WEBVTT - Ad Budgets Shift from Social Media To Connected TV: Steelhouse

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about Mark Zuckerberg in his presentations

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in front of Congress. One thing we've heard less about

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>is what's been going on in the minds of big

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>advertisers and how they're going to be using Facebook going forward.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk a little bit about it from that

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>angle is Mark Douglas, chief executive officer of Steelhouse, which

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>works with advertisers of all sizes and tries to give

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>them some context from a data perspective of how to

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>go about doing so, and his bay in Los Angeles. Mark,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.639
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. UM, So

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just let's start with how much advertisers have actually pulled

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the wake of the Facebook reach, if at all. UM,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen any advertisers pulled back, and we have

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>UM close to a thousand pretty sizable advertisers that use

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>our software. Um, what we've seen is actually a lot

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more concern about GDPR, which is a whole another topic.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Basically there being yet global basically is a global UM

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>protect a privacy protection law that's coming out of the EU,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>and so I think there's and that has that has

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some stiff penalties. If you violate it, you can be

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>penalized four percent of your revenue. What's the concern on

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>behalf of advertisers. Well, because the virtually every company in

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe has to conform with it, and it's brand new,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it goes in effect on MA and UM. Europe has

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more consumers than actually the US does. So in other words,

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is advertisers wouldn't be able to access

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the information of European users. Therefore they couldn't target the

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>odds as well as the idea they have to dislose.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But what the information that they're collecting is being used for.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So Apple actually this past weekend released OS updates for

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>every every Apple OS, iOS, Apple TV, Mac os and

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>now when you open their operating systems or any of

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the apps, they just slose to you that they value

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>your privacy. They dislose what data are collecting, how long

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they're retaining it for. That's going to happen in Europe

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for essentially every company in Europe and every app in Europe.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And Apple did it worldwide. I don't know if they

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>did in China, but they did it certainly in the

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>US and Europe. And that that happened for Apple this weekend.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>It has to happen for all companies that operate in Europe.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So if someone, if you're a US company, soone gets

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane, when they get off the airplane and

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they read and they use your app, you now subject

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to that law as a company. And that's coming on. Mark.

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to give you about the thirty seconds or

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe even forty five seconds, give us the short version

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of of Mark Douglas. Because you're born in the Bronx

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Aviation High School, you learned to code in Seattle Oracle

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Center of you E Harmony. These are all part of

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>your biography. Yeah, so um, yeah, I'm a Bronx kid

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and UM dropped out of college about one semester and

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>then UM taught myself to program, bought a book and

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>borrow a computer, taught myself to program and then UM

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of found kept connecting with the right technologies.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I learned how to program on Windows, which is now

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>way back from the developers at Microsoft that wrote it,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually met Larry Ellison and then that you know,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was in Silicon Valley, and now um, I'm in Los

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Angeles kind of enjoying the l A lifestyle, but I

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think working harder than most people. And you know, I

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bring some New York five to l A, so working

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a little harder than most people in l A. The

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>reason I wanted to introduce your background here is because

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to this idea of how you

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>reinvent yourself and specifically the reinvention of video and video

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on demand. Tell us what's going on with things like

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>video advertising, Direct TV now, Hulu Live, Fox Now, and

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that marketing and advertising is going to be

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>working with video in the future. So, you know, one

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really interesting. If you ask UM, if anyone

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, what's whether to where the biggest um

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at tech companies, the first name they'll say is Google

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and the second name they'll say is Facebook. Well, actually

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not right. Fox is actually bigger than Facebook. And

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>if Fox and Disney combined, they might be bigger than Google.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>So and that's all television ad revenue. All that ad

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue is going online and so connected to TV. More

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>than six percent of Americans now watch a majority of

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>their television on demands, so use it. It's started with Netflix,

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>but now it's basically every channel. And so when you

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>watch television is broadcasts we might I say broadcast, I

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>mean just cable. Um, those ads are just broadcast based

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on time slots. Like the people watch the show have

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>these qualities and we want to, you know, kind of

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>put our message in front of them. But you watch

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the same exact show on connected TV, um, you can

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you Basically the targeting on those ads is now much

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more personalized in the way that Mark Zuckerberg talked about

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>basically gave a tutorial on Internet advertising this week and

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of centators even just the Internet, and um,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>so you get kind of the same kind of targeting

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>now for television. It's a huge transition. Okay, So given

