WEBVTT - Amazon Part 6: The Billionaire and the Tabloid

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>January nine, two nine, at precisely six oh seven in

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the morning Pacific time, was a massive turning point in

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the life of Jeff Bezos. It's the divorce that has

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the tech world buzz. The world's richest man, Amazon CEO

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos announcing he and his wife Mackenzie are splitting

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>up after twenty five years. Bezos kicked all of this

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>off by sending a tweet, the couple releasing a joint

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>statement Wednesday, reading, in part, after a long period of

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>loving exploration and trial separation, we have decided to divorce

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and continue our shared lives as friends. If we had

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>known we would separate after twenty five years, we would

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>do it again. This was shocking news to their colleagues, acquaintances,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>even casual friends. Most people had no reason to believe

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the relationship was strained. Of course, couples get divorced all

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the time. It's what happened next to change the course

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Amazon story. Later that day, a usepaper tabloid

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>reported that Bezos was seeing another woman. What happens when

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the richest men in the world decides to

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>divorce his wife and then starts dating the wife of

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. So wait,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos had a girlfriend. Bezos had presented a picture

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of an amicable separation in his tweet, but within just

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a few hours reports in the news media, we're complicating

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>his tidy narratives. Not long after Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and his wife Mackenzie announced they were divorcing after twenty

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>five years of marriage, reports surface that Bezos had been

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>dating TV personality Laurence Sanchez. She's now separated from her

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>husband Patrick Whitesell. He's the co CEO of the Hollywood

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>agency w M E and reportedly introduced Bezos to his wife.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>All three were photographed together at an Amazon party. Soon

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that the infamous supermarket tabloid, The National

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Inquirer was ready to publish the entire story it had

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the couple's private romantic text messages. The media had a

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>field day on the real A daytime talk show host

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Lonnie Love lampoon the text messages with a dramatic reading,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I want. I want to get a

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>little drunk with you tonight. Not falling down, no, just

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a little drunk. I want to talk to you and

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>plan with you. Listen and laugh. I basically want to

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be with you when I want to fall asleep with

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you and wake up tomorrow, read the paper with you,

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and have coffee with you. Yes, me to say and sing.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course even the President of the United States

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>joined the pylon. Well, I wish your luck. I wish

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your luck. It's gonna be a beauty. Here was the

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>world's then wealthiest man, a business icon, having an adulterous relationship,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and even more shocking getting busted by a sleazy tabloid

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>inside Amazon employees and executives where flabbergasted. Here's former VP

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Craig Berman. It was shocking when it came up because

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>it was completely unexpected, and that was a turn that

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure Hollywood could come up with that

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of plot twist. You're listening to Foundering, I'm your host,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>brad Stone. The leaked story about Bezos's affair posts several mysteries.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>What happened to the bezos Is marriage, How did Bezos

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>get involved with Laurence Sanchez, a former TV anchor, But

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>most pressing of all, how did the National Enquirer get

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos's personal text messages as well as intimate photographs, including,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as they claimed at the time, a Dick pick I

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>spent several months unraveling these questions and also looking into

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge allegation posed by Bezos himself that there may

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have been a global conspiracy to embarrass him. The resulting

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>saga touched on the Washington Post, journalistic freedom, Donald Trump,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, and the murder of

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dissident journalist Jamaica Shoji. Unbelievably, Bezos managed to come out ahead.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>In a stroke of pr genius, he turned the tables

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on his tabloid adversaries, But in the end, the entire

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>episode would have enormous repercussions for Bezos and for Amazon,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a company nearing a one trillion dollar market value at

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the very height of its control over the Internet and

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. It's the tech mogul versus the tabloid.

