WEBVTT - The Man That Destroyed Google Search

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>All Zone Media. Hello, and welcome to Better Offline. I'm

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>your host ed zig Tron. Well, and in the next

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>two episodes, I'm going to tell you the names some

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of the people responsible for destroying the Internet. And I'm

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>going to start on February fifth, twenty nineteen, when Ben Gomes,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Google's former head of Search, well, he had a problem.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Dishler, then the VP and GM of Ads at Google,

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and Shiv Van Carterman, then the VP of Engineering Search

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ads on Google Properties, had called something called a

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>code yellow for search revenue due to and I quote

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>emails that came out as part of Google's anti trust

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hearing steady weakness in the daily numbers and a likeliness

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that it would end the quarter significantly behind in metrics

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of unclear for those unfamiliar with Google's, in turn,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of scientology esque jargon which means most people,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>let me explain, a code yellow isn't a terrible need

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to piss or some sort of crisis of moderate severity.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The yellow, according to Stephen Levy's Tell All book about Google,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>refers to and I promise this is not a joke,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the color of a tank top that a former VP

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of Engineering called Wayne Rosling used to wear during his

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>time at the company. It's essentially the equivalent of deafcom

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one and activates, as Levy explained, a war room like

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>situation where workers are pulled from their desks and into

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a conference room where they tackle the problem as a

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>top priority. Any other projects or concerns are sidelined and independently.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I've heard there are other colors like purple. I'm not

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get into that, though, it's quite boring and

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant to this situation. In emails released as part of

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justices antitrust case against Google, as a

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>previously mentioned Dishler laid out several contributing factors. Search query

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>growth was significantly behind forecast, the timing of revenue launches

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was significantly behind, and he had this vague worry that

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>several advertiser specific in sector weaknesses existed in search. Now

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to cover something because I've messed up, and

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I really want to be clear about this. I've previously

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and erroneously referred to the code yellow as something that

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Gomes raised as a means of calling attention to the

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>proximity of Google's ad side getting a little too close

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to search. I'm afraid the truth is extremely depressing and

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>so much grimmar. The code yellow was actually the rumble

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of the goddamn rot economy, with Google's revenue arms sounding

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the alarm that its golden goose wasn't laying enough eggs. Gomes,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a Googler of nineteen years that basically built the foundation

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of modern search engines, should go down as one of

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the few people in tech that actually fought for an

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>actual principle, and he was destroyed by a guy called

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Prabaka Ragavan, a computer scientist class traitor that sided with

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the management consultancy sect. More confusingly, one of their problems

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was that there was insufficient growth in queries, as in

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the amount of things that people were asking Google. It's

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit like if Ford decided that things were going

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>poorly because their drivers weren't putting enough goddamn miles on

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>their trucks. This whole story has personally upset me, and

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to hear that in this but

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>going through these emails is just very depressing.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>A few days beforehand, on February first, twenty nineteen, Kristen Gill,

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>then Google's VP business finance officer had emailed Shashi Thakker,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>then Google's VP of Engineering, Search and Discover, saying that

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the ADS team had been considering a code yellow to

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>close the search gap it was seeing, vaguely referring to

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>how critical that growth was to an unnamed company plan.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, this email was in response to Thaker

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>stating that there is nothing that the search team could

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do to operate at the fidelity of growth that the

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ADS department had demanded. Shashy Forward did the email to

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Gomes asking if there's any way to discuss this with

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Sandar Pashai, Google CEO, and declared that there was no

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>way he would sign up for a high fidelity business

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>metric for daily active users on search. Saker also said

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>something that I've been thinking about constantly since I read

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>these emails, that there was a good reason that Google's

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>founders separated search from ads. I want you to remember

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that line for later. A day later, on February second,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, Thacker and Gomes shared their anxieties with Nick Fox,

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>a vice president of Search and Google assistant, entering a

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple day long debate about Google's sun lust for growth.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This thread is a dark window into the world of

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>growth focus Tech, where the Kherr listed the multiple points

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of disconnection between ads and Search, discussing how the search

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>team wasn't able to finally optimize engagement on Google without

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>hacking it, a term that means effectively tricking users into

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>spending more time on a site, and that doing so

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>would lead them to and I quote, abandoned work on

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>efficient journeys. In one email, Fox adds that there was

