WEBVTT - Can the Universe exist without space?

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jorge, are you a hoarder or do you like

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to throw things away? We keep everything, we have, every drawing,

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>my kids ever made. Man, not me. I value space

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more than stuff. I love to throw things away. Wow,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what does your family give you for your birthday? Then?

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Empty space? Actually, my wife rent a dumpster and says

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I can throw out anything I want. It's like a

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>negative present. Hey, space is precious. You know you can't

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have too much of it. You can't have too much

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>nothing said nobody never, Nothing is better than nothing. This

0:00:42.640 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is the best nothing I ever got. Hi more handmade

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics. Hi. I'm Daniel,

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist and I really do love space.

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And Welcome to our podcast. Daniel and Jorge explain the

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>university production of I Heart Radio, in which we explore

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff in space, empty space, not so empty space,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>space builled with really crazy bonk, or stuff that's hard

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand, and sometimes even the very nature of space.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We talk about all of these things in this podcast,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and we break them down, and our goal is to

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>deliver them to you in a way that actually makes sense,

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>so you go away thinking, huh, I get it, or

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at least I get it as much as scientists get it,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>which sometimes isn't that much. And sometimes it feels like

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a whole lot of nothing, and sometimes

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we are literally talking about nothing, and sometimes we're trying

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what is nothing exactly right. Yeah, deep questions, now, Daniel,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>when you say you love space, do you mean like

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you love, you know, just space travel, like where the

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>planets are, or did you just like, you know, having

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of space in your life. I love all

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 1>of it. I love outer space, I love deep space.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I live near space. I also love having space in

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>my living room, Like it's not unusual for me to

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>toss out a piece of furniture and go, you know what,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the room is just better with nothing there. You like

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>everything about space. There's nothing negative about space for you.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty pro space. Yeah. Absolutely, you would live in

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>an empty box if you could, exactly. I'm like a

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>cat that way. Are you looking forward and to your

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>children leaving the house then, because that's just more space,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is more space. I'm not looking for to them leaving,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but if they do, I'm looking forward to throwing all

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their stuff away. Oh man, that's going to come back

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to want you. They're like, why did you throw away

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>my comic book collection that's worth three million dollars? Now, yeah, exactly,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>but this space is priceless, right, Well, we like to

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about space in this podcast and also about what

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it represents, what it means, because it's kind of a

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>topic that businesses don't have a super clear idea about.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It's one of these really fun quite in

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>physics because only recently did we figure out that it's

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a question that sort of has an answer. It's a

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>question that's worth asking. It's one of these questions that's

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so basic that we just sort of assumed we knew

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer. You know, space is space. It's the nothing,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the emptiness. And only recently have we realized, Wow,

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>space could be much more than that, and it really

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>deserves our attention. Right. Even more important is this sort

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of idea that maybe we don't need space, Like maybe

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just sort of like an add on to the universe. Yeah,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is it at the foundation of reality or is it

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just something that fills up something else? You know, imagine

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what it would have been like to be a person

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand years ago. You never would have experienced reality

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>without air, for example, So the concept of like a vacuum,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a place where there was no air would have been

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>totally alien to you. So now, of course we know

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's possible. It seems obvious that air is not

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental property of the universe. But we're at the

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>next level and wondering, like, well, is space fundamental? Could

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you take it apart? Do you really need it? Yeah?

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, so the universe, it doesn't have any air

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in it, right, most of the universe is pretty empty. Yeah,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>from that point of view, exactly, we were dealing with

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a very unrepresentative example. And we do this all the

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>time in science. We assume that the things we experience

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>our universal and we can generalize from these examples to

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe. We're doing this all the time, left

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and right without even realizing it. So now we're asking

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a similar question about space. You know, our our assumptions

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about space valid. Can we break it apart? Do we

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>even need it? Is it possible for it to have

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>bubbled up from something else? Yeah, it's a space topic.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But space is pretty empty. I think we have a

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>whole podcast episode about that, right, Like, what's the average

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>density of the universe or like how much stuff is

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>there really on a like cubic foot Yeah, we do

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have a whole podcast about how empty spaces and we

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>take you on a journey from the top of the

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere into the Solar System and then out into interstellar

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>space and then finally into intergalactic space. And mostly space

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is intergalactic space, right, Like there are these huge streams

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of galactic clusters of galaxies swinging around each other, but

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>between them there are these vast bubbles and voids that

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have galaxies in them. So most of the universe

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of by volume, is this intergalactic space, which is

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>not totally empty. There's still stuff in there. That's a

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of dark matter, there's definitely dark energy. But

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>it's most of the universe and it's pretty empty, but

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not down to zero. Yeah, and there's a lot of

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it space, I mean, in the universe, there's a whole

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of it. Like if you are going at the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, it would still take you as far

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>as we know right now, you know, tens of billions

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of years just to go from one side to the other.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of time. Absolutely, And remember the speed

