WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 10/12: 4 things to fix the offense, 3 up/down vs. Saints, Raiders Preview

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Bar and Lazarre. Hello, everybody nailed it?

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Joined as always buy our bart.

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex Bar throw the ball

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>against the Saints on third and short. Yes, I can't

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>tell if you're making fun of me. Your extual's trying

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to follow. I have it on a table here. Do

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>you want to see it?

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to keep going. When when is when

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we need a whiteboard?

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 2>When teams throw the ball against the Saints on third

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>and short, yes, they are converting a first down thirty

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>three percent of the time, it's not good. When they

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>run the ball against the Saints on third and short

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>sixty two.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Of the time is good. It's funny because like I

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not that you don't you know. I'm not trying to

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>say like you don't know any stats, but like usually

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's me that's like, you know, bringing the spreadsheet to

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Well, that's a very tangible stat. Yeah, that's true.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this earlier. I got I got it

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>as people could imagine. We got a bunch of stuff

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>on our mind. But we were talking earlier about the

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Herald story that came today Alex with Andrew Callahan and

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Doug Kyde. You know a lot of information there, some

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of it that I think we could have probably gleaned

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on our own, right, Like the Patriots have receivers that

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>don't get open, and an offensive line that doesn't block

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody in a quarterback that's broken, Like I think we

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all like we all knew that, right. But one of

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the pieces of information we don't have to get into it,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>but I knew it would would grind your gears was

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned that the Patriots are are not at the forefront.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the way to phrase this, And

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they said they didn't use analytics. So okay, they said

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't use analytics.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>First off, by the way that rant I had last week, Yeah,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>five third and shorts last week for the Patriots. They

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>threw it four times and they ran that for cocta

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>fake tush push on the other one. So so much

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 2>for the numbers there on that.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>That could have been a touchdown if Andre gets the ball. Yeah, well,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of things could have been. I'm

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying like in terms of like it was, they.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Definitely set it up well, they only ran like thirty

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Tousch pushes to set it up, which is start the

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>season push.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But I here's the thing.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the and by the way they ran

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 2>it when they were down thirty four nothing so great

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>time to break that out. I don't think the NFL

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 2>likes the term toush push, So that's why I'm so

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>committed to continue using it. Okay on the Herald story,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>so you know where I'm at with Like when I

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>say analytics, the math, I'm talking about win probability models,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>win probability EPA, CPO, anything that has expected in it

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>or theoretical or hypothetical they brought up in that article

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like next gen stats, which is player right player, a

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>guy running twenty miles an hour, He's running twenty miles

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>an hour. It's very tangrble. I have no problem with

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that stuff should be used. That stuff's great. It's when

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you get into the hypothetical, theoretical expected that you just

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>totally lose me and I think it's nonsense. But the

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>next gen stat stuff they absolutely should be using. Every

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>team should be using it. Yeah, I'm not saying it

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>should be the be all, end all, but it's I mean.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's informations a tool. It's a tool. It's a tool

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>away putting it. So that wasn't at the top of

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>my mind. I have a couple of things that are

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>at the top of my mind. I didn't really know.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Like usually I we you know, I try to set

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the table, have something like an opening take yeah back

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>when you thought the show was going to start having

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>ordered No, no, no, no, it does, it does. I

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to. It's really okay. No, it has order.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>It has order. My OCD makes it.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh, here's the thing. I I don't know where to

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>go with this because if you and I'm telling saying

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you as in you, the people, you, the listeners. If

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys want to call into the show today and

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ask us big picture questions, who's the next head coach,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>who's the next GM, who's the next quarterback? I understand.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that. We'll answer those questions. We'll talk

0:03:55.440 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>about those things. If you want to listen to how

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do they fix this this season, I'm cool with that too.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about that. Also, how do they be

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, more competitive this year? If you want them

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to take for the number one overall pick. Fine, If

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you want them to try to piece this thing together

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to be better on the field this season and this

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>week against the Raiders. Also, fine, we're gonna give you both.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna give you both. But here's here's my my

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>big opening thing. And this is recent now, and uh,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of puts a little bit more directions in

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>my mind because you know, those two things are so

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>polar opposite. Like, let's talk about next year and in

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the future, let's talk about this week against the Raiders.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It couldn't be more on either side of the of

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Jerry Judy. Jerry Judy is apparently, according to

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think multiple reports, safe to say at this point,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>available and likely to be moved before the NFL trade deadline. Yeah,

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so on some levels, I've gotten this this pushback on

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on on the X machine already. Why would you give

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up draft capital to help this team? Why would you

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>let Bill Belichick make any more trades? Why would you

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>make a trade that would make this team better and

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe put you in a spot where instead of the

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>second overall picking the draft, you're picking fifteenth again, And like,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the point in that, right? And my whole thing

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with all of that is that Jerry Judy is somebody

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that we've both been clamoring for because of his skill set.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a good player, good player, good route runner, gets

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>open against man coverage, which this team can't do and

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is a dead last in the league right now in

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>production against man coverage. This is one of the best

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>man coverage beaters in the league.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Judy, he is his route running Is that we

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 2>talk about a carrying trade, right, Yeah, what makes his

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>ability to separate on a route on his own is

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.119
<v Speaker 2>his carrying trade. He is top fifteen in the league

0:05:59.200 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>in that regard.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>A technician, Yeah, he's a route running technician. He's got

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that PhD and route running and he's pretty good with

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball in his hands too after the catch. So

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>my whole thing with Jerry Judy is in all likelihood

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>acquiring Jerry Judy. Well, let me first say this. You're

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not trading your first round pick for Jerry Judy. You're

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not trading for first round pick for anybody else. You're

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not trading No one's trading a first round pick for

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy. You don't no, like the Chiefs. No, I

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>could see the Chiefs doing it. I don't they if

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they if they had a first round pick on the

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>table for Jerry Judy, he wouldn't be a Bronco anymore.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, you get a few weeks, all right, yeah,

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. No one's trading a first round pick for

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy, so you're talking at most a second round pick,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a Day two pick. So that with that out of

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you're the idea of to me of

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>trading for Jerry Judy is a long term play, it's

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>long term. He's twenty four years old. He's twenty four,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>so you give him a contract extension, you trade a

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mid round pick for him, third round pick, second round pick,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes. And whether it's Mac Jones throwing him

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the football in twenty twenty four or it's Michael Pennocks

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>throwing him the football in twenty twenty four, what difference

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>does it make? What difference does it make? Either way?

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy is making the quarterback and the offense better, period,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>full stop. He's making them better. That's all that matters.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's Drake May, Michael Pennix, Mac Jones, Kyler Murray,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>whoever's throwing him the ball next year, it makes the

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>team better. I would also mention that this drives me

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>up a wall. People's attachment to non first round picks

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>drives me up a wall, Alex, because it's we do

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this all this time on the show, because it's a

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>good bit. Yeah, it's the family Guy Mystery box. Yep.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You can have Jerry Judy or you could draft a

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the third round and he might be as

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>good as Jerry Judy. Right, So, I like, what is

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the infatuation with the draft picks. I'm not saying that

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams do it right and the Rams say f

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the picks and they know there's a happy medium. There's

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a happy medium, and no one's sitting here today saying

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at the page. I would actually say that they shouldn't

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be trading their first or second round pick for Jerry

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>j So that's I wouldn't trade the second. Now maybe

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Judy and a third for like a second, Yeah

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you know you're getting You're not.

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>They should not lose any top one hundred picks. I

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>would trade a third for Jerry Judy. Might trade a third.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But so here's the thing.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 2>If we're going to really blow this up and talk

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>about this down the road, like that, Yeah, the Patriots

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>are not getting the first overall pick. That's just not

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen. I know a lot of people think it is.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 2>The Bears hold the trump card right now because they

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 2>have their picky and the Panthers pick. So a lot

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of people are like, oh, they need a tank so

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>they can get Caleb or whatever. It's not all about

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>like tanking in the NFL. You don't need the second

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>overall pick to get the second best player in the draft.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 2>And what I mean by that, or you don't need

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the second worst record, sorry, to get the second best

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>player in the draft. It's as much about how you

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>position yourself.

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>To move up the board.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's why I like, I'm not as hesitant

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>to part ways with the third round pick as like, oh,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a third round pick, you're turning into a great player.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 2>But like, are you gonna if if they want to

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>move into the top five take a quarterback and they're

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>sitting there at like seven, is that the pick you're

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna need and now you don't have it?

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But that also goes to another point. You can trade

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>from future years.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>You can trade from future years. But I would add

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>as well so one, I would try to trade future

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 2>your picks for Jerry Tuty. The other thing is this

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>is where you talk about what are they gonna do

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 2>with some of the guys on the team.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that aren't expiring contracts. Yeah, and if you.

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Somebody did this a couple of years ago, like they

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 2>traded for a guy that was on a long term deal,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>like I mean long term but with Judy multi year deal,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and then they traded away another player on expiring contract

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and got like the equivalent of that pick back. So

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>they essentially it wasn't that they didn't get a better

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>player at a certain stances were a little different, but

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>like they extended the window. So if you were to

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>trade like a third for Jerry Judy and then trade

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>like one of the expiring players Hunter Henry Kendrick born

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Josh Uche and maybe like a fifth for a third,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>well now you you still have the same number of

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>third round picks you always had, Like that would be

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>can I yeah, I hear you, Yeah, I just I

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the real value in those picks to me, and this

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>is a unique situation is to trade up if they

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 2>need a quarterback. Because you're not talking about trading up

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>like like we usually do with them from like twenty

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen. We're talking about going from like seven to

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 2>two or three, and that's where you do want to

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 2>be able to position yourself a certain way, all right, So.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>We're both I think in lockstep that we would offer

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick for Jerry Judy, and that's the most.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the highest we'd go. I might do like a

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>second for Jerry Judy in a third okay something. I

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the Broncos would do that. Okay, fair enough,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's just let's just, you know, call it a

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>third round pick. Sure, here's the Patriots last five third

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>round picks. Oh you came ready? Are you ready for this?

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I just pulled this up. Wait can I hang on?

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Hang on?

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Marte Maphu, yeah, uh, Marcus Jones yep. All right, So

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>then I gotta go back to mac Jones draft class.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>That would be Ronnie Perkins yep.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh. Twenty twenty. They had two that year, right three?

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Uch, noj was second, Anthony Jennings yep. Oh, and the

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>two tight ends yep. And keenan Assi OSSI.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And now we're am I eighteen nineteen nineteen, yeah, nineteen.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's Nikhil Harry draft.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>That would was chase one of its third I think

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 2>it's chased one of its right, third round, right when

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Damien Harris was the fourth round.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>No third round. Oh, they're both third round picks and

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yadney could just okay. So to summarize, Marty Mapuh, Marcus Jones,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie Perkins, Anthony Jennings, Devin Asiassi, Dalton Keene, Chase Winovich,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris, Yadney, kajuiced woof, And you guys are worried

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>about giving up a third round pick for that collection.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Am I allowed to be worried about it in losing

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>an asset to move up in the first round?

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>No, you're not. Why. I'll tell you why two reasons. One,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a million different ways to split that at him, right,

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you can trade from future years. You can trade

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>two fourths instead of a third, Like, there's a million

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>different ways to cut up that pie. Two, who's the

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>GM of the team, Because if it's the same guy

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's sitting in the chair right now, you and I

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>both know well and good that he ain't trading up

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. Well, he's not taking a quarterback either,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's not trading up.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so no, he's gonna hold onto the third because

0:12:58.160 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that's where they're going to take the quarterback.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're going Like. The bottom line is is

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that Jerry Judy makes your team better now, he makes

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>your he makes your team better in the future, and

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>stop obsessing over the draft picks. Stop. Okay, moving on

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>from that, and you can.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Call it one caveat and all that now yes, no, yes,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>no caveat. Yes, no, you have to have to have

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to sign him long term. I know you can't let

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 2>him walk after twenty twenty four, but that's that defeats

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the entire purpose.

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but that that's where I would I would like

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to think that Macro, assuming that Macro is still going

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to be here in twenty twenty four, maybe he can

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sit there and say to Bill, like, come on money.

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>If they make that trade and then let him walk,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a total mis mismanagement of assets.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree. Okay, Okay, let me put that. Let's

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>let's that's the Jerry Judy take from me and from Alex.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>If you want to call in and disagree, you want

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>email in and disagree or agree, we can still talk

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about Jerry Judy for the rest of the show. But

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I have I have four things, Alex, four things that

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I would do to fix the offense right now, and

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't include Jerry Judy. Right, We're not talking about external,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>internal moves. So I'm gonna read them off one by

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one and then you can tell me your opinion. Right,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one starts up front, right, offensive line, start up front.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line has to get better. So when the head

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>coach goes on Sunday and Monday and Wednesday, kind of

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>his whole mantra and the mantra around the team right

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>now in the building is start all over, right, start

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>all over? Like just forget about the last serio, no idea,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>who that is? I knew what you were doing. I

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>still let it get to me. Start all over right,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So in the interest is starting off like, what does

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that mean to you? Start all over? I got this

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>question a lot, like what's that mean to you? Start

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>all over? To me, what that means is, let's go

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the spring and training camp day one. What

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was our team, what was our installation? What were the

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>plays that we were running? And that's what we're gonna do, right,

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And in that Vein. When it comes to the offensive line,

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>starting all over to me is going back to march.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>What you thought you had along the offensive line. These

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>were our penciled in five starters along the offensive line.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So therefore, I think, and I would even go as

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>far to say that it's ridiculous if this isn't the case.

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>From left to right, Trent Brown assuming healthy, Cole Strange,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>David Andrews, Mike on Winne. Who I think is gonna play?

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Riley Reef is.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Going.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>He's been limited's let me played last week kind of

0:15:58.600 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>standing off to the side during stretching.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You'll be all right.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>He played a little. I think he's healthy enough to play.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's healthy enough to play a hundred percent.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to rotate him.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't want to get too caught up again.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Why not I would. I would still put Riley Reef

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at guard Mike and win it tackle. But sure, it's

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen it. See that. That's why I didn't

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like go that way, because it's not the right. It's

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. But I still feel like we have

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to say it, all right. I think that if you're

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're truly starting all over. But and that's starting

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all over.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 2>We talk about the best five that you know, maybe

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>something changes it left guard, but more or less, that's

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>your best five.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's your best five. And I think one of

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the few bright spots from that debacle against the Saints

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was that I thought Riley Reef played okay. I thought

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Riley Reef looked solid. I thought even looked like that's

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the word like twitchy almost, you know, like he was

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>moving well, and he was sudden with his movements and

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he was able to redirect and stay in front of guys.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Had a really really good one on one rep against

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Breeze, who's the Saints' first round pick, Breezy whatever,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>first round pick, and uh, you know, Breezy tried to

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>spin move him, shut it down. I thought he was

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>really good in that game against New Orleans. And he's

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>got to be in your starting lineup. If if they

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>don't think he can play tackle anymore, because the the

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff we saw in the summer, the foot speed, that

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, then maybe he's left guard right, but

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gotta he's got to play. He's got to be

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the starting five. That's where I would if you're

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna start all over, like that's starting all over to me,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>starting all over and and and rolling with like the

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>young guys like Antonio Maffi and City. So how's that's

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not starting all over? That's that's not.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I did think it was interesting to go back to

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>that Harald piece. They it doesn't say from a source,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>but it sounds in form like it's almost like they're

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting there reporting it with that really reporting that Cole

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Strange is facing a challenge for his job from Mafi.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>So I, Mafi's so tough, and we're gonna get to

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like three up, three down here in a little bit.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Mafi's tough because he was he was Okay, it's currently

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 2>in a battle for his starting cold. Strange currently in

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a battle for a starting drob with fifth round rookie

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Antonio Maffy.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's fair, but Mafi was He was good

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>against Dallas, or I shouldn't say good. He held his

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>He treaded water against Dallas, right like I thought that

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't bad the film, Yeah, the film was some progress.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>He was terrible against New Orleans. He just he doesn't have.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I did the feel and the instincts. Yet I think

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the lack of playing time at the position

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to college, which Belichick talked about last week

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in his press conference when he was giving him credit

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for learning. But line movement stuns, twists, blitzes, things like that,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like he doesn't know how to pick him up yet,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't. He doesn't know. So I still think

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not ready. All right. So that's number one, though,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Start all over on the offensive line. Put the five

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>guys out there that not only I think are the

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>best five that you have on paper, but is the

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>original penciled in. This is what we were going to

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>go into the season with offensive line before all the

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>injuries and all the other stuff happened. All right, Number two,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this is really important moving forward.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Let the kids play at wide receiver. I play them

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>all and when, and I include Taekwon with the kids,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>right Taekwon. I know, Pop Douglas probably not going to

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>play in this game on Sunday, but this is just

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in general, Taekwon Douglas. Booty should be active. Booty should

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>be active. He should play over Juju. If you're not

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>playing Booty over Juju. It's because you pay Juju. That's

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the only reason. It's the only reason. The only guy

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out of this receiver room that deserves to keep playing

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is Kendrick Port. Everybody else should be riding the pine

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for the younger guys, the more explosive options, and also

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously the guys that are going to develop hopefully or

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe not.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you includingly cunning him. No, Okay, yeah, I

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>think that expands beyond the receivers. I understand, you know,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe with the line it's a little tricky, but I

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 2>would give Mafia a chance to win that job against

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Cole Strange.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not doing it with they're off, because this

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is an interest of fixing it, Okay. And I think

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I say play the kids, and I

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>know I brought out the developmental thing. Maybe you just

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>think they're better. I think they're better. Okay.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I would say play the kid like uh Marte Mop

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>who's only played like twenty percent of snaps this year. Yeah,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and some of that is because he's a passing down

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>player and they keep following these big holes and teams

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>are running the ball, But like, play him, play Keon White,

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 2>another guy that should play. I'm off for playing the kids,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, a wide receiver, they might help you.