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big disconnect between what finance and ads wants

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and what Search was doing. Every part of this story

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>pisses me off so much. When Gomes pushed back on

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the multiple requests for growth, Fox added that all three

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of them were responsible for Search and that Search was

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and again I quote, the revenue engine of the company,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and that bartering with the ads and finance teams was

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>now potentially the new reality of their jobs. On February sixth,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, Gomes said that he believed that Search was

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>getting too close to the money and ended his email

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by saying that he was concerned that growth is all

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that Google was thinking about. On March twenty second, twenty nineteen,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Google VP of Product Management Darshan Cantac would declare the

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>end of the Code Yellow. The thread mostly consisted of

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>congratulatory emails until Gomes made the mistake of responding congratulating everyone,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that the plans architected as part of the Code

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Yellow would do well throughout the year. Enter Probarka Ragavan,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>then Google's head of Ads and the true mastermind behind

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Code Yellow, who would respond curtly saying that the

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>current revenue targets were addressed by heroic RPM engineering and

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>that the core query softness continued without mitigation, a very

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>clunky way of saying that despite these changes, query growth

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>was not happening at the rate he needed it to.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>A day later, Gomes emailed Fox Andhaker an email he

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>intended to center Ragavan. He led by saying that he

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was annoyed both personally and on behalf of the search team.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>In this very long email, he explained in arduous detail

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>how one might increase engagement with Google Search, but specifically

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>added that they could increase queries quite easily in the

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>short term, but only in user negative ways, like turning

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>off spell correction or ranking improvements, or placing refinements effectively

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>labels all over the page, adding that it was possible

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are trade offs here between the different kinds

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of user negativity caused by engagement hacking, that he was deeply,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>deeply uncomfortable with this. He also added that this was

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason he didn't believe that queries, as in the

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of the things with people searching on Google, were

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a good metric to measure search, and that the best

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>defense against the weaknesses of queries was to create compelling

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>user experiences that make users want to come back.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Crazy idea there, what if the product was good not

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>good enough?

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Of prabaka, so little bit of history about Google here.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>They regularly throughout the year do core updates to search.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>These are updates that change the algorithm. Let's say, okay,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to suppress this kind of thing. We can

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>elevate this kind of thing. And they are actually the

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>reason that search changes. It's why certain sites suddenly disappear

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or reappear. It's why sites get a ton of traffic,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>some don't get any, and so on and so forth.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>But they do a lot of them. The one that's really.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Interesting and a little bastard and I went and looked

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>through pretty much the last decade of these, the one

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me it was the March twenty

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen core update to Search, which happened about a week

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the code yellow, meaning that it's

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very likely that this was a result of Prabaka's bullshit.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So this was expected to be one of the largest

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>updates to Search in a very long time, and I'm

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>quoting Search Engine Journal there. Yet when it launched, many

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>found that the update mostly rolled back changes and traffic

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was increasing to sites that had been suppressed by previous updates,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like Google Search's Penguin update from twenty twelve that specifically

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>targeted spami search results.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>There were others that were.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Seeing traffic as well from an update that happened on

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the first of August twenty eighteen that was a few

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>months after Gomes became head of Search.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>While I'm guessing here, I really don't know. I do

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>not work for Google.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I do not have friends there. I think the timing

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the March twenty nineteen core update, along with the

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>traffic increases the previously suppressed sites that one hundred percent

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>were spamy seo nonsense. I think these suggest that Google's

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>response to the co jello was to roll back changes

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that were made to maintain the quality of search. A

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>few months later, in May twenty nineteen, Google would roll

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>out a redesign of how ads were shown on Google Search,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>specifically on mobile, replacing the bright green AD label and

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>URL color on ads with a tiny, little, bolded black

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>note that said ad in the smallest font you could

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>possibly put there, with the link looking otherwise identical to

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a regular search link. I guess that's how they managed

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to start hitting their numbers, hah. And then in January

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, Google would bring this change to desktop, and

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the vergins John Porter would suggest that it made Google's

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>ads look just like search results now awesome. Five months later,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a little over a year after the code yellow situation,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Google would make Probakar Ragavan the head of Google Search,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with Jerry Dishler taking his place as the head of Ads.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>After nearly twenty years of building Google Search, Gomes would