0:04:49.279 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you that story after the break. All tech

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>companies need a powerful founding story, and the story of

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff and Mackenzie driving to Seattle after leaving New York

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>City in has been part of Amazon's mythology from day one.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>In April eighteen, Axel Springer CEO Matthias Stuffner asked Jeff

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Bezos about it in an on stage interview. The launch

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon was really something that you did together. Could

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you describe a little bit what Mackenzie's role was. First

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>of all, Mackenzie, you know, she had married the stable

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>guy working on Wall Street, and a year after we

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>got married, I went to her and said, I want

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to quit my job, move across the country and start

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this uh internet bookstore. And Mackenzie, of course, like she said, great,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>let's go, because she wanted to support it, and she

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>knew that I had always had this passion for invention

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and starting a company. It's a story that Bezos had

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>been telling for more than twenty years example that Mackenzie's

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>acceptance of this dot com dream was key to the

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>company's founding. Here he is talking to Henry Blodget of

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Insider. You turned fifty recently. Any change outlook on life? Uh? No,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not really, you know, I Uh, I'm still dancing into

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the office. I love my life. I have four kids.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>My wife claims to still like me. I don't question

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>her aggressively on that. Um, I do the dishes every night,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and I can see that actually makes her like me.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a very odd thing. It's I think that too.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty convinced it's like the sexiest thing I do.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>His wife humanized him. She made him seem like more

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>than a businessman whose creation was up ending retail and

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>devastating small merchants. In the early days of Amazon, Mackenzie

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was in a girl to the business of the company.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>She was Amazon's first accountant. As the company added employee,

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>she was able to move away from the day to

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>day business of Amazon and pursue her own interests. At Princeton,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>she had studied to be a writer. She published two

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>novels called The Testing of Luther Albright and Traps, and

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one of her rare public appearances, Mackenzie Bezos described her

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>then husband as one of her best readers. Here she

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is in conversation with Charlie Rose. He's such a good reader,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to get his reaction to the actual

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>story so that he was so that he could be

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>surprised in the right places. You know, I still have

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the copy he read. It's great because he very generously

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>went through and wrote all the spots that made him

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>laugh out loud, and all the spots that made him try.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie illuminated another side of Bezos. It was quite endearing

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that he was the kind of husband so supportive of

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>her that he would read and mark up her manuscripts

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>line by line. Here was somebody routinely accused of killing

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>books actively making one better. Inside Amazon, employees viewed Bezos

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>as a family man. Craig Berman, a former communications executive,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>worked directly with Bezos for over a decade. In my

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>experience in working closely with him, uh family was everything

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to Jeff. He was extremely and still is extremely close

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to his family. That the reverence he has for his parents,

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's as high as it gets, and that flowed into

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>his own personal family. Mackenzie was no longer active in

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon after the earliest days, but critic says her opinion

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was still highly valued. She came in to help Bezos

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>prepare for the most high stakes presentations, including the unveiling

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Kindle. So Kendall came out is very, very newsworthy,

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff was front and center unveiling these products on stage,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and there was an extraordinary amount of preparation. Mackenzie did

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>come in and she would sit in the audience and

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>watch Jeff go through multiple rehearsals, and she would provide feedback.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>In these moments, Craig and all the Amazon employees could

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>see the deep respect that Bezos had for his wife.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It came across as a marriage of equals. I think

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he absolutely trusted her judgment and valued her perspective. And

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I think Jeff appreciated having a really smart person who

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>could be pretty objective. You know, we would prepare for it.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like this is a rehearsal that Mackenzie's coming to. Now.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Who can really say what happens inside the private confines

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of a marriage, but clearly over the years Bezos and

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie grew apart. She was a bookish writer who rarely

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>made public appearances, and as far as I could tell,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>she's virtually unknown. And see how all social circles. Bezos

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was drawn to public events, the trappings of wealth, and

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the lure of adventures like scuba diving and space travel.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.479
<v Speaker 1>As we discussed in an earlier episode, he also gravitated

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to Hollywood and the bright lights of celebrity. On December three,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he hosted a star studied Hollywood party at his home

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in Beverly Hills, Mackenzie was nowhere to be found, and

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the guests was a woman named Laurence Sanchez.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>She had her own helicopter video production company, and she

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was a veteran broadcaster, the former host of the tabloid

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>TV show Extra and the morning program Good Day l A.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Here she is doing a TV segment on a private