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, DeVante Parker and Juju Smith Schuster have given

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you zilch, nothing, nada.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there was that one ball against the Saints,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and Parker did a good job of getting

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>himself in position to catch it, and he just didn't

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>close his hands. It just went right through his hands

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't make it and he didn't like make

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 2>it any effort to go up and get it or sorry,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 2>made the effort to go up and get it, but

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 2>he didn't make any effort to actually make the catch

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 2>once he got up there, and it was like, what

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 2>are we doing here?

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>He's one on one all the time and he doesn't win,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>right because teams are begging Mac Jones to throw the

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ball outside the numbers. Yeah, and he's so it. Parker's

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>one on one all the time, he doesn't win. Juju.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>We know we don't have to like beat a dead

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>horse like Juju has been terrible for them all right,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So play the youngins born Born Thornton for this week

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Boorn Thornton Booty who's lining up where I would play

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Born at the Z yeah, I'd play Booty as a

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>third receiver, and I'd played Taekwon at the X.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, probably i'd play Taekwon at the X. In twelve,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I would almost play when you go to eleven, I'd

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 2>kind of put Taekwon in the slot just to get

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>him some free releases. Yes, and maybe it's Born at

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 2>the X. Maybe it's Booty. They can kind of just

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 2>go back and forth between. Yeah, I'm not like two

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>caught up and like where exactly they'll play. I think

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Brien will figure that piece of it out, but I'm.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Just I'm just curious. Yeah, because I'm thinking about it

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for this week, Like Taekwon's not the savior, right, Like

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we know that Taekwon's not the savior, but for starters,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Parker's given his zilch. Parker has given you nothing, And

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's something to be said for the

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that Taekwon can at least run through a defense

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like it might happen, like he might just run.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you're looking for can he be a contributor.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he's not a coverage dictator, but if he can

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 2>show you enough that he can be your third or

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 2>fourth receiver. Does that help them this year? I don't know,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>but we've talked about what next year is going to

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>look like. Parker and Juju really the only receivers under

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>contract are they still gonna be here? And then Thornton

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's it in the rookies, Like Bourn's contract's upright,

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So how many receivers do you have to go get

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>next year? If you know Thornton can at least be

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a depth guy. It's not great for the fiftieth overall pick,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 2>but hey, it's something, yeah, and it's one less guy.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You have to add it. And even if he can

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>also just be I'm not as concerned with Taekwon with

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>volume as I am with like actual impact of the

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>spacing and the ability to threatn the safety, to keep

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the safety over the top, and like how it opens

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>up the middle of the field maybe a little bit

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>just by having somebody on the outside that can actually

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>run by somebody one on one. It's not like I

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>don't expect, because of what we've seen, for Taekwan to

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>ever develop into like a high volume producer. But I

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>also don't need him to do that necessarily. I just

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>need him to be a threat out on the football field.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>So the offensive line configuration go back to the March

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive line configuration, play the kids. I also just would

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>say quickly about Booty. I saw enough from Booty in

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the summer to think at this point when it comes

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to like the quick hitters, the slants, the screens off

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>our pos, all this stuff that they're trying to feed

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to Juju, I just think Booty's in more explosive player

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>at this time at this point, so I think he's

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that are suited to catch some of those passes if

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're still gonna do.

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So those are my two things so far. Number three,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Hunter Henry is your only consistent option, probably

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your best option at this point. I think Kendrick Bourne

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is more uh there's more boom to his game, but

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not as much consistency to him. Okay, Hunt, I

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>believe that everything in the passing game needs the funnel

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>through Hunter Henry. Yeah. Yeah, everything he's there. I mean

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he needs to.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to say he needs to be in the

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Julian Nevilman role, not like he.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Needs to be the chain mover. He needs to be

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve targets a game. Yeah, and he needs

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the chain mover, Like when it's third down.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You know that first third down of the game last

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>week against the Saints, the route that Mac threw to

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>him is really just like clearing it out, Like he's

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>not even really the first read in the progression. Necessarily

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a clear out route. He's running through the middle

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the field to take the linebacker and the safety

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the window for the crosser to Devonte Parker.

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him clearing out. I want the ball

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going to Hunter Henry, right, So Hunter Henry, I think,

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>needs to be whatever way you want to call it,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like the number one reading the progression. The concept needs

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be set up for Hunter Henry, Like he's got

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be your go to volume guy in this offense

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>because the receivers. I think Kendrick Bourn's like, like I

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just said, a good big play guy, and I don't

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>mean like he's gonna hit a seventy yard touchdown, but

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you get you catch my drift. Like he's one of

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>those types of guys that can make some high, high

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>impact plays, but not necessarily high volume plays. The volume

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can pass catcher in this offense for you, is Hunter

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Henry so he needs to be the third down chain mover.

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He needs to be the guy that you set up

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to wind man to man like, that's the guy that

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm funneling the offense through right now. So that's number three,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>number four, last one here, and this one I cannot

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>stress enough is something that I just can't figure out

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about this team. Thy Montgomery needs to be the third

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>down back. Yes, they need Toy Montgomery to be the

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>third down back. I don't understand why they don't want

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this. I don't understand why he's playing wide receiver.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't get any of the usage with thy Montgomery

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to this point. He has shown in last summer, in

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the opening week of that season, last year, and this

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>summer that he's a decent third down back and I

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>need to see him in that role. I think that

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>this offense is starving for the checkdowns, the dump offfs

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>into the flats, the one on ones against the linebacker,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and having somebody that can actually get open. And I

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think Zeke and Remandre are getting the job done

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. I think that they take too long

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to get into their routes. I think that Mac doesn't

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>know if they're on an option. Are they breaking in?

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Are they breaking out? And he's waiting. He's holding the

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot, trying to throw the football to them,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>waiting for them to get out of the backfield, waiting

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for their route to declare just two much much time,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>take it time. Montgomery's got to be the third down back.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So those are the four things that I would do. Yeah,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know where I'm at with Montgomery.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you on that he had that bad

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>drop this week, but that's not you can't be sending

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>time Montgomery.

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Go ball. Yeah I was a crosser, but he's playing

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. I might and agains. So I would add

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple things to that one. Here we go again.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>You want to guess who I'm going with this.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>No, just get in ie formation or single back and

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 2>just hand the ball off like that. No more fake

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 2>push push, no more running out of shotgun, no more

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>remember like Pop Warner, Remember twenty two dive two back to.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I know that's not how plays are called at this level,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>but like, can I get a twenty two dive.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Something like that? Run the ball like that. That's really

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the only thing I'd add they need. They're not going

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to be able to win games during the ball forty

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>times a game. They need some sort of semblance of

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a running game. In the running game the way it's

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>constructed now, isn't it.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, I agree. I think that in a

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, like I kind of put that all

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>together with the offensive line take, you know, that it's

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>all kind of goes together. I do think that based

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>off of, you know, some of the things that you know,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to some of the players about this week.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I asked a couple of guys, all right, well,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien said that there's gonna be tweaks. He didn't

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>say that there's gonna be like wholesale changes, but he

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>said that there's gonna be tweaks. And I think some

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they are gonna try to tweak is,

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, less less tosses, less outside zone, like let's

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to hit the outside and just letting these guys,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>these big guys like on Wyne Vederian Lowe, Trent Brown,

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>like just fire off the ball. If it's Mafi at guard, like,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just fire off the ball. Right. Like to your point,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not not as much of the side to side,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not as much as the movement block, but just gap

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and just run ahead, right like that's sort of gonna

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be sort of the goal I think more this week.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And the Raiders defense, like you should be able to

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>run the ball a little bit on that interior D line.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you on that. But those are the

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>things that I would try to do. Now, there's no

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>quick fixes. They have a personnel issue. They have a

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>talent issue on this team. We all know that. So

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna fix that's not gonna fix itself overnight.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you start to think about some of the

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>things that the team can do to make it better,

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where you have to start. It's obviously,

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it's not not gonna be the number

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one scoring offense in the league the rest of the

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>way just because you make time Montgomery the third down back.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We are all aware of that. But in terms of

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what they can do in the on the micro level

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to try to make this at least look like an

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL offense, those are some of the places that I

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would start, big picture wise, really quickly before we open

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the phones. I think my like, my one thing with

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the big picture on this team, I don't know if

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you agree with this. Alex, I was walking. I think

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we walked out together on Sunday after the game. Yeah,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I fully admit I said this yesterday. I think

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on playbook like, I was like, fire everybody, right, ihire everybody.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I do think that we

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>need to take a step back and take a deep breath.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this is one thing I'm not

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>saying like because they're gonna turn the season around and

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs. That's not what I'm saying. But I

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is one thing that you know, separates an

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>owner like mister Kraft with people that cover the team

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like us in fans. Right, is that the knee jerk

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>reaction to fire Bill on Monday morning because they lost

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty four to nothing, that didn't happen because you got

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to see the forest through the trees, right. You can't

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just react so knee jerk to everything. I would just

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>say that at this point we all know. I think

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>where I'm leaning. I think I know where you're leaning.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>By won't speak for you in terms of the future

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of the team and the head coach. I am certainly

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards a full reset, but With that being said,

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I do want to see the entire body of work.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I do want to see the entire body of work.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that in season firing is the right

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>way to go about this, but I I I'm leaning

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>towards that being the end outcome here. Don't get me wrong.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But let's see what it looks like, you know, in January. Right,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's give it a breath and uh, and

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see what it looks like. If it still looks

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like a train wreck, then he's gone, like, that's well.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how many games are you gonna lose by?

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>If by thirty consecutively? Right, That's kind of what it

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>comes down to. Can they be better this week? And

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>then what happens when you get to Buffalo in Miami? No,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>it's you got to see the whole picture, definitely, I there.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that there needs to be like a

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 2>rush to make a change. There's maybe a little inherent

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>value if you wanted to see somebody on your staff

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>as an interm you of that. But I don't know

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 2>that it was so much a gut reaction to that

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>game as it was the last two weeks. What makes

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 2>it tough for me, and I'm I'm the guy that's

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the optimist. I'm the guy that's always sitting here. You know,

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you make fun of me for being too positive. Sure,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>it's it would be one thing if the issues as

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 2>weird as this sounds, if the issues were things we

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't expect, I would almost feel better. Yeah, Like, let's say,

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>let's say instead of you know, the offense being bad

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and the defense looking pretty good, let's say that they

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>were losing all these games, like sixty to fifty. I

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>would almost I'd feel better because I'd be that's really weird,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>but hey, we know this defense can do it, and

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>they'll probably turn it around.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And look at this do what the offense is doing.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>We've been saying since March even, Yeah, the offensive line

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to do this team in right, and what

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 2>has happened. The offensive line has done this team in

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So to me, all they've done to this point is

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>confirmed priors. And that's where I think it's a little

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>again totally. You want to see the forest for the trees,

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>but at this point.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to see the full picture.

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 2>But maybe we're not looking at the whole forest. But

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of trees in front of us right now.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's you know, every chance I get. I have said,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 2>this is not an overnight issue, right, Like, this isn't

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>just about two games, This isn't just about some you know,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a battle, was it now like eleven day stretch or

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.479
<v Speaker 2>something like that. This has been brewing, and this has

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>been building in the In the personnel side of things particularly,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>is is problematic. They they're right now, Uh, they're not

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>a very good talent evaluating team. They don't evaluate talent

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 2>very well. They have really not made a single good

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>offensive move on this team in like five years. Yeah,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>this has been my take. Sorry, this this has been

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 2>my take. What was the last good offensive personnel moved

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to Patriots made? And I like Matt when we both

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 2>liked Zeke, but that was like good for the city.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, the situation is what it is.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>You made the right mo the only good move that

0:33:57.920 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they have made in the last five years. And I

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>know it had and turned out good, Yeah, but it

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was the drafting Mac was the right move, and so I.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Would argue that they've made one good move since. Yeah,

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 2>And it was about forty hours later when they drafted

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Ramandra Stevenson.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, like like drafting Christian Gonzalez was a

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>good pick too.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Offensive, I like offensive the last like you look at

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 2>what they've done since, and I don't even know that

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Like some of it is is is misidentifying talent, but

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>some of it's also just the lack of trying. Who

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>when's the last time they put a and I defined

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 2>premium asset as a top fifty pick or in fre

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>agency making a player five highest paid at their position

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 2>in the league. Yeah, when's the last time they put

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a premium asset in an tackle position?

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Isaiah Win, They've this isn't It's something that I

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>also think that, like we've talked about, but yeah, it

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>just to echo your point there, there was there was

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a time in place in Bill Belichick's tenure with the

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots where they always used to be a step ahead

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of these things. Yeah. Uh, you know, I tackle obviously

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the one that we always talk about his Nate soldered

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt Light to Nate Solder. Right, they drafted Matt Nate

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Solder a year before Matt Light retired. Nate Solder I

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>think he played some right tackle his rookie year and

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some title sixth offensive line tight end thing, but really

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>he was a backup. Volmer was at right tackle, Matt

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Light was at left tackle. Those guys were in trench starters.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 1>There are good players for the Patriots, but they still

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>drafted Nate Soldier in the first round because they knew

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Light was going to return.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Even even at a less impact position. They went, I

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>mean it was seamless Kevin Falk to Shane Vereen to

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Danny Woodhead to James White, Danny Woodhead and I don't

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>even know. And James White was an important player for

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 2>this offense, and that's an important role for It's it's

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>not like they tried to draft his replacement or sign

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 2>his replacement in Whift.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>What was the plan? Like?

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Was it time Montgomery? I don't think it was because

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 2>they'd be playing him there?

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, was it?

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Pierre Struck got caught nineteen passes in college. Again, it

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>goes to that point where they haven't invested at all

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 2>at tackle. They made one investment wide receiver. It missed,

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 2>but they made what do you think it's gonna look like?

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 2>And you look at the guys they've had leave. How

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>many of these big name players that left. You can't

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 2>find even the attempt the one for one to replace

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them. You can't even find the attempt.

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just I think we harp a lot on

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the drafting, but their pro personnel evaluation on offense has

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>been terrible.

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 2>No, it's the whole thing again. It's like I said,

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 2>premium mass set. There's such a thing as a premium

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>mass set at wide receiver. And people will talk about,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you know one, people will talk about Hunter Henry Well

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 2>that was technically before mac, but I would say that

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 2>was a good move. People will bring up DeVante Parker.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 2>He's not I don't think he's in the top twenty

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>highest paid receivers in football right now. Nelson Aglar was

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 2>like the twenty fifth highest paid receiver. When they sign up,

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>people talked about that, Oh they gave Nelsonnagelor a big contract.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 2>That's not a big contract for wide receiver in today's game.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Juju Smith Schuster is the thirty six.

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Highest paid wide receiver in football. Those are not premium assets.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>They are also just bad evaluations of the player. Like

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the deave Port. I'm trying not to like pile on

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 1>them too much about the Jacobe for Juju thing because

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about that too, but I was wrong

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. Sitting in this chair in this studio talking

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to you about it, I'm not running the football team

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>right like right, And I'm not saying that that makes

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>me like it's better, but it is kind of better,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>right Like it's you're supposed to know more than me.

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>They're supposed to prove us wrong.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're supposed to be here the media, aud mouth

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>saying what we think, and everybody in the comments, who

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 2>are these guys, you know, leading to the professionals, and

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 2>then they do the right thing, and everybody rips us

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter?

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's the natural order. So they had all the

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>information I had about probably said. And I'm not exonerating myself.

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying they should have been right, and I

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>should have been wrong, and they were wrong too. That's

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a problem. John new Smith is having a much better

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>year in Atlanta. So you could talk about that being

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:58.959
<v Speaker 1>like a usage thing, but I think that that's part

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of GMing right, is knowing how you're gonna use a player.

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I always say this, You got to

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 2>have whether you're drafting a player, whether you're signing a player,

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you need to have outside like maybe like Day three guys,

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you're just drafting for potential whatever, But whether you're gonna

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 2>draft a player where you're gonna sign a player like

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 2>with a premium asset, what is the plan? We talked

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 2>about this. A lot of people call in and say,

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, I like so and so prospect. We did

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 2>this with with Quintin Johnston, right, people, And he's been

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 2>good in LA. Yeah, he's been fine in LA. There

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 2>there are people who called in were like, yeah, we

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>like Quinn Johnson. We sat in and said, yeah, he's

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a good player, but is he gonna play what is

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 2>the path to him making them a better team? And

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>there were other good players with more clear of a path.

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It does felt like at times they've added guys just

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 2>to add them and the I mean I Johnny Smith,

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Nikil Harry, there's some guys on defense as well that it's.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Like Jalen Mills, Juwan Williams, what was the plan there? Yeah?

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Are you just adding the player to Adam? Yeah, yeah,

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that. I just it's all of

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it like we I think we harp on the draft

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't about Like my take earlier by Jerry Judy,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think we harve a lot on the draft

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>picks because the drafting has been bad. Outside of a

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>few isolated instances, maybe more recently, it's been a little

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>bit better than it was in let's say, like sixteen

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen. But the twenty twenty two draft is not

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>better than anything that brings it right. Twenty one was good.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>This year's looks good. Yeah, this year looks okay. I

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>mean Christians Alz looks great.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Christians also looks great. They'll hit on one of Mapu

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and White. I think the jury's still out, but there's

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 2>a night with each one that I think one of

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>those guys.

