for cameras in

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom generally. I'm for audio. I'm for live audio.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the transparency matters. But I think that there's

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>something that triggers human beings to behave differently.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 2>When they care. There definitely is, And I guess the

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>only thing that I'd say in their defense is that,

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>particularly when you're in the minority and you can't control

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the legislative calendar, the only tool you really have in

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the minority is to move public opinion, and so there

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is a value in the televised hearings the extent that

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you can inject something in. I mean, look, as you said,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm on your show today because I injected something into

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 2>the public conversation about what was going on in Venezuela

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 2>and some of the legal authority that wouldn't have happened

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>if this was a closed door hearing. And so there's

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a there's value within that, and you know, but.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You also showed that you can you could do something

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that may I don't believe you were trying to be performative.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, no, well, I mean I'll tell you candidly because

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 2>there was a there was a political reporter who was

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>asking all this the day before, what are you going

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to ask percent? And I said, what I know is

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>that he is going to be filled with talking points

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>from the Trump administration. He's going there's going to be

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of theatrics because that's his style. And therefore

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to tell you what I'm going to

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 2>ask him because I'm working on on some things that

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't want him to be prepared for, because I

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>want him to be engaged in this. And this reporter

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>came to me afterwards and he said, I understand why

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>you didn't tell me now, but what we were trying

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to do was to say I had earlier written a

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>letter to the oil majors pointing out to them that

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>because the Trump White House has not outlined any legal

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 2>authority for seizing Venezuelan and oil, any investments they might

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>make to refine distribute that oil, they're going to be

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 2>exposed to Venezuela's creditors, the largest of which is China,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>because this is a fraudulent conveyance. And I had wanted

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to go in with that, and we got the uh,

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the good fortune, the bad fortune that a day or

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>two before, Marco Rubio had been before the Senate Foreign

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Relations Committee and had made some suggestions about things that

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>we knew were legally not true. And so it was

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>just an opportunity to go and frame those conversations with

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>percent to say, Okay, you either have to either have

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 2>to agree with Rubio, in which case you're in a problem,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>or clarify clarifying, which is going to put you in

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a pickle. And I didn't want him to be prepared,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and we had to and we had to keep our

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>tone down because if he got on the defensive of

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>starting to throw out all of the you know, the

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Pam Bondi burn book stuff. Five minutes goes pretty quick

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in that situation.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, what what I found interesting is that Besson didn't

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>react sort of as as a you know, the the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's you know, at first, he was sort

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of tried to be an adult when he first took

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the job, and now he you know, you see him,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's an adult behind the scenes now, But

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you do, you know, because I think he look, I

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think he does talk Trump off off of some ledges

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that are even worse than the ledges that Trump that

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we see Trump go out on. But I've noticed that

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Besson is clearly trying to get on the President's good

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>side by by being performative in public against the quote

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>unquote owning the Libs or whatever it is that Scott

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Besson thinks he has to do to keep his job.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't do that with you. Why do you

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>think that is? You think he was embarrassed that he

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the answer.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure he understood the question, to be honest.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he did it either. Yea, Because and.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>This was where we get into it, because Rubio had

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 2>said that Treasury was managing these funds under their authority,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and we knew the Treasury.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>He didn't actually kept saying what authority, yeah and.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>So and so. You know, at least framing the question

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 2>that way, you can't say, well, this is just because

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you know you're some liberal. You either have to point

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>to the specific one of the you know, Congress has

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>given Treasury ninety one separate authorities to manage ninety one

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>different types of trust accounts. If if the Treasury Department

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>had done what Rubio said they it had done, the

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Treasury Secretary would know which of those trust accounts applied.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>And when you read those ninety one trust accounts, and

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>none of them actually fit the bill. So, I you know,

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I think he was trying to well, let

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 2>me not expect them what I was trying to do.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there was no way for him to answer

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that question in ways that just sort of made Trump

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>happy that he went viral and made a Democrat look bad.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I fear something worse. I fear

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that they haven't thought about this yet.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, and I don't want to. It's dangerous to

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 2>go down too many conspiracy rabbit holes if we If

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you agree with my point that they have not, well,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 2>this isn't just This isn't even something I'm agree with.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Administration has not given any indication that they have any

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>legal authority to take title to Venezuelan oil or to

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>distribute Venezuelan oil. As a result of that, you now

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>have this account that we're taking. They've moved it to Cutter,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>which is a whole other set of problems because there

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>are superios where Treasury takes custody to accounts, but we

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>keep them in US banks where we can monitor. This

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>is now in a place that's notorious for hiding money, right,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and then said that they have no wateritor in place

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to monitor the inflows and the outflows. Well, if you

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 2>were doing all that, then you take Trump in his

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>face that there are a lot of bad people in

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela who are using money to funnel drugs and run

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>these narco terrorism empires. How do you possibly know that

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the money you're distributing back to Venezuela isn't going to

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>those bad actors. And as I was asking the questions,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>what I was trying to get them to acknowledge is

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 2>I'll stipulate for the purpose of the hearing that Maduro

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a bad guy. You didn't want the way to go

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>through there. Why wouldn't you have an audit regime in

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 2>place to monitor that? Rubio said they did have an

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>audit regime regime. Bessen said they didn't have one yet

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>but would set them up, which suggests that the two

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of them didn't coordinate their story, right, And so now

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>this raises this is where the conspiracy starts. Is it

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>not being audited because it's going to shady characters in

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela or is it not being audited because it's going

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 2>to shady characters in the United States?

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't know if they want to.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no time. Would you even know how to answer

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that question? Right?

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it gets into this administration, and I think you know,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious if you now see this trickling down

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to the cabinet secretaries. Look, if the president doesn't believe

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that some of these rules don't apply to him, separation

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of powers doesn't apply, you know, all these little things

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in it. And it takes the Supreme Court rebuke that

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>he got late last week on tariffs, and even then,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not really accepting the rebuke the way normal presidents would.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>A normal president would do one of two things, find

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>another you know, find another way, or ask Congress to

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>give him the authority whatever. You know, he's just attacking

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the institution itself. Do you get the sense now that

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>many of these cabinet agencies that come before you guys

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and these hearings, when they do these testimonies, they feel

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>as if they don't really have to abide by the

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rules of Congress. They just have to do just enough

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>performance and they'll be protected by the majority.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Sadly, that's true, and frankly that's probably been true for

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a long time. I mean, remember, you know, Jim Jordan

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 2>denied a sub poena to come and testify before January sixth,

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and he was never really prosecuted for that. And so

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I think there is a sense that, if you know,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 2>a government based on the rule of law is predicated

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>on the idea that the people force in the rule

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of law will comply with the rule of laws, that

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 2>falls apart pretty quickly.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>A constitution becomes a piece of paper if you don't

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>use it.

