WEBVTT - Surveillance: McCain Was A Life-Long Learner, Stavridis Says

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jailey.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg PIM.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>We were over the weekend, UH setting up the best

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>way to discuss the Senator from Arizona. My first name

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was Trevillus. Yes, Admiral James George Well, James trevinas I said,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get admirals trevit us out. Of course it tofts

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course this wonderful book See Power, which talks

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>about our oceans. Uh is well, Admiral, thank you so

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us this morning. Your thoughts on John McCain, Well,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let me start. We've been talking correctly about what it

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>means that the nation to lose John McCain, If I may,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you what it means for the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Navy to lose that. That's exactly what I wanted. He is.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>He really is a legend, starting back at the Naval

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Academy where he was the ultimate bad boy. He had

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>more demerits than anybody in his class. He graduated at

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the absolute bottom of his class. He got away with

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>everything and he was beloved for it. Flashed forward incredible

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>heroism in Vietnam. We all know that um and then

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>consistently for the rest of his life, the Navy continued

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a touchdown. He was the son and grandson

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of two fourth star admirals, and I can tell you,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as a fourth star admiral myself, that is not an

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>easy position. I look at my own children in the

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Navy struggling with that. John McCain was an icon for

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this nation, but even more so for the U. S. Navy.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We will miss him deeply. Who are the new John

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>McCain in the Navy? If you go to Annapolis today,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>who are the new John mccains? How do you build

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>them today? We are fortunate that the service academies, and

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>here I'll I'll grudgingly admit, the place just up the

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>river called West Point does a pretty good job. Thanks

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as that. The Air Force Academy in Colorado, it wasn't

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>aware of that either. And all those academies are all

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about duty, honor, country. They are all driven by honor

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>codes that say we will not lie, cheat, or steel.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And they produced people to throw a name out like

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs for Star

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Admiral as straight as as an arrow and extraordinary leader.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of John McCain's out there these days.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Steverda's John McCain was a naval aviator and that

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>also had an effect on the way people look at

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>appropriations and the power that the US Navy is able

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to project. I'm wondering if you could just comment on

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>his role as an naval aviator and what legacy he

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>will leave there. Yeah. I have to begin by saying

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that I came out of the Academy and I wanted

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a naval aviator, you know, like Goose and

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Maverick and Top Gun. By the way, the remake is

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>coming out soon, uh, And I could never do it

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>because every time I did a barrel role, I lost

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>my lunch in the cockpit. So I have enormous respect

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for these aviators and really that ability to project power

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from c on these massive aircraft carriers, eight combat aircraft

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on the decks of each, seven acres, those sovereign American

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>acres that go anywhere. They can move a thousand miles

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in a day. These are extraordinary machines of war, but

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they are useless without these naval aviators like John McCain.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You commanded the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group and that conducted

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>operations in the Persian Gulf operation of Rocky Freedom operation

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and during Freedom. What's changed in terms of the use

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of aircraft carriers to project not just military force but

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>political influence. What's really changed since I had command of

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise and we were doing simultaneous operations in Afghanistan, in

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Iraq and over the Horn of Africa. That that incredible

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>operational flexibility, that ability to maneuver, that has not changed.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>But what has changed is the rise of pure navies,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>notably China and Russia have become much more capable at sea.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So instead of, if you will, getting open sea space

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to move those carriers and simply launch those strikes, today

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>our carriers have to worry about other navies at sea

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>who can compete with us, like China and Russia. That

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>means we have to be better at missile defense, better

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at anti submarine warfare, better at protecting the carrier at

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seed than we had to previously. Admiraldu To finish up

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with our discussion of John McCain before we get back

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to more important international relations matters with your work at

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>TuS Fletcher School. Al Hunt, in his beautiful essay, mentions

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>John Glenn and I think there's not enough said about

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we know of McCain over Vietnam, but the

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>technology of the Korean War that Ted Williams and John