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I think they might both like technically hit, but are

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>either one of them an impact player? And I think

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you've seen flashes from the I don't think. I think

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys are role players, and the defense

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that knows how to use role players. Like I'm not

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that it is like a horrible thing. You just

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>read off all the third round picks the last few years.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>If they get role players in those picks and then

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to Mario Douglas might be something. So it's like, you know,

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a misconception that a good draft means,

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like all the players are like six of seven, five

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of seven. If fifty percent your players become like solid

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>contributors from a DRID, you want it. You always want

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to hit on your first You generally have two Day

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>three picks. You want to hit two of two. You

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>want to hit on two of those three, Yeah, and

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>then one or two on Day three. Yeah.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 2>If about half your draft class becomes contributing players, you

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 2>had a solid DREFD, you do better beat a solid draft.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 2>I think that they hit on their first round pick.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel it's a decent chance one of those two

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Day two guys turns into something and then they have

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 2>to Mario Douglas and it's like, all right, if one

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 2>more of those Day three guys comes along, maybe a

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Tonio Maffi's a guy. Yeah, all right, that's just fine.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 2>You're not you know, it's not gonna go up in

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the Hall of Fame, but that's a fine draft.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Mafi kills me. And I didn't know when I was

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this, but I you know, I'm gonna say it.

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say it for three down. But I think

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing is is, uh, you know, it's been

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>pro personnel and it's been on a on a college

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>scouting level too, and I think sometimes we even don't

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.720
<v Speaker 1>call both things out and I and I really feel

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's been on a pro level.

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Off.

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the calls and then we'll

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>do three up, three down from this last game against

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. Brandon is an Oregon Brandon, if you're still there,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I doubted that one. Cousin, Patty, what's up, cousin Patty?

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 6>You know I'm still hanging on.

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, Evan.

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't want this to come off as like in

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 6>a jerk, but the idea that I brought up on you,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 6>like I had no idea, Like that's that's why I

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 6>asked the question. That's why I had the idea. Like

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 6>I didn't know they were still running McDade teams.

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, No, I just didn't know. You're good.

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 6>No, I'm glady cleared up because I'm like, all right, well,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 6>I guess that makes sense. It looks like crap. So

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 6>here's my idea.

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I will you know, what do you guys.

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Think about this? Love the idea of trading for Jerry

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 6>and you know we're gonna have all this frigging money

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 6>to spend in the offseason, Go get T Higgins and

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 6>draft I don't know how to say his name, Bashanu

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 6>or and I mean, just ride it out with Mac

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 6>for at least next year. I don't know who's coming

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 6>up in twenty twenty five. Do you think that's a

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 6>better idea than possibly taking a like another quarterback like

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 6>a Drake May. Yeah, I agree. I don't think we're

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 6>gonna get Caleb Williams. But then you're you're sort of

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 6>throwing them to the wolves, you know, I mean basically

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 6>our whole line minus Cole Strange, and you know, all

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 6>the guys that we drafted, all the guards and Jake

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 6>Andrews that we drafted are are off the team next year.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question, Patty, and thanks for the call. Uh,

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question about what's the best way for it.

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Is it going back in the quarterback Carris in the

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>draft and drafting one of the quarterbacks, or is it

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>continuing to build the offensive personnel so that either Mac

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>works or two years from now, a year from now,

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you get the quarterback and just drop him in and

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hit the ground running. They have so many holes on

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>offense that it's a fair question to ask if it's

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>better to just start drafting offensive players that aren't quarterbacks,

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because no quarterback is gonna succeed if you just drop

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>him into this mess right now. But my contention to

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that is, and this is the one time that I

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>might agree with you on this, I don't know what

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback classes in twenty twenty five and beyond are

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 1>going to look like. I do know that there's a

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of quarterbacks in this class that I really like.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you really like a quarterback in this class

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can upgrade that position, I'm of this, of

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the thought that you have to do that. But at

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I can hear the other side of

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it of drafting, was it Joe alt Right is the

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>other the guy he's said, say you're gonna love him,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Harrison Junior. If you're that high up like I

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>brought Bowers, I can understand that line of thinking, and

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe we get to that point I said earlier of

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>wanting to see the whole picture. If Bill O'Brien has

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones playing better football in the second half of

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the season, and the arrow starts to point back upward,

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for mac I don't think he's ever gonna develop into

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>anything like special at the position, but maybe he's a

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>better bridge option for the time being as you draft

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>your left tackle stud or your receiver stud or whatever. Yeah.

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I just the other thing you have to consider here

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 2>is the whole value of that rookie quarterback contract. Yeah,

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:42.439
<v Speaker 2>and the clocks essentially run out on that for mac

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Jones next year. You know they have the fifth year option,

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 2>but next year's released last year under contract. You have

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 2>a chance to reset that thing entirely if you take

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback this year. And if it wasn't such a

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 2>strong quarterback class, I might say, you know, Joe al

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Fashanu or whatever, but you're gonna have a shot. I think,

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 2>get up potentially franchise guy as long as you're picking

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>in the top fifteen. And I used to be the

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 2>one that was like, yeah, if you don't get the

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 2>guy memember you really wanted, was it Davis Mills or

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Kellen Mond, I'd like to tell that the mac Jones

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>here where you were like, oh, just you know, wait

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 2>till the second.

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that. I said, if you if I

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>had to take any of the day two guys like

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the day two three guys.

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna kind of give myself

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the opposite of Victory lap here too, because you wanted

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>that guy and I said no at that point, just

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>wait till next year. Next year looks like a really

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 2>good class too. You remember the guy who I was

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 2>talking about was filed your COVID who's now.

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>A tight end. So look, you did like I did,

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like filder Covic and then BC ruined him. Uh mate,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going around this city right exactly exactly, maybe next year's

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>class ends up being good. I personally believe Shouldar Sanders

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to go back to school, So I think

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the only guy that I can tell you is

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be in next year's class right now.

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So Shouldar Sanders is gonna go one one. So

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have to be the worst team in the league.

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 2>And if you're picking Joe Alt, if you add more Harrison,

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 2>those guys are gonna win you games.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I look.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>At the rest at class, the guys who are projected

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 2>first round picks right now, Caid klub Nick, I don't

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 2>think this is very updated because Clemson's offense has not

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:11.479
<v Speaker 2>been good.

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He does not look like the typical Clemson quarterback. Drew Aller.

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Did you see the press conference with James Franklin about

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Drew the other day where the reporter ass like, have

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 2>you ever told h to just throw it deep?

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Just to do it? Yeah?

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Drew Aller right now? Has you're drafting Mac Jones again.

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 2>If you draft Drew Aller, the only other quarterback is

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>supposed to go in the first round next year's a

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 2>guy named Connor Connor Weigman from tex A and m

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>who's not even a starter there yet.

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you get in like Ty Simpson, who hasn't Okay,

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>sot me ask you this question.

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 2>If you have a chance to draft a franchise quarterback

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 2>with your quarterback who at best has been up and

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 2>down entering the final year of his rookie deal, I

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 2>think you have to do it.

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just too important of a position. So let me

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>ask you the important question, because this is this is

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a good money question that we're going to get starting

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in January. We're gonna get this questioning at me now

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>five thousand times. Yeah, who is the Jalen Hurt of

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty four.

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you're not even asking me about the first round?

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Who is the Jalen Hurts.

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Because let me preface it. If you're gonna this is

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the this is the Carson Wentz year. The Eagles drafted

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts right going into Carson Wentz's fourth year. They

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>gave Carson Wentz the fourth year to see if it

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be good or not. It wasn't. That's when

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they pivoted to Jalen Hurts. So everybody that called us

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>last year in last draft cycle about the kid from Tennessee, oh,

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Ken Hooker and calling him the next Jalen Hurts and

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, they I kept on saying, you're a

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.439
<v Speaker 1>year too early, You're a year too early. We're here now.

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So is there I know JJ McCarthy is like the

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones. I have no interest in JJ McCarthy. I

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have zero interesting Yeah. So is there a guy that

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>has the tools but maybe needs to be put together? Okay?

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>So can I give you a couple of names? Yeah?

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 2>You know I have to give you a couple of

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 2>names here. Yeah, a guy a lot of people like

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 2>is Riley Leonard from.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Duke Oh yeah, I do like him I like his moxie.

0:47:58.360 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>He just make up.

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:01.359
<v Speaker 2>He's got the makeup. He runs really well. He is

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 2>not remotely a passer right now, and he just suffered

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 2>a pretty serious ankleing, so there's some wonders about him.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That sounds right up the Patriots.

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I like kJ Jefferson from Arkansas. Big dude, big guy,

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 2>cannon arm plays with a ton of confidence, can run

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the football. He's kind of got that like, and I

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 2>use this comp very very loosely. He's got a little

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 2>bit of that Cam Newton thing where he's like, I

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>can throw it pastua, I can run through you. Now,

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 2>his decision making that needs to build up, both as

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 2>a runner and a passer. He's a little too loose

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 2>with the football right now. The conference is maybe a

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 2>little too much, But I like him.

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Milton from Tennessee.

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 2>From Tennessee, I am very interested for you to actually

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 2>watch and break down time.

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Watched like a little bit of him because he would

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 1>come in for Cockers sometimes last year because they're blowing

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>teams out. And he would also come in from Hooker

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for hook On Hill Mary's because he's.

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing about Joe Milton. If you need somebody

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 2>to throw the football eighty yards. Joe Milton can throw

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the football at the right. If you need somebody to

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 2>throw a five yard slant, Joe Milton can throw the

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>football eighty yards. Like that's just kind of There's one

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 2>play I think it might have been in their spring game.

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember where they're at, like the five yard line,

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and he's trying to hit a crosser along the end line,

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like the back of the end zone, and he throws

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the ball like like four rows into the stands. Yeah,

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:20.240
<v Speaker 2>which is like impressive but not really helpful.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 1>But you're telling me he's like his in his pro day.

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna He's Pro day. They're gonna love.

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 2>So so here's they Remember how last year I said,

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Richardson makes Josh Allen looks like he plays under control.

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Joe Milton is the next evolution of that. Okay, but

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Joe Milton. Joe Milton makes Josh Allen look like Chad Pennington.

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 1>And Joe Milton's defense, that is kind of what we're

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 2>So again we're talking about the guy who just rock

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Can you build him up? That's maybe Joe Milton. I've

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 2>got two more for you okay quickly. One is Grayson

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 2>McCall from Coastal Carolina. Gray McCall's been in college for

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a while, and.

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>One coat say, like is he is he thirty? At like?

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's like twenty four? What point are we

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to the NFL?

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 2>So Grayson McCall, people thought he'd be a first round

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 2>pick at one point and then a bunch of quarterbacks

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 2>in this class kind of came out of nowhere. He's

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, it'll be twenty three in December. He's if

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you're somebody who thinks, maybe Zach Wilson that makeup is

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 2>what you want and he just got butchered by the

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Jets or the spoiled rich kid thing did him in.

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Grayson McCall moves around really well, throws a really pretty ball.

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna wonder about the jumping level of competition and

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 2>consistency in the last one. And this one's really interesting.

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.760
<v Speaker 2>You talked before about Riley Leonard being up the Patriots

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 2>alley if it's still this regime, because this is a

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>trend with them. Dj Ujungloway is the quarterback at Guy.

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So he was he was the number one recruit in

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the country coming out in class of twenty nineteen. Not

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 2>number one quarterback, number one recruit, and it was supposed

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 2>to be they had Deshaun Watson, they had Trevor Lawrence.

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 2>This was the next guy. Big dude, six four to two.

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he's two fifty. Yeah, six four, two fifty,

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 2>can throw the ball around the yard. Electric it'ber Matt

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and we're doing this. They they never they never figured

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 2>him out. Dabo Sweeney, shocker, couldn't figure him out. He

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and I was ready to write him off. But he

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 2>has gone to Oregon State this year and that I

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 2>know you don't like Pack twelve pac Twel's no joke,

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 2>this yere Beavers. He has been awesome through five touchdowns

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 2>last week beat Utah. Alright, this is but this is

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots thing, right, former high score recruit maybe got

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 2>misused in college.

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing this again next year. This is the

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Patriots thing. Right.

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 2>But but but but you know, high high ranked, high

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 2>score recruit, maybe didn get figured out. Old has been

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 2>really good this year. And you're the guy that's clamoring

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 2>for that modern quarterback. He can run it, he can

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 2>throw it, he can process up the line.

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>All of it.

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 2>This is who he was supposed to be, and it

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 2>just never clicked for him at organ At Clemson, it's

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 2>clicking for him.

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna rise up draft boards. He's gonna be a

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:57.879
<v Speaker 2>guy that probably ends up in that day too, maybe

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 2>early day three conversation that people look at and say,

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>if he goes to the right and this was Jalen Hurts,

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 2>if he goes to the right situation with the right

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 2>coaching staff, the talent is certainly there, not just for

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>him to be a starter, but for be a guy,

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to be a guy that can win games.

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>It's just how much did Clemson set him back? All right?

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>All right? I like that. It's depressing that we're talking

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>about that on October twelve, you're gonna be a big

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>DJ younga leg and that that's where we're at. I

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I just really quickly on the quarterbacks because I have

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not watched them as extensively as you. As you just

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>rattled off, like seventeen, you gotta watch this week. But

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the one, well, so let me just play. It's still early,

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of ball to be played, so that

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>can all change. The one guy that I really really like,

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:38.319
<v Speaker 1>and this is not like a mid round Yeah, because

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not that deep. Yeah, I love Drake

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Bay Oh Evan likes the second best prospect in the way.

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I really like Drake May. And when I watched Drake May,

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>my comp right now is Justin Herbert. Yeah, you're not

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the only one that says that. Oh really, Yeah, No,

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, I don't pay attention, So who is it.

0:52:56.440 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 2>One of the big draft guys. Is like he's halfway

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 2>between Justin Herbert and Josh Allen.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think he's more controlled than Josh Allen, So

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's where we're getting at from.

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I definitely think he's closer to Herbert. I I'm starting

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to come around on him. Like my thing with quarterbacks,

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 2>with first round quarterbacks again, it's that carrying trait thing.

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:16.919
<v Speaker 2>What does he do that nobody else in the class does.

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Drake May is kind of in this weird spot where

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 2>even I think when you take Caleb Williams out of it,

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 2>because he's a unicorn.

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that any single one of Drake May's

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 2>traits are the best in this class, but every single

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 2>one might be the second best in this class. And

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 2>usually that's the guy that I'm like, but he's he's

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:37.839
<v Speaker 2>just so well rounded that I'm starting to come around

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to it.

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, Like I got he's got confidence, poise, polished

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.919
<v Speaker 1>like he just looks he knows that he can play

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the position. He knows what the position entails. And I

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that I watched him a

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lot last year because of some of their skill players

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and Josh dat that was who it was. He's got

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that that off platform moxie too, right, Like

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he can move around and throw off platform, he can

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:06.479
<v Speaker 1>throw a little side arm, he can flick the wrist

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. I think he's got a lot of

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the of just throw making ability. Like he's just a quarterback.

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like we're trying to make an athlete

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>into a quarterback. It's not like we're trying to do

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.319
<v Speaker 1>what they try to do with Mac where you're trying

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to take the intangibles and turn that into an NFL quarterback.

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, this guy's extremely well round.

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's you know, everybody wants to point to Mitchell Trubisky.

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>He and I was doing that.

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 2>I was doing that a couple of months ago because

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 2>I was not super impressed with him last year as

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a freshman. Yeah, Richard freshman, I like, I think people

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 2>were just talking about projection.

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And not what he was doing.

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And you're seeing that growth now and yeah, he's fucking

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:47.879
<v Speaker 2>it's it's I can't.

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I know it's Syracuse. I I don't don't, Okay, but

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying. But I'm saying that I don't hype

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>him up in terms of like actually the end result

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the play, but like knowing where to go at

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He's just I think he's got something, all right.

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I don't want to spend too

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna let me just say that they have plenty

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of times they're gonna play Duke in a couple of weeks.

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 1>That Duke.

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 2>And this is to the Rley Leonard people, Oh look,

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 2>he made Duke relevant. That Duke offense is fine to fine,

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 2>That Duke defense might be one of the ten best

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>in college football right now.

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 1>That Duke. This is what you do.

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:24.279
<v Speaker 2>So for people including you, who want to learn about

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:25.839
<v Speaker 2>these quarterbacks, here teach me.

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:26.919
<v Speaker 1>This is what you do.

0:55:27.120 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 2>You find the games where they're actually fit. Like Washington organ.

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>This year talking about quarterbacks in the draft, Drake May

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>against Duke is gonna be very all right, let's clear

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the phone lines and then let's talk about the actual

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriots team. All right, Jeff is in Maine. What's up? Jeff?

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 4>Hey, guys, how you doing.

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Uh?

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 4>So you can twist my arm into the Erry Duke.

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't mind taking him for the future. Uh, there's

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 4>a part of me that kind of just wants to

0:55:56.960 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 4>let this team die and sea, especially the offfensive line.

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, use what you got. I don't think we

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 4>need to trade for any defensive players or anything like that.

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 4>We've got put of his talent coming back. That's my

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 4>take on the roster. And then you guys know, great

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 4>value in the Walmart brand.

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right, So.

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember how we used him, but assuming that

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Bill O'Brien uses Taekwon like great value, will Fuller, what

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 4>would that usage look like based on you know, whatever

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 4>film from Houston you watched to scout what Bill O'Brien

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 4>used to do during the off season. I'll take off

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 4>the here, thanks guys.

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jeff. I actually wrote about this in the off season,

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>because like, what else are we going to freaking write about?

