Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Buck at
Speaker 1: bucksexton dot com. Perhaps the Biden team was never serious
Speaker 1: about calls for unity, because they certainly didn't last very long,
Speaker 1: did they. As the nation prepares for the January twentieth
Speaker 1: peaceful transfer of power, there's an air of menace hanging
Speaker 1: over our nation's capital. Instead of pomp and circumstance, DC
Speaker 1: is bristling with barbed wire and HESCO barriers and thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands of National Guard deployed. What's going on here?
Speaker 1: It's hard to think that national healing is the Biden
Speaker 1: Harris objective while their underlings transform the streets of DC
Speaker 1: into a fortress on lockdown. You've no doubt heard the
Speaker 1: media outlets talking about how there will be more National
Speaker 1: Guard deployed in DC than in and Afghanistan, two theaters
Speaker 1: of war combined. They will share this continuously until the
Speaker 1: moment Biden is sworn in, and then well afterwards, because
Speaker 1: the whole purpose here is to heighten the public's anxiety
Speaker 1: of the perceived risk of another insurrection. Oh what was
Speaker 1: that insurrection the first time around? You might ask, You
Speaker 1: mean the one that involved a mostly peaceful protest that
Speaker 1: then did have a section of it devolved into a
Speaker 1: riot and one police officer was killed, one protester was
Speaker 1: killed by direct action of law enforcement, and also of participants,
Speaker 1: depending on which one we're talking about. And they were
Speaker 1: trying to do what exactly. The belief is that they
Speaker 1: were going to overthrow the government. That QAnon Shaman or
Speaker 1: whatever walking around in a furry hat with a spear
Speaker 1: was really going to seize control of the Congress. I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody, including that guy, believe that's what was
Speaker 1: going to happen. But you see, the theatrics that are
Speaker 1: underway in DC are meant to exceed the actual threat.
Speaker 1: We've talked about the Capitol Hill ride on January sixth.
Speaker 1: It was lawless, it was awful, it was stupid, and
Speaker 1: anyone who broke the law should be held to account,
Speaker 1: but there was no real effort to overthrow the government
Speaker 1: by force. Calling that an insurrection is an exaggeration, and
Speaker 1: it's an intentional one. It's one with real consequences. The
Speaker 1: unprecedented martial preparations for this inauguration are meant to look
Speaker 1: as though they're preparing for a foreign military to invade
Speaker 1: our nation's capital at any minute. What's the real threat here?
Speaker 1: Internet chatter? Do you remember how we were told constantly
Speaker 1: during the Obama administration about how there were an unprecedented
Speaker 1: number of threats online against President Obama? And then you
Speaker 1: also recall that there are people who somehow lost their
Speaker 1: jobs for mere criticism of Obama or for crossing the
Speaker 1: press when it came to Obama. Because they create a
Speaker 1: climate of fear in which everyone gets treated as though
Speaker 1: they're insurrectionists, as though they're far radical extremists, that's why
Speaker 1: they exaggerate all of this all along. They expand out
Speaker 1: the net. They want to capture everyone. Whether you're reasonable
Speaker 1: or not, you get lumped in with the crazies. Right,
Speaker 1: and speech equals violence, you see, so your words have
Speaker 1: to be suppressed. It's not enough merely to say we
Speaker 1: can have political differences. You are no longer in this
Speaker 1: country allowed to say what you think happened in the election.
Speaker 1: They're saying, including the Lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, for example,
Speaker 1: that that is not protected speech. Now, what's the formulation
Speaker 1: they use for that? Well, if people can say that
Speaker 1: they think the election was stolen, then people will act
Speaker 1: on that. They'll be violent because of that, and so
Speaker 1: we have to stop it. You see, this is what
Speaker 1: they do. If people can say that they thought that
Speaker 1: Barack Obama was a socialist and a bad president, a leftist,
Speaker 1: then there'll be other people who decide to act on
Speaker 1: that and write in threats, and the Secret Service then
Speaker 1: has to investigate it. They lump it all together. They
Speaker 1: treat it like it's the same. What an effective mechanism
Speaker 1: of control? They're trying to show us right now what
Speaker 1: the next four years are going to look like. That's
Speaker 1: why there are photos of National Guard troops sleeping on
Speaker 1: the marble floors of the Capitol Building. That's meant to
Speaker 1: get all of this attention. Very few people have asked,
Speaker 1: are these measures even necessary? Don't they have sleeping pads
Speaker 1: and sleeping bags, and why are they on the cold
Speaker 1: marble floor of the Capitol building. Doesn't that seem excessive?
Speaker 1: But the implication, and it's clear, the Democrats want America
Speaker 1: to c DC as a city under siege, and that
Speaker 1: means that you have to ask the next question, who
Speaker 1: is it under siege? From Trump voters? Those are the
Speaker 1: optics right now? That's what they want people to think
Speaker 1: and believe about our nation's capital. They are setting up
Speaker 1: a show of force commensurate with their overblown fears of
Speaker 1: this recent right wing coup attempt from Trump voters. They've
Speaker 1: convinced a large number of Democrats that these extreme measures
Speaker 1: are necessary because unless they were to deploy twenty six
Speaker 1: twenty seven thousand National Guard plus all the Secret Service
Speaker 1: and FBI, unless they deploy all of them, another right
Speaker 1: wing faction will attempt a second overthrow of the United
Speaker 1: States government. Hold on a second. There wasn't a first
Speaker 1: attempt at an overthrow of the government. There was a riot.
Speaker 1: There was a protest that got out of control and
Speaker 1: turned into in part, a riot in the United States
Speaker 1: capital that did not last very long, was put down,
Speaker 1: and for which people are being punished, in some cases
Speaker 1: punished severely. Keep in mind, while all this is happening,
Speaker 1: that there's actually no there's no intelligence or proof that
Speaker 1: such a plot against our government is imminent. There might
Speaker 1: be some online chatter from people who are upset about
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election outcome. They're venting, they're trying to
Speaker 1: get attention from their buddies, but that's not a serious
Speaker 1: or credible threat. And there are threats all the time.
Speaker 1: People who work in media get threats. I get threats.
Speaker 1: What do you do about this? You go on with life.
Speaker 1: Unless it's credible and actionable, you can't worry about it.
Speaker 1: And yet what we see here is the elevation of
Speaker 1: bits of Internet chatter to being an imminent threat to
Speaker 1: our very system of government. That's what they want America
Speaker 1: to think in DC right now. And let's not forget
Speaker 1: the four years of Russia collusion lunacy, since we're talking
Speaker 1: about conspiracy theories here that was mainstream among elected Democrats
Speaker 1: and their corporate media lackeys, completely mainstream Russia collusion. You
Speaker 1: said it, you got more clicks, more viewers. There was
Speaker 1: never any punishment for this. There was never any backlash
Speaker 1: against it from the system, from the elites, from the apparatus. Look,
Speaker 1: let's be very clear, from a purely security based standpoint,
Speaker 1: the military preparations this week in DC are an overreaction.
Speaker 1: DC is the most heavily police and patrolled city in America.
Speaker 1: Even during normal times. Just try to cross the street
Speaker 1: and jaywalk near a Capitol police officer under under normal
Speaker 1: circumstances and you'll see the ferocity with which even the
Speaker 1: most mundane and trivial rules are enforced in and around
Speaker 1: ouration's capital. And it's understandable that there's some concern. There's
Speaker 1: understandable that crowd control should be taken into account. Let's
Speaker 1: also remember that in twenty sixteen, Antifa was running riot
Speaker 1: through the streets of DC and there were no major
Speaker 1: charges brought against them. They lit a limousine on fire
Speaker 1: in our nation's capital in broad daylight on Inauguration Day,
Speaker 1: and we're screaming, not my president. But that was just fine.
Speaker 1: There was no real worry about that. According to the Democrats,
Speaker 1: that was a mostly peaceful protest. Every American should feel like,
Speaker 1: on a process level, the continuation of our political tradition
Speaker 1: of the peaceful transfer of power is important and should
Speaker 1: be supported, and it almost will be a peaceful, orderly event.
Speaker 1: Whatever Trump voters think of the integrity of the last
Speaker 1: election the policies of the incoming administration, there should be
Speaker 1: an understanding that this is how it goes right. And
Speaker 1: I know our politics are messy. I know people are
Speaker 1: angry right now, but we have ways to deal with that.
Speaker 1: But what the Democrat Party is doing right now is
Speaker 1: intentionally making the inauguration seem like it's occurring under a
Speaker 1: state of actual siege of our capital, as though this
Speaker 1: is eighteen twelve and the British are on the way
Speaker 1: to burn down the White House. This is nuts, and
Speaker 1: we know who they blame for this. This is being
Speaker 1: done for political leverage and almost certainly is going to
Speaker 1: be the justification for more aggressive surveillance, not against actual
Speaker 1: extremists or people who are planning violence, but against people
Speaker 1: with pro Trump anti Democrat views. You see, this is
Speaker 1: part of the playbook. The Democrats are all posing as
Speaker 1: aggrieved victims, now terrified their very existence, so that they
Speaker 1: can make real victims of their political opponents later on. This, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: is likely to work, which means it's a troubling time
Speaker 1: for the country. The people claiming to be the oppressed,
Speaker 1: the people claiming to be the ones that aren't allowed
Speaker 1: to share their politics publicly without fear, are the ones
Speaker 1: who are actually doing the purges. They're the ones who
Speaker 1: are actually shutting down news sites, shutting down social media apps,
Speaker 1: and calling for boycotts and the surveillance state to expand
Speaker 1: to keep an eye on their political opponents. That's what's
Speaker 1: happening right now. We can all see it. And that's
Speaker 1: why even the pretense of calls for unity from the
Speaker 1: Biden Harris Camp ring hollow. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Absolutely
Speaker 1: and it's so easily debunked. It's simply false that thousands
Speaker 1: of dead people voted. It is false that there were
Speaker 1: thousands of ballot signature signatures that were fake. It's also
Speaker 1: false that dominion voting machines switched thousands of votes. None
Speaker 1: of this is true. And all Republican leaders have to
Speaker 1: do is to say that the election was not stolen.
Speaker 1: And if they do that, then they can calm down tension.
Speaker 1: All you have to do is submit. Congressman Ted Loose says,
Speaker 1: all if it was bending the knee, say everything you
Speaker 1: said was wrong, and then we can have unity until
Speaker 1: we need you to bend the knee again and admit
Speaker 1: that you're wrong on something else. Why isn't that working better?
Speaker 1: I don't understand. Why. Why isn't it really bringing everybody together? Gee,
Speaker 1: I don't know, Ted. Maybe some people still have questions
Speaker 1: and they don't trust Democrats who lied about the last election.
Speaker 1: For four years and still due to this day. All right,
Speaker 1: they still continue with this nonsense. But it's something that
Speaker 1: the left wants to hear. They want to believe. The
Speaker 1: Democrats want to believe that they have extended a hand
Speaker 1: to the other side and we're the ones who are
Speaker 1: slapping it away. The Democrats want to believe that it
Speaker 1: is conservatives who are being unreasonable in this whole process
Speaker 1: and are adding fuel to the fire of our political discontent,
Speaker 1: and the Democrats are just being great, open minded, patriotic Americans,
Speaker 1: who you know, come on, we see what's really happening.
Speaker 1: They're putting people on TV night after night, day after
Speaker 1: day who are saying that Trump terrorists are more dangerous
Speaker 1: than al Qaeda. We played that audio for you yesterday.
Speaker 1: They're actually saying this stuff, that we should increase the
Speaker 1: surveillance state to look at Trump voters, and that we
Speaker 1: should scan the National Guard, we should vet National Guard
Speaker 1: members for Trumpian sympathies. I'm not exaggerating. Here. You go, MSNBC,
Speaker 1: some guy who used to be a senior FBI official.
Speaker 1: If that's not terrifying enough, Figliutsi here he has played
Speaker 1: thirteen It's more and more evidence develops, Andrea that there
Speaker 1: were active and former military and police within that insurrectionist crowd.
Speaker 1: I think this is a very valid precautionary measure, but
Speaker 1: I want to also caution that this not be some
Speaker 1: false sense of security. Well, everyone has been checked out
Speaker 1: by the FBI. Let's understand something, and we learned it
Speaker 1: painfully during the insurrection. Though. Signs of radicalization really are
Speaker 1: not that someone has a criminal record or that someone
Speaker 1: is on a terrorist watch list, but rather that they
Speaker 1: have online postings that indicate radicalization and an intention for violence.
Speaker 1: The FBI doesn't have those kinds of resources, nor do
Speaker 1: they have a time the timeframe in this race against
Speaker 1: the clock to check out twenty five thousand people's social
Speaker 1: media postings, nor may they even have the legal authority
Speaker 1: to do so. That's my concern. I just want to
Speaker 1: point out that this has been widely reported. I should
Speaker 1: say this should have been widely reported. It has been reported,
Speaker 1: but not nearly enough. Hashtag kill Mike Pence was trending
Speaker 1: for a while on Twitter recently. Okay, that was a
Speaker 1: hashtag on Twitter, And I just want to do do
Speaker 1: you think the FBI is going to track down all
Speaker 1: those people? Do you think they're all gonna all gonna
Speaker 1: face prosecution for a threat against a federal official and
Speaker 1: interstate commerce. No they are not. Oh wow, it's almost
Speaker 1: like there's a huge double standard here. Political violence is
Speaker 1: something the left excelled in through all of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: But there was one incident that they can attribute to
Speaker 1: the right at the Capitol Building after the election in
Speaker 1: the beginning of twenty twenty one. And we're supposed to
Speaker 1: forget who was burning down buildings all summer. We're supposed
Speaker 1: to forget who was rioting attacking police. Attacking a federal
Speaker 1: courthouse is also an attack on our system. For example. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know it's not the Capitol Building, but it's also,
Speaker 1: you know, not an outhouse in the middle of a
Speaker 1: field somewhere that no one cares about. It's a federal building.