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Glenn flew in was is medieval? Is medieval the right word? Yes,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>medieval is the right word. And you're right to mention

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>both of those legends, especially John Glenn, who was a

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>lifelong naval aviator. He was a US Marine Corps and

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of course they're part of the Department of the Navy,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and they flew basically flying crates that were very similar

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to what came out of World War Two. By the

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>time John Cane was flying much more advanced radar, much

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>better capability. You have to tip your hat to people

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like John Glenn when I when I look at what

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here, it is about the deployment. His

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pin was mentioning the boats in the water today, the

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>aircraft carrier excuse me, shift, so what I know spoken

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like your thank you? Yeah, God nailed nailed that as

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>far as I got airmalster Vitas was a grumming canoe

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with wings, yes, with the wigs within this adimalster view.

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a new technology. Would Senator McCain know the

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>two technology? Could he land a plane on one of

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>these new carriers we have in a minute, And I

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>will tell you that actually that technology makes it tom

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you could probably land plane on an aircraft carrier.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's how good it is now. Seriously, John McCain, UH, open, intuitive,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>lifelong learner, and I think that's very important quality and

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a leader that ability to change and step into new technology.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And John McCain did that every day. That's why he

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was so important on the Senate Armed Services Committee because

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he knew those technologies so well as he was funding

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>them for us to take them for Well, let's finish

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>up this discussion before we get back to uh the

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>work at hand. Your wonderful book in my book of

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Year, The Leader's Bookshelf had a seventy nine books

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in it. For our listeners, what is the book in

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>your the Leader's bookshelf that has the most to do

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with Senator McCain. I think the one that would reflect

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the most would be another prisoner of war story, and

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that's James Stockdale, who you'll recall Tom was at one

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>point vice presidential candidate with Rossborough. He and his wife Sybil.

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Stockdale and his wife Sybil wrote a book called In

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Love and War about Stockdale's time in the camps, alternating

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>chapters between the two of them. It's a love story

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that transcends war and is also brings to focus what

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>John McCain went you win those camps. Let's come back

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with James Durvinus the toughs. James Stockdale pim buried at

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Naval Academy and Mr mckaine will join him. Yes,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he was at most Stocktail was also he was shot down,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in North Vietnam. That was in September. We'll come

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>back with James Trevines. Lots to talk about on our

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>International Relations film. I liked where you're going there with

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the boats at ham today and uh ships boats, ships, Yeah, well,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say also, you know, just over the weekend

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a report that there were there were three

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Russian warships that were spotted passing through the bus Verus

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that connects Turkey. Let's let's come back and talk to

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>James drevinus about that more typical themes what we thank him? First?

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Comments on uh Senator McCain John gollub with us listening

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to the opening show festivities, and there's sort of that

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>August and in school used to start Wednesday of Labor Day,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of when you reallocated your portfolio. And

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, anybody with parents, we hate it.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's all starting earlier and earlier. Were there? Now, how

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>do you reallocate this morning? Well, I'm first of all,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that you really do relocate, but you

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and I were talking about this before on TV. The

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>real question is how much of your money do you

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:49.479
<v Speaker 1>put in technology? And how how strong are they equity investment?

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Where do you put it in tech? Yeah? And I think, um, right,

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, these companies are just so powerful in their

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to earn and their potential upside, and even as importantly,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the damage that they're doing to other large parts of

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy in the process of their success is just

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>making them look relatively so much more attractive, relatively attractive,

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and that goes to the idea of value trap. Where's

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the value trap in the market? Our listeners. They're gonna

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>make decisions there in cash. They've missed the bull market.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Where are we twelve months trailing? I can bring this

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>up in a Bloomberg quickly with the w E I function.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>It's only up eighteen percent double digit in the last

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. Okay, fine, where's the value trap that I

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to buy cheap? But it's a mistake. Well, I

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will tell you. When I'm talking to traditional value investors,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they're finding it hard to find anything that looks really cheap.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think that perhaps the area might be in

