WEBVTT - And Then There Were Four

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>here's your host. And then there were four four teams

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>left super Bowl looming. It's the a f C and

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>NFC championship weeks. I am Paul Tcharchi and my co

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>host Brian Johnson once again for these playoff games. Hi, Brian,

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going on charge? Good to talk to you. I

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I think some of us would have picked these four teams,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily most people. Uh yeah, most of us

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't picking the Niners. But yeah, I just I just

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of gave him a chance when I said the

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Giants went in eight nine years ago, is massive underdogs

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and upset the number one seed Packers and anything could happen,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and anything did happen. Yeah, it was that was a

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that was a shocking outcome. Honestly, I was really stunned

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for about twenty four hours after that game that, given

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the offensive performance of the forty Niners that they won

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that game. Yeah, I mean in Green Bay marched right

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>down the field. First it looked so cool. It's uh,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the best weekend of football ever. I'm concerned.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And now we've got two games that are going to

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>struggle to live up to that just by default, but

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it should be good games. Anyway. I got forty Niners

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong last week. I said, I thought that Brian, that

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they had just they might just be wrung out that

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they have done so many road games. Then it was

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>six of eight on the road. Now there's seven of

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>nine on the road, and that you know, they've been

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>basically playing playoff games since Christmas for Pete's sake, and

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, here we are February looming, and I was

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>worried they had run out of gas. I was wrong

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. We'll talk about forty Niners rams in just

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but let's start with the a f C

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>side as your team. You know, you jumped on the

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you jumped on the Bengals band way. It was pre

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Borrow band way. That's saying something. I did a lot

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of flags for that. You did, you did it well

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not I think was still black. People said I was insane,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna pick a team, dude, four And I

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, you can't get any worse than They're only

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>going up where they were at that point. Al Right,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody will accuse you of being a bandwagon jumper at

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that time. So Bengals travel to the Chiefs this I

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprised if either team won. The spreads

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>like three and a half. So it's it's seven, it's seven,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>which is shocking, is it really? Yeah? Bengals are seven.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals in the points all the way. I'd like a

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>money line, especially considering these teams played in Week seventeen.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Granted it was in Cincinnati. The Bengals won that game one,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so we'll reference that game for sure. Over under fifty

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 1>four and a half points, high scoring game. Funny things,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Both defenses are pretty good. Bengals defense is better than

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>people think. What's pretty good too is the weather forty

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>three degrees and clear minimum wins. Can't ask for anything

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>better this time a year in Kansas City. Should be

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>uh again, should be high scoring games, should be fun

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy purposes. Um, we'll start with the running game

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>though with the Bengals and Joe Mixing. Initially, I was like,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give Mixing and a and this one. It's

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a shootout, right, But I'm just gonna give him a

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>b here. He did not have a good game on

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the ground against the Chiefs in that week's seventeen game,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve carries for forty six scoreless yards. Casey has been

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>good against the run this year. They've only surrendered seven

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns and running backs in the regular season. That's great,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really great. Uh. They held Nagi Davis and Devin's Singletary

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs to combine fifty five yards on twenty

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>two carries. Singletary did run for a touchdown last week,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's more about the receiving angle for mixing in

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this one. He's been very active in the passing game

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as of late, total twenty six targets over his last four.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>In that week seventeen game, he had seven catches for

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>forty yards. The Chiefs have allowed the fourth most catches

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and third most receiving arts running backs like that the

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>regular season, So a hundred plus combo yards should be

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the cards. But I would not be shocked if

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if he has more receiving yards than rushing yards in

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this game. So if that reason just to be for him,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase though he gets an A because he was

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a league winner. Levin catches two hundred and sixty six

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>yards and three touchdowns. Now, okay, here the contrary and

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>point up for that would be Chiefs go into this

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>week of prep and the clear mandate is we're not

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to let Jamaar Chase beat us again. Yeah, and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they do whatever it takes to take away Chase. Meanwhile, Higgins,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Boyd and others might have an opportunity to feast if

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's how the Chiefs choose to attack this. Yeah, the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have surrendered the fifth most wide receiver touchdowns in