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, I think there's a I think there's a

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>separate issue in this Trump administration. And I certainly don't

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>want to, you know, be here praising Jeff Sessions but

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 2>in the first Trump administration, he was constrained because there

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>were a number of people in his administration, people like

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>John Bolton, people like Jeff Sessions who understood the independence

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of what they had to do and and you know,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 2>respected the president, were there to carry out his orders,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>but took took their oath to the constitution. Seriously, the

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>people who Trump nominated for cabinet secretaries, virtually to a person,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>where nominated because they'll take orders. Anybody who was going

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to stand up has been has been merged from the party.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Adam Kinsinger and I did not agree on

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>very much. That Adam Kinzinger was dangerous because he challenged

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the president. Right, I agree with Marjori Taylor Green on

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>virtually nothing. She's dangerous because she challenges the president. And

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>so the people who are left there. I mean, think

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>of all the criticisms Trump had of Marco Rubio back

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in the presidential race. Those criticisms stung because Marco Rubio,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>he's a beta dog, right, that's who is person.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I joke, you know, Marco, Marco needs to know

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and understand that when when Venezuela goes south, or Cuba

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>go south, or Iron Goo South. Whichever one of these

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>adventures that either we're about to embark on or have

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>embarked on and we haven't and it sort of had

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>some either becomes unpopular for some reason or whatever. It's

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Rubio that's getting thrown under the bus. Yeah, and you know,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this is how he operates. He does not It is

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>never his fault, no matter what happens. But it is.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It also explains Congressman, you know what you've never heard

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ever out of this White House. Donald Trump had a

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting today with one of his business partners from thirty

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Donald Trump had a meeting today with an

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>old college roommate. Donald Trump had a meeting today with

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some he has no friends or colleagues or acquaintances that

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>will do business with him who did business with him

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies, eighties or nineties, or the first.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Technoy at least not since I stained bad.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, I mean, but he went through. It's a pattern

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. I mean you look at it from first

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>term to second term. You basically have Steven Miller. Yeah,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, it's basically it. And so because

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>when he loyalty is one way with him, and when

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he throws somebody away and they you know, that's it,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and they won't come back. You know, most of them

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>don't come back into the fold unless they're kind of

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like Lindsey Grant, right, who were just desperate for it.

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, I mean, it's like it's a certain type

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of person I was. I was a CEO for sixteen

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>years in the energy industry before I came to Congress.

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And there is a certain type of person who is

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>who is transactional and always wants to make sure they

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>get the best end of the deal. And you never

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>do a deal with that person twice, right, the people

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>who So.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That's been the view of that's basically Donald Trump in

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>his life. Nobody's ever done a second deal with him.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the parable of Giuliani. Right.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you about why you're in Congress. Congress.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you look at our problems today, it

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately Congress's fault. Like this is, and I go

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>back forty years. Congress's inability to do things is put

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the courts. Congress's inability to do things is

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on the presidency's. Congress's decisions to to not

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>make tough decisions, to let the executive branch do it.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's been sort of a slow thing, right, It's

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's an emergency here, trade authority there. You know, it's

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>been it's been over time. But here you are running.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You're a CEO. Here you are and I so I'm

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>glad somebody who's had a real career, meta pay role

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>wants to come to Congress. But it is not a functional,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>small d democratic institution these days, particularly when you join

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>starting in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 2>What keeps you there? Well, so let me let me

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 2>give you what I take a lot of inspiration from.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of beauty in the story. So I

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen. We sold our company in twenty sixteen. I

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>was trying to figure out what to do next. I

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 2>had a one year non compete, so I couldn't work

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 2>in the industry that I was in for a year.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>And I started going around because I was frustrated that

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>my representative wasn't standing up to Trump, and I felt

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>like what we needed in this era, so someone was

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 2>standing up to Trump. And my my big issue for

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>my whole life has been trying to do something about

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>climate change. That the businesses I ran and most of

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>what the legislating I've done. And a good friend of mine,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Katie McGuinty, who had been the head of the Council

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of Environmental Quality and the Clinton White House, she said,

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to encourage you to run, but I

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>will tell you that this is if you know what

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>you wanted, I want to have written on your tombstone

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 2>about what you contributed to the Earth during your time

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 2>on it. There's no better job than being a member

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 2>of Congress. And if you don't know what you want

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>written on your tombstone, there's no worst job, because you

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>have such enormous levers that you can pull on. And

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>so you know, in my private sector life, we deployed

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a couple hundred million dollars I'm worth the capital projects,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 2>made some money for various investors. It looks good in

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a resume. My first year in Congress cut a billion

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 2>dollars of legislation passed specifically to deploy clean energy technologies.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Not that not that things are measured in dollars, but

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>this was a fresh number of Congress and movement in

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 2>different ways. And the part of it that I think

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 2>is sort of beautiful and inspired hiring is that the

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I flipped seat. They'd been Republican for fifty years. There

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>were forty of us in that class of eighteen who

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 2>flipped seats. Of the forty of us, Jennifer Wexton, Ben mccadams,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and Anthony Brindisi had held prior elected office. The other

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven had never held any elected office before coming in.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>No, it's what made it a really good class.

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know, and it was you know, me and

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Dean Phillips had been CEOs. Lauren Underwood with a nurse.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Alissa and Abigail were spies. Tom Melanowski and Andy Kim

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>were in the State Department. JOHNA. Hayes was a teacher.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>You had all these people who you know, the single

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>greatest thing that Donald Trump has ever done is he

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>made people feel like they wanted to contribute to society. Right.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>And yes, you know the I think everything that you

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 2>say to criticize Congress is fair. I think it goes

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 2>back way more than twenty years. I went forty founders.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Our founders created a Congress that was the article one branch.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>It was where all the people were, it was where

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 2>all the budget was. Congress is now less than one

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>half of one percent of the total federal budget, because

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>every time we identify a problem, we basically create an

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>executive branch agency to fix it, and we gradually, you know,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>make ourselves weaker and weaker. And I, you know, I

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 2>think other than other than the War Powers Act, I'm

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>hard pressed to think of a time where Congress took

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>power back from the other agencies or the other branches.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>But I can think of lots of time, starting with

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Marbori versus Madison, where the judicial branch took power from

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the legislative branch. Lots of times where the executive has

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>taken power from legislative And I think we're vastly overdue.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, if we still believe that it's important to

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have a government with three co equal branches, we got

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to be a little more equal. And I think we

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>need to sort of push for some structural reforms. And

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 2>the while I'm not naive about a loan that's going

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to take, what other job could I possibly get where

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I could actually have a role in fixing that.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Toddcast is brought to you

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>by American Financing. So if you looked at your credit

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>card statement lately, you're working forty fifty hours a week

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>just to buy groceries and gas, things that used to

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford. Right, and the credit card companies

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>are charging you over twenty percent interest for the privilege.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Think about that.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of extra money out the door. It's

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>designed to keep you under water. Well, American Financing is