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples. Companies that were very expensive have fallen a

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>fair bit, are a little bit cheaper than the market

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, but their their brands are just getting demolished

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>by technology. And we are changing the way that we're

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>buying things because you can, you know, have you know,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just search on Google or or or Amazon. I'm going

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick up a major consumers something you buy at

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store all the time, folks. In revenue growth

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is flat with the hope and prayer of single digit

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>growth into the future. Versus a major tech company where

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in ninety days you can get two years of revenue

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>growth that you get in a food company. And I

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you you love the idea of cash flows,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the price for per cash

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>flow on these tech companies are trading at a discount

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to the market, partially because investors don't fully believe that

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>this growth can continue into the future. And I think

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're likely gonna be wrong. And part of this

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is the management of those tech companies. Is it safe

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>to say that that they're not making the accounting and

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>capital deployment mistakes of previous Tech Bowl markets. I think

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more responsibility out there and maybe that

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>or may just be that that some of these stories

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are are coming of age um and and you know,

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioning this again on on on the TV

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>show this morning, but if you look at the revenue

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>revenue chart of Amazon versus Walmart, one of them, you know,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the Amazon line just looks like it launches,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was at one pace for a period of

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>time and then all of a sudden revenues and profits

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as we all became more comfortable with the types of

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>brands and and this and it's not only that one

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>company but others as well. How do you buy tech

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if our listeners say, I don't want to buy just

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the three names everybody else owns. Yeah, I mean you

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can buy any t I you can buy a broad portfolio.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Might mind you. You know, there's a whole there's obviously

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's dozens or hundreds of companies that that

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>are part of that that ecosystem. And yeah, you don't

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>want to buy just five or seven names. Um And

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's success stories in everything. In a matter

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of fact, if you even look in areas like reads

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>UM with you know, real estate investment trust, which wouldn't

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be what you think about technology, but the most exciting

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>companies there are companies they are building data centers UM

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for cloud computing, and those are interesting plays. Um. You're

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in you know, in in innovative consumer companies

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that are using technology. So it's not just in our group.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Our David Wilson does a great equity update in the

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock hour, sort of like the ten stocks of

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the day. They're moving in that and I have been

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really quite taken by the the the idiosyncrasies of each

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>retail story. Now retail has got to react to Amazon.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>We all understand that as well. How do you how

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>do you strategize about retail and the cacophony of the

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>American consumption. Well, I think you have. I think you

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of stories here. One is that in

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the near term, these these companies are doing UH surprisingly

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>well because the American consumer is in great shape and

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the unemployment rate is low, wages are

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>beginning to rise, which has other side effects, but the

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>consumers in super shape and that's helping UM a lot.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But the question is is it masking UM? Perhaps? And

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that the long term story is is somewhat

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>dire for many of these brick and mortar names, but

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but no different than people who have invested in Japan,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was for twenty or thirty years a downward

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>trend line, but with periods of brilliant jumps where you

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to play play the game. Right now, maybe one

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of those times where retail, even though it's on a downtrend,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>looks absolutely brilliant because the consumers in great about I

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think that large cap companies are probably going to continue

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to do UH to outpage UM there in a in

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a world where again the economy is good right now,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but in the world world. The economy has been tighter.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>We're managing margins has been the key to six says.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Larger companies have just done a better job at managing

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>those expenses in margins. John Golub with a start at

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>sweets as we look at the equity Margaret, you know

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what in August afternoon we had animals to beat us

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>on and wonderful comments on John McCain and talking about

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>international relations on this day, as we did with John

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>gobb of Credit Sweets, a little different conversation, and we

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>could do that with Fred Lane with Lane Generational, which

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is a dead serious effort with Raymond James to actually

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to people about the emotion of money. Now. Granted,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Fred Lane, what what's your minimum investment? Two

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>dred million, five thousand? What's a reasonable number? And to

0:15:58.080 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that's upot and other people to

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>rounding here. But the answer is, and I don't want