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that that is a huge transition, are you seeing that

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and frankly Google are losing some of the lure

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that they once had because these targeted ads are perhaps

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>even more effective given the fact that they are more

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>notable as the only advertisement and they're on a specific show,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're also not skippable. The ad completion rates broadcast

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>television or fourteen percent, so because most people DV are

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the ads. The ad completion rates for connected television on

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>demand television are nine percent because they're completely unskippable. And

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right the the earl. We can now measure this

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at sealhouse. We can now measure this. And the TV

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is a powerful medium and it's showing up on connected

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>TV also, so we're seeing already some budgets. That's where

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some budgets move where the early adopters have

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>connected to the advertisers who are early adopters are starting

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to move some budget from UM social media, from other

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>digital channels like mobile advertising, display advertising to television and UM.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing response rates for the consumer that are just,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of really really strong. Approaching paid search

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of effectiveness. If you're in the marketing or

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>advertising world and you're listening to Mark Douglas, what are

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>some of them I'm going to use the term buzz words,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but what are those key things that you want to

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>be spending your weekend learning about so that when you

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>go into the office on Monday, you can have a

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>constructive conversation about how your business is going to operate

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the future. The that's an interesting question. I think, um,

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the topics we touched on are really the

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ones I'm putting most of my energy into, and it's there.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>There's basically another way to think about it is that

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional media is making a comeback. It's kind of been predicted,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Google dominates and Facebook dominates, and Display dominates,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and essentially traditional media because it's not just connected television,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>digital radio is like with and or with Spotify, who

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think just went public or is about to go

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>put don't know they went public, got it, and so

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that is making a big comeback, and I think that's

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>where we're putting a lot of attention. I think any

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>advertiser should, especially traditional media advertiser, should be thinking, how

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>can you know? How do I how do I now

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>target traditional media? Thanks very much for being here, Mark Douglas,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive Steelhouse. You're listening to Bloomberg. It's been one

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest secrets in the global oil business for

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>more than forty years. These are the financials of Saudi Aramco.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Well secret no longer here to tell us more. Will Kennedy,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Managing editor for Europe, Middle East and Africa, Energy and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Commodities for Bloomberkey, joins us for London. Well Kennedy, thank

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being with us. Just to give

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>people a little bit of a sort of description as

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to why this is so relevant and interesting, not only

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>if you're an investor, but just if you want to

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>understand how the oil business works. There were two things

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to say I think him One, Saudi Arabia has suggested

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that it might like to I p O this company,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and it would, given its scale, be the probably the

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>largest sequity deal ever. So that's made it hugely interesting

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>to investors and everyone around the world. And secondly, this

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>soil at Aramco pumps underpins the whole Saudi economy. This

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is the income stream that pays for social spending in

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the kingdom. It's increasingly assertive military and uh the royal family.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So I want to just get your sense. Do you

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>think the potential investors looking at the numbers reviewed by

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg would feel more positively towards the company considering the

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's the world's most profitable one, or take

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a take a little bit more of a placious stance.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>There were there's a mixture of things here in Lisa.

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean there were some extremely good positives. Clearly, even

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>last year when our prices were below where they are now,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this was a company that was making considerably more than

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>any other company in the world. Um, and it will

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be making even more money this year as all that

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>vallees to seventy dollars and beyond. Do you see a

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet that's pretty much pristine, no debt at all.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You see oil production costs which by our estimates perhaps

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of ex On and Shell, the two biggest

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded companies oil companies in the world. But there

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>are probably negatives for investors, and the one that probably

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>needs highlighting more than any other is is the tax regime.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>What we discovered is that saudio Abia has imposed a

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>new tax regime, a royalty regime, which takes a share

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of every single dollar the company owns earns sorry um,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and that that take rises of oil prices. So it

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>goes up once I'll get to seventy, it goes up

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a and to once ago to a hundred to investors

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>may feel that really limits for them the upside of

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>any rallying oil prices if they were to invest in

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a company like this when it went public. Now, what

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about in terms of actual profits? I

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>believe what do they say about the almost thirty four

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in income for the first six months. That's

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>according to what Blimberg News has seen. Yeah, that's right,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and that was in seventeen when prices were a lot lower.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And to put that in perspective, I mean they produced

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ten million miles a day. Excellent Shell between them probably

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>produced somewhere about seven million miles a day, but those

