WEBVTT - A Look At Retail, Markets, And Supply Chain Struggles 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We have a perfect

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>segue there. Talking about retail sales, Greg Jarrett, we have

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Angie Solanki joining US, National director of Retail for US Colliers. Uh, Angelie,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Here is Greg was

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just mentioning really strong retail sales coming out this morning.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, what do you make of it, because again

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>across the board the West, some concerned about the consumer,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but some really strong numbers this morning. Yeah, we're actually

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>quite surprised and also excited. I mean, we're forecasting for

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>year and somewhere around six percent increase in holiday sales,

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and we just feel that people are still looking to

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>get back into the stores. The traffic is back. We

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>saw about eighty three to increase in foot traffic, whether

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>it was department stores, apparel stores, or beauty So people

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting ready for the holidays. Is there going to

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be enough stuff for them to buy? I mean, I'm

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm already having visions of walking into the Toys r

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Us and seeing the shelves empty, although I don't know

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll be walking into a Toys are Why aren't you

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>walking into a Toys r Us for Steve there? Yeah,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>find a different store. But yeah, there aren't any more

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or less in terms of physical stores. However, we do

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>still have the same concerns. So, you know, holidays shopping,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>although it is starting early, we definitely think the reason

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>why is because shoppers are a bit worried about the

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, may feel Holidays away from them, so they're

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be potentially less merchandise well just may not

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>arrive on time. So there is you know, those concerns

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.279
<v Speaker 1>still do exist. Um, so we'll probably see an early

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>shopping spree and that's going to actually, I think help,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>although um retailers hopefully are well prepared for this. Yeah,

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where I wanted to go, because we

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't hear from the retail companies in terms of earnings

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for a couple more weeks here. I mean, what are

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the retailers saying about their inventories are about their ability

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to get product when it's needed, because boy, we're hearing

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it from so many others that there wrote backups at

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the ports. For example, there's lacks of lack of truck drivers,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>trains are backed up, the containers and everywhere you look.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems to really be a big issue. Yeah, it's

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a mis uh mismatch. And what I

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is possibly what is occurring right now.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Some retailers are receiving shipments that were prior season, so

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that now they're conflicted with hold on a second, I

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>don't even have my holiday shipment. Now I have my

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>prior season merchandise. How am I going to put that

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>into the store? Do I need to discount that? So

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the pressure that is being pushed onto retailers is just

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just all over the map. And I feel for

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>them because it's a big struggle. Um, not only are

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they struggling with you know, the merchandise coming in on

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>time or over a merchandise meaning that they probably have

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>either received multiple orders two or three times what they

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>planned for, So now they may have too much merchandise

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>during the holiday season, and will that extend their holiday

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>potential sales into January February. By the way, do you

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think we saw savings rates jump during the pandemic and

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they've come back down stabilized a couple of percentage points

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>above the historical average. Do consumers spend down back to

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the norm? I know we're actually going to

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>see an increase in spend based on some surveys we've

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>been reading, we actually see that consumers are going to

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>spend either a little bit more compared to prior year UM,

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but probably roughly around you know, about six to seven

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars on the average spend for gifts during this

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. I think if people are still really in

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the mood to celebrate, you know, the mass mandates are

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>relaxing quite a bit, especially in our more dense urban cities,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So we will definitely see a bit more spend occurred

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this year, and then we'll start to see hopefully and

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>softening UM and next year with the with the savings

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. And you talked to us about real estate,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>retail real estate. I'm here on Lexington Avenue between fifty

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>eight and fifty nine Street, UM. All of the retail

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>space with the exception of one very small Swiss chocolate

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>store remain empty. Are what are we thinking about? What

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are the retailers saying about, you know, getting back into

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the physical stores now? They're definitely retailers are very excited.

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>It's actually been a very busy year. I have to

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>stay within our organization at Colliers. We've just and the

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>transactions are speeding up. I think what we're seeing is

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the falling right now. Fifty fine million square feet of

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>retail has been absorbed across the US year to date,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's another fifty million square feed about that is

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>under construction. So we are seeing momentum. There's movement from

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>other markets, global markets where retailers are coming into our

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>into the US. But what we're seeing is a very

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>strategic approach. So they're really taking the time to say, Okay,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to expand, where should we expand first.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So what I mean by about is, of course, a

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people left the city and so when they left,

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>um retailers follow. And so the retailers are saying, let's

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>go into some of these suburban markets where we're seeing

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, year over year sales increases from our competitors. Uh,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's some great locations. Let's try to get in

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>now and then we'll start to look at or relook

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at some of our urban markets. But it's not going

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, there's still it's still you know, viable space. Please.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>You know, remb umber that rechire not going away, and

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the physical footprint is definitely not going away. I wonder

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if anybody wants to move back to Midtown. Our stores

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are empty, right, Paul? Is it still pretty empty around

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg office. Yeah, but the tourists are slowly coming back.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I was again, I was out in the city having

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dinner last night, and I noticed that the tourists are

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>starting to come back. So it's the worst of both

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>worlds exactly. They're always welcome, of course. Of course, Hey, Angie,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Angie Solanki, their national

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>director of retail for the US. Over at call, you're

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to us about what do you expect this holiday

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>season after we had some real bang up numbers on

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. Let's bring in a j Odin right now.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>He's an investment strategist at b n y Melon Investor Solutions,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and um, we're looking at another rally today after yesterday

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we had the biggest games. I believes in March. What's

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>driving us higher in the face of inflation concerns, supply

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>chain issues, labor shortages. Thanks for having it, That's a

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>great question, and I think a lot of it has

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with we're chipping away slowly at that wall

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of worry that we saw in September. September were sort

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of everything sort of came together in this perfect storm,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and we saw the death ceiling issues sort of added

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to that persistent inflation question, and then the news that's

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to about the potential for real estate um position

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>more contagion issue, but obviously became more contained. And so

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all of that created a lot of volatility in October

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and now obviously I mean in September, but obviously now

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we chipped away a little bit. The death citing issue

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>pushed off until December, and although supply chain issues haven't

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>been resolved, the labor market numbers that we're getting being

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit stronger, moving from five down to four

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>point eight were we I think the market is digesting

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that although we're still going to have some

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>persistent inflation, supply chains are gonna take a little bit

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>time to normalize that the markets are still supportive of

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>rich assets and inflations. Clearly here that's why you're seeing

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed incomes fell off, But where investors are going is

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to where they can get some sense of inflation protection.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>That's I guess, while you're also seeing movement in the

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto market as well. So clearly the quality names, the

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>ones that have pricing power, are going to have staying

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>power and the age and ability to ride out some

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of this inflationary turbulence that we're gonna see for the

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>next few months. And I think that's why you're seeing

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the doubt out performing the rest of the major industry.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So a J do I Do I stick with that

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>rotational trade? You know, a lot of folks made back

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>boys September of last year really arguably into the more

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>cyclical names, maybe the banks, the energy names. Do I

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>stick with that? Order? I try to again take a

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the quality top line growth stories, whether it's

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>tech or healthcare. How do I think about that? I

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a little bit of both. You

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want some income, right, you want diving in um yield

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, all as you want those quality names. UM

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see turbulence overall, But it seems like this

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is reopened three point oh in a sense. Right, we

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to to you know, it's reopening the economy.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Then there seems like we pull back a bit. But

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>even seeing the news about international travel restriction being lifted

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>for vaccinated UM consumers, that's that's that's all positive news.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>And and it seems like this time hopefully that we're

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna be staying in that reopen trend. So

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to your point, I think it's gonna be a little

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>bit of both. It's gonna be income quality with those

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with pricing power, but also reefs as well. We like those, um,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going going forward as we we we navigate this inflationary pressure. Um.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>What about property here? I wonder you like reads, Um,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>do you buy real estate even even in this inflated market?

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're so you're saying about the actual

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>individual housing? Um? Yeah, you know, I think I think

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>prices prices are a bit high, um. And so from

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>from individual perspective, I mean, if I think about myself,

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I would probably probably hold tight a bit um. And

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>but I mean from a reef financing perspective, it seems

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>like that's what a lot of consumers are doing, and

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense while rates are low, um, even

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>though they are creeping up, creeping up a bit um,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you do you do get the value. I mean, you know,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>housing prices, Hopefully you'll hold the value. I mean it

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in a sense that that real act, that the ability

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to just sort of in a sensive access as an

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>equity in and keeping keeping too inflation trends, so I

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I would caution it just because of prices and hopefully

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you know when when things normalize a bit, maybe prices

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>come back when it comes to individual housing. But from

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the res perspective, we do like the income um and

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and instability to sort of deal with the tapering and

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the potential for area likes that are coming into Paul