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of light is like mind boggling lee fast, right, It's

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly fast. And yet these distances, even inside our Solar

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>System are incredible, Like it takes minutes for light to

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>get from here just to Mars, which is our neighbor,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and hours to get out to the outer Solar system.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we communicate with probes and rovers and

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff on other planets, the reason you can't drive them

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is because they are so far away. You can't do

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>real time driving because the lag is too long. And

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just inside our Solar system. So the distances to

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>other galaxies millions of light years and deeper into space

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>billions of light years, they're hard for us to get

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our mind around. So, yeah, space is pretty spacious. I

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guess I hadn't thought about it before. Like if even

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're Superman or Superwoman and you're traveling, you can

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you're able to fly at the speed of light, it

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>would still take you like a billion years just to

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, go to the other galaxies out there in

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yeah, well that's an interesting question. Does Superman

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to travel at the speed of light? Can he

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be superluminal? I mean, how far away is his home

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>planet anyway, I don't know you're the physicist. I just

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>read the comic books. I don't dissect them scientifically. I'll

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>go find out exactly where his home planet is and

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>figure out if he broke the law on the way here,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and if so, I'll issue him a physics ticket. Well,

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he can just bring it up with his heat visioned Daniel.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And also, how are you going to arrest him? Good

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>luck with that, citizens arrest Mr Superman. But yeah, there's

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of space out there. It's definitely not a

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>small part of the universe. But I guess the question

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is it a necessary part of the universe. So today

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, we'll be asking the question can the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>universe exist without space? Space? Space? Space space? That question

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is so profound it needs an echo. It echoes through

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum of infinity, through the vacuum of our understanding

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. Absolutely, through the empty space in my head.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's a fun question, and it sort of mirrors

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the way I treat furniture. You know, I look around

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>my house and I asked myself, do we need that chair?

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody ever sits there and we get rid of it.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We're like, ah, it's better off. And now we're cycling

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>through modern physics and we're like, m, do we really

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>need the whole concept of space? Like is it really

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be included in the sort of fundamental list

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of things you need to build a universe or is

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it like you know, ice cubes or atoms or hurricanes,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>something that you know comes from your more basic ingredients.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I would hate to be a furniture in your house.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I would live in constant fear. Yes, absolutely,

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you must constantly justify your existence in my house, or

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you're on the trashy. It's like huff Post reporters. You know,

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that's just for your furniture, not your family as well.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Or pets. Absolutely, living creatures definitely belong to the family.

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Chairs not so much so if you could have a

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger house, would you have a bigger house? No? No,

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a bigger house. In fact, I had

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some friends who once moved to a bigger house and

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I almost ruin their marriage because they ended up shouting

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>each other from different rooms across the house. And they

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>did better when they had to, you know, share a

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>small apartment. Yeah, we talked about this and I offered

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the better solution of just getting an intercom system. You

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>are going to engineer everybody's marriage. Huh. I'm gonna go

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to your your couple's counseling. There's a solution for everything

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in engineering, marital engineering. Wow, that's a better name for therapist.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, Yeah, it's a big question whether or not

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we need space in the universe. It seems pretty fundamental,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, how can you have a universe without space? Like,

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't space the universe? Yeah, but just because it's hard

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to imagine doesn't mean it's not reality. Right. A lot

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of what reality is was difficult for us to wrap

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>our minds around. So when you do this kind of exploration,

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you got to sort of be willing to give up

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>something you thought was fundamental, something you assumed was inherent,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and ask your question whether it can come from something else.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, as usual, we were wondering how many

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>people out there have thought about this spacious question, whether

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>or not we need space. So Daniel went out there

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>into the well to the internet to ask people is

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it possible to have a universe without space. Here's what

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they had to say. Oh, that's a good question. I

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think, so okay, why, Well, I don't know. I

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know. I don't know why. I

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just know I think space is only one of the dimensions, right,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you can probably have a universe. It's just time and

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe not space. I'm gonna say yes. Well, my understanding

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is that, yeah, I guess you can. Um. I mean,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was this space when the Big Bang occurred in the

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>moments after that, or was it all dense metal with

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>zero space? But my understanding is that if you have

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a different universe that could operate off a completely different

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>set of physical laws. So I guess never say never

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. You can have a universe without space.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Our situation with matter having out competed antimatter, I think

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually pretty unique. Um there, and I would I

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think they're a little universe blips all over where universe

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>pops into existence and annihilates and no spaces created. I

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>guess you can have universe with out just this dimension space,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can have all the other dimensions possible, but

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it will be crowded. I guess it would mean what

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you mean by universe, because before the Big Bang all

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe was there. It was just compressed and to

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, there was no space. So if you can't

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that just the universe then yeah, all right, some mixed

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>reactions here. Some people could live without it, some people

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>could really want it. Yeah. It basically wraps up the

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whole question of what spaces and where it comes from

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and all these answers I see echoes of general relativity

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and quantum mechanical perspectives on this question. So good job listeners,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>And to those of you who would like to participate

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in future rounds of answer random questions for the podcast,

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>please write to us two questions at Daniel and Jorge

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. There's a lot of reference here and the

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>answers to the Big Bang to write that's something I

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>hadn't thought about before. Was their space before the Big Bang?

