Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Mark Mass Show,
Speaker 1: where we talk about the decentralized revolution, the way the
Speaker 1: world is swinging, the pendulum swinging from centralization to decentralization.
Speaker 1: We look at this through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology. Of course, the technology being bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, the
Speaker 1: decentralization that is leading to the acceleration of this decentralized revolution.
Speaker 1: And I like to look at the convergence of these
Speaker 1: three things to see just how quickly things are changing. Now. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's like the frog and the boiling pot, the proverbial,
Speaker 1: you know, frog and the boiling pot of water. It's
Speaker 1: like it happens like slowly, so you don't really notice it,
Speaker 1: but it's happening. And if you can start to learn
Speaker 1: to see the signpost, you can see how fast this
Speaker 1: is changing now. Um, the world obviously has been swinging
Speaker 1: towards centralization, and we have the the World Economic Forum
Speaker 1: and the World Trade Organization that you and the I
Speaker 1: M F, etcetera. And they've been working towards this for
Speaker 1: a long time. But of course the more they push,
Speaker 1: the more they squeeze, the more things are falling back.
Speaker 1: And some of the things we can see that have
Speaker 1: been planned for a long time. There was an article
Speaker 1: that came out this week that was pretty shocking to
Speaker 1: a lot of people. Uh, really shocking to a lot
Speaker 1: of people, But it actually shouldn't be because this article
Speaker 1: is actually pretty old. And as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: there's an article what what came out this week was
Speaker 1: shocking because of what it proposed, but what proposed is
Speaker 1: actually just coming true, which is something that was actually
Speaker 1: proposed fifteen years ago. So an article came out in
Speaker 1: December of two thousand six, and the article is plans
Speaker 1: to create a carbon trading credit card for everyone. Now
Speaker 1: I've covered this before about a year ago. I covered
Speaker 1: how MasterCard is making a credit card that would track
Speaker 1: carbon purchases. You can find that on my YouTube channel.
Speaker 1: Just search Mark Moss on YouTube. But this article came
Speaker 1: out in two thousand and six and it says that
Speaker 1: there was a plans for this, so, um, you shouldn't
Speaker 1: been caught off guard, unless, of course, you weren't paying attention.
Speaker 1: And it says here that every citizen would be issued
Speaker 1: with a carbon credit card to be swiped every time
Speaker 1: they bought gas, paid for an electricity bill, utility bill,
Speaker 1: booked an airline ticket and under a nationwide carbon rationing scheme,
Speaker 1: rationing scheme, a world of scarcity, not abundance, not not
Speaker 1: the world that we live in and with unlimited amount
Speaker 1: of abundance and wealth. No, a rationing seam scheme for
Speaker 1: con scarcity that could come into operation within five years. Now.
Speaker 1: This was written fifteen years ago. They said I could
Speaker 1: come into operation five years. It was a little bit
Speaker 1: behind the time. But here it is today. But first
Speaker 1: I was talking about what they were talking about here
Speaker 1: fifteen years ago. And it says that under the schemes,
Speaker 1: no such thing as a conspiracy. Right, what's the definition
Speaker 1: of a conspiracy. Conspiracy is two or more people plotting
Speaker 1: to do something. Conspiracies happen all the time. My wife
Speaker 1: and I conspire against our kids all the time. Um,
Speaker 1: this scheme, this is no such thing as a conspiracy. Well,
Speaker 1: this is a scheme where everybody would be given an
Speaker 1: annual allowance of the carbon they could expend on a
Speaker 1: range of products, food, energy, and travel. If they want
Speaker 1: to use more carbon, they'd be able to buy it
Speaker 1: from somebody else, and they could sell any surplus. So
Speaker 1: you only get a certain amount of food, energy, and travel.
Speaker 1: That's it. Now, if you're really rich, you can buy
Speaker 1: extra credits. Probably if you're really important, like John Kerry
Speaker 1: telling African nations that they shouldn't have any natural gas
Speaker 1: to bring them out of poverty. And he's flying there
Speaker 1: on his private jet to tell them. But you know,
Speaker 1: he's doing good for the world, so he could go
Speaker 1: ahead and blow all that carbon. Right. So I suppose
Speaker 1: if you're a John carry or someone who's doing good
Speaker 1: for the world, you get extra carbon. Or if you're
Speaker 1: someone very rich, the poor people though you get you
Speaker 1: you don't. You don't have enough carbon credits, so no
Speaker 1: red meat for you. You get the slop, the piece
Speaker 1: sup the bugs. That's what you get. Um, you don't
Speaker 1: get to travel. You used all your carbon credits to
Speaker 1: keep your house warm in the winter. You didn't need
Speaker 1: to keep your house warm. You could have just you know,
Speaker 1: worn long Johns and a bunch of blankets, and then
Speaker 1: you could have saved those credits and then maybe you
Speaker 1: could have got a bus to go see your mom
Speaker 1: fifty miles away, not a plane ticket. You don't have
Speaker 1: enough credits for a plane ticket, so you couldn't get that.