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>be relegated to the spe VP of Education at Google. Domes,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>who was a critical part of the original team that

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>made Google Search work, who has been credited with establishing

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the world's largest and most important search engine,

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was chased out by a growth hungry managerial type, several

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of them actually led by Probagar Ragavan, a management consultant

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>wearing an engineer costume. As a side note, by the way,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I use the term management consultant there as a pejorative

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>while he exhibits all the same being counting morally young

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guided behaviors of a management consultant. From what I can tell,

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan has never actually worked in that particular sector of

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 2>But you know who has.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>San Dhar Pishai, the CEO of Google, who previously worked

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at McKinsey, arguably the most morally abhorrent company that's ever existed,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>having played roles both in the two thousand and eight

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, where it encouraged banks to load up on

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>debt and floored mortgage backed securities, and the ongoing opioord crisis,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>where it effectively advised Perdue Farmer on how to growth

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>hack sales of oxy content and extremely addictive painkiller. McKinsey

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>has paid nearly one billion dollars over several settlements due

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to its work with Perdue. But I'm getting sidetracked, but

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>one last point. McKinsey is actively anti labor. When a

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>company brings in a McKinsey consultant, they're often there to

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>advise on how to cut costs, which inevitably means layoffs

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and outsourcing. McKinsey is to the middle class. What fleshy

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>in bacteria is the skin. But back to the emails,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>which are a stark example of the monstrous, disgusting rot economy,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the growth that all costs mindset that's dominating the tech ecosystem.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you take one thing away from this episode,

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>I want it to be the name Prabakar Ragavan and

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>an understanding that there are people responsible for the current

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>state of the Internet. These emails, which I really encourage

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you to look, and if you go to where's youreed

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>dot at, you'll be able to see a newsletter that

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has links to them. Well, these emails tell a dramatic

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>story about how Google's finance and advertising teams, led by Ragavan,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with the blessing of CEO Sandhar Pashai, the McKinsey guy,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>actively worked to make Google worse to make the company

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more money. This is exactly what I mean when I

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the economy, an illogical, product destroying mindset that

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>turns products you love into torturous frustrating quasi tools that

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>require you to fight the company to get the thing

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you want. Ben Gomes was instrumental in making Search work

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>both as a product and a business. He joined the

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>company in nineteen ninety nine, a time long before Google

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>established dominance in the field, and the same year when

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Larry Page and Sergey Britain tried to sell the company

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to Excite for one million dollars, only to walk away

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>after Vinnard Coosler and Excite investor and co founder of

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>some Microsystems that's now a VC who tried to stop

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>people going to a beach in Halfman Bay, Well, he

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>tried a low ball and with a seven hundred and

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars offer also known as a one hundred

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>square foot apartment in San Francisco. In an interview with

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Fast Companies Harry McCracken from twenty eighteen, Gomes freyed Google's

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge as taking the page rank algorithm from one machine

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to a whole bunch of machines, and they weren't very

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>good machines at the time. Despite his impact and tenure,

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Gomes had only been made head of Search in the

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>middle of twenty eighteen after John Gillanderia moved to Apple

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to work on its machine learning and AR strategy. Domes

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had been described as Google's searches are beloved for his

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>ability to communicate across Google's many quite decentralized apartments. Every

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>single article I've read about Gomes and his tenure at

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Google spoke of a man deeply ingrained in the foundation

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of one of the most important technologies ever made. A

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 1>man who had dedicated decades to maintaining a product with

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a and I quote Gomes here guiding light of serving

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the user and using technology to do that.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.239
<v Speaker 2>And when finally given the keys.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>To the kingdom the ability to elevate Google Search even further,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>he was rap fucked by a series of rotten careerists

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to please Wall Street, led by Provakar Ragavan. Do

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to know what Provacar Ragavan's old job was?

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What Probacar Ragavan the new head of Google Search, the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that ran Google Search, that runs Google Search right now,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that is running Google Search into the goddamn ground.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to know what his job was?