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>At the Big Bang? Or was space created at some

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>point in the history of the universe? Yeah, space and time? Right,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, let's dig into it, Daniel. Let's start

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with maybe the basic stuff, like what is space? How

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>do physicists think about what space is? Yeah, this is

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a great question, and we have sort of two answers

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for what space is based on whether you're thinking about

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it from the point of view of like quantum mechanics

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're thinking about it from the point of

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>view of general relativity. And remember that these are the

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>two pillars of thinking in modern physics, too great ways

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to describe parts of the experiments we've done. Quantum Mechanics

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>describes basically everything that has to do with little particles

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at small scales and all the forces that were familiar

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with except for gravity, and general relativity talks about how

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>space is curved and it's bent, and that's really what

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>gravity is. And so the answer to the question what

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is space sort of depends on whose perspective you want

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to take first? What do you mean, how can something

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>depend on your perspective? Aren't you looking for like one answer?

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We are absolutely looking for one answer, but we don't

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have one answer. We have two theories, quantum mechanics and

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>general relativity. They treat space very differently and we haven't

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>been able to unify them. So the short answer is

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what space is because we don't have

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a single coherent theory for the whole universe, and the

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>two theories we do have disagree about what space is,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>all right, So what are the two theories about space?

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And is there enough space between them to tell the difference. Well,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's start with quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the theory that tells us how electromagnetism works, how the

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>weak force works, you know, how photons move, and it

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>tells us that space is fundamental. It assumes that space

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>exists and it adds stuff to it. So if you're

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna build a universe using at least our current theory

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics, then you start from space. You say,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>let's assume there's a space, and then at every point

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in that space, I'm gonna say whether or not there's

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a quantum field and how much energy it has. But

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like at the bedrock of the whole theory,

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just like assuming that space and time are things that

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you can put fields in them, right, because that's kind

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of baked into the definition of a field, right, Like

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't have a field without space, like a field

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is by definition like how things vary in a space.

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right exactly. And we'll talk later about whether you

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can generalize that to like abstract spaces rather than physical

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>spaces and what that means. But you're right for the

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>physical fields that we're talking about, you know, like the

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>photon field. It's just a value all through space. But

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>as you say, space is fundamental to that. You need

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to know like there's a certain value of field here

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and over there at a different location in space, it

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>has a different value. And for example, the shrouding your

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>equation tells us how a wave function exists across space,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and how that wave function evolves through time it spreads

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>out through space, for example. So it's pretty deeply baked in.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So quantum field theory sort of the modern version of it,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as we think about it, doesn't really have an answer

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to the question of what is space. It just sort

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of like assumes it exists and starts from there. It's

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like the basical list of ingredients. Would you say then

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe quantum fields defined space or do you think

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>space could exist without quantum fields. Well, that's a great question.

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>In our current theory, you can't have space without quantum fields,

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Like quantum fields filled the entire universe. There's no sense

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in which you could have space without them. That's just

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of according to the theory. But do they define space?

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're deeply coupled to it. Yeah, absolutely, so

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely part of the inherent nature of

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>space in quantum field theory that you have these fields

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that live on top of it. But remember that quantum

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>field theory can also have stuff in it that doesn't

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of come into the very beginning, right, Like we

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>can talk about the very basic ingredients of the universe,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>space and quantum fields, but we don't add to that

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>things like you know the atom, right, The atom is

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not a required element of the definition of the universe.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>It comes from that other stuff. So the ad and

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we think it exists, but it's not like fundamental. And

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>remember the goal of physics, as you say, is to

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>come to one theory, one explanation, one most basic list

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of ingredients and the rules for combining them that then

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>explains everything else. So we're constantly trying to throw stuff

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out on purpose so we can get like the minimal

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>list of fundamental things that can then explain everything else.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>As emergent. We want to explain ice cream and atoms

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and hurricanes in terms of the simpler, more basic elements.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys want the dumpster then too, so you

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>can throw out theories. I definitely want to throw space

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>out on the physics dumpster. I would love to explain

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>space in terms of something more basic and fundamental and say, man,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>remember when we had space criming in here and we

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had no space because we had so much space. But

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>then if there's no space, then there's no space in

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the dumpster either, Daniel, where would you throw it out? Oh? Man,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll get a bigger dumpster, all right, So then that's

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics. But then general relativity has a different view

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of space. Yeah, General relativity tells us that space is

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not something which is just like inherent and that you

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>can assume. General relativity tells us that space is really different.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It's dynamical. It's not like the backdrop for everything. Instead,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 1>it's in this dance with matter. Right. When you have

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>matter and energy around, space bends and it curves, and