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>doing something they hate. They're actually trying to help people.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They have mortgage rates in the fives. They're showing homeowners

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how to take their hard earned equity to wipe out

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that high interest debts. The average savings is eight hundred

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month. So talk to a salary based mortgage consultant,

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>no upfront fees, no obligation, commission, none of that to

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>see how much you can say and if you start today,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you could delay to mortgage payments. American Financing a call

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>America's Home for home loans eight six six eight eight

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>five ten eighty one. That's eight six six eight eight

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>five one zero eight one, or go to Americanfinancing dot net.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Slash the Chuck Toodcast use that code. This episode of

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast is brought to you by Zbiotics. Let's

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>face it, after a night with drinks, it's hard to

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>bounce back the next day. You have to make a

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>choice either have a great night or a great next day. Well,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where pre alcohol comes in. Zbiotics pre alcohol probiotic

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a build

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>up of this by product, not dehydration that's to blame

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rough days after drinking. Pre alcohol produces an

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>enzyme to break this by product down. Just remember to

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>make pre alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>responsibly and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Now. Look, I

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>don't drink anymore, so I can't give ze biotics pre

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>alcohol a personal endorsement. But my producer Lauren does drink

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and he tried it out. Lauren, how was your experience,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, Chuck.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I was a bit skeptical at first, but the other

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>night I went out with my wife to our favorite

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 3>spot for Margarita's and tried pre alcohol beforehand and got

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 3>to admit I was surprised by how good I felt

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the next morning. Disable the pop right out of bed,

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 3>get a workout in, have a great day of work.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So pre alcoholic gets my stamp of approval.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. You ready to try it? Go

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to zbiotics dot com slash chuck podcast right now. You'll

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>get fifteen percent off your first order when you use

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Chuck podcast at checkout. Plus, it's backed by a one

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent money back guarantee, so there's no risk. Subscriptions

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are also available for maximum consistency. Remember to adad to

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>zebiotics dot com slash Chuck podcast and use the code

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Chuck podcast at checkout for the fifteen percent discount. Again,

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 1>use the code Chuck podcast. You you have made the

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>case for why you should be there, and I appreciate

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that attitude. I fear that not many have the same

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>attitude that you have. You know, some wanted as a

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>stepping stone as well. Some are you know, some are

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Some actually want it on their resume so they can

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>say they did it on that front. But let's talk

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about so one of the way. One of the ways

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I describe myself as I always say, I'm short term pessimistic,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but long term optimistic that history shows that when we

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>are in these moments, we do the structural changes or

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>updatings that are needed. And the only question is whether

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>how much violence it takes before we get to that point.

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>And I know that sounds harsh. I don't mean to

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sound or doomer gloom, but when you look at the

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we've really only had about four periods where we've made

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>serious changes to the constitution to try to update the democracy,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>right at the start, during and after the Civil War,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and the period that I'm currently obsessed with, basically the

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>first twenty five years of the twentieth century, where we

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>had where we had three of the most important reforms

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>that were added to the constitution, women, the right to vote,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>income tax, and direct election of senators, and all three

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>were really direct responses to what felt like a crisis.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>In the moment. It felt like income inequality was out

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of control with the industrialists and they weren't paying their

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fair share. Tariffs were not the way to fund a government.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>People realize this, The democracy felt like it wasn't really

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>responsive to the people. I think we now feel that

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>same that same thing. Now I've got my own theories

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as to why that is. I think Congress is too

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>damn small. But we'll get to that in a minute.

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course, with the feeling that hey, the Senate's

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>rigged and it's it was a bribery scandal, by the way,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in the great state of Illinois that helped accelerate the

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cause of direct election for senators. Illinois, of course, has

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>its fair share of scandals political scandals over the century.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 2>You say a bribery scandal involving an Illinois senator, I

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have to ask which one you refer to.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, you know, I knew my five

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>governors had served time. I was like, oh wow, so

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they also were the cause of the direct election of

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>senators too. Yeah, apparently votes went for thirty five grand

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in today's dollars, was what a vote for a US

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>senator was in the state ledge back in nineteen oh nine.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, a couple of weeks ago, there's a

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a constitutional amendment that was introduced in Congress

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to give Congress nullification powers on pardons if if enough

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>members decided it was yes. While it was actually I

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>think Johnny Olewinsky, Okay, he introduced it, and Bacon became

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the first Republican to sign on to it. What's the appetite.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>You sound like you're a reformer. You you'd like to

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>get involved in some of the updating of the American democracy,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>reforming the institution. Maybe it's a constitutional amendment, some stuff

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you can do just with an Act of Congress. What

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are the reforms that you'd like to focus on for

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this decade?

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>So Number one, I think you are spot on that

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 2>there are so many echoes both to the reconstruction era

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and the twenties, and I think trying to not repeat

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>the mistakes of reconstruction, but also to recognize, like we

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we appropriately lionized Teddy Roosevelt because he was

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 2>someone who came in and said, I'm not going to

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>burn the institutions down, but I'm not going to praise

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 2>them as being perfect either. We have to make some

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>significant structural reforms to fix this. And it's you know,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 2>the whole trust busting era. I think that, arguably, you know,

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 2>is what set us up for such a booming century.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I think if you look at the reforms we've made

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 2>over time, everything we're really proud of in our history

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>has made democracy more inclusive, whether that was you know,

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>expanding the franchise to women, to minorities, to Native Americans,

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>direct election of senators. The most anti democratic institutions in

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the United States are still the ones that hold us back.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>The Senate, the Electoral College, and the structure of the

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court. The Senate sort of has a self destruct

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 2>button that Article five of the Constitution says that you

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 2>can't You're not even allowed to amend the Constitution in

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a way that would reduce the proportional power of the states.

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Because I think our founders understood how deeply anti democratic

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the Senate was and what the problem is, We've introduced

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a bill to get around that in a sort of

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a sideways way by saying, let's create twelve nationally elected

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>at large senators so that the Senate would actually have

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>a significant block of senators who had to be responsive

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to national public will, as a way to fix that.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court, I think, on any objective analysis, has

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 2>always been political and has always been lowercase C conservative.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, with the exception of the War in Court,

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 2>they have always protected the power of incumbents over expansions

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>of democracy. And there's nothing particularly wrong with them being

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>political other than the fact that they tell themselves a

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>story that they are just gods on high who live

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>in a temple and dispense wisdom, and they're not political actors,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and yet we all know they are. And so we've

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>introduced some legislation that would basically take advantage of the

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>fact that Article three of the Constitution specifically says that

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is limited to disputes

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 2>between the States admiralty law and the maritime law, matters

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>related to ambassadors and such a pellet jurisdiction, as the

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Congress provides. So Congress has the ability if we choose

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to strip all the pellet jurisdiction from the Supreme Court.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 2>And so what we've done is introduced legislation that would

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>say the Senior Appellate Court would now be a separate

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>court and judges would be randomly assigned from the seventy

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>or eighty Senior Circuit Court judges, so that you couldn't

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't choose your docket right, And that would go

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 2>through to set that case so that we would actually

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>have you wouldn't have a way to politicize the court

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and do that. We can do that, you know, and

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>I for one, think that Clance Thomas and Samuel Lto

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 2>are really good at maritime law and admiralty law, and

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they could continue to do that. Matters related to ambassadors, fine,

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>you can have your lifetime appointment. I think beyond that though,

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>on the Supreme Court, prior to nineteen twenty five, the

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court didn't get to set there on docket. Congress

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 2>gave them the power to set their dockete and grant

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>cert in the judges active nineteen twenty five. We could

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 2>take that away, right, and all of a sudden you

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have the situation where Thomas makes a footnote in

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a dissent and somebody says, Okay, I see what you're saying.