Speaker 1: That's what they're talking about here. I know that sounds crazy.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna read it again. Everybody would be given
Speaker 1: an annual allowance of the carbon. They would expend on
Speaker 1: a range of products, food, energy, and travel. They wanted
Speaker 1: to use more carbon, they would buy it from somebody
Speaker 1: else so they could sell it. I'm poor, I don't
Speaker 1: have enough money. I'll sell my allotment and I'll just um,
Speaker 1: I'll just eat bugs and p slop and i won't
Speaker 1: ever travel, and I'll just use blankets. Yeah, it says
Speaker 1: carbon allowances could be treated as bank accounts. Of course,
Speaker 1: we store that in our bank. Um, we can trade
Speaker 1: them through our bank system. Um. And think about this.
Speaker 1: We'll get into this in a in a minute. Actually,
Speaker 1: but how would they enforce something like this? At what
Speaker 1: point do they say that I can't get any more meat? Like? Who?
Speaker 1: Like some like a police officer comes to my house
Speaker 1: and watches me at the grocery store? Like, how do
Speaker 1: they enforce that? We'll come back to that. So this, uh,
Speaker 1: that was this article that has read. It was fifteen
Speaker 1: years ago, but it resurfaced just this week, of course,
Speaker 1: by none other than the World Economic Forum the West.
Speaker 1: They came up with an article titled Mike Carbon An
Speaker 1: Approach for Inclusive and Sustainable Cities and so um. They
Speaker 1: are basically saying that this world that was envisioned fifteen
Speaker 1: years ago is back now. They say that there's three
Speaker 1: developments that really helped them see that they could shape
Speaker 1: the is my carbon initiative. One of them was the pandemic,
Speaker 1: and the pandemic was an amazing test of social responsibility.
Speaker 1: No one could have imagined that all these people would
Speaker 1: have willingly just locked themselves down in their home, maintained
Speaker 1: social distancing war masks blindly accepted, didn't taken mass fascinations,
Speaker 1: accepted contract tracing applications to monitor not just their own
Speaker 1: movements but who they interact with. It demonstrated the core
Speaker 1: of individual social responsibility. They say, how good. Then they
Speaker 1: talk about all this the new technological breakthroughs number two,
Speaker 1: the Fourth Industrial Revolution as it's called now. The head
Speaker 1: of the World up Comic Forum, Claud Schwab, wrote a book. Well,
Speaker 1: he's written several books, but he's written a book called
Speaker 1: the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Now I've read the book. I've
Speaker 1: read his other book, covidenteen, The Great Reset. I haven't
Speaker 1: read his most recent book, the Great Narrative, But I
Speaker 1: have read there the two. I don't like to tell
Speaker 1: people what's in the books because it makes me sound
Speaker 1: like a crazy person. What I'd recommend is that you
Speaker 1: go read the book for yourself. I say that I
Speaker 1: take them at their word. They're the ones that said it.
Speaker 1: Let them tell you what it has to say. So
Speaker 1: read what the Fourth Industrial Revolution is. Let me just
Speaker 1: let me. Let me, let me give you a hint.
Speaker 1: Industrial Revolution was bringing machines. So before the Industrial Revolution,
Speaker 1: we had, you know, horsepower and manpower. The Industrial Revolution
Speaker 1: brought machines that could do the work of five thousand men.
Speaker 1: What's the fourth Industrial Revolution? The fourth and fourth Industrial
Speaker 1: Revolution is the merger of man and machine. He talks
Speaker 1: about a world where you can't even tell the difference
Speaker 1: between man and machine. We have chips in our brains.
Speaker 1: They all of our brain waves go into AI clouds
Speaker 1: that they can read, and on and on and on.
Speaker 1: That's in fourth Industry Revolution. I say, no, thank you.
Speaker 1: They talk about emergent technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, and
Speaker 1: digitalization that can enable tracking personal carbon emissions. How nice
Speaker 1: new ways to track you see what they're saying here?