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul is not the best time to buy an individual,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>but converse league a great time to sell a j

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We've we had some good financials. Have earnings results in

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the financials UH this week capped off here by Goldman

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Sax today. What are you looking for UH in this

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>earning period as we kind of get into the meat

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of over the next couple of weeks. I mean, it's

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>super spinning is so important, right, I mean, we have

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about with this pandemic, everything sort of came

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to a stand cell and we've been looking for organic

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>growth to take over, and it's to be it's that

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>handoff for that bridge between fiscal and monetary policy to

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>come over into really just from the economy itself sort

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of standing on its own. And so continuing to see

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>strong earning numbers is important for us because we need

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to know that that baton handoffs can happen, and that

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as we see capering and potential for rate hikes down

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the future, that we won't see any sort of pullback

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. So I think to continue to see

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>stronger earning numbers is going to be important overall. And

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the earnings that we've seen so far, you're impressed, I

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean you're be with the for example, the financials we've seen.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's showed divertification from the banks. I mean,

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>when we think about the banks, can we think about uh,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>it's usually it's a lot of it has to do

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with the yield curve, but their ability to do so

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in a low interest rate environment and still produced is

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a positive for the market. So I think that strong financials. Uh. Overall,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a positive seeing as that we're still at

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, a zero percent fund. Ray All right, A

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>j thank you so much for joining us. We really

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting your thoughts here. A j Oden investment strategist

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for b n Y Melan Investors Solution. So, Matt, not

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>a good time to be a buyer real estate. I

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>think that's terribly unfortunate in my case. Um, I'm if

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's your if it's your primary residence, I think there's

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>not much you can do. And yeah, but you're just

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be headed home pretty soon. I feel

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like if I if I rent a place, I'm just

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be I feel like I'm just giving money away hurt. Yeah,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta think that the market's not gonna be

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this crazy for this long. But who knows. Um so,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's even a rental markets in the city, it's

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten very tight, very quickly. But maybe on the burbs

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit better. Well, they buy the dippers

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have won the day again today. Let's get

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a sense of maybe where we go from here. As

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>we get into the meat of this third quarter earning season,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we bring in a grizzled voice from the investment community.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Christine Hooper, chief Global market strategist for Investment, Well, I

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>say grizzle because listen to this. They have one point

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>five trillion dollars in assets under management. So when Christina speaks,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>people listen, and we are so approached to having Christina

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on our show over time. Christina again. It feels like,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just when people were starting to get a little worried,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit spooked about this market, the wall of

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>worry and all those things that are out there, the

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days, I kind of erased that a

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Well, certainly, but I wouldn't say we're out

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the woods yet. I would expect continued volatility. What

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we learned from the f O m C minutes is

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is full speed ahead and likely to

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>announce and begin tapering in November. I think that will

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>contribute to volatility, as will the continuation of earning season.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Not so much. I think for any negative surprises, I

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly will get a few of those, but I think

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's more about the guidance for the future and issues

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like supply chain disruptions. So what about um inflation? Is

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the FED moving you think quick enough to keep this

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>under control. Well, um, hopefully it is. I think so,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just because I'm of the camp that that most of

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the inflation we're seeing is relatively transitory. Now keep in

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mind that transitory doesn't mean that it goes away in

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a month or two um. In fact, there's some some

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>dictionaries that would define transitory is not permanent. But I

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do think we're likely to see elevated prices, higher inflation

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>war of the coming months, and that it may not

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>uh may not moderate until the middle of next year.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have to to buckle our seatbelts and expect

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that to be problematic, and that some of the headlines

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>could be scary, but this really shouldn't impact long term investors. So, Christina,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of the big bank's report results

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, have to buy some just some eye popping

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of Goldman Sacks today. What did you take

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>from the financials and what we saw this week? Well,

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I certainly expected financials to be a highlight of earnings.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Right that there are certainly far more tail winds than

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>headwinds for the financial space, So this isn't surprising. I

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't want us to be lulled into a false

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of security because some some sectors, some industries are

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to fare as well in this environment as

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>financials have. So which ones are are you most concerned about? Well,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly the ower marchin industries um UM, transportation,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>general retail, um, autos um, those that are certainly being

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>um impacted by supply chain disruptions. I think that's where

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see some of the pain uh this

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this earning season. And again though I don't think it

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>should deter investors. I think we just need to be

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>prepared for this. Yeah, I'm looking at my map go

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>function on the Bloomberg terminal and I like to look at,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the number of ships cargo ships that

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are outside Los Angeles or Savannah, New York and some

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of the big U s ports. It ain't get any

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>better out there. And I'm kind of concerned over the

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks when we hear from consumer products companies,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>technology companies, industrial companies that we're going to hear a

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>lot about supply chain issues. It just feels like it's

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a longer term issue that perhaps the

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>market is not fully discounting how do you think about that? Well,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is certainly store in to discount it. Um.