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. Six wide receiver touchdowns surrendered in the

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>playoffs so far, six six two by the Steelers and

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in four by Gabe Davis alone. And that's the angle there,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>uh for te Higgins, if you're trying to be contrarian DFS,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Chase is gonna be the chalkiest wide receiver. He's He's

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>less expensive on no sites than Um Cooper, Cup, Deebo Samuel.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Then as Jamaar Chase. Everyone's gonna look at the weeks

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen game. But with bodes well for te Higgins, let's

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>jump to him. I'll give him a b even though

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I like him more in this game. Is the Chiefs

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>held Stefon Diggs to three catches for seven yards last week,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and Jamaar Chase is the Stefan Biggs of the Bengals,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>right And uh, the just mentioned Gabe Davis two yards

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and four touchdowns. He's the number two receiver for the Bengals,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So uh, I'm sorry for the Bills. Higgins the number

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>two for the Bengals, just three catches sixty two yards

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the week seventeen game, did not score. It was

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>all about Chase, of course, but uh, I like Higgins

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just as much as Chase. And if if you're only

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>picking one Bengals receiver pairing with Joe Burrow or not

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in DFS, if you want to be contrarian, you go

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with Tee Higgins. I think he has the chance to

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>outproduce Jamaar Chase in this game. Um, the safest play

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>might be Tyler Boyd just to see for him. Though

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>four catches thirty six yards in a touchdown in the

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen game, he did not score last week against Tennessee,

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but he had touchdowns in each of the four games prior.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley Isaiah Mackenzie combined for seven catches on nine

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>targets against the Chiefs last week, so slot receivers have

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>been active against them. So I like Boyd here and

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>going back to DFS one more time. If you're doing

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a big stack with Bengals Burrow, Higgins, Boyd, that's how

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you deferrange your differentiate yourself in bigger tournaments. Uh. And lastly,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the past catchers, we gotta talk

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>c j Uzomo is having a great great playoffs just

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>four catches thirty two scoreless yards in Week seventeen. Opposing

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends have averaged five catches and fifty fifty two

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in the regular season against Kansas City,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty good, but they've totaled just six touchdowns. Uh.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox had a meager two catches for nine scoreless

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>yards against Kansas City in a in a high scoring affair,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't look like a great matchup for Suzy,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but neither was Tennessee last week on paper, and he

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>had a great game for his standards, so certainly a

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>viable play this week, So a see for him and

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow a easy. We had four touchdowns four six

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>yards in Week seventeen, got a slew weapons. You gotta

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>love Burrow in this one. It feels like those Chiefs

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks that have been that overperformed for a long stretch

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the regular season. It's kind of coming to roost

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>now and you know they kind of are who they

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are and to some degree, you know, Mike Hughes uh

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>uh assurdavious Award. You know those Hues especially is a

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>meager talent awards banged up. I wonder if there's uh,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like those guys are exploitable at cornerback and

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>should mention Honey Badger Tyrone Matthew in concussion protocol right safety,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but he should he should play in this game, so

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge Forenzamaica. But he's trending, he's

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>trending towards playing. I expect him to play all right

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>over the over the chief side. We'll start with the

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Darryl Williams got all the work in that

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen games and he's dead to us now. Yeah

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he might he's uh, he's kind of had setbacks this

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>week in practice. Not like it really would have mattered

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>anyway if he was active. Or not, he'd be up

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>third in that pecking order. But Williams had a hundred

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and seven combo yards and two rushing touchdowns in that game.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So but he got almost all the work in that game.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And this feels like we're going to have two different

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>guys to get a lot of it's Jerick McKinnon and

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Hilaire gonna give him both the CE. McKinnon

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>had ten carries for twenty four scoreless yards against Buffalo

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>last week. He did catch five passes for fifty four

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>yards on seven targets. C E. H was far more

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>effective rushing last week, sixty carries on just seven sixty

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>yards on seven carries. So I guess we see with

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>more rush attempts in this game. Uh, it's really more

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>about the receiving angle with Jet here. The Bengals have