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it can do weird things like it can ripple, right,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and it can expand. And this is the things that

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we see, like we see ripples in space. We know

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that this general relativity picture is at least approximately correct.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It might not be the fundamental theory of the universe,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's really accurate. It predicts these gravitational waves and

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we see them. It can accommodate at least the accelerated

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the universe in terms of a cosmological constant.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>We don't understand why that's there, what's happening, etcetera, but

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it can be accommodated in general relativity. So it's very

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>successful description of how matter and space interact. And it

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>suggests that space is not fundamental, that it sort of

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>states at the same level as matter our energy, because

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the too sort of have this feedback loop between each other.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically says that space is a thing, right like, it's

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>not static, it doesn't exist, it doesn't ignore matter, you know,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like it responds to matter, and you know, it's not

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>independent of matter exactly. And you can do these weird

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we never imagined that it could do, which

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>means it might be able to do other weird things

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we also hadn't yet had the imagination to do. Anytime,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we're limited by our imagination. I'm always skeptical that we've

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>thought of everything. I know, the theorists are very smart,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and even our science fiction authors are always pushing the

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>boundaries of creativity when it comes to like, you know,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>intellectual concepts. But there's always the possibility that there's always

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>something else out there we just haven't thought of that

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>could be happening in our universe. So space could have

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>really weird properties that we never imagined. Imagine, for example,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>being a scientist that's a fish swimming through water all

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the time and not realizing, you know, that space could end,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or that your water wasn't actually fundamental, and they could

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do other weird things like boil and turn into a gas.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, space like that could have other phases, other

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>weird properties we just haven't observed yet, and so we

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>assume are impossible because I guess, once you can get

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>space to bend or ripple or expand then who knows

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>what you can make it do? Who knows what you

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>can make it do exactly? And the solutions to general

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.959
<v Speaker 1>relativity are so complicated and difficult, and that it's not

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>possible to conceive of all the possible configurations that are

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent with it. Those are the two views of space.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>One says that it's something that you know, can't touch

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or that you live on top of, and the other

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>one says that it's something that it's more of a thing,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's dynamic and you can manipulate it and it

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can change, So that those are the two basic views

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>about space, right, But it doesn't sort of explain what

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>space is. It's just sort of like how you regard space. Yeah,

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>but that's sort of what space is. You know, space

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>is how we treat it. Some people might say space

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is just like a mathematical construct in our minds. You know,

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not actually something that's physical. For example, in quantum mechanics,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we never deal with space itself directly, right, All we

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>ever do is deal with the fields in space. We

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>never like interact with space itself, and so it's sort

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of like just an abstraction. It's just like a way

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about organizing these fields. Whereas in general relativity,

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like spaces the thing. It's the thing that's keeping us

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Earth. It explains gravity, which is pretty important.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know, how we represent them in our theories

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>goes a long way to telling you what we think

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they are. All right, Well, I think that sets the

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>space for a deeper discussion about space and whether or

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not Daniel can through it in the dumpster or not.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Please please please, please, please please please. I would be

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so offended if I was space right now, I would

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>limit your space Daniel. But let's get into that question

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and also whether or not we will ever be able

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to know what the answer is. But first, let's take

0:20:49.600 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. All right, we're talking about space and

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we can just toss it out, Daniel,

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's so unappreciative. How can you just

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>throw the thing out that you know you grew up in. Well,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's make a distinction here. We are, of

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>course searching to explain space, to figure out whether it's

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the basic ingredient of the universe or whether it emerges

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from something else. But that's not to say the things

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that emerge are uninteresting or unimportant. Right, Like, the entire

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>field of biology is emergent in the sense that you could,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in principle, calculated all from fundamental particles. But that's not

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like a smart way to do biology. Nobody would anybody

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>does do biology from the particle perspective. I just want

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure people don't think that we're being negative

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.239
<v Speaker 1>about emergent phenomena. They're fascinating, they're amazing, they're incredible. We

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>are emergent phenomena. It's just, you know, part of this

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>question of getting down, drilling down to the deepest nature

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of reality is to ask what's fundamental and what's emergent,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily to judge them. You just want to add

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>your bets and not offend your spouse's biologist. I have

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the deepest of respects for my spouse and also for biology,

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which is not your furniture. Just not my furniture, absolutely

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. So there are two perspectives about space. It

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like quantum mechanics doesn't say anything about space other

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>than it's there and you can't mess with it, and

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>general relativity says that it's something that you can sort

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of mess with and change and bend. And I guess

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the question is are those two things incompatible or is

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there a sort of a fundamental conflict about them? Like

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't you have quantum mechanics sit on top of general relativity? Yeah, exactly,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And people are working on exactly that, trying to unify

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>general relativity and quantum mechanics in several different ways, and

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in doing so, they're giving us hints about answers to

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>this question about whether space is fundamental or not. Like

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>when they put these two things together, they basically have

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision like, well, do we have spaces