Speaker 1: They try to light it on fire in Portland, but
Speaker 1: you don't you don't see any effort to Oh no,
Speaker 1: antifas just an idea. They say, it's not even a movement,
Speaker 1: it's not even a real thing. They're not scanning people
Speaker 1: social media enough. What'll what'll get you, what'll get you
Speaker 1: tossed off social media? What'll get you in trouble these days.
Speaker 1: You already know you can't say the election was stolen,
Speaker 1: which is that that is First Amendment protected speech, But
Speaker 1: you can't say it. If you do, they'll take action
Speaker 1: against you. And how far a leap is it from
Speaker 1: you are now kicked off social media to you are
Speaker 1: now on the radar. I just have to remind you
Speaker 1: of this. They used informants, they used agents, you know,
Speaker 1: people acting on behalf of the government to go after
Speaker 1: George Papadopoulos, and they use FISA warrants on carter page.
Speaker 1: What was that all about? Trying to get after Trump
Speaker 1: and go after Trump people? But those are completely absurd,
Speaker 1: fabricated cases, you don't think. And they paid no real
Speaker 1: penalty for this. A few people the FBI lost their
Speaker 1: jobs or their pensions. Nobody went to prison. Andy McCabe,
Speaker 1: former acting FBI director, lied about it. No real consequences
Speaker 1: for him. So what's the message. What's the lesson? More importantly,
Speaker 1: what's the lesson that we take from this? They can
Speaker 1: get away with stuff like this, but now they're they're
Speaker 1: bringing pressure, they're mobilizing all across society for the suppression
Speaker 1: of what you could say is Trumpist ideas. Okay, they're
Speaker 1: they're trying to destroy Trumpist ideas, not even just repudiate
Speaker 1: Trump the man. And so what are you even allowed
Speaker 1: to say online? Are you allowed to say that the
Speaker 1: Russia illusion investigation was a hoax? I'm saying it, But
Speaker 1: is that now? Is that? Do independent fact checkers disagree
Speaker 1: with me? They're gonna shut that down too. They're going
Speaker 1: to rewrite the history. In fact, they're even telling us
Speaker 1: they plan to rewrite our history. Play sixteen. They will
Speaker 1: not write their history. We will write their history, and
Speaker 1: their shame will last forever. They are carved like they
Speaker 1: are carved, like etching into granite, granit onto history's list
Speaker 1: of villains in this country. Mark Meadows, Lindsey Graham, Kevin McCarthy,
Speaker 1: Josh Holly, Ted Cruz, Looe Brooks, and two many match it.
Speaker 1: There will be no forgetting. There will be no forgiveness.
Speaker 1: We do not seek retribution, but we do seek accountability
Speaker 1: and justice for an assaultant attack on the government of
Speaker 1: the United States of America. They killed six people and
Speaker 1: for the first time in the history of our country.
Speaker 1: From one hundred and fifty years after the end of
Speaker 1: the Civil War or the Confederate flag at long last
Speaker 1: reached United States Capital. It was created through the Roads Fund.
Speaker 1: Up as this, a liberal fascistic mob desecrated the floors
Speaker 1: of the House of Representatives into sent They don't get
Speaker 1: to rewrite what happened. I want to be very clear.
Speaker 1: They do seek retribution. Don't forget that you're listening to
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast on the iHeart radio app or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Historically, we will find out who he's
Speaker 1: beholden to, who pulls his strings. I would love to
Speaker 1: see his phone records to see whether he was talking
Speaker 1: to putin the day that the insurgents invaded our capital.
Speaker 1: But we now know that not just him, but his enablers,
Speaker 1: his accomplices, his cult members have the same disregard for democracy.
Speaker 1: Do you think we need a nine to eleven type
Speaker 1: commission to investigate and court everything that they can pull
Speaker 1: together and explain what happened? I do. Let me again
Speaker 1: to your point of who is he beholden to? As
Speaker 1: I've said over and over, as I said to him
Speaker 1: in that picture with my blue suit, right as I
Speaker 1: was leaving, what I was saying to him as I
Speaker 1: was pointing rudely at him, with you, mister President, all
Speaker 1: roads lead to Putin. I don't know what Putin has
Speaker 1: on him politically, financially, or personally, but what happened last
Speaker 1: week was a gift to Putin because Puttin wants to
Speaker 1: undermine democracy in our country and throughout the world. And
Speaker 1: these people, unbeknownst to them, maybe are Putin puppets. They
Speaker 1: were doing Putin's business when they did that at the
Speaker 1: incitement of an insurrection by the President of the United States.
Speaker 1: So yes, we should have a nine to eleven commission,
Speaker 1: and there is strong support in the Congress to do that.
Speaker 1: You need to hear this because this is what is
Speaker 1: going to happen, That's all. And Nancy Pelosi podcast it
Speaker 1: commissioned chardonay, Nancy strikes again. She's sitting there with Hillary
Speaker 1: and they're having this chit chat about Putin, Putin's role
Speaker 1: in this. She says she wants to pull the president's
Speaker 1: phone records. You heard it. Let's pull the president's phone
Speaker 1: records to see if he's talking to Putin on the
Speaker 1: day of what happened at Capitol Hill. These people are insane.
Speaker 1: This has nothing to do with Putin or Russia nothing.
Speaker 1: And yeah, you could always make the case that any
Speaker 1: day that's a bad day for America, any day of
Speaker 1: riots or lawlessness. And we know this is true. China
Speaker 1: also benefits from that. Any country that is an adversary
Speaker 1: of the United States likes to see unrest, destabilization, dissension,
Speaker 1: you know, at the deepest levels divisiveness. Yeah, they benefit
Speaker 1: from that. But that's not unique to the situation at all.
Speaker 1: On behalf of really chewan On Shaman or whatever running
Speaker 1: around there with the furry had on, he was doing
Speaker 1: this on behalf of Putin. Unbeknownst to him though. Look,
Speaker 1: this is one of the reasons that I was so
Speaker 1: and I know people the initial reaction was, but buck,
Speaker 1: people are so upset, they're so angry, And I said,
Speaker 1: I know, but this is you know, it's it's like
Speaker 1: the boss in all the movies, you know, this was
Speaker 1: really you saw this a lot in nineties movies, nineties
Speaker 1: action movies. There's this you know, smug jerk of a boss.
Speaker 1: And this is often true in like the cop movies,
Speaker 1: and you know, the rogue police officer who's trying to
Speaker 1: get the job done. And what he really wants is
Speaker 1: to get up in the in the in the hero's
Speaker 1: face and and just antagonize him and be so you know,
Speaker 1: unfair to him that he finally just you know, pops
Speaker 1: him one in the face, punches him right in the jaw.
Speaker 1: And as much as that may feel like it's a
Speaker 1: reaction that's been building up over time, guess what. And
Speaker 1: it's hand in your badge and your gun. You know,
Speaker 1: now your job's in jeopardy and this smug bureaucrat gets
Speaker 1: what he wants. I knew that this Capitol Hill riot
Speaker 1: was going to be used to the maximum by the Democrats.
Speaker 1: The moment that it started happening, I said, oh my god,
Speaker 1: what is going on here? First of all, that it
Speaker 1: was just it was just upsetting. It should not have
Speaker 1: happened on any level as an American. But beyond that,
Speaker 1: I said, they're what, they're going to take something that's
Speaker 1: you know, on the scale of let's say, on the
Speaker 1: scale of insurrection. One being a person standing on a
Speaker 1: street corner with a sign that says, you know, overthrow
Speaker 1: America by himself, and ten being you know, battalion level
Speaker 1: armed insurgency guys with machine guns and heavy weapons, making
Speaker 1: a move to secure government build things and opening fire. Right,
Speaker 1: that's a ten. That's a straight up coup. You know,
Speaker 1: this was like a I don't know, a four or
Speaker 1: five maybe, and they're treating it like it was a nine.
Speaker 1: That's the point. They're treating it like it went far beyond,
Speaker 1: like this was we just barely maintained control of the capital.
Speaker 1: They're grossly exaggerated, but I knew they would because there's
Speaker 1: political benefit in it for them. And some of you saying, buckets,
Speaker 1: it's a two or three. You know, you understand what
Speaker 1: I'm saying that they've taken this and made it a
Speaker 1: they they've treated it like this was a Trump backed
Speaker 1: full on they're calling it an insurrection. I mean, you
Speaker 1: know what that means. I mean, there's a reason we
Speaker 1: have something called the Insurrection Act. It's to put down
Speaker 1: armed rebellions within our own borders. That's what they The
Speaker 1: history that Democrats are writing right now is they they
Speaker 1: just avoided thousands of people on the Capitol on capital
Speaker 1: grounds that they've said kidnapping and even executing members of Congress,
Speaker 1: you know, opening fire and seizing the Capitol building and
Speaker 1: creating a military confrontation. They're treating it like it's that's
Speaker 1: what happened. That is not what happened. Okay, it was
Speaker 1: a riot. It was people being stupid. They got rowdy,
Speaker 1: and some people got hurt, some people got killed. Shouldn't
Speaker 1: have happened. But this is not an open coup effort
Speaker 1: against the United States government. But because they're setting that
Speaker 1: narrative in place, the Democrats are solidifying that narrative right
Speaker 1: now as they're also taking power of the government. Their
Speaker 1: reaction to this, and this is what I'm trying to
Speaker 1: tell you, this is what I'm trying to warn you of.
Speaker 1: Their reaction, as unfair as it is, as wrong as
Speaker 1: it is, is going to be based upon treating this
Speaker 1: as an actual armed insurrection against the United States government.
Speaker 1: Do you see, Yes, we're going to argue against us
Speaker 1: and try to convince as many of our fellow Americans
Speaker 1: as possible. Come on, guys, it wasn't what they're saying
Speaker 1: it is. It was a riot, it was wrong, but
Speaker 1: it wasn't a real concerted effort called on by the
Speaker 1: actual president the United States to overthrow the government. But
Speaker 1: all the all the pieces they're putting in place right
Speaker 1: Now all the things that they're talking about, expansion of
Speaker 1: surveillance of their political opponents, changing laws and statutes to
Speaker 1: focus more on right wing extremism. It's geared toward that.
Speaker 1: They've now created a narrative and they're going to execut
Speaker 1: Look what they were able to do with Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: It was a fabrication. It was all based on some
Speaker 1: guy collecting rumors from people that were Russian disinformation, Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: and they used this to go to They took this
Speaker 1: to the top of the FBI. They had the FBI director,
Speaker 1: they had other people, they had the CIA director all
Speaker 1: spun up, all freaked out about Russia using Trump as
Speaker 1: a pawn and there was there must be deeper ties.
Speaker 1: You just heard Hillary and Pelosi. Clinton and Pelosi talking
Speaker 1: about this on a podcast. I can't believe Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: as a podcast. What's a listen to Hillary Clinton? Good God,
Speaker 1: But they're still going with this, this whole Putent's puppet thing.
Speaker 1: It was never true, it doesn't exist, it's not real.
Speaker 1: But look what they were able to do with that.
Speaker 1: Now they have something, make no mistake about it. This
Speaker 1: gives them an opening. This gives them an opportunity to
Speaker 1: push for the most tyrannical suppression of conservative speech, ideas
Speaker 1: and ideology in my lifetime. That's what we're going into
Speaker 1: right now. That is the storm that we are steering
Speaker 1: right into the center of. And people still, I think,
Speaker 1: are stuck in a state of disbelief. They can't imagine
Speaker 1: that their fellow Democrats would really do that, or or
Speaker 1: perhaps they can imagine it, but they think that Trump
Speaker 1: has a plan and Trump is going to swoop in
Speaker 1: and save us. No, we have to take what Trump represented,
Speaker 1: and we have to be the ones. We have to
Speaker 1: be the Americans who represent those ideas and that style
Speaker 1: of pushing back against the establishment, the swamp, and the elites.
Speaker 1: It's now on all of us, you know Trump. You know,
Speaker 1: in ancient times, sometimes they would send forward a champion.
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen the movie the movie Troy with
Speaker 1: you know, Brad Pain and a bunch of other famous actors.
Speaker 1: This was practice sometimes where you would send forward a
Speaker 1: champion and whoever won the battle would then the other
Speaker 1: the other army would submit right and depending on whichever
Speaker 1: side won that one v one battle. You know, I
Speaker 1: understand for a lot of people, Trump was the champion
Speaker 1: sent out before the conservative and I'm speaking metaphorically here,
Speaker 1: of course, the conservative army, so to speak. And he
Speaker 1: was vanquishing foes left and right, and that was the perception.
Speaker 1: And I'm here to tell you that Trump is no
Speaker 1: longer in that position. We don't we don't have one
Speaker 1: person standing in the front of the rest of the movement.
Speaker 1: Who is blazing the trail, who is pushing back and
Speaker 1: who and who is invincible. We had a sense that
Speaker 1: Trump was invincible. I understand politically they could not stop him,
Speaker 1: and now they just did. And we can talk about
Speaker 1: the election and integrity and what and the media and
Speaker 1: the suppression of the Hunter Biden story and the suppression
Speaker 1: of the truth about COVID lockdowns, all these different things,
Speaker 1: and we will, but we also need to take stock
Speaker 1: of where we are right now. Who's standing for conservative
Speaker 1: values ideas constitutionalism in this country? Right now? You are.