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>jet company. Not that it's an option for everyone, but

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Flight Options is a company that offers private jets. You

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>don't even understand how exciting this is for me. This

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is the most amazing plane. And look, I want to

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>take you inside this beauty. It is unbelievable. Lauren was

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at the party with her then husband Patrick Whitesell. He's

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a major Hollywood agent. At the party, Beazos was photographed

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>with Lauren and Patrick. I'm not entirely sure if that's

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time they met, but it's clear that after

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the party, Beazos and Laurence started seeing more of each other,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and by the beginning of laurence Helicopter Company was filming

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>documentary videos for bezos is private space company Blue Origin.

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Now is the time to open the promise of space

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to all and lay the way for generations to come.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>We are a blue origin, and this is where it begins.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometime that year, it appears they started dating. Strangely, Bazos

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>carried on the relationship out in the open, even though

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>he was still married. His total disregard for public attention

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was baffling. Either he didn't anticipate the coming avalanche of

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>negative publicity or he didn't care. They were photographed at

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a hotel in Miami and at fancy restaurants in Venice

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Beach and Santa Monica. That December, Bezos had another celebrity

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>filled party for Amazon Studios at his Hollywood home. Once again,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie wasn't there. This time, Lauren was by his side.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So it was probably inevitable that someone would reveal their affair,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that Bezos would try to get ahead of the

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>story by tweeting news of his divorce. Here's Craig. I

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was personally stunned, like jaw dropping to the floor, stunned.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>My colleagues were just as stunned. I think that was

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the universal reaction. It was so unexpected coming from this

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>person who really, I mean, you talk about a reverence

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>within an organization, Those those types of things just didn't happen,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And so forward to happen at that level that the

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>surprise factor was it was off the chart. Crig says

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that the most unsettling thing was that Bezos preached good

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions and sound judgment within the company. It was like

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Bezos had violated his own code. His employees felt let down.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a person and a company that put such

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a premium on having good judgment, and here was an

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>incident where it looked like this person maybe wasn't displaying

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a level of judgment that that people expected of him,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was really jarring. Although Bezos got

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to announce his impending divorce himself, he couldn't contain the

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>mail stroke them. The affair was revealed, the intimate text

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>messages were leaked, and then things got even weirder. A

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>few weeks later, on February seven, Bezos posted a remarkable

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>essay to medium saying that he was being blackmailed. I

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>asked my colleague to read a selection of it. Something

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>unusual happened to me yesterday. Actually, for me, it wasn't

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just unusual. It was a first. I was made an

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>offer I couldn't refuse, Or at least that's what the

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>top people at the National Enquirer thought. I'm glad they

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that, because it emboldened them to put it all

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in writing, rather than capitulate to extortion and blackmail. I've

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>decided to publish exactly what they sent me, despite the

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>personal cost and embarrassment they threatened. This was entirely unprecedented,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot to unpack in here. In his essay,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Beazo said he had hired private investigators to learn how

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer had gotten a text messages. The Inquirer

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>seemed desperate to shut it down, and Bezos compet and

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>paste and entire emails from the inquirers editor in chief.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>In the emails, the editor seemed to threaten to publish

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the intimate photographs that Bezos had exchanged with his girlfriend,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>including something the editor called a below the belt selfie.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>In his essay, Bezos poses the question why was the

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>National Enquirer so desperate to stop his investigators from sniffing around?