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>two companies made just seven point four billion each. So

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you can really see that the low costs that Aramco

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>have to pump their ta million miles a day from

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>these giant fields under the Society desert mean that it's

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>far more profitable than its nearest piers in among the

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>western all major's. Excellent Shell. Now, the Saudi crown Prince

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed been a salmon who has justly been visiting the

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>United States in the last couple of weeks. What is

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he said about about Saudi ARAMCA I mean, he he

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>has while he was in America all along his our

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>start again him and forgive me he made He made

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>selling Saudi Aramco doing an I p O a centerpiece

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of his reform for the kingdom, and he said that

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it might be worth as much as two trillion dollars

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and it would be key to key to change in

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy of the kingdom of preparing it for the

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>oil age. I mean, he's still stuck by that. What

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>has changed that he says they'll only sell it when

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the time is right, when oil prices right. One thing

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that I'm struck by is how much flexibility does the

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabian government have to love the additional taxes or

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>take additional profits from the company. It has all the

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>scope that it wants. I mean, it can change the

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>tax regime whenever it wants. And I think you're rightly

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>st highlight that that's probably going to be a key

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>concern for investors if they look at this company. Clearly,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the primary role of Saudi Aramco is to support the

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fiscal uh power of Saudi Arabia, and if they need to,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to take presidents over looking after minority investors,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and that you know that maybe we'll be enough money

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, but that's going to be something for investors

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to think about as they assessed the risk of this investment. Well, Kennedy,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, and congratulations, really

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating story at William Kennedy, Managing editor for the

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>E M e A Energy and Commodities Team, UH for Bloomberg.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We are joined now by Bob mulroy, chief executive officer

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of Partner Therapeutics, also former founder and chief executive of

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Merrimac based in Boston. Bob, thank you so much for

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>being with us in congratulations. Your first drug, lu Keen,

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm pronouncing that correctly, was just approved by

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to treat acute radiation sickness. I am a

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>little concerned, however, about the sort of fact that this

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>drug exists and the fact that the U. S. Department

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of Health and Human Services office actually began stockpiling this

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>drug in case of a nuclear attack. Is that the

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>main purpose of this drug, so lucine isn't actually an

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>older drug, and its purposes really to help restore your

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>entire immune system and so in diseases where you might

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have in affections, it's very important. Um. And in the

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>case of a radiation sickness, which you could occur from

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear accident, but that could be a leak at

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a power plant, it could be from a radioactive mind

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's deep in the ground. So there are many different

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>possible sources of radiation sickness. But but the US government

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>did after nine eleven make a decision to stockpile drugs

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that could help in a public emergency, and lucine is

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those drugs. So how many people do they

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have doses for? So I'm not sure that that's public information.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that they are targeting, uh, you know, covering

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of patients with the stockpile over time,

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and what they've done today, I'm not sure that's public.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, we're excited that this new approval

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and the new data that's been shown with luke. I'm

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's the first drug to be shown effective at

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>treating patients who have been exposed to radiation forty eight

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>hours after an incident. Is really important because in an emergency,

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you can necessarily dose everybody right away. You've got to

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>get the drug and the medical treatment to the potential

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>patients who have been exposed. Um so luka I really

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is a is a breakthrough in that area. Just tell

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>people a little bit about your background, because you're the

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>former chief executive of Merrimack that ran into some issues

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that caused you to leave and you had to cut

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the workforce there. Tell us about why you decided to

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>put together Partner Therapeutics and the strategy behind Partner. Well,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been in the industry for twenty five years and

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I love drug development. And after leaving Merrimack, I partnered

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with a gentleman named Debashi's Road Chattery who ran oncology

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at exactly at Sergeon, Well he was chief medical officer there,

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but he ran oncology at Sinofie and Glaxo and and

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been good friends for years. And what we saw

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was a trend in the industry where um, the larger

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>companies were focusing on fewer and fewer targets, particularly in

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the immunotherapy space. But there weren't a lot of companies

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what would you need to make those immunotherapies work.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we said, well, let's try and work on

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the elements of the components you need to get immunotherapy work,

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and so one of the key components is stimulating the

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>immune cells that immune therapies can trigger. And Luken we

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>saw it was a key ingredient to that. And if

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about luke on, it's only one of two

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>drugs and combinations with immunotherapy that have been shown to

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>work in cancer. Now, if you happen to be a