Speaker 1: They have a world like I'm for Him as a
Speaker 1: scale three sixty initiative that demonstrates the use of Fourth
Speaker 1: Industrial Revolution technologies across the whole life cycle. There can
Speaker 1: be there's major advances, uh, including transportation and personalized apps
Speaker 1: like an account for your personal admissions. Now, again, how
Speaker 1: do they get you to buy into this? How do
Speaker 1: they get you to buy into this and not buy
Speaker 1: plane tickets, not travel to go to your mom, not
Speaker 1: have any more red meat, and on and on and on. Well,
Speaker 1: there's part indoctrination, which would get you to buy into
Speaker 1: it that way, and then if you don't buy into it,
Speaker 1: then there's the forced means. We're gonna get more into
Speaker 1: that in a minute. You're listening to the Mark ma
Speaker 1: Show talking about the decentralized Revolution, the way the world
Speaker 1: is swinging from centralization towards decentralization, and we look at
Speaker 1: through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. We're talking
Speaker 1: about politics, Uh, it's around the finance, and of course
Speaker 1: it's through the technology. I'm gonna back with more and
Speaker 1: this in a minute, talking about what just came out
Speaker 1: this week from the World Luck Coming Forum. You don't
Speaker 1: want to miss it. We're gonna talk about the bigger
Speaker 1: implications of this and the dangers to you. So I'll
Speaker 1: be back with that and more in a minute. Don't
Speaker 1: go away, Oh, welcome back. You are listening to the
Speaker 1: Mark Ma Show. We're talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking
Speaker 1: about the way the world's changing rapidly, rapidly, rapidly. Right
Speaker 1: BeForever Nic it's from centralization to decentralization, and the centralization
Speaker 1: is still they're in full effect. Now I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: too back to what they're doing and how they want
Speaker 1: to enforce this specifically. Of course it's with technology, but this,
Speaker 1: but this came out. They want to really track individuals
Speaker 1: and make sure that they limit your own um carbon exposure. Now,
Speaker 1: where where did all this come from? And where does
Speaker 1: all this go? Let's talk about where it goes first,
Speaker 1: all right, and then we'll come back to where did
Speaker 1: it come from. Now let's see um some other things
Speaker 1: that are happening in real time. Now we have sensualization.
Speaker 1: You might think of that as collectivism or globalization. The
Speaker 1: opposite of collectivism would probably be individualism. So I am
Speaker 1: a person, I am made in God's image, I have
Speaker 1: I have been endowed by the creator right the things
Speaker 1: that are said in the Declaration of Independence. Collectively, as
Speaker 1: an individual, I have the pursuit of life, liberty, and property.
Speaker 1: I have the right to my own property, start with
Speaker 1: my own body. With what I own, I have the
Speaker 1: rights protect my own property. And that's it. Now. Collectively,
Speaker 1: at some point, maybe our interests aligned. So for example,
Speaker 1: you and I are together, an attacker comes to kill
Speaker 1: both of us, we might decide to align together to
Speaker 1: fight that attacker. We both have fields that need to
Speaker 1: be planted. I say, hey, I'll help you with yourrors
Speaker 1: if you help me with mine. So we're individuals. What
Speaker 1: we want maybe different, but sometimes our interests come together
Speaker 1: and they align collectively. There is there is no such
Speaker 1: thing as the state. There's individuals. The state is a
Speaker 1: collection of those individuals. What happens, though, is at some
Speaker 1: point a certain group of individuals want to have power
Speaker 1: over the rest of the people, and that starts creating
Speaker 1: centralization or central planning. Central planning always fails, It always
Speaker 1: has and the reason why it doesn't have enough data
Speaker 1: to make the decisions that need to be made in
Speaker 1: a free market, and it takes away humans motivation, incentives,
Speaker 1: things that they just don't think about. Now, let's take
Speaker 1: a look at where we're at today and where this
Speaker 1: is going really quickly. So here's this article. I saw
Speaker 1: Europe's economy and living standards are plumbering plumbing, so uh
Speaker 1: and arguably we're you know, living in the best time
Speaker 1: in history. Technologies at all time high efficiencies, an all
Speaker 1: time high life has never been better. But yet living
Speaker 1: standards are plumbing. Why is that? Well, let's see it
Speaker 1: says enterprises are on the verge of closing. In Britain,
Speaker 1: sixty of enterprises are on the verge of closing due
Speaker 1: to higher electricity prices of British British factories have reduced
Speaker 1: working hours and seven percent are temporarily closed down. Electricity
Speaker 1: bills have risen by more than one percent compared to
Speaker 1: last year. So that's in Britain, sixty of enterprises are
Speaker 1: on the verge of closing down. If six of the
Speaker 1: enterprises closed down, what happens, Well, all those people that
Speaker 1: had jobs there don't have jobs anymore. Now all those
Speaker 1: people are unemployment, they have no income, they're not spending
Speaker 1: money and other people's businesses, and then those businesses closed down,
Speaker 1: and then those people are at a job and then
Speaker 1: they don't have any money and they don't spend money
Speaker 1: and other people's businesses anymore. On top of that, now
Speaker 1: we don't have any business provide any goods and services
Speaker 1: or what would be considered wealth. Right, we wealth is
Speaker 1: goods and services. We need businesses to produce those things,
Speaker 1: goods and services. But yet sixty on the verge of
Speaker 1: closing down. Why higher electricity prices. Now, let's keep going
Speaker 1: and then we'll talk about this. In Germany, the number
Speaker 1: of firms and individuals went bankrupt in August alone just
Speaker 1: last month rose compared to the same period last year.
Speaker 1: The figure was significantly higher than German analysts has had
Speaker 1: expected our forecast. According to the experts, and they expected
Speaker 1: through the autumn the number of bankruptcies will only increase.