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>His job before Google, He was the head of search

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for god damn Yahoo from two thousand and five through

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>two thy and twelve when he joined the company. When

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Probakar Ragavan took over Yahoo Search, they held a thirty

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>point four percent market share, not far from Google's own

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty six point nine percent and miles ahead of the

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen point seven percent that Microsoft's MSN Search had. By

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>May twenty twelve, Yahoo was down to just thirteen point

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>four percent and had shrunk for the previous nine consecutive months,

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and was being beaten by Eva, the newly released BING.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>That same year, Yahoo had the largest layoffs in its

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate history, shedding two thousand employees, or fourteen percent of

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>its overall workforce. The man who deposed, Ben Gomes, someone

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>who worked on Google Search from its very beginnings, was

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so shit at his job that in two thousand and nine,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo effectively threw in the towel on its own search tech,

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>instead choosing to license Bing's engine in a ten year deal.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>If we take a long view of things, this likely

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>precipitated the overall decline of the company, which went from

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>being worth one hundred and twenty five billion dollars at

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the dot com boom to being sold

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to Verizon for four point eight billion dollars in twenty seventeen,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>which is roughly a three thousand square foot apartment in

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. With Search no longer a priority in making

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>less money for the company, Yahoo decided to pivot into

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Web two point zero and original content, making sum bats

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that paid off, but far far too many that did not.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It spent one point one billion dollars on Tumblr in

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen, only for Verizon to sell it for just

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars in twenty nineteen. It put Zimbra in

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven ostensibly to complete with the new

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Google Apps productivity suite, only to sell it for a

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reported fraction of the original purchase price to VMware a

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>few years later. That's not his fault, but nevertheless, Yahoo

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>was a company without a mission, a purpose, or an objective. Nobody,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll speculate even though his leading the company really

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>knew what it was and what it did. Anyway, just

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a big shout out right now to Kura Swisher, who

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>referred to Pradaka as well respected. When he moved from

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo to Google. He absolutely nailed at Kara bang up job.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>In an interview with zd and ets Dan Farber from

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, Ragavan spoke of his intent to

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>align the commercial incentives of a billion content providers with

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>social good intent while at Yahoo, and his eagerness to

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>inspire the audience to give more data.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>What anyway before that, It's it's actually hard.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>To find out exactly what Ragava and did, though according

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to ZDNA, he spent fourteen years doing search and data

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>mining research ibm MM. In April twenty eleven, The Guardian

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>ran an interview with Ragavan that called him Yahoo's secret weapon,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>describing his plan to make rigorous scientific research and practice

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to inform Yahoo's business from email to advertising, and how

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>under then CEO Carol Bart's the focus had shifted to

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the direct development of new products. It speaks of Ragavan's

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>scientific approach and his steady process based logic to innovation

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that is very different to the common perception the ideas

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and development are more about luck and spontaneity. A sentence

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm only reading to you because I really need

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you to hear how stupid it sounds and how specious

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the tech press.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Used to be.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, this entire article is ridiculous, so utterly vacuous, that

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually astonished I don't want to name the reporter.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I feel bad.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>What about Ragavan's career made this feel right? How has

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody connected these thoughts before? I have a day job,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I run a PR firm, I am a blogger with

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, and I'm the one who said, yeah, okay,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>drag Uller is now the CEO of the Blood Bank.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Nobody saw this. Nobody saw this at the time. I

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just feel a bit crazy. I feel a bit crazy.

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, this was something written several years

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>after Yahoo had licensed its search technology to Microsoft in

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a financial deal that the next CEO, Marissa Maya, who

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>replaced Barts, was still angry about for years. Ragavan's reign

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as what zd Neat referred to as the search Master

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was one so successful that it ended up being replaced

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>by a search engine that not a single person in

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the world enjoys saying out loud. The Guardian article ran

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly one year before dramatic layoffs at Yahoo that involved

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>firing entire divisions worth of people, and four months before

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Carol Barts would be fired by telephone by then chairman

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Roy bost. Her replacement Scott Thompson, who previously served as

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>president of PayPal. Would last a whole five months in

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the role before he was replaced by former Google executive

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Mayer, in part because it emerged he lied on

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>his resume about having a computer science degree.

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Brobaka, did you not notice that anyway? Whatever?