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This is where Bezos leaves the realm of established facts.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>He starts to construct a hypothetical case. He suggested the

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>real culprits of his leaked photos might have been enemies

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Washington Post. Remember Bezos owns the Post, and

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Post had a long list of enemies. In two

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen, they had aggressively covered the Trump presidency. That's

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one enemy. Also, a few months before, a columnist for

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Post named Jamalika Shoji was brutally murdered by Saudi agents,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Post comprehensively reported on the atrocity. That made

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the Post a new enemy, the government of Saudi Arabia,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whose Crown Prince allegedly ordered the killing. By the way,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Crown Prince denies this. Bezos just sort of put

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these things out there. He never says it explicitly, but

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>he leaves readers to connect the dots that maybe his

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>intimate text messages were leaked because of some connection between

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer, Donald Trump, the Saudi government and their

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>common enemy, the Washington Post. Here's an excerpt of what

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he wrote. My ownership of the Washington Post is a

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>complexifier for me. It's unavoidable that certain powerful people who

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>experienced Washington Post news coverage will wrongly conclude I am

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>their enemy. For reasons still to be better understood. The

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Saudi angle seems to hit a particularly sensitive nerve. The

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>essay melted the Internet. In media and tech circles, it

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was all anyone could talk about at the time. I'm

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>writing a book about Amazon and Bezos, and I have

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the uncomfortable revelation that the story is moving in a

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>completely unexpected and tawdry direction. To write a book about

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this iconic tech leader, I'm going to have to write

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>about a sex life. And I have to examine whether

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Bezos was the victim of a global conspiracy or is

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>reel adversaries, tabloid journalists or the enemies of the Washington

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Post and a free press will unravel that mystery next. Okay,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so the National Enquirer published an eleven page spread about

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Bezo his affair with Laurence Sanchez, and Bezos is now

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>waging an all out war with the tabloid trying to

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>understand how they got his text messages. He hired a

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>very powerful private investigator named Gavin de Becker. This guy

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a legend in the security field. Here's

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Gavin describing his credentials in an editorial about his work

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>for Bezos. I asked my colleague to read what he wrote.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>For forty years, I've advised at risk public figures and

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>government agencies on high stakes security matters. My career has

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>included working with the CIA, FBI at the Reagan White House,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>counseling foreign leaders, and advising on controversial murder cases. I've

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot, and yet I've recently seen things that

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have surprised even me. Almost immediately, Gavin suspicions fell on

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one of Laurence Sanchez's closest confidence, her older brother, Michael.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael was a Hollywood talent manager who had helped Lauren

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>with her career over the years. He later spoke to

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Fox News about his relationship with his sister. I've been

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>managing Laurence since the day she came home from the hospital,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and through the highest of highs and lowest of low's,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I've always been there to do whatever she needs and

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to protect her whenever she needs protection. To me, Michael

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds a bit defensive here. He's trumpeting his professional relationship

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with his sister, all claiming that she needs his protection

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as if he's the guardian. I'm an accomplished fifty year

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>old woman, and as we'll come to find out, Michael

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez was deeply involved in his sister's life. He went

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>out for dinner several times with Bezos and Lauren while

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they dated, and he even attended another star studied party

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at bezos Is home. He described his first impressions of

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos to Fox News well, to be perfectly honest,

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to like him because it would have

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>made all of our lives much simpler. But when I

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>met him, he was charming, brilliant, loved flying and everyone

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in our family and his pilots, so we had a

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about. And most importantly, he was he

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was deeply in love with Lauren. Michael is one of

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the strangest people I've ever interviewed for a business story.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>He's charismatic and charming, full of swaggering confidence and gossip,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's also full of contradictions. He's an avid Trump supporter,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's gay. He styles himself as a public relations guru,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but imagines he has complete control over the media, which

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of course is impossible. As soon as his name surfaced

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as a leaker in the Bezos affair, Michael Sanchez said

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that any hint of his involvement was crazy. One soulce

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>close to Jeff Bezos. His private investigators tells CBS News

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>they've conducted multiple interviews with Michael Sanchez, the brother of

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Bezos his own girlfriend. They say Sanchez, a Trump support,

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>discussed the matter with What just Stone and caught a

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>page two of Mr Trump stulches defenders. Contacted by CBS News,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a person close to Michael Sanchez dismissed allegations of his

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>involvement as quote sloppy leaks and crazy conservative conspiracy theories.