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>If I bring this case, we can go in and

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>bring this down. We can take that away. We could

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>We have the power of the purse. Why don't we

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>always give the Supreme Court one hundred percent of the

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>appropriation they ask for. We could go back and say

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 2>we're going to give you less next year unless you

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>institute the following ethics reforms. Right, let's make people trust

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the court. Then, all things that we could do within

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>our power, And I know there are a lot of conversations.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I'm one of those who thinks incentives

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you got to fix incentive structures, meaning you can have

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a good person with bad incentives, they'll do bad things. Yeah, agree, right,

0:31:57.640 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and a bad person with good incentives can end up

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>doing good things. You know what if it took seventy

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>five votes to confirm a Supreme Court justice, I promise

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you would get people that were the least partisan people

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you could find, no matter who the president was.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 2>True, although I would remind you of that Hamilton's line

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that supermajorities create the problems they're designed to solve.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand that he argues that, but he also argues

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in Federal seventy eight that the goal should be to

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>find the least If the goal in finding a judge

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is whatever it takes to get the least, you know,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of the most neutral person you can get. That

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was the point of lifetime appointments. I mean, look, imagine

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't have lifetime appointments, Donald Trump would have

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fired Neil gorsicch this weekend. Yeah, okay, right, I think

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do. Know that he probably does that,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and probably you would have fired Amy Cony Barrett after

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of times ago. So it is,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I take your point on supermajorities, but if you so,

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I had a source of mine who worked in the

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bush Justice Bush Council office in the Bush w forty

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>three's and back then it took sixty votes essentially to

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get a judge through, and he said, if it had

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>been fifty that they wouldn't have nominated any of the

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people they nominated.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, dad, what Kevin? I got what fifty one votes? Like? Right?

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So the point is that we haven't had you would

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You'll nominate a partisan, You'll nominate a partisan warrior. I

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think the three Liberals are, you know, I mean, I

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>think Kagan's the least of the least partisan of the

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>three liberals, but I think all of them are more

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>partisan warriors than Stephen Bryer was or Ruth Bader Ginsburg was,

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And you certainly see that with Alito in particular, I mean,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he certainly is a partisan warrior. I mean, although ironically

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he came through during the sixty the sixty zone.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and I don't have a way legislator to

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>fix this because of Article five, but it's worth noting

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that for every state in every country that's copied the

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 2>US form of democracy. None of them copied the structure

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Senate, you know, the over representation.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>The way we don't would we export a democracy. We

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>also recommend multi member districts.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's funny so many This was probably three

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 2>or four years ago. We run a bipartisan, bicameral trip

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to Iceland. Iceland has had they have the longest continuously

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 2>active parliamentary form of government. They first met in like

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the year nine hundred. There's all this fascinating history and

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>so we're meeting with them and they're showing us their

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 2>chambers and they described how sometime in the last century

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>they essentially adopted the US form of government. And they

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 2>went through and he said, after twenty years we got

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>rid of what you would call the Senate because it

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 2>just come things up. And there sitting there and Tom Carper,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 2>it's this big frown in his face and all of

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 2>US House members start churning. But there's sort of an

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 2>acknowledgment that that structure and I say this on the judges,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>because the Senate always is going to skew you know,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 2>conservative and again in the lowercase see sense because it

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 2>always overly represents rural areas, people closer to the land.

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're sort of you know, you know, traditional,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 2>all that sort of stuff, And maybe that made sense

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>in seventeen eighty nine, but it means that, you know,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the the swing vote in the Senate is always very

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 2>far to the right of the Median American voter.

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Look, the national Senators are because I have a founding

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>founding father historian, and she's she runs the George Washington

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Library right now at Mount Vernet, and her fix for

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the Senate is to essentially carve out you know, you

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>basically you take the top six, get five senators. The

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>top six most popular state gets five senators, The next

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>say six, get four senators, the next five or six

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 1>get three, and then everybody else gets two. I don't

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>know if that passes Article five muster only it.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Does because it says that you can't you can't amend

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the Constitution in any way that would change the proportional

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 2>representation in the Senate.

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's a but it in some ways, what you're

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>describing a twelve national Senators is potentially one thing. Let

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>me get something that I'm obsessed with because I think

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it solves a couple of problems without touching the Constitution,

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is and that is uncapping the House.

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 2>I've got to abile to do that too.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It is we are you know, when we shut it

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>down to nineteen thirty, when they when they locked in

0:36:57.920 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in at four thirty five, we were at about one

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>percon three hundred and fifty thousand each district. We're now

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one per eight hundred and as I like to remind people,

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand is the population of the fifteenth largest

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>city in America. I don't think the Founders meant for

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and thirty five congressional districts to be all

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the size population wise of one of the fifteen largest

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>cities in America. So if you go back to what

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>it was in nineteen thirty, because we were doing it

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>every decade, expanding the House with the size of the population,

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you might need a constitutional amendment to put

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a put a numerator in there and say that no

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>congressional district can be bigger than point oh three percent

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of the right Now, that would make it point oh

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>three percent of the population. If we went to one,

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>say three point fifty one per four hundred. Right around there,

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we'd have about eight hundred and fifty eight hundred and

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy members of Congress. But what it really does is

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>that it allows the electoral college to level, basically become

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a level playing field. Wyoming goes from being six six

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>times more more an advantage of a presidential vote over

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a Californian. They still have an advantage, but it's two

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So it's it's what I would argue,

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it keeps in what the founders always wanted, which is

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at the small stage, should get a little more influenced,

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but not a lot more influence. Right, two and a

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>half to one feels better than six to one, And

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it would make jerrymandering just less necessary. You're

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>going to have it in some places, but it's it's

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>less and somebody's harder to do, and you probably lower

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you probably diversify Congress just by sheer numbers in ways,

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get different walks of life and and it

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>will be the people's house again. But try telling, try

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>making the case that the problem in Washington is not

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>enough politicians.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's number one. It's worth reminding people that

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>for all the people who work in Washington only five

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty seven and won an election. If you're