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>So I wrote about this in the off season, and

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I went back and watched Will Fuller and Jamison Williams,

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jameson Williams at Alabama with Bill O'Brien as

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator and Will Fuller in Houston with Bill

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:58.839
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien as the head coach slash offensive guy. I think

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with Will Fuller, what you saw you did see a

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of verticals with Will Fuller, right, a lot of

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:06.800
<v Speaker 1>go balls, a lot of things, you know, just verticals

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>down the field. Uh. He used him a lot, though,

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I'm looking forward to with Taekwon,

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think Alex you had mentioned this a little

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>bit at the beginning of the show. Uh. He used

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>him a lot out of like stack alignments. Right, so

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>two receiver stacks. Uh. So you have the point man

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on the line of scrimmage. The idea is is that

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that point man is going to run off the ball

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna he's gonna take the contact, right, he's

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get off the line. He's gonna create a little

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of pocket of space underneath him for the receiver

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to get off the line, uh, without a jam. Right,

0:57:40.480 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So get a free release at the line of scrimmage

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and then will Fuller is so fast that he was

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 1>able to then just make make things happen. With Taekwon,

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I I feel a similar way, and why I'm taking

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the cheese per usual on a receiver shocker with Taekwon,

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's similar where I think that Bill

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien is gonna find ways to get him off the

0:58:03.840 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage, whether it's playing him out of the slot,

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what I think that you mentioned earlier, which

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is one way motion him right, like running him into

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the route like they do with Tyreek Hill in Miami,

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or running him out of bunches or stacks where teams

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have to pick him up down the field instead of

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>jamming him at the line of scrimmage. I think last year,

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not trying to go down the road of

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like let's pick on Maddy p but last year they

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>played him a lot at the X. They played him

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot on the line of scrimmage, and so he

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of pressman and at his size, he

0:58:36.680 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just isn't big enough to get off of the pressman

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>coverage at this level. So what you have to do

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is you have to get him off the line of

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage and I think that that's why I was bullish

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the spring, and you all made fun of me

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the one practice that I saw from Taekwon,

0:58:49.000 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and I was already like all all in on it.

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>The reason why is because I saw like a plan

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>being hatched of. He's one hundred and eighty pounds soaking wet,

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna just isolate him against man coverage

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on the outside and expect him to win one on one.

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna find creative ways to get him open. And

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what Bill O'Brien's gonna do. Yeah,

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but you can go back on Patriots dot com if

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you search that I like Fuller Jamison Williams my name

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on Patriots dot com. He should probably be able to

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>find that. I remember writing about it. All right. John

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is in Louisiana. What's up, John? Hey?

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Your Yes?

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:59:27.920 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 3>I want I want just talking about it with moving

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 3>on with Mac and draft to drink me. The reason

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 3>why I was thinking about it is you know exactly

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 3>what you have in Mac, so why not just build

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 3>around him. I know he's having a roth here, but

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 3>we know what we got it. I'm just building around

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 3>them like, why why not you go that route?

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's a fair take. And thanks for the call, John,

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting it's a fair take. And the caller

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 1>before I talked about, well why don't we use to

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>pick on a tackle or receiver and continue to build

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with Mac. I think the problem is is that you

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>might know what you have with Mac and is that

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he ain't it right?

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's even beyond that that they had

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 2>their chance to build around Mac. Yeah it was the

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.280
<v Speaker 2>last two years, yea, and they didn't do it. And

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot harder to build around. So then what

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>you build around him?

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>This year?

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>He's on an expiring contract. Are you going to resign him?

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to risk losing him? And then you

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 2>know what if the next years again that twenty twenty

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>one class we talked about, what if they missed the

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 2>next year? Kenny Pickett was the only first round pick

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in that class. So then you're gonna build this whole

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>thing around Kenny Pickett? Yeah, who also probably isn't it.

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I just the regardless of Mac, the clocks run out.

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>The clocks run out to build around him because you're

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>losing that rookie contract, you kind of have to reset that.

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I also we talked about and I talked about like

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this was the year that I wanted to find out

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about Mac. And I understand that we can have excuses.

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line has been horrible, the receivers are also mid

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or limited or whatever you want to call it. And

1:00:57.200 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien hasn't come in a way the magic wand

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and fixed off all these issues, right, so you have

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>all the excuses. I think dan Orlovsky said New England

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is currently the hardest team in the league to play

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for probably right, He's probably it's close. Carolina is

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad too, all right, Yeah, But regardless, it's probably

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty close. They're bottom five you play, So the only

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>team where it's worse is that the only team that's

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>yet to win a game yet, this Carolina. And then

1:01:23.120 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like I tend to say no to the Giants just

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because I love Dable, but the Giants offensive line is

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a train wreck, So maybe the Giants are up there

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. But regardless of all of that, I still

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>think that you have seen you can isolate the quarterback

1:01:38.160 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>play enough that you can see where the warts are

1:01:42.320 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in Mac Jones's game, and I think both of us

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how like the nature versus nurture argument of

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how we got here with Mac Jones, I'm not sold.

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>This is as down on Mac Jones as I've probably

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>been since they drafted him. This is in terms of

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>my confidence level that you can build around Mac Jones

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and be not just a productive offense, but a winning

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>football team with Mac Jones as your quarterback. This is

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>probably as down on him as a player as I've been.

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you feel about that. I just

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm down on the whole situation. It's not even just

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>him as a play again.

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I go back to that thing where, even if you

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>did want to give him another year one, unless you're

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>overhauling the coaching staff on the front office, where's the

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>belief that that's what's going to happen. Because last year

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>we all sat here and said, you know, yeah, we

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 2>know they haven't really invested on offense before.

1:02:37.320 --> 1:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's as clear as day this year that they

1:02:38.800 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have to.

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Do it, and they didn't do it. And even if

1:02:41.400 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>you move on and it's somebody else who is willing

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to commit to it, then what happens then he plays

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the fourth year, are you picking up his option? All right,

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that's two years and then what are you extending him?

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What if not?

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>If he's still not good? The window to figure it out,

1:02:56.640 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>we're years.

1:02:57.200 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>One and two. Yeah, and they didn't use those years

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out. So do you feel like you

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have a definitive like I I in terms of like

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I get I just said we're gonna see the whole

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>picture right yeah, but right now this second, do you

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like you have enough information to figure that out? No?

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm close.

1:03:18.000 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>No, because if, like I, if you're gonna tell me

1:03:21.160 --> 1:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that there's gonna be another coaching staff in here next year,

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>another GM, then maybe there's an argument for it.

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But short of short.

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Of anything spectacular, I feel like they're just at the

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>point where the the timeline for rebuild. And actually talk

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to somebody who works not not even more, but used

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>to work in the NFL front office about this. With

1:03:42.480 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the fifty year option, everything and every team's a little different,

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>but generally the timeline for rebuild is there's what you

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>call year zero, which is you're bad. You're just bad,

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you're overhauling the roster. That was right exactly, Yep. Then

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you draft the quarter you have year one. The goal

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>in year one is to figure out if the quarterback

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you've drafted as an NFL quarterback or not to what

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>extent you don't have to know, but like, is this

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the guy We're going to move forward with a lot

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of teams never even get past that. Yeah, but it

1:04:12.120 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>felt like, you know, year two if and this is

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>all assuming you check the box from the year before,

1:04:18.560 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Year two is can you make the playoffs? Can you

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>just get in the dance? Can you win enough games?

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Can you beat a couple of good teams while you're

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in there? Year three in your year three is then

1:04:29.640 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>can you be a contender? And you're building this up

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>around the quarchampionship window? So year three, I think is

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>can you contend? All right, I contend? How I heard it?

1:04:38.040 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you contend for your division? You should be a

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a division contender. You should win a playoff game. Okay,

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>year four and five, that's where you win.

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The top championship win. That's championship windows. Maybe instead of

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>championship window, I should say contending contending window.

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're you're you're not like a championship favorite, but

1:04:53.560 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>all right, championship contender, yeah, they were ahead of schedule

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>with Mac. They were where you should be after year

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>two in year one, and then they went backwards. And

1:05:02.320 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>so right now, based on that timeline, this year they

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>should be an out. They should be a contender for

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the division and outside contender for the super Bowl. Next

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>year they should be a super Bowl contender.

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Yikes. Do you see them getting there?

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I'm like, all right, you got to

1:05:15.280 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>reset the process. Got it all right? Kevin is in

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Burlington and they're going to get up to three up,

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>three down? What's up? Kevin?

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Hey, guys, thanks for taking my call. I want to

1:05:24.720 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 5>make the case of I want to make the case

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 5>of Belichick really had a well thought out plan for

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:33.080
<v Speaker 5>the offense, but it just wasn't able to implement it,

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 5>because I think the offensive problem is really date back

1:05:36.080 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 5>to when Brady and Josh were still here. If you

1:05:39.400 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 5>remember in twenty nineteen, they started eight to zero, but

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 5>the offense really wasn't good and it ultimately sank that team.

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's at that part Belichick wanted to

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 5>transition away from the Irah Pergin system because Brady was

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 5>leaving and Scarnaki was leaving, and I think he wanted

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>a more consistent running game, and it was very difficult

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 5>at that time to on board new receivers because I

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 5>think college was more spread RPO and NFL was running

1:06:06.160 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 5>a out of Shanahan. So if you remember, in that offseason,

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 5>they brought in Jed Fish as the key coach, and

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Jed was he spent time with Mike Shanahan, he spent

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:19.920
<v Speaker 5>time with Sean McVay, and that's when they brought in

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Kim Newton. But unfortunately that was also the off season

1:06:22.560 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>of COVID, so I think that was really really impacted,

1:06:26.360 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, any kind of new philosophical install and then

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Jed was hired away from the University of Arizona as

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 5>the head coach before the season even ended. And then

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:39.320
<v Speaker 5>if you look, you know, last year with Patrica, they

1:06:39.360 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 5>were still trying to run you know, Shanahan's zones schemes.

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:46.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think, you know, ultimately it's this failure to

1:06:46.760 --> 1:06:49.400
<v Speaker 5>transition to the new offensive system that's the root cause

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of the offensive problems, and the offenses of like Ellie Wise,

1:06:52.840 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Josh Daniels, and Bill O'Brien are very difficult to run

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 5>successfully in the modern NFL. I think until this transition happens.

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm worried that our office will continue to crush this team,

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 5>regardless of the types of players that they have.

1:07:05.960 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks thanks for the call, Kevin. Yeah, it made a

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of really good points and things that we've touched on.

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:13.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked a lot about like the twenty

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty two draft and how a lot of those players

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>were kind of built more for Shanahan offense. You know,

1:07:19.240 --> 1:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>athletic guard, speed receiver, speedback, right like, those are some

1:07:23.680 --> 1:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of those picks that were made to suit. That my

1:07:27.040 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. And it's not to disagree with Kevin necessarily

1:07:30.120 --> 1:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because I agree with him that a big part of

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>their offensive failures were the systemic changes that they made

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that have not taken hold right that they've tried to

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>make and they haven't worked. I've been saying a lot

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this week and in general, but this week especially about

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>how annoyed I am that they ditched the full back

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and just don't have a fullback on the roster anymore.

1:07:54.600 --> 1:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That to me, I think was a misstep. We talk

1:07:57.400 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about like all these types of moves. I agree. Now.

1:08:00.720 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The one point that I would push back a little

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bit on on that being the entire reason. H if

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you had good players, I don't think it would matter.

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, And that that to me. If you want to

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>install this new offense, fine, go out and get players

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to run it. And it just all comes back to

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:18.479
<v Speaker 2>that if you ever invested, if you had real talent

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>on offense, I don't care if you're running and Erhard

1:08:22.120 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Perkins West Coast spread RPO. If you have you know,

1:08:26.800 --> 1:08:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Stefan Diggs and the Buffalo Bills offense, you're probably gonna

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>be a pretty good offense, right right.

1:08:32.200 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I So I agree that maybe they miscalculated on a

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of on a lot of different elements, be trying

1:08:41.080 --> 1:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to be more Shanahan like, and that's why this all

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>came apart in a sense. But I still think that

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that's getting even for me getting a little too caught

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the x's and o's instead of the jimmy's

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and jokes. Yeah all right, Uh, let's do three up,

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>three down, and then we'll take a few more of

1:08:57.400 --> 1:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>these fun calls before we wrap.

1:08:59.160 --> 1:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>In classic blowout fashion, Alex, I did two up, five down,

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you get blown out like that, you

1:09:07.479 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't get more than two. That's my rule. So let's

1:09:09.840 --> 1:09:13.519
<v Speaker 1>start with the positives. I'll start here because I kind

1:09:13.520 --> 1:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of mentioned him already first out of the game, first

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>up in the game, Riley Reef. I thought Riley Reef

1:09:18.360 --> 1:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was a lot better in this game than what they

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>put out there at guard. A one hurry allowed and

1:09:22.760 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>happened late with Bailey Zappy in the game in the

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. I thought he was really good in his reps,

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>run blocking. I think he shows some leverage, some toughness,

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>some ability to move guys in the run game. Pass protection,

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:37.479
<v Speaker 1>he's been way, way, way better than anything they've thrown

1:09:37.479 --> 1:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>out there in pass protection at guard. Much better moving

1:09:40.720 --> 1:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>side to side, much better anchor. I'm intrigued. I'm intrigued.

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a good player that they could film. I

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>should say for Riley Reef, and maybe they have a

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good player. I'll go to Mario Douglas.

1:09:54.400 --> 1:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>He got open on that one route and he made

1:09:57.040 --> 1:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a nice catch and I mean, am I wrong?

1:10:00.320 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>No? And he got hurt, but he got hurt on No,

1:10:02.240 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe he would have done more. That's not his fault. No,

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe he would have done more. I don't know, he's enough.

1:10:07.520 --> 1:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like two weeks in a row, we had

1:10:09.000 --> 1:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what Damario Douglas is enough for one catch that he

1:10:11.880 --> 1:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>made in the game.

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:15.479
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like he should be playing more. Well, I

1:10:15.479 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>guess like he couldn't have played more last week.

1:10:17.120 --> 1:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But number two up Anthony Jennings. I thought Anthony Jenks

1:10:20.360 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was good in this game. Four stops in the run, game,

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>set a good edge, had a hurry. Nobody had multiple

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hurries in this game because the Patriots had no pass rush.

1:10:29.000 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So the fact of the matter is is Anthony Jennings

1:10:31.320 --> 1:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is one hurry, tied for the team lead. So tied

1:10:34.400 --> 1:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for the team lead in hurries. Four stops against the run.

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Is Anthony Jennings a difference to making edge? No? Can

1:10:42.040 --> 1:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he set the edge of the defense and play the

1:10:44.080 --> 1:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>run on first down? Yes? And for right now, that's

1:10:47.840 --> 1:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be how they're gonna have to survive without Judon right,

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna have to have a roll, everybody's gonna have

1:10:53.040 --> 1:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be hyper specific to that role, and they're gonna

1:10:55.840 --> 1:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have to patch it together. So I have Anthony Jennings.

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing this for the I think the are we

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>can around picking this guy at this point. I'm probably

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:03.559
<v Speaker 2>just doing it to annoy people more than anything.

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Else.

1:11:04.000 --> 1:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Miles Bryant, Oh my god, had that big hit on

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Mike Thomas and he's stepping up making he's like their

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>third highest graded run defender right now on PFF. Yeah,

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>he's had like I think it's maybe says more about

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>the defense than him, but he's been one of their

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>best defensive players this year.

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Not bad, not bad. Miles Brian has uh turned in

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to a player that fans poke at all the time. Yeah,

1:11:26.120 --> 1:11:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this with all sincerity. If you're still picking

1:11:29.760 --> 1:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on Miles Brian and saying that Miles Brian is bad,

1:11:32.000 --> 1:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>you're not watching the games, right, You're not your your

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>your priors have brought have blinded you, and you're not

1:11:37.880 --> 1:11:42.639
<v Speaker 1>watching the games this year. Is he prime Stefan Gilmore? Hell? No?

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Is he a serviceable nickelback? Yes? Yeah? All right? Do

1:11:47.439 --> 1:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you have any more ups? No? Good? Good? I've you're

1:11:51.040 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna hate what my downs are too. Number one down? Okay?

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones, Yeah, Mac Jones, number one down. I wanted

1:11:57.120 --> 1:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to save this for three up, three down and talk

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>about MCA a little, but here Mac is a down.

1:12:02.960 --> 1:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what the problem is is with Mac. The

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>three biggest things that I see that are wrong with

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Mac right now. Number one, first and foremost is he

1:12:12.040 --> 1:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is Sam Darnold seeing ghosts out there. He's seeing ghosts

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>even when it's a clean pocket. It's not a clean

1:12:17.520 --> 1:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>pocket to Mac Jones right now. His footwork's all over

1:12:20.800 --> 1:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the place, his eyes are out down on the rush.

1:12:23.800 --> 1:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>He is feeling pressure that doesn't always exist, and that's

1:12:28.760 --> 1:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a big, big, big problem. He had a couple of

1:12:33.439 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>plays in this game where if he had just hung

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket and stayed with the play instead of

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>being sped up and making a quick decision because of

1:12:43.479 --> 1:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the of the panic meter with the pressure, he had

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>some open reads in this game, but the ball is

1:12:50.439 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>coming out so quickly or not at all because he

1:12:53.280 --> 1:12:57.599
<v Speaker 1>was panicking because of the pressure. So that I don't

1:12:57.640 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>know how you fix that. I And when I say fix,

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you fix that. In season he

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>might be able to go to the offseason, take a

1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>step back from football and reset and go six months

1:13:12.200 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>without getting hit, and that might reset him mentally to

1:13:15.400 --> 1:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the point where he can come in next season and

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:21.799
<v Speaker 1>not be sped up and panicked under pressure. But in season,

1:13:21.960 --> 1:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you necessarily fix that. And the

1:13:25.479 --> 1:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>other thing. I you know, I mentioned the footwork, I

1:13:27.560 --> 1:13:29.599
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the eyes, you know, going down at the rush,

1:13:29.720 --> 1:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the reds. I just really think that that's

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a broken quarterback. And I'm at the point now with Mac.