Speaker 1: It's up to all of us. There is no hero,
Speaker 1: there is no champion, and right now, who is the
Speaker 1: great defender of any of this? Perhaps one will emerge,
Speaker 1: but in the meantime, it's on you, it's on me,
Speaker 1: and it requires us to understand exactly what we face
Speaker 1: from the opposition because they are mobilizing to use the
Speaker 1: apparatus of the state to use the media's bitterness about
Speaker 1: Trump for four years. You understand, they don't just want
Speaker 1: dominance in the ratings back. They don't just want the
Speaker 1: ability to be the narrative creators. They want payback. They
Speaker 1: want to go after people that they think stole their
Speaker 1: glory from them for years. Here that's what's happening. This
Speaker 1: is why all the deep platform and everything else that's
Speaker 1: going on is something we must pay attention to. And
Speaker 1: of course while they do all this, there are still
Speaker 1: some who are pretending that, yeah, Democrats are calling for unity.
Speaker 1: I will say this, if you submit, you will be
Speaker 1: unified in a sense. You'll just give up who you
Speaker 1: are as part of that unity. That's the choice they offer. You.
Speaker 1: Just admit that everything you believed in was wrong. Every
Speaker 1: vote that you cast for the last four years, or
Speaker 1: every idea that you shared that was in any way
Speaker 1: echoed by or perhaps you were echoing Trump, Trump's ideas.
Speaker 1: Anything you did with that you have to pay penance
Speaker 1: for that. Now you have to repudiate it. You were
Speaker 1: totally wrong. Bend the knee, beg forgiveness, and they're hoping
Speaker 1: you don't figure out that they still want to destroy
Speaker 1: you even after you do all that. But maybe they'll
Speaker 1: let you think you've got unity for a day or two.
Speaker 1: But they still want to make you give up that
Speaker 1: part of yourself, abandon those ideas, admit you were wrong
Speaker 1: and you were less than for thinking what you did.
Speaker 1: That's that's the unity the left is calling for right now.
Speaker 1: So you do have a choice. I have a choice.
Speaker 1: We all do. I could turn right now on the
Speaker 1: whole Trump movement. Oh my gosh, become one of these
Speaker 1: celebrated former conservatives. You know, I'd spend six months. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'd get a book deal. I'd spend six months going
Speaker 1: on MSNBC and CNN. That, oh, buck, all of us.
Speaker 1: What made you come to realize that everything Trump ever
Speaker 1: said or stood for was awful and evil and wrong?
Speaker 1: You know, tell us more about this. Liberals at home
Speaker 1: saying he's still disgusting and I hate him, but this
Speaker 1: sex and guy at least woke up the Trump Now,
Speaker 1: I say no, I don't don't. I don't back off
Speaker 1: the ideas. I don't back off what the movement stood
Speaker 1: for one bit. I just have never put that much
Speaker 1: stock or faith in any one man or any one
Speaker 1: persons as the embodiment of a political movement. This is
Speaker 1: a movement. It is not a cult, and the movement
Speaker 1: continues on. That's where our focus has to be. Now,
Speaker 1: what are the ideas that really mattered? What can we
Speaker 1: do to support them today? Because the other option is submit,
Speaker 1: bend the knee, you know, and if you want tell
Speaker 1: all your liberal friends about how you've you've totally changed
Speaker 1: your outlook here and they'll patch you on the head
Speaker 1: for a day or two, and then a week later
Speaker 1: they'll still think that you're some some rube, some easily
Speaker 1: fooled buffoon who fell, who fell for the Trump spell.
Speaker 1: I say, no, bring it. We're not done yet. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversations and
Speaker 1: message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com. He may read it on the show. And
Speaker 1: so I just want Senator Schumer to understand that he
Speaker 1: is the right person at this time for this moment
Speaker 1: to deliver the relief that hopefully President Lex Biden and
Speaker 1: Vice President Lex Harris will bring forward with the support
Speaker 1: of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer so that we can
Speaker 1: heal this country, and he is well poised to do
Speaker 1: that job extremely well. Yeah, Schumer. When I think heal
Speaker 1: the nation, when I think bring everybody together, the first
Speaker 1: name that comes to mind is Chuck Shumer. Sure, that's
Speaker 1: one way to go, that's one approach with all of this.
Speaker 1: Let let's hear from the man himself. He's telling us,
Speaker 1: let's heal, but first, let's just continue to trash the
Speaker 1: former president in play seven. Well, it's tremendous responsibility, and
Speaker 1: there's so many things we have to do to make
Speaker 1: this country better. We have to recover from all of
Speaker 1: the de treatise that the Trump administration has left, but
Speaker 1: even more important than that, we have to recover from
Speaker 1: the COVID crisis and then move America forward so that
Speaker 1: every working person, every family, every person in America feels
Speaker 1: they have a real chance to advance. That has been
Speaker 1: that feeling hasn't been very strong in the American people
Speaker 1: over the last while, and we must do everything we
Speaker 1: can in our power to restore it. Well, I'm glad
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's in the White House either way, but the
Speaker 1: bottom line is I will as Majority leader I'll try
Speaker 1: to help him get his agenda done. Schumer in charge,
Speaker 1: Pelosi in charge, Biden Harris in charge. And I think
Speaker 1: you're gonna hear the Biden administration is going to be
Speaker 1: a hyphenated administration. You know, people take a hyphenated name
Speaker 1: once they marry something. And you know, I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't know, that's not not not, not my move. And
Speaker 1: again I've never married. But it's good. It's not just
Speaker 1: the Biden administration. It's gonna be the Biden Harris administration
Speaker 1: because she's gonna have a much larger role in this.
Speaker 1: Because I still believe they're gonna pass this off to her.
Speaker 1: I don't know how soon. I've said to you, maybe
Speaker 1: before the midterms, but the more I thought about it, it
Speaker 1: it might make more sense to win until after the
Speaker 1: mid terms and that way. Yea, and Biden at one
Speaker 1: point said he was only going to run for one term.
Speaker 1: This has now been all forgotten, but there was a
Speaker 1: there was a time at which he was kind of admitting, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm really old, and I I don't know if I
Speaker 1: can do this, but you know, I'll pass it off
Speaker 1: term two. Now it's oh no, he's gonna last all
Speaker 1: eight years. I just don't think. Look, the percentages are
Speaker 1: not on his side that he'd be in a physical
Speaker 1: capacity to go eight years from where he is right now.
Speaker 1: But you see this, this, there's this generation of politicians
Speaker 1: who never, never want to not be important and be powerful,
Speaker 1: never want to let it go. They'll they'll be the
Speaker 1: one you know, they'll they'll go into their hundreds if
Speaker 1: they can. I mean Pelosi certainly is one of them.
Speaker 1: Same thing with Joe Biden. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest from Bucket buck Sexton dot com. Harsani Time,
Speaker 1: everybody our friend David Harsani from National Review in the mix.
Speaker 1: Good to Nashview dot com to read his latest David,
Speaker 1: good to have him. Man, let's jump right into the
Speaker 1: free speech issue. I do not think it is even
Speaker 1: a little bit of an exaggeration. In fact, I would
Speaker 1: just is it right now that this is the most
Speaker 1: dangerous time for the suppression of speech in the country
Speaker 1: in my lifetime. I think even more so than post
Speaker 1: nine to eleven because of the implications of what's being
Speaker 1: said right now. What do you make of it? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree with that I think it's the worst time
Speaker 1: for free speech since maybe Wider Wilson in the First
Speaker 1: World War, Suedition Act and stuff like that. I think
Speaker 1: that people have figured out a way around the First
Speaker 1: Amendment suppressed millions of people and the things that they say.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure that I have any sort of good,
Speaker 1: you know, ideas and how to stop them. But I
Speaker 1: do know that people who are whose inclination is to
Speaker 1: shut down speech do not care about free expression. They
Speaker 1: don't care about the First Amendment. I think I've noted
Speaker 1: this on the show before, but simply saying I believe
Speaker 1: in the First Amendment doesn't mean anything if you don't
Speaker 1: believe in the values that gird all of that. You know,
Speaker 1: lots of places don't have a First Amendment. That doesn't
Speaker 1: mean we don't believe and their freedom of speech as well.
Speaker 1: It's a value that we share, but we don't share
Speaker 1: it anymore. We have CNN and Oliver Darcy and other
Speaker 1: people like that. We're just authoritarians who want to shut
Speaker 1: down their competitors. I want to shut down people who
Speaker 1: say things they don't like, and the media is the
Speaker 1: biggest defender. But I think the Democratic Party's pretty bad,
Speaker 1: and I think it boths very poorly moving forward. I
Speaker 1: think there are people, I think there are a lot
Speaker 1: of powerful corporations and voices who would very much like
Speaker 1: to return to a time when they're well. I mean,
Speaker 1: they don't view it as I think people have gotten
Speaker 1: used to Fox News being dominant in ratings, for example,
Speaker 1: in cable. But there are a lot of folks out
Speaker 1: there who remember, you know, if you work at CBS
Speaker 1: News or something, you remember that there was no Fox
Speaker 1: News until nineteen ninety six, and we could go back
Speaker 1: to a country in which there is no full spectrum
Speaker 1: distribution conservative cable channel. I mean they're already also going
Speaker 1: after NEWSMAC and an O A N and pressuring the
Speaker 1: cable providers with and unlike Fox. Those are those are
Speaker 1: two channels that they might actually be successful trying to
Speaker 1: get them to get carriage pulled. I mean that's and
Speaker 1: and other cable personalities are calling for this. They of
Speaker 1: course they are, yeah, and listen, I don't you know.
Speaker 1: The argument is these people are saying dangerous things like
Speaker 1: the election was stolen. First of all, I don't care
Speaker 1: that they're dangerous things. I think you'd be able to
Speaker 1: say whatever you want whatever you want as a want,
Speaker 1: and if if you're saying something that's slander, someone should
Speaker 1: suit you, you know, or or or whatever. So I
Speaker 1: don't care if there's a cute and non cable network, right,
Speaker 1: I think they deserve to be on the air now people,
Speaker 1: because people are always like trying to make, you know,
Speaker 1: offer some line on what's acceptable or not. That's not
Speaker 1: the point. It's a neutral principle. I am for free speech,
Speaker 1: and just because it's difficult to defend doesn't mean I'm
Speaker 1: not for it. And the idea that we and like
Speaker 1: you mentioned, they're going after and or whatever it's called.
Speaker 1: But they're also going after podcasts. I saw I think
Speaker 1: I forget where it was USA today at a piece
Speaker 1: about how podcasters are finding a like a loophole in
Speaker 1: which to speak about certain things. Is that a loophole
Speaker 1: to speak about certain things? You're just an authoritarian censor
Speaker 1: the loophole, there is an old loophole. The loophole is
Speaker 1: the one that they are using to shut down speech
Speaker 1: they don't like. And so anyway, it's just a dangerous
Speaker 1: way to think about the world. To start saying this
Speaker 1: is acceptable and this isn't you know, people always mentioned
Speaker 1: yelling fire in a theater. You can yell fire in
Speaker 1: a theater. That was from a Supreme Court decision around
Speaker 1: World War One that allowed Drew Wilson to throw socially
Speaker 1: anti where socialists into jail. Yeah, shank the US. It
Speaker 1: was pure authoritarianism and the Holmes the Holmes decision was
Speaker 1: an abomination. But people still yell this like it's an argument. Endor.
Speaker 1: I know. So anyway, so we're in agreeance, yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: I I look, I'll give you an example even today.
Speaker 1: You know how I feel about lockdowns, and I'm sorry
Speaker 1: it is. My view of this has always been if
Speaker 1: we're even having and I just mean in general society
Speaker 1: is even having a debate about how effective lockdowns were,
Speaker 1: that means they weren't effective. Because we got put into
Speaker 1: this with the belief that it would be it would be,
Speaker 1: it would be clear. I mean, you saw the Atlantic
Speaker 1: and all these different experts, these people were writing in
Speaker 1: major journals and publications back in May and June. You know,
Speaker 1: we'd have a sixty percent, eighty percent reduction in the virus.
Speaker 1: And now you look at places like California all time record, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, so if it's not obvious that lockdowns are
Speaker 1: really effective. They're clearly not effective enough to justify and
Speaker 1: by the way, I would argue even an even more
Speaker 1: extreme position than that, but clearly not effective enough to
Speaker 1: justify the abuse of power and authority. But but here
Speaker 1: we are. I was just trying to tell I was
Speaker 1: just trying to tell people my thoughts on this, and
Speaker 1: and David I got a. I got dinged on on
Speaker 1: Facebook for writing after covid let's match and put this
Speaker 1: in quotes after covid let's mask up during Flu season two.
Speaker 1: It's already starting. Just a few voices here there are
Speaker 1: in support of this comment, but it will grow and
Speaker 1: grow until mask up forever. It's the polite thing to do,
Speaker 1: is the new mantra. There are people right now who
Speaker 1: are starting the you know, guys, we probably should actually
Speaker 1: wear masks after this, because it's so effective and we
Speaker 1: want to stop the flu as well. Look what we've
Speaker 1: done to flucases in this country. I'm making an argument
Speaker 1: about a future policy. I'm not even negating or questioning
Speaker 1: mask effectiveness. I'm just saying that. And I get a
Speaker 1: you know, this is dinged for you know, you have
Speaker 1: to go to the CDC for more information. And the
Speaker 1: way this works now is I'm I'm going to be
Speaker 1: shadow band on Facebook for the next month for what
Speaker 1: for pointing out what is true? There are people advocating
Speaker 1: for mask even after the mass vaccination happens. The argument
Speaker 1: for masking after you've been vaccinated is insane, but people
Speaker 1: are making that argument still. Yeah, I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: even understand, Like you can't say the election was stolen,
Speaker 1: Like why can't I say those words? It's ridiculous. But
Speaker 1: I'm the mask thing. I mean, I'm pretty radicalized on
Speaker 1: this now in the sense that I'm sorry that I
Speaker 1: supported any lockdowns ever at all. I mean, I just
Speaker 1: don't think the government has the right to tell you
Speaker 1: not to go to church or not to go to
Speaker 1: your business. If people want to lock themselves down, that's
Speaker 1: their business. If people want to tell you not to
Speaker 1: want to tell you to wear a mask in their
Speaker 1: place of business, that's fine. But I shouldn't be forced
Speaker 1: to do it, you know, to be fined if I'm
Speaker 1: walking in the street, et cetera. There's just no government
Speaker 1: has no power to do that. And I mentioned it
Speaker 1: again on this show. You have governors who act like dictators.