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 2>concerned about size of government, the elected folks are not

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the problem. So we've got we've got legislation to do that.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 2>We we The way we did ours is say we

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 2>will on every going forward census, you expand the members

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 2>of the You expand the number of members in the House,

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>rather than expanding the number of people we represent it.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>And you lack a district at five hundred thousand. We

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 2>picked five hundred thousand for sort of arbitrary reasons. But

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 2>there's been a number of political scientists who look at

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>this cube root law that if you look at all

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the parliamentary democracies of the world, you put population on

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 2>one the access how many members, It kind of follows

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 2>a cube route, and it's about five hundred. So at

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 2>least just say, well, we know this works because other

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 2>governments kind of run on this form.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll just tell you my math. When I went to

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I went to the fiftieth largest city in America, which

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>happens to be Arlington, Texas. They have a population of

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>four hundred thousand. Fair enough, I thought, you know what,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty that they are one community of interest, right,

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>A suburban you know, small city from Dallas is a

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>community of interest, and I thought so it felt fair.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But I take your point at five hundred. I mean,

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point four to five hundred isn't.

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 2>A huge Yeah. The distinction there's there are people smarter

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 2>than me who have argued that you increase the odds

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that the chance for gerrymandering shenanigans if you expand, and

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I can't argue either side of that. I think broadly speaking,

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 2>you are going to get more districts where there are

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 2>more people, which means that I think you counter some

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 2>of the reason why the electoral college stuff works out

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 2>is that essentially large rural areas are overrepresented, urban areas

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>are underrepresented.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Since the people are in the right that levels that out, you're.

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Going to skew more votes that way. We added a

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 2>provision that said if any state has more than two

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 2>districts allocated, they can at their at their choice, go

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to multi member districts with choice voting, because there's there's

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 2>some really interesting analysis that if you have a multi

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>member district, it's really hard to jerrymander so that the

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 2>top two are of the same race and same party

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 2>all the time. You can do that for the top one,

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's hard to do it for the top two.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 2>And so if you get a situation where you know

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>me and whoever comes in second are representing the same communities,

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 2>you should, in theory get rid of some of the

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 2>polarization in Washington. But put it that way, and we're

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>with other ideas, but that's the way that we've structured it.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, well, say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>day regret. They're best selling out of office gummanes. We're

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro dose to our newest

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THCHC and CBD products, all designed

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. So

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Sol also

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.800
<v Speaker 1>selling sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order, So go to gitsold dot

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>com use the promo code todcast. Don't forget that code

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's getsold dot Com promo code todcast for thirty percent off.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Having good life life insurance is incredibly important. I know

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>from personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother, single mother, now widow, myself

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for college? And lo and behold, my dad had

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>require you just answer a few health questions online. You

0:43:57.880 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>quoted ethos dot com. Slash Chuck so again that's ethos

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>insurance is something you should really think about it, especially

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a growing family. Look, you're one of

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the few members that engages in this conversation. There aren't

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>many members that are thinking about this. You know, is

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it a caucus of twenty thirty. Who's the group that

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you're working with that are animated on this.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 2>So I would say there have always been a number

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of members. Don Bayer from Virginia is very thoughtful on this.

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Earl blooming Hour was great, still is, but not a

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>member of Congress anymore. Jamie Raskin's very thoughtful. I think

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the challenge that all of us get in, you know,

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 2>we're elected every two years. We got to stay focused

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 2>on things that the public cares about. And I think

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the number of members who think about this stuff and

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 2>care about it is much higher than the number of

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 2>members who are willing to say, I'm going to prioritize

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 2>this over all the things that voters are telling me

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 2>to prioritize at any given time. And so I did

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 2>a thing about this with some various other podcasters recently,

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and when everybody said, what's the most important thing we

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 2>can do to drive this forward is just make noise

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 2>about it. You know, the more that voters care, the

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 2>more that those of us in elected office have to

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>do something about it now.

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>So I've made it a huge part of any time

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I do a speaking gig. I talk about this all

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the time, like, there are things that we can do

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and you don't even have to pass constitutional amendment. And this,

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>this to me, is one of the biggest small de

0:45:56.400 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>democracy reforms you can make without a constitutional amendment, because

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's a bunch of there's a bunch of after

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on effects that are that are interesting.

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And I would also say that whether it's you know,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 2>five hundred thousand or four hundred thousand, the barriers are

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 2>more construction, Like we're probably need another office. We could

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>do that. There's space on the mall.

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'd love to do. You know what

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see that we flip the script and

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a majority of all staff is in the district and

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>only a small handful of staff is in Washington. I

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.439
<v Speaker 1>could argue that you could you could do that. I'd

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>also allow for remote voting. I think that with eight

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty members of Congress, maybe that is something.

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Because here's the thing. You know, if you make it

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit harder for the lobbyist to find

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the member of Congress, maybe that's not so bad.

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I want to sound like an old

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 2>fuddy duddy who I know you're going to last see. Well,

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I was you know, the last time I was a

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.760
<v Speaker 2>CEO was before COVID. I I'm still a firm believer

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>in the water cooler.

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that isn't look I'd love to see that.

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see all of the members of Congress

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>move here with their families. I think that, you know,

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 1>if you want to. There's I teach a class called

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>How Washington Works to college students, and I was doing

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole thing on Congress last week and I said,

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had these various moments where it just got worse

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for a specific reason, and this current era it began basically,

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it began with the rise of Gingridge and the rise

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of Gingrich happened because of partisan of a partisan decision

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 1>by Democrats back in eighty six in an Indiana congressional district.

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's known as the Bloody eighth. It's a it's got

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of this this there's a sort of mythical status

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. But it gave rise to Newt, and then

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Newt when he became the leader, basically got rid of

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't want any more. He wanted all his members

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in the you know, he stop people working

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Mondays and Fridays, and everything became about, you know, only

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>be in Washington Tuesday through Thursday and be in the

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>district and that prioritize not bring in your family. And

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>then you know, that had all sorts of and frankly

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>both parties now have accepted that schedule. And so yeah,

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see you guys two months here, one

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>month not here, two months here, you know, something like that.

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious, Chuck, if you think through that. I've

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>only served obviously in the post Gingridge era, there are

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 2>members who stay in DC through the weekends and there

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 2>are those of us who go home. Broadly speaking, you

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 2>don't stay in DC over the weekend if you're not

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in a really safe seat. And so I would I

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 2>would worry a little bit about that because since so

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 2>much of this job as relationships. Wouldn't that concentrate power

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in sort of the senior safest seat members who could

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 2>stick around you got to go back to your district

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 2>if you don't know whether you're going to win your

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 2>next election, well it could.

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you're changing the way Congress works, right and

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of everybody has to work two months on

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>right and it's sort of, then that's that's evening out

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Look, I think the fact that you

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know you could. The other idea that sits out there

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is if you're going to do term limits for House members.