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the list of fundamental ingredients in our new theory of

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>quantum gravity or not. And there's a couple of different approaches.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>One is sort of like make gravity a quantum theory,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it as like just another quantum force that

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>exchanges particles the gravitons in order to make gravity happen,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and sort of making quantum mechanics primary. And the other

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is to try to quantize gravity itself, you know, either

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>make the universe into little pixels or take the gravitational

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>field and make a discreet and so that would make

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a general relativity sort of at the primary foundational level

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of these new theories of quantum gravity, and which direction

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you go sort of dictates the fate of the idea

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of space and whether it's fundamental or emergent. I guess

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe one difference is that like in general relativity, if

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a speck of dust, it's technically bending the

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>space around it. But in quantum mechanics, if you have

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like a proton or an electron, it's not really bending

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>space around it. Right, In quantum mechanics, we have no

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>description of the curvature of space that works, right, So yeah, absolutely,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a quantum mechanical description of gravity or

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the bending of space, so we can't describe how space

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>has bent around of dust particle. We know that it

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is though, right we think that that's true. One of

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the difficulties is that we can't test these things very

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>well because particles have very very small amounts of gravity.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Member gravity so much weaker than all the other forces,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like ten to the thirty times weaker. So we can't

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really test these things because all the other forces dominate.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Two protons, for example, coming together, the large Hage and

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>collider feel almost no gravity in comparison to the strong

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the weak and the electromagnetic forces, So it's very

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to do an experiment at the particle level that

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tests gravity. I guess maybe then to get back to

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>our question, then what do these two theories say about

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea of having no space? Like could you have

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>no space in plantum mechanics or general relativity or is

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that impossible according to the theories. So there are now

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really fun ideas about how space might not be fundamental,

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>how you could have a universe without space in quantum mechanics.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think these ideas are really cool because they

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>make us think about quantum mechanics sort of at a

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>more basic level. You know, we think about the wave function.

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>For example. Wave function is like this basic element of

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics. It tells you what's going to happen to

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a particle, or for example, where a particle might be.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>If you have a question about the outcome of your experiment,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the wave function tells you this outcome has a certain probability,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and that outcome has another probability. And typically we think

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>about the wave function as distributed across space, like is

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the electron here or is the electron there, But in

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>principle it can be distributed across abstract states also, you know,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like the electron spin or the outcome of your experiment,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>or all sorts of other kinds of things. And so

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard for us to sort of augment the

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>current concept of space with these like abstract spaces. We

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>call them Hilbert spaces in which the wave function lives.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And it might be that those Hilbert spaces are the

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>actual primary thing that we can sort of let go

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of these concepts of position and based the whole existence

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the universe just on those sort of abstract spaces

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>than the ones that are not physical, that don't represent

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>actual locations, that are not anywhere. I think what you're

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>saying is that, like maybe space, according to the theory,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>is not like a physical thing or physical space, but

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>it's rather just sort of like a mathematical concept or

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>set of relationships. Is that what you mean. Yeah, we

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>know that it's a set of relationships. As we said earlier,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in quantum mechanics, we never actually interact with space. All

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we do is we see sort of the propagation of

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>information through fields as that information moves through space. But

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really that information is moving through the field, and so

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you can think about it in terms of like pieces

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of space that are sort of woven together. So it's

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>like the relationships between different elements of the field, and

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the space itself is really just like the relationship between

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>those elements. So this one is far away from that one,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>or this one is close to that one. So you

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have those bits of the field like

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hanging in an absolute, actually existing space. It might just

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be that they have those relationships in another way and

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>woven together that gives the same effect as if they

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>were actually in a space. I wonder if it's sort

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of like the concept of money. You know, like something

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is worth more or has a bigger price on it

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>just because it doesn't mean that it has more energy

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to it or more matter to it, or you know,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sits closer to you, or you can do more things

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with it. It's just so happens that this thing has

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a labeled with a big price on it, and that

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that one has a labeled with a lower price on it.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of what you mean, Like, maybe space

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is really just like the economy of the yeah, exactly.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>And you can also think about it in terms of

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>like your networks. Think about your relationships with your family.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Who are you close to We even use that word close, right,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're physically far away from somebody else, you

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have a network of people that you interact with who

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>know you very well, and then people who are distant,

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and then people who are basically super impossibly far away. Well,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it might be that that sort of like the fundamental

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>definition of who you are and what your spaces rather

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>than like where you actually are sitting in your bedroom

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or in Los Angeles or in Germany or wherever. Maybe

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>space is just an emotional space, you know what I mean?

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Like space is really just the emotional currency of your relationships. Yeah,

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and these are just analogies we're using to try to

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>get your mind away from this primacy of space that

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been assuming and thinking about the universe as built

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>out of things that don't hang in space but still

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>have relationships with each other, and then those relationships are

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>what space emerges from. And we can actually do this

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not just by doing analogies to social media, but actually mathematically,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and people have taken the way function of the universe.