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Gavin de Beecker confirmed to the Daily Beast that his

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>firm did speak to Michael Sanchez, and in their conversations

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>several things struck them as highly unusual. Gavin's firm says

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael shared outlandish theories about how the Inquirer might have

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>learned about Bazos's affair with his sister. He suggested that

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Deep State or American spies might have hacked into

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Bezos's phone. He also bragged about his ties to right

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wing Trump world types, and he suggested that he knew

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the editor of The National Enquirer and kept bragging about

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>how he could manipulate the paper's coverage. By the end

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of these phone calls, the private investigator was convinced that

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Bezos's girlfriend's brother was a culprit soon Bezos's camp starts

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to the press too. I asked my colleague to

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>read for Gavin de Becker. Michael Sanchez has been among

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the people we've been speaking with and looking at strong

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>leads point to political motives. That's from an interview Gavin

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>de Becker gave to The Daily Beast and probably no coincidence.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The Daily Beast is owned by Jeff Bezos's friend Barry Diller.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So then, in a non televised interview with Fox News,

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sanchez defends himself sort of. Here's anchor Howard Kurtz

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>describing their conversation. The notion that Laurence Sanchez brother Michael Sanche,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>as a Hollywood talent manager, was somehow responsible for this.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It didn't just sort of bubble up out of nowhere.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Sources at am I and even the lawyer for David Pecker,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirer owner who's a close friend of President Trump,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have kind of tried to finger him. But Michael Sanche

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>has told me on the record that there are in

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>fact multiple suspects, that he's never seen any of this

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>salacious pick chers or tex uh and that in fact,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:08.719
<v Speaker 1>any attempt to implicate him this is one. So Michael

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez is out there talking to the media denying everything,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and this puts the National enquire in a very awkward position.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The guy they're hinting as their confidential source is saying

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not their confidential source. And if Michael isn't the source,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>then it sort of lent credibility to Bazos's theory that

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirers involved in some sort of political conspiracy. This

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 1>was something the Inquirer absolutely wanted to shut down because

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they were already in hot water for something else. Tonight,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the publisher of The National Inquirer making headlines of his own,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>David Pecker, granted immunity by federal prosecutors investigating Michael Cohen,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the President's former fixer. According to a source familiar with

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the matter, Pecker is a longtime friend of the President's

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>who helped catch and kill negative stories about him, including,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 1>according to Cohen, having his company pay a woman for

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>exclusive rights to her account of an alleged affair with

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Before the Basos ordeal, the National Inquirer was

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>caught in an unrelated scandal involving another rich guy and

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>his alleged affair. In that case, it was Donald Trump

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and an adult actress named Stormy Daniels. The publisher of

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The Inquirers a longtime friend of Trump's, and the tabloid

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>went to unusual lengths to protect him. Essentially, they interviewed

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Stormy Daniels and other women who claimed to have damaging

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>information about Trump. They bought the exclusive rights to the

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>women's stories, and then they never ran the articles, and

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because the Inquirer had exclusive access, the women had no

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>way to get their stories out. This practice is known

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in the media business as catch and kill because they

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>catch an elusive piece of information and then kill it

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>by suppressing the story. This became a problem for The

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Inquirer after Trump became a candidate for president, because it

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>could be seen as a violation of campaign finance laws.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Not good. Eventually, their publisher am I, signed a deal

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>with the U. S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of New York. If they violate the deal, their executives

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>could be charged with a crime. So they were very

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to accusations of wrongdoing, especially charges that they were

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>once again working with the Trump administration or say, the

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Saudi government. This is all happening in the background when

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirer goes to war with Bezos. So, with the

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 1>catch and kill scandal hanging over their heads, the National

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Enquirers about to do something very, very unusual after the

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>allegations of Saudi involvement. The National enquires lawyers also hit

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the TV circuit. It's taboo for news organizations to talk

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about their off the record sources, but two people watching

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the saga unfold, a lawyer for The Inquirer's parent company

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>am I, seemed to come very close to doing just

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that on TV. Here's attorney Elkan Abramo. It's on ABC

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>with George Stephanopoulos. It absolutely is not extortion and not blackmail.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>What happened was the story was given to the National