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not a huge fan of term limits. I

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think they've worked in the state legislative level. I

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think they've only made lobbyists more powerful. They've made governors

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>more powerful, they've made state legislatures less powerful, just generally.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could doing a broad stroke. But the

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>best idea I've heard if you do institute term limits,

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which would need a constitutional amendment, is to make the

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>House four year terms. And if you had the House

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at four year terms, would you at least maybe for

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the first you know, and and by the way, if

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you end up doubling the size of the House, you

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>might actually want to have half the house up two years,

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the other half up the other two years, and go

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with four years. There might be some logistical reasons to

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. But if you did four year terms, would

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it would it encourage what it discourage? Because right now

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you're running for reelection. The day you get sworn in

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on January third, you're dialing for dollars.

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 2>And I again, I'm gonna sound boy scouty, but I

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.800
<v Speaker 2>had this conversation with Timmy Duckworth at one point, you

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 2>know who, of course was in the house before, and

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 2>she made the observation that the one thing she missed

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 2>about the house, like she didn't miss not having to

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 2>run every two years, right what she missed was that

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>in the house you you have to be right on

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 2>the pulse of where Americans are all the time. And

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 2>in a six year term, you know, you can the

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 2>first couple of years just working on things like dictated

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>by your own wisdom. And there's a value in that

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate. But you do that, there's you know,

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 2>none of us like dialing for dollars. Some of us

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:02.399
<v Speaker 2>like kissing babies for weird reasons.

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And that in the Epstein files, be careful sorry, thinking.

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Much, yeah, week but but there is a value in

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 2>being out there and saying, Okay, where's the pulse of

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the country right now? And I have to respond to

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 2>because I'm going to be on the ballot again shortly.

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think our founder has got that right, even though

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of that have for a little goofy.

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the Democratic Party brand.

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a poll over the weekend that if you just

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>looked at Trump's numbers, you'd be like, oh, this has

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.760
<v Speaker 1>got to be good news for Democrats, right, He's sixty

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:43.359
<v Speaker 1>percent disapproved upside down in every issue. But then, when

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>given the choice of you have the main problems, who

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>do you trust? Democrats are Trump? They were both in

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the low thirties, and neither was also in the thirties.

0:51:55.680 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic brand has really taken a beating. Do you

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think the four years of Biden we're a successful four

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:09.320
<v Speaker 1>years and it's just been bad messaging or is this

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a is this a much bigger problem than Democrats want

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to face.

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 2>So I never quite know what to make of those

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:24.240
<v Speaker 2>studies because are those polls because named members always perform

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 2>well ahead of what the party idea is, like you know,

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Congress broadly is unfavorable. The Democratic Party is broadly unfavorable,

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party is broadly unfavorable. Sean Caston is popular,

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>right at least in our district. You know, you know,

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>go on down the list and I think the I

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 2>think depending on the question we're asking. You know, we

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 2>for all sorts of reasons that you were well aware of,

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 2>we have political parties. If you ask people what are

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 2>the things that you want government to do and where

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 2>your values are those those things are very popular across

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 2>broad bipartisan swaths of the economy. We want we want

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>to get shot when we go to school. We think

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 2>all people should have equal rights. We you know, we

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 2>want a peaceful transfer of elections. You know, those things

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 2>tend to skew democratic in this moment. The brand isn't

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 2>so good. But it's sort of like saying, do you

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.959
<v Speaker 2>like do you like Jerry flavored kolas? That's one question.

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:24.800
<v Speaker 2>What is the brand status of mister pibb. That's a

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 2>different question, right even though even though they're synonyms, so

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 2>so all that really says to me is, okay, maybe

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 2>don't hang your don't hang your party after your idea

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 2>and get votes. But that doesn't necessarily mean whether or

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.720
<v Speaker 2>not Democrats or Republicans are going to win the next election.

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately that's a race by race.

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I I guess what I'm I mean. Do you

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think the the party has a leadership problem or a

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>brand problem or is it just you know, a better

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I look at look, I think a better

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>leader if Biden, And I don't know if maybe if

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he had fifteen years younger, he could have done the

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:08.920
<v Speaker 1>job better, could have traveled the country more or whatever.

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But I look, I look at the Biden term and

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a better leader keeps the country from looking

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to Trump again. Like I think that a better leader

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 1>turns figures out how to help the country turn the page,

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't do it. Is that all on him?

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Was it circumstances? Was it starting the presidency with an

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>impeachment trial and create an impossible situation? Maybe I'm not like,

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I do think that the Democrats are

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>being punished by some voters for somehow not putting Trump away.

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what that means in their head, right,

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean putting him in jail, just means, you know,

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>how is it that we did not how did we

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>end up with him still here?

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So I think, look, everybody knows who the voice

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 2>of the Republican Party is. Nobody knows who the voice

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Democratic Party is right now. And that's not

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a criticism of the Democratic Party. That's just the reality

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 2>of when you're out of power in all three chambers ways,

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:14.760
<v Speaker 2>nobody is. Nobody's going to look to the Senate Majority

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 2>leader or Senate Minority leader to be the voice of

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the party you know, or that you know, etcetera, etcetera.

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I think at the same time, Biden's great strength and

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 2>his great weakness was that he was a senator. Trump's

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 2>great strength in his.

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Way, by the way, you really don't like the Senate.

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I'm not saying true. But that's not

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 2>why I'm making a point. Trump's great strength and his

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 2>great weakness is that he's always been a CEO, right.

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think, and I say that that because Biden

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 2>was an extremely effective president in terms of the infrastructure

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 2>bills that we passed, the climate bills, we passed, the

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 2>recovery from COVID, the way the economy turns around. He

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 2>got that done because he had a masterful understanding of

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 2>how to get things through the Senate. And I think

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 2>that reads the American people as being way down in

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 2>process that I don't care about. Why are we Why

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 2>am I having to talk about what we did to

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 2>make a compromise with Joe Manchin in order to get

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 2>this thing through. Compare that to Trump, who says, look,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 2>this is what we're going to do. I don't care

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 2>what happens. I don't care what my favorability is. This

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 2>is where it's going. And I think there's a I

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 2>think there's a forceful executive that we need in the

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 2>White House that you just don't get there if all

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:26.959
<v Speaker 2>of your formative years are crafted in a legislative body

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 2>with an ousesource in it. We haven't had a leader

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Democratic Party with executive experience. It's Bill Clinton, right,

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 2>and the Republicans consistently nominate people with executive experience. And

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you look back, go back to your

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 2>period in the twenties, you know Roosevelt Teddy. Roosevelt walks

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:56.800
<v Speaker 2>into a room, you are not under any confusion of

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 2>who the top dog in this room is. Donald Trump

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 2>walks into a room, You're inder no confusion about who

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the top dog is. Biden walks into a room. He's

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a nice guy, right and and like morally I like him.