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Barts joined Yahoo in two thousand and nine, so about

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>four years into Broba Kha's reign of terror, I guess,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and she joined in the aftermath of its previous CEO,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Yang, refusing to sell the company to Microsoft for

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>forty five billion dollars. In her first year, she laid

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>off hundreds of people and struck a deal that I've

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before to power Yahoo Search using Microsoft's being search

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>engine Tech, with Microsoft paying Yahoo eighty eight percent of

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the revenue a game from searches. A deal made Yahoo

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple hundred million dollars for handing over the keys

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and the take to its most high traffic platform. As

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I previously stated, when Brabakhar Ragavan, Yahoo's secret weapon was

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>doing his work, Yahoo Search was so valuable that it

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was replaced by Bing its sole value. In fact, I

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe I'm being a little unfair. There's a way

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of looking at this that you could say that Yahoo's

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>entire value at the end of his career was driven

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>by nostalgia and association with days before he worked there. Anyway,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the state of modern search, it's actually very,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to find much about Ragavan's history. It took

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>me hours of digging through Google and at one point

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>being embarrassingly to find three or four articles that went

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>into any depth about him. But from what I've gleaned,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>his expertise lies primarily in failing upwards ascending through the

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>ranks of technology on the momentum from the explosions he's coursed.

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>In a wide interview from twenty twenty one, GLAD handler

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Levy said Ragavan isn't the CEO of Google, he

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just run the place, and described his addition to the

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>company as a move from research to management. While Levy

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>calls him a world class computer scientist who has authored

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>definitive text in the field, which is true, he also

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>describes Ragavan as choosing a management track, which definitely tracks

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with everything I found out about him. Ragavan proudly declares

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that Google's third party ad tech plays a critical role

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in keeping journalism alive, and a really shitty answer to

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a question that was also made at a time when

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>he was in aggressively incentivizing search engine optimized content, and

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a year after he'd deposed someone who actually gave a

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>shit about search. Under Ragavan, Google has become less reliable

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is dominated by search engine optimization and just

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>outright spam. And I've said this before, but look, we

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>complain about the state of Twitter under Elon Musk and

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>justifiably he's a vile, anti, semi racist bigger. We all

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>know this. It's fully true. We can say a million times. However,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue that Ragavan, by extension some Ar Pashai deserve

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times more criticism. They've done unfathomable damage to society.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You really can't fix the damage they've been doing and

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the damage they'll continue to do, especially as we go

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>into an election. Ragavan and his cronies worked to oust

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes, a man who dedicated a good portion of

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>his life to making the world's information more accessible, in

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the process burning the Library of Alexandria to the goddamn

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ground so that Sundar Pashai could make more than two

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars a year, and Ragavan a Manager High

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>by Sundar Pashai, a former McKinzie man. The King of

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Managers is an example of everything wrong with the tech industry.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Despite his history as a true computer scientist with actual

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>academic credentials, Ragavan chose to bulldoze actual workers, people who

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>did things, and people that care about technology and replace

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>them with horrifying toadies that would make Google more profitable

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and less useful. Since Prabakar took the reins of Google

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, Google search has dramatically declined with these

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>core search updates I mentioned, allegedly made to improve the

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>quality of results, having the adverse effect increasing the prevalence

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of spammy shitty search optimized content.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>It's frustrating. The anger you hear in my voice.

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The emotion is because I've read all of these antitrust emails.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I have gone through this guy's history, and I've read

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>all the things about Ben Gomes too. Every article about

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes where they interviewed, is this guy just having

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>these dreamy thoughts about the future of information and the

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>complexity of delivering it at high speed.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Every interview with Ragavan.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Is some vague bullshit about how important data is it's

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so goddamn offensive to me. And all of this stuff

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>happening is just one example of what I think are

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>probably hundreds of things happening across startups or that have

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>happened across startups in the last ten or fifteen years,

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and big tech two and it's because the people running

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry are no longer those who build Tim

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Larry Page and Sergey Brin left Google in December twenty nineteen,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the same year, by the way as the Code Yellow thing,

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and while they remained as co controlling shareholders, they clearly

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>don't give a shit about what Google means anymore. Propakar

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan is a manager, and his career, from what I

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>can tell, is mostly made up of did some stuff

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at IBM, failed to make Yahoo anything of no, and

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>fucked up Google so badly that every news outlet has

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>run a story about how.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Bad it is.

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>This this is the result of taking technology out of

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the hands of real builders and handing it to managers

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at a time when management is synonymous with staying as

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>far away from actual work as possible. When you're a

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>do nothing looking to profit as much as possible, who

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't use tech, who doesn't care about tech and you

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>only care about growth.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're not a.