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Enquirer by a reliable source that had given information to

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer for seven years prior to this story.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>It was a source that was well known to both

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bezos and Miss Sanchez. Was it Michael Sanchez? I

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>can't discuss who the source was. Uh just it's a

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>confidential within a m I UM, so I'm not going

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to answer who the source was. It was somebody close

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to both Bezos and Miss Sanchez. It's crazy to me

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that a lawyer for the papers on TV dropping hints

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about the confidential source of their story. But you've got

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind that it's in the National Enquire's

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>best interests if the story starts and stops with one

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>leaker without any political conspiracies. So case closed, right, A

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>brother sells out a sister, either for money, notoriety or jealousy. Really,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it all should have ended right there. But things were

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>about to get even more complicated because, for whatever reason,

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bezos and Gavin remained attached to the possibility that there

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>were political motives behind the whole thing. So they take

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one more swing at saying the Saudi government had something

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with Bezos's leak romantic text messages. In March,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Gavin wrote a guest article for The Daily Beast. In

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the essay, he again points a finger at Michael, but

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he added reality is complicated. It can't always be boiled

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>down to a simple narrative like the brother did it.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Gavin theorized that by the time Sanchez gave the tabloid

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>paper the Goods, the Inquirer had already seen text messages

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>between the couple. In other words, Gavin suggested there was

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a second culprit, and he was now convinced that wrong

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>doer was overseas. Our investigators and several experts concluded with

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>high confidence that the Saudis had access to bezos his

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>phone and gained private information. As of today, it is

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>unclear to what degree if any Am I was aware

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the details. Now this might sound outlandish, but Gavin

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and Bezos did have solid reasons to believe the government

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia was out to get him. For the

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.479
<v Speaker 1>past few months, an online army of Twitter accounts had

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>been attacking Bezos. The accounts are believed to be linked

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to Mohammed bin Salman, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Their tweets called for a boycott of Amazon's website in

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. Here's a sample tweet. It's pretty horrible.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>We're after you. The Jew worshiper of money will go

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt by the will of God at the hands of

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia, the owner of Amazon, and Shook is the

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>owner of the Washington Post. Is the spiteful Jew who

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>insults us every day. End quote. By the way, Bezos

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is not Jewish, but it didn't matter. The Saudi government's

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>hatred of Bezos was real. They blamed him for the

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post coverage of the murder of Jamaica Shoji, and

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>though there was no real evidence that the Saudis were

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the original leakers to The Inquirer, people kind of lapped

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it up. Here's the thing, The idea that Bezos had

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>been targeted because of his brave ownership of the Washington

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Post was kind of compelling, so public opinions swung over

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to Bezos camp after that. The only question left is

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>whether the Saudi theory was even real In this ring

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI and federal prosecutors set out to investigate

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the truth of this tangled saga was finally going to

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>come out, That's next. Over the spring of the National

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Inquirer removed as editor in chief, and their parent company

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>am I put out a remarkable statement explicitly denying that

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 1>there was any conspiracy or mystery at all to the

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>origins of their story. Quote. The fact of the matter

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is it was Michael Sanchez who tipped the National enquir

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>off to the affair on September ten, and over the

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>course of four months, provided all of the materials for

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>our investigation. His continued efforts to discuss and falsely represent

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>our reporting and his role in it has waived any

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>source confidentiality. There was no involvement by any other third

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>party whatsoever. End quote. So the National Enquirer was no

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>longer dancing around it. Laurence Sanchez's brother was the sole leaker.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It would seem like they broke a fundamental principle of

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>journalism by revealing their secret source. But I actually have

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>some sympathy for the National Enquirer here because I spent

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>months talking to Michael when I was reporting my book

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Unbound. He asked that I used the following statement

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in my manuscript. Everything I did protected Jeff Lauren and

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>my family. I would never sell out anyone. I also

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Michael confidentially, meaning I wasn't planning on revealing

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>him as a source. But when he read the conclusions

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in my book that he was the lone source of

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>information to The Inquirer, he strongly disagreed and he started

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>acting out against me. This time. Over the course of

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he emailed many high profile journalists about our conversations, accusing

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>me of sloppy reporting and cherry picking facts to cast

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>him in a bad light. So because he outed himself

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>as one of my sources, I feel free to discuss

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it now. See, Michael and Lauren had a complicated relationship.