1:13:37.920 --> 1:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how you feel about it, but

1:13:40.040 --> 1:13:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the point now with Mac that I don't

1:13:42.680 --> 1:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>know if you can put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a guy that once you

1:13:48.880 --> 1:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>start to lose it in that respect, and you start

1:13:52.760 --> 1:13:57.479
<v Speaker 1>feeling pressure that doesn't actually exist, and you start being

1:13:57.560 --> 1:14:00.759
<v Speaker 1>unsettled with your footwork and like throw with your feet

1:14:00.760 --> 1:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>parallel to the line of scrimmage and not stepping into throws.

1:14:04.800 --> 1:14:08.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, a couple examples, like the Time Montgomery interception.

1:14:10.360 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You can argue that a good receiver it hit him

1:14:13.960 --> 1:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>right in, catches that ball and shields the safety and

1:14:18.200 --> 1:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>makes the catch. The ball is a lollipop. You gotta

1:14:23.120 --> 1:14:25.799
<v Speaker 1>step into the ball and throw it. If he steps

1:14:25.840 --> 1:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>into the ball and throws it with some velo instead

1:14:29.120 --> 1:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of just arking it up there to Time Montgomery, the

1:14:33.000 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>safety is not even a factor. Right, Like if he

1:14:35.479 --> 1:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>steps and rips it, then Time Montgomery catches it on

1:14:39.200 --> 1:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the run and cuts in in front of the face

1:14:41.880 --> 1:14:45.639
<v Speaker 1>of the safety and never gets hit. But the ball

1:14:45.760 --> 1:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>took too long to get there, and it causes these

1:14:48.080 --> 1:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>types of interceptions. That's not because he was panicked in

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the pocket necessarily, It's because he doesn't have any confidence

1:14:55.040 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to step up in the pocket and step into a

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>throw and let it rip. Those throws need they need

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to have more mustard on them, They need to have

1:15:03.400 --> 1:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more velocity on them. I just I'm not sure how

1:15:07.120 --> 1:15:09.519
<v Speaker 1>you put Mac back together at this point. All right,

1:15:09.520 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that leads perfectly into my first down. The offense, it

1:15:13.520 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just Mac was panicked. He was rushing.

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't get anything blocked, they couldn't run the ball.

1:15:18.240 --> 1:15:22.519
<v Speaker 2>Nobody was getting off open. Is there any part of

1:15:22.560 --> 1:15:24.599
<v Speaker 2>that game you look at. I know you you sort

1:15:24.600 --> 1:15:27.240
<v Speaker 2>of liked what Riley Reef did, but yeah, you know,

1:15:27.280 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>as a whole, the game plan was bad. It was

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:32.400
<v Speaker 2>all bad. It's a bury the ball game. For the offense,

1:15:32.600 --> 1:15:36.439
<v Speaker 2>they weren't good enough. They just weren't good enough. I

1:15:36.479 --> 1:15:38.639
<v Speaker 2>know people are gonna say that this is me excusing Mac,

1:15:38.760 --> 1:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>especially because you just said Mac is your first down.

1:15:42.160 --> 1:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it's no, it's it's all of it. It's it's

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:47.799
<v Speaker 2>it's Mac's bad. The offense is bad, the pass catches

1:15:47.800 --> 1:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>are bad, the run games bad, and it's they all

1:15:50.160 --> 1:15:53.559
<v Speaker 2>compound when another. Yeah, and it's not the kind of

1:15:53.560 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>game where you can single one person out, I think

1:15:55.120 --> 1:15:56.439
<v Speaker 2>and say, this person had a bad game.

1:15:56.600 --> 1:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It was all bad. Their offensive film is itster Yeah,

1:16:01.000 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 1>it is disgusting to watch. It is an absolute abject disaster,

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to the point where I always watched the Patriots stuff

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to Patriots stuff. Then I turned the page. Now that

1:16:11.520 --> 1:16:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders played on Monday night, so that threw off

1:16:13.640 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my schedule a little bit. Yeah, regardless, thank you, thank

1:16:17.200 --> 1:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you for feeling bad for me. Regardless, the Raiders and

1:16:21.000 --> 1:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Packers played that Monday night game. What was the

1:16:23.880 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 1>final score, seventeen to thirteen, seventeen thirteen, something like that.

1:16:28.640 --> 1:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So they both because the Raiders haven't scored twenty once

1:16:30.960 --> 1:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this year, they neither team scored a lot of points.

1:16:32.920 --> 1:16:37.559
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. Their offensive film is fifty times better

1:16:37.640 --> 1:16:39.439
<v Speaker 1>than what the Patriots put on film. Yeah, they were

1:16:39.439 --> 1:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just turned the ball over and they didn't score. But

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter was is that it was

1:16:44.040 --> 1:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>synced up. It looked like an NFL offense right, Like,

1:16:46.880 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>guys are running routes, bockers were blocking, quarterback was throwing.

1:16:50.800 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>It was all on time. It just they're not very

1:16:53.520 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 1>good right now, right, So they didn't hit on enough

1:16:56.520 --> 1:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>plays consistently to put up a lot of points. But

1:17:00.080 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>if you put the Raiders offense that they're going up

1:17:02.800 --> 1:17:06.519
<v Speaker 1>against this week and the Patriots offense side by side,

1:17:06.240 --> 1:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the ugliness of the Patriots offensive film compared to the Raiders,

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be night and day to you. I mean,

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a disaster right now for the Patriots offense.

1:17:14.920 --> 1:17:17.559
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. I had a

1:17:17.560 --> 1:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>few more specific guys though, Okay, Number two Antonio Mafi. So,

1:17:24.040 --> 1:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Mafi has tools. I'm excited about some of the

1:17:27.960 --> 1:17:30.479
<v Speaker 1>things I've seen from Antonio Mafi. I think he's got

1:17:30.560 --> 1:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL play strength. I think he's got NFL hand strength.

1:17:33.960 --> 1:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got NFL leverage and balance and ability

1:17:37.680 --> 1:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to block and posture and all that kind of stuff. Like,

1:17:39.960 --> 1:17:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got NFL tools. I put Antonio Mafi

1:17:44.640 --> 1:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>as a down, but I really mean Adrian Clem. Adrian

1:17:49.040 --> 1:17:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Clem's got to start making his money on this team,

1:17:51.560 --> 1:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in this organization. A guy like Antonio Mafi has one

1:17:56.800 --> 1:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>achilles heel right now. He can't pick up a stunt.

1:18:00.439 --> 1:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>He can't pass off a stunt. It's not physical, it's

1:18:04.360 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not foot speed in this game as much as it

1:18:07.880 --> 1:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is mental of not seeing it right. He's not seeing

1:18:11.400 --> 1:18:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the stunt coming. He's not mentally processing line movement up front.

1:18:16.000 --> 1:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>To me, that points more to coaching. This is a

1:18:18.520 --> 1:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>common problem for Antonio Maffi going back to the summer,

1:18:22.200 --> 1:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>which means that they've been coaching him up on it

1:18:24.840 --> 1:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>since the summer and he's not getting better. And at

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some point in time, Adrian Clme's got to start making

1:18:32.880 --> 1:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>some people better on the offensive line. They have to

1:18:35.640 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>start looking like a five man unit on the offensive line.

1:18:40.080 --> 1:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And don't don't give me like they haven't played enough together,

1:18:43.080 --> 1:18:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't want to hear that these guys have

1:18:45.680 --> 1:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like him and Trent Brown have basically been out there

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>since since pad practice has started. Okay, Like we're not

1:18:51.760 --> 1:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about him working next to a guy that hasn't

1:18:54.960 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>played at all, like a cold strange or something like that.

1:18:58.600 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>At some point in time, the line has to have

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>an upward trajectory. There needs to be some development for

1:19:04.400 --> 1:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the younger players on this line, like for example, City

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So he guard tackle whatever. Yeah, the fact that City

1:19:13.920 --> 1:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so cannot even be active on game day when you're

1:19:16.920 --> 1:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>rolling Vederian Low out there at right tackle as an

1:19:19.400 --> 1:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>indictment on the coach. Because he's a fourth round pick,

1:19:22.960 --> 1:19:25.839
<v Speaker 1>he has some tools, he's an athletic kid. He tested

1:19:25.880 --> 1:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>really really well in the combine, so he's got some

1:19:29.640 --> 1:19:32.599
<v Speaker 1>raw ability. And the fact that he's not better than

1:19:32.680 --> 1:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Vederian Low to me points to coaching and development. So

1:19:37.360 --> 1:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>whether you want to put Mafia as a down or

1:19:40.240 --> 1:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Clem as a down, it's one and the same to me,

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Mafi Adrian Clem, that's my second down. Mine is

1:19:47.000 --> 1:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the defense. I think you see whe I'm going with this.

1:19:51.840 --> 1:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>You look at the drives the Saints had early in

1:19:53.840 --> 1:19:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the game, eight plays, sixty two yards, four sixteen, five

1:19:57.640 --> 1:20:00.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty six. It's hot knife through butter and this this

1:20:00.479 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 2>is a quarterback that had a bad arm, a bad

1:20:03.400 --> 1:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>throw on the shoulder. Yeah, a team that struggled to

1:20:07.320 --> 1:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>move the ball the we end. Look, maybe he's healthier,

1:20:08.920 --> 1:20:10.479
<v Speaker 2>but a team that struggled to move the ball the

1:20:10.479 --> 1:20:12.920
<v Speaker 2>week before. Honestly, you look at it, I know people

1:20:12.920 --> 1:20:15.679
<v Speaker 2>think probably could have gotten worse. They were like three

1:20:15.800 --> 1:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>or four deep balls that either Car didn't throw to

1:20:19.280 --> 1:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Olave or he did and Olave.

1:20:21.160 --> 1:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Just missed them. There was one touchdown that ol remember,

1:20:23.960 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>he dropped it Brian.

1:20:26.160 --> 1:20:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So as bad as it looked, they got bailed out

1:20:29.439 --> 1:20:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple times by the Saints. UH coverage didn't line up,

1:20:34.520 --> 1:20:36.559
<v Speaker 2>pass rush never got home. They weren't able to put

1:20:36.560 --> 1:20:38.160
<v Speaker 2>any pressure on Car, which they had to do to

1:20:38.200 --> 1:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>win this game. Alvin Kamara is making guys missing the

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:43.880
<v Speaker 2>open field, that that'll happen, but they just didn't seem

1:20:43.920 --> 1:20:46.679
<v Speaker 2>like they almost seemed caught off guard by the way

1:20:46.720 --> 1:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara was used in this game.

1:20:48.880 --> 1:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Defense down. Okay, so I have a position group on

1:20:52.680 --> 1:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the defense, in particular the safeties. Yeah, that's fair. If

1:20:57.080 --> 1:21:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I had to pick one, Yeah, that's fair all of them. So,

1:21:00.240 --> 1:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Dugger, where are you? M I a missing an action?

1:21:06.479 --> 1:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Dugger made some plays in the flat right, made

1:21:09.280 --> 1:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>some tackles like Derek Carr throwing late to the flat

1:21:12.280 --> 1:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Dugger made some tackles. Cool there. This goes

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>back to something that we talked about a few minutes ago.

1:21:20.040 --> 1:21:23.519
<v Speaker 1>With the personnel. They always used to have a plan,

1:21:23.840 --> 1:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>right like Nate Solder to Matt liked to Nate's older

1:21:26.880 --> 1:21:28.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna use that because it's an easy one

1:21:28.600 --> 1:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>to use, Matt liked to Nate's Solder. They always used

1:21:31.479 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a plan. How many years? How many years?

1:21:35.240 --> 1:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the same thing with tackle? How many years, Alex

1:21:38.200 --> 1:21:42.599
<v Speaker 1>have We talked about free safety's center fielders in the draft,

1:21:42.880 --> 1:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>saying at some point you are gonna have to take

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Devin McCarty's successor, at some point you're gonna have to

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>get somebody in the building. And both of us were

1:21:51.720 --> 1:21:55.799
<v Speaker 1>lockstep that we prefer Devin to actually school this kid right,

1:21:56.000 --> 1:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like teach them. And they ignored it. They ignored it,

1:22:01.160 --> 1:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they ignored it, they ignored it. And now they're in

1:22:03.640 --> 1:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a position where they have box safeties that aren't deep

1:22:09.080 --> 1:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>middle safeties playing center field in a single, high heavy defense.

1:22:14.720 --> 1:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And Jabriel Peppers, Kyle Duggar, Adrian Phillips, those guys, it's

1:22:21.880 --> 1:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>not their fault. They're playing out a position, all of them.

1:22:25.520 --> 1:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh Shaheed Rashid Shahied, Yeah, catches that big pass.

1:22:30.880 --> 1:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Phillips is like the buzz defender. He lets him

1:22:34.760 --> 1:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>go by, he leaves Jabrill Peppers on him on an island.

1:22:38.840 --> 1:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Jabrill Peppers can't pick him up because he's not Devin

1:22:41.040 --> 1:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>mccordy in his prime. Big play Chris o'lave is touchdown.

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Duggar, where are you going, dude? There's a route

1:22:51.120 --> 1:22:53.799
<v Speaker 1>on the right side line. I think it's Michael Thomas.

1:22:54.200 --> 1:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like a one on one, like fade back shoulder thing.

1:22:57.360 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And then there's one route in the middle of the

1:22:59.160 --> 1:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>field and it's Chris a Lava and Kyle Dugger allows

1:23:03.360 --> 1:23:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr to I manipulate him out of the passing window.

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr looks right, so Kyle Dugger moves right, and

1:23:10.120 --> 1:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then Derek Carr immediately comes back left and hits Chris

1:23:12.400 --> 1:23:15.599
<v Speaker 1>a Lava. There's nobody else in the area for Kyle

1:23:15.640 --> 1:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Dugger to go to right like it's a There's no

1:23:18.240 --> 1:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>route that's threatening his zone for him to worry about.

1:23:23.000 --> 1:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Their free safety play is abysmal. It's been terrible, and

1:23:27.240 --> 1:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all of it goes back like this is why I

1:23:29.479 --> 1:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>keep on going back to the head guy. All this

1:23:32.400 --> 1:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the fact that they never addressed a

1:23:35.439 --> 1:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>successor to Devin mccordy, and now they're in a position

1:23:38.400 --> 1:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>where they don't have one and they're stuck, and it's

1:23:42.439 --> 1:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>been ugly at times at free safety.

1:23:45.080 --> 1:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>It's something we talked about or learning the show. How

1:23:46.720 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>many guys have left. It's not just on offense. How

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:50.640
<v Speaker 2>many guys have left and just left and there was

1:23:50.720 --> 1:23:53.960
<v Speaker 2>no plan to replace him. You know, whether it's on

1:23:54.080 --> 1:23:57.360
<v Speaker 2>offensive tackle, at running back, at receiver, it's safety, at linebacker.

1:23:58.640 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 2>We've seen it a lot over the past few years

1:24:00.720 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 2>in free safety. Certainly that list. I don't know what

1:24:03.479 --> 1:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>they thought, maybe like Jabrill Peppers could play it or something,

1:24:07.280 --> 1:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>or Jalen Mills could play it. But he's not even

1:24:09.000 --> 1:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>playing like he's the most logical free safety. Yeah, roster,

1:24:12.120 --> 1:24:12.719
<v Speaker 2>he's not playing.

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So Jabrill Peppers and Kyle Duggar if you want them

1:24:15.880 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to play center field and like a like a coverage

1:24:19.320 --> 1:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rotation where you're running some sort of exotic and the

1:24:22.640 --> 1:24:26.519
<v Speaker 1>center fielder drops out of center field and the robber

1:24:26.640 --> 1:24:30.559
<v Speaker 1>drops back like it's some sort of rotation post snap. Sure, fine,

1:24:30.920 --> 1:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>as like a stagnant single high safety like Devin used

1:24:34.840 --> 1:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, can't happen, like you can't have that guy.

1:24:37.840 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And they had options, like there was options in the draft,

1:24:40.400 --> 1:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>option in the draft. Mayor Taylor Rapp was here. Yeah,

1:24:43.040 --> 1:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>another guy you could do it, all right, you got

1:24:45.720 --> 1:24:49.599
<v Speaker 1>you want to guess special team? Yes, yeah, there was.

1:24:49.800 --> 1:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty clear. Uh, this is just good.

1:24:53.439 --> 1:24:55.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're not thirty four nothing. You're not wrong

1:24:55.760 --> 1:24:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Chad Ryland. Look, I'm conflicting on Chad Ryland. We'll start

1:24:59.160 --> 1:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>with Chad Ryland. Seven of his eight kicks had been

1:25:01.720 --> 1:25:03.519
<v Speaker 2>from forty eight or longer. He's fifty percent on all

1:25:03.560 --> 1:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>his kicks. Yeah, Uh, seven of his eight have been

1:25:06.040 --> 1:25:07.880
<v Speaker 2>from forty eight or longer. There are long kicks, so

1:25:08.080 --> 1:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>you're not gonna have You're not gonna hit ninety percent

1:25:10.160 --> 1:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>from forty eight or longer.

1:25:11.080 --> 1:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Nobody is justin.

1:25:12.000 --> 1:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Tucker doesn't, but you're here to He was drafted because

1:25:15.920 --> 1:25:17.680
<v Speaker 2>he's a big leg. He should be hitting some of

1:25:17.680 --> 1:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>these and he's not.