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, what's a doal gonna do? Should I be

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market. I want to talk about how the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sweat is different now from the kids than it was

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty or forty years ago. You've got to deal with

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the emotion of families, the generational and how are the

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>kids different than they were a generation ago. Well, I

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think the kids are so different. I think we

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>as parents and some in some cases, have been overly

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned with our kids emotional well being and maybe haven't

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>asked him to do enough chores and be self sufficient enough.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this about my own children as well. Um

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think in general that my concern is that

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the next generation, UM, well, I think find it a

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>little harder to accumulate capital. Then this past generation has founded.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The baby boomers have found it easier because there were

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so many of us entering the economy that drove GDP growth,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think the I think today's world is a

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>little different than it's gonna be harder to accumulate capital.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I think global growth is going to be over time,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be declining, and that's going to make

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it harder to accumulate capital. In the old days, you

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had a cash flow off of a pot of money

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and you could write ignorances tuition to whatever school. Today,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>pim correct me if I'm wrong. It's overwhelming. It is

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>for families and generations. It's just overwhelming. How do you

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with that? How do you deal with somebody with

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a pot of money who says, look, I can't do

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this because I can't write the checks. I got to

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>dip into capital. Well, Michael, actually myel no, no, we're

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>taking notes. Yeah, no, I listen. Most of my clients

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't in that aren't directly in the crosshairs of that dilemma. However,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the question, and I'm glad it's being asked increasingly,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is is there are a good return on investment in

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a college education? The rack rate, the rate that's supposed

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to be paid frequently is not okay. So you know,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you got average university, maybe they're seventy seventy five all end,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but magically they come up with a scholarship for kids.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But your kid could put the puck in under the

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>crossbar from he was different, thank you. Both My kids

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>were different because they were hockey players. And that's rather unfair.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>They are heavily recruited athletes and that and that they're

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they're putting a different class. But for the average, the

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>really smart, hard working kid, he's probably not gonna get

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>scholarship help if his parents have means and the and

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the worst people that the people who are the worst off,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I should say, are the people are making two fifty

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars year because they're making enough, and they've been

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>good savers and put money away, and they have equity

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in their home, and the universities don't want to hear

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that they need help. And so you know, frankly,

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those kids are going to end up

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>um the beneficiary of their parents large and the parents

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna end up with a lot less than in

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the way of retirement income. And it's it's an unfortunate situation.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the reasons I say to everybody, all clients,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>let me meet your children. Let's get the magic compounding

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>going when they're young years old. Put away ten fifteen

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year consistently every year. That adds up

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>by the time you're fifty. It's a lot of money

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by the time you're fifty. Fred Fred Lane, I want

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask about the context in which we kind of

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>do all these comparisons, you know, and and one of

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the things I've kind of noticed is everyone's trying to

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>compare now to a period, let's say, after the Second

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>World War, and if you look at that as the anomaly.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone had any money. I mean, no one had anyoney.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I can remember conversations around the dining room table where

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>when asked about the depression, my father would say, what depression?

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>No one had any money before, no one had any

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>money during, and no one had any money afterwards. And

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering whether we're comparing this to some nostalgic gold

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and age that really didn't exist from most people. Look,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the standard of living for the average from Americans in

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>general is breathtaking lee high, there's no question about it. Uh.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And yet by comparison, when we see the super wealthy

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and the very wealthy all a function of the accumulation

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of wealth that's gone on, um, you know, certain people

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna feel as if they've missed out, they missed

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>missed because they only have two cars and they have

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a boat, and they don't have a summer home, and

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>oh too bad. And and I'm not saying that dismissively.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that dismissively risively, But I'm saying a

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>different in a different fashion, which is the wealth effect

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>has created a class of human being, a class, a

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>small class who are unbelievably wealthy, but you know, it's

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a function time. You know you you remember, I remember

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Pam in six when I came to Wall Street, the

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>dow was at six hundred in four d. If you