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fifth most catches to running backs in the

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>regular season, So I like beginning with the c UM

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and again c H gets a C two mentioned the

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>seven carries for sixty yards last week. Josh Jacobs had

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty three yards on just thirteen carries in the wild

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>card round against the Bengals. Derrick Henry Deante Foreman combined

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for twenty four carries, a hundred yards and a touchdown

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals last week. Uh, since he was without

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackles Josh Tupo and Mike Daniels last week. Both

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>have been practicing this week they should play. That will

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>help a little bit there, but both both. You gotta

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like both the running backs for the Chief's offense, of course,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of liking, nay loving someone, Travis Kelsey, Hey,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can I give him an A plus? It's off season plus? Well, no,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you will know what what you can give him is

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy Fonzie a year. I should have given him that.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know I love my my revenge spite angles.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey born in Ohio, went to University of Cincinnati.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a Cincinnati universe. I think his University of Cincinnati.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals chose to draft Tyler Eifert over Tyler Kelsey

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>way back in and there was like four other teams

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that drafted the tight end over Travis Kelsey. They're probably

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>still kicking themselves over that. So love Kelsey this week.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>He was somewhat quiet by his standards in that week's

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen game five catches twenty five yards. He did score

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, but a great match up here. The Bengals

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>were top five in the most catches, yards and touchdown

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>surrendered to tight ends in the regular season. Last week,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's tight ends did nothing. But that's pretty understandable, uh,

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>since he did yield twelve targets to be very comparable

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller. In the wild card round he caught seven. Uh.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Foster Moreau also saw three targets in that game, so

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>tight ends very active against the Bengals. Kelsey is my

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>pick for the highest scoring skill position player on this

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>slate by far. I don't think I could fade him

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>under any circumstances. Really, I will quickly throw out Noah

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Gray as a punt option in DFS. Dirt cheap would

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be a differentiator. If he volters a touchdown. He has

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>seen the field in a couple of targets here in there.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It would be a dirty, dirty touchdown, but you never know. Okay,

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>over to Tyreek Hill and the rest of the wide receivers.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Hill gets an A as well, despite just six catches

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for forty scoreless yards in Week seventeen. In the Week

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen game, I expect a better performance on Sunday. Posing

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the regular season didn't put up great

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers against the Bengals, collectively, averaging thirteen catches, one fifty

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>six yards and zero point nine touchdowns, less than the

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game, but Cincinnati has a surrendered a touchdown

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to the position in sixth straight, including one to A. J.

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Brown last week, who also had a hundred forty two yards.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Whiteouts combined for two hundred and seven yards in

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that game. Uh. The week prior, Las Vegas wide receivers

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>total seventeen catches on six yards in a touchdown. So

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>easy a for Tyree Hill and over to Byron Pringle

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nicole Hardman. Uh. We like Pringle Moore on this show.

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving both the c uh Pringle the stronger. See.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>In Week seventeen, Pringle had three and my guy, I'm

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm big, I'm I'm big into the Pringle. Yeah, he

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>had three catches thirty five yards, didn't score. Hardman one

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>catch fifty three yards didn't score. Neither did much. But

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last three games, Pringle has seen seven targets

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and all at least seven targets in all three, he's

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>pulling away from the pack a little bit. Like I

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>keep interrupting, No, no no worries. Uh, twenty two targets over

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that three game span. Hardman has sixteen targets over that

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>same span, but just five total over his last two games.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, Pringle has has separated himself from Hardman's

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that I think that one

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons you saw Josh Gordon get demoted to

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the practice squad is because springs Pringle's snap count and

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness has gotten so high that there's just there's no place,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no plays left for Josh Gordon on the field anymore.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And and DeMarcus Robinson is still ahead of Josh Gordon.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw him his name out there quickly. He he

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>does get a bench created, but he has another punt

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>play option in DFS, he's gonna be on the field.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And in this what should be a high scoring affair

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>can pay the same amount basically for Pringle in a

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>DFS world, right, and you know a little more than

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like it's a grand twelve hundred or something like that.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It's enough of a difference. But uh not not loving