1:25:19.840 --> 1:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1:25:20.040 --> 1:25:21.840
<v Speaker 2>The snaps and holds haven't been great at times. There

1:25:21.880 --> 1:25:24.240
<v Speaker 2>was another bad snap this week, this time on a punt. Yeah,

1:25:24.280 --> 1:25:26.160
<v Speaker 2>almost so went out the back of the end zone.

1:25:26.280 --> 1:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Bryce bearing it. Look he got it going later in

1:25:28.200 --> 1:25:29.519
<v Speaker 2>the game. He was good later in the game. But

1:25:29.520 --> 1:25:31.559
<v Speaker 2>he shanked his first two punts. Those both led to

1:25:31.560 --> 1:25:33.360
<v Speaker 2>short field for the Saints and boom, just like that,

1:25:33.400 --> 1:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you fall in the hole.

1:25:34.160 --> 1:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that was concerning.

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:39.599
<v Speaker 2>And then you had bro Peppers try to like pick

1:25:39.680 --> 1:25:42.160
<v Speaker 2>up a punt that was bouncing and fumbled it and

1:25:42.200 --> 1:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't end up turning it over, but very much almost did.

1:25:44.680 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>In time, Montgomery ran two kicks out of the en

1:25:46.360 --> 1:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>zone that he didn't need to run out of the enzone.

1:25:47.920 --> 1:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So the whole thing, it just didn't and.

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, exactly, well, no, he's at Ryland not run Bear

1:25:56.479 --> 1:25:59.960
<v Speaker 2>during the second half was good. But it's just like

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing on offense where it just looks like guys

1:26:03.000 --> 1:26:05.599
<v Speaker 2>are trying to do or being asked to do more

1:26:06.040 --> 1:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>than what's realistic because they're compensating for what's going on

1:26:08.680 --> 1:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>around them.

1:26:09.640 --> 1:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about a lot on offense.

1:26:11.160 --> 1:26:13.360
<v Speaker 2>It exists a little bit on defense, maybe more now

1:26:13.360 --> 1:26:15.599
<v Speaker 2>with some of the injuries. You're seeing that pop up

1:26:15.640 --> 1:26:16.679
<v Speaker 2>on special teams as well.

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, two more quickly, all right, Vaderian low like

1:26:22.800 --> 1:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>he's just gonna live on the downs list, right, Like

1:26:25.280 --> 1:26:28.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's not good enough. It's just not good enough.

1:26:28.920 --> 1:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's not his faulty as playing. So this kind

1:26:31.160 --> 1:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of goes to my next one, but it's not his

1:26:33.920 --> 1:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>faulty as playing. They should have better options than Vaderian Low.

1:26:37.479 --> 1:26:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Your fourth round pick should be a better option. Leyow

1:26:39.680 --> 1:26:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Collin should be a better option. Like, they should have

1:26:41.560 --> 1:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a better option, but they don't. Yeah, and he gave it.

1:26:44.479 --> 1:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gave up another five pressures in this game. He

1:26:48.160 --> 1:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>has given up the most pressures in the league amongst tackles.

1:26:53.040 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Alex and he's only played four games and he's still

1:26:57.960 --> 1:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>giving up the most. Yeah. Okay, so he is the

1:27:00.920 --> 1:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>worst right tackle. He's the worst tackle in football, period,

1:27:07.800 --> 1:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's this Patriots starting right tackle. So this goes

1:27:12.240 --> 1:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to the last one. He's on the perpetual down list.

1:27:15.920 --> 1:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It seems like for right now, Bill Belichick. Bill Belichick

1:27:20.479 --> 1:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on the down list significantly. He's down bad at this point. Yeah,

1:27:26.240 --> 1:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of issues with this team. Most of

1:27:28.680 --> 1:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>them are personnel driven. We've talked a lot about all

1:27:31.120 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of that right tackle, free safety. Some of these spots

1:27:36.520 --> 1:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about go back to the whole thing

1:27:38.800 --> 1:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of what was the plan, what was the succession plan,

1:27:42.120 --> 1:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what was the thought process? Those spots. It's now two

1:27:45.439 --> 1:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>years in a row. And this is why I lumps

1:27:47.040 --> 1:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Vederian Lowen with Bill. It's now two years in a row.

1:27:49.920 --> 1:27:52.559
<v Speaker 1>That right tackles the worst position on the Patriots roster.

1:27:53.560 --> 1:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Worst position? Yeah, how do we not address this? How

1:27:57.640 --> 1:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>they didn't address it at all?

1:27:58.760 --> 1:27:58.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1:27:58.960 --> 1:28:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Sorry? Signed? Rather, they signed Riley Reef and Calvin Anderson.

1:28:01.720 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That was addressing. They signed a career backup in thirty four,

1:28:04.160 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and they drafted a guard from Eastern Michigan and tried

1:28:06.400 --> 1:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to make them into the mystery box again city so

1:28:08.560 --> 1:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>could be anything. He could even be at tackling. And

1:28:10.479 --> 1:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I got this question on Twitter. I think of like, okay, well,

1:28:14.040 --> 1:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>out of McGlinchey, McGary, Jwan Taylor, Like who who's who

1:28:19.080 --> 1:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are those guys at Orlanda Brown? Who those guys have

1:28:22.040 --> 1:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>actually played well with their new teams. It's not the point, right,

1:28:24.960 --> 1:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not the point. It's not that's not how it works.

1:28:27.320 --> 1:28:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't just say, oh, this guy hasn't been good,

1:28:29.640 --> 1:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so that why why waste? Like why sign him? Yeah,

1:28:32.240 --> 1:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of a, it would have been better than what you

1:28:34.360 --> 1:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>had and be you don't know what that player would

1:28:36.080 --> 1:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>look like in your system and in your team Bill

1:28:39.960 --> 1:28:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Belichick's you can There's so many different things you can

1:28:43.439 --> 1:28:45.559
<v Speaker 1>point to. You can point to end game stuff, you

1:28:45.560 --> 1:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>can point to game plan stuff, you can point to

1:28:48.960 --> 1:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>personnel decisions. It's down bad all of it. And at

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:56.679
<v Speaker 1>this point, I'm running out of things, and I can't

1:28:56.720 --> 1:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm saying this about Bill Belichick. I'm running out

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of things to say that he helps this football team with.

1:29:05.080 --> 1:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>If you can tell me one thing that you really

1:29:08.000 --> 1:29:12.439
<v Speaker 1>think that he is helping them contributing to winning on

1:29:12.520 --> 1:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this football team, I'm all years.

1:29:14.640 --> 1:29:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Miguel Ben's in very well time tweet right now. How

1:29:17.600 --> 1:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>many right tackles do you think Matt starting right tackles

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:21.679
<v Speaker 2>you think Mac Jones is played with with his time

1:29:21.680 --> 1:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in the Patriots?

1:29:23.280 --> 1:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, ten? Yes, actually, yeah, nailed it? You want to? Yes?

1:29:29.760 --> 1:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy? Isaiah Win, yep, that's one, Godneka just yep.

1:29:33.880 --> 1:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Cannon, Calvin Anderson, Vederian Lowe, Oh man, I don't know.

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Trent Brown, yep, you got one more from last year,

1:29:47.400 --> 1:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it's all twenty one guys. Oh god, who's

1:29:52.000 --> 1:29:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the one from last year? It's like on the tip

1:29:53.680 --> 1:29:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of my tongue. It's killing me. Who is it? Connor McDermott. Ah, yeah,

1:29:58.720 --> 1:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I knew, I knew who it was.

1:29:59.640 --> 1:30:02.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, the rest justin Hran Yanni could just and

1:30:03.000 --> 1:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Mike and Win. I said, y oh did you who

1:30:05.120 --> 1:30:05.559
<v Speaker 2>did I miss?

1:30:05.560 --> 1:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Trent Brown?

1:30:06.040 --> 1:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1:30:06.160 --> 1:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You see your drant? Yes? Oh god, god, what a list.

1:30:10.439 --> 1:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in three years, less than three years, really to

1:30:12.880 --> 1:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and change a two and a quarter?

1:30:15.439 --> 1:30:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, all right, that's a new right tackle every

1:30:18.760 --> 1:30:19.679
<v Speaker 2>three games.

1:30:19.760 --> 1:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, Who's who's your last down?

1:30:22.920 --> 1:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>No?

1:30:23.120 --> 1:30:24.519
<v Speaker 1>That was it? You only have? Yeah?

1:30:24.560 --> 1:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, you have three offense defense Qecially coaching. I

1:30:27.080 --> 1:30:28.800
<v Speaker 2>feel like I kind of wrapped it in with all

1:30:28.840 --> 1:30:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of it.

1:30:30.040 --> 1:30:32.559
<v Speaker 1>How do you like? Genuine question? Because I you know,

1:30:32.600 --> 1:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what we do. Yeah, And what's up?

1:30:37.200 --> 1:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:30:37.360 --> 1:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is wrong with Chad Ryland? Like

1:30:39.520 --> 1:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's just simply that he's been asked

1:30:41.880 --> 1:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to kick a lot of forty eight plus the arders

1:30:44.120 --> 1:30:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and I can't say fifty plus anymore? Yeah, No, it's

1:30:46.600 --> 1:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of little things. I think.

1:30:48.520 --> 1:30:50.599
<v Speaker 2>You know, you had the bad snaps, and first of all,

1:30:50.600 --> 1:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>you had he didn't really get a chance to kick

1:30:52.160 --> 1:30:55.879
<v Speaker 2>in the preseason and it's wild, right, which that helps.

1:30:56.840 --> 1:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You had the bad snaps, the bad field in New York,

1:30:59.000 --> 1:31:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and you wonder if it all just kind of compounds,

1:31:01.160 --> 1:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, you know, he kind of didn't have

1:31:03.520 --> 1:31:05.599
<v Speaker 2>he didn't kick really in games for a few months,

1:31:05.640 --> 1:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and then his first game action was rough. And now

1:31:08.240 --> 1:31:10.599
<v Speaker 2>maybe he's in his head and he hasn't exactly had

1:31:10.600 --> 1:31:12.519
<v Speaker 2>a lay up to get back going right. It's not

1:31:12.560 --> 1:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>like he's gotten like a twenty five thirty five year

1:31:15.040 --> 1:31:17.559
<v Speaker 2>old five yard chip shot to sort of just see

1:31:17.560 --> 1:31:20.000
<v Speaker 2>one go through. I don't think he's a bad kicker,

1:31:20.400 --> 1:31:23.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's so mental at that position, and I wonder

1:31:23.160 --> 1:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>if that stuff's all just starting the layer up.

1:31:24.880 --> 1:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, just add it to another the list of

1:31:27.280 --> 1:31:29.439
<v Speaker 1>things that are not going well for this team. All right,

1:31:29.479 --> 1:31:31.599
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the phones. Dan is in New York.

1:31:31.640 --> 1:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Dan?

1:31:34.560 --> 1:31:35.840
<v Speaker 7>Hey, guys, can you hear me?

1:31:36.200 --> 1:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Yep?

1:31:36.520 --> 1:31:37.720
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yeah.

1:31:37.800 --> 1:31:39.479
<v Speaker 7>So I just wanted to say that I feel like

1:31:39.479 --> 1:31:41.679
<v Speaker 7>this weekend's game is pretty big in the sense that

1:31:42.040 --> 1:31:44.360
<v Speaker 7>if we lose, it's just going to be spiral effect.

1:31:44.400 --> 1:31:46.759
<v Speaker 7>I mean, got Buffalo in Miami after that, and then

1:31:47.720 --> 1:31:50.200
<v Speaker 7>and after the Commanders and Colt is not a gimme,

1:31:50.320 --> 1:31:52.800
<v Speaker 7>So going into the by potentially there's a good chance

1:31:52.800 --> 1:31:54.600
<v Speaker 7>of you or two and eight, one and nine and

1:31:54.600 --> 1:31:57.559
<v Speaker 7>three and seven. So at that point, do you guys

1:31:57.600 --> 1:31:59.640
<v Speaker 7>think that we should embrace the full timeway. What's the

1:31:59.640 --> 1:32:01.719
<v Speaker 7>status of the team then, like, are they even until

1:32:01.720 --> 1:32:05.439
<v Speaker 7>we committed or yeah, very hypothetical. I think it's a

1:32:05.439 --> 1:32:06.320
<v Speaker 7>good chance happening.

1:32:06.560 --> 1:32:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, if they're like one to nine one. Thanks

1:32:08.520 --> 1:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for the call, Dan, so h embracing the tank, I

1:32:11.400 --> 1:32:13.479
<v Speaker 1>don't really know. You know, we've talked about this in

1:32:13.560 --> 1:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of like tanking comes from the top down.

1:32:16.040 --> 1:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a goofy thing you can do as fans,

1:32:17.880 --> 1:32:20.120
<v Speaker 2>but the team will never Guys on the team aren't

1:32:20.120 --> 1:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna I'd say they're not gonna quit. But like, guys

1:32:23.120 --> 1:32:25.519
<v Speaker 2>are still playing for future jobs, future contracts, Guys are

1:32:25.560 --> 1:32:26.559
<v Speaker 2>coaching for future jobs.

1:32:26.680 --> 1:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the biggest thing. And you know,

1:32:29.320 --> 1:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't usually get into this to the to the

1:32:32.000 --> 1:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>psyche too much, but in this in these moments, you

1:32:36.120 --> 1:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to. Yeah, and I think the biggest

1:32:38.160 --> 1:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm interested in when we go to to

1:32:40.680 --> 1:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Vegas this weekend, back to Vegas again, you get to

1:32:44.040 --> 1:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>go to luxow see the beam? God, Uh buy in?

1:32:52.120 --> 1:32:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Like want to will who's pulling on the rope? Because

1:32:57.720 --> 1:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't lose seventy three in a two week span

1:33:02.000 --> 1:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on talent alone. You don't lose like that on talent alone. Right,

1:33:05.479 --> 1:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You lose on that because you're not They're not. Everybody's

1:33:08.520 --> 1:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is giving it one hundred and ten percent. So this

1:33:12.960 --> 1:33:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is a really big test in my mind because you're

1:33:16.640 --> 1:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>going to Vegas, You're going on a six hour flight

1:33:20.160 --> 1:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Uh, you're leaving a day earlier than

1:33:23.439 --> 1:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>normal because of the long fight. So this is a

1:33:28.880 --> 1:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of like a weekend, right, It's a little

1:33:30.720 --> 1:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a trip, Like we're not just going for

1:33:33.160 --> 1:33:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for you know, twenty four hours and coming home. Who's

1:33:39.120 --> 1:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>who wants to play on Sunday? And is there enough

1:33:42.320 --> 1:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>guys in that locker room right now that want to

1:33:44.520 --> 1:33:46.839
<v Speaker 1>play on Sunday and want to fight for the season

1:33:47.120 --> 1:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and want to try to pull out of this where

1:33:49.320 --> 1:33:51.639
<v Speaker 1>they have that kind of effort or do they lay

1:33:51.640 --> 1:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>another egg? Because if they lay another egg, then I'm

1:33:54.320 --> 1:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to get with you on the fact that in

1:33:56.280 --> 1:34:00.799
<v Speaker 1>season firing is on the table. If they chose some fight. Uh,

1:34:00.880 --> 1:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and they show Gofer did they win? Like, you know,

1:34:04.800 --> 1:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's pos Like, then that's showing you something, right, Yeah,

1:34:08.479 --> 1:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is to me, before we get to schemes

1:34:11.640 --> 1:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna do key matchups here in a second,

1:34:13.439 --> 1:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get to matchups and x's and o's and

1:34:16.120 --> 1:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>game plans and things like that against the Raiders, the

1:34:20.040 --> 1:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing is is do they even want to freaking

1:34:22.439 --> 1:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>be there or not?

1:34:23.520 --> 1:34:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Right?

1:34:24.400 --> 1:34:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fair.

1:34:26.240 --> 1:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I would just to the second part of that question,

1:34:28.080 --> 1:34:30.040
<v Speaker 2>like what do you look for if it gets to

1:34:30.040 --> 1:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that point?

1:34:30.439 --> 1:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>If it does? Yeah?

1:34:31.600 --> 1:34:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh, And we kind of talked about it earlier, like

1:34:33.360 --> 1:34:35.800
<v Speaker 2>how do the kids look the guys who you know

1:34:35.880 --> 1:34:39.080
<v Speaker 2>are gonna be here if they reset it, Kean White,

1:34:39.120 --> 1:34:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Marte Maphu, Taekwon, Thornton, Tomorrio, Douglas Kashawan, Boody, the rookie lineman. Uh,

1:34:43.640 --> 1:34:45.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe Andrew Steuber gets some run like these are the

1:34:45.640 --> 1:34:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Collie Cunningham. These you're just kind of looking to see,

1:34:48.400 --> 1:34:49.720
<v Speaker 2>all right, are any of these guys part of the

1:34:49.720 --> 1:34:53.519
<v Speaker 2>plan moving forward? Or like can any of them help

1:34:53.560 --> 1:34:54.720
<v Speaker 2>you build this thing back up?

1:34:54.840 --> 1:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Or where do you really need to go? And address. Yeah,

1:34:56.960 --> 1:34:59.519
<v Speaker 1>all right, Gene is in South Carolina. What's up? Gene?

1:35:01.439 --> 1:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Hey you guys hear me up?

1:35:03.120 --> 1:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep, we're gould Oh.

1:35:07.400 --> 1:35:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Jump speak your phone?

1:35:09.160 --> 1:35:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you hear me?