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I think he was extremely effective for what he did.

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think we need to you know, as we

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 2>get to our nomination process, we need we need to

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 2>get people who, you know, make it very clear that

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:21.920
<v Speaker 2>this is where the buck stops.

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You want an alpha dog, whatever that means in the moment.

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look like, Look, we're at a moment that demands

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I want a Churchill. I want somebody who

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 2>says I have nothing to promise you but blood, sweat

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and tears. I can't guarantee will win, but I can

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 2>guarantee we'll lose if we don't fight. So once more

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to the Battlement's my dear friend. Like, that's that's what

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 2>we need in this moment, right. I don't particularly want

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 2>someone who's going to talk about the reconciliation process.

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen out there that you like?

0:57:56.600 --> 0:58:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean for the people who are running or look,

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna My prediction is that whoever we nominate is

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 2>not going to be someone who has no executive experience.

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean a governor? Does that mean someone who

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>haven't named yet. I think it's a I don't think

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the leading candidate at this point in the cycle has

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:16.440
<v Speaker 2>ever emerged.

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Scout Walkers, that is one hundred percent true.

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Didn't become president, right.

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I remind people of this all the time. Well, just

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the three Democratic presidents of my lifetime. I guess Biden

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is the outlier because he was kind of always pulled

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>well early on, and I've look I've always viewed his

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 1>nomination as sort of a COVID accident. I don't think

0:58:38.920 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>he earned it. I just think it the band, you know,

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the music stopped and everybody agreed to just give it

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to him. But if you look at the other three Obama, Clinton,

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and Carter at this point in time and all of

0:58:49.560 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>those presidential cycles that they ended up president, they were

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not the front runner at this point, and they were

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not even being they were they were barely registering as can.

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It's in the in Carter and Clinton, and you know,

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama was seen as somebody that was going to be

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>four years down the road. You know, he wasn't necessarily

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 1>right away. So I tend to agree with that. Do

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you think this is a party that would nominate somebody

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with a CEO background, and I'm not you know, it's

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:22.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual for the Democrats to do something like that, like

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a Mark Cuban.

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Or or you know, you know, or a governor. I mean,

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we we lionized the business sector a little

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 2>bit too much. Government's a fundamentally different job. I think

0:59:34.840 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 2>it's important to have somebody who's led a large organization,

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, who has been who has been the decider

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 2>in that George Bush ism. You know, you could get

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that in the private sector. You can get that in

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a governor's mansion. You know, you could get that, you know,

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, major cabinet secretary, you know it kind of

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 2>but I think I think it needs to be someone

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 2>with those kind of backgrounds. I also think, you know,

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I think you want somebody who's who's who's authentic. I think,

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>without naming names, there are some people who are in

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the mix right now who are very different people when

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the curtain is down, then when the curtain comes up

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and it becomes very clear as they go through, you know,

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think there are some people who are just

1:00:16.960 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of consistent in who they are at all at

1:00:18.920 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>all moments. And I think that's again, like for all

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of Trump's faults. People appreciate that that he is who

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>he is all the time.

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, it's interesting, let me and you may have

1:00:31.720 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>already kind of answered this question with your Churchill response

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with your Churchill remark that you're really looking for Churchill,

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which because one of the things that I like to

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at the divide inside the party right now

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is less left versus center, and that exists. I think

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's more of a tactical debate. What I the real

1:00:53.160 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>divide I'm sensing and I think the Texas primary really

1:00:56.720 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of shows this one pretty well is U And

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>even in the presidential I could I could compare Gavin

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to rom which is, do you want a fighter or

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want a uniter? Are you looking? Are we

1:01:11.840 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for? Is the next president need to be somebody

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who's going to take the fight and one you know

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you're to or is the next president going to be

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tough but try to bring the country together? And I

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's a fun of Mike. I think there are

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>some Democrats who say, hey, we tried the united stuff

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with Biden. It didn't work. It's time to It's time to,

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, get somebody who's not afraid to throw a

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>punch somebody more like Bill Clinton. I mean, you could argue,

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do you want Bill Clinton or Barack Obama? Right? You

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>know that? And those are distinctively they were two different

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>types of presidents. Where do you fall?

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So I had this conversation with Pelosi after January sixth

1:01:56.120 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that I said, this moment calls on us to figure

1:02:00.360 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>out how to be better politicians than Abraham Lincoln. Because

1:02:03.840 --> 1:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in Abraham lincoln second inaugural when he said, it may

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>seem strange to you know, for any just God to

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>bless a man for earning his spread from the sweat

1:02:10.720 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of another man's face. But let us not judge less

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>we we judged ourselves. And the butt was Lincoln saying,

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know how to unite the country

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and be morally clear about what just happened. And I

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 2>think that tension has always been in our politics, doesn't

1:02:26.120 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>you know? To be a uniter is to is to

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>forgive some sins. To not forgive the sins is to

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>not be a uniter. I see the divide as being

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different than you going into this cycle

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that I think the particularly with the wealth inequality and

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>with the huge disruptions and unemployment. My daughter's a freshman

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in college right now. When we were looking at colleges,

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>one of her comments was that every college she looks

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>at is sixty sixty five percent female. The you know, you,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got a whole lot of young men who who's

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>who's forward forward expectations is different than what they thought

1:03:07.880 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be. And AI is making that

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>worse because the jobs that are being displaced are jobs

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that historically skewed very male people who analyze large sets

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of data, identified trends, and prepared memos for their bosses,

1:03:19.200 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>right whether that was a bank or a law firm

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 2>or an engineering firm. There's a lot of uncertainty there.

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think the I think the person who gets

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>really energized at Bernie Sanders rally is not that much

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 2>different than the person who gets really energized at a

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Kirk rally. The institutions are terrible, and I want

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to I'm going to support them and burns them down. Yeah,

1:03:39.920 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think the I think there's sort of a

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>nihilism at the fringes that's really dangerous. If you if

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you come forward as a politician and say trust me,

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the institutions are going to be fine. You're not very credible.

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think there are very few politics I've seen, but

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I think this is what we wanted. I keep going

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>back to Teddy Roosevelt, who says, I love the institutions

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and they are desperately in need of repair, and this

1:04:07.840 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>is what we're going to do, right, And that I

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>think is the more interesting divide right now. Not uniers

1:04:15.080 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>have dividers. But who's the person out there who can say,

1:04:17.120 --> 1:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I can I understand your pain. I understand that the

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>system did not work for you in the way that

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you thought it was going to go for it, But

1:04:23.600 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to burn it down. We're going to

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>work together and make it better and make it more inclusive, right,

1:04:33.760 --> 1:04:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you know. I keep going back to the twenties. Was

1:04:36.280 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that there was that Louis Brandeis line when he said,

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>when you have great concentrations of wealth, you only have

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>three choices. You can let the wealth take over the government,

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>which is to embrace fascism. You can have the government

1:04:45.520 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 2>take over the wealth and embrace communism, or you can

1:04:47.520 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>break up the wealth and embrace capitalism. Right there, you go,

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>That's that's kind of where we are right, but that.