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Robinson to llege obviously, and but in last and

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly not least, Patrick Mahomes gets an a just two

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>passing yards two touchdowns. In the week's seventeen game, we

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Williams, Darryl Williams had two rushing touchdowns. Uh,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes had twenty five rushing yards in that game. Josh

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Allen had I don't know a good amount of rushing

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>yards as the Bengals last week, and he had about

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean against the Chief he had I think sixty

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves. And the Bengals that allow the sixth

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards of this season. Not not They're a

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>good defense, not great. Mahomes is a great quarterback. Should

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be a great game. But who go Bengals, Go Bengals.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break. When we come back, we'll break

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>down forty nine at Rams Fantasy Football Weekly Styles. Stay tuned,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Forty Niners take on the Rams,

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and obviously, these teams met twice in the regular season.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You would think, since the Rams are favored in this game,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that they would have won any of those two, but no,

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>those are forty Niners victories. And you mentioned how that

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Forts have been somewhat road Warriors. Uh, they have.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>This is trending. Despite the Rams efforts to suppress ticket sales,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's still it's gonna be more in this game. It's

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at least and they're real fans too. The

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams fans are gonna be like extras from like the

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>paramount set or something like the It's not as bad

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as when the Chargers play it so far, right, I

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mean that's like the Rams because they moved to l

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>A and immediately went to the Super Bowl, have gotten

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate fan base. So I still think it's going

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to be I think it will be more Rams fans

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>than Niners fans, but there will be plenty of They

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Area money that's bought their way into so far one

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>way or another. Um. Rams lost both of the games,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>including the Niners win an in game and Week eighteen,

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to watch the status of the ankle injury

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to elite left tackle Trent Williams. That is a big

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>X factor in this game, so something you want to

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>watch there as well. Let's start with the Let's start

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with the running game. Elijah Mitchell just gets a C

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>grade for me. Uh. He had the thirteen carries last week,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>which was way way way down for me. Probably rolled

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>into that averaging twice as many, but that Packer bad

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>weather game, Niners offense couldn't get in and go in

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of punts. Um, you know. Even factoring in that

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen carry game the last six games, he's still averaging

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three carries per game, which I do like. In

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the two meetings with the Rams this year, Elijah Mitchell

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>carried the ball forty eight times, both of them wins.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>One of them was a lopsided wins, so they gave

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell lots of carries, but he wasn't efficient. The average

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just three and a half yards per carry. That was

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a full yard under his season average. Against the Rams,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a good run defense. He seemed declining rushing averages

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games, down to just three yards per

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>carry last week, Brian, and with that knee injury, I

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just feel like Elijah Mitchell, just the efficiency and the

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness just doesn't feel like it's there right now. And

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>then add in he's never played this much football in

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one year either, well not even close. Yeah. Adding Deebo

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Samuel with back to back ten carry games, and my

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sky high confidence for Mitchell that I had had at

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season and even in the first

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of games of the playoffs. Uh, it's chiseled away

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And so I am nervous about Mitchell.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I like his chances of scoring. L A is allowed

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>to touchdown per game over the last nine games. Uh.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And Jeff Wilson may very well not play. He did

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not practice on Wednesday or Thursday. Not sure about Friday yet.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Um so well, Um, I've got the sea Grantam Mitchell.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he finds the end zone here, but I

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised for you. Peters out in like the

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty yard range, sixty yard range. Yeah. Leonard Fournette had

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a great game behind a battered old line for the Books,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was dinged up himself. Had a good game

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams last week. If Trent Williams comes back,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll knock Elijah Mitchell up to a B grade,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>But he sits at a C right now with with

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not knowing what Trent Williams status is. Um I mentioned

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's really no other running backs to mention, but we'll

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>use that as our transition to Deebo Samuel, who I

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned had the ten carries and back to back games

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just frankly looks fresher as a running back than Mitchell does.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The knee injury, all the carries, everything else from Mitchell

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Um and I think it was very telling at the

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>end of last week's game, Brian, when the Niners had