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, think about, like what is a quantum mechanical

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>description of the whole universe? Can you describe everything in

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe and you don't have to necessarily put them

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in a location, you know, just say there's a probability

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for this particle and probably for that particle, and then

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>link them together and say, well, this one is entangled

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that one. This concept of quantum entanglement of particles having

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like their fates connected to each other because they have

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a common past. This entanglement might provide that weave, It

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>might provide the connection between like the bits of the

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>universe that when you weave them together, some things are

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more entangled than others, and so they seem closer together,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and other things are less entangled, and so they seem

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more distant. It might be that this quantum entanglement are

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>those same relationships that connect these bits of the wave

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>function that make it seem as if it is hanging

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in some space. And this sort of set of relationships

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or currency or valuations, that's what you call these Hilbert

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>spaces or is that different? The Hilbert space is the

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>set of possible wave functions that you can have, and

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>then the relationships between the different wave functions that are disconnected,

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>those are the entanglements. Those come together to make this

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like grand weave that we call space. And

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>if this is true, it doesn't mean that space is

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not like real. It just means that it comes from

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>something else, you know, that it bubbles up from something

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>more primary, just like air is real, even if it's

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.239
<v Speaker 1>not fundamental to the universe. You can still breathe it.

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It's still very nice on a nice, fresh windy day

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. Come on, never happens. But I guess

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe a question is what's the difference? You know, like

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the word Hilbert space still has the word space in it,

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So like what would be the difference between a Hilbert

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>space or these abstract connection space and maybe a more

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 1>regular definition of space. Well, our four dimensional space has

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>certain properties. You know, information transforms through it in a

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>certain way. It follows the speed of light. There are

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>four dimensions, including time. An abstract Hilbert space is much

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>broader and more general, like it can be infinite dimensional.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You can have complex values, you know, imaginary numbers, all

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things. So this is sort of like a

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>subset of all the possible Hilbert spaces. It's like it

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the relationship between all these quantum wave

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>functions can be described in this sort of simpler subspace,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this four dimensional subspace, in which all that information can

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be mapped onto the whole hill of beans. It's the

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>whole hill of beans. But it also means other interesting things.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>If this is true. It means that, for example, you

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>could have different spaces inside this, like larger Hilbert space.

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You can have like our chunk of space which is

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>all woven together, and you could have another one somewhere

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>else was also emerged and is totally disconnected from ours,

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and you could have maybe parts of it without these relationships, right,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you could have a whole bunch of people with

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>no friends on Facebook exactly, or even parts of the

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>world where there is no Facebook. Hard to imagine, right,

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but it might be true. And so if this picture

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is accurate, then the answer is absolutely you can have

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe without space. It's not necessarily clear that you

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>need space to have the universe. And you can have

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>parts of the universe with space, parts of the universe

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>without space, and other parts of the universe you know

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that have different kinds of spaces. And you might be thinking,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>hold on, he's saying the word parts. What does he

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mean if there's no space, what parts is he talking about?

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know, these parts don't necessarily have like

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a spatial relationship. You can't say this one is here

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and that one is there in the sense of like

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:14.239
<v Speaker 1>where is your family? You know, you guys might be

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>physically somewhere, but the actual relationships between you, those connections

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that tie you together, like where is that It isn't

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>really anywhere, It just sort of in your emotional space. Yes,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can't find your family, that's a whole different

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>problem there, and a whole different type of podcast. There's

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole genre for that. But that's sort of the

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical view. If you say quantum mechanics is primary

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and the way function for the universe is the most

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>basic thing, then can you build up a universe without spaces?

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Space necessary? That's the quantum mechanical path, right, And it

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:44.959
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the answer is sort of yes, Like if

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics is all there is, then it might be

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>possible to see how you could not have space absolutely.

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's some really fun recent ideas things called like

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>condensate cosmology, where space condenses in these like steam like

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>droplets from these weird fun spin networks that are more fundamental,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna do a whole podcast about that sometime

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Well all right, well then, and now,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what does general relativity say about not having any space?

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that possible? According to that view, general relativity really

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has no problem with space not existing because in our

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>general relativistic understanding of the universe, think about what happens

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the history, Right, we have the current universe. We

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>look back in time and we see the universe getting

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more and more compact, and we propagate back and further

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and further and further and approaches this special moment, this singularity,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this time before which space does not exist. And you know,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>there are various ideas for how to tackle that and

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what that means and if it's a breakdown of the

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>theory and if it needs to be replaced by something else.

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But in our current albeit imperfect, non quantum mechanical general relativity,

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>there is this concept that there is no space before

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang, there's no space or it was just

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>super compressed. It's super compressed in the very first moments

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, but before that, before the singularity itself, right,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this moment of infinite density, that space did not exist.

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That it doesn't make sense to ask where is something

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or when is something because the whole notion of space

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and time came into existence then, like there is no

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 1>space and time before then. And this is not something

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that's very easy to think about because we don't think

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>about space and definitely not time beginning right, But a

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>whole other podcast episode about whether you need time and

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>if time is an emergent phenomena. It's a whole even

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>more difficult question to grapple with because you have to

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>think about, like, could there be a time before which

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>there was no time. But putting that aside for the

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time being, at least, it's hard still to think about

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a universe existing without space. But if you can still

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have time, right, if you say time exists, but maybe

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>space is not fundamental, it might make sense to you

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to think about like space itself is this weird thing

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, this weird do that does stuff, and

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it can bubble and it can expand. It's being created

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. If it's being created, then you know, maybe

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a moment before it was created, or you know,

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you can think about what is there when it's not

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>being created right and there's there's no space, if there's

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>no space being created exactly, and it might be that

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you can have a universe before space is created. Might

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be the time existed before the Big Bang, but just

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>not space. And there's some like conditions required for space

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to be created for it to expand. Like you might

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a weird concept for space to be created,

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but remember that it's happening right now. You know, the

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the universe is not the motion of stuff

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>through the universe. It's the creation of new space between

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>us and other galaxies, between you and your couch between

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>everything and everything else. So it's happening right now. And

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just that we have only recently realized that space

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is this bizarre fabric that can do these things like

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be created spontaneously everywhere simultaneously, that we've come to ask

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>these quests, and so we just really don't have a

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>notion and understanding of what space is even in general relativity.

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's certainly is possible that it can be created.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, you can imagine there being a pre

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang moment when there was a universe but just

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>no space. All right, Well, it sounds like both theories

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are pretty cool with the idea of not having space.

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They can both take it or leave it. Yeah, absolutely,

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>variations of quantum mechanics can accommodate space not being fundamental

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>even though our current quantum field theory sort of assumes

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's there. You can build these extensions that sort

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of make it possible for space to be emergent, for

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it to bubble up, rather than just being an assumed

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>property of the universe. Alright, so space, take it or

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>leave it? Leave it? All right, Let's get into how

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we would ever know if space is or not disposable

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>or dispensable. But speaking of time, it's time to take

0:36:51.880 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>another quick break, all right, Daniel. It sounds like physicists

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.479
<v Speaker 1>could take space or leave it. It sounds like both

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>theories about the universe would be okay. They wouldn't break

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>down if you suddenly got rid of space. Yeah. And

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if you took a survey of physicists right

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>now and you ask them if space was fundamental or emergent,

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>if it came from something else more fundamental, I bet

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you get like saying that it's an emergent, that it's

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>not fundamental, that it's comes up from something else, which

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>means that you could have a universe without it, or

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>portions of the universe without it. I think that's the

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>current mainstream thinking. And as we all know, the universe

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>works democratically, so whatever the majority says must be true. No,

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely capable of being misled and having the wrong idea.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's sort of exciting that it's widespread.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>It means that lots of people are working on it,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>People are developing new ways of thinking about these really

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really basic questions, and people out there also should be

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>excited it means that, like we're just the beginning of

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>asking questions about the universe and tackling them. If you

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are excited about questions like you know, what is the

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>universe and where did they come from? And what's it

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>really made out of? Remember that there are huge tracts

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of questions that are just really being explored by This

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is just now, and so there's plenty of room to

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>make like really fundamental Einstein level discoveries about the nature

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. Right. I think what you're saying is

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that there's an electoral college in the universe, and who knows,

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>who knows what the rules are for that? That's right. Fortunately,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>physics is easier to calculate than the electoral college. All right,

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe now the big question is how would

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we know or not whether space is fundamental or whether

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>or not it's like an add on or like an

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>optional preference in the universe you could live in. Is

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>there a way for us to test it because we

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>live in this space that we're trying to test. Is

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it possible to I don't know, create an experiment where

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you have no space? Yeah, there's really two steps to that. First,

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>is we gotta make more theoretical progress and then we

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>got to do some experiments. So on the theoretical side,

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what we really need is a unification of quantum mechanics

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and general relativity. We need a theory of quantum gravity

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that tells us how the universe works, so that we

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can think about, like what is space, and this theory

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if it all hangs together and like does everything it

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>has to do, meaning it can describe everything that gravity

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>can do, and they can describe all the tiny fundamental

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>particles and it brings those together in a way that

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that you know, they don't disagree with each

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>other like the current quantum mechanics and general relativity do.

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Then we can ask questions of that theory. So first

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got to make progress. Theoretically, we need like an

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>actual theory that totally works. Before the break, we talked

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about a few possibilities like directions people are going. These

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are like half formed ideas. People are like building scaffolding.

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You can see the outlines of a structure of people

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to make work, but nobody has an actual

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>functioning theory of quantum gravity where we can ask these

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of questions and get answers. I guess you need

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of theory first, right, Like, you can't just

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>take out space and measure it and not measure it.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you measure not space? Well, we have done

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really cool experiments about space, right, Like

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing gravitational waves is incredible. It tells us that space

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>really is sort of fungible and dynamic. And measuring the

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the universe that's also kind of an experiment

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that tells us what's going on with space. And a

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of times experiment informs us. Remember that we didn't

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>expect the universe to be expanding in an accelerating manner

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>until we saw it, and it totally shocked us and

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>surprised us. So sometimes experiments can inform us. I think

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in this case, we really need theory to tell us,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like how we can do experiments to answer this question,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>because currently the only experiments I can think of are

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ones that are like at the center of a black

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hole or requires super colliders the size of a solar system,

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not things we can get done tomorrow. No, exactly, because

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, general relativity and quantum mechanics they disagree about

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>what's at the center of a black hole. You know,

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>general relativity says, oh, there's a singularity there, but quantum

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>mechanics says, you can't have a singularity because that's too

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>much information isolated in one little spot and it violates

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. And so if you could see

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what was going on inside the black hole, you can

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 1>get great clues as to how to build your theory

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of quantum gravity. Or if you could somehow do tests

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of particles feeling gravitational forces by building a super huge

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>collider and smashing those particles together at crazy high energies

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>enough energy where like gravity is as powerful as the

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>other forces, that maybe you could get a clue as

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to how to build your theory of quantum gravity. But

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we can't do either of those experiments today, And so

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what we need is some inside from the

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>theory to tell us, well, look, here's how the universe

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is put together. Here's our theory of what spaces, and

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this theory gives us a clue about how to look

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for evidence that the theory is correct. You know, there's

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>some like wrinkles, some experiment we can predict the outcome

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of that can tell you whether or not this is right.

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like if only you can break the loss of

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>physics so that you could figure out the laws of exactly.

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And there's maybe one more hint of something that we

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>can do, which is that we can look for more

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence of this creation of space. We can look for

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>evidence of those first moments just after the Big Bang

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and trying to find some gravitational radiation from the Big

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Bang itself. But what do you mean, like a shock wave,

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>or like actual radiation, or like gravitons. Yes, exactly all

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of those things. You know that we have microwave background

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>radiation from about four hundred thousand years after the Big Bang,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>when this hot plasma cooled and became transparent. We see

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>those photons, and people often say that that radiation is

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like from the Big Bang itself. It's not quite as

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from you know, four hundred thousand years after the Big Bang,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>when the universe became transparent and that light is now

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>still propagating around. We'd love to see earlier. We'd have

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to look further back to the actual creation of the universe,

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever happened there, And so it might be Passe will

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>do that by looking for gravitational waves that were created

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in those very first moments when the universe was expanding

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>so rapidly, we think that gravitational waves were made. So

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>there's another kind of radiation called the cosmic gravitational background

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that might have clues as to what the nature of

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.760
<v Speaker 1>spaces and whether it was created in those first moments,

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if we could see it like the echoes of the

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>creation of space, yes, exactly, and so we have theories

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>about what that might look like under various configurations. And

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you might remember several years ago people didn't experiment where

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they thought they measured those waves. It was called BICEP two.

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But then it turns out that they were mistaken and

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they were actually just measuring dust between galaxies. So that

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was disappointing, But it might still be possible with a

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>better round of experiments, more precision and control of that dust,

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to see the actual radiation from the early universe and

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>get a glimmour as to whether space was created or

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it had always been there. And there's another possibility

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right us to whether or not we can confirm this

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>existence or the tendency of space, and that is that

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the future there might not be any space.

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly, are we going to run out of space

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or are we just gonna, you know, get a victim

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>from our house. No, you're absolutely right. And some of

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>these theories of loop quantum gravity, for example, they predict

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that the universe's expansion will stop and it will turn

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>around and it will compactify, so that space is like

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>being destroyed instead of being created, and we'll have like

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a reverse big bang, this big crunch, And it's not

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>clear what would happen after that. Would we get another

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>big bang? Would we just have no space for a while?

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But does time even exist anymore? We don't know. So yeah,

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>stick around another few trillion years and the question might

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>just answer itself. Yeah, things might get a little bit

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>more crowded or were space and cluttered? All right? Well,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it is possible for the universe to

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not have any space, But we may not find out

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>any time, you know, unless we observe something incredible or

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we make a breakthrough in one of these theories that

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:01.959
<v Speaker 1>let us look or you know, kinks that we can

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>use this evidence that space cannot exist. Yes, and I

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think that there will be theoretical progress. People are working

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>really hard on this stuff. Black hole information paradox is

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>giving us some clues. So there's a lot of really

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>smart people working really hard on these questions, and I

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>think in the next five or ten years we'll see

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>some really clever, fascinating, mind blowing theories coming out to

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>explain our bunkers universe. They just need a little space,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, no pressure. All right, Well, we hope you

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that discussion. Thanks for joining us, see you next time.

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio or

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my heart Radio visit the I heart

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:45:53.360 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.