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Well you're you're you're not wrong, I mean, I am.

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if if Trump supporters decide to prioritize

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>their economic concerns over their cultural concerns, there is a

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>majority that will burn this place down. I have often

1:05:16.600 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I it's sort of like there's a

1:05:19.880 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the you know, Steve Bannon and Bernie

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanders talk very similarly at times, they have a lot

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>more in common they Burnie would hate. Neither one of

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>them would accept that premise, though they may agree in

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of acknowledge that they agree on some of

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But the distrust of big corporations in particular,

1:05:40.680 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, and I think that moment is coming.

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the question is is the person who

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>puts that coalition together a responsible actor or an irresponsible actor?

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>FDR was did that FDR put that coalition together? And

1:05:57.720 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he was a responsible actor.

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I find myself thinking that there's almost an exact parallel,

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:08.280
<v Speaker 2>but exactly inverted to the Reconstruction era. Time it was,

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Democrats were the party of essentially the

1:06:10.520 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>oligarchs and the white working class. The Republicans were everybody else.

1:06:15.880 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>And if you're the oligarchs in the white working class,

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>you have plenty of room for the klan. Right. But

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>in that era, the Republicans who said we need to

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>hold people account for their sins, they were the radical Republicans, right,

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and they had that same sort of like they were

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>defined not by who they were, but who they weren't.

1:06:37.000 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like we're flopped on that right now

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and strung a lot of the same issues. And I

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know what lessons we learned from that era, because

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>ultimately the radical Republicans didn't. You know, we got three

1:06:49.280 --> 1:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>solid amendments out of it, and one hundred years later

1:06:52.800 --> 1:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>we actually started enforcing those amendments.

1:06:55.600 --> 1:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, and that's the I guess that's why I'm

1:07:01.480 --> 1:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>long term optimistic. I know we're going to make these changes.

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I just wondered, do we have to have do we

1:07:06.840 --> 1:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have to run into more roadblocks? Do we have to

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have more people die? I go back to this. You

1:07:10.680 --> 1:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>know we didn't you know, we had to see you know,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:19.479
<v Speaker 1>child labor laws didn't pass overnight. We had to see

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>kids getting you know, abused and die from from these

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>terrible workplaces before we made the changes. That were necessary

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because we were letting the industrialists were running a monk, right,

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>AIS kind of may end up running a mock. So

1:07:35.160 --> 1:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll get there. It just how much damage has to

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>be done before we before we collectively decide to act, right. Yeah, yeah,

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to quote Churchill, right, you can trust the Americans to

1:07:48.480 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>eventually do the right thing after they've exhausted every other

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what is it, every other path of that doesn't work.

1:07:54.920 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>So I don't I don't want to throw this member

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>under the bus. But at one point we were voting

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>on one of these gotcha votes and he came up

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>to me on the floor. I said, he, you're voted

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>on this one. And I said, well, you know, Churchill said,

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you can always count on Americans do the right thing

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>after they have exhausted all the other options. So if

1:08:09.200 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you just always do the right thing, history will view

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you as being very precient. And I voted one way

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and he sticks his card in the machine boats the

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>other wind and says, yeah, I can't do that.

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe his districts just slightly more purple than yours.

1:08:27.320 --> 1:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>It isn't, but that's another story.

1:08:30.600 --> 1:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I didn't know where our conversation was going

1:08:33.880 --> 1:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to go. We went deep in the reform rabbit hole,

1:08:36.040 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which I I I will jump right in when that

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>will take place. We look you, you are the type

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>of member of Congress, and I'm glad to know is there.

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking about these things. You're thinking about the institution.

1:08:49.520 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking about what what are you gonna what's the

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>institution going to look like when you leave? I hope

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:57.519
<v Speaker 1>there are more members like you.

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 2>No, we'll look there. Congress is better than you think.

1:09:02.280 --> 1:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot line Look and I used to

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>tell people this too. I'd say, you know, ninety percent

1:09:07.080 --> 1:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that that Congress does, they you know

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they do without much debate because we agree on ninety percent.

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Ten percent we disagree on, we disagree on vehemently.

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I like to point out to

1:09:19.360 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>people is if you think through all the members of Congress,

1:09:23.120 --> 1:09:24.519
<v Speaker 2>come up with a list of the members that you

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>think are bona fide knuckleheads, and just come up with

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>your list and count them, divide that by five thirty five.

1:09:30.520 --> 1:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the congressional knucklehead ratio. Then then go to your

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>own office. Your own office probably has the same knucklehead ratio.

1:09:37.400 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>We are a representative body, and you know, and it's

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, is it is it ten to fifteen percent? Maybe,

1:09:42.880 --> 1:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's not ninety percent.

1:09:44.680 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there a let me ask you this for I

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>let you go, Is there a reform caucus that has

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>developed that people where this stuff's being incubated, whether it's oh,

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>should we uncap the House? Should we do this constitutional amendment?

1:09:56.479 --> 1:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Should we do this? Or is it just certain members

1:09:59.120 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>doing it?

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And it's certain members and you and you you raise

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:04.679
<v Speaker 2>the good question that maybe we should start a caucus.

1:10:04.760 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think i'd like to see that because I

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bet you you get a biparty. I bet you'd be

1:10:09.080 --> 1:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>quickly become a bipartisan caucus, you know, sort of how

1:10:11.920 --> 1:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to remodel the democracy.

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Derek Kilmer had his Modernization Caucus that was very

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:21.840
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan last term. They tended to focus on some smaller

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>boar issues, you know, and one of the things that

1:10:23.680 --> 1:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of makes it partisan that you wish it wasn't.

1:10:26.600 --> 1:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And I had conversation with my Republican colleagues, is that

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party today has a has a strategy that

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>can win the control of the minoritarian institutions. The Democratic

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Party has a strategy that can win the minoritary institutions.

1:10:41.520 --> 1:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>So the democratic policy agenda is much better at winning

1:10:44.840 --> 1:10:46.839
<v Speaker 2>the House than winning the state in the electoral college.

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>And to really make democratic reforms is partisan because of that.

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't be, but it's just sort of the way

1:10:53.920 --> 1:10:54.720
<v Speaker 2>we're skewed right now.

1:10:55.720 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>No, it's that that's a that's a I totally understand

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how that works out to be the case.

1:11:06.160 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>But uh, yeah, we appreciate having me on. You give

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>me more.

1:11:10.479 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>No, this was great, and I want to you know,

1:11:13.360 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the next time, if you've got a new thing you're

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to do any if you get this caucus started, whatever

1:11:18.280 --> 1:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it is, I want to do this again.

1:11:20.320 --> 1:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Sounds great.

1:11:23.800 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>H