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>had to get a first down to Salt Way the

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers on their own field and arctic conditions, they ran

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball with their wide receiver, Deebo Samuel. He's got

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to touch the ball at least twenty times in this

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>game for them to have a chance. Well, not not carries,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking catches, and still if they're gonna win, I

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>mean I'd love it. Don't get me wrong, but that

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of touches for Deebo Samuel Um monster

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>games for Deebo and both meetings with Los Angeles three

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns spread against across the two games. Hundred and forty

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>total yards, hundred thirty three total yards. A grade for

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel in this one. Brandon Aok gets a B grade.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He had a huge game in the Week sixteen, sorry,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Week eighteen game against the Rams with the Rams

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to finally, you know, stop Samuel and do anything

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>they can to stop Samuel. There's gonna be opportunities for

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ayou can in better coverage. In the two games against

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rams has seen only Jalen Ramsey for one pass attempt.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>They really use Ramsey on Deebo Samuel. So he's doing

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a very good job. I like I you can this

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one be great for him. He's gonna get softer coverage

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>against David Long and Darius Williams. Darius Williams looked awful

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>when the Bucks were coming, like there was a sixth

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>straight plays and then he couldn't make Yeah, he bad.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I like you. I think I think

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice I think it's a nice sneaky play here.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with the receivers, I want to talk about Juan Jennings.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Last week I told you I liked Jennings because slot

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers had some success against the Bucks. He only ended

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>up with like two catches for ten yards, but he

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>did have a drop. He had he had one drop

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and then another near miss that would have put him

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>closer to forty yards. Anyway, he scored twice against the

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Niners in the Week eight team matchup from inside the

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>five yard line. Jennings has as many catches as the

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>rest of the team combined this year from inside the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>five yard line. So if you're looking for a cheap

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in DFS, John Jennings is a possibility. I will

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>mention Mohammed san who is going to return from his

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>knee injury in this game and could take a little

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the slot work, but I really don't think so, because

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Jenny has been better. I keep forgetting that he's on

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the team. I know well, he hasn't played since Week nine,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's a good Travis Benjamin on the fort too,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think mostly in a special team's role, but yes,

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the tight end position of George Kittle.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Rams are solid tight end defense. Only two tight ends

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>had six receptions against the Rams all year. It was

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews and t J. Hockenson. Neither one of him scored.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They had eighty nine yards for Andrews just forty eight

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>yards on the six receptions for t J. Hockenson. Last week,

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady targeted Gronk eleven times, only four completions. There's

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a good tight end defense. No tight end has scored

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams since Week ten, but in Week ten

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it was George George Kittle, Yeah, he got it. I

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think he has a long running good history against the

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Rams for whatever reason. I have the numbers in front

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of me, but only had ten yards in the week

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>A team meeting. Though also I'll mention that did not

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>score in that meeting. Um before last week, and Kittle

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had kind of a little of a breakout game, he

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>was by far it was the only receiver do anything

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Packers last week. He had been held under

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine yards in four straight games. They've been badly

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>under use it, under utilizing George Kittle. Prior to last week,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he had like one of the worst drops you would

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ever see, and then then and then the very next target,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>it was like one of the most amazing, no, one

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>of those amazing catches you've ever seen. The complete gin

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and Yang of pass catching ability they did. They did

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it up getting that same like thirty ish yard completion

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I will look like ultimately the same route later in

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that same game to Kittle. So I gotta be great

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on Kittle. Tough matchup, but Kittle's pretty special. They still

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>need to go to him. But I don't see the

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a upside that you often get from George Kittle at

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, and in DFS I probably would

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>not pay his price tag in this matchup. I believe

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that is everybody. That is everybody for San Francisco. Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, sorry. So you know, given that we've got

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>an A grade on Samuel to Be grades on his receivers,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on John Jennings, I've got a B

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>grade on Garoppolo here surprisingly safe despite the fact that

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't scored in two straight games, but prior to that,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>he had scored in every single game this year that

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he had played in, and he had topped two hundred

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>nine nine yards in four of the last five regular