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>had just put money into the market, it didn't matter

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what you did. You know, you you you would accumulate

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>tremendous levels of capital. But you have to be in

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the game in order to benefit from the game. Patient

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and also unemotional, staying the course. Staying the course, you

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>make adjustments, of course, but no pun intended. But but nonetheless, um,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to be in the game, and you have

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to be unemotional and frankly, you know, when there's a

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>rollover in the market, bingo, that's the time to be

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>putting money to work. Where I grew up, it was

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>people that bought Kodak, you know, from Frank Strong and

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>George Eastman, or they bought a company called hay Lloyd,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which became a company called Xerox. You must have clients

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>about Apple for a song or Amazon when they sold books.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you advise them to do when it becomes

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty and thirty and of a portfolio? How dare you

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sell that? Do you write? Puts again? It? Well? What

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do you do with a huge gain that overweights a portfolio. Well,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think writing some some calls against it, having some

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>having some of that stockhold against you makes sense. I mean,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're comes a point when there's over concentration in a portfolio.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, man, I'm not talking about some cutesy

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>pie academics out of m I t talking about huge

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>overconcer If someone is fifty or eighty or nine of

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio in one stock, you have to caution them

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to diversify because things happen right now. It's it's it's

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>tricky because um, I mean, I have a client who

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>owns tens of thousands of stock as a result of

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>being on a board, UM, and the stock has continued

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to appreciate and appreciate and appreciate, appreciate. It's very well positioned.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in the life sciences healthcare sect but well it's

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's fift of this individual's net worth, So it's not excessive.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little excessive, quite honestly, but there's enough resources

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's okay. But um, you know we as

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you I think you know. Tom My portfolio for my

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>growth investors is fifteen stocks we say we don't rebalance,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but we do. When we get to eleven or twelve

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>or thirteen percent, we have to rebalance. It's imprudent not

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to so we've owned companies, you know. But this is

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>against in in Fred and I are on the same

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>page on this full disclosure, folks, against the industry of rebalancing.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>If you get the three or four percent of a portfolio,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and think of all the gain you lost on Apple

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>or Amazon if you're smart enough to buy him. I mean,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole list of stocks, look at the top.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it too too much, Fred to say

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's basically on the edge of Sequoia. You and I

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>are talking about a model that really harkens back to

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the genius of Sequoia. Absolutely listen. I mean concentration matters.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>You have to you can't. If you own the market,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>you will perform like the market. If you want to

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>outperform the market, you have to be concentrated, which means

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a point of view, and you

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>have to have sectors and companies that you know well

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that you feel will will perform in a superior way.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's a focus on secular growth. In my experience

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>buy stocks now. Yes, Um, although new money coming in.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling my clients, look, if you if you're if

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you're the kind of person who's going to have a

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>regret that we buy it at this level and it

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>goes down ten percent because of which I'm not predicting,

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but if you're going to live with deep regret and

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna you'll get that back within a year

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>or two, there's an alternative E and so certain clients

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we're putting money into ninety and two hundred seventy day

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred sixty day c d s and when

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they when they're a tour, we put the money to work.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're kind of dollar cost average. It's a psychological

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>thing and it's not really compete. It's not coming to

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>me to be doing it because I don't think we're

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in I don't think we're ready for over session. This

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was valuable, but it's not why we booked you are

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto maple Beliefs just totally loaded this year? Is

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it going to be like a joy for you to

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>go to Boston Fleet Centered, Boston Garden whatever and see

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto map Beliefs. It's never a joy to go

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to Fleet because the Bruins just don't have the skilled

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>players that I like to see plays. Really, I like

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to the opposing teams. Boston has always had a tradition

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in my view, Bobby or being the great exception of

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not having flashy, highly skilled, great skating players. Don't they

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>just don't. They don't play e C a c Hockey.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, get you know, cut to the chase right right,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Fred Lane with us and e c a c Hockey