Speaker 1: And I mean that in the most literal sense. In
Speaker 1: the Roman Empire, they had dictators and times of emergencies
Speaker 1: that had full power to do whatever they wanted. And
Speaker 1: that's exactly what we have now for almost a year
Speaker 1: in states in Michigan and Virginia and in other states
Speaker 1: New York. It's just an American and I just can't
Speaker 1: believe that the Supreme Court allows them to do that.
Speaker 1: There is just no precedent for it in American history.
Speaker 1: I'm furious as well that not only has there been
Speaker 1: all this overreach and as you point out, the tyranny
Speaker 1: of these governors and primarily Democrat governors, although there are
Speaker 1: some Republican governors that have really been way too willing
Speaker 1: to go along with the the Fauci consensus on this stuff.
Speaker 1: That kind of doctor Fauchi. I mean, I don't care
Speaker 1: what anybody says. He's a disaster. I mean, this guy
Speaker 1: is not helpful, his ideas are not sound, he does
Speaker 1: not have good judgment, but he's used as this he's
Speaker 1: almost this uh you know, this you know, superhuman figure
Speaker 1: that we all if you challenge him, you're this guy
Speaker 1: was wrong about the risks and spread of HIV for
Speaker 1: years and years. I mean, he was a top public
Speaker 1: health authority about that. That was decades ago. He's been
Speaker 1: wrong about this time and time again. But you see
Speaker 1: in Europe, David like, there was just a protest in
Speaker 1: the Netherlands and there's a photo of a guy jumping
Speaker 1: on this police machine that's essentially like a water cannon,
Speaker 1: you know, anti protest vehicle, and he's he's on the
Speaker 1: windshield this protesters jumped on the windshield. He's you know,
Speaker 1: putting out the middle finger to the sky. And I
Speaker 1: was like, where is that in this country. They've had
Speaker 1: huge anti lockdown protests in Spain, in Germany, in the Netherlands,
Speaker 1: I mean, in the UK, you know, thousands of people
Speaker 1: gathering together. Here in America, we just sort of sit
Speaker 1: around like, yeah, you know, maybe one day the vaccine, Well,
Speaker 1: what's it gonna take. I don't know, that's an interesting
Speaker 1: that's an interesting thought. Maybe people are less inclined to
Speaker 1: listen here as it is in many places, So I
Speaker 1: don't I don't know. You know, when you have urban
Speaker 1: areas with tons of people, it probably becomes more you know, apparent,
Speaker 1: or maybe they're forcing it harsher. But those are just guesses.
Speaker 1: I don't know why. I I don't know why our
Speaker 1: Americans aren't more upset by this. I think they've been.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of scare mongering going on. And again,
Speaker 1: I'm not diminishing what's happened. We know what's happened. Hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of people have died. But the idea that
Speaker 1: we should just shut everyone down, when mostly this is
Speaker 1: a disease that affects older people. We could have protected them,
Speaker 1: We could have protected other, you know, parts of the
Speaker 1: population that we're susceptible to it and allowed us, you know,
Speaker 1: allowed the economy to move on, to go on, and
Speaker 1: it just didn't happen that way. And you're right with
Speaker 1: Saint Fauci. You know, my problem with him isn't even
Speaker 1: that he's wrong about a lot of things. My problem
Speaker 1: is that he treats people and American citizens as children,
Speaker 1: like he will tell us, you know, oh, I had
Speaker 1: to say that what was it? Herd immunity is going
Speaker 1: to be at sixty five percent, because I didn't want
Speaker 1: to scare people and say it was ninety like. That's
Speaker 1: not up to you. You're a public official. You need
Speaker 1: to tell us the information that you have, and then
Speaker 1: we make decisions. This is why him when people say
Speaker 1: scientists should be running things, scientists do not balance out,
Speaker 1: you know, in their thought process, all the things that
Speaker 1: go on in society. It is dangerous to allot to
Speaker 1: allow them to lie to people. Saint Fauci David the
Speaker 1: the the original sin for me of Saint Fauci was
Speaker 1: and I do not I believe this is bs. I
Speaker 1: do not believe that this is even really true. He
Speaker 1: was dismissive about the public wearing masks, and we're told
Speaker 1: because he didn't want us to all run out and
Speaker 1: buy the N ninety five masks and there wouldn't be
Speaker 1: enough for healthcare providers. That means this would be like
Speaker 1: someone telling you, as a doctor, don't take that antibiotic
Speaker 1: because I'm worried that somebody else who might need it
Speaker 1: more to say their life won't have it. That is
Speaker 1: what he did. That is immoral, It is wrong, But
Speaker 1: he gets this pass on it. He gets this pass
Speaker 1: and you know what the truth is, It's because he
Speaker 1: knew that the data up until then, and he knew
Speaker 1: that the signs up until then did not support the
Speaker 1: trade off of what he now tells us is obvious,
Speaker 1: but he can't say that, so he says, oh, I
Speaker 1: made this what this idea that he lied to us
Speaker 1: for our own good about masks? This is awful. But
Speaker 1: people think that this is an excuse like their children,
Speaker 1: and and you know, and and there's there's a piece
Speaker 1: in the Times I think today or yesterday where they
Speaker 1: talk about vaccines and how a lot of these public
Speaker 1: officials in government are downplaying the effectiveness of vaccines for
Speaker 1: I don't know why, because they think that, you know,
Speaker 1: people are gonna act I responsibly or whatever. That's not
Speaker 1: up to them. We act. This is a free country
Speaker 1: or was, and we can act in any way we
Speaker 1: feel like, within the law, and it's not for them
Speaker 1: to treat us like children. The next it's also it'll
Speaker 1: also go ahead, go ahead, David policy because yeah, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: because politicians are not as bright as everyone thinks. I
Speaker 1: hope and or I mean, I hope they don't think that,
Speaker 1: but they aren't bright, and they make policies on what
Speaker 1: foult she says. The governor of Michigan is not bright.
Speaker 1: She just does whatever Foult she says. So if he's
Speaker 1: lying she's basing public policy on his lies, and that's
Speaker 1: dangerous or not just him, other CDC officials and government officials.
Speaker 1: And we're speaking of David Sani of National Review. Read
Speaker 1: his latest. He's a clear thinker and he actually cares
Speaker 1: about free speech at National Review dot com. David the
Speaker 1: next the next fight. And you're already seeing the start
Speaker 1: to happen because this cames comes up in that New
Speaker 1: York Times article, This idea that we should all mask
Speaker 1: up after we're vaccinated, that is rooted in a premise
Speaker 1: that they'll start to lose control of making people mask,
Speaker 1: and so maybe then we'll all be safer if we
Speaker 1: all mask until we're all sure. But but on an
Speaker 1: individual basis, it is irrational. It is irrational to tell
Speaker 1: someone they have to wear a mask after they've been
Speaker 1: vaccinated because of I mean, in the Fiser trial, one
Speaker 1: out of thirty thousand people actually got sick, didn't die,
Speaker 1: got sick with COVID after being vaccinated. If you have
Speaker 1: a one in thirty thousand chance of getting sick, which
Speaker 1: means a one and thirty thousand chance of even getting
Speaker 1: it and passing it to anybody else. So now that's
Speaker 1: not you know you still have to work. These people
Speaker 1: are insane. I mean, this is crazy. They like to
Speaker 1: control you, and you know they're gonna say why is
Speaker 1: you know, why is it okay to fifty thousand people
Speaker 1: a year die of flu and we can just stop
Speaker 1: flu and put masks on as if we're supposed to
Speaker 1: walk around being safe from all things all the time.
Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. As soon as I get that vaccine, I'm
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask anymore. I hate wearing a mask now,
Speaker 1: and I don't think it's good for society to wear
Speaker 1: a mask. I don't want to get into the specifics,
Speaker 1: but just interactions with people are weird. No, it's dehuman
Speaker 1: It dehumanizes, it dehumanizes all of us. There's a reason
Speaker 1: why the Taliban dresses women like beekeepers. There's a dehumanization
Speaker 1: to the depersonalization of your appearance in this way. It
Speaker 1: is not good for society, and I mean this is
Speaker 1: a I'm gearing up for this fight. I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: banned from social media for it, though, David, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get kicked off of platforms for saying, post vaccine, you
Speaker 1: should not have to mask and fauci if he had
Speaker 1: any any guts whatsoever would say that. But we still
Speaker 1: have about forty percent of New York City schools closed
Speaker 1: down because he doesn't have the guts to say it's
Speaker 1: outrageous that they still have schools shutdown. He won't he
Speaker 1: doesn't want to offend the lib CNN watching consensus. But
Speaker 1: have you have you noticed the psychs a shift in
Speaker 1: sort of the shutdown stuff since Biden won the election,
Speaker 1: with Cuomo saying we can't go on doing this forever
Speaker 1: and oh yeah, for liberals, I think you're going to yeah,
Speaker 1: I think now because it's not useful to them. And
Speaker 1: people call me a conspiracy theorist about that this, but
Speaker 1: I don't think I am. I think that you'll see
Speaker 1: people being more positive, putting more positive spins on things,
Speaker 1: wanting to open things up. They don't want the economy
Speaker 1: failing under Biden, and but they do want to keep
Speaker 1: controlling you. So I think that will be interesting, especially
Speaker 1: with the masks. But more more than that, the speech.
Speaker 1: The speech bothers me more than anything. There's no reason
Speaker 1: I shouldn't be able to say the election was stolen
Speaker 1: because you know what, maybe it was. Maybe one day
Speaker 1: it will be and what I can't say those words
Speaker 1: because it offends someone. It's it's it's also the sort
Speaker 1: of they used the Capitol Riots to sort of smear everyone.
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper does it all the time on seeing it
Speaker 1: to smear everyone as some kind of radical conspiracy theorists
Speaker 1: for having any questions that do not comport to his
Speaker 1: world aview. And and it's it's it's it's a way
Speaker 1: to sort of chill debate. And I think it's it's
Speaker 1: it's dangerous. R Sonny. We're in this. We're in this
Speaker 1: one together, my friend. Thank you so much for joining
Speaker 1: us National Review dot Com. Read David's latest, Please support
Speaker 1: his work, follow him on social media before both of
Speaker 1: us get kicked off. David, thanks so much. Thank you.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. However, I have said
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden that I do feel we do you
Speaker 1: lay out this agenda and fight participation from the other side.
Speaker 1: If they're going to be ricasseltra and they're gonna throw
Speaker 1: up roadblocks, go on without them. Use you executive authority.
Speaker 1: If they refuse to cooperate. That is Abraham Lincoln did
Speaker 1: to start this mantling slavery. That is what Harrard Truman
Speaker 1: did to start the integration of the armed services. All
Speaker 1: these things were done by executive order. So you can
Speaker 1: do big things and you can do great things. So
Speaker 1: you do things that are lasting. Nothing there's been more
Speaker 1: lasting than the ambassipation proclamation. Same thing, but integrating their
Speaker 1: armed services. So I think that Joe Biden should leyout
Speaker 1: his proposal. Invite cooperation. If they give it, work with them.
Speaker 1: If they don't give it, work through them. Just steamroll
Speaker 1: the Republicans Democrat member Congress. They're Cleburne telling you, just
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, he's got he's got a pen on the
Speaker 1: phone now and he's gonna use it. Don't worry about
Speaker 1: anything that the other side wants or arguments that they're making.
Speaker 1: They come to your side, they do what you want,
Speaker 1: or you run over them with an executive order. They
Speaker 1: take your they take your policies as as their own.
Speaker 1: They submit they've been the knee, or we want the
Speaker 1: super executive once again, no notice. You know, it was
Speaker 1: terrible when when Trump us executive orders. Oh it's Turney
Speaker 1: and now they're like, yeah, Biden, use all those executive orders.
Speaker 1: Same thing with Obama. It feels like nobody these days
Speaker 1: in the political establishment really as much in the way
Speaker 1: of principles, but particularly on the left, they don't even
Speaker 1: pretend anymore. And it doesn't even matter, right, whatever is
Speaker 1: good for them in the moment, whatever elevates their power
Speaker 1: and prestige, that is the principle. Everything else is just
Speaker 1: standing in the way of that. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
Speaker 1: Carol Marker waits over at the New York Post with
Speaker 1: an excellent piece Here be where the experts who want
Speaker 1: lockdowns to go on forever. Let me give you a
Speaker 1: little bit of this one, because this is going to
Speaker 1: be really important. This matters to all of us. Matters
Speaker 1: the health of the economy, matters to our individual freedoms
Speaker 1: and rights and liberty. It matters to whether or not
Speaker 1: the Constitution even counts anymore. And we I think have
Speaker 1: gotten We've gotten it in our heads that we're much closer,
Speaker 1: we are much closer to liberation from lockdowns than we
Speaker 1: really are, especially when you see some of the arguments
Speaker 1: that are being made right now here, they go quote,
Speaker 1: now that the COVID nineteen vaccines are here, it's time
Speaker 1: to celebrate the beginning of the end of this plague. Right.