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>season games, including putting up three d sixteen yards against

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these same Rams and Week A team. Uh B, Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>don't don't see this is I think this is a

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>great contrarian play. Recently, everybody's thinking about this Packer game.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo look bad, the arctic conditions, getting drops over the field,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. I love flipping it to a contrarian play.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Some people have given up all hope, so I do

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>real quick. It's not a story. But he's four man

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>uh or woman teams on underdog the best ball, UH

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>site and you can you have to pick up quarterback.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>You only get one quarterback, and of course Garoppolo is

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the last quarterback taken. And when I whenever I'm stuck

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with the San Francisco San Francisco quarterback, I'll take Garoppolo.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But you see some people just taking tray Lance. But

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>granted they are trying to differentiate themselves from the field.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But Lance commit. Could Lance committ at the goal line

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and still a rushing touchdown? Not impossible, but they haven't

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>used him that way since the beginning of the season,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so it would be it would be a deep callback.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like more people are banking on a benching

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>than just like a or an injury. He has injured, right,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Garppolo still got the shoulder and finger. But yeah, actually

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel I feel pretty good about Garoppolo. If you're gonna,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go contrarian at quarterback, this is

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>your play. Obviously, with only the other four quarterbacks are

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>also he'll be under like five the big time. Probably true.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably true. Let's go to the rams, uh, let's start

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>running game on the ramps and cam acres. Who he

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he relegated Tony Sony Michelle to the bench. Last week.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>He's winning. He won the time share battle eight one

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of the naps to of the snaps. I still can't

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>believe he's back playing after I can't get this level.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, his running looks pretty good for cam Akers,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but he nearly fumbled the game away last week. Two

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>lost fumbles. If he has an early fumble in this game, Brian,

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the bend benching is not is not impossible here. You

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>can't you. It's a good time to go in the doghouse.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're fumbling the ball, there's no no time to gap.

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't on the field. Single elimination playoffs. Niners are

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>great run defense. Forty Niners finished six against the run

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season, giving up just seventy five yards

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>per game. No runner his top fifty eight yards since

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Week nine. That's early November, to tell you how long

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>ago Week nine was. And that includes in the playoffs

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Zeke thirty one yards, Aaron Jones forty one yards, and

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that was with A. J. Dillon missing half of the game.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Small small numbers. Through the second half of the season,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>including the playoffs, San Francisco is giving up just three

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>point four yards per carry, which would have made them

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the number one run defense across the full season. Do

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you have any concerns with Damiko Ryan's defensive coordinators drawing

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interest as a head coaching candid people

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in here in Minnesota. Distract is that it not letting

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>him interview yet he's not allowed to with the new

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>league rules. So they made a rule. Yeah, they do

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it during the bye week, back in the bye week,

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or you gotta wait till after They didn't know that, yea,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that they should have been doing that basically forever. Yeah,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I know, because it happened to know. Yeah, alright, so

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that's cam Akers. I'm I'm pretty down on cam Akers here.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C grade for the reasons that

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned. Let's go to the passing game, and

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with Cooper Cup. Of course obvious a.

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>He had overeen yards and both of the games against

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners running out of the slot. He goes

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>against Kwan Williams. Kwan isn't bad, he hasn't a lot

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of He's not allowed to touch down all year, But

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>who cares? Cooper Cups a monster. He's going to get

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>his numbers and he still gets an A grade. Speaking

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of almost fumbling the game away, he almost did the

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Well, he did fumble which almost led to

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole game going bye bye for the Rams, but

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>correct although the cam Akers fumble at the goal line

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the first half, massive implications on

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole rest of the game. Really um okay, And

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so Cooper Cups and obviously let's talk about ob jam

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>putting him down at his seat level here with Cooper

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Cups sitting on you know what should be a pretty

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>good game, is there enough left to go around for

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>oh b J. We have seen some tandems do okay

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>against the forty niners. Feeling and Jefferson did okay, Higgins

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and Chase did okayt Cafine Lot did did okay. But

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>it's hardly a lock, and more often than not, teams

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>playing the forty Niners it's only the main guy that

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>performs reliably well and generally are not too deep. And

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that includes in the playoffs when only Davante Adams got

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>paid and only Amrii Cooper got paid. Nobody else on

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>either team, no receiver on either team did anything, including

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Ceedee lamb who is a disaster? I

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know exactly joke. If that's the whole we'll have whole

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>offseason shows on Ceedee lamb Um. O b J is

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>very touchdown dependent, with less than thirty nine yards and

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>four of the past five games he's gonna face cornerback

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Dante Johnson the most often. Johnson is roughly fourth string

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>here on the always churning Niners secondary. I don't like

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>him very much, but the Niners have been have been

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>battling gamely with marginal replacement level cornerbacks all year long,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So I've just got the C grade on O. B J.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You need the touchdown. If he doesn't give you the touchdown,

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he hurts your team, but he might score then. Van

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson's on the bench. He's dealing with the knee injury.

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Super low volume makes him unstartable. He has had one

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or two catches in five of the past six games.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Can't count on I can't count anything here for whatever reason,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if he's inactive or not for whatever reason, if he

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>holds him out or he gets hurt in game. It's

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>with Ben Sco and Wreck. So there's a punt option

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>for you if you're you're desperate, but I'd rather go

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to Tyler Higbee. He had two good games against San

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Francisco this year. The first game thirty eight yards, touchdown,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>second game fifty five yards and two touchdowns, but those

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>games are mostly an outlier for Higby. The average tight

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>end game against San Francisco is just thirty five catches

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and and thirty four yards per game. UM Diners have

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>been a good tight end defense. Dalin Schultz did put

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>up eighty nine yards in the first playoff game, but

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>then last week the Green Bay tight ends, granted they're

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>not good. They didn't even catch a pass so well.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Mars Eighties Lewis did, but he fumbled it away. And

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of game losing bumbles or contributing to games lost,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>way to go Marcin. Yeah, actually I think he got

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to zero yards on that play. I think he had

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a zero yard box score. Maybe I just misread it,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but all right, So then let's go to the final

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>player left here, Matthew Stafford. I've got an A grade

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on Cup, I've got to C grades on on O

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>b J and Tyler Higbee. B grade on Stafford here

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>um one good game against San Francisco, one bad game,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco. The Niners are a good past defense

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that plays better than its talent would suggest. The average

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>passing game against San Francisco over the past six games

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just two d twenty yards and one point one touchdowns.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, these have been playoff games, and good team

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>most predominantly good teams in this mix, including Matthew Stafford,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 1>is part of that two and twenty yards and one

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>point one touchdowns. I'm I'm lukewarm on him here, that's it.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. Who you got, I've got forty Niners,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>even though I keep waiting for the other shoe to

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>drop at this point, why not thet I like San

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fran To, even though they don't like being called San

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fran in San fran Like, who you got? I've got

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got Chiefs just because I can't get my cell

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>off to take Patrick Mahomes. You know, go against Patrick

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and Arrowhead. How about you. You've got Bengals. I

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gotta go Bengals. It's gonna be a great game, or

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we can only hope it's a great game. And the Chiefs,

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously season playoff veterans at this point, been too two

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>straight Super Bowls. But I don't know that that game

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>last week that a little bit well, not radily, but

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was an emotional roller coaster for him.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they might be spent maybe a little bit.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>There could be they could come out flat in this one.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to Paul Allen, my radio friend Paul Allen,

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was in Las Vegas last weekend

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and into this week, and he he placed a first

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>half wager on the Bengals for exactly that reason. I

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>felt like there was there was a good chance that

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were going to come out flat in this

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>because of all just all the emotions of the win

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from last week. Yeah, unbelievable. Uh, we'll find out. We'll

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>find out. We'll break down the Super Bowl game in

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Not sure what we're gonna do next week.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Talk about Ceedee Lamb at the Ceedee Lamb Show. We

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>do a way too early, like first round mock or

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that for next year. We'll figure it out.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll figure it out. Thanks for listening to everybody. We'll

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be back next week with more Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio. For

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts, from my heart Radio, visit the I heart

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.