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>This is very understandable. We're coming out of this incredible

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>economic disruption in the pandemic. UM. So it makes sense

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're experiencing all these issues and it makes sense

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that it will take some time for them to be

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>worked out. Um. Having so, having said all that, I

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>would expect, especially not only companies UH in those areas,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk about difficulties thus far, but to give guidance

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for the fourth quarter. I'm quite frankly this situation has

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten worse in the last couple of weeks, so it's

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more going to be about UH next quarters earnings

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and the impact there. So I think guidance is absolutely critical.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>UH to the extent that companies have visibility, I was

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>going to say, don't you think visibility is lacking right now? Um,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Certainly some have greater visibility than others. I think as

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think companies have. Some companies at least have a better sense,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>for example, of semiconductor supplies and how that situation is

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of versus what we're seeing in in in other areas

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of supply chain disruptions. But yes, UM. In general,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>visibility is going to be a challenge. Do you think

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>earnings have come down enough to reflect some of these

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>margin pressures that we might see in Christina or do

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you think there's maybe some risk to this market from

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from earnings. Well, I certainly think that that earnings UM

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>are are going to be negatively impacted. And I think

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that we're going to see anything terrible UM,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but certainly for those companies with the narrow margins, it's

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have a significant impact. But again, it's a

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>relatively short term problem in the grand scheme of things.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a long term problem right now because

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it could last several quarters UM, but UM for those

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with a long time horizon, these are kinds of issues

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that could present buying opportunities if they're reflected in stock prices.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to quickly get your take on rates.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the ten year climb back up to one

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty basically right now. One where do you see rates going? So?

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that that the movement is going to be higher,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that it's going to be a

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>smooth move and they're certainly going to be headlines events,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>data releases that can send the yell lower temporarily, UM.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But in my mind, we're going to be closer to

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two than one percent when we finished this year, and

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to be higher than where we

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>are today. So and again, just following up on that,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Christine UM, just wondering about the FED, UM, do you

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>expect this tapering, in this eventual rate increase policy that

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we're likely to see over the next six and twelve months.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect this to be I guess well received

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>by the market or rational received by the market. I

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>think it will. Let's keep in mind that the stock

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>market has become so incredibly dependent upon accommodative monetary policy,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and so this is a situation in which UM, the

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>market is going to welcome, UM a a very slow

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>normalization process. And so I think in particular, things like

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when J. Powell says that there has been a very

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>conscious un coupling of tapering from rate hikes, I think

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a very well received because right now markets have

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>come to accept the fact that we're going to see

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tapering start soon. UM, They're more wary about rate hikes

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and where that might take us. So I think that

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this this approach is and will be well received by markets.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks so much for joining us, Christina. Always

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>great to get your insight. Christine and Hooper their chief

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>global market strategists over at Investco. As Paul said, they

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have about one and a half trill billion dollars of

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>assets under management out of Atlanta. That does it for

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this Friday. This is Bloomberg. Now let's get to Mark Noble.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He's the executive VP of E T F Strategy at

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Horizons E T S and we want to talk about

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain issues the semiconductor industry, how that's reshaping

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. Um, Mark, what do you think about where

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we stand right now? Is there any light at the

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the tunnel here? I? I don't think so. Um.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that you know right now the semiconductor

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>issue with supply chains and the fact that semiconductors have

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>become probably the most highly politicized industry globally, means we're

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>probably looking at three for us to get some sort

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>of supply chain movement where these can get to market.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>UM very much viewing what's happening with a semiconductor's market

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to be similar to what we saw in the seventi

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>three oil shock, where the pandemic has really shown the

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>fragility of the supply chain where we've been so heavily

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>reliant on Asian manufacturing. The vast majority of semi connector

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>components are manufactured in Asia, the majority of i P

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is in North America but not manufactured there. And it's

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>resulted in a situation where you know, the United States

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and China are very much at odds to get control