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course with Lane generational with Raymond. Some interesting

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>inside there, folks. Right now, Aaron Brown with us with

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>ubs as we look at where to places the money

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and the big difference, Aaron is, all of a sudden,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a yield in the short term space. Are we

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>back to normal equity and bond correlations? Yeah? I think

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that we are back to what I think is going

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to persist for some time, which is a negative stock

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bond correlation. I think that's really important for asset managers

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and particularly for US as an asset allocator, in that

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that the stock bond correlation is negative,

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it helps actually for acid allocators to be long stocks

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and be long bonds. As a diversifier, so you actually

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can stay longer stocks and have a larger weight of

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>allocation to equities in your portfolio. Given the fact that

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the stock bond correlation is negative, how two thousand six

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>has been that long, right, it has, and we think

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it's going to persist. What could turn it negative is

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>if we were to see inflation spike well ahead, Well,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask about the earnings boom that

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in US companies particularly, and where they're going

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to use the money that they make. Are they going

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to be paying down more debt? And that means that

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be less supply of corporate bonds. So

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's likely, right. I think that you are going

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>to see them continuing to pay down debt. But I

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think that particularly right now, given the fact that rates

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>are still low, that the expectation that rates are going

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to rise, you are still going to see a bringing

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty lofty bond issuance um, which is one of the

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons actually that we are negative high yield right now

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in our asset allocation portfolios. Aaron Brown with us, and

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we will continue right now. Is is such a tradition

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>PIM is a moment of silence at the New York

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange. It is more often, but today most poign,

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yes, it is a moment of silence for

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the passing of Senator John McCain formal Navy aviator and

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>also really a mavericka in the on the floor of

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Senate, and in New York, of course

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate Schumer talking about renaming the Russell Building in Washington

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for John McCain. Let us listen in to the quiet

0:27:38.440 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at the New York Stock Exchange, the New York Stock

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Exchange and honor of John McCain. We've seen this many times, Pam.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course as we come up on September eleven,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I should announced within the remembrance of September eleventh that

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll be with Cantor Fitzgerald again this once again this

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>year with scarlet food. Yes, and there in their efforts

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to remember September eleven, continue with the Aaron Brown of UBS,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Managing Director ahead of asset allocation? Is asset allocation uh,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>something that depends on the perspective of UBS or the

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>perspective of the client. It's a great question. It Actually

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we have our own capital market assumptions that our own

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>asset allocation views. There are certain parameters the clients, when

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we're speaking with clients will set for us and with

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>us until they'll ask us to take a specific overweight

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to an asset class, or to a country, or in

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>many cases to hedge if we're talking to our sovereign

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wealth fund, to hedge, the underlying currency that they transact in.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Also we're seeing increasingly is specific clients want to increase

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>their private market asset allocation views. So whether it's into

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>real estate, into hedge funds, into venture capital, or into

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>real assets like real estate, timber, other commodities. So a

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, certainly we will have our own views

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and we have our own capital market assumptions that underpin

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>how we allocate. But a lot of the dialogue that

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we have with clients is understanding what their parameters are

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and what they either want to include or exclude in

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of asset allocation. Well, the reason I asks, and

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you mentioned these these situations is because risk

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is a two edged sword, right at least two, maybe

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a nine. But the reason being that risk is great

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>when you're making money, But do they really understand the

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>risks that they're taking by asking to go into these

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>private investments that may lack liquidity. It's interesting because if

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you rewind a couple of years ago in terms of

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the asset allocation conversations that we were having, they were

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>looking to mitigate risk, they were looking to lower their

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>equity allocations. Now that we're you know, several years, in

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years into the bowl market equity assets have outperformed,

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly what their expectations are. We're now actually

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing the opposite conversations having and clients wanting to increase risk,

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to take more risk on potentially more a liquidity

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>risk as well, in order to earn a higher return.