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They fought over money, and they were frequently estranged. In

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>our conversations, Michael had a lot of bad things to

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>tell me about a sister. He criticized her intelligence, her

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>personal relationships, and her skills as a broadcaster. He also

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thought very highly of himself, and he seemed to deeply

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that he could control the media. It was a

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>dangerous combination. One mystery that Michael cleared up for me

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was whether the National Enquirer ever had a dick pick

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>from Jeff Bezos. Remember the Inquirer claimed they did, and

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they threatened to publish it. As all this was happening,

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike claimed in the press that he never sent the

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Inquirer dick pic, and he went so far to suggest

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that if such a photograph existed, then there must have

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>been a second leaguer. This really angered the Inquirer because

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>again it opens the door to the suggestion that there

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>might be some bigger conspiracy. So I'm talking to Michael

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about all this for several months, and one day, over

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>drinks in the Castro neighborhood of San Francisco. He told

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>me what I believe is the truth. He said that

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for weeks he tantalized the Inquirer editors with the notion

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that he did have a dick pick. Then he met

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with one of their reporters in person and they faced

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time the papers to top editors, and this is when

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he showed them a photo that he had downloaded from

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a site called rent men dot com. So basically, he

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>told me that he pulled one over on the Inquirer.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>They believed they had the incriminating photo, and they did

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>have a dick pick, just not one belonging to Jeff Bezos.

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>When all this finally came out that Michael Sanchez was

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>playing all sides, he was furious and he launched a

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>volley of lawsuits against am I, the editor in chief

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of The Inquirer, Jeff Bezos, and Bezos's investigator, Gavin de Becker.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He charged them with defamation, and ironically, Michael's lawsuits ended

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>up clarifying the whole matter. In the litigation, court documents

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>showed Sanchez had signed a contract with the Inquirer paying

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>him two hundred thousand dollars for the story, and the

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>reporters and editors said under oath that Sanchez was their

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sole source of information and that authorities had nothing to

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>do with it. Sanchez ended up losing most of those

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>cases and had to pay Bezos two hundred and eight

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for legal fees. It's pretty ironic that he

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>paid out to Bezos almost the exact amount of money

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was paid by the Inquirer. In the end,

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sanchez's story is kind of sad. He could have

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>been living large with Bezos and Lauren and their mega

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>yachts and opulent vacation properties. But first he betrays his sister,

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and then he just keeps betraying himself by constantly gossiping

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to the press and by launching these failed lawsuits. He

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>loses his relationship with his sister, then his credibility, and

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then he loses a large sum of money. So was

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>there any truth to the idea of a global conspiracy

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Saudi government may have hacked bezos phone in

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>retaliation for the Washington Post coverage of the murder of

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Ka Shoji. Well, this was also a matter of

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>confusion and contradictory information. In early The Guardian published a

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>report claiming that Bezos's phone was hacked that he had

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>downloaded a piece of spyware called Pegasus. We're learning new

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>details of an next ordinary claimed that Amazon CEO Jeff

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bezos phone was hacked by Saudi Arabia. The Guardian reports

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>an investigation ordered by Bezos blames the hacking on a

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>personal message that apparently came from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>been solvon I talked to several security experts who weren't

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>convinced there was any real evidence Bezos his phone was hacked,

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, there was zero evidence that,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>even if he was hacked, that that was how his

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>private information had been leaked to the National Enquirer. And finally,

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>both the FBI and the Manhattan d A looked into

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this tangle of accusations and dropped the matter without bringing

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>any charges at all. So why did we hear so

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>much about this story? Remember, Bezos wrote about it in

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>his medium post, and his investigator brought it up in