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>patient who is undergoing or undergone chemotherapy or bone marrow transplant,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>how would Lukin figure into your life. So today Lukens

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>approved to treat patients with with a m al acute

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Milo leukemia or under a bone mile transplortation transplantation. And

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens in those cases is you need to uh

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in amail for instance, the cancer is against the immune

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>system and destroying immune cells. So UH Luken can help

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reconstitute and rebuild your immune system. UH when you're getting

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>chemotherapy for treatment, so you don't have an infection, so

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively replace the cells that are cancers that are geting

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>killed by the chemotherapy. The same is true with bone

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>mile transplantation, where you have to regrow or restimulate or

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>replace that immune system. Because many of those patients they

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>don't die of the cancer, they'll die of infections as

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>a result of the cancer reducing their immune systems effectiveness.

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Lukin restores the immune systems so that they don't they

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>don't suffer those effects. I want to talk about the

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>process of getting the drug approved by the FDA, because

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>there's been talk that the FDA is trying to expedite

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>approvals in response to the to the cries for cheaper medications.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Did you find that it was a faster process than

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you've heard and experience than in the past. It was

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a very fat process for us, but but not one

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a typical today. We applied for something called priority review,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which is available to any drug that is deemed to

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be important to the public health, to a particular treatment

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of a condition where you really have a breakthrough therapy opportunity,

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we applied for a priority review in the

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>f d A granted that priority review and review the

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 1>drug in essentially a six month time frame as opposed

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, typical twelve or fourteen months. What

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are you working on now? What's in the pipeline? Well,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for luke On what's exciting about it is that uh

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>uh emunotherapy, which is the latest wave in cancer is

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is a really important growing area and lucan is in

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole number of trials, including a big Phase three

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>in frontline melanoma today as well as in trials with

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>cancer vaccines. And in the second area, uh, lucan has

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>plays in a very important role in the immune system,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>where we're finding out that our diseases like Alzheimer's and

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Parkinson's that have a big immune system component and potentially

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in those indications that there have been early dated in

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Phase two showing if you can restore the immune system

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you can benefit those diseases as well. Just real quick,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>any any wish for an initial public offering anytime in

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Well, right now, we're going to focus

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on on on growing lukine of the business and working

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on building our pipeline of other drugs um but uh,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how things go. And just to offer the opportunity,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you did pick up a manufacturing plan from Santa Few, right,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right. So we did acquire a biological

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing facility outside of Seattle, Washington, which helps make lucine.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But we're hopeful other products that we're bringing into the

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>pipeline they can make for us as well, and so

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll have. An important capacity in today's world is the

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>ability to supply product reliably to patients and too physicians.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and that's a critical thing as as capacity

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>industry gets constrained with all the development. Thanks very much

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Bob mulroy is the chief executive

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>partner Therapeutics. They are based in Boston, home to a

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one of six one Boston New Report int thirty

0:19:54.720 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in MetroWest and the South Shore. There seems to be

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>escalating fissure between the left and the right in the

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>United States? Is it the same among chief executive officers

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of American companies? Here to talk about that and the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>consequences of these fissures is Joe Minerrek, Senior vice president

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and director of Research at the Committee for Economic Development,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>also a former chief Economists at the Office of Management

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and Budget during all eight years of the Clinton administration. Joe,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. You co

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>authored a book last year, Sustaining Capitalism, Bipartisan Solutions to

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Restore Trust and Prosperity. In your conversations with executives, do

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you get the sense that they are trying to foster

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more bipart partisanship, or if you've seen the partisanship sort

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of spread to the c suite. We have something of

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a self selected audience. I don't want to overstate this,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>but uh, the folks who engage with us at the

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Committee for Economic Development believe in bipartisan solutions to the

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>nation's problems. I think that that. However, I think I

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can assert that that is fairly representative of the business community.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>When you have problems in business, Uh, they're not republican

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or democratic problems. There are not republican or democratic facts.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>They are not republican or democratic solutions. Business leaders tend

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to be focused at solving problems, facing facts, and uh,

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out at the end with success and our perception,

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>my perception is that the folks I talked to are

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a way to solve the nation's problems. Well,

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Joe interact, I beg your pardon is is there a

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>development of a parallel economy or a parallel government? Because

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in your book you talk about how that that lawmaking