Speaker 1: Not so fast, Carol writes. The media and expert classes
Speaker 1: seem determined to make permanent the pandemics abnormal way of life.
Speaker 1: In December, a New York Times piece, here's why vaccinated
Speaker 1: people still need to wear a mask. Kicked off the
Speaker 1: perma gloom. Vaccinated people will still need to wear masks
Speaker 1: because those with high viral loads could be even worse spreaders.
Speaker 1: The paper quoted doctor Yvonne Maldonado of the American Academy
Speaker 1: of Pediatrics, even worse spreaders. That's horrible. It's also a
Speaker 1: horribly misleading I know because I read the rest of
Speaker 1: the article. The fear arises from studies on monkeys, which
Speaker 1: found that some vaccinated monkeys didn't get sick but still
Speaker 1: carry the novel coronavirus in their noses. But wait, those
Speaker 1: monkeys were intentionally exposed to massive amounts of virus and
Speaker 1: still had less virus than unvaccinated animals. While Cornell virologist
Speaker 1: John Moore told the Times, ah, well, maybe don't intentionally
Speaker 1: expose yourself to massive amounts of the virus. Then a
Speaker 1: continual drumbeat of opinion keeps repeating that vaccination will change
Speaker 1: little or nothing. The new line is that we must
Speaker 1: be we will be wearing masks indefinitely, and we should
Speaker 1: really be wearing more serious masks, and certainly more than one.
Speaker 1: Masks are going to be with us for a really
Speaker 1: long time, Alicia Scheckter Perkins, a Boston University physician, told
Speaker 1: chalk Beat, especially because we know kids are not going
Speaker 1: to be vaccinated right away, and masks are a really
Speaker 1: strong protective measure. Kids won't be vaccinated right away. That's
Speaker 1: in part because kids seldom contract COVID nineteen, very rarely
Speaker 1: have severe cases and aren't major spreaders across much of Europe.
Speaker 1: Kids under twelve don't wear masks. Forcing two year olds
Speaker 1: to wear them indefinitely is sheer American madness. End quote.
Speaker 1: Great piece in the New York Posts from Carol Markowitz. Here.
Speaker 1: I've been telling you that there is a mass hysteria
Speaker 1: at work with the American approach to COVID, And I'm right,
Speaker 1: and I've been right all along, and with more data,
Speaker 1: more time, I'm even more certain. Of that rightness. This
Speaker 1: is insane. We are we are now because of the
Speaker 1: heightened anxiety and the media panic mechanisms around this. We
Speaker 1: are accepting a future in which the infinitesimal possibility of
Speaker 1: COVID infection for anyone will still be grounds for COVID
Speaker 1: restrictions on everyone. This is nuts. This is from people
Speaker 1: who aren't as smart as they think they are, who
Speaker 1: want to control other people, and who live with this
Speaker 1: constant anxiety of, oh, my gosh, I may not be
Speaker 1: guaranteed to live to a hundred. You know, a lot
Speaker 1: of what I've seen here is that there are some
Speaker 1: of us who understand that we could die any day,
Speaker 1: that any of us could die in any day, and
Speaker 1: we're doing our best, and we're trying to live the
Speaker 1: most purposeful, decent, and worthwhile lives we can with the
Speaker 1: time we've got. But there are no guarantees. But there
Speaker 1: is certainly a mentality that I think is prevalent among
Speaker 1: a lot of leftists, among a lot of Libs, a
Speaker 1: lot of atheists in particular of that set, who believe that, oh,
Speaker 1: the government will keep them safe and protect them, and
Speaker 1: they're they're terrified at the notion of any threat to
Speaker 1: their lives, and anything the government says that will protect
Speaker 1: them they're willing to go along with. This is fear.
Speaker 1: This is a kind of day to day cowardice, really,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately it has infected the public mind here to
Speaker 1: the degree that those who are just terrified all the
Speaker 1: time of the virus are shouting and screaming and making
Speaker 1: so much noise about it that the rest of us
Speaker 1: have to operate under their rules. Even though I've said
Speaker 1: all along, if somebody wants to live in a bubble,
Speaker 1: if they want to take extreme precautionary measures for themselves,
Speaker 1: they have that right. But they have the right now
Speaker 1: of force everybody else to do that too, on what basis.
Speaker 1: You know, there are other respiratory diseases that are out there,
Speaker 1: like the flu as you know, that kill people every year,
Speaker 1: that kill immunocompromise individuals, And this is starting to be
Speaker 1: something along the lines of some people can have a
Speaker 1: lethal reaction to peanuts as an allergy. They can go
Speaker 1: into I think it's anaphlactic shock, right, They go to
Speaker 1: shock from peanuts. And so now when you get on airplanes,
Speaker 1: I'll say, well, you, no one can open peanuts because
Speaker 1: there's a severe peanut allergy on board. So what if
Speaker 1: they said, we need to eradicate peanuts from all of society.
Speaker 1: You can't have them anywhere. You say, well, how many
Speaker 1: people really die from peanut allergies in any given year?
Speaker 1: And then you say how many how many people you
Speaker 1: know peanut farmers, and how many different you know businesses
Speaker 1: and you know, mister peanut and different brands, and how
Speaker 1: many millions of dollars and thousands of jobs are all
Speaker 1: tied into this? And I don't know, maybe maybe a
Speaker 1: couple of people die every year from peanut allergies in
Speaker 1: the US. I'm not sure the numbers. I know it's
Speaker 1: not that big. But it's about saving one life, don't
Speaker 1: you see. So we have to ban them everywhere, like
Speaker 1: we're banning nuclear waste because a few people have that. Now,
Speaker 1: I understand I'm taking this intentionally into the realm of
Speaker 1: the absurd, but it's because what you're seeing now with
Speaker 1: the arguments about forever masking and forever lockdown, those are
Speaker 1: absurd arguments and they're based on a similar line of
Speaker 1: thinking to what I'm telling you. With the eradication of
Speaker 1: peanuts from the whole world, because there are people that
Speaker 1: have peanut allergies. Once we are once you are vaccinated, well,
Speaker 1: let's say with the Fiser vaccine, one in thirty thousand
Speaker 1: people got really sick from the Fiser trial, like actually
Speaker 1: had a bad case of covid um. You know, about
Speaker 1: four percent ish had some form of COVID much less, okay,
Speaker 1: much less. This is across thirty thousand people. So so
Speaker 1: now if you're if you're gonna tell me that you
Speaker 1: know that the chance is less than five percent that
Speaker 1: you could even get COVID. And think about this. You're
Speaker 1: gonna be around other people if they're vaccinated. Two, This
Speaker 1: is now point five percent. I'm sorry, this is now
Speaker 1: five percent and five percent. You start doing the math
Speaker 1: on this, and it's it's you know, one in twenty
Speaker 1: and one in twenty that you would even exposed to COVID.
Speaker 1: That's one in four hundred that the second person is
Speaker 1: going to actually have a risk of contracting COVID. I
Speaker 1: mean you, and now you play this out. This is
Speaker 1: how her immunity works. So it's not just that you're
Speaker 1: very unlikely to get it, but somebody around you also
Speaker 1: has the vaccine is very unlikely to get it, and
Speaker 1: this keeps playing out, but it's never going to be
Speaker 1: entirely zero. As the point you know, there's there are
Speaker 1: going to be people out there who have the unfortunate
Speaker 1: reality of a severe peanut allergy where if it even
Speaker 1: has particles in the air, they could go into shock.
Speaker 1: We can't protect people what one hundred percent, and we
Speaker 1: shouldn't be forced to try. But that is what is
Speaker 1: happening right now with the latest mentality. You're seeing it.
Speaker 1: You go go to a search, you'll find it online.
Speaker 1: People saying, you know, because so so here's where we've
Speaker 1: gone too. I used to say, why don't we mask
Speaker 1: up for the flu and never have if it's so
Speaker 1: effective and so important and if it saves us one life.
Speaker 1: People that were mask maniacs were saying, shut up, this
Speaker 1: is worse than the flu. That's just a you're a
Speaker 1: flu bro. That's irrelevant. And it's not irrelevant because it's
Speaker 1: the exact argumentation they're using applied to a different circumstance.
Speaker 1: So they just shouted it down because it was inconvenient.
Speaker 1: Because clearly what it shows is a long history of
Speaker 1: society accepting that we cannot stamp out entirely influenza and
Speaker 1: influenza deaths, and that it's not something that we should
Speaker 1: try through the measures that we're talking about here. If
Speaker 1: we got a vaccine, great, and we do take vaccine
Speaker 1: for flu year and y're out, but it's only you know,
Speaker 1: forty to sixty percent effective depending on the year. But
Speaker 1: we under we don't make people mask we don't shut
Speaker 1: down businesses, we don't do all these things for the flu.
Speaker 1: And we pointed that out to show that, See, we
Speaker 1: lived in a society where we understood that there will
Speaker 1: be some risk to living your life from some diseases
Speaker 1: that are out there. And they didn't like that because
Speaker 1: as it was inconvenient for their argument, so they said,
Speaker 1: shut up, don't talk about that. Now, you know what
Speaker 1: they're doing now that we're getting to the end of
Speaker 1: this pandemic, probably in the next six months we'll actually
Speaker 1: get to vaccination at the level that we need. But
Speaker 1: now we're coming to the end, this is saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, we probably should mask up for flu two.
Speaker 1: That will save even more lives. Flu virtue signaling masking
Speaker 1: is now a serious thing, and it's going to gain
Speaker 1: steam too. It's gonna gain steam, because it goes to
Speaker 1: this part of people's brains where they think I'm a
Speaker 1: good person, I like science, I'm one of the smart people.
Speaker 1: So everyone should have to do this too for the flu.
Speaker 1: And I would say that everybody then should also have
Speaker 1: to do this for the common cold. Some people who
Speaker 1: are immunocompromised, not a lot, but some people who are
Speaker 1: immunocompromised are at risk of getting They can develop, you know,
Speaker 1: viral pneumonia from what starts out as a as a
Speaker 1: common cold infection that can happen a cold can get
Speaker 1: much worse, especially if you're severely immunocompromised or you're elderly.
Speaker 1: So we're all going to wear masks all the time
Speaker 1: now forever, and when do you wear them? When they
Speaker 1: tell you to wear them? So remember it's not as
Speaker 1: though we even get the benefit of perfect continuous mask usage.
Speaker 1: That's not that's not the reality, which is why these
Speaker 1: lockdowns and mass policies have obviously failed. It's because you
Speaker 1: wear them until you sit down at a restaurant, You
Speaker 1: wear it until you adjust it, you wear it until
Speaker 1: you start coughing or whatever. You know. Now now you're
Speaker 1: now you're just breathing air like everybody else, or you've coughed,
Speaker 1: you're germs into the air with everybody else around you. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's always this highly highly imperfect mandate that's been
Speaker 1: put in place, as we know. But now they're going
Speaker 1: to be arguing in favor of it. Let me go
Speaker 1: back to this, this piece that Carol Markowitz writes in
Speaker 1: the New York Post. Meanwhile, Gavin Yama, a professor of
Speaker 1: Global health and public policy at Duke, urges people to
Speaker 1: wear N ninety five high filtration masks undercloth masks. Who
Speaker 1: decided we should aim for a risk free society. If
Speaker 1: two masks are better than one, why not three, four
Speaker 1: or five? Why not eight? For that matter, why don't
Speaker 1: we reduce speed limits everywhere a to ten miles per
Speaker 1: hour indefinitely, a move that would dramatically reduce car accidents.
Speaker 1: Some experts seem almost spiritually invested in forestalling a return
Speaker 1: to normalcy, and so does the incoming by administration. End quote.
Speaker 1: Those of you who listen to this show know that
Speaker 1: I have been saying four months, four months and months.
Speaker 1: Just wait, they're going to say you're wearing the wrong masks.
Speaker 1: Just wait, they're going to tell you it was really
Speaker 1: the N ninety five masks all How did I know
Speaker 1: that those of you listen to show know that again?
Speaker 1: For months, I've been saying, just wait, they're gonna tell
Speaker 1: you you really need two masks, two masks better than one.
Speaker 1: And to that, I just say, Wow, we've lost so
Speaker 1: many people to COVID and they're not willing to go
Speaker 1: to three masks? Are they not willing to take this seriously?
Speaker 1: I'm a triple masker. You know. This is like turning
Speaker 1: into those razor blades where it went, you know, four blades,
Speaker 1: two blades, three blades, four blades, eight blades. You know,
Speaker 1: I mean, how close a shave do you really need? Right? Well,
Speaker 1: that's what we're doing with masks, and I saw it
Speaker 1: coming if you look in my Twitter feed. Although I
Speaker 1: know they're trying to purge everything now, but I'm on
Speaker 1: record with this. I have been telling you they will
Speaker 1: say these things, and now they are being said publicly
Speaker 1: by health experts. How did I know? Because I know
Speaker 1: what these people are doing, I know what their mentality is.
Speaker 1: I understand the game that they're playing. I understand that
Speaker 1: they are now they're invested in this because God forbid,
Speaker 1: we all figure out that what they've been telling us
Speaker 1: to do all along just made us all more depressed,
Speaker 1: more harassed, and did not bring anywhere near the health
Speaker 1: benefits they pretended. And I'm talking about things like locking
Speaker 1: down millions of people from their offices, telling them not.