Speaker 1: German Chancellor Olaf Schlotz acknowledged that many Germans have faced
Speaker 1: with rising prices for fuel and food. So again in Germany,
Speaker 1: the number of businesses and individuals that went bankrupt just
Speaker 1: lacks last month or up over This is way higher
Speaker 1: than people had forecast. It's only going to get worse
Speaker 1: through the fall, and that the chance of oil off
Speaker 1: schlots acknowledged that this is happening because of rising prices
Speaker 1: for fuel. Again, the same as Britain wire six percent
Speaker 1: in the business going out of business because of fuel
Speaker 1: because of energy prices. Now we're just barely getting started.
Speaker 1: The crisis is just ahead. At the same time, many
Speaker 1: experts believed that stopping the nord Stream will cause Europe's
Speaker 1: worst energy crisis in decades. So we haven't even seen
Speaker 1: a yet. Many experts expect this to see the worst
Speaker 1: crisis in decades. The circumstances that it's we've already seen
Speaker 1: a sharp increase in energy resources on the European market,
Speaker 1: which is why businesses and in Britain are going out
Speaker 1: of business, which is why bankruptcies are going through the
Speaker 1: roof in Germany. As a result, energy bills of European
Speaker 1: households have increased. According to Golden Sacks analyst, its cumulative
Speaker 1: cost will peak in early So business is going out
Speaker 1: of business in the UK, increase in bankruptcies in Germany
Speaker 1: and we haven't even gotten to the peak of it yet.
Speaker 1: They're saying the peak will come in early three. But
Speaker 1: as I just said, the experts were already caught off guard.
Speaker 1: It's already way worse than the thought it would be.
Speaker 1: Is it a chance that we won't see the peak
Speaker 1: for a while? It says that the increased cost of
Speaker 1: gas or energy has an adverse effect on the living
Speaker 1: standard of people. Duh. As the world gets more access
Speaker 1: to cheap, abundant energy, human life flourishes. We can use
Speaker 1: machines to do the work of five thousand men than
Speaker 1: we can and use that time to create more machines,
Speaker 1: or create more science or technology or medicine, drive the
Speaker 1: world forward. But if we have the opposite of that,
Speaker 1: which is less energy, less cheap and abundant, then we
Speaker 1: get the opposite of that. We get less human flourishment. Now,
Speaker 1: it says um. An even more dangerous problem is the
Speaker 1: falling liquidity of your European products produced at the new
Speaker 1: cost of energy. European products are becoming uncompetitive in the
Speaker 1: world market. Their price is much higher because of the
Speaker 1: cost of their energy. So in order for me to
Speaker 1: run my manufacturing plant to make cars or electronics or
Speaker 1: handbags or whatever fill in the blank, I have to
Speaker 1: have energy. I gotta turn the lights on, I gotta
Speaker 1: turn the machines on. The sewing machines c and C machines,
Speaker 1: whatever it may be. I need energy to do that.
Speaker 1: If I don't have energy to do that, I can't
Speaker 1: run my production. Or if the cost of my energy
Speaker 1: goes up, it pushes my expenses up and I may
Speaker 1: not have enough profit. If my expenses go too high
Speaker 1: and I can't sell my product for more money, or
Speaker 1: my product price comes down and I can't produce it,
Speaker 1: I have no profit. What happens shut down, which is
Speaker 1: why in Britain six of businesses are on the verge
Speaker 1: of going bankrupt because they can't afford to produce the products.
Speaker 1: But even worse than that, as I make the case
Speaker 1: over and over, wealth is not money. Money isn't wealth.
Speaker 1: Nobody wants money, which I know sounds absurd. We want
Speaker 1: the things where we need, the things that money buys us.
Speaker 1: Wealth is goods and services, so we must manufacture things.
Speaker 1: We must produce things. That's how we build wealth. And
Speaker 1: now Europeans are becoming uncompetitive in the world. They cannot
Speaker 1: produce wealth. Oh man, I'm gonna go deep with this,
Speaker 1: but I gotta take a break. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: Markmas Show. We're talking about the decentralized revolution, the way
Speaker 1: the world is swinging from centralization to decentralization, and I'm
Speaker 1: explaining why centralization is the problem. We're gonna get back
Speaker 1: to the attack that years on you, UM, and then
Speaker 1: we'll tie all the way back to what we started about,
Speaker 1: which was this carbon tax that's happening on you, and
Speaker 1: they're gonna enforce it. Gonna be careful. So I'll be
Speaker 1: back with all that and more in a minute. Don't
Speaker 1: go away, We're back, all right, Welcome back. You are
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Moa Show. We're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution each and every week, talking about the way
Speaker 1: the world is changing as we look at it through
Speaker 1: the lens of politics, finance, and technology. We're talking about UM,
Speaker 1: a plan that started fifteen years ago and now it
Speaker 1: has come to pass. This week on the World that
Speaker 1: kind of forms website, they talked about their new plan
Speaker 1: to have a carbon tracker for you, and if you
Speaker 1: don't have enough carbon credits, you won't be able to
Speaker 1: buy food or energy to heat your house or travel
Speaker 1: to go see your mother. Now we're talking about where
Speaker 1: this naviotly goes. We're kind of jumping forward talking about
Speaker 1: the massive energy crisis that's happening over in Europe, and
Speaker 1: um we left off. Were said that European products are
Speaker 1: becoming uncompetitive in the world market because their price is
Speaker 1: too high. Why is their price too Why because their
Speaker 1: energy is too So they're not able to produce wealth.
Speaker 1: They can't produce goods and services, which means they can't
Speaker 1: export anything, which means they have no energy or no
Speaker 1: money coming back in. I love this quote from Turkish
Speaker 1: president and Drudge and Edrogen. He says that Europe reaps
Speaker 1: what it sews, So European countries are themselves to blame
Speaker 1: for the problems they face this coming winter because of
Speaker 1: reduced gas supplies from Russia. That's according to the president.
Speaker 1: According to him quote, Europe reaps what it sews, while
Speaker 1: Turkey has no problems with gas supplies. Now, part of
Speaker 1: what I'm hoping that you're picking up here is centralization.
Speaker 1: None of these people that are being affected in Britain,
Speaker 1: or in Germany or in the rest of Europe, none
Speaker 1: of these people want this to happen. None of them
Speaker 1: voted for this to happen. None of them are okay
Speaker 1: with this happening. There's some central authorities that they don't
Speaker 1: want have in control over their life. They've decided that
Speaker 1: the people should suffer for the greater good. The people
Speaker 1: didn't choose that. They don't want that. That's the problem
Speaker 1: with centralization. They don't know what you want. They don't
Speaker 1: know what's best for you, and frankly, they don't have
Speaker 1: the information to be making these types of decisions. They're
Speaker 1: not God. They're not God. Now um Europe reaves put
Speaker 1: us out. It made these policies. It's like your mom,
Speaker 1: you made your bed, now you sleep in a kind
Speaker 1: of thing. They said, Turkey has no problems. The crisis
Speaker 1: in Europe is a result of political mistake. Political mistake.
Speaker 1: On one hand, sanctions against Russia are favorable only to
Speaker 1: the United States. On the other, the imposition of the
Speaker 1: post hydrocarbon economy on Europeans has shown its insolvency. So
Speaker 1: they've done it in two ways. One, they've decided to
Speaker 1: shut down their own energy. Germany shut down their nucle
Speaker 1: the reactors Europe. The UK, Britain has decided not to
Speaker 1: get its oil or natural gas out of the ground.
Speaker 1: They've decided that so their own imposition on the post
Speaker 1: hydrocarbon economy, they've decided to shut it all off, they've
Speaker 1: decided to put themselves a depending on what Russia is doing.
Speaker 1: That's on one hand, now they put themselves depending on Russia,
Speaker 1: and then on the other hand, they decided to shut
Speaker 1: Russia off. So I'm not gonna make any of my
Speaker 1: own food or grow any of my own food. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna buy it all from this person. But then
Speaker 1: I'm gonna sanction that person decided not to buy any
Speaker 1: food from that person. So now I have no food. Yes,
Speaker 1: that's exactly what's happening. But then with food they did
Speaker 1: with energy, it's insane. As a result, energy prices in
Speaker 1: Asia and Latin America today are much lower. H Asia,
Speaker 1: so much lower. Good thing for China, right, Latin America?
Speaker 1: All right, energy prices are way down and much lower,
Speaker 1: and so are the wages of production workers. Everyone's more prosperous. Congratulations.
Speaker 1: In other words, European products are totally uncompetitive. Why because
Speaker 1: the cost to produce those goods has gone up too much.
Speaker 1: Now where does this lead? Where does this lead? Now?
Speaker 1: It is because of central planning. In a decentralized world
Speaker 1: of individualism and free markets, we would never have this problem.
Speaker 1: We have this problem because of central Planning one, Central
Speaker 1: planners DESI had to shut down their fuel to central
Speaker 1: planner deside not to buy anymore. And what's the result,
Speaker 1: It says here, poverty is coming. The next logical consequence
Speaker 1: will be mass production closers and rising unemployment. That sounds
Speaker 1: pretty bad as a matter of fact, As I already
Speaker 1: said right at the beginning. In the UK they had
Speaker 1: businesses think there are are on the Virgin one bankrupt.
Speaker 1: So the next logical consequence will be mass production closures
Speaker 1: and rising unemployment. More people out of work, more business
Speaker 1: is being shut down. Um, no production of goods and
Speaker 1: services or no wealth, he says. Um, rising unemployment will
Speaker 1: cause a drop in living standards and an additional burden
Speaker 1: on government budgets as the fight against poverty requires additional
Speaker 1: social spending. So rise in unemployment will cause a drop
Speaker 1: in living standards. Yeah, if you don't have a job,
Speaker 1: a good paying job, you don't make enough money to
Speaker 1: live nice right, to go out to dinner once in
Speaker 1: a while, to be able to like take your kids
Speaker 1: on a little trip once in a while, to have
Speaker 1: a new car so it doesn't break down the side
Speaker 1: of the road all the time. Oh yeah, and you know,
Speaker 1: keep your house warm in the wintertime. Um, if you
Speaker 1: lose your job, you can't afford any of that. Now
Speaker 1: there's no heat at the winter for you. There's no
Speaker 1: one at the dinner with your spouse, there's no taking
Speaker 1: your kids on a trip, there's none of that. Your
Speaker 1: quality of life you're living standard went down. And on
Speaker 1: top of that, as if that's not already bad enough,
Speaker 1: look man, we're going we're there's massive prosperity in the world.
Speaker 1: The only reason why the quality of life should ever
Speaker 1: be going down is because of these decisions they've made.
Speaker 1: They have chosen to decide to do that. If you
Speaker 1: have a nice job paying you a million dollars a year,
Speaker 1: and you have the best life, and your wife is
Speaker 1: loving it and your kids are loving it, and you're
Speaker 1: taking vacations all the time, and you decide to quit
Speaker 1: your job and not get another job, your quality living
Speaker 1: go down. And that is your choice. That's exactly what's happening,
Speaker 1: except where it's not your choice. It's the central planners
Speaker 1: choice for you, not for them. Of course, you know,
Speaker 1: John Kerry is gonna keep flying his private jet. His
Speaker 1: life's gonna be fine. It's your life that's going to
Speaker 1: have a lower standard of living. Now on top of that,
Speaker 1: there's an additional burden on government budgets. So now the
Speaker 1: government budgets have to help out all these people. They
Speaker 1: have to fight against poverty, which requires what that's right,
Speaker 1: more spending. So now they have to continue to print
Speaker 1: more money, which causes more inflation and causes the problem
Speaker 1: to get even worse. European economy survived through stimulus, but
Speaker 1: this exacerbates in inflation. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutt said, quote,
Speaker 1: you can't help everyone. So we in the West will
Speaker 1: be a bit poorer because of the high inflation and
Speaker 1: the high energy costs. So because the inflation is so bad,
Speaker 1: you know, price of everything is going up so high,
Speaker 1: and the high energy costs, well, the high energy costs
Speaker 1: pushing the prices up so high, and the unlimited money
Speaker 1: printing that we do continue to push the price of
Speaker 1: things up so high. So because we just you know,
Speaker 1: shut down our energy and decided not to buy anymore,
Speaker 1: and you know, because we just can't stop printing trillions
Speaker 1: and trillions of dollars out of thin air, then you know,
Speaker 1: the cost of things going up and we're just going
Speaker 1: to be more poor. How about no, how about no?
Speaker 1: How about let's not print trillions of dollars for meaningless,
Speaker 1: worthless things. How About let's get our own energy out
Speaker 1: of the grounds. We can bring our costs down. How
Speaker 1: About we bring our cost downs, we can get our
Speaker 1: own manufacturing base back to work and back being competitive again.
Speaker 1: How about no, how about we just kind of go
Speaker 1: back to how it was. It was like a decade
Speaker 1: ago when we were on the path of prosperity. But
Speaker 1: instead we're just gonna accept this. Well, as he says,
Speaker 1: quote will be a bit poor because of high inflation.
Speaker 1: On top of that, migrations are ruinous to the budget.
Speaker 1: Migrant influx in the European countries of the past two
Speaker 1: decades has been less than one million people a year,
Speaker 1: but already last year one point three million people entered
Speaker 1: the countries, and this year they were already one point
Speaker 1: eight million people this year. Well, that is a massive
Speaker 1: burden on top of the government, which means what, Well,
Speaker 1: it means more money printing. They don't have any jobs
Speaker 1: because the jobs are being shut down, and so now
Speaker 1: the government has to take care of that. How much
Speaker 1: does that cost? It costs a lot of money. The
Speaker 1: average cost person immigrant per migrant is seven thousand euros
Speaker 1: per year. Germany alone spends up to fifty five billion
Speaker 1: euros annually on refugee aid. And if you think that's bad,
Speaker 1: in the United States, through the southern border through Mexico,
Speaker 1: we've had two million people already across. The United States
Speaker 1: has the same problem. I'm talking about Europe right here,
Speaker 1: but your but the US isn't the same problem. Sell
Speaker 1: central planning is failing. I'm gonna come back. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: talk about that. I want to break down these numbers
Speaker 1: for you, and then I'm gonna talk about how they're
Speaker 1: trying to enforce this and how you and I can
Speaker 1: escape this if you don't want this in your life.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Mark Moa Show. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the Decentralized Revolution, talking about the way the world is
Speaker 1: changing through politics, finance, and technology. Of course that technology
Speaker 1: is bitcoin and the decentralized Revolution. Let me be back
Speaker 1: with all of that and more in a minute. You
Speaker 1: don't want to miss it, so don't go away. Let
Speaker 1: we're back, all right, Welcome back. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Mark ma Show. We're talking about the decentralized revolution,
Speaker 1: the way the world is changing as we're looking at
Speaker 1: it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. Of course,
Speaker 1: that technology being bitcoin, the decentralized technology that is changing
Speaker 1: the world. Now we're talking about Europe and the problems
Speaker 1: are going through, of course we're talking talk about it.