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>User, You're a parasite. And it's these parasites that have

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dominated and are now draining the tech industry of its value.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>They're driving it into a goddamn ditch. Ragavan's story is

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.959
<v Speaker 1>unique in so far as the damage he's managed to inflict,

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>or if we're being exceptionally charitable, failed to avoid in

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the case of Yahoo, on two industry defining companies, and

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he did it without being a CEO

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>or founder is remarkable. Yeah, he's far from the only

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>example of a manager falling upwards. I'm going to editorialize

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit here. I want to think about your job history.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think about the managers you've had.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I've written a lot about management, and specifically to do

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with remote work and the whole thing around guys who

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>don't do work, who are barely in the office, telling

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you you need to be in the office. This problem

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is everywhere. Managers are everywhere, and managers aren't doing work.

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure someone will email me now and say, well,

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a manager and off I'll do work all the time.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, make sure you do.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why you're emailing me telling me how good you

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are at your job. People who actually do work don't

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>feel defensive about it. People who do things then are

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the actual profit center. They don't need a

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast to tell them they're good at their job. What

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem is in modern American corporate society

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>is that management is no longer synonymous with actually managing people.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not about getting the people what they need. It's

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>not about organizing things and making things efficient and good.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not about execution. It's about handing work off to

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>other people and getting paid handsomely. And if you disagree

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>easy at better offline dot com, I will read your email,

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll even respond. But the thing is management has

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>become a poison in America. Managers have become poisonous because

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>managers are not actually held to any kind of standard. No,

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>only the workers who do the work are. What happened

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Gomes is one of the most disgusting, disgraceful

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>things to happen in the tech industry. It's an absolute joke.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes was a goddamn hero. And I really need

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you to read the news there and read these emails.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I need you to see how many times him and

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Thakka Great Guy as well were saying, hey, growth is

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>bad for search. The thing that Ben Gomes was being

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>asked to do was increase queries on Google, the literal

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>amount that people's search. There are many ways of looking

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at that and thinking, oh shit, that's not what you want.

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Surely you don't want no queries. You don't want people

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not using it at all, but queries going upwards. Lennearly

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>suggests that if you're not magic, get to use the growth.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>At least the people are not getting what they want

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on the first try, which, by the way, kind of

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>feels like how Google is nowadays when you go to

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Google and the first result and the second result, and

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifth result and the tenth result just don't get

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what you need because it's all that SEO crap. Now,

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this is all theorizing. But what I think prabagar Ragavan

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>did was I think he took off all the fucking

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>guidelines on Google Search. I think he rolled back changes

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically to make search, to increase queries, to give Google

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>more chance to show you adverts. I am guessing don't

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have a source telling me this, but the pattern around

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the core search updates. The fact that Google Search started

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>getting worse toward the middle and end of twenty nineteen

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and unquestionably dipped in twenty twenty. Well, that's when Prabakar

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>took over, That's when the big man took the reins.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>That's when Drac Killer got his job at the blood bank.

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is the thing. There's very little that you

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and I can actually do about this. But what we

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>can do is say names like Probagar Ragavan a great

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>deal of times so that people like this can be known,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so that the actions of these scurrilous assholes can be

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>seen and heard and pointed at and spat upon. I'm

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting spitting on anyone, no violent acts. No can

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be pissy on the internet like the.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Rest of us. Now I'm ranting. I realize i'm ranting,

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>but this subject, really, it really got to me. But

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not the only one.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>In the next episode, I'm going to conclude this sordid

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>three part fiasco with a few more examples. And how

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>many of these managers, these bean counters, devoid of imagination

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>or ability or anything of note save for that utter

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>slug likability. To protect oneself, I want to talk about

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>how these people manage to obfiscate their true intentions by

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be engineers, by pretending to be technologists, and pretending.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 2>To be innovators.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you all about how Adam Masseri

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>destroyed Instagram, and I want to tell you how little

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman has achieved other than making him and his

0:29:47.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>friends rich. See you next time. Thank you for listening

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can check out more

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of his music and audio projects at Matasowski dot com,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>M A T T O S O W s ki

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can email me at easy at better

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>offline dot com, or check out better Offline dot com

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to find my newsletter and more links to this podcast.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.