1:35:09.920 --> 1:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:15.559
<v Speaker 8>So, just I know, I'm just a fan, but it's

1:35:15.560 --> 1:35:17.720
<v Speaker 8>just an idea for you guys. I was curious what

1:35:17.760 --> 1:35:20.519
<v Speaker 8>you guys thought. So I know they talk about people

1:35:20.600 --> 1:35:26.000
<v Speaker 8>not having or the players not having any uh any

1:35:26.000 --> 1:35:31.160
<v Speaker 8>confidence in Mac, So why couldn't we You know, DeVante Parker,

1:35:31.360 --> 1:35:33.439
<v Speaker 8>he's missed a couple of Condessa baskets that I think

1:35:33.479 --> 1:35:36.080
<v Speaker 8>he could have caught, and he just I just didn't

1:35:36.120 --> 1:35:39.639
<v Speaker 8>think he like tried like he was better last year

1:35:39.760 --> 1:35:43.360
<v Speaker 8>and then juju, I mean, obviously just missed communication. We

1:35:43.400 --> 1:35:45.040
<v Speaker 8>can go on. I listen to you guys talk about

1:35:45.040 --> 1:35:47.760
<v Speaker 8>it all the time. The tight ends work with work

1:35:47.800 --> 1:35:51.120
<v Speaker 8>with him. Why not just bring cunning him up and

1:35:51.240 --> 1:35:54.040
<v Speaker 8>use Booty and you just Douglas when he's not hurt

1:35:54.760 --> 1:35:57.679
<v Speaker 8>and and just go with these younger receivers and try

1:35:57.680 --> 1:35:59.519
<v Speaker 8>to build something on that. But Mac, he's like Mac

1:35:59.560 --> 1:36:01.240
<v Speaker 8>has a better relationship with the younger.

1:36:01.040 --> 1:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Receivers anyway, Okay, yeah, thanks for the college. Interesting. I

1:36:06.000 --> 1:36:09.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the younger receivers versus older receivers thing.

1:36:11.320 --> 1:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you this. If your idea of bringing

1:36:14.280 --> 1:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Malik Cunningham up is to put in a Taysom Hill

1:36:17.920 --> 1:36:20.439
<v Speaker 1>package and just give you that option on offense to

1:36:20.479 --> 1:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe run him a little bit like that, fine, I

1:36:23.439 --> 1:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have no interest in MALIEK Cunningham playing receiver in the game. None.

1:36:28.640 --> 1:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>If you want him to play wildcat quarterback and add

1:36:31.840 --> 1:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that element, because you can't move the ball anyway, so

1:36:34.680 --> 1:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you might as well try it, I can hear that.

1:36:37.160 --> 1:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you're asking me to play Milie Cuttingham at

1:36:39.160 --> 1:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, I'm out. That's where I'm at. Right, Do

1:36:42.680 --> 1:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you disagree?

1:36:44.840 --> 1:36:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not opposed to the idea, like long term

1:36:48.560 --> 1:36:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of him being a wide receiver, but I just from

1:36:50.360 --> 1:36:51.800
<v Speaker 2>what we saw in the summer, he's not close enough

1:36:51.840 --> 1:36:53.400
<v Speaker 2>he had to play that position in the NFL game.

1:36:53.479 --> 1:36:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Not even close. All right, let's get into the Raiders

1:36:55.640 --> 1:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. This Raiders game, I think is in

1:36:58.400 --> 1:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways like the Saints and that, and

1:37:03.120 --> 1:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is true almost every week. Not

1:37:05.200 --> 1:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick on a scap here, but if you were

1:37:09.160 --> 1:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to like rank the rosters, Raiders have a better roster.

1:37:12.800 --> 1:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>They have better They have a better top of the

1:37:15.520 --> 1:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>roster than the Patriots. The Patriots don't have a Max Crosby.

1:37:19.200 --> 1:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Well they do, but he's hurt. The Patriots don't have

1:37:21.640 --> 1:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a DeVante Adams, correct they I don't think they have

1:37:24.240 --> 1:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a Josh Jacobs, No, sob Myers, and they don't have

1:37:30.080 --> 1:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Myers, so they don't. The Raiders have better top

1:37:34.960 --> 1:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>end talent than you do, so in that respect, it

1:37:39.160 --> 1:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>makes it tough for me to pick the Patriots in

1:37:40.960 --> 1:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this game because I think pretty much everything else is equal,

1:37:45.880 --> 1:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but they have a few more game changers than you do,

1:37:49.040 --> 1:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's going to tilt the scales to the Raiders.

1:37:51.960 --> 1:37:53.720
<v Speaker 1>With that being said, though I do think that this

1:37:53.880 --> 1:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is a winnable game. It comes back to what I

1:37:56.680 --> 1:37:59.720
<v Speaker 1>said earlier about do they want to win? Do they

1:37:59.720 --> 1:38:02.559
<v Speaker 1>even want to be there? That's gonna be a factor

1:38:05.439 --> 1:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in general with the Raiders, there's there's two

1:38:08.080 --> 1:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>things that really stand out to me. One, obviously, Max

1:38:12.320 --> 1:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Crosby is one of the best players in the league.

1:38:14.960 --> 1:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>His film is just ridiculous, Like the guy combines the

1:38:20.160 --> 1:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>relentless motor with skill and block anticipation, and the ability

1:38:26.920 --> 1:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to against the run and the pass like he's I

1:38:29.600 --> 1:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's what makes him so rare is that there's

1:38:32.080 --> 1:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that can rush the passer in

1:38:33.800 --> 1:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the NFL a lot. There's not a lot of guys

1:38:36.760 --> 1:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that can play the run as well as Max Crosby can.

1:38:39.120 --> 1:38:42.519
<v Speaker 1>He does both of them at an elite level. He

1:38:42.600 --> 1:38:46.559
<v Speaker 1>completely ruined the game for the Green Bay Packers on

1:38:46.560 --> 1:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night. I think he did it for Steelers too

1:38:48.320 --> 1:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the other week. Yeah, completely took the game over. So

1:38:52.120 --> 1:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he can do that against his patriotsy, he certainly can

1:38:55.920 --> 1:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>against this offensive line. So that's number one. And number

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>two to me is that I think that if you

1:39:04.280 --> 1:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>get too caught up in all the weapons that the

1:39:07.960 --> 1:39:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have, you are gonna get overwhelmed by trying to

1:39:12.880 --> 1:39:18.280
<v Speaker 1>solve plug holes defensively. Uh, it's Adams is tough, right,

1:39:18.320 --> 1:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Like Adams the best receiver in football, maybe you know

1:39:21.479 --> 1:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>he's top five. Certainly looks a little compromise to me

1:39:24.439 --> 1:39:26.439
<v Speaker 1>with that shoulder like I didn't think he looked like

1:39:26.520 --> 1:39:31.559
<v Speaker 1>he was as good. And that's where other guys get

1:39:31.560 --> 1:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>open off of that. So then you have that, and

1:39:34.040 --> 1:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then you have the run game, which I've always touted McDaniels.

1:39:37.120 --> 1:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I still even though there are numbers and their production

1:39:39.040 --> 1:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't quite as good as last year in the Run game,

1:39:41.400 --> 1:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think that they design it really well and

1:39:43.560 --> 1:39:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacob is a good runner. So you have the

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>run Game and then you also have their their their slots,

1:39:49.479 --> 1:39:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Meyers, Hunter, renfro Uh, those guys. So I think

1:39:53.280 --> 1:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if you try to play, you know, the game plan

1:39:58.400 --> 1:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is we're gonna till coverage to Adams and we're gonna

1:40:01.320 --> 1:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do this and we're gonna stop to run with you know,

1:40:03.120 --> 1:40:05.240
<v Speaker 1>seven in the box, and like, I think that you're

1:40:05.240 --> 1:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get overwhelmed by trying to plug holes. The one

1:40:08.760 --> 1:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you can do. They'll like, you know, to

1:40:11.439 --> 1:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>use a Star Wars reference, because you know a big

1:40:14.160 --> 1:40:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars guy the uh the spot and the death

1:40:17.560 --> 1:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Star that you can shoot at. Well, that's appropriate because

1:40:20.120 --> 1:40:21.639
<v Speaker 1>as we call it, their stadium is the death Star.

1:40:22.160 --> 1:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You maybe Mac canhelp me. What's it called, like the

1:40:24.680 --> 1:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that that they shoot in ventilats that ventilationship. Yeah, yeah,

1:40:30.560 --> 1:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the ventilations shaft of the Raiders death Star is the

1:40:34.280 --> 1:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is Jimmy Jimmy. Jimmy Garoppolo is beatable, right like

1:40:40.240 --> 1:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you can you can beat no but Evan. But Evan

1:40:43.040 --> 1:40:46.519
<v Speaker 1>he's a winner. Have you seen his record? So Jimmy,

1:40:47.240 --> 1:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>uh is? The game plan against Jimmy is very very

1:40:51.920 --> 1:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cut and dry, right like he his his splits. Whether

1:40:55.880 --> 1:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to watch the film or you want to

1:40:57.320 --> 1:41:00.479
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers, his his splits tell the story.

1:41:01.280 --> 1:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Pressure no pressure in breakers all other rats. If you

1:41:05.400 --> 1:41:07.519
<v Speaker 1>take away the middle of the field and you pressure

1:41:07.560 --> 1:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, he will self destruct. Yeah, point blank. So

1:41:12.439 --> 1:41:16.679
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, in this game, it's all about throwing

1:41:16.720 --> 1:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>off Jimmy because if you just let him sit back

1:41:19.760 --> 1:41:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there and he let him throw his digs and his

1:41:21.920 --> 1:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>slants and his you know, crossing routes and things like that,

1:41:25.720 --> 1:41:28.919
<v Speaker 1>their weapons are going to move the ball. Their weapons

1:41:28.920 --> 1:41:31.559
<v Speaker 1>are good. They're gonna move the ball. If you get

1:41:31.640 --> 1:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy to throw up all over himself, then you have

1:41:34.960 --> 1:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a chance. So if I'm the Patriots, I'm game planning Jimmy,

1:41:38.280 --> 1:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm pressuring the quarterback. I'm this is basically what they

1:41:41.640 --> 1:41:44.559
<v Speaker 1>did last year. Yeah, I'm I'm packing the box in

1:41:44.600 --> 1:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field, right because that kills two

1:41:47.160 --> 1:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>birds with one stokeus top the run and I'm gonna

1:41:49.320 --> 1:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>take away the middle of the field and I'm gonna

1:41:51.280 --> 1:41:54.639
<v Speaker 1>make Jimmy Garoppolo beat me down the field and outside

1:41:54.640 --> 1:41:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers like that. That's where I'm gonna make him

1:41:56.720 --> 1:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>beat me. And if he does, you tip your cap

1:41:59.600 --> 1:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately you lost, right But that but that's the

1:42:02.640 --> 1:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>way that the cookie crumbles.

1:42:04.320 --> 1:42:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:42:04.560 --> 1:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That That's where I'm at with this Raiders game. I

1:42:06.280 --> 1:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's winnable. I'm not picking the Patriots because they

1:42:08.840 --> 1:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I picked the Patriots the last two weeks for some

1:42:10.880 --> 1:42:15.439
<v Speaker 1>God only knows what reason, and they embarrass me both times.

1:42:15.479 --> 1:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not taking the Patriots. But if I'm the

1:42:17.840 --> 1:42:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Patriots in this game, I worry about how can I

1:42:23.400 --> 1:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I I might not be able to stop DeVante Adams, right,

1:42:26.880 --> 1:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like Chrischi Gonzales, I don't have a Durell Reeves Stefan

1:42:30.120 --> 1:42:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Gilmour to go out there and stop DeVante Adams. But

1:42:32.760 --> 1:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>if the guy who's throwing the ball at Devonte Adams

1:42:34.760 --> 1:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>can't get him the ball, then I'm in in good shape.

1:42:37.200 --> 1:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just I isn't isn't the game playing the

1:42:40.720 --> 1:42:43.800
<v Speaker 2>same against the Patriots. Yeah, right, and and that's where

1:42:43.800 --> 1:42:46.080
<v Speaker 2>all right, So you gotta pressure the quarterback, you got

1:42:46.080 --> 1:42:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to take away the number one receiver, you gotta take

1:42:48.160 --> 1:42:50.800
<v Speaker 2>away the middle of the field. Patriots might be better,

1:42:50.840 --> 1:42:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Quip takeaway the middle of field with their safeties. But

1:42:53.400 --> 1:42:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about Max Crosby and Marcus Peters versus josh

1:42:59.200 --> 1:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>U Chay and Chay Jackson essentially Devonte Adams. You mean no, no, no,

1:43:03.120 --> 1:43:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying the two guys. If both defenses are gonna

1:43:07.320 --> 1:43:09.479
<v Speaker 2>go with the same thing, right, it's who's going to

1:43:09.600 --> 1:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>execute their assignments at a higher level. Is it Max

1:43:12.240 --> 1:43:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Crosby and Marcus Peters or is it josh Uchay.

1:43:14.880 --> 1:43:15.240
<v Speaker 4>And j C.

1:43:15.400 --> 1:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Jackson. Yeah, And if that's the key, j C. Jackson

1:43:18.920 --> 1:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters might be kind of close interchangeable. Yeah.

1:43:21.400 --> 1:43:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just think Max Crosby takes this game over.

1:43:24.840 --> 1:43:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I just I just don't see how he doesn't.

1:43:26.160 --> 1:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'm with you. I think that's more than fair.

1:43:29.600 --> 1:43:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The other kind of big picture matchup thing before we

1:43:31.760 --> 1:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the little matchups, big picture matchup thing. This

1:43:35.600 --> 1:43:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I think Fred put it the other day

1:43:37.680 --> 1:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that normally we talk about like two really good teams,

1:43:41.040 --> 1:43:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and like it's like strength on strength, right, Like it's

1:43:43.240 --> 1:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like great offense against great offense. They're great defense against

1:43:46.080 --> 1:43:50.479
<v Speaker 1>great defense. This is a weakness on weakness. Okay, So

1:43:50.640 --> 1:43:53.559
<v Speaker 1>this is basically a big part of this game to me.

1:43:53.600 --> 1:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And who might win this game is who stinks less

1:43:57.280 --> 1:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>in this category in man coverage or the Patriots against

1:44:02.800 --> 1:44:05.519
<v Speaker 1>man coverage. Who doesn't screw the pooch?

1:44:05.760 --> 1:44:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Right?

1:44:06.080 --> 1:44:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Because the Raiders right now dead lass in the league

1:44:10.520 --> 1:44:13.599
<v Speaker 1>in most statistics in man coverage as a defense man

1:44:13.640 --> 1:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to man defense. They think they're giving up over in

1:44:16.640 --> 1:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nine yards per past attempt in man this season, right,

1:44:19.000 --> 1:44:21.599
<v Speaker 1>by far the most in the league. The Patriots are

1:44:21.640 --> 1:44:24.479
<v Speaker 1>by far the worst man coverage offense in the league.

1:44:24.479 --> 1:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They can't win against man coverage. So who makes more

1:44:29.080 --> 1:44:32.679
<v Speaker 1>plays the Raiders defensive backs or the Patriots receivers against

1:44:32.680 --> 1:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>man coverage.

1:44:33.200 --> 1:44:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Well that kind of goes into mine where I'm curious

1:44:35.600 --> 1:44:39.400
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like without Juju and Tomaro Douglas. Right,

1:44:39.560 --> 1:44:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Juju's a fifty eight percent used to drake guy. Douglas

1:44:42.800 --> 1:44:44.760
<v Speaker 2>is twenty five. But Douglas is like ten percent of

1:44:44.800 --> 1:44:46.880
<v Speaker 2>all their receiving yards this year in just twenty five

1:44:46.880 --> 1:44:50.960
<v Speaker 2>percent of the snaps. Is it Taekwon, is it Kaishaun

1:44:51.040 --> 1:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Boody or are you can get more Jalen Rager. Honestly,

1:44:54.479 --> 1:44:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't surprise me, and Evans is probably gonna annoy you.

1:44:56.720 --> 1:44:59.640
<v Speaker 2>But I wonder if we just get a ton of twelve.

1:45:00.080 --> 1:45:02.679
<v Speaker 2>We just get a ton of twelve personnel with Kendrick

1:45:02.680 --> 1:45:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Born and Devonte Parker and they're just putting Faroh Brown

1:45:05.800 --> 1:45:08.160
<v Speaker 2>in the game a lot to counter Max Crosby. Yeah,

1:45:08.240 --> 1:45:10.160
<v Speaker 2>instead of having that third receiver on the field with

1:45:10.200 --> 1:45:13.160
<v Speaker 2>guys banged up. I would like to see Kijon Booty.

1:45:13.200 --> 1:45:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you probably should see Taekwon Thorn a good amount,

1:45:15.680 --> 1:45:18.040
<v Speaker 2>especially without Douglas, because he gives you that speed element.

1:45:19.160 --> 1:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>There'll be a little bit of all of that.

1:45:20.520 --> 1:45:22.519
<v Speaker 2>But I would not be surprised if we see a

1:45:22.560 --> 1:45:25.000
<v Speaker 2>ton of twelve in this game, essentially just with the

1:45:25.040 --> 1:45:26.960
<v Speaker 2>six offensive tackle in Pharaoh Brown.