Speaker 1: It's central planning causing this same thing. We sell the
Speaker 1: United States as well. Um It says that following the
Speaker 1: catastrophic electricity and heating bills, Europe's population is facing mass
Speaker 1: unemployment followed by a decline in social support from the state,
Speaker 1: and these processes inevitably lead to an overall decline in
Speaker 1: living standards. There's no reason why I we need to
Speaker 1: do UM except this. This is the effect of central
Speaker 1: plan This is no different then what happened through the
Speaker 1: nineteen seventeen Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, or what happened through
Speaker 1: Hitler's Germany, or what happened in China and Mao's Great
Speaker 1: leap forward in the forties and the fifties. It's the
Speaker 1: same thing. It's a small group of people taking control
Speaker 1: of an entire population, an entire economy, and trying to
Speaker 1: dictate where people go, what people do and trying to
Speaker 1: make plans that they think are best, but they don't
Speaker 1: have the data to back that up. And just like
Speaker 1: in the Bolshevik Revolution, it led to massive shortages, allowed
Speaker 1: to lead to massive starvation, and ultimately it led to
Speaker 1: massive deaths. Approximate people died during the Bolshevik Revolution which
Speaker 1: was rookie numbers. Because Maw in China tried to really
Speaker 1: up those numbers. He tried, he had about fifty million
Speaker 1: people died in China. Why same thing. He mismanaging economy
Speaker 1: because it doesn't have the data. No central planner can
Speaker 1: do it. We had mass starvation, mass misallocation. And that's
Speaker 1: exactly what's happening today through what Kloud Schwab of the
Speaker 1: World like my Forum calls a public private partnership, we
Speaker 1: have centralization again. They want to tell you what you
Speaker 1: can do, where you can travel, how much you can eat,
Speaker 1: what you can eat, and so forth. So going back
Speaker 1: to where we started the article on the World Like
Speaker 1: my Forum website, this week that came out, which was
Speaker 1: my Carbon and Approach for Inclusive and Sustainable Cities, which
Speaker 1: was floating the idea of now putting in place an
Speaker 1: app that tracks are carbon exposure, which came from a
Speaker 1: fifteen year old article where they actually talked about it
Speaker 1: for the first time. And under the scheme, everybody would
Speaker 1: be given an annual allowance of the carbon they could
Speaker 1: expend on a range of products, food, energy, and travel.
Speaker 1: If they want to use more carbon, they'd be able
Speaker 1: to buy it from somebody else. So this is where
Speaker 1: it's going. A small group of unelected leaders having their
Speaker 1: way in history tells us what happens. Now, how do
Speaker 1: they enforce this? Well, that's where the final piece comes
Speaker 1: in your money. They aren't gonna be it and you're
Speaker 1: not gonna have police officers at grocery stores, you know,
Speaker 1: checking your carbon score before you put things into your
Speaker 1: grocery basket. Right, You're not gonna have people at your house,
Speaker 1: you know, verifying what you're cooking. What they do is
Speaker 1: they do it through control of your money. So to
Speaker 1: the point we've talked about here, they have a credit card,
Speaker 1: and your credit card or your debit card or your
Speaker 1: bank tracks it for you. So then you're going to
Speaker 1: put gas in your car, there's no police at the
Speaker 1: gas station checking your carbon credits before you buy gas. No,
Speaker 1: it's already tracked for you on your credit card. So
Speaker 1: you go to swipe your card and they're like, nope,
Speaker 1: you've you've exceeded your a lotment of carbon. No gasoline
Speaker 1: for you, But I I need gas. My car is
Speaker 1: out of gas. I gotta go help my mom she's sick.
Speaker 1: Well sorry, nope, nope, you've met your carbon allotment. Or
Speaker 1: you're at the grocery store checking out and it's like, uh,
Speaker 1: I can't sell you this red meat. Your your credit card,
Speaker 1: I won't pay for it all. You get his bugs today.
Speaker 1: You want to go travel, your daughter is getting married.
Speaker 1: You want to go see your daughter up. No, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: you don't have enough carbon credits. You can't travel to
Speaker 1: go to your daughter. You can't buy the ticket. Why,
Speaker 1: because of your money. The money is how they control you.
Speaker 1: It's always the way I say it, over and over.
Speaker 1: I'm a broken record. Without the freedom of payments, there
Speaker 1: is no freedom. I should have maybe have a big
Speaker 1: sign made and to put in your office. Without the
Speaker 1: freedom of payments, there is no freedom. Which is why
Speaker 1: everything hinges on the money, which is why through the
Speaker 1: Fourth Industrial Revolution that the world of my foreman is
Speaker 1: promising us. They want to move us into a central
Speaker 1: bank digital currency as CBDC. With a cb d C,
Speaker 1: they can program the money. So again it's not right.