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the semiconductor, which has really come to the four

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>as the key technology used for all consumer electronics, from

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>everything from you know, smart TVs and artificial intelligence to

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of course what we've seen with automobiles. So it is

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>almost at a crisis situation, and you know, no amount

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of money being thrown at it is probably going to

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>allow us to have reassoring of this commodity. And I'm

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>very much unu as a commodity until there's you know,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more excess manufacturing capacity, which will take a couple of

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>years to built. Mark, I don't even know how we

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>out here. I don't even have cocktail our kind of

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of this topic. How did we get here? Well,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason that we got here was that for the

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>last fourty years, globalization has occurred where supply chain has

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all been focused on just in time delivery of technology.

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And so the United States benefit in technology has really

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>come from the I P which is developing the technology.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have Silicone Valley providing sort of the

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>brain trust for development of technology. But to actually build components,

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you have components built all around the world. So for example,

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>if I'm doing etching on semiconductors, that's likely happening through

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>a SML in in Netherlands, but I'm actually building the

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>key components that go into you know, glaphics processing units,

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>which are the major driver of things like artificial intelligence

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>even automobiles. Now that's being done in Taiwan, and then

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I have shipping coming through China, and I have you know,

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Japan and Korea also offering different pieces, and all these

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>these uh uh supply chain opponents would come together to

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>create this just in time manufacturing. When you have any

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>disruption of the supply chain, which we've seen with the

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic UH it results in a breakdown of any one

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of these components, you end up with complete gridlock in

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>getting these semiconductors to market. But that's only one piece

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. The more important piece is that data is

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really you know, the idea of data. If we talk

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about where the economy is going for the next two decades,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>really what we're moving forward is a digital economy, and

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a digital economy requires semiconductors to move data. Very much

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>view data as the new oil. So semiconductors are the

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>new engine of that data. And if you want to

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>be you know, the lead economies in the next couple

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of decades, you need to have exposure to semiconductors. And

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what's happened is China, for example, realize that they have

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a huge vulnerability relative to the rest of the world,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and that they use semiconductors for all of their technology development,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but they don't actually manufacture them. So they've been holding semiconductors.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They've been taking you know, I p and people from

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan to come and work there. And the United States

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>has now double down, even introduced an act in called

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know uh Chips in America Act where they're

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>also trying to double down to control the supply. So really,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for your listeners, it's almost viewing it like the oil

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shock in the nineteen seventies, again where the safety and

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 1>security of these massive global economies is focused on controlling

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.239
<v Speaker 1>supply of semi conductor is the way that they were

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on controlling supply of oil in the eighties. So, um,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what's an investor to do in this situation? I mean,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way to hedge against these problems? Well,

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, you know, you would think this would create

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>volatility in the space, but actually creates an interesting opportunity

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>because one, there's only excess capacity being built and demand increasing.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So where we expect the semiconductor market to probably be

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about a trillion dollar market by it's roughly a five

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar market now. And the one thing that's interesting

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in this market that doesn't exist with other technology markets

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>is that there's going to be I believe, hundreds of

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>billion of dollars spent by governments globally to support an

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>underpinned development and manufacturing in semiconductors. So your baseline revenue

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of these companies or subsidies is very well controlled, even

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if you end up with volatility. So as a long

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>term buy and hold investment, uh, it's probably extremely attractive

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>simply because demand is not going away and you've got

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>massive public investment going into this, like you would with

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure investment. So even if you end up an

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>inflationary market, you have that being supported with money coming

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in from the public. And then long term semi conductors

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are only going to be more widely used in all

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>facets of our life, which means long term demand does

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not decline. So this is definitely a long term investment

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>play that has a lot of opportunity even if it

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>becomes a political powder keg at certain periods during the

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>supply chain disruption. All right, Mark, thanks so much for

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really appreciate that. I certainly have a better

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding here, but I'm disappointed that we can't just throw

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>money at the problem. It's usually my strategy their Mark Noble,

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>executive VP of et F Strategy at Arise and ETFs.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you just throw money and build a more

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a new fab plant. But apparently that takes a while.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess takes a while. It takes some time to

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do that, and um, Unfortunately it looks like companies like

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>t SMC are willing to throw more money at it

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than companies like Intel. Yeah. Interesting, but we got to

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>get some of that back on short. Sounds like as

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we talked to some of the experts like Mark. Thanks

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. Put on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.