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is polluted by special interest lobbying, re election fundraising demands,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and revolving door job appointments. That seems to be pretty

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>contradictory to what you're describing when you talk about business leaders. Well,

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to business leaders who want to try to

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>find solutions. And I find that many business leaders, even

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>those who don't engage with us directly, do have a

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of the need to face facts when they are

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with issues with respect to their own businesses. So

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we do have, I believe, an opportunity to work with business,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to have business cooperate with government to try to find

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>ways to solve the problems that we face today. I

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know there will be differences with respect to particular issues.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It of course gets very tricky when you have business

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>leaders from different parts of a particular industry where there

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>are issues of regulation or issues of alternative technologies, where

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you have the potential to have one side win and

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side lose. But the business community, by and large,

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in my experience and the people with my work, try

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to solve problems. And right now

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we have some very big issues that we need to address,

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and folks I talked to are willing to do that.

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about some of the big issues and

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>just wearing your hat as the head of the committee

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for Economic Development, but also as the as the senior

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>vice president of the agency, but also with your former

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>role at the o MB. How concerned are you about

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the deepening deficit in the US. We have been on

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a path where our debt has been growing faster than

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>our elective income. The debt to GDP ratio, which is

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>economist jargon, has been rising, and that has been going

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on for uh, just about two decades now. That is

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>not sustainable. We can't continue along that path. And the

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>longer we wait, the bigger build up of debt we

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>will have. And that to me is a matter of

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>enormous concern. Uh. It's a matter of concern for me personally.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I have two daughters and three grandchildren, and I have

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a hard time looking at them in the eye sometimes.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can imagine my grandchildren saying, ten twenty

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>years from now, you know, why didn't pop a deal

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>with that? I thought it was supposed to be something

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>he worked on. Uh. And that's that should be worrisome

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. The head of a corporation wants to leave

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a corporation behind. UH. That is sound. And I've spoken

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of business leaders telling me that they consider the nation's

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>fiscal and balanced to be the greatest threat to the

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>future of their businesses. Really, that's that's really, you know.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's It's interesting though, because if you hear some economists

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and some members of the current administration, they'll say, if

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you look at the deficit with respect to the GDP

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of the nation, UH, it's not so big of it.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not so big of a deal. What do you

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>say to that, Uh, If you want to measure that

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>by recent history, you have to understand that you have

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not just lowered the bar, you buried the bar. For

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years, our budget UH position has not

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>been sustainable. And you want to say, well, it's not

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so bad, it's better than it was in the depths

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the UH the financial crisis. That's true. In the

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>depths of the financial crisis, we were setting records for

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the size of our deficits, you know, trillion dollar deficits

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in our history. And now we're

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in a position where if you start from where we

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are and you draw a straight line with a UH

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with a ruler in the direction in which we want

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to go, in which we are now going, UH, you

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>will find that in we're going to have uh deficits

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that are back in the trillion dollar range again. Uh.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Ten years from now, in the nation's debt will be

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>greater than it's gross domestic product. The debt to GDP

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ratio will be over for the first time since the

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>end of World War Two. Uh. And now we're talking

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about setting that standard in a peacetime economy, when the

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>economy is growing relative to of course, the the the

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>enormous emergency in World War Two when we we would

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>borrow all we needed to to finance our freedom. Uh.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We have no excuses today for that kind of behavior.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what so what do you said us

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that people who are listening to you do? Earlier today,

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I got the chance to speak the Congressman Dave Bratt,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican the Virginia seventh District, asked him about teacher pay

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time when you're running one and a half

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar deficits according to the OMB, and there was

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a disconnect in terms of trying to make any kind

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of inroads into Well, you know, maybe the money should

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have been spent on education. What do you do? Well,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking here and the members of our organization are

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about bipartisan solutions. I think the first thing that

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.959
<v Speaker 1>we have to recognize is that our budget problem is

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so large that the only way that we are going

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to solve it is if we have everyone at the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>table and everything on the table. We need our nation's

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>leaders in the Congress and in the executive branch to

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize that there is no way to solve this problem

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>where one side gets everything at once and does not

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have to pitch in. Alright, everybody is going to have

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to be involved. Well, thank you for being involved, and

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>thank you for Sustaining Capitalism, the book that you co

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>authored last year. Joe Minrick is the director of Research

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Committee for Economic Development. He's all our former

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>chief economist at the Office of Management and Budget. Thanks

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.