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the media at least twice. Well, it suggests a few possibilities.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>One is that Bezos sincerely believed that he was hacked,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Saudis were involved, and he wanted to expose

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirer for their role in the treachery. Another option

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is more cynical, that Bezos didn't truly believe it, but

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to distract from the much more mundane to

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pressing story that he was caught cheating on his wife

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and that his girlfriend's brother sold them out. I asked

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Craig Berman, the former Amazon VP, what he thought Bezos

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>believed my guests, and again I'm speculating my guess as

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they he and his advisors felt comfortable that they had

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>gotten to some facts and felt comfortable enough to go

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>out and confront those facts. I think they executed it

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>really well. I think they achieved what they were trying

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. Now, whether or not it was the true

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>fact or not, I don't know. And so if it was,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>if it was meant to UH to get people off

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the trail of something else, it may have been effective

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>in that. I don't think we will ever know for

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sure if Bezos' phone was really hacked and if he

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>thought the Saudis had tipped off the Inquirer. But I

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately Bezos and his handlers were happy to muddy

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the waters, letting the confusion and ambiguity about a possible

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>global conspiracy swirl around mate Bezos look good. It allowed

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>him to keep alive the possibility that his brave support

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of his newspaper, The Washington Post was the source of

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>his personal troubles. Around a year after the Inquirer story published,

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>he spoken a memorial for Jamaica Shoji. Here he is

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>addressing Kho's fiancee. No one should ever have to endure

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what you did. It is unimaginable, and you need to

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>know that you are in our hearts. We are here

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and you are not alone. In this epic battle between

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer and Jeff Bezos, it looked as if

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirer scored an early decisive victory. They broke a

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.919
<v Speaker 1>huge story about the richest man in the world having

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>an affair with the wife of one of the most

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>powerful men in Hollywood, but ultimately Bezos one on the

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>pr front. In the popular imagination, the story of the

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>tech mogul and the tabloid got blurry to the extent

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that people remember it at all. It's with a lot

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of confusion where the Saudi's involved, Trump the brother That's

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>why Craig still marvels at how Bezos managed to pull

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>off this victory against the news publication. He certainly did

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>defeat in and spectacular fashion an outlet that was really

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really coming after him hard. It was a defeat that

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>most public figures lose in our business of communications and

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>public relations. You don't answer the door when Mike Wallace knocks,

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and if the inquirer has something, It's probably true. Most

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>people don't survive those, so Bezos one. But what about

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>his company? Remember he spent twenty years building an image

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with an Amazon as a family man, and now their

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>CEO wasn't an entirely different orbit of celebrity and notoriety.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Tabloid newspapers and websites would follow his every move With

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>his new girlfriend by his side. He chow up courtside

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at Wimbledon, at the super Bowl in Miami, even in

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the DJ booth of a popular nightclub. Bezos was enjoying

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. He seemed to love flaunting his new

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Lauren and together indulging in the trappings of

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>exorbitant wealth, and that was going to be a problem

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for the CEO of Amazon. Modesty and frugality were important

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>values of the company, even more so with antitrust authorities

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>investigating its growing power. The CEO image that Beazos had

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>spent two decades cultivating of a devoted family man and

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>committed husband was a thing of the past. In a sense,

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>his personal life had become incompatible with his professional responsibilities.

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>He had a choice to make, and it would be

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>a historic one. Here's Craig again. I think he does

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have a level of self awareness to kind of understand

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>what the impacts of those things are. And I think

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that maybe what may have ultimately contributed to him stepping

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>away from the CEO role Bezos's resignation and his blast

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>off into space on a Blue Origin rocket that's coming

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>up in the next and final episode of Foundering. The

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Amazon story. Foundering is hosted by me brad Stone Sean

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>When as our executive producer, Raimondo as our audio engineer.

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Molly Nugent is our associate producer, Mark Million and Manner

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>May Robin a Jello and Molly shoots our story editors

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Mark Bergen. Francesca Levi is the head

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcasts. Be sure to subscribe and if you

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like our show, leave a review. Most importantly, tell your

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>friends see you next time.