Speaker 1: They told you not to see your family over Thanks,
Speaker 1: they told you it was reckless to see your loved
Speaker 1: ones over Christmas, and then they went and did those things,
Speaker 1: but they still say it publicly. Why why? And the
Speaker 1: establishment the social media companies who have benefited tremendously Amazon,
Speaker 1: Google benefit tremendously from lockdown their bottom line, I mean
Speaker 1: as well as just the general general users and activity online.
Speaker 1: They are full in on suppression of what are clear
Speaker 1: and obvious truths. Now they won't let someone like me
Speaker 1: even say just wait, because if I can predict the
Speaker 1: stupidity of the mask mandates, if I can predict what
Speaker 1: the mask maniacs are going to say next, and I have,
Speaker 1: then people start to say, hold on a second, why
Speaker 1: does this guy He doesn't have an MD, he doesn't
Speaker 1: have a science background, Why does he know? Because I
Speaker 1: understand what these authoritarian tyrants are doing. I know what
Speaker 1: they're up to I see it, and I understand what
Speaker 1: their incentives are here. Their incentives are not to keep
Speaker 1: you healthy. Their incentives are their own reputation, power and control.
Speaker 1: That is what they care about. And they will not
Speaker 1: they will not budge on these issues because the moment
Speaker 1: there's an opening, you say, well, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: you are we or are we not allowed to make
Speaker 1: risk assessments for what's acceptable in society's It's appalling what
Speaker 1: they're doing right now. You're listening to the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio act or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: I don't know what it's like where you are across
Speaker 1: the country, because we're in now two hundred stations, and
Speaker 1: you know we're in We're in cities all over the place,
Speaker 1: and some cities are better than others when it comes
Speaker 1: to this. But I just I know I'm in New
Speaker 1: York City until I moved to Florida, and producer Mark
Speaker 1: and I already talking about how we can make that happen.
Speaker 1: But I'm in New York City, so I know what's
Speaker 1: going on with the school system here, and and they're
Speaker 1: now also misrepresenting what's going on because it all looks
Speaker 1: so terrible, given with the science and the numbers. Tell
Speaker 1: us Deblasio the worst mayor in America. Some of you
Speaker 1: fight me on that one, and you say your mayor
Speaker 1: is worse. And if you live in Portland, or you
Speaker 1: live in Seattle, maybe Denver, I don't know, but you
Speaker 1: live in some of these cities, yes, okay, Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: You can argue with me about your mayor being worse,
Speaker 1: and I'm open to that. But the New York City
Speaker 1: mayor is a unique level of awful in many ways.
Speaker 1: And he says that the vast majority of schools here
Speaker 1: are open, right, that the COVID pandemic hasn't forced them
Speaker 1: to lockdown. It turns out that three hundred and forty
Speaker 1: four schools in New York out of eight hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty schools are closed, So sixty percent of schools are open.
Speaker 1: That's the vast majority. I mean, it's a majority. But
Speaker 1: when you say vast majority of schools are open, people
Speaker 1: are thinking, at least in my head, I'm thinking eighty percent,
Speaker 1: ninety percent. That's the vast majority, sixty percent, So that
Speaker 1: means forty percent of New York City schools are closed
Speaker 1: right now for COVID reasons. Students are not learning, They're
Speaker 1: doing the zoom stuff at home. It doesn't work for
Speaker 1: a whole lot of kids, especially low income and minority children.
Speaker 1: They suffer the most because of this, And yet they
Speaker 1: say things. Look, it's intentionally dishonest. Oh, a vast majority
Speaker 1: of schools are open. No, they are not, a bare
Speaker 1: majority of schools are open when all of them what
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of them should be? Because we know
Speaker 1: beyond doubt, and even Fauci, that little quizzling bureaucrat, has
Speaker 1: to admit this. Kids are at almost no risk and
Speaker 1: almost never spread it. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Erica in Trump
Speaker 1: we Trust. She joins us now she's a columnist as well,
Speaker 1: and culder dot com for her latest and twenty one.
Speaker 1: Happy New Year, Happy New Year, Good to talk to you, Buck.
Speaker 1: So And people keep asking me a question that I
Speaker 1: want to ask you, and I have people all over
Speaker 1: the country asking it to me. I get emails, I
Speaker 1: get phone calls. It uh, you know, listeners and readers
Speaker 1: of what I do, and they're saying, what do we
Speaker 1: do now. And they'll even point to say amnesty, which
Speaker 1: Biden's openly talking about, and they say, and they're asking,
Speaker 1: what do we what's our next move? I don't have
Speaker 1: a good answer right now, and so I'm hoping you
Speaker 1: have a good answer, because it feels right now like
Speaker 1: the Conservatives in this country are about to get steamrolled
Speaker 1: on at least a few issues. Yeah. Um, there must
Speaker 1: be something um psychologically wrong with me, because no matter
Speaker 1: how bad things get, I always I always can see
Speaker 1: the funny side. I see the ray of light at
Speaker 1: the end of the tunnel. Um. I mean, Conservatives are
Speaker 1: going through a leaving process right now. At least we
Speaker 1: probably won't carry it on and invent crazy Russian conspiracy
Speaker 1: theories for the next four years. Will probably work through it.
Speaker 1: And I think that's really that explains the absolute rock
Speaker 1: bottom support Trump has, which is quite low. I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean there are different polls right now with some
Speaker 1: show his support like twenty nine percent, the greatest poll
Speaker 1: I saw, and something I've been pushing since immediately after
Speaker 1: the election. I gave some college speeches, I wrote a
Speaker 1: couple of columns about it. The way forward is Trump
Speaker 1: is um without Trump. I know people, some Trumpsters has
Speaker 1: some loved it, have been a little more annoyed with
Speaker 1: me for four years pointing out that he's not keeping
Speaker 1: any of his promises. I was completely convinced he was
Speaker 1: going to lose for during two seventeen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: then twenty twenty came along, and whoa, the Democrats. It's
Speaker 1: it's the theme of my book, Resistances Futile. Just when
Speaker 1: you think Trump is dead, that the left overreacts and
Speaker 1: and brings brings his supporters back. So we had the
Speaker 1: BLM and Antifa riots in twenty twenty. Combine that with
Speaker 1: the ridiculous shutdowns in all these Blue states putting businesses
Speaker 1: out of business, bankrupting small businessmen, and doing nothing about
Speaker 1: the COVID rate while they get haircuts and go to
Speaker 1: fancy restaurants, I might add, And those two things, the
Speaker 1: COVID shutdowns and city after city burning while the media
Speaker 1: lies to us, I thought, oh my gosh, now he
Speaker 1: has a chance. So, as you know, when we talked
Speaker 1: about it um this summer in August, my position was,
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: And the American people ended up doing exactly what I
Speaker 1: wanted to happen. We pretty much had a red wave
Speaker 1: below the presidential election. I mean it's I'm still really
Speaker 1: happy about the election, very upset about Georgia, which I
Speaker 1: blame Untrump. Um. But in any event, still, the Democrats
Speaker 1: were supposed to have this huge blue tsunami pick up
Speaker 1: fifteen seats in the House. Our polls showed the Democrats
Speaker 1: were picking up fifteen seats. No, instead, Republicans picked up seats.
Speaker 1: I think I think we may have picked up fifteen those. Um.
Speaker 1: There's at least one congressional race in New York State,
Speaker 1: UM that Democrats are still drying to steal. Um. It's
Speaker 1: very close. The Republicans is now a head by I
Speaker 1: don't know, like twenty votes or something. UM Tenny is
Speaker 1: her name, and UM. In the Senate, Yeah, okay, we
Speaker 1: lost too. We were supposed to lose a lot more
Speaker 1: than that. We were supposed to be losing Texas. We
Speaker 1: will remember John Cornyn Um Olympia snow up in May.
Speaker 1: Um ohi uh um. We were supposed to lose many
Speaker 1: many Senate seats. Now, Lindsay Graham, they threw all that money,
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham. Yeah, and of course the two week we
Speaker 1: did lose Arizona and Colorado, but we picked up a
Speaker 1: seat in Alabama, so so the end result is not
Speaker 1: so bad, though unfortunately we don't have control of the Senate. Um.
Speaker 1: And what I loved about the election was it shows well,
Speaker 1: I mean, who knows, who knows if if Trump's ideas
Speaker 1: are popular or not. I think the I think at
Speaker 1: least half the vote voting for Trump can't stand the man,
Speaker 1: but are terrified of the Democrats, absolutely terrified of them. Um,
Speaker 1: they ran the best candidate they could run, in a sense,
Speaker 1: the most moderate of them, the least woke id politics. Yes,
Speaker 1: admittedly a dementia patient. So so what Republicans need to
Speaker 1: be looking for is someone who will run on the
Speaker 1: national populist agenda that Trump ran on and then completely
Speaker 1: betrayed his supporters on. But this time we got to
Speaker 1: get somebody who won't betray the people who vote for him.
Speaker 1: Speaking of and Culter Besseling, author and culter dot com
Speaker 1: for her latest column. And I've spoken to some Democrats
Speaker 1: actually recently about this. I'm wondering what your take is
Speaker 1: because you wrote Audios America and that came out, and
Speaker 1: then the President was making many of the same arguments,
Speaker 1: and I believe there was a time when he even
Speaker 1: was willing to say or he let it out that
Speaker 1: you know, I read Culter's book and I love it,
Speaker 1: and he's talking about things like the wall and these
Speaker 1: ideas that you wrote about. Yet an anchor babies everything
Speaker 1: he betrayed us on O. Okay, right, But at the
Speaker 1: point point big that you saw these things coming. And
Speaker 1: now we have the issue of amnesty that I mean,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is saying I'm gonna We're gonna push through amnesty.
Speaker 1: People are asking me what can we do to stop it.
Speaker 1: I've had some Democrats tell me, oh, maybe the Democrats
Speaker 1: in elected office will get a little bit wishywashy on this.
Speaker 1: I don't see that. So then is an amnesty gonna happen?
Speaker 1: Or am I missing something? Well, I'm not good at predictions.
Speaker 1: I certainly hope it won't. And this would be my
Speaker 1: pitch to the Democrats and to Biden and genuinely having
Speaker 1: their their best interests in mind. Whom whom is hurt
Speaker 1: the most by dumping low wage workers on the country,
Speaker 1: well number one African Americans and if there is any
Speaker 1: base Joe Biden owes, he owes his nomination to African Americans. Um,
Speaker 1: I don't know. If you just saw this study yesterday,
Speaker 1: I tweeted it that, um, um, the more Hispanic employment
Speaker 1: goes up, the more Black violence goes up. Why our
Speaker 1: jobs are being taken? Their jobs are being taken by
Speaker 1: people coming from countries um where Oh wow, working for
Speaker 1: seven dollars in an hour, that's like living like a king. Um. Well,
Speaker 1: Americans are used to a little higher payment, So for
Speaker 1: one thing, I just think it would be a huge
Speaker 1: mistake to a central part of his space. Yes, there
Speaker 1: are black activists, you will see them on MSNBC. They
Speaker 1: all have jobs at Princeton. They are for amnesty and
Speaker 1: oh it's the Rainbow Coalition and the Browns and the
Speaker 1: black No, no, no, no no, no, get down to actual
Speaker 1: black and brown people. They want jobs, They want jobs
Speaker 1: that pay well. If if there are moderate Republicans working
Speaker 1: for Biden, if he still has a bone of moderation
Speaker 1: in him, he should also know that it is not
Speaker 1: as I mean, this is going around the internet. I
Speaker 1: haven't really or a Twitter, I haven't made a point
Speaker 1: of disputing this. It is not the case that if
Speaker 1: he says I'm granting amnesty to the Dreamers, that it
Speaker 1: will be only eleven million. After read read Adios America
Speaker 1: on the Agricultural Adjustment Act of the Reagan amnesty, and
Speaker 1: there have been many amnesties in addition to that one
Speaker 1: since then. Um. For that, you had to prove you
Speaker 1: would work on a farm in the US between you know,
Speaker 1: the specific six month period they estimated the bo about
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand people or we owe them. They picked
Speaker 1: our picked our crops for us. Um. It ended up
Speaker 1: being about a million, including cab drivers in the ARK,
Speaker 1: including a couple of the terriffs from the nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: seven World Trade Center bombing had never set foot out
Speaker 1: of New York City, illegal aliens from I don't know,
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia or something, Um, I mean bombing, right? Sorry? Sorry?
Speaker 1: Is that sway? Was it? Ninety three World Trade Center? Yet?
Speaker 1: My how time flies? Thank you? Yes, ninety three? Um.
Speaker 1: And and even the people who were working on it
Speaker 1: at the I n S said that ninety percent of
Speaker 1: those applications for amnesty as an agricultural worker, they determined
Speaker 1: ninety more than ninety percent I believe were frauds, and
Speaker 1: yet they were all approved. So once you have an
Speaker 1: amnesty for any gro about there, how are you going
Speaker 1: to prove when somebody came to America whether their parents
Speaker 1: really brought them. No, all you are doing is opening
Speaker 1: this up to every every poor person or every I
Speaker 1: mean in their countries, a middle class person in all
Speaker 1: of Latin America to pour in and take jobs from
Speaker 1: our working curs. That's all. And you've seen the caravans
Speaker 1: are already happening. I mean they're they're well aware of
Speaker 1: what a Biden administration means and what's coming. So that's
Speaker 1: why you have there's video of this. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is any of you go see. It's all over the place,
Speaker 1: thousands and thousands of people. And their their process for
Speaker 1: getting through Guatemala is very similar for their process for
Speaker 1: getting into the United States at the US Mexico border,
Speaker 1: which is get a whole bunch of people together and
Speaker 1: just go because you're what do you do? Yes? Yes, well,
Speaker 1: I mean why not just you know, I mean, Trump
Speaker 1: didn't have to be needlessly antagonistic about it. But if you,
Speaker 1: if you Jemine only care about the working class, as
Speaker 1: Joe Biden purports, to um, and he does have his
Speaker 1: moments of nonseniality still, and I'm sure he has a
Speaker 1: lot of a lot of assistance and aids who have
Speaker 1: been with him for a long time. Though this is
Speaker 1: the the the He is the dying remnants of the
Speaker 1: of the of the Democratic Party that gives a crap
Speaker 1: about the working class. If that means anything. It means
Speaker 1: and especially any year after COVID, you do not dump
Speaker 1: millions and unlimited to supply. I mean currently there there
Speaker 1: are act least forty million illegal aliens in this country. Um,
Speaker 1: if you grant him all amnesty, and you can say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's eleven million, or you can say it's it's it's
Speaker 1: four million, it's only the dreamers, the dreamers. No, once
Speaker 1: that program opens up, there is no way of limiting it.