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And so the question I think is prudent, which is

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is this the right point in the cycle to be

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>doing that? And I think given how well really, you know, um,

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>private market assets have performed, there is a willingness to

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to take that illiquidity risk. The one thing

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say is there are from our asset allocation studies,

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there are benefits to diversification, to expanding the asset classes

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and the remit in which you're investing in. You know,

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the question can you be too diversified? I'm sorry, can

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you be too diversified. Absolutely, you can be huge risk. Absolutely.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been one of our themes for the show today.

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not that you want to own only Apple

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>or only Amazon and look like a genius, but you

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>know it's Peter Lynch called a diversifications a tangible issue,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think you really have to be

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>critical in terms of the interplay between tactical asset allocation,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>which we define as inside is twelve months and longer

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>term asset allocation, which we define as twelve months. How

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>do you respond to clients very quickly or how do

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you respond to clients that diversified out and we're underinvested

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in equities and they're angry. I mean, so a lot

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of the studies we're doing now are for those types

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of clients. And we think that it's right now in

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the cycle you should still be long and be overweight equities,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and we don't think that it's too late to be

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>overweight equities at this point, but we understand that over

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the next three years we're predicting that we will have

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>our recession. So you have to be really managed that

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>tactical risk as well. Aaron Brown, thank you so much

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with you will be yesterday on the Battle of Alice

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>asset allocation. This is a great pim to have Fred

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Lane with us in the Aaron Brown really, you know,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like that timy year. Yes, and also just

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to you know, be a little patient and don't get emotional. Well,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that were easier said than done, particularly with do you

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to James Travitis earlier about the navy and John

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>McCain is appropriate to talk to the twenty second Attorney

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>General of Arizona about John McCain in Arizona. And this

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is Grant Woods, who is the rarest or rare in

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>American politics, someone within the middle territory of his Republican party.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Grant was wonderful to have you with us in particularly,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest out of New York and Washington, the

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>focuses on John McCain of the east of Annapolis and

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Naval Academy where he'll be buried. How divisive

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was John McCain within Arizona Republican politics. Well, that's a

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>good question. Thank and thank you for all you're doing

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.959
<v Speaker 1>here to honor Senator McCain and talk about his amazing life.

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Um well, I think as time went on. Uh, there's

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a big difference as but I think we see around

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the country between the hardcore activists and the Republican Party,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were generally not very supportive of Senator McCain

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and haven't been for a long time. And then you

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>had the general um pop elation there that you know,

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just Republicans throughout Arizona, and obviously he was very popular there.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He won handily every time that that he ran. So

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you go to the Republican meetings with

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the hardcore, it wasn't pretty. Uh, you know, when when

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>he when he ran for president in O eight and

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they they did their little election at the state Republican

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>meeting and they endorsed Duncan Hunter for president now John McCain,

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and that didn't work out too well for them, I

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think. But it was typical, you know, it's just

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this just the way it goes. It was they were

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty hardcore and they didn't like the fact that he

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>regularly worked with people across party lines. Can you explain

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the what seemed to be the personal enmity between President

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and Senator m team Why did that exist?

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, um, I think it's a one Way Street.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I think Senator McCain, Um,

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's, as everyone knows now and and has

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>reflected upon, he had quite the remarkable life, and he

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>had been up against different powerful forces his entire life.

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So here in his latter years, when Donald Trump entered

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the picture, that was no big deal for John McCain.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>John McCain is going to be John McCain, and that

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>means he was going to say what he thought and

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do what he thought was right for the country. And

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really didn't really engage in any of this

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>um personal enmity. On the other hand, it really did

0:35:55.120 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>seem to get under Donald Trump's skin. And I think

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's just because it's reflective of the men um and um.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has been very um, very good at ridiculing

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>people to the point where they ultimately backed down and

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>go away or um or get on board, and that

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that just wasn't gonna happen with John. But I can

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you over the last couple of years, so since

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>since Trump announced until until now, um, it really wasn't personal.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It didn't really bother him. These insults or slights are