1:45:27.280 --> 1:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I think that that's a big part

1:45:29.200 --> 1:45:32.479
<v Speaker 1>of this game. Like when you talk about one are

1:45:32.479 --> 1:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the scheme tweaks that they can make Max protect keep

1:45:37.160 --> 1:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody in right right, Like just seven guys in the

1:45:41.120 --> 1:45:43.479
<v Speaker 1>protection eight guys in the protection whatever you want to

1:45:43.520 --> 1:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>call that with the running back. Seven man protect, eight

1:45:47.000 --> 1:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>man protect, play action, two man route combinations not We

1:45:52.160 --> 1:45:54.559
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a little bit last year. A lot

1:45:54.560 --> 1:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of bit I should say, was Zappi right, Like, not

1:45:57.120 --> 1:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>only does it protect the quarterback, but it also so

1:46:00.240 --> 1:46:03.679
<v Speaker 1>simplifies the read for Mac. He's basically reading one route,

1:46:04.800 --> 1:46:08.599
<v Speaker 1>right so, and really more in reality, is really really

1:46:08.720 --> 1:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>reading one player and that's the deep safety. But the

1:46:11.200 --> 1:46:13.760
<v Speaker 1>deep safety plays the post. He's throwing the crosser. The

1:46:13.760 --> 1:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>deep safety jumps the crosser, he's throwing the post. Like

1:46:17.040 --> 1:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's It's really as simple as football gets for a quarterback.

1:46:21.040 --> 1:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So I I would really think that they are going

1:46:23.840 --> 1:46:25.439
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of that this week. Whether it's

1:46:25.720 --> 1:46:27.479
<v Speaker 1>true they haven't. I don't think they've run a single

1:46:27.479 --> 1:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>snap in true six O line yet. I don't think so,

1:46:30.280 --> 1:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's true six to oh line or it's you know,

1:46:34.080 --> 1:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve personnel and bowl tight end, stay in and block regardless,

1:46:38.320 --> 1:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be a part of this game plan

1:46:40.240 --> 1:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>moving forward.

1:46:40.840 --> 1:46:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I just think you have the perfect

1:46:42.800 --> 1:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to do it this week with how banged up

1:46:44.680 --> 1:46:45.280
<v Speaker 2>they are at receiver.

1:46:45.760 --> 1:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, uh, quickly key matchups. We kind of

1:46:49.840 --> 1:46:53.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this one already, Uh Varian Lover's Max Cross. Yeah,

1:46:53.560 --> 1:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought were already doing this. Sorry, that was one

1:46:55.680 --> 1:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of mine. Yeah yeah, it kind of is hian. I'm sorry,

1:46:59.200 --> 1:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't meant to laugh, but Vedarien Low against Max Crosby, Uh,

1:47:03.760 --> 1:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is as big of a mismatch as

1:47:06.360 --> 1:47:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Parsons was, Like, this is a gigantic epic mismatch.

1:47:12.439 --> 1:47:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:47:12.800 --> 1:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what the Patriots do other than

1:47:15.360 --> 1:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to throw waves of bodies at Max Crosby. Again,

1:47:18.200 --> 1:47:22.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve personnel Pharaoh Brown. Yeah, it's gotta be like Pharaoh

1:47:22.280 --> 1:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown double teams and if they're passing, then like the

1:47:24.960 --> 1:47:28.479
<v Speaker 1>back like goes over there to the to Crosby side too,

1:47:28.800 --> 1:47:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and like if he gets through the two guys on

1:47:30.520 --> 1:47:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the double team, then he's got to at least run

1:47:32.600 --> 1:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>over a speed bump on the way to the quarterback, right,

1:47:35.000 --> 1:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you just have to throw waves and waves and

1:47:37.720 --> 1:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>waves of bodies at Max Crosby. And uh I mentioned

1:47:41.080 --> 1:47:43.599
<v Speaker 1>this when they played Parsons, Like when you when it's

1:47:43.600 --> 1:47:46.320
<v Speaker 1>your turn to chip them, like like freaking like lay

1:47:46.320 --> 1:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>into him a little bit, right, like like actually hit him. Uh,

1:47:49.760 --> 1:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you gotta make him feel some of that, and you

1:47:52.200 --> 1:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>gotta maybe even most importantly, like gotta make him start

1:47:55.720 --> 1:47:58.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for it right, like I'm gonna get off the ball.

1:47:58.960 --> 1:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, is it coming? Is it not? Right? And

1:48:01.320 --> 1:48:04.439
<v Speaker 1>then that kind of that split second of indecisiveness that

1:48:04.439 --> 1:48:07.599
<v Speaker 1>buys you time too. Uh. So you gotta throw away

1:48:07.600 --> 1:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as at bodies at him. You can't leave Venderian low

1:48:09.800 --> 1:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>one on one against him at all, really, right in

1:48:13.439 --> 1:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>this game? This is a this is a tough one.

1:48:15.840 --> 1:48:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's my top one too. I mean they got

1:48:18.120 --> 1:48:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to figure out away again. I think it's fair with

1:48:19.760 --> 1:48:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Brown probably helps. I think shifting coverage to the right

1:48:22.560 --> 1:48:25.639
<v Speaker 2>probably helps, but or shifting sorry blocking, Yeah, but then

1:48:25.760 --> 1:48:28.840
<v Speaker 2>you need Trent Brown winning one on one. You need

1:48:28.880 --> 1:48:32.360
<v Speaker 2>whoever's at left guard winning on one that creates its

1:48:32.360 --> 1:48:33.479
<v Speaker 2>own issues within itself.

1:48:33.560 --> 1:48:36.599
<v Speaker 1>That's why I probably would expect Riley Reef to play

1:48:36.680 --> 1:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>left guard, because the left side is probably gonna be

1:48:39.920 --> 1:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one on one. Yeah, and so he's probably your best

1:48:43.800 --> 1:48:46.479
<v Speaker 1>bet leaving him one on one at this point, So

1:48:46.479 --> 1:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I could see that, all right. Uh, number two here,

1:48:49.000 --> 1:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked a ton about Jacoby main reason is

1:48:52.200 --> 1:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because like I don't want to be taking any victory

1:48:54.080 --> 1:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>laws because I was dead wrong about this, So I'm

1:48:55.920 --> 1:48:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna like rag on them as like everybody else

1:48:58.400 --> 1:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is about Jacoby and like really quickly like not pointing

1:49:01.400 --> 1:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fingers at anybody in particular. But if you're like doing

1:49:04.040 --> 1:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jacoby victory lap, like can we go back to

1:49:06.120 --> 1:49:08.599
<v Speaker 1>your tweets in March and your articles in March, like

1:49:08.640 --> 1:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>what were you saying about to move back then? Cause

1:49:11.160 --> 1:49:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going you know, and I'm trying not to,

1:49:14.240 --> 1:49:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not I was dead wrong about this too.

1:49:16.960 --> 1:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're gonna play revisionist history and now all

1:49:19.280 --> 1:49:21.479
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden fast forward to now and you're gonna

1:49:21.479 --> 1:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>write your articles of the Patriots really screwed this one up, like, well,

1:49:26.240 --> 1:49:29.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, did you two? You know, like you probably did.

1:49:30.920 --> 1:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby versus John Jones, I think is probably gonna be

1:49:33.439 --> 1:49:36.599
<v Speaker 1>the matchup most of the time. I would expect JC

1:49:36.760 --> 1:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to stay on the on the perimeter with with DeVante Adams,

1:49:42.240 --> 1:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this one's tough. I think John Jones will be fine

1:49:46.200 --> 1:49:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in coverage on Jacoby. Jacoby obviously is a great route runner,

1:49:50.760 --> 1:49:53.559
<v Speaker 1>good hands. We know Jacoby Uh. The one thing that

1:49:53.600 --> 1:49:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I would be worried about in this game one of

1:49:56.240 --> 1:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the odds Josh lets him throw a pass. I think

1:50:00.000 --> 1:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty high. Yeah, it depends on what the score

1:50:03.200 --> 1:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is like if it's a close game. I don't know

1:50:05.400 --> 1:50:07.240
<v Speaker 1>if McDaniels McDaniel's trick plays all the time.

1:50:07.560 --> 1:50:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, that's on the table whenever, that's on the

1:50:09.920 --> 1:50:12.519
<v Speaker 2>table whenever. I just it's gonna be just as an

1:50:12.520 --> 1:50:15.320
<v Speaker 2>observer of the game, it's gonna be fun to watch

1:50:15.400 --> 1:50:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Dacobe Myers and Jonathan Jones, two good players, two players

1:50:18.000 --> 1:50:21.360
<v Speaker 2>who know each other very well, going head to head.

1:50:21.720 --> 1:50:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that'll be enjoyable to watch. And this is

1:50:24.880 --> 1:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>a big game for Jakobe. You don't think there's a

1:50:26.880 --> 1:50:29.240
<v Speaker 2>little extra juice for him.

1:50:29.080 --> 1:50:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Your kid, yourself. I am interested to see what he's

1:50:32.479 --> 1:50:35.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna do me as well. It's gonna be interesting match up,

1:50:35.280 --> 1:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. Last one here, whether it's Colton Miller on

1:50:40.080 --> 1:50:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the left side, Miller will be there at left tackle.

1:50:42.560 --> 1:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Their right tackle situation. I think Illuminor has started over

1:50:45.840 --> 1:50:48.240
<v Speaker 1>there most of the time, but he's hurt and Munford's

1:50:48.280 --> 1:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the backup. I Either way, whoever's that right tackle because

1:50:52.000 --> 1:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Colton Miller is a pretty solid player. You can rush

1:50:55.040 --> 1:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on coldon Miller too, but Josh J Josh J has

1:50:59.240 --> 1:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta get out to the quarterback a little bit. Like

1:51:01.880 --> 1:51:05.439
<v Speaker 1>last week one Hurry really wasn't very impactful in that game.

1:51:05.520 --> 1:51:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Didn't play a ton, but wasn't very impactful. It needs

1:51:08.760 --> 1:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to be better than that. Without Judon, they need second

1:51:12.760 --> 1:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>half of last year josh Uja, Right, like, that's the

1:51:15.760 --> 1:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>player that they need to see. I know he's been

1:51:17.960 --> 1:51:21.240
<v Speaker 1>banged up and that could be a factor, but if

1:51:21.240 --> 1:51:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he plays a backup right tackle, even if he plays

1:51:23.360 --> 1:51:25.599
<v Speaker 1>a lumin or who I don't really think very highly of,

1:51:26.080 --> 1:51:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he should be able to win that matchup. And if

1:51:28.240 --> 1:51:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get any sort of pass rush going, it

1:51:30.720 --> 1:51:34.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to come through josh Uja. Yeah, I'd agree with that.

1:51:34.600 --> 1:51:36.639
<v Speaker 2>It's we've talked about this for a few weeks now

1:51:36.680 --> 1:51:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that with Matthew Judon out, we're gonna see, right, he

1:51:39.200 --> 1:51:42.639
<v Speaker 2>had that great end to the season last year and

1:51:43.080 --> 1:51:45.560
<v Speaker 2>was it hey he finally figured it out, or was

1:51:45.560 --> 1:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>it just teams were so over compensating for what Judan

1:51:48.920 --> 1:51:50.479
<v Speaker 2>was doing that he kind of got cut loose. Now

1:51:50.479 --> 1:51:51.840
<v Speaker 2>we can see what he does as a number one

1:51:51.840 --> 1:51:52.439
<v Speaker 2>pass rusher.

1:51:52.520 --> 1:51:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Yep, you got anything else?

1:51:53.640 --> 1:51:56.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bill versus Josh, Bill Belichick, Josh McDaniel's just that

1:51:56.640 --> 1:51:58.880
<v Speaker 2>element of it, and it goes to your thing about

1:51:58.880 --> 1:52:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the trick plays, and you know on both sides are

1:52:00.960 --> 1:52:04.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna have some special in store. I thought, Josh out

1:52:04.160 --> 1:52:06.679
<v Speaker 2>coach Bill last year. Josh's staff out coach Bill's staff

1:52:06.720 --> 1:52:10.160
<v Speaker 2>last year. And yeah, you know, it's a big spot

1:52:10.200 --> 1:52:12.240
<v Speaker 2>for Bill Belichick, Bigger than anybody. I would say, bigger

1:52:12.240 --> 1:52:14.320
<v Speaker 2>than Mac Jones, is a big spot for Bill Belichick.

1:52:14.520 --> 1:52:16.280
<v Speaker 2>We said last week was a big spot coming off

1:52:16.280 --> 1:52:18.479
<v Speaker 2>the worst loss of his career. He did not respond.

1:52:18.800 --> 1:52:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Does he respond this week?

1:52:20.280 --> 1:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a it's an interesting matchup. I actually have

1:52:23.120 --> 1:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, I love Josh. Yeah, and I've

1:52:25.160 --> 1:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>actually enjoyed watching the evolution of his offense in Vegas. Uh,

1:52:30.439 --> 1:52:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot to get a lot watch a

1:52:32.360 --> 1:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of Vegas because they've played him twice. And you know,

1:52:35.320 --> 1:52:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing is with him, we've all I've kind of

1:52:38.240 --> 1:52:42.519
<v Speaker 1>always believed that McDaniels does McDaniels and the players. It's

1:52:42.520 --> 1:52:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on the players to adapt and fit the system. And

1:52:46.360 --> 1:52:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's been pretty true in Vegas at quarterback, right,

1:52:49.280 --> 1:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>which I think a big reason why Derek Carr is

1:52:51.120 --> 1:52:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not there anymore.

1:52:52.240 --> 1:52:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1:52:52.560 --> 1:52:55.679
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of yeah, but in terms of how

1:52:56.000 --> 1:52:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he's used the personnel, I think it has evolved quite

1:52:58.800 --> 1:53:00.559
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Like because he didn't have a Divite Adams

1:53:00.600 --> 1:53:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in New England, right, so to find ways to get

1:53:02.920 --> 1:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Devanta Adams open, You're not going to run Devanta Adams

1:53:05.840 --> 1:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>like he used Julian Edelman, right, Like, that just doesn't

1:53:07.920 --> 1:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. So I think that they have adapted

1:53:11.240 --> 1:53:13.280
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit in terms of how they attack down

1:53:13.320 --> 1:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the field. And they're still middle of the field offense.

1:53:16.160 --> 1:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>There's still a gap run team. There's a little bit

1:53:18.840 --> 1:53:21.559
<v Speaker 1>more Shanahan in there now because of Jimmy I think,

1:53:21.680 --> 1:53:24.639
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit more bootlegs and things like that,

1:53:25.160 --> 1:53:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and like just a little little less full back. Not

1:53:29.560 --> 1:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like they haven't ditched it, right, Yaka Johnson's still out there. Yeah,

1:53:33.400 --> 1:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen percent last year they were at twenty one percent,

1:53:36.120 --> 1:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's not a huge difference this year. Yeah, And

1:53:38.920 --> 1:53:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I you know, but against the Packers, that stood out

1:53:41.479 --> 1:53:43.599
<v Speaker 1>to me a little bit was that Yaka Johnson snaps

1:53:43.600 --> 1:53:46.439
<v Speaker 1>were really just like short yardage in red zone when

1:53:46.439 --> 1:53:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they were in between the twenties, they ran a lot

1:53:48.760 --> 1:53:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of twelve and they have they have Mayor obviously a

1:53:52.760 --> 1:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end, and they have a Hooper too, So they

1:53:55.120 --> 1:53:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have two tight ends that I think are are capable,

1:53:58.200 --> 1:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and they they've ran it a little bit differently, not

1:54:01.080 --> 1:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton differently, but a little bit differently just because

1:54:04.240 --> 1:54:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of the personnel. So he's adjusted. They're trying to get

1:54:07.240 --> 1:54:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the run game going, just like the Patriots. Josh Jacobs

1:54:09.680 --> 1:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has not been as good. No, and that's I think

1:54:11.960 --> 1:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a big reason why too, whether they've changed some of

1:54:14.360 --> 1:54:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the blocking schemes and some of the things up front.

1:54:16.800 --> 1:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's the Raiders. I mean the Raiders. This is

1:54:19.320 --> 1:54:23.559
<v Speaker 1>an interesting game. It's the Raiders are the Raiders. The

1:54:23.560 --> 1:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are gonna know them well, they're gonna know Josh well,

1:54:26.439 --> 1:54:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna know Patrick Graham, the defensive coordinator. Well, this

1:54:30.160 --> 1:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>comes down to to me, again not to be a

1:54:32.480 --> 1:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>broken record, but this comes down to effort, Like this

1:54:34.600 --> 1:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>comes down to want to do the Patriots want to

1:54:37.000 --> 1:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>play hard? Do they want to be there? Do they

1:54:38.560 --> 1:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get a win? And the Raiders coming off

1:54:41.160 --> 1:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that Packers with you know, they're still in it. I

1:54:43.440 --> 1:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think what they're two or three? You know, they're still

1:54:45.680 --> 1:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in it. The Patriots maybe not. Yeah, that's a thing.

1:54:49.640 --> 1:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what we got. All right. On that note, we're

1:54:52.560 --> 1:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap it up and Alex and I will be

1:54:55.040 --> 1:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>back next week to preview the Buffalo Bills and the Bills.

1:54:59.520 --> 1:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Are the Dolphins Bills? Is it Bills Bills? First? The

1:55:03.080 --> 1:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. Recap this game against the Raiders. Let's just

1:55:07.520 --> 1:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>hope the Patriots. Is it fair to say competitive against

1:55:11.480 --> 1:55:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bills? Is like a win in this situation. Let's

1:55:13.760 --> 1:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>see what happens this week. Yeah, let's see what happens

1:55:16.120 --> 1:55:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. Oh boy. All right, we'll see you guys

1:55:17.920 --> 1:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>next week. Thanks, thanks for listening. Thank you for downloading

1:55:22.600 --> 1:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Subscribe on Apple, google Play, and everywhere else

1:55:26.360 --> 1:55:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you listen. Like the show, Please rate and review us.

1:55:29.560 --> 1:55:32.120
<v Speaker 8>Listener comments and ratings help keep us high in the

1:55:32.120 --> 1:55:35.440
<v Speaker 8>podcast rankings so new listeners can find us. Be sure

1:55:35.480 --> 1:55:39.480
<v Speaker 8>to check Patriots dot com for more news and more podcasts.