Speaker 1: You will be you will be crushing the America. Do
Speaker 1: you think there's a real hope though, of b I'd
Speaker 1: in not then doing, I mean, because that kind of
Speaker 1: goes where these Democrats are telling me that they're that
Speaker 1: even the Democrats as a party are not totally necessarily
Speaker 1: on board for mass amnesty, which I find I feel
Speaker 1: like they are. But do you think there's a chance
Speaker 1: they might, they might get you know, squeamish, skittish. I don't,
Speaker 1: I don't, don't. I I'm I'm not good at prediction.
Speaker 1: You're gonna play the fifth on this, and okay, we
Speaker 1: can let you please. That's a prediction. I can tell
Speaker 1: you what I think they ought to do it, and
Speaker 1: give you the arguments for why they ought to do it,
Speaker 1: and I think I could convince them. Now they're gonna
Speaker 1: have pressure from their woke base. But oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: there's there's a cornucopia of issues he can be pushing
Speaker 1: that's going to make the woke based happy. There's so
Speaker 1: many things. There are so many things they can do,
Speaker 1: you know, go expand you know what I don't know,
Speaker 1: welfare and minimum wage, start working on UM giving out
Speaker 1: even more under Obama Care. Oh you've got it, you
Speaker 1: got you gotta have the trial for for try. Let's
Speaker 1: get to that. Your base demands that there are so
Speaker 1: many things he can do other than this. Just put
Speaker 1: it off a little bit longer. And before I let
Speaker 1: you go, who is the future of the Republican Party
Speaker 1: right now? UM don't know that either. People change, So
Speaker 1: let's see what happens. UM there are a couple I've
Speaker 1: i'm I'm I'm fan of I'm big fan of Ron
Speaker 1: de Sam just the governor of Florida. UM. Greg Gianforte,
Speaker 1: new governor of Montana. Although um, I've got to put
Speaker 1: a footnote on that. The main reason I love Gianforte
Speaker 1: is the night before he won his election to the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives from from the great state of Montana,
Speaker 1: he punched a Guardian reporter and broke his glasses. I
Speaker 1: do recall that check out Ann's latest column everybody and
Speaker 1: culture dot com and uh and we'll have you back.
Speaker 1: Is this, uh, this new Biden reality unfold. So thanks
Speaker 1: for joining. Good to talk you back, Blah Baye. Your
Speaker 1: listen to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. We're going into Wednesday knowing that
Speaker 1: we're getting provided to do the work, and we've got to,
Speaker 1: Laura work to do. It's not going to be easy.
Speaker 1: As we have discussed, Joe as outlined our plan for vaccinations,
Speaker 1: our plan for recovery, and in particular relief. I am
Speaker 1: very much looking forward to be sworn in as the
Speaker 1: next Vice President of the United States, and I will
Speaker 1: walk there to that moment proudly with my head up
Speaker 1: and my shoulders back. Now, what are they going to
Speaker 1: do with the first hundred days? What are they going
Speaker 1: to actually get accomplished? You've already seen things like Biden
Speaker 1: saying he's going to get rid of the Keystone XL pipeline.
Speaker 1: This is just there's gonna be a lot of this,
Speaker 1: things that are nonsensical and really only harmful as policy,
Speaker 1: but that appeal to a certain favored constituency of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. There's gonna be There's gonna be a fair
Speaker 1: amount of that. So you'll see executive orders on on
Speaker 1: things like Keystone XCEL A lot of It's funny. I've
Speaker 1: heard people that I know who operating the corporate world.
Speaker 1: I've heard people who will talk about D and I,
Speaker 1: and I kept thinking, what would d At first, I
Speaker 1: would think about this, Let's say d N I, like
Speaker 1: the Director of National Intelligence. What is but we're talking
Speaker 1: about you know, Goldman Sachs, or we're talking about you know,
Speaker 1: corporate Walmart hiring practices or something. What do you mean
Speaker 1: d N I? Oh, D and I Diversity and inclusion?
Speaker 1: You're gonna have a lot more of that. I can
Speaker 1: see that the transgender Pennsylvania state health official who was
Speaker 1: who pulled pulled her, pulled her father or mother, I
Speaker 1: forget one of her parents out of the nursing home
Speaker 1: system in Pennsylvania while other people were all suffering horribly
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania. Very highvid anyway, the first transgender senior public
Speaker 1: senior public health official, I think first transgender transgender might
Speaker 1: have to be sent. I'm not sure if if it's
Speaker 1: sent a confirmed or not. But you see a lot
Speaker 1: of that. As I'm trying a lot of diversity and
Speaker 1: inclusion stuff, a lot of you know, oh this is
Speaker 1: the first of or the first person too, or whatever
Speaker 1: it may be. So you'll see a lot of that.
Speaker 1: And the places though that I think we have to
Speaker 1: be the most aware of the Left really ramming through
Speaker 1: the agenda is going to be this the spending that
Speaker 1: they do and how they distribute money under the guise
Speaker 1: of COVID relief. There's going to be a ton of money.
Speaker 1: We already know that, a ton of money given to
Speaker 1: blue cities and shoring up their budgets places like New
Speaker 1: York and Los Angeles. I still think they have enormous
Speaker 1: problems over the long term because of the outflow of people.
Speaker 1: But there's gonna be there's gonna be a lot of
Speaker 1: that that goes on, just the cash that will be
Speaker 1: sloshing around, taxpayer cash, and Democrats are gonna feel like
Speaker 1: they have a very free hand to distribute it. That's
Speaker 1: gonna be something that I don't know, we can't really
Speaker 1: stop it, you know, because they'll use reconciliation if they
Speaker 1: have to remember that budgetary trick of reconciliation, which they
Speaker 1: did use for part of Obamacare back in the day
Speaker 1: as well when they finally lost their supermajority. But there's
Speaker 1: a lot. Oh, you know, I didn't speak about pardons today,
Speaker 1: and I meant too. I'm sorry. I'll get into that
Speaker 1: more tomorrow when it's Trump's last day and there may
Speaker 1: actually be the pardons. I'll just say this one. I
Speaker 1: think that the case against Asge is highly flawed. I
Speaker 1: don't think you can commit espionage by releasing classified information
Speaker 1: when you're not a US citizen and you've never had
Speaker 1: a security clearance. So I think that's I think there's
Speaker 1: real merit to that. I think that the curiaku thing
Speaker 1: I'd have to look at some more. I mean, they
Speaker 1: did him dirty. I mean, the guy didn't need to
Speaker 1: go to prison. So I look, I would support a
Speaker 1: pardon for Curiaku. I would support a I would support
Speaker 1: a pardon for Julian Assange, which as a former Intel
Speaker 1: official I know is like sacrilege. But the charges they're
Speaker 1: bringing against him, I don't. I don't support sharing all
Speaker 1: that classified information out there. I mean, I don't think
Speaker 1: that was I don't think that was a a good move,
Speaker 1: a helpful move. But I also don't think that he
Speaker 1: broke us law by doing it. I think that's a stretch.
Speaker 1: And who else is? Oh and Tiger King? Pruser Mark?
Speaker 1: Should Tiger King be pardoned? You know I never watched it? Still, Okay,
Speaker 1: so we got we gotta make producer Mark watched Tiger King.
Speaker 1: We'll see if he should be pardoned. Oh and Little
Speaker 1: Wayne Bruser marks, a Little Wayne be pardoned? Sure? I
Speaker 1: liked his music back in the day. I like Lil
Speaker 1: Wayne too. Pardon Little Wayne. This is the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Join the conversations and message fuck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: or email Team bucket iHeartMedia dot com. He may read
Speaker 1: it on the show. Like soft butter on warm toast.
Speaker 1: It's time to spread some freedom from coast to coast.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call yesome? What is this like? Uh?
Speaker 1: Like the soundtrack to uh, you know, espionage thriller or something?
Speaker 1: What do we think You didn't hear this in the
Speaker 1: background in your head when you were doing CIA stuff. No, always,
Speaker 1: always I did have the If I had to pick
Speaker 1: the best for me, the best espionage look, the best
Speaker 1: espionage song, or whatever, you're the best spy thriller soundtrack
Speaker 1: of all time. As of course the James Bond on theme.
Speaker 1: Nothing ever really can compare to that. But beyond that,
Speaker 1: if you're asking for an overall espionage thriller soundtrack, I
Speaker 1: actually have to say The First Born Identity had some
Speaker 1: really really cool stuff the First Born Identity movie soundtrack,
Speaker 1: because I've seen that movie so many times that I
Speaker 1: actually know the music pretty well. They did a very
Speaker 1: good job on that one, I've got to say. And
Speaker 1: some of the some of the soundtrack from the movie
Speaker 1: The Saint, which is a nineties flick that it's funny.
Speaker 1: My brothers and I we always argue about movies and
Speaker 1: TV shows. It's like our way of bonding, especially action
Speaker 1: or thriller, you know movie TV shows. And they thought
Speaker 1: that The Saint was so bad it's good, But I
Speaker 1: thought it was pretty just solid overall. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I thought it was pretty watchable. Have you ever seen
Speaker 1: a producer mark, I have not known. It's got Val Kilmer.
Speaker 1: It's a little little cheesy in some parts, but it's
Speaker 1: got some good stuff. Exactly A ringing endorsement. Yeah, I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't rush out to see it. If you could
Speaker 1: watch it for free, if it appeared on your Netflix
Speaker 1: que or something, I'd say, give it a go. Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Shoe is in it, best known perhaps for being the
Speaker 1: girlfriend of Ralph Maccio and the Karate Kid. So she's
Speaker 1: in it, and she's also now and that she actually
Speaker 1: is the kind of bad lady in the first season
Speaker 1: of The Boys on Amazon that is on my list.
Speaker 1: I wanted to watch it for a while. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: you haven't seen that, Mark, No, not yet. One you
Speaker 1: will love go to the top of producer marks. Que.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm planting a flag on this one. Man. You
Speaker 1: will like The Boys a lot. You'll be into it. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'll put a very interesting take on so you know
Speaker 1: how Game of Thrones, Oh whashual, you didn't see Game
Speaker 1: of Thrones. But Game of Thrones took the dungeons and dragons,
Speaker 1: Lord of the Rings, you know, genre, and added like
Speaker 1: kind of sex, drugs, and rock and roll to it
Speaker 1: a little bit. The Boys takes the superhero motif and
Speaker 1: runs in a very dark but highly entertaining direction with it.
Speaker 1: I've heard that about Umbrella Academy. Also, that's something else
Speaker 1: I wanted to watch. It seems I didn't check that
Speaker 1: one similar. Yeah, yeah, but I think the Boys, you,
Speaker 1: I mean, you gotta watch that. You That's but that
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't know if missus Mark would like
Speaker 1: that one that she does. She like superhero stuff. She does.
Speaker 1: She always likes all the Marvel stuff with me, So
Speaker 1: I think, yeah, then you get you guys. Could you
Speaker 1: guys could rock that one together and the first episode?
Speaker 1: Will you try to get it in? Maybe this weekend
Speaker 1: you and missus Mark should try that unless you're in
Speaker 1: the middle of something else right now season wise, No,
Speaker 1: we're not, so I think I think we can try
Speaker 1: it this weekend. All right, we'll get We're gonna get
Speaker 1: a report her at least We're gonna get a report
Speaker 1: from producer Mark on The Boys for all of you
Speaker 1: who'll do his Uh. The Penalty Box is going to
Speaker 1: review The Boys on Amazon. And I'm trying to get
Speaker 1: my little sister, who's very busy. She's got an adorable
Speaker 1: new newborn baby boy. So I'm now an uncle as
Speaker 1: we know, Uncle Buck. I'm trying to get her to
Speaker 1: join me for movie night this week. Uh it's now.
Speaker 1: Princess is out of town on some business and I'm
Speaker 1: trying to do movie night this week with little little
Speaker 1: ciss uh, and I want her to watch She's never
Speaker 1: seen Big Trouble in Little China, and we're gonna watch
Speaker 1: it together. I've maybe seen it one hundred times, but
Speaker 1: I don't care. We're gonna We're gonna order and take
Speaker 1: out and watch Big Trouble a Little China. And she's
Speaker 1: gonna have my mom babysit the baby for the night.
Speaker 1: So that's what I was gonna ask, who watches the baby?
Speaker 1: Oh my mom my Mom is like super babysitter. She's Grammy.
Speaker 1: Grammy has already raised four kids, so she's like, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, it's like she's a machine sent from the future.
Speaker 1: To raise children perfectly, like she knows what she's doing.
Speaker 1: It's Grammy, her official name. I call her that sometimes
Speaker 1: I don't know, we gotta you know, I feel like,
Speaker 1: you know, what ends up happening. Did this happen to
Speaker 1: your family too, The baby ends up naming. I feel
Speaker 1: like the grandparents, you know, calls him, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Like I had a great grandmother named Gaga because that's
Speaker 1: what my one of my aunts called her, you know,
Speaker 1: not lady Gaga for it, but called her Gaga before
Speaker 1: she could say grandma. I don't remember where my grandmother's
Speaker 1: name came from. I don't know who called her at first,
Speaker 1: but my grandmother was Bubby, which is Yiddish for grandmother. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: you know that's what I mean. Like, I feel like
Speaker 1: people come up grandparents. All a lot of them get names.
Speaker 1: I don't know a lot, you know. I called my
Speaker 1: grandfather on my mom's side, we just call them Paul,
Speaker 1: which you know, I'm sure a lot of people call
Speaker 1: people maybe their dad or their granddad Paul. And then
Speaker 1: I called my other grandmother grandma, but we kind of
Speaker 1: didn't pronounce the nd it was. It was kind of
Speaker 1: just grandma, like g r A M A U. So yeah,
Speaker 1: people come up with with names for grandparents out there.
Speaker 1: I feel like that's a pretty standard one. But and
Speaker 1: you've probably never seen big Trouble in Little China, right,
Speaker 1: I have not known that's that's like eighties. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you'll love it, so I can't tell you,
Speaker 1: but I mean the boys, you and missus mark top
Speaker 1: of the list and tell everybody what you think about
Speaker 1: that when and now we have top of our list
Speaker 1: roll call. And for that I turned to all of
Speaker 1: you Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton team buck at
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com. Make sure you're also go and check
Speaker 1: in at the site in Bucksexton dot com and editorial
Speaker 1: up there today. That is catching on like wildfire online.
Speaker 1: So would very much like all of you to check
Speaker 1: that one out. If you could please share it on
Speaker 1: your Facebook page, that'd be great, all right, Sarah Rights, Hey,
Speaker 1: bucking Mark, I recently discussed I recently know you've discussed
Speaker 1: losing some of your listeners and people who follow you
Speaker 1: on social media. Fear not, I will continue listening on
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio or Freedom ninety three point seven in Denver. Could
Speaker 1: some of your social media breakups have to do with
Speaker 1: people dropping the platforms more than dropping the buckster. About
Speaker 1: six weeks ago, I deactivated my Facebook account, deactivated my
Speaker 1: Twitter account several months back, and deactivated my Instagram tonight.
Speaker 1: Of course, that means I am no longer following you
Speaker 1: or anyone else on any of those platforms. I have
Speaker 1: one other question I like your opinion on. Now that
Speaker 1: the Democrats control the Senate, how much do you think
Speaker 1: we can rely on Joe Mench and these self described
Speaker 1: conservative Democrat to vote on common sense laws instead of
Speaker 1: the democrats wish lists so that we don't have to
Speaker 1: get Kamala to be the tie breaker. Sarah, first off,
Speaker 1: what you're saying is true, and I appreciate you raising
Speaker 1: this so I can tell everybody there are multiple things
Speaker 1: going on at the same time in conservative media right
Speaker 1: now conservative social media. One is that there has been
Speaker 1: a purge of accounts by the social media giants. If
Speaker 1: you had hashtag stopped to steal or hashtag anything q
Speaker 1: Q andon related things like that, they just suspended and
Speaker 1: deactivated thousands and thousands of accounts. So a lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of people have been caught up in that.
Speaker 1: There are also people who have voluntarily deactivated at some level, right,
Speaker 1: there are people who have decided they are no longer
Speaker 1: going to be following anyone as you have on those platforms.
Speaker 1: And I think that there was I mean, I know
Speaker 1: there was some anger about people like me who who
Speaker 1: condemned the Capitol Hill riot right away. By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't say that like, oh look at me, I
Speaker 1: condemn it. I think it's obvious. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: this is as straightforward a proposition as you'll find. Was
Speaker 1: the riot bad? Yes, it's bad. Don't do that. People
Speaker 1: shouldn't have done that. You know, there's some things that
Speaker 1: are that are black and white. There's some things that
Speaker 1: are right or wrong, and this is one of them.
Speaker 1: You know, it's very straightforward. So, yes, Sarah, I think
Speaker 1: that that's multiple things coming together. But you raise that
Speaker 1: there are people who have just decided to consciously uncouple
Speaker 1: from social media. I guess you could say, and that's
Speaker 1: that's one of them. Let oh, yes, and you asked
Speaker 1: about Mansion. I don't know. I'd like to tell you
Speaker 1: that Mansion will hold the line and not not bowed
Speaker 1: a pressure in the Senate on Democrat agenda items that
Speaker 1: are really left wing and radical, But think about all
Speaker 1: the pressure they'll be able to bring, think about all
Speaker 1: the inducements. You know, vanity is such a powerful tool
Speaker 1: when it comes to getting politicians to do what you want.
Speaker 1: And even for someone like Mansion, as long as he
Speaker 1: feels like he's on safe ground for reelection in West Virginia.
Speaker 1: You know, does he want the media to treat him
Speaker 1: as a as a as a moderate and a maverick
Speaker 1: who can go both ways but you know, still get
Speaker 1: it done for the Democrats? Or does he want to
Speaker 1: be a hateful, evil Trump supporting, you know, awful person
Speaker 1: who stands athwart the Democrat agenda. That's a real thing,
Speaker 1: you know, that's a that's a concern. That's a consideration
Speaker 1: that I think people need to take into account as
Speaker 1: we look at all of this. Hank next up here, Heybucker, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: time to take a good look at Hollywood's involvement in
Speaker 1: all this. The blatant hypocrisy they exude is unbearable. I
Speaker 1: live in California and work in the film business. The
Speaker 1: hospitals are full, the depths are climbing. But Newsome and
Speaker 1: Garcetti have declared the film business essential workers and toilet paper.
Speaker 1: Commercials are still being made while stores are out of
Speaker 1: toilet paper. If anyone gets injured on set or on
Speaker 1: their way to or from they will need one of
Speaker 1: those coveted hospital beds. But they still work full steam.
Speaker 1: Over the years age a large portion of the film
Speaker 1: business has relocated to Georgia and brought a lot of
Speaker 1: money there. It makes me wonder what the connections are
Speaker 1: to the state with the strangest election problems. I suppose
Speaker 1: it's a good place to start following the money shields
Speaker 1: high Hank. Yeah, I mean what you're saying about Hollywood
Speaker 1: is interesting. I'm not up on what the film industry,
Speaker 1: you know, loopholes are for this period of COVID lockdown,
Speaker 1: Nor do I know all that much about how much
Speaker 1: of Hollywood has moved to the state of Georgia. I know,
Speaker 1: for a while they were doing a lot of production
Speaker 1: up in like Vancouver and parts of Canada because it
Speaker 1: was so much cheaper to do there than to do
Speaker 1: it in California. So yeah, I don't know. I kind
Speaker 1: of wonder where they're doing all these shows for Netflix
Speaker 1: and all this new production. I can't imagine it's all
Speaker 1: happening or even a majority of it's happening in Los
Speaker 1: Angeles proper. But I'm not up on it, Hank. So
Speaker 1: you raise an interesting, an interesting question. I just don't know,
Speaker 1: all right, Kit, next up here. First, let me preface
Speaker 1: this by saying I'm an original Saturday Squad listener, love
Speaker 1: your show, in particular the history Deep Dives. I listened
Speaker 1: to every show via the podcast on a few days behind.
Speaker 1: I am a bit frustrated with you, though. Please stop
Speaker 1: giving the Left fuel by saying we did not come
Speaker 1: up with evidence of fraud or that there was not
Speaker 1: enough evidence. In Pennsylvania alone, the fact that there were
Speaker 1: over two hundred thousand more votes than there were voters
Speaker 1: is one evidence of fraud enough to change the results,
Speaker 1: and that should have nullified the entire vote of that state.
Speaker 1: It wasn't that there wasn't enough evidence, it's that the
Speaker 1: courts would not allow it to be heard. That is
Speaker 1: a total system failure. If the courts were not going
Speaker 1: to function properly when it counted the most, what recourse
Speaker 1: do we have? They were the last line of defense.
Speaker 1: Keep up the great work, though I still love your
Speaker 1: show and everything about it shields high Well, kid, I
Speaker 1: appreciated it. And honest, constructive criticism or just criticism from
Speaker 1: anybody out there who listens that comes from a place
Speaker 1: of wanting this show to be better. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: And that's why I'll even read it on air. We've
Speaker 1: got more messages coming into the inbox than we can
Speaker 1: ever get to in one day. But I think we
Speaker 1: all need to hear from people that have a bone
Speaker 1: to pick with me or think that I'm a little
Speaker 1: bit off on something. I share that with folks, so
Speaker 1: that we have all different perspectives and opinions from the
Speaker 1: conservative side. And by the way, if there's a liberal
Speaker 1: that has an interesting take that wants to write in,
Speaker 1: I'll read that too. I'm just not going to read
Speaker 1: the liberal stuff with all the curse words in it
Speaker 1: and whatever, because to waste of everybody's time. So so, kid,
Speaker 1: I'll say this the stuff you've heard some of it,
Speaker 1: and I say this, I do say this respectfully. Some
Speaker 1: of what was said about election fraud was just not accurate.
Speaker 1: And in Pennsylvania, for example, and I've talked to Sean
Speaker 1: Parnell extensively about this, some of it was that the
Speaker 1: actual state voter system was not updated with the right numbers,
Speaker 1: and so it seemed like there were massive over votes
Speaker 1: happening based on registered voters, but they actually needed to
Speaker 1: update the registrations that were in the system that appeared
Speaker 1: on the statewide site. And you say that there are
Speaker 1: more people who voted than could have voted, and that
Speaker 1: that should nullify the vote. Well, the problem with that
Speaker 1: is who did they vote for? Kit how do we know, right?
Speaker 1: And so what do you're you're going to nullify? So
Speaker 1: you're gonna take everyone's votes in that state and say
Speaker 1: that it didn't count, even assuming what you're telling me.
Speaker 1: And I'm telling you that that's actually not that there
Speaker 1: weren't two hundred thousand more votes than voters in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: I've looked at this, I've checked the numbers. I know
Speaker 1: we've been told that. I know that's been out there.
Speaker 1: But even if that were true, there were millions of
Speaker 1: people who voted in Pennsylvania. So you're gonna throw out
Speaker 1: all of those votes, and then you know what happens.
Speaker 1: And by the way, even if you did that, even
Speaker 1: if Pennsylvania had been thrown out, Joe Biden still would
Speaker 1: have had enough in the electoral College to win. So
Speaker 1: it's not that there and I've never said there was
Speaker 1: no evidence or fraud there. Clearly were there a problem,
Speaker 1: and they've had admitted even Democrats admit there were a
Speaker 1: couple of dead people who voted here, a couple of
Speaker 1: dead people voted there. I mean that's frauds. So there's
Speaker 1: there's obviously some fraud, but it's could we prove it
Speaker 1: to a level where it would have changed the course
Speaker 1: of change the outcome of the election? And that's where
Speaker 1: are the efforts to date were? They were insufficient? And
Speaker 1: I know this is a tough thing to hear. I
Speaker 1: know people don't like to hear it, but that's where
Speaker 1: we are. And kid, I appreciate you being an original
Speaker 1: Saturday Squad listener OSS and now going on almost a
Speaker 1: decade of listening to the show. I hope that the
Speaker 1: Freedom Heart Producer market I will continue to serve you
Speaker 1: as well as we have up to this point. So
Speaker 1: thank you very much for writing in. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
Speaker 1: All right, next up here, Jesse Buck. I appreciated your
Speaker 1: statement regarding how we were led on my certain parties
Speaker 1: and why I appreciated the fight. False hope was not
Speaker 1: what we needed. No krack in, no Senate wins, nothing
Speaker 1: but disappointment, feeling very let down all around, Jesse, I
Speaker 1: totally agree. And there were people who were peddling false
Speaker 1: hope about the election. We need to come to grips
Speaker 1: with that. That's the truth. I will say. The employer
Speaker 1: for unity is no more serious than Russia collusion. And
Speaker 1: all I can say, as a man of your ages,
Speaker 1: I thought adults were better than this. Where are the
Speaker 1: adults in the room in Congress and in the Senate.
Speaker 1: Where's the ability to discuss issues without hack job tactics
Speaker 1: and faulty smears. We have real issues, like our debt,
Speaker 1: which is only compounded by these absurd lockdowns and COVID
Speaker 1: prevention nonsense, where the facts are still ignored and we
Speaker 1: still can't speak because they're actively censoring our speech. I
Speaker 1: thought silence was violence. Guess that's just one more hypocrisy.
Speaker 1: The Left is guilty of it. Here. I am feeling
Speaker 1: fairly hopeless. What are we supposed to do? Oh, Jesse?
Speaker 1: I wish I had an answer or a perfect response,
Speaker 1: or something that I feel like, you know, can take
Speaker 1: this pitch you've thrown and I can just crack it
Speaker 1: into the upper deck for a homer like the producer
Speaker 1: mark Baseball. But yeah, I don't have an easy one here.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't have a way to tell tell
Speaker 1: you that this is all going to work out for us.
Speaker 1: We just have to batten down the hatches, prepare for
Speaker 1: what's coming, remember who we are, remember what we're all about,
Speaker 1: and try to convince as many of our fellow Americans
Speaker 1: as possible as we enter this new course of a
Speaker 1: Biden Harris presidency that it is not a good course
Speaker 1: for the country. That's where we are now, and we
Speaker 1: continue to keep our shields high.