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>all of that. The only one that got that bothered

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.959
<v Speaker 1>John was when he said that John wasn't a hero

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>um because he was captured. And I promise you it

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was not because of him taking a personal insult to

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that there less, it was about the other po debuts

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that here in their later years they

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with this that's not and he really

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>resented that. I will say Grant was one of the

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>most employant images we've seen as we speak of John McCain,

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was him going up in airplane stairs with Rob Portman

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of Ohio. I would suggest you and Senator Portman represent

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the dinosaurs of the Republican Party, the dying breed, maybe

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with Olympia Snow of Maine of some form of Montorism.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>How risky is your Republican Party of doing a wig,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of wandering into the trap of the

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Whigs of eighteen fifty, eighteen fifty two and on to

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the death of eighteen fifty six. Is that a legitimate

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>risk out in Arizona. I I think so for sure,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will happen here in Arizona, and

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it will happen across the United States if

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>things don't change. And as Senator McCain always said, if

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>if for no other reasons, He'd like for you to

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do things for the right reason. But if for no

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>other reasons, look at the demographic and if if the

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is going to be anti hispanding UH, anti minorities,

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to be um AH, if it really

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to stand up for the Constitution and just

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be divisive between groups, then there really is no future there.

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And if you talk to people who are under the

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>age of I don't know, it's a thirty five, they

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why the Republican Party acts that way. They

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>don't see race necessarily as as even an issue. They

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see discrimination against UM people because of their sexual

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>orientation as as an issue. Why are you people still

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about these things? And I think as we go forward,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>UM Republicans are going to have to remember what they're

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>all about, which is limited government, which is a strong

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>national defense and working with our allies. And most importantly

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for John McCain's perspective, we have to stand for what

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he's it for, and that is free basic human rights

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in the United States around the world. And if we

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't stand for that, if it's just a party about me,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>me mean, which is the opposite of John McCain. Then, um,

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>then it probably deserves to go away. Well, I just

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>want to reintroduce, uh, speaking with Grant Woods, former Attorney

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.479
<v Speaker 1>General of the State of Arizona and the former chief

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of staff for a Senator John McCain when he was

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in Congress as a congressman. Grant, just tell if you

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>can a little. There's a story that maybe not a

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people know, having to do with how Senator

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>John McCain requested a combat assignment in the Vietnam War.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And he was thirty years old when he was assigned

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to the U. S. S. Forestal and he escaped death

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on the forest all during a horrendous fire. Yes, yes,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, that's where he he wanted to be where

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the action was. You know, he was, Um, he was

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>quite the character. Um always and in those days he

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of your Tom Cruise stereotypical fighter pilot, you know,

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a little hard, play hard, and and he wanted to

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>be he wanted to be in combat. And then when

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he went on he was on the forest call, he

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was on the deck that day, and uh, that was

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just one of the big tragedies of all time in

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>our military. And I know, I know, Jona. I mean,

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a guy, I forget, I forget what his

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>nickname was, but there was a guy who would wash

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>your window of your of your jet just before you

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>were getting ready to take off. So they were all

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>lined up and this guy always gave him a thumbs

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>up and and he said something, some little phrase. And

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>so there's John in there in the cockpit. The guy

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>does that, and then all of a sudden there's this

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>huge explosion with one of these bombs that gone up

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in the and he looked down, Uh there was a fire,

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and then another big explosion, and when he looked down

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that that guy who he knew very well, who was

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>his friend, was gone. He had evaporated into the air.

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And somehow John got out of that plane before the

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>next huge explosion and made his way across the deck,

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>whereas you know, many many people didn't um. And I

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think the remarkable thing there, which doesn't surprise anyone, is

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that almost immediately he asked to uh go to another

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>ship so he could get back in the air and

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>back fighting for our adventure. Well, great Woods, thank you

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so much. Was greatly greatly appreciate your attendis today. Mr

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Woods a close, close friend and adviser to John McCain

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to views on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio