WEBVTT - Rush Limbaugh May 7th 2019

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Hey, Mother's Days right around the corner, folks, do

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not miss the opportunity to deliver the smile that only

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>comes from one eight hundred flowers dot com. One eight

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred flowers has amazing offers on beautiful Mother's Day bouquets

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and arrangements starting at To get these beautiful bouquets, these

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>arrangements other Mother's Day gifts, go to one eight hundred

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>flowers dot com. Click on the radio icon, enter the

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>code rush. It's that's simple times drumming out one eight

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred flowers dot com code rush Hurry. The offer expires Friday.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bolding Branch sheets They are the softest, the most comfortable

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sheets you will ever sleep on it and they only

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>get softer overtime. Boldon Branch uses a pure one organic cotton.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>They have thousands of five star reviews. They are loved

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>by hundreds of thousands of Americans, including former US presidents.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Go to Bowldon Branch dot com today for fifty dollars

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>off your first set of sheets and free shipping with

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the promo code rush you spell at B O, L

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>L and Branch dot com. Remember the promo code rush.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Balls and The Washington Post is worried about Democrats

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>falling into the electability trap and choosing a nominee after all.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>He asked, can anybody really define what electable means? He

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>points out that in past election cycles, supposedly electable politicians

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton failed. Whoever said they

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>were electable left did? I never thought they were. Jimmy

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Carter came out of nowhere and won. Nobody thought he

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>could win. Four years later, Ronald Reagan, he wasn't considered

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the most electable candidate when he ran for president against Carter,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but he wanted a landslide. Bill Clinton, Barack Obama. They

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>were seeing as long shots when they first announced, but

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>they won anyway. In the sixteen election, every political insider

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>said Donald Trump was not electable. He's in the White

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>House now, while Hillary and her supporters are blaming the Russians.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>James call me, John Stewart, deplorable voters, Facebook, anybody else

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they can think of now. Mr Balls might have a point, though,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>focusing on electability could be a trap for Democrats. Instead,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe they should ask which of their candidates are unelectable,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and when they look at it that way, the answer

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>has to be all of them,