Speaker 1: Now we have a digital payment system, and sure, the
Speaker 1: government could go through all your records and they could
Speaker 1: you know, subpoena in your bank records and your credit
Speaker 1: card statements, and then they could go through them all
Speaker 1: and they could try to build this picture and then
Speaker 1: they could you know, get a get a warrant and
Speaker 1: they could free your bank account or whatever. And they
Speaker 1: can do that today. A CBDC is different though. The
Speaker 1: CBDC is programmable. So in advance we set the rules like, hey,
Speaker 1: if they've hit this certain threshold on carbon, then they
Speaker 1: can't buy this, this or this. They can only buy this,
Speaker 1: this or this. We've determined that this minority sub set
Speaker 1: of people need this special treatment, so they get extra
Speaker 1: money or they get these extra privileges with their money.
Speaker 1: This upset doesn't um This upset of a person said
Speaker 1: something mean online. Uh, you know, he associated with this
Speaker 1: other person who went to this location, and so he
Speaker 1: doesn't get any privileges anymore. You see how that is
Speaker 1: very easy to do with this type of money, and
Speaker 1: again without the freedom to transact. There is no freedom
Speaker 1: and this is coming. It's coming very very fast. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, just this week we saw announcements
Speaker 1: um that the President Biden, the Biden administration had put
Speaker 1: together an executive order, I meaning on the dictator, I
Speaker 1: say what I want. The executive order was that there
Speaker 1: was supposed to be this deep dive and research done
Speaker 1: into the digital currency space, and the reports came back
Speaker 1: just this week and they they recommended it released a
Speaker 1: framework outline of the regulation of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies,
Speaker 1: and it said, uh, the framework suggests the creation of
Speaker 1: a US Central Bank Digital currency or c b DC.
Speaker 1: There you have it now. Of course, Uh, if you
Speaker 1: had to guess which nation in the world do you
Speaker 1: think would be the first one to roll that out?
Speaker 1: If you guess the nation that has the social credit
Speaker 1: score system, the one that denies you bus tickets and
Speaker 1: plane tickets and things like that, because you might have
Speaker 1: said something to mean online, we're talking about China, then
Speaker 1: you would be correct. Of course, China be the first
Speaker 1: one to roll at to CBDC. It's the final piece
Speaker 1: of their puzzle. That's exactly what you has are doing.
Speaker 1: A framework suggests the creation of a US Central bank
Speaker 1: digital currency, the CBDC could make it possible an efficient
Speaker 1: payment system, create technical innovations, facilitate cross border transactions, all
Speaker 1: wall fostering environmental sustainability, meaning if you don't buy or
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, if you've if you've met your allotment of carbon,
Speaker 1: or you've bought too much petrol, or you've bought too
Speaker 1: much red meat, then no meat for you. Now, we
Speaker 1: don't need a CBDC to have an efficient payment system.
Speaker 1: We have bitcoin. Uh. We don't need the government to
Speaker 1: create technical innovations, we already have them. We don't need
Speaker 1: to facilitate cross border payments and transactions. We already have that.
Speaker 1: Bitcoin did almost a hundred million dollars of cross border
Speaker 1: payments in Del Salvador in the last eight months, near
Speaker 1: instant and near free. So we already have it. Now.
Speaker 1: It doesn't control you. It doesn't foster environmental sustainability, which
Speaker 1: is the last part they said. So it doesn't have that.
Speaker 1: But of course why would it. Why would you want
Speaker 1: a money system that controls you? The answer is you wouldn't.
Speaker 1: Why would you adopt a currency that gives them complete control,
Speaker 1: surveillance over you and control over you why would they
Speaker 1: have that. You have that, and of course you wouldn't.
Speaker 1: Why would they want it? Well, of course why, of
Speaker 1: course you know why. Because they want that total control.
Speaker 1: Like Henry Kinstinger said, control all the food, you control
Speaker 1: the people, control the energy, control the continent, control the money.
Speaker 1: You control the world. So they've already got the food.
Speaker 1: They want to track your food on your app to
Speaker 1: make sure you're not over of your carbon score. Then
Speaker 1: they want to control the energy, shutting it down. Control
Speaker 1: which type of energy you can use, what type of few,
Speaker 1: what type of fuel your car could run off of
Speaker 1: in California, no more gasoline engines up. And then finally,
Speaker 1: finally the money. Control the money, you control the world.
Speaker 1: They have to take control of the money. Now the
Speaker 1: central bank already has control over the money because they
Speaker 1: can print it, reduced the supply and increase supply whenever
Speaker 1: they want. But now they'll have the ability to bake
Speaker 1: in the control. And that's where things are going. That's
Speaker 1: why we need to end this move to centralization and
Speaker 1: swing back to the centralization where you and I have
Speaker 1: the power to direct our lives as I see fit,
Speaker 1: as we see fit. Sovereign individuals with our own sovereign money.
Speaker 1: It all starts with the money. Without the freedom of payments,
Speaker 1: there's no freedom. And that's where bigcoin comes into play.
Speaker 1: It's the exact opposite of a central bank digital current.
Speaker 1: See hopefully that makes sense. Hopefully you know which way
Speaker 1: you want to move uh, and it's not towards the state.
Speaker 1: That's what I got for your today. Thanks so much
Speaker 1